Latest / DA CREW Podcast / SEASON 2 DA CREW PODCAST_BONUS EPISODE _71_ HOST SHANETTE W JOHNSON (1)

Transcript

SEASON 2 DA CREW PODCAST_BONUS EPISODE _71_ HOST SHANETTE W JOHNSON (1) · DA CREW Podcast

0:10
Hey, hoye, and welcome to another episode of the Through podcast. I
0:14
am your visionary Queen Angel and if you are a diva that's looking to amplify
0:20
your voice and you're looking for our home, we have faith for you.
0:26
Come on over and join dim Divas Up, yeahweys and amplify your voice.
2:00
H Let's talk about it. What's your hopes? At Johnson? Join me
2:25
every first and third Monday of the month at eight pm Eastern standards and let's
2:36
talk about it. You good evening and welcome to Let's talk about it.
3:17
I am your Hostnett Johnson. Thank you for tuning in for my bonus show
3:23
on today. Excuse me, I just got flew back in from Denver,
3:31
so I just ran in here so I'm gathering myself. But tonight's show,
3:38
I would like for you guys to just sit back and relax. If you
3:44
have any questions to ask the guests when I bring him on, I would
3:51
like for you to give that number of called that's at the bottom of your
3:53
screen four two, four three one. I'm my guest tonight is the one
4:06
and only Tanawa Downey. He is an activist. He is currently going around
4:17
to all the States serving the Attorney generals. I am so happy and so
4:25
excited to be sitting here talking to him. He's the only one that I
4:32
reached out to many activists on regarding the injustice, about what's going on with
4:39
men and women that's around currently incarcerated in prison on wrong for conviction, over
4:45
centused, and unlawful, and no one had return any of my emails,
4:53
any of my posts. But Tanawa Downey, thank you so much, so
4:59
much. We're appreciate you. I know you busy. You seen that you
5:02
served the great state of text. It's just on today in a general term.
5:10
Didn't want to come down and accept the papers. So I'm gonna give
5:15
the floor to you and let you it was more about yourself and let us
5:19
know what's going on. Thank you so much for having me. It's an
5:24
honor for me to do this. So you know, when I started this
5:28
about ten months ago, I said that I will I will speak to any
5:31
group that will listen to me, and I will I will come to any
5:34
any location that will host me. You know what's important right now is that
5:39
is that the information I have that I've been building and the knowledge that that
5:46
understand I need to give it out to people, because you know, it's
5:49
not something that I should be keeping inside, something that is going to benefit
5:54
and value the whole nation. So the more I spread it, the more
5:58
I give it freely to everybody, the quicker we're going to be able to
6:02
all come to terms with the reality and learn how to actually address this system,
6:08
because there are ways that we can address it. And so you know,
6:12
it's an honor to be able to do it. And UH, and
6:14
I think that that, uh that you know, your your audience is a
6:17
is a group that I haven't spoken to before, and so I certainly am
6:21
thankful for being able to be given that opportunity. So I'm sorry, guys,
6:26
I've been been coughing for a few days here, getting right out on
6:30
the on the road here, lots of talking. But my name is Camall
6:33
Downey, and I'm a national civil rights advocate and litigator, and I I
6:39
deal with primarily prison related civil rights issues and uh and also family family matters.
6:46
And so we have some cases that that we're bringing to the United States
6:50
Supreme Court. We're gonna be heard very very soon, and uh, we're
6:56
ramping up for for that right now. We're we're putting the states and the
6:59
courting position where they're not going to have a choice, and we don't want
7:02
them to uh to reconsider whether or not we're right or whether or not they
7:08
have to do the right thing. We're going to just bring it home and
7:11
uh and make sure that overwhelmingly that they understand the true nature of the of
7:15
the beast right now and and and that if they continue to act contrary to
7:21
the will of the people and the very laws that create their office and grant
7:26
them their authority, then they will no longer have authority because any abuse to
7:30
delegate authority, of course, results in violence of public trust. So and
7:33
that's a crime. And so we want to make sure that that these criminals
7:38
that are currently leading our country that they understand that you will not be leading
7:41
us any longer. You can either return to the stablish rule law, obey
7:44
the will of people, uh and and have respect for the lass they put
7:47
into place, or we will we will make sure that that you will not
7:51
leave our country any longer. So, thank you. How would this help
8:00
the men and women that's currently that's fighting unlawful imprisonment and over censuses, How
8:09
would this help them gain their freedom? So, uh, there's there's one
8:20
thing that's very very important for us to all to understand, is it there's
8:24
a difference between wrongful imprisonment and wrongful conviction. Right, those are two vastly,
8:30
vastly different things. So, so wrongful conviction presumes that there is a
8:35
judgment that is in place and that that judgment is valid, and thus you
8:37
have to do what's known as a claims processing action, So you would do
8:43
an appeal. Right, So if you go through a judicial process, you
8:48
go through adjudication, they find you guilty, right or wrong, there would
8:52
be a judgment that's in place. That judgment is then used to put you
8:54
into prison, right, so that they could put you into involuntary servitude and
8:58
and and profit off of your labor. Now, the issue is is that
9:03
if that judgment is not valid because the court didn't have the right to be
9:07
able to overseee the case, or some other substantive issue occurred, that it
9:13
attacks the fundamental the fundamental judgment and the actions or the court's authority to be
9:20
able to be a court. If there's a fatal action that affects the substantive
9:24
nature of that judgment, the judgment doesn't even exist. It's void, fully
9:30
void, without force or effect on any parties in dispute. So my point
9:35
here is is that is that all of these people in prison, they need
9:39
to change their approach, right because today they're being told to go and appeal,
9:46
right, being told to go appeal their judgment. And that presumes that
9:50
they have a balid judgment. And I'm going to tell you that right now,
9:52
there isn't a single person in the nation that is imprisoned in any prison
9:58
that has a ballid judgment, not one single person, right, And and
10:03
there's reasons why. But if that's true, and I'll tell you why in
10:07
a moment. But if that's true, then what that means is that they're
10:09
not wrongfully convicted. They are unlawfully imprisoned because there is no judgment. There's
10:16
nothing holding them there, which means that the state is depriving them without just
10:20
competent, without without just cause. So you cannot lock a person up and
10:26
do it through in illegal means, contrary to the established procedures or processes that
10:31
is codified in constitution that directs them on the proper way to adjudicate. They
10:35
can't act outside of that and produce a lawful result. So when a state
10:43
is made up of a whole bunch of men, right, it's called the
10:46
body of men that they can a state. You know, consider my body.
10:48
My body has a whole bunch of different parts. I've got a hand,
10:52
eyes, ears, legs, fingers, I've got all these parts of
10:54
my body, right, and this makes up the body. You can't awagh.
11:00
Well, the state has a body of men as well. And that
11:01
body of men makes up judges and prosecutors and cps and all of these agencts
11:07
a part of that body. So when my body, when my hand goes
11:11
out and steals something, right, and it steals something, my head can't
11:16
say, oh wait a second out, that was my hand that did it.
