Latest / Independent Voter Podcast / A New Era for Independent Voters - EP4
Transcript
- 0:01S1: Olas media.
- 0:03S2: Welcome to the Independent Voter podcast from Independent Voter Project.
- 0:07S2: We're going to expand a little bit a new era
- 0:09S2: of independent voter news that the journalists just don't cover,
- 0:13S2: where we have these debates on a national level, really
- 0:17S2: taking on issues so that people have more educated disagreements
- 0:21S2: with each other. Let's just explain how the process really works. Hello,
- 0:33S2: and welcome to the Independent Voter podcast. I'm Chad Peace.
- 0:36S2: You're you're at least temporary host. This podcast is a
- 0:40S2: little different than what we've done before, but it's right
- 0:43S2: in line with the same ethic. Uh, we're we're going
- 0:46S2: to take issues, obviously, things like election reform, because that's
- 0:50S2: what we've been covering for 12 something years and just
- 0:53S2: go more in depth to how it really works. So,
- 0:57S2: for example, you know, a lot of people go, well,
- 0:59S2: why don't you just run as an independent? Why don't
- 1:01S2: you just start a third party? Well, let's just explain
- 1:03S2: how the process really works, which then you come to
- 1:06S2: your own conclusions of why more people don't run as
- 1:08S2: independents or start third parties. Um, but something I'm also
- 1:13S2: excited about is we're going to expand a little bit.
- 1:16S2: There's going to be some issues, like cannabis policy and
- 1:20S2: social justice and correction reforms, where we have these debates
- 1:24S2: on a national level that are talking about issues where
- 1:29S2: there's a lot of the factors involved in those discussions
- 1:32S2: that most people just don't know. I'm I'm proud to
- 1:36S2: be a part of this, that, you know, independent voter
- 1:39S2: Podcast one just being here. But two, I think when
- 1:43S2: we have educated disagreements, we can come to solutions and
- 1:48S2: policy positions that are more informed and then end up
- 1:52S2: working for those folks who thought they disagreed. So it's
- 1:57S2: our launch of the Independent Voter podcast. And now to
- 2:00S2: get this started, I'm bringing on a very special guest,
- 2:04S2: someone that has been in this space for a long,
- 2:06S2: long time, uh, comes with a lot of credentials. Kara McCormick.
- 2:15S2: For those of you who have been a part of
- 2:17S2: Independent Voter for, what, 12, 13 years now? You know,
- 2:22S2: independent voter has been called everything from, you know, far left,
- 2:25S2: far right libertarians, socialists, um, and all of that's true. Uh,
- 2:32S2: what we're we're excited today because this is the first time,
- 2:36S2: you know, after thousands of news articles online, um, all
- 2:40S2: the reform work that's been done by the Independent Voter Project, um,
- 2:44S2: that we that we really engage in a podcast and
- 2:47S2: have some discussions that that will help highlight what we
- 2:50S2: mean when we say we're all these different ideologies. Um,
- 2:55S2: the Independent Voter project, for those of you who don't know,
- 2:58S2: was founded about, you know, 16 or 17 years ago,
- 3:02S2: really with the purpose of, um, you know, a number
- 3:05S2: of former Republicans and Democrats, uh, seeing the political system
- 3:10S2: getting increasingly partisan and saying, what can we do to
- 3:15S2: try to bring back some level of, you know, policy
- 3:21S2: discussion rather than political and partisan discussion? The first thing
- 3:25S2: they did was they drafted California's top two nonpartisan primary initiative.
- 3:33S2: Now there's folks in the reform space. I live in
- 3:35S2: the reform space, um, who don't like the top two
- 3:38S2: primary because not enough candidates get on the ballot. It
- 3:41S2: limits it to two. And from their perspective, you know,
- 3:44S2: that insulates the duopoly, so to speak. Right. Um, I
- 3:48S2: understand that perspective. IVP understands that perspective. But, um, we
- 3:52S2: work with a lot of those folks now to try
- 3:55S2: to expand the options in the general election ballot. But
- 3:58S2: the ground the the principle behind California's nonpartisan primary, which
- 4:03S2: is the same principle behind the independent voter news to
- 4:08S2: which IVP funds, is that elections serve voters, all voters,
- 4:14S2: independent voters with a lowercase I. So independent Democrats, independent Republicans,
- 4:20S2: independent third party and voters that are registered independent should
- 4:24S2: all have an equally meaningful vote. And on when it
- 4:29S2: comes to, you know, whether it's a news article or
- 4:32S2: it's an opinion piece, have an opportunity to be heard.
- 4:36S2: That's the ethic that we try to bring behind the
- 4:40S2: reforms that are done by Independent Voter Project. That's the
- 4:43S2: ethic behind the editorial standards of us. I'm Chad Peace.
