Latest / Crosstabs / Rep. Paul Evans - Vets, Prep and Limits
Transcript
- 0:16SPEAKER_02: I'm ready when you're ready.
- 0:17SPEAKER_02: You ready?
- 0:18SPEAKER_02: I'm ready.
- 0:19SPEAKER_02: We have new mics, so this is the second round of mics.
- 0:21SPEAKER_02: I think the last mics went pretty well.
- 0:23SPEAKER_02: I think so, too.
- 0:24SPEAKER_00: We're here.
- 0:25SPEAKER_00: The real question is, Representative Paul Evans, why are you still here?
- 0:28SPEAKER_00: You've been in the legislature a few years, right?
- 0:30SPEAKER_01: I've been in the legislature since 2015.
- 0:31SPEAKER_01: 2015.
- 0:31SPEAKER_01: So this is your 11th year now.
- 0:32SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 0:37SPEAKER_00: Wow.
- 0:38SPEAKER_00: It only feels like 100.
- 0:40SPEAKER_02: What did you do before?
- 0:41SPEAKER_02: You were in the Navy, Army?
- 0:44SPEAKER_02: Air Force.
- 0:44SPEAKER_02: Sorry, Air Force.
- 0:45SPEAKER_02: That's right.
- 0:46SPEAKER_02: I was in the Army.
- 0:47SPEAKER_02: That's all right.
- 0:48So everybody's giving each other loves today on Ways and Means,
- 0:50and I was texting Vicki.
- 0:52SPEAKER_02: I said, what, nothing for your husband?
- 0:54SPEAKER_02: You know, a little help?
- 0:56SPEAKER_02: Nothing.
- 0:57SPEAKER_01: She put it in the text ring.
- 0:59SPEAKER_01: What did you do in the Air Force?
- 1:02SPEAKER_01: I was an air weapons controller, mission crew commander.
- 1:05SPEAKER_01: Oh, nice.
- 1:06SPEAKER_01: My last overseas assignment, I was the...
- 1:12SPEAKER_01: in theater mission crew commander that I answered to a one star,
- 1:15SPEAKER_01: the Joint Forces Air Component Commander,
- 1:18SPEAKER_01: everything that flew in that theater worked for me.
- 1:21SPEAKER_01: So I had a surveillance section,
- 1:23SPEAKER_01: ID section,
- 1:24SPEAKER_01: weapon section,
- 1:25SPEAKER_01: air defense section,
- 1:26SPEAKER_01: and my job was to make sure that
- 1:29SPEAKER_01: Time-sensitive targets were prosecuted.
- 1:32SPEAKER_01: Troops in contact were serviced,
- 1:34SPEAKER_01: making sure aircraft got refueling,
- 1:37and making sure that my team of 20 actually were able to put
- 1:41fire wherever we
- 1:42SPEAKER_01: needed to to protect our kids.
- 1:44SPEAKER_01: Best job I ever had.
- 1:45SPEAKER_01: That was in theaters, so where was that?
- 1:47SPEAKER_01: The last one was in Afghanistan.
- 1:49SPEAKER_00: Okay.
- 1:49SPEAKER_02: Oh, wait, wow.
- 1:51SPEAKER_02: Wow.
- 1:51SPEAKER_02: Thank you for that.
- 1:54SPEAKER_00: Thank you for your service.
- 1:55SPEAKER_02: I was in Germany.
- 1:56SPEAKER_02: But I never, I got the Bosnia.
- 1:57From what I've heard,
- 1:58there's some places in Germany that can be kind of tough.
- 2:01SPEAKER_02: I went to Bosnia, so I was there during that time, kind of in the 90s.
- 2:04SPEAKER_02: The First World War or the Second one?
- 2:06SPEAKER_00: Sorry, sorry.
- 2:07SPEAKER_00: I'm not that old, but you're a jerk.
- 2:09SPEAKER_00: I need a question about my wars.
- 2:10SPEAKER_01: I was in Bosnia.
- 2:11SPEAKER_01: I was actually in Italy in support of the Bosnian campaign in 1995.
- 2:15SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 2:18SPEAKER_01: In 1998, we had a warm-up for the Kosovo campaign.
- 2:21SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 2:21SPEAKER_02: Back in Italy.
- 2:23SPEAKER_02: Yeah, that was in 95 I was there.
- 2:25But yeah,
- 2:26I was outside of Würzburg in Germany is where I stationed first
- 2:29ID outside of there.
- 2:30SPEAKER_02: It was fun.
- 2:32SPEAKER_02: I enjoyed it.
- 2:32SPEAKER_02: I enjoyed being in Europe.
- 2:33SPEAKER_02: That part was kind of fun.
- 2:34SPEAKER_02: That time of the 90s,
- 2:37SPEAKER_02: it was still kind of hard when it went east,
- 2:41SPEAKER_02: but it was still fun traveling.
- 2:43Every weekend I'd take the $29 bus trip to northern Italy or
- 2:47Switzerland or
- 2:48SPEAKER_02: something,
- 2:48SPEAKER_02: and it would be 48 hours.
- 2:50SPEAKER_02: It was so much fun.
- 2:51SPEAKER_02: It was a blast.
- 2:53SPEAKER_00: Oh, that's great.
- 2:54SPEAKER_00: Would you say that's how public transportation should work, Brian?
- 2:58SPEAKER_02: Well,
- 2:58SPEAKER_02: I don't believe in public transportation,
- 3:00but I think in Europe it worked really well because we built a
- 3:03really good grid
- 3:04SPEAKER_02: after we destroyed it.
- 3:05SPEAKER_02: So if we destroyed everything and we could probably start over,
- 3:10SPEAKER_02: I bet we'd build a really better transportation grid.
- 3:13SPEAKER_02: And you might even get your bridge to West Salem.
- 3:15SPEAKER_02: Someday.
- 3:16SPEAKER_02: Someday.
- 3:16SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 3:17SPEAKER_00: Well, I'm looking at just a top secret document, Brian.
- 3:21SPEAKER_00: So this is,
- 3:22SPEAKER_00: I think,
- 3:22one of the great things about being able to go across the aisle
- 3:25is you can share
- 3:25SPEAKER_00: information.
- 3:26SPEAKER_00: And here I'm looking at the secret plan to defeat the Republicans.
- 3:30SPEAKER_00: And I know there are very many,
- 3:31SPEAKER_00: especially,
- 3:32SPEAKER_00: I think,
- 3:32SPEAKER_00: House Republicans who know that this existed.
- 3:35SPEAKER_00: They believed it existed, but they've never seen it.
- 3:38SPEAKER_00: And you should take a picture of this.
- 3:41SPEAKER_00: It's a blank page.
- 3:43SPEAKER_00: So I don't know if he redacted everything.
- 3:45SPEAKER_00: I'll put it on the cover, Reagan.
- 3:46SPEAKER_00: No, it's not redacted.
- 3:47SPEAKER_00: It's not redacted.
- 3:48SPEAKER_00: It just doesn't exist.
- 3:49SPEAKER_00: There's nothing on it.
- 3:50It's just that sometimes we say we have a plan,
- 3:52and the plan is to have a plan.
- 3:53SPEAKER_00: The plan is to have a plan, yes.
- 3:55SPEAKER_00: And listen, I mean, we probably have a plan to defeat the Democrats.
- 3:59SPEAKER_00: It's very similar.
- 4:01uh and we'll we'll put whatever on it needs to go on it i guess
- 4:03but it's just you
- 4:04know i just thought you guys might want to actually know
- 4:06transparency is important
- 4:07to me yeah i appreciate that we have no plan i appreciate well
- 4:11yeah i don't know
- 4:12what our plan is i don't i'm not doing leadership stuff this
- 4:15time so it's funny i'm
- 4:16not either yeah yeah that's right you uh quietly retired yeah
- 4:20yeah from leadership
- 4:21SPEAKER_01: yes yes
- 4:24SPEAKER_01: Shortest leadership stint, I think, in Oregon history.
- 4:27SPEAKER_01: Wow.
- 4:28SPEAKER_01: How long?
- 4:29SPEAKER_01: Four months, I think.
- 4:30SPEAKER_02: Four months?
- 4:30SPEAKER_02: Oh, wow.
- 4:31SPEAKER_02: Well,
- 4:31SPEAKER_02: so Rep Chudson was saying,
- 4:33so it was basically you and two other ones that were doing the
- 4:35campaign side.
- 4:37SPEAKER_02: Well, politics.
- 4:38SPEAKER_02: Or the politics side.
- 4:39SPEAKER_02: And then he was kind of doing the policy side.
- 4:41SPEAKER_02: Because we asked him kind of how they did it.
- 4:43SPEAKER_02: That's what we let him think.
- 4:46SPEAKER_02: He's young.
- 4:46SPEAKER_02: He is young.
- 4:47SPEAKER_01: We want him to be excited.
- 4:48SPEAKER_02: Yes, he is a rookie, so that part's good.
- 4:52SPEAKER_02: That was fun.
- 4:52We had a good conversation with him,
- 4:54and he seems to enjoy the policy stuff.
- 4:56He's not quite there on the politics stuff yet,
- 4:58but you learn that over time.
- 5:00SPEAKER_01: I believe,
- 5:03whether you're Republican or Democrat or Pirate Party or
- 5:06whatever you want to call
- 5:07SPEAKER_01: yourself,
- 5:08If you have a heart and a head and can figure a balance,
- 5:12we need you here.
- 5:13SPEAKER_01: And he's got a big heart and a big head.
- 5:15SPEAKER_01: And I think he's going to be a great legislator over time.
- 5:19SPEAKER_01: My job as an old guy is to sometimes give a bad time to him.
- 5:22SPEAKER_01: as the old school approach of beating him into the job a little bit.
- 5:27SPEAKER_01: He's far brighter than I ever was and he's got,
- 5:30SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 5:31a once in a class or once in a group of folks mind for
- 5:38understanding the third or
- 5:39SPEAKER_01: fourth level of a problem.
- 5:41SPEAKER_02: That's a good point.
- 5:42SPEAKER_00: So when you got here,
- 5:43SPEAKER_00: let's take that,
- 5:44SPEAKER_00: when you got here as a freshman,
- 5:45SPEAKER_00: who were some of those people for you?
- 5:48Who were some of your mentors or some of the people who kind of
- 5:50took you under
- 5:50SPEAKER_00: their wing in this process?
- 5:52SPEAKER_01: When I first got here in 2015, I wasn't supposed to be here.
- 5:55I won a seat that a particular political consultant we won't
- 5:59name had guaranteed
- 6:01SPEAKER_01: would not be lost.
- 6:03SPEAKER_01: And surprise, I got here by 744 votes in America.
- 6:06SPEAKER_01: And, um,
- 6:10SPEAKER_01: I had lots of mentors.
- 6:12SPEAKER_01: Some I didn't really see as mentors, but they saw me as somebody to mold.
- 6:18SPEAKER_01: Val Hoyle did her best every day to remind me that I was not...
