Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Top two sneaky right wing pipelines for women | Maintaining Frame 159

Transcript

Top two sneaky right wing pipelines for women | Maintaining Frame 159 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Edit.
• 0:00
  Speaker 2: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:03
  Speaker 3: My name is Brian who with Allison, and this is
• 0:05
  Speaker 3: maintaining frameum a one fifty nine Top two sneaky right
• 0:08
  Speaker 3: wing pipelines for women where we got a couple of
• 0:12
  Speaker 3: requests and we're going to be looking at them. Yeah,
• 0:15
  Speaker 3: shout out to the person who sent them.
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: You enrich my life.
• 0:18
  Speaker 3: These are two videos by Briarnyclaire, who I'm sure is
• 0:22
  Speaker 3: going to have something completely unique to say about feminism
• 0:25
  Speaker 3: and communism that I've never heard before. And I'm going
• 0:28
  Speaker 3: to be boiling my noodle trying to figure out how
• 0:29
  Speaker 3: to make counter arguments.
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: So yeah, let's do the things. Let me get you
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: yeh sure?
• 0:33
  Speaker 4: All right? So if you would like to support the show,
• 0:35
  Speaker 4: please go to Feed the Badger dot com slash support.
• 0:38
  Speaker 4: There's a lot of cancer that needs to be responded to,
• 0:41
  Speaker 4: and I'm going to try to respond to all of it.
• 0:44
  Speaker 4: After this one, I'm going to be doing a response
• 0:47
  Speaker 4: to someone who went on the Whatever podcast and apparently
• 0:52
  Speaker 4: thought that he owned them because instead of arguing against
• 0:59
  Speaker 4: the female guests miss injury, he actually argued against the host,
• 1:04
  Speaker 4: calling the female guest out on her miss injury, so
• 1:07
  Speaker 4: stay tuned for that. But if you would like to
• 1:09
  Speaker 4: send a comment throughout the show, please do so at
• 1:11
  Speaker 4: feedbadger dot com slash just the Tip. That's feed the
• 1:14
  Speaker 4: Badger dot com slash just the Tip. And let's let's
• 1:17
  Speaker 4: get this started. You just want let's just go go
• 1:19
  Speaker 4: into it.
• 1:20
  Speaker 3: Let's I got some I got some timecodes for this one.
• 1:24
  Speaker 3: So this is Byroney Claire. The video is called let
• 1:27
  Speaker 3: Me Turn on the the Scene Switcher.
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: The video is called Tradwives Versus gold Diggers.
• 1:33
  Speaker 3: It's a trap and the first clip I guess, well,
• 1:37
  Speaker 3: let's play the intro and then I'll get.
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: Into the first time code. What's up?
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: No, I'll have to wait. I'll have to wait. Just
• 1:44
  Speaker 3: go It's okay, Thanks babe.
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: That you can be investigative like this, dude.
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: How good are you at house cleaning?
• 1:51
  Speaker 5: Excellent?
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: Cooking excellent?
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: Oh that's a nice question to ask, huh, saying if
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: a skill sets fit in with your lifestyle, what are
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: you going to be asking her next? About her hobbies,
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: her dreams in life? What about what she's looking for
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: in a partner?
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: Willing to just stay home and not?
• 2:11
  Speaker 4: Should I speak now or should I hold my piece?
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: You can.
• 2:13
  Speaker 3: Well, I wanted to get a sense of like what
• 2:16
  Speaker 3: the gist of this video is going to be.
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: But if you want to speak to that, go ahead.
• 2:19
  Speaker 4: No, let us continue. I'm going to keep my mouth
• 2:22
  Speaker 4: shut in order to get through this as efficiently as possible.
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: She's playing a clip of a man asking a woman
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: about some of her skills. I don't have the full context.
• 2:34
  Speaker 3: I don't know if if there was a two if
• 2:37
  Speaker 3: this was a two way conversation, and she's just showing
• 2:40
  Speaker 3: one half of it. No idea doesn't matter to me.
• 2:44
  Speaker 3: People can have whatever opinions they want to have about
• 2:47
  Speaker 3: whatever arrangement they want to have. So but of course
• 2:50
  Speaker 3: Briwate and Claire doesn't like this because this is not
• 2:54
  Speaker 3: a good arrangement in her view.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: Okay, do you want her not to work? But lucky
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: for you, she's doing that already because you know we
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: hate independent women, right, So he's very patriarchal. That must
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: mean that he is absolutely excelling in patriarchal culture which
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: we live in today.
• 3:12
  Speaker 2: You're going to be the provider.
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: I'm looking for work, Okay, yeah, yeah, oh so okay,
• 3:17
  Speaker 3: so she cherry picked this specific instance. All right, so
• 3:20
  Speaker 3: her video is called drid wise versus gold Diggers, and
• 3:25
  Speaker 3: we can just get like I'll just get the summary
• 3:28
  Speaker 3: without going into her gobbledygook. This conversation explores the intersections
• 3:32
  Speaker 3: of classism, gender roles, and societal expectations, particularly focusing on
• 3:37
  Speaker 3: the narrative surrounding traditional and modern feminity. It critiques the
• 3:41
  Speaker 3: concept of the gold digger and the pressure's women face
• 3:44
  Speaker 3: in a patriarchal society, while also addressing the economic realities
• 3:48
  Speaker 3: that shape these dynamics.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: The discussion highlights the impact.
• 3:51
  Speaker 3: Of media portrayals on gender expectations and the ongoing struggle
• 3:55
  Speaker 3: for women's independence in a capitalist framework.
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: Okay, so let me go.
• 4:01
  Speaker 3: Let me just jump to the first time code that
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: was the most relevant.
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: This is about one fifty seven. So right here, let's
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: listen to this.
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: My wife makes zero dollars, but she gives me the
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: freedom to build wealth without distraction. By handled, think you
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: mean handling everything else. There is so much power in
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: the work nobody else sees. And I take none of
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: that for granted. So she earned zero dollars from external things,
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: But you did just say that she was doing a
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: lot of work so you must be paying her though, right,
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: you know, something for her retirement as well, stuff for
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: her to be able to spend for her own free money,
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: because she's doing a lot of work to support you.
• 4:38
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 4:38
  Speaker 3: So this is the idea that if a woman is
• 4:40
  Speaker 3: not working but she is a stay at home wife
• 4:44
  Speaker 3: or mother, that, according to feminists, is unpaid labor, even
• 4:48
  Speaker 3: though the guy with the job is literally paying for
• 4:52
  Speaker 3: her home and her clothing and her needs and her tension. Yeah,
• 4:57
  Speaker 3: and he's investing in her future. They probably have bank accounts.
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: There's well, we don't even know the extent of it.
• 5:03
  Speaker 3: But of course already Kurr doesn't care about that because
• 5:07
  Speaker 3: she only cares about the material value of anything. She
• 5:12
  Speaker 3: thinks money is somehow something other than what it is. So,
• 5:17
  Speaker 3: you know, because money is just what it's a It
• 5:19
  Speaker 3: basically is a way of measuring the value of a
• 5:23
  Speaker 3: person's labor, and it is, but she thinks of it
• 5:27
  Speaker 3: as the way you get stuff. And I guess if
• 5:30
  Speaker 3: a woman doesn't have money, or she's not earning money
• 5:33
  Speaker 3: on her own, she can't get stuff.
• 5:37
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm pretty sure this woman is getting stuff. Yeah,
• 5:39
  Speaker 4: let's be honest, and yeah, exactly.
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: Of course, yeah, of course that's what you would be
• 5:44
  Speaker 3: like if a woman like is a housewife gets like
• 5:48
  Speaker 3: whatever the husband is giving her.
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: Even a single woman.
• 5:51
  Speaker 3: Who just goes on dates with men is getting something.
• 5:55
  Speaker 3: She's getting dinner, she's getting dates, she's getting to go
• 5:57
  Speaker 3: to the movies, she's getting to go to concerts, she's
• 5:59
  Speaker 3: getting to go to you know, trips. She just gets
• 6:03
  Speaker 3: that like that. It doesn't the money doesn't matter. Who
• 6:07
  Speaker 3: the money is spent on and how that money is
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: spent matters.
• 6:11
  Speaker 4: I just wanted to point out that not only is
• 6:13
  Speaker 4: she well first of all, considering that people probably won't
• 6:17
  Speaker 4: have Social Security. Everybody who's buying into or paying into
• 6:20
  Speaker 4: Social Security, yeah, that's probably not going to exist in
• 6:23
  Speaker 4: fifteen years. So a woman whose husband is actually putting
• 6:27
  Speaker 4: away savings for her probably will be able to retire
• 6:30
  Speaker 4: or have some kind of security net. Every all of
• 6:33
  Speaker 4: these other women who are investing in the government. Government's
• 6:35
  Speaker 4: not dearly a good bet, but that's what you're putting
• 6:39
  Speaker 4: it in. But so she's probably better shouldn't be better
• 6:42
  Speaker 4: off when she retires than Byrony Claire who invests her
• 6:45
  Speaker 4: faith in the government. But the other thing I wanted
• 6:47
  Speaker 4: to point out is that this woman, if the statistics
• 6:51
  Speaker 4: around homemaking or housewives are correct, she is getting a
• 6:56
  Speaker 4: living doing half the work. So she although she has
• 7:00
  Speaker 4: to trust her partner, one of the benefits she gets
• 7:04
  Speaker 4: is that she's doing half the actual work that he's
• 7:07
  Speaker 4: doing or anyone else in society. This is what blows
• 7:11
  Speaker 4: my mind when I looked at the statistics. A woman
• 7:13
  Speaker 4: who stays at home works about twenty four hours a week,
• 7:18
  Speaker 4: and that's like childcare, chores everything. The man she stays
• 7:22
  Speaker 4: at home who's supporting her works forty nots a week,
• 7:26
  Speaker 4: and everybody else in society is working more like fifty
• 7:30
  Speaker 4: five sixty of fifty five sixty hours a week everyone else.
• 7:34
  Speaker 4: So Byrony Claire is taking a situation where a woman
• 7:39
  Speaker 4: instantly removes twenty thirty hours of work from her week,
• 7:46
  Speaker 4: which she can then replace with leisure activities. If she's
• 7:49
  Speaker 4: a homesteader, then she probably is running a farm, right
• 7:52
  Speaker 4: and that probably increases the amount of time, but that
• 7:54
  Speaker 4: this is an overall estimation. She's immediately shaving off twenty
• 8:00
  Speaker 4: thirty hours of work a week by becoming a homemaker,
• 8:05
  Speaker 4: and Byrony Claire is framing this as oppression of women. Now,
• 8:10
  Speaker 4: I'm not judging people for how they arrange their lifestyle.
• 8:13
  Speaker 4: If both parties is fine with it, are fine with it,
• 8:16
  Speaker 4: and you know, the guy's like, yeah, i'll work, I'll
• 8:18
  Speaker 4: work forty nine hours, you can work twenty four. I'm
• 8:21
  Speaker 4: okay with it. I'm fine. And by the way, men
• 8:25
  Speaker 4: with home homemakers do work a little bit less than
• 8:28
  Speaker 4: every other man, so I mean that may be a
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: reasonable trade off. He may think that it's more important
• 8:33
  Speaker 4: to have his wife be less stressed so she can
• 8:36
  Speaker 4: go and take care of her kids or their kids
• 8:39
  Speaker 4: with more patience, more tolerance, you know, more willingness to
• 8:44
  Speaker 4: be flexible, that kind of thing. That maybe what's what's
• 8:47
  Speaker 4: worth it to them, right, So I'm not judging that,
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: But that's a hell of a bonus. I mean, I like,
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: think about it, Brian, wouldn't you like to just shave
• 8:55
  Speaker 4: twenty hours off your week work week? I just be like, yeah,
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: I'm done. That would be that would be quite the thing.
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: I wouldn't mind it. But no, actually I'm a workaholic,
• 9:06
  Speaker 4: so it probably would drive me nuts. But regardless, it
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: seems like, yeah, she's just completely omitting that, and of course,
• 9:12
  Speaker 4: I mean I leave it up as an exercise to
• 9:14
  Speaker 4: the viewer whether or not women genuinely are oppressed when
• 9:18
  Speaker 4: they're working half as much as their partner, and there are.
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: Still people demanding that women who are working half as
• 9:25
  Speaker 3: much still get paid more.
• 9:27
  Speaker 4: Yes, yes, they don't recognize that the finances are joint.