11:18
You can't punish me, right, No, all parts of the body
11:20
will be held accountable for any action or action of any part of my body.
11:26
So when government chooses to take action in a case, and this is
11:30
directly out of the tour claims acts, you guys, if government is welcome
11:33
to take to take a sidon case to take action. But if they do,
11:37
then they're no different than any other party. Right, the body of
11:41
men that make up the state is no different than the body of men that
11:45
make up family. So when a prosecute attorney who is an agent of the
11:50
state working for the state, claiming to prosecute on behalf of the state.
11:54
When an agent of the state chooses to accuse you of something and thus take
11:58
a role in the in the case itself, and now the state of Oklahoma,
12:05
or the state of Idoa, or the state of Washington becomes the party
12:07
in the cause, that judge has a constitutional obligation Code of Biden Article three
12:13
to accuse himself because he has a complex of interest he works with a plaintiff.
12:18
So Article three has never been changed. And Article three is the one
12:24
thing that we all need to we all need to learn because we when we
12:28
talk about jurisdiction, there's lots of different types of jurisdiction. We're not talking
12:33
about the law jurisdiction at Mualti versus Kamon law. That's what we're talking about.
12:35
What we're talking about is the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court because
12:39
the Supreme Court it has its own jurisdictional authority to operate as well, because
12:45
that court has to operate within the parameters established by the Constitution of essays when
12:48
we agree. So Article three says, in all cases in which a state
12:54
shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction means
13:01
that that's the court that acts first. It is the original court. So
13:03
if a state is a party in any cost, then that means that the
13:07
United States Supreme Court is the court that acts first. You go to that
13:13
court, and no other court in the country can act before that court takes
13:16
action. So you know, this is a this is a significant issue that
13:20
we've forgotten about. But if we want to understand the history or or the
13:26
original intent of the pridigions the Constitution, well we would typically go to the
13:31
founders and what they said about it, and so we will oftentimes find ourselves
13:35
going to what's called the Federals Papers, written by John Jay, Alexander Hamilton,
13:39
and James Madison. So if we want to understand why Article three says
13:43
that if a state is a party in the cause, then it must recuse
13:46
itself max as the judges cause, let's go to James Madison. Let's see
13:50
what he had to say about it in Federal's Papers. So the Federals number
13:54
ten New York Packet It was written November twenty third, seventeen eighty seven.
13:58
The article was titled The Union as a Safe Guard against Domestic faction and Instruction.
14:03
And in that article James Madison said, no man is allowed to be
14:07
judged in his own cause, because his interest would, no doubt bias his
14:09
judgment and not improbably corrupt his integrity. With equal nay, with greater reason,
14:15
a body of men are unfit to be a judge party same time.
14:18
You see, James Madison knew that if the body of men that make up
14:22
the state chooses to become an accuser, it cannot be presumed that the same
14:28
body of men can be neutral and biased in acting as a judge. They
14:31
knew that. That's why they wrote it instead that if the state chooses to
14:35
speak of a party and cause, but it must recuse itself. And now
14:39
they had to identify a new neutral, unbiased third party, new neutral,
14:43
unbiased judge. And they weren't referring to state supreme courts, because the state
14:46
supreme courts didn't exist at the time of the adoptions the Constitution. They were
14:50
referring to the United States Supreme Court. That's it. So when we say
14:54
that that is a court of last resort, that is appellet jurisdic And remember
15:01
it says that if a state is a party, they have original jurisdiction.
15:03
In all other cases pertaining to equity and law, they are appellate jurisdiction.
15:11
So if the state is a party in the cause, then the states do
15:16
not have jurisdiction right And according to the Supreme Court just three weeks ago,
15:22
that the difference between a a jurisdictional rule and it claims processing rule. In
15:28
other words, the difference between the court's ability to be a court and have
15:31
jurisdiction to speak the law versus an appeal right. The difference between the two
15:37
is that is that a jurisdictional rule can never be waived. It can never
15:41
be forfeitted because it comes as a first duty and obligation to the court.
15:46
The court gets its authority to be a court to even call someone in long
15:50
before anybody even is a part of it. That court has to determine as
15:54
the first order doesn't have the authority to be a court, doesn't have the
15:56
authority to call those people in, and if it does, if it does
16:00
not have authority right if it doesn't, then it doesn't matter if they summons
16:04
you and you came in, you can't grant that court jurisdiction because the court
16:07
gets jurisdiction before you even get there. Jurisdiction is a first order to the
16:12
court, is a first rule, first duty. So even if they call
16:17
you into that court, you cannot grant them jurisdiction because their authority for jurisdiction
16:22
goes before you have the right to give it up. They can't, so
16:26
you cannot waive jurisdiction. You cannot forfeit jurisdiction because the jurisdiction is assigned to
16:33
the court. The judge doesn't get to decide whether they have jurisdiction or not
16:37
because it's the court and the statute the constitution that provides the jurisdiction. So
16:44
my point in all of this is this. My point in all of this
16:47
is this is that in order for a court to render illegally binding decision,
16:52
it must have two things. It must have subject matter jurisdiction and it must
16:56
have personal jurisdiction. Now, subject mattersjurisdiction is the right to oversee the type
17:02
of cases brought before it. So, for instance, in the case of
17:04
a death, you would not take that to a small claims court because they
17:07
would not have subject manager reisdiction to oversee the disposition of disea's assets. You
17:11
would bring it to a probate court. That would be the court that have
17:14
subject manager's diction. Now the second thing that it must have is it must
17:17
have personal jurisdiction. Now, personal jurisdictions is the right to oversee the parties
17:22
involved in dispute. If the court lacks either one of those two things,
17:26
it does not have jurisdiction, and therefore it cannot speak the law, and
17:30
any action that it takes is fully voided, not force or effect. Under
17:33
civil rules sixty before. So when you go to civil rule sixty which deals
17:37
with the nullification of judgment, they're avoiding the judgments. If you go down
17:41
to be four sixty before, what it says is it says that a judgment
17:45
is either valid or void. It is valid in all instances except for when
17:51
the court rendering decision lacks either subject manage jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction. If it
17:56
lacks either one of two things, it is a void judgment, and avoid
18:00
judgment is always in favor. Void, it can never become valid it has
18:03
no forcer effective parties involved dispute because the court can never retain jurisdiction when it
18:07
lacks jurisdiction. So my point is this, that every single one of these
18:14
brothers and sisters that are in these institutions that we call sweatshops in China but
18:18
prisons here in America, where we are forcing the weakness, most vulner barn
18:22
in society into an institution where we will where we will rob them of their
18:27
of their label right, and we will label them a criminal, will tell
18:30
all society how horrible they are, right and then and then we will and
18:36
then we will uh, and then we will walk around and stay this is
18:38
justice, and will tell the whole country that that slavery doesn't exist. We're
18:45
gonna lie to everybody, and uh, you know, those brothers and sisters
18:49
that are there, they're not they're not wrongly convicted, they're not over sentenced.
