Latest / The Slippery Slope / The news for Covid vaccines gets worse and worse
Transcript
- 0:06Hi, I'm Jake Fallon and you're listening to the slippery slope
- 0:11well, some more covid news or vaccine news, should have put it
- 0:15that way. Hey Alex Berenson on his sub
- 0:17Stacks reporting the news for covid.
- 0:21Vaccines gets worse. And worse goes on to say that a
- 0:25big study says, natural immunity protects against Omicron for
- 0:29over a year. However, mRNA shots fail in
- 0:33months and this is the third paper with all.
- 0:36Awful mRNA data in a week, he asked when will the media even
- 0:41pretend to care? I'm going to say they're not
- 0:43going to pretend to care because they've already been given the
- 0:47directions there told. Hey this is how we're going to
- 0:50report things and you don't want to.
- 0:52You don't want to wonder, you don't want to, you know, go any
- 0:56other direction. Other than what we told you.
- 0:59This is the way you have to report things so he says goes on
- 1:02to say that two doses of covid. Vaccines offer.
- 1:05No protection. Against Omicron infection and
- 1:08may even increase the risk of infection within months.
- 1:12And this is according to a new paper in the New England Journal
- 1:15of Medicine. In contrast.
- 1:18People previously, infected with earlier, coronavirus variants
- 1:22had a fifty percent lower risk of Omicron infection that
- 1:27protection remains steady even more than a year after the
- 1:31initial infection, however, details of the paper are even
- 1:36More devastating for mRNA shot Advocates than those top-line
- 1:41figures. Now looking through this, this
- 1:44paper, the New England Journal of Medicine, you've got to get
- 1:47your head around all the that all the facts and figures that
- 1:51they're using the differences as a function of time since the
- 1:55immunologic event, which is the previous infection or
- 2:00vaccination, showed rapidly waning vaccine protection.
- 2:07You get that vaccine protection rapidly wines after the second
- 2:13and third doses. However, this is very important
- 2:18it says but slowly waning protection from previous
- 2:23infection which just means you've got better longer lasting
- 2:28protection. If you've been infected, you've
- 2:32gotten over the virus, your protection, goes on for a long.
- 2:36Lot longer. Then if you've only had, if
- 2:40you've had your double dose or lock in Australia, where he
- 2:42getting out third, and some places are getting their fourth
- 2:46dose. As now you're getting rid of
- 2:48protection, if you've been infected.
- 2:52So it goes on to say a sensitivity analysis in which
- 2:57previous positive, testing included both PCR positive and
- 3:01Rapid antigen positive results, showed similar findings to those
- 3:04of the main analysis. Which indicates that exclusion
- 3:08of previous rapid antigen positive test.
- 3:11May not have Vice their estimates and effectiveness of
- 3:15previous infection and mRNA 1273 vaccination against be A1, and
- 3:22b0 2, which are forms of um of covid.
- 3:25And any Omicron infection the effectiveness of previous
- 3:30infection vaccination and hybrid.
- 3:34Immune immunity The in the analysis of mRNA 1273 showed
- 3:40similar patterns to those of the analysis of the BN, T, 1, 6, 2,
- 3:46b 2, which is the fires of vaccine which is all to say in
- 3:49their discussion that previous infection with a variant other
- 3:53than Omicron was associated with an approximately. 50% reduce
- 3:59risk of infection, no difference in the protection of previous
- 4:05infection. It gets Be a one and be a to
- 4:07were discernible to those vaccinations.
- 4:11And no previous infection had negligible.
- 4:14Effectiveness against be. A 1 and B, A two.
- 4:21Negligible. So what's the point anyway?
- 4:24Guys didn't say but most persons receive this second dose more
- 4:28than eight months earlier. So this is the excuse of but
- 4:32they haven't, you know it's been eight months since I got the
- 4:35second dose and this is why this is why this is why we've got
- 4:41this reduce. We've got such a high risk of
- 4:45being infected because they had their dose.
- 4:48Eight months, eight months ago. The second dose however, a
- 4:53person who has had previous infection, fifty percent reduced
- 4:59risk of infection precious, but it goes on to say, these
- 5:03findings are explained by the short-lived protection of
- 5:07primary series vaccination against Omicron infections and
- 5:13the most durable protection from natural infection.
- 5:18So that again, these findings are explained by the short-lived
- 5:22protection of primary series vaccination, against Omicron
- 5:26infections. And the most durable protection
- 5:31from natural infection as confirmed by the additional
- 5:36analysis of protection, as a function of time after previous
- 5:39infection or vaccination, basically the only way, the
- 5:44vaccines can help you against. If you're constantly getting
- 5:50them because they talking here they go on to talk about the
- 5:55booster vaccines. So you you cannot just get
- 5:58vaccinated have the double dose and leave it for 12 months.
- 6:02You have to constantly every three or four months.
- 6:05You have to get a booster and I'll go to ask what are the
- 6:10long-term side effects of these vaccines going to be if every
- 6:14three or four months they keep you know?
- 6:17Rolling out the scare tactics as they're doing, Australia, here
- 6:20of getting your booster every three or four months, get your
- 6:23booster, get your booster. Get your booster.
- 6:26Your body is just going to be full of these mRNA vaccines or
- 6:30what you're going to be the long-term effects.
- 6:32And yet the natural protection that you have from your body's
- 6:35immune system with your body's immune system against Omicron
- 6:42against covid. Is so much better so much better
- 6:47than these vaccines and yet. Yes.
- 6:51As Alex parents and said, when is the media going to actually
- 6:54report on these things properly? When are they going to start
- 6:58asking questions? When is the media?
- 7:01And maybe, when are they going to hold our governments
- 7:05accountable? When will media hold the
- 7:08government responsible? Hold them accountable for giving
- 7:13pharmaceutical companies, immunity from legal action for
- 7:18giving us vaccines that don't seem to work properly that have
- 7:24a lot of side effects that go under reported or maybe they get
- 7:29reported, it seems like they do get reported back to a medical
- 7:33and medical fraternities are and not inclined to act upon them.
- 7:38Any more immediate as a reporter On the many more when or will
- 7:43they ever hold a government's responsible?
- 7:45Will these pharmaceutical companies ever be held
- 7:47responsible? Because our own immune system
- 7:51does a far, far far greater job, then the stupid vaccines that
- 7:56they rolled out and what are the long-term side effects going to
- 8:01be from these vaccines. I think we're going to start
- 8:05seeing the issues become more and more prevalent within our
- 8:09society. We need to start asking a lot
- 8:11more questions about what is really happening to our bodies.
- 8:15As a result of these vaccines, or they're being forced upon us,
- 8:19start asking more questions. Keep holding the government
- 8:23accountable. Keep holding these big
- 8:24pharmaceutical companies. Accountable.
- 8:27That's my opinion. Thank you for listening to the
- 8:30slippery slope, and please, please, please.
- 8:32Please throw some message flickers and message.
- 8:36Let me know what you think. If you think I'm wrong, that's
- 8:38fine. Tell me I'm wrong. please like
- 8:41and share the podcast, really appreciate everyone listening
- 8:45and yeah, thanks for listening to the slippery slope