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: She has all kinds of legal protections on being able
• 9:37
  Speaker 4: to be to be supported. Prior to the Equal Rights
• 9:41
  Speaker 4: Amendment or all of that legislation, she would have to
• 9:44
  Speaker 4: be legally supported even in marriage, so he couldn't like
• 9:47
  Speaker 4: lose his job and just be like, ah, well it's time. No,
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: that would actually have been illegal in the past, but
• 9:53
  Speaker 4: feminists got rid of those laws, so men can now,
• 9:56
  Speaker 4: you know, lose their job and not go to jail
• 9:58
  Speaker 4: for it. So I guess that it's good on feminists,
• 10:01
  Speaker 4: but that was specifically. But what Phyllis Schaffly was upset
• 10:05
  Speaker 4: about with a lot of the feminist movement is that
• 10:08
  Speaker 4: they were getting rid of those kinds of protections for women.
• 10:11
  Speaker 4: But fair enough, I mean, that's not I won't complain
• 10:14
  Speaker 4: that the feminists did that, but regardless, she has legal
• 10:18
  Speaker 4: protections against being abandoned by her husband. If she is,
• 10:23
  Speaker 4: then he has they go to divorce court and he
• 10:25
  Speaker 4: has to pay alimony. So it's not a situation where
• 10:28
  Speaker 4: she's just completely off on her own. But then the
• 10:31
  Speaker 4: other thing is that she's invested her faith in somebody
• 10:34
  Speaker 4: who presumably loves her or at least has developed some
• 10:38
  Speaker 4: kind of attachment to her, whereas Byrony Claire is like, no, ladies,
• 10:41
  Speaker 4: you got to invest your faith in government. Faith in government,
• 10:44
  Speaker 4: and by government. It's not really just government, is it.
• 10:47
  Speaker 4: It's also government corporate collusion. So it's basically what she's
• 10:51
  Speaker 4: saying is, women, don't invest your faith in men. Invest
• 10:56
  Speaker 4: your faith in the men who control govern and.
• 11:00
  Speaker 3: Corporations take money from men. It's still it's still men. Yes,
• 11:06
  Speaker 3: there's a big middle man between the men.
• 11:09
  Speaker 4: Yeah, so that that gives them the impression of independence.
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 11:14
  Speaker 4: So, so, ladies, don't invest your faith into a single
• 11:17
  Speaker 4: man whose affections you have the ability to illicit through
• 11:22
  Speaker 4: your behavior. Invest your faith in the patriarchy. This is
• 11:27
  Speaker 4: a feminist saying that that what they would term the patriarchy,
• 11:31
  Speaker 4: which is eliteman right, because the little man is bad
• 11:34
  Speaker 4: the big man, the big man is good. Feminism.
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, I.
• 11:40
  Speaker 3: Think this is the center for point. But let me
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: play a little bit more.
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: Well, wait a second, he's saying that he hasn't yet
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: built wealth, but don't feel too bad for him because
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: he's got more stuff on his profile. I told my
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: wife I can no longer help with the dishes because
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: Trump banned men from women's sports. Have you ever seen
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: a diamond shaped like Trump? This dude actually custom.
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: Cut up what I think he was joking with his wife.
• 12:02
  Speaker 4: Yes, I'm not answering for a joke. Friend.
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's a pretty stone. The guy's a real dalist
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: and as many a bro podcast or riving politician will
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: tell you, the real problem with the world today is
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: women not getting married young and having lots of babies. Okay,
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: these lit LIFs, and that divorce is bad, actually fifty
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: percent of marriages and a device.
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: Does it feel bad to be like a Buffy fan
• 12:24
  Speaker 3: when all of the rat fountains are also Buffy fans?
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: I pity you all, all right? I think that was
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: the first clap. Basically, it's all right, bad divorce, divorce
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: is bad?
• 12:37
  Speaker 4: Yes, like what what? I didn't realize that this was
• 12:42
  Speaker 4: the only thing the only people that divorce and riches
• 12:45
  Speaker 4: is divorce attorneys and state's collecting child support. Like what
• 12:52
  Speaker 4: the yeah, let's let's celebrate the complete destruction of any
• 12:56
  Speaker 4: kind of upward mobility in the middle class, like there's
• 13:00
  Speaker 4: never going to be Like literally, divorce is destroying upward
• 13:05
  Speaker 4: mobility in the middle class. That's it. You're done, Like
• 13:08
  Speaker 4: you get divorced and that's it for you.
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: She's trying to make the claim with that first clip.
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: The claim is that women are being asked to or
• 13:18
  Speaker 3: there's a movement. I guess a sentiment. I guess a
• 13:24
  Speaker 3: sentiment's the better way to put it. That women should
• 13:27
  Speaker 3: consider getting married younger and having children earlier instead of
• 13:33
  Speaker 3: doing the girl Boss thing. And Byrony Clair is saying
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: that that makes no sense because there are no men
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: that are going to be willing to step up and
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: you know, essentially pay for these women to have children
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: because men are not getting work.
• 13:53
  Speaker 2: They're not working. But men are not working because there's literally.
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: Obstacles up and down to prevent men, especially white men
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: in the United States, from getting jobs that women can't
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: get and get more money at. Therefore, those women who
• 14:11
  Speaker 3: are getting those jobs and are making more money, are
• 14:13
  Speaker 3: looking for men that make even more because they don't settle,
• 14:18
  Speaker 3: and there are very few of those men. This goes
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: back to the Tommy Lauren things right, which he says
• 14:22
  Speaker 3: the pickens are slim, without any sympathy or consideration for
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: the fact that men are in this position because of feminism,
• 14:30
  Speaker 3: because of the way that it's come out in policy,
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: and you know, things like college grants, things like favorable
• 14:36
  Speaker 3: hiring for women and all of that, and so like
• 14:40
  Speaker 3: men are being they're being set back by all of
• 14:44
  Speaker 3: these obstacles, which of course feminists will presume men couldn't
• 14:48
  Speaker 3: possibly have obstacles because they're the patriarchy and they have
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: all the power. But when those men are basically in
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: the world, they're like, I'm looking for work, I can't
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: find work, then it's their fault because there are men
• 14:59
  Speaker 3: and they should be able to have it all figured
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: out and women shouldn't have to settle. So feminism created
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: the problem, feminism exacerbates the problem, and no one seems
• 15:09
  Speaker 3: to see that that is the problem. And so she
• 15:13
  Speaker 3: is basically making the argument that look at we've hobbled
• 15:16
  Speaker 3: all of you, but you're still failing. So this is
• 15:19
  Speaker 3: your fault, and that's kind of what that first bit
• 15:23
  Speaker 3: is about. So when that when you know, when a
• 15:26
  Speaker 3: man says I can't I'm looking for work, but I'm
• 15:28
  Speaker 3: having a hard time he yeah, go ahead.
• 15:32
  Speaker 4: No finish, I apologize.
• 15:34
  Speaker 3: Well no, I was just gonna say, maybe, like we
• 15:36
  Speaker 3: should be, if anything, trying to help men get you know,
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: realize their potential allowed.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: In the space to do it.
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: But also maybe like women should be looking for something
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: more than just like what a man makes and earns.
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: But she has virtues.
• 15:52
  Speaker 4: Isn't this guy just basically I mean, if let's take
• 15:55
  Speaker 4: him for face value, first of all, he's very much
• 15:57
  Speaker 4: cherry picked, like completely as you said originally, So this
• 16:01
  Speaker 4: is this is the this is the man who supports
• 16:04
  Speaker 4: her thesis. But the other thing is, if we take
• 16:07
  Speaker 4: him at face value, how is what he wants different
• 16:10
  Speaker 4: than what spoilt girlies want. They want someone to provide
• 16:14
  Speaker 4: for them and they don't want to have to do
• 16:17
  Speaker 4: any actual housework. Like So, so if a man has
• 16:22
  Speaker 4: the same attitude towards his partner as a spoilt girly,
• 16:26
  Speaker 4: there's a problem with him. But what about the spoiled
• 16:29
  Speaker 4: girlies like this, she's basically looking. It's the same thing
• 16:33
  Speaker 4: like what happened with AOC calling Elon Musk and Donald
• 16:37
  Speaker 4: Trump having a fight on Twitter. You know, the girls
• 16:40
  Speaker 4: are fighting. Remember that barone Claire is looking at men,
• 16:45
  Speaker 4: a man who's expressing the attitude that a significant number
• 16:49
  Speaker 4: of women have towards their partners, and saying this man
• 16:52
  Speaker 4: is bad.
• 16:55
  Speaker 6: Mm hmm yep.
• 16:56
  Speaker 4: And so that's that's interesting again. So if a man
• 16:59
  Speaker 4: has the same attitude towards his romantic partner as a
• 17:02
  Speaker 4: lot of women do, Byronny Claire thinks he's a bad man.
• 17:07
  Speaker 4: But I'm not pretty sure she doesn't apply that to women.
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: All right, I'll play the next time code.
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: Chryl sandbeg Lean and feminism.
• 17:18
  Speaker 3: So there's this other feminism, Alison, that is not the
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: real feminism. It's called corporate girl boss feminism. Did you
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: know that it's actually not real feminism? This is the
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: real She's got the real feminism. That's a fake feminism,
• 17:32
  Speaker 3: that's a corporate, capitalist, patriarchal feminism.
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: I guess I don't know.
• 17:36
  Speaker 4: Can I put my Can I create a version of
• 17:40
  Speaker 4: feminism and put it in the running.
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: Only if it follows the base rules of feminism.
• 17:45
  Speaker 4: Of course, yeah, I don't think you care. I will
• 17:48
  Speaker 4: probably be violating the base rules, which is women don't
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: have to take responsibility and well, number one.
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: Women are always victims, men are always oppressors.
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: Everything after that, you have that, but you gotta like
• 18:01
  Speaker 3: you can't break those two. That's like the cardinal pillars.
• 18:05
  Speaker 3: So but uh yeah, So basically she tries to do
• 18:09
  Speaker 3: this the girl boss thing.
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: That's not real feminism.
• 18:11
  Speaker 4: So so what I wanted to point out before we continue,
• 18:16
  Speaker 4: she said, you're not going to be on under the thumb.
• 18:19
  Speaker 4: It's like, what are you talking about. You're under the
• 18:22
  Speaker 4: thumb of corporations and government. You're saying, oh, you're not
• 18:27
  Speaker 4: under the thumb of a man, Well, yes you are.
• 18:30
  Speaker 4: You are now completely beholden to basically the deep state.
• 18:35
  Speaker 4: I don't know if that's considered conspiracy talk anymore, but
• 18:39
  Speaker 4: you're beholden to a bunch of men who men and
• 18:41
  Speaker 4: women who are going to vote to use your tax
• 18:44
  Speaker 4: dollars to underwrite debt so that they can make millions,
• 18:48
  Speaker 4: they can become millionaires and billionaires. Like, is that not
• 18:51
  Speaker 4: being under the thumb of someone? Like?
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: Is that not? Like?
• 18:55
  Speaker 4: This is this is what's so interesting is she's she's
• 18:57
  Speaker 4: still advocating being under the thumb. It's just that she
• 19:01
  Speaker 4: thinks that, for some reason, being under the thumb of
• 19:04
  Speaker 4: someone that you are having sex with and is your
• 19:07
  Speaker 4: companion in life is somehow worse than being under the
• 19:10
  Speaker 4: thumb of a bunch of bureaucrats who are looking at
• 19:12
  Speaker 4: you in terms of how much they can get from you.
• 19:15
  Speaker 4: It's worse to be ow. It's worse to be a
• 19:18
  Speaker 4: cow in the wild, the buffalo, you know, with your meat,
• 19:23
  Speaker 4: than it is to be a cow in a herd
• 19:26
  Speaker 4: going to the slaughterhouse.
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: Okay byrony, Yeah, well she is a statist, so that's
• 19:32
  Speaker 3: what she's going to do.
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: It makes me so very angry. In fact, what you
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: will find from feminists is then pointing out how unfair
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: it is that women are expected to work a forty
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: plus hour work week to then go home to do
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: the second shift of unpaid labor. While you're doing the childcat,
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: you're looking after the husband, and you have this whole
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: mental and emotional load going on because you're the one
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: that's running the household and making sure that everybody is
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: taken care of, and on top of all, of that
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: you're expected to pay fifty when it comes to all
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: of the bills for the house.
