Latest / UK Column Radio / The Treasury Letter – with Justin Walker

Transcript

The Treasury Letter – with Justin Walker · UK Column Radio

0:06
Speaker 1: Good evening to the UK Column viewers and listeners. Welcome
0:11
Speaker 1: to what's really a special edition. I'm going to be
0:15
Speaker 1: speaking to Justin Walker about money, banking, the financial system,
0:23
Speaker 1: and I'll just say that it was back in February
0:26
Speaker 1: that I had a chat with him about the Bradbury Pound.
0:29
Speaker 1: That's that conversation still available on the UK Column website.
0:33
Speaker 1: And we were also talking about the history of the
0:39
Speaker 1: Bradbury Pound, and of course on the UK Column website
0:43
Speaker 1: there's also let me read this out so I get
0:45
Speaker 1: it right, Banker's Bradbury's carnage and slaughter on the Western Front.
0:52
Speaker 1: And that actually is a little video which Mike Robinson
0:55
Speaker 1: produced back in November twenty twelve, so a long time
1:00
Speaker 1: ago but still highly relevant. Well that's the little introduction
1:05
Speaker 1: just in.
1:05
Speaker 2: Welcome, Welcome, Thank you Brian for inviting me again. I
1:10
Speaker 2: mean you and I have known each other now. I mean,
1:13
Speaker 2: it's frightening, isn't it. And he was about two thousand
1:15
Speaker 2: and four. I think we first touched base as twenty
1:17
Speaker 2: years ago.
1:18
Speaker 1: Yeah, it must be about there. What's frightening is that
1:20
Speaker 1: we can't actually remember it to pin it down, and
1:28
Speaker 1: it's incredible at the moment. I know there's all this
1:30
Speaker 1: stuff about as you get older, you know, time speeds up.
1:35
Speaker 1: But I talk to a lot of younger people and
1:38
Speaker 1: they also think that life is very fast at the
1:40
Speaker 1: moment and time goes past quickly. But I'll just say
1:45
Speaker 1: with that happening, it's even more difficult to remember what happened.
1:51
Speaker 2: Well, I had somebody because I don't like political parties,
1:54
Speaker 2: as you know, I don't like the format of political parties,
1:57
Speaker 2: but somebody did say to me a few days ago
2:00
Speaker 2: that we ought to set up the Grumpy Party. For
2:03
Speaker 2: all those of us who've been at it for a
2:04
Speaker 2: long time, we've probably sweeped a par because I think
2:07
Speaker 2: even thirty year olds are getting grumpy now.
2:10
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is true, but it's also true to say
2:13
Speaker 1: that there are a lot of more mature people who
2:16
Speaker 1: have worked an incredibly long time, far longer than you
2:20
Speaker 1: and I have worked. They've been trying to educate people
2:25
Speaker 1: and explain what's happening and get the truth out there,
2:29
Speaker 1: and I've always got great respect for them. I remember
2:35
Speaker 1: a number of the ladies that got involved with the
2:37
Speaker 1: UK Column. A lady called Margaret Carroll I mentioned at
2:43
Speaker 1: the UK Column conference in Bristol on Saturday, just gone
2:49
Speaker 1: because she was one of the original people that got
2:51
Speaker 1: in touch with me. But then you know, we had
2:54
Speaker 1: Sheila and Carol and Kate and and yeah, a lot
2:59
Speaker 1: of people who were very hard their whole lives really
3:02
Speaker 1: trying to trying to make sense of the madness around us.
3:06
Speaker 1: Now today we thought we'd get back into the subject
3:10
Speaker 1: and money. And you've been pretty active in the background,
3:14
Speaker 1: and in particular you saw the opportunity to make contact
3:18
Speaker 1: not only with the new MPs but also to see
3:23
Speaker 1: how the Chancellor would react to some simple questions, what
3:28
Speaker 1: have you been up to?
3:29
Speaker 2: Well, yes, I've written a twenty eight page open letter.
3:36
Speaker 2: I have to admit that four pages are full of
3:38
Speaker 2: nice pictures and stuff, so it's not quite bad. But
3:40
Speaker 2: it is to show the whole system of finance and
3:45
Speaker 2: international finance for what it is. It is an open letter.
3:51
Speaker 2: I know the Chancellor has received well. Put this way,
3:54
Speaker 2: it went to the HM what you call it with
4:00
Speaker 2: it came put this way my MP bless him, Tim Farron,
4:04
Speaker 2: and did exactly what I asked him to do as
4:06
Speaker 2: an MP, and he sent my letter to HM Treasury
4:10
Speaker 2: to the Chancellor asking specifically for the four questions to
4:16
Speaker 2: be answered, and he did exactly as I asked him,
4:20
Speaker 2: So that's good. That's a big tick for a change
4:22
Speaker 2: for an MP.
4:24
Speaker 1: Justin can I can I just come back in there,
4:27
Speaker 1: because I think this is a very important point. There
4:31
Speaker 1: are a lot of people who have got to the
4:33
Speaker 1: stage where they utterly dismiss MPs their useless, don't bother
4:41
Speaker 1: to speak to them or anything else. But at the
4:43
Speaker 1: end of the days, it's true that MP's are part
4:49
Speaker 1: of all we've got and we shouldn't give up on
4:53
Speaker 1: these people. We should always be trying to educate them
4:57
Speaker 1: and engage with them, because it's clear that across the
5:04
Speaker 1: all spectrum of what is it, six hundred and something
5:07
Speaker 1: MPs in the house, there are many MPs, even if
5:13
Speaker 1: we say it's a handful of MPs, but they're there.
5:17
Speaker 1: They're not happy with what's happening in many areas. A
5:21
Speaker 1: lot of them, we know, are frightened or scared in
5:24
Speaker 1: the system, and we know that because they'll actually say
5:27
Speaker 1: so in private. But they are trying to do some things,
5:31
Speaker 1: and I think it's very important that we still try
5:34
Speaker 1: and engage with MPs, give them facts and evidence, and
5:39
Speaker 1: ask them to do things because ultimately they are there
5:42
Speaker 1: to serve us.
5:44
Speaker 2: Aren't they. Well, I you know, I couldn't agree with
5:47
Speaker 2: more with you. I mean, I'm we've got we've got
5:50
Speaker 2: three hundred and whatever it is, brand new MPs and
5:53
Speaker 2: they're not completely under the well, they're not completely inside
5:57
Speaker 2: the Westminster bubble yet telling them Mark, But there are
6:00
Speaker 2: some who I still think will wake up and think, gosh,
6:04
Speaker 2: what's happening? And remember we had Andrew Bridgen, you know,
6:08
Speaker 2: bless him. I wish he was still in Parliament. Perhaps
6:11
Speaker 2: off that man, you know, once he realized that we
6:14
Speaker 2: were up against the globalists and what they were doing,
6:18
Speaker 2: he came out and he said, right, I'm going to
6:20
Speaker 2: go where the truth takes me. And he did mention
6:23
Speaker 2: the Bradbury Pound in parliament. That's the first MP to
6:26
Speaker 2: probably have mentioned the Bradbury Pound or Treasury notes for
6:31
Speaker 2: well over seventy years. But going back to Tim Farron,
6:34
Speaker 2: I did actually get a response from the Treasury. And
6:38
Speaker 2: because it's so short, I will read it to you.
6:42
Speaker 2: And this bear in mind. This is to Tim Farron,
6:45
Speaker 2: and it's come from It's signed by nobody, It's just
6:49
Speaker 2: simply signed by the Correspondence and Inquiry Unit HM Treasury
6:56
Speaker 2: and bear in minded. He sent the letter to the
6:59
Speaker 2: Chancellor and what he got back was this, Dear Tim Farron,
7:04
Speaker 2: thank you for your correspondence dated tenth of October on
7:08
Speaker 2: behalf of your constituent, mister Justin Walker. Then it gives
7:11
Speaker 2: my address regarding fiscal policy. The Government is grateful to
7:17
Speaker 2: you for drawing attention to the issues set out by
7:20
Speaker 2: mister Walker in his email and supporting documentation. HM Treasury
7:27
Speaker 2: is always keen to receive feedback from people up and
7:30
Speaker 2: down the country. I hope this is helpful. If you
7:34
Speaker 2: have any questions about this reply, please email Public Inquiries
7:40
Speaker 2: at HM Treasury dot gov dot UK, quoting the reference
7:44
Speaker 2: number and then he gives a whole garbage of numbers.
7:47
Speaker 2: So there you are. That is the response to a
7:49
Speaker 2: twenty eight page, thoroughly detailed an evidence based letter all
7:54
Speaker 2: about the Bank for International Settlements. That governor going to
7:58
Speaker 2: meetings there? Does he talk to the Chancellor? Did the
8:02
Speaker 2: Chancellor Rachel Reeves know about the Bradbury pounds? She worked
8:06
Speaker 2: at the Bank of England and she went to Oxford
8:09
Speaker 2: University and she went to LSC London School of Economics.
8:14
Speaker 2: So I asked her a question. Did she know about
8:17
Speaker 2: what the treasury did to save the economy in nineteen
8:20
Speaker 2: fourteen outbreak in the First World War? And at the
8:23
Speaker 2: end of the day, I said, are you now going
8:26
Speaker 2: to implement You're going to implement a modern day equivalent
8:30
Speaker 2: to the Bradbury pound treasury notes. In other words, after
8:34
Speaker 2: all the treasury basically what treasury notes are as an
8:37
Speaker 2: extension to the change in our pockets. It's the government
8:40
Speaker 2: creating money under m nort And are you going to
8:44
Speaker 2: do that down to fill your twenty two billion alleged
8:47
Speaker 2: black hole and all the rest of it? Four simple
8:50
Speaker 2: questions asked no reply. All I got was that, And
8:54
Speaker 2: I even I have to say Tim Farron was exasperated,
8:57
Speaker 2: and I'll be writing an open response to Tim how
9:02
Speaker 2: we proceed further, probably after the budget, once we know
9:05
Speaker 2: what's in the budget. Right they just fold us in contempt.