- 4:49S2: I've been hired by Independent Voter Project pretty much since
- 4:52S2: its beginning. Um, it's one of something I've grown a
- 4:56S2: passion for, something that I care about. Um, I understand
- 5:00S2: that when it comes to reform and really when it
- 5:02S2: comes to anything in politics, we have to start by
- 5:06S2: looking at everyone's perspectives and why they're doing what they're doing. Um,
- 5:11S2: I think a lot of good intentions and good, good
- 5:14S2: thoughts go to waste because they get cut off before
- 5:18S2: we have an opportunity to explain. I hope that this
- 5:20S2: podcast provides a platform for that. Um, you get to
- 5:24S2: hear perspectives that you may not agree with, but, um,
- 5:27S2: that highlight or help inform why people are doing and
- 5:32S2: believe the things that they do. I also want to
- 5:36S2: I want to welcome our first special guest, someone that, um,
- 5:40S2: I think is a hero in this space. Uh, Cara McCormick. Um,
- 5:45S2: she's out there in the freezing cold Maine. I'm in
- 5:48S2: the relatively warmer San Diego right now, although it is
- 5:52S2: raining outside. Um, some people, especially in the reform space,
- 5:56S2: may know Cara McCormick because she led the first successful
- 6:00S2: statewide effort for ranked choice voting. Uh, she's done a
- 6:04S2: number of other things. She also has a day job, um,
- 6:07S2: where she is a, you know, expert in research, opposition research. She's.
- 6:14S2: Come on. She's a big part of this, um, this
- 6:17S2: new phase for for ivn. So I want to welcome
- 6:20S2: Cara here to give a shout out and hello and
- 6:22S2: and say whatever you want to say. Cara.
- 6:24S3: Hi, Chad. Um, this is Cara McCormick. Um, I'm super
- 6:29S3: excited to be on your show. The first inaugural IVP show. Um,
- 6:36S3: I co-founded an organization called The Chamberlain Project with Peter
- 6:40S3: Ackerman about ten years ago. And at the beginning of January,
- 6:44S3: we dissolved the organization. The Chamberlain boards all voted to
- 6:49S3: combine all of our entities, which include Americans elect. Level
- 6:55S3: the playing field, the Committee for ranked Choice voting, and
- 6:58S3: then our citizens to end superPACs with the Foundation for
- 7:03S3: Independent Voter Education, which is the nonprofit sister organization of
- 7:08S3: the Independent Voter Project. And Chamberlain and all of our
- 7:12S3: entities have actually been aligned with the Independent Voter Project
- 7:16S3: for more than a decade now. Um, I'm excited that
- 7:21S3: Chamberlain has merged with, um, five. And, um, you know,
- 7:26S3: the way that we came together, Chad was, you know,
- 7:30S3: more than ten years ago, I started researching, um, the
- 7:34S3: unlikely and tremendously remarkable success of the top two primary
- 7:39S3: initiative in California. Um, and as I was looking to
- 7:44S3: start a ranked choice voting effort here in Maine, um,
- 7:48S3: I that's that's how I first how I first found you,
- 7:52S3: because you and your organization sort of had the fearlessness
- 7:56S3: to take on the duopoly and challenge, um, the structural
- 8:03S3: issues that we have in our democracy that sort of
- 8:06S3: protect the duopoly and stop independence from having a voice
- 8:10S3: in our politics.
- 8:12S2: Well, I think that's one of the reasons we've gotten
- 8:15S2: along so well over the years, too, is because if
- 8:18S2: you look at that, okay, we did the top two primary.
- 8:20S2: You know, you you really got the first major ranked
- 8:24S2: choice voting, uh, statewide effort, uh, successful. If you live
- 8:29S2: in the wonky world of reform politics, you know, at
- 8:32S2: that time when we kind of got to know each other,
- 8:34S2: it was ranked choice voting. People were fighting with the
- 8:38S2: nonpartisan top two primary people because ranked choice wanted more
- 8:42S2: candidates and top two limited it to this. And like,
- 8:45S2: I think we hit it off and you can correct
- 8:47S2: me if I'm wrong, Cara, but I think we hit
- 8:49S2: it off because we were like, look, we understand why
- 8:52S2: we're approaching things the way we are. We're our end
- 8:55S2: goal is the same. We want better representation. We want
- 8:58S2: more competition at the ballot box. Right. We're frustrated with,
- 9:02S2: you know, the folks that control the process, where to
- 9:04S2: where voters really don't matter. And there's different avenues to
- 9:09S2: get there depending on where you're at. And I think
- 9:13S2: that's what's led to not only the relationship between you
- 9:16S2: and I, but, you know, you have folks from from
- 9:18S2: Fairvote and Unite America and open primaries and all these
- 9:22S2: organizations who are doing these, this reform work to finally
- 9:26S2: start saying, okay, why are you doing this? And you
- 9:29S2: see a lot of those organizations now working with each other,
- 9:32S2: realizing that these reform efforts, they're not in opposite, they're
- 9:36S2: not opposition to each other. In fact, they can learn
- 9:40S2: from each other. They can work together in some places.