18:56
They're they're illegally they have been they have been kidnapped, they have placed
19:00
into an institution that is robbing them of their life, their love and then
19:03
lying to the world about them. And the sad thing about it is that
19:08
but for the government's criminal acts and creating a criminal environment, there wouldn't be
19:14
crime because they create the environment where the crime can exist. And then when
19:18
our people who are poor, or disenfranchised, or or placed into a situation
19:25
where there's a little bit of pressure, then they choose to break the law
19:29
within the environment that our government created, so that our government can come in
19:33
and say when now we're going to arrestue. So when our own government buys,
19:37
sells, manufactures drugs and then brings those drugs into the poorer communities in
19:42
our society and places those drug sales within them, they are creating the criminal
19:48
environment. And I stay to them, but for your criminal act, there
19:52
would not be crime. So the issue criminality, and this is the fundamental
19:56
argue. This is what I want. If if anybody listens to anything I
20:00
have to say, please listen to this right here. This is the most
20:04
important thing that I could say tonight, is that the issue of criminality,
20:10
the way we are dealing with it today, it will never be solved.
20:12
It can never be solved because when we go from the bottom up right and
20:17
we say we're going to hold the people countful for the crimes that they commit.
20:22
The problem is is that if our country is being led by criminals.
20:26
People are acting outside of the law and agreed upon codeconic established by the majority,
20:30
the very laws that create their office and grant them their authority. They
20:34
are criminals because the criminal is simply one that transgressed the law. And it
20:37
doesn't matter if they transgress the constitution or they transgress the state statute. If
20:41
you transgress the law, you are a criminal. Okay. So if our
20:45
country is being led by criminals, then that means our country is going to
20:48
be led toward criminality, and that will produce an environment of criminality, and
20:53
as a result, we will produce a society of criminals. So the issue
20:56
of criminality must be hammed from the top down. We must first ensure that
21:03
we have leaders that are leading their country in a lawful direction out of love,
21:07
faith and obedience and the law and respect for the people and the laws
21:10
that they establish. And until we do that, our country is not heading
21:14
in a good direction, and we will continue to produce criminals because we are
21:18
simply product of our environment. So if our leaders are creating the environmental criminality,
21:22
then you can expect that our people become criminals. But what I'm saying
21:26
to the people, the United States is we don't have to follow them anymore.
21:30
We can look at what they are, we can understand what they are,
21:33
and we can say, you know what, I don't follow criminals.
21:34
Criminals don't have a position of honor in my house. Right, They're no
21:40
longer going to They're no longer we're going to walk around and say that they're
21:42
good because they're out killing people. Abstrae impunity. Right, We're not going
21:45
to allow these things to continue to proliferate and and skew our understanding of our
21:52
own country because we all believe in something. I believe in. I believe
21:55
in country, probably as much as anybody that's ever that this country's ever produced,
22:00
right. But I don't believe in the government. I believe in the
22:04
people. And I'll tell you what, we can have faith in the people.
22:08
I'm gonna win this. We're gonna make the right decision that the country's
22:12
going to listen to what I have to say, and they're gonna agree with
22:15
the things that I'm saying because we have always and we will always choose to
22:18
do right when shown that what we are doing is wrong. Our leaders have
22:23
no power. We don't have to follow them. If they're criminals, then
22:29
fine, we will leave them there and we're going to go the other direction
22:33
with lawfulness because we don't have to follow criminals. We don't have to do
22:36
it. So that's why I'm fighting crime from the top down, because i
22:42
want our people to understand that our leaders today are acting outside of the constitution.
22:49
And when their actions are outside of the constitution, then we can be
22:52
damn sure that whatever they are producing is unconstitutional. And until the return the
22:59
establish rule law and obey the constitution and the laws that are in place,
23:03
that they are not going to ever produce anything that is binding, anything that
23:08
is lawful, anything that is valid. So as long as they're acting outside
23:11
of a law, than ever some one of our brothers and sisters are sitting
23:15
in an institution where this that where all of these these judges, prosecutors,
23:22
anyone with the juris doctorate degree profits off of them. And so we have
23:26
a massive group of people that have a degree in slavery, literally slavery,
23:32
because the Thirteenth Amendment, of course made slave and prisoner's synonymous with one another.
23:36
They mean the same thing, right when you say you can't have slavery
23:38
except as a punch of crime. You just said that a slave is a
23:42
prisoner and prisoner's slave. Great, now we know the truth. Now we
23:45
know what you meant all along. Because justice. Justice is simply a term
23:49
who is created by slave owners in order to protect the property right. Because
23:53
justice, Justice is neither good nor bad. Because when it comes to the
23:56
issue of sin, everybody, everybody falls, No one is gonna stand up,
24:02
no one wins. Justice would never side with one part or another.
24:06
Justice is equally concerned about both the accuser and the accused, because justice cares
24:11
about hurting people, and there's hurting people on both sides. We're not going
24:15
to continue to take our hurting brothers, these sisters, put them into a
24:18
hurtful situation and say, you know what, now you need to go get
24:19
healthy, because that's gonna work. We're gonna we're gonna heal them, We're
24:25
gonna take care of them, we're gonna love them, and we're gonna say,
24:26
you know what, how have we failed you? How these our government
24:30
failed you? Because our gouvernments failed to all of us, because of these
24:33
people that walk around and say these people walk around and say I don't know
24:37
the law, but I but I know, I know, case Paul,
24:41
I don't know what the constitution says, but I know what a judge says.
24:45
Right. Judges don't make laws. Right. They walk around and they
24:48
say, Okay, give me ten thousand dollars and you're still going to go
24:52
to prison. Right. I mean, I mean all of the fundamental things,
24:56
the things that we believe in American principles, is being destroyed by these
25:00
people who walk around that we have to call honorable every day, and they
25:03
do it in this level of arrogance. They have destroyed our country. They've
25:07
robbed our people, they murdered our people. They've created it an unbelievable amount
25:11
of trauma and conflict and crime. They are the source of all of it.
25:15
And yet they're doing it so that they can line their pocket. It's
25:18
a profit off of this institution that we have to then call them honorable.
25:22
There is no honor in robbing the people of the United States. You cannot
25:26
profit up of your illegal as government. And we're done. We're done allowing
25:30
you to continue to destroy our country because you guys want to get rich.