9:10
Speaker 1: Right, justin let's pull this apart a little bit because
9:14
Speaker 1: that response which you read out, I was laughing to
9:19
Speaker 1: myself really as you read it, because that is a
9:23
Speaker 1: pretty classic, wonderfully crafted Bob Off letter. So it's full
9:30
Speaker 1: of niceties and plassitudes, but the real messages go away,
9:35
Speaker 1: little boy and don't bother us. And of course we
9:39
Speaker 1: should pay attention to the fact that it wasn't sent
9:42
Speaker 1: to you, that was sent back to an who was
9:47
Speaker 1: asking the question. So I can imagine in the audience
9:50
Speaker 1: there'll be people who say, yes, well, you know, what
9:54
Speaker 1: did you expect It's a waste of time, to which
9:57
Speaker 1: I say, absolutely not, because now what we've got from
10:01
Speaker 1: the Treasury is a letter where it demonstrates that they
10:06
Speaker 1: the Treasury, do not want to engage on this subject.
10:12
Speaker 1: So for the audience, justin you wrote a very long letter,
10:16
Speaker 1: but within it I think you said to me that
10:19
Speaker 1: there were four key questions, right, So let's for the
10:23
Speaker 1: audience very simply, very carefully tell the audience what the
10:30
Speaker 1: key questions were and why you wanted to ask those questions.
10:36
Speaker 1: So let's do them one at a time another time.
10:39
Speaker 2: Well, the first one concerned the Andrew Bailey, the governor
10:43
Speaker 2: the Bank of England, as with all governors of the
10:46
Speaker 2: Bank of England, and they disappear to the Bank for
10:51
Speaker 2: International Settlements every seven to eight weeks where they had
10:56
Speaker 2: meetings with about eleven or twelve other governor of the
11:00
Speaker 2: big top banks and other invited guests. Now, there is
11:05
Speaker 2: a book which I reserve, which I recommend people to read,
11:10
Speaker 2: and this is The Tower of Basil by Adam Lebour,
11:15
Speaker 2: and it's entitled it's basically called the Shadowy History of
11:19
Speaker 2: the Secret Bank that runs the world. And within the
11:23
Speaker 2: first few pages they state that the governor the Bank
11:27
Speaker 2: of England goes to Basil in Switzerland and has these
11:31
Speaker 2: private meetings and he says no minutes are taken. So
11:36
Speaker 2: you have these meetings of the top twelve central bankers
11:39
Speaker 2: plus other invited guests, and there are no minutes taken.
11:45
Speaker 2: So I asked the question to the Chancellor. Does Andrew
11:50
Speaker 2: Bailey come and see you when he's been to one
11:52
Speaker 2: of these meetings? Does he tell you what was discussed,
11:56
Speaker 2: what was decided?
11:58
Speaker 1: So just let me that one or tease that one
12:01
Speaker 1: apart a little bit. So the basic question is about
12:05
Speaker 1: the head of the Bank of England going to have
12:09
Speaker 1: meetings with the Bank of International Settlements, the Senior as
12:15
Speaker 1: I understand it anyway, we'll call it the senior World Bank.
12:20
Speaker 2: The Central Bank, the Central Bank.
12:22
Speaker 1: Central bank of the central banks. Yeah, so he goes
12:26
Speaker 1: to have meetings with the Bank of International Settlements and
12:33
Speaker 1: there are no minutes taken. We don't believe there are
12:35
Speaker 1: any minutes taken. And so your question to the Chancellor
12:41
Speaker 1: was does she get briefed when he comes back from
12:46
Speaker 1: those meetings to say what was discussed and what he
12:49
Speaker 1: said on behalf of the United Kingdom? Right? And in
12:56
Speaker 1: the in the response that came back from the Treasury,
13:03
Speaker 1: from the Treasury, not from the Chancellor, from the Treasury,
13:07
Speaker 1: they simply ignore that question. Is that correct?
13:11
Speaker 2: Dontally ignore it, don't ignore it, right, And that we've
13:14
Speaker 2: come to the second question.
13:15
Speaker 1: No, wait, wait, just before you get there, because we
13:21
Speaker 1: were able to report the UK column was able to
13:24
Speaker 1: report some time ago. I'm going to guess a couple
13:26
Speaker 1: of years ago that we discovered that the Bank of
13:30
Speaker 1: International Settlements was setting up a special office in London
13:37
Speaker 1: in order to progress Bank of International Settlement.
13:42
Speaker 2: And the Central Bank Ocurrencies projects.
13:46
Speaker 1: And in the set up documentation which was available to
13:51
Speaker 1: the public, it clearly said that the Bank of International
13:55
Speaker 1: Settlements had diplomatic immunity in the documents and in the
14:00
Speaker 1: movement of documents and individuals connected to the Bank of
14:05
Speaker 1: International Settlements.
14:08
Speaker 2: Absolutely correct. When BIS has a termed BIS Bank for
14:13
Speaker 2: International Settlements. When personnel are moving around and they're carrying
14:18
Speaker 2: their bags, their dispatch bags, documents and what they are
14:21
Speaker 2: treated exactly the same way as ambassadors and embassy staff
14:26
Speaker 2: taking around documents. In other words, no, they're not allowed
14:30
Speaker 2: to be looked at by customs or anyone like that.
14:33
Speaker 2: They have total diplomatic community when moving documents and stuff around.
14:38
Speaker 1: Right, So we're reinforcing this all the time. So the
14:43
Speaker 1: Bank of International Settlements calmly comes in and out of
14:47
Speaker 1: the UK to its entire satisfaction. The public in UK
14:54
Speaker 1: are led to believe that the Bank of England is
14:58
Speaker 1: looking after our money correct, independent of government, but in
15:05
Speaker 1: partnership with government. And don't worry, the Bank of England
15:10
Speaker 1: is doing its very best to make sure we live
15:14
Speaker 1: happy and prosperous lives.
15:16
Speaker 2: And please remember that the Bank of England has a
15:19
Speaker 2: committee that involves the Governor and others, but unelected, unaccountable
15:24
Speaker 2: individuals who set the country's interest rates. All done by
15:30
Speaker 2: the Bank of England. And so it's openness and transparency.
15:35
Speaker 1: Yeah, so we could take a guess. We can assume
15:38
Speaker 1: that interest rates are going to be a very critical
15:42
Speaker 1: thing that are going to be discussed with the Bank
15:44
Speaker 1: of International Settlements due to its immensely powerful position. But
15:51
Speaker 1: we're also led to believe that even discussions on that
15:55
Speaker 1: are not necessary, not necessarily shared between the Governor of
16:02
Speaker 1: the Bank of England and the government through to the Chancellor.
16:08
Speaker 2: So we want to shine the light. We want to
16:10
Speaker 2: know what goes on. I mean, does Andrew Bailey go
16:14
Speaker 2: knocking on the door and say, Chancellor, I've just been
16:16
Speaker 2: to bustle. I've got a capull debrief for you. Here
16:19
Speaker 2: we are, this is what we discussed, these decisions we made.
16:21
Speaker 2: What do you think does that happen or does nothing
16:25
Speaker 2: at all happen? We don't know, and we should know
16:28
Speaker 2: because money creation and money supply should be, if you like,
16:33
Speaker 2: in the hands of the people. It should be unelected,
16:37
Speaker 2: basically unelected, unaccountable people at the moment are deciding on
16:42
Speaker 2: how much or how little money the world has to
16:44
Speaker 2: spend private individuals who like to meet in secret. That
16:48
Speaker 2: can't be right, not in that it can't be right.
16:52
Speaker 1: And of course we're also living in a time where
16:55
Speaker 1: we've only got to look at the headlines across the
16:58
Speaker 1: whole spectrum of gacy media to see that billions of
17:03
Speaker 1: pounds are suddenly appearing in order to keep the war
17:08
Speaker 1: in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine going.
17:12
Speaker 1: No problem with billions of pounds for arms, ammunition, munitions
17:18
Speaker 1: for the slaughter in Ukraine and the Middle East. But
17:22
Speaker 1: we can't manage to scrape up the money for winter
17:26
Speaker 1: fuel payments for elderly people who are who are short
17:32
Speaker 1: of money.
17:33
Speaker 2: Basically, yeah, absolutely, priorities, you know, our priorities go look
17:38
Speaker 2: out of the window. I mean, it is, it's unbelievable
17:42
Speaker 2: actually when you actually do look at it, our money
17:45
Speaker 2: creation and money supply has been, as I said, put
17:49
Speaker 2: into the hands of private, unelected, unaccountable people who like
17:52
Speaker 2: to meet in complete secrecy. What on earth is that
17:56
Speaker 2: it's all about?
17:57
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so let's let's move on to question two.
18:00
Speaker 1: Then what was the second will the question do?
18:04
Speaker 2: Was around an interview that Professor Richard Werner, that's w
18:09
Speaker 2: E R N N E R. He's a German economist,
18:13
Speaker 2: but he lives over in Britain. I think he's university.