• 20:02
  Speaker 4: This is bullshit. Yeah, this is just not reality. Men
• 20:06
  Speaker 4: do more work in a relationship in which men are
• 20:10
  Speaker 4: the primary providers. Men do more work period the end
• 20:15
  Speaker 4: it starts. The more work that a man does to provide,
• 20:19
  Speaker 4: the more work he's doing overall in his family. So
• 20:22
  Speaker 4: the most work relative to a woman is a situation
• 20:25
  Speaker 4: where a man has a stay at home wife who
• 20:27
  Speaker 4: provides nothing financially for the family, he is doing the
• 20:32
  Speaker 4: most amount of work relative to her. So this is
• 20:36
  Speaker 4: absolute bullshit. If you, as a woman, want to do
• 20:40
  Speaker 4: the least amount of work, then get a man who
• 20:43
  Speaker 4: does the most amount of providing if that's what you want. Okay,
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: that's all I had to say. But this is this
• 20:48
  Speaker 4: is absolute bullshit. It's not proven. This resentment has no
• 20:52
  Speaker 4: proof behind it.
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, well it's I mean, like we've heard this
• 20:58
  Speaker 3: a million times. Women are like these people are always
• 21:02
  Speaker 3: whining about what they call unpaid labor, as though like
• 21:05
  Speaker 3: if you lived on your own, you wouldn't also have
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: to I don't know, wipe your ass, do your laundry,
• 21:11
  Speaker 3: buy groceries, cook your meals like, oh, unless you you know,
• 21:15
  Speaker 3: you're the kind of person and things. I'll just stay
• 21:17
  Speaker 3: home and like Sue in my own juices and order
• 21:20
  Speaker 3: door dash every day. Well that sounds like a you
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: problem then, So anyway, next.
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: One is the leaning to be the perfect wife and mother. Oh,
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: you can lean into classism and sexism and basically be
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: like the three women from Sirens. To what Mary Rich guys,
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: I'll handle this. We didn't pursue them, Devin, they came
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: to us. We have special powers, all of us do. Nah,
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: you thought it was the other three women. I was
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: thought about, not that it's these three, but both avenues,
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: even though they go in different ways, end up with
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: you being entirely financially dependent on one man, but one
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: is seen as a saint whilst the other as a
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: sinner one man.
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: Why be financially dependent on one man when the government
• 21:59
  Speaker 4: can give you the pickens of many. I wonder if
• 22:02
  Speaker 4: it's just the exercise of statist power that gets her off.
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: Well, I have a feeling that I don't know.
• 22:07
  Speaker 3: I just's I think she has daddy issues and that's
• 22:11
  Speaker 3: why she's a statist. I think that she's when she
• 22:14
  Speaker 3: says I don't want to be dependent on a man.
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: Either her father, you know, wasn't around for her, or
• 22:22
  Speaker 3: more likely, her mother separated her from her father and
• 22:26
  Speaker 3: then told her terrible stories about him, which is a
• 22:30
  Speaker 3: lot more common than people think. And so she grew
• 22:33
  Speaker 3: up thinking that men cannot be dependent on because my
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: daddy wasn't there. And I know I'm psychoanalyzing here, but
• 22:40
  Speaker 3: just I hear this so often, like women like this
• 22:43
  Speaker 3: almost all the time. I don't want to be dependent
• 22:45
  Speaker 3: a man. I want the government to take care of me.
• 22:47
  Speaker 3: This is why our country is in the state that
• 22:50
  Speaker 3: it's in. This is why we have all of these
• 22:53
  Speaker 3: problems with Medicaid and social security fraud and all this
• 22:59
  Speaker 3: other stuff. Is because, I mean, it's because women vote
• 23:03
  Speaker 3: for it. Like that's what it is. Yeah, single women
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: in particular, but like a lot of women are made
• 23:09
  Speaker 3: single by the policy because they see that as more
• 23:11
  Speaker 3: appealing than getting married.
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: And yeah, maybe getting married means that.
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: Life will be a little harder, but at least it's
• 23:18
  Speaker 3: your life that you have control over. And so now
• 23:21
  Speaker 3: you have all these people that are dependent on the
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: state for everything, which is exactly what people like Byron
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: and declaire want because once you get hooked on the state,
• 23:29
  Speaker 3: it's hard to let go because you could lose whatever
• 23:32
  Speaker 3: your lifestyle is, whatever comforts you know in security you
• 23:35
  Speaker 3: felt you had is gone.
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: Now you have to fend for yourself.
• 23:38
  Speaker 3: But this is what people like this want because it
• 23:41
  Speaker 3: creates dependency, and then it creates generations of dependency because
• 23:45
  Speaker 3: the people who you raise also are on the same
• 23:49
  Speaker 3: you know, they're they're on the treadmill too, And the
• 23:52
  Speaker 3: men who pay into it get more and more scorn
• 23:56
  Speaker 3: every generation. Even though that money that these people are
• 23:59
  Speaker 3: getting is not coming from nowhere. It's coming from men's labor.
• 24:02
  Speaker 3: It's not even coming from the government. They're just taking
• 24:05
  Speaker 3: it from men and giving it to women. And this
• 24:08
  Speaker 3: person wants more of that. She wants that hugely, you know.
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: And I mean like it's.
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: The same it's the same song, guys. Doesn't this get
• 24:18
  Speaker 3: boring for you? It's the same arguments. They never change,
• 24:23
  Speaker 3: They never evolved, they never become more sophisticated. Give me
• 24:27
  Speaker 3: more government, socialism good only for women. Fuck men, make
• 24:32
  Speaker 3: them pay. It's the same shit. It's the same shit.
• 24:36
  Speaker 3: It's never gonna change.
• 24:39
  Speaker 4: Well, not until we yield the rift between the genders.
• 24:42
  Speaker 4: I mean, well, and we're not even facing the end
• 24:45
  Speaker 4: of civilization like this, and it was something that would
• 24:48
  Speaker 4: occur to me. It's like, well, Russia was communist once
• 24:51
  Speaker 4: and now Russia is not communist, right, so you can
• 24:55
  Speaker 4: actually heal from communism. You can't heal from feminism. And
• 24:59
  Speaker 4: the funny thing is that feminism is going to take
• 25:01
  Speaker 4: out our species at the end of the day, at
• 25:05
  Speaker 4: least this kind of victimhood feminism, this kind of constant
• 25:10
  Speaker 4: suspicion of men, and ultimately, Byrony Claire is not actually
• 25:15
  Speaker 4: selling freedom from men. She's saying that a woman who
• 25:19
  Speaker 4: is in an intimate relationship with a man has less
• 25:22
  Speaker 4: control over men than a woman's vote, which is just
• 25:27
  Speaker 4: not the case. Because no matter what, Byrony, the state
• 25:32
  Speaker 4: is still going to extract it's fifty hours of work
• 25:35
  Speaker 4: from you, and the corporations whatever you want to call it,
• 25:38
  Speaker 4: the corpo gov is still going to extract it's fifty
• 25:41
  Speaker 4: hours of work from you. Ladies. It's still going to
• 25:43
  Speaker 4: expect that. But if you get in a relationship with
• 25:45
  Speaker 4: a man where you trust a man, you can have
• 25:47
  Speaker 4: that right that because that's the difference. The man actually
• 25:51
  Speaker 4: cares about you. The corpo state only cares about your
• 25:56
  Speaker 4: labor because it wants to use that labor to underwrite
• 25:59
  Speaker 4: all of this debts. That it's just you know, that's
• 26:02
  Speaker 4: that's that's your ass has to cash those checks that
• 26:06
  Speaker 4: the government writes. And she looks at the government and
• 26:10
  Speaker 4: she sees love, she sees intimacy, she sees affection. She
• 26:16
  Speaker 4: looks at corporation, she sees love and intimacy, affection. A
• 26:19
  Speaker 4: corporate job is where I'm gonna find myself, where I'm
• 26:22
  Speaker 4: gonna find my love. I'm gonna be loved, gonna be
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: loved by the government. I'm gonna be loved by corporations.
• 26:29
  Speaker 4: This is what she's saying. It's like, and this is
• 26:33
  Speaker 4: this is the pathology. And part of the reason why
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: she probably thinks that way is because corporations and governments
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: are the strongest thing that exists. So she's basically just
• 26:46
  Speaker 4: she is the same mental type as when the Genghis
• 26:50
  Speaker 4: Khan rolls into town. She's not the type that's like, okay, ladies,
• 26:55
  Speaker 4: let's let's get our shields out and make a final
• 26:58
  Speaker 4: stand like a true Teuton. She's not that tight. Wait,
• 27:03
  Speaker 4: she's a harem girl. Ow all the other women, the
• 27:06
  Speaker 4: shield maidens are like, yet final standtime, We're gonna We're
• 27:10
  Speaker 4: gonna die with our men. She's like, does this hair
• 27:13
  Speaker 4: do these harem pants make my lass?
• 27:14
  Speaker 6: Look? Gang?
• 27:15
  Speaker 4: Guess come over here, I'm ready for you. She is
• 27:19
  Speaker 4: the tighte. She's the female that orientates herself to the
• 27:23
  Speaker 4: most powerful force in the area.
• 27:27
  Speaker 6: She has.
• 27:27
  Speaker 4: No, she's not autonomous. She's a harem girl. And this
• 27:32
  Speaker 4: is what we've encouraged in women by taking away the
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: expectations of virtue, self sacrifice and throwing your lot in
• 27:42
  Speaker 4: with the fate of your social group. This is what
• 27:46
  Speaker 4: this is what happens. This is what you get. This
• 27:48
  Speaker 4: is how you get harem girls. This is how you
• 27:51
  Speaker 4: get them.
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: All right, I'm jumping ahead to the next time code.
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: It's completely arcades infantilized men. One is when it comes
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: to doing housework labor.
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: Oh, I'm a.
• 28:03
  Speaker 3: Little uh wait, no, I'm not quite where I need
• 28:07
  Speaker 3: to be.
• 28:07
  Speaker 2: Like, it's right here.
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: She humiliated him, and the worse, she'll entrap him with
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: kids and make him pay alimony to her for the
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: rest of her life. If you know, the men go
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: the wrong way movement that's literally every woman ever. But
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: then she won't just ruin his life and the.
• 28:22
  Speaker 4: Different ideas, lady, that's her men role.
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: She took advantage of him, she humiliated him, and the worse,
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: she'll entrap him with kids and make him pay alimony
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: to her for the rest of her life. If you know,
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: the men go the Wrong Way movement, that's literally every
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: woman ever, and she's.
• 28:39
  Speaker 3: Something let the men going their own way, but she's
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: calling it the men going the wrong way? So do
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: you want men and women together or not? But I
• 28:48
  Speaker 3: think what you want is men in service to women,
• 28:51
  Speaker 3: And Migtoile makes you angry because they're not looking to
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: hurt women. They don't have any ill designs on them.
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: They just don't want to be involved with them. And
• 29:02
  Speaker 3: so they've chosen not to be involved with them. And
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: that burns your ass because then you can't control them.
• 29:09
  Speaker 3: And that's all this is about. You want to control
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: men when and Migtao doesn't even it doesn't pose any
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: threat to you except that you can't control them anymore.
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: That's how I know you don't really want men out
• 29:24
  Speaker 3: of your life.
• 29:25
  Speaker 2: You want them to serve you. That's what you want.
• 29:29
  Speaker 3: And That's why she's a state is because if she
• 29:32
  Speaker 3: uses the state, then the men have no choice but
• 29:35
  Speaker 3: to comply, because otherwise the state sends men with guns
• 29:38
  Speaker 3: to their homes to extract the resources. This is an
• 29:41
  Speaker 3: evil woman with an evil ideology, plain and simple. She
• 29:46
  Speaker 3: can dress it up in as much pink as she wants,
• 29:48
  Speaker 3: but I know at the end of the day, she
• 29:50
  Speaker 3: is prepared to use the violence of the state by
• 29:53
  Speaker 3: proxy to get what she wants. And men who say
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: they don't want anything to do with it, they are
• 29:58
  Speaker 3: the enemy. I'm not lying and I'm not exaggerating. That's
• 30:02
  Speaker 3: literally what this is. This is why I get angry
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: at the collaborator. And the worst part is that she
• 30:10
  Speaker 3: doesn't even have the ovaries to do it herself.
• 30:12
  Speaker 2: She will do it through other men.
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: She'll use other men to extract resources from men to
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: give it to her.
• 30:19
  Speaker 4: Like I said, she's a collaborator. She had orientated herself
• 30:22
  Speaker 4: towards the most powerful what she perceives as masculine force
• 30:26
  Speaker 4: in the room.
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: Okay, it won't just ruin his life, but everybody else's
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: life too, because she'll asks a government for money as well,
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: and we'll just keep on popping out children. What a
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: welfare queen. Yes, Reagan is still haunting us from the grave.
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: And you'll notice a lot of gold digger accusations go
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: towards BIPOC women. And you know what, the welfare queen
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: false narrative because once again it's been disproven. This is false.
• 30:54
  Speaker 2: But it's head of Global No, it's not disproven.
