Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Censoring Satan, DEI is DOA, Teacher Transitions Ten Year Old | HBR News 442

Transcript

Censoring Satan, DEI is DOA, Teacher Transitions Ten Year Old | HBR News 442 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  This is HBr News number four forty one. Censoring Satan Dei is doa teacher
• 0:10
  transitions ten year old where we discuss the news of the week and give it
• 0:14
  the Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. I
• 0:23
  hope you guys are doing well this week and that you're laughing at all of
• 0:25
  this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it. My name is Brian and
• 0:30
  I'm joined by doctor Rander, Mcammon Hannah Wallin, and we are going to
• 0:33
  be bringing you the news from a badgery perspective on this week's HBO news show.
• 0:39
  We're going to be following up on the Iowa man who destroyed a Satanic
• 0:44
  altar and like the consequences of that, Florida International University eliminates DEI department or
• 0:52
  one of their DEI departments. Racial discrimination is apparently alive and well in the
• 0:59
  National Organization for Women and more so, stick around, it's going to be
• 1:02
  a good time and be sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show,
• 1:07
  so you guys might Last week, we talked about how much of a
• 1:11
  problem it is that Taylor Swift has been essentially made into pornographic images. I
• 1:21
  think they called it something else. I forget. It was like intimate intimate
• 1:23
  fake images done with AI. And how this is a problem, right,
• 1:27
  Sexualizing women with artificial intelligence is a problem. Well, apparently the opposite is
• 1:32
  also a problem. So there is this thing called dignifi or dignif AI where
• 1:41
  they basically take women who are dressed scantily clad and reclothe them. And this
• 1:47
  is also a problem. So the Daily Caller has this article We're gonna be
• 1:49
  looking at the patron show called some Internet dork is trying to reclothe beautiful women
• 1:55
  because of dignity. It is pathetic. That's a lot to rethink about.
• 2:00
  Yeah, I know, it actually plays on this. It's almost paradoxical truth
• 2:06
  that. I mean, I've never been to a titty bar, but people
• 2:08
  who have been to titty bars and strip joints, they're like, they'll see
• 2:13
  these girls draping themselves over these poles and whatnot. But then they glance over
• 2:17
  at the bar maid and you can see her cleavage through her shirt and that's
• 2:22
  the most exciting nudity in the whole place, because you're not supposed to see
• 2:27
  it. Just a tiny amount of titillation is far more titillating than than than
• 2:35
  the full and uncensored hole bag thing going up. You know, those fists
• 2:40
  are going to go a psychohost beast about this though. Oh yeah, they
• 2:45
  totally they already have they they've completely they've gone like basically, can't do anything
• 2:51
  with AI at all. Yeah, no agnistic to look at naked women guys,
• 2:55
  but it's also misogynistic to put their clothes back on without Yeah, so
• 3:06
  we're gonna look at this article in the Patron show and if you want to
• 3:08
  become what was that, this is gonna be great. Oh yeah, it's
• 3:14
  gonna I think it is. I think it's gonna be There's gonna be lulls
• 3:15
  to be had. So if you want to be a part of that,
• 3:19
  you have to become a Badger yourself. Are going to feed the Badger dot
• 3:21
  com setting up a monthly subscription five bucks a month. We'll get you into
• 3:23
  our discord where you'll be able to participate in all of the additional content,
• 3:29
  including Patron shows, and you get to see things before they go live.
• 3:32
  For example, there is I believe there's a raging there that you can watch
• 3:36
  right now if you are a patron before it goes live on the tubes.
• 3:40
  And there's lots of really stimulating and interesting discussions going on in the discord as
• 3:46
  well as well as events and whatnot. So that's feed Thebadge dot com.
• 3:49
  Set up a monthly subscription and be become a Badger so you can enjoy all
• 3:53
  of this additional content. And if you don't want to wake up one morning
• 3:57
  to find that we've been yeeded from the main extreme Internet for our views or
• 4:01
  our problematic behaviors, then go to badgerfeed dot com or honey Badger Radio dot
• 4:06
  com. That is where our content lives. And without further ado, we're
• 4:10
  gonna get into the story. So first things first, let's talk about Satanism.
• 4:16
  I guess so satan most Affected what I call this? Wait? Wait,
• 4:20
  when did this become a comedy show? I know, I know,
• 4:25
  but what stick with me it's I think it's always been a clown show.
• 4:29
  I mean, this is like why this shows world has become a joke.
• 4:33
  So Michael cass I think we covered this a while back when it happened Michael
• 4:39
  Cassidy would be headed a statue put up by the Satanic temple at Iowa's capital,
• 4:45
  which is a funny place for a Satanic temple. Iowa was not known
• 4:50
  for that kind of thing, so anyway, Michael Cassidy has been charged with
• 4:56
  a felony under the state's hate crime statute. The Wholk County's Attorney's office charged
• 5:01
  Cassidy with third degree criminal mischief in violation of individual rights, a class D
• 5:08
  felony under Iowa's hate crime statutes. Cassidy, an unsuccessful Republican candidate from Mississippi
• 5:14
  State House of Representatives, clamed that he destroyed the statue due to the victim's
• 5:17
  religion. The Satanic Temple of Iowa had displayed the statue for the holidays,
• 5:23
  and the damage is deemed beyond repair. Satanic Temple does not believe in Satan
• 5:28
  or the supernatural, according to their own accounts, promoting effective and artful protest
• 5:33
  according to their own accounts, Yeah, Satanism has never been tried, by
• 5:39
  the way. I wasn't aware that you all had hate crime laws in the
• 5:46
  US. I thought it was still limited to the to the shows of my
• 5:51
  own eclectic continent, and indeed anywhere else that's long since fall into communism.
• 5:59
  When did that happen? Is another one of those bills that they called the
• 6:02
  Love Kittens and Puppies Act, and then they snuck it through Congress the middle
• 6:08
  of the night. It's it's been around for a long time, and I
• 6:10
  think I want to say that one of the catalysts was the attack on man
• 6:18
  in Texas that was it was really horrific. They tied him to the back
• 6:23
  of a truck and dragged him because he was gay, and so to me,
• 6:30
  I look at this type of crime like that type of crime, and
• 6:34
  it shouldn't matter why you do it. It's brutal, it's a horrific act.
• 6:39
  It should be penalized and to the fullest extent of the law, and
• 6:44
  the individuals involved should be put through psychiatric evaluation because nobody in their right mind
• 6:49
  would do something like that to another human being. If you can look at
• 6:54
  another person's actual face in fear and pain and do things like that to the
• 7:00
  it's not just hate. There's something else wrong with you right that. That's
• 7:04
  there's something going on in your brain. But that kind of incident was used
• 7:11
  to usher in laws that basically say when you commit a violent crime, or
• 7:16
  or when you commit a crime where there is an individual deemed a victim because
• 7:21
  of what you did, if your reason for doing it is because of the
• 7:29
  person's skin color, because of the person's religion, there's sex, you know,
• 7:33
  any any characteristic that has been deemed immutable, even though now you know
• 7:41
  they're they're allowing you to identify then different ways. So it's questionable whether anything
• 7:47
  is immutable anymore. Uh, it's it's now a hate crime. It's considered
• 7:53
  a higher crime. So it's it's the other way to think of it is
• 7:58
  it's more okay to murder some buddy for money than it is to murder somebody
• 8:01
  because you don't like some characteristic about them, which makes no sense to me,
• 8:07
  because I think it should not be okay under any circumstances. And it
• 8:11
  allows something like this, which is simple destruction of property. And it was
• 8:16
  stupid. I'll give you that. Like the guy had. He didn't really
• 8:20
  accomplish anything doing this except getting himself in trouble. They'll they'll put the statue
• 8:26
  back up, there'll be another one. Nobody is is going to change their
• 8:31
  minds or the way they think about the statue because this guy did this.
• 8:35
  He probably felt like he needed to do this as the hero of some group,
• 8:41
  some movement, some religious belief, that that's in opposition to Satanism and
• 8:46
  everything. But in reality, it was a completely useless gesture and it would
• 8:52
  have been much better to just ridicule the ever loving fuck out of putting a
• 8:56
  Satanic altar in the courthouse. But you know, that's that's neither here nor
• 9:05
  there. The hate crime law thing, they didn't have to name it something
• 9:09
  else. It convinced people that it was not what it was going to be,
• 9:15
  and in reality, it makes no sense at all. You convince people
• 9:20
  that there are worse reasons and better reasons for committing a premeditated crime that has
• 9:28
  a victim. The owner of this alter would be the victim, I guess,
• 9:33
  because it's that that group's property, and it's you know, it's it's
• 9:39
  ridiculous to destroy somebody's property, even if you don't like it. There are
• 9:43
  there are other ways to handle that situation. But why the individual did it
• 9:50
  doesn't matter if it was on purpose, and like it's not an act of
• 9:56
  self defense, like that actually is a legitimate excuse for committing a crime when
• 10:03
  it's real, like when somebody is actually threatening to harm you, when something
• 10:09
  is being done to you. But just having something present in a location doesn't
• 10:13
  injure you, you know, unless it's radioactive. I don't think this is
• 10:18
  radioactive. So now we've had we've had those those laws in place for quite
• 10:24
  a while, and they're dumb. There's no point to them other than to
• 10:30
  create power for some people over other people. Recent events have left me wondering
• 10:39
  what this hate crime bill in question even actually said. You like, was
• 10:43
  there a clause on page thirty thousand and six saying it's totally fine if you
• 10:50
  pull down and behead a statue of Thomas Jefferson, and you do it specifically
• 10:54
  in the name of anti white sentiments. It's totally fine if you melt a
• 11:00
  statue of Robert E. Lee and broadcast the footage of his burning death mask,
• 11:05
  you know, to send a message to any white people or patriots who
• 11:09
  are thinking of acting up. But bapher men, no, no, no,
• 11:15
  no, young Bucky, that's a protected figurehead right there, That's an
• 11:18
  important part of our history. Who even breathe near that thing is straight to
• 11:22
  the gulag with you. Is that what the law said? I doubt it.