- 6:22SPEAKER_01: She was your majority leader then?
- 6:23SPEAKER_01: She was the majority leader.
- 6:24She was very good at reminding me every day that I shouldn't be
- 6:27asking questions
- 6:28SPEAKER_01: and my vote really didn't matter and that I should shut up and call her.
- 6:32She'd never served in the military,
- 6:34but her approach certainly represented it.
- 6:37SPEAKER_01: And then my mentors were really Brian Clem,
- 6:42SPEAKER_01: because we'd been friends for 30 years,
- 6:44SPEAKER_01: Jeff Parker,
- 6:47SPEAKER_01: Greg Matthews.
- 6:48I had worked in the governor's office from 2007 to 2010 and
- 6:51then went into private
- 6:53SPEAKER_01: sector and then went back into teaching.
- 6:57When I had been in the governor's office,
- 6:59Greg Matthews was a new legislator.
- 7:01SPEAKER_01: I got here in 2015 just as he was leaving.
- 7:03SPEAKER_01: But that first term, I called him a lot, asking for advice.
- 7:07SPEAKER_01: Vicki Berger, who had the seat before me, is still a mentor.
- 7:10SPEAKER_01: I call her and ask her for advice.
- 7:14SPEAKER_01: But Jeff Barker was my assigned mentor.
- 7:17SPEAKER_01: Margaret Doherty was basically my second Irish mother,
- 7:21SPEAKER_01: who would also tell me every day how his...
- 7:26SPEAKER_01: making mistakes.
- 7:28But we had actually,
- 7:29I think,
- 7:29a pretty crew back then that were centrists.
- 7:33SPEAKER_01: I don't know if they call themselves mods, but I'm a vet.
- 7:36SPEAKER_01: I have 35 firearms, I believe, the second method.
- 7:41SPEAKER_01: I used to go to a church until I got kicked out over a gun.
- 7:47SPEAKER_01: So I'm not exactly the lefty part of our caucus, but I still believe in
- 7:52universal access to education and healthcare,
- 7:54I just believe you should work for it.
- 7:55SPEAKER_01: So there was a space there at that point.
- 7:59Do you really think the party,
- 8:03because you still have those same core beliefs,
- 8:05right?
- 8:05SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 8:05SPEAKER_02: Those still exist today.
- 8:06So where do you think the Democratic Party as a whole then is,
- 8:11I mean,
- 8:11is it true?
- 8:12Do you believe it's shifted left of where it wholly believed 10
- 8:17years ago?
- 8:17SPEAKER_01: I do.
- 8:17SPEAKER_01: I do.
- 8:22SPEAKER_01: How do I put this?
- 8:26SPEAKER_01: Someone once said that politics is show business for ugly people.
- 8:30SPEAKER_01: And as a guy who was a face for radio, I firmly welcome that example.
- 8:36SPEAKER_01: Politics is a show.
- 8:38There are certain things that people do because they think that
- 8:41it's going to help
- 8:42SPEAKER_01: them and their image.
- 8:45SPEAKER_01: I still believe 50 to 60 to 70 percent of the folks that are here
- 8:50If you did a Venn diagram,
- 8:53what we want are probably somewhere in the same shape.
- 8:56SPEAKER_01: How we describe it, how we view it, everything else will be different.
- 8:59SPEAKER_01: What's changed is,
- 9:01SPEAKER_01: in my opinion,
- 9:03the extremes of both parties now are kind of not just satisfied
- 9:08with you believing
- 9:10SPEAKER_01: in the cause...
- 9:11SPEAKER_01: but they want you to fight Pyrrhic victories that are divisive,
- 9:15SPEAKER_01: purposefully divisive,
- 9:17and they want you to fight for Pyrrhic victories that 100% is
- 9:22the beginning of the
- 9:23SPEAKER_01: negotiation.
- 9:24SPEAKER_01: They think there's a 200% somehow.
- 9:27SPEAKER_01: And I think in our party in particular,
- 9:30SPEAKER_01: we try to be a party of a big tent,
- 9:32SPEAKER_01: but when you start standing for everything,
- 9:34SPEAKER_01: you really don't stand for much of anything.
- 9:37SPEAKER_01: So I'm trying to say, look,
- 9:41SPEAKER_01: As a guy who spent 20 years in the military,
- 9:42SPEAKER_01: who believes in a multicultural society,
- 9:46SPEAKER_01: who respects different faiths and different ethnic traditions,
- 9:50SPEAKER_01: everybody is part of the melting pot.
- 9:52SPEAKER_01: At the same time, perhaps maybe identity politics isn't
- 9:57the best way we can move forward maybe perhaps we can focus on
- 10:01little things like
- 10:02civics like making our schools work like making sure that small
- 10:06business and
- 10:07working families and big business owners have an infrastructure
- 10:10grid that functions
- 10:11like let's get back to the governance side and unfortunately in
- 10:15my party especially
- 10:18with social media and just some of the ways that communication
- 10:21happens now
- 10:23People pick fights to get clicks to do things that then have
- 10:27consequences they
- 10:28SPEAKER_01: don't think about,
- 10:29SPEAKER_01: and that affects relationships,
- 10:30SPEAKER_01: because this building is built on relationships.
- 10:32SPEAKER_01: So I think we've not only moved left,
- 10:35but I think the type of legislature that we're getting now from
- 10:38the left and the
- 10:38SPEAKER_01: right,
- 10:39SPEAKER_01: partially because of COVID,
- 10:41SPEAKER_01: partially because of the construction,
- 10:43SPEAKER_01: they're not used to actually dealing with people
- 10:46SPEAKER_01: In their face, they're not really used to criticism.
- 10:48SPEAKER_01: They're kind of in a bubble.
- 10:51SPEAKER_01: And a lot of folks have never governed before.
- 10:52SPEAKER_01: They come out of the advocacy world.
- 10:55SPEAKER_01: And,
- 10:55SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 10:56SPEAKER_01: the reason that Rick Lewis and I,
- 10:58SPEAKER_01: literally,
- 10:59SPEAKER_01: on a committee that I never had a majority on,
- 11:01SPEAKER_01: I always had equal numbers,
- 11:02SPEAKER_01: Democrat,
- 11:02SPEAKER_01: Republican,
- 11:03SPEAKER_01: when I ran the committee,
- 11:05SPEAKER_01: the reason and the way we put 29-27 together,
- 11:08SPEAKER_01: the restructured emergency management,
- 11:09SPEAKER_01: was we put the partisan stuff out and we said,
- 11:12SPEAKER_01: If it's good policy, it's in.
- 11:14SPEAKER_01: If it's shitty policy, it's out.
- 11:16How do we actually make sure that these agencies are freed and
- 11:19simple enough to
- 11:20SPEAKER_01: function,
- 11:21SPEAKER_01: and yet at the same time they don't run like kittens across the stage?
- 11:24SPEAKER_01: So he was local government.
- 11:26SPEAKER_01: I was a former local government guy.
- 11:28And that takes us into kind of what you guys are doing in the
- 11:31short session,
- 11:31SPEAKER_00: which is your veterans omnibus bill.
- 11:34SPEAKER_00: Can you talk us through,
- 11:35SPEAKER_00: because there's some discussion,
- 11:37SPEAKER_00: a little bit in Ways and Means,
- 11:38SPEAKER_00: but not a ton,
- 11:38SPEAKER_00: about what you guys are doing with the omnibus,
- 11:41SPEAKER_00: because I was reading it,
- 11:42SPEAKER_00: and I was reading it last night,
- 11:43SPEAKER_00: because I'm a bad chief of staff that doesn't prep until the last minute.
- 11:46SPEAKER_00: This is true.
- 11:47SPEAKER_00: This is true.
- 11:48SPEAKER_00: So...
- 11:49Walk me through why set that threshold that you did at the 10
- 11:52million funding index
- 11:54SPEAKER_00: to inflation back from 2015 when you got here,
- 11:56SPEAKER_00: right?
- 11:57SPEAKER_00: With some of the things that you're doing in 2017.
- 11:58SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 11:59SPEAKER_01: So here's what happened.
- 12:00SPEAKER_01: In 2015, I got elected.
- 12:03SPEAKER_01: 2016, I wasn't supposed to be able to win re-election.
- 12:08SPEAKER_01: And the speaker,
- 12:09SPEAKER_01: this is now the governor,
- 12:11SPEAKER_01: said,
- 12:11SPEAKER_01: look,
- 12:12SPEAKER_01: it was a miracle you got here the first time.
- 12:14SPEAKER_01: We're not really planning on you being here.
- 12:16What's the one thing that you actually would like to accomplish
- 12:18if you're a one-term person?
- 12:20SPEAKER_01: And I said,
- 12:20the only thing I want to accomplish is finish the work of
- 12:25funding the programs that
- 12:27we laid out in the 2008 Task Force on Veteran Services that I'd
- 12:30led when I was for
- 12:31SPEAKER_01: Kungoski.
- 12:32SPEAKER_01: We had 36 bills and 14 different executive orders,
- 12:37SPEAKER_01: but because of the recession,
- 12:38SPEAKER_01: we were never able to fund it.
- 12:39SPEAKER_01: We were never able to do a lot of that work.
- 12:42SPEAKER_01: So I said,
- 12:42SPEAKER_01: what I want is what Julie Parrish wants,
- 12:45SPEAKER_01: which not surprisingly got a surprise on her face,
- 12:48SPEAKER_01: but I said,
- 12:48SPEAKER_01: I want a part of the lottery.
- 12:50Give me 2% or 3% of the lottery,
- 12:53and you won't ever need to give general fund again.
- 12:56SPEAKER_01: And she said, we can get you at 2%.
- 13:01SPEAKER_01: And to her credit...
- 13:03SPEAKER_01: And a lot of people have a lot of views about the governor,
- 13:05but the reason I endorsed her in a primary where I had two
- 13:09friends running,
- 13:10SPEAKER_01: and the reason I've stood up for her is when she gave me her word,
- 13:15SPEAKER_01: We got it out of the House at 2%.
- 13:18SPEAKER_01: It got into the Senate.
- 13:20SPEAKER_01: And a couple of senators,
- 13:21SPEAKER_01: not to name names,
- 13:22SPEAKER_01: Peter Courtney,
- 13:24SPEAKER_01: tried to kill it because they didn't want lottery money going.
- 13:28SPEAKER_01: And she went to bat when no one else would.
- 13:30And basically the building was going to burn down before we
- 13:32left without at least getting 1.5%.
- 13:33SPEAKER_01: And why that's important is
- 13:37SPEAKER_01: They wanted to take it to 1%,
- 13:38which basically would have just taken away the 10 million that
- 13:41we'd finally gotten
- 13:41SPEAKER_01: for general fund for veterans.
- 13:43SPEAKER_01: It would have been a swap.
- 13:44SPEAKER_01: I said, it doesn't get us anything.
- 13:46SPEAKER_01: And plus it lies to the voters.
- 13:47SPEAKER_01: Voters are thinking there's going to be an increase in F2.
