Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 092126 -Status, Sovereignty, and the Financial System: A Wide-Ranging Radio Ranch Conversation

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 092126 -Status, Sovereignty, and the Financial System: A Wide-Ranging Radio Ranch Conversation · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:27
  Unknown: This mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:30
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:32
  for support of the mitochondria like never before.
• 0:36
  A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial
• 0:39
  function is kind of like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:48
  That is snap,phat.com.
• 0:52
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International Terahertz frequency wand
• 0:57
  through iterraplanet.com.
• 1:00
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 1:30
  Blasting the voice of freedom worldwide,
• 1:32
  you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 1:36
  Unknown: Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.
• 2:14
  Unknown: Well, there you go.
• 2:16
  Alvin Lee kicks us off again with those prophetic lyrics, and it's another
• 2:21
  rendition.
• 2:22
  I don't know about that word these days, Chris. It's another rendition
• 2:26
  of the Radio Ranch. Roger Sale's your host, People's Patriot Network, our platform.
• 2:31
  It is,
• 2:32
  ah, it's
• 2:34
  04/16/2019,
• 2:36
  Chris, it's the day after.
• 2:40
  It's the day after. Yes, it is. The holy day of April. The Ides
• 2:44
  of April, they're dangerous. I've always wondered, I think I read somewhere years ago, and I've tried to recall it a few times,
• 2:53
  why
• 2:54
  we use that particular date for this bloodletting.
• 2:59
  I know there's got to be something symbolic in it, maybe somebody out there in the audience knows can give us a clue, but there's a reason that they do that on that day. We know, of course, that the vehicle
• 3:11
  that's used, the document
• 3:13
  that is used, is called a statute staple
• 3:16
  contract.
• 3:17
  Now it's not really known by that label, but that is technically
• 3:22
  and legally what it is. You could even redefine
• 3:25
  that down another step further and say it's a Jewish Shetar.
• 3:30
  That's the day that people filled
• 3:34
  out their little Shetar
• 3:36
  yesterday,
• 3:37
  if not before, the majority, probably most of our folks didn't, God bless you.
• 3:43
  But you went and filled out that Shetar
• 3:45
  and you know, Chris, if you send those things in unsigned,
• 3:49
  I don't care if you put down that you owed them 10 gazillion dollars and sent that thing in unsigned,
• 3:56
  they will send it back to you and there will be no
• 3:59
  debt incurred because you did not sign it under penalty of perjury and that is the most important thing. There's two important things about a shetar,
• 4:11
  okay,
• 4:12
  about a statute staple contract, about a ten forty form,
• 4:15
  and the reason that contract
• 4:18
  takes that form, and it's in the UCC,
• 4:21
  it's under specialty contracts,
• 4:23
  I believe,
• 4:24
  if you want to try and trudge through the UCC,
• 4:27
  which is quite an ordeal,
• 4:29
  and you'll find it over, I believe, if I remember John's lectures correctly, in the specialty
• 4:35
  section
• 4:36
  where you'll find confirmatory
• 4:37
  writings too,
• 4:39
  Chris,
• 4:41
  and the
• 4:42
  Jewish Shetar, or the statute staple contract,
• 4:46
  or the specialty contract as they refer to it, has to have two elements.
• 4:52
  We've talked about this before. I've tried to school all on this a little bit, and I'm gonna see how good
• 4:58
  a student you were in those lessons. Chris, do you remember what those elements are that make it effectively a Jewish Shet'ar?
• 5:07
  Well, I think there has to be let's see here. Notice and opportunity to respond. No. Has nothing to do with due process. This is not due process. This is a contract.
• 5:20
  Unknown: And it must have full disclosure
• 5:23
  and agreement
• 5:26
  Unknown: Okay, these are the two key things that that contract has to have to fit into that category.
• 5:31
  It has to be signed under seal.
• 5:35
  That's why if you don't sign it, they'll send it back to you because it's not effective contract,
• 5:40
  and the
• 5:41
  shatar has to include a recognizance.
• 5:47
  A
• 5:49
  what? What did he say?
• 5:52
  Unknown: That means a confirmatory
• 5:54
  acknowledgement.
• 5:55
  Unknown: It
• 5:56
  acknowledges and records, of course, recognizance.
• 5:59
  Do
• 6:00
  a lot of stuff with words here around this
• 6:03
  little gathering of folks,
• 6:06
  and recognizance,
• 6:07
  obviously the base word, is recognize.
• 6:11
  Yeah. And so
• 6:13
  it recognizes
• 6:14
  another body of law.
• 6:17
  It's got some stipulation in there that refers to another
• 6:22
  body of law. In this particular instance of the one that people filed yesterday,
• 6:28
  the recognizance
• 6:29
  is Chris?
• 6:32
  Unknown: Under penalty of perjury. No, that's the jurat. The recognizance is different.
• 6:38
  Unknown: When it's recognizing something, what do you think that that ten forty form that is a statute staple contract that is in reality a Jewish Shetar,
• 6:46
  what do you think it recognizes? Probably
• 6:50
  Unknown: the obligation to pay and the political status of the payee or the taxpayer. How about to abide by all the rules and regulations in title 26 CFR?
• 7:02
  Ah, which is not law but code.
• 7:04
  Unknown: No. It's policy.
• 7:06
  It's not code. Code is in The United States code. The federal regulations
• 7:12
  are public policy.
• 7:15
  Unknown: They're
• 7:16
  Unknown: actually private policies posed as public. Correct, well no, because the public that they're policying for are all the damn slaves.
• 7:27
  They can't write those regulations,
• 7:30
  that's why none of them apply
• 7:32
  except eight seventy one and eight seventy seven to U. S. Nationals,
• 7:37
  only to, as it says in 1.1-1A,
• 7:41
  an income tax is owed by all citizens of The United States and residents.
• 7:46
  First sentence:
• 7:47
  And to the exception of 871B
• 7:50
  and 877B,
• 7:53
  those two uniquely
• 7:55
  all non resident individuals,
• 7:58
  all non resident alien individuals.
• 8:02
  There's your two categories,
• 8:04
  there's your free, and there's your bond. You know what I try to do with you guys so
• 8:09
  much is to try and take this complicated stuff welcome Shane
• 8:14
  complicated
• 8:15
  stuff and it's very complicated
• 8:17
  and reduce it down to something that's easy to understand,
• 8:22
  okay? And this is the absolute rubber meets the road statement right here.
• 8:27
  You're either free or you're bond.
• 8:31
  Unknown: And that is free stated and the Immigration and Naturalization
• 8:36
  Unknown: Act Oh, we're gonna get to that in a second. We're gonna get to that heavy in a second. Just hold on to that. Okay. Well, there's only two options there. It's a and b. Well your bond. That's what I'm saying. When you send them an affidavit,
• 8:48
  tell them what you're not because somebody is difficult to contest a negative,
• 8:53
  tell them what you're not,
• 8:55
  and and send it to them. They and say, it doesn't matter. Let them figure out what you are. Hell, there's only one other option.
• 9:04
  That's right. That's the B option. Okay. Capital B option. And CR people, oh man, we by look, I found out about this. It had let my lost sleep about it. For years, I've been reading. I've been studying. I followed every guru that's come to town and everyone I could find on the internet.
• 9:23
  Okay?
• 9:25
  Alright. Well, it all boils down to this. You don't have to be any kind of a guru to understand you're either free or you're bond.
• 9:35
  Unknown: Let me,
• 9:37
  reflect back to the beginning of your conversation and pose a potentiality answer to your question of the significance
• 9:44
  of this yesterday,
• 9:45
  the particular day, the ides of April as it were. And that would be for those who pay attention to this esoterica
• 9:52
  geometria
• 9:54
  or numerology
• 9:55
  or magic numbers
• 9:57
  that the five and one of the 15 combined to equal the six, the VI.
• 10:03
  And
• 10:04
  Roman numerals as it were. And that could have some geometric,
• 10:09
  t r I c k,
• 10:11
  influence on that selection of that particular day, I would observe.
• 10:16
  Unknown: Well, you know,
• 10:19
  maybe
• 10:20
  I won't even go there. I had a thought I'd like to drop out. I won't even drop it out on this show.
• 10:26
  So, He was first. Yeah. But back to back to our lesson here. Okay, so class,
• 10:33
  what's the two things that make a specialty contract a Jewish shetar?
• 10:38
  It's signed
• 10:40
  under penalty of perjury
• 10:42
  and it has a recognizance.
• 10:44
  Now the other example that I like to use in trying to get this across to folks is, because virtually everybody's done this,
• 10:53
  probably everybody signed a ten forty form, but you didn't know what you were doing, okay? But virtually everybody in this audience is listening to me today has gone into a car dealership,
• 11:03
  either used or new, and picked out a vehicle and signed a promissory note.
• 11:09
  Would you say that that's probably a true statement?
• 11:13
  Unknown: Think that's very relevant material, yes sir, and accurate. Okay, so when you sign that promissory
• 11:19
  Unknown: statement there
• 11:22
  and you sign it, you don't have to sign it under penalty of perjury, but you sign it, right? We've got to sign it to make it active because you're volunteering to pay this payment for this extended length of time, but
• 11:33
  promissory in
• 11:35
  note, it's got a recognizance,
• 11:39
  and the recognizance
• 11:40
  is that it relates to the statutes of your state that are written in there by the legislature
• 11:46
  on debts and when they're overdue and how much time you've got to pay that payment every month to defeat the remedy.
• 11:55
  You see, the remedy is always out there. They can come grab it at any time, okay, and every month when you pay that payment within that time range, you defeat the remedy. You defeat the remedy. You defeat the remedy until it's extinguished.
• 12:12
  Unknown: That's very intriguing, Roger. You know, that brings up a point to
• 12:16
  hyper accentuate
• 12:18
  our Friday host with the most, mister Bren Allen Winters, who is discussing the law of promises
• 12:25
  Yes. Contracts as it
• 12:27
  Unknown: at this very moment on his Saturday show, I think it is. He's doing it right now. And, you know, we don't cross promote even on our own platform enough. I'm going to try and get Paul, who should be with us tomorrow,
• 12:40
  to see if he can get Dennis Fletcher on over here. I'd like for y'all to hear Dennis and meet him and know that his show is available on Saturday mornings.
• 12:49
  They're on the network and it's a very good program. It's not as detailed, drilled down, and they don't do the stuff we do,
• 12:56
  but it's a fine program. He's been doing it for ten years, okay, and he's got pretty good worldwide audience and more people joining all the time. Listen. People are joining our ranks, buddy. I was watching, Chris. What does this show?
• 13:13
  I wanna say eye on the prize or something like that. I'm not sure who does. I've only heard it a couple of times, but it it originates
• 13:21
  at Revolution Radio,
• 13:23
  and, Paul has a relationship with him, and we
• 13:28
  you know, we kind of what
• 13:31
  do you do there? You don't directly mix but you just kind of get a little on the periphery. So, I get information from him about I'm
• 13:39
  sure that he gets information
• 13:40
  about me and what we do but they need to know more because Paul and I promoted it on Friday at the start of the show. I don't know if anybody else had a chance to listen but Paul co hosted
• 13:52
  Dennis' show this past weekend
• 13:54
  and I told cross
• 13:57
  promote or rebroadcast?
• 13:59
  Well, you Or simulcast. Well, of
• 14:02
  course, simulcasting is the same thing on multi channels
• 14:06
  and
• 14:07
  but he was just filling in for him. I don't know what happened. Dennis had to do something. He lives very interesting that I'd like to talk with him about and why and the reality of it. He lives in Riyadh.
• 14:22
  Saudi Arabia. Yes. And and so anyway, we'll get that done one of these days but Paul was on the show, hosted his show over the weekend and I told Paul I might call in and I listened to the first part because he's mainly talking about and Paul had a whole bunch of technical problems
• 14:39
  which he never does. He's always having to deal with with me doing it, you know, or other people and so it was funny to hear him do Yeah, a
• 14:47
  he got through it pretty well. I'll I'll rib him about it a little bit tomorrow
• 14:51
  but regardless, I got in there in the last thirty minutes and he had some of his other Eurofocus
• 14:57
  on there.
• 14:58
  Graham,
• 14:59
  Graham something and that Hitchcock guy that wrote a senate the
• 15:03
  synagogue of Satan?
• 15:06
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. You got Graham Hancock, and I think the I should be able to tell you the Hitchcock's name. I I know it very well, but it's just escaping me right now. Right. Well, anyway, we know who we're talking about. So they were on there.
• 15:19
  Unknown: At least Graham was, and I laid out our stuff. You know, you can't lay out my stuff real quickly, generally, but I gave them a good synopsis. There's another woman on there that does World War II YouTube channel stuff,
• 15:32
  and
• 15:33
  they were pretty impressed, I think, and they said, Gosh, we need to get you on the show, and I said, I'd love to get you on our program, and we'll see if we can work on that too.
• 15:41
  But
• 15:42
  this cross promoting each other is very fertile ground because there's so many people coming in my mind to to to different areas.
• 15:51
  The the unplanned movie which by the way when we went to look at it had been pulled yesterday.
• 15:56
  John got a hold of me and I went back and checked mine and they pulled it. So, after promoting it yesterday, they pulled it already.
• 16:04
  I'm not saying that's because of me. I'm just saying, you know, that somebody snuck it in there, and they found it finally.
• 16:11
  Unknown: But I could've watched it over sort of classic fight.
• 16:14
  Unknown: You know, I could've watched it.
• 16:17
  Over
• 16:18
  the weekend, guys, but, honestly, that make
• 16:22
  That that subject just just turns my stomach like no other.
• 16:30
  Unknown: Absolutely, it is appalling.
• 16:32
  It is an abomination.
