Latest / The Morning Edition / Will the Kyle and Jackie O implosion unleash Sandilands globally?
Transcript
- 0:03S1: As much as Australians love to hate Kyle Sandilands and
- 0:07S1: Jackie O, who for so long ruled Australia's most expensive
- 0:11S1: radio program, the implosion of their show is consequential and
- 0:16S1: not just in a business sense. Though if Sandilands is
- 0:19S1: successful in the lawsuit he launched against his former employer
- 0:23S1: this week, it could take down the entire radio network.
- 0:26S1: I'm Samantha Selinger Morris, and you're listening to The Morning
- 0:29S1: Edition from The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald today.
- 0:34S1: Media writer Callum Jaspin on whether Kyle Sandilands might take
- 0:38S1: his brand to another platform and turn it into a
- 0:41S1: political force with an even greater focus on the grotesque.
- 0:46S1: And what's happened to Jackie O. It's March the 25th. Callum,
- 0:54S1: welcome back to the podcast.
- 0:56S2: Thanks for having me.
- 0:58S1: Okay. This week, Kyle Sandilands launched legal action against the
- 1:02S1: radio company Arn for sacking him. Tell us, what is
- 1:06S1: this stoush all about?
- 1:08S2: Well, I think it can really be boiled down to
- 1:11S2: a case of flying too close to the sun. Kyle
- 1:15S2: and Jackie O have been a mainstay in Australian media
- 1:18S2: for more than 25 years, and for a big chunk
- 1:20S2: of that, they've been some of the highest paid yet
- 1:23S2: most popular and controversial characters. On Radio.
- 1:28S3: Australia's most controversial media performer, Kyle Sandilands, has escaped punishment
- 1:33S3: again for one of his offensive on air traffic.
- 1:36S4: Conversations about sex. Plus, female staff recorded using the toilet.
- 1:41S5: And the boys will try and figure out who's made
- 1:44S5: that we.
- 1:46S6: And what exactly will it take for commercial radio shock
- 1:49S6: jock Kyle Sandilands to get the sack? In the past
- 1:52S6: two days, sponsors have been deserting the Kyle and Jackie
- 1:54S6: O show in droves after Mr. Sandilands made some puerile,
- 1:58S6: sexist comments about a female journalist.
- 2:01S7: Some fat slag on Telegraph website. I'm sorry. News.com.au has
- 2:06S7: already branded it a disaster.
- 2:08S8: A disaster.
- 2:10S7: What a what a fat bit of thing you are.
- 2:12S2: But a major part of their bargaining power has to
- 2:15S2: this point, been. Well, if you don't want us, someone
- 2:18S2: else would. The story has really ramped up in the
- 2:21S2: past few years after the duo launched into Melbourne, and
- 2:26S2: they were handed an astonishing $200 million, ten year contract
- 2:31S2: in 2023 by their employers, Arn media. Now, the backdrop
- 2:38S2: of this most recent stoush has been that since launching
- 2:42S2: into Melbourne in April 2024, it really couldn't have gone
- 2:46S2: much worse from both a ratings and advertiser perspective. And
- 2:52S2: on February 20th this year, after Kyle had already that
- 2:56S2: Friday morning, clearly maybe woken up on the wrong side
- 2:59S2: of bed, but he'd spent the morning berating the show's
- 3:03S2: producers for not being up to scratch. And then later,
- 3:06S2: he turned his focus to Jackie O, accusing her of
- 3:09S2: being off with the fairies while looking into astrology charts
- 3:13S2: on that show relating to the former Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
- 3:17S9: Oh, it's affecting other things, like your fixation on this
- 3:20S9: has made you almost unworkable.
- 3:24S10: Oh, it's not that bad. Oh.
- 3:27S9: You're not talking. I'm talking.
- 3:28S10: You do that like that's not fair.
- 3:30S9: Like I it's but it's but it's actually true. But you, you,
- 3:34S9: you might have done that in five minutes, but you're
- 3:36S9: off with the fairies with this shit.
