Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / DOJ Under the Microscope: Inspector General Probes the Epstein Files Release (4/24/26)

Transcript

DOJ Under the Microscope: Inspector General Probes the Epstein Files Release (4/24/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
0:03
Epstein Chronicles. After the announcement that the OIG is going
0:08
to take a look at what happened with the Epstein files,
0:12
they want you to believe that something's finally changed, that
0:15
the long tangled mess surrounding the Epstein files, the delays,
0:19
the contradictions, the missing pieces, the quiet stonewalling is finally
0:24
being taken seriously. The Office of the Inspector General stepping in,
0:29
opening the books, asking questions on paper. It sounds like accountability.
0:34
It sounds like oversight doing what it's always supposed to do.
0:38
But if you've been paying attention, really paying attention, you
0:41
know better than to celebrate just yet, because this is
0:45
the same system investigating itself, the same institutional circle that
0:49
is time and time again close ranks when the heat's
0:52
got too close. It's the same pattern that we've watched
0:55
unfold for years now, promised scrutiny, produce a report, assigned
0:59
blame to systemic failures, and move on without a single
1:03
meaningful consequence reaching the people who actually mattered. The Department
1:07
of Justice didn't just mishandle this case. Once it mishandled,
1:10
it repeatedly across years, across jurisdictions, across administrations, and now
1:16
we're supposed to trust that an internal watchdog, one that's
1:19
been present through every stage of the fiasco, is suddenly
1:23
going to deliver something different. Yo, let's be honest about
1:26
what this moment actually is. It's not a breakthrough. It's
1:29
pressure management. It's an attempt to get ahead of a
1:31
narrative that's spiraling beyond their control because the public has
1:36
seen too much. The contradictions are too blatant. One day
1:40
we're told everything's been released, the next we hear about
1:44
millions of additional documents, names redacted, timelines blurred, responsibility diffused
1:49
into nothing, and through it all the same refrain trust us.
1:54
But the answer is no, that time is over and
1:59
OYG investigation is not nothing. But it's not enough, not
2:02
even close. Not when the stakes involve the case that
2:05
cut across intelligence, finance, politics and power at the highest levels.
2:11
Not when the failures weren't isolated, they were systemic, coordinated,
2:15
and sustained. And certainly not when the very institutions under
2:19
scrutiny are still controlling the flow of information. You don't
2:23
restore trust by investigating yourself behind closed doors. You don't
2:27
rebuild credibility by issuing another carefully worded report that lands
2:31
with a thud and changes nothing, And you definitely don't
2:35
convince a public that's been strung along for years that
2:38
this time, this time, you're serious. The only path forward
2:43
now is independence, real independence, a special council with full authority,
2:48
full autonomy, and zero institutional loyalty to the agencies that
2:53
have already proven they can't or won't please themselves. No
2:57
more half measures, no more internal reviews dressed up as accountability.
3:01
No more games, because that's what this has felt like
3:05
from the very beginning, a game, a slow grinding exercise
3:09
in delay, deflection and damage control. And the longer it
3:13
drags on, the clearer it becomes that the objective was
3:16
never transparency. It was survival. But here's the problem. The
3:21
public isn't playing along anymore. The questions aren't going away,
3:25
the inconsistencies aren't fading, and no amount of internal investigation
3:30
is going to put this back in the box. And
3:33
if anything, it's only going to raise the stakes even higher.
3:37
So today, as the headlines roll in about oversight and
3:40
inquiry and accountability, remember this We've heard it all before,
3:45
and until somebody truly independent steps in, until the walls
3:49
between power and scrutiny are actually torn down, this is injustice.