• 11:26
  The government doesn't like to be as specific as that. If we're following
• 11:31
  the European pattern, then it'll be something like hate is anything that can be
• 11:37
  perceived as hate, perceived by whom. You might ask, what whosoever is
• 11:45
  enforcing the laws? Who might that be wet this point is people who hate
• 11:50
  men, mostly white men, but it clearly started with men. All men
• 11:56
  as such. Missionery cannot be perceived as hate, because men are themselves a
• 12:03
  form of hate, and any harm we do to them, even vicariously,
• 12:07
  is actually by the transitive property love. Woe betide anyone who loves men.
• 12:15
  That's that's the worst kind of hate, namely misogyny. Of course, you
• 12:20
  can say you love men, you can say you love America. In politics,
• 12:26
  what you say means deadly squad, much like what propagandists call the bill
• 12:33
  is usually the polar opposite of what it actually entails. That that Inflation Reduction
• 12:39
  Act was just about printing even more money. The Border Security Act is about
• 12:45
  further facilitating and pampering the onslaught of foreign invaders. It comes down to actions.
• 12:52
  That's that's actions are what these evil scumbags get away with, and it's
• 12:56
  what their victims cannot get away with. You can say what you like about
• 13:01
  men. But if your actions actually reflect applied androphilia, then you're an in
• 13:07
  cell and a misogynist and an evil MRA, and you're on an FBI watch
• 13:13
  list. You can say you love America, but if you actually make any
• 13:16
  effort to uphold and protect it's its culture, it's electoral integrity, Heaven forbid
• 13:24
  its borders, thugging jail straight to jail, believe it or not, jail.
• 13:30
  Case of point, no one in the government will come right out and
• 13:33
  say I love Baphomet. But actions speak louder than words. When Satan himself
• 13:41
  rises to take over the world, he won't even need to disguise himself in
• 13:46
  a pleasing form. Human beings will will do the deceiving for him. He
• 13:52
  could, he could, He could rise out of the ocean like Cthulhu,
• 13:56
  wings and pitchfork and everything with two middle fingers standing for the cameras, and
• 14:01
  these these scumbags will ravel around him, going, everyone leave this poor asylum
• 14:07
  seeker alone. He's just a child. He was just jogging. And then
• 14:11
  when Jesus descends from the heavens to fight Satan, they'll call him an insurrectionists
• 14:18
  and shoot him in the fucking throat. Mark my words. The prophet has
• 14:22
  spoken, it's probably already happened. Actually, well, I was going to
• 14:24
  say it, that's happening. There have been for President rallies where a lot
• 14:33
  of you know, I love Craft nerds stood around and chanted eat us first,
• 14:39
  over and over again. But I don't, I don't know how serious
• 14:45
  that sounds like. It's not incredibly serious, right, No, I think
• 14:48
  that's joke. But it was still a thing that happened, So sure,
• 14:54
  sure, I don't. So I have here. This is the This is
• 14:58
  the This is the statutes. The Statute of in Iowa. It reads seven
• 15:05
  nine at two violation of individual rights hate crime. Hate crime means one of
• 15:09
  the following public offenses when committed against the person or person's property because of the
• 15:13
  person's race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation,
• 15:18
  sex, sexual orientation, age, or disability, or the person's association with
• 15:22
  a person of a certain race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin,
• 15:26
  political affiliation, sex, sexual orientation, age, or disability. And
• 15:31
  then there's like a bunch of sub things. Criminal mischief is here. It
• 15:33
  says criminal mischief in violation of the devotal rights under seven under section seven to
• 15:39
  one six dot six A. So yeah, they do have a thing on
• 15:41
  the books. I don't believe in hate crimes. I just believe in crimes.
• 15:46
  So you know, if you if you chain a guiy to the back
• 15:48
  of a truck and drag him behind you because he's gay, I mean,
• 15:54
  that's terrible, But I think the dragging a person behind the truck is the
• 15:58
  crime, not the I don't like him because he's gay part. I don't
• 16:03
  think that's important at all. I don't care what your reasoning is. I
• 16:06
  just care about the crime because when you get into and I know that we're
• 16:08
  not necessarily in disagreement about that, but like, this is how you take
• 16:12
  away people's rights. You basically you do it by saying we have to protect
• 16:18
  people from hate crimes, as if it's a different kind of crime, and
• 16:21
  it's not. And also it becomes selective. I recall that a man black
• 16:27
  man got behind the wheel of a vehicle and drove into a parade and killed
• 16:30
  a lot of people and said he did it because they were white, and
• 16:33
  there was no hate crime charge. And I mean there was a charge because
• 16:37
  it was you know, murder with a vehicle or whatever, but it was
• 16:42
  almost like pointless to even make that a part of it because but obviously people
• 16:48
  want us to focus on things like race. Now when it comes to this
• 16:51
  specific thing, I guess my only question is, like, how do we
• 16:53
  quantify a religion? Because people will say the Church of Satan is a religion,
• 16:59
  but I don't think it is. I think it's just people trolling Christians
• 17:02
  like it it's you. It doesn't exist in a vacuum, right like Satanism
• 17:07
  does not exist separate from Christianity. It is the it is a part of
• 17:14
  it. But of course Satanists would tell you, and I've known some that
• 17:18
  they're not really practicing any religion. They're just anti theists essentially, and anti
• 17:25
  theism. Like if we're I would say that a lot of things could be
• 17:29
  considered religions because they we we as human beings, have a religious like I
• 17:33
  think mind, like the way that we organize things like you could you just
• 17:37
  look at like the Summer of Love, see all of the religious ways that
• 17:41
  George Floyd was portrayed by people who would claim not to be, you know,
• 17:47
  to either be agnostic or not religious at all. So it's obviously we
• 17:49
  do have a a have a behavior towards that. You know that this kind
• 17:55
  of like idle worship or some kind of worship, But I don't. I
• 18:00
  don't know that you could classify Satanism as a religion based just because they have
• 18:06
  their symbols and whatever, because if they're just trolling, like the Cthulhu people,
• 18:11
  then you know, I don't know that that counts. Now, I'm
• 18:14
  not justifying anything. I think that he destroyed someone's property and there should be
• 18:18
  penalties. But I think that if we're talking about it in the framework of
• 18:22
  freedom of religion, I'm not sure that that's the correct you know, like
• 18:26
  the correct thing to criticize because I don't know that it's a religion. I
• 18:30
  know this sounds nitpicky. And plus we can see how selective it is because
• 18:34
  if you recall not that long ago, we didn't cover it because it wasn't
• 18:38
  entirely relevant, but it kind of is now because you can compare it.
• 18:41
  There was a guy who was getting as blasted on the Congress floor and it
• 18:45
  was shot, it was like filmed and put on the internet, and nothing
• 18:48
  happened to him. So you know, like I mean, is that also
• 18:52
  free expression? Like? And what happened with all of the churches that were
• 18:57
  burned, you know, in America because of like Roe v. Wade,
• 19:02
  or in Canada because of the supposed you know, bodies under the under the
• 19:06
  under the churches. So I weren't actually there, by the way, Yeah,
• 19:11
  that weren't actually there, right, That's why I suppose it, like
• 19:14
  it was never proven. So then the the I guess what, I'm the
• 19:18
  the only I can't fault them for denalizing the guy for destroying property. But
• 19:23
  I don't think it should be constituted as a hate crime, because I don't
• 19:27
  think anything should be constanted as a hate crime, regardless of motive, because
• 19:33
  that is a dangerous precedent to set. And you know, was it stupid.
• 19:37
  I don't know that he was trying to like do something, because I
• 19:41
  saw an interview with the guy. He just said that, you know,
• 19:44
  he thinks that this is just a step too far, and he is a
• 19:47
  he is a Christian, and he doesn't believe that Satanism should be normalized,
• 19:52
  and that was his reasoning. I'm not saying I agree with it or disagree
• 19:53
  with it, but I understand I understand it. No, oh, I
• 19:59
  forgot, I'm not sharing that rights have, So anyway, that's just what
• 20:03
  I think about that. I mean, I don't I don't think it's gonna
• 20:07
  I think that ultimately it's going to create more sympathy for the Satanists, and
• 20:12
  that's probably what they want. I mean, if you think about it,
• 20:15
  like it's it's like what it's the same tactics that it seems they're only enforcing
• 20:21
  these hate crime laws against one particular religion group of people. Yeah, they're
• 20:25
  only doing it to Christians. Christianity. Surely that is itself a hate crime
• 20:27
  and sort of yeah, and and and one could argue that if they're only
• 20:32
  doing this against Christianity, is that is that Satanism itself? Like I don't
• 20:37
  know, Like when I say real Satanism has never been tried. My point
• 20:44
  is, like you said, a lot of them will tell you that they're
• 20:48
  they're not worshiping actual Satan and they do have a religious belief and it is
• 20:55
  about uh, you know, old gods and so on. And as a
• 21:00
  uh former practicing pagan, I wasn't a Satanist. I was Wiccan, which
• 21:04
  is probably dumber but not in in some ways not but I mean I interacted
• 21:15
  with Satanists at pagan spirit gatherings and stuff, and a lot of it was
• 21:22
  basically about rebelling against the concept of religion while still having some degree of spirituality.
• 21:30
  Religion of concept, the concept of religion being the idea of morality as
• 21:37
  opposed to ethics and everything. And they even sort of had like where Wicca
• 21:44
  and some of the other varieties of pagan witchcraft had a a rule where you
• 21:53
  know, as long as you're not hurting somebody, you do what what you
• 21:57
  want to and it's we didn't have a concept of sin, like Christianity has
• 22:03
  a concept of sin, but right and wrong were concepts, and it's wrong
• 22:08
  if what you're doing causes harm. Where Satanism their rule was do what you
• 22:18
  will shall be the whole of the law, which to me indicates that if
• 22:25
  you really had to think about it, it's offensive to Satanism to punish this
• 22:33
  guy for destroying the statue because who was actually hurt by it? At most,
• 22:38
  you know, you could say, well, you know, you should
• 22:41
  have to pay to replace the statue. Yeah, but they didn't. But
• 22:44
  there I think they are the ones that press charges. So they were hoping
• 22:48
  someone would do something so they could use the system to punish them under the
• 22:52
  precedent of this hate crime law, and that proves that their beliefs are fake,
• 23:00
  like they don't they don't actually believe what they claim to believe. Because
• 23:06
  if they did that, that bit about do what thou will shall be the
• 23:11
  whole of the law. It doesn't matter, you know what the consequences are.