• 30:57
  Speaker 3: Literally exists like it's you can say that somewhere somebody
• 31:03
  Speaker 3: named Jeene Dembley wrote an article that debunks it.
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: But that doesn't mean anything. It doesn't mean anything.
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: Like women are literally paid to have children if their
• 31:13
  Speaker 3: man is not in the home. I mean, it doesn't
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: make their life easy. It probably isn't, but they don't care.
• 31:20
  Speaker 3: Like some of them get really mercenary. They literally treat
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: their children as a commodity that they just exist to
• 31:27
  Speaker 3: give them money. And you can find videos all over
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: the Internet of women boasting about their food stamp check
• 31:35
  Speaker 3: coming or their wickcheck or their child support checks or
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: whatever it is, and how they're gonna spend it, which
• 31:42
  Speaker 3: is basically just on whatever the hell they want that day.
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: There's no consideration for the future. Everything is in the present.
• 31:48
  Speaker 3: You can find it all over the internet. So I'm sorry,
• 31:51
  Speaker 3: but you can tell me some asshole wrote an article
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: but it's meaningless.
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: It doesn't matter.
• 31:55
  Speaker 3: Okay, it exists, and it's actually not just a problem
• 31:59
  Speaker 3: for the men who might be, you know, the fathers
• 32:04
  Speaker 3: of those children that maybe want to be involved with
• 32:05
  Speaker 3: them but can't be because the state said, you're you
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: can have this money, but only if you exclude men
• 32:12
  Speaker 3: from your life. But it's also harmful to the women
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: because it makes their lives harder, it puts them in
• 32:17
  Speaker 3: a hole they can't get out of, and it's especially.
• 32:19
  Speaker 2: Harmful to the children themselves.
• 32:22
  Speaker 3: But of course that you know my pointing that out, well,
• 32:25
  Speaker 3: I guess I'm just imposing my patriarchal rationality on everything.
• 32:29
  Speaker 4: Okay, let's uh try to get through this.
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: There's only one There's only one more time home, right.
• 32:35
  Speaker 3: I built it on to five main points. Most of
• 32:39
  Speaker 3: it is gibberish. So because that's what she is, all right,
• 32:44
  Speaker 3: here we go, we go. I think I need to
• 32:45
  Speaker 3: go back a teeny bit.
• 32:46
  Speaker 4: Okay, so this looks interesting because it, I mean, bok
• 32:51
  Speaker 4: su up that basically Byrony Claire is trying to sell
• 32:54
  Speaker 4: women on marrying the state yeah.
• 32:58
  Speaker 2: All for videos.
• 33:01
  Speaker 4: If she was around in like I don't know what
• 33:04
  Speaker 4: when did Genghis Khan do his thing like the twelve
• 33:07
  Speaker 4: eleven hundreds, she would be selling women on yeah, just yeah,
• 33:11
  Speaker 4: just okay, let's just let's just invite our our invaders
• 33:16
  Speaker 4: in with open arms.
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: We'll get more marriages, mean fewer people on government roles.
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: These claims should give us pause. The idea that marriage
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: will selve poverty and has historically been fraught with racism.
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: Infamous unmarried welfare queen invoked in politics and media was
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: invariably a black Orlatina mother. The implication was that if
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: only these women marriage, creating a private welfare state of two,
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: they wouldn't be poor, effectively absolving the government from assisting
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: Americans have economically disadvantaged And that book is honestly fantastic
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: and I will be coming back to it in the
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: future because do.
• 33:50
  Speaker 4: You notice how this separates out black women from black men,
• 33:54
  Speaker 4: Because what the welfare state did was outcompete black men
• 33:57
  Speaker 4: in their own communities. Like I mean, if let's say
• 34:02
  Speaker 4: corporation shut down like a mom and pop barrio, is
• 34:07
  Speaker 4: that the correct way of turning, you know, like a
• 34:09
  Speaker 4: mom and pop store in Inhada, Oh jega okay odega, good,
• 34:16
  Speaker 4: thank you. Sorry. If a corporation went into a black
• 34:20
  Speaker 4: community and start started out competing black businesses, she'd be
• 34:25
  Speaker 4: all over that as like, oh, that's that's corporate malfeasans,
• 34:29
  Speaker 4: it's corporate greed. But essentially, what the government did is
• 34:32
  Speaker 4: it went into Black communities and it out competed Black men,
• 34:36
  Speaker 4: thus destroying Black families and ultimately their communities. This whole
• 34:39
  Speaker 4: initiative took healthy Black communities and towns and turned them
• 34:44
  Speaker 4: into ghost towns and ghettos. That's what it did. And
• 34:50
  Speaker 4: here she's saying, oh, that's not racist. It's racist to
• 34:54
  Speaker 4: point out the ultimate like what happened, and specifically to
• 35:00
  Speaker 4: black men, because they are out competed and pretty much
• 35:03
  Speaker 4: driven out of their communities unless they became gang leaders
• 35:06
  Speaker 4: or parts of gangs. Right, it is racist to point
• 35:09
  Speaker 4: this out. So they've constructed a system in which if
• 35:14
  Speaker 4: no matter what they do to black men, right, no
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: matter what kind of horrible crap they do to black men,
• 35:21
  Speaker 4: it's racist to point it out because you might be
• 35:23
  Speaker 4: criticizing black women. Do you see how this narrative sets
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: the two apart and then destroys everything, just flattens everything.
• 35:30
  Speaker 4: And then now she's saying that these these narratives that
• 35:36
  Speaker 4: you know, maybe I should get married and start rebuilding
• 35:39
  Speaker 4: your communities and families. These narratives are going to delegitimate
• 35:45
  Speaker 4: government intervention. Like I said, like Brian is saying, it's
• 35:49
  Speaker 4: all about justifying government spending. It's all about justifying government
• 35:53
  Speaker 4: spending and government oversight, which means the parasites that we've
• 35:59
  Speaker 4: seen like that unmasked by Doge, the parasites continue to
• 36:04
  Speaker 4: latch on to the vein and justify their existence. And somehow,
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: despite the fact that we've done this for how many
• 36:12
  Speaker 4: or seventy years now, and we've seen the effects. It
• 36:15
  Speaker 4: destroys communities, It destroys kids, it destroys families. Like this experiment,
• 36:21
  Speaker 4: the government going in and removing black men from their
• 36:24
  Speaker 4: families out competing black men, has resulted in communities that
• 36:28
  Speaker 4: are economically disadvantaged, torn apart, and dead black men, and
• 36:35
  Speaker 4: plenty of fodder for the prison industrial complex. We've done
• 36:40
  Speaker 4: this experiment and we can't say that Actually, no, the
• 36:43
  Speaker 4: government can't replace fathers. It just can't. All it can
• 36:47
  Speaker 4: do is justify itself and use this situation, this cancer
• 36:52
  Speaker 4: that it created to justify why it gets more of
• 36:57
  Speaker 4: our funds, why we have to underwrite more of government debt.
• 37:01
  Speaker 4: I you know, a long time ago, Brian, you said
• 37:04
  Speaker 4: that conservatism essentially is correct me if I'm wrong, that
• 37:08
  Speaker 4: conservatism is essentially fiscal conservatism.
• 37:10
  Speaker 2: Right, I think that I said.
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: I don't know that that's quite what I said, but
• 37:16
  Speaker 3: go ahead, though, I mean.
• 37:17
  Speaker 4: Okay, But I'm actually starting to really understand this. There
• 37:21
  Speaker 4: are two parties. There are two real philosophical things going on. Well,
• 37:26
  Speaker 4: I don't know if we want to call it philosophical,
• 37:28
  Speaker 4: but perspectives. There is the perspective that government debt is moral,
• 37:35
  Speaker 4: that government has to intervene to protect us from ourselves
• 37:40
  Speaker 4: and as such has to take out giant loans in
• 37:44
  Speaker 4: our name that our asses have to pay the interest on. Right,
• 37:48
  Speaker 4: there's that perspective, And then there's the perspective that says
• 37:52
  Speaker 4: this is completely immoral. There is a name for systems
• 37:56
  Speaker 4: in which one group of people gets to decide what
• 38:00
  Speaker 4: gets to take the productivity from another group of people
• 38:05
  Speaker 4: and beliviate about how they're moral, more moral than the
• 38:11
  Speaker 4: people they're stealing from. That system starts with an s like,
• 38:17
  Speaker 4: I'm like becoming more and more an camp. I can't like.
• 38:20
  Speaker 4: This is a system of slavery, and it is justified
• 38:25
  Speaker 4: through these narratives that men cannot be trusted with women.
• 38:30
  Speaker 4: Like once you break that, the government becomes everywhere. It
• 38:35
  Speaker 4: gets to go in everywhere, It gets to oversee every
• 38:38
  Speaker 4: single relationship, It gets to divide, and it gets to
• 38:43
  Speaker 4: get its fingers in there and get more and more
• 38:45
  Speaker 4: justifications for why it casts to write at larger and
• 38:48
  Speaker 4: larger loans to itself which we have to pay the
• 38:50
  Speaker 4: interest on. That's what she's doing. And I realize now
• 38:56
  Speaker 4: that there are two real camps. There are people who
• 38:59
  Speaker 4: say when a government takes a loan, that is immoral
• 39:05
  Speaker 4: on its face, When a government decides to write itself
• 39:09
  Speaker 4: a check that someone else has to cash or has
• 39:11
  Speaker 4: to cover, that is immoral. And then there are the
• 39:14
  Speaker 4: people who say, oh, no government debt's fine, Well, we
• 39:18
  Speaker 4: are probably in the tail end of that system, friends.
• 39:22
  Speaker 4: And now all of the governments around the world that
• 39:25
  Speaker 4: have been playing this game of increasing debt underwritten by
• 39:29
  Speaker 4: the labor of the people that have no opinion of
• 39:32
  Speaker 4: have no real direct say in how much debt is
• 39:35
  Speaker 4: created because the government's doing it for our benefit. Right,
• 39:39
  Speaker 4: this is coming to an end, and now we get
• 39:41
  Speaker 4: to see all of the central banks of the Western
• 39:44
  Speaker 4: nations playing musical debt. Who's going to be left with.
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: The bag mt potato of debt?
• 39:53
  Speaker 4: Yeah, hot potato, who's going to be left?
• 39:56
  Speaker 3: It's unsustainable, but Barney Clair doesn't know or doesn't care.
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: No, of course it's.
• 40:01
  Speaker 4: Unds sustainable, because it's like, it's parasitic like this, this,
• 40:05
  Speaker 4: this is it's it's a parasite that's latched onto the
• 40:08
  Speaker 4: taxpayers aorta and is feeding and feeding and feeding and
• 40:12
  Speaker 4: feeding and feeding, and the only the only thing it
• 40:14
  Speaker 4: does is justify itself, spin out some some anesthesia, so
• 40:19
  Speaker 4: you're just like, you're just too stoned to care. All
• 40:22
  Speaker 4: it does is justify itself and feed more until you
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: die of starvation, and then it dies of starvation. Because
• 40:30
  Speaker 4: this is what's really hilarious that the elites are building
• 40:33
  Speaker 4: their freaking bunkers or trying to go to Mars or
• 40:36
  Speaker 4: whatever the hell they're doing. No, you're gonna get taken
• 40:38
  Speaker 4: out too, my friends, because in fact, you are more
• 40:41
  Speaker 4: likely to be taken out because if you get that
• 40:43
  Speaker 4: fucking parasite off. The host might survive, but if the
• 40:46
  Speaker 4: parasite kills the host, both die.
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: All right, let's let this is the last let me see,
• 40:51
  Speaker 2: is it the last one? Eight? Yeah, this is the
• 40:54
  Speaker 2: last sound of.
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: Advantage And that book is honestly fantastic and I will
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: be coming back to it in the future because when
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: it comes to friendships, relationships and everything around heteronormativity, very
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: important book, and we have to talk about theism elephant.
• 41:11
  Speaker 4: What this is, Like, this ability for men and women
• 41:14
  Speaker 4: to form partnerships and build is the biggest threat to
• 41:20
  Speaker 4: government spending? Like the full stop? Where do you think
• 41:25
  Speaker 4: we're coming from?
• 41:25
  Speaker 2: Yes, okay, yeah, that's what I've been saying.
• 41:28
  Speaker 3: Like, the biggest threat to status is a stable, secure
• 41:33
  Speaker 3: family that is self sustaining that doesn't need the government. Basically,
• 41:37
  Speaker 3: the more people need the government, the more necessary the
• 41:41
  Speaker 3: government is, the more people will promote it. Like why
• 41:44
  Speaker 3: is it the people who are you know, burning cars
• 41:48
  Speaker 3: and like destroying Los Angeles right now? They're not working
• 41:52
  Speaker 3: well because they don't have jobs, and so they're demanding
• 41:55
  Speaker 3: the government like the Ultimately they're all like socialist communist types.
