Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Weinstein gets another win, Single moms on notice | HBR News 553

Transcript

Weinstein gets another win, Single moms on notice | HBR News 553 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five fifty three. Weinstein gets
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: another win single moms on notice when we discuss the
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: news of the week and give it the Badger treatment.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. I
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: hope you guys are doing well this week and that
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: you are laughing at all of this absurdity, so that
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: you are not consumed by Why do I have a
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: hard time with those words together?
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: Ah, this is me laughing.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: At all of the absurdity.
• 0:34
  Speaker 2: I am not consumed by it.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: I am your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always,
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen and doctor Randa mcam.
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: We are not furries. Do not imply that I'm going
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: to just open up with that because I know people
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: like to jump. Have you guys ever heard of cartoons?
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Cartoons are not furries. We like animals.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: We think that cool and we draw them.
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: Yes, it's okay. It doesn't mean that we identif fie
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: with them. But anyway, we have a great show lined
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: up for you guys this week, so please be sure
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: to continue the conversations both in the live chat right
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: now as well as the comments section after the video
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: is complete. On today's HBr News, we're gonna be talking
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: about the latest developments regarding the Harvey Weinstein cases, at
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: least at least one of them. The Late Show is
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: closing its doors, and more so, stick around. It's gonna
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: be a good time and be sure to join us
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: afterwards for the Patron only show. So you guys might
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: have heard a little something coming out like pretty soon.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure, like I think it's very soon, and
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: somebody saying, yeah, it's coming up. It's coming up pretty soon.
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Is Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey. And despite Nolan being essentially
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: like the current one of the very few, like really
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: big Hollywood directors, he's made some interesting decisions with regards
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: to the Odyssey, and I thought we might like talk
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: about them in the Patron Show because I do believe
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: that Greek myths are kind of like, they're very popular
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: with men. It's a very masculine thing, in my opinion,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: and I think that there's like some serious subversion going on.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: But I thought we might look at this interview that
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: Nolan did with Time magazine where he explains.
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: The Odyssey is even more fundamental to Western culture than
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: the Bible. I know, that's a controversial thing to say,
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: but it's been around for like, like over a thousand
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: years longer.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's older than it's older than Jesus years. Give that.
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: So this is like, this is like doing a Jesus
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: biopic with Elliott Pages Jesus.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, And I you know, I want to spend
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: too much time on this, but I was a big
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: fan of the Iliad and the Odyssey. That was like,
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: I loved that stuff. I ate it up. So anyway,
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: we're gonna like, look at this interview that Christopher Nolan
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: did with Time Magazine where he essentially explains that he
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: knows how to do Homer's work better than Homer. And
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: so if you want to join us for that, please
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: consider becoming a patron my going to feed the Badger
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: dot com forward slash Subscribe. Five bucks a month will
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: get you into the Discord server, where you'll be able
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: to watch all the additional content and even join us
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: in the conversation yourself. If you are able to give
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: at higher levels, and if you don't want to wake
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: up one morning to find that we have been yeaded
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: from the Internet, then please go to badgerfeed dot com
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: or Honey Badger Radio dot com to find where all
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: of our content lives so that you don't miss out
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: on any of this delicious cringe. And I just saw
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: somebody in the live chat saying Rumble is once more broken.
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: I think it's working, so you should be able to
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: look at it. I just I you know Rumble has
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: been awful this week. Oh well, go to Rumble right now.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: Try refreshing, because I do see people are on Rumble
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: and it's running there. I don't see an issue with it,
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: so it might just be a little jankye. I know this.
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: Sometimes it freezes up randomly when I'm trying to watch
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: Rumble content, but I do try to stick to it.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: So anyway, thank you guys so much for coming and
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: joining us. You could literally be anywhere else and yet
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: yet you are here. So let us get into today's story.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: So first, I want to just jump into a little
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: bonus story that I didn't originally list but I got
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: to cover because it's delicious.
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: Oh he looks so sad. It looks like he's trying
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: to smile but he can't.
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: So the Late Show, which Stephen Colbert has been canceled
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: and will conclude with its final episode this Thursday, the
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: day after tomorrow on May twenty first, marking the end
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: of the thirty three year late show franchise on CBS
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: eleven eleven I'm Sorry on CBS eleven seasons after under
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: Colbert and twenty two under David Letterman World War eleven,
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah eleven. CBS announced the cancelation on July of twenty
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: twenty five, stating that it was a purely financial decision
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: due to declining ad revenue and rising production costs, despite
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: the show being the highest rated late night program for
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: nine consecutive seasons. That says a lot. However, the decision
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: has sparked controversy, with critics, including former host David Letterman,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: who called CBS executives lying weasels, and political observers suggesting
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: political pressure from the Trump administration. They're blaming Trump for
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: this for the show's being canceled. May have played a role,
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: especially after CBS settled a lawsuit filed by Trump and
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: shortly before approving the sky Dance Paramount merger. Now, before
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: you guys give me your thoughts on this, I just
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: want to say, this is how that the legacy media
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: has essentially shot itself in the foot or whatever ate
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: its own put its foot in its mouth. The show
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: was on for thirty three years and Colbert sank it
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: in like what five, five or six, because I mean,
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: I think it started like around COVID, you know, if
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: you think about it, because I mean, you guys remember
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: the vaccine thing, right, So, and obviously all of the
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: focus on the Orange man. I think that's what actually
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: killed not just his late show, but all of the
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: late shows. He's just the first one. I think he's
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: the first one I go. I don't know if the
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: other ones I haven't looked. I don't know what Seth
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: Meyers is doing. But anyway, so it's just it's amazing
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: how fast you can like tank yourself because you just
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: cannot cope with like the reality that that there are
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: people in the middle of America that vote and you
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: don't like the way that they vote. Because that's all
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: it comes down to.
• 7:00
  Speaker 3: You know, Remember though, that Jimmy Kimmel almost went and
• 7:08
  Speaker 3: there was there was some legal mumbo jumbo that kept
• 7:11
  Speaker 3: him on. Not popularity, it was it was all finiggling
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: with the legal status, threats of lawsuits and bullshit like
• 7:22
  Speaker 3: that over contracts and stuff, not not because he was
• 7:29
  Speaker 3: necessarily good enough to stay. So technically Kimmel beat him
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: to the punch in terms of failing hard and failing first.
• 7:40
  Speaker 3: But he was he was saved by the lawyers.
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. Yeah. But anyway, any anytime any of
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: these shows failed, they're going to try and blame it
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: on you know, Trump, Republicans, whatever. But it was just
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: because they suck. I mean, that's it. So anyway, that's
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: the story. I just thought it was something I wanted
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: to share. Anybody else gout.
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: If this cancelation comes down to rising production costs, as
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: we're told it is, I'm like, how, it's exactly the
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: same format as it has always been. It's not like
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: they're doing it in a stadium now or on a
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: cruise ship off the coast of Miami or whatever. It's
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: just a studio and some chairs and a desk, and
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: behind that desk sits a bloviating clown who's dead inside.
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: If the production costs are rising, I can only assume
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: it's due to the salary of the bloviating clown who's
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: dead inside.
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: How much do.
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: You make per episode, Stephen? How much did you make
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: and how much of the of the show's budget is
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: your salary. It's significant, isn't it. The answer to both
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: questions is significant, just like the biggest chunk of a
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: Hollywood movie's budget is the actors, especially you know, the
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: big names, because they are not replaceable, not replaceable unless
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: you've got AI AM all right. I love AI. I
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: don't use it myself. I don't much care for it,
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: but I love what it's going to do to Hollywood,
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: namely nuke it to death. If this AI revolution can
• 9:32
  Speaker 2: nuke Hollywood to death and meanwhile make the perfect animated
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: version of Calvin and Hobbes, all else will be forgiven
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: whatever else happens. But yeah, you could have saved the
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: Late Show, Stephen. If you did it for free, you
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: could have saved it. If you did it for a
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: reduced salary, you could have saved it, like maybe one
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: million per episode instead of ten million, whatever it is.
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: That's all it would take. So at least go out
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: with dignity, Stephen. Please don't go out yelling Trump did this?
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: Trump did this? No, he didn't.
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: You did by demanding to be paid a king's fortune
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: for the job of reading pre written propaganda from a teleprompter.
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: It's monkey work, Stephen. I could do it with my knob.