25:33
We're done well, And that's what we've been saying. And everyone that I
25:42
don't talk to the ones the men's that I don't talk so so far has
25:48
said the same thing that their environment when they was growing up, how you
25:53
know they turned to crime and you know it started when there was at the
25:59
end age of twelve ten, you know they didn't have Wow, Angela,
26:06
can you take us to a two minute commercial and when we come back,
26:12
I would love for anybody if you have a question for mister Downey, please
26:21
called the number, drop it in the box. Let's you know, let's
26:26
let's get this movement going commercial, please Angela sixty seconds. Take a mental
26:45
health minute to learn about depression disorders they call symptoms that affect how you feel,
26:52
how you think, and how you handle daily life. Depression should be
26:59
treated by health professionals. Don't try to handle it alone or treat it with
27:04
alcohol or illegal drugs. Treatments include psychotherapy or talk therapy, medication, and
27:12
sometimes brain stimulation therapy. These treatments may also be used in combination with one
27:18
another. If you think you might have depression, talk to a trusted friend,
27:22
family member, or healthcare provider. The earlier treatment begins, the more
27:27
effective it is. Learn more about depression through the NIMH website. And take
27:33
sixty seconds to share this mental health minute to help someone else. Okay,
27:48
and we back. Just recently, we've seen that over in a state of
27:53
text that Governor Grig Abbitt had parton someone that kill black Lives matter? Can
28:08
you give up? Do you have an opinion on that or what he did?
28:15
I'm sorry, I don't. I don't keep track of of any any
28:18
uh, any any central news issues, Okay, so I'm not aware of
28:25
any of it. I try to detract myself from, uh, from what's
28:29
going on in the world because that's a distraction, and I want to maintain
28:32
focus on on what God's mission, God's place in front of me. So
28:36
I allow God to bring with what he needs to bring me, and I
28:38
try to prevent the news from keewing my disposition the views of of what I
28:45
have. So I'm sorry, that's under That's okay, that's understandable. Angela
28:52
is mister cornell on because I believe he said he had a question. No,
29:02
he's not, Okay, did you want to ask this question? When
29:11
he called back in? Okay, both of you guys will come on.
29:21
Okay. That's Angela Thomas, our engineer. She's in the background. And
29:26
she also support advocate for the Texas. She speaks on behalf of the men
29:37
and women in Texas. She used her voice, I've been speaking on the
29:41
out for the men and women in Denver. So that's where I've seen you
29:48
when you serve the Attorney General and in Denver, and I've been following you
29:57
for quite so row. And like I said, it's an honor to have
30:02
you here and to let us know what's going on your movement so we able
30:08
to back you. Because really I haven't seen no activists really out there going
30:18
to the Supreme for serving them. Alfred Davis on behalf of the men and
30:22
women. To me, some of them are just a way to someone name
30:27
come up in the news who's and they just fight for that person instead of
30:33
fighting for uh, everyone else. I have a call coming in for you.
30:41
And what I like people to understand is that is it is it.
30:48
Sometimes sometimes leaders have to step up because because if you want to inspire others
30:53
to follow you, Uh, there's nothing more inspirational than the leader willing to
30:56
draw a store and lead the charge. You know. I chose to do
31:00
that because I have the knowledge and the understanding the historical underpinions that affect this
31:07
particular issue. And so this is too big of an issue for me to
31:11
to let someone else take the take the lead. You know, I need
31:15
to put myself at a certain level of risk personally because there's too much at
31:18
stake. I know the underpinnings. I know how to produce and manifest the
31:22
outcome that we want to see because I understand the process that they use to
31:26
get to that point. And so what I'm doing is is I'm showing them
31:30
that this is what happens and and and all of this is well known and
31:34
documented all to Blackstone. We know exactly what will happened when they choose to
31:38
break down the new process to the procedures and processes that have long been established
31:42
and and that's what we're at today. So you know, I chose to
31:45
do this because because you know, this is too important for anyone other than
31:51
the other than myself to do it. I know the issues, I know
31:55
the underpinnings of the issues. I know how to manifest them. So yeah,
31:59
I'm putting myself in a certain level of risk, But I'm doing that
32:01
because it's going to show what has happened to all of you right, because
32:06
this isn't about me. This is about our country, and it's about my
32:09
children and your children and her children actually having the future. That's that's predictable,
32:15
it's sustainable because we can have faith in the laws that govern us and
32:19
and know that that that our outcomeing future is stable because the systems adhere to
32:23
that. So that's what I'm thinking. I'm thinking a restoration of our nation
32:29
through the faith, of restoration of our of our foundational laws. And I
32:35
have a question for you calling. You're on the air with that's with your
32:40
listen at Johnson and mister Downey, go ahead with your question. My question
32:52
is on this state that or for eighty five time person who has preserved the
33:04
Uh? Did did I hear? By? Back? Time? Was that
33:06
what I heard? Can you turn it? Can you turn down? He
33:12
came here? Can and repeat your question? You turn you here? You
33:22
can't? Can you hear me? Now? Can you hear her? Now?
33:29
I can't? I can't. Yeah, just sau you know, like
33:31
I had a diving issue in military, so I don't hardly hear out of
33:36
my one of my ears. I have a very difficult time hearing. Okay,
33:38
But the individual was sentenced to thirty minutes in prison, and then the
33:45
statements and he was told that they do eighty five percent of the time and
33:50
that he was eligible to do maybe five percent of the time. Now,
33:52
my math is math, and he's eighty five percent of the time. Would
33:57
have been up this this past April, but they had added five more months.
34:02
He's never been in trouble and the since he's been there, he's graduated
34:07
from high school, he started college and there he's working now and he's completely
34:13
out the programs. I told him he should speak to the social work.
34:16
He spoke to the social work and they told him to contact the judge.
34:20
She hasn't heard anything back, So I'm wondering, is it really eighty five
34:24
percent of the time. That's just something that they say. So unfortunately,
34:30
unfortunately, what is happening across the country is that is that these lower courts
34:37
are out of control, absolutely out of control. So we've got these judges,
34:43
the lowest judges of all like that, the trial judges and the hearing
34:46
judges, and these people are are outright, blatantly, in your face,
34:52
violating every single right that you could possibly imagine it exists, and they're doing
34:57
it because they make a lot of money from doing so, right, And
35:00
so you know, one of the things that I'm trying to do here is
35:06
is that is that I'm trying to draw the United States Supreme Court out from
35:09
their hiding place right now, because they're simply sitting up there in their little
35:15
perth saying, we have all this power and we are you know, this
35:17
this Supreme Court, that that that acts fairly and justly and and uh and
35:23
protects the people and guardians of liberty, all these things that they claim to
35:28
be, and yet they don't produce right. Their actions are contrary to the
35:31
things that they say that they that they are. And so you know,
35:35
if your actions are contrary to your morals, or if your words are contrary
35:39
to your actions, then your liar. Right, You're a liar. And
35:43
and only only a person that these words and actions align, or principles and
35:49
actions aligned, is going to be the truth. And so as long as
35:52
that Court sits there and hides behind these judges and these courts and these clerks
35:58
and continues to obstruct and not address the issues that they themselves put into place,
36:02
they're despicable predecessors. We have to call honorable every day told all of
36:07
these judges with the purview of the Supreme Court, until they step up and
36:10
say, you know what, we're going to do the right thing for the
36:14
first time in the history of or a country and the first time for the
36:17
history of that institution. Until they step up and they assert their supremacy.