18:16
Speaker 2: He's at the University of Winchester at the moment. And
18:19
Speaker 2: Professor Richard Werner, who is actually a champion of public banks,
18:23
Speaker 2: and he's quite sympathetic to what I've been writing. I
18:27
Speaker 2: don't know if he's written read what I've written, but
18:30
Speaker 2: he's certainly sympathetic to the principle of the money creation
18:37
Speaker 2: by the state form the state. And he also came
18:40
Speaker 2: up with quantitive easing. It's quite a character. But he
18:45
Speaker 2: was on a Russia Today program and I put the
18:47
Speaker 2: hyperlink in so it's all there. You can see him
18:49
Speaker 2: talking about it. And he was on Russia Today. And
18:52
Speaker 2: it's only a forty five second link, you know, it's
18:55
Speaker 2: only a forty five to five second speech. But in
18:57
Speaker 2: it he says to this other chap who is a
19:00
Speaker 2: City of London commentator and quite embedded in the system,
19:05
Speaker 2: and he said, you are aware that the City of
19:07
Speaker 2: London is a country in its own right. It's a
19:11
Speaker 2: it's not part of the United Kingdom. It's a country.
19:14
Speaker 2: It's a state in its own right. And we all
19:17
Speaker 2: know that the past Queen. The Queen was expected on
19:21
Speaker 2: formal occasions when going into the Square Mile, she had
19:25
Speaker 2: to touch the sword. That's basically getting permission to go
19:29
Speaker 2: in to do whatever she was going to do within
19:32
Speaker 2: the City of London. So technically and legally, the city
19:36
Speaker 2: of London is classed as a country. So hang on
19:41
Speaker 2: a moment, we have the Bank of England, which is
19:44
Speaker 2: supposedly looking after our money creation and money supply and
19:49
Speaker 2: you know, looking after the British economy, actually positioned in
19:54
Speaker 2: a foreign country. So I simply asked a question, is
19:58
Speaker 2: Professor Verner right? And in which case, if he is right,
20:03
Speaker 2: how does this influence the status of the Bank of
20:06
Speaker 2: England with HM Treasury. It's quite incredible. I mean, Richard
20:11
Speaker 2: Werner is clearly he knows what he's talking about, and
20:15
Speaker 2: the other commentator who he was talking to was scribbling
20:19
Speaker 2: down notes because he didn't know right.
20:21
Speaker 1: So this was the key element of question two. Then
20:26
Speaker 1: was it?
20:26
Speaker 2: The question two? Is is it true what Professor Richard
20:30
Speaker 2: Verner said when he said that is the Bank of
20:32
Speaker 2: England a separate state to the United Kingdom? And if
20:36
Speaker 2: it is, well, how does this impact upon the Bank
20:40
Speaker 2: of England which is located within the square mile therefore
20:45
Speaker 2: in the separate country. If professor is correct, right, and we.
20:50
Speaker 1: Are deliberately doing this in a very pedantic way, And
20:55
Speaker 1: the reply that comes back from an anonymous person in
20:59
Speaker 1: pretty much anonymous department in the Treasury is simply not
21:05
Speaker 1: to answer this question, which at its heart is historical fact.
21:10
Speaker 1: A lot of this is not difficult to see and
21:12
Speaker 1: to establish. But the Treasury didn't want to answer that
21:17
Speaker 1: second question. It didn't even want to acknowledge that element.
21:22
Speaker 2: No, yeah, so you know, I mean, I mean, basically
21:28
Speaker 2: they are bank to rights. I mean the evidence that
21:31
Speaker 2: I put forward is it comes from very credible people.
21:35
Speaker 2: And of course was my uncle was a director of
21:37
Speaker 2: the Bank of England for seventeen years and I got
21:41
Speaker 2: to meet quite interesting people behind the scenes. And it
21:46
Speaker 2: was my uncle who told me at at my age,
21:50
Speaker 2: when I was sixteen, I was going back to school
21:53
Speaker 2: and you know, I was on the train with him
21:56
Speaker 2: having breakfast, and he was discussing what was I going
21:59
Speaker 2: to do for my career, and you know, I told
22:02
Speaker 2: him and he suddenly said, well, I'm going to give
22:04
Speaker 2: you two bits of advice to take through life. Never
22:07
Speaker 2: believe anything you read in the press because we control it.
22:10
Speaker 2: And never ever believe a politician when they say they
22:13
Speaker 2: can do something. They can't unless we say they can.
22:16
Speaker 2: And of course, the tender age of sixteen, going back
22:18
Speaker 2: to do his o levels it. It went over my
22:21
Speaker 2: head a little bit, but I did remember thinking, oh,
22:24
Speaker 2: he's going to a meeting for the bank, you know,
22:26
Speaker 2: for the Bank of England as a director, and I
22:30
Speaker 2: knew obviously Pilkinton's class and he was a big man
22:33
Speaker 2: in the industry, so I just assumed it was something
22:37
Speaker 2: to do with industry and stuff. So I didn't think.
22:39
Speaker 2: But I do remember that conversation very clearly. So it
22:43
Speaker 2: you know, it shows that there are wheels within wheels
22:47
Speaker 2: and well money again, going back to money creation, money supply,
22:52
Speaker 2: it's not in the hands of the people.
22:54
Speaker 1: And it's not in the hands of the politicians either.
22:57
Speaker 2: I think we can assume, I suppose elected servants, it's
23:01
Speaker 2: not even there.
23:03
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's go on to question three then in
23:06
Speaker 1: exactly well, the.
23:07
Speaker 2: Question was remarkably simple. The current Chancellor, she has been
23:16
Speaker 2: in her CV, she's been to Oxford, she's done the
23:20
Speaker 2: London School of Economics, and she worked for a time
23:23
Speaker 2: at the Bank of England. So Rachel Reeves is well
23:27
Speaker 2: versed in economics and money creation, money supply, or at
23:33
Speaker 2: least you know, that's what we're led to believe. So
23:36
Speaker 2: my question was very very simple. Did she know what
23:40
Speaker 2: happened on August seventh, nineteen fourteen, And of course that
23:44
Speaker 2: was the day that the Bradbury pounds came into the
23:47
Speaker 2: high street banks from the Treasury, saving the country from
23:54
Speaker 2: financial collapse and the run of the banks. And because
23:58
Speaker 2: everyone was shown these notes treasury notes, and I actually,
24:03
Speaker 2: I think I can show your viewers. I don't know
24:06
Speaker 2: if I did it las time, but I will show
24:08
Speaker 2: you the note which I picked up from a stamp
24:12
Speaker 2: shop in New York some time ago. But there we are.
24:17
Speaker 2: That is a Bradbury pound. That's the third edition. The
24:21
Speaker 2: first lot that came out as an emergency after three
24:24
Speaker 2: days was on stamp paper and it was only printed
24:29
Speaker 2: on one side only. This is the third edition, which
24:32
Speaker 2: came out at the back end of nineteen fourteen. So
24:37
Speaker 2: once the people had explained to them because obviously they
24:40
Speaker 2: were hoping to pick up gold, they were hoping to
24:42
Speaker 2: pick up half sovereigns and sovereigns for their notes, and
24:46
Speaker 2: they were told, no, you're going to get instead the
24:49
Speaker 2: same as our coinage. You're going to get these notes.
24:53
Speaker 2: And they are totally safe and stable because they are
24:56
Speaker 2: based on part of the liquidity of our nation. There
24:59
Speaker 2: would and the wealth and the credit of our nation. Okay, So.
25:04
Speaker 1: Just so we're we're going to we're going to encourage
25:08
Speaker 1: our views and listeners to go back to that February
25:13
Speaker 1: discussion we had on the Bradbury Pound and fraudulent banking.
25:17
Speaker 1: If you want the detail on the on the Bradbury
25:21
Speaker 1: and the history factual history around it, go to the
25:25
Speaker 1: UK column website and just search for the Bradbury Pound
25:28
Speaker 1: and it will come come up.
25:32
Speaker 2: So that was the third question you want.
25:33
Speaker 1: The bit I want to add, of course, is the
25:36
Speaker 1: fact that what we are talking here is about currency
25:40
Speaker 1: being created out of the hands of private, unaccountable bankers,
25:46
Speaker 1: but also effectively money being created without an attached burden
25:51
Speaker 1: of debt, interest ry and interest rate. So this this
25:56
Speaker 1: is why the Brawberry Pound happening in the way it
26:01
Speaker 1: did at the time it did, is such an important
26:04
Speaker 1: milestone because it highlights the fact that the bankers, these unelected,
26:11
Speaker 1: unaccountable bankers, are creating money, and of course they're pulling
26:15
Speaker 1: not only nations, but they're pulling individuals into debt the
26:19
Speaker 1: whole time. So you ask the question, does Rachel Reeves
26:24
Speaker 1: know about the Bradbury Pound and the reply from the
26:30
Speaker 1: anonymous person in the semi anonymous Treasury Department is to
26:37
Speaker 1: simply ignore the question. Correct, yeah, right, So number four.
26:44
Speaker 2: Well this is the big one, and this is a
26:47
Speaker 2: very simple one again, Chancellor, Are you now on the
26:52
Speaker 2: budget day which is on the thirtieth next next well
26:56
Speaker 2: it's going Wednesday. Are you now going to do what
27:02
Speaker 2: David Lloyd George, who has Chance of the Excheque in
27:04
Speaker 2: nineteen fourteen, are you now going to do that to
27:07
Speaker 2: fill your your twenty two billion pound hole, et cetera,
27:12
Speaker 2: et cetera. In other words, are you going to use
27:15
Speaker 2: the wealth, the labor potential, our creativity of the nation
27:20
Speaker 2: and as a nation we are valued by the Office
27:23
Speaker 2: of National Statistics so around about just probably over just
27:27
Speaker 2: over forty trillion pounds? So are you going to put
27:31
Speaker 2: a fraction of that into liquidity and use that as
27:34
Speaker 2: debt free and interest free money to save the nation,
27:38
Speaker 2: to look after our public services, to look after our
27:43
Speaker 2: central infrastructure, and to protect our strategic industries. Because we've
27:48
Speaker 2: seen what's happened to Pulish Deal, We've seen shipbuilding collect
27:51
Speaker 2: I mean everywhere you look, industry has collapsed. So are
27:55
Speaker 2: we going to put into liquidity part of our nation's
27:58
Speaker 2: wealth to underpin in future prosperity, debt free, interest free,
28:04
Speaker 2: and completely separate from the entire financial system that's controlled
28:09
Speaker 2: by the likes of the Bank for International Settlements. And
28:11
Speaker 2: then you've got the im FORECD World Bank et cetera,
28:14
Speaker 2: et cetera, et cetera. And you've got the goal markets,
28:17
Speaker 2: the financial market, all controlled by private families and private individuals, unelected, unaccountable.