- 3:37S10: Tell me where. No, no, no, tell me where. I've
- 3:39S10: been off with the fairies during the show.
- 3:41S9: I don't have to. I don't have to prove anything.
- 3:42S9: You do.
- 3:43S10: You can't accuse me of doing something.
- 3:44S9: Listen to the. Listen to the programme. You'll hear yourself.
- 3:48S10: Oh, no. Just give me one example.
- 3:49S9: Be aware of what's really going on.
- 3:52S10: Kyle, I totally am offended by you saying something.
- 3:58S2: He sort of said live on air, that everyone else
- 4:02S2: is thinking the same thing in this building. You don't
- 4:04S2: give a shit. Now, she didn't return to the show
- 4:08S2: the following week and the week after that on the
- 4:10S2: Tuesday evening. Arne releases a statement saying that her contract
- 4:14S2: had been terminated after she informed the company she could
- 4:17S2: no longer work with Sandilands. So I guess to sum
- 4:22S2: up the show's success in Sydney over the past two decades,
- 4:26S2: for anyone who hasn't listened but sort of knows the formula.
- 4:31S2: I'll leave this to Kyle's lawyers now. This is an
- 4:34S2: extract from his statement of claim filed to the federal
- 4:37S2: court over the weekend. Quote, it was high energy and controversial,
- 4:42S2: involving the broadcast, amongst other things, material that was irreverent
- 4:46S2: and deliberately provocative, including using crude humour, ribald commentary and
- 4:51S2: sexual innuendo. Banter and tension between Mr. Sandilands and Miss
- 4:55S2: Henderson was a central dynamic to the show. Mr. Sandilands
- 4:59S2: generally performed the role of the dominant and abrasive personality,
- 5:02S2: who was deliberately outrageous and often offensive, whilst Miss Henderson
- 5:06S2: played a moderating role as a warmer and more emotionally
- 5:10S2: attuned character. The statement of claim says.
- 5:14S1: And so if I've got this right, Callum is is
- 5:16S1: Kyle Sandilands main argument that essentially the Arn radio network
- 5:23S1: paid him for his out there behaviour and therefore to
- 5:26S1: sack him for that same behaviour is invalid because he
- 5:29S1: actually committed no serious misconduct or breach of contract. Like
- 5:33S1: is essentially that what the judge is going to have
- 5:35S1: to judge on?
- 5:36S2: Well, again, it's hard to know. But if we're to
- 5:39S2: take Sandilands as lawyer's word for it, not only was
- 5:43S2: that consistent with the past behaviour, but he sort of
- 5:46S2: claims that he was doing what was actually asked of him. Now,
- 5:51S2: the contract says that Sandilands and his lawyers reckon that
- 5:55S2: this was absolutely no different to the car on Jackie O.
- 5:58S2: We've known for so long and that in fact, he,
- 6:00S2: as we've all sort of said in the past, is
- 6:02S2: that he's said and done much, much worse. His lawyers
- 6:06S2: wrote that the exchange was congruent with the style, tone
- 6:08S2: and nature of the show and the robust character that
- 6:11S2: Arn desired. Now, that last word desired suggests this was
- 6:15S2: a tried and tested formula that Arn had specifically asked for,
- 6:19S2: and Kyle was playing into intentionally. They say there was
- 6:22S2: no breach, and what does seem apparent is that while
- 6:25S2: Kyle may have an argument, Henderson has now deviated and
- 6:29S2: it's left all three parties in a tight spot.
- 6:33S1: Okay, so that brings us up to today. We know
- 6:35S1: that this fallout has just been a massive gossip story,
- 6:38S1: but it's also a really unique business story. Tell us why.
- 6:43S2: So I don't think the stakes have ever really been
- 6:47S2: higher for a media company than they are with this deal.
- 6:51S2: And that's for any kind of media, let alone radio.