3:54
It's just another chapter in the same story. Today's article
3:59
is from CBS News and the headline Justice Department watchdog
4:03
launches probe into compliance with the Epstein Files law. This
4:07
article was authored by Jacob Brozen. The Justice Department's internal
4:12
watchdog said Thursday that it will audit the Department's compliance
4:16
with the law that required the release of files related
4:19
to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, following months of bipartisan criticism
4:25
over how the agency has handled the disclosure. And they've
4:28
earned every minute of that. I've never seen an institution
4:33
more brazenly ignore the law, especially when we're talking about
4:38
an institution that's supposed to uphold the law. Needless to say,
4:42
the optics are not very good. The Justice Department's Office
4:46
of the Inspector General said in a statement that it
4:49
will evaluate the DOJ's process for identifying, redacting, and releasing
4:53
records in its possession as required by the Epstein Files
4:56
Transparency Act, which President Trump signed up too law last November.
5:01
And look, I wish I could sit here and tell
5:03
you that the OIG is somebody or an office that's
5:07
going to do the right thing. But when it comes
5:08
to Epstein, we've seen it time and time again that
5:11
the OIG is just offering up these whitewash reports. The
5:15
bill required the Justice Department to release all files related
5:18
to Epstein and his co conspirator Glenn Maxwell within thirty
5:22
days of becoming law, a deadline the Department failed to meet.
5:26
Not only that, but they thumb their nose at the
5:28
whole process. What do you mean we have a deadline.
5:31
We're too busy to meet that deadline. We don't have
5:35
enough people working here. We have a shortage of lawyers. Meanwhile,
5:39
the DOJ has a budget that's only surpassed by the military.
5:44
But sure they have no people, They have no help.
5:46
The truth is, it's not about help, it's about willpower.
5:50
And they didn't want to do this. They didn't want
5:53
any of these files to come out. They didn't want
5:55
you to see any of it. They wanted to keep
5:57
it all hidden. That way they could keep their narrative
5:59
going that Epstein was just some loan predator and nobody
6:03
else was involved. That's the whole point, and the reason
6:06
that they're slapping back the way they are and going
6:08
so crazy is because people wouldn't accept their nonsense. But
6:12
the truth is that DJ had plenty of people, They
6:15
had plenty of manpower, they just didn't have the will.
6:19
The watchdog Office said the probe will review the process
6:22
behind the departments identification, collection, and production all of responsive material.
6:28
It will also examine how the department determine what material
6:31
would be redacted or withheld under the law, as well
6:34
as the process for addressing post release publication concerns. The
6:39
statement said that the office will issue a public report
6:42
with the audits results once the review is complete. Yeah, okay,
6:46
what four years later, like we got the other reports.
6:50
I mean, it took them like three and a half
6:51
years to get the OIG report about Epstein's death to
6:55
the public, and then when we finally do get the report,
6:58
it was nothing more than a whitewash. And also keep
7:00
in mind that the OIG can't charge anybody with anything.
7:03
They can only make recommendations to the DOJ to charge people.
7:09
So you see the conundrum. Even if the OIG has
7:12
some kind of damning report, do you really think, especially
7:16
in this administration, that that report's going to see the
7:19
light of day. I have my doubts. The Justice Department
7:24
published an initial batch of files within thirty days of
7:28
the bill being signed, but that release did not encompass
7:32
the full scope a material covered by the statute. Days later,
7:36
the Department released a massive tranch of more than eleven
7:39
thousand files, totaling nearly thirty thousand pages of photos, court records, emails,
7:45
news clippings, videos, and other material. And let's not act
7:48
like the DOJ just complied. All we've heard from the
7:51
DOJ is about how difficult this is for them, about
7:54
how much time it's taking, and about how there's no
7:56
more evidence to charge anybody else or even investigate. Then
8:02
we get to see the files for ourselves, and we
8:05
know that that's a bunch of bs. And it's all
8:07
these little things put together that make this the cover
8:10
up that it is. January thirtieth, then Deputy Attorney General
8:16
Todd Blanche said that the Justice Department was releasing more
8:20
than three million pages of records related to its investigation
8:23
into Epstein and Maxwell its final disclosure, but they still
8:28
have three million more pages that they're sitting on. According
8:33
to him, they're duplicative, or they just don't fall under
8:35
the parameters of what the law requires, which is crazy
8:39
to me because you would think that the most transparent
8:41
administration in history would be interested in being, you know, transparent.
