Latest / UK Column Radio / Roland Tremblay on why Einstein was wrong

Transcript

Roland Tremblay on why Einstein was wrong · UK Column Radio

0:35
None. I'm a writer, I'm an author.
0:40
I've got perhaps 8 or 9 books published in French, in France,
0:46
in English. I've got at least 4-4 or five
0:48
books published, novels, poetry, essays, philosophy.
0:54
And then the last one is New Age physics.
0:58
It's I think it's reversed anyway and.
1:03
No, it's not traversed on my side.
1:04
Oh, great, perfect. And but, you know, I was a court
1:08
clerk in the Crown Court in Isleworth in London for 12
1:12
years. And I've worked in conferences
1:14
before that, producing conferences.
1:16
I've got a master's degree in French literature, so, you know,
1:19
not physics. So my book cannot be that
1:22
complicated because if I don't have a degree myself in physics,
1:25
it is just, you know, learning online and everything about
1:28
physics and trying to figure out everything, then everybody can
1:32
understand it. Because I'm, I don't go into
1:34
lots of details or equations or proof or anything like that.
1:37
So it's more philosophical, you know, physics.
1:40
Well, I like that already because I have this view that
1:46
science should be open source and has always been open source.
1:50
It shouldn't be relegated to people in white coats with a
1:55
with a stamp on a piece of paper.
1:58
Well, exactly. You know, they used to have like
2:01
a, a very nice kind of relationship.
2:04
There was Germany, France and England, you know, the UK, they
2:07
they were, you know, all working on physics and writing stuff and
2:11
writing, reading what the other was writing and coming up with
2:13
new ideas. But you know what a peer review
2:15
process now everybody, everything that can be against
2:19
Einstein or Newton, you know, certainly would not pass.
2:22
You know, it will never be published.
2:24
So it's, it's a bit like, you know, all the stuff about
2:27
COVID-19, it's, it's, it's very censored.
2:30
And if you want to see that, and Stein was incorrect on anything,
2:33
you know, you'll be left out of the door.
2:34
So probably, you know, lose your career.
2:37
I don't know. So it's, it's, it's it's very
2:40
difficult for people with a tentative theories, you know,
2:42
and even within theoretical physics, it's, it's very
2:46
difficult for them to, to move away from, you know, the, the
2:50
standard physics if you want. OK, so basically you're arguing
2:55
that Einstein was wrong on a bunch of things.
2:59
Yes, and not only almost almost everything to be honest.
3:03
And you know, it's, it's all been misinterpreted and you
3:06
know, it's all fantasies that everything that he said, you
3:09
know, disproves that disprove that there's always a different
3:11
interpretation. It's like quantum mechanics as
3:14
well. There's always a different kind
3:16
of explanation or interpretation that you can give to something.
3:19
And they don't seem to have looked very hard to find them
3:21
for a start. And you know, physics should be
3:24
very simple and very easy to understand if it's becoming like
3:27
only 5 people in the world can understand it, like quantum
3:29
mechanics. And there's a serious problems
3:31
and it's got to be mechanical in nature.
3:33
You know, you need to be able to see particles and you need to be
3:36
able to move and you might be able to explain what is going on
3:39
here and in the interactions. It cannot just be mathematical,
3:42
you know, otherwise, yes, you can.
3:44
They are theories, you know, so they, you can reach for good
3:46
results like Einstein, you, you reach very good results and
3:49
Newton as well. But they are, you know,
3:51
alternate theories, but they, they explain the same
3:55
observations. So that's the thing.
3:57
So, you know, for Newton, if you've got gravity for Newton,
4:01
it's like these two balls are emanating like some sort of
4:06
attraction and then the balls come together.
4:08
This is what gravity is, but we never seen this, this attacking
4:12
force and we don't know what the power source is.
4:15
So for new for Einstein, it's the whole space time is actually
4:19
a sheet of paper that can be bent, that can actually be
4:22
pierced, you know, so and, and reduced to nothing from which a
4:27
Big Bang can start. You know, it's like the
4:30
singularity. So in in atomic expansion
4:33
theory, there is no more Big Bang.
4:34
There is no more singularities. There's no more black holes.
4:37
There is no more wormholes possible because there is no
4:40
sheet of basically space time that can be bent and everything.
4:44
But the the idea of gravity in the atomic expansion theory is
4:49
that matter expands and so but we cannot see it because if you
4:52
were expanding yourself, how could you see that matter
4:55
expands, that everything is expanding at the same rate,
4:58
which is a rate of 0.00000077 per second square.
5:05
Sorry. So if matter expands, then the
5:09
the distance between objects reduces and that's the same
5:13
thing. And if you've got two big balls
5:15
here that are actually are expanding and they're passing,
5:18
you know, each other in a parallel opposition, opposition
5:21
as you, if we cannot see the expansion, what happened is that
5:26
they, they don't change size. And then you can see that it
5:29
becomes a, a natural orbit effect so that you can see now
5:33
what orbits are or why they exist because with the
5:36
expansion. But when it doesn't, if it
5:39
expands, they just expand and they just pass each other.