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: Shut this this is you could have taken a pay
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: cut and then and then passed the torch to someone
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: else who would work for a low salary. That's all
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: they would have taken. And this isn't like the CEO
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: argument CEO is making too much money. Well in a
• 10:49
  Speaker 2: way it is. But CEOs are responsible for creating value,
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: not labor value, the value of the product. And if
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: the product loses value, the CEO takes the blame. At
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: that point they should take a significant pay cut, and
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: indeed they have to in that circumstance, or or they
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: should or I have to stand down to someone who
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: will take a pay cut. And if they don't want to, well,
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: their company tanks and their product ceases to be. And
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: that's what has happened here. You were taking hundreds of
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: millions of dollars to be a bleating retard, Stephen. The
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: public has only so much patience for a bleating retard.
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: So enjoy the thirty pieces of silver and the legacy
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: of the millions dead and crippled from the VACS scene.
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: Enjoy explaining that to Saint Peter you did what, Yeah,
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: that happened. Oh, to be a fly on the wall
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: of the Pearly gate when that happens. We'll just have
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: to use our imaginations. Good advice in general, I hit
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: by retreat back into my imagination where amazing things are happening.
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: All right, Hannah, go ahead.
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: So what these guys do, not just Colbert but also
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: Kimmel and all the other dipshits that are creating uh
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: presumed comedy because it never really was comedy with an
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: intent to shovel political message down people's throats. Their days
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: are pretty much numbered because I think the reason this
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: is happening isn't because of rising costs. It's never been.
• 12:56
  Speaker 3: Profit's never been the reason that these guys and people
• 13:00
  Speaker 3: like them get employed. It's not too uh to get
• 13:05
  Speaker 3: advertising dollars. It's not to sell merchandise, it's not to
• 13:11
  Speaker 3: sell seats in in uh their audience. It is essentially
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: to make something look popular that isn't popular, and that
• 13:25
  Speaker 3: is basically being a woke dipshit. And of course forever
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: there has been this idea that if you make something
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: look popular on television, people will do it, and if
• 13:39
  Speaker 3: you make it look unpopular on television, people won't do
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: it like as long as there's been television, and before
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: that it was radio, and before that it was the stage,
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: you know, and before that it was whatever else you
• 13:55
  Speaker 3: could use to entertain people. It's oh, there's always been
• 14:00
  Speaker 3: this mentality. If you make something look popular, you can
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: make it become popular, And for some reason, there are
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: always people ready to adopt that belief and maintain it
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: and put energy into it, and in the modern era,
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: funding until they realize that, as it has always been,
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: that is bullshit. It's always been bullshit, it will always
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: be bullshit. But a new generation of people who make
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: money doing stupid things has to learn that, at least
• 14:39
  Speaker 3: at least once or twice a century, no, you can't
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: make you can't make people like something by pretending in
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: front of them that it is popular. They will still
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: notice that, you know what, it actually sucks, and so
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: they'll have to try to figure out some other way
• 15:02
  Speaker 3: to sell woke ideology because this isn't gonna work. So
• 15:07
  Speaker 3: all the all the guys, all the gals that are
• 15:11
  Speaker 3: trying to use look at me, I'm woke, and I'm
• 15:14
  Speaker 3: rich and famous, and everybody loves me as as their
• 15:18
  Speaker 3: stick are gonna slowly become unemployed over the next few years.
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: That's that's what I'm seeing happen. They're they're not they're
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: not getting the job done. Clearly, people are going in
• 15:32
  Speaker 3: exactly the opposite direction. They're all being made fun of.
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: They're being laughed at more than they're being laughed at.
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: So I hope that they all fall one right after another.
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: Like toy soldiers. I don't have any sympathy for this.
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: It's all fake and uh and my opinion it might
• 16:01
  Speaker 3: as well be. I mean, it's propaganda, right, it might
• 16:06
  Speaker 3: as well be war propaganda and the war is on you.
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: So yeah, I'm I'm happy to see this.
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: Well, you know, I was just gonna say, to add
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: to this, it's interesting that they're running out of money,
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: and I was wondering how much if they were getting
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: any money from the government, and that's why they're running out.
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: I wonder if they it was discovered that they were
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: getting like three Letter Agency money, US AIDS money, maybe
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: some of their yeah, because I mean they were effectively
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: a propaganda arm like unofficially, it's not like you know,
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: the BBC or the CBC or the ABC in.
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: Here's the other thing. You can't. You can't necessarily always
• 16:59
  Speaker 3: trace whether USAID's money is being given to a group
• 17:03
  Speaker 3: or not, because what happens is one group gets it
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: and then they pay it to other groups for other
• 17:13
  Speaker 3: things and so on, and the next thing you know,
• 17:16
  Speaker 3: there are like twelve degrees of separation between the original
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: recipient and where the money ultimately lands. That's what money wondering,
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: and that's what USAIDS was for. Yes so, and the
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: spl may never find out.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: And the SPLC and the SBLC could also have been paying.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: You know, somebody in the chat mentioned that. Miao Foresina
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: said funny, Funnily enough, as soon as the SPLC thing
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: came out, they were all doing some segment on cash Bettel.
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: It is interesting, isn't it. They all want to attack him,
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: and they're all like, obviously they they're not competitors. They're
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: not competitors. For the time slot they all hang out.
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: They did. They start remember when COVID was going on,
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: they were doing like Colbert Myers Kimmel, all of them
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: what's his name, the guy nobody cares about, I already
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: forget his name, fallon. They were all doing like a
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: thing together at the same time, they were all like
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: talking to each other and they acted like it was
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: like this big you know, Avengers Assemble moment or something.
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: But then all it did was reveal, Oh, these people
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: all they all go to the same parties, they all
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: they're all on the same page. They probably all have
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: the same writers. So yeah, they're probably getting money from,
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: you know, the same sources. So that's what I mean.
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: It's like, you know, it's obvious. And then I also
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: reminded of something else, like very recently about I think
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: it was last week on my channel. I have a
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: live show I do every Saturday where I talk about
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: cultural stuff, and I did a whole it was basically
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: the entire show was devoted to like this, the Anita
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: Sarkisian timeline because she had like re emerged in gamer
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: gate recently because she was attached to some popular game
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: and they were accrediting Anita Sarkisian in the credits for
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: the game, and everyone was talking about it and a
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: lot of people were like who is this? So I
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: was like, well, you all need a history less it
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: could have been a musical number for like two hours.
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: Well no, that's the right answer, literally who Yeah.
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: But I went through the whole thing and explained it.
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: And if you guys remember when Colbert was doing the
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: was it he to do with the Daily Show for
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: a while, or maybe it was when he was doing
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: the Colbert Report in twenty fifteen twenty sixteen, he had
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: Anita Sarkisian was a guest, and he went on there
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: and basically played his like straw man of like a
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: right wing guy, and you know, allowed her to basically
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: like trounce the straw man. And that was the whole segment.
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: She was on there for like five minutes, but they
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: flew her out. So you know, now that Anita Sarkisian
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: is like making waves in the gaming industry and Colbert's
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: out of a job, maybe he could ask her for
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: work and she.
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: Can make him, you know, just as a as a
• 19:58
  Speaker 2: softball attempt at ab bold question, Colbert, asta, can you
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: name some video games? And she himmed and heard.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah. She actually struggled with that grand theft also, oh yeah, yeah,
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: that's fine, Yeah, that'll do. Yeah, you've heard. Yeah, I know. Anyway,
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: so yeah, it's amazing how the table turns. All right,
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: So anyway, we're gonna move on to the next story again.
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: Send us a super chat or super chow if you want. Oh,
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: I got one from maryth g. Thank you send us
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: something through, so I'll read it out. I'll do it
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: between stories. Marrethg gives us five bucks and says, HPR
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: News number five five three, honey for the badgress, thank you, Meredith.
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: Is Colbert out of a job? Probably not. He's probably
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: just gonna be I think he's gonna be doing something else.
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: But no, he's He's definitely like he could. He could retire, honestly,
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: unless you know, his cost of living is much higher
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: than what he makes, and he's like spending all kinds
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: of money. So but anyway, my.
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: King wife doesn't divest him. That would be tragic.
• 21:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I know, right, that'd probably he had an exit plan.
• 21:13
  Speaker 3: I'll bet he had an exit plan.
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, he's got you know, he's probably friends with Pelosi.