• 16:33
  It is a thing to deny the Creator. It
• 16:37
  Unknown: is such an opposite
• 16:39
  thought and action from anything that's basically human.
• 16:44
  Okay? I mean, really. Murderer and eating bait? Not a good thing. Murderer Incorporated. Jeez, what a bunch of freaking animals run this place. Well,
• 16:53
  you know, the good news is that they're being exposed. I was looking at some videos this morning, Chris, and I stumbled on one that is basically it looks like from what I've gotten into it so far reading
• 17:05
  Henry Ford's The International Jew. It's a forty five minute video. I'm not very far into it,
• 17:13
  but what caught my eye is I went down and scrolled through the comments, and they haven't disabled the comments on this video,
• 17:21
  and man, it's
• 17:23
  just
• 17:24
  tens,
• 17:25
  twenties, thirty, forty of them, and they basically all say the same thing in one way or another. So
• 17:32
  to take from what I'm seeing and what other people have commented on of the Great Awakening
• 17:38
  is when people awaken,
• 17:40
  they gyrate to some area of interest, wouldn't you think?
• 17:44
  Oh gosh, this is happening. It's either political
• 17:47
  or because of yesterday and the tax thing or because of the unplanned movie that they went in and saw that got a mask and big questions and question and everything that brought them up to their present reality. All any of those things. That's just three. Lord knows that immigration is another one.
• 18:04
  The the on the streets out there where you live.
• 18:09
  Shane, what what did I read the other day? The city of San Francisco in one month had 16,000
• 18:16
  calls to come get fecal matter off the sidewalks.
• 18:20
  Sixteen, zero in thirty days?
• 18:24
  Unknown: Wow.
• 18:25
  It's a lot of poop.
• 18:28
  Unknown: So anyway, no matter where what one of those influences
• 18:32
  wakes you up
• 18:34
  because there's a point in the line when we all agree that you wake up. All of a sudden, you kind of maybe had some intuition and you may have thought some but all of a sudden, something happens and boom, you wake up, okay? That's when the process begins.
• 18:51
  And there's a lot of people waking up and they go to gyrate to whatever area interest may have spawned that or that they had,
• 18:59
  and so what you
• 19:01
  got to do is tie all that together. It all comes from the same source they don't know that yet,
• 19:06
  okay? And so this cross promotion
• 19:09
  and getting the people that are that somehow somebody of theirs told them about Dennis or somebody heard Graham and so so you need to listen to this guy on Euro Folk Radio or whatever the
• 19:19
  initiation of that was, the more we can promote,
• 19:23
  the more we can fertilize all those areas.
• 19:28
  They may not What be
• 19:30
  Shane? I'm sorry.
• 19:33
  Unknown: Yeah. Let's promote
• 19:35
  Unknown: people's station network. Well, I try, man. You know, let me tell you what the limitations are, Sean. I'm almost 71 years old.
• 19:44
  Been doing this I've been doing this for thirty years.
• 19:48
  Okay?
• 19:48
  And I'm tired. Right. Alright. I'm tired. I don't I love teaching. I've been able to synthesize this down to its absolute basics, I believe, where they can be gotten across easily, but I just don't have the time, energy, or initiative
• 20:02
  to sit there and do all the promotion. I used to do it but I couldn't get any reaction.
• 20:07
  Hell, I've sent this information to everybody you see from from from David X twenty two to Gerald Celente
• 20:15
  to to to Bill Holter to Jim Willie. How many more? And
• 20:20
  the hell I was on Joyce Riley's show with it three times and she never understood it.
• 20:26
  Unknown: Never. I I do it on comments. I do it in comments.
• 20:30
  Unknown: Okay, so I I but but the key to all this is getting it getting it simplified because
• 20:37
  you can't do this in sound bites from the greater information.
• 20:41
  You've got to synthesize it down to general concepts that can be gotten across easily.
• 20:47
  Okay? And then because the other problem you face in getting that out is that the
• 20:53
  percentage of people that are receptive is so small.
• 20:59
  All were called, but few were chosen. Well, I know one thing after doing this as long as I've done it that everybody's not supposed to know this stuff.
• 21:08
  Unknown: Okay? True.
• 21:09
  Unknown: It's just everybody's
• 21:11
  not supposed to know it. A whole bunch of people are supposed to be dumbasses
• 21:14
  like they appear to be out there and they're gonna, I guess, continue to be that way and I'm sorry for em. I guess I pray for em. I've tried to help em every time I can for all these years, and I've gotten rejected almost soundly every time. So what I do is we've got this platform. We've carved out a niche audience,
• 21:33
  and I work with you guys.
• 21:37
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 21:38
  We call them useless eaters.
• 21:40
  Unknown: Well, I don't wanna call them that. I'm I feel sorry for them, but for whatever reason, the the truth is not in them or at least they have no desire to get out and do what it takes to be able to get it and understand it and then
• 21:55
  impute it, input it, and live by it and exemplify it when you do that because when you do that, you exemplify the truth, see?
• 22:04
  Then, people see and you got all this nice stuff going on in your life and your life seems to pretty well in general sense straighten out and now all of a sudden people want what you got.
• 22:15
  Now the horse is out of the barn.
• 22:21
  Okay.
• 22:22
  Chris,
• 22:23
  you sent me a real nice Email yesterday.
• 22:28
  It was very timely.
• 22:30
  I did? Yes, you did. That was very timely because it I was dealing with a new guy. We may have him call in here today. I'm probably going to have him on the show one day because he's one of these guys that he's just stumbled into this and all of a sudden, he wants all the answers.
• 22:48
  What happened with your lien when they stole your money? What about this? What about that? I said, Learn the information. He writes me another question. I said, Learn the information.
• 22:56
  Get your book, read it,
• 22:59
  ruminate on it for a little bit. First of all, most of your questions are going to be answered in that.
• 23:04
  Secondly,
• 23:05
  I'm
• 23:06
  not going to sit here and go into a twenty or thirty minute story on something that
• 23:11
  you'll get to it, okay? One bite at a time, I appreciate, however.
• 23:16
  I really appreciate his enthusiasm,
• 23:19
  okay?
• 23:20
  And so I told him, he said, Can I call you? And I said, Well,
• 23:25
  I'll do that,
• 23:26
  but what I've tried to do
• 23:28
  over these, especially the last probably six years,
• 23:32
  is
• 23:34
  everybody wants to do this private. They don't want to do it public, they want to do it private, okay,
• 23:40
  and because they're scared, they don't want somebody to know who they are, the fear bugs got them a whole of them real good, whatever.
• 23:47
  And so to try and
• 23:49
  salvage some of my personal time from trying to do that with each and every one of you individually,
• 23:55
  I said, listen, I'll do it for free on the air
• 23:59
  so everybody can learn.
• 24:02
  And the people, the old timers, the Darrells, and the Shanes,
• 24:06
  and the other folks that are out there that have been longtime listeners, the Benz, because I know Benz out there every day, okay? They can't hear it enough,
• 24:16
  so we help reinforce
• 24:18
  their bass lessons.
• 24:20
  They can help maybe with any questions,
• 24:23
  and everybody
• 24:24
  benefits.
• 24:25
  It's not just me using up my
• 24:28
  precious personal time of sitting here one on one. So I said, Okay, what we'll do is this:
• 24:34
  If you want to do a private thing, I'll do that with you, but I'm going to charge you. I originally said $100 an hour, I think I've raised it since to $150
• 24:43
  an hour to try and deter people from doing it.
• 24:47
  Unknown: Still cheap.
• 24:48
  Unknown: And so, cheap as shit. I guarantee you, go get a lawyer, you find a lawyer that knows what's going on and see how much he charges you an hour. Okay?
• 24:57
  And I guarantee you most of them don't know what we talk about here.
• 25:02
  Okay, but if you want to get and I think I wrote him back, he said, That's a great idea, I'd love to come on the show how to get on, and we didn't set up a day. I told him Tuesday and Thursdays were the best days for that type of discussion. So, we'll see if he calls in. Anyway, a new student. So, obviously,
• 25:18
  I'm I'm I'm thrilled and somebody that's got a lot of questions and desire to know and you know, that they're real motivated,
• 25:25
  you know, and so he asked me a question. He makes a statement in one of his emails. He said, well, I think I'll write the Secretary of State or call him and ask him about the two types of citizenships.
• 25:42
  And I again, the first thing I wrote back was I said, learn the material so you'll understand what the hell they're telling you.
• 25:54
  So, anyway, Chris,
• 25:56
  about that time,
• 25:58
  Chris sends me this Email yesterday.
• 26:02
  Now, Chris, is that clue you in?
• 26:06
  Gonna tell you where
• 26:08
  you can go get it.
• 26:10
  It's www.state,
• 26:18
  state.gov,
• 26:23
  gov,www.that
• 26:27
  Unknown: is the official passport division website.
• 26:30
  Unknown: Don't let the cat out of the bag yet here. Travel.state.gov,
• 26:37
  US Department of State, and the underlying
• 26:40
  title is Certificate
• 26:42
  of Non
• 26:44
  Citizen
• 26:45
  Nationality.
• 26:46
  Now Chris,
• 26:47
  I'm going to publicly say this, I stand corrected.
• 26:51
  I've said, in my knowledge, the only time I'd seen that exact language was on the oath in the passport application.
• 26:58
  Now I see it on their website.
• 27:00
  So they use it in real selected areas.
• 27:04
  Unknown: Non And in the Immigration
• 27:06
  Unknown: Non
• 27:08
  citizen
• 27:09
  nationality certificate.
• 27:11
  So I'm going to read this because it's not too long. The Department of State occasionally so this is so he says he's going to write them and ask them about the two citizenships,
• 27:20
  so I just forwarded this to him, Chris.
• 27:23
  I said, Here, this ought to answer your questions.
• 27:28
  The Department of State occasionally receives requests, do they really, for certificates of non citizen national status
• 27:36
  pursuant
• 27:37
  to section three forty one
• 27:40
  of the Immigration Naturalization
• 27:42
  Act, INA eight USC
• 27:45
  fourteen fifty two. Chris likes to quote all these statutes and stuff, I don't, but I'm quoting it out of their letter.
• 27:53
  At the time of the certificate,
• 27:56
  as the
• 27:59
  title,
• 28:03
  I guess I can't read this morning, as the title of the certificate indicates,
• 28:09
  only,
• 28:10
  only,
• 28:11
  a person who is a non citizen US national,
• 28:16
  I. E. A US national but not a US citizen,
• 28:21
  close parentheses,
• 28:23
  may apply for such a certificate.
• 28:25
  So if you ain't one of them, no
• 28:28
  need to apply.
• 28:30
  You know, it's like in the old days, Chris, back there on the East Coast, it'd say Irish don't apply.
• 28:40
  As
• 28:40
  defined
• 28:42
  by the INA,
• 28:44
  that's the Immigration Naturalization Act,
• 28:47
  all US citizens
• 28:49
  Now get
• 28:50
  this tricky stuff here
• 28:52
  All
• 28:53
  US citizens
• 28:55
  are US nationals.
• 28:59
  All
• 29:00
  US citizens
• 29:02
  are US nationals,
• 29:06
  Unknown: but
• 29:08
  Unknown: Shane,
• 29:09
  only a relatively
• 29:11
  small number of persons
• 29:13
  acquire US nationality
• 29:16
  without
• 29:17
  becoming US citizens.
• 29:19
  So what did they just tell us? It's at the base of everybody's
• 29:23
  status.
• 29:26
  Isn't that what that said, Chris?
• 29:29
  Unknown: Says you gotta be special because very few people know about this. Let's
• 29:34
  Unknown: look at the first part of it.
• 29:37
  Okay, and I've never had these thoughts before, quite honestly.
• 29:42
  All
• 29:43
  US
• 29:44
  citizens
• 29:45
  are US
• 29:46
  nationals,
• 29:47
  but only a relatively
• 29:49
  small number of persons
• 29:52
  acquire
• 29:53
  US nationality
• 29:54
  without becoming
• 29:56
  US citizens.
• 29:57
  Look at the first part. All US citizens are US nationals,
• 30:01
  so this status
• 30:03
  underlies
• 30:04
  everybody's.
• 30:05
  Who is everybody?
• 30:06
  All persons born are naturalized.
• 30:10
  Is that pretty much everybody right there? All
• 30:15
  persons born are naturalized?
• 30:18
  Generally. Okay, well then that applies to both U. S. Citizens and U. S. Nationals according to what they said right here.
• 30:26
  Unknown: It's post facto, I think, is the language.
• 30:29
  Unknown: So you've got a cloak over your real nationality
• 30:33
  no matter what status you are,
• 30:36
  how you got there, all persons born or natural. Yeah,
• 30:42
  it's a dark cloud. No, that's the shackles.
• 30:45
  These are the shackles that are on you euphemistically,
• 30:49
  legally placed there by fraud.
• 30:53
  Unknown: Yeah, a panopticon,
• 30:55
  an invisible wireless,
• 30:57
  Unknown: barless prism. Okay, so that's a really important sentence. All
• 31:02
  citizens are US nationals.
• 31:04
  That's one of those things that you know,
• 31:06
  like for me personally,
• 31:08
  I know that, but to see them state it like that
• 31:13
  really puts
• 31:15
  the shine on it,
• 31:18
  If you know what I mean. Is the
• 31:20
  Unknown: first selection under the
• 31:23
  title eight USC 11 o one parenthetical small a parenthetical 22
• 31:28
  parenthetical
• 31:29
  capital a,
• 31:31
  Unknown: not to be confused with capital b. Oh, heavens forbid. Let's not do that.
• 31:36
  So all US citizens let's try and find my place again here. All you all US citizens are US nationals. Only a relatively small number of persons acquire
• 31:46
  U. S.
• 31:48
  Nationality
• 31:49
  without becoming
• 31:51
  U. S. Citizens.
• 31:53
  Interesting.
