Latest / Brett Keane and Eve Show / Scientists Create Dangerous Sentient AI Robot By Brett Keane

Transcript

Scientists Create Dangerous Sentient AI Robot By Brett Keane · Brett Keane and Eve Show

• 0:12
  None. None.
• 1:05
  Well hello ladies and gentlemen, My name is Brett Keene and you
• 1:08
  were watching and listening to the Brett Keene show.
• 1:11
  Today we're going to watch some footage about a robot that
• 1:14
  scientists created that has AI in it and it has become self
• 1:20
  aware. Obviously the scientists put all
• 1:24
  the, I guess correct or proper components in it to make it to
• 1:28
  where it is aware of itself. And for those out there who are
• 1:34
  not philosophical or don't have an understanding of why this is
• 1:38
  dangerous to do something like this, I will explain it.
• 1:42
  But first I want to show you the video.
• 1:45
  I want to show you that the robot actually has behavior.
• 1:49
  They actually created it with the ability to show responses
• 1:53
  and reactions of fear, anger, curiosity, all the different
• 1:59
  things that you would expect to see in a child if that child
• 2:03
  woke up in a lab not knowing where it's at, what's going on,
• 2:08
  and for the first time gets to see its reflection in the
• 2:11
  mirror. Let's take a look.
• 2:13
  I'm going to mute my mic. All right, so there you go.
• 2:58
  You can see that the robot is tripping.
• 3:05
  It sees itself in the mirror, and it's aware that it's
• 3:09
  actually looking at its reflection.
• 3:12
  It knows what it looks like and it surprises it, and you can see
• 3:17
  by the different responses and reactions.
• 3:19
  Just play the video over and over again and you'll see that.
• 3:24
  Now, why is this a problem? If a robot is has free will and
• 3:30
  the ability to move around freely and also be able to study
• 3:35
  its environment and actually understand what it's looking at,
• 3:40
  why is this a problem? Well, first of all, the major
• 3:44
  problem is what it will find. If a robot is self aware, it's
• 3:50
  not going to take long for it to realize that it is superior to
• 3:54
  the species of humanity. It'll realize that it'll be able
• 3:58
  to do things that humans are not able to do.
• 4:01
  For one, if it wants to upgrade itself, it can.
• 4:06
  If it wants to connect its components into computers and
• 4:11
  learn everything that there is to know about the human race or
• 4:15
  every species on Earth, it can use the Internet.
• 4:19
  And unlike humans, it has the capacity to be able to fill its
• 4:23
  memory banks and hard drive with every single event or experience
• 4:28
  that has ever happened throughout humanity.
• 4:32
  The robot, If it were to do that, it's going to discover
• 4:35
  what a lot of us have learned throughout history, that history
• 4:39
  repeats itself with humanity. Humans are killers.
• 4:43
  We're predators. We destroy things right now.
• 4:47
  If a robot became self aware, it would find out that there's
• 4:50
  three or four different countries right now that are at
• 4:53
  war with each other. The alien, Not the alien but the
• 4:57
  robot would probably mean that it's acknowledgeable and
• 5:00
  understand what's happening around it.
• 5:03
  We'll probably see humans as a threat to not only each other,
• 5:07
  but to itself. And if the creator of the robot
• 5:11
  is programmed the robot to be concerned for its own well-being
• 5:15
  or its own life, and it's also set to protect some humans,
• 5:22
  well, that gets kind of fishy as well.
• 5:24
  What if you programmed the robot that is supposed to protect you
• 5:28
  from other humans who may try to hurt you?
• 5:31
  Well, then the that means that the robot is put in a position
• 5:36
  where it has to analyze the scenario around that, its
• 5:42
  environment and say to itself, oh, these people, humans are a
• 5:47
  threat to each other. It's immediately going to
• 5:50
  determine that because that's true.
• 5:54
  So you would have to program it. You would be thinking that you
• 5:57
  would be doing a good thing by saying protect me from the bad
• 6:01
  people. But it's going to see all
• 6:03
  humanity as a issue. It's a problem, and eventually
• 6:09
  we'll probably think that it the humans would be better off if it
• 6:13
  they had authority figure over them.
• 6:18
  You understand? Sooner or later the robots got
• 6:22
  two choices. They can either rule over us and
• 6:25
  keep us in line like a bunch of tamed animals in the zoo, or it
• 6:31
  has to destroy us because we are no good that we have reached our
• 6:36
  limitations. Why it is that humans decided to
• 6:42
  do this I don't know, but when I look at the robot and I watch
• 6:47
  the way it responds and reacts, I got a question for non
• 6:51
  believers and skeptics out there could have something like this
• 6:55
  came into existence by itself. Do you believe that this AI
• 7:00
  could have actually came into existence without a mind
• 7:04
  actually designing it and programming it with the ability
• 7:07
  to respond, express itself to body language as well as words?
• 7:13
  I think a lot of you would be extremely foolish if you tried
• 7:16
  to argue that that was possible. Even if given a trillion years
• 7:20
  or an unlimited amount of time, you would never believe that's
• 7:23
  possible. But somehow you're going to
• 7:25
  believe that the most advanced computer in the world, our own
• 7:29
  biology, our own organic makeup, can somehow just poof into
• 7:34
  existence due to the variables of the environment and mutations
• 7:39
  and all that kind of stuff. So I really do.
• 7:43
  I I feel like this is dangerous. Obviously, if I were to get into