36:22
Then then these judges out here at the edge, they do whatever they want
36:27
because they're following their leadership, and their leadership are criminals. So you know,
36:34
if if the judges out here at the edge, the ones that are
36:37
dealing with the trial courts and everything, if their leadership is acting unlawfully and
36:43
is hiding behind their institution and hiding behind all of these obstructions that they put
36:47
into place all these courts, because that's all that is all that the court
36:52
is is an obstruction. Every single step of this justice system is an obstruction
36:58
to prevent you from reaching that court. There's all designed to to wear you
37:02
out, tire you out, make you angry and disillusioned, so that that
37:07
court doesn't have to do what they are constituted and obligated to do, which
37:10
is which is enforced to we the people and protected. So they're they're they're
37:15
hiding, and so what I'm trying to do is I'm trying to draw them
37:17
out. I'm trying to draw them out right so that so that they're no
37:22
longer hiding behind those is because that court is I'm challenging it. You have
37:29
to. If you are what you say you are, and if you can
37:31
do the things that you say you can do right, and if you protect
37:35
the document and the things that it says, then it's time for you to
37:38
step up to do your job. Because today we have fifty regional governments that
37:45
are fracturing and breaking apart, that are unrecognizable to the American people. Because
37:51
the only thing that makes America America is American laws. So when we no
37:54
longer enforce or recognize the laws that make us America, when we have faith
38:00
and the one law that binds us together, then we become the United States
38:02
of California, or the United States of Texas, or the United States of
38:07
New Jersey. That's not the United States of America. We do not have
38:12
fifty regional governments. We have one unified body of laws that unify all e
38:17
pluribus union out of many one. So we need to make a decision right.
38:22
Do we want to have fifty regional governments? Do we want to break
38:27
apart? Do we want to permit these regional governments to treat the people however
38:30
they want in these institutions that we call sweatshop in China a prison here in
38:34
America? Do we want to continue to do that? Or do we want
38:37
to go back to our foundation and go back to that institution and stay to
38:40
them. Either one, you step up and do your job and assert your
38:45
supremacy and get these lower courts to abide by the things that you have to
38:49
abide by. And if you don't want to do that, then I stay
38:52
court. Go home, Go home because you no longer have an institution.
38:55
Go home because you're not what you say you are. Go home because you
38:59
have no power. Because as long as the lower court is able to take
39:02
away rights, freedoms, communities, and privileges that they cannot take away,
39:06
whose court's more powerful? If the Supreme Court is supreme been great Supreme Court,
39:13
I would say, step up and do your job, or you're gonna
39:15
find yourself without an institution pretty quick. And those nine justices, I'm telling
39:19
you right now, they don't want to give up their power. They don't
39:22
want to give it up. They want to lose their institution. But today
39:25
they are nothing. They are worthless, they are pointless, they have no
39:30
power. They aren't doing a damn thing because guess what, all of these
39:35
lower courts. I've been in seventy courts, no less than seventy courts the
39:39
last over the last ten months, in at least twelve different states, where
39:43
that judge in that courtroom has said that the Constitution does not apply to my
39:46
courtroom. It was just stated earlier today in another courtroom here in Texas.
39:52
This is an egregious state. This is a this is preason, this is
39:57
sedition. This is a person that's for the he will support and defend and
40:00
be bound by the Constitution in the States. And yet he says, not
40:04
my courtrooms, not my court No, you're not going to talk about that
40:07
in my courtrooms. Why because that law binds him to certain parameters, that
40:14
prevents him from being able to make money off of the decisions that he makes.
40:20
These judges have got to get under control, because if we don't get
40:22
them out of control, then we will no longer have a nation. And
40:27
that's not me saying anything other than the obvious, because we are fracturing and
40:31
breaking apart because we have states that say that we're not going to follow the
40:36
constitution. Not in my courtroom, Not my courtroom. But remember the only
40:40
thing that makes America America is American laws. Without faith in them, we
40:46
have no longer America, and we are left to our own refuge in institutions
40:52
that believes that they can do whatever they want to people the United States without
40:55
recourse, with absolute immunity, and uh with with uh with with no effect.
41:01
What's sober and so and so? To answer your question? Right?
41:07
To answer your question today? Today? Unfortunately, unfortunately, we have too
41:12
many battles that are being fought out at the edge. I can't win all
41:15
those battles. But what has happened to that man? Not only is it
41:19
illegal because he should have never been there for those thirty three years, but
41:22
now they're continuing to hold him over right, they're continuing to hold him even
41:25
though they've made an agreement, a contract with him, and that contract had
41:29
certain terms and stipulations. And now the contract holder says, oh, we
41:32
don't care about contract. We don't care about our honor and our integrity and
41:36
the and the and the words that we said and the promise that we made,
41:38
we don't care about that. We're just gonna do whatever we want to
41:42
do anyway. Is that honorable? Is that an honorable institution? No?
41:47
So, so we need to we need to understand that what we believe in,
41:52
what we call good every day, is not good because good honors the
41:57
words that they say. Good honors the law. Good doesn't kill people with
42:00
abstinent and punity. Good doesn't create conflict in Christ. Good doesn't lock a
42:05
person up for thirty three years without lawful jurisdiction to do so, and then
42:08
hold him over for another five months when they were supposed to let him out.
42:13
That's not good. That's evil. And when you understand what it is
42:16
that you're looking at, once you understand what it is that they truly are,
42:21
any guys, you know how to feed him? Because evil, evil
42:25
works for the enemy. Guys. You want to work for good, Then
42:30
spend some time with your Bible, spend some time with God. And when
42:34
you learn about God's attributes, what you're gonna find is that his attributes are
42:38
the exact opposite of everything that that institution stands for. God says, release
42:44
the prisoners. They stay, lock him up. God says, your sins
42:45
are forgiven. They say, we're going to label a fellows for the rest
42:49
of your life. God says, release the change in the mind of the
42:51
other. They stay, They are our there are slaves. Everything that they
42:54
stand for is the exact opposite of what God demands. So I know what
43:00
side I'm on because I know who I'm fighting for. And so if they
43:02
fight for me, you just have to ask yourself who is that they're fighting
43:07
for. And once you understand who they're fighting for, then I would ask
43:12
you to decide which side you want to be on these I know who I'm
43:15
fighting for, and I know who they're fighting for, and I know who's
43:17
gonna win this war because that's already been determined. It's already been promised,
43:22
and we're showing it every single day with every still in one of these these
43:25
attorney generals we come against. These guys, they're scared to even talk to
43:30
me. They are scared of two pages, two pieces of patients. They
43:35
will not come down and even receive this from me because they're that scared of
43:38
it. Because what they're doing is punishable by death, and it is absolutely
43:45
one hundred percent certain that the crime is committed. They don't even these attorney
43:52
generals in the state of Ohio and the state of Wisconsin and the state of
43:54
Michigan are Minnesota. You know when I handed them this criminal aff of David
44:00
identifying the crime of decoration rights and the club law and the conspiracy private rights,
44:07
when they read it, do you know that those three assistants during generals
44:10
through that paperwork, through it and said we don't accept service through it.
