Latest / Inside The Criminal Mind / The Father in the Emergency Room: Toronto, 1999

Transcript

The Father in the Emergency Room: Toronto, 1999 · Inside The Criminal Mind

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: A father in the emergency in nineteen ninety nine. Picture
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: the fluorescent hum of an emergency department at night. A
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: father is standing at the intake desk with his son
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: in his arms, and the boy cannot breathe properly. Anyone
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: who's held a wheezing infant knows the particular terror of
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: listening to a small chest fight for air. The father
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: is told that a pediatrician is not available, that he
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: will needed to wait his turn into in a system
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: built for triage rather than terror. This is Toronto, nineteen
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: ninety nine. The hospital is Saint Michael's, a respected downtown institution.
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: A man is Henry Masuka. What happens next has been
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: discussed for decades in true crime circles, even the movie.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: Masuka faced what he perceived as an indifferent bureaucracy standing
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: between his child and survival, made a catastrophic decision. He
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: held a doctor at gunpoint. The weapon in his hand
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: was a Pelican, though it was not loaded. It could
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: not have killed anyone, but nobody in that department. The
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: emergency department could have known that in the moment, and
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: neither could police who were called to the scene. When
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: Masuka eventually exited the hospital, officers shot him. He died
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: from those wounds. A father who by every account was
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: acting from a bearable fear for his son's life became
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: in the span of an evening a statistic. In the
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: long and painful history their shootings involving weapons, there were
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: neighborn never capable of inflicting the harm that justify lethal force,
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: even though the police obviously were not aware of it.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: There is a reason this case resurfaces, and almost nothing
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: to do with true crime, sensationalism, and everything to do
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: with the way eerie way art and life crossed paths.
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: As I mentioned years later, a film by the name
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: John Q, starring Denzel Washington, told the story of a
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: father who takes an emergency room hostage after being deny care.
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: The parallel seemed really close to audiences and critics that
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: many assume the Masuka case had directly inspired it. The
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: filmmakers themselves acknowledge the resemblance. But here's the detail that
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: complicates this. The screenplay for John a Q John Q
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: had already been written before the Toronto incident even took place.
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: Life did not imitate art here, something closer to convergent
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: evolution occurred where a story premise so universal in its
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: emotional logic, a parent locked out of care for a
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: dying child simply existed independently in two places at one time.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: What does it mean that this scenario was, in a sense,
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: waiting to happen. We might think about the primal nature
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: of the pre parental protective instinct, the way it can
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: override the ego's normal capacity for risk assessment when a
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: child's in danger. The father in this story was not
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: a criminal by disposition. He was a man whose threat
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: appraisal system had been hijacked by his emotional system, an
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: overwhelming attachment imperative, a feeling of hopelessness, the same neurobiological
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: wired that makes a parent lift a car after chop
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: child under conditions of extreme threat to offspring, the nervous
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: system narrows its options down to fight. We should also
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: examine the institutional side. Emergency departments operate under triage logic
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: that makes sense. I could check it actuarially, actuarily sorry,
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: and can feel monstrous individually. The pediatrician not being immediately
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: available is not in the abstract evidence of negligence. Hospitals
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: cannot stop every specialty for every possible emergency at every hour.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: But when you're the parent holding the child in the
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: moment of crisis, the abstract logic of resource allocation offers
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: no comfort at all. This is a tragic gap between
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: systems thinking and lived experience, and there's a gap that
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: produces genuine casualties on both sides of the desk. Then
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: there is a question of police response, but they it's
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: a brief one because they really had no clue that
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: he didn't have a real gun. This case endures a
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: cultural memory, not because of a singular villain, but because
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: it offers no clean moral resolution. A frightened father and
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: a strained institution. Everything that call a single night, and
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: nobody walked away from having it done something purely wrong
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: or purely right. What we are left with is a
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: portrait of how fear, both parental and institutional, can escalate
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: in parallel until the outcome becomes almost inevitable. Foreshadowed not
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: by a screenplay, by by the far older and more
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: universal script of a parent who will do almost anything
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: to keep their child alive.