Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Europe’s Muslim Crisis: Immigration, Islamism & the Fate of Western Civilization | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Europe’s Muslim Crisis: Immigration, Islamism & the Fate of Western Civilization | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: A lot of the fund of Littlest fo Last Little
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: and an individual loss. This is the show, all right, everybody,
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: welcome to your own book show on this Saturday, Sober fourth.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: But everybody's having a great beginning of your weekend. Oh right.
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: I'm still not one hundred percent there, not even maybe
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: fifty percent. I'm not sure. So you'll have to bear
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: with me if I'm a little slow today, and both
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: mentally and energy wise, we will see. But this is
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: uh yeah, this whatever it is, this COVID, it's taking
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: a lot, taking a lot out of it. All right,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: let's let's jump in. I thought today we do kind
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: of take on a topic, a topic that keeps coming
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: back and people keep writing to me about and people
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: keep misrepresenting my views on and and I thought we'd
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: kind of cover it well a to z. I don't
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: know if we'll cover a to z, but let's say
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: a to s ada M and I don't know. We'll
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: cover a lot of it. And of course it's a
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: great opportunity for you to ask questions about this topic
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: in particular, or about anything else you want to ask.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: The super Chat is available to ask about anything. But
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: it would be good if we kind of add out
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: all the questions around this issue, all the questions about
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: specifically Islamic immigration to Europe, what to do in the future,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: what to do with the most that are there, how
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: to approach immigration in the future. Uh yeah, any anything, anything,
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: any questions you have about these things, ask now or forever,
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: hold your peace or something like that. As now. It's
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: an opportunity. This is this is the show. We're going
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: to try to cover it all. I'm open to talk
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: about other things. I know some of you wanted me
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: to talk about the Piece deal. There's just nothing new.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: They're going to start negotiating tomorrow. I mean, it's all babe.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: Just when on television and say it's done done. Yell absolutely,
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: there's no question. Hostages are coming home, you know. So
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: he's he's on the assumption that nothing can go wrong.
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: I don't know anything that you guys don't know. I
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: think I will talk about it tomorrow probably and Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday.
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: It'll be in the news every day. We'll see how
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: this evolves and how it develops. Been happy to ask
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: answer any questions you have in the super chat around
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: it on once we complete our discussion of of Islam
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: in Europe. All right, I see Michael's already coming in
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: with one hundred bucks, so we're already well in our
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: way to reaching our goals in terms of super chats,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: So just remind you they all goals. This show is
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: funded to contributions from people like you, so thank you
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: to all of you who contribute to the show. Don't
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: forget Patreon dot com. You can put in your on
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: book show and become a monthly supporter. Or PayPal is
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: another way to become a monthly supporter and support the show.
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: You can also go to Twitter right now and let
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: the world know that we're doing this show right now,
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: so maybe more people can come. They can ask the questions,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: get it off their chest, you know, lecture me tell
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: me why I'm wrong. It'd be good to air all
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: these issues out, all right, So let me just say
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: I you know, first, my proposals around this are not
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: proposals that have that are what I think will happen.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: There are proposals around what I think is politically feasible.
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: I have no idea what's political feasible, and the political
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: feasible is pretty lame and pretty limited. And this is
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: what I would propose if I were running for the
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: government of the UK or France or Germany. This is
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: what I think Europe should do. This is what I
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: think political parties in Europe should propose, should stand by,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: should implement, Whether it's doable, whether the citizens would go
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: for it, I have no idea, But that's true of
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: any radical proposals. They're always going to be questions about implementations,
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: about the ability to implement, given the world in which
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: we live. But you know, this is again what I
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: think should happen. Why is this even an issue? Right? So,
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: I'm very poor immigration, as you know, I'm poor immigration
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: pretty much everywhere. I would love to see a world
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: in which we have, for the most part, with some
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: security screenings and some yeah, basically security screenings. I would
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: like to see a world of open immigration. This is
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: an issue because there's basically a war going on, a
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: war that we'll see how things go with his own
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: ramas and what happens in Iran and what happens in
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: a few other places. Could be that the war is
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: going to be winding up winding down in the years
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: to come. But there is a war going on, and
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: that war fundamentally is between the West, between those who
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: old Western values and between Islamism, between the Islamist powers
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: in the world, you know, motivated primarily or guided primarily
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: funded primarily by Iran and often by Katah, and in
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: some of the other Islamic countries in the Middle East.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: This war is being fought as we speak, and in
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: h in Africa, it's a it's a war being fought
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: in Israel. It's a war being fought all of them,
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: at least in one way or another. It's a war
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: that's being fought on and off over the decades, at
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: least over the last four so decades in Asia, in
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: India and Pakistan, but also in place like Indonesia and Malaysia,
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: though it's on a on a Philippines or so on
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: a on a lower flame over there more recently. It
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: is a war between those who would impose Sharia law,
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: would enslave all in the entire world to a Sharia
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: law based system, to Islamic law. They would impose it
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: by force, and those who would like to hold on
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: to the vestiges of Western civilization, the vestiges of enlightenment
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: that we still have. It is an undeclared war at
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: least in terms of those who are more aligned with
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: the West. It is a word that the Muslims, the
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Islamists know that they are waging. They know the purpose,
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: and they know their motivation and their goal, and know
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: what they want and know exactly what they seek to achieve.
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: But it is a war which the West has chosen
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: to ignore, to pretend it doesn't exist. Islam, after all,
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: George Bush told us, was a religion of peace. Uh.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: Islamists so a tiny little minority. They're not you know,
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: they're not serious. They can't really achieve their goal. They're
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: not you know, there's not there's no there there, there's
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: there's nothing to be worried about. Be happy, just just
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: you don't don't think about it. Don't think about it.