44:15
Ring Ohio then went in Ohio, took that paperwork. He threw again on
44:20
the hallway and he's stopped away saying I don't accept service. And I said,
44:23
sir, I put it in your hands. It's been sure right,
44:28
it's been surved right. These people are pissed. They're pissed off because we
44:34
caught them, and we caught them in their criminal acts. And there's no
44:37
excuse. There is absolutely no there's no right to self defense for any public
44:42
official. Any public official that breaks the law can never ever ever justify their
44:47
criminal acts. Never. That's why, that's why public officials have no right
44:52
self defense. They cannot defend themselves against this and every seal prosecutor, single
45:00
judge. Every single law enforcement officer across this country commits these crimes one hundred
45:04
times a day, a hundred times a day, and they're all felonies,
45:07
and they're all punishable, as prescribed by law, by death. So I'm
45:13
not saying that that's what needs to happen. But what I am saying is
45:15
that if you guys don't wake up your public officials, if you attorney generals
45:20
don't start to show some action, then what's going to happen is is I'm
45:22
going to be back in DC in another week and a half, and when
45:25
that happens, I'm going to tell you right now that the tables are going
45:30
to be completely different. We are that as of that moment today, when
45:36
I serve and notice to you guys, and I show you that what your
45:38
institution and your servants your agents are doing and how they are doing it unlawfully,
45:44
without any without any justification for doing so. When I show you that
45:49
right and you choose to do nothing about it, then let me tell you
45:52
what's going on. There's a difference between negligence and there's a difference between wilfulness.
46:00
Right today, you might have been ignorant, you might have been doing
46:04
it in negliges. Even your prosecutors may not have realized what they were doing
46:08
was wrong, and we can accept that to a certain extent. But when
46:13
I show you that what you're doing is unbaful and you do not immediately stop
46:16
doing it, then that means you are knowingly and willingly continuing to engage in
46:22
criminal behavior. And that's a whole different ballgame, because I don't mess around
46:24
with people that are going to purposely and intentionally destroy this country and harm our
46:30
people. I have shown you that what you're doing is wrong, and you
46:32
guys have thrown it down the hallway and told me that you don't accept service.
46:36
Well, I don't care about your accepted service. You've been shown right,
46:39
and now you continue to do it every single dait. You're continuing to
46:44
do it, and now that is wilful, knowledgeable, blatant violations of the
46:47
law, treason his acts. So I suggest that in another week and a
46:52
half, you guys do the right thing, take action, because if you
46:55
do not, then God help you, God help you. H Well,
47:01
we have mister cornell is back, but us he's going to be the last
47:07
one to ask question as we're almost out of time, mister Cornell, are
47:13
you there, ess, ma'am, I'm here, ma'am. Okay. I
47:23
like that you spoke about the Supreme Court having the ultimate jurisdiction over over the
47:31
land and that because of this ultimate jurisdiction, you're saying that the local court
47:37
and the bottom officials are violating the rights of the people. So are you
47:43
indicating that by certificate of a rent of surguary that the people should file a
47:49
complaint on like a civil client action complaint because the Supreme Court and order for
47:53
them to address the law court positions. Because what you're saying is that the
47:58
Supreme Court is the one who's allowing violation of our constitutional about field of rights.
48:02
Is that what you're saying is so. So there's there's a couple of
48:07
things that you said in there that that that are that are not consistent with
48:10
with what I with what I was saying, But I'm you're absolutely right.
48:14
Yeah, But let me clarify a couple of things. First off. First
48:17
off, that court put into place intentional rulings, intentionally directing every court within
48:24
the nation. And this goes back to the inception of this court, right
48:28
from the very very beginning of that court. They have been putting into place
48:30
for rulings that have been undermined the union, underminded constitution, and sheerness and
48:36
in the wrong direction. Because of the first twenty eight justice Supreme Court justices,
48:40
twenty one of them owned their own slaves. So we have an institution
48:46
that is built upon the institution of slavery by men that wanted to proliferate that
48:51
industry. That is what they placed is the foundation. But the problem is
48:54
the foundation was supposed to be the Constitution. It was not supposed to be
48:59
judgement rulings. Judges don't create law. But we've been calling judge made rulings
49:04
law for long enough. It's a lie. It's not true. Judges do
49:07
not create a law. Right, they create rulings. Now, but this
49:10
is the problem. You do not do a sirciory. You cannot do a
49:15
circiory because a circiory comes from the nineteen twenty five judicial format of the United
49:21
States Congress. And what Congress was doing in the nineteen twenty five judicial format,
49:24
they did two major things. One they made the Supreme Court a court
49:29
of discretion, and two they told us that in order to petition the court,
49:32
you must use a rit of sterciority. Now why did they do those
49:37
two things, Because in nineteen twenty five, six months before the Jujitsal format
49:43
came out, there was a case called Get Lovers, New York. And
49:46
in Get Lovers, New York, what the Supreme Court said was they said
49:50
that the people of the United States have the right to the freedom of speech
49:53
and it is protected against interference by the States because of its codification within the
49:59
Constant Houston's text. So all of a sudden, we have a Spring Court
50:02
coming out and saying, you know what, freemous speech is protected. States
50:06
can't interfere with freeous speech. And that's kind of a strange, kind of
50:09
a strange ruling considering the fact that we protected the freedom of speech on December
50:15
fifteenth, seventy ninety one, when we add ratified and adopted Bill Rights.
50:19
Did we not? Well, we did, we thought, But unfortunately,
50:22
a Spring Court in eighteen thirty three, in the case called Baron versus Baltimore,
50:25
said that the Bill Rights does not apply to the States. It only
50:30
applies to the federal government. And as of that moment, no one anywhere
50:34
within the jurisdictional of the United States outside of the District of Columbia was protected
50:38
by any of the provisions and guarantees of the Bill Rights. None. None,
50:45
And so then in nineteen twenty five we find out that in nineteen twenty
50:50
five, Congress finds out that this has been happening. So for the last
50:53
one hundred and forty eight years, no one has been protected by the Bill
50:57
Rights, and Congress says, holy cow, that's a pretty big deal.
51:00
We don't want the people to find out about that. So here's what we'll
51:04
do. We're gonna make you a court discretion. We're gonna say you have
51:07
the discretion so you could pick or choose what you want to hear, so
51:09
we don't have to deal with these great, big issues that are in placed,
51:13
because those are too big. They're too big to deal with. So
51:15
we'll make you a court discretion so you don't have to hear every case,
51:17
and that way you could push away the ones that they're too big to have
51:20
to deal with. Right. But the issue there is is one one.
51:27
Acts of Congress must must be must be consistent with the Constitution. If an
51:30
Act of Congress violates the obligations the Constitution, then it cannot be valid.