- 9:43S2: So that's how I've really enjoyed our relationship, you know,
- 9:48S2: as it's developed here. And I think this kind of
- 9:50S2: gives us an opportunity where you and I, we don't
- 9:52S2: we don't share an opinion. You know, our opinions aren't
- 9:55S2: the same on all this stuff, but we understand that
- 9:58S2: the goals are the same. And so I think we
- 10:00S2: can from that we can have a, you know, a
- 10:02S2: good platform for conversation and invite people who don't agree
- 10:05S2: with us. And I want to talk to those people
- 10:08S2: who say, ranked choice voting is the stupidest idea ever,
- 10:10S2: and this and that. Let's talk to them. Right. Um.
- 10:14S3: 100%. The the obstacle is the way. And you know,
- 10:18S3: Peter Ackerman, the late Peter Ackerman, who I had the
- 10:20S3: honor of working with for for a very long time.
- 10:23S3: And you did too. You know, he always said, Cara,
- 10:26S3: let a thousand flowers bloom, you know, and and as
- 10:30S3: long as we're all kind of working towards dismantling some
- 10:34S3: of the structures that have kept the, the, the status
- 10:39S3: quo in, in place in terms of, like first past
- 10:42S3: the post voting. Well, you know, top two gets rid
- 10:46S3: of first past the post voting. Just like ranked choice
- 10:48S3: voting gets rid of first the first past the post
- 10:50S3: voting that first past the post voting is really, you know,
- 10:55S3: Peter used to say it's as harmful to our democracy
- 10:59S3: as cigarettes are to to our collective health. Right.
- 11:04S2: And, Cara.
- 11:05S3: Just.
- 11:05S2: Just for our for our audience, you know, that may
- 11:07S2: not they hear first past the post, but really what
- 11:10S2: how the way I when I hear first past the post.
- 11:12S2: To me that just means plurality voting. You don't have
- 11:15S2: to get a majority to win. It means you can
- 11:18S2: be elected by a small subset of the electorate. Right.
- 11:22S2: And not the majority of the people. Right. So, and
- 11:25S2: our system operates that. Right. Most people don't know that.
- 11:27S2: But I mean, you take a low turnout primary, for example,
- 11:30S2: where the general election doesn't matter. I mean, you can
- 11:34S2: basically have three, 4% of the population electing a United
- 11:37S2: States senator. Right. But most people don't know that. It's
- 11:41S2: not their fault. It's not. They're stupid. They're not they're
- 11:43S2: not even ignorant. It's that nobody discusses how our election
- 11:47S2: process actually works. And that's one of the things that
- 11:50S2: I think you and I, um, you know, there's a
- 11:52S2: lot for us to learn, but I think we can
- 11:54S2: also offer a platform to talk about it.
- 11:57S3: Totally. And, you know, together we actually have done some things.
- 12:00S3: We have won campaigns. We have won lawsuit.
- 12:04S2: Well, to be fair, we've lost a lot too.
- 12:07S3: Yeah, we definitely have. Yeah, we definitely have. And and
- 12:10S3: you know, you win some, you lose some. Um, but uh, well,
- 12:14S3: sometimes that's how the sausage and the democracy gets made, right?
- 12:18S2: Well, exactly. And I mean to bring it back to
- 12:20S2: to to Peter Ackerman. I think, you know, somebody in
- 12:23S2: the space who really understands the level of not only
- 12:26S2: commitment and what he gave up to advance reform. You know,
- 12:30S2: I think one of the things I know, you were
- 12:32S2: with him a lot longer than me, but one of
- 12:34S2: the things he taught me, I consider him a mentor
- 12:36S2: of mine, um, was that there really aren't any losses, right?
- 12:42S2: That you that losses are Are the stepping stones right
- 12:46S2: to making change, right? Somebody had to go and file
- 12:49S2: the lawsuit against the Commission on Presidential Debates in order
- 12:53S2: to expose so much of the hypocrisy about how it's
- 12:57S2: a democratic process. You know, Peter Ackerman didn't have to,
- 13:01S2: but he spent a considerable amount of money, time, investment
- 13:05S2: of energy to do that. Knowing the end of the road,
- 13:08S2: there was likely an administrative court saying, yeah, those are
- 13:14S2: real good arguments, but too bad. Right. He knew that
- 13:17S2: going in, but he did it anyway and took that
- 13:20S2: loss knowing that that's what needed to take the next step.
- 13:25S3: Yeah, I mean and that's just definitely been my experience
- 13:28S3: with ranked choice voting in Maine. And even now with
- 13:30S3: the super PAC, um, initiative that we ran and won
- 13:35S3: in Maine to get rid of super PACs, you know,
- 13:38S3: you have to you can't do these things, um, knowing
- 13:44S3: that in the end, you're going to win. You know,
- 13:47S3: you need to do these things because they're the right
- 13:49S3: things that need to be done at the moment, win
- 13:52S3: or lose. Um, there's a lot of people in politics who,
- 13:57S3: you know, I've worked in politics for, you know, 40
- 13:59S3: years or something. Now at this point, and there's a
- 14:03S3: lot of people in politics who come in at the
- 14:05S3: end and support you when they know that you're going
- 14:08S3: to win and they won't support you along the way
- 14:10S3: when they're not sure if you're going to win. And
- 14:12S3: so I feel like both you and I have been
- 14:15S3: really brave and and, you know, for me, a lot
- 14:18S3: came from the courageousness of Peter saying, yeah, we, you know,
- 14:21S3: we should do this. You can do this, Kara. Um,
- 14:24S3: even if you don't win, it's okay to to do
- 14:27S3: this now. Losing is really painful, I have to say.