5:42
But if it doesn't expand because we cannot see it, then there's
5:44
lots of motion effect for which that the distance reduces, but
5:48
the object remains the same size from our point of view.
5:50
And then you, you get, you get to an orbit.
5:54
So this is what gravity it probably is.
5:57
You know, it's like everything is expanding for reason that we
6:00
don't know about, but all matter, all the particles and
6:03
then the rate that I've just said.
6:06
And this is what why the the distance reduces as as things
6:11
expand and we cannot see the expansion.
6:15
OK, hang on, hang on. There's a lot going on there, so
6:19
let's just break some of that apart.
6:21
You mentioned gravity. Something that I have been
6:24
fascinated by is exactly what is gravity because it cannot be
6:30
reproduced by humans. This is, this was Newton's idea,
6:35
just that there there was a force attracting an attracting
6:38
force acting in a distance where you know, the masses were
6:42
attracting each other. And from that on, he, he, he
6:45
came up with an an equation, but his equation was based on
6:48
observations. So if you observe a phenomena in
6:53
nature, you can always come up with an equation to explain it.
6:56
You know, it's like Galileo came up with the acceleration
6:59
multiplied by T square. It gives you the the rate at
7:03
which an object falls onto the Earth.
7:06
Maybe I've got it wrong, but it's about that acceleration
7:10
material by Times Square and so when an object is falling down
7:14
to earth, what is happening is that the earth is expanding by
7:17
4.9 metres per second each second and the objects falls to
7:22
the earth and the the acceleration for it.
7:25
The earth is expanding to catch up with the object.
7:27
The object is actually just floating in space.
7:31
And what I'm saying is that the distance reduction between the
7:35
object falling and the earth produces one because the objects
7:39
are expanding. So that's the absolute deduction
7:43
in distance in in cavity. But there is a further relative
7:46
decrease in distance because space does not expand with the
7:50
with the objects, with everything else in the universe.
7:53
So space is a void. So a metre before the expansion
7:58
is half a metre after everything is doubled in size and
8:01
everything double S in size every 19 minutes.
8:03
Now that sounds very alarming, but we don't see anything
8:06
expanding. So in our resulting reality,
8:08
nothing is expanding. So and there is a lot of space,
8:11
you know, behind it. But so this could actually
8:14
decrease in distance because space doesn't expand with
8:17
everything else. If you're going 30 miles away in
8:20
space and it takes you 3019 minutes to get there, by the
8:23
time you get there there there's only 15 metres of of space or
8:29
kilometres. Oh, whatever.
8:31
So, so, so did this. This is what the acceleration
8:34
is. The relative decrease in
8:35
distance is what why there was an acceleration.
8:38
So if you're going to a destination that is 50 miles
8:40
away and then you know everything's expanding as as you
8:43
go there and space is not by the time you get there, the
8:46
distance, all the distances have shrunk.
8:49
And it is because everything is expended, but you know, orbits
8:53
counteracts gravity. So, you know, we always have the
8:56
same distance from the sun and the Earth when it's orbiting.
8:59
And, you know, when they call magnetism also can counteract
9:01
gravity. So.
9:02
So these are two things that you know can keep gravity apart.
9:10
This expansion idea if if you can't observe it, how do you
9:14
know that everything is expanding?
9:17
It's a theory, but they are proof.
9:19
You know the I I don't know if people search on YouTube about
9:24
how a slinky falls from a building, you they will see
9:28
something extraordinary that neither Newton or Einstein can
9:31
explain that you, you actually hold the slinky in your hand
9:36
from the top of a building. You can even see it from your
9:38
own height. And when the slinky falls, it
9:43
will actually stay. It will be suspended in the air
9:45
the, the, the base of it. And then the whole thing will
9:48
fall down. And only when the touch suddenly
9:50
will go down. So it's levitating.
9:53
The stinky is levitating in the air the base of it.
9:55
And if you, you have to slow it down to really see, but it's
9:58
several seconds, you know, it's a massive slinky and it falls
10:02
and falls. And this is levitating.
10:04
There is no way we can just turn on Newton that it could levitate
10:07
the base of it because it it when Newton everything falls
10:11
immediately. And if you've got a massive big
10:13
funnel like that, then you've got an object that's going to
10:15
fall in Einstein. As soon as it's at the top of
10:19
the funnel, it will fall immediately.
10:21
So the only explanation for this is that when you have a stinky
10:24
and you let go or spring both ends comes back together.
10:27
You know there is not one that stays there without moving and
10:30
the other one coming down and then fall off.
10:33
So what's happening is that the base of the stinky is moving up
10:36
while the top is going down. And what?
10:39
And then it's because the earth is expanding at the same rate
10:42
that the base is going up. So you can see that the base of
10:45
the stinky is going up, but you can't see it because the the
10:48
earth is expanding with it. And, and the stretch of the
10:51
stinky was because of the expansion of the Earth in the
10:54
1st place because you were holding it, the stretch, you
10:56
know, while you were being pushed up by the Earth and the
10:59
stinky was coming down. So that's one proof.