• 31:54
  Section 101
• 31:55
  A. 21 of the INA
• 31:57
  defines
• 31:58
  the term national as
• 32:02
  quoting from the act a person owing permanent allegiance
• 32:06
  to a state.
• 32:09
  A
• 32:10
  Unknown: state is important phraseology.
• 32:13
  Unknown: Now I'm gonna tell you right now,
• 32:15
  every day or as much as I can on this program,
• 32:19
  I stress learning the basics
• 32:21
  and knowing that video which you've watched and commented on, the science of law, cold,
• 32:27
  And if you understand that formula, r plus d equals r,
• 32:31
  and the things that are associated with it, like what's a person of an entity to whom the law ascribes rights and duties? If the law doesn't ascribe me any rights,
• 32:42
  I owe no correlative duties.
• 32:44
  Therefore, I can't be that person,
• 32:46
  sir.
• 32:49
  That's substantive law right there. That trick,
• 32:53
  if you learn that cold,
• 32:55
  you can work your way through their deepest fraud and I'm going to prove it to you right there. They just told you because they had to and because they like to hide it and then rub it in your face
• 33:06
  because it makes them feel superior.
• 33:09
  It makes them feel chosen. Well, the son of a bitches are chosen. They're chosen by Satan to enslave humanity
• 33:16
  under fraud utilizing this mechanism.
• 33:19
  They're chosen.
• 33:27
  A r plus d equals r, and all y'all think that all that stuff's crap, okay, I'm gonna show you it ain't crap right there. A national as a person owing permanent allegiance
• 33:38
  to a small s state.
• 33:41
  Well, if I owe the allegiance, then that's where I get my rights, isn't it?
• 33:47
  Unknown: Allegiance is a legal connection.
• 33:50
  Unknown: Alleg the word allegiance comes from
• 33:53
  the the word allegiance
• 33:56
  originated
• 33:57
  in the feudal system.
• 33:59
  It was the relationship
• 34:02
  of the liege man to the liege lord,
• 34:08
  and it's where the legal axiom came from. If you receive the benefit,
• 34:13
  you owe the duty.
• 34:15
  All and the allegiance
• 34:17
  is the basis of jurisdiction,
• 34:20
  that relationship,
• 34:22
  okay? That's why understanding this stuff is so critical, alright?
• 34:27
  So, if you owe complete allegiance
• 34:29
  to a lord or is that the place you're supposed to be and get your duties? Yeah, but yes.
• 34:36
  Unknown: Get your servants.
• 34:38
  Unknown: Okay?
• 34:38
  In a sense, yes.
• 34:41
  But again in our specific
• 34:43
  example,
• 34:44
  our subservience
• 34:45
  was to God because that's where those people that are now called nationals
• 34:50
  got their capital R rights and owed their capital D W. And
• 34:57
  so what I'm telling you is that when I saw the Nationality Act of 1940
• 35:03
  for the very first time and Larry Beecraft sent it to me,
• 35:10
  okay, Larry's a nice guy, I've known him for many years, but he's not trained in the substantive law,
• 35:15
  okay?
• 35:16
  When I put the book out, he wrote me an email and said, Roger, what definition of the word person are you using? That was his question and I said, I'm using gaiuses,
• 35:26
  what one are you using?
• 35:33
  Because he wasn't using gaiuses,
• 35:36
  okay, and that's why some of these people that are trained like attorneys
• 35:41
  don't understand this because they don't understand r plus d equals r and where the hell you come up with the word person and to which body of law are you a person to?
• 35:53
  If if you know if you knew what, if you knew that and when I saw that on
• 36:00
  Nationality Act of 1940,
• 36:02
  they've got the definitions loaded right at the front of that act,
• 36:06
  and A is that one right there, a US national owes permanent allegiance to a small less state. When I saw that first sentence, when he sent it to me, I knew I had them.
• 36:19
  But why? Because I understand that substantive law backwards and forwards and in my sleep.
• 36:29
  And if you want to get total confidence that you can dice through anything they throw at you with Excalibur,
• 36:37
  you go listen to that video until you know it in your sleep.
• 36:47
  Gotta own it. Yes. Okay? And that's why I say that and there's a perfect example right in the middle of this. It tells you exactly what the hell is going on because it tells you national is the old state citizen.
• 37:03
  Unknown: I did send you a reply
• 37:06
  on that particular
• 37:07
  email that I sent yesterday
• 37:10
  and put some clarifications inside
• 37:12
  square brackets,
• 37:14
  parenthetical enclosures in the square form as it were,
• 37:17
  to delineate and clarify that they have particularly left out portions of the numbers that apply that
• 37:25
  they leave off the one and the eight eleven o one
• 37:29
  make it and to make it a little tougher for less than the diligent
• 37:35
  and the You mean incessantly
• 37:37
  Unknown: searched truth. You mean on the like, on the back of the lien where they leave off that it can only be applied to federal employees like that?
• 37:46
  Unknown: Yeah. Kinda like that. You know? It's a well, it was generally a pretty good article that they put out there, but, you know, and they tell you it's title eight, and they put the section up first that they use to spell out the word instead of using the section sign.
• 38:00
  Double s is overlapped vertically as it were.
• 38:03
  And, you know, there's some other little things, but for those of us who read with
• 38:08
  some adept,
• 38:10
  informed
• 38:11
  ability
• 38:13
  that's a little beyond the normal because we've been reading this stuff forever and learned their tricks and traps and
• 38:20
  modus operandi,
• 38:22
  it becomes evident of what they're suggesting by doctor of infra. In fact, you meant on that statute
• 38:28
  state contracts,
• 38:30
  Unknown: they go outside the four corners and refer to other documents that are not on the paper, and therefore, it's not full disclosure and fully informed consent. No. No. No. It was full disclosure. They put the recognizance right on the paper that you signed. If you didn't go look at what the recognizance referred to, you're bad, buddy. You're bad. Hey, Daryl. How you doing, man? Fine print.
• 38:51
  Unknown: Fine, Chris. Yeah. I I'm hey. Good morning, everybody. Hey. There's Daryl. Good morning. Fellows.
• 38:57
  Good morning. Good morning, Chris.
• 39:00
  Yeah. Good morning, Shane, Roger.
• 39:02
  I'm
• 39:03
  I'm looking at Chris's email he sent me. Thank you, Chris,
• 39:07
  Unknown: and reading along. Okay. Good. Well, let's cover some more of this because that's what I kinda wanted to do today. They've changed this since the last time I saw it about
• 39:17
  seven or eight years ago.
• 39:20
  It goes on to provide
• 39:22
  that
• 39:24
  INA provides that the term
• 39:27
  national of The United States includes
• 39:30
  US citizens
• 39:31
  as well as persons who,
• 39:35
  though not citizens of The United States,
• 39:38
  owe permanent allegiance to The United States,
• 39:42
  noncitizen
• 39:43
  nationals.
• 39:44
  Now who is that? That's American Samoa.
• 39:49
  Unknown: That differentiator
• 39:50
  there is referring to capital n,
• 39:54
  natural
• 39:55
  persons explicitly and exclusively,
• 39:57
  not generally
• 39:59
  Unknown: small p persons which are corporate fictitious entities. Yeah. Well, that well, that that's another one. A nomenclature that they use for this catch all stuff is they'll say, are you a US person?
• 40:10
  And that p is always capitalized that I've seen. Okay? By the way, let me add this. I don't know. Did any of y'all probably not? Did any of y'all watch the Masters over the weekend?
• 40:23
  I'm hearing crickets, okay? I heard some recording. Well, there was a guy. I There was a guy that was in contention that's a real sharp young golfer. His name is Fresnel, I think,
• 40:34
  and he's a tall, lanky guy. He almost looked a little he looks Arabic or something. He's dark skin darker skinned,
• 40:41
  but he's a tall, lanky guy, and he can knock the fire out of that golf ball. Okay? And they're talking about him, and they said, he lives in Salt Lake City,
• 40:50
  but his
• 40:52
  his nationality
• 40:53
  is Tongan,
• 40:54
  which is Tonga is an island down there,
• 40:58
  American Samoa,
• 40:59
  and I was sitting there thinking,
• 41:01
  I wonder what passport he got in The US on because obviously he went and got the American Samoan passport,
• 41:08
  and when they get a passport
• 41:10
  in this exclusionary
• 41:12
  thing here at the last,
• 41:14
  they get one that's stamped in there, this person is not a citizen of The United States.
• 41:22
  In their passport,
• 41:24
  there's a stamp
• 41:25
  that says this person is not a citizen of The United States, they're the exclusion to all of this other stuff.
• 41:34
  Otherwise, everybody that's a citizen has an underlying status of a national,
• 41:39
  all they have to do is access it.
• 41:42
  Okay, so let's continue here. Section three zero eight INA
• 41:47
  confers US nationality
• 41:49
  but not US citizenship
• 41:52
  on persons born in an outlying possession
• 41:56
  of The United States.
• 41:59
  So
• 42:01
  that we know from what our research and from the Nationality Act of 1940,
• 42:06
  that now the outlying territories
• 42:09
  are the states,
• 42:11
  not American Samoa exclusively,
• 42:14
  okay, or Swain's Island
• 42:16
  here.
• 42:17
  So
• 42:18
  the term
• 42:20
  outlying possessions of The United States,
• 42:23
  it's defined.
• 42:25
  Listen,
• 42:27
  I challenge you to read it and understand it.
• 42:31
  I challenge
• 42:32
  you to read that outlying territory
• 42:35
  section of definitions
• 42:37
  in
• 42:39
  Act of 1940
• 42:41
  and explained to me what it says. I read it one day on the air to Brent when I first stumbled on this years ago, and I read it on the air to Brent, we were over there at the micro effect, and Brent said, that is the single biggest bunch of gobbledygook
• 42:57
  I'd ever heard, and this is another example. If
• 43:01
  you didn't know what was going on in the background,
• 43:04
  you couldn't read that and come away with an answer.
• 43:07
  If I wouldn't have known they were trying to hide this status and how they were doing it, I wouldn't have known what they were doing because I couldn't understand it.
• 43:19
  Unknown: Notwithstanding, they leave out the operant term
• 43:22
  insular
• 43:23
  possession Sure they do. By the doctrine of that you're supposed to be able to imply by the words that are there what is missing particularly to deceive
• 43:32
  others to believe you're talking about something else when you're talking about something specific.
• 43:37
  Unknown: Well,
• 43:38
  you know, as Glenn
• 43:39
  said years ago,
• 43:41
  he said, If you don't understand the backing of this stuff, the feudal system, the substantive law,
• 43:47
  all you're doing is shadowboxing
• 43:50
  with these creatures,
• 43:51
  and that's all you're ever gonna do because their deal is built on those two things and hiding it from you.
• 44:04
  Unknown: Yep.
• 44:05
  Unknown: Okay.
• 44:06
  So let's see here.
• 44:08
  In
• 44:09
  as American smelling that island, I never can remember. Slanes Island.
• 44:14
  No other snatch.
• 44:16
  Okay, here now this is a nice little sentence.
• 44:19
  No
• 44:20
  other statutes
• 44:22
  define
• 44:23
  any other territories
• 44:26
  or any of the states
• 44:28
  as outlying
• 44:29
  possessions.
• 44:31
  It doesn't say that that doesn't apply,
• 44:33
  it just says that no other statutes refer to it.
• 44:41
  Hey, Daryl. Are these some sneaky sons of bitches or what?
• 44:47
  Unknown: Yeah. They they're they're really good. It's a good thing that it's a good thing that I'm part Kazarian because I can see through the light. You know? I have the I have the magic decoder gene ring.
• 45:00
  Unknown: So yeah.
• 45:04
  Unknown: I
• 45:05
  I get it, you know.
• 45:09
  I get it really good. So Well
• 45:12
  Unknown: I know you do, and that I'm proud of you and everybody that's
• 45:17
  got what other
• 45:18
  what whatever
• 45:20
  mental or physical predilection
• 45:22
  we've got to be obsessed by this stuff called freedom and truth.
• 45:28
  God
• 45:29
  bless you, my hats off to you. In addition to section three zero eight of the INA, section three zero two of public law 90 two-two
• 45:37
  41
• 45:38
  provides
• 45:39
  for certain inhabitants
• 45:41
  of the Commonwealth
• 45:42
  of Northern Mariana Islands, and I don't know anything about this,
• 45:47
  who became United States citizens by virtue of Article three of the Covenant
• 45:52
  to opt for the non citizen national status.
• 45:56
  They probably parallel those
• 45:58
  of the American Samoans.
• 46:00
  Let me get Michael here. I'm working with you I think that was part the
• 46:05
  Unknown: Spanish American War. Could have been.
• 46:08
  Unknown: Quite a bit.
• 46:09
  Unknown: And they do a lot of they
• 46:11
  do a lot of stuff with the Northern Mariana Islands in in reference
• 46:16
  to putting sweatshops
• 46:18
  and stuff down there because of these previous agreements. On the Fuqua? Yeah, there's
• 46:24
  some real shady stuff going on down there too. Anyway, this is the meat of this thing that I wanted to get to. As the department
• 46:31
  has received few
• 46:32
  requests,
• 46:33
  few people are requesting these noncitizen national documents.
• 46:37
  Guys, that's unfortunate.
• 46:39
  Maybe we can change that. But the numbers are going up. Well, let's hope so. There's no justification.
• 46:45
  There's no justification
• 46:47
  for the creation
• 46:48
  of a non citizen national certificate.
• 46:51
  There's just not enough people wanting them these days.