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: You know, he knows about the stock trade. So anyway,
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: uh so yeah, let us uh, let us get into
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: the next story. All right, So we gotta talk a
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: little about Harvey Weinstein. So a New York judge recently
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: declared a mistrial just last Friday on the fifteenth, in
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: Harvey Weinstein's third Manhattan rape retrial after the jury became
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: hopelessly deadlocked. The panel had deliberated for about three days
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: and sent multiple notes to Judge Curtis Farber indicating they
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: could not reach a unanimous verdict on whether Weinstein raped
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: former aspiring actress Jessica Man in a Manhattan hotel in
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: twenty thirteen. After an initial instruction to keep trying, the
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: judge formally declared the mistrial when it became clear no
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: agreement was possible. This marks the second time a jury
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: has failed to reach a verdict on this specific charge
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: against Weinstein. Jurors reportedly built a split nine to three
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: in favor of not guilty, with three guilty votes coming
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: from men, So even the men just fell for it,
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: of course, citing issues like contradictions in the accuser's statements
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: and doubts about her credibility and memory, prosecutors must now
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: decide whether to pursue a fourth trial. Weinstein, already convicted
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: of sex crimes in New York and California and serving
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: a lengthy prison sentence, remains behind bars, while this particular
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: hashtag meet to era charge remains unresolved.
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: All right, I see two possibilities here, broadly, and they
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: both amount to basically theories. The first is he's guilty,
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: like completely obviously guilty as sin, but he keeps getting
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: away with it because the jury keeps getting nobbled in
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: some way. Uh yeah, yeah.
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: This is a theory. Yeah, but I don't.
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: Know something something the Jews. The second is he's completely innocent,
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: but something something the Jews have thrown him under the
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: bus to save their own skinned hides. They were like,
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: who a were going to pin this on? Who we're
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: going to burn at the stake for our collective widespread crimes.
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: How about the guy with the shriveled raisin dick that
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: doesn't work? Oh hell, yes, let's do that. But but
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: won't the jury be confused that a guy with a
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: shriveled raisin dick that doesn't work somehow rape someone. Yeah, no,
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: it'll be fine. Rape whatever we say it is. Remember,
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: if he's so much as accidentally rubbed his raisin dick
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: against anyone, whatever, that's rape. And I mean, come on,
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: it'll be so funny if we pin if we pin
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: a million rapes on a guy who can't even masturbate
• 24:18
  Speaker 2: without tweezers and a whole punch have Harvey's just been there, seething,
• 24:24
  Speaker 2: just angry all the time at his haunted corpse of
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: a dick, just dreaming about murdering everyone. And that's why
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: he keeps agreeing to produce Tarantino movies, because he was
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: such a fucking murderer. And now he's that the Jew
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: everyone thinks is raping everyone, when really it's us, you know,
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: the rest of us all the time. Come on, you
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: can't tell me that wouldn't be the funniest thing ever
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: if if we pulled that off, I don't. I don't
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: know which of these conspiracies is more likely, So I
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: guess truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Like Weinstein
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: did indeed do his best to rape as many people
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: as possible, but all he could ever do was tickle
• 25:11
  Speaker 2: them with his cracked, arid sultana dick. And that is that,
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: you know, That's that is technically sexual assault.
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: If you do that.
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: Oh, if he was able to penally make contact with
• 25:27
  Speaker 2: a clitterist, a clitorist twenty times the size of his
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: sick wasp of a jew dick, well I suppose, I
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: suppose that technically could be rape. But like I said,
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: that that'll be what's confusing the jury, and it's not
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: even beginning to get to the bottom of the matter
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: of the epidemic of big shot Hollywood Jews raping everyone alleged,
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: of course allegedly. And I'm not even naming names because
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: it would be quicker to name the names who are
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: not the names, so I will say no. I think
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: I'm just saying if Jews and Muslims could just like
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: stop raping everyone in general, yeah, that would be great.
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: Dogs around them become monted news on a budget right now?
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: All right?
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: So the the really fun part of this is is
• 26:21
  Speaker 3: thinking about how much money has been spent on this
• 26:23
  Speaker 3: case now, and then of course there's there's the two cases.
• 26:29
  Speaker 3: There are two areas where there have been cases against Weinstein,
• 26:33
  Speaker 3: and both of them have probably spent millions of dollars
• 26:38
  Speaker 3: at this point trying to prosecute this guy, and both
• 26:42
  Speaker 3: of them have had serious issues trying to prosecute this guy.
• 26:49
  Speaker 3: This doesn't vode very well for me too, hashtag me too,
• 26:53
  Speaker 3: all right, but I would I would hate to be
• 26:57
  Speaker 3: one of the people from Los Angeles County, California, or
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: one of the people from New York County, New York
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: where Manhattan is, or even even just from the states
• 27:13
  Speaker 3: because like both of these cases, both of these offices
• 27:19
  Speaker 3: that are that are prosecuting him are funded not just
• 27:22
  Speaker 3: by their local respective tax paying systems, they're also funded
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: by the state. And so if you live in California
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: or in New York, part of the reason your taxes
• 27:37
  Speaker 3: are so expensive is because they are trying to prosecute
• 27:44
  Speaker 3: rape cases on the basis of the popularity of the case,
• 27:50
  Speaker 3: not on its provability, not on how much evidence there is,
• 27:55
  Speaker 3: not on whether or not they think the guy is
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: actually guilty, which is actually a fundamental violation of due process.
• 28:04
  Speaker 3: Prosecuting you when they're not sure they can win and
• 28:09
  Speaker 3: they just want to fuck your life up, or they're
• 28:12
  Speaker 3: under political pressure, that actually violates your due process right.
• 28:19
  Speaker 3: Part of your right to do process is that you
• 28:23
  Speaker 3: should expect part of the process to be that they
• 28:27
  Speaker 3: vet the case before they bring it. It's kind of
• 28:31
  Speaker 3: like if you're going to start a fight in an
• 28:35
  Speaker 3: alley with some gang member, you don't pick the biggest,
• 28:40
  Speaker 3: strongest guy in the bunch before you bring it unless
• 28:45
  Speaker 3: you are bigger and stronger than he is, or enough
• 28:49
  Speaker 3: faster than he is that his size isn't going to matter,
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: and you have to be pretty damn fast for that.
• 28:55
  Speaker 3: Apparently these guys are not. But in the meantime, the
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: case they're going up against doesn't involve much in the
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: way of evidence and has all kinds of holes in it,
• 29:09
  Speaker 3: and not just the ones that were allegedly penetrated or not.
• 29:15
  Speaker 3: So your money is just being wasted. What a piece
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: of shit that you're dealing with the system that you're funding. Yeah,
• 29:26
  Speaker 3: you know, like I feel bad for any guy that
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: has to go through this. I don't have to like
• 29:33
  Speaker 3: a guy at all. In fact, I can downright borderline
• 29:37
  Speaker 3: hate someone and still feel bad that he would have
• 29:40
  Speaker 3: to go through something like this. But if you're paying
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: for it, if you're one of the people it's funding this,
• 29:49
  Speaker 3: you should be pissed as fuck. You should be writing
• 29:52
  Speaker 3: to your legislators. You should be writing to your your
• 29:55
  Speaker 3: county commissioners, your mayor, your council. You should writing to
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: everybody in executive positions and legislative positions in government from
• 30:08
  Speaker 3: the state down and bitching about this. Why is my
• 30:12
  Speaker 3: money being spent on this? They're obviously never going to
• 30:15
  Speaker 3: pin anything on this guy. Let him go go find
• 30:20
  Speaker 3: somebody else to prosecute, like maybe somebody you can prove
• 30:25
  Speaker 3: did something. If they can't win a case against him
• 30:31
  Speaker 3: in the two most woke ass liberal bullshit places in
• 30:37
  Speaker 3: all of the United States, they don't have a case.
• 30:43
  Speaker 3: They never had a case, and they're never gonna have
• 30:45
  Speaker 3: a case, and they might as well quit. And yet
• 30:51
  Speaker 3: as long as they can steal your money to keep
• 30:55
  Speaker 3: funding this, they will never stop. This man will die
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: before the case against him is over, and they might
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: even continue to try to litigate it afterward, because that's
• 31:09
  Speaker 3: what these guys do. They need to be They need
• 31:13
  Speaker 3: to be stopped by the public. They just don't have
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: any kind of sense at all, and they don't have
• 31:22
  Speaker 3: to because they have your wallet so they can spend
• 31:26
  Speaker 3: whatever the fuck they want.