- 6:54S2: This kind of money really is astronomical now. For the
- 6:57S2: first time again on Monday evening, we got a bit
- 7:01S2: of a look into the actual details of this contract. Now,
- 7:05S2: Sandilands claims he is still owed upwards of 85 million.
- 7:10S2: There was a breakdown in sort of just how he
- 7:13S2: has paid. That included a $7.4 million upfront annual fee.
- 7:17S2: It included a $200,000 per year consultancy fee, licensing fees
- 7:22S2: and a $120,000 per year flight allowance. Now, I think
- 7:27S2: probably any listeners would probably get better bang for their
- 7:31S2: buck than their Qantas frequent flyer points on that. But
- 7:34S2: sort of regardless of what you think, radio hosts just
- 7:37S2: don't have the same kind of cut through that they
- 7:40S2: once did. As share of listening has been impacted by
- 7:43S2: things like watching TikTok reels or listening to podcasts on
- 7:48S2: Apple and Spotify. And as part of that, content has
- 7:51S2: just become generally more globalized. But at the same time,
- 7:55S2: Kyle and Jackie O at the time of this deal
- 7:57S2: were becoming more popular. They got their best ever share
- 8:00S2: result in the third share of 2023. And Arne had
- 8:05S2: this unique opportunity and they wanted to make the most
- 8:08S2: of it. So what they decided was they would take
- 8:10S2: the show that was, you know, for 20 years dominant
- 8:14S2: in Sydney to the three other markets that they had
- 8:17S2: the Kiss network in, that being Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide.
- 8:20S2: Melbourne was the first one. Melbourne is the biggest radio
- 8:24S2: market in Australia. So they thought, well, look, if this
- 8:27S2: show has been so successful in Sydney, we have an
- 8:28S2: even bigger opportunity in Melbourne. But the important point here
- 8:33S2: is that with $20 million per year, paying them this
- 8:38S2: much would only work if the show was successful elsewhere.
- 8:41S2: Because the money that you're saving on on air talent
- 8:45S2: on production team's individual marketing, less localized content, it can
- 8:50S2: only be replaced if this show is a juggernaut and
- 8:54S2: that that is replicated into Melbourne. Now, interestingly, there wasn't
- 8:58S2: actually a heap of criticism of the deal at the time.
- 9:01S2: I guess that says something about just how successful they
- 9:03S2: were that people thought that this maybe made sense. But
- 9:07S2: in radio terms, it's a little bit like having the
- 9:10S2: AFL or the NRL in television. As long as you
- 9:13S2: have them, you'll get ratings and therefore advertising dollars, and
- 9:16S2: without them you lose a potential massive audience. But it
- 9:20S2: was maybe a bit presumptuous to assume that Melbourne would
- 9:22S2: take to them and the numbers would simply be replicated.
- 9:26S1: And we know that ever since a Carl Sandilands contract
- 9:29S1: was torn up last week, that the impact on Arn,
- 9:32S1: it was just immediate, wasn't it?
- 9:34S2: Yeah, to put it bluntly, it has torn apart Arn.
- 9:38S2: The company is now worth less than a third of
- 9:41S2: what it was worth when they handed them the deal
- 9:43S2: on Monday. The company's market value dropped below 100 million,
- 9:48S2: and it was only months after their sort of immediately
- 9:51S2: disastrous launch into Melbourne that had flopped. We were reporting
- 9:55S2: that ALM was preparing to make $20 million in cuts
- 9:58S2: and cut 50 staff. These continued as advertiser share continued
- 10:02S2: to fall. They've now cut more than 250 jobs since then,
- 10:08S2: and offshored several of their sort of more back end functions.