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: That's the context. The context is that there's all going on.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: And within that context there has been a large increase
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: in Muslims living in Europe. And of course, one of
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: the big questions how many of those Muslims, of Islamists,
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: how many of them are committed to this ideology and
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: and part of the problem is we we don't even know,
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: We don't really have good stats on that. But it's
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: important because they are if they are Islamists, they are
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: agents of the enemy, which we again unknowingly maybe to ourselves,
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: are at war with. So there is all going on,
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: and that's one of the many problems that immigration that
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: is expressed through immigration. It's not the only problem, you know,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: the issues of crime and poverty and culture and all
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: of that, But those I think are minor problems. Those
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: are not problems that are that difficult to solve, and indeed,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: the proposals I have which solve those problems at the
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: same time. But the only reason this rises to actually
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: being a substantive issue is that there's a war and
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: they've taken up aalms, and they have institutions, and they
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: are organized, and there is if you will, you know,
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: they're guiding principles and guiding organizations and coordination across different
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: organizations under the big broad umbrella of the Muslim Brotherhood
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: or maybe other umbrellas. But it's real. It's real, And
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: those of you who don't believe it's real, just remember
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: isis not that long ago. Well, Ice is still alive
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: and well, both in Iraq and Syria, but also in
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: Northern Africa. So's a Kaida. They're both very active in Afghanistan,
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: and the spin offs are active in Pakistan. And Hamas
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: is no different than ISIS and has no different goals
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: in ISIS and Rizbala is maybe Shiite instead of Sunni,
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: but fundamentally shares the same goal and same motivations and
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: same you know, long term aspirations as ISIS and al
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: Qaida and all of these. So you know, the issue
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: here is that all these entities exist. Another thing that's
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: really really important to note when they are confronted militarily,
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: because it's all they're defeated easily and quickly. This is
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: a one which one of the sides, the side of
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: the Islamists, is very weak. They have no capacity to
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: build weapons. They can steal them, they can buy them,
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: but they can't build them. They can't improve them, they
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: can't innovate. They can terrorize, but not for very long.
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: Once a Western force, any Western force really is ralled
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: in the United States, fans any Western force, it takes
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: the war seriously, it can wipe them out. It can
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: wipe them out in a matter of days, weeks, months,
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: But they can be wiped out. Isis was destroyed once
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: the West became semi serious and actually it was Russia
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: that took that one pretty seriously. You know, Iran is
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: maybe a force, but it too is a paper tiger,
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: as Israel showed in its twelve day war against Iran.
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: You know, Iran is an insignificant military force, insignificant military power. Again,
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: there's no there, there, there's nothing if one identifies it.
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: So the real problem with this war is not the
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: strength of the enemy. It's the unwillingness of the West
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: to recognize that it is at war it seriously and
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: to deal with it. So that is the context. And
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: in that context they are significant numbers of Islamists in Europe,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: some in the United States, really all over the world
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: who are acting as agents of the enemies of the West,
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: whether explicitly as part of networks or implicitly as those
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: who would advocate for sure real law, or those who
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: on occasion pick up a knife and commit acts of
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: terror in support of the goal of the enemy without
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: any coordination, as did you know that the monster who
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: killed the Jews in the UK a couple of days ago.
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: So there's a war once I knows it. Now the
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: site doesn't. The one side is committed, it knows what
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: its goals. It knows what its long term mission is.
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: The other side doesn't want to see it. It's buried
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: its head in the sand. But when it brings its
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: head out of the sand and it confronts the situation,
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: victory is easy, simple, quick, not that big of a deal.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: So what do you do about the fact that is
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: now a significant number of Muslims in Europe? Well, my
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: view is the uh, the only problem with Muslims in
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: Europe is the extent to which those Muslims affiliated with
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: associated with supportive of or potentially supportive of the Islamist cause.
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: To that extent, they are agents of the enemy and
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: they need to be dealt with. So what should Europe do. Well, first,
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: your past to recognize that's it. It's a war. It's
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: a pretty low flame war. It's not one that they
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: need aircraft carriers for. But they need to recognize that
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: the war, and indeed Europe is doing the opposite. It
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: would be great, for example, if European countries, the European
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: country I was in charge of, in order to deal
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: with the Islamic problem in Europe, would for example, declare
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: made a declaration of hostility to Islamism, maybe a declasion
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: of war, maybe a declasion of some kind of declasion
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: of hostility, declaring that Islamism is an enemy. It is
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: hostile to everything Europe stands for and believes in. It
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: is Islamism, by its very nature, is militant. It is
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: about using force, it is about violating rights, and it
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: is about the negation of any kind of separation of
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: state from religion. And there needs to be an unequivocal,
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: unequivocal declaration that that is unacceptable, that is evil, and
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: that is wrong, that is anti the principles on which
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: Europe stands on, and that this particularly European country is
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: going to dedicate itself to separating state from religion and
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: to fighting Islamism, and for all its citizens to recognize
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: that Islamism Sharia law will never ever ever become the
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: governing law in a particular country. So first politicians need
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: to go out there and say, those seeking sharia law
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: in this country, it's never happening, never going to happen.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: And to the extent that you advocate violence to achieve this,
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: you are the enemy. So that has to be the beginning.
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: So that's step number one. It then has to declare
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: that anybody affiliated with this ideology, anybody who takes an
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: active role in support of establishing Sharia law or active
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: role in support of a terrorist organization, they will be deported.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: There we send out of the country, and if they're
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: applying to immigrate to the country, they will not be accepted.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: That is as part of the background check. Support for
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: organizations promoting Sharia law, organizations promoting terrorism, and that includes
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: by the way, Jamas, you're out of here. That is
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: you know. Of course, this will require a huge mental
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: shift in Europe because that means that Europe needs to
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: become the number one ally of Israel and needs to
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: support Israel's attempt to destroy Islamism in Israel, to destroy
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: Islamic organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad and Risabalah and
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: Iran and all of that. So active support for sharia,
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: the establishment of Sharia law, active support of terrorists organizations,
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: active supports of terrorist organizations in cludey Hmas, any terrorist
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: organization that is affiliate with the Islamist movement the Islamist
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: world is reason for deputation and for denial of immigration status.