28:24
Speaker 2: The whole system is corrupt, totally corrupt. So are we
28:28
Speaker 2: now going to turn our backs on such a corrupt
28:31
Speaker 2: system and have sovereign money for our sovereign people, sovereign nation,
28:37
Speaker 2: debt free, interest free, and we can get on with
28:40
Speaker 2: our lives, have prosperity, have happiness, and quite simply, if
28:46
Speaker 2: you like, go to the like other words, find a
28:49
Speaker 2: solution to all these problems that we have. In fact,
28:52
Speaker 2: when I was told about the Bradbury Pound, the gentleman
28:56
Speaker 2: telling me about it off the record said, and you
28:59
Speaker 2: will have a solution to all of Britain's economic woes.
29:03
Speaker 2: And that's what it is.
29:05
Speaker 1: Indeed, the key bit that we've been emphasizing is that
29:10
Speaker 1: if you understand the history of the Bradbery pound. You
29:14
Speaker 1: suddenly realize that the idea that private banks have to
29:19
Speaker 1: be the ones that issue the money with associated debt
29:24
Speaker 1: is complete and utter nonsense. We don't have to live
29:26
Speaker 1: in this way where private on accountable banks control all
29:33
Speaker 1: the money that makes everything happen, and then everybody, including
29:38
Speaker 1: the nation, drowns in debt. And just to highlight it,
29:42
Speaker 1: the twenty two billion that you mentioned there, that was
29:48
Speaker 1: the sum declared by labor. As Keir Starmer came into power,
29:55
Speaker 1: he was very quick to say that they'd found a
29:57
Speaker 1: twenty two billion pound coal in those nasty Tories finance finances.
30:05
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, once again keeping this left right division, I mean,
30:10
Speaker 2: the globalists always need division, So what better way to
30:15
Speaker 2: set one side of the house up against the other side,
30:18
Speaker 2: keep a division going, Divide and rule, divide and rule,
30:21
Speaker 2: and nobody then bothers to see. We'll hang on a moment.
30:25
Speaker 2: Why are we all running around like headless chickens when
30:28
Speaker 2: quite clearly this is going on and it shouldn't be
30:30
Speaker 2: going on. So that's the point of this letter, And
30:34
Speaker 2: any one of those four questions can bring the house
30:37
Speaker 2: cards down. It is a house of cards they've built
30:40
Speaker 2: for themselves. But only once people wake up to the
30:43
Speaker 2: realities of central banking and how the whole system works.
30:47
Speaker 1: Right, So the power of your letter was one that
30:54
Speaker 1: you took the trouble to put a very comprehensive letter
30:57
Speaker 1: together with historical fact fact about how the banking system works.
31:06
Speaker 1: And then in that package of information which I would
31:10
Speaker 1: presume you put together, apart from giving that information to
31:15
Speaker 1: the Chancellor and the Treasury, it was also showing that
31:20
Speaker 1: you verticomas knew your stuff about how the system works.
31:26
Speaker 2: So I was also quoting a lot of historical figures
31:29
Speaker 2: that people never heard of, people like Vincent Vickers, who
31:32
Speaker 2: was a director of the Bank of England join the
31:37
Speaker 2: nineteen fourteen saw the Bradbury Pound rescue the economy and
31:41
Speaker 2: then became a champion for sovereign money ever since. He
31:44
Speaker 2: fell out with the Governor of the Bank of England,
31:47
Speaker 2: Montague Norman, when he set up the Bank for International Settlements.
31:51
Speaker 2: So in other words, there are good people. I know,
31:53
Speaker 2: there are good people inside the City of London who
31:56
Speaker 2: don't like the system. I mean, I've had private conversations
32:00
Speaker 2: I don't know who I'm talking to, but they were
32:02
Speaker 2: introduced to me by David Paycock and KEM Parlerton, two
32:06
Speaker 2: stalwarts who were money reformers who latched onto me when
32:11
Speaker 2: I first mentioned the Bradbury and everything else. And that's
32:15
Speaker 2: when I was suddenly realized that there are good people
32:19
Speaker 2: on the inside who don't like the status quote, who
32:22
Speaker 2: want to see it change. So this is why I
32:24
Speaker 2: think we've got very exciting times ahead of us.
32:27
Speaker 1: Yes, indeed, just to come onto the chance for herself,
32:32
Speaker 1: Rachel Reeds, she worked at the Bank of England. Can
32:38
Speaker 1: we should we believe that she was there working and
32:44
Speaker 1: she actually understood what was going on around her. Do
32:48
Speaker 1: you think she was that capable or do you think
32:51
Speaker 1: she was a young lady who was very excited, probably
32:56
Speaker 1: to be working in an immensely powerful organization.
32:59
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a very interesting question that and I haven't
33:03
Speaker 2: got the answer. I mean, we know was. I mean
33:06
Speaker 2: every time I hear two tier now I think of Kiir.
33:08
Speaker 2: But there is a two tier university system. We got
33:11
Speaker 2: Rhodes scholars for instance, and allegedly Rhodes scholars are, if
33:16
Speaker 2: you like, shown behind the scenes, they are allowed to
33:19
Speaker 2: see behind the mask. I don't know. As the youngest answer,
33:23
Speaker 2: we just don't know. That's where we start to go
33:26
Speaker 2: into theory. What I presented in this letter are blatant
33:30
Speaker 2: historical facts which can't be denied, so you know, but
33:34
Speaker 2: they've done their best to airbrush this history out, no
33:40
Speaker 2: doubt about it. If it hadn't if I hadn't discovered
33:42
Speaker 2: the book by Thomas Johnston, the MP left wing labor
33:47
Speaker 2: MP in nineteen thirty who wrote the book The Financiers
33:50
Speaker 2: and the Nation, I wouldn't have found out about the
33:52
Speaker 2: story of the Bradbury Bound. Yes, so other books have
33:55
Speaker 2: been written where they just casually mentioned treasury notes without
33:59
Speaker 2: delving into the realities of what a treasury note really
34:02
Speaker 2: means and the implications for how the economy. You know.
34:06
Speaker 2: So it was back in the nineteen thirties at Thomas
34:09
Speaker 2: Johnston MP, who by the way, became the father of
34:12
Speaker 2: a Scottish hydroelectric scheme in the Highlands and had a
34:16
Speaker 2: tremendous legacy. He also looked after Scotland joined the Second
34:19
Speaker 2: World War and behalf of Churchill's wartime cabinet. And he's
34:24
Speaker 2: one of those few MPs whose legacy you can be
34:27
Speaker 2: really proud. He can be really proud of and nobody
34:30
Speaker 2: seemed to have a bad word to say against him,
34:32
Speaker 2: so he could talk to if you like, left right,
34:34
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. He worked to get things done and he
34:39
Speaker 2: hated corruption, and that's why I wrote this book, The
34:42
Speaker 2: Financiers and the Nation, which I recommend people. You can
34:45
Speaker 2: actually read it online.
34:47
Speaker 1: Okay, now, your MP, what was his reaction to getting
34:54
Speaker 1: that style of letter about can't confront me?
34:58
Speaker 2: But he used the word which I I thought was
35:00
Speaker 2: very telling. He was basically disgusted by the answer that
35:04
Speaker 2: he received. How you know, basically it was just a
35:08
Speaker 2: well I said, joking with somebody today. It's almost as
35:11
Speaker 2: if artificial intelligence wrote the book, wrote the letter. It
35:15
Speaker 2: was totally without any empathy and treated Tim Farron, you know,
35:20
Speaker 2: not a dear Tim. I mean, we've seen letters that
35:22
Speaker 2: come back from ministers and things like that where they
35:25
Speaker 2: start off by saying dear and then you get the
35:27
Speaker 2: first name of the the MP and say I thank
35:31
Speaker 2: you a constituent. It may just be a bland letter,
35:34
Speaker 2: but it's then signed by whoever it is. But in
35:37
Speaker 2: this case it's just dear Tim Farron and then signed
35:40
Speaker 2: by this what I may just find it it's signed
35:44
Speaker 2: by the Correspondence and Inquiry Unit, HM Treasury.
35:49
Speaker 1: Is there actually a human signature on the bottom.
35:54
Speaker 2: Or is it an at all? Just that in print?
35:57
Speaker 2: In fact, we'll we'll send you well you'll have a
36:00
Speaker 2: copy of the letter, obviously take out my private details. Yes,
36:03
Speaker 2: but I said so people can see it.
36:06
Speaker 1: And they should see it, because of course this is
36:09
Speaker 1: this letter. It's insulting to you, but it's grossly insulting
36:14
Speaker 1: to an MP.
36:15
Speaker 2: Exactly, you know, I mean, I think they I'm honestly
36:20
Speaker 2: genuinely shocked by it, and I should be writing to Tim.