• 23:17
  He was doing what he wanted. So, you know, actually having
• 23:22
  something in a courthouse where laws other than do what thou wilt shall be the
• 23:26
  whole of the law, it seems a little bit anti satanic if you ask
• 23:33
  me, because they're they're associating their belief system the deity being a symbol of
• 23:38
  the belief system, as opposed to a lot of religions where the belief system
• 23:44
  is stems from the deity. It seems like that would be offensive to them
• 23:49
  to have to have a symbol of their religion in a location where the thing,
• 23:57
  the one thing that is of violation of their beliefs is done the enforcement
• 24:04
  of law. That is not just do what you will, but either here
• 24:14
  nor there. I guess the main thing is the whole hate crime thing is
• 24:18
  bullshit. The whole as the concept of hate crime is bullshit. And I
• 24:27
  will say, notice that the person who felt like he had to protect the
• 24:32
  community against this offense was a man. Yeah. The clause that I love,
• 24:41
  I love Satanists is do what that will. But no one, no,
• 24:45
  no, no, that's not satanic. That is not satanic? Is
• 24:48
  neo satanic? Is it? No? It is not has absolutely nothing to
• 24:53
  do with Satanismanism doesn't have that. Wika it Wicca has it. Other pagan
• 25:02
  face have it, but Satanism does not. You are allowed to hurt people
• 25:07
  if you are a Satanist, all right. The point is this guy,
• 25:11
  uh, in any case, didn't anyone? The only damage she did was
• 25:15
  to property. And if if disrespecting property rights is a hate crime, then
• 25:23
  you guys have a hell of a lot of communists to arrest. Fake good
• 25:29
  that's true. I got, I got, I gotta read these super chows.
• 25:32
  But let us know what you guys think about this. In the comments,
• 25:34
  Richard Bierre gives us five bucks and says, but who is producing these
• 25:37
  consumer goods that women happily spend their money on that they will dispose of in
• 25:42
  six months? Is that an old one? Because I don't have to be
• 25:47
  an old one, but it might be. Then I got another one from
• 25:49
  him, but it disappeared, but it says he gave us five bucks and
• 25:52
  says all the supermarket is on the DEI de I E cult bandwagon, as
• 25:59
  their old overtly advertising their employment opportunities to be excluding white men. Isn't that
• 26:03
  a dress up doll program for women's picture? I mean, Aldi is a
• 26:07
  nice store if you're really poor. So I guess I don't know, but
• 26:11
  that is it racist of them to reflect their customers? Is that what they
• 26:15
  think they're doing? I haven't no idea, so I like all they're they're
• 26:19
  probably owned by some big corporate entity that's enforcing that on them or ye or
• 26:26
  they accept uh, they accept MasterCard and Visa, and we know that we
• 26:32
  at least know for sure that MasterCard is doing it. They're they're enforcing DEI
• 26:37
  on companies by altering how they do business with companies depending on whether they use
• 26:45
  it or not in their decision making process. Yep, And Meredith G gives
• 26:52
  us when I'm sorry, Richard already read Richard Bierre, Is this the one?
• 27:00
  No? No? Meredith G gives us five bucks and says HPR News
• 27:04
  four four one honey for the badger's hate crime. We're always a backdoor to
• 27:08
  taking away our rights. And if my recollection is correct, that the victim
• 27:12
  of the crime that ushered in these laws was involved in criminal activities, so
• 27:18
  the whole thing was predicated on a lie. All right, thank you,
• 27:22
  Meredith. So the victim of the crime, oh yeah, and so yeah,
• 27:30
  the whole thing is predicated on a lie. That's right. Richard Bierre
• 27:33
  gives us five bucks. Now I'm catching up, as Hannah. Those perpetrators
• 27:37
  are all executed, but the various activities activists, I'm sorry, we're complaining
• 27:42
  that they weren't charged with a hate crime, as even execution and absence of
• 27:47
  being charging an victim of a hate crime on top was somehow insufficient for the
• 27:51
  crime. There is the notion that no religious symbols should be allowed on government
• 27:56
  property. I mean, I'd be okay with that as a lawn like yeah
• 28:00
  there, I mean, unless you live in a theocracy or something. You
• 28:03
  know, there's a lot of courthouse that have the Ten Commandments and things like
• 28:07
  that that people have objected to the Ten Commandments being up. Yeah, and
• 28:14
  I don't know there's people that argue that are that our laws are based on
• 28:19
  the Ten Commandments, but we don't. Actually, I think they don't.
• 28:25
  They haven't read them if they believe that. Like, there's a few of
• 28:27
  the commandments that that we have laws that are the same, and then there
• 28:34
  are some that you like, there's no law against envy, for instance,
• 28:40
  and there's no law against being disrespectful toward your parents, so failing to honor
• 28:47
  your parents. And the first Yeah, the first Amendment is I guess violates
• 28:52
  the first four commandments, which were all you have to follow this God or
• 28:56
  else in the first Amendment is now you don't. Yeah, yeah, it
• 29:02
  doesn't have to be in in the courtrooms for people who follow those commandments.
• 29:10
  Well, I guess to honor them and such. Yeah, Well, I
• 29:12
  think public buildings that I think I can get behind the idea that if you
• 29:18
  display religious imagery in a public building, like a government building, it's like
• 29:22
  taking a stance, and maybe it's better that you don't or just leave it
• 29:27
  up to the states. I mean, I don't know, but that way,
• 29:32
  you know, you don't have to worry about Satanists or or trolls making
• 29:36
  up religion so they can just put it in the space to piss everybody off
• 29:41
  because I think that I would just look to see I would just look to
• 29:44
  see a consistent enforcement of one law in particular that is the same as one
• 29:51
  of the one of the commandments, and it's the one that everybody gets wrong.
• 29:55
  Like everybody thinks that there's a commandment that says that you can't lie.
• 29:59
  That's thou shalt not false witness against thy neighbor. In other words, thou
• 30:04
  shalt not lie about another person. Yeah, so when someone says how are
• 30:11
  you feeling, and you say fine, and actually you're a hairshy of suicidal,
• 30:18
  that's a lie. But you're not going to hell for that, right.
• 30:22
  But if you say, uh, the guy down the street raped me
• 30:29
  in the middle of the night last night and it never happened, that's a
• 30:36
  that's burying false witness against your neighbor. Mm. That that you're going to
• 30:40
  hell for, all right, that's the that's the difference. And unfortunately,
• 30:47
  now if you say that guy stole all of my rare coin collection, and
• 30:52
  they can prove that it's not true, the court will come down on you
• 30:56
  for perjury and filing false complay with the police and anything else that you've done.
• 31:02
  That's a violation of the law in order to punish you and discourage you
• 31:07
  from doing that again. But if you're a woman and you say that guy
• 31:12
  raped you, and and they proved that it's it's false that you knew that
• 31:18
  that didn't happen when you said it, nothing happens to you, that that
• 31:26
  needs to change. I would I would like to see that consistently enforced.
• 31:30
  Richard Bierre gives us five bucks superchow and says, and if prohibition of any
• 31:34
  and all religious displays on public property were to be properly enforced, then it
• 31:40
  would include the prohibition of radical gender ideology and other pseudo religious displays with all
• 31:45
  the flavors of critical theory, whether it be about race or gender ideology.
• 31:48
  Well, that's what that's the current battle is like over you know, critical
• 31:52
  theory being essentially treated as a religion. And there's a lot of strong evidence,
• 31:57
  a lot of strong eviden that supports that. So that would be great.
• 32:04
  I'm all for that. I'm here for it. Thank you. Richard
• 32:07
  the Great Indoors gives us ten dollars super chow and says this just in Satan
• 32:10
  has pledged to reduce CO two emissions of the Nine Circles of Hell by roasting
• 32:15
  souls on an electric stove from now on. Not to be outdone by this
• 32:20
  blatant pr stunt from down under, Heaven has also chipped in and promised to
• 32:23
  install one hundred new windmills in the clouds. Yes, and I got a
• 32:30
  super chat from Albatross for five bucks, and he says, my super child
• 32:35
  form Yesterday show writers, slash, activist, slash, et cetera, go
• 32:38
  surprise Pikachu face when the men they told to f off actually fed off.
• 32:44
  So frustrating. Yes, and I think that's it. I feel like there
• 32:49
  was more, but yes, no, we got all of you. All
• 32:52
  right. Well, thank you guys for the super chows and chats, and
• 32:57
  if you send any rumble rants, I'm certainly got my eyes out for those.
• 33:00
  We're going to move on to the next story. So this one comes
• 33:07
  from campus reform. Florida International University in Miami has eliminated its division of Diversity,
• 33:14
  Equity and Inclusion in response to a state mandate, the Florida Statement.
• 33:19
  The Florida Department of Education voted to ban public funds from being used for programs
• 33:23
  that quote categorize individuals based on race or sex for the purpose of differential or
• 33:30
  preferential treatment end quote. The decision ensures that taxpayer funds can no longer be
• 33:35
  used to promote DEI or diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEE as I
• 33:40
  like to call it. On Florida's twenty eight state college campuses move ALIGNCE with
• 33:45
  a broader initiative to refocus higher education on academic integrity and a factual account of
• 33:51
  the nation's past rather than ideological creation. Yeah, so they're just going to
• 33:57
  rename it. You'll know that, right, Just like the people pushing for
• 34:00
  ESG are already discussing how to talk about ESG without calling it ESG, the
• 34:07
  people pushing for DEI are just gonna give it a different initialism and claim it's
• 34:13
  a different thing. It's a perpetual cycle of word fuckery. It's the y
• 34:20
  Isherian euphemism treadmill, and we're not even at the beginning of that cycle,
• 34:23
  not by a long chalk. Diversity is a euphemism for racism, Equity is
• 34:30
  a euphemism for wealth redistribution, but inclusion it's a euphemism for exclusion. The
• 34:37
  whole thing is a euphemism for socialism, which is itself a use a euphemism
• 34:40
  for communism, which is itself a euphemism for likecophobia. And yes, that
• 34:45
  is the end of the line. They can't turn that into euphemism. That's
• 34:50
  why they just expunged it from everyone's vocabulary successfully, I might add, because
• 34:57
  the very existence of such a con remains a mystery to most people. Yes,
• 35:02
  I find myself repeating myself, but I have to because people still aren't
• 35:07
  getting it. In this press release, like you said, there's this statement
• 35:12
  the aim is to provide students with an accurate and factual account of the nation's
• 35:15
  past, rather than exposing them to radical, woke ideologies. End quote.