51:36
Either right, and so the Court can be a court of discretion so long
51:40
as a state is not an into party. If a state is named a
51:45
party, then the Constitution has created the constitutional obligation for the Supreme Court to
51:50
hear the case as original jurisdiction. That is a constitutional obligation assigned to the
51:55
Supreme Court United States. So when the Supreme Court is an obligation by the
52:00
Constitution, that means it cannot be delegated. It cannot be discretionary because you
52:06
cannot use discretion with regard to what its opposite obligations. So, Supreme Court
52:10
the United States, I want to ask you, why is it that you
52:15
have had the duty and responsibility, the constitutional obligation to oversee every case in
52:20
which the state has become a party, and yet there are millions of cases
52:24
every single year with a state being a party, and you have failed to
52:28
fulfill that obligation. Why is it that you are not fulfilling that obligation,
52:32
Supreme Court? Why is it that you are not doing what the Constitution has
52:36
said that you must do? And why is it the Congress tells us to
52:40
use a registertionory? Why do they tells you use a ritis sociory. They
52:44
tell you to use a rit of cerciority because a ritisserciority is a request to
52:49
review a lower court's decision. So if you are bringing a petition to Supreme
52:53
Court and you are requesting them to review a lower court's decision, then that
52:59
means that there is a judge. It's in place. So when you bring
53:00
a rit of sociority Supreme Court, you cannot invoke Article three. You cannot
53:06
invoke original jurisdiction because you are saying that there's a lower court decision that exists.
53:10
And if there's a lower court's decision that exists, they don't have an
53:14
original jurisdiction. So you cannot bring a rid of sociory and invoke original jurisdiction.
53:20
You must bring a different mechanism. And the mechanism that we're using is
53:24
a rit of Hagess corpus. It's a writ of Habeas corpus. Because brother
53:29
today today that the writ of cerciority is an appeal. It's an appeal.
53:36
The writ of Habes's corpus tests the validity of the attainment. Is it unlawful
53:40
imprisonment? And if it's unlawful imprisonment, then the rid of Hayes's corpus is
53:45
used to remove the unlawful imprisonment. The rid of Habes's corpus is there to
53:49
challenge the detention. So if the judgment is void and it doesn't exist,
53:53
it's fully without force or effect, then that means that all of you are
53:57
unlawfully imprisoned. And the way you deal with unlawful imprisonment, it's to a
54:00
redivating corpose. We go there and we are invoking Article three and we are
54:04
telling that court you're not We're not asking you to hear a case. We're
54:07
telling you you must hear a case because the constitutions established the obligation and either
54:10
one you could build the obligations countries. Okay, but you made a distinction
54:20
earlier about unlawful convictions and run for conviction. So because you're secure Body nine
54:28
six Constitution and that they cannot be so based upon their qualified immunity from prosecution,
54:34
then what did you tell the families are sitting in prison? You know
54:37
what I'm standing the wrong for conviction as opposed to unlawful convictions, And how
54:43
do they be able to get a reed from their conviction during the eleven h
54:46
seven process when they have the anti terrorism back in place, prohibiting you from
54:51
filing anything subsequent applications on eleven oh sevens and bringing in new discovered evidence of
54:59
information. Right qualified qualified immunity is a lie. It's a lie. It
55:07
was a lie that was created in eighteen ninety by the Weight Court. And
55:12
remember the Weight Chief Justice Weight was well known to be a slave sympathizer.
55:16
He misread the law on numerous occasions. This is well known. He put
55:20
into place some of the most disgusting rulings that ever existed, such as plus
55:22
e versus ferguson, such as the Crunk Shot case, such as that these
55:27
civil rights acts or cases. He made numerous rulings that were intended to undermine
55:31
the Union and undermining the reconstruction amendments because he wanted to reinforce the slave institution,
55:37
which he has successfully done for another one hundred and eighty years. But
55:42
the issue of sovereign immunity derives from a decision that he made in eighteen ninety
55:46
called Hans versus Louisiana. Listen, there is no such thing as sovereign immunity.
55:52
You cannot have sovereign immunity right because states are not sovereign because a sovereign
55:59
state is one that is independent of itself, not subject to a higher government
56:02
whose laws is subject to So only a sovereign state cannot be or cannot be
56:09
subject to another law's higher loss. So when the States says they're sovereign,
56:15
then what they're saying is, we don't have to follow that higher law,
56:17
that higher government's laws. We don't have to follow the Constitution because we're sovereign.
56:22
Right, States aren't sovereign. States gave up their sovereignty to join the
56:25
Union, to subject themselves to the supremacy of the United States Constitution. You
56:30
are not sovereign states, because if you were sovereign, then that would mean
56:34
we wouldn't have one nation, we would have fifty nations. We would be
56:37
a confederacy once again like we are today. So if you claim to be
56:42
sovereign, you claim to be you know, above the law, then you
56:45
are not subject to the Constitution United States and States. I'm gonna tell you
56:50
right now, that is not a proposition that that would propose that you that
56:53
you that should pursue because unfortunately, there's three hundred thirty million people that believe
57:00
in America, they don't believe in the bullshit that you're creating. They don't
57:02
believe in the destruction that you're bringing upon this and we aren't gonna follow you,
57:07
right because we can see exactly where you're taking us. We can see
57:10
exactly what you're doing because you're profiting off of it. Right, you guys
57:15
are criminals. You're destroying our country, you're killing our people, and then
57:20
you make us walk around and call you honorable. At the same time,
57:22
there's no honor in you justice. You go Black said it in nineteen sixty
57:27
honorable men, honor the law. There's no honor in criminals. There's no
57:31
honor in people that are going to lead our country toward criminality and then hold
57:36
the people accountable because you guys are too arrogant to actually self reflect and the
57:40
things that you do, your crimes and the decisions that you make that is
57:45
destroying people. So the thing is, there is no sovereign beauty. So
57:50
under the tenth Amendment, right, the tenth demendon, you cannot delegate powers
57:53
that you and yourself don't have. If I'm not sovereign, government cannot be
57:58
sovereign because I cannot elegate onto government. Is something that I don't have.
58:01
So when they claim sovereign community, you stay to them bullshit. I'll show
58:06
you how sovereign you are. And that's what we're doing. That's what we're
58:08
doing. Brothers. They're not suving civil rights have been violated if my civil
58:14
rights have been violated due to some unlawful conviction. Okay, So are you
58:16
indicating the fact that we should get the Attorney Junior's office, I mean the
58:21
the United States Problem of Justice to conduct an independent investigation and to all of
58:24
these because of the fact that kill saying that all of these judges and these
58:30
prothecutors and and and are conducting an illegal operations rat system and our criminal justice
58:36
system Blacks being convicted by all white jewry. You know plea bargain agreements processors.