36:24
Speaker 2: I mean, Tim is no fan of the Browdberry, yet
36:26
Speaker 2: he still says he's got problems with it and this,
36:28
Speaker 2: that and the other. But he's never gone he's never
36:31
Speaker 2: sat down with me to go through all those problems
36:33
Speaker 2: he supposedly has. I think basically he's fearful of opening
36:38
Speaker 2: something that he's not capable of handling.
36:41
Speaker 1: Well, isn't it interesting that you bring up the word fear,
36:44
Speaker 1: which I mentioned early on in the little introduction to
36:48
Speaker 1: to what we're going to discuss. Just make it simple
36:52
Speaker 1: for me so there's no misunderstanding the letter that he wrote.
36:57
Speaker 1: Was it to the Tim Barren I'm sorry forwarded for
37:01
Speaker 1: you was did it go to the Treasury or did
37:04
Speaker 1: it actually go to Rachel Reeves herself.
37:07
Speaker 2: I don't know. I haven't seen the letter he forwarded.
37:09
Speaker 2: He just said he had forwarded a letter with my
37:12
Speaker 2: thing to the treasury, so I don't know if it
37:14
Speaker 2: was directly. He did say to me, don't expect a
37:17
Speaker 2: reply beside the budget. It will be too busy doing
37:20
Speaker 2: the budget, So I said, did that I thought, well,
37:23
Speaker 2: probably I won't. So I don't know if he's actually
37:28
Speaker 2: sent it to a treasury or to I haven't actually
37:30
Speaker 2: seen the covering letter.
37:31
Speaker 1: Right, So this is something to stay on the trail of,
37:35
Speaker 1: isn't it, Because if it is just that bland letter
37:39
Speaker 1: has come back from the Treasury, I would have thought
37:42
Speaker 1: the next step is a robust letter to Rachel Reeves
37:48
Speaker 1: to ask what this nonsense is and to ask for
37:52
Speaker 1: you know, a proper response from her, as one MP
37:55
Speaker 1: to another from Tim Farron too.
37:57
Speaker 2: Yes, no, I would totally agree, and I'm going approached
38:00
Speaker 2: him to see what he actually did send to the
38:04
Speaker 2: Treasury and so we'll take it from there. But I'm
38:08
Speaker 2: also going to write, once I know what's in the budget,
38:12
Speaker 2: and what is happening and how people are probably going
38:15
Speaker 2: to find themselves being taxed more and businesses are going
38:20
Speaker 2: to be taxed more. I mean, I've talked to two
38:23
Speaker 2: small businesses a day and they're dreading the budget. They're
38:26
Speaker 2: just dreading what's going to be in the budget. So
38:29
Speaker 2: it's going to be very interesting. Let's see what they
38:32
Speaker 2: come up with, and then we'll say, well, hang on,
38:35
Speaker 2: why didn't you just do what happened in August nineteen fourteen.
38:40
Speaker 2: You could have done that. It's also the same way
38:42
Speaker 2: as reduce our coinage in our pockets. Why couldn't you
38:45
Speaker 2: do that? So there will be, if you like, an
38:48
Speaker 2: addition to this letter.
38:51
Speaker 1: Right, but let's stay on this case, justin on this element,
38:57
Speaker 1: because basically we're going to have a budget where we
39:02
Speaker 1: are to believe that the Chancellor Rachel Reeves, with all
39:06
Speaker 1: of a huge mental acumen and intelligence and training, is
39:13
Speaker 1: going to be acting as an accountant to tell the
39:19
Speaker 1: UK as a nation state, what is going to happen
39:24
Speaker 1: in order that our finances stay in an appropriate state
39:31
Speaker 1: of profit rather than loss. That's what the budget is about,
39:38
Speaker 1: and what we hear year upon year of course, is
39:42
Speaker 1: how Ultimately, any problems are going to be solved by
39:47
Speaker 1: an increase in taxation, where supposedly the state is going
39:54
Speaker 1: to take more money out of our pockets. And it's
39:57
Speaker 1: ruthless because it's always bread, isn't it over a range
40:01
Speaker 1: of areas, So if you're not a drinker, they would
40:04
Speaker 1: get you on a petrol tax increasing. There's always a
40:11
Speaker 1: route so that everybody gets caught in the tax snare.
40:17
Speaker 1: But we've already established in this discussion that in the background,
40:23
Speaker 1: the banks, who actually have control over the finances we
40:28
Speaker 1: the public, are not even allowed to know what was
40:34
Speaker 1: discussed and who discussed it where.
40:37
Speaker 2: Exactly as I said, the whole system is absolutely rotten
40:42
Speaker 2: to the core. It has to be replaced, lock stock
40:46
Speaker 2: and barrel. You can't tinker with a system. What's so interesting,
40:50
Speaker 2: and I mentioned got to mention it before. All the
40:53
Speaker 2: schools of economics. You know, you've got the Austrian school,
40:56
Speaker 2: the Keynesian School, the New Economics school, all these different schools.
41:01
Speaker 2: They all have different ideas for how an economy should function,
41:05
Speaker 2: and yet not one of them addresses that simple point,
41:08
Speaker 2: or the simple point that the entire financial system is
41:11
Speaker 2: in private unelected unaccountable hands meeting in secrets. Now not
41:16
Speaker 2: one of them is. So the whole discipline of economics
41:19
Speaker 2: is flawed as it stands at the moment.
41:22
Speaker 1: This is very interesting, justin because some time ago I
41:26
Speaker 1: was given I think partly as a joke, but somebody
41:30
Speaker 1: gave me a little book. I'm afraid I can't remember
41:33
Speaker 1: the name of it, but it was written by a
41:35
Speaker 1: man in America, and essentially, i'll call it The Idiot's
41:39
Speaker 1: Guide to Economics. And it was a clever little book.
41:43
Speaker 1: I think it had been written I'm going to say
41:46
Speaker 1: in the nineteen thirties or something like that. And I
41:51
Speaker 1: did read the book I've been given it. I did
41:53
Speaker 1: read the book. But you're absolutely right. What was what
41:58
Speaker 1: was not mentioned? It wasn't that it was me and
42:00
Speaker 1: not discussed. What was not even mentioned was the banks
42:07
Speaker 1: and who the banks were and how it was that
42:10
Speaker 1: these unelected, unaccountable bankers were controlling the money that allowed
42:17
Speaker 1: everything to operate, or if they wanted to not operate.
42:22
Speaker 1: And if we think of the situation in twenty twenty
42:26
Speaker 1: four where we are being told that, oh dear, yes,
42:30
Speaker 1: something else has collapsed in UK. As you've mentioned steel,
42:34
Speaker 1: we can't build ships, the roads are full of potholes,
42:37
Speaker 1: the NHS is collapsing.
42:39
Speaker 2: What carbon credits to look forward to destroying the planets?
42:43
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, So there's all this disaster and we don't
42:50
Speaker 1: really have any money to spend. But on the other hand,
42:55
Speaker 1: and I'm ramming this one home, when it comes to
43:00
Speaker 1: keeping the war in Ukraine going, we've got billions, and
43:06
Speaker 1: Gaza and Gaza with the Israelis as well, we've got millions.
43:11
Speaker 1: We've got billions. And we get a simple clue for
43:15
Speaker 1: this situation because if you read you can read the
43:21
Speaker 1: Financial Times, you can read the key newspapers. What we
43:26
Speaker 1: are not seeing is the bankers saying, hang on a minute,
43:31
Speaker 1: we haven't got any money for war.
43:34
Speaker 2: Exactly.
43:35
Speaker 1: The bankers are not saying we're shorter money, you can't
43:38
Speaker 1: have money for the for the next fifty million shells.
43:43
Speaker 1: We're seeing the exact opposite. We're seeing not only the
43:48
Speaker 1: money for the weapons and the ammunition to slaughter people.
43:52
Speaker 1: I'll just stick in Ukraine on this one, because certain
43:55
Speaker 1: aspects of this more obvious. We're not seeing them say no, no,
44:00
Speaker 1: you can't have any more shells because we haven't got
44:02
Speaker 1: the money. What we're actually seeing. It's the exact opposite.
44:06
Speaker 1: We're not only seeing the money for those shells. We're
44:10
Speaker 1: in the background seeing that there's got to be more investment.
44:14
Speaker 1: That means money into the military industrial complex because it's
44:19
Speaker 1: full and woefully short of producing the number of shells
44:23
Speaker 1: that are necessary to keep this war really going. We
44:28
Speaker 1: do not hear banks saying no, no, no, there's no money.
44:34
Speaker 1: The better way of doing this is to go for peace.
44:37
Speaker 1: What we see the banks doing is the opposite. And
44:40
Speaker 1: presumably I'm going to be a little bit old and
44:43
Speaker 1: cynical here, this is because the bank's no fault. Well,
44:47
Speaker 1: that they can make obscene profits out of war.
44:52
Speaker 2: Well, let me just reiterate the First World War, all right,
44:56
Speaker 2: The Bradbury Pound saved the day. But then they wound
45:00
Speaker 2: down the Bradbury Pound because the City of London and
45:03
Speaker 2: the Bank of England went running around to David Lloyd
45:05
Speaker 2: George the chance and said we want to go back
45:07
Speaker 2: now to buying guilts and bonds from the British government
45:11
Speaker 2: at three three and a half percent interest whatever. So
45:14
Speaker 2: because of that, the national debt in nineteen fourteen at
45:18
Speaker 2: the outbreak of the First World War was around four
45:22
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty million pounds okay when the when the
45:28
Speaker 2: war ended, sorry five hundred my figures now, but when
45:31
Speaker 2: the war ended it was five six hundred million or
45:35
Speaker 2: whatever it was. It had gone up a huge amount,
45:37
Speaker 2: absolutely astronomical, and of course that was the national debt
45:41
Speaker 2: that was spiraling out of control. When it sort of
45:43
Speaker 2: had you had the depression everything else, and then you
45:46
Speaker 2: had the Second World War where the debt again went
45:49
Speaker 2: shooting up. And of course the national debt today is
45:52
Speaker 2: what's it over three trillion pounds now it's three point
45:55
Speaker 2: one trillion or something like that. And the interest on
45:59
Speaker 2: the on the monthly repayments we're having to do to
46:04
Speaker 2: service this national debt. I think three months of repayment
46:08
Speaker 2: by the treasury is the equivalent of now the twenty
46:11
Speaker 2: two million pound black hole that apparently has to be filled.