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I was just gonna say, there's another reason why
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: I think that these high profile cases have to like
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: go through and basically they have to get a guilty
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: verdict because think about it, the narrative of rape culture
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: itself is at stake here. Yeah, the entire the validity
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: of the me Too movement and all the damage that
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: it's done, not just in Hollywood. Hell, most of the
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: damage that was done was to normal men, like the
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: lives of normal men that worked regular jobs in various industries,
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: and the Me Too movement was used as the cudgel
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: to remove men and force them out of workplaces and
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: then replace those positions with women because it just so
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: happened to coincide with various like women's movements that wanted
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: to change the demographics of a given company. So, like
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: you know, I've many times on this channel talked about
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: what happened in animation, but you can basically say this
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: is across the board everywhere, you know, every industry where
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: the me too movement was able to take root and
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: a lot of men lost their jobs, and a lot
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: of women took their jobs, and likely a lot of
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: women that weren't really qualified took those jobs because they
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: just needed women in there. Imagine the amount of damage
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: to that narrative, and not just that, but the entire
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: rape culture narrative itself. I'm reminded of, you know, the
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: Merry Cost study that gets used to basically determine that
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: there aren't enough convictions happening on college campuses, there aren't
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: enough convictions happening in the military, there are enough convictions,
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: or enough cases taken seriously in various other places where
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: that the logic of the Merry Cost Study has applied,
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: which is how they how they do it. They say, well,
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: the Merry Cost Study says this, Therefore this must be happening.
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: And if it and we're not getting the appropriate number
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: of convictions, or we're not finding enough men guilty, then
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: it's obviously because we're not doing it. We're not doing
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: it hard enough, we're not firing enough men, we're not
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: we're not kicking enough boys out of college and school,
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: whatever it is, right, if this case falls apart, which
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: it looks like it is in many ways, and I
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: would argue that it's probably worth looking at all the
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: even the stuff that he was found guilty on, to
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: see like if there's any holes in that, because I
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: bet there is. We have seen how the justice system
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: has failed to work for people and for for the accused,
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: specifically men, in the past, because of activist judges, because
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: of juries that have been biased, you know, against the
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: uh against the accused. I bet it's worth looking at
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: the even the cases that were you know that we've
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: gone through, just to see if that's if if the
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: stuff I talked about with the Merry Cost study and
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: the power of the Me Too movement, the necessity of this,
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: of this narrative to persist that we live in a
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: rape culture dominated by men that's you know, that use
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: rape to essentially oppress women. Then it's gonna probably give
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: you some skewed data in terms of how things shake out.
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: I but I don't want to speak to like the
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: stuff he's been accused that he's been found guilty of,
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: because you know, who knows. But in terms of like
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: these cases that are still ongoing and we're talking like
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: ten years later, and yeah, like if you weren't found
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: if if they couldn't believe women in like New York
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: or Los Angeles, if they couldn't find a way to
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: like clearly convict and the woman's story is inconsistent, the
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: fact that this is basically being thrown out. It took
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: too long, but it's obvious that there wasn't much of
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: a case there to begin with. And again, I never
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: said I liked Harvey Weinstein, but I watched this case
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: closely because this is extremely important to that greater narrative.
• 35:20
  Speaker 1: It's like the Bill Cosby one, you know, Bill, we
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: haven't heard about the Bill Cosby thing, because it seems
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: like he's basically beating that case. And so because he is,
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: it's not getting a lot of airtime, it's not being
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: talked about because again, it shatters the lies that we've
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: been hearing for like the past ten years. So for
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: my part, I think that I'm very interested in seeing
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: where this goes because I really don't think there's a
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: case against this guy. I don't. I think that naughty
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: stuff was happening in Hollywood, but I don't think any
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: of it was like you know, I don't think any
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: of it was non consensual or very little of it,
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: because again, and why would you need to do that
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: when you can just buy off these women and of
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: course women will take it like hose will be hose
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: no matter where. I'm sorry, but if you bang this dude,
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: if you touched his uh whatever it is, is octapousois
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: for to become a star. That's not rape, that's not
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: I don't even care. I don't like the power dynamic
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: thing personally. I don't think that that applies. I think
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: that you grow a spine and you say I'm not
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: doing that, and I don't care what you offer me.
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: I don't care what you know, what you have over me.
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: I don't care. I'm gonna go I'll work at a
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: fucking McDonald's and I'll have my dignity, you know. So
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: I don't buy that personally, but you know, I think that,
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: Uh that's all I'll say about that.
• 36:43
  Speaker 3: So this is something I think a lot of people
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: don't understand. There's there's a big difference between a power dynamic,
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: like in jail, between a prisoner and a guard that
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: can make their life living hell and they can't leave,
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: even go in place else to get away from it,
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: versus h you know, you're you're looking, well, you're looking
• 37:07
  Speaker 3: to become a part of a business, and this is
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: what it takes to join that business. That's the moment
• 37:17
  Speaker 3: where you learn that's a business you don't want to
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: be part of. Yeah, right, it isn't you know, not
• 37:22
  Speaker 3: not when you've got you know, a double mortgage and
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: you're up to your ears in debt and you're pretty
• 37:30
  Speaker 3: much stuck with that company because you can't leave. But
• 37:35
  Speaker 3: this was entry level uh you know, no pun intended, uh,
• 37:42
  Speaker 3: entry level application. And and the worst part of it
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: was every woman who benefited from it promoted that and
• 37:53
  Speaker 3: continued that they didn't do anything to put a stop
• 37:56
  Speaker 3: to it. They let the next woman and the next
• 37:59
  Speaker 3: have to go through that in order to compete with
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: them because of how many women it would eliminate. So,
• 38:07
  Speaker 3: while you've got this guy who may have been using
• 38:10
  Speaker 3: that method as as part of his interview process, you
• 38:15
  Speaker 3: also have a shit ton of women who have been
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: using the same method as part of their process of
• 38:24
  Speaker 3: eliminating the competition. Well, I'm willing to do anything. Therefore,
• 38:29
  Speaker 3: if you're not, you know, and feminists will argue that
• 38:36
  Speaker 3: men who accept hazard pay to do hazardous jobs are
• 38:41
  Speaker 3: are hindering women from taking those jobs, right from getting
• 38:47
  Speaker 3: that higher pay. They'll argue that it's that that men
• 38:50
  Speaker 3: are encouraging those jobs to continue to be hazardous, instead
• 38:54
  Speaker 3: of businessmen saying, well, we can't find anybody do this
• 38:56
  Speaker 3: unless we make it safer. And and so they will
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: recognize that there's a dynamic there when it's men who
• 39:06
  Speaker 3: will do anything for a buck, when anything might mean
• 39:11
  Speaker 3: driving a truck with something radioactive in it or explosive,
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: or or otherwise doing something dangerous, doing something that people
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: might attack them for doing and such. Right, but they
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: won't recognize it when it's women who will have sex
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: to be to get a chance to become famous. And
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: that also means that women who will not have sex
• 39:36
  Speaker 3: to get a chance to become famous are less likely
• 39:39
  Speaker 3: to become famous. And if that's what you want, becoming famous,
• 39:44
  Speaker 3: which seems to me like it would be a huge
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: pain in the ass, But I suppose some women do
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: want that, A lot of women. Apparently a lot of
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: women considering how many around OnlyFans now.
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, something like women are on only fans. Yeah, like
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: women of zoomer women, I think.
• 40:02
  Speaker 3: But having sex to get famous, Uh, you know, it's
• 40:07
  Speaker 3: it's only, it's only, it's only distasteful if you can
• 40:12
  Speaker 3: claim victimhood for it. You can't really claim victimhood if
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: you took your own pictures and put them on the internet.
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: They're not even having at this point, they're just playing
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: the part of them having sex, and and the men
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: watching have to just imagine.
• 40:30
  Speaker 3: Themselves, imagine themselves. Although there's also a gazillion porn sites
• 40:36
  Speaker 3: out there with with amateur stuff on them too, But
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: the point being, it's it's rather duplicitous of women to
• 40:47
  Speaker 3: make those arguments, right when it's it's uh, driving the
• 40:52
  Speaker 3: radioactive truck or working in the location where you might
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: get shanked, you know, or assault to buy a whole
• 41:00
  Speaker 3: group of men versus you know, a check that a
• 41:06
  Speaker 3: chick that was on the casting couch for maybe an hour,
• 41:11
  Speaker 3: right for one time, maybe in order to get in
• 41:15
  Speaker 3: order to get her foot in the door right. And
• 41:18
  Speaker 3: and that was something that she she said yes to
• 41:23
  Speaker 3: marry costs. A lot of people don't today don't realize
• 41:27
  Speaker 3: the thing that she did that is the most objectionable.