58:40
Okay, I have a copy of your camplate right here, and you
58:44
talk about plea bargain agreements. Okay, that's a process that's illegally because it's
58:47
being held behind the scenes where your indictments being no good. Is that that's
58:57
true? It's absolutely true. Yeah, you put plea bargains are not valid.
59:00
Plea bargains have never been valid. You cannot use you cannot use threats
59:05
of intimdation, coersion address by the very entity that's bringing the accusation and use
59:09
that to formulate a contract of guilt, because when you use dress to formulate
59:14
a contracts, that contract is void. It's wholly void without force effect on
59:17
parties involved dispute. Dresses a jus pole of the events for a crime of
59:21
breached contracts are toward. Article three of the United States Constitution says that in
59:25
all cases or that the trial of all crimes with the exception of impeachment,
59:30
shall be by jury, and the trial sol curren state range crime sate have
59:32
been committed. Nowhere in that does it say that you can convict a person
59:37
of crime other than impeachment in any other way but trial by jury. You
59:40
guys don't get to change the rules. You guys don't get to change the
59:44
obligations that people in the United States do that consistent with the special manufactature of
59:47
Article five. If it's not changed, and it's consistent with with what the
59:52
Article five demands by an authentic act of people, then guess what that is?
59:57
An active sedition committed by t to the didition. Because sedition is defined
1:00:02
as the speaking or writing of words such as law established in order to cause
1:00:07
dis affection to the Constitution, to procure its alteration in other than lawful manner.
1:00:13
Your obligation. I already have, brother, It's already there. I'm
1:00:21
trying to get them to actually do something about it. That's why I'm That's
1:00:24
why I'm speaking the way i'm speaking. That's why I'm That's why I'm speaking
1:00:29
toward a strict group, because they need to understand that I'm coming after them,
1:00:34
all right. I'm coming after them with the law and with the people,
1:00:37
and we're going to address this situation that there that they cause, that
1:00:40
they put us into because of their arrogance and their greed. We're going to
1:00:45
address this situation. And they can either one come back to the stablish rule
1:00:49
law and work with me to to to move forward consistent with what the law
1:00:53
demands and the parameters that is established. And if they don't want to do
1:00:58
that, then they can continue. When are your things? Unluckily, in
1:01:00
which case they will be known for the rest of history as nothing but a
1:01:07
bunch of traders, criminals to try the distorination people. I thank you,
1:01:15
I thank you, I thank you for that. Thank you, mister Cornell
1:01:19
for your questions, and thank you mister Downey for your support out there applicating
1:01:25
for the men and women that's currently incarcerating and for this state. Thank you
1:01:31
guys for joining us on today. So, mister Downey, I just want
1:01:38
to give you one more thing to keep you rolling, to keep gassed getting
1:01:45
you to the other states. Can you let us know, let the views
1:01:50
know how to get in contact with you. Yeah, yeah, you guys
1:01:55
again, I'm here to serve you. You know what, do you guys
1:02:00
believe that I can do what I say that I'm trying to do is irrelevant.
1:02:04
I have my faith. God has given me that faith. He is.
1:02:07
He has shown me that I can have faith in it and I can
1:02:10
believe in it, and I'm going to live out my faith. I'm going
1:02:14
to do it because that's what I believe in, and I'm either going to
1:02:17
put my faith in action. And I would rather be a fool believing in
1:02:22
something than an idiot sitting on the side doing nothing and wishing that I would
1:02:27
have that I would have at least tried. So I would rather fail miserably
1:02:30
trying to do something that's right than to sit back and say there's nothing I
1:02:36
can do. So what I'm doing is I'm doing everything that I believe is
1:02:42
in within my power. And if I fail, then at least we're going
1:02:45
to fail knowing that there's lots and lots of new options. Right at least
1:02:51
I'm going to fail with opening up the eyes of a lot of people that
1:02:53
may may not have been able to see something before. So I do this
1:02:59
because I love country. I do this because I love my people. I
1:03:01
do this because this is the right thing to do. I don't do this
1:03:04
for the money. I've never taken a check since I went in a full
1:03:07
time litigation nine years ago. I operate on donations because I want to focus
1:03:10
on service, not money. I will not fight for anyone. I will
1:03:14
only fight for everyone. I don't take individual contracts. But you guys,
1:03:17
you guys are welcome to contact me. You're welcome to use any of my
1:03:21
information. You know, empower yourselves. I have information. Listen to the
1:03:25
things I'm saying. Take it because I've given it to you for free.
1:03:29
God gave it to me for free. I need you guys to take it
1:03:30
for free because the more people that know and have the knowledge that I have
1:03:35
right, the more powerful we as the people are going to become. And
1:03:37
so we have donation points and yes we are traveling across the country. We
1:03:45
have another seventeen states to go. We only have until now between now and
1:03:49
June sixth, so we need quite a little bit of gas. We're actually
1:03:52
out of gas right now. We're pretty close to it and we're gonna need
1:03:54
to tank here very very soon. But we have cash app, we have
1:03:59
try, we have Benmo, and we have PayPal and they're all exactly the
1:04:01
same. It is we shall be free. That's w E s h A
1:04:09
L L B E f R E E. And we would welcome whatever blessings
1:04:14
you guys want to send away. Don't take any food out of your out
1:04:15
of your family's mouth because you know, uh, God's going to make sure
1:04:19
that that we see it true. But I do need help from you guys,
1:04:23
and uh, and I don't ask for much, but but if you
1:04:26
are able to, we would absolutely welcome the blessing. And just know that
1:04:30
that I'm going to reset destination and I'm going to argue on your behalf and
1:04:34
that's not going to cost you a thing, because this is the gift that
1:04:38
God gave me to be able to do this for you because he loves me
1:04:43
enough that, uh, he wants to show you how much he loves you
1:04:46
as well. So we're gonna be successful in this. There's no doubt at
1:04:50
all. I have no doubt whatsoever that we are going to win. And
1:04:54
uh, and you're gonna get home. But if you want to contact me,
1:04:57
my phone number is Choo zero to six zero four four four seventy three,
1:05:02
and again I would welcome discussions. I do have a lot of calls
1:05:05
every day, so I can't guarantee I'll be on, but that is my
1:05:09
number. You're welcome call me if you want to shoot me an email if
1:05:12
you're able to do that. My email address is my first name. Th
1:05:15
A n A w A h AT We Shall be Free twenty twenty three dot
1:05:23
com. You guys, I love you guys very much, and keep your
1:05:27
chin up. You have nothing to defend yourselves for any more. God has
1:05:30
forgiven you of your sins, and we're not going to make that institution understand
1:05:34
that that you are not sinners, that your sin, whatever you did,
1:05:41
is nothing, it's void, it's without forced to effect because that institution didn't
1:05:45
do the right thing. They decided they were going to prison instead of set
1:05:48
free, and we're gonna change it. Let me thanks, thank you,
1:05:55
yeah, thank you. Business. All things ain't what they used to be
1:06:06
where in all the blue skies. But boys and misdow wind that blows from
1:06:14
the Lord and something