- 13:50SPEAKER_01: So we got to 1.5%.
- 13:53SPEAKER_01: That was the deal.
- 13:54SPEAKER_01: No more, no less.
- 13:55SPEAKER_01: 1.5.
- 13:55SPEAKER_01: Yep.
- 13:57SPEAKER_01: We win the election.
- 13:58SPEAKER_01: The election happens.
- 13:59SPEAKER_01: Ballot measure 96 passes by historical, I think, 87, 88% margin.
- 14:05SPEAKER_01: Comes in,
- 14:06SPEAKER_01: the governor's budget,
- 14:07SPEAKER_01: Kate Brown's governor,
- 14:09took the full $10 million out and tried to supplant it with the
- 14:15lottery money.
- 14:17SPEAKER_01: And I told her before the session,
- 14:19SPEAKER_01: I told her at the beginning of the session,
- 14:21SPEAKER_01: I said,
- 14:21SPEAKER_01: please don't do this.
- 14:23SPEAKER_01: Because we made a promise.
- 14:24And as much as you are a governor of my party,
- 14:27my loyalty is with veterans before anybody else.
- 14:30SPEAKER_01: So there was a budget officer who I won't name,
- 14:35SPEAKER_01: who evidently scoffed and said,
- 14:37SPEAKER_01: well,
- 14:37SPEAKER_01: what is the House really going to do about this?
- 14:40SPEAKER_01: Thanks to David Gomberg and Betsy Johnson and some of the others,
- 14:45SPEAKER_01: I made the case and said,
- 14:46SPEAKER_01: look,
- 14:47SPEAKER_01: Every dollar,
- 14:48SPEAKER_01: and I want this as an important thing for the whole show here,
- 14:51SPEAKER_01: every dollar we invest in state money,
- 14:53SPEAKER_01: every dollar,
- 14:54SPEAKER_01: state money,
- 14:56SPEAKER_01: brings back in direct assistance $251.
- 15:02SPEAKER_01: In indirect,
- 15:05SPEAKER_01: so direct means compensation and benefits,
- 15:07SPEAKER_01: getting people into the system,
- 15:09SPEAKER_01: because in America you have to make a claim,
- 15:10SPEAKER_01: as you know,
- 15:11SPEAKER_01: before you can get rated.
- 15:12SPEAKER_01: $251 in direct.
- 15:16SPEAKER_01: indirect GI bill, home loans, those types of things, 501.
- 15:20And if you actually get them into the VA health care system,
- 15:23it's a $1 in for $1,011 return.
- 15:27SPEAKER_01: So I said, look, we have 350,000 veterans.
- 15:31SPEAKER_01: The Vietnam era is starting to pass on.
- 15:33SPEAKER_01: If they don't get their benefits, they never will.
- 15:36SPEAKER_01: Their families don't get them.
- 15:38SPEAKER_01: So we pushed really hard, and we got back 8.5 million of the 10 million
- 15:43SPEAKER_01: in addition to the other programs.
- 15:45SPEAKER_01: And I was supposed to be okay with that.
- 15:47SPEAKER_01: I never had been okay with it.
- 15:48SPEAKER_01: It was supposed to be $10 million.
- 15:50SPEAKER_01: So in the bill, I had a statement for aspirational.
- 15:53SPEAKER_01: Didn't commit the government,
- 15:54SPEAKER_01: but it's reminding them,
- 15:56SPEAKER_01: because in this building,
- 15:57SPEAKER_01: memories fade fast.
- 15:59SPEAKER_01: $10 million was the base before you messed around with it.
- 16:01SPEAKER_01: I wanted to go back to $10 million plus interest.
- 16:03SPEAKER_01: It gets you about $13 million.
- 16:05SPEAKER_00: Amnesia.
- 16:06SPEAKER_00: So it's a political amnesia.
- 16:08SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 16:09SPEAKER_00: Oh, we have a lot of that in this building.
- 16:10SPEAKER_02: Political amnesia.
- 16:13SPEAKER_02: That was a legislator intent.
- 16:15SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 16:16SPEAKER_01: So the bill does several things.
- 16:19SPEAKER_01: We wrote it big,
- 16:21SPEAKER_01: knowing that we probably wouldn't get it,
- 16:22SPEAKER_01: but I wrote in the past,
- 16:27the administration has had issues with the agency trying to
- 16:32grow just because of
- 16:34SPEAKER_01: lots of other things.
- 16:36SPEAKER_01: I've tried it for three or four years before this governor got in.
- 16:42SPEAKER_01: With this governor,
- 16:43SPEAKER_01: and again under priorities that I understand,
- 16:48have not been able to grow the staff that I think we need for
- 16:51the specific needs of
- 16:52SPEAKER_01: this current era of veterans.
- 16:54SPEAKER_01: They need some different coordinators to go after and get them.
- 16:57SPEAKER_01: So I've tried it through the agency.
- 16:59SPEAKER_01: That didn't work.
- 17:00SPEAKER_01: Tried it in ones and twos through the budget process.
- 17:02SPEAKER_01: That didn't work.
- 17:03SPEAKER_01: So this time I basically,
- 17:04SPEAKER_01: with a stakeholder group,
- 17:06SPEAKER_01: we named 12 positions we wanted to add,
- 17:09SPEAKER_01: but we added them at 28,
- 17:11SPEAKER_01: 30,
- 17:11SPEAKER_01: and 32 so that we had time to basically get there.
- 17:15SPEAKER_01: God bless the co-chairs.
- 17:16SPEAKER_01: They're like, yeah, we're not going to put that into statute.
- 17:18SPEAKER_01: But you got our attention.
- 17:19SPEAKER_01: What are you trying to do?
- 17:20SPEAKER_01: And I said, look, we need these positions.
- 17:23SPEAKER_01: An agency is afraid to ask for them and to ask.
- 17:26SPEAKER_01: And by the time you get through the process, it's never really added.
- 17:30SPEAKER_01: We add a whole lot of people to DHS.
- 17:31SPEAKER_01: We add a whole lot of people to other places.
- 17:33SPEAKER_01: The veterans just never gets there.
- 17:35SPEAKER_01: So by God, I'm going to put a fire on it, and I want the conversation.
- 17:39SPEAKER_01: And to their credit,
- 17:40SPEAKER_01: they're like,
- 17:41SPEAKER_01: look,
- 17:41SPEAKER_01: we're not going to fund it now,
- 17:42SPEAKER_01: but we'll have the conversation,
- 17:44SPEAKER_01: which is what I want.
- 17:45The other things the bill does is it allows a little more
- 17:47flexibility for the
- 17:49SPEAKER_01: education grant fund.
- 17:50SPEAKER_01: It goes from $5,000 to $10,000 because the cost of education has gone up.
- 17:54SPEAKER_01: We create a new suicide prevention program,
- 17:56SPEAKER_01: which is really going to be cool because it will actually be
- 17:59SPEAKER_01: Programs that are out there and they're struggling and they basically,
- 18:02SPEAKER_01: I look at it as a third of the funding type thing.
- 18:04If they've got two-thirds but they need that last bill a bit to
- 18:07make it work,
- 18:07they can apply.
- 18:09We're now protecting for the Vietnam-era guys who were told
- 18:12when they were getting
- 18:13SPEAKER_01: out,
- 18:14SPEAKER_01: send your DD Form 214 to the county clerk.
- 18:17SPEAKER_01: Well,
- 18:17SPEAKER_01: what happened is because of new laws on public information,
- 18:21some of these Vietnam vets are having their DD Form 214s caught
- 18:25up in public
- 18:25SPEAKER_01: information requests.
- 18:27SPEAKER_01: So their social's out, their history's out.
- 18:30SPEAKER_01: So we're trying to fix that.
- 18:31SPEAKER_01: It's a lot of little things.
- 18:33SPEAKER_01: But overall, it's the biggest vets package we've had since 2017.
- 18:36SPEAKER_01: So I'm grateful that everybody came together.
- 18:39SPEAKER_01: We had wonderful stakeholders.
- 18:41SPEAKER_01: AOC is still a little nervous about one part of the section,
- 18:45but I think at the end of the day they're going to be happy
- 18:48because what we're
- 18:49trying to do is every year some counties end up not spending
- 18:53the money for veteran
- 18:54SPEAKER_01: services through the VSO program.
- 18:58And some counties are really doing a lot of work and they need
- 19:01more money,
- 19:01SPEAKER_01: but we don't have it to give.
- 19:03SPEAKER_01: What this does is in the last quarter,
- 19:05SPEAKER_01: so only the last quarter of the biennium,
- 19:09SPEAKER_01: it says,
- 19:09SPEAKER_01: all right,
- 19:09SPEAKER_01: if monies aren't expended,
- 19:11we're going to be able to reallocate them to the folks that
- 19:13actually have a plan to
- 19:14SPEAKER_01: use it to help more vets.
- 19:16SPEAKER_01: So, again, I think it's a good bill.
- 19:19SPEAKER_00: Does that make sense?
- 19:21SPEAKER_02: So Oregon kind of sucks when it comes to veterans.
- 19:24SPEAKER_02: We're number 45 out of vets.
- 19:26SPEAKER_02: That's what Senator Manning said in Ways and Means today.
- 19:28SPEAKER_02: Yeah, we're pretty horrible in that.
- 19:30And I just have to assume maybe it's more of a cultural thing
- 19:34we don't have.
- 19:36SPEAKER_02: A base, right?
- 19:37SPEAKER_02: We don't have kind of like, so you don't really have a voting block.
- 19:40You don't really have like somebody who represents a base or
- 19:43has a portion of a base.
- 19:46SPEAKER_02: I mean,
- 19:46do you think that's kind of really more where that culture
- 19:48comes from of why it's
- 19:49SPEAKER_02: just so difficult to...
- 19:53SPEAKER_01: I think so.
- 19:53SPEAKER_01: I mean...
- 19:56SPEAKER_01: I think that the points you illustrate are absolutely true.
- 20:00SPEAKER_01: I also think there's a libertarian streak in Oregon that is there.
- 20:07The reason we lost our base in Portland was because a governor
- 20:11got into a contest
- 20:12SPEAKER_01: with a president,
- 20:13SPEAKER_01: both by the way of the same party,
- 20:14SPEAKER_01: Republican to Republican.
- 20:16SPEAKER_01: And one president,
- 20:19SPEAKER_01: Nixon,
- 20:20SPEAKER_01: told another governor,
- 20:21SPEAKER_01: you either do this or else,
- 20:23SPEAKER_01: and then the base went away.
- 20:24SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 20:26SPEAKER_01: So it isn't a partisan thing.
- 20:30SPEAKER_01: I think it is a cultural thing in that we just don't have the military,
- 20:33SPEAKER_01: at least active duty,
- 20:34SPEAKER_01: as a big part of our state.
- 20:35SPEAKER_01: That said,
- 20:37SPEAKER_01: proportionately,
- 20:37we're actually one of the bigger guard states in terms of
- 20:40number of guard per
- 20:40SPEAKER_01: population.