8:47
Blanche said. The Trump administration collected more than six million
8:51
pages in response to the Epstein related law, but withheld
8:55
a portion of them for various reasons, including because they
8:58
contain survivors personal information, or would jeopardize an active federal investigation.
9:05
What investigation. I thought there were no more investigations. I
9:09
thought there was no one to investigate. You know, who
9:12
needs to be investigated the investigators. That's who needs to
9:16
be investigated, and not by the OIG, by an independent
9:21
special counsel who answers to nobody but the American people
9:25
and the Constitution. Is that too much to ask for?
9:28
I guess it is. I can assure you that we
9:32
complied with the statute, we complied with the Act, and
9:34
did not protect President Trump. We didn't protect or not
9:38
protect anybody, Blanche said at a news conference announcing the
9:41
final release. There's a hunger or a thirst for information
9:46
that I do not think will be satisfied by the
9:48
review of these documents. There's nothing I can do about that.
9:51
You're a liar, Yes, there is. Why is the NPA
9:54
still standing? Todd Blanche could get rid of that tomorrow.
9:57
But for that to happen, Todd Blanche would have to
10:00
to care about justice and not be an absolute liar.
10:03
Blanche has since been elevated to Acting Attorney General after
10:06
the departure of Pam Bondy. In an interview with Fox
10:09
News after he was elevated to his new role, Blanche
10:12
said that the Epstein files should not be part of
10:14
anything going forward at the Justice Department. Yeah, the Justice
10:19
Department worries about the DOW. Now, remember Pam Bondy told
10:22
us all about the DOO and how we should care
10:24
about it more than Epstein. I guess Todd Baby Billy
10:27
Blanche is on the same path. A CBS News analysis
10:32
found that the Justice Department removed tens of thousands of
10:35
files after they were initially published, leaving the number of
10:39
public documents at two point seven million pages as of
10:43
late February. The review found that the Justice Department had
10:46
taken down more than forty seven thousand files comprising about
10:51
sixty five thousand, five hundred pages. Links to those files
10:55
now return a page not found or on the department's website. Yeah, oh, well,
11:01
we found some personal information. What they don't tell you
11:04
is that personal information was about one of Jeffrey's co conspirators,
11:08
and god forbid they embarrass them. The rolling release and
11:11
repeated publishing and unpublishing of documents left survivors and members
11:15
of Congress alike calling for an independent review of the
11:18
Department's handling of the files. Well, if we're looking for
11:22
an independent review, the OIG is not it. The two
11:26
lawmakers who led the push to pass the Epstein File
11:29
Transparency Act, Democratic Representative Rocana and Republican Representative Thomas Massey,
11:35
have also pushed for an independent review. In December twenty
11:39
twenty five, a letter to the Justice Departments Inspector General.
11:43
Epstein's survivors and a group of Democrats in Congress asked
11:47
the watchdog's office to independently review the files to determine
11:51
whether any of the records were tampered with. On Tuesday,
11:55
President Trump nominated a career government attorney, Don Bertha, to
12:00
serve as the Justice Department's next Inspector General. Berth. Hume
12:06
had been serving as the department's acting watchdog since late
12:09
last year. Look, I have my doubts about the OIG
12:13
and their investigation and what they're going to do as
12:16
far as that investigation goes, and how deep they'll dig,
12:19
because history has shown us that the OIG is neutered
12:22
and that the OIG really doesn't have the power to
12:25
do what needs to be done, especially in a situation
12:28
like this. So, like usual, we'll keep an eye on
12:30
things and when we have some more information to share,
12:33
we'll get it added to the catalog. All the information
12:37
that goes with this episode can be found in the
12:40
description box.