- 14:31S2: You get used to it.
- 14:32S3: Yeah. I mean, as Catherine Gale, she called me up. Um,
- 14:35S3: you know, after. After a pretty bitter loss.
- 14:38S2: Another hero.
- 14:39S3: 2020. Another total hero of this of this movement. Um,
- 14:44S3: and she said, you know, you're at least you're on
- 14:45S3: the field, Kara. She and she read me the Teddy
- 14:47S3: Roosevelt quote about being, you know, being the man in
- 14:50S3: the arena. Um, and being on the field. And that's
- 14:53S3: that's better than just sort of sitting in the sidelines
- 14:55S3: and complaining about about everything and accepting, um, everything the
- 14:59S3: way that it is and not trying to do what
- 15:01S3: sort of is in is in my DNA is in
- 15:03S3: a lot of Americans DNA, which is this, this feeling
- 15:06S3: like we need to form a more perfect union, you know,
- 15:09S3: that we can't we can't stop.
- 15:11S2: Yeah. And I mean, that kind of takes us to
- 15:12S2: our next our next really step is okay, well, what
- 15:16S2: what can we do about it? Right. Um, you know,
- 15:19S2: IBM was developed as an educational platform just to educate
- 15:23S2: people how the process works. Look, here's what a closed
- 15:25S2: primary is. Here's what an open primary is. Oh, here's
- 15:28S2: examples of things going on. And organizations across the country
- 15:31S2: doing stuff. What? You know what Kara's you know what
- 15:35S2: what I'm really excited about your participation in this and
- 15:38S2: your willingness to to join us on this crazy venture
- 15:41S2: is that this next phase of ivn, we, you know,
- 15:44S2: we can't do everything. We don't have a massive, you know,
- 15:46S2: budget like some of these organizations. But what we want
- 15:50S2: to do is say every month, let's let's take something
- 15:53S2: and let's just explain how it really works. Right? When
- 15:56S2: we're talking about an election, how does it really work?
- 15:59S2: And we want to break out of, okay, we don't
- 16:01S2: need to talk about elections all day in this wonky world. And,
- 16:04S2: you know, it's like, let's talk about things like that
- 16:07S2: are going on that are important, affecting our daily lives,
- 16:11S2: like in policy, whether it's corrections or social justice or
- 16:16S2: it's it's cannabis policy. Right. So we're going to start
- 16:19S2: off with a few issues. Obviously, sticking to election reform
- 16:23S2: is one of them. Um, but every month do a
- 16:26S2: series that has a very in-depth article video component and
- 16:31S2: podcasts like this where we're not talking about, hey, this
- 16:35S2: is the perfect solution and this is the problem, and
- 16:38S2: just say this is these are the conditions. This is
- 16:41S2: how it really works. If we want to talk about
- 16:43S2: whether this idea is good or this idea is bad,
- 16:47S2: let's at least understand what the real landscape is, because
- 16:52S2: I think a lot of the discussions, the arguments, the
- 16:56S2: vitriol we get into is because we're we're all talking
- 16:59S2: with a totally different set of facts. And some people
- 17:02S2: are pursuing a policy trying to fix X, and then
- 17:05S2: somebody's arguing with it. They don't even know X exists. Right.
- 17:10S2: And so say, hey, this is how it really works. So, Cara,
- 17:14S2: I know you've gotten started on our first kind of relaunch.
- 17:17S2: You know, we we've done some of these in the
- 17:19S2: past when, you know, related to like PBMs and the
- 17:22S2: health care industry and stuff, which are pretty esoteric topic
- 17:26S2: that became hot a few weeks ago. But, um, I'm
- 17:30S2: excited you're coming on as as somebody who is an
- 17:33S2: opposition research person who, who knows when you put something
- 17:37S2: on paper, you have to stand behind that. It's right. Is, uh,
- 17:41S2: you know, what are you. What are you working on, Kara?