- 20:41SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 20:42SPEAKER_01: And our mission state,
- 20:43because of Kay Falls with the training base and then the active
- 20:47birds out of
- 20:47SPEAKER_01: Portland,
- 20:49SPEAKER_01: our reach and our importance in the National Guards,
- 20:51SPEAKER_01: we punch above our weight.
- 20:52SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 20:54SPEAKER_01: I think people want to support veterans, they just are unfamiliar.
- 20:58SPEAKER_01: And so it's not a priority.
- 20:59SPEAKER_02: Yeah,
- 20:59SPEAKER_02: because I talk to some of them,
- 21:01and of course they hate the fact that they have to pay income
- 21:04taxes on their
- 21:05SPEAKER_02: federal money.
- 21:06SPEAKER_02: I mean, that's a big one that drops us down the list, right?
- 21:10SPEAKER_02: Absolutely.
- 21:12And so then we're also not attracting those people to our state
- 21:15because they're not
- 21:15SPEAKER_02: going to go if they're going to pay 9% on their...
- 21:18SPEAKER_01: And we're not helping them on property tax.
- 21:19SPEAKER_01: No, we don't help them on anything, really.
- 21:21SPEAKER_01: And on education...
- 21:23SPEAKER_01: We haven't made some of the,
- 21:24SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 21:25SPEAKER_01: because of the veterans lottery,
- 21:27SPEAKER_01: we've put campus veteran service officer programs out there.
- 21:29But some states really have put programs that recruit students
- 21:35so that maybe they
- 21:36SPEAKER_01: might stay afterwards.
- 21:37SPEAKER_01: We've never been able to have the resources to do that.
- 21:41SPEAKER_02: I think,
- 21:42SPEAKER_02: like,
- 21:43SPEAKER_02: if I were to put my tinfoil hat on,
- 21:45SPEAKER_02: part of the desire is veterans,
- 21:48SPEAKER_02: for the most part,
- 21:50SPEAKER_02: tend to vote center-right.
- 21:52SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 21:53SPEAKER_02: of the number,
- 21:54and so I think states like Oregon don't actually want to cater
- 21:57to those voters over
- 22:01SPEAKER_02: time,
- 22:02SPEAKER_02: right?
- 22:02SPEAKER_02: I mean, it's not like, oh, they make this
- 22:04SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 22:05SPEAKER_02: very hard and fast rule,
- 22:06SPEAKER_02: but I think there's something to like,
- 22:08SPEAKER_02: well,
- 22:09SPEAKER_02: they just say they put it off.
- 22:11SPEAKER_02: We don't have a base.
- 22:11SPEAKER_02: We don't really have that many people,
- 22:12SPEAKER_02: but I think,
- 22:14SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 22:14SPEAKER_02: especially if you wanted to retire,
- 22:16SPEAKER_02: I mean,
- 22:16SPEAKER_02: our coastline is an incredible place to retire.
- 22:19SPEAKER_02: You know,
- 22:20SPEAKER_02: we should be going after those,
- 22:21SPEAKER_02: those veterans and like the stuff you're doing,
- 22:23SPEAKER_02: the services,
- 22:24SPEAKER_02: um,
- 22:25are incredible because that's an attractant as people,
- 22:27especially the younger ones,
- 22:29right?
- 22:29SPEAKER_02: The education bonuses and stuff.
- 22:31We kind of want those people who are the people that usually
- 22:34don't mind taking
- 22:35SPEAKER_02: risks,
- 22:36SPEAKER_02: starting small businesses,
- 22:38SPEAKER_02: doing all the things.
- 22:39So I feel like we should attract those people to the state
- 22:41because isn't that what
- 22:42SPEAKER_02: we're supposed to be doing,
- 22:43SPEAKER_02: some prosperity?
- 22:44SPEAKER_01: I'm glad you actually said that because...
- 22:48SPEAKER_01: The next plan in the book for veterans,
- 22:52SPEAKER_01: I don't have one for Republicans or Democrats,
- 22:54SPEAKER_01: but I have one for veterans,
- 22:56SPEAKER_01: is we're going to try to put together a specific program,
- 22:59SPEAKER_01: and Angstrom and I tried to do this a while back for concrete folks,
- 23:04but targeted industries where vets may want to become not just
- 23:10a worker or a
- 23:12SPEAKER_01: contract worker,
- 23:13but actually an owner of a company and try to find ways to
- 23:16basically support both
- 23:19The industry is to help hire more vets and then also to train
- 23:22them to be small business owners.
- 23:25SPEAKER_01: Because what Oregon can do,
- 23:28SPEAKER_01: we don't have enough money to be able to replicate what the feds do,
- 23:31SPEAKER_01: but we have the money to unlock federal money.
- 23:35SPEAKER_01: And Congress has done a lot for vets, but it's hard for vets to find it.
- 23:39So,
- 23:39like for example,
- 23:40there are specific loans specifically for veteran businesses.
- 23:45SPEAKER_01: But going through the Byzantine effort to find them is a problem.
- 23:50SPEAKER_01: So my hope is we can actually take program A,
- 23:55SPEAKER_01: put money with a navigator,
- 23:57SPEAKER_01: and say,
- 23:58SPEAKER_01: all right,
- 23:58SPEAKER_01: this year we're going to focus on truck drivers,
- 24:01SPEAKER_01: for example.
- 24:02Next year,
- 24:02we're going to focus on something else,
- 24:04but very clear,
- 24:06very crisp.
- 24:07And we can't do everything but focus on a sector or a
- 24:09particular job and try to
- 24:11SPEAKER_01: build the ecosystem of owners and operators.
- 24:14SPEAKER_01: And I think that that can bring some stability.
- 24:20SPEAKER_01: And if we're smart about it,
- 24:22SPEAKER_01: a lot of vets,
- 24:22SPEAKER_01: they want,
- 24:23SPEAKER_01: especially after you've been overseas or been in for a bit,
- 24:27Going back to being a clerk at Walmart just doesn't quite have
- 24:30the same zing as
- 24:31SPEAKER_01: leading the fire team through the bush.
- 24:34SPEAKER_01: So you want a little bit more responsibility.
- 24:36SPEAKER_01: You want a little bit more of that.
- 24:37SPEAKER_01: So I think that that's our next step.
- 24:39SPEAKER_02: I agree,
- 24:39SPEAKER_02: because I think that's where,
- 24:40SPEAKER_02: because vets have that mentality of wanting,
- 24:43SPEAKER_02: they're kind of risk takers just in general.
- 24:46SPEAKER_02: So that idea,
- 24:46SPEAKER_02: you need to have a little bit of the risk taking to start a business,
- 24:49SPEAKER_02: to go to a small town in Oregon and say,
- 24:52SPEAKER_02: yeah,
- 24:52I'm going to start a rock crushing pit and I'm going to throw
- 24:54everything on the
- 24:55SPEAKER_02: line and mortgage my house and see if I can make this thing do it.
- 24:58SPEAKER_02: But they're going to put in 90 hours a week trying to make it happen.
- 25:01SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 25:02SPEAKER_02: And hire other people.
- 25:03SPEAKER_02: And I just think that that's really,
- 25:06SPEAKER_02: instead of maybe going after the targeted,
- 25:08SPEAKER_02: we just want the income taxes taken away.
- 25:11Maybe going after this idea,
- 25:12how do we attract them to become economic surpluses to our
- 25:17state?
- 25:17SPEAKER_02: And I applaud that.
- 25:19SPEAKER_02: That's a great idea.
- 25:20SPEAKER_02: Well, I'll be talking to your wife about getting some help for that.
- 25:22SPEAKER_02: She would.
- 25:23SPEAKER_02: She's got a few.
- 25:24SPEAKER_02: She's got a couple of allowed ones in our district.
- 25:26SPEAKER_02: Mostly me.
- 25:27SPEAKER_02: But especially on the right to start stuff,
- 25:30because I really think our state needs to figure out a way to
- 25:34help people,
- 25:35SPEAKER_02: to your point,
- 25:37SPEAKER_02: navigate how to just start a business.
- 25:39SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 25:39SPEAKER_02: Like you said, they may be great at...
- 25:42SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 25:43SPEAKER_02: crushing rock,
- 25:44SPEAKER_02: like we're talking about,
- 25:45SPEAKER_02: just that industry,
- 25:45SPEAKER_02: but they don't know accounting.
- 25:47SPEAKER_02: Like, I've got to figure out that piece.
- 25:49SPEAKER_02: I've got to figure out how to HR and payroll.
- 25:52And it's getting a little better with stuff out there,
- 25:54but it seems very daunting.
- 25:56SPEAKER_01: It does.
- 25:56SPEAKER_02: You know, and then the banking side of it.
- 25:58SPEAKER_02: How do I get a loan and what sort of services are out there?
- 26:01SPEAKER_01: That's where I actually believe the state of North Dakota,
- 26:04SPEAKER_01: that great liberal bastion,
- 26:06SPEAKER_01: gives us the best idea for a state bank.
- 26:10SPEAKER_01: It's specifically for businesses.
- 26:14SPEAKER_01: It's not a checking account.
- 26:16SPEAKER_01: It's not a savings account,
- 26:17but basically money that can be used to leverage and support
- 26:21startups or businesses
- 26:23SPEAKER_01: that are in niche industries that if we didn't have,
- 26:25SPEAKER_01: we'd lose others.
- 26:27SPEAKER_01: And again,
- 26:28SPEAKER_01: if I trusted Business Oregon more,
- 26:30SPEAKER_01: I'd suggest it there,
- 26:30SPEAKER_01: but I don't,
- 26:31SPEAKER_01: and they know it.
- 26:31SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 26:32SPEAKER_01: So...
- 26:33SPEAKER_02: Well, I think, who was it?
- 26:36SPEAKER_02: Was it you who said it Ways and Means this morning?
- 26:38SPEAKER_02: You know, rep Smith said they just kind of keep re-changing OBD.
- 26:43SPEAKER_02: You know, it's just shuffling the decks on the Titanic, right?
- 26:46SPEAKER_02: And it's really,
- 26:47SPEAKER_02: because they're just giving so many different roles to do,
- 26:50SPEAKER_02: except for help people just start businesses.
- 26:53SPEAKER_02: Can you just do that?
- 26:54SPEAKER_02: I've seen some proposals in Missouri.
- 26:56SPEAKER_02: There was a really good one where the states set aside
- 26:59a percentage of all of their contracts had to go to small
- 27:03businesses that started
- 27:04SPEAKER_02: in the last five years.
- 27:06SPEAKER_02: I like that.
- 27:06So it kind of required the state to kind of help people as
- 27:10they're starting there.
- 27:12SPEAKER_02: And they give preference points to vets.
- 27:14SPEAKER_02: And they gave a couple preference points to those.