- 10:13S2: The fact that the show never really got out of
- 10:16S2: eighth place at breakfast in Melbourne meant that advertisers just
- 10:20S2: went elsewhere, and this was obviously in combination with an
- 10:23S2: activist campaign by the mad fucking witches. And all of
- 10:26S2: that just really spelt this situation where things went from
- 10:30S2: bad to worse. The show contributed to Aaron losing 16%
- 10:34S2: of its advertising revenue in 2025 alone. That equates to
- 10:39S2: 28 million. So the knock on effect of your breakfast
- 10:44S2: show flopping, which is really meant to set up the
- 10:46S2: whole day for a station, can't be understated.
- 10:51S1: After the break.
- 10:52S2: The view was sort of, look, here's this crass duo
- 10:54S2: who are going to come to Melbourne. They're openly bragging,
- 10:57S2: or at least Sandilands is about doing zero work to
- 11:00S2: try and win over the Melbourne audience. They barely made
- 11:03S2: a trip down to Melbourne, and they want you to
- 11:05S2: be aware of the fact that they're getting paid 10
- 11:08S2: million bucks each a year to do so.
- 11:15S1: Okay, but what does it actually matter if this company tanks?
- 11:18S1: Like walk us through that.
- 11:20S2: If we do get to a point where Arn is
- 11:22S2: forced to pay out what Sandilands claims he's owed more
- 11:25S2: than 85 million, it could prove existential for the company.
- 11:29S2: And now that's important for a few reasons, one of
- 11:33S2: them being that whatever you think of The Car and
- 11:37S2: Jackie O show, they are a uniquely Australian, well sourced,
- 11:40S2: local piece of content that is coming out of Australia,
- 11:45S2: and it's harder and harder to come by at the moment,
- 11:47S2: as everything from talent to advertising dollars are scooped up
- 11:50S2: by digital giants. And so with this court case potentially
- 11:55S2: taking years, that time off air for for both of
- 11:59S2: them could prove catastrophic, particularly for Sandilands, whose daily broadcasts
- 12:04S2: are almost the oxygen that keeps him relevant. And there's
- 12:07S2: also an argument that this could be detrimental to radio. Overall,
- 12:11S2: their contract and popularity added to radio's relevance itself, and
- 12:15S2: without them, hundreds of thousands of listeners who either listen
- 12:19S2: to the show or cycled through several shows each morning
- 12:22S2: on their way to work on the school drop off
- 12:25S2: or anything like that, could just switch to Spotify. And radio,
- 12:28S2: in its essence, is built on habits, and once you
- 12:31S2: kill those habits, which are much easier to kill than
- 12:34S2: they are to build up, it could be hard to return.
- 12:37S11: So you just said there that.
- 12:38S1: Part of the reason it matters is because they were
- 12:41S1: uniquely Australian, and now we know they've absolutely flopped in Melbourne.
- 12:45S1: Obviously they were a huge hit for a hugely long
- 12:47S1: time in Sydney. So do you think that they were
- 12:50S1: sort of an iconic Australian brand across the nation on
- 12:54S1: some level. Like, do you think they had that sort
- 12:56S1: of importance in terms of the radio landscape?
- 12:59S2: I mean, my view is that the duo are sort
- 13:02S2: of emblematic of this sort of sense that Sydney is brash,
- 13:06S2: it's in your face, and it's a place where you
- 13:08S2: flaunt your wealth compared to Melbourne, where if you're rich,
- 13:12S2: you try and sort of play it down. And we
- 13:14S2: sort of saw this with this contract. I mean, in
- 13:18S2: Henderson's book, which was released a few years ago after
- 13:20S2: this deal was signed, she talks about them both wanting
- 13:25S2: to secure this pie in the sky figure, which was
- 13:28S2: $10 million each per year. I mean, it's pretty rare
- 13:32S2: that you get people talking about what their they view
- 13:37S2: their personal value is in dollar terms, so openly as
- 13:41S2: as these two could. And I think it's probably put
- 13:44S2: a bit of a target on their back because previously
- 13:46S2: in Melbourne, people didn't actually pay that much attention to
- 13:48S2: them like Sandilands is obviously the the host of Australian Idol,
- 13:52S2: which is a show that obviously a lot of people watch,
- 13:55S2: but the majority of Australians don't. And by the time
- 13:58S2: their ten year deal was announced alongside the launch into Melbourne,
- 14:02S2: the view was sort of, look, here's this crass duo
- 14:04S2: who are going to come to Melbourne. They're openly bragging,
- 14:07S2: or at least Sandilands is about doing zero work to
- 14:10S2: try and win over the Melbourne audience. They barely made
- 14:13S2: a trip down to Melbourne, and they want you to
- 14:15S2: be aware of the fact that they're getting paid 10
- 14:18S2: million bucks each a year to do so.