• 41:59
  Speaker 3: And you know this because if you look at the
• 42:01
  Speaker 3: photos of the protests. Is not just Mexican flags. There
• 42:04
  Speaker 3: are Mexican flags, Palestine flags, there's now Iranian flags, there's
• 42:10
  Speaker 3: and there's straight up Soviet flags.
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: Why what are those countries all have in common? Nothing?
• 42:16
  Speaker 3: Well, then what is it about. Well, it's not about
• 42:18
  Speaker 3: any of those things. As I've said many times, the
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: thing is not about the thing. The thing is always
• 42:23
  Speaker 3: about the revolution. Everything else is the distraction. And those people,
• 42:26
  Speaker 3: they they you know, there was a video clip of
• 42:30
  Speaker 3: a black woman that was trying to go to work
• 42:32
  Speaker 3: or something and she was being she was asking the
• 42:34
  Speaker 3: protesters to like allow her space to move, and the
• 42:38
  Speaker 3: protesters refuse to do it, and she's like, I have
• 42:40
  Speaker 3: to go to my job and they were like a job,
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: Like it was so disgusting.
• 42:44
  Speaker 2: So because they don't have jobs, why would you?
• 42:47
  Speaker 3: And the thing is, if you do this over multiple generations,
• 42:50
  Speaker 3: where you create generations of people who are state dependent,
• 42:55
  Speaker 3: maybe a little bit more than the last generation, the
• 42:57
  Speaker 3: next one's a little bit more in the last one,
• 42:59
  Speaker 3: you're gonna to a point where there are more people
• 43:01
  Speaker 3: taking out than putting in. And that's where we're at now.
• 43:05
  Speaker 3: And that's why it's unsustainable and that's yeah, that's the
• 43:10
  Speaker 3: reason for all of this strife is you have a
• 43:12
  Speaker 3: bunch of people who are lazy fundamentally and just don't
• 43:16
  Speaker 3: want to build anything. They just feel they just had
• 43:19
  Speaker 3: their handout. They're just asking for stuff. And of course
• 43:22
  Speaker 3: the people who are going to get any kind of
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: recognition of that first are going to be women.
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: But anyway, let's play the rest of this.
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: Don't think it was never leading here, because just like
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: the masculinity crisis has helped to fuel fascism, women are
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: key for its uprising too, as it's talked about in
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: Naomi Clients Doppelganger. In fact, fascists and neo fascist movements
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: from Mussolini to Pinochet have recognized the powerful role played
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: by women, particularly when cast in their supposedly natural role
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: as mothers and protectors of nationalist traditions and healthy bloodlines.
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: For example, hair rewarded women deemed of good arian stock
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: who agreed to quit the workforce and become baby making machines.
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: And how many right wing pundits have we heard.
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: That Hitler said I'll give you guys tax breaks if
• 44:06
  Speaker 3: you have babies, and JD. Van says, we should have babies.
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: Therefore they're the same. Did you know that guys.
• 44:14
  Speaker 4: Say welfare policies are the same.
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: But no, but no, but but welfare policies are not
• 44:20
  Speaker 3: Hitler Allison. It's that simple. She decided that Hitler and JD.
• 44:25
  Speaker 3: Van's are the same because they have said similar things.
• 44:29
  Speaker 3: I also remember one time Hitler saying, you know, hello,
• 44:31
  Speaker 3: how was your day? And I said that once too,
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: So I guess I'm Hitler. We're you know, we are
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: never are we ever going to get out from the
• 44:40
  Speaker 3: shadow of World War two? Shit, Like we're still like
• 44:44
  Speaker 3: we just cannot escape that mythology of World War two
• 44:47
  Speaker 3: because of people like this, Like it's it's hilarious, Like
• 44:51
  Speaker 3: just can we just move on. I'm so tired of
• 44:54
  Speaker 3: being called a Nazi. It's boring, It's really boring.
• 44:57
  Speaker 4: Is this the final concode?
• 44:59
  Speaker 6: Yea?
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: That was that was the time, final time?
• 45:01
  Speaker 4: Okay, that actually said we're all Yeah. That actually segues
• 45:06
  Speaker 4: really well into the sneaky right wing pipelines for women,
• 45:11
  Speaker 4: and I think I'm going to mostly focus on the
• 45:13
  Speaker 4: two one was she She basically calls out two women,
• 45:18
  Speaker 4: mostly Candice Owens and Rachel o'barrow, I think is the
• 45:24
  Speaker 4: way you pronounce her name. So let's just let's just
• 45:27
  Speaker 4: start at the beginning, because I think, yeah, just started
• 45:30
  Speaker 4: the beginning.
• 45:30
  Speaker 2: Of this one.
• 45:32
  Speaker 4: Okay, thank you a thousand bucks. Thank you, completely unrelated
• 45:40
  Speaker 4: to the topic of this show.
• 45:42
  Speaker 2: Thank You, Thank You, come again.
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: It is I gotta ask you. Have we been doing
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: men's jobs long enough for them? Why are we still
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: stuck with.
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: These?
• 45:52
  Speaker 4: Weren't men's jobs. How did homesteading and women's jobs become
• 45:57
  Speaker 4: men's jobs? Like this, it was always women, like working
• 46:02
  Speaker 4: from the home was always coded women. And in fact,
• 46:06
  Speaker 4: like in the eighteenth hundreds, we've I mentioned this before,
• 46:09
  Speaker 4: women were celebrating being able to work in the home
• 46:14
  Speaker 4: as opposed to work outside the home because they saw
• 46:17
  Speaker 4: it as their place. I remember listening to Anne rand
• 46:21
  Speaker 4: On like what like a proto the view a while back.
• 46:25
  Speaker 4: It's like a a talk show basically for women, and
• 46:29
  Speaker 4: she talked about how women weren't as at the time,
• 46:33
  Speaker 4: weren't really picking up what feminism was throwing down because
• 46:36
  Speaker 4: they had their own thing. They had the home and
• 46:39
  Speaker 4: the end. Prior even during the Suffragettes, most women didn't
• 46:43
  Speaker 4: want the vote and they One of the reasons why
• 46:45
  Speaker 4: is because they felt they had the power of necessity
• 46:50
  Speaker 4: because they controlled the home. Now, what is the power
• 46:52
  Speaker 4: of necessity? The power of necessities controlling at the time,
• 46:57
  Speaker 4: controlling lighting, heating, pottable water, food during winter, clothing, and
• 47:04
  Speaker 4: all of this other stuff that women were responsible for,
• 47:07
  Speaker 4: because the home actually was a unit of sustenance for
• 47:11
  Speaker 4: the family, and the women were responsible for the economy
• 47:14
  Speaker 4: of that, and it was an very important thing, right,
• 47:19
  Speaker 4: And often the products of the home were a big
• 47:22
  Speaker 4: portion of the economy itself, the outside economy as well,
• 47:26
  Speaker 4: because you'd have cloth, Cloth was a big thing. Probably
• 47:29
  Speaker 4: you would have food that would last, so preserved food
• 47:33
  Speaker 4: stuff like that. These are the things that would be traded, right,
• 47:36
  Speaker 4: And this is the past, So this was always women's work.
• 47:41
  Speaker 4: And I actually think that two things. One actually speaks
• 47:44
  Speaker 4: sort of well of women in a way, in a
• 47:47
  Speaker 4: strange way. They used to have things that women did,
• 47:52
  Speaker 4: things that they produced with their own hands, ways of
• 47:56
  Speaker 4: improving their material circumstance through their own actions that were
• 48:00
  Speaker 4: unique to women. So for example, being a spinster, which
• 48:06
  Speaker 4: probably wasn't actually as much of an insult as we
• 48:09
  Speaker 4: think it was, but that was considered unique feminine skill,
• 48:15
  Speaker 4: a unique thing that the feminine manifested into the world,
• 48:19
  Speaker 4: like a way that women's actions created something that was
• 48:22
  Speaker 4: unique to them, and it was a big part of
• 48:23
  Speaker 4: women's identities to be able to spin. That's why you
• 48:26
  Speaker 4: have all a lot of the mythology or the folk
• 48:29
  Speaker 4: tales around spinning in the spinning wheel, because there's a
• 48:32
  Speaker 4: big part of women's identities. And it was also seen
• 48:34
  Speaker 4: as very powerful, which is why in a lot of
• 48:37
  Speaker 4: more I guess pagan cultures who controlled fate spinners, right,
• 48:45
  Speaker 4: So there was this mentality that this was a huge
• 48:47
  Speaker 4: and important power. And you can understand why because cloth
• 48:51
  Speaker 4: in the past it isn't now, was absolutely critical and
• 48:54
  Speaker 4: it wasn't just critical for protection, which is really important
• 48:58
  Speaker 4: for humans because we don't we know a lot of
• 49:01
  Speaker 4: the environments we went into were not naturally adapted to.
• 49:04
  Speaker 4: But cloth became critically important. It's like an outer shell.
• 49:08
  Speaker 4: But it also became our identities. So women were literally
• 49:11
  Speaker 4: constructing people's identities through their work, and this was something
• 49:15
  Speaker 4: that when we removed from women, I think they went
• 49:18
  Speaker 4: fucking nuts, Like I think that what we're seeing now
• 49:22
  Speaker 4: is insanity. And then there's another aspect to this, because
• 49:26
  Speaker 4: women's industry actually made their families more autonomous relative to
• 49:32
  Speaker 4: the government. Women who homesteaders, and this is something that
• 49:38
  Speaker 4: like a while back, this is a long time ago,
• 49:40
  Speaker 4: I was listening to a woman who homesteads and she
• 49:43
  Speaker 4: was talking about her lifestyle and why she pursues it,
• 49:46
  Speaker 4: and she said, one of the big reason is that
• 49:48
  Speaker 4: the more food that you make for your family with
• 49:51
  Speaker 4: your own your own labor like that you control, the
• 49:57
  Speaker 4: less anxiety you have in the modern world. So she
• 50:01
  Speaker 4: saw herself as being a source of a security for
• 50:07
  Speaker 4: her family because she was able to make food, which
• 50:12
  Speaker 4: you can live without a lot you cannot live without food.
• 50:15
  Speaker 4: So she was able to provide the basis of her family,
• 50:18
  Speaker 4: which allowed her family to meet more autonomous from these
• 50:22
  Speaker 4: gigantic corporate and government systems. And that's how she saw herself,
• 50:26
  Speaker 4: and probably throughout history, that was the role that women had.
• 50:30
  Speaker 4: They allowed their families to not, you know, to make
• 50:33
  Speaker 4: choices of whether or not they really wanted to invest
• 50:36
  Speaker 4: so much in the corporate government system. Now we're all
• 50:39
  Speaker 4: tied to it like it's a freaking like we're on
• 50:41
  Speaker 4: life support, right, because women abandon that role or don't
• 50:45
  Speaker 4: want to pursue it anymore to same degree, or don't
• 50:47
  Speaker 4: know how. It's a failure of imagination. Okay, so now
• 50:51
  Speaker 4: we're all stuck and stuck with this parasite sucking on
• 50:56
  Speaker 4: us because we absolutely like we don't know how to
• 51:00
  Speaker 4: get off the modern monetary system because women no longer
• 51:03
  Speaker 4: provide an alternative, which is what they did. No wonder,
• 51:06
  Speaker 4: the government, no wonder corporations went after women, And I
• 51:10
  Speaker 4: think maybe that's why everything blew up. Government spending blew up,
• 51:15
  Speaker 4: all this corporate consumerism blew up when women abandon that
• 51:19
  Speaker 4: role they wanted them to, because then everybody is going
• 51:23
  Speaker 4: to be reliant on the corporate government system instead of
• 51:27
  Speaker 4: having the autonomy afforded by women who control the household
• 51:32
  Speaker 4: and use it as a means of producing goods that
• 51:36
  Speaker 4: create the autonomy. Okay, so I think that was one
• 51:39
  Speaker 4: of the things that governments and corporations pursued, like Rockefeller
• 51:43
  Speaker 4: trying to get to get farm girls into the factories
• 51:46
  Speaker 4: and out of the farm like that was a huge initiative.
• 51:49
  Speaker 4: He think she did that because he's just such a
• 51:51
  Speaker 4: nice guy. No, it's because they wanted to smash women's
• 51:56
  Speaker 4: power in the home and it was a power and
• 52:01
  Speaker 4: now we don't have it anymore. Thank you Byrony Claire.
• 52:04
  Speaker 4: Enjoy your spot and the government teat.