- 27:16SPEAKER_02: And you can do that,
- 27:17SPEAKER_02: I mean,
- 27:17SPEAKER_02: without getting into the identity politics too much that we talked about,
- 27:20SPEAKER_02: but you can do that a little bit by just saying,
- 27:23SPEAKER_02: hey,
- 27:24SPEAKER_02: let's just set aside,
- 27:25SPEAKER_02: to your point,
- 27:25SPEAKER_02: this pot of money or this pot of contracts,
- 27:29To help people,
- 27:29because that's the hardest thing is the getting off the ground.
- 27:32I'll give you one more,
- 27:33and I think your dad,
- 27:35if he's listening,
- 27:36might like this.
- 27:39It's time to amend the law to allow Business Oregon to hire
- 27:43people that can work on commission.
- 27:48you want people to actually be effective in trade overseas,
- 27:52you give them a piece of the pie.
- 27:55SPEAKER_01: Instead of it being an X job with XY benefits and everything else,
- 28:01you get them off their ass and into the fight by giving them an
- 28:05extra 2% or 3% if
- 28:06SPEAKER_01: they're able to land things because incentives in the market do work.
- 28:10SPEAKER_01: Sales.
- 28:11SPEAKER_01: It's sales.
- 28:11SPEAKER_01: And the thing is, the public, in my opinion,
- 28:15Things that are the public's business are generally the things
- 28:17that the private
- 28:18SPEAKER_01: sector couldn't do or shouldn't do.
- 28:21SPEAKER_01: In areas where the state is trying to help business,
- 28:24SPEAKER_01: instead of trying to make it more state and government,
- 28:26SPEAKER_01: it should be more because that's the realm it's in.
- 28:29SPEAKER_01: So what motivates private sector is incentives.
- 28:32SPEAKER_01: Let's actually give them the ability to do that.
- 28:35SPEAKER_01: Most other countries, most other states,
- 28:39SPEAKER_01: do it that way.
- 28:40SPEAKER_01: But for some reason, we haven't really picked that up yet.
- 28:44SPEAKER_00: You mentioned the Titanic.
- 28:46SPEAKER_00: And the Titanic was a pretty big disaster.
- 28:49SPEAKER_00: And speaking of disasters, we've got to prepare for them.
- 28:51SPEAKER_00: Yes, we do.
- 28:52SPEAKER_00: And that's what Spartacus does, I think.
- 28:54SPEAKER_00: Spartacus.
- 28:56SPEAKER_00: So tell me about Spartacus.
- 28:58SPEAKER_00: Is it an acronym?
- 28:59SPEAKER_00: Does it have a meaning?
- 29:01SPEAKER_00: Do you need to pull up the acronym?
- 29:03SPEAKER_00: It's long.
- 29:04SPEAKER_00: It is long.
- 29:05SPEAKER_02: He's got to get his glasses out to full of the acronym.
- 29:08SPEAKER_00: So the whole idea is there's some sort of,
- 29:12SPEAKER_00: the main one being the Cascadia earthquake event,
- 29:15SPEAKER_00: the 100,
- 29:16SPEAKER_00: is it the 100-year earthquake event that people are anticipating?
- 29:18SPEAKER_00: 300 years.
- 29:19The 300-year event,
- 29:20and people are anticipating is going to hit at some point.
- 29:23SPEAKER_00: We have to be ready for it, right?
- 29:24SPEAKER_00: That's right.
- 29:25SPEAKER_00: And I would say among things that get deprioritized in the building,
- 29:29SPEAKER_00: we've already talked about veterans.
- 29:31SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 29:31We could go to higher education and then we could talk about
- 29:34emergency preparedness.
- 29:35Those are the things that just like if you're on the list,
- 29:37like,
- 29:37man,
- 29:38you are at the bottom.
- 29:39SPEAKER_00: Just so happens the three things I care most about.
- 29:41SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 29:43SPEAKER_01: Good job picking topics.
- 29:43SPEAKER_00: That's why you've had to be here longer.
- 29:45SPEAKER_00: It just takes longer to get it done.
- 29:46SPEAKER_00: So tell us about Spartacus.
- 29:47SPEAKER_01: All right.
- 29:48SPEAKER_01: So the acronym.
- 29:49SPEAKER_01: You ready?
- 29:51SPEAKER_01: The Oregon Statewide Preparedness Authority for Response Training in
- 29:55SPEAKER_01: Intergovernmental Continuity of Imperative Services.
- 29:59SPEAKER_00: Spartacus.
- 30:01SPEAKER_00: And it's an I-S at the end, not U-S.
- 30:02SPEAKER_00: I had it spelled wrong.
- 30:03SPEAKER_00: Thank God you have an acronym.
- 30:04SPEAKER_00: Spartacus.
- 30:07So the reason we called it Spartacus is because for three years
- 30:10I was trying to
- 30:11SPEAKER_01: push the same thing and no one heard about it,
- 30:13SPEAKER_01: no one remembered.
- 30:13SPEAKER_01: Now they damn well remember it.
- 30:15SPEAKER_00: It's an acronym.
- 30:16SPEAKER_00: I like it.
- 30:16SPEAKER_00: Yes.
- 30:17SPEAKER_00: I remember hearing about it last session.
- 30:18SPEAKER_00: Yep.
- 30:19SPEAKER_00: So what are you trying to accomplish through it?
- 30:21SPEAKER_00: What would be some of the high priority things?
- 30:23SPEAKER_00: Like you said, big omnibuses, right?
- 30:25SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 30:25They start out as big and expensive as you can make them and
- 30:28you pare them down to
- 30:29SPEAKER_00: get through the process.
- 30:30What's kind of,
- 30:32where did you start or even just like what's the top couple of
- 30:35things you need?
- 30:35SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 30:36SPEAKER_01: So the Spartacus Bill this year is really two parts.
- 30:41SPEAKER_01: Part A we've cut out, but I'll get to that in a minute.
- 30:46Part B is a series of policies we need in place because of the
- 30:52dynamic nature of FEMA right now.
- 30:54SPEAKER_01: FEMA is undergoing a reform.
- 30:56SPEAKER_01: They've gotten rid of a lot of the lawyers.
- 30:58SPEAKER_01: They can't give the money out like they used to.
- 31:01SPEAKER_01: So what I suspect will happen is,
- 31:04SPEAKER_01: as they're trying to figure out how to make the Stafford Act different,
- 31:07SPEAKER_01: there'll be a disaster.
- 31:08SPEAKER_01: Congress will want to do something.
- 31:10SPEAKER_01: FEMA won't be able to because of authorities,
- 31:12and they're going to go back to the days of just sending a
- 31:14block grant to the
- 31:15SPEAKER_01: state.
- 31:16SPEAKER_01: But a block grant can't be distributed per block.
- 31:19SPEAKER_01: There has to be a process.
- 31:21So what the rest of the bill does is it stands up a mirror of
- 31:25existing policies for
- 31:26SPEAKER_01: public assistance,
- 31:27SPEAKER_01: which goes to local governments,
- 31:29SPEAKER_01: et cetera,
- 31:29SPEAKER_01: for reimbursements,
- 31:30SPEAKER_01: individual assistance.
- 31:32It sets up within legal authority,
- 31:34something called the Disaster Recovery Authority.
- 31:37SPEAKER_01: So as soon as the response is over and we're pivoting to recovery,
- 31:41SPEAKER_01: communities can learn to expect who they're supposed to contact,
- 31:45SPEAKER_01: what they can ask for,
- 31:46SPEAKER_01: for that immediate help.
- 31:47SPEAKER_03: Mm-hmm.
- 31:48SPEAKER_01: and it does a couple other things,
- 31:49SPEAKER_01: gives county commissioners a little more authority during food disasters,
- 31:53SPEAKER_01: and a couple other things.
- 31:55SPEAKER_01: The first part,
- 31:57SPEAKER_01: the Spartacus part,
- 31:58SPEAKER_01: quite frankly,
- 32:00is trying to keep faith with the promise that was made to the
- 32:02state of Oregon in
- 32:04SPEAKER_01: 2001.
- 32:05SPEAKER_01: When I was mayor of Monmouth back in 2000,
- 32:09SPEAKER_01: The Oregon government,
- 32:12SPEAKER_01: for a lot of reasons,
- 32:13SPEAKER_01: none of them really responsible,
- 32:15decided to move the Public Safety Academy from Monmouth to
- 32:19where it is in Salem.
- 32:21SPEAKER_01: And the promise was,
- 32:22SPEAKER_01: we're going to build this facility that is state-of-the-art,
- 32:25SPEAKER_01: but we don't want everybody to have to come to Salem.
- 32:28We're going to build it,
- 32:29and we're going to build five satellite campuses.
- 32:32Well,
- 32:34as they built the fortress,
- 32:37they kind of forgot about the other five.
- 32:39SPEAKER_03: What?
- 32:39SPEAKER_01: So what they did was,
- 32:41SPEAKER_01: instead of that,
- 32:42they bought a pickup truck and a trailer and a series of
- 32:47equipment that they drive
- 32:49SPEAKER_01: around the state as part of their distributed learning.
- 32:52SPEAKER_01: Now, the learning is good.
- 32:54SPEAKER_01: The props they try to do something with.
- 32:57SPEAKER_01: But we are in a place now where...
- 33:01We have about 5,000 firefighters in the state of Oregon that
- 33:04are volunteer.
- 33:06SPEAKER_01: We have at least that many that are involved in the EMS system.
- 33:09SPEAKER_01: Most of them in the rural areas volunteer.
- 33:12In large-scale disasters,
- 33:13you have what I call first and second responders.
- 33:17The first responders are the ones that you think of,
- 33:19cops,
- 33:19firefighters,
- 33:20EMS,
- 33:20etc.
- 33:21SPEAKER_01: Second responders are the community emergency response teams,
- 33:25SPEAKER_01: the CERT,
- 33:25SPEAKER_01: the amateur radio guys and gals,
- 33:27SPEAKER_01: the Red Cross,
- 33:28SPEAKER_01: those folks.
- 33:30SPEAKER_01: We need places that are standardized for the kind of...
- 33:36SPEAKER_01: interdisciplinary training necessary for people to keep their skills up.
- 33:40SPEAKER_01: And right now, two things are happening in rural Oregon.
- 33:44Volunteers are having to respond more often to bigger fires for
- 33:48a longer amount of
- 33:48SPEAKER_01: time,
- 33:49SPEAKER_01: longer amount of time,
- 33:50SPEAKER_01: and the full-time departments that they augment as volunteers,
- 33:54SPEAKER_01: they're strapped.
- 33:55So the days of the fire guys and gals on shift being able to
- 34:00train the volunteers
- 34:01SPEAKER_01: because they got some extra time,
- 34:02SPEAKER_01: they don't got the extra time anymore,
- 34:03SPEAKER_01: so the volunteers aren't getting the training.
- 34:05SPEAKER_00: And the volunteerism is going down.
- 34:07SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 34:07SPEAKER_00: I've talked to local fire districts,
- 34:08and they've said part of their funding problem is that they
- 34:11don't have volunteer
- 34:11SPEAKER_00: firefighters.