• 46:54
  Designing a separate document
• 46:56
  that includes anti fraud mechanisms
• 46:59
  was seen as an inefficient
• 47:01
  expectation
• 47:02
  of resources.
• 47:04
  We thought we'd take that money and lump it into the, I don't know, 3 to $5,000,000,000,000
• 47:10
  that we've wasted over there in The Middle East. That's a far better application for those funds. Don't you think, guys? Rather than having these intricate certificates
• 47:19
  with all of this, no tampering,
• 47:22
  anti fraud mechanisms
• 47:24
  involved.
• 47:25
  Oh, man, the expenditure of that waves cast off the chains of outrageous servitude. Something like that could break the budget of the Clinton Foundation. Let's face it.
• 47:36
  Okay?
• 47:38
  Jeez. These people just are unbelievable.
• 47:41
  Unknown: Therefore I I have a question here. Okay. Oh, I'm sorry. No. Go ahead, Darrell. Well
• 47:47
  Unknown: well,
• 47:49
  Unknown: you you you mentioned in in this
• 47:52
  document mentions
• 47:53
  natural person. So
• 47:55
  I I have the captain obvious question here. What's the opposite of a natural person?
• 48:01
  What's what's the opposite of An natural
• 48:05
  Unknown: an unnatural
• 48:06
  person or a person that An unnatural
• 48:09
  Unknown: person.
• 48:11
  Unknown: Or a person that's a slave. Is a person that's a slave an unnatural person?
• 48:17
  Unknown: Raise it out. US citizen. A US a US fourteenth amendment citizen
• 48:23
  bearing allegiance would be an unnatural
• 48:26
  Unknown: Sure would be. Sure would be because you're just old common piece of property. That's pretty unusual. Of time wrath. Imagine a piece of property that walks around.
• 48:36
  So let's finish this out here. Got Michael Michael
• 48:39
  has joined us, and we got about a paragraph and a half left here, but this is where it gets down to the meat of stuff that's different for me. Therefore the Department determined
• 48:49
  that those who would be eligible to apply for such a certificate
• 48:53
  may instead
• 48:55
  apply for a United States passport
• 48:57
  that would delineate
• 48:59
  and certify
• 49:01
  their status as a national but not a citizen of The United States. Okay, well we'll just do that. Anybody that would like to take this option,
• 49:10
  please don't forget to heed the warning box in the application
• 49:13
  and make sure to send them your citizenship
• 49:16
  evidence.
• 49:17
  Here's
• 49:18
  the last paragraph:
• 49:19
  If a person believes he or she is eligible under the law as a non citizen national of The United States
• 49:27
  and the person complies
• 49:29
  with the provisions of section three forty one
• 49:33
  and USC eight,
• 49:34
  USC fourteen fifty two, he or she may apply
• 49:38
  for a passport at any passport agency of The United States.
• 49:42
  When applying,
• 49:44
  applicants
• 49:45
  must execute a form DS-eleven
• 49:48
  and show documentary
• 49:49
  proof of their non citizen national status
• 49:53
  as well as their identity.
• 49:54
  Well what would be your documentary
• 49:56
  proof of your non citizen national status,
• 50:00
  but an affidavit
• 50:02
  stating what you're not.
• 50:04
  That's notarized
• 50:05
  Citizenship
• 50:07
  they can put right in their little file. Okay? So there it is. Now I don't remember when I saw this years ago that they had that nomenclature
• 50:17
  at the bottom. I don't remember that part. It may have been there. I might have missed it back then. Those years were foggy,
• 50:24
  but I this I thought was new. I wanted to appreciate
• 50:28
  and thank Chris for sending it and digging it up, and I wanted to take the time to go over it on the air today because I thought it was pretty important.
• 50:38
  Unknown: It is.
• 50:39
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. It's it's real important. So if you
• 50:44
  I wanted to wait a little bit till you go all the way through it. So if you go back up to the top
• 50:49
  and
• 50:52
  at the very beginning,
• 50:54
  where it's talking about
• 50:56
  as title of certificate indicates only natural person who is a noncitizen US national.
• 51:06
  Wherein it also says that all
• 51:09
  as defined by the INA, all US citizens are US nationals, but Okay. So right there,
• 51:15
  when you're born when you're born when you're in your in your nativity,
• 51:20
  you're on born onto the land
• 51:23
  by birthright,
• 51:25
  a US national.
• 51:26
  And then they they register you with the certificate,
• 51:30
  and you become a US citizen Yep. In bondage.
• 51:34
  And so so what so what's happened right there okay. So that's the underlying aspect of this is that you're a US
• 51:41
  noncitizen US national.
• 51:43
  Okay. Or
• 51:45
  and and so then they they put the veneer over you, the overlay, the veneer,
• 51:49
  and and they hypothecate you and turn you into collateral, which is an unnatural person, which bearing allegiance
• 51:56
  through bondage.
• 51:58
  At this point, you've been effectively,
• 52:01
  and I believe the exact word would be expatriated.
• 52:04
  At this point, they expatriated
• 52:06
  you
• 52:07
  to a unnatural
• 52:09
  person
• 52:10
  bearing allegiance to
• 52:13
  corp of the United States. A sec a secondary
• 52:16
  Unknown: status. They
• 52:18
  they exported
• 52:19
  you to a secondary status, and I've got something important, but I don't wanna interrupt your line of thought, so go ahead.
• 52:26
  Unknown: Well,
• 52:28
  so then my
• 52:29
  so then sort of cutting to the end of the chase right there is that by
• 52:35
  submitting an affidavit
• 52:38
  of prima facie evidence,
• 52:40
  you are repatriating
• 52:42
  Exactly. And you're dropping your dual citizenship.
• 52:45
  You're you're repatriating.
• 52:47
  What you're doing is you
• 52:49
  all all US citizens are dual citizens.
• 52:53
  All US unnatural persons are dual citizens.
• 52:57
  And what you're doing is that you're repatriating
• 53:00
  and becoming
• 53:01
  a nondual citizen. You're becoming a a single
• 53:05
  I'm I'm loathe to use that word, but okay. You're becoming of one status,
• 53:09
  Unknown: the primary status, the underlying status. And how about So I just I just want to How about a how about an unequivocated
• 53:17
  status?
• 53:20
  Unknown: Remove yourself from 100 to one.
• 53:23
  Now
• 53:24
  Unknown: the
• 53:25
  point I wanted to make was this,
• 53:28
  because we said that only a natural person can do this, right?
• 53:36
  Right? So
• 53:38
  what does that exclude? What
• 53:40
  does that exclude? That means corporations
• 53:42
  can't be persons under that system.
• 53:47
  Unknown: Of course.
• 53:48
  Can't be their Yeah.
• 53:50
  Unknown: Yeah. No. They can only be unnatural persons. That's correct. Okay. But under the fourteenth amendment, they made them persons
• 53:58
  so they can control us with them. Because
• 54:01
  Unknown: yeah.
• 54:03
  Because
• 54:04
  fourteenth amendment citizens are unnatural persons
• 54:09
  because they
• 54:10
  those persons weren't created by God. They were created by the state that you owe allegiance to. That's right.
• 54:17
  Unknown: So,
• 54:18
  anyway, I wanted to thank Chris and and read that and
• 54:24
  put it out there for today's discussion. If anybody want any other people wanna comment on anything we covered there, but he the difference is if you don't know what we know and you read that document,
• 54:36
  you don't know what the hell they're telling you.
• 54:41
  Unknown: So the
• 54:42
  I I did have another comment on on this in in the middle of the middle of that document
• 54:48
  where it talks about
• 54:52
  the outlawing territories
• 54:54
  and the states.
• 54:56
  And
• 54:58
  so
• 54:59
  the
• 55:00
  this is how I I keep them all separated is that The United States States,
• 55:06
  which is the state of Florida, the state of Alabama, the state of New York,
• 55:11
  the state that the condition, the state of
• 55:14
  the condition thereof,
• 55:16
  the state of
• 55:17
  the allegiance and jurisdiction is
• 55:20
  a state of a state.
• 55:23
  I call it the USS.
• 55:25
  Okay. US citizens are under the USS. United States states of states.
• 55:31
  Now the outlying territories,
• 55:34
  okay, where there is no other
• 55:36
  and and the other states where where there is no other
• 55:42
  what what was the what was the term they used, Roger?
• 55:47
  No regulations.
• 55:48
  No
• 55:51
  there's I don't know. Oh, come on. Help me here. I don't know which South Of Jersey? Oh, there there's no other code code that defines Oh, yeah. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Okay.
• 56:03
  So so what was by by virtue of the fact that there are no like you said, there's no other codes or regulations that apply to those,
• 56:12
  doesn't mean that they don't exist. No. And those are the original states. That falls back to the original
• 56:18
  Unknown: It falls back to the original constitution by default because there's no statutes that define them. Right.
• 56:25
  Unknown: And And it because there's there can only be two. Yeah.
• 56:29
  Yeah.
• 56:30
  So, I mean, if you was to ask people, if you if you were to ask anybody, are you a
• 56:35
  are you an unnatural
• 56:37
  are you an unnatural synthetic person or are you a natural person? Okay. When I think just based upon that simple question,
• 56:45
  most people
• 56:47
  would want to men and women would wanna identify themselves as a natural person unless you're one of these
• 56:54
  transgender
• 56:56
  cyborg. AOC
• 56:58
  Unknown: supporters.
• 57:00
  Now hold it. We got a very good petri Yeah.
• 57:03
  We got a good petri dish here. Yeah. Daryl because they got old. They got some old hands. Yeah. You and me and Chris and Shane and we got a newbie here, Samuel, that's joined us. Now, Samuel,
• 57:16
  you've been taking the show in, obviously, this morning. I'd like to get your observations on this.
• 57:23
  Well,
• 57:26
  Unknown: that kind of move, if that verbiage changed
• 57:29
  over the years, and they're finally coming up that close to telling us the truth,
• 57:34
  that tells me, like, somebody's doing a protection action, and it's not a pawn coming up on the board. That's like a bishop.
• 57:42
  Unknown: Is what I their asses for one day.
• 57:45
  Unknown: Can I can tell you? I can tell you one thing
• 57:47
  do it. I'm gonna tell you one thing for sure.
• 57:51
  They
• 57:51
  probably had not changed that nomenclature
• 57:54
  at state on the passport application
• 57:58
  for probably thirty or forty years,
• 58:01
  and when the book came out and we got this information out, they actually changed the oath on the passport application
• 58:08
  to cover their ass for what I was exposing they were doing.
• 58:14
  Unknown: They
• 58:18
  Unknown: also took verbiage. They
• 58:20
  took verbiage out of the instructions
• 58:22
  under the OMB Act section. Who was gonna say something right there?
• 58:28
  Unknown: It was me.
• 58:29
  I didn't
• 58:32
  quite hear where Chris found this. Is it in the passport
• 58:35
  Unknown: area? Okay, no. It's here, it's on the internet,
• 58:39
  www.travelstate.gov.
• 58:47
  Travel.state.gov.
• 58:50
  Travel.state.gov.
• 58:57
  Unknown: Okay,
• 58:58
  Unknown: awesome. Okay,
• 59:00
  so anybody can access it.
• 59:05
  When I first got into this, I'd never seen this before and somebody, when we first started doing shows, sent it to me. That was about seven, eight years ago, okay?
• 59:14
  So about eight years ago actually, about this time of year.
• 59:18
  I hadn't seen it. A couple of people have brought it up over the last eight years and I said I'd seen that before but when Chris sent it to me yesterday
• 59:27
  and I had this other new student that's asking saying, I'm going to call a right state and ask him about the two citizenships
• 59:34
  and I just started laughing kind of to myself
• 59:37
  and I sent him this. I said, well, hey, this is what they're going to tell you
• 59:41
  and but
• 59:42
  just exactly,
• 59:43
  I'll tell you, Samuel, again,
• 59:46
  unless you know the basics and unless you've read the information and have some idea, you can read that that letter that we just read till the cows
• 59:55
  come home,
• 59:56
  and you're not gonna know what they're telling you.
• 59:59
  Unknown: A necessary
• 1:00:01
  point of clarification
• 1:00:03
  is that although I sent the email to you, I didn't do that original research, although I have done some substantially
• 1:00:12
  similar research and perhaps sent that to you. That came from another source, but there are many of us out here diligently
• 1:00:19
  investigating
• 1:00:20
  and researching this with critical
• 1:00:22
  investigative
• 1:00:23
  skills
• 1:00:25
  to uncover
• 1:00:26
  the treachery and deviosity
• 1:00:28
  encrypted
• 1:00:29
  Unknown: within the system or the cancer of mood. That's right. And by going over what we've gone over today you can easily see and you can easily hang your hat on what I'm about to tell you. There was fraud used in this.
• 1:00:44
  No.
• 1:00:46
  Okay, and what do we know? What's the axiom? Fraud vitiates any contract ab initio.
• 1:00:52
  So all you people that are worried about them coming after you because you're filing these documents,
• 1:00:58
  you don't understand what's happening.
• 1:01:00
  Their fraud is being exposed. They can't come after anybody.
• 1:01:11
  Unknown: Tell me it's not so.
• 1:01:12
  Unknown: No. See? Well, what I'll tell you is so is the fraud and the spell that's been cast on our society, country, and fellow Americans
• 1:01:21
  by this intimidation
• 1:01:23
  that they've put on us for about the last forty or fifty years.
• 1:01:29
  When when you say you when you tell you walk up to somebody and say the three letters IRS,
• 1:01:35
  and they start shaking like a dog passing a persimmon seed.
• 1:01:41
  Unknown: And
• 1:01:48
  Unknown: if you don't think it applies, what the hell do you think happened yesterday
• 1:01:53
  when all those people that are our fellow countrymen
• 1:01:56
  signed dutifully their little statute stapled Jewish Shetar
• 1:02:00
  and trotted right down to the post office to get it postmarked on the last day?