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: Now in terms of Islamism to a loge extent, that is,
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: most of what you need. Now, what do you do
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: with the fact that Muslims making such a different culture
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: to Europe and they come and they leach off the
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: welfare state, and you know, they they have rape gangs
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: and they treat women horribly, and they get involved in
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: violent gangs and they do all stuff like that. What
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: do you do with that? Well, here again it's fairly simple.
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: You do the opposite of what Labor Party is doing
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: right now in the UK. First you declare an un compromising,
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: unbending commitment to the rule of law, and then the
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: law applies to everybody. You don't get special treatment because
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: you're a Muslim or you immigrant. Everybody is treated the same.
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: You rape, you go to jail for a very very
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: long time. You murder, you go to jail and we
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: throw away the keys. You participate in any kind of violence,
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: I think penalties should be increased, particularly in Europe, where
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: you guys are particularly particularly lenient when it comes to
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: penalties visa your violent crime. So by by the law,
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: I mean the biggest problem in Europe has is that
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: it doesn't it doesn't prosecute immigrants who violate the law.
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: And what does that do And encourages people to violate
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: the law. Second, so rule of law. You know you
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: got rape gangs, then you don't put them in jail. Fava.
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: They should never see the light of jay. You rape
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: the little kids, you should never see the light of day.
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: And it doesn't matter what your colored skin is. It
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter where you come from, doesn't matter what your
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: religion is. Second, immigrants should get no welfare, zero zilch.
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: They should get no welfare. And by the way, if
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: policemen are not doing their jobs in terms of prosecuting
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: the rule of law, then the policeman should be fired.
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: If cities telling their policemen local policemen don abide by
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: the law, then the city should be taken over by
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: the national government and the police should be fired and
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: the city council should be fired. There's a law in
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: the land. You've got to abide by the law, and
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: if law enforcement won't do it, then their law enforcement
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: needs to be replaced. There can be no tolerance and
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: should be zero tolerance. The police will look the other
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: way because they're members of the same tribe of their
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: friends or whatever. And indeed, you know police don't do
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: their jobs, should be tried for corruption and everything else,
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: just like you would treat anywhere else. So rule of
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: law number one second zero welfare. Immigrant should get no welfare.
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: Now I don't think anybody should get welfare. Welfare should
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: be zero for everybody, but at the very least immigrant
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: should get no welfare. There should be no incentive to
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: come in order to get welfare. So you come to
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: work or you don't come. You don't get housing, you
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: don't get put up in hotels, you don't get benefits,
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: you don't get paid, and not to work. You don't work,
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: you starve or let local charity take care of you,
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: or you get kicked out you leave. Generally, the immigration
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: system should be shifted from an asylum immigration system, which
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: should be basically zero, to an immigration system that is
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: built around work. You want to come and work, welcome,
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: You're not gonna get any welfare, and if you don't
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: work after a while, you're gonna be asked to leave.
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: So rule of law no welfare. Immigration based on work.
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: And when you qualify for citizenship. Citizenship should be tough.
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: So one you know, it should take a long time
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: before you qualify for citizenship. I don't know, twenty years
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: or more. And when you qualify for citizenship, you should
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: have to pass a pretty rigorous task that shows your
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: familiarity with the political system. You should be able to
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: you should have to swear alliance to this political s
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: system and thus a rejection of the idea of Sharia law.
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: So citizens, you cannot become a citizen. You cannot start
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: voting until you are fully committed, until you've been in
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: the country for a long time, you speak the language fluently,
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: you understand the political system involved, and this is true
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: in the United States as well, and you've embraced that
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: political system, and you've excluded in this case we're talking
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: about Muslims. You've excluded Sharia law as a possibility to
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: the extent that you support Youuria law shouldn't become a citizen,
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: should not be allowed to become a citizen. So these
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: are the basic requirements. Declare war are still to Islamism,
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: Read out those of which are rea or terrorism and
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: throw them out. Don't allow them into the country, make
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: immigration work based, enforce the rule of law, reject welfare
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: for immigrants, and make citizenship hard to get and requiring
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: a real commitment to the political system and really to
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: the culture of the place. Do that through language, for example,
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: and work, and I think if you do those things,
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: Islam is not a problem in Europe. Immigrants will assimilate,
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: they will secularize, they will move away from whatever culture
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: and whatever religious threat they might pose to the to Europe,
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: to the UK, to Frans to whatever it happens to be.
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: All the problems in Europe today a consequence of the
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: fact that these principles are not practiced. That there's a
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: buryed a head in the same mentality with regard to Islamism,
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: that immigration is based on welfare, on guilt, on asylum,
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: not on work. Indeed, the places where you have the
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: worst outcomes for immigrants are those places that he cease
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: to insist the least about work requirements, and it's just
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: the least about assimilation. Those places that segregate immigrants and
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: therefore don't require assimilation are the ones that have the
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: biggest problems with immigrants. If you assimilate, if you acquire language,
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: if you acquire work, and you're rigorous in imposing the
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: rule of law, and you weed out the radicals like
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: in moms in mosques preaching the takeover of the British
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: government and the position of Sharia law should have long
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: been gone from Britain, you know, in moms in mosques
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: hailing terrorist organizations are Hamas Chris bala isis al Kaida,
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: or there was the Brotherhood and more generally should be
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: gone from Europe to the intellectual leadership that makes that
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: possible should be gone, all right, So that is my solution.