- 34:12SPEAKER_00: That's right.
- 34:12SPEAKER_00: And that hurts rural and small districts the most,
- 34:15SPEAKER_00: but it'll hurt in urban districts eventually or is already.
- 34:18SPEAKER_01: It will.
- 34:19SPEAKER_01: And when I was Wildfire Recovery Chair,
- 34:22SPEAKER_01: we did a survey of 800 firefighters,
- 34:25SPEAKER_01: all volunteers,
- 34:26because at the time there was a conversation coming out of
- 34:29Senator Finley's office
- 34:30SPEAKER_01: of like,
- 34:30SPEAKER_01: hey,
- 34:30SPEAKER_01: let's have a new classification for no-entry firefighters.
- 34:35SPEAKER_01: meaning that they respond to fires,
- 34:37SPEAKER_01: but they just don't go in,
- 34:38SPEAKER_01: they're kind of backup and auxiliary.
- 34:40SPEAKER_01: The problem with that is,
- 34:41SPEAKER_01: number one,
- 34:41SPEAKER_01: insurance companies only recognize firefighter one training,
- 34:44SPEAKER_01: so it wouldn't count.
- 34:46SPEAKER_01: And the second is, just as...
- 34:48truth in advertising anybody who's crazy enough and I used to
- 34:52be a volunteer
- 34:52firefighter for seven years crazy enough to want to run in a
- 34:55fire isn't going to
- 34:56care about certification if they hear a baby crying or a woman
- 34:58in distress they're
- 34:59going to go through the door so that was a non-starter as far
- 35:03as a lower credit so
- 35:04the answer was what the volunteers told us is they don't want
- 35:07lower standards they
- 35:07SPEAKER_01: just want more opportunities to train so the vision is
- 35:12SPEAKER_01: We build Spartacus.
- 35:14SPEAKER_01: What that means is $60 million in the first trunch.
- 35:18SPEAKER_01: First trunch, $40 million going over to DPSST.
- 35:23We're going to build a 911 training center there as well as a
- 35:25911 operation center
- 35:27in addition to $20 million in upgrades they need for their
- 35:30police and other things.
- 35:32SPEAKER_01: $20 million for Core 3 to support that.
- 35:35SPEAKER_01: That's the first phase.
- 35:37SPEAKER_01: And the deal has been nothing for Salem that doesn't.
- 35:40SPEAKER_01: Bend also get, and Bend is making sure it's Salem.
- 35:42SPEAKER_01: So it's an agreement.
- 35:44Second and third phase written into the statute is we don't
- 35:47know where they need to go.
- 35:49SPEAKER_01: We have ideas,
- 35:50SPEAKER_01: and we divide it into geographic areas,
- 35:52but what we need is a request for proposal because whoever
- 35:56wants these things,
- 35:57SPEAKER_01: it isn't just building it,
- 35:58SPEAKER_01: it's who's going to actually be using it,
- 36:00SPEAKER_01: and maybe they have some ideas over governance.
- 36:03SPEAKER_01: So the goal is...
- 36:05SPEAKER_01: The first tranche is 60 million.
- 36:08SPEAKER_01: The second tranche would be 40 million.
- 36:11SPEAKER_01: And then a third tranche would be 40 million.
- 36:13And the two that apply in tranche two and the two that get it
- 36:17in tranche three,
- 36:18SPEAKER_01: all of those would be in rural areas around the state.
- 36:21But they get to basically put in the best package for what they
- 36:24would use it,
- 36:25SPEAKER_01: who the partners would be,
- 36:26SPEAKER_01: how it would run.
- 36:27SPEAKER_01: And the bottom line is, by the time we build these out,
- 36:31SPEAKER_01: My goal is by that time to have funding through DPSST to say, look,
- 36:36If it's in a particular place where they just don't have the
- 36:39ability to run it,
- 36:40SPEAKER_01: like Core 3 plans on running it.
- 36:42SPEAKER_01: Yep.
- 36:43But if it's maybe in Rogue Siskiyou,
- 36:44they've got a plan to maybe half fund it.
- 36:48SPEAKER_01: Well, maybe DPSST can forward deploy people.
- 36:50And the goal would be for the volunteers that are out there on
- 36:54any given weekend or
- 36:55SPEAKER_01: any given week of the month,
- 36:57you'd have options to go get your training boxes squared so you
- 37:01don't have to worry
- 37:01SPEAKER_01: about
- 37:03If you missed a Wednesday night or a Thursday night or that
- 37:05type of stuff.
- 37:06SPEAKER_01: It's aligned with what the strategy has been forever.
- 37:08SPEAKER_01: It's just people have forgot it.
- 37:10SPEAKER_01: And I'm old and I'm cranky and I've only got so many years left.
- 37:13So I'm getting louder and louder about making sure we keep our
- 37:15promises to rural Oregon.
- 37:19SPEAKER_02: It's almost like Rule 27 training.
- 37:21I really feel like they should create more opportunity to make
- 37:25sure that I get my
- 37:26SPEAKER_02: Rule 27 training.
- 37:27SPEAKER_02: I don't know that that would help, honestly.
- 37:29SPEAKER_02: I want a regional training.
- 37:30SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 37:31SPEAKER_02: I'm not sure that's going to be a priority of those facilities.
- 37:35SPEAKER_02: Sorry, I make a joke.
- 37:36I think you're spot on with the...
- 37:38We're obviously familiar with the Core 3 stuff.
- 37:40SPEAKER_02: I mean, I think having...
- 37:42SPEAKER_02: regional facilities, regional training facilities.
- 37:46SPEAKER_02: It's kind of important.
- 37:46SPEAKER_02: Everybody benefits.
- 37:48All of your EMS people benefit because you now have this
- 37:51facility that you can use to train.
- 37:52And the vision is that it would be a training facility with
- 37:55also lodging so that
- 37:57SPEAKER_01: during a major event we'd have a safe place to evacuate people.
- 38:00SPEAKER_02: Yeah.
- 38:01SPEAKER_02: I mean, the reality is the shit will hit the fan.
- 38:04SPEAKER_02: We just don't know...
- 38:06SPEAKER_02: Where the wind's blowing and when the fan's going to turn on.
- 38:10SPEAKER_01: We're 325 years past.
- 38:11SPEAKER_01: 300.
- 38:12SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 38:12SPEAKER_01: So any minute, basically.
- 38:15SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 38:16SPEAKER_00: Hopefully not in session.
- 38:18SPEAKER_00: The last thing,
- 38:19SPEAKER_00: we were talking about this,
- 38:20SPEAKER_00: something that can move at any minute,
- 38:22SPEAKER_00: like an earthquake,
- 38:23SPEAKER_00: would be bill limits.
- 38:24SPEAKER_00: House bill, oh, so wait, before we move on.
- 38:26SPEAKER_00: What's the bill number on Spartacus so people can check out that?
- 38:29SPEAKER_01: 4121.
- 38:30SPEAKER_00: 4121.
- 38:30SPEAKER_00: Where is it right now?
- 38:32SPEAKER_01: It is in ways and means.
- 38:34SPEAKER_01: And I've been begging them to try to move the non-cost portion now.
- 38:39Because if FEMA can't help people,
- 38:45we don't have the authority to help people.
- 38:47SPEAKER_01: And an emergency board can send money, but they can't legislate.
- 38:51SPEAKER_00: So you need the policy.
- 38:52SPEAKER_00: I need the policy.
- 38:54SPEAKER_02: Co-chair Sanchez.
- 38:55SPEAKER_00: There we go.
- 38:56SPEAKER_00: I'm sure she's listening.
- 38:57SPEAKER_00: She's got abundant free time.
- 39:00SPEAKER_00: So 4,002 is the bill limits,
- 39:01SPEAKER_00: and the conversation has really picked up at the end of last session.
- 39:07SPEAKER_00: And I think kind of maybe two of the unfortunate,
- 39:12SPEAKER_00: maybe,
- 39:13SPEAKER_00: you become the poster child of it,
- 39:14SPEAKER_00: along with Senator David Brock-Smith.
- 39:16SPEAKER_00: So talk to me about,
- 39:18SPEAKER_00: first of all,
- 39:19SPEAKER_00: I think,
- 39:20are people misrepresenting the bill limits thing or are they
- 39:24misrepresenting how
- 39:25SPEAKER_00: you're using your bills,
- 39:27SPEAKER_00: do you feel?
- 39:27SPEAKER_00: Yes.
- 39:28SPEAKER_00: Okay, so talk to me about that part first.
- 39:31SPEAKER_01: So I can't speak for Brother DBS.
- 39:33SPEAKER_01: Brother.
- 39:35Although if I was in the minority,
- 39:38I would probably be doing the same thing as him.
- 39:40SPEAKER_01: Sure.
- 39:41Which is an important point because I don't think a majority
- 39:44party should ever put
- 39:45SPEAKER_01: something into effect that permanently disadvantages the minority party.
- 39:49SPEAKER_01: I don't think it's right.
- 39:50So people have made quite a story about the fact that last
- 40:00session I introduced
- 40:01SPEAKER_01: somewhere around 317 bills.
- 40:01SPEAKER_01: Mm-hmm.
- 40:04SPEAKER_01: Here's the fact that is sometimes lost.
- 40:07SPEAKER_01: Number one, 70 of those bills were at the request of lobbyists.
- 40:12SPEAKER_01: They weren't my ideas.
- 40:13SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 40:14They were things that advocacy groups needed a bill to be able
- 40:18to do things.
- 40:19SPEAKER_01: Number two,
- 40:21SPEAKER_01: the state of Oregon is,
- 40:23SPEAKER_01: in the House and the Senate,
- 40:25SPEAKER_01: two chambers out of six in the country.
- 40:29SPEAKER_01: Two of six...
- 40:31Out of 99 chambers,
- 40:33because one's unicameral,
- 40:34that does not allow amendments on the floor.
- 40:38SPEAKER_01: Why that's important is the following.
- 40:41SPEAKER_01: I have a lot of, I've spent my entire life studying government.
- 40:44SPEAKER_01: I have three to four policy areas I'm passionate about.
- 40:47And in a district that's also a swing district,
- 40:51there's lots of different ideas.
- 40:52SPEAKER_01: There's not one prevailing culture.
- 40:55So I have standing offers that if a citizen wants to bring
- 40:57something forward and
- 40:58SPEAKER_01: they want to work the bill,
- 40:59SPEAKER_01: I'll introduce it.
- 41:00SPEAKER_01: I don't have to agree with it.
- 41:02SPEAKER_01: My job is to be their voice.
- 41:03SPEAKER_01: I will help them as much as I can.
- 41:05SPEAKER_01: If I agree with it, I'll probably help them more.
- 41:07SPEAKER_01: But either way, I'm not going to be the block.
- 41:08SPEAKER_00: Which I think most legislators wouldn't do.
- 41:11SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 41:11SPEAKER_00: That's not a common policy.
- 41:13SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 41:14SPEAKER_01: Not common.