- 14:21S1: And I wonder if all this crassness and of course,
- 14:23S1: you know, sort of telegraphing how much money they wanted
- 14:26S1: to make and how much they're worth. Uh, do you
- 14:28S1: think this has put an uncomfortable mirror up to Sydney society?
- 14:32S1: You know, I mean, obviously they did really well here,
- 14:34S1: but are they becoming more on the nose in Sydney
- 14:37S1: as well just for that crassness or is that who
- 14:39S1: we are? Callum and Sydney.
- 14:42S2: Look, I don't want to cast aspersions from from down
- 14:45S2: south because they might come across as biased. But look,
- 14:48S2: it's undeniable that since the show launched in Melbourne, they
- 14:52S2: have lost almost 250,000 listeners by survey. So that's a
- 14:58S2: number that sort of captures anyone that listened to the
- 15:00S2: show during that period. So whether or not Sydneysiders have
- 15:04S2: changed their attitude towards them, fewer people were listening by
- 15:09S2: the end of the show in Sydney. And I think,
- 15:13S2: you know, it's it's interesting in a sense where you, um,
- 15:16S2: it's sort of like a, the analogy of a frog
- 15:19S2: in boiling water where they've been part of the furniture
- 15:22S2: in Sydney for so long that their listeners are just
- 15:25S2: used to it. And people that don't listen just go, oh, well,
- 15:28S2: that's Kyle and Jackie O. You'll get to know them or,
- 15:30S2: you know, whatever you think of them. But this potentially
- 15:34S2: shined a spotlight on just some of the content. And
- 15:37S2: I think, you know, once you have a national media story,
- 15:40S2: you start getting national media attention. And obviously, the most,
- 15:44S2: probably the most famous example is the competition where they
- 15:47S2: tried to tell who was urinating by the sound of
- 15:50S2: their urine on air. And there's countless examples, but it
- 15:54S2: just sort of reminds people that this is what's on air.
- 15:57S2: And look, I think if the show launched in 2026
- 16:01S2: or another show launched with the exact same content that
- 16:05S2: people weren't just used to it being written off as
- 16:08S2: Kyle and Jackie O, I don't think it would have
- 16:10S2: lasted longer than a few weeks.
- 16:12S1: And I think it is easy to sort of make
- 16:14S1: light of the sort of behavior that Kyle Sandilands exhibited
- 16:17S1: on the show, but it's got to be said that
- 16:19S1: he did arguably, uh, pronounce some very intolerant views towards
- 16:25S1: a number of communities. So it isn't all laughing matter.
- 16:29S1: But I've got to ask, like, if someone like Kyle
- 16:30S1: Sandilands isn't in radio, won't he just start a podcast
- 16:34S1: or a YouTube channel? Like, is that is that what
- 16:36S1: we're likely to see?