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: Now to what extent, How big of a problem is this, right,
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: how big of a problem is this? To what extent
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: the Muslims in Europe identifies Islamists? How many Muslims are
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: they in Europe to begin with? So it's really hard
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: to get kind of statistics about the Islamism thing because
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: I think partially because Europeans don't want to know. It's
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: part of the bury their head in the sand. They
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: don't want to find out, they don't ask the surveys.
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: But you know, it appears that if you look at
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: various areas in Europe and different areas are gonna get
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: us slightly different results. You know, Muslim particularly recent immigrants,
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: have a very favorable view of sharia law, but very
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: few of them actually want to impose it on the
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: country that they're coming into. So you know among For example,
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: in France, in twenty nineteen, a poll showed that a
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: significant number forty six percent of farm born Muslims believe
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: Sharia law should be applied in the country. Now it's
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: not clear what that means. Does that mean like marriage
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: law should be applied to Muslims in the country, or
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: does it mean that it should replace the existing law
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: of France. But among Muslims born in France the number
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: is only eighteen percent. Generally, it seems that it's you know,
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: well under twenty percent of Muslims that actually want to
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: impose Sharial law beyond their own Muslim community. Let's see,
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: it's it's probably around you know, two percent of Muslims
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: in Europe who actually want to replace existing low with Sharia.
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: So twenty percent would leturial law to be applied to
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: them in a sense of marriage and civil law like that,
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: but two percent wanted to apply to the entire country. Okay,
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: two two percent is a lot of people. If there
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: are millions of Muslims, two percent could be thousands. And
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: those are the people who grab knives and attack people.
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: Those are the people who commit terrorist attacks. Islam is
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: going to do a lot of damage before it is
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: completely pacified, because it doesn't take much to do damage. Sadly,
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: a small minority, a tiny minority, concrete, real havoc. But
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: part of declaring one's hostility to Islamism and in a sense,
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: declaring war with it, is beefing security, beefing up monitoring,
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: beefing up intelligence and stopping them. All right. Uh so,
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: you know, it's it's really odd to tell. We see
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: videos all the time with people during these demonstrations going
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: up to cops and yelling, you know, we want to
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: post your real law in the UK. We want sharia
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: law everywhere. Is that one guy? Is that one hundred?
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: Is it one hundred thousand? Is it a million? Do
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: we know? It seems like we know very little. Maybe
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: somebody should do more research and try to figure this out.
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: It seems like it would be an important data point
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: to have. Right again, different polls, so different things. Sony
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: four percent of Muslims in the UK in twenty sixteen
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: said they supported ISIS. A four percent is a lot
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: supporting ISIS. That's about as evil as it gets. And
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: doing something about those four percent. They should be watched, monitored,
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: and some of them should be deported immediately. So you know,
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: it's it's going to be important to identify, monitor and
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: get rid of how big is how big is the
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: is the Muslim population in Europe. I mean, you'd think
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: that they're going to be taking over any minute now
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: by kind of the panic that so many people express.
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: Let's take a few countries, Fans for example, Fans, I mean,
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: let's I also have here. Yes, so France has today
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: between five to six million Muslims. They constitute between eight
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: to ten percent of the population, eight to ten percent
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: in some areas. It's much more than that, if you
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: go to Marseilles, for example, some neighborhoods in Paris. In
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: some areas you don't see wisdoms anyway, but eight to
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: ten percent of the total population if immigration continues, let's say,
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: at medium levels, or even if high immigration. And given
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: that you know France, the French, they don't have a
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: place for births, but they have a reasonable level of
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: having children, not like Italy, where it's completely shrinking that
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: by twenty fifty, you know, Muslims might be between thirteen
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: to eighteen percent. Say neither case. Are we talking about
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: the fact that Muslims are going to be a majority
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: even by twenty one hundred than not a majority. They're
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: not close to being a majority. In a place like France,
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: Germany Muslim population is six point one percent. And you know,
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: even if you have crazy high migration, like you're in
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: the mid twenty teens, which is unlikely, it might reach
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: by twenty fifty, might reach again twenty percent. Twenty percent
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: ceased to be the highest percentage you could get to
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: by by twenty fifty if you had really high migration
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: and you didn't put any of the restrictions that I
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: talked about in place. Let me see, I know, to
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: see if the UK, I thought I did Frans the
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: United Kingdom twenty fifty projection is that if you had
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: a high immigration migration, no deportation, high migration, you would
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: get to sixteen point seven percent of the UK population
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: by twenty one hundred. You maybe get to twenty percent.
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: Now that's a lot, but it's it's not a majority.
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: And by then twenty one hundred, that's what sixty something
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: is seventy seventy seventy five years. How many of those
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: are regional Muslims, even Muslims, how many of them have
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: completely assimilated become secular. How much is islami in a
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: factor And suddenly if you take into account the way
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: I think about it, that is, you know, the complete
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: repression of anybody supporting Sharia or the explicit advocacy of
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: rule of law and oppression of welfare. So immigration rates
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: would come down. Right. A lot of Muslim immigrants who
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: come are coming for the paycheck. So if you get
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: rid of the wef estate, as I said, for immigrants,
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: if you make citizens re climate really difficult, if you're
• 37:34
  Speaker 1: a hostile to Islamism, immigration would plummet. Immigration Muslim countries
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: would come down. Now UK created this mass anyway, because
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: the UK was doing you know, this is a consequence
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: of Brexit. If the UK was still part of the EU,
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: then it would have a lot of immigrants from Ukraine
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: and would have a lot fewer immigrants right now from
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: Bangladesh and Pakistan. So yeah, anyway, so yeah, work requirement,
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: no welfare, apply the rule of law, tough suggestions, requirements
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: and make it really difficult for anybody to uphold charial
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: law and to advocate for Islamism. And the problem of
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: Muslims in Europe is solved, all right. I am open
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: to questions. Let me, God, my voice is going again,
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: so we're not gonna go for very long today. Sorry,
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: but my voice just doesn't exist the last few days.