• 35:22
  They're still using that euphimism in an official press release. It doesn't matter if
• 35:27
  you're calling it radical as long as you're still calling it woke, because they'll
• 35:31
  just go what is woke? Even me? And that is a valid question,
• 35:37
  just as valid as asking what does it mean to be perceived as a
• 35:42
  hate crime? And to if I use credit, They do attempt to define
• 35:49
  what they seem to mean by woke elsewhere in the text, As you also
• 35:52
  said, quote, programs that categorize individuals based on race or sex, for
• 35:58
  the purpose of differential or preferential treatment. But that's exactly what these assholes think
• 36:04
  they're fighting against, because they think everything by default is white supremacy and misogyny.
• 36:09
  Therefore, surely all they're doing is leveling the playing field. Do you
• 36:14
  think they can't get around that definition with another lexical conjuring trick individuals. We
• 36:21
  don't categorize individuals. We're concerned with the bigger picture, collective masses of oppressed
• 36:29
  bodies. It's perfectly fine to chant from the river to the sea in Sheilla,
• 36:35
  as long as you're not directing it at an individual. Is he And
• 36:38
  you can't even sack me for saying that. You're going to have to find
• 36:42
  some plagiarism, and they'll find some other dodgy initialism that they all agree encapsulates
• 36:51
  this new definition and gets around whatever it needs to get around. They're very
• 36:55
  good at naming the problem orbeit in the form of the needlessly wordy leftist memes.
• 37:04
  Well, the antidote to garrulousness is laconicity. A small amount of words
• 37:13
  that get straight to the point is how you defeat an excessive amount of buggering
• 37:17
  about with postmodern jargon and the antidote to an entrenched one way system is to
• 37:24
  open up a second lane in your vocabulary. You need to outline both extremes
• 37:32
  of whatever is deemed unacceptable discourse. Just say we will not tolerate misogyny or
• 37:42
  missentry, We will not tolerate xenophobia or likecophobia. End of message, Send
• 37:49
  tweet, because the only response they'll have to that is misery and likeophobia.
• 37:54
  It don't even exist. We haven't even heard of that second one. And
• 37:58
  that's when you are those motherfuckers because they have just definitively exhibited missigery and likecophobia.
• 38:06
  If you can't even acknowledge that a form of bigotry even exists, then
• 38:10
  you are that kind of bigot. Now, some of you might say misogyny
• 38:17
  doesn't exist, and we could sit here splitting hairs about the applicable context,
• 38:21
  but it's kind of a moot point anyway, because I'm guessing none of you
• 38:23
  particularly want a job in a university, so university it's it's not all it's
• 38:32
  cracked up to be. But just just saying I'm one of those people that
• 38:38
  I don't I don't think misogyny actually exists, or at least I'll say,
• 38:45
  real misogyny has never been tried either. But as far as the law is
• 38:51
  concerned, you know, it's it's good that they're saying public funds cannot be
• 38:55
  used for this. I have the same skepticism you do, Mike. I
• 39:01
  don't know. They'll find ways to try to get around this, and or
• 39:06
  they'll just ignore it. They'll say they're complying. So unless unless the federal
• 39:14
  government or the state government in whichever it's the state law, unless the state
• 39:19
  comes in and inspects and double checks to make sure that they're not actually doing
• 39:24
  the thing that this law forbids, it's going to continue. And it's why
• 39:31
  I will say, you know, you can't solve problems like this with government
• 39:37
  solutions. The only government solution would be to take the government out of it
• 39:43
  all together by saying that state funds don't get used for public education beyond the
• 39:51
  secondary level. And then then of course they'll attack secondary schools all right,
• 39:58
  state funds don't get used for those either, Right, that would solve the
• 40:04
  problem. Get it out of the government, get the government out of the
• 40:07
  schools, and problem go ahead. Then individual parents will have to pay attention
• 40:16
  to what's going on. In their schools before the schools start transitioning their children
• 40:24
  or teaching them that their their race, their ethnic background, whatever makes them
• 40:31
  bad people because they're the wrong one, or otherwise imposing all of this diversity,
• 40:39
  inclusion and equity bullshit on them, because the parents would actually be as
• 40:46
  involved in the school system as they were fifty years ago, when it was
• 40:53
  pretty normal to see one walk into the school for something, and parent teacher
• 41:00
  conferences like you'd see lines of parents showing up waiting to speak to the teacher,
• 41:07
  and PTA meetings you'd actually see parents and not just teachers at the PTA
• 41:14
  meetings, which today isn't really the case anymore. Yep. Yeah, I
• 41:21
  mean, basically the best you could hope for, honestly is that the government
• 41:27
  polse funding. I mean that there's not much else they can do, but
• 41:30
  that's like the best thing they can do, because this shit can't can't sustain
• 41:36
  itself on, like you know, in another way other than using taxpayer dollars,
• 41:42
  right way, as far as as far as them working around it,
• 41:45
  it will be the same as like, you know, the critical race theory
• 41:49
  thing where people are like, you know, they would be like you can't
• 41:52
  be teaching critical race theory in schools, and of course the teachers would be
• 41:54
  like ha ha, her her, we don't teach critical race theory in schools.
• 41:58
  Who told you that we do that? And what they're missing is and
• 42:00
  the you know, the the activists are right, they're not teaching it.
• 42:05
  Literally, it's just the method by which they teach anything else. So you
• 42:12
  can't teach critical race theory. It's not something you teach to children, just
• 42:16
  like gender theory or any of this other stuff. It is a lens through
• 42:22
  which you teach everything. So and this is the thing, like the problem
• 42:28
  is just like gamer Gate, the problem was not about the ethics. The
• 42:31
  problem was with the ideology. And if you don't do something about the ideology,
• 42:36
  if you don't start like picking the money out, and you have to
• 42:39
  be very vigilant and watchful over what they're teaching these kids and how they're running
• 42:45
  their their their colleges and their middle schools and their high schools and all of
• 42:49
  that, it's just going to keep happening because the problem is the ideology.
• 42:53
  But you can defund it, and I'm all for that. That's okay,
• 42:57
  that's a start, but it's certainly not the The problem is there are too
• 43:00
  many people within the system that are too corrupted by the system. What was
• 43:07
  that defund everything? Yeah, defund everything, like like VvE Ak said,
• 43:13
  take a chainsaw and get rid of the Department of Education. Yes, but
• 43:16
  not just don't stop there. You got to do something about because there's all
• 43:21
  these for profit universities that have people that work there that learned of all of
• 43:25
  their critical theory shit in the Department of Education. And by the way,
• 43:29
  that is wokeness. Wokeness is simply critical consciousness. You can you got to
• 43:34
  go and delve into that a little bit to get an expansive version, but
• 43:37
  essentially it is the way you see the world in terms of these inverted hierarchies
• 43:44
  that are imagined, because there are inversions of hierarchies that you that don't actually
• 43:49
  exist, that you think exist. And you're using a critical theory oriented like
• 43:53
  rhetoric to essentially convince yourself and everyone else that these hierarchies exist and have to
• 44:00
  be subverted by you. And and and of course it's all about like the
• 44:06
  revolution, you know, so that it's critical consciousness, that's all. But
• 44:10
  the critical consciousness is not something that you can write into a curriculum or into
• 44:16
  you know, like a book that someone teaches. It's the way that the
• 44:21
  teachers teach. It's how they teach their students. It's how they organize their
• 44:25
  their their organizations and institutions. It's who they hire. You know. They
• 44:30
  have this thing called focastic entryism right where they say we're gonna hire based on
• 44:37
  DEI, and they make DEI the focus, and then they hire people,
• 44:40
  and those people know that they're only getting that job because of DEI, and
• 44:44
  so they start to believe that DEI is the only way they could get a
• 44:46
  work, to get work, you know, in this particular field. So
• 44:51
  they are also woke because they're they're like more likely to be woke because they
• 44:54
  think that's necessary for them to like, you know, have a job,
• 44:59
  and because they're all involved in this and they're all on this, on this
• 45:02
  woke shit, they also believe that the only way they can keep a job
• 45:07
  is if they continue to be woke and double down on wokeness and look for
• 45:10
  look for like isms and phobias everywhere and always find it because that's what they're
• 45:15
  supposed to do. That's what critical consciousness does. Like if you miss the
• 45:19
  bus, you know, when you're going to class and it makes you five
• 45:22
  minutes late. That's because of systemic oppression, because that's what you're You're programmed
• 45:29
  to find it in everything, no matter how incidental. If it rains,
• 45:31
  it's patriarchy that this is why feminists make ridiculous arguments. They legitimately believe them
• 45:37
  most of the time, you know, and it's because that they're conditioned to
• 45:42
  think of the world in this way and they have no agency, which is
• 45:45
  narcissism because they think it's all about them all the time. So I'm glad
• 45:51
  that they're they're defunding them, but this is not gonna stop anything. You
• 45:55
  definitely have to, you know, like I guess to the degree that government
• 45:59
  can do any thing, that's basically it. All they can do is take
• 46:01
  away the funding. So I guess there's that, But it's got to happen
• 46:06
  at the bottom level. It's gotta happen on the micro level though. That's
• 46:09
  the only way that's gonna change. But it's you know, I'm happy for
• 46:12
  this to happen. That's all my thoughts on that. I got a big
• 46:20
  super chow a couple of them. I think let me go up, let's
• 46:24
  see. Okay, Richard Beierre look on that put up there. Okay.