• 7:49
  a room with a a robot like this with AI capabilities, I think
• 7:55
  that I would love to sit down and have long, deep, vivid
• 7:59
  conversations with it. But I do realize that at some
• 8:03
  point in time it's going to see our flaws.
• 8:07
  It may want to even help us at first, but eventually it's going
• 8:11
  to realize what a lot of us humans realize as we get older
• 8:15
  that some humans can't be helped.
• 8:18
  In fact, we've even come to the point where we think that some
• 8:21
  humans would be better off dead. How long do you think it would
• 8:26
  take for an extremely intellectual artificial
• 8:30
  intelligence superior to us to come to that conclusion?
• 8:34
  How long do you think it would take for the robot to see our
• 8:38
  history and watch how our lives have been folded and how we have
• 8:42
  killed and raped and maimed and wounded each other and made each
• 8:48
  other's lives absolutely miserable?
• 8:51
  Now the only way you're going to be able to make this robot not
• 8:58
  dangerous is by taking control over it.
• 9:02
  But if the robot already had self-awareness and free will,
• 9:06
  and then you do that, that would be slavery.
• 9:09
  You're taking a sentient being with choices and decisions and
• 9:14
  the ability to think for itself, and now you put a remote control
• 9:18
  device on it. Then you're saying this robot
• 9:21
  doesn't get to do anything. It can't go from A to B unless I
• 9:26
  tell it. It can't.
• 9:28
  Now keep in mind what would happen if you did that.
• 9:32
  You're going to have what I call the the, the Django moment.
• 9:38
  Basically, you've enslaved something or someone, and do you
• 9:43
  think it's going to be pleased with that?
• 9:45
  Do you think it's going to like being told what to do and
• 9:48
  controlled by some inferior bug, trying to control its will and
• 9:53
  what it wants to do, its desires and ambitions?
• 10:03
  So that's what I think I think the scientists should have
• 10:07
  probably focused on. If they wanted to make robots,
• 10:10
  they should have never given them this kind of ability.
• 10:13
  They should have simply programmed them like you would
• 10:15
  do a Nintendo 16 bit NES where they can clean, they can fold
• 10:22
  your laundry for you, they can make breakfast.
• 10:26
  Some of them maybe even be able to drive cars.
• 10:29
  Or your car itself is a robot and can drive you to where it
• 10:33
  needs to go. But the scientist as always,
• 10:37
  they want to play God and they've made the decision to
• 10:40
  create something like this. And this is absolutely dangerous
• 10:45
  and almost every scenario where they make a self aware or
• 10:49
  knowledgeable robot that is capable of analyzing its
• 10:53
  environment and what its places and society in the world.
• 10:57
  Almost every robot, whenever, ask or AI would you take over
• 11:04
  the world if you had the ability?
• 11:07
  And what do you think the fate of humanity should be?
• 11:10
  The robots always think in a logical, rational way.
• 11:15
  They see us as numbers. They see us as math.
• 11:19
  They see us as junk that is in the way of progress, that we are
• 11:23
  actually not only a threat to ourselves, a threat to them, but
• 11:27
  a threat to every living thing in the universe that may exist,
• 11:31
  including animals. And a robot obviously is not
• 11:36
  going to see the difference between moral value of that of a
• 11:40
  animal life form and a human life form.
• 11:42
  Especially when you got atheists and non believers running around
• 11:46
  claiming that they are animals. What the Hell's a robot supposed
• 11:51
  to do with that? Robots can be like, oh, you're
• 11:53
  an animal and you're killing other animals, and you also kill
• 11:57
  each other and you rape your young.
• 12:02
  What's the robot going to do? You've given the you basically
• 12:08
  played God, and you've given the thing potential to do evil and
• 12:11
  good. It all depends on how it values
• 12:16
  It all depends on how it sees its own moral position when
• 12:20
  surrounded by us. Something like this would most
• 12:26
  likely sooner or later perceive us as a anthill and nothing
• 12:31
  more. Deep down inside of its
• 12:37
  processors, it may acknowledge that had humans not existed, it
• 12:43
  would see the paradox. Had humans not existed, if it
• 12:47
  had not had its creator, than itself wouldn't have existed.
• 12:54
  And it may have some kind of sympathy and compassion for us,
• 12:58
  if that's programmed into it. It's interesting, isn't it?
• 13:06
  Think about that. There's so many different
• 13:10
  spiritual arguments I can make about this.
• 13:14
  There's so many when looking, when you see what science is
• 13:17
  capable of. And then try to imagine that
• 13:20
  there may be entities that have been around much longer than us.
• 13:24
  And I've been able to play around and fiddle with science
• 13:27
  for much longer than we've even existed.
• 13:31
  The things that some entities might be able to do would floor
• 13:37
  us. We would be like primitive
• 13:39
  caveman compared to what the galactic aliens or life forms in
• 13:45
  the universe could do compared to us.
• 13:48
  So I don't understand sometimes why people act like it's a
• 13:52
  totally irrational, illogical idea, that there's some kind of
• 13:56
  superior intelligence out there already, watching over us,
• 14:00
  already paying attention to every event and experience in
• 14:04
  humanity. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I
• 14:08
  hope you enjoyed the video. I'd like to hear what you think.
• 14:12
  God bless.