Latest / Inside The Criminal Mind / The First Crossing: When Criminal Fantasy Becomes Action

Transcript

The First Crossing: When Criminal Fantasy Becomes Action · Inside The Criminal Mind

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody, to Inside the Criminal Mind. Today we're
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: looking at when criminal fantasy becomes action. There's an important
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: difference between imagining something and doing it. Human beings routinely
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: experience aggressive, disturbing, socially unacceptable thoughts without acting upon them.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: An angry employee imagines striking a supervisor. Someone humiliated by
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: a former partner fantasizes revenge. The existence of a thought,
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: even a disturbing one, does not by itself predict criminal behavior.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: That distinction is essential when attempting to understand serious offenders.
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: Popular culture often portrays the first major offense as an explosion.
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: Years of hidden darkness suddenly erupt into violence. But the
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: psychological transition may be considerably less theatrical. Instead of one
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: dramatic moment in which inhibition disappears, there may be a
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: sequence of smaller crossings. An individual fantasizes, then rehearses, then
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: approaches a situation where acting becomes possible, then retreats. Later,
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: the person approaches again. Each encounter with the boundary between
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: fantasy and behavior may alter how psychologically distant the forbidden
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: act feels. Fantasy can play several different roles in the process.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: For some offenders, repeated fantasy may function as rehearsal. The
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: imagined scenario becomes increasingly detailed. The location, the victim, the control...
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: But fantasy alone does not explain offending. Countless people have
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: violent or unusual fantasies without ever committing crimes. Researchers, therefore,
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: have to consider fantasy alongside personality, learning history, substance use,
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: social circumstances, previous behavior, mental health. Another important process is rationalization.
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: Before violating a deeply established rule, people frequently construct explanations
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: that make their behavior temporarily acceptable. The victim deserved it.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Nobody will really hurt me. The rationalization does not necessarily
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: eliminate awareness that the behavior is wrong. It can create
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: enough psychological distance for that knowledge to permit action. Smaller
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: behavioral experiments may matter as well. An offender contemplating a
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: serious crime may first engage in less consequential boundary violations, surveillance, trespassing, theft,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: These behaviors should not automatically be interpreted as precursors to
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: severe violence. Most people committing lesser offenses do not progress
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: to extreme crimes. Then comes the first crossing. Psychologically, its
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: significance may extend beyond the crime itself. A previously hypothetical
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: question has been answered. Can I actually do this? For
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: some offenders, the experience may be frightening enough to strengthen inhibition.
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: For others, avoiding immediate consequences may produce a dangerous lesson.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: The anticipated catastrophe, arrest, overwhelming guilt does not occur. The
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: boundary that once appeared absolute has now been crossed, and
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: crossing it once may change the meaning of crossing it again.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: This is why understanding criminal escalation requires more than asking
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: what someone wanted. The most consequential moment in a criminal
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: trajectory may therefore occur before anyone recognizes that a pattern exists.
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: It is the moment when the offender discovers that the
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: forbidden act is no longer merely imaginable, but actually is possible.