- 17:44S3: So for the first, for sort of the inaugural how
- 17:47S3: it really works, um, you know, you and I decided
- 17:50S3: together that a really good one might be like this
- 17:52S3: whole thing of. Have you ever wondered why, in the
- 17:55S3: greatest democracy in the world, almost no one ever runs
- 17:59S3: for president of the United States as an independent. So
- 18:03S3: the answer is that running as an independent is extremely difficult,
- 18:08S3: if not impossible. And that's why so very, very, very
- 18:11S3: few people have ever attempted it and why no one has,
- 18:15S3: you know, in modern history has ever won. So we
- 18:17S3: wrote this article, um, called How it Really Works, um,
- 18:21S3: and How Presidential Elections really work when it comes to
- 18:25S3: independent candidacies. And it goes through in a very in-depth
- 18:29S3: way and talks about ballot access issues, um, talks about
- 18:34S3: how partisans design the timing of ballot access deadlines to
- 18:38S3: block outsiders about how signature requirements in states are a
- 18:45S3: nearly impossible task. Did you did you.
- 18:49S2: Did you fit the Commission on Presidential Debates into this?
- 18:52S3: Yeah. Of course. There's a whole section about, you know,
- 18:55S3: my favorite organization, the Commission on Presidential Debates, which has
- 19:00S3: rules that they have had since 1988, which have, uh,
- 19:05S3: you know, denied an independent candidate access to the debate stage. Uh, and,
- 19:11S3: you know, if you can't get on the debate stage,
- 19:13S3: you can't become president. We talk about all the different,
- 19:16S3: enormous fundraising disadvantages that there are. There's a problem with
- 19:21S3: our electoral college and our winner take all system. That
- 19:24S3: means that even if an independent candidate got 25% in
- 19:28S3: every single state in the Union on election day, they
- 19:31S3: would still maybe, you know, they would still not win
- 19:34S3: a single electoral college. A college vote. So we're looking
- 19:38S3: at all the obstacles. There's even like intimidation that has
- 19:41S3: gone on in 2024. I don't know if you know this, Chad,
- 19:45S3: but there's an organization called No Labels that basically has
- 19:49S3: filed a Justice Department complaint saying that these organizations conspired
- 19:54S3: to intimidate and harass um, its representatives and its donors
- 19:58S3: and even its potential candidates to prevent them from achieving
- 20:01S3: ballot access for 2024. Um, so.
- 20:06S2: If I can interject a little bit just to explain
- 20:09S2: for the listeners, um, some, you know, even those that
- 20:12S2: have followed me just like to re-emphasize, like a lot
- 20:15S2: of times when you're talking about independence, going back to
- 20:17S2: like that small I independent is like, this could be
- 20:21S2: a third party candidate, frankly, it could be somebody running
- 20:23S2: outside of the machine. We've all seen how candidates who
- 20:26S2: are Democrats and Republicans who aren't embraced by the powers
- 20:30S2: that be, just kind of get pushed out. Is that
- 20:33S2: a lot of times when we're using the phrase independent,
- 20:36S2: it could mean a third party or an independent. We're
- 20:39S2: talking about somebody outside the structure. I also want to
- 20:42S2: qualify that. That doesn't mean any of us are anti-party.
- 20:46S2: It's not like we have this big grievance against Republicans
- 20:49S2: and Democrats, especially when you're talking about, you know, your
- 20:51S2: average Republican and Democrat or even folks in office. They
- 20:54S2: have to live in the world that exists, too. We're
- 20:57S2: really talking about a system, right? My father was in
- 21:00S2: the legislature as a Democrat for over 22 years. My
- 21:03S2: mother is a Republican. I have Republican, Democrat friends are
- 21:08S2: very proud of their party. There's nothing wrong with that.
- 21:10S2: But we've created structures that, you know, and this is
- 21:13S2: my personal bias. I honestly believe that reform will strengthen
- 21:19S2: the Republican and Democratic parties themselves, because a lack of competition,
- 21:24S2: I think, has created weaker parties. Yes, they may hold
- 21:28S2: a lot of offices, but the fact that you have
- 21:30S2: a 20 something percent approval rating of Congress, I think
- 21:34S2: is indicative that the people may not support them. So
- 21:38S2: it's how do you measure your power by the number
- 21:40S2: of seats or how how whether the voters actually like you?
- 21:45S3: Yeah. I mean, I'm I'm a proud, proud Democrat. I've
- 21:49S3: almost exclusively worked for Democrats. I mean, I did work
- 21:52S3: for Angus King when he ran for United States Senate
- 21:55S3: in 2012. Um, but, you know, I think I'm, I
- 22:01S3: think I'm pro party, but I'm a little bit upset
- 22:07S3: about how the system, the two party system, sort of
- 22:11S3: the two parties working together, have created this system that's
- 22:15S3: almost designed to crush their competition, to crush the outsiders,
- 22:19S3: making it really impossible for people who aren't, um, a
- 22:23S3: Democrat or a Republican to compete at a serious level.
- 22:26S3: I'm I'm upset at the way that they've sort of
- 22:29S3: together entrenched themselves in our politics and control most of
- 22:36S3: the political infrastructure. They control the debates. They control the funding.