46:15
Speaker 2: And then we have a national debt. For why did
46:18
Speaker 2: we have a national debt when we didn't have to
46:20
Speaker 2: borrow money? We could have used our own credit to
46:23
Speaker 2: run the economy.
46:25
Speaker 1: Right, And this is this is money that has been
46:30
Speaker 1: created out of nothing by these unaccountable bankers.
46:36
Speaker 2: Yeah, I just remember those figures for the First War
46:38
Speaker 2: six hundred and fifty million was a national debt in
46:41
Speaker 2: nineteen fourteen, and then in nineteen nineteen a treaty seven thousand,
46:47
Speaker 2: five hundred million, so it had rocketed up. As I said,
46:52
Speaker 2: they like to make a killing out of the killing.
46:54
Speaker 1: Yes, that that is the correct expression. Now let's let's
46:58
Speaker 1: ramp it up a bit, because if people haven't heard
47:02
Speaker 1: of the Bank of International Settlements before, and you can
47:05
Speaker 1: go online and have a look at their website and
47:09
Speaker 1: delve into it. There's a certain amount of information you'll
47:12
Speaker 1: get out of it. But what you're not going to
47:15
Speaker 1: get out of their website is the history of the
47:19
Speaker 1: Bank of International Settlement. And I want to say to
47:23
Speaker 1: the audience that I've had an increasing history. Sorry, I've
47:30
Speaker 1: had an increasing interest in good analysis of the Second
47:37
Speaker 1: World War, and in particular the war on the Eastern Front,
47:42
Speaker 1: so that where the Russians, of course were facing huge
47:49
Speaker 1: German army, well.
47:50
Speaker 2: They took the front of the whole indeed.
47:53
Speaker 1: Yeah, And of course this is a story which has
47:55
Speaker 1: largely been untold in the West. And I've found at
48:00
Speaker 1: this stage in my life that I got interested in
48:03
Speaker 1: learning more about this. And on YouTube there are some
48:07
Speaker 1: truly excellent documentaries, original footage, and very good analysis of
48:14
Speaker 1: the war and how it progressed. There's also some very
48:19
Speaker 1: very emotional YouTube channels where they narrate the diaries of
48:26
Speaker 1: largely German soldiers and officers who fought on the Russian Front,
48:31
Speaker 1: and many of those if there's if the person survive
48:36
Speaker 1: long enough in the diary, it would sort of go
48:39
Speaker 1: from the euphoria of the excitement of getting on the
48:42
Speaker 1: train to go and fight fight those nasty Russians to
48:47
Speaker 1: the harsh reality of starling Grad and post styling Grad
48:53
Speaker 1: when the armies were in a German army was in
48:56
Speaker 1: a really terrible defeat, and of course the people would
49:00
Speaker 1: talking about the huge casualties, casualties on a scale which
49:04
Speaker 1: the West can't understand because Russian casualties huge German casualties
49:12
Speaker 1: estimated at about six million. And this is the reality
49:19
Speaker 1: of what that wall on the Western Front is now.
49:22
Speaker 1: In looking at those video clips, I also came across
49:25
Speaker 1: a gentleman called Mark Felton who would do these really
49:30
Speaker 1: excellent little sometimes short documentaries about could be about a battle,
49:36
Speaker 1: it could be about equipment, could be about people. And
49:39
Speaker 1: I was very surprised a couple of weeks ago to
49:41
Speaker 1: find out that he'd made a documentary about the Bank
49:46
Speaker 1: of International Settlements, And I just need to move my
49:50
Speaker 1: screen here a bit to have.
49:53
Speaker 2: I've been following Mark Felton for the last four or
49:55
Speaker 2: five years, yes, and I've always found his videos be
49:59
Speaker 2: very informative. I've got a lot of interest in the
50:01
Speaker 2: Second World War and the First World War, and I
50:05
Speaker 2: particularly like the fact he highlights parts of the Second
50:09
Speaker 2: World War I didn't even know happened. So yes, you know,
50:12
Speaker 2: you never stopped learning. And that's that's what Mark Felton does.
50:16
Speaker 2: He brings into the picture stuff which has ever been
50:20
Speaker 2: airbrushed or basically wasn't considered important so it's never been covered. Yes,
50:25
Speaker 2: I find his programs are his documentaries are very very good.
50:29
Speaker 1: Indeed, so the little documentary, now, can I read a
50:33
Speaker 1: date here? Well, it was two weeks ago.
50:37
Speaker 2: It was about two weeks ago. Yeah, you've seen it.
50:40
Speaker 2: I've seen it and we both touched base on it.
50:42
Speaker 1: Yes, so over half a million views now. But it
50:46
Speaker 1: was called Himmler's Fourth reich Ss Assets Saved in Global Conspiracy,
50:55
Speaker 1: and the basic story is that Himmler, well before the
51:02
Speaker 1: end of the war, realized that Germany was not going
51:05
Speaker 1: to win, in particular fighting on two fronts between the
51:10
Speaker 1: Russians and the Western Allies, and he started to work
51:14
Speaker 1: on a plan to get German wealth and ill gotten
51:19
Speaker 1: gains assets that have been stolen from the countries they'd invaded,
51:23
Speaker 1: to get those out of Germany squirreled away in German
51:29
Speaker 1: controlled companies worldwide in order to build a power base
51:35
Speaker 1: host collapse of the Reich. That is the historical story.
51:40
Speaker 1: It is a factual story, and Mark Felton does a
51:46
Speaker 1: really I think amazing analysis of this. Of course he's
51:51
Speaker 1: talking about Himmler, but he's also talking about other people.
51:54
Speaker 1: But he highlights how a number of companies Krup, Ryan, Metal,
52:00
Speaker 1: Semens and Bosch are four that come to the forefront
52:05
Speaker 1: of what he's talking about. But also we have the
52:08
Speaker 1: creation of the Bank of International Settlements to help this process.
52:15
Speaker 1: And if people are thinking to themselves as we're talking, oh,
52:19
Speaker 1: this can't be true, well it's absolutely true. And the
52:27
Speaker 1: worrying aspect is reinforced by the fact that post war,
52:31
Speaker 1: immediately post war, there were senior political and intelligence figures
52:38
Speaker 1: in both the United States and the UK who were
52:44
Speaker 1: deeply concerned to learn that this huge Nazi German wealth
52:52
Speaker 1: had been funneled into German companies and there was a bank,
52:58
Speaker 1: the Bank of International Settlements, informed to help them do
53:02
Speaker 1: what they were doing. This this is obscene justin.
53:07
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, I mean you've got to remember that
53:10
Speaker 2: during the Second World War. And as I said, going
53:12
Speaker 2: back to this book, which does cover it in detail,
53:16
Speaker 2: I do recommend it. I'm halfway through and I'm enjoying.
53:18
Speaker 2: I didn't. I never thought I'd read a book on
53:20
Speaker 2: banking and enjoy it, or at least exposing what we're
53:24
Speaker 2: all vicious of and what we're now realizing did happen.
53:27
Speaker 2: I mean, squirreling way gold in Czechoslovakia and gold pinched
53:32
Speaker 2: by the Nazis. I mean, everywhere you look, it's just skulduggery.
53:35
Speaker 2: But you had you had Americans and Germans, French and
53:41
Speaker 2: British banking people meeting corresponding joined the Second World War.
53:46
Speaker 2: Despite the war being fought, there was a contact between
53:50
Speaker 2: them all in neutral Swittsman. So this is all going on.
53:55
Speaker 2: It is quite staggering. And as I said, the full
54:01
Speaker 2: history of the Bank for International Settlements and the entire
54:04
Speaker 2: central banking system needs to be understood by everyone, and
54:08
Speaker 2: then you get a better idea of what our politics
54:11
Speaker 2: are today and.
54:13
Speaker 1: How and where people within that system, where they're loyalty
54:19
Speaker 1: lies and does not lie.
54:21
Speaker 2: Yeah, it is, as I said, the status of the
54:25
Speaker 2: City of London being a separate country. It's absolutely mind blowing,
54:30
Speaker 2: jaw dropping when you actually start to see what is
54:34
Speaker 2: being done supposedly in our name, but not in our name.
54:37
Speaker 2: It's been done on behalf of others, the globalist whatever
54:41
Speaker 2: you want to call them, a tiny number of people.
54:43
Speaker 2: My late uncle said that ten thousand people round the world,
54:49
Speaker 2: and I've talked to another bank who said eight and
54:51
Speaker 2: a half thousand people run the world. Well, there's eight
54:54
Speaker 2: billion of us, and we're all running around like headless chickens.
54:58
Speaker 2: For every one of the wretched banking types, there's nearly
55:02
Speaker 2: a million of us. As I said, it's and one
55:07
Speaker 2: of the things I am now saying loud and clear,
55:09
Speaker 2: it is our collective ignorance about banking and money creation
55:14
Speaker 2: and money supply. That is their protection because if we
55:18
Speaker 2: don't understand it, they can get away with it.