• 1:02:11
  Because they're scared,
• 1:02:13
  they're scared. If I don't do this, two things are gonna happen, either I'm gonna get a bunch of money back I don't deserve, or if I don't do this, they're gonna come eventually and take something I got.
• 1:02:29
  Works well. It damn works like a snap. Are you kidding me? How you doing, Eric Hoglund? This is one of our old timers here. How you doing, bro? Hey, Roger. What's going on? Hey, Harry. Well, we're just having a little program here.
• 1:02:41
  Unknown: Yeah. Great program. Hey. I got two
• 1:02:44
  questions.
• 1:02:45
  Unknown: What
• 1:02:46
  exactly is h 71
• 1:02:49
  b and h 77 b? What are those two tax Well,
• 1:02:53
  Unknown: you know, I used to have that question too, Eric.
• 1:02:57
  So I wrote
• 1:02:59
  Glenn
• 1:03:00
  because I know if I if there's any expert on the tax code that I know, it's Glenn Amorton,
• 1:03:05
  okay?
• 1:03:06
  I wrote Glenn, and I said, Glenn, what are $8.71
• 1:03:09
  and $8.77
• 1:03:11
  B taxes?
• 1:03:13
  One of them
• 1:03:14
  are taxes on corporate bonds
• 1:03:17
  that Frank Brushaber
• 1:03:18
  went to court on to contest the sixteenth Amendment,
• 1:03:24
  and in the Brushaber
• 1:03:26
  case, if you'll read the synopsis
• 1:03:28
  online,
• 1:03:29
  it says
• 1:03:31
  Frank Brushaber's
• 1:03:32
  attorney
• 1:03:33
  brought up in court in the trial
• 1:03:36
  that Frank Brushaber
• 1:03:37
  was a non resident alien
• 1:03:41
  citizen of the state of New York,
• 1:03:43
  but it was never decided on in the trial, but it was brought up.
• 1:03:47
  The other section is if you expatriate,
• 1:03:50
  truly expatriate,
• 1:03:52
  and and there's some involvement
• 1:03:54
  there. Okay?
• 1:03:56
  Unknown: Does expatriating
• 1:03:57
  mean leaving the the country? It means exchanging passports.
• 1:04:04
  Changing jurisdictional
• 1:04:05
  statuses and Yep.
• 1:04:07
  Unknown: Just tell them I don't wanna be any of this shooting match. I'm gonna go over and
• 1:04:12
  I think the Chinese communists have got it going. I think I'm gonna go over and join that bunch.
• 1:04:20
  Or maybe be a dual citizen Israeli. I always wanted to have soup with a fetus in it. I don't know about you.
• 1:04:28
  Unknown: No.
• 1:04:33
  Unknown: So, Samuel, I want as the newer
• 1:04:37
  of the bunch here,
• 1:04:38
  and we always cater to folks like yourself because we want these basic questions and concerns and misunderstandings
• 1:04:45
  cleared up for you folks as early a stage possible.
• 1:04:48
  Have you got any additional questions?
• 1:04:53
  Unknown: No.
• 1:04:55
  It's pretty clear to me,
• 1:04:57
  but I did have a recommendation
• 1:05:00
  and
• 1:05:01
  you wanted me to send you I'm not very good at that. Maybe Chris will do it. But I think people
• 1:05:08
  that are really gonna understand this and it's gonna fall on their ears, immediately be absorbed, I probably listen as much as Chris does out there,
• 1:05:16
  is the Bruce Ray Riggs, the Tom Lacoveira Stewart that we mentioned last week,
• 1:05:21
  but also there's a lady called Al Whitney,
• 1:05:25
  and her program on RBN is called in defense of humanity.
• 1:05:29
  She has a lot of people
• 1:05:32
  looking for salvation,
• 1:05:33
  a way out desperately.
• 1:05:36
  Unknown: Well, then she ought to go and ask John Statmiller
• 1:05:40
  why he wouldn't have me on his program to introduce this to the rest of the broadcasters over there at the Fine Network.
• 1:05:48
  Unknown: I didn't know that.
• 1:05:52
  Unknown: Wow, when was that? About eight years or so ago.
• 1:05:57
  Know, Don? Listen, that's why I've run across a whole bunch of people
• 1:06:03
  consider to be extremely questionable in their character,
• 1:06:06
  okay, in our community
• 1:06:08
  since I've been doing this, and that's why I'm doing it here and we're doing it on our own because I don't have to interact with any of those psychopath people.
• 1:06:19
  Unknown: Michael might notice the particular
• 1:06:22
  lack of sponsors
• 1:06:23
  advertising
• 1:06:25
  paid
• 1:06:26
  controllers
• 1:06:27
  of what the content is on this particular station as opposed to others.
• 1:06:33
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:06:34
  let's just say, I'll leave it at this, there's some skeletons in the closet over there.
• 1:06:41
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:06:44
  Unknown: Well, what if you just went on as a guest to Well, I'd happy
• 1:06:48
  Unknown: to do that, okay?
• 1:06:50
  Okay. I
• 1:06:52
  did a number of shows on RBN
• 1:06:54
  back in the early days
• 1:06:56
  and then we just moved on from there, you know, but every one of these network owners
• 1:07:02
  have stabbed me in the back along the way.
• 1:07:05
  Okay? That's why we're doing what we're doing right here.
• 1:07:09
  Unknown: I might offer
• 1:07:12
  for Michael and other listeners who have a inquiring
• 1:07:16
  mind and want to know,
• 1:07:18
  a former host over there that got dispatched
• 1:07:22
  also,
• 1:07:24
  was Jerry Kirk whose stuff is up on
• 1:07:27
  let's see. His
• 1:07:29
  site is
• 1:07:31
  Unknown: Oh, it's the guy who who
• 1:07:33
  Unknown: the guy who gave his property to God
• 1:07:37
  in the conference.
• 1:07:39
  He's still fighting them.
• 1:07:42
  Unknown: Yes.
• 1:07:42
  In fact, I'm not sure if he's still on the planet or not. I had a very concerning call from him some months ago, back back over a year ago,
• 1:07:52
  that did not bode well.
• 1:07:55
  Unknown: And let's see here. A let's I should be able remember that right this second. Roger, if you don't know who he is, he had deeded his property to God.
• 1:08:06
  Okay.
• 1:08:07
  Unknown: Called the God Trust or
• 1:08:10
  that's pretty common in The Middle East.
• 1:08:13
  Unknown: Okay. This guy's not as loony as you might think. He's pretty
• 1:08:16
  Unknown: smart. He put it in a trust and put God as a beneficiary,
• 1:08:20
  or he just actually tried to sell it? God,
• 1:08:23
  God give him a receipt, you know, all that stuff.
• 1:08:26
  How do you give God a receipt?
• 1:08:30
  Unknown: I have I have no idea on the particulars of it, but Well, I'm sure whatever
• 1:08:36
  Unknown: planet
• 1:08:38
  to divert back to.
• 1:08:40
  Unknown: They if they're if they're screwing with him,
• 1:08:44
  you know, those particulars on how it was set up will
• 1:08:48
  have great bearing on the whatever decisions, I would think.
• 1:08:54
  Unknown: Yeah. And and in most states, it's five years before
• 1:08:58
  paying your property tax to god
• 1:09:00
  is probably gonna really come to bear.
• 1:09:05
  Unknown: Well, you know, listen, that's a good point. I'm glad you brought it up because you see how many different approaches all these people are taking because they simply don't understand how the system is structured
• 1:09:16
  and how much problems they're going through in pursuing some sort of a remedy when the answer is so easy. All you got to do is send your citizenship evidence to the Secretary of State. That's the answer.
• 1:09:30
  Unknown: Right.
• 1:09:31
  Unknown: Now which one would you rather do? Do you want to go beat your head against the wall for a couple of days because it feels so damn good when you stop or do you want to come over here and learn a little bit and take the easy approach?
• 1:09:42
  Your choice.
• 1:09:45
  Unknown: I gotcha.
• 1:09:49
  Yep. Maybe Chris will send you that link on Bruce Ray Riggs. I think you'd appreciate that that video.
• 1:09:55
  Unknown: It's all on the fourteenth amendment. It's very historical. He may have. He may have. I think I might have What? Seen
• 1:10:03
  Okay. May have missed unclesam.com.
• 1:10:06
  Okay. Chris, send it to me on the side, would you? Again, if you did before. I love your history lessons.
• 1:10:12
  Unknown: Love your history lessons, Roger, and I think you're gonna appreciate
• 1:10:16
  Unknown: what this guy has to say about the fourteenth amendment. Okay, well I was listening to one this morning that I found, I'm not through yet, I think I sent it to Daryl though,
• 1:10:24
  and it is a guy that I really admire, okay, and that's Doctor. Don Livingston.
• 1:10:31
  And for those of you who may not know, and most of you probably don't know who this gentleman is,
• 1:10:36
  he was a
• 1:10:38
  professor emeritus
• 1:10:39
  at Emory University over in Decatur,
• 1:10:43
  right there next to Atlanta,
• 1:10:45
  the Harvard of the South it's called occasionally,
• 1:10:48
  and he was one of the original founders of an organization called the League of the South,
• 1:10:54
  which promoted
• 1:10:55
  real history and the southern traditions,
• 1:10:58
  and then they had some kind of a disagreement,
• 1:11:01
  and him and a bunch of his buddies went off and founded an organization called the Abbeville Institute,
• 1:11:07
  and this is a talk he did in Stone Mountain in 2015.
• 1:11:11
  I'm only about fifteen minutes into it, Darrell, but this guy Don Livingston is real
• 1:11:17
  sharp,
• 1:11:18
  okay? Now,
• 1:11:20
  one of the reasons I wanted to mention it is because you can go over to sovereigntosurf.com,
• 1:11:27
  sovereigntosurf.com,
• 1:11:28
  our main little
• 1:11:30
  beachhead is a website over there, and down on the right side, about halfway down, is an hour long talk he gave Samuel
• 1:11:39
  on a lot of history, the fourteenth amendment that I damn sure never heard before or since,
• 1:11:45
  and he was still with the League of the South back then, and you can access and listen, download that right on the sovereigntosurf.com,
• 1:11:52
  but yeah, this history is fascinating, isn't it?
• 1:11:56
  Unknown: Yes, and I'll definitely do that. I'm
• 1:11:59
  a history junkie.
• 1:12:01
  Unknown: What was he saying today?
• 1:12:03
  Just a little bit, I par. Before
• 1:12:07
  budget of the state of Louisiana
• 1:12:10
  was
• 1:12:11
  $100,000
• 1:12:13
  After the Civil War, the first budget that came out, what do you think it was?
• 1:12:21
  1,000,000? Yep, right on the nose.
• 1:12:25
  10 times, sounds about right. That's about how much they were going to inflate everything. Okay, so that's a Darryl, I'll I'll try. I got a busy afternoon. I probably won't see this until later tonight or tomorrow morning, but it's one I wanna I wanna
• 1:12:40
  be sure and listen to myself, and I may put it on today's show description since we talked about it. It's called The Real Reason the South Succeeded
• 1:12:49
  by Donald Livingston.
• 1:12:51
  I'll repeat that again:
• 1:12:53
  The Real
• 1:12:54
  Reason the South
• 1:12:56
  Succeeded
• 1:12:57
  by Donald Livingston. It's on YouTube, about a forty seven minute talk. I'm interested to hear the facts I've never heard before that he brings out and what I haven't listened to.
• 1:13:09
  So where else would we like to go with the program today, guys?
• 1:13:14
  Unknown: So so Roger, if you inflate everything ten ten
• 1:13:18
  times, right, then 40 acres and a mule, divide that by 10.
• 1:13:27
  Unknown: Well, though, what I was looking at was the bankers' balance sheets.
• 1:13:33
  Unknown: Okay.
• 1:13:37
  Unknown: Okay, let's switch gears for a minute. I'd like to take a poll because there's some new information coming out this morning.
• 1:13:44
  What are y'all's feelings on this Notre Dame fire? Was it a false flag? Is Macron trying to pull his ass out of the fire of the yellow vest by burning down
• 1:13:55
  one of the venerable institutional structures
• 1:13:58
  in the entire country of France with that goes back to the twelve
• 1:14:03
  hundreds.
• 1:14:07
  Unknown: I could offer my view if you like. Sure.
• 1:14:11
  I think it's highly specious,
• 1:14:14
  and it would not be beyond expectation
• 1:14:17
  that the synagogue of Satan
• 1:14:19
  would start such a fire to try to blame the blame on their intended victim,
• 1:14:25
  the so called or
• 1:14:27
  Islamist,
• 1:14:28
  to prevaricate and start a war.
• 1:14:32
  Unknown: Alright. Anybody else got any 2¢ on this? Daryl, what are your thoughts here, man?
• 1:14:40
  Daryl must have left. He must have been dealing with a customer. Well, my thoughts on it are buttressed
• 1:14:46
  by a couple articles I've seen that said, You know, there's been a mysterious
• 1:14:52
  upswing in church fires around France recently,
• 1:14:58
  So somebody's been torching a bunch of churches in France recently,
• 1:15:04
  but they didn't point any fingers.
• 1:15:07
  Now the big church gets
• 1:15:10
  torched and they're gonna start
• 1:15:12
  to point some fingers and it's gonna be pointed straight at the yellow vests, what do you want to bet?
• 1:15:19
  Unknown: Oh yeah, probably.
• 1:15:22
  Unknown: And then by us, this is the way these guys work, they go out and start a bunch of church fires,
• 1:15:28
  nobody is blamed, they do it very surreptitiously,
• 1:15:31
  and then they come back and do the big one that puts everybody's jaw dropped,
• 1:15:36
  and they blame it right on and frame the yellow vests. Bye bye, yellow vest movement.