• 41:32
  Speaker 3: She in her interview process, she specifically selected her wording
• 41:39
  Speaker 3: in order to avoid getting getting answers. Oh I consented basically,
• 41:48
  Speaker 3: so instead of asking did you ever have sex under
• 41:53
  Speaker 3: whatever circumstances she was describing against your will, she always
• 41:59
  Speaker 3: said when you didn't want to, Well, there's a huge
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: difference between the way people always take against your will
• 42:07
  Speaker 3: versus between the way people always take when you didn't
• 42:10
  Speaker 3: want to. Right, against your will is pretty straightforward. There's
• 42:15
  Speaker 3: not a lot of wiggle room there. Against your will
• 42:18
  Speaker 3: is when you specifically want not to and have expressed
• 42:25
  Speaker 3: I don't want to do this. Your will is to
• 42:30
  Speaker 3: get out of there or go do something else to
• 42:33
  Speaker 3: avoid that situation to not experience what you're experiencing, right,
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: But when you didn't want to might mean you promised
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: yourself before you left the house that you weren't going
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: to do this, but then once your inhibitions were down,
• 42:49
  Speaker 3: you grabbed some guy and ran off with him and
• 42:51
  Speaker 3: had sex. Anyway, Well, that was when you didn't want to.
• 42:56
  Speaker 3: You didn't specifically desire this outcome beginning of the night.
• 43:01
  Speaker 3: And there are women who will answer, yeah, I did
• 43:04
  Speaker 3: this when I didn't want to. I had promised myself
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: I wasn't gonna do that. But it really isn't the
• 43:09
  Speaker 3: same as being held down or held at gunpoint your will.
• 43:18
  Speaker 3: It's not the same. And when people try to claim
• 43:23
  Speaker 3: that it is, what they're actually doing is dismissing the
• 43:29
  Speaker 3: experiences of people who have actually had things done to
• 43:33
  Speaker 3: them against their will, People who have been brutalized, people
• 43:37
  Speaker 3: who have been knocked unconscious, drugged, chased down the street,
• 43:44
  Speaker 3: grabbed and taken against their will, had had weapons used
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: against them, been in fear for their life the entire
• 43:51
  Speaker 3: time it was happening. Not just people that are pissed
• 43:54
  Speaker 3: off because the morning after, because gosh darn it, I
• 43:57
  Speaker 3: wasn't going to do that, and then I did. Like
• 44:00
  Speaker 3: that is not getting raped, Gosh darn it. I wasn't
• 44:04
  Speaker 3: gonna do that, and then I did. Is not the
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: same as I wanted to get away from that. I
• 44:11
  Speaker 3: didn't want to be there. I didn't want this person
• 44:13
  Speaker 3: around me. I didn't want to be touched, and this
• 44:16
  Speaker 3: person wouldn't take no for an answer. This person chased
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: me down, this person held me against my will. This
• 44:22
  Speaker 3: person used a weapon to intimidate me or a drug
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: to knock me out. That's a very different experience, and
• 44:29
  Speaker 3: unless you've had the ladder, you might not understand how
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: different the two are. You might not understand how minuscule
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: the former is by comparison, but it is. It's like
• 44:44
  Speaker 3: nothing in comparison. You might as well be upset that
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: you ate that cake and now you're fat. Well, don't
• 44:53
  Speaker 3: need any more cake. But don't come crying to me
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: and acting like somebody shoved it down your throat because
• 44:58
  Speaker 3: they didn't.
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: Okay, So I got a super chat from Sarathis for
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: one thousand Hungarian Hungarian currencies, and they say, who are
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: the victims of Weinstein? The women who took the deal
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: on the casting couch and became famous actresses are the
• 45:20
  Speaker 1: ones who didn't and didn't Well, it's a mix, but yeah,
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: it's basically people who were they. I think that the
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: overwhelming majority, if not all, of them were people that
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: were offered an opportunity to become famous and it was
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: conditional and they took the deal and they didn't like
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: the deal afterwards, or they decided they could, like you know,
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: do something to get more, Like they already became famous,
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: but now it's like, oh, we're all doing this. Now
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna do this too, and I'm gonna get paid.
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: And that's what they did. That's what I think there was.
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: Some of them were just mad that people found out.
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so and yeah. And there's like the other part
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: of it too, is where you know, it's either if
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: you're a woman who took the casting couch deal and
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: then it comes out that there was a casting couch
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: deal and you were one of many women who are
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: part of it, you now have to face a choice
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: did you willingly do this, which makes you a whore?
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: Or were you raped, which makes you a victim, And
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: so they'll choose the I was raped thing instead. This
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: is like in the military, and I'm going back to
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: the just briefly, and then we got to move on
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: to the next story. In the military, a lot of
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: the stories I hear about guys that are falsely accused
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: in the military involve them, you know. They're like military
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: guys are young. They go to they're on leave somewhere.
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: They go off base to like a bar. They meet
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: a girl at the bar, because there are women in
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: the bars near the military bases, look going to pick
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: up dudes and they sleep with them. They and those
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: women are married or they have boyfriends, are often married,
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: and they're cheating on their husban with this guy. And
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: so they got to get out of They got to
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: get out of trouble now because they're getting caught or something.
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: So they just say, oh no, I didn't cheat on you.
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: He raped me. It's the same impulse, the same the
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: same motive. The motive is I am not a bad person.
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: I was a victim. I'm gonna say that, and it works.
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: It works very well when you're a woman. So this
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: is an example of that.
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: Anyway, schroding is rapist, like or whatever it is, shorting
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: is feminist. A woman is simultaneously empowered and victimized until
• 47:35
  Speaker 2: she decides what works best for her at the time. Yes,
• 47:40
  Speaker 2: and then it is decided. I don't know where I
• 47:42
  Speaker 2: had that first. It might have been Hannah. Hannah posts
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: that a lot.
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: I've heard Allison, Hannah and Karen use it, But yes,
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: did you come up with that?
• 47:51
  Speaker 3: I don't know which one of us came up with that?
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: Actually it's I. Sometimes we've said something so much, all
• 47:57
  Speaker 3: three of us that I can't even remember if you
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: said it first. But it's it's a lot of this
• 48:03
  Speaker 3: stuff we say isn't remarkable. It's common sense, or it's
• 48:08
  Speaker 3: what should be common sense, and it would have been
• 48:12
  Speaker 3: common sense fifty years ago, maybe seventy five years ago,
• 48:17
  Speaker 3: but unfortunately feminism spent all of society's common sense on
• 48:24
  Speaker 3: dildo's and pink wigs, and there isn't very much of
• 48:27
  Speaker 3: it left.
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, anyway, let's know what you guys think about this
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. We got to move on to
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: the next story, so let us talk about this one.
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: So it's another legal case thing and a shocking turn
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: of events. Alex Murdau, who was found guilty of murdering
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: his wife. His name is murder and he murdered. Okay
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: found guilty of murdering his wife and son, has had
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: his conviction overturned. The double murder conviction was overturned due
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: to procedure errors centered around a county clerk by the
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: name of Becky Hill. Hill is accused of improperly speaking
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: with and influencing the jury without any of the CAS's
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: attorneys present, or without any of the cases attorneys present. Rather, so,
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: she talked to the jury and influenced them behind the
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: backs of the lawyers. She allegedly gave them instruction and
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: offered her opinion of the case in one instant, stating
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: that the defendant was not credible and should not be trusted.
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: It was later discovered that Hill was also writing a
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: book about the case and had a financial interest in
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: the outcome of the trial. Despite the conviction being overturned,
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: Murdaw is nowhere near a freeman, as he is already
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: serving sixty plus years of state and federal time for
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: his financial crimes. So this guy was found guilt guilty
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: of murdering his wife and son, and that conviction was
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: overturned because the county clerk, Becky Hill, thought he was
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: guilty and basically was writing a book about this and
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: wanted the book to have a certain I guess conclusion,
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: and so she influenced the jury to convict this guy.
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: And so they found out and they overturned the case.
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: That's crazy, But okay, anybody else want to chime in?
• 50:30
  Speaker 3: When I put this in. The reason I put this
• 50:33
  Speaker 3: in wasn't because I think this man is innocent or
• 50:39
  Speaker 3: guilty or whatever. This was kind of a badshit trial.