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: Okay, I'm done, all right, So what's the time code?
• 52:13
  Speaker 4: Okay, so let me just try to why does this
• 52:15
  Speaker 4: keep going to this one? All right? It's because I
• 52:18
  Speaker 4: have this expanded, all right, So let me take a
• 52:21
  Speaker 4: look at this. I did my best to go through
• 52:23
  Speaker 4: all of this, but it is a lot of shit.
• 52:26
  Speaker 4: Go to twenty three to twenty three seconds in or
• 52:29
  Speaker 4: just maybe just keep.
• 52:30
  Speaker 2: Playing it twenty three seconds.
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: Oh, just keep playing it getting any better treatment or
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: benefits from it, in fact, actually advocating for less riots.
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: Brett Cooper wanted to be a Hollywood actress. However, she's
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: made far more fame and money by just being a
• 52:43
  Speaker 1: right wing influence. Such a shame that that conservative snow
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: White movie was never made. Oh wait a second, that
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: was actually just the marketing plot Candesigns used to be
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: a liberal making waves even in high school.
• 52:55
  Speaker 3: I mean it was even that little Tuler movie thing
• 52:59
  Speaker 3: was better than think they actually made with snow White.
• 53:02
  Speaker 2: Sorry, but uh yeah, she's just taking jabs.
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: At the Daily Wire I'm indifferent to that whatever Bret
• 53:10
  Speaker 3: Cooper left them, and she made her own platform. But
• 53:14
  Speaker 3: she's a little bit like to Zoomery for my taste.
• 53:17
  Speaker 3: So I don't really watch her. Okay, I meant not
• 53:21
  Speaker 3: that I have a problem with her. I don't think
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: she's fine, but just not just.
• 53:25
  Speaker 2: Not mi, just not me.
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: School. Well, she sued the Stanford, Connecticut school district for
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: racism and won thirty seven thousand dollars, and she went on.
• 53:35
  Speaker 4: What Okay, anybody she's talking about Candace owns and how
• 53:38
  Speaker 4: she sued for racism.
• 53:40
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's go when was that? What? Let me go back?
• 53:44
  Speaker 3: Yeah, racist threats twenty twenty Stanford threat's case filed by students,
• 53:50
  Speaker 3: settled for thirty seven and fifty.
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: So she started doing this in twenty sixteen.
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: All right, Well that was Candace from twenty sixteen is
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: very different from candis of today.
• 53:59
  Speaker 2: So that's all I'll say about that.
• 54:01
  Speaker 4: But also, you consider racism to be legitimate, honest, like
• 54:08
  Speaker 4: as a principle, why would you have a problem with
• 54:11
  Speaker 4: Candace Owen's addressing a legitimate wrong right even if her
• 54:18
  Speaker 4: politics changed? Like why, Like the thing is that she's
• 54:21
  Speaker 4: she's basically saying these tools should only be available to
• 54:25
  Speaker 4: people who believe as she does.
• 54:27
  Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
• 54:28
  Speaker 4: I mean it is possible that Candace owensued based on
• 54:31
  Speaker 4: something that actually happened, I don't know, or also it's
• 54:35
  Speaker 4: possible that she didn't and she regrets what she did.
• 54:41
  Speaker 2: All right, Uh thumb, just play more of this, Okay, Yeah.
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: Become a prominent right wing figure, fairly controversial even in
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: the right wing space, but she's been having like this
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: wonderful rebrand where she's kind of like this pop culture
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: lifestyle sort of person, and you know what, men are
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: appreciating her so much more, especially after she started talking
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: about Harvey Weinstein and taking his side.
• 55:02
  Speaker 7: Appreciating something well, okay, so again, Brianny Claire is claiming
• 55:09
  Speaker 7: the reason is because Candice Owens has come to our
• 55:14
  Speaker 7: side of the Harvey Weinstein conversation.
• 55:17
  Speaker 3: She has come around and said, oh wait, due process matters.
• 55:20
  Speaker 3: The evidence doesn't look good. It looks like he's beating
• 55:23
  Speaker 3: these cases, which by the way, I think Hannah sent
• 55:27
  Speaker 3: me a follow up and it looks like one of
• 55:29
  Speaker 3: another one of Harvey Weinstein's accusers that they there might
• 55:34
  Speaker 3: be a mistrial, they might throw it out because it
• 55:36
  Speaker 3: doesn't look like the evidence against him is very strong.
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: And that was all I said.
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: Now, Candace actually interviewed Harvey Weinstein herself and did a
• 55:45
  Speaker 3: lot of digging into the case, and I'm I'm glad
• 55:48
  Speaker 3: because at the end of the day, I just want
• 55:50
  Speaker 3: the truth to come out. And so Brianny Claire is saying, oh,
• 55:53
  Speaker 3: she's supporting a serial rapist, but no, she's looking at
• 55:58
  Speaker 3: the case. It's like Andrew Tate. She's looked at the
• 56:01
  Speaker 3: case found there isn't one and there might be some
• 56:04
  Speaker 3: abuse of the justice system against people unfairly. Harvey Weinstein
• 56:08
  Speaker 3: is the same anyway.
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: That's her problem politics.
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: And has made this shift, including doing things like hating
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: diversity and skims ads called me too a witch hunt
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: on men. And she's got a fitness that specifically targeting you.
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: Mothers got to snap back into that body to make
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: sure that he still values you, right, And.
• 56:27
  Speaker 3: Oh my god, Maybe it's so that women feel better
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: about themselves because canus has been pregnant a bunch of
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: times or a couple Yeah.
• 56:35
  Speaker 4: Like, why I thought that women did this stuff for
• 56:37
  Speaker 4: themselves unless they're conservative women, I suppose, Yeah, Okay, keep going.
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: The thing is that a lot of people on the
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: left really got on the canvas own train when she
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: started talking about Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively and all
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: of this culminates in her holding up a sign of
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: make him a sandwich. So inspirational. I know, Kadisha mentioned
• 56:56
  Speaker 1: in the video.
• 56:57
  Speaker 4: You know the Joe Justin Baldonian bid Blake Lively stuff.
• 57:01
  Speaker 2: Do you know about that?
• 57:03
  Speaker 7: No?
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: Do you know who Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively are?
• 57:06
  Speaker 3: No?
• 57:06
  Speaker 4: Tell me about it?
• 57:07
  Speaker 3: Just well okay, So, I mean it's kind of a
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: big old mess. But the Blake Lively Justin Baldoni situation
• 57:14
  Speaker 3: is sort of being compared to It's kind of like
• 57:17
  Speaker 3: an Amber heard Johnny Depp thing.
• 57:19
  Speaker 2: So Blake Lively is an actress.
• 57:22
  Speaker 3: I think she's the wife of Ryan Reynolds, who you
• 57:26
  Speaker 3: probably know. Ryan Reynolds is the famous guy known for
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: playing Deadpool in the in the Deadpool movies. And Blake
• 57:34
  Speaker 3: Lively was in a movie with Justin Baldoni. And by
• 57:36
  Speaker 3: the way, Justin Baldoni I remember years ago. He's an
• 57:40
  Speaker 3: actor to producer. He's not super famous. He hasn't blown
• 57:43
  Speaker 3: up really, but you know, he's been in the business
• 57:46
  Speaker 3: for a while. And Justin Baldoni was making a movie
• 57:50
  Speaker 3: I can't remember the name of it, it doesn't matter,
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: some rom com thing and he's he is playing opposite
• 57:57
  Speaker 3: Blake Lively, who is the female lead, I think, and
• 58:01
  Speaker 3: perhaps a love interest character. Again I don't know. I
• 58:03
  Speaker 3: don't know the movie, but there are some scenes they
• 58:06
  Speaker 3: do together that are kind of intimate, and Blake Lively
• 58:09
  Speaker 3: for whatever reason, I'm maybe just to create drama or
• 58:13
  Speaker 3: buzz for the tabloids, but she basically made claims that
• 58:17
  Speaker 3: he was doing inappropriate stuff with her, and Justin Baldoni,
• 58:20
  Speaker 3: being a really good male feminist, was like, you know,
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: did that thing where you you kind of apologize but
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: you don't really like take responsibility as kind of like,
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: you know, I don't think I did anything wrong, but
• 58:33
  Speaker 3: if she thinks I did something wrong, then maybe I
• 58:35
  Speaker 3: did do something wrong. And it was like a big
• 58:37
  Speaker 3: old thing and it kind of like hurt his job
• 58:40
  Speaker 3: prospects and everything. But it turned out that none of
• 58:43
  Speaker 3: that was true and that she was just doing that
• 58:45
  Speaker 3: for attention and because she wanted to feel And then
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: Ryan Reynolds got involved in it and created drama too,
• 58:50
  Speaker 3: because you know, he had a bug up his butt
• 58:53
  Speaker 3: about Justin Baldoni for whatever reason. And so it's a big,
• 58:56
  Speaker 3: old dramatic mess. And you know, Candice, I think she's
• 59:00
  Speaker 3: covering it partly because she's interested in sort of tearing
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: down the me too stuff, and she not a big
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: fan of feminism. I'm not saying that she doesn't have
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: her own feminist leadings. I know people in the chat
• 59:11
  Speaker 3: are gonna explode at me for even implying that she's
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: a perfect anti feminist, but never mind that. I'm saying
• 59:18
  Speaker 3: that she's been critical of the movement of me too.
• 59:21
  Speaker 3: And this is just like the way that she goes
• 59:23
  Speaker 3: about it is she talks about these pop culture things
• 59:27
  Speaker 3: because it's what she's interested in, and it's a way
• 59:29
  Speaker 3: of getting involved with that. So I don't remember the
• 59:32
  Speaker 3: whole story. I didn't really follow it super close. I
• 59:34
  Speaker 3: thought about covering it. I think I may have covered
• 59:36
  Speaker 3: a little bit of it on a news show once,
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: but it's not as it's very messy and there's a
• 59:41
  Speaker 3: lot of weird drama, you know, with it.
• 59:44
  Speaker 4: So well, thank you for responding to that, but it
• 59:47
  Speaker 4: sounds like we can move on.
• 59:50
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it doesn't matter.
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: Brian Rennie just wants to like try to discredit Candae essentially.
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 1: Be doing a deep dive into Candice ISNs. So I'm
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: gonna leave them space to do that, but that we
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: will be coming back to Candice in this video and
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: this Owe is like a mean girl.
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah she has to, she has to.
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: But over the past few years that conservative women are
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: not just the Marjorie Taylor Greens of the world. They're
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: not just Karen's who are shrill and yell for the
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: manager and feel all entitled and take its space. I mean,
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: no one wants to be like them. Oh no, a
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: rebrand has been happening, a glamorous one.
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, to all the exact same stuff. Exactly.
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 3: Who is the most managerial manager? If it isn't the state,
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 3: I mean, who's the biggest manager?
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 4: I want to speak to the state that's firing.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: Where's the states involved in pop culture and lifestyle? All
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: of these women are looking pretty. Whether you're a tradwife
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: or a crunchy mom, a fitness lover, a pop culture fiend,
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: a former lefty, a party girl, or you just want
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: to be a normal girl. Trust me, there's a conservative
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: clique just for you without realizing what's happening, you could
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: be on one of these pipelines to become one of
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: these cute servatives too. And yes, it is a real
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: term that people associate with, coined by Alex Klark, who, yes,
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: we sadly will be coming back to.
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 4: So I don't know who Alex Clark is, who is
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 4: no idea, no idea.
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 2: She took some pictures of Brett Cooper.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 3: Okay, you know what I'm I just want to say
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 3: sometimes I think these like feminist YouTubers. I think they're trying,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: like they think their videos are like resumes for the
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 3: astroturfed like NGOs to fund them. And I'll tell you
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: why I think this. You know Alex Cooper the host
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 3: of the Call Her Daddy podcast. So Alex Cooper no
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: idea where she came from, but out of nowhere she
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: had the biggest podcasts in the world that women watch
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 3: on Spotify and it's so massive. She had like, you know,
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 3: big stars on, like very big musicians. She had Kamala
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 3: Harris on well in a way, they constructed a studio
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 3: Similacrum over in Washington so that she could sit down
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 3: with Kamala Harris but she basically got all of the
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 3: biggest pop culture stars that towed the line in terms
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 3: of like the right opinions on her show. And I
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 3: think that a lot of the big like three letter
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 3: agencies that want to control culture, they see that podcasting
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 3: is the future of the way that you reach people,
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 3: especially women.