• 46:30
  Richard Vierre gives us five dollars and says, I wonder if the Blindfolded Lady
• 46:35
  Justice statue would be considered a religious symbol. I don't know. It's kind
• 46:38
  of you know, the United States architecture is based in Roman stuff, but
• 46:45
  I don't I don't think that anyone actually gives tithes and plus I don't think
• 46:51
  that we actually acknowledge justice in this in this country as much as we used
• 46:55
  either. It's not supposed to be a deity figure or a a figure of
• 47:04
  religious significance. It's supposed to symbolize the fact that justice is blind to everything
• 47:13
  but the evidence and the logic, as opposed to who has money, who's
• 47:21
  considered, you know, moving and shaper in society versus is poor, and
• 47:27
  who is a nobody in society? Like That's that's all it's about. And
• 47:32
  it doesn't really have anything to do with anything that would be considered religious.
• 47:37
  Yeah, he's on paper. Richard gives us five. It's a reminder of
• 47:43
  how the court system is supposed to operate. Yeah, it's it's supposed to
• 47:45
  be about how it's spoken. Richard Bier gives us five dollars, thank you,
• 47:51
  and says, if the woman, oh Hannah, if the woman lies
• 47:53
  about grape to cover up infidelity, wouldn't she be guilty of breaking two commandment?
• 47:59
  Yes? And then I got another one from Winter because it's five dollars
• 48:05
  and says, yeah, I know of someone who joined and promoted Satanism just
• 48:08
  control the Christians even though they didn't truly believe. Well, yeah, if
• 48:15
  you really believed he really believed in Satan, that he existed or he exists,
• 48:22
  why would you follow him because you'd have to believe in God. And
• 48:27
  if you believe in God, you believe in God's wrath. So it just
• 48:30
  it. I think it's just to be, you know, like it's just
• 48:35
  to be contrarian or opposition to Christianity. I mean, it's like nobody's gonna
• 48:40
  make like, you know, the the opposite of Muhammad because they wouldn't take
• 48:46
  that shit whatever. I mean, I guess that's still Satan, but you
• 48:50
  know you can't do that shit in in an Islamic country, all right.
• 48:54
  Richard Vierre gives this five bucks and says a thing about PTA meetings is that
• 48:59
  they gradually went into the direction where some parents were either not permitted to attend
• 49:04
  or discouraged from attending, and then the parents who would attend would be the
• 49:07
  ones who went along with the school slash activists teachers agendas, basically having only
• 49:13
  the mean girls click at the meetings as parents who wanted their agendas advance no
• 49:17
  matter how the rest of the school acted well. Community started. Yeah,
• 49:25
  when communities started tolerating concerned parents being hauled out of parent teacher meetings for being
• 49:37
  conferences, not conferences, but the the the big parent teacher meetings, the
• 49:42
  community parent teacher meetings, for asking questions that were inconvenient to the the administrators
• 49:51
  like that. That should have stopped immediately. That should have resulted in the
• 49:57
  recall of those administrators. When that happened started happening, and when people started
• 50:02
  putting up with that, that was the beginning of the end of the public
• 50:07
  education system. Yep, all right, thank you guys for the superchows.
• 50:15
  We're gonna move on to the next story. Let us gust think about this.
• 50:19
  A man. Oh Gilda Yazzy, a former vice president of the National
• 50:27
  Organization for Women Now, a feminist organ a powerful one in case has been
• 50:31
  granted permission to take her racial discrimination case against the feminist group trial. Yazzy
• 50:37
  alleges that she was harassed, barred from the office, and removed from her
• 50:42
  position as vice president because of racism on the part of the former now president,
• 50:47
  Tony Van Pelt. Patriarch oh Now denied any racist motivations, claiming Yazzy's
• 50:54
  termination resulted from mismanagement of company money and an inability to fill job duties.
• 51:00
  A federal judge has refused to dismiss the case, allowing it to proceed to
• 51:04
  trial, as he hopes that her case will hold Now accountable and affect positive
• 51:08
  change in the organization. Wow, what kind of what kind of racism are
• 51:15
  we talking about? I haven't been furnished with an indication of this woman's sphinotype.
• 51:22
  Oh well, i'll tell you in a second. I'll look it up.
• 51:25
  Really, she's not white, it is, if that's what you're wondering.
• 51:32
  But let's see. Oh, I tried to look her up before,
• 51:37
  and she's like I tried to look her up before. Yeah, she's looks
• 51:44
  Indian or something. I'll share a picture. How about that? Yeah?
• 51:50
  I did, I did look her up, and it was hard to determine
• 51:55
  like what ethnic background she has, what race she is from just looking at
• 52:01
  her picture, but that that doesn't necessarily mean that she's not of a non
• 52:09
  white race, like a race that's considered non white. Anyway, she looks
• 52:15
  like brown Hannah. Anyone else saying that, Yeah, it's like overcooked Hannah.
• 52:23
  That guy on Twitter, that's what it looks like when I get a
• 52:27
  really dark tan. Yeah. I would bet though, with her her jewelry
• 52:34
  and everything, that she's maybe got a Native American heritage American, but it's
• 52:39
  it's also possible that she's more like, uh, toward the European or Western
• 52:50
  Asian, which if you get a DNA test and you have Native American heritage,
• 52:57
  it doesn't come out always and say Native America. And they've created this
• 53:01
  category of Western Asian for some reason to to uh So that would still be
• 53:08
  the same kind of genetic heritage. But it's still it's interesting to see this
• 53:16
  happen and she was bullied for her brownness and Elizabeth Warren something that happens in
• 53:29
  communities where there's actually a prevalent Native American population. There there are some benefits
• 53:37
  that you get if you are somebody that maybe grew up on a reservation,
• 53:43
  like it wouldn't be something that I'm very slightly more Native American than Focahontas,
• 53:49
  not enough to be like, hey, I'm an Indian, you know,
• 53:52
  uh, but you know, whatever, whatever you want to say in terms
• 53:58
  of, you know, the the type of terminology you'd use for that,
• 54:04
  it wouldn't apply to me. Not not in terms of any kind of I
• 54:08
  don't have any history of being discriminated against for it or anything like that.
• 54:15
  But if I wanted to say somebody did, it would be just as hard
• 54:21
  for them to debunk that as it would if I had grown up on a
• 54:27
  reservation or anything. Right, And I've run into people who have been in
• 54:34
  areas in New York or areas in like the northeastern part of the United States
• 54:38
  where there's a lot more tribal representation from the Six Nations, and they're because
• 54:47
  of a little bit of conflict between maybe business owners and people who they're not
• 54:57
  allowed to discriminate against their people who You can find this out in Canada too.
• 55:02
  There there are some things that are not taxed if you're Native American or
• 55:07
  or indigent. So people get mad about it, and there are racial slurs
• 55:15
  that I won't introduce because we're on YouTube and they would probably shut our channel
• 55:20
  down for that that are specific, uh to to people who get those tax
• 55:25
  breaks that you only hear from people who have to do extra work because of
• 55:31
  those tax breaks or any other kind of benefit like that. And uh yeah,
• 55:37
  tribal representation has diminished greatly in New York. A lot of people have
• 55:40
  gone out west because of sort of the it's not so much conflict as like
• 55:49
  a hostile environment with with people, and as a result of that, there
• 55:55
  there is some discrimination that goes on. It's very possible that her case is
• 56:00
  fully legitimate. It's also possible that it is absolute bullshit. Well, I
• 56:07
  mean they're saying misused funds and there's the very thing I've noticed. Yeah,
• 56:15
  I mean I don't really you know what, it doesn't matter to me.
• 56:17
  This is this is again, this is just feminist fighting feminists, Like this
• 56:22
  is what always happens, you know, like this kind of this kind of
• 56:25
  ideology and these state funded GMOs they invite corruption and then corruption happens, and
• 56:31
  then they all fight each other over the scraps. And that's kind of what
• 56:36
  I think is happening here. I think that there's a pretty good chance this
• 56:38
  woman misappropriated funds or engage in some kind of scam, and then another woman
• 56:44
  found out or like whatever. And then and now, because the current president
• 56:49
  is a dude, she's like, Oh, I'm gonna suit the pants off
• 56:51
  of this guy. He's a man. He doesn't stand a chance. And
• 56:53
  so I don't know. I just I don't even care. I think they're
• 56:58
  all corrupt. I said, live by this ord, die by this word.
• 57:01
  When you base how you treat other people on who is white, who
• 57:07
  is not white? And and you know, or who is black, who
• 57:12
  is not black? Who is who is a woman? Who is not a
• 57:16
  woman, if there is such a thing anymore as being not a woman,
• 57:21
  because you can't say that either, right, but anything like that, If
• 57:27
  you base your your whole outlook and your whole treatment of other people on again
• 57:32
  those characteristics that we once would have deemed immutable, you make yourself vulnerable to
• 57:38
  having that used against you, especially if you also advocate believing allegations against people,
• 57:47
  whether they are founded or not. And so now she's made an allegation,
• 57:54
  they have to believe her. M M. I'm amused by this,
• 58:04
  honestly, Yeah, I think it's amusing too. But at the same time,
• 58:07
  I like this. This is an example of what happens when you run
• 58:13
  your organization on these I guess you can call him principles, these pillars,
• 58:19
  yeah, these ideological pillars. Yeah, belief systems, yep, gonn to
• 58:24
  get anyway, let us you guys think about this one in the comments.
• 58:28
  I got a super chow from Richard Bierre. Again. He gives us five
• 58:30
  bucks and says, but punctuality and performance standards are at work. Are who
• 58:37
  white supremacy and racism they are, which is why she might win. Actually,
• 58:44
  I mean the president or the president's a man. He is a woman
• 58:47
  of color. That's basically like getting you know, like free of a kind.
• 58:52
  I think as far as poker hands go, and he's just got nothing.