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: Uh okay, let me remind you of our sponsors. One
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: of our sponsors hand to shut Wealth and to shut
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: wealth dot com hander shot is with two tees, hand
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: to shot wealth one would and then dot com slash ybs,
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: where you can find information about products that they have
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: that can really help you reduce your capital gains taxes.
• 39:34
  Speaker 1: If you've got a big stock portfolio, that is, that
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: has a lot of capital gains and if you sell
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: stock you're gonna pay a lot of capital gains taxes,
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: or if you're about to sell your company and dread
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: the idea of paying a third of whatever you get
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: in taxes, well, contact hander shot wealth dot com slash
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: ybs to get information about how they can reduce your
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: capital gains or defer it significantly in a way that
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: really reduces your tax load and enhances wealth creation. You
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: can find an interview I did with Robin about this
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: on my playlist on the sponsors we talk about We
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: talk about this issue and you'll learn a lot, I
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: think from that interview. I think you'll enjoy it and
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: you'll see if this is a product that might be
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: something you would be interested in. Alex Epstein alex Epstein
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: is a sponsor of the show. Alex is, of course
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: the world expert on energy use, the world expert on
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: fuss ol fuels and electricity and energy, on environmentalism and
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: climate change and all this stuff. And you can read
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: him alex Epstein dot substack dot com. Alex Epstein does
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: upsteck dot com. There's just an Alex Ai that you
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: can ask questions of. I mean, you will learn so
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: much from reading Alex so much about kind of one
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: of the most crucial questions that we have today and
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: one that is so contested out there in the world.
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: And finally that I'm an institute. Let's see that they
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: were we were promoting. They wanted me to promote something different.
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: Let me there, it is, all right, let's see. So, yes,
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: the Atlas Shrugged Essay contest. I don't know if any
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: of you applying, but there is, uh there's an Adoles
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: Shrugged Essay contest, and there's a deadline. The deadline for
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: the essay contest is October thirty first, So it's the
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: end of this month, the essay contests. The winner of
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: the essay contests, you win twenty five thou dollars. I
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: didn't know it was that high. Anybody wins the Atlas
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: shruggessy context because twenty five thousand dollars. It's open to
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: high school, college and graduate students worldwide, and you know
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: you can you read the novel, engage with ideas, and
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: you answer a question. Again, twenty five thousand dollars. That's
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: a lot of money. Again. Entry deadline is Oktober thirty. First,
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: if you're a student, you've read at La Shrugged, and
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: you have until the end of the month to submit
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: the essay. To get more information, to get what the
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: essay looks like and how to do it and how
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: long and all of that, go to ironran dot oak
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: slash slash start here inran dot org slash start here. Oh,
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: Troy just showed up and did five hundred Australian dollars.
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Troy. That is greatly, greatly, greatly appreciate it.
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: So thanks Toy. I'll remind everybody you can still ask questions.
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: I'm not gonna go for very long. As I said,
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: my voice is fading, and I will try to do
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: shows every day this week, but they might still be
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: shorts until I get my voice in my energy back.
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: It's it looks like this is gonna be a while.
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: We will see, all right, Thanks toy, Thanks John Baiales
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: for doing a sticker. Let's see, Thank you Ryan. Let's
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: see who else did a sticker today? Thank you Steven? Whoops?
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: All right, I think that's all. Yep, that is all
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: the stickers that we have. A toy with five hundred
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: stallion dollars really got us to our targets. So I
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: appreciate that. And let's see. Reminded every body to use
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: Patreon patreon dot com to become a monthly supporter of
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: the show. Very very valuable member. This show is only
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: made possible because of you. Your monthly contributions, your super
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: Chat contributions are what makes this show possible. And so
• 44:19
  Speaker 1: without you, I can do this, So please keep them
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: coming again. You can do it through Patreon, you can
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: do it through PayPal, and you can do it here
• 44:26
  Speaker 1: through super Chat. Really really really appreciated. I see Jeremy
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: just became a member, so you can also become a
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: member on YouTube. So all different ways to support your
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: own book show. One other way which we haven't had
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: anybody do in a while, I guess I haven't advertised
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: to either, is you can sponsor a show. That is,
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: you can pick a topic. You can send me a
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: series of questions or chat with me about what you
• 44:54
  Speaker 1: would like cover it, and I will do a show
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: on a topic of your choosing for one thousand dollars.
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: So one thousand dollars and I will talk about whatever
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: you would like me to talk about. So let me know.
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: All right, let's jump in with uh and Michael another
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: one hundred dollars question. Michael did this yesterday as well.
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: Thank you, thank you, Thank you, Michael. I really appreciate that.
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: So Michael asks, what Donald Trump is clearly showing is
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: that we do not have three functional branches of government.
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: Were one branch trying to dominate the other two, and
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: we see Congressional Republicans acting as if they are cabinet
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: members and Trump administration. Yeah, I mean, I think that's
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: absolutely right. I think that we have a dysfunctional Congress
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: and it's been dysfunctional for a while. Trump has suffaced
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: that in a way that we haven't seen with any
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: other administration. He's surfaced that because he does whatever the
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: hell he wants, in Congress will do nothing, nothing to
• 45:59
  Speaker 1: stand in a way to block him, to counter him,
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: to you know, and to try to reassert its own
• 46:06
  Speaker 1: power again. This is a consequence of decades and decades
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: and decades of dysfunction, of decades of not passing laws,
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: of decades of basically handing to the executive more and
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: more and more power and being willing to tolerate that.