- 41:15SPEAKER_01: Second thing is, I will offer sometimes a bill
- 41:19SPEAKER_01: Try to think 2,
- 41:22SPEAKER_01: 4,
- 41:33SPEAKER_01: 6,
- 41:34SPEAKER_01: 8,
- 41:3410 years out,
- 41:23and sometimes I'll offer bills on ideas that I have maybe a 70%
- 41:28idea of it,
- 41:28but I want to throw it out there to see who sticks their head
- 41:31up and they're
- 41:31SPEAKER_01: interested,
- 41:32SPEAKER_01: so we start working things.
- 41:33Because in this building,
- 41:34unless it's written down,
- 41:35no one really thinks it's real.
- 41:37SPEAKER_01: The other thing is,
- 41:38SPEAKER_01: in some committees,
- 41:40SPEAKER_01: if you don't have a bill,
- 41:41SPEAKER_01: you're not invited to the discussion.
- 41:44So I want a bill so I get invited to the damn discussion
- 41:48because some of these
- 41:48SPEAKER_01: things,
- 41:49I've watched them go round and round and round for years and
- 41:51common sense just
- 41:52SPEAKER_01: keeps eluding them.
- 41:54SPEAKER_01: And in some other cases,
- 41:55SPEAKER_01: LC,
- 41:57SPEAKER_01: Legislative Council,
- 41:59is a little bit detailed about how they write their measures so
- 42:03I sometimes will
- 42:04have something written in two or three different ways so we can
- 42:08angle around to
- 42:09SPEAKER_01: make sure that what people are thinking is actually reflected.
- 42:11SPEAKER_01: So
- 42:13SPEAKER_01: I look at legislation as the tools of our craft.
- 42:18The reason I introduced surrender 17 was because of COVID and
- 42:22the construction process.
- 42:24SPEAKER_01: A number of the bills that I had introduced over the years,
- 42:27SPEAKER_01: people weren't actually able to participate in.
- 42:30SPEAKER_01: So I said to myself, hey, we're opening up pretty soon.
- 42:33SPEAKER_01: And it was a little more open last session.
- 42:36I brought all the bills that I thought were either somebody had
- 42:40asked me to
- 42:40SPEAKER_01: introduce or I thought were worthy of a conversation forward.
- 42:44I put study bills out so that I had vehicles that I could play
- 42:48in those particular
- 42:49SPEAKER_01: committees on issues just in case.
- 42:52SPEAKER_01: And I'm not planning on introducing 300 bills again,
- 42:55SPEAKER_01: but I felt that at least they should have been given an opportunity.
- 42:59SPEAKER_01: Those that didn't get picked up, I'm probably not gonna really move on.
- 43:03But to me,
- 43:05the reason I am here as a legislator is my job is to give voice
- 43:10to 78,000 people.
- 43:11SPEAKER_01: The only way I know how to do that is through the tools of our craft.
- 43:15SPEAKER_01: Now, here's the thing.
- 43:17SPEAKER_01: I'm not opposed to bill limits if
- 43:21SPEAKER_01: we have amendment on the floor potential.
- 43:24SPEAKER_00: Yeah, because otherwise you have to track every committee.
- 43:26Every committee,
- 43:27and you have to have a vehicle in every committee to make it
- 43:29work.
- 43:30SPEAKER_01: If,
- 43:30SPEAKER_01: and again,
- 43:30SPEAKER_01: I've offered rule changes,
- 43:32SPEAKER_01: so I think people in this building know I'm loud and sometimes grumpy,
- 43:37SPEAKER_01: but I'm pretty consistent.
- 43:39I introduced a House rule proposal that would allow for
- 43:42amendments on the floor.
- 43:44SPEAKER_01: I've introduced one that would,
- 43:47SPEAKER_01: in fact,
- 43:47SPEAKER_01: an amendment to 4002 that would say,
- 43:49SPEAKER_01: all right,
- 43:49SPEAKER_01: if you want bill limits,
- 43:51SPEAKER_01: Legislators only.
- 43:53SPEAKER_01: Governor doesn't get any.
- 43:54SPEAKER_01: Which I agree with.
- 43:55SPEAKER_00: I'm going to be honest.
- 43:55SPEAKER_00: I think, like you said, this is a legislative process.
- 43:58SPEAKER_00: We have 90 legislators.
- 44:00If you can't convince one of them that your idea is good
- 44:02enough,
- 44:03it sucks.
- 44:03SPEAKER_00: That's right.
- 44:04SPEAKER_01: No question.
- 44:05SPEAKER_01: No question.
- 44:07SPEAKER_01: And you want to cut 1,000 bills out of the process?
- 44:10SPEAKER_01: No agency bills, no judicial.
- 44:12SPEAKER_01: 100%.
- 44:13SPEAKER_00: Or agencies need to go through the committee bill process.
- 44:16SPEAKER_00: There you go.
- 44:16SPEAKER_00: And one of the things I noticed that I don't necessarily agree with,
- 44:19SPEAKER_00: the speaker has in her presentation on bill limits,
- 44:22SPEAKER_00: I pulled it up on OLS,
- 44:23you can introduce extra committee bills if the chair and a
- 44:27member of the minority
- 44:28SPEAKER_00: party agree.
- 44:29SPEAKER_00: And I said, wait, that doesn't say vice chair.
- 44:31SPEAKER_00: Hold on a second.
- 44:32SPEAKER_00: No.
- 44:32maybe the vice chair doesn't want to but one of their members
- 44:35wants to go rogue and
- 44:36so now they can go rogue and introduce a bill and i was like oh
- 44:38that's sneaky but
- 44:39yeah i think and so so what if you could set the limit do you
- 44:43have a rough idea of
- 44:44where you think the limit is flexible enough is it a hundred or
- 44:47is it so my
- 44:49granddaddy who had an eighth grade education taught me never to
- 44:52negotiate against
- 44:53SPEAKER_01: myself there you go
- 44:54SPEAKER_01: Very good.
- 44:55SPEAKER_00: Eighth grade, that's the reading flesh test.
- 44:58SPEAKER_02: I think that if you cut out some of those other things,
- 45:01you would probably get rid of probably half of those agency
- 45:05bills and governor
- 45:06SPEAKER_02: bills,
- 45:06SPEAKER_02: and then you would have...
- 45:08SPEAKER_02: And then other people,
- 45:09SPEAKER_02: I think other representatives,
- 45:10SPEAKER_02: if they took a governor's bill and they wanted to go work it,
- 45:13SPEAKER_02: they're going to drop three or four other bills,
- 45:16SPEAKER_02: pet projects or something,
- 45:17SPEAKER_02: because...
- 45:18SPEAKER_02: They're going to go work a governor's bill.
- 45:19SPEAKER_02: So I think the process would work itself out.
- 45:22I think the bills would come down because you would give
- 45:25legislators something to
- 45:26SPEAKER_02: do,
- 45:27SPEAKER_02: which is to go pass an agency bill or go pass the governor's bill.
- 45:31SPEAKER_02: Because that's part of the problem is you've got to have...
- 45:35SPEAKER_02: something to do in this building as a legislator.
- 45:38SPEAKER_02: You've been here a long time,
- 45:39SPEAKER_02: so you know how to pass a bill,
- 45:40SPEAKER_02: so you know the techniques that it takes to do that.
- 45:44SPEAKER_02: A lot of the new people are learning those things.
- 45:47SPEAKER_02: You're really talking more fix the process,
- 45:49SPEAKER_02: not just take the low-hanging fruit by just putting bill limits.
- 45:53SPEAKER_01: Here's another thing.
- 45:55SPEAKER_01: We don't need bill limits if committee chairs actually say no.
- 45:59SPEAKER_01: Of the 317 bills,
- 46:00SPEAKER_01: I want to be very clear,
- 46:02I was very specific and even sent an email to all of the
- 46:05committee chairs because I
- 46:06SPEAKER_01: said,
- 46:06SPEAKER_01: look,
- 46:06SPEAKER_01: I'm introducing this many,
- 46:07SPEAKER_01: here's why.
- 46:09SPEAKER_01: I'm not asking for a hearing unless I'm asking for a hearing.
- 46:13SPEAKER_01: Just because it's in your committee doesn't mean,
- 46:15SPEAKER_01: like some of this stuff,
- 46:16SPEAKER_01: if an individual from my district wants to work it,
- 46:19SPEAKER_01: they can ask.
- 46:20SPEAKER_01: Some of this other stuff, it's there in case a conversation is possible.
- 46:24SPEAKER_01: If it's not, I'm not going to move it.
- 46:27SPEAKER_01: But I talked to a committee chair,
- 46:29SPEAKER_01: a dear friend of mine,
- 46:30SPEAKER_01: and I'm like,
- 46:30SPEAKER_01: he's on the edge about this bill.
- 46:32SPEAKER_01: And he's like,
- 46:33SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 46:34SPEAKER_01: yeah,
- 46:34SPEAKER_01: I just,
- 46:35SPEAKER_01: and I said,
- 46:35SPEAKER_01: well,
- 46:36SPEAKER_01: all right,
- 46:37SPEAKER_01: how many times did you say no to people?
- 46:39SPEAKER_01: He's like, well, I never say no to having hearings.
- 46:42SPEAKER_01: I'm like, well, maybe that's why you had to go to two minutes up.
- 46:46SPEAKER_01: Pick and choose which you're going to actually hear.
- 46:48SPEAKER_01: He's like, what do you mean?
- 46:49SPEAKER_01: I said, I only ask for a hearing.
- 46:51SPEAKER_01: for things I want a hearing on.
- 46:54SPEAKER_01: I never expect a hearing on things I haven't asked for.
- 46:56SPEAKER_01: There's a process in this building, but it goes back to what you said.
- 46:59SPEAKER_01: A lot of folks are still learning that they don't want to be the bad guy.
- 47:02SPEAKER_01: Well, I can't fix that.
- 47:04What I can fix is if there's a problem and we need process and
- 47:08you want to reduce
- 47:08SPEAKER_01: the number of bills,
- 47:09SPEAKER_01: fine.
- 47:10SPEAKER_01: We are the legislative branch.
- 47:11SPEAKER_01: We're supposed to be lawmakers.
- 47:13SPEAKER_01: Let's start there.
- 47:15SPEAKER_00: And you do,
- 47:15SPEAKER_00: as a chair,
- 47:16SPEAKER_00: I think,
- 47:17SPEAKER_00: especially a lot of the newer chairs,
- 47:18SPEAKER_00: they don't realize they have limited time.
- 47:20SPEAKER_00: They just kind of think of it as infinite, and they'll jam new stuff in.
- 47:23But if you're going to properly work a bill,
- 47:25you're going to do your public hearings.
- 47:27SPEAKER_00: I appreciate Chair Marshall a lot in housing during long session.
- 47:30SPEAKER_00: If there were substantive amendments,
- 47:32we were back for another public hearing on the substantive
- 47:34amendments first.
- 47:35SPEAKER_00: As it should be.
- 47:36And then we would wait another meeting before we would even
- 47:39consider working the bill.