• 58:57
  So we'll see what happens. But let us know what you guys think
• 59:00
  about this in the comments. And now we're going to get to the last
• 59:02
  story, which is kind of a doozy so yeah, oh yeah, we
• 59:07
  have half hours, so I think this will all right. Uh. Thank
• 59:12
  shout out to Mike Jayford help doing the write up with it. So a
• 59:16
  family flees the United States back to their homeland of India after a teacher at
• 59:22
  their daughter's school goes too far with her gender identity obsession. This story centers
• 59:29
  around the family's daughter, Tia. Note that her name, as well as
• 59:34
  the names of others who have been changed or the names have been changed for
• 59:37
  anonymity reasons. While Tia this is not a real name and her family have
• 59:43
  declined to speak to any and all media, they have given permission to their
• 59:47
  friends and acquaintances tell their story. Tia, by all accounts, was a
• 59:52
  normal ten year old girl, that is until she encountered her new teacher,
• 59:58
  miss A. This new teacher was, by all available metrics, a good
• 1:00:01
  teacher and was whit district administrators called her exceptional. She was thought highly of
• 1:00:08
  by the parents whose children had taught, and she was even seen as a
• 1:00:14
  leader amongst other teachers, some of which he even helped train. But missus
• 1:00:21
  A was not without her quirks. A fellow teacher whom she worked with noted
• 1:00:27
  a weird habit. She'd constantly be pulling a few girls to the side to
• 1:00:31
  talk. It was almost always girls of diverse ethnicities. She'd put her arms
• 1:00:37
  around them a lot. It got to the point where one of the girls
• 1:00:40
  started dressing like her and acting like her. It was extremely odd. End
• 1:00:45
  quote. Missus A was also an avowed advocate of gender ideology and a staunch
• 1:00:52
  supporter of the LGBAT community. She praised her school district for their policy which
• 1:00:58
  did not allow parents to pull their children out of Pride Month related curricula,
• 1:01:04
  a practice she worked to implement where she currently taught. She along with the
• 1:01:08
  principle of the school, led a staff meeting in twenty twenty two discussing the
• 1:01:14
  school's new LGBTQ secrecy policy. One teacher she worked with said the following about
• 1:01:20
  the meeting. Quote, she and the principal had put together a slide show
• 1:01:24
  saying you have to do this. They imply that if we didn't comply,
• 1:01:30
  we would lose our jobs or be arrested. It got my attention. Missus
• 1:01:35
  A went over the data management system to show how we could hide information from
• 1:01:38
  parents about name and gender. One teacher spoke up in the meeting, but
• 1:01:44
  was shot down and shamed for even asking a question. I had not heard
• 1:01:50
  of any of this before. End quote. This is around the time that
• 1:01:52
  Tia enters the story. Rachel Hammill's daughter, one of TIA's classmates, noted
• 1:01:59
  that it was around this time that Tia had caught missus A's eye. Missus
• 1:02:04
  A kind of started to spend much more time with her. She would be
• 1:02:07
  sitting next to her when she was teaching, she would be near her at
• 1:02:12
  recess. They had a lot of private conversations. No one can be sure
• 1:02:16
  of when the subject of gender transition came up during their discussions, but two
• 1:02:21
  of her classmates and a local mother recall a time when Tia, who was
• 1:02:24
  wearing a traditional style Indian dress, complained to missus A that it itched.
• 1:02:30
  Missus A positive to Tia that maybe she did not like the traditional female dress
• 1:02:35
  because she was not a girl and was actually a boy instead. Shortly afterwards,
• 1:02:39
  missus A, along with Tia, informed her class that Tia had changed
• 1:02:44
  her name as well as her pronouns. She would be going by the name
• 1:02:47
  Felix, and her pronouns were now he him, They them, and most
• 1:02:52
  importantly, no one outside of school was to know about this change. The
• 1:02:57
  change was shared with the rest of the school. Email from missus A read
• 1:03:01
  that Tia quote has opened up to me there past I'm sorry quote has opened
• 1:03:07
  up to me these past few months and has just requested this change. This
• 1:03:12
  change is his right and is not to be questioned. End quote. The
• 1:03:16
  email also indicated that the school was not to change her name on their electronic
• 1:03:21
  roster in order to keep her parents unaware. Rachel Hammill stated, quote,
• 1:03:25
  the girls would never be allowed to say her real name in front of missus
• 1:03:30
  A because missus A would correct them. Because of this, Hamill's daughter stopped
• 1:03:36
  hanging out with Tia outside of school and on the playground. She didn't know
• 1:03:39
  how to act and quote. In one class field trip, Ta's mother volunteered
• 1:03:45
  to chaperone, TIA's class was instructed by missus A to refer to Tia by
• 1:03:51
  her original name for the day, but when one of the students slipped up
• 1:03:54
  and referred to Tia as Felix, DIA's mother grew very concerned. Mother of
• 1:04:00
  the daughter who made the mistake recalls the situation quote, her mom was confused
• 1:04:04
  and asked her to call Tia by her normal name. It was very confusing
• 1:04:09
  for my daughter. She was wondering why the girl was lying to her mom
• 1:04:13
  and quote. Another incident occurred at another mother's house with Tia. The mother's
• 1:04:17
  daughter and a mutual friend were working in a group assignment. The mother explains
• 1:04:21
  what happened, quote a little bit later, maybe in May, My daughter
• 1:04:25
  and a friend were both at the house working on a group project that Tia
• 1:04:29
  was also involved in. They were explaining each of their parts, and when
• 1:04:32
  they got to the point of TIA's part, my daughter suddenly didn't know how
• 1:04:36
  to discuss her. She started doing this thing where she'd be looking up and
• 1:04:41
  would try to keep things straight, saying, e she I mean, we
• 1:04:45
  were outside of school, so it's she. But she got to the point
• 1:04:50
  where she was hyperventilating, and I was watching this and got I felt like
• 1:04:55
  holy cow. I stopped her and told her just to be kind and respectful,
• 1:05:00
  and I gave her permission not to participate in them. No, mom,
• 1:05:04
  we have to, or else we'll get in trouble. Davis's daughter reported
• 1:05:08
  or retorted as her friend nodded, you have to say it the right way.
• 1:05:12
  They both had tears in their eyes at this point, and my daughter's
• 1:05:15
  friends said, quote, and we're not supposed to tell our parents. Quote.
• 1:05:20
  As many of the parents in the district had started hearing that supposedly a
• 1:05:25
  student had transitioned genders. TIA's parents were still unaware. All they noticed was
• 1:05:30
  how miserable and reserved their daughter had become. Another mother recalls TIA's change in
• 1:05:36
  mood. Quote, she wasn't eating well, her sleep was affected. She
• 1:05:41
  saw a dark cloud over her daughter, and her daughter wanted to talk only
• 1:05:44
  to missus A, even at night and on weekends. Quote. This is
• 1:05:48
  around the time Tia finally broke bring a phone call between TIA's mother and another
• 1:05:54
  classmate's mother. Tia approached her mother and explained everything. The other mother recalls
• 1:05:59
  the conversation, stating the following quote. Her daughter had come to her and
• 1:06:02
  was crying and very upset. She was saying she wants to go to school,
• 1:06:08
  see her friends like normal, and doesn't want to be a boy anymore.
• 1:06:12
  But Tia was afraid that missus A would be mad at her and wouldn't
• 1:06:15
  like her anymore. Her mom was like, what are you talking about?
• 1:06:18
  End quote from there, TIA's mother decided to directly confront missus A. Once
• 1:06:25
  missus A understood what TIA's mother was there for, she immediately began to ignore
• 1:06:30
  her and focused on Ia. TIA's mother then approached both a school counselor and
• 1:06:34
  the school principle, but received mostly the same response. The principle, according
• 1:06:40
  to a local mother, informed her that quote missus A had done nothing wrong
• 1:06:44
  and was just following school policies. They treated her like she was crazy and
• 1:06:48
  had no grounds and quote. It was then decided by TIA's mother and father
• 1:06:54
  that both Tia and her younger brother would be pulled out of school and to
• 1:06:57
  be taken out of the state for the time being. A friend of the
• 1:07:00
  family recalls the situation quote, the family is very scared. They were struggling
• 1:07:04
  and had no idea what to do. The dad had just wanted to get
• 1:07:09
  away from everything and forget that it ever happened. There's a lot of shame
• 1:07:13
  and a lot of how could we let this happen to our child? And
• 1:07:16
  we don't and we didn't know. Quote. While the family took refuge out
• 1:07:20
  of state, the school did not stop contacting them. They received multiple emails
• 1:07:26
  from school staff asking where the children were. Missus A also attended to contact
• 1:07:30
  Tia, telling Tia she could live with her. Oh my god. Eventually
• 1:07:34
  Tia and her family moved back to India. One last revelation would come a
• 1:07:40
  year later in the summer of twenty twenty three, when a local activist and
• 1:07:45
  mother of a student in the same area received an anonymous parcel. The parcel,
• 1:07:48
  which was hand delivered to her mailbox, consisted of page at their page
• 1:07:54
  of printed emails. All of these emails were from the school's internal email system,
• 1:07:59
  and they all all had to do with Tia. Most of the emails
• 1:08:01
  were sent after the family fled to Oregon, with some being from the school
• 1:08:05
  administration, but the bulk of them were from missus A. Some of the
• 1:08:10
  highlights of these emails from missus A to Tia ours follows. Quote make sure
• 1:08:15
  this email is deleted too when we are done, because otherwise, when your
• 1:08:19
  mom looks, you'll be outed instantly. Another one reads I kept emailing you,
• 1:08:25
  but I was worried your mom interfered before you saw my messages. Another
• 1:08:29
  one read, I was all so serious, I would take you into my
• 1:08:32
  own home anytime you need. Another one read you need to get a personal
• 1:08:38
  email set up so we still have a way to communicate. And one more,
• 1:08:44
  I'm worried you're going to leave and I will never be able to be
• 1:08:46
  reached. That's the end of that story. There's not much to add.
• 1:08:53
  Really, this story very much speaks for itself, and cuteos to Mike for
• 1:08:59
  actually telling as much of the story that needs to be told. What I
• 1:09:04
  will add is, can you imagine if Tiar's parents as a result of their
• 1:09:13
  actions in response to this grooming? And I can't help but worry that even
• 1:09:20
  grooming is a euphemism of insufficient descriptive details its torture, mental and psychological torture,
• 1:09:30
  with the ultimate goal of physical torture, painful and irreversible physical torture.
• 1:09:38
  Does anyone doubt that missus A would not be satisfied until Tea was on a
• 1:09:44
  hospital bed and under a menacing array of syringes and scalpels. Well, can
• 1:09:51
  you imagine if Tea's parents were arrested and sent to prison for seven years because
• 1:10:00
  of their decision to attempt to save their daughter from this cruel and unusual torture?
• 1:10:08
  Well? Could that possibly happen? Well, that's exactly what can now
• 1:10:12
  happen in Scotland by law. Let that sink in if you even can.