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: And Donald Trump now is the beneficiary of all that,
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: and the exploiter, the exploiter of all that. And that
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: is what he is doing, and he is making it
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: clear that Congress is useless. Now, let us hope, and
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: a real push needs to be made to reassert congressional power.
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: It is really, really important that we have a fully
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: functional government, not just the government of a strong executive
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: and nothing else. So we need a strong Congress. We
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: will see the extent to which the Supreme Court, the
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: Court seemed to be standing up to Trump, or see
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: if the swim Court is willing to let that stand
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: and willing to do its constitutional job of checks and balances.
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: But one thing is unequivocal, and this is what Michael
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: is pointing out that Congress has defaulted on its responsibilities,
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: and it's a damn tragedy that they're not taking it
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: more seriously and that they're not introspecting and thinking about it.
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: But a rebirth, a re energizing, re energizing Congress should
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: be a big part of whatever future agenda a decent
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: political party has in America. Right equal to reality? Off topic,
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: but I know an atheist who claims the Enlightenment came
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: from Christianity. Any book recommendation showing it was actually against
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: religion and a Christianity was irontained enlightenment and not its source.
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: You are going to have a wait. There will be
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: a book coming, I don't know when on this particular
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: topic or authored by Don Watkins and myself, So it's
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: it's in the works. The talk I gave this summer
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: at o'conn was in a sense kind of an outline
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: of the project. Uh. But but there is a there's
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: a book project in the works around exactly this question.
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: The you know, if you're willing to do the work,
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: there are lots of books that show that, but but
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: you have to do the work yourself. Nobody actually walks
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: you through it. We will, We'll walk you through it.
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: We'll walk you through how the Enlightenment is not christian
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: The Enlightenment is a rejection of Christianity. It's it's lighting up.
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: It's it's it's enlightening after an era of lack of light.
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: But it is exactly it's The Enlightenment isn't move away
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: from religion. It's not a complete rejection of religion. And
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: that's part of its weakness that it doesn't completely reject religion,
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: and it doesn't have a complete philosophical alternative to religion.
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: That is part of its weakness. But it certainly is
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: a move away from religion. It doesn't come out of Christianity.
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: It develops in spite of and to spite Christianity. And
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: to do that you would have to do a lot
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: of reading around the Enlightenment. You know Jonathan Israel's book
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: Books in the Enlightenment, the fantastic books that I've talked
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: about in the past called The Closing of the Western Mind,
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: which shows how Christianity closed the Western Mind, and then
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: the reopening of the Western Mind showing what led to
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: the reopening of the Western mind. But Christianity is the
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: enemy of reason, the enemy of thought, the enemy of progress.
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: And you know, and to the extent that Christianity's reasonable,
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: it's because it has been influenced by the Enlightenment, not
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: the other way around, Brian. With Trump taking over the military,
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: are you going to move to Portugal? Will AIRI move
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: to another country? I'll ask again in a year, Yeah,
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: ask again any year. The answer now is no. You know,
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: Trump is not taken over the military. He is according
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: to American law. He is the commander of a chief,
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: always has been every president is. Nothing special has happened.
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: What's happened is the use of the military in the
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: American streets. We will see how that develops, and how
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: that develops, and how that evolves, and whether that justifies
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: running away or not talking a year. But no, I
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: have no plans to absolutely not bread pants hi on.
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: I'm curious if you read The Mohammed Code by Howard Bloom.
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: It's a scathing indicament and condensation or history of Islam,
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: highlighting the West's evasion. I had to put it down
• 51:13
  Speaker 1: many times, and maybe it's too angry. I haven't. I haven't,
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: but I've read a lot of stuff on Islam. I
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: know exactly the extent to which the West has evaded.
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: So it wouldn't I'm sure it wouldn't surprise me. I
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: don't think there's anything particularly new. And again, you know,
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: to the extent that Islam goes stronger, it's only because
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: of the west evasion. Islam has nothing to offer the world.
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: It has nothing to offer its own people. It's weak.
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: Uh it's it's weak. It's pathetic, it's it's it's it's
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: it's it's there's nothing there. Uh So, so I would
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: it's only the sanction of the victim. It's only the
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: sanction of the West that makes Islam have any any
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: strength at all, has any bearing on the world. By
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: the way, my talk from Okon on the West, on
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: Western civilization in Christianity is available now on my channel
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: on YouTube and on the I'm an Institute channel, but
• 52:21
  Speaker 1: it's on my channel, so you can find it right now.
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: You should go watch it. I think you'll find it.
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: It's a forty minute talk with a Q and A
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: I think you'll find it interesting and you should send
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: your friend. Equal to reality, you should send your friend
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: to listen to my talk. I lay out the argument
• 52:43
  Speaker 1: there lyon is it legit to criticize the worn drugs
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: because there's no defined enemy. Is a warn Islamism similar?
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: It is different because it's an ideology. Is it like
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: if not had been a globally sporadic versus concentrated in Germany. Yeah,
• 53:08
  Speaker 1: that's a good question. I mean, I wouldn't I wouldn't
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: say that the war is with Islamism. Islamism needs to
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: be identified as the cause of the enemy, the ideology
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: of the enemy. But the war needs to be with
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: specific organizations. That is, the war needs to be with
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: the Muslim Brotherhood, with Iran, with Ramas, with Balah, and
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: with all the different spin offs of the Muslim brotherhoods
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: in Europe and elsewhere. So one of the things that
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: you need to do. One of the things that you
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: need to do is once you identify Islamism is the
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: ideology of the enemy, now you have to make a
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: list of all the organizations, all the entities, all the
• 53:59
  Speaker 1: country trees, the constitutomy. But you're right, you can't fight
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: an ideology. You have to fight a concrete political entity
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: eon Ramas, Muslim otherhood. But to do that, to be
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: able to identify which entities you're fighting, you have to
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: know what the ideology is Liman, thank you for the
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: question that helped me clarify that for everybody. Andrew feel bad.