• 50:44
  Speaker 3: I mean, it was all based on circumstantial evidence, but
• 50:50
  Speaker 3: the defendant did do a lot of lying and he
• 50:55
  Speaker 3: got caught lying, right, So it makes a very hard
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: to defend him at all. And I'm not going to,
• 51:04
  Speaker 3: but I am going to defend is my favorite thing
• 51:09
  Speaker 3: to defend. Due process, And there are two main reasons
• 51:16
  Speaker 3: why do process is very important. Why it is very
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: important that the standards should always be upheld, That people
• 51:26
  Speaker 3: involved in a case should always be on their best behavior,
• 51:32
  Speaker 3: working their hardest to ensure that everything is done fairly
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: and honestly. And nobody is trying to circumvent the process,
• 51:45
  Speaker 3: nobody is trying to manipulate the process behind the scenes.
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: That it's all evidence based and based on the credibility
• 51:54
  Speaker 3: of any witnesses and so on. One obviously is so that
• 52:00
  Speaker 3: we do not jail innocent defendants, so that we don't
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: punish people for things they didn't do. But the other
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: reason is so that people who did do something don't
• 52:17
  Speaker 3: have the ability to manipulate the system by using technicalities,
• 52:24
  Speaker 3: as everybody likes to say, when technicalities actually are somebody
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: violated their due process rights. If you get a conviction
• 52:36
  Speaker 3: of somebody who did do the thing that you're trying
• 52:39
  Speaker 3: to get a conviction of, you want it to be
• 52:41
  Speaker 3: rock solid. You don't want there to be something they
• 52:44
  Speaker 3: can use to appeal their sentence. You don't want them
• 52:46
  Speaker 3: there the court to have to go through trial after trial.
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: You don't want some sort of situation where they get
• 52:56
  Speaker 3: off scot free and you can't have another trial and
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: nothing else to charge them with. You don't want any
• 53:03
  Speaker 3: of that, because then you have somebody who did something
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: they should be locked away for, out and about and
• 53:12
  Speaker 3: able to do it again. And we don't know necessarily
• 53:20
  Speaker 3: which way it is with this case. I'm sure there's
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: a lot of leaning one direction or another among anybody
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: who has read all of the evidence. Even his family
• 53:33
  Speaker 3: isn't too keen on, mister Murdoch. But the thing is
• 53:42
  Speaker 3: for it to be right, for our system to hand
• 53:46
  Speaker 3: down a punishment and make him serve that punishment, the
• 53:52
  Speaker 3: case must be meticulously kept on a track of fairness
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: and justice. And if you go straight down that track
• 54:02
  Speaker 3: of fairness and justice and there is a jail sentence
• 54:06
  Speaker 3: at the end or worse, then there is nothing that
• 54:11
  Speaker 3: you can do to stop it. And it's not an
• 54:16
  Speaker 3: abuse of the system, it is the system working. When
• 54:20
  Speaker 3: you have something like this happen, it puts everybody involved
• 54:25
  Speaker 3: through hell, Like everybody that is afraid of this man
• 54:31
  Speaker 3: now has to worry that he's going to go home
• 54:35
  Speaker 3: or at least get out, and everybody who put energy
• 54:40
  Speaker 3: into making this case, everybody that suffered to make the
• 54:48
  Speaker 3: case happen, now has to go through it all again
• 54:52
  Speaker 3: if they try him again, which they probably will. It's
• 54:57
  Speaker 3: crap when something like this happens, crap for everybody. And
• 55:01
  Speaker 3: if this happens to an innocent person, that means an
• 55:06
  Speaker 3: innocent person is now instead of being able to just
• 55:10
  Speaker 3: appeal a sentence or appeal a conviction, that person now
• 55:15
  Speaker 3: has to go through the trial again. So all sides
• 55:20
  Speaker 3: of this end up losing. When you have a due
• 55:23
  Speaker 3: process violation and it results in something like this or
• 55:30
  Speaker 3: any means of the case having to be restarted, right,
• 55:38
  Speaker 3: you still have you still have a whole series of
• 55:43
  Speaker 3: things now you have to go through again. So I
• 55:46
  Speaker 3: don't know, A neat scholar does have a point. In
• 55:49
  Speaker 3: this particular case. He isn't getting out because he's still
• 55:51
  Speaker 3: guilty of financial fraud and he's got forty years for that,
• 55:54
  Speaker 3: so they don't have to his family doesn't have to
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: worry about that. But in many cases that's not always
• 56:02
  Speaker 3: the situation. So you do have we do have very
• 56:06
  Speaker 3: solid reason for demanding a higher degree of discipline from
• 56:15
  Speaker 3: everyone involved in the justice system, and that was that's
• 56:21
  Speaker 3: not what happened here, and there needs to be accountability.
• 56:25
  Speaker 3: So this, this clerk needs to be held to account
• 56:29
  Speaker 3: and we'll see what comes out of that. It's it's
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: an egregious thing to torpedo an entire case like this
• 56:38
  Speaker 3: by doing something so stupid, and given what she did
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: for a living a county clerk, she knew better, She
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: knew she was engaging in a due process violation when
• 56:51
  Speaker 3: she did it, and she should have refrained.
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I'd like to see where that goes. I mean,
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: the guy's gonna go to jail for the other stuff.
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: But you know what, that's that's still it's still important.
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: You know, there's probably they probably will still have to
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: pursue this absolutely, but in the meantime, you know, like
• 57:20
  Speaker 3: I said, it's just it's very important that this woman,
• 57:24
  Speaker 3: like a case needs to be pursued against her for
• 57:27
  Speaker 3: what she did. Losing her job six months probation. That's
• 57:30
  Speaker 3: not that much, right, you can get another job.
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, this is really serious, like it's a really great y. Yeah,
• 57:40
  Speaker 1: all right, let's see any super chat super Child's all right, No, no,
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: all right, cool, that's fine. All right. Well, you know
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: I did get something before the show, but I don't
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: know when the relevant time to bring it up is.
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: Maybe I'll just bring it up on Wednesday if I
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: do something there. So all right, let us know what
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: you guys think about this one in the comments. We're
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: gonna move on to the last story. This one is
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: my favorite. This is the best story. This is the
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: most promising story in my opinion. Okay, this is great,
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: all right. So US Attorney for the District of Columbia,
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: Janine Piro announced on Friday, that was last Friday, that
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: her office will now aggressively prosecute parents whose children participate
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: in teen takeovers, which are large, chaotic gatherings of miners
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: that have disrupted neighborhoods like Navy Yard and Noma with fights, assaults, robberies,
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: and disorderly behavior. Pierro said that her office will enforce
• 58:42
  Speaker 1: DC Code two two DASH eight eleven contributing to the
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: delinquency of a minor and curfew laws. More strictly, parents
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: who knowingly allow it able or fail to supervise their teens,
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: including dropping them off, letting them skip school, or not
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: preventing curfew violations could face fine, to court ordered parenting
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: classes and up to six months in jail. Charges can
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: be pursued even if the juvenile is not prosecuted. Parents,
• 59:08
  Speaker 1: do your job, or we will do ours, Pierro warned,
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: framing the move as a response to parental neglect that
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: burdens taxpayers and law enforcement. The policy went into effect
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: immediately and pairs with existing juvenile curfew rules under seventeen
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: off streets by eleven pm weekdays through and midnight on weekends.
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: It has drawn mixed reactions with some welcoming accountability and
• 59:33
  Speaker 1: others criticizing federal involvement in local matters. This is part
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: of a broader push to curb youth crime in DC
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: amid ongoing team takeover incidents. And the reason why I'm
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: happy about this is we know that who this is
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: going to affect. It's going to affect single moms, single
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: moms the most. And you know what, it's about fucking
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: time because we have here heard too much that there
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: will be like a teenager that you know, is on
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: the stre and they steal a car and they get
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: into an accident and they kill some people or whatever
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: it is because their moms are not involved. Their moms
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: are out at the they're out at Bellinoce, they're out
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: at the club, they're hanging out with their friends there.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: They leave them with you know, wherever. And I think
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: this is great, man. I I mean, I don't like
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: that we've gotten to this point, but something has to
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: be done. And I think when you start telling the parents,
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 1: you put the single moms on notice, maybe they will
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 1: then get their shit together. That's why I like this.