55:20
Speaker 1: Indeed, but justin let's let's let's be fair to the
55:24
Speaker 1: banking system, and in particular let's be fair to people
55:28
Speaker 1: working in the banking system that what we are talking
55:32
Speaker 1: about is really the power and control at the highest
55:38
Speaker 1: level of banking. What we are not talking about, well
55:42
Speaker 1: we're not certainly not suggesting, is that people who work
55:46
Speaker 1: in the local high street bank, which is which is
55:50
Speaker 1: doing a really good job. It's facilitate.
55:53
Speaker 2: I can one hundred percent agree with you, because when
55:55
Speaker 2: I first came across the Braverery Pan, and then I
55:58
Speaker 2: came across the Bank Internet Settlements, I've only had great
56:02
Speaker 2: enjoyment going into banks meeting them those of the days
56:05
Speaker 2: when we did a bank. By the way, there were
56:07
Speaker 2: a few high street banks ten years ago, and the
56:10
Speaker 2: first question I'd always asked the teller in a very
56:13
Speaker 2: friendly way, to tell you, have you ever heard the
56:15
Speaker 2: Bank for International Settlements. I didn't find one who had
56:19
Speaker 2: ever heard of it? Mind you, Having said that, I've
56:21
Speaker 2: talked to something like twenty MP's face to face since
56:25
Speaker 2: twenty twelve, and after wishing them a good morning or
56:29
Speaker 2: good afternoon and being pleasant, the first question I said,
56:32
Speaker 2: can I ask you, can you tell me what you
56:34
Speaker 2: know about the Bank for International settlements. Not one of
56:37
Speaker 2: them could tell me anything at all.
56:39
Speaker 1: Yeah, not one now before it goes out of my head.
56:43
Speaker 1: In the Mark Felton video, at one point he is
56:48
Speaker 1: talking about this concern post war, immediately post war concern
56:55
Speaker 1: by well, some of it were politicians, some of the military,
56:59
Speaker 1: people of intelligence, people concerned about what this bank of
57:04
Speaker 1: international settlements was. And I can imagine for many of them,
57:11
Speaker 1: perhaps who'd actually fought in the Second World wore deep,
57:16
Speaker 1: deep unease that the Nazi war machine was working under
57:23
Speaker 1: the surface to build a post war power base. I
57:26
Speaker 1: can imagine that would be very creepy for people. So
57:30
Speaker 1: when individuals did raise the concerns, one of the people
57:36
Speaker 1: who spoke up to say, oh, no, no, there's not
57:39
Speaker 1: a problem was none other than our King. Am I correct,
57:44
Speaker 1: I'm just.
57:44
Speaker 2: Going to say that, Yeah, King George and sixth himself. Yeah,
57:50
Speaker 2: which is not like King Charles the third and his
57:55
Speaker 2: beliefs in climate change and other things. Yeah, it's oh dear,
58:00
Speaker 2: oh dear, oh dear. I am a monarchist. I'm a
58:04
Speaker 2: constitutional monarchist, but I do have real problems with the
58:08
Speaker 2: House of windsor or should I say, the House of
58:12
Speaker 2: what is it. Well, I can't remember the name now,
58:14
Speaker 2: So what's the house of the sacksburg bergen Goberg. I'm
58:18
Speaker 2: ebe one of my senior moments. Yes, sax coburgen Gopher.
58:23
Speaker 2: It does bother me. It does worry me because there
58:26
Speaker 2: would be and of course there are many researchers who
58:28
Speaker 2: believe there are very close links between the House of
58:31
Speaker 2: Windsor and the further Iich and Adolf Hitler and you know,
58:37
Speaker 2: but I mean there's all sorts of I still think
58:39
Speaker 2: there's a few stones to be unturned. And you know,
58:42
Speaker 2: we turned over to see what's underneath, and let's.
58:45
Speaker 1: Just put a little clue in for the audience. So
58:50
Speaker 1: I would imagine a few people getting interested by what
58:53
Speaker 1: we're saying here. But the the key meeting that helped
58:58
Speaker 1: form the Bank of International Settles and get this lot
59:01
Speaker 1: going was called the Red House Meeting. Actually the Red
59:05
Speaker 1: House was there.
59:06
Speaker 2: Well, yes, the Red House Meeting. Yeah. The Bank for
59:08
Speaker 2: International Settlements was set up in nineteen thirty and the gentleman,
59:14
Speaker 2: the two gentlemen who were responsible for it were Montague Norman,
59:18
Speaker 2: who was the Governor of the Bank of England at
59:20
Speaker 2: the time and longer serving government we've ever had. And
59:24
Speaker 2: Helmer Schlacht, who was well, he became Hitler's future finance minister.
59:31
Speaker 2: He was an enthusiastic Nazi to start with, and then
59:35
Speaker 2: he managed to escape with Nuremberg War trials. I think
59:38
Speaker 2: he did go to prison, but when he came out
59:42
Speaker 2: he moticed memoirs and sketched over things. But yes, in fact,
59:48
Speaker 2: this is a bit what I'm reading about in the
59:50
Speaker 2: book at the moment is that is the actual build
59:53
Speaker 2: up to the Second World War and how his you know,
59:58
Speaker 2: loyalty to the Nazi party was accepted totally by the BIS.
1:00:02
Speaker 2: Didn't they didn't, but they weren't bothered by it at all.
1:00:06
Speaker 1: Yeah, and we're in this world at the moment where
1:00:13
Speaker 1: you've touched on this, and I think we need to
1:00:15
Speaker 1: reinforce it. We've got King Charles at the moment who
1:00:20
Speaker 1: stands up publicly alongside the World Economic Forum with that
1:00:27
Speaker 1: wonderful gentleman mister Schwab boasting that he King Charles is
1:00:34
Speaker 1: alongside global figures who were controlling significant sums. I was
1:00:44
Speaker 1: going to I was trying to put a percentage on it,
1:00:46
Speaker 1: but at one of them, he was boasting that he
1:00:51
Speaker 1: was there with a group of global financiers who controlled
1:00:55
Speaker 1: one third of the global wealth. And they weren't there
1:01:01
Speaker 1: to discuss how people were going to be fed and
1:01:04
Speaker 1: now they were going to have clean water and they
1:01:07
Speaker 1: were going to have a home and a bed to
1:01:09
Speaker 1: sleep on. No, they were there to discuss their plans
1:01:14
Speaker 1: for the net zero global economy. And if you listen
1:01:21
Speaker 1: to what these people say, what Schwab says about the
1:01:24
Speaker 1: sustainable development goals, I'm not putting picking up any human
1:01:29
Speaker 1: empathy and love. I picking up something which is amazingly
1:01:35
Speaker 1: cold and callous by the very people who control these
1:01:41
Speaker 1: huge amounts of money. So life is not as as
1:01:48
Speaker 1: we believed, and it's not as many people do believe today.
1:01:55
Speaker 2: The king should not be involved with what's going on
1:01:58
Speaker 2: as the Prince of Wale. To us debatable whether he
1:02:01
Speaker 2: should be there, but as our constitutional common law king,
1:02:04
Speaker 2: he is there to uphold the law of the land,
1:02:06
Speaker 2: the common law. He should not be delving into any
1:02:10
Speaker 2: of his stuff. And really it's I don't want to
1:02:15
Speaker 2: sound over the top, but he is committing treason by
1:02:18
Speaker 2: what he's doing. I mean, that is the bottom line.
1:02:22
Speaker 2: Because he's involving himself with people who are making decisions
1:02:26
Speaker 2: behind closed doors. They are decisions based on extremely bad sites,
1:02:31
Speaker 2: and they are decisions which are involved men's rea Malissa Fullfot.
1:02:36
Speaker 2: These people are not doing it for the best interests
1:02:39
Speaker 2: of the human race. They are doing it for their
1:02:42
Speaker 2: best interests, and our king is directly involved with them.
1:02:46
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to use that
1:02:48
Speaker 2: tea word. It is treason.
1:02:49
Speaker 1: What he's doing, in your opinion, is treason.
1:02:52
Speaker 2: In my opinion, it is treason, and I would be
1:02:56
Speaker 2: interested to see how people could challenge me on that.
1:02:58
Speaker 1: Yes, And also a key thing is that in the
1:03:03
Speaker 1: globalist agender, where where the banking system is not only
1:03:11
Speaker 1: just in bed with the global corporations, you know, there's
1:03:15
Speaker 1: a love affair taking place. This is a very close
1:03:18
Speaker 1: and intimate relationship between the international bankers and the biggest corporations.
1:03:24
Speaker 1: But they are not constructing plans for the benefit of
1:03:29
Speaker 1: any nation state. What they're actually talking about is a
1:03:35
Speaker 1: post nation state world. And you can pick this up
1:03:38
Speaker 1: in a lot of the material.
1:03:39
Speaker 2: Or industrial revolution or global technocracy. Yes, what do you
1:03:45
Speaker 2: like it? Basically, it means that we no longer can
1:03:49
Speaker 2: make decisions for ourselves, our sovereignty will have completely gone.
1:03:54
Speaker 1: Indeed, and we have such wonderful figures as Mark Carne
1:03:59
Speaker 1: or Mark Carne as Mike Robinson from the column likes
1:04:01
Speaker 1: to call him, and he was happy to be on
1:04:06
Speaker 1: public records saying that any business that did not want
1:04:10
Speaker 1: to get on board with their Green agenda, their Green Agenda,
1:04:16
Speaker 1: would be put out of business, will be forced out
1:04:20
Speaker 1: of business. So he was prepared to just stand and
1:04:24
Speaker 1: threaten anybody who, however big their business was, whatever they
1:04:31
Speaker 1: were doing in business, he was prepared to say, if
1:04:34
Speaker 1: you do not adhere to our future plans regarding the
1:04:39
Speaker 1: Green Agenda, net zero, sustainable development goals all combined, then
1:04:46
Speaker 1: the banks would put you out of business. I mean
1:04:49
Speaker 1: this should have been all over the UK press, shouldn't it.