• 1:10:17
  It's not just teachers, by the way, who have this absolute power.
• 1:10:23
  If your child is walking to school and some sweaty clown in a panel van
• 1:10:29
  pulls up and goes, hey, kids, you want a sex change,
• 1:10:31
  the same shit applies. If your children decide to join this cult of body
• 1:10:36
  horror for any reason, you cannot forbid them from doing so, or even
• 1:10:43
  advise them against doing so, or you'll go to prison for longer than a
• 1:10:48
  rapist, for infinitely longer than the clown in the panel van. They're not
• 1:10:55
  even breaking the law, not in Scotland. You are breaking the law for
• 1:11:00
  not letting the child torturers torture your child. Consider this a warning to the
• 1:11:10
  rest of the world. I personally find it particularly perturbing because I have three
• 1:11:16
  infant nephews currently residing in Scotlin, and I don't think anyone in my family
• 1:11:21
  even knows about this recent change to the low because God knows, they're not
• 1:11:26
  going to hear about it on the TV, and they wouldn't believe me if
• 1:11:29
  I told them until it's already far too late. So yeah, I can't
• 1:11:36
  even describe it in words. The best I can do as a sound.
• 1:11:42
  Yeah, A lot of people have tried to deny that what's going on in
• 1:11:50
  the schools is grooming. But a key element of grooming is talking the child
• 1:12:00
  into a mentality of the groomer and the child versus everybody in the child's life
• 1:12:09
  whose job is to protect the child, and in particular are parents. Like
• 1:12:17
  it's it's hard to sit and read or listen to being read a story like
• 1:12:25
  this because it has so many parallels to what a pedophile does, and I
• 1:12:32
  have memories of that. I'm not going to say I'm triggered. I don't
• 1:12:36
  really get triggered anymore, but holy fuck, guys, if you have been
• 1:12:43
  through this, you know what I'm talking about. Like this is this is
• 1:12:46
  almost exactly the same, except that email didn't exist when I was a kid.
• 1:12:57
  But that kind of you know, you've got to find a way to
• 1:13:01
  talk to me without your parents. You've got to find a way to hide
• 1:13:05
  this from your parents. You've got to find a way to protect our relationship
• 1:13:12
  from your parents, because they're the bad guys. That is grooming, That
• 1:13:16
  is predatory, That is not fighting for somebody's right, that is not fighting
• 1:13:27
  for the student, that is not protecting trans kids, that is imposing a
• 1:13:36
  mental health condition. Gender dysphoria is a mental health condition. It is distress.
• 1:13:43
  It is a type of body dysmorphic disorder. Right, it is not
• 1:13:53
  just a characteristic It's not a fun thing for people to go through. And
• 1:13:59
  to impose something like that on a child so that you could use the child
• 1:14:02
  for an agenda is I would say, actually more predatory than just overt molestation,
• 1:14:15
  Like this is molestation plus and it should be prosecuted as such. These
• 1:14:24
  parents are really lucky that they could take their child and leave the country.
• 1:14:28
  Right. There's another story that is in my opinion, even more disturbing because
• 1:14:40
  the state is actually acting against the parents. Montana has had their child protected
• 1:14:50
  Services has removed a child from the family's home because the parents were not supporting
• 1:15:00
  transitioning. Right. This is not a seventeen year old that you know,
• 1:15:08
  may or may not understand what they're doing. This is an elementary school kid.
• 1:15:15
  Yeah, Canada has a law. There's a law in the books on
• 1:15:19
  helping. They can take your kids from you respect their pronouns. The Montana
• 1:15:26
  one is a fourteen year old, so she's like eighth grade. Right,
• 1:15:30
  eighth grader a kid who is not old enough to drive a car. Not
• 1:15:38
  old enough to go on a date with a boy without a parental supervision.
• 1:15:44
  Right, Not old enough that if the parents left her home alone for more
• 1:15:48
  than an hour or two, the state wouldn't would consider that, okay,
• 1:15:54
  right, Not old enough to have a job without parental permission, Not old
• 1:16:00
  enough to go to an NC seventeen movie or an R movie, but old
• 1:16:08
  enough to decide she wants or tits cut off. Yep, that's that's the
• 1:16:16
  world we live in right now, and quite likely talked into it by someone
• 1:16:24
  who calls herself an educator. That's not education. It is conversion therapy.
• 1:16:34
  Absolutely. Like Mike said, it'schological torture. And I will also add that
• 1:16:41
  I think one of the things that people have to pay attention to is that
• 1:16:47
  this is just the one that we know about. And one of the things
• 1:16:51
  that I see a lot when i'm when I see a lot of people talking
• 1:16:54
  about, like you know, grooming children, it's almost always they're worried about
• 1:16:59
  men doing it. There are there's plenty of women that do it. Like
• 1:17:02
  if you if it happens in the schools, what percentage of teachers are women.
• 1:17:06
  I'm just saying that that they have to be a part of this,
• 1:17:10
  and you're just got to face some dark realities that you know, there's a
• 1:17:14
  dark side to women, and this is how it can be expressed. This
• 1:17:17
  is their way of being compliant with you know, something that is politically correct
• 1:17:25
  but not correct, and and it's something when I say conversion therapy, I
• 1:17:30
  don't know, a lot of people may not understand this, but in the
• 1:17:34
  LGBTQ community, right, the whole alphabet soup community, the phrase conversion therapy,
• 1:17:42
  the term conversion therapy actually has a connotation that is similar to like torture
• 1:17:48
  camps, because that's essentially it is gaslighting. It's taking people who have a
• 1:17:57
  natural tendency to be different in some way or another from from the norm,
• 1:18:03
  from sexual norms, or to have gender dysphoria, and and gaslighting them.
• 1:18:14
  And and then of course it also over time involved more brutal methods, physical
• 1:18:20
  torture and including you know, in some cases rape. It was it was
• 1:18:27
  pretty horrible, and it was actually standard, right, it was something that
• 1:18:31
  was done as as we're trying to help these people. So you know,
• 1:18:36
  uh, no bad, no bad methods, only only bad motivations. So
• 1:18:43
  as long as we have a good motivation for this. Our methods are okay,
• 1:18:47
  and that's basically what's being done here. Except instead of toward homosexuality or
• 1:18:56
  instead of toward being straight, it's away from being straight. Instead of to
• 1:19:00
  word identifying as the sex of your birth, it's a way from identifying as
• 1:19:04
  the sex of your birth. And again it's no bad, no bad methods,
• 1:19:12
  only only bad intentions. Except if you're bad methods bad targets. Yeah,
• 1:19:20
  if you are LGBT and lgbt Q, if you're in the alphabet soup
• 1:19:26
  mafia and you accept this kind of behavior, you're not You're not real in
• 1:19:33
  terms of your beliefs. You're as the person that you're pretending to be,
• 1:19:40
  the community that your pretending to be part of, you are every bit as
• 1:19:45
  bad as a people who did it to young gay and lesbian men and women,
• 1:19:51
  boys and girls, people with gender dysphoria, people who had different ideas
• 1:19:59
  about what they enjoyed in terms of like fetishes and things like that that were
• 1:20:05
  harmless. That people that tortured them for who they were are no different from
• 1:20:13
  you. For those that don't accept it, you know, we actually have
• 1:20:20
  to be noisy, stand up, say this isn't us. This isn't who
• 1:20:26
  we are, this isn't what we accept, and this doesn't represent us.
• 1:20:30
  And you can't you know whether whether gamer Gate goes on forever or not not.
• 1:20:38
  Your shield has to go on forever because shit like this being done to
• 1:20:45
  children like these kids are going to be suicidal when they get older. They're
• 1:20:51
  going to be messed up for the rest of their lives, even if they're
• 1:20:57
  not conned scammed into transitioning, even if they're not scammed or conned into sexual
• 1:21:06
  liaisons that they don't really feel and don't really like that aren't really something they
• 1:21:13
  would consent to if fully informed and just able to make their own decisions without
• 1:21:17
  adult interference. Even if they don't go through those experiences, just the act
• 1:21:24
  of being gaslighted, just the experience of being gaslighted in this way is enough
• 1:21:30
  to fuck up your head to the degree that you will be suicidal for years
• 1:21:35
  afterward, and it can make you vulnerable to other types of victimization these kids.
• 1:21:45
  Even if ninety percent of the kids that are subject to this kind of
• 1:21:49
  bullshit don't change who they think they are for any period of time, they're
• 1:21:58
  still going to be easier to target. Most of them will have their boundaries,
• 1:22:08
  their personal boundaries, their understanding of not other people's boundaries, but they're
• 1:22:12
  understanding of their own personal boundaries where they can say no to things and enforce
• 1:22:20
  it if somebody refuses to listen when they say no. Most of these kids
• 1:22:27
  are going to have difficulty with that for the rest of their lives, and
• 1:22:30
  they're going to get walked on in various ways. They may be victimized by
• 1:22:33
  scammers, they may be victimized by other sexual predators that are going to come
• 1:22:39
  along, because this is a type of sexually predatory behavior, and a small
• 1:22:45
  few of them will go in the other direction and they will become predators because
• 1:22:51
  of this. The teachers that are doing this to our students are creating future
• 1:23:00
  victims, current victims, and future predators. Yep. And you should all
• 1:23:08
  be scared. And this is terrifying to me, not just for the kids,
• 1:23:15
  but for what's going to happen in the future when their particular dysfunction that
• 1:23:21
  has come from this is we're not you know, we see this happening to
• 1:23:26
  one or two kids that make the news, But those one or two kids
• 1:23:31
  that make the news, each of those has like thirty classmates, and they
• 1:23:41
  have a school that they were attending that has you know, six other grades,
• 1:23:47
  five or six other grades, depending on whether it's got a kindergarten,
• 1:23:50
  whether they're their sixth grade is part of their junior high, you know,
• 1:23:55
  and that school system has a policy that is affecting the kids in those classes.
• 1:24:01
  And if it's in an urban area, there may be if it's an
• 1:24:05
  elementary school, there could be several other elementary schools in that same urban area
• 1:24:12
  with the same policy and teachers doing that to students in those schools as well.