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: Dems and Republicans agree on subsidizing people for healthcare. That
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: odds of a power for power's sake. It's a crude
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: political climate. Both sides agree on the fundamentals. You fight
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: to the death comments. Yeah, no, absolutely. I mean I
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: haven't commented on the government closure because it's all theater.
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: It's meaningless, it has no real meaning ideologically or existentially
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: or economically. It's a power grab each party. It's a
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: power grap and it's a performance art, right, So each
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: party is trying to be perceived as tough for its
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: own voters before their twenty twenty six elections. So Democrats
• 55:14
  Speaker 1: have to do something because otherwise they seem like they're
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: caving to Trump on everything. And Trump has to be
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: perceived as going after the Dems and getting them and
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: schooling with them. So he's going to use the shut
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: down to shut off all the favorite programs of the Democrats.
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: It yeah, it's one hundred percent power. There's no fundamental
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: difference between the two political parties. You know, maybe they
• 55:41
  Speaker 1: disagree about transgender and sports. That's one issue I think
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: they disagree about. But what else do they disagree about?
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: Not much, right other than that, gay marriage maybe, but
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: that's about it. It's these a few culture issues, abortion,
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: a few cultural issues, and everything else they agree on.
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: They agree on spending our money like there's no tomorrow.
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: They agree on subsidizing everything. They agree on essentially planning
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: the economy. They agree on the government should have immense power.
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: They agree on everything. So if you think, as some
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: of you think, I think that the most important issue
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: in the world is transgender in sports, then that makes you,
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: you know, you hate the fact that sports. Then you
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: vote for one party and if you have a different
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: perspective and transgenderism in sports, you have a different I mean,
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: that's it. No, there's no difference in immigration, not really,
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: Now would you boil it down? I mean again, immigration
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: was used more as a club than as a difference. Ideologically,
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: there's very little ideologic difference between the two parties and
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: immigration when you boil it down. They don't like immigration.
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: Now Democrats have become more the party of immigration because
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: Republicans don't like immigration, so the Democrats are the opposite.
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: Not because there's any real belief, not because there's any
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: real belief. Remember that Biden negotiated this immigration deal with Republicans.
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: There was going to close the border and basically dramatically
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: limited immigration, and he was fine with it in congression
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: of Democrats will fine with it and Republicans ultimately wouldn't
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: pass it because Trump wanted the immigration issue for the campaign.
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: But there was a lot of agreement around immigration across Yeah.
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: I mean, they are Democrats on the left who want
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: the chaos and who want just to bring in whatever,
• 58:11
  Speaker 1: but they don't dominate the Democratic Party. The people who
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: dominate the Democratic Party would have cut a deal, but
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: Trump didn't want a deal. So yeah, maybe there's some
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: differences on immigration, but they're not big. And whose side
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: are you on on that one? I'm probably more in
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: the Democrats side than the Republicans. So yeah, when Bush
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: tried to pass biparties and immigration reform and it looked
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: like it was going to pass, Democrats killed it because
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: the unions slapped them down. Unions anti immigration. So Americans.
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: The reality is Americans. Americans say in polls they're very
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: pro immigration, but the activists on both parties, both left
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: and right, do not want immigrants, the unions don't want immigrants,
• 59:11
  Speaker 1: and of course Maggot, the mago or the Republican base
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: doesn't want immigrants. So but the parties are not that different.
• 59:25
  Speaker 1: Parties are not that different, Jamie. A YouTube video titled
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: the Death of Economics one to one ft MESI, who
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: were a guy apparently with an ECON degree, claims were
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: foolish to believe in supplying demand and that rent weight
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: controls on bad. Can you review refute it? I'll look
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: for it. There's really good article. I think it was
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: in the Law Street Journal by Brian Abracht abr on
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: exactly this. He shows quite the opposite. Supplying demand work
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: beautifully and the laws of supplying demand work amazingly and
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: a great at predicting. And you know, so this is
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: whatever this video is. It's foolish, all right, Michael. Do
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 1: you think Americans are more prone to initiation of force
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: than Europeans because Americans are saturated with an immaturity and
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 1: narcissism the Europeans have grown out of. He continues, there's
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 1: more pressure to appear materially successful as a way to
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: achieve suitour self esteem in the US that doesn't exist
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: in Europe. You know, I don't know. I don't know
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: if that's true. You know, this is a complicated question
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: of what is it about America that makes American you know,
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: more violent society? And look, even with all the terrorist
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: attacks in Europe, America is a more violent society and
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: more likely to die of a violent crime in the
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: United States than you are in Europe. Even though we
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 1: have a lot less terrorism from Islamists, we have a
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: lot more violent crime. Now what makes that? So? What
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: is it about Asian cultures that makes them so nonviolent?
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: Like Japan and South Korea unbelievably low crime rates and
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: no violence. I mean, that is a complicated question and
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: I don't have an answer to it, but there is
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 1: something and the sounds contradict you, but there's something about
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: the ambition, the willingness to break social conventions that exist
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: in American society that when filtered through bad values and
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 1: and and and and and bad choices and and maybe
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: this pseudo self esteem and narcissism that Michael's talking about
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: produced violence. So, uh, you know, the the these other
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: cultures are more uh, I don't know, rules following uh
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: less entrepreneurial less innovative, less ambitious, which makes them less
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: violent maybe, but also makes them less of all the
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: positives that associated with that and most of these positives.