- 22:40S3: And that that through this, voters have kind of gotten
- 22:43S3: used to that. They only have this binary choice, right,
- 22:46S3: that they can only choose one or the other and
- 22:48S3: are left oftentimes, uh, feeling like they have to choose
- 22:53S3: between one or the other and, and not even feeling
- 22:56S3: free to be able to choose who they like the most. Um,
- 23:00S3: who might be an outsider, um, who's who is just
- 23:04S3: as qualified but doesn't have a D or an R
- 23:06S3: after their name. So yeah, I'm I'm definitely not against
- 23:09S3: the parties. I'm a super proud Democrat, um, you know,
- 23:13S3: and and I'll vote. I'll vote for independence and work
- 23:17S3: for independence. Um, but, uh, I, I don't think we
- 23:23S3: have to settle for, for, um, for a system where
- 23:29S3: running as an independent is practically impossible and will basically
- 23:32S3: remain impossible for the rest of my life, for the
- 23:35S3: rest of my children's lives, and for the rest of
- 23:38S3: yours and your children's lives, and even your grandchildren's lives.
- 23:41S3: Unless there's like some sort of political shift that happens
- 23:43S3: in our democracy.
- 23:45S2: Well, I'm a proud, non-partisan NPP voter. They call him
- 23:49S2: in California. And just as a matter of transparency, you know,
- 23:52S2: I've done work for Republicans. I've my day job, how
- 23:57S2: I make a living. I do non-political stuff, and then
- 24:00S2: I also do some campaign work and public public outreach. And,
- 24:04S2: you know, I'm a vendor and in a in a
- 24:07S2: space where it's shocking, where most vendors like, they wear
- 24:10S2: blue jackets or red jackets. I'm very proud that, you know,
- 24:14S2: over the years I've worked for Gary Johnson, I've worked
- 24:16S2: for Tulsi Gabbard, I've worked for Ted Cruz, I've worked for, um,
- 24:20S2: a very left firms that have hired us to do
- 24:23S2: creative work. Right. Um, I'm proud of that. I don't
- 24:26S2: have to agree with everything every client does, but I'm
- 24:29S2: just giving you that background as a matter of transparency
- 24:32S2: so you know who I am. But one issue I
- 24:34S2: want to bring up, because, I mean, it's omnipresent. The
- 24:39S2: I love Donald Trump, I hate Donald Trump. And we're
- 24:41S2: going to try to stay out of that conversation. I
- 24:43S2: think it's largely irrelevant. Um, and a lot of the
- 24:46S2: discussions of how do we fix the way things work,
- 24:48S2: but here's a case in point was, you know, they're
- 24:53S2: trying to pass this continuing resolution, which did end up passing,
- 24:57S2: but a guy named Thomas Massie says, there's no way
- 25:00S2: I'm going to vote for this. Right. And Trump goes
- 25:02S2: out there, I'm going to primary you. You're just grandstanding
- 25:05S2: right now. Trump does this very publicly. Right. But there's
- 25:12S2: there's a couple set of facts like if anybody knows
- 25:14S2: you don't have to agree with him or not, but
- 25:17S2: Thomas Massie is not a grandstander. You may call him
- 25:19S2: an ideologue like you may agree with his ideology, may not.
- 25:22S2: But he's a very principled and acts on principle. And
- 25:25S2: he always has been in office because he's, you know, know,
- 25:27S2: he's a small L libertarian. And he had a he said,
- 25:32S2: I never vote for these things. Right. And the point being,
- 25:37S2: it's not just Donald Trump. Donald Trump does it very
- 25:40S2: publicly and says it, but the game that exists is, hey, hey, look,
- 25:43S2: I'm trying to get this passed. We need to get
- 25:45S2: this passed in this system that we have. I'm going.
- 25:48S2: He says, I'm going to primary you. What that means
- 25:51S2: is your district is going to be represented by a Republican.
- 25:56S2: You're going to have a closed primary in Kentucky, where
- 25:59S2: a lot less people are going to vote, and they're
- 26:00S2: just going to be Republicans. And guess what? Most of
- 26:03S2: them support me. So I'm going to try to take
- 26:06S2: you out at that stage of the election. I think
- 26:09S2: that's a great example not to bash Trump. Okay. That's
- 26:13S2: what Trump did in playing the game. It's I don't
- 26:16S2: agree with it. I don't like that strategy. But you know,
- 26:20S2: don't kid yourselves. Democrats do this. And most of the
- 26:22S2: time it's because they get a phone call from somebody
- 26:25S2: or somebody consulting stuff and say, you better fall in
- 26:28S2: line or you're about to face a massive attack from
- 26:31S2: the powers that be, right? They just don't do it
- 26:34S2: so publicly, right? Those are the types of things that
- 26:38S2: I think we would like to explain. And then I
- 26:41S2: think that also leads us into okay, well, well then
- 26:43S2: what is your ethic, Chad? You obviously have opinions. You
- 26:46S2: have bias. You express them. Cara. You you know, you're
- 26:48S2: a Democrat. You're going to have your opinions and bias.
- 26:52S2: That's okay. We're not we are not unbiased as ivna.