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 3: So what I saw to the other day, I was
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: just like turning on my Amazon firestick and there is
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 3: a show or of documentary or something on Hulu called
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 3: Call Her Alex, and it's about Alex Cooper, the host
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 3: of Call Her Daddy on Hulu. Okay, And I saw
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 3: that and it's just about her, and I'm like, but
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 3: she's just a podcaster. But then I realized, well, Hulu
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 3: is owned by Disney, which is like under like the
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 3: big umbrella, Like it's a mega corporation media conglomerate, and
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 3: they're pushing her as like the face.
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 2: Of podcasting for women. Allison. She came from nowhere.
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 3: She is not that interesting, she is not talented, but
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 3: she has the right size audience that she sends the
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 3: right message. She is the mouthpiece of feminism in the
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 3: modern day for women. This is why I was telling
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 3: you about this podcast way back when I first heard
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 3: about it, and it's all and it's not just it's
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 3: not political explicitly.
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: It's like, you know, talking to.
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 3: Celebrities about usually celebrity women almost always about things like
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 3: you know, their periods and all this girl stuff and like,
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 3: you know, at their what do they call it, when
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 3: you're in like an open relationship and you can like
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 3: you know, like go on a weekend escape with another guy,
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 3: like this kind of stuff that they promote on there.
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: You know, women like.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: Like finding themselves and the and the fucking the secret
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 3: and all that shit. It's all in there. It's all
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 3: aimed directly at women. And what I'm realizing is that
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 3: Alice Cooper is making millions and millions of dollars on this,
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 3: and there have been other feminists that have gotten paid
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 3: by NGOs like Planned Parenthood, the Biden administration, the Clinton administration,
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 3: whatever it is, so that they can go on podcasts
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 3: and debate against people like Brian Atlas or whatever, right,
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 3: but whatever podcast whatever, And I know that for sure
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 3: there's there. I've seen a couple of them even admit
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 3: in other podcasts that they I guess people thought nobody
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 3: would see or they're like Oh yeah, I'm getting like
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 3: money from this organization and that organization, and they're all
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 3: like these feminist organizations. So starting to think that Brianny
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 3: Claire sees that and she's trying to get that money.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 3: So she's making videos that just regurgitates the talking points,
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 3: you know, like here's all the stuff I have to say.
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 3: I'm gonna cite my sources. I'm gonna be adam. I mean,
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 3: she's got one hundred thousand subscribers, but she probably thinks
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: if I can get that government contract, because she's a statist.
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 2: So why wouldn't she want to work for the state.
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 3: Why wouldn't she promote the state with her show in
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 3: the hopes that the state will give her a job
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 3: where her job is to promote the state to everyone
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 3: who watches her show.
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 4: Wait a second, I think Byrony Claire has lost weight.
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 2: Well if she, if it was, it wasn't because of men.
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 4: No, no, of course not. But I just and maybe
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 4: she's trying to go for because you know what, Scooper
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 4: is not an unattractive woman.
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 2: Not an unattractive woman.
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, she looks like your typical California.
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 4: Yeah, but that's that would be considered to be tryal
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 4: and if Byrony Claire is going to hone.
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: In on those, she's gonna have to like, yeah.
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 4: Yeah, it's gonna have shaved down. So she won't lose
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 4: weight for a single man who will love her, but
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 4: she will lose weight for the government.
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: Mm hmm, Okay, I'm just I mean, look, no, I
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 3: don't have any evidence back up, but I do know
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: that if you are a successful feminist podcaster, you will
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 3: get the attention of government agencies NGOs whatever, who will
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 3: pay you like millions. Remember we just learned like the
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 3: other day last week that there was the Democrat Party.
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 3: And this is just in the United States. Think about
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 3: this stuff going on in all these other countries. Because
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: I believe Briarannyclair is either English or Australian, I can't
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: really tell. But they were spending twenty million dollars to
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 3: figure out how to get men on board with the
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: Democrat Party in me and they hired a you know,
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: queer latina of size to be a part of that.
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: So why wouldn't they be spending money in all kinds
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 3: of other places investing in people like this, and they
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 3: wouldn't like, what's a million dollars to the government. It's
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: a drop in the bucket.
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 4: So they can just write an another they can just
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 4: write out another debt. Just take out another debt in our.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 2: Name, that's what I'm guessing, in the name of men.
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 4: And then create another Byrony Claire podcast to ship on men,
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 4: so that men know that they owe everybody and keep working.
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 4: And that's probably why she really hates MiG Tao. The
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 4: worst thing that happens is quiet quitting. Yep, okay, the
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 4: quiet quitting of men, the quiet quitting tsunami of men
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 4: is the worst thing that could possibly happen to these women.
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 4: All right, so let's.
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 2: Say another another time. Code just keep going, all.
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: Right, But you know you're cute servatives because being pretty,
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: as Betty Draper taught us, it's the most important thing
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: for a woman to be. We all know what a
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: good mother she was. And it's important to note just
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: how much more sneaky these are than the manisphere. Even
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: though they kind of work in parallel and sometimes they
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: can overlap, they can lead you down another pipeline that
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: you can just push you down there further, and then
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: before you know it, you become the perfect Evin magazine reader,
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: a white, thin, fertile woman who lives, to say of
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 1: her manner, really wants to get back to God's country,
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: even if she's not religious all the time knowing.
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 4: I just want to comment on this, what kind of
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 4: woman just like sluices down this How like you're really
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 4: telling on yourself by Rony or your audience. Do you
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 4: not have deeply held principles or do you just sluice
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 4: down this pipeline and then just suddenly discover oh, I'm
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 4: far right, Like, I don't think that this is how
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 4: it's happens. But ultimately, what she's saying is that the
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 4: people that who she is or her audience are so
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 4: feckless and shallow that they can actually be influenced in
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 4: the way.
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 5: See what I'm saying, Like, the particulars of my values
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 5: have maybe changed since I was sixteen, but the fundamentals haven't,
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 5: Like fundamentally.
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 4: It's weird because I sort of took this from feminism.
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 4: Feminist said men and women should be equal, and I'm like, okay,
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 4: then I should be held to the same standard as men.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 4: I think I misunderstood that massively when I was in
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 4: my late teens, but it became sort of a foundation
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 4: of what I aimed for. So if men would be
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 4: expected to care about women in this circumstance, shouldn't I
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 4: have to care about men in this circumstance? You know
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 4: that kind of thing, And that hasn't really changed since
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 4: my early twenties, my late teens, in my early twenties.
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 4: And she's saying that fundamental parts of yourself can be rearranged,
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 4: fundamental parts of the women that are part of our
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 4: audience can be rearranged merely by seeing some the dazzled chickens.
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 4: I don't know, like, look at my chickens, my beautiful chickens,
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 4: and my chicken and everybody's a far right homesteader now
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 4: like that malleable? Like does anybody in our audience just
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 4: find this like slightly offensive? Of course not, because you
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 4: all see yourselves as victims, and victims are the most
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 4: malleable things on the planet.
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 2: Okay, all right, play more of this.
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that the patriarch of the house is the one
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: that you ultimately will be obeying, sorry, just following the
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: orders of sorry, just respecting, And not only will you
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: be doing that, but you'll be spreading the gospel to
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: other women as well. Actually, speaking of eating magazine, let's
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: start that, shall we. Conservatives will never win if they
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 1: imagine themselves as you talk to specimens.
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 4: I mean, ultimately, she's she's not saying you're gonna be free, ladies.
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 4: She's just saying, who's going to be your master instead
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 4: of a man who actually gives a crap about you,
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 4: about protecting and providing for you, presumably because that's the
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 4: way we've evolved. You are going to be a ward
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 4: of the state who you really trust the state to
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 4: have your best interest in mind, like I mean, obviously
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 4: Byrony Claire does. Because she's she's like Brian is saying,
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 4: she's probably positioning herself to get to get a good,
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 4: good fat vein on the taxpayer, get to get access
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 4: to a nice fat vein of government debt. But you know,
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 4: the rest of you, No, you're you're shit out to
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 4: live like you're just going to be subject to the government,
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 4: or you're gonna be subject to probably a man who's
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 4: telling you what to do in your corporate job. Like
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 4: you're not getting away from it. It's just that she
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 4: is selling the form of subjugation that, in the end
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 4: of the day, is probably gonna make her bank account fatter.
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: Okay, mm hmm, abuse at the mass media. We need
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: to involve ourselves in the creation of pop culture. That's
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 1: from Brittany Martinez, creator of Evy magazine, which I.
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: Think that you are no relation.
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: Or a cool this video which I did on that. Now,
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: one of the most important things to about all of
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: the women that you see in this space is they
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: are so often called brave for going against the grain
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 1: because they've been brave enough to break the mode of
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: what the nasty feminists like me is asking of them.
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 4: You are you fucking kidding me? Well, I don't know
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 4: how brave conservative women are for breaking the mold, because
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 4: they generally have they have a social sphere that they
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 4: can be part of. But if you do break the mold,
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 4: is a feminist against feminism. I have experienced what feminists
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 4: will do, destroy your careers, lie about you in the media,
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 4: get you kicked out of career of a place where
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 4: you access career opportunities. They'll do everything they can to
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 4: unperson you. So yeah, it does take a lot of bravery.
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 4: If I could be so bold as to say, so, okay.
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: Right, decision by coming on over to the right coming
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: on over to the good side. They've turned that on
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: the higher education they pursued, and that being celebrated for
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 1: not only wanting to maintain the status quo but actually backpedal, like,
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: we actually don't want all these.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 4: What the hell are you talking about? The status quo
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 4: is the government taking out more debt that the taxpayer
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 4: has to underwrite. That's the status quo. You are the
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 4: status quo. The status are the status quo. And I mean,
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 4: I could maybe get behind. Status are people who believe
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 4: in a government that has to spend within its means,
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 4: and probably that would be a monarchist situation, but does
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 4: not actually take out debt, does not get does not
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 4: spend the country into debt based on its pet projects
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 4: and based on a mythought or a a moral schema
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 4: that makes the government have moral authority over the people
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 4: it governs, which is really what feminism did. It created
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 4: a situation where the government has moral authority over the
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 4: people who have to have to underwrite it's spending. All right,
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 4: that's the status quo. I can.
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 2: Uh big change.
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 4: The big change is now corporations get to get in
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 4: on the act. I know we're running behind.
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, like, what do we what are we
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 2: going to do?
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 3: Like we got like less than five we got like
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 3: five minutes before the other show.
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I know. Okay, let me let me take a
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 4: look from here. Just keep going and all will take
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 4: a look. How far this goes?
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: Okay, I can jump ahead.
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 3: I put the transcript through Rock and ask it to
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 3: find me some clips so I can probably just see
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 3: what Rock suggested.
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 4: Well, the first the one is Candice Owen and the
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 4: second one is the Amanda Show, Make America Healthy Again
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 4: for thirty.
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 1: Eighth The Amanda Show. That's what that's from, Make America
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: Healthy Again. I have indeed covered the crunchy at White pipeline,
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: and you we'll definitely see a lot of overlaps with
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: that area. People who are most vulnerable to this pipeline
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: and want to be mothers, new mothers, and people who
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: are already mothers. And honestly, it makes perfect sense why
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: you would want to.
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 3: Want to be mothers new mothers and people who want
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 3: to be mothers. You mean, like you soul, like average women,
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 3: you mean like normal women.
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: Okay, make sure that your kid had the healthiest food,
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: had the best things in the world, like we always
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: hopefully on each generation after us have a better life
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: than we had, right, And it's no secret that women
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: are kind of like the backbone of the regular everyday
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: economy in the way that we do the grocery shopping,
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: we do the meal planning, and we know what is
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 1: going into our famili's mouths, you know, like that's how
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: we are meant to care for people, care for those
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 1: around us. So this is especially targeted at women because
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: it taps into the nurturing which we've been trained in
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: since our infancy.
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and ultimately what she's going to get at is
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 4: that women taking responsibility for this which which incidentally women
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 4: taking responsibility for their family's material needs is why we
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 4: had probably the autonomy in the past that we did
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 4: from government, why government was smaller because there was a ballast,
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 4: there was the home that the government didn't get into.
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 4: And that's that's where all of this these laws about
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 4: coviture and and they actually prevented government oversight over women.
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 4: People don't realize that, but women were basically anarchists in
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 4: the past. They had their space, no government oversight over it,
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 4: and they did their had their own economy, no government
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 4: oversight over it. All of this autonomy actually prevented everybody
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 4: from being too reliant on government. And of course the
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 4: status is like, goddamn women can't reclaim their autonomy. That
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 4: would mean we'd be less reliant on government.
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: Okay, someone's worth as a person being directly tied to
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: their quote health is not a new message. It's faked.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: So I went into fascism as well. You see this
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: through fascist messaging, and you see it on the right,
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: like Joe Rogan was one of the people that were
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: peddling this.