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: And this is only going to be happening in DC,
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: which does have a crime problem. But maybe if it
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: works there, other cities will follow suit. I mean, they
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: can only really do it there because you know, Janine
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 1: is this is like a federal thing because it's also
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: the capital. But maybe other cities will see that and
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 1: like want to implement something like that. So anyway, that's
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: that's that.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 3: X was kids and they used to when we were
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 3: all kids. You say, all of the United States, they
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: had these commercials that they would air at ten o'clock
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 3: at night. It's ten pm. Do you know where are Yeah,
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: they need to start doing that again.
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: Well I am, I'm again in two minds about this.
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: We have we have a similar proposal emerging in the
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 2: UK of charging parents with the crimes of their children.
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 2: On one hand, like we often say, a huge reason
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 2: for all this crime and delinquity among the youth these
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: days is fatherlessness. Without the influence of a father, without
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 2: the strong, deep voice of a piste off dad, without
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 2: the implication of his strong, deep fists, children are highly
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 2: a greatly more likely never to develop boundaries. The boundaries
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 2: necessa to keep high trust societies functioning. And so the
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 2: single women who are raising these children almost always buy
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 2: their own choice. They just let their children run a
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 2: mark and they can they're allowed to, and maybe, just maybe,
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 2: it would be interesting to see what would happen if
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 2: they were not allowed to. What if the government was like, no,
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 2: you have to discipline your children or you will be arrested.
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: You can see why I'm into minds about it. Like
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: I don't trust single mothers to raise their children properly generally,
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 2: but I don't trust the government to solve the problem,
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: either generally or otherwise. When the government tells single women
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: to discipline their children, what are they going to do?
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 2: What are those single mothers going to do? They're gonna
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 2: beat the shit out of their children. I mean they
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: already do. If there's no farther around to non violently
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: imply that you're gonna get an ass whipping, then the
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: only thing that mother can do is apply an actual
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 2: ass whipping wherever applicable, as best they can from an
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: early age, like well before the child is bigger than men,
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: is your only window of opportunity. And at that point,
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: you've got a young adult who has been conditioned by violence,
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 2: who has been taught that we solve our problems with violence,
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 2: that we use violence to control each other, and pardon
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 2: my ass, but I think that shit is already happening,
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: and it has been happening for a long time, and
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: it's contributing to the heaving mass of criminals who think
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: they can solve all their problems with violence. Like nature
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 2: already has a solution to this problem. It's called fathers.
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: Fathers don't have to whip your ass. They can just
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: give you the stinkye. They can just raise their voice
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 2: a little bit once, briefly, and that's enough to remind
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: you that there is someone bigger than you, stronger than you,
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 2: who can lay the smack down if they absolutely have to.
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: Mothers aren't going to do it usually, and the government's
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: not going to do it either. They'll they'll just give
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 2: these mothers a slap on the wrist, and give these
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: teenagers a slap on the wrist and send them on
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: their way to go off and stab fascists again. And
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: by fascists, I do of course mean whitey. In fact,
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: it wouldn't surprise me at all if if we gave
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 2: the government the power to prosecute parents for the crimes
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 2: of their children. The government will go ahead and conveniently
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: ignore the single mothers who have total custody over those children.
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 2: You know what they're gonna do. How many of you
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: are ahead of me already. Yep, They're gonna prosecute the
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 2: absent fathers. When I say absent fathers, I mean the
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 2: fathers who have been denied custody and are busy working
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: themselves to death in shitty jobs to pay child support
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: for the kids they never get to see. Well, if
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 2: you weren't there to raise your kids, it's your fault.
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: Men.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: But but, but, my ass, I know, we gave you
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 2: a legal order to stay the fuck away from your
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 2: children forever. But now we're gonna charge you with a
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 2: crime or neglecting your children for doing what we legally
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: ordered you to do on pain of being charged with
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: a crime like like not looking after your children. Does
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: that sound far fetched, ladies and gentlemen, as far fetched
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: as a teenager paying child support to his rapist. Well,
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: it always sounds absurd until it happens, and then it's
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: just the way it is. Then we enter the flow
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 2: chart of it isn't happening. It's happening, but it's a
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: good thing, next thing happens, et cetera. So yeah, moral
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: of the story is don't get the government involved. Whenever
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: it seems like the government is going to solve your problem,
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 2: take a step back. Yeah, chuck a glass of cold
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 2: water on yourself and then slap your own face.
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: Do it again and again.
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 2: What does the government do? What does the government do
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: every time? It makes the problem worse? The purpose of
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 2: a system is what it does, and the purpose of
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 2: a government is to make everything worse. Is it that simple?
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 2: Is it really that simple? Could anything so complicated really
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 2: be that simple?
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: Yes?
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 2: Actually, yes it is. It's how we got here, how
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: it will get even worse forever. Governments make everything worse.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: Men make everything better. Yes, it is exactly that simple.
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 2: So what do women do? Do they make it better
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: or do they make it worse? Well, it's hard to say,
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: because all we see them do is fought about in
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: the middle ground, complaining about everything, playing men against each other,
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: be they are privately functioning men or governmentally functioning men.
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: And that's me being as trapped charitable as possible. Sorry,
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 2: not sorry, it's true. Fucking the end.
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 3: There you go. There's really only one thing the government
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 3: can do at all to improve the situation that single
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 3: mothers have caused, and that is to get the fuck
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: out of the way of the fathers, because most of
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 3: the time, when there is a father who is estranged
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 3: from his children, it's not because he just decided he
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 3: didn't want to see them. It's because she decides she
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 3: didn't want him to see them. So these men are
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 3: not able to help their kids because they're not allowed nearby.
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 3: And the worst part is, at this point, men know
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 3: that if they fight for custody, there's a pretty strong
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 3: chance they're going to fight false allegations of some sort
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 3: of partner or sexual violence. On top of that, it's
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 3: going to cost shitloads of money to fight that legal battle.
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 3: They could lose, and they could be forced to pay
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 3: her legal expenses on top of their own. That is
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 3: one of the reasons why kids are in this environment
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 3: where their moms are not teaching them how to act
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: like young adults, and so they don't know how and
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 3: they're not doing it. They're not acting like young adults,
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: they're acting like toddlers with young adult free them. The
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 3: only way that the government can get the fuck out
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 3: of the way is to enforce paternal custody. And it's
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 3: unfortunate that it would require a government action to eliminate
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 3: a government action. But that's the case because the government
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 3: decided that it owns your marriage if you've gotten married,
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 3: and it owns your your custody rights of you, of
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 3: your children, if you've had children, And so if your
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 3: wife divorces you, the government will enforce if she decides
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 3: to go for custody or demand custody and coerci you
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: intent too signing over custody or get a court to
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 3: give her custody, they'll enforce that. They will keep you away.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 3: They will say, nope, Dad, you can't go in there.
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 3: You can't lecture your kids. You can't teach your kids sportsmanship,
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 3: You can't teach your kids anything about morals or ethics
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 3: or common sense, thinking before you act, you know, and
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 3: things like that. You can't do that. Mom does not
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: want you there. And if they get hit by a
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 3: train doing something stupid, or if they get shot by
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 3: a cop doing something stupid, or if they break into
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 3: a store and they end up in jail because they're
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 3: the one that got caught, it's your fault. Even though
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 3: we wouldn't let you do anything to arm them against
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 3: those ideas, against those stupid ideas, it's your fault, right,
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 3: but it's not. It's the government's fault. The best thing
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 3: that could happen would be if she was smart, and
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 3: I know she really doesn't have control over this, but
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 3: she would be encouraging a legal change. We don't care
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 3: where you divorce was from. It doesn't apply here. If
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 3: you live in this area, the father has the right
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 3: to see the children. Custody is fifty to fifty by
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 3: default in this area, regardless of what your divorce decree says,
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 3: unless there is some criminal conviction that would indicate a
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 3: danger to the children by one parent or the other.
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 3: And that's all they can really do, because if they
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 3: do anything else, it's going to turn out the same
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 3: way as all of the other things they've done. What
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 3: are all the other things they've done? You look at
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 3: when the government orders parents not to beat their children,
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 3: don't beat your children. And when it orders parents to
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 3: properly feed their children, things that you shouldn't have to
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 3: tell parents to do, right, the government starts trying to enforce. Well,
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 3: some parents are not doing it right. We have to
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 3: tell them to do it. The next thing, you know,
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 3: you have an agency, a government agency that kidnaps people's children,
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 3: and sells them to rich people. That's definitely good for
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 3: the children, isn't it. And just go into neighborhoods where
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 3: there are poor people and we'll just label being poor neglect.