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 1: And again it's when that ambition gets channeled into bad
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 1: values in bad directions. Uh, that's you know, when bad
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: things happen on that end. You know, Latin American culture,
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: which is not particularly ambitious, is quite violent. So the
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: countries which have some of the highest violence rates in
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 1: Latin America and Africa, and it's not linked there to ambition.
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: So you'd have to really think through culture and attitude
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: and and and exactly what's going on and why some
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: cultures are more likely to be violent than others. I
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 1: don't I don't have I don't have an answer. It's
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: not like, yeah, what's the similar between I don't know,
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: violence and Olsavado and violence and America and violence in
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: Central Congo. I mean, you have to control for so
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: many variables. But I don't know. I do think that
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: the fact that Europeans a little bit more passive, less
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: take initiative, less ambitious has something to do with it.
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 1: But those all virtues. So why do virtues lead de
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: vice only when they're filtered through something like narcissism or
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: or you know, a desire for pseudo self esteem materialism.
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 1: I like numbers. How does left Islamist alliance fit within DIM? Well,
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: I mean I think that DIM will teach us that
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: it's not I think, you know, I don't know how
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: it fits. Put it that way. I shouldn't speak for DIM.
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: It's not sustainable alliance. It's not an equilibrium alliance. It's
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 1: an alliance of convenience that falls apart at the at
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: the at the earliest opportunity. You could see that with
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: the flotilla that that came across the Mediterranean. As soon
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: as some of the Islamists discovered that some of the
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: activists and the flotilla were gay, they wanted to walk away.
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: There was a huge fight between the different elements within
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: within the flotilla. They separated, they disintegrated. So I think
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: the leftist Islamist alliance is unstable. It cannot survive. It's
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: it's a it's an alliance of opportunity, nothing more neo.
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: How can the government find out whose Islamists are not
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: without mass surveillance, Well, you don't need mass aveilance. All
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: you need is to survey those mosques that are teaching
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: Islamist ideology, those preachers that are advocating for Sharia law
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 1: that is completely legit, and they should be surveyed, and
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: they're being surveyed today. You know, you have already intelligence
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: agents in many of these Muslim communities because you're monitoring
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: them because there's terrorism there. It's not that hard given
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: that to be able to identify you is and isn't
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: affiliated with these groups, So not that hard to do
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: they congregate together, particularly today, Michael, is there a chance
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: that stock crocket boom is not a bubble? AI? Is
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 1: that revolution? I mean, anything's possible. I just think that
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: what you're seeing right now is probably massive over investment
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: in AI infrastructure. And how that all plays out I
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: don't know exactly, but the valuations right now AI might
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: be a revolution. But how you turn that revolution to money,
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: which is what you would have to do in order
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 1: to make these valuations make sense. Nobody has that business
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 1: model yet that I've seen. You know, how can vetting
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: be done in individuals from third world countries if their
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: governments don't have data on their citizens? Oh? I mean,
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: it's not that hard to vet an individual. And if
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: there's no data. You have to make the call about
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: whether you want to give them the benefit of the
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: doubt or not. I don't think it's a big risk
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: and I don't think there's a big issue about who
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: you let in. Once they're in, you can keep surveying,
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: surveilling them and for period. You can give them a
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: period in which they're being surveyed and to see if
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: they're if they're part of any kind of hostile group
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: or it what happens when the majority of police and
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: prosecutors and Muslims. Then you live in a Muslim country.
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: But where are the majority of police when prosecutors Muslim?
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: And if it's a local issue, then fire them if
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: they're not abiding by the law. The central Gumma should
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: have that power. And if it's at the federal level,
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: then it's too later. Ready they're all Muslims already, so
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: you're living in a Muslim country. Move But if you
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: follow the rule of law, and if you've done all
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: these things, then that will never happen. Jacob, how much
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: of this plan can be done as a solo European
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: country versus the EU as a whole? Would you have
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: to leave the EU to employment specifically deportation. No, I mean,
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: look at how much Denmark has done relative, for example,
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: to Sweden. Denmark has done a lot of this, has
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: deported a lot of people that has a very different
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: immigration policies than Sweden does. And indeed, in twenty fifteen
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: when all the Muslims were coming after the Serians Civil War,
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: they didn't come to Denmark. They went right through Denmark
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: to Sweden. Because Denmark was giving no welfare, was giving
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: zero welfare, was not hospitable, Sweden was. They skipped Denmark
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: and went straight to Sweden. Curious if you said this
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 1: to Harry and he gets and if he gets it,
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: I don't think I said anything here that I think
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: Harry would disagree with. I'd be surprised. Psa Urons Oconn
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: Talk has recently been available on the Aris YouTube channel.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: It's on my channel forget a Rice channel. Check it
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: out on my channel, Jamie. The video is by the
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: videos by channel called Unlearning Economics and it does takedown
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: videos of Thomas soul Milay speaks unfavorably of Melay speaks unfavorably.
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: Henriy Hazlitt seems like a leftist with a vendetta yeah,
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, I mean it makes sense, but yeah,
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: it makes sense for a leftist to do that, but
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: I can't imagine that there's any real quality there. All right,
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: thank you guys. I better get off because I am
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: losing my voice. I apologize for this being a short show.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: Thank you again for all the support. Thanks to all
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: the super chatters in particularly, thank you, thank you, thank you.
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: Really really appreciate it. And I will see you guys
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: probably tomorrow, probably do something again, another show show tomorrow.
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: Hopefully my voice will get a little stronger. I will
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: get a little stronger from show to show. Please subscribe
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: if you're not a subscriber and like the show before
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: you leave, like the show before you leave Patreon, don't
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: forget that. Bye, everybody, see tomorrow.