• 1:15:42
  Bye bye, popular support.
• 1:15:44
  Bye bye,
• 1:15:45
  problem.
• 1:15:49
  Unknown: Solution.
• 1:15:52
  Unknown: It makes a lot of sense to me, man. And, Chris, you know I'm I'm the I'm the one that sits back reticently and and takes caution. You're the one that jumps in and blames everything on them, okay, right off the bat. But this, now that the the few more facts come out, this is high work. Yeah. The this is highly suspicious
• 1:16:12
  because you know what else came out today?
• 1:16:15
  There weren't any construction workers there yesterday
• 1:16:18
  for the renovation.
• 1:16:21
  Unknown: What a coincidence.
• 1:16:26
  Unknown: Wow. Well, just the fact that it hasn't burned since 1200
• 1:16:30
  sort of says something about it, you know. Well, evidently the It was Sunday.
• 1:16:37
  Unknown: Well, the other thing is that church was built
• 1:16:41
  when it was started. The original foundation evidently
• 1:16:44
  was built out of this real highly flammable wood
• 1:16:48
  that they just used back then.
• 1:16:53
  It had a lead roof to protect the wood. Well, the good news here is they did salvage the
• 1:17:00
  interior
• 1:17:01
  and
• 1:17:02
  a lot of the artifacts, whether you're Catholic or not, the artifacts are really important and
• 1:17:09
  those were evidently salvaged and they're going to rebuild,
• 1:17:12
  but it's going to be interesting to see as this story develops if exactly the scenario that I laid out doesn't come to pass.
• 1:17:22
  Unknown: I hear they removed
• 1:17:24
  Okay. Shane, first. Hear they removed
• 1:17:29
  the statues
• 1:17:30
  four days before the fire
• 1:17:33
  started. Well, there there's a They removed all the the good stuff
• 1:17:37
  Unknown: out of the the church, and then then they started a fire. Well, if that's the case seen if that's the case, Shane, then that absolutely points at false flag without a doubt. What were you gonna say, Chris? Yep.
• 1:17:52
  Unknown: Well, Michael Rivera used a special word term yesterday in his, speaking about the fire
• 1:17:59
  and said that they had removed
• 1:18:02
  all of the objects out of the rectory, if you will. There was this particular term he used I'm searching for because it was not one immediate in my lexicon that I'm familiar with. I'm looking for that, and I'll relate it as soon as I find it. Okay.
• 1:18:17
  Unknown: Let's see. I'll pop up Zero Hedge. I'll
• 1:18:20
  do a refresh
• 1:18:21
  here on Zero Hedge and see if anything else
• 1:18:25
  well,
• 1:18:26
  Apple Apple Apple's joined jumped in, and Apple's
• 1:18:30
  gonna contribute to a bunch of companies or
• 1:18:33
  are
• 1:18:34
  bellying up to the bar. They're they're not taking that money and and buying their stocks back like they're all doing. They're gonna take some of it and go help rebuild Notre Dame. Now that's that's real civil of them, isn't it?
• 1:18:50
  Unknown: Damage control.
• 1:18:51
  Unknown: You walk down the street out there, Shane, and you pat
• 1:18:55
  them on the back as they're going home from work this afternoon and say, good job, boys. Good job.
• 1:19:03
  Unknown: Yeah. So I think the word,
• 1:19:06
  Chris is looking for is desecration.
• 1:19:11
  There's some desecration
• 1:19:13
  involved in this fire
• 1:19:16
  Okay.
• 1:19:17
  Of being, like, all of those church and all that stuff and
• 1:19:21
  Unknown: I couldn't make out that term you said there's Desecrate
• 1:19:24
  Unknown: desecration.
• 1:19:27
  Unknown: No, I don't think that's it.
• 1:19:31
  Unknown: Was it one of these like I looked at your vocabulary. One of these like Catholic terms that most people aren't familiar with if you're not Catholic kind of things?
• 1:19:42
  Chris?
• 1:19:44
  Unknown: It
• 1:19:46
  was absolutely a Latin term,
• 1:19:48
  nearly positive.
• 1:19:50
  Rivera was
• 1:19:52
  in the
• 1:19:53
  Catholic church, although I think he's at least part of the tribe who can professes that clearly. And I don't think he's malicious generally, although occasionally he
• 1:20:03
  Unknown: fails to be totally clear or talk about some particular topics and does some damage control, I observed? Well, I would say it because I'm a regular reader of Rivera's site. I I just about go to it every day at the end of the day because I find a lot of articles there I don't find anywhere else, quite frankly. I think he's a very good radio host. He's got a great mind and real, real good recall and
• 1:20:27
  good presence on the air too. I've always respected him as a host.
• 1:20:32
  If he is of the tribe,
• 1:20:34
  he's pretty critical of them on a day to day basis, and they attack him a lot, evidently,
• 1:20:39
  and the fact that I believe that he's part Mexican or has some type of Mexican heritage in his background,
• 1:20:47
  which would easily
• 1:20:48
  lead
• 1:20:49
  me to believe that he could have been a Catholic and that he may be or be what we term a reforming Catholic.
• 1:20:58
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:20:59
  My biggest problem with him is he doesn't believe that there's any geoengineering
• 1:21:04
  going on. Well,
• 1:21:06
  Unknown: stuff doesn't make any sense to him either and it's unfortunate
• 1:21:10
  to see,
• 1:21:11
  and the demarcation
• 1:21:13
  line between people like us that want to know what's beneath the surface and the people that still
• 1:21:19
  concentrate on surface stuff.
• 1:21:23
  Unknown: I I have to have Dean Wiggington on and have a debate with them.
• 1:21:31
  Unknown: Well, we were crickets. We've all got our specialties and our interests and and the as you can tell from the things we cover here, it takes years to delve down into the stuff we covered in the first hour of this program.
• 1:21:45
  I mean, it took about it took about at least a quarter of my lifetime
• 1:21:50
  to dig in it and understand it.
• 1:21:54
  Unknown: I sent Michael a copy of your book.
• 1:21:58
  Unknown: Well, I, you know, he's not gonna sit down and read read anything like that. It it just
• 1:22:03
  like I said, Shane, it's unfortunate to me, but there's just a few of us that that wanna that this registers with. Now, I sent you.
• 1:22:12
  I I went over. I didn't send you. I went over a list earlier in the program of the people that I, just off the top of my head,
• 1:22:20
  have sent this information to. Gerald Celente,
• 1:22:23
  Bill Halter,
• 1:22:24
  the guy at X twenty two, the, the guy at SGT report, report, and over the last years, it's been other people too, you know, but I've never received any kind of a reply
• 1:22:35
  from any of those people except Jim Willey. Jim Willey and I had a little bit of
• 1:22:41
  a thread going back a year or year and a half ago and
• 1:22:45
  I can understand those guys are all busy, they got intricate things they're involved with, and for them to take what their primary interest, subject matter, and line of investigation is and totally put it over on the left side
• 1:22:59
  and then dive into this, which takes a bit of your attention and focus,
• 1:23:04
  it's just not a step they're going to take, but yet because that
• 1:23:09
  information
• 1:23:10
  is not known and understood by them, how does anybody understand the financial system if you don't understand that the people as property are the basis of it? Daryl, are you with us? Are you back with us?
• 1:23:24
  I think no, it must not be. Daryl. Daryl sent me a John Titus,
• 1:23:29
  a new John Titus video this morning. His I think it's titled Mommy, Where Does Money Come From? And he goes into a real nice analysis on this transaction,
• 1:23:39
  this paper that was written on how money is created,
• 1:23:43
  versus the two schools.
• 1:23:45
  The two schools are the Bernanke people that want to lie to you and say that all these loans come from savings,
• 1:23:51
  and the other ones that tell you that commercial banks
• 1:23:55
  make it by this
• 1:23:57
  mail
• 1:23:58
  as you call it the Mandrake mechanism, I think that's what G.
• 1:24:03
  Edward Griffin called it, but through this fraud that we understand it as of giving them a promissory note, discounting and monetizing
• 1:24:12
  it into the secondary market, and then bringing that money back that fuels, pays for the good, and is is then in the economy as monetized.
• 1:24:21
  So but he doesn't know John Titus as much as he does know and I tip my hat to him. He does great work, okay? And he's really got a beat on the financial system,
• 1:24:32
  but he can't say that bankers make money out of thin air because they don't,
• 1:24:36
  and anybody that tells you that bankers make money out of thin air do not understand the system.
• 1:24:46
  Unknown: To me, it's Mises
• 1:24:48
  Institute.
• 1:24:49
  Unknown: Mises.
• 1:24:51
  Mises Institute. Mises Institute.
• 1:24:53
  Thank you. Eric von Mises is the way it's pronounced and that's down in Auburn, Alabama.
• 1:24:59
  That's at the, you know, it's affiliated with Auburn University.
• 1:25:03
  The von Mises Institute, they're one of the few places in The United States that actually teach Austrian economics.
• 1:25:16
  Their website, by the way, the kind of front website that represents the
• 1:25:20
  von Mises Institute is lewrockwell.com,
• 1:25:24
  lew,
• 1:25:25
  not lou,
• 1:25:26
  lewrockwell.com,
• 1:25:29
  a very very
• 1:25:31
  Austrian
• 1:25:32
  economics
• 1:25:33
  oriented page, there's a lot of good information on there. I don't go to there too much anymore, but that's a good page, I highly recommend it.
• 1:25:45
  Lewrockwell.com.
• 1:25:47
  Okay. We got about alert looking like thirty minutes left. What what would y'all like to talk about here?
• 1:25:54
  Unknown: Well, you first brought up at
• 1:25:57
  the beginning beginning
• 1:25:58
  of the show.
• 1:26:00
  Unknown: Tiger Woods?
• 1:26:03
  Unknown: No. You were talking about the
• 1:26:05
  fifteenth.
• 1:26:07
  It's the fifteenth, and you were talking about paying the taxes and how to get out of the taxes. Well, it's real simple. Hold it. Hold it, Shane. It's real simple, man. You file that affidavit.
• 1:26:19
  Unknown: Okay? First of all, but you got to file it with the Secretary of State first, do not file it with the IRS
• 1:26:25
  under any circumstances
• 1:26:27
  unless you just really want to get a $5,000
• 1:26:30
  frivolous filing penalty. If you're just hell bent to leather to get a $5,000
• 1:26:36
  frivolous filing penalty like some people evidently are, then you go file it with the IRS first.
• 1:26:43
  Because if you do that, that's what you'll get.
• 1:26:49
  Unknown: A bill.
• 1:26:52
  Unknown: You file it with the Secretary of State,
• 1:26:55
  you wait a little while,
• 1:26:57
  and then you write a nice cover letter,
• 1:26:59
  and you say this document is on file with the Secretary of State as my citizenship evidence, and I would use that term in quotes very
• 1:27:09
  liberally,
• 1:27:10
  As my citizenship
• 1:27:12
  evidence,
• 1:27:13
  please place it in my administrative
• 1:27:15
  file. You write that letter to the IRS
• 1:27:18
  and you're done. What are the only two sections of the code you're responsible for at that point, Shane?
• 1:27:28
  Unknown: Which two?
• 1:27:30
  Unknown: After
• 1:27:31
  you file that affidavit,
• 1:27:33
  which sections of the code are you now
• 1:27:37
  obligated to pay should you have any of those taxes?
• 1:27:42
  Unknown: Eight seventy one
• 1:27:44
  and eight seventy
• 1:27:45
  Unknown: seven b. Good man, Shane. Exactly And
• 1:27:49
  if you don't have any eight seventy one b, any corporate bonds like Union Pacific,
• 1:27:55
  or you're not really expatriating,
• 1:27:57
  then you got no tax obligation
• 1:27:59
  according to 26 CFR 1.1-1A.
• 1:28:04
  An income tax is owed by all individuals who are citizens of The United States and residents,
• 1:28:10
  and to the extent of eight seventy one B and eight seventy seven B,
• 1:28:15
  all non
• 1:28:16
  resident alien
• 1:28:18
  individuals,
• 1:28:20
  which you can be if you want to be one,
• 1:28:28
  and it's not their choice as to tell you what you are. You see, they can't tell you which one of those you are because that's tyranny, isn't it?
• 1:28:39
  That's
• 1:28:41
  tyranny.
• 1:28:42
  Hey Samuel,
• 1:28:43
  you're one of these slaves over here, buddy, and I don't want any lip back from you.
• 1:28:49
  That's tyranny.
• 1:28:54
  So that statement right there
• 1:28:57
  tells you that the whole thing's on real shaky footing
• 1:29:02
  because the only thing they can do is shift the presumption
• 1:29:06
  and make it appear like tyranny,
• 1:29:09
  but it's not really tyranny.
• 1:29:12
  It's a shift in the presumption of law that you're this status,
• 1:29:16
  that owes that income tax and is dutifully
• 1:29:20
  due to follow all the rest of those regulations in all other 49 of those titles of that public policy jargon crap
• 1:29:28
  called the Federal Code of Regulations.
• 1:29:34
  Masterfully done. And in every other one of them, Samuel,
• 1:29:38
  in every other one of those 49,
• 1:29:42
  they make that jurisdictional
• 1:29:43
  statement on the front page just like they do in title 26 CFR,
• 1:29:49
  but in the other 49 it's different.
• 1:29:52
  Do you know what it is in all those?
• 1:29:59
  Unknown: It's you.
• 1:30:00
  Unknown: Residence.
• 1:30:03
  Now
• 1:30:04
  why did they make title 26 different?
