Latest / Brian Thomas / Inside Scoop with Breitbart News - Bradley Jaye

Transcript

Inside Scoop with Breitbart News - Bradley Jaye · Brian Thomas

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Ato six fifty five GARROSD talk station. They're happy Tuesday
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: to you. Oh, I love tuesdays of this time. It's
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: time for the inside scoop with one of my favorite websites,
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: bright Bart b R E I T B A rt
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: dot com book mark. You'd be glad you did because
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: you get to read what Bradley Jay writes. Bradley J.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: The politics editor breit Bart Look Front page News. Senate
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: passes funding bill to and Schumer shutdown, written by Oh
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: Bradley J. Bradley J. Welcome back to the fifty five
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: Carse Morning Show, my friend. Always a pleasure to have
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: you on the show.
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: I look for to Tuesday mornings at this time. Too
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: great to be with you.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: That's nice to hear Bradley, and I do find your
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: site informative so real quickly I know they've agreed. I
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: guess minor concessions, if you can even call them that
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: rehiring the four thousand or so employees that were fired
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: during the shutdown, Might I interject, Bradley Jay, employees that
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: would not have been fired had there not been a shutdown.
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: They get their payback. No more firings. Three appropriations bills
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: going through, which I presume probably would have gone through anyway,
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: because they've alread gone through the sausage making process and
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: the government is opened. I guess through what January thirtieth.
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: That's right, yeah, January thirtieth. It's the build through the Senate.
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: Now the House is going to vote tomorrow night. Just
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: a total unconditional surrender from the Democrats. They got absolutely nothing.
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: The only concessions they got were to undo some of
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: the things that had happened during the shutdown they initiated
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: but wouldn't have happened otherwise, and a promise on a
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: vote that is doomed to failure. Just an absolute disaster
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: for Truck Schumer, who now has the moderates upset with
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: him over his strategy and the left upset with him
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: for Cavin.
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: All right, before we get to the Schumer future question,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: which I have written down like I got to ask him, Bell,
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: what do you think is going to happen to the
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: schuck Schumer? You mentioned the unconditional surrender, and I have
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: to give although I dearly love respect and put him
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: up there as almost number one, if not number one,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: of my favorite representatives. Thomas Massey, devout libertarian principles. He
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: is a strict constitutional as he is. He did not
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: like the vote for the CR because it was it
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: kept funding levels at twenty twenty four. That was Biden
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: level funding. That said, was it not a stroke of
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: political genius for the Republicans to do that taking the
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: wind out of any sales the Democrats might be trying
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: to get because of some maybe reduction. So this wasn't this,
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: you know. They they couldn't point to the supplements going away.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: They're the ones that put the deadline for the supplements.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: They couldn't point to the CR being oh my god, draconian.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Look how much gut cuts they made from government. It
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: was the Biden level funding levels. So they had nothing
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: to argue, Bradley.
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: They really did. And look, Democrats made this. These enhanced
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: Obamacare premium subsidies expire at the end of this year
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: for a good reason. It's a COVID era thing. We
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: know why they did it. We're finding out a little
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: bit more. Every every week is more and more trickles
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: out about Arctic fraud. They the Democrats thought that it
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: was just going to be a guarantee that Donald Trump
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: would never be back in office, that there would just
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: be a Democrat there for until Kingdom come. Thank god
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: that that's that's not the case. And look the thing
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: about this you had. Bernie Sanders said this in his
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: video that he posted out. I guess it was yesterday
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: the day before. Uh. He's criticizing his party for folding
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: and not getting anything he guarantees, only sending these subsidies.
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: But he said, we are already paying the highest prices
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: in the world for health care. So tell me, so,
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: tell me how these subsidies work. I mean, are you
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: kidding me? You're making our point for us.
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: Bernie Bradley j. You are right because Obamacare was merely
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: a vehicle designed to collapse under the weight of its
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: own pressure in order to bring about government funded health
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: care for all. And that's exactly what Obamacare effectively is.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: Thank god, the Supreme Court said they could not make
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: us buy it through the commerce clause, but there it is. Nonetheless,
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: no one buys into it. It becomes the insurer of
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: last resort, meaning the claims pile up. People who are
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: very sick and get on Obamacare and have all their
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: claims paid. And then, of course the government has to
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: fake it being affordable by paying the insurance companies the premium.