- 47:40SPEAKER_00: And I think that's like the ideal process.
- 47:42SPEAKER_00: And so if you do that, you realize you have X number of minutes.
- 47:46SPEAKER_00: You've got an hour and a half twice a week.
- 47:50And you've got that for a certain number of weeks until your
- 47:52first chamber.
- 47:53SPEAKER_00: And then you lose a ton of stuff.
- 47:55SPEAKER_00: And then you work your second chamber stuff.
- 47:57And so you kind of actually got to do some math and figure out,
- 48:01well,
- 48:01how much actual time?
- 48:02SPEAKER_00: bills could I work if you did three public hearings,
- 48:05SPEAKER_00: maybe,
- 48:05SPEAKER_00: and then maybe you end up having extra time and you can adjust it.
- 48:08SPEAKER_00: But ultimately, that's your limit.
- 48:10SPEAKER_00: Your limit is your committee time, I suppose.
- 48:12SPEAKER_00: And so that would probably be the counter-argument to limits on bills.
- 48:17It's a lot harder on the House because you've got twice as many
- 48:21members than you
- 48:22SPEAKER_02: have on the Senate.
- 48:23SPEAKER_02: So on the Senate side, our chair and vice chair, I think that's also...
- 48:28SPEAKER_02: They should be working together more and they should be saying,
- 48:32SPEAKER_02: no,
- 48:33SPEAKER_02: does your,
- 48:33SPEAKER_02: does your Republicans need that vice chair?
- 48:37SPEAKER_02: Do they need a hearing?
- 48:38SPEAKER_02: What do they need on this bill?
- 48:39So that way it's not the Democrat telling the Republican,
- 48:42we're not going to hear you bill.
- 48:43SPEAKER_02: It's like,
- 48:44SPEAKER_02: it's the vice chair going to their colleague and saying,
- 48:47SPEAKER_02: Hey,
- 48:48SPEAKER_02: are you really looking for a hearing on this?
- 48:49SPEAKER_02: Or what's the right?
- 48:51SPEAKER_01: Go back to leadership and communication.
- 48:52SPEAKER_01: So yeah, we were not really training our chairs in my opinion.
- 48:57SPEAKER_01: We're not really training our chairs to do the facilitator role,
- 49:01SPEAKER_01: where not just you tell your folks in the committee,
- 49:04SPEAKER_01: this is what we're doing,
- 49:07SPEAKER_01: but you ask.
- 49:08SPEAKER_01: When I was chair,
- 49:10SPEAKER_01: again,
- 49:10SPEAKER_01: of a committee that never had a majority,
- 49:12SPEAKER_01: I would meet with my two vice chairs and I'd say,
- 49:14SPEAKER_01: look,
- 49:15SPEAKER_01: give me a scale,
- 49:16SPEAKER_01: the stuff we want to talk about,
- 49:18SPEAKER_01: the stuff we don't want to talk about,
- 49:20SPEAKER_01: and then and only then will we do the courtesy hearings.
- 49:24SPEAKER_01: What's important for you guys?
- 49:25SPEAKER_01: What's important for you guys?
- 49:26SPEAKER_01: What's important for your people?
- 49:28SPEAKER_01: What about your district?
- 49:30SPEAKER_01: And then you come together as a team.
- 49:33SPEAKER_01: And I don't understand why some committees don't do that.
- 49:38SPEAKER_01: And I know some committees are huge in their jurisdiction.
- 49:41And yet,
- 49:42you really kind of know which bills are probably going to move
- 49:45and not move.
- 49:46SPEAKER_01: So I don't think bill limits is the all...
- 49:51SPEAKER_01: knowing answer,
- 49:53SPEAKER_01: and in our system where we don't have floor amendments,
- 49:56SPEAKER_01: where a speaker picks the committee chair,
- 49:59SPEAKER_01: the committee membership,
- 50:01SPEAKER_01: and now would potentially limit the number of bills,
- 50:05SPEAKER_01: I don't think that gives the minority the ability to express their voice,
- 50:08and I don't think it allows legislators to do our due diligence
- 50:11as lawmakers.
- 50:13SPEAKER_02: Well,
- 50:13SPEAKER_02: and even if you're not in leadership,
- 50:16SPEAKER_02: but you're in the majority party,
- 50:17SPEAKER_02: you're still kind of in the minority.
- 50:20SPEAKER_02: So unless you're a committee,
- 50:21SPEAKER_02: because if you're just on a committee,
- 50:22SPEAKER_02: you're just a member on that committee.
- 50:24And it's probably just as hard as you to work a bill as it is
- 50:28to be somebody in the
- 50:29SPEAKER_02: minority party in that committee.
- 50:30SPEAKER_02: So it's not easy to pass a bill already.
- 50:34And I think you're right with I liked how you laid out how you
- 50:37do your 300 bills
- 50:38SPEAKER_02: because it makes sense.
- 50:40SPEAKER_02: Because a lot of times if you're working out a bill,
- 50:42SPEAKER_02: you'll say,
- 50:42SPEAKER_02: no,
- 50:42SPEAKER_02: I don't need it before the first chamber deadline.
- 50:45SPEAKER_02: I do want a hearing in April after the first.
- 50:48SPEAKER_02: Give me a courtesy hearing when you have a lull.
- 50:50SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 50:50SPEAKER_02: Because I kind of want to work this process out.
- 50:52SPEAKER_02: And like you said, hit the bushes and see who kind of flushes out.
- 50:56SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 50:57You know,
- 50:57because that's how you can find like we did the prevailing wage
- 51:02on affordable housing.
- 51:03SPEAKER_02: in the Senate,
- 51:04SPEAKER_02: and we kind of flushed it out earlier,
- 51:06SPEAKER_02: but we really wanted to flush it out in the short session,
- 51:09SPEAKER_02: and we found partners where we didn't think we had partners.
- 51:12It didn't pass because we know the unions are going to beat up
- 51:16against it,
- 51:16SPEAKER_02: but I think we found a spot.
- 51:20where we can go we found also where the really hinge points are
- 51:23the pinch points
- 51:24and so now that's helpful yeah so now we want to go back and
- 51:27say okay we know you
- 51:29guys really hate that right and then why and then but that's
- 51:32just process so we got
- 51:34to introduce now probably because it was one bill we go after
- 51:37the whole enchilada
- 51:39now we're probably going to introduce four bills right because
- 51:41i'm going to put
- 51:42SPEAKER_02: them in parts
- 51:43SPEAKER_02: That's right.
- 51:43SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 51:43And you're going to work the long session to try to figure out
- 51:46what which bill can
- 51:47SPEAKER_02: get some legs.
- 51:48SPEAKER_02: Maybe this one can't because of whatever.
- 51:50SPEAKER_02: Right.
- 51:51SPEAKER_02: And this one does.
- 51:51SPEAKER_02: So I get your point,
- 51:52SPEAKER_02: because if you 25 just seemed low to me,
- 51:56SPEAKER_02: if you are on Senator Anderson's on four different committees.
- 52:01SPEAKER_02: And wait, so finance and revenue is new to them, and that's a lot.
- 52:04SPEAKER_02: I mean,
- 52:04there's a lot of work we've got to do with our income tax and
- 52:07our tax and spend
- 52:08SPEAKER_02: policies in the state.
- 52:09SPEAKER_02: I mean, that's a lot of work.
- 52:11So you're there housing,
- 52:13early childhood,
- 52:14behavioral health,
- 52:1525 bills doesn't cut it.
- 52:16SPEAKER_01: That's right.
- 52:17SPEAKER_02: So I'm with you.
- 52:18SPEAKER_02: I don't know if it's 300.
- 52:19SPEAKER_02: I don't know if a limit is necessary.
- 52:21SPEAKER_02: I think if we just change the process a little bit,
- 52:23I really believe you that I think in our conversation that
- 52:26that'll kind of fix
- 52:27SPEAKER_02: itself.
- 52:28SPEAKER_01: I think you're right.
- 52:29SPEAKER_01: And again, I...
- 52:31SPEAKER_01: I respect the speaker.
- 52:33SPEAKER_01: I think she is approaching a problem that she sees.
- 52:36SPEAKER_01: And I'm not going to argue the symptoms.
- 52:40SPEAKER_01: I just assess the problem differently.
- 52:42SPEAKER_01: I think the problem is...
- 52:44Committee chairs need to be a little more decisive and
- 52:47recognize that they need to
- 52:49SPEAKER_01: make choices,
- 52:50SPEAKER_01: and we probably should narrow the number of non-legislator bills.
- 52:55SPEAKER_01: Fine with that.
- 52:56SPEAKER_01: They weren't elected a legislator.
- 52:57SPEAKER_02: Yeah, it's true.
- 52:59I think we're approaching this problem like they're kind of
- 53:02approaching campaign finance.
- 53:04SPEAKER_02: where it's just really,
- 53:05SPEAKER_02: you know,
- 53:06SPEAKER_02: oh,
- 53:06SPEAKER_02: oh,
- 53:07SPEAKER_02: there's a problem,
- 53:08and then they're just trying to whack their problem with the
- 53:10easiest solution,
- 53:12SPEAKER_02: and like,
- 53:12SPEAKER_02: oh,
- 53:12SPEAKER_02: just put limits on campaign finance.
- 53:14SPEAKER_02: And it's like, well, now the money just goes into the dark holes.
- 53:19SPEAKER_02: So I just don't think that's the right way to approach it.
- 53:23SPEAKER_02: You know, I think the same thing with the bill limits.
- 53:25SPEAKER_02: It's really more process, shedding a light on it, and making it happen.
- 53:30SPEAKER_02: Well, we lost Reagan.
- 53:31SPEAKER_02: He had a meeting, so I guess we're done.
- 53:33SPEAKER_02: Well...
- 53:34thank you for the opportunity it was great yeah and uh let me
- 53:37know if you ever want
- 53:38to walk through the conversations on other things well and when
- 53:41we go through some
- 53:42more vet stuff i think we need to make sure that that committee
- 53:45and also the bills
- 53:46that we do i would love to work with you on that sounds great
- 53:49let me know so i just
- 53:50SPEAKER_01: want a big shout out to uh rick lewis is um yeah he's a rock star
- 53:58SPEAKER_02: Yeah, we're losing to Jim.
- 53:59SPEAKER_01: He's retiring this year, and it's such a bummer to lose Rick.
- 54:02SPEAKER_01: I've already tried to beg him twice, but I just appreciate him.
- 54:06SPEAKER_01: And I understand that your boss may be looking to run for another thing,
- 54:11SPEAKER_01: and even though I'm not supposed to say such things,
- 54:14SPEAKER_01: I'm wishing him good luck.
- 54:15SPEAKER_01: Oh, thanks.
- 54:16SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I appreciate that.
- 54:17SPEAKER_03: I think that... Cut, cut, cut.
- 54:21SPEAKER_01: I think Bowley would do well with some leadership.
- 54:24SPEAKER_01: I appreciate that.