• 1:30:08
  Because the tax code had to adhere a,
• 1:30:11
  and because they want to use this loophole so those cheap ass Edomites, Satanist slavers, don't have to pay any taxes either.
• 1:30:22
  Because I'd be willing to bet you everything I've got,
• 1:30:26
  and everything I've ever acquired,
• 1:30:28
  that virtually every one of these high levels
• 1:30:32
  sabotean
• 1:30:33
  pieces of crap up there that know what's going on have got one of these documents on file with the Secretary of State. I'll bet you everything
• 1:30:44
  I've got.
• 1:30:46
  Unknown: Hear. Hear.
• 1:30:49
  Unknown: Hear. Can
• 1:30:53
  Unknown: you file a FOIA on that?
• 1:30:55
  Unknown: You you wouldn't get it.
• 1:30:59
  Hell, they can't even find out how many of the people in the Congress are dual citizens.
• 1:31:07
  Unknown: Who do you suppose the gatekeepers are?
• 1:31:12
  Unknown: There have been people trying to find out how many of our little senators and congressmen up there have also hold
• 1:31:21
  other citizenships
• 1:31:22
  and what they are, and they can't find it. They will not release the information.
• 1:31:30
  Unknown: Why?
• 1:31:32
  Unknown: Well, I don't know, Shane. Gosh. You don't think it's because 70 or 80%
• 1:31:37
  of them have dual citizenship with Satan's sandbox over there, do you?
• 1:31:43
  No, I haven't. I'm sure that couldn't be it.
• 1:31:50
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:31:52
  Unknown: I do know this, no matter who they are or what power they've amassed or how much quote unquote respect they've got, when you file this affidavit with the Secretary of State, it exposes their sorry slave and asses to the bone,
• 1:32:08
  to the bone.
• 1:32:12
  Now think about it, we've shifted back under the common law at that point.
• 1:32:18
  In essence, is not the affidavit
• 1:32:21
  an offensive weapon?
• 1:32:26
  It's an offensive weapon, we lobbed a mortar right into their bivouac area.
• 1:32:33
  They can't do shit because they're totally exposed
• 1:32:37
  by virtue of the fact that they can't respond,
• 1:32:43
  By virtue of the fact that they tacitly agree,
• 1:32:46
  that verifies
• 1:32:48
  everything.
• 1:32:49
  You're slaven pieces of crap.
• 1:32:52
  You've committed crimes against humanity
• 1:32:55
  to a magnitude
• 1:32:57
  that nothing in the history of our planet
• 1:33:01
  even compares.
• 1:33:05
  And they convict themselves,
• 1:33:07
  Samuel,
• 1:33:08
  because they can't deny.
• 1:33:17
  They can deny everything else.
• 1:33:20
  Haven't you seen them deny everything else? Doesn't it say in the protocols
• 1:33:24
  right there if you get caught deny deny deny? Doesn't it say that? Don't they do that?
• 1:33:30
  Hell yes they do.
• 1:33:32
  Unknown: All these rules for radical revolutionary terrorists.
• 1:33:36
  Unknown: Have you seen them deny one affidavit
• 1:33:38
  that's been sent up there in eight years? I haven't.
• 1:33:43
  They don't do anything except
• 1:33:46
  send out that damn stupid bluff letter they're evidently not sending out anymore.
• 1:33:53
  Unknown: As they the one thing that always stuck in my head, you know, some
• 1:33:57
  short phrases and stuff stick in your head for life? Yep.
• 1:34:02
  One that stuck in my head is as they beat you to death, they cry out in pain. Yeah. Right.
• 1:34:13
  Unknown: Yeah. I've seen one that relates to our That's how it stuck.
• 1:34:17
  I've seen one resisting. I've seen one that relates to our pals phrase like that, I can't remember it recently.
• 1:34:25
  So I have a question. Okay, good, we like questions. Shane, front and center.
• 1:34:30
  Unknown: Yes.
• 1:34:31
  Okay, Chris,
• 1:34:32
  how is your
• 1:34:34
  Unknown: passport application going? Took the question right off the tip of my tongue.
• 1:34:40
  Unknown: Well, as a matter of fact, I made a call to travel.gov
• 1:34:44
  phone number yesterday for their intake for questions,
• 1:34:48
  and surprisingly
• 1:34:50
  not,
• 1:34:52
  it's still in I put in
• 1:34:56
  Receivership.
• 1:34:57
  Quotation mark processing.
• 1:35:00
  And I I pointed out again that processing
• 1:35:03
  me emotes the thought of the commercial where they used to have the guy calling on his car that had broke down the roadway way away from where he was at. And the guy says, yep. I got five of my guy best guys out there working on it right now. They're all sitting there on the hood having lunch.
• 1:35:22
  So I put a call into the supervisor
• 1:35:25
  again. They said that it would be noted
• 1:35:27
  that
• 1:35:28
  request to the supervisor from the LA office. In fact, I have
• 1:35:33
  interesting the address on Merkur
• 1:35:36
  Avenue Northwest
• 1:35:38
  in the city there
• 1:35:40
  to write a complaint to the LA office of the passport division.
• 1:35:45
  Again,
• 1:35:46
  I've already sent one to them before. I'm still not getting any responses from them.
• 1:35:52
  So I
• 1:35:53
  still have no passport,
• 1:35:55
  no communications even though I paid it for the expeditious delivery,
• 1:35:59
  the contract that they are failing to provide honest services on.
• 1:36:05
  Unknown: Well, keep us informed, Chris. You got a very unique situation,
• 1:36:09
  and you ought to maybe ask them if their processing
• 1:36:13
  will beat your natural death.
• 1:36:16
  You'd like to get the thing before you expire.
• 1:36:20
  Unknown: Derek. Is that, lying? Is that That's fine. Yeah.
• 1:36:24
  Unknown: Well, I don't know that you could consider it a crime. You'd have to find out some internal information to be able to charge them with that, Chris. But they've got a duty to do that because it's stated on the agreement that you signed and paid for.
• 1:36:39
  Unknown: They have a recognizance.
• 1:36:41
  Unknown: Yeah, they got a recognizance
• 1:36:43
  in there.
• 1:36:46
  The the
• 1:36:47
  recognizance
• 1:36:48
  is the international criminal database there,
• 1:36:52
  Chris.
• 1:36:56
  Unknown: It may have to go through the international court or
• 1:37:00
  the Vidicon.
• 1:37:01
  Unknown: No. You better hope it doesn't go to the international court because they won't allow them into The US.
• 1:37:07
  Did
• 1:37:07
  you know that?
• 1:37:09
  They won't Pompeo
• 1:37:10
  won't give a visa to the investigator for the international court to come over and ask questions about war crimes.
• 1:37:19
  Criminals don't wanna be in jeopardy. Do you know who else they were they refused a visa to last? Who they can't they didn't he had an open visa and they stopped him from boarding the flight and wouldn't let him fly into The US where he'd lived for a number of years and gotten his degree is the guy that started BDS.
• 1:37:37
  They wouldn't let him in last week. Yeah.
• 1:37:41
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:37:42
  Roger, it's interesting you bring up Pompeo because he's been out there shilling and humping for his,
• 1:37:49
  for the Zionist state
• 1:37:51
  and, the the Trump administration
• 1:37:54
  about making the, all the red guard
• 1:37:57
  of Iran,
• 1:37:59
  the Iranian guard,
• 1:38:00
  a terrorist organization. Okay? So they've already done that. Right. So the moment the moment that something happens,
• 1:38:07
  now they can they don't have to use a war declaration.
• 1:38:11
  They're thinking that they're gonna just be able to use the prior declaration
• 1:38:16
  and attack them as a as a terrorist organization.
• 1:38:21
  Oh, yeah. And by the way, they're saying that the Iranians are working with Al Qaeda. Remember that name from the past, Al Now
• 1:38:29
  here's here's a warning for everybody who's listening to this.
• 1:38:34
  They are assuming that being the Trump administration,
• 1:38:37
  Pompeo, the state department, and the media that you're so stupid
• 1:38:42
  that you don't realize
• 1:38:44
  that Al Qaeda
• 1:38:46
  is Sunni
• 1:38:48
  and
• 1:38:50
  Iran
• 1:38:51
  is Shia.
• 1:38:52
  And I assure you
• 1:38:54
  Unknown: There's night and day.
• 1:38:56
  Unknown: Sunni
• 1:38:57
  Shias Shias will not be working with
• 1:39:02
  Unknown: Sunni Al Qaeda. Nope. And then And ISIS is us. And and the
• 1:39:07
  Iranians
• 1:39:08
  turned around and declared the CIA a terrorist organization.
• 1:39:12
  But
• 1:39:14
  listen, Mad Dog Pompeo
• 1:39:16
  and the madder dog, the one that's even worse than him, really, I guess, is Bolton.
• 1:39:22
  I mean, Bolton's the one that turned makes my skin crawl. Okay? But Pompeo ain't much better.
• 1:39:28
  Boltinski? Boltinski. Yes. Boltinski.
• 1:39:30
  And obviously,
• 1:39:33
  your fellow Nevadian,
• 1:39:34
  mister Sheldon Adelson,
• 1:39:36
  has had a incredible influence in getting those two guys their positions.
• 1:39:41
  And if
• 1:39:42
  if Trump Trump needs to jettison these damn neocon assholes
• 1:39:47
  and get them out of there.
• 1:39:51
  Unknown: Well, I know I'm sure it's but but see.
• 1:39:56
  Unknown: Well well, wouldn't that mean he'd have to get rid of his
• 1:40:00
  daughter and Yeah. His son-in-law too? Yeah. Because they're all
• 1:40:05
  I I mean,
• 1:40:07
  listen. You know, the guy the guy is is been compromised and co opted into the the Zionist fraternity. He sure has. The neocons are in charge.
• 1:40:18
  The Talmudic neocons
• 1:40:19
  are in charge.
• 1:40:20
  Did did you see that,
• 1:40:22
  I did a little have any of you guys heard about this, I'm I'm take I'm sorry if I'm hijacking the thread here,
• 1:40:29
  but kinda.
• 1:40:30
  But did you see this, Democrat,
• 1:40:33
  in South Bend, the mayor, this, guy by the name of Buttig?
• 1:40:38
  They're they're they're trotting him out as a Democratic,
• 1:40:43
  a,
• 1:40:44
  kinda like the the Obama. You know? He came out of nowhere, and Yeah. And now he should be president. Yep. Yeah. Well, I did some research on him. He's a Rhodes scholar. 2004,
• 1:40:55
  he's a Rhodes scholar.
• 1:40:56
  I
• 1:40:58
  I keep harping on this Rhodes scholar thing, and you all these all these people, you you trace it you trace it right back to him. You go back you go back over the last twenty, thirty years and you find that contemporary people that are causing or the operatives are all Rhodes Scholars.
• 1:41:17
  Unknown: Wow. So No surprise here. Yeah.
• 1:41:22
  Told Daryl, did I tell you I met a Rhodes Scholar?
• 1:41:26
  I really met one, he's a friend of a friend of mine who his name is Bock. Oh yeah? It's b o c h, Bock,
• 1:41:33
  and he was in the same Rhodes Scholarship
• 1:41:36
  class as
• 1:41:38
  Bill Clinton,
• 1:41:39
  and he had
• 1:41:41
  He was before I met him, was the president of the World Bank,
• 1:41:46
  and my very good mutual friend that we have,
• 1:41:49
  he's he's that's how I met him was through my friend, and he had asked him, he said, my my this guy, Rogers, tell me the World Bank doing all this stuff, and he said, Dave, the World Bank is so screwed up internally,
• 1:42:02
  they couldn't accomplish that crap. And he wasn't one of the bad guys, but he was a pretty nice guy. I just met him briefly, but, I just thought that was always pretty interesting.
• 1:42:14
  Unknown: Well, if if he was the president of the World Bank and he said that, wouldn't that make him a liar? Because
• 1:42:20
  Unknown: I didn't get I didn't get that impression, but, you know, I mean
• 1:42:24
  Well, maybe he's a good liar. He might have been a good liar. I don't know. But I did I did I did cross paths with him and and press the flesh momentarily at one point. Chris?
• 1:42:35
  Unknown: Well, I I used to I used to hang out with senator Tom Harkin from Iowa for years. I was his personal
• 1:42:43
  chauffeur
• 1:42:44
  pilot,
• 1:42:45
  him and his family.
• 1:42:46
  And I got along with him great. We were friends. Okay? I used to babysit his daughters,
• 1:42:52
  but
• 1:42:53
  but he was still he was still a
• 1:42:57
  thieving Democrat.
• 1:43:01
  Unknown: You know? Well, did you see this there's a There's a good case that came up. I've got the tab open right here. I was gonna watch the video
• 1:43:09
  and I hadn't watched it yet. Let me see if I can find it.
• 1:43:13
  About this ex senator who's going through this divorce.
• 1:43:19
  He's a guy from New York. Let's see if you can remember his name. I hope I hadn't dumped this tab out.
• 1:43:26
  I
• 1:43:28
  got so many open. The the
• 1:43:30
  Alfonse
• 1:43:31
  Diamato.
• 1:43:32
  Remember him?
• 1:43:35
  Oh, yeah. Alfonse Diamato from New York. Well, him and his wife are going through this real serious,
• 1:43:42
  real serious contested
• 1:43:44
  divorce
• 1:43:45
  evidently.
• 1:43:46
  I'm gonna read this pretty short article here,
• 1:43:50
  and what has come out was the wife
• 1:43:54
  of former New York Republican state Alfonso Di Amato has gone to federal authorities alleging that her husband committed bank fraud and that he forged her signature to checks from a secret bank account for millions of dollars spanning a seven year period.