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: The money's going directly the medical insurance carrier, so that
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: makes it look like it's free. And by getting rid
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: of the caps on those subsidies, anyone can join in,
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: and a lot of people did because financially speaking, it
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: might it did work out for a whole lot of people.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: But now that those supplements are gone, most people are
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: going to go go back, have to go back to
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: the private sector to get their medical insurance, meaning bigger
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: and bigger weight is going to be loaded down on Obamacare.
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: It's designed to collapse brightly. At least that's my perspective.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: Maybe you got a different one.
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: No, I think you're exactly right. And this is just
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: another example with the payment to the insuring companies of
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: how the party dynamics have shifted so much during the
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: last ten years. The Democrat Party is now the party
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: of the coastal elite. That's who they cater to. If
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: they've become the party a big business. It was something
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: that I wouldn't have thought was possible just over a
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: decade ago, but they have fully embraced it. As the
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: Republicans under Trump had brought in more and more blue
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: collar working American voters. There has just been a total shift,
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: and the Democrats can't argue otherwise. Now.
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: Well, the other argument that came out just the other
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: day may have motivated the Democrats to move forward with
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: this reopening of the government. Bradley, is the idea that
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: Trump threw out and others have thrown out. Why don't
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: these supplement dollars just go to the person themselves and
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: then they can use them like their medical savings accounts,
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: to apply to private sector medical insurance policies. And there
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: are hundreds of companies out there offering medical insurance. It
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: can be affordable if you know how to work in
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: more people would But it's like school choice. Let the
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: money follow the kid. Why does this money have to
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: go directly to the medical insurance companies whose stocks have
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: gone through the roof.
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: It sounds almost to me like you're proposing something that
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: might actually benefit the American people below in your healthcare
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: competition is not what Obamacare is about. It is not
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: at all, as you have said. It is all about
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: creating something that inevitably will fail and fail upward, as
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: you're a Democrat, into just more socialized socialized medicine.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we've got to see us enter the one size
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: fits all new government program Medicaid for all. We're going
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: to save this. Because of Obamacare collapse, people are dying
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: in the streets. They can't get medical treatment. We need
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: a solution. That solution is going to come from government,
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: even though government solution led to the collapse that needs
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: to be saved. I mean, yeah, I mean, he can't
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: make this up.
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: Bradley, Well, right, I'll tell you one thing that Chuck
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: Schumer said on the floor before the vote last night.
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: He said, the American people have now are woken to
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: trump health care crisis. I think that the American people
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: have woken up to the crisis right now. I don't
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: think that they blamed Trump. This was such a loser
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: for Democrats, this shut down because the one issue that
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: Democrats wanted to force into the national conversation, this issue
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: is health care is such a loser for them. The
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: American people are examining it now. They're hearing Bertie Sanders
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: talk about how the American people have the most expensive
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: health care in the nation, and they're asking, what exactly
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: are we trying to save here? Why are Democrats trying
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: to prop up Obamacare. Yet again, this could be an
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: opportunity for Republicans to if they actually go on offense
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: and are aggressive, which Republicans are not generally inclined to do.
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: This would be a heavy lift for them and to
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: be at character. But if Republicans sees the moment, they
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: could actually do something not only that lowers healthcare prices
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: and availability for the American people, but might actually be
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: a winner at the ballot box.
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: Imagine that, no question about it. And some astute journalists wrote,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: no one objective to the animous consent agreement to speed
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: the end of the shutdown. Reading from your article, do
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: you think that's because they realize that this there's no
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: reason to just end this pain that they brought about.
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: I mean, let's just get this thing through. We know
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: we're done, it's over, Let's get the government back open.
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: Is this an acknowledgment that perhaps they realize in this
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: whole who wins who loses political argument which is so childish,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: that they are the losers indeed in the hearts and
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: minds of the American people on the shutdown.
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: Well, look, bron I worked on Capitol Hill for a
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: long time, and there was a saying that we used
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: here all the time, Bote, no hope.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: One thing that Senator came said during his press conference
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: this week announcing that he was caving is that there
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: were many more Democrat senators who wanted this to end,
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: but who would not vote for it because they didn't
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: have to. It's no accident that there were eight Democrats
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: who voted for this, and there were exactly eight Democrat
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: votes that were needed. And here's another point. None of
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: those eight are up for reelection this year. They're all
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: either retiring or they're up in twenty eight or thirty.
• 9:32
  Speaker 2: This is going to be the new listless test for Democrats.
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: It's politically toxic to have voted to end the shutdown.
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: It's another example of how just the radicals, the no king,
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: the resistant Democrats of the world have just fully fully
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: won over control of the Democrat Party.
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: Well, and that suggests the answer to the question was
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: going to ask you what does this mean for Chucky Schumer.