- 26:57S2: We are proud for over ten years. I mean, media
- 26:59S2: bias fact check has rated us as unbiased, but, you know,
- 27:02S2: based on not being able to categorize us as left
- 27:05S2: or right, um, all sides has ranked us right in
- 27:08S2: the middle. Um, I think that's because Ivan's editorial standards
- 27:12S2: are simple. No partisan attacks. What that means is don't
- 27:16S2: make an argument and say, oh, because Republicans are stupid
- 27:19S2: or because Democrats are crazy, right? Make an argument. Attack
- 27:23S2: what is no partisan attacks. No personal attacks. Same thing. Right?
- 27:28S2: Calling somebody an idiot is not how you advance an argument. Um,
- 27:33S2: substantiate what you say. If you're going to say something,
- 27:36S2: you know, point us to some set of facts or
- 27:39S2: something that we can trust, you know, to substantiate it.
- 27:42S2: And then the last one that that's a little different
- 27:45S2: needs some explaining is no self-promotion. I mean, by definition,
- 27:49S2: especially if we have a candidate or a representative or
- 27:52S2: somebody on, you know, everybody's always self-promoting because we're justifying
- 27:56S2: our positions. And what we do with no self-promotion is like,
- 27:59S2: don't come on here to sell t shirts. Don't come
- 28:02S2: on here to BS. Right. If you're going to write
- 28:04S2: an article, it's not a press release is make an argument. Okay.
- 28:08S2: So you know that etiquette I think over time, um,
- 28:12S2: has withstood the test of time. And you can go
- 28:14S2: on ivn everything. Um, you know, that's our grounding principle. Um,
- 28:20S2: you know, over the years, I think we're well over 7500,
- 28:24S2: you know, news articles that we've published. A lot of,
- 28:27S2: you know, Sean Griffiths, who's been our tried and true
- 28:30S2: editor for a long time, takes the etiquette very seriously.
- 28:34S2: Perhaps nobody understands the breadth of the election reform landscape,
- 28:39S2: including myself and Cara, as much as as Sean Griffiths does. Um,
- 28:43S2: but that's the same ethic, especially as we expand out
- 28:46S2: into talking about additional issues. Right. When you go and
- 28:51S2: you take an issue like cannabis and say, well, what's
- 28:54S2: really going on in the cannabis space is it really
- 28:58S2: is the debate really about legalization versus not legalization? My
- 29:03S2: answer would be, well, you know, watch, watch the how
- 29:06S2: it really works series. And you'll see, like, that's not
- 29:09S2: the real fight going on right now. Um, and IBM's
- 29:13S2: just going to wants to lay out the facts so
- 29:16S2: that then you can say, okay, well, maybe now here's
- 29:19S2: how I'd view the policy. Right. So that's a big background.
- 29:23S2: That's our mission. That's about us. Uh, Cara, I don't
- 29:27S2: know if you have any parting words. I'm very excited
- 29:30S2: to embark on this, uh, with you.
- 29:33S3: Uh, efforts that I've been involved in to advance nonpartisan
- 29:41S3: reforms have been successful. The ones that have been successful
- 29:47S3: have been successful because it's Democrats and Republicans and independents
- 29:51S3: all working together, not in a nonpartisan way to do
- 29:57S3: something structurally that benefits all of us. Uh, instead of
- 30:04S3: choosing a side and digging in and going to war.
- 30:09S3: And so if this podcast and the work that we
- 30:13S3: do together, um, can lead more people to sort of
- 30:18S3: come along with that ethos. You know, Chad, we've said
- 30:22S3: this to each other over and over and over again.
- 30:24S3: We know from looking at polling and and from doing
- 30:29S3: all these elections all these years and just from being
- 30:31S3: from living in this space that people who are out there,
- 30:35S3: we agree on so much more than we disagree on. Right. We, um,
- 30:41S3: in Maine, we just ran an initiative to end superPACs
- 30:45S3: in the state of Maine, and we ended up with 74.9%
- 30:50S3: of the vote. So, um, in a general election, we
- 30:54S3: got 600,000 votes. It's more votes than were cast for
- 30:59S3: any initiative or any politician in the history of the
- 31:02S3: entire state of Maine elections. Wow. So when I'm driving
- 31:05S3: around or walking around in the supermarket in Maine, I
- 31:08S3: can look and say, you know, three out of every
- 31:11S3: four people that I'm looking at in the supermarket agree
- 31:14S3: that we need to get rid of super PACs. You know,
- 31:16S3: and we agree on that. And it doesn't matter. We
- 31:19S3: want in every single of the 16 counties we won
- 31:22S3: in every single red county and every single blue county.