• 1:44:12
  Katuna
• 1:44:12
  Diamato,
• 1:44:13
  who has been in several rounds of legal battles with her husband over the last few weeks,
• 1:44:19
  said in an interview that she found out about the account when The UK based bank, guess what bank it was,
• 1:44:27
  you got it, HSBC
• 1:44:29
  sent a letter to her home about the account opened in her name. So she's going through a divorce, and she gets a letter from this bank about this account. The couple, who'd been married fifteen years, are going through a complicated
• 1:44:44
  and contentious
• 1:44:46
  divorce.
• 1:44:47
  You know how much money he boosted through there in seven years?
• 1:44:53
  Unknown: I
• 1:44:54
  don't know. 50,000,000.
• 1:44:55
  Unknown: 20,000,000? Uh-huh. 4 40,000,000.
• 1:44:59
  Unknown: 40,000,000. Wow.
• 1:45:02
  Unknown: That's substantial.
• 1:45:03
  Unknown: Inflation. Okay. They they got they got this guy absolutely
• 1:45:07
  totally cold by the shorthairs.
• 1:45:09
  There was another interesting article,
• 1:45:12
  Darryl, on banking
• 1:45:14
  that that I stumbled on,
• 1:45:16
  and it was about this report
• 1:45:19
  that came out,
• 1:45:21
  A research study on ongoing crime spree by Wall Street mega banks
• 1:45:27
  gets a total news
• 1:45:29
  blackout,
• 1:45:30
  and this very reputable corporation
• 1:45:33
  did a very extensive
• 1:45:36
  research
• 1:45:37
  over a number of years of seven major banks,
• 1:45:40
  and it came out in the report and basically called it a rap sheet, okay? An organized crime
• 1:45:48
  and one little bitty financial publication
• 1:45:51
  is the only thing that covered it but remember a week ago when
• 1:45:55
  Mad Maxine Waters was chairing that financial committee
• 1:46:00
  hearing on the big bankers. Yeah. They were passing the report out at that. Yes.
• 1:46:05
  They were they were passing the report out at that meeting to everybody. Okay? But none of the news sources will touch it. Alright?
• 1:46:14
  And that's very interesting also. I'm sure more will come out about that as we go forward. Well, I
• 1:46:21
  Unknown: I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna make a prediction here. Okay? And we'll try to keep track of this mister Alfonse Damato.
• 1:46:28
  But I'm gonna predict that nothing of any import will come against charges against Alfonse Damato, and here's why.
• 1:46:37
  The DOJ
• 1:46:38
  is owned by the banking cartel. Yep.
• 1:46:43
  Must do that one. And he will not he will not he will not face any any any real serious consequences.
• 1:46:52
  And the news cycle will go on,
• 1:46:54
  and and she'll get she'll get something.
• 1:46:57
  And
• 1:46:59
  but the
• 1:47:01
  the DOJ
• 1:47:02
  and the treasury is owned by the fund. That's fine. Owned by the the international banking. And those are those are your kings. That's your sovereign right there. Yep. That's right there. That's your sovereigns. Those are your sovereigns right there. Samuel
• 1:47:17
  Unknown: Samuel mentioned history and and going into it. Now fascinating it is. In my book, From Sovereign to Serf Government by the Treachery and Deception of Words, the very first incriminating document that I ever found in my path is reprinted
• 1:47:32
  in full and excerpted in the book, but if you've not read
• 1:47:37
  that Woodrow Wilson's repudiation
• 1:47:40
  of dollar diplomacy,
• 1:47:42
  all the keys are right there in that letter from Woodrow Wilson's presidency,
• 1:47:47
  and the reason he repudiated
• 1:47:48
  dollar diplomacy
• 1:47:50
  is because of the burdensome and antiquated
• 1:47:53
  tax system
• 1:47:55
  that would be imposed,
• 1:47:57
  and the fact that it could go to the absolute heart
• 1:48:00
  of this country
• 1:48:02
  just now trying to awaken to its people and their needs.
• 1:48:05
  Now that means when you throw somebody in bankruptcy,
• 1:48:09
  first of all, they came to him and asked him to back the loan because they wanted to use the US military
• 1:48:15
  as the muscle to collect the damn taxes.
• 1:48:18
  That's why they were getting him to cosign it. Okay? And if you go in and bankrupt a country and take it over and you're gonna control it, you've gotta control the laws and you gotta control the money.
• 1:48:32
  Got to. Necessity.
• 1:48:37
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:48:39
  Unknown: And as
• 1:48:40
  I've said before on this program,
• 1:48:42
  I'll bet you there's not one other show on the entire face of this globe that can come out and just about virtually prove to you that the Department of Justice is not under Trump's management.
• 1:48:54
  If you think it is, look at the crap he's gone through for the last two years.
• 1:49:01
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:49:02
  you can see you can see who who the DOJ is under management of. Okay?
• 1:49:08
  And the most recent example of this is
• 1:49:13
  Julian Assange has been indicted
• 1:49:16
  and Hillary Clinton hasn't.
• 1:49:18
  Yeah. Who's
• 1:49:19
  in charge of of the DOJ.
• 1:49:22
  It does. I I I I'm not I'm I'm not trying to be figurative either. This is literally
• 1:49:30
  selective
• 1:49:31
  persecution.
• 1:49:32
  Unknown: You saw you saw Hillary's clip from this weekend when somebody asked her about Assaj,
• 1:49:38
  and she said he he he needs to get what he deserves.
• 1:49:42
  My god. I couldn't believe that woman said that.
• 1:49:47
  Unknown: Yeah. Well,
• 1:49:49
  I mean, I I I
• 1:49:52
  can I
• 1:49:54
  can believe she said that? I I actually had the pleasure of spending a week with her,
• 1:49:59
  miss Hillary Clinton. Did you? And
• 1:50:03
  and her entourage for a full week.
• 1:50:07
  And
• 1:50:07
  they were they were a bunch of schmucks
• 1:50:10
  when I had to deal with them, so I can believe it. Yeah.
• 1:50:14
  Unknown: Me bring let me bring another facet in here. There's rumbles that are coming out, and one of them from such people as the notable Jim Willey
• 1:50:23
  that Julian Assange is in white hat hands
• 1:50:26
  and that he's gonna be used to turn the tables on these people. Well, we'll see how that pans out.
• 1:50:34
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:50:35
  Did did
• 1:50:36
  Jim Willey get that information from Q?
• 1:50:39
  Unknown: I I don't know if Jim Willey listens to Q, but where it came from, but it was on the on this little SGT report video that I watched last night.
• 1:50:50
  Unknown: That's not radically diverse from what I projected
• 1:50:53
  when it first occurred on the show in the face this Patriot Network.
• 1:50:58
  Unknown: Well, let me bring something to the point that's really stuck in my craw this week. You know, Brenton came on Friday and somehow had gotten a copy of that
• 1:51:08
  indictment, And he went over it point by point, if you guys remember Friday,
• 1:51:14
  and at the bottom, it was unsigned
• 1:51:17
  by the foreman of the grand jury.
• 1:51:23
  Unsigned?
• 1:51:24
  Unsigned. That
• 1:51:27
  Unknown: makes it a sham legal fictitious document because it's not authenticated with somebody under rule 11 e of the federal rules of evidence requiring somebody with the power and authority to accept culpability, liability, responsibility for the claims made.
• 1:51:42
  Unknown: Well, the the
• 1:51:43
  it's just copy I saw was signed. It was?
• 1:51:48
  Unknown: Yeah. I can send you I'll send you a copy that is. I'll take your word for it. I'll take your word for it. Okay? But but Brent's copy had not been. Okay. And I would, that it,
• 1:51:58
  that's a very interesting difference right there and where the hell he got it but
• 1:52:05
  hopefully,
• 1:52:05
  this will fall in our favor and it'll fall in Julian Assaj's favor.
• 1:52:11
  And that's my hope.
• 1:52:12
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:52:13
  I wanna know where the cat is.
• 1:52:15
  I'm worried about the cat.
• 1:52:20
  I like cats.
• 1:52:25
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:52:26
  we'll see where puss is maybe one of these days. You know, they were trying to blame Ecuador's
• 1:52:32
  backpedaling like crazy, okay,
• 1:52:35
  and they're trying to blame part of his this on his sloppy habits,
• 1:52:39
  and evidently they had a picture of two dishes that were dirty
• 1:52:44
  that gave this was the sloppy way that he was leaving the place, and a picture of the bathroom, which evidently the person commented on, I said it was spotless.
• 1:52:55
  But
• 1:52:56
  it's it's real ugly. And by the way, Moreno,
• 1:53:00
  the president of Ecuador's got a trip coming up to The US, and he may or may not have an audience with president Trump. We'll see.
• 1:53:10
  Unknown: Well, you know, I sent you I sent you an email and some links
• 1:53:15
  or some supposition on my part that isn't it funny that Julian Assange is indicted the day after the day after that the Ecuador
• 1:53:25
  Ecuadorian government enters into an IMF contract.
• 1:53:30
  Unknown: 4,200,000,000?
• 1:53:33
  Unknown: Yeah. And then there's another 6.8,
• 1:53:36
  7 point up to 10 from other sources, Shane. It's the but the IMF is the nut of it.
• 1:53:46
  So Well, interesting times in which we live.
• 1:53:50
  The best thing we got going for So the other skies
• 1:53:54
  we can step out of this stuff. Go ahead, Daryl. Well,
• 1:53:58
  Unknown: it's just I'm just saying, you know, it's just more an aggregate of information that that correlates
• 1:54:04
  and supports my hypothesis that the banks are
• 1:54:08
  are
• 1:54:09
  the sovereign administrators
• 1:54:12
  of
• 1:54:13
  of the
• 1:54:16
  judicial system.
• 1:54:17
  And
• 1:54:19
  so as soon as as soon as Ecuador
• 1:54:23
  releases
• 1:54:25
  sovereignty
• 1:54:26
  and enters into a recognizance with the IMF,
• 1:54:29
  they have a duty.
• 1:54:32
  And and and you have Julian Saund. She's an Australian Australian.
• 1:54:37
  You have Ecuador and a sovereign territory
• 1:54:40
  in London with international immunity.
• 1:54:43
  And all of a sudden, all those jurisdictions and immunities and sovereignties
• 1:54:48
  are laid asunder and laid laid aside
• 1:54:52
  into from a from a superior force, which is is The United States a
• 1:54:58
  a United States grand jury indictment?
• 1:55:01
  What?
• 1:55:02
  Unknown: For a for something they can't prove
• 1:55:05
  they can't prove what they're charging him for is collaborating with Chelsea Banning on cracking a password, and they can't prove he did it.
• 1:55:14
  Unknown: Is this is akin to the Spanish Inquisition.
• 1:55:18
  Unknown: Okay? Absolute. And Or the new third child.
• 1:55:22
  Unknown: Mean I mean, the only thing the only thing left for Julian Assange is to put him in an iron mask.
• 1:55:27
  Okay? And and and and and since he's in London, maybe they're just gonna go ahead and put him in an iron mask and put him in the Tower Of London. Yeah. Stick him on the rack.
• 1:55:38
  Unknown: We'll get the truth out of him. Fire.
• 1:55:40
  We'll get the truth out of him. Put him on the rack over there, Chris.
• 1:55:48
  Unknown: Alright. So Well
• 1:55:51
  But anyway Alright. Sorry I had to drop off there. I That's okay. I had to I had a phone call, and I I had to make some money. Well
• 1:55:59
  Unknown: Hey, man. We drift in and out. We drift in and out. It's an ongoing conversation.
• 1:56:03
  We're one trick ponies here. The only trick we know is freedom, and we try and teach it to you.
• 1:56:09
  If you're teachable, I don't know if you're teachable or not, our guys, the ones that come here, seem to be pretty teachable, and I'm happy to see if myself and my fellows,
• 1:56:18
  such learned fellows as Chris and Daryl
• 1:56:21
  and the others out there can make sure everybody gets a real good
• 1:56:25
  arms around it subject matter hold of this stuff.
• 1:56:30
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:56:31
  Unknown: Freedom freedom is based in freedom freedom freedom for natural people
• 1:56:36
  is
• 1:56:37
  based in natural law. Yep. Okay. The law of nature and nature's God.
• 1:56:42
  Unknown: Freedom is there. Okay? And the truth will set you free. That's right. And they can't legislate it away, but they sure hide it. Samuel, you wanted to ask a question, I think, right there at the last, didn't you?
• 1:56:56
  Unknown: Yeah. For the affidavit,
• 1:56:58
  would you consider using
• 1:57:00
  in care of non domestic and the nearest ZIP code and parentheses and I stuff like wouldn't worry about any of that stuff.
• 1:57:08
  Not important. Okay.
• 1:57:11
  Unknown: General Lutz, let's
• 1:57:12
  put it this way, don't major on the minors,
• 1:57:16
  major on the majors. Okay. Okay? Listen, we'll have Paul with us I'm
• 1:57:20
  not sure what we'll talk about. Brexit will probably come up and no telling what else, but everybody enjoys Paul,
• 1:57:26
  and we'll look forward to having him with us tomorrow.
• 1:57:29
  So you guys have a nice day. I'm gonna go have lunch with the expats
• 1:57:32
  and enjoy a stunningly
• 1:57:34
  beautiful day in Ecuador today. So I'll see you guys tomorrow. Have a great day. I hope you got something out of today's show. There's a lot of meat in there.
• 1:57:43
  Unknown: Thanks. Thank you, guys. Bye. Have a seat. Ciao, amigos. Bye
• 1:57:48
  Unknown: bye.
• 1:57:49
  Unknown: Pasta la vista,
• 1:58:42
  Unknown: Blasting the voice of Freedom Worldwide,
• 1:58:45
  you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 1:58:49
  Unknown: Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.