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: I note another line you pointed out the civil war
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: for the soul and direction of the party is just beginning.
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: Of course, you're writing about the Democrat Party. Does this
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: mean they've woken up and are going to start shifting
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: more toward the Oddly enough, Fetterman turned out to be
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: a normal kind of sounding human being as a Democrat.
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: Are they going to move toward Fetterman? Are they going
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: to move more toward AOC.
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: I think that the party has no choice but to
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: move towards the AOC type wing. Look. Part of the Senate,
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: even more so than the House, is insulated from the
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: political wins, and part of the job of a Senate
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: leader is to take those slings and arrows and to
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: be unpopular to protect his own members. The problem for
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: Schumer is that he himself is going to be in
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: danger at the ballot box. I think it's notable that
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: a reporter chased him down the other day and asked
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: him if he was going to run for reelection, and
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: he would not commit to it. I think that AOC
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: would be wise to run against him and not run
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: for president. Of course, I'm not out here looking to
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: give AOC any advice, but there's no doubt that Chuck
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: Schumer himself is in political peril right now, and a
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: lot of the members of his caucus feel like the
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: reason that he forced him into this shutdown was for
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: his own personal political benefit.
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: And if that that is something that I believe could
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: actually called some members of his own conference to start thinking, well,
• 11:35
  Speaker 3: maybe it's time for a change.
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: Not to mention how all these candidates for Senate, these
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: Democrat candidates around the nation are calling for him to
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: step down and pledging not to vote for him. He
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: could be in real trouble down the roads.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: And I get that, and I can certainly understand California,
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: for example, sending an AOC leftist to replace Chucky Schumer.
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: But out here in the great unwashed man in state,
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: let's say, purple state states that are kind of closed,
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: sometimes Republicans, sometimes Democrat. Do you think that message is
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: going to carry the weight and win over the hearts
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: and minds of the American people, Because, honestly, Sir, I
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: hate living in a time or a socialist or an
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: out loud admitted communists can even get elected. But can
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: they get elected in states beyond New York and California
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: and some of the other batcrab crazy blue states.
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: Bradley, It's politically toxic and in a lot of ways,
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: Democrats are in a similar spot now as Republicans were
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: a decade ago. The longtime leaders of the party had
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: run the ship aground, and there was a battle for
• 12:41
  Speaker 2: what direction the party was going to go in as
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: specifically to Capitol Hill. Look, leadership isn't as important anymore.
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: You don't have as much a threat to members with
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: Congress doesn't legislate, so prime committee spots aren't as important.
• 12:57
  Speaker 2: Members can raise money elsewhere, They're not as dependent. They're
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: not as dependent on leadership bar jess or all these
• 13:04
  Speaker 2: campaign committees, and you can take your message directly to
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: the people with social media websites like brightbart and and
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: on and on. You're not dependent on the establishment media
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: that oftentimes these the establishment of these political parties controlled
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: The difference for Republicans vitween Republicans in and Democrats now
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: is Republicans had a savior waiting by the grace of
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: God named Donald Trump, who actually led the party in
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: the right direction that would actually expand the tent and
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: give Republicans an electoral future. Democrats don't have that, and
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: I think that the direction that their party is going
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: to take is one that has incredibly far to the
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: left and such a turn off for most independents, most moderates,
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: and won't do anything other than to generate excitement with
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: the furthest left of their party. That war is going
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: to be messy. I think that the party that wins
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: will be bad for the country. Hopefully it doesn't move
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: the over to window that way, but Republicans have a
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: real opportunity.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: If they can seize it, they sure do. Politics editor
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: Bradley J. From Breitbart Breitbart dot com Real quick, since
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: I mentioned Massy before, he's got a discharge petition for
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: the Epstein files with the House out of recess that's
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: going to be brought up. What do you think.
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: I think that this has been out there for two longs.
• 14:29
  Speaker 2: The discharge petition isn't even gonna do that much. It's
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: limited in what it can compel the administration to do.
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: Let them vote on it, let them have their day,
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: get it over with, Let's get back to business.
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: Pull the band aid off. Bradley Jay, thanks for spending
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: time with my listeners with me today and thanks for
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: what you do each and every day Breitbart. My best
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: to you and the Breitbart team will do this again
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: next Tuesday. T have a great week, my friend. It's
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: a twenty one right now. Stick around. Use retired lieutenor
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: colonel Daniel Davis with a Daniel Davis Deep Dive coming
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: up next. Fifty five k RC for more and for