- 31:26S3: There are ideas that are strong enough to sort of
- 31:30S3: transcend the partisan warfare for all of us. And so hopefully,
- 31:36S3: Ivn continues to be a space where people can can
- 31:39S3: write about that. And this podcast where we can talk
- 31:42S3: about talk about that. And, you know, I have a
- 31:45S3: little card on my desk that my husband gave me
- 31:48S3: for Valentine's Day that says, love is when two people
- 31:51S3: begin with a dream and never stop believing. And you know, Chad,
- 31:55S3: I think that that's that's us too. You know, we've
- 31:58S3: had this dream for a long time. And, um, even now,
- 32:02S3: when a lot of people are sort of throwing up
- 32:04S3: their hands or pulling the covers over their heads in
- 32:08S3: their beds and not wanting to get out of out
- 32:10S3: of bed because of, you know, sort of where we are,
- 32:13S3: you know, never stop believing. That's that's part of that's
- 32:16S3: part of of of what, what we're here to do.
- 32:19S2: Well, I feel very optimistic about a lot of things,
- 32:24S2: including the country itself and our and the and the
- 32:27S2: development of. I mean, democracy is not easy. A representative democracy.
- 32:32S2: I can already hear people. We're not a democracy. It's like,
- 32:34S2: you know, well, that itself that just that requires a
- 32:37S2: whole discussion, right? Um, but I'm optimistic. Right. We we
- 32:42S2: improve over the years. We have ups, we have downs,
- 32:45S2: we have fights, we have all this kind of stuff. But, um,
- 32:49S2: you can see the the the things that need the
- 32:53S2: the relationships that need to be made, the conversation, the
- 32:56S2: conditions are, are becoming ripe. And we can choose to
- 32:59S2: be pessimistic or pessimistic and think the world's going to
- 33:02S2: fall or, or we can be optimistic and see those
- 33:05S2: opportunities and hope they manifest.
- 33:08S3: Totally. And if we do that, you know, the exercise,
- 33:12S3: the exercise of doing our democracy helps restore and save
- 33:16S3: our democracy. You know, being involved, staying informed, being an
- 33:19S3: active part of of of of democracy and and sharing.
- 33:24S3: Sharing yourself. This is all. These are all. This is
- 33:27S3: all about our freedom. And the more that we do it,
- 33:29S3: the better that we get at it. And, um, hopefully
- 33:32S3: we'll be we'll be unified. Um, we will be more unified.
- 33:36S2: I can already hear the things is, you know, some
- 33:38S2: people go, you know, democracy, right? Like, you know, that's
- 33:41S2: code word for, you know, you know, a liberal cause
- 33:45S2: or whatever. And so one of the things I always
- 33:47S2: think is like, okay, we're talking about representative democracy, constitutional democracy, right.
- 33:52S2: And like how our representatives get get elected. Right. Um,
- 33:57S2: it's it's crazy that those words have become politicized and
- 34:01S2: partisan ized and everything themselves. But I'm hoping that, you know,
- 34:05S2: in our discussions and stuff is like, okay, if that's
- 34:09S2: the way you feel, say it. But then let's have
- 34:10S2: a conversation about it, right?
- 34:13S3: Absolutely, absolutely.
- 34:15S2: I encourage you to, you know, subscribe to the podcast,
- 34:18S2: check out Independent Voter Project.org come to events, um, you know,
- 34:24S2: and check out the types of things we're talking about.
- 34:26S2: Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and check out things like
- 34:31S2: the National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers, where you find there's
- 34:35S2: other organizations like that I've mentioned before, like Open primaries,
- 34:39S2: Unite America. Um, fairvote. There's there's a lot of organizations
- 34:46S2: out there. You may not agree with everything that they're doing.
- 34:48S2: They may, you know, you may say, oh, well, they're
- 34:50S2: really just a Democrat or really just a Republican organization.
- 34:53S2: I say a lot of these organizations, people have their
- 34:56S2: own ideological ideologies. They have their own perspectives and stuff.
- 35:00S2: But there's a lot of them that are trying to
- 35:02S2: advance good. And I think the best thing we can
- 35:04S2: do is to engage, to talk and get involved. And
- 35:09S2: so I'd encourage that. Everybody does that. Um, so, Kara,
- 35:13S2: I want to thank you for joining us today. I
- 35:15S2: know you're busy and but, you know, folks are going
- 35:17S2: to read a lot more from Cara. And I'm sure
- 35:19S2: you're going to be on, on this podcast. And a
- 35:21S2: number of times, um, you know, somebody like yourself brings
- 35:24S2: such a depth of knowledge and perspective, um, not just
- 35:27S2: to the reform space, but, I mean, your day job
- 35:29S2: of doing all this opposition research and really understanding, you know,
- 35:33S2: much deeper than the superficial political, you know, partisan discussions
- 35:36S2: that happen, you know, more generally. Um, I think provide
- 35:40S2: a great value. Um, so thank you for taking the time.
- 35:43S2: I'm looking forward to, to this work together. And then
- 35:46S2: I want to thank all of our listeners for, for
- 35:48S2: chiming in. And I hope we're going to you're going
- 35:50S2: to enjoy the content and the information that we bring you.
- 35:53S2: So thank you. I'm Chad Peace and you're listening to
- 35:55S2: the Independent Voter podcast.
- 36:12S1: Olas Media.