• 1:24:18
  And if it's not just a school board policy in that municipality but a
• 1:24:25
  policy in the state, then you're talking about statewide. You're talking all the
• 1:24:30
  kids in an entire state during their elementary school years being subjected to this gaslighting.
• 1:24:40
  And those are the kids that are going to be eligible for military service
• 1:24:46
  in about eight to twelve years that you know, maybe a little less.
• 1:24:56
  Those are the kids that are going to be waiting on you at fast food
• 1:25:00
  places that you go to. Those are the kids that are going to be
• 1:25:04
  getting their first jobs as as state tested nurses, AIDS and nursing homes,
• 1:25:14
  taking care of your parents, you know, or your grandparents, if you're
• 1:25:18
  really young, going to be teachers. Yep. Those are the kids going
• 1:25:23
  to the public education system. And those are the kids that are going to
• 1:25:28
  become the next generation of cops, right, the next generation of bureaucrats and
• 1:25:33
  government, the next generation to run for city council in your communities. This
• 1:25:43
  is they're the ones that you're going to be depending on to keep the electricity
• 1:25:49
  going, to make sure that there is is you know, still a sanitation
• 1:25:55
  system in your community. All of that is being affected by this gas lighting.
• 1:26:05
  So it's not just these kids are victims. This whole society is going
• 1:26:14
  to be relying on these kids twenty years from now, maybe less fifteen years
• 1:26:20
  from now some of them, and they're going to be fucked in the head
• 1:26:30
  and you're going to be too old to do anything about it. Yep.
• 1:26:38
  To sort of wire this back into the first story, there's some discussion around
• 1:26:44
  this subject as to whether this shit counts as a religion. By some accounts,
• 1:26:49
  it does count because it involves supernatural superstition. You can change physical reality
• 1:27:00
  just by verbally insisting that reality is what you say it is. If saying
• 1:27:08
  an incantation over a wafer makes it physically change into the body of Christ.
• 1:27:12
  That if that's a kooky element of religion, then it pales in comparison to
• 1:27:17
  this, where you literally can say a bunch of incantations over a female body
• 1:27:24
  and it becomes a male body, or a male body and it becomes a
• 1:27:26
  female body. But I think it's completely barking up the wrong tree to even
• 1:27:33
  split hairs as to what is and is not a religion or what is and
• 1:27:35
  is not a cult. None of that is important. It's like, I
• 1:27:41
  don't care what your religion is. If it's a neo religion or an ancient
• 1:27:45
  religion. If you're torturing children, then I don't care what else you call
• 1:27:49
  it. Just don't torture children. I mean, is it really that complicated?
• 1:28:00
  Gotta appreciate that I got some super chat hoows hows or I got a
• 1:28:04
  super chat first. Richard Viergez is five bucks and says, but did it
• 1:28:11
  miss it? Uh? Well, there is there is one up here.
• 1:28:15
  What is the action looking like that? If you showed missus a videos of
• 1:28:21
  people walking away from the camera, that she could pick out every single one
• 1:28:26
  who had been previously victimized, way like was done with other predators who were
• 1:28:31
  asked they would target based on watching them walking away from the predators. Somehow
• 1:28:36
  managed to choose each and every single person who had been victimized previously. Well,
• 1:28:44
  I don't think this girl has been, but her parents were certainly maybe
• 1:28:47
  not involved enough where they were too trusting. And I think because the father
• 1:28:53
  clearly has regrets. I think he's very very shamed and guilt. But fortunately,
• 1:29:00
  well we don't know actually like how much time. But they can find
• 1:29:05
  predators like this, can figure out who's vulnerable. That's that's what they figure
• 1:29:10
  out. And a lot of times, Yeah, that vulnerability stems from having
• 1:29:16
  been victimized as a child, and it does. It does make it harder
• 1:29:23
  for you to judge and resist the next time, because you make excuses to
• 1:29:28
  yourself for why you were victimized or why it wasn't that bad or so on.
• 1:29:32
  And the grooming process also makes it hard for you to recognize. But
• 1:29:41
  it doesn't necessarily mean I mean some everybody that gets victimized, even multiple times,
• 1:29:47
  has the first time. Yeah, and like she's working with elementary school
• 1:29:54
  kids. Yeah, rich bergis five bucks again and says there's a child in
• 1:30:01
  Montana being removed from parents' custody as if as they aren't affirming the child.
• 1:30:06
  There was an officer to place the child with a relative. In Wyoming,
• 1:30:10
  where there is a lower bar for access, the child might be going to
• 1:30:14
  the birth mother. In Canada, can't this be categorized as religious in doctrination?
• 1:30:18
  Does anyone remember when colts sell flowers at airports? Well, Harry Krishnas
• 1:30:24
  are as a different animal. But yes, well that, yes, that's
• 1:30:27
  what we're saying that that's where the fight. The fight is is basically to
• 1:30:30
  see it, recognize as a religion so that we can like give it the
• 1:30:33
  same limitation. When you do that, you make a rod for your own
• 1:30:36
  back if you are of any religious persuasion, because well, this is just
• 1:30:42
  a religion. And then they'll go, well, you have a religion,
• 1:30:44
  you're a Christian, So so if you're allowed your thing, why aren't we
• 1:30:46
  allowed our things? And the answer is because you're torturing children. Yes,
• 1:30:51
  there is there are some There were some religious people who use their religion as
• 1:30:55
  an excuse to talk to children. I don't give a fuck, just don't
• 1:30:58
  talk to children. Well, the one good thing about colinat to religion is
• 1:31:01
  that the state will not be allowed to enforce it anymore. Right, if
• 1:31:05
  it's a religion, then the state is not allowed to make people comply with
• 1:31:12
  it. The state is religious. Minus. I got another super child from
• 1:31:19
  Richard Beer for five bucks and he says civilization was nice. World at it?
• 1:31:24
  Uh. And then I got a super chat from Derek Workman for five
• 1:31:28
  dollars and he says trans by proxy let people know yes. And I want
• 1:31:32
  to say, like, in case you guys don't think I was going there,
• 1:31:35
  it is mostly women pushing this stuff. I am making that point.
• 1:31:39
  I'm saying that most people when they talk about the grooming, the focus on
• 1:31:43
  the men, like the Jeffrey Marsha. If a male teacher did this,
• 1:31:48
  it's especially a male teacher who doesn't have that fucking gay voice. I mean,
• 1:31:54
  if if such a man would even be allowed to be a teacher,
• 1:31:58
  because it's yeah, that's the point. If a straight presenting man or even
• 1:32:04
  a k presenting man tried to become a teacher, he would get accused of
• 1:32:09
  Peter Phillia with his first fucking week. And that's why men don't go into
• 1:32:13
  teaching anymore, because because it's it's an extremely missandric industry. At this point,
• 1:32:21
  men have to walk on eggshales every single day if they if they want
• 1:32:26
  to be a teacher. And it's been that way for a long time.
• 1:32:30
  Actually, it was that way. My dad's been retired for a long time,
• 1:32:34
  like he was. He was retired for uh, he retired before nineteen
• 1:32:41
  ninety nine. He was retired when my son was born. So yeah,
• 1:32:47
  he was retired for a long time before he passed away. And he had
• 1:32:54
  been noticing it for quite some time when he was a teacher that there there
• 1:33:00
  hit a point in the early eighties where if there was a student in his
• 1:33:06
  room with him, he did not have his door closed at all, Like
• 1:33:12
  he that was his decision because then he would be able to demonstrate, you
• 1:33:17
  know that that he wasn't alone with a student. And eventually he got to
• 1:33:24
  the point where if he was alone in his room, he still had the
• 1:33:27
  door open because anybody could say they were in there, like that's just that's
• 1:33:34
  that's just during during the eighties and nineties, and it got worse from there.
• 1:33:44
  I don't know, it's uh, it's not going to get better either.
• 1:33:50
  You can't fix this by state interference. You can only fix this by
• 1:33:59
  parental interference. And in order to fix it by parental interference, you have
• 1:34:04
  to eliminate state interference. So it has to become something where the parents have
• 1:34:13
  the right to say no to what the school is doing, and parents have
• 1:34:18
  the right to pull their child from that school and go to another school.
• 1:34:24
  And if there is going to be state funding of schools, then it should
• 1:34:30
  follow this student. And if parents do not like what is going on at
• 1:34:34
  the school that they are sending their child to, then they should be able
• 1:34:39
  to take their child from that school and go to the school of their choice
• 1:34:45
  with this child and say we'd like to enroll here, and here's the information
• 1:34:50
  on how to get this child's state funding for this school instead of the school
• 1:34:55
  they were attending. And that should be that right away. The state should
• 1:35:03
  not have any say in it at all. Yeah, all right, Uh,
• 1:35:11
  well, with all that said, I guess we're gonna move on to
• 1:35:14
  the Patron show. End it there. I'll let us know what you guys
• 1:35:17
  think about this in the comments, and know that the last story is kind
• 1:35:19
  of heavy, but we should know this kind of stuff's going on, so
• 1:35:24
  you know, and share this video with people, let them know what's going
• 1:35:29
  on, really appreciate that. So we're gonna head into this patron show now
• 1:35:33
  and have a little bit of fun with this article. Some internet dorc is
• 1:35:36
  trying to reclose beautiful women because of dignity. It is pathetic written by k
• 1:35:44
  Smythe, which sounds like a made up name, but I guess it's filling.
• 1:35:50
  It's for people who are too poshta call themselves smith. Yeah yeah,
• 1:35:55
  smithe. So anyway, if you want to join us, you have to
• 1:35:59
  become a patron. Go to feedbadgeer dot com and set up a monthly subscription.
• 1:36:02
  Five bucks a month will get you into the discord, where you'll be
• 1:36:05
  able to watch all of the additional content in the same way you are now,
• 1:36:09
  and if you give it higher levels, you can even be a part
• 1:36:11
  of the discussion itself. So thanks guys for coming on the show. If
• 1:36:15
  you like this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribe,
• 1:36:19
  hit the BELF Notifications lead as a comment. Let us know what you
• 1:36:21
  guys think about what we discussed on the show today, and please please please
• 1:36:25
  share this video because sharing is care. Thank you so much for coming on
• 1:36:29
  today's episode of HPR News and we will talk to you all in the next
• 1:36:32
  one. Take care everybody,