1:04:54
Speaker 2: And look at British Steel, isn't it. Well you know
1:04:56
Speaker 2: they're closing down this plant and they're now going for electri.
1:05:00
Speaker 2: I mean again, what's happened to British Steel. It's the
1:05:03
Speaker 2: Green Agenda that is putting them out of business and
1:05:06
Speaker 2: they we're going to have to import our steel. It's crazy.
1:05:10
Speaker 1: Yes, And the other figure I think we should mention
1:05:13
Speaker 1: in with regard to huge, obscene sums of money. Is
1:05:18
Speaker 1: our old friend Justin Welby, Well, certainly not God in
1:05:24
Speaker 1: my opinion. Justin head of the Church of England, but
1:05:28
Speaker 1: on record photographs of sipping champagne alongside Christine Legarde and
1:05:36
Speaker 1: the bankers, but boasting that he was he was assisting
1:05:42
Speaker 1: the assembling of seventeen trillion in order to unleash a
1:05:50
Speaker 1: green global agenda. So this is the man heading up
1:05:55
Speaker 1: the Church of England which sends around begging letters because
1:05:59
Speaker 1: they can't fix the local church roof and.
1:06:05
Speaker 2: Everything is upside down, and the people at the top
1:06:10
Speaker 2: do not represent the people. They represent this tiny number
1:06:14
Speaker 2: of oligarchs whatever you want to call them, psychopaths. I mean,
1:06:18
Speaker 2: there are plenty of terms I could use, but these
1:06:21
Speaker 2: people are basically not human. Actually, if we really wanted
1:06:25
Speaker 2: to get down to it, they are anti human. These
1:06:28
Speaker 2: these individuals who are creating this ghastly future for us
1:06:33
Speaker 2: are anti human. That's the only way you can describe them.
1:06:37
Speaker 2: They are anti human.
1:06:38
Speaker 1: And the other thing is, and I do this deliberately,
1:06:42
Speaker 1: Bible's not your cup of tea, But the Biblical warning
1:06:46
Speaker 1: is the love of money is the root of all evil.
1:06:51
Speaker 2: Well, it's the only time Jesus lost it, wasn't it
1:06:54
Speaker 2: in the temple? And with the money changes the money lenders. Yes,
1:06:58
Speaker 2: and I think we should at least from that.
1:07:00
Speaker 1: Yes, Yeah, so I think that's probably a very good
1:07:05
Speaker 1: place to end on. Justin. We will get up as
1:07:09
Speaker 1: much information as we can in the show notes so
1:07:12
Speaker 1: that people have got links to the key things that
1:07:16
Speaker 1: we've been talking about, and if we'll have a copy
1:07:19
Speaker 1: of your letter suitably redacted for people to see, and
1:07:24
Speaker 1: I'd like to say it, and we'll have other material,
1:07:27
Speaker 1: including the link through to Mark Felton's excellent production. But
1:07:31
Speaker 1: I think I like to say to you, justin, stay
1:07:34
Speaker 1: on the case, because I would love to see what
1:07:38
Speaker 1: response we can get out of Rachel Reeves herself when
1:07:43
Speaker 1: she's gently pinned to the wall with a letter that
1:07:46
Speaker 1: she can't we go out of To see what this
1:07:51
Speaker 1: lady has to say for herself.
1:07:53
Speaker 2: I think it's going to be very interesting. I just
1:07:55
Speaker 2: have one pleaver if when the truth does come out
1:07:59
Speaker 2: and we all realize just how rotten everything is, I
1:08:03
Speaker 2: just have one plea to people. I do not want
1:08:05
Speaker 2: to be the Chance of the Exchequer, so please find somebody.
1:08:08
Speaker 1: Else, Well, this is this is true, but the whole
1:08:13
Speaker 1: system is rotten. Not everybody in it is rotten. A
1:08:17
Speaker 1: lot of people fearful.
1:08:19
Speaker 2: So there are good people. No, this is one thing
1:08:21
Speaker 2: I do want to emphasize. There are a lot of
1:08:23
Speaker 2: good people within the system Who've got their mortgages, they've
1:08:27
Speaker 2: got their bills to pay, they've got their children at school. Look,
1:08:30
Speaker 2: there are a lot of decent people caught up in this,
1:08:33
Speaker 2: and we just simply want them to get up and
1:08:36
Speaker 2: walk away because the truth is coming out now. The
1:08:38
Speaker 2: genie is out of the bottom. And and once it does,
1:08:41
Speaker 2: everything will be exponential and and and the people will
1:08:45
Speaker 2: take over. And as I said, money creation and money
1:08:49
Speaker 2: supply should be in the hands of the people. We've
1:08:52
Speaker 2: got to have transparency and countability and wisdom and empathy.
1:08:59
Speaker 1: I mean, there's a lot of integrity and honesty, yeah, key,
1:09:06
Speaker 1: and very important human passion.
1:09:09
Speaker 2: Let's let's use compassion, you know, compassion. Let's help people
1:09:13
Speaker 2: who genuinely need helping. I mean, you know, we just
1:09:16
Speaker 2: want to be human about money creation and money supply
1:09:19
Speaker 2: should be a human task and the best of a
1:09:22
Speaker 2: human empathy, you know, all all all the values that
1:09:26
Speaker 2: we hold dear should come out in that. So yeah,
1:09:29
Speaker 2: I'm I'm I'm excited, actually, Bran, I think things are
1:09:33
Speaker 2: starting to happen and I wouldn't like to be on
1:09:36
Speaker 2: the other side. It's good versus evil, and there's a
1:09:39
Speaker 2: razor blade between the two. You can't sit on the
1:09:42
Speaker 2: fence any longer. Now, there's no way you can sit
1:09:44
Speaker 2: on the fence. It's good versus evil. There's a razor
1:09:48
Speaker 2: blade between and people have got to make up their
1:09:51
Speaker 2: mind which side there.
1:09:52
Speaker 1: And everybody, everybody and anybody doing something, no matter how small,
1:09:58
Speaker 1: this makes a difference. And so when people are feeling
1:10:02
Speaker 1: a little bit lost and oh my goodness, it's hopeless. No,
1:10:04
Speaker 1: it's absolutely not hopeless. But what we need is millions
1:10:08
Speaker 1: of people.
1:10:09
Speaker 2: And there is another tactic too. Don't just think about
1:10:12
Speaker 2: your MPs. Think about your local counselors. Local councils are
1:10:17
Speaker 2: strapped for cash. They're having to give up on essential
1:10:20
Speaker 2: services for vulnerable people in their communities. Go and see
1:10:24
Speaker 2: the counselors. Make them aware of the content of this video,
1:10:28
Speaker 2: make them aware about what's going on, Make them aware
1:10:30
Speaker 2: about the challenge being put to Rachel Reeves and right
1:10:35
Speaker 2: to the chairman of the local party that the MP
1:10:37
Speaker 2: belongs to as well. Make them aware of what's going on.
1:10:41
Speaker 2: You know, this is not just a case of talking
1:10:43
Speaker 2: to the MP. It's talking to the infrastructure around d
1:10:46
Speaker 2: the supporting network around the MP as well, because they're
1:10:50
Speaker 2: disordinary people too. And as I say, once they wake
1:10:54
Speaker 2: up to what's going on, do you think they're going
1:10:56
Speaker 2: to remain quite about it. Nobody wants to be a
1:10:58
Speaker 2: counselor to cut back on essential services where they say,
1:11:03
Speaker 2: really frightened and vulnerable people losing those services. They don't
1:11:07
Speaker 2: want to enjoy that. They don't want to do that.
1:11:10
Speaker 2: So you know, don't just approach the MPs. Approach local
1:11:14
Speaker 2: counselors and the makeup of a local party that controls
1:11:18
Speaker 2: the situation as well within your local patch. As I said,
1:11:22
Speaker 2: there are a lot of people can do, but most
1:11:25
Speaker 2: important of all, arm yourselves with the facts. Get to
1:11:28
Speaker 2: know things. And I always say to people, I'm not
1:11:31
Speaker 2: an economist, and if you know, if I can understand it,
1:11:35
Speaker 2: anyone can understand it. Do not be frightened, because that's
1:11:38
Speaker 2: what they want you to be. When it comes to
1:11:40
Speaker 2: money creation and money supply. People go, oh, I can't
1:11:43
Speaker 2: be involved with that. Oh no, listen, I stuck at
1:11:45
Speaker 2: it because of my uncle who my uncle was in
1:11:48
Speaker 2: the contacts. But I understood it, and I stuck at it.
1:11:51
Speaker 2: As I said, if I can do it, and I've
1:11:54
Speaker 2: not been to university, I haven't got degrees or anything
1:11:56
Speaker 2: like that. But if I can understand it, anyone can
1:11:58
Speaker 2: understand it.
1:11:59
Speaker 1: Yeah, brilliant. Justin. Thank you very much for speaking with
1:12:05
Speaker 1: me afternoon evening as it is now. It's been really
1:12:09
Speaker 1: great and we'll do our best to get this out
1:12:12
Speaker 1: far and wide, and of course the audience can help
1:12:15
Speaker 1: us enormously by helping share the content and spread the
1:12:20
Speaker 1: word and of course do your own research, get stuck
1:12:23
Speaker 1: in on the banking system, the Bank of International Settlements.
1:12:28
Speaker 1: We'll leave it there, justin.
1:12:29
Speaker 2: Thank you very much, Brian, Thank you very much.
1:12:31
Speaker 1: Thank you