- 16:38S2: Well, I mean, Kyle very much could take his talents
- 16:41S2: to YouTube. Now. Henderson it sort of seems like maybe
- 16:44S2: she is wanting to actually just take a step back
- 16:46S2: from the public spotlight more generally. But, you know, a
- 16:51S2: sort of comparable example might be we've seen one of
- 16:54S2: Nine's most popular talents, Karl Stefanovic, launch a podcast this
- 16:59S2: year as he seemingly tries to set himself up for
- 17:02S2: life after television. Now, a lot of the stuff that
- 17:05S2: goes on his channel is largely just interviews with right
- 17:09S2: wing politicians and influencers, and this kind of stuff would
- 17:13S2: need a lot more ring fencing on a licensed broadcaster, which,
- 17:17S2: you know, there are rules that apply to both radio
- 17:21S2: and to television, and the industry regulator has has really
- 17:24S2: sharpened its focus on Arn recently, but with fewer regulations.
- 17:29S2: This means that whether or not you believe Stefanovic's beliefs,
- 17:33S2: he is clearly identified that there's money to be made
- 17:36S2: by pandering to a highly engaged, highly online audience that
- 17:39S2: really appears to line up with this sort of rise
- 17:43S2: of one nation that we've seen at the moment. Now,
- 17:46S2: I doubt Kyle does the same in terms of going
- 17:49S2: down a political avenue, because I just don't think people
- 17:52S2: would really take him that seriously in that sort of domain.
- 17:55S2: But what we very well could see is his content
- 17:59S2: move online and sort of veer further towards this sort
- 18:03S2: of vulgar, or at least pushing the limits a bit
- 18:07S2: further in the future.
- 18:09S11: And so, Callum, what.
- 18:10S1: Happens now with the court case?
- 18:12S2: So we've really not heard much from Henderson. She's been
- 18:17S2: very quiet. She released one statement a few days after
- 18:21S2: her contract was terminated, saying that she didn't quit. She
- 18:26S2: seemingly seems to be of the opinion that her contract.
- 18:29S2: She wanted to keep her contract, but do something else now.
- 18:31S2: Arne seemed pretty confident of their decision to terminate Henderson's
- 18:35S2: contract as well. What we understand was that there was
- 18:38S2: a pretty extensive letter from her lawyers detailing the reasons
- 18:42S2: just why she didn't want to work with Sandilands any longer,
- 18:46S2: and because she was contracted to deliver the show with them,
- 18:48S2: they just tore that contract up. Sandilands, I guess, as
- 18:52S2: things have always been, has sucked up a lot of
- 18:54S2: the attention naturally, because he's continued to be a lot
- 18:58S2: more vocal while she has stayed quiet. Now, there's no
- 19:02S2: knowing exactly how this court case will play out or
- 19:05S2: even how quickly it will happen, but I'm sure Sandilands
- 19:08S2: will want a resolution as quickly as possible so that
- 19:10S2: he can get back on air or in front of
- 19:13S2: his listeners somewhere, wherever that will be. But whether a
- 19:16S2: judge views this as being as important a priority as
- 19:19S2: he does over another backlog of cases, we'll have to
- 19:22S2: wait and see.
- 19:23S1: Well, thank you so much for your time.
- 19:26S2: Thank you.
- 19:37S1: In other news, today, Singapore Airlines will launch daily flights
- 19:41S1: to Sydney's new $6 billion international airport on November 23rd.
- 19:46S1: Taking advantage of its curfew free status. Tesla is facing
- 19:51S1: multiple legal actions in Australia over a claim it charged
- 19:55S1: an Australian customer more than $10,000 for its cutting edge,
- 19:59S1: fully self-driving software, despite their car being technologically restricted from
- 20:05S1: activating the autonomous feature here. And the ABC has scrapped
- 20:10S1: its flagship current affairs program, 730 on Wednesday night, as
- 20:14S1: more than 2000 staff are expected to strike for the
- 20:18S1: first time in 20 years. Today's episode was produced by
- 20:24S1: Kai Wong. Our executive producer is Tammy Mills, and our
- 20:28S1: podcasts are overseen by Lisa Muxworthy and Tom McKendrick. If
- 20:32S1: you like our show, follow The Morning Edition and leave
- 20:35S1: a review for us on Apple or Spotify. Thanks for listening.