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 3: Their house isn't the nicest house in the neighborhood. We're
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 3: going to take these children out of this environment and
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 3: sell them to mister and missus money bags and we'll,
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 3: you know, make a tidy under the table profit. But
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 3: we're actually protecting these children from this terrible environment where
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 3: the family only has one television. And I hate to
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 3: say it, but I really view it that way after
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 3: seeing neighbors and friends go through experiences with Child Protective Services.
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 3: Actually had one neighbor whose five year old walked to
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 3: school with the other five year olds and because she
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 3: was not enrolling her child that year, they told her
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 3: to lock her five year old in the house. Can
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 3: you imagine telling people that their five year old should
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 3: not be allowed to play outside, But that's what they did.
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 3: These are idiots. We don't really want to give them
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 3: more control over people's families. In fact, the whole agency
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 3: should be abolished rather than tacking on something else that
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 3: they can do. And instead, we really need to see
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 3: less government interference with dads overall. And granted, there will
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 3: be circumstances where moms or dads, because they've done something
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 3: that is measurable and they can be convicted for, will
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 3: have to be kept away, but those are much more
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 3: rare than people think. And by the way, among among
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 3: abuse perpetrators in child maltreatment cases in the United States,
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 3: women outnumber men. Mothers dramatically outnumber fathers, and in the
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 3: case of fatalities from child maltreatment, that's seventy percent mother
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 3: perpetrated as opposed to father perpetrated in cases where one
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 3: parent is involved in the fatality. So it is more
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 3: likely that women would be affected. And there's nothing wrong
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 3: with that, and that's it. That's the only thing they
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 3: can do. They can't they can't do it right. They
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 3: can't do it right. In the juvenile justice system, kids
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 3: in juvi are are ending up getting raped by the
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 3: staff that's there to try to turn their lives around
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: for them. Kids in the elementary school system, well they're
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 3: getting raped by the staff that's there to try to
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 3: teach them reading, writing, arithmetic, and job skills. And you know,
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 3: kids that get picked up by child protective services get
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 3: sold two people. So now all they can do is
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 3: get out of the way. Anything else is going to
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: be bad and it's probably going to have tragic results.
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, all I will say is that at
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: this stage, the crime with the teens and all that
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: there is nothing really that the police can do to
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: reverse that because all the stuff that you guys are
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: talking about. While I welcome it, I'm also not for
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: the government solving familial problems. I think that they will
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: have to do something about the crime, and they can't
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: really convict teens. I would rather not convicting them as adults.
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: I would rather that somebody else take the accountability, and
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: if it falls on the single moms, that might be
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: the best way to act as a motivator for single
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: moms to step up and do something. At least get
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: involved with your kids. At least, you know, abandon your
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: like you know, single mom lifestyle of like going out
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: and being with friends all the time. Get involved. It's
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: sorry that the dad's not around. That seems like a
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: you problem. And I think that, like considering that, what
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: we would really need to do to fully address the
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: situation cannot be done by the police. They can't do that.
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: The government is not equipped to do that either, And yes,
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: I agree they should just get out of the way.
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: But we're talking about teenagers that are alive right now,
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: that are doing, like, you know, untoward things out in
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 1: the streets with a bunch of other peers who are
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 1: also in the same situation. Let's can we just hold
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: the single moms accountable. That's basically what I want to see.
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 1: And I think that if even the threat of that,
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 1: like her just saying this is what we're gonna do,
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: I think that is gonna be enough to at least
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: motivate some of the And I know it's gonna affect
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: single moms. I know that's where it's gonna land, because
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 1: even if they're like even if the father is you know,
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: they know who the father of these children are or whatever,
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: there's a pretty good chance that he's either nowhere around,
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: or he's in jail, or he's dead. So like, you know,
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: we're looking at like like you can't even affect them
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: if they're not around, Like I've seen that in where
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: I grew up, right, So I do think that holding
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: the moms accountable or the parents accountable, if we want
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: to be fair is the only way forward, because then
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: the parents will be like, oh, I guess I gotta
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: do something because I don't want to get in trouble.
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: And yeah, it might mean that they beat their kids
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: and I'm not for that, but we can't make the
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: government tell them not to do that. So what do
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: you do? Like, I'm just saying, we have a shithnd
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: we got to make the most of it.
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 3: So you know, yeah, if if you're if you're a
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 3: single mom and your kid is out there committing crimes
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 3: and we can find the father, he can now petition
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 3: for custody and this will work against.
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: That, that could work too, but crime, yes, but the father
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: might not be any better though, Like you have to
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: understand that these women don't pick good men to have
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: babies with. So it's it's not going to change things
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: that much. Like most cases, everyone's a mess, So the
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: the the buck should stop with the parents who basically
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: enable the behavior. Could it end up that, yes, they'll
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: give custody to the dead, Sure, but that's only if
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: A he's around, B he wants to be involved, which
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: sometimes that's not the case, Like sometimes he's got women
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: will end up you know, opening their legs for unworthy
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: dudes that don't want to be fathers, that are just
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: looking to get their dick wet and they don't want
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: to be fathering any kids or they didn't their were
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: kids or whatever it is. So we just got to
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: work with things as they are.
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 3: You know, they could still do it when it is
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 3: the case, and it would be a hell of a
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 3: threat for women. You'll lose the custody and you'll lose
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 3: the welfare, you'll lose the child support it's coming in.
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 3: You'll lose everything because I think a lot of times
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 3: these women, these kids are are their meal ticket not there.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well they're using to get tax benefits and wic
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: and you know they're right ebt. Sure, Yeah, prosecute the
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: active parent when a minor commits a serious crime sounds
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: pretty simple and direct. I'm saying like that it's not ideal.
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: Ideal is that the kids are not out there committing
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: crimes Like that's ideal. But we're we're in the middle
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: of a mess, and I think that this is the
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: best response because again it's are we not all about
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: female accountability? Like that's what will happen. And now you
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: could say, well, the cops are gnocentric and they're gonna
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: hunt the man down. I don't know, maybe, but it
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: doesn't sound like it. It sounds like she's going after
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: the parents. And if the parents are moms, then the
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: parents are moms. Like that's I'll take it. I'll take
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: it like it's either that or things just continue to
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: get worse on the streets. It's either that or things
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: continue to get worse on the streets. And those kids
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: are just out there joy writing and getting into accidents
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: and killing each other. And I'd rather, like, you know,
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: there'd be the chance that some single moms will face
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 1: some consequences. That'd be great. So anyway, let's see if
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: let's see if there's any other super chats. No, no
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: super chests, those super child's all right, Well, that's that's
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 1: the new show. We're gonna go into the Patron show
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: now and we're gonna look at this article from Time
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: magazine where Christopher Nolan tells us about how awesome he is,
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: that he's so great. Well, actually, you know, it's interesting.
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: Thing is the adaptation the version of the the the Odyssey.
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 1: It's not even the audits. Yeah, the Odyssey. The version
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: of the Odyssey he's adapting is not Homer's translation. We'll
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 1: get into that in the Patron Show. It's it's actually
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: a pretty interesting, I would say twist, but it's predictable,
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: so maybe it's not all right. But yeah, so you
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: guys want to join us for that start a become
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 1: a Badger, going to Feedbadger dot com forward slash just
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 1: well no, not just a tip. That's send us a
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: message feed the Badger dot com forward slash, Subscribe to
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: join us in the Discord server, and hopefully I'll see
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 1: you guys in the Patron Show. For this, I want
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: to thank Mike j for helping me with the write ups.
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: I want to thank Mike and Hannah for your always
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: stimulating commentary. And I'm gonna thank you guys change for
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: joining us on the show because without you all, we
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: would just be yelling into the into the void. So
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 1: with all that said, if you guys like this video,
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: please h like, subscribe if you're not already subscribed to
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 1: the BELF notifications, leave us comment. Let us know what
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: you guys think about We'll be discussed on the show today.
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: Shout out to the vertical chat. I see that there's
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: like a new person in there that's actually having a
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: conversation with us. Uh so, Hello to Leah Simolorak fourteen
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: seventy seven. Thank you guys for so much for coming
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: on this episode of HBr News and we will see
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: you next tuesdayecom.
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 2: For racial Pedo to the junkular. This is Honey Badger
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 2: Radio Radio Week.