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 6: When it comes to health, being unhealthy is us then no,
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 6: being unhealthy, like wanting to be healthy is now bigotry,
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 6: Like she's saying, oh, people draw tying people's worth to
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 6: their health.
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 4: Look, lady, even if somebody was like Allison, you're worthless
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 4: if you're less healthy, I don't care because being unhealthy
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 4: impacts me on like an objective level.
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: What is this nonsense?
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but at least you're not a fascist though, so so.
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 4: The expectation that corporations and government not do things that
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 4: make people unhealthy is now you see how they take
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 4: the effects, like corporates and government collusion, they take the
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 4: effects of their own bullshit on people, and then they say,
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 4: if you call that out, you're engaging in an and
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 4: you're a bad person. They hide all of their bullshit
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 4: and plain sight just by saying you're a bad person.
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 4: They get women like Byrony to say, you don't like
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 4: the fact that the FDA allows meat producers to put
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 4: pink slop into your kid's food, Well, then you're just
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 4: a you're just a healthist, you're just a fascist. So
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 4: it's it's really funny because she's simultaneously with saying that
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 4: people are fascists if they want to be healthy, if
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 4: they call corporations and governments out for not encouraging health
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 4: or for lying about health, that these people are fascists.
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 4: She's also going to say that people should call corporations
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 4: not governments because she's a status and I don't know
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 4: if we can really make the distinction anymore. But these
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 4: authoritarian organizations out, people should come together to call them out. Well,
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 4: they're already doing it, Byrony, in these groups which you
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 4: call fascist, Like, okay, let's keep going. Just well, I
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 4: just want to finish this section and then we'll be done.
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: I am a giant Aaron Brockovich fan, a toxic town
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: at dark Waters, you name it. I am huge when
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: it comes to social justice and connective action, it's the
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: people who live in the area.
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 4: Is she's setting up the lands? Who's setting up be
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 4: like saying, oh, I'm so for social activism against corporations
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 4: and governments engaging in behaviors that harm the health of
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 4: the people. I'm so for that, because now she's going
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 4: to tell us all, why were a bunch of fascists
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 4: for calling out the government and corporations for not caring
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 4: about people's health. That's what's good. Okay, Let's keep going.
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: Who are most affected by the companies because they've got
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: less political sway and less power. So companies get away
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 1: with dumping waste there because nobody cares about them. Not
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: in the world that still believes meritocracy judgment goes to
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: the poor rather than the real culporate the corporations.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 4: Okay, she's against the merrortocracy. Judgment goes to the poor
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 4: rather than the real culporates of corporations. But you just
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 4: judged people for calling out corporations as fat Okay, let's
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 4: keep going.
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: Governments most of the time don't care. It takes a
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: lot of effort to get them to care. So there
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: is an element of truth to women being concerned about
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: the people that they love and especially their children, their
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: vulnerable children not being protected. We know that even in
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: a rich country like the USA, not everyone has access
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: to clean drinking water from their tach like in Flint, Michigan.
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: Companies have done a lot to be negligent or corrupt
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: governments or threatened and silence people in order to allow
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: them to keep their profits high. And so there's a
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 1: very valid and real concerns which do need to be addressed.
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: But instead of like that collective good being focused on,
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: you know, food dyes are being targeted, food deserts aren't
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: being addressed, which affect the poorest and most vulnerable people.
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: And it comes down to individuals being encouraged to atal
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: get it, grow the run food because it's responsibility.
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 4: Is because we cannot government like food deserts exist because
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 4: in ghetto areas, as a result of the complete destruction
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 4: of the social fabric, there are no businesses. There are
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 4: no grocers. Again, this is a knock on effect of
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 4: the destruction of the relationship between men and women, which
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 4: incidentally provides the social fabric upon which businesses can exist
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 4: and flourish. And if they are, that relationship's broken, you're
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 4: gonna have food deserts because nobody's gonna want to come
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 4: in and start. A business that is going to be vandalized,
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 4: is going to be burnt out, it's gonna be stolen
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 4: from to the point of being driven out of business. Okay,
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 4: that's the result of government policy. Okay, let's keep up.
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 4: And this is the payload right here. We're about to
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 4: get to the payload. Okay, her problem, Okay, go ahead.
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: Men have been used in this space, especially when it
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: comes to vaccinations United.
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 4: The payload was the idea that this is putting responsibility
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 4: on women. So women need to protect their families from
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 4: government and corporate overreach. Remember I talked about how women's
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 4: autonomy probably protected their families from government and corporate overreach
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 4: in the past. Or like a, yeah, that's where this is.
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 4: She doesn't like it, because what women need to be accountable.
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 4: Women need to be responsible, God forbid. Okay, yeah, just
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 4: She later goes on to say one and four Republicans
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 4: disagreed with the statement that parents have to duty to
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 4: vaccinate their children. And because of this disinformation, which ra
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 4: Afk junior and women are sadly sharing two with children
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 4: and one adults have lost their lives in the US
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 4: because of measles. Okay, right, And honestly, I would say
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 4: that the last five years has been people are now
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 4: more hesitant about jabberinos than ever before because of this. Yeah,
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 4: I wonder why, I wonder why. Right, So she is
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 4: okay with a corporation, a pharmaceutical company, and the government
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 4: coming together and forcing the consumption of that pharmaceutical product
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 4: even when it has not and then you cannot argue
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 4: this it has not gone through all of the proper testing. Right,
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 4: They're fine, he's she's fine with turning the whole frickin
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 4: everywhere US into labrats. But god forbid you actually hold
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 4: women accountable for the food that their families eat. And
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 4: then that's that's the thing. She is running cover for
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 4: the pharmaceutical industry. Here, she's not just running cover for
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 4: the pharmaceutical industry. She is literally running cover for the
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 4: pharmaceutical industry in collusion with the government forcing people to
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 4: take their products. Like, wrap your mind around this. This woman,
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 4: this isn't grassroots. This woman is pushing a narrative of
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 4: it's a control narrative by the government, by corporations over
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 4: all of US, and she doesn't even push back against it.
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 4: And she's saying, oh, well, we have to do this
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 4: because because the government knows best better than women. And
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 4: presumably the solution for her would be that that women
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 4: go and say to the corporation, well you should, you
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 4: should treat people better, get them healthier food, you know.
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 4: And honestly, I think that she mentions food deserts just
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 4: as a way to silence and frame as fascism. The
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 4: discussion that's starting to happen about the FDA and corporation
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 4: in the US is their responsibility not to feed Americans
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 4: things like pink slime. You know what pink slime is, right, Brian.
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 4: It's like basically like a meat slurry. So it's everything
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 4: that you can't really put into a beef cut, and
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 4: they just turn it into a slurry. They I think
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 4: they treat it with chlorine and then they feed it
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 4: to you. Probably animals would die on it, but humans
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 4: are unusually robust for animals, so we survive not very well.
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 4: We're sick, but you know, if you care about your health,
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 4: you're a fascist, all right. We could I could go on,
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 4: but it just goes on and on and on. Basically,
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 4: she's a mousepiece for authoritarianism, for submitting to the government
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 4: like she has this. Oh you before Christianity makes you
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 4: submit to your man who probably gives a crap about you.
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 4: And let's face it, the average man doesn't really like
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 4: what did what did these women think is gonna happen?
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 4: I mean, even as like a secularist, I look at this,
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 4: I'm not really offended. You know, submit to your man? Okay, Well,
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 4: my man isn't interested in telling me what to do
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 4: most of the day period he like there were go
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 4: there's probably years where he isn't interested in telling me
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 4: what to do. Like my father. I'll use an example
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 4: of my father never really told my mother what to do.
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 4: And they're not Christian except once once. Once he lost
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 4: his ever living shit and blew his top up at
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 4: my mother because she wasn't doing what he told her
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 4: to do.
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 2: Once.
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 4: You want to know what that was, you guys want
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 4: to know? All right, we were in technically a war
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 4: zone and we were being bombed every night, and there
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 4: was a lottery to get the families out of there.
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 4: We won the lottery where we were like in the
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 4: first ten and my mother did not want to leave
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 4: my father, and he absolutely blew a gasket. This is
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 4: a very laid back guy. He absolutely blew a gasket
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 4: and put his foot down and said, you are going.
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 4: There is absolutely no question right and we left. That's
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 4: probably the one time I've ever seen my father take
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 4: charge and say no, there is you are going. You
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 4: are leaving, and you are not arguing. And that is
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 4: probably about the only time throughout human history men would
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 4: take charge for the most part that their wives are
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 4: puttering around in the garden. They're puttering around buying and
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 4: selling land, they're puttering around weaving, and they're just sitting
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 4: there like, okay, I'm fine, I'm not gonna tell you
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 4: what to do in your day to day. And then
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 4: what you know, the huns starts going over the fricking
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 4: hill and they're like, no, lady, you're you have to
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 4: leave your wife, take the kids out, do not argue.
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 2: Leave.
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 4: And that's the one time that a man actually will
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 4: tell what his wife what to do, and she presents
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 4: that as some kind of evil. And yet how many
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 4: times of day does the government tell you what to do?
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 4: How many times a day, does the person you know
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 4: who writes out your check tell you what to do?
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 4: Think about that, Think about how ridiculous this human being is,
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 4: and think about the bullshit she's selling women. Like again,
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 4: women who are homemakers work half as much as everyone else,
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 4: and they work half as much in a context where
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 4: they probably the only time the person who is paying
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 4: their bills will tell them what to do is when
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 4: he's freaked out because the hun is going over the
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 4: mountains towards them right every other day, She's just gonna
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 4: be pottering and doing whatever she wants. What do these
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 4: feminists think men do? They just sit there and like,
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 4: you gotta fold it absolutely with a tea square. I'm
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 4: gonna bring out the t square, honey, and make sure
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 4: those tea towels are folded precisely. You think that, No,
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 4: men don't do that. Men have no interest in that.
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 4: As long as the wife isn't freaking being spared by
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 4: the hun, he's probably fine with whatever she's doing. But no,
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 4: we can't be happy with that. We cannot submit to
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 4: a man who's probably fine with ever. Whatever way you
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 4: want to deal with your time, as long as you're
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 4: not getting yourself killed. We have to submit to a
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 4: government who's gonna tell you whether or not you can
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 4: have chickens, how many chickens you can have, I wear,
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 4: your property lives are, how much taxes you have to pay,
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 4: whether that you can fart or leave your house or
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 4: why you have to wear, and how many feet we
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 4: can be from another human being who never We've gotta
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 4: submit to an entity's demands on destroying our autonomy, our
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 4: endless sen They write checks that we have to cash.
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 4: This woman is she, like I said, the only reason
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 4: she's doing this is because she wants a spot on
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 4: the government tit and she doesn't give a crap about
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 4: the lives of any other woman. I cannot fucking believe
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 4: women like this get so many women, so many fucking
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 4: women supporting them. All Right, Okay, Brian, I apologize that
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 4: was a long rant. Let's go, let's finish this off.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 4: I will take it all out. We are gonna go
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 4: to the next part of this and it's all my
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 4: fault that it went late. So but if you want
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 4: to comment on anything that has been said, feed the
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 4: Badger dot com slash just the tip, and if you
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 4: want to support the show, feed the Badger dot com
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 4: slash support Again, a big thank you to Richard for
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 4: helping us out. That's pretty much. I don't see anything else.
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 2: Guys.
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 4: You guys gotta send your super chows like. It's very
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 4: appreciated to hear from you. Okay, do you have any
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 4: super chats.
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 6: Or super No?
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 2: No, nothing, no Q THEU.
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm gonna cue the thing some of Like, if
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 3: you're watching this on the horizontal, that's gonna go away.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 3: But if you're watching in the vertical, like if you're
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 3: on your mobile phone, you see this, don't leave. We'll
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 3: be right back after this brief interrupt.
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 8: Name things that really do make you a better feminist
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 8: than everybody else. Vimega published number one.
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 2: Being a human.
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 8: You can be a very powerful ally to feminists even
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 8: if you are male, but you are never fully going
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 8: to get the female experience. Because women are the group
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 8: of humans who are oppressed under patriarchy as a class,
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 8: and men are the dominant group of humans in that system.
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 8: Women are the ones who must lead to the movements
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 8: towards their own liberation. Being a woman is central to
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 8: being a feminist because feminism is movement that is by
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 8: and for women. While men are also impacted negatively by patriarchy.
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 8: Wekalinity stocks too. In the end, it is men who
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 8: have always benefited from it.
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 2: And women who have suffered under it. That's the hands
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: of men.
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 8: The best way to support the feminist movement as a
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 8: man is to challenge other men male privilege