11:03
Another proof is that the Pioneer anomalies, I don't know
11:06
if you're aware the spacecraft that I've left in the solar
11:09
systems, you know, as long as something is in orbit around the
11:12
the sun, you know, you cannot see any difference because
11:15
everything expanded the same rate.
11:17
And the orbits of the planets also expand, you know, going to
11:19
spiral, you know, and so you cannot see this.
11:22
But if you don't have something that is orbiting, like the
11:25
Pioneer anomalies, the Pioneer spacecraft, they start
11:28
decelerating and they're decelerating.
11:30
They've called out the anomaly and they have actually proposed
11:32
some solutions, but none of them are very credible, like gas leak
11:36
or something. It's because the solar system is
11:38
expanding towards it. And because the solar system is
11:41
expanding it, it it's actually reducing in distance.
11:43
And in reality it's not reducing in distance.
11:45
It is going exactly the same space, but it's a relative
11:48
effect that makes it really decelerate as the solar system
11:52
is expanding. There are other proofs like that
11:54
involving springs and things. So, you know, you come come up
11:57
with theories and then the best, the ones that can explain
12:00
everything is actually the one that you should adopt.
12:03
And to be honest with you, it explains everything in physics.
12:07
This is the expansion of matter and the collection of matter as
12:10
well explains everything like maeochromatism, which is a
12:13
second force of nature. It's the expansion, the growth
12:16
and the shrinkage of the electrons themselves.
12:19
They can go and they can shrink. And if you've got many of them
12:22
and they've you've got clouds of them, then they can actually
12:25
push each other. And so that's the force of
12:28
Cologne. And if they actually all came
12:32
out same density, they will all shrink back.
12:34
So that's the attracting force of Cologne.
12:36
And if they are kind of different densities and they are
12:38
kind of stock, then you've got static electricity and you've
12:41
got massive big clouds of these electrons.
12:43
And clouds of electrons in atomic expansion theory is our
12:46
magnetic fields and clusters of electrons are photons and they
12:50
are light. So that's difference, you know,
12:53
from Einstein. So photons are no longer kind of
12:55
intangible particles, you know, made of energy.
12:59
They are actually clusters of electrons and the size of them
13:02
defines their wavelength and their colours.
13:05
And if they are, you know, eat light or visible light or
13:09
traviolate or X rays, and the size of them means how many
13:13
electrons, clusters of electrons you've caught you've got per
13:17
cluster. So this means that relativity is
13:20
not real. There is a relative Vt to
13:24
motion, you know, and and in my theory, you know when objects
13:29
are moving towards you, they're not moving, they're actually
13:31
expanding. And then if they are moving
13:33
away, they are just shrinking because you, the reality is
13:37
actually psychological in nature.
13:39
You can only be a representation of your own brain within your
13:42
mind. And you receive signals, you
13:44
know, made of, you know, electrical signals or
13:46
electromagnetic signals. And then it gets into your eyes.
13:49
And then you can actually represent reality in your mind.
13:52
So at this point, there's nothing really real.
13:55
There is no distance in the universe when the UFOs, your
13:58
phone disappear and reappear. It can go, it can go anywhere at
14:02
any distance at any time very quickly because it's shrinking
14:05
away to that place that where they are or it's expanding
14:08
towards where they want to go. And so there is still a more
14:12
relativity to motion. So we will still need kind of
14:14
transformation equations like Lorenz to actually find out
14:18
where something is relocated in space compared to where it
14:21
really is. Because light bends as it
14:23
actually pass between, you know, near star, you know, it bends.
14:26
All galaxies, it bends. This is a cavitational lensing
14:30
effect which actually confirm Einstein's theory.
14:32
But you don't need Einstein to actually explained that, you
14:35
know, estimates passing by a star would actually bent because
14:39
of the expansion of matter as the sun expands and the the the
14:43
the light would actually go in a partial bit around the sun and
14:46
then so the distance between them reduced.
14:48
But since light goes very quickly then actually will
14:50
continue on this layer on its on its course, but it will actually
14:54
have actually reduce the distance.
14:56
So we would have changed path. So when you look at the light,
14:58
when you see the clusters of electrodes into your eye,
15:01
something that you look at, it will seem that the planet is
15:05
there, sun is there, but it's actually not there.
15:08
It's actually it has bent a lot before it arrived to you.
15:11
So that these are so and the connectivity is like for
15:16
productivity motion. Special relativity of Enstein is
15:20
about relativity, motion relativity and Galileo had one
15:24
too. The Galileo relativity of motion
15:26
is probably probably best. This is probably what we should
15:28
go back to instead of Enstein if you don't want my idea that
15:32
actually everything is actually expanding or shrinking with
15:36
motion from your point of view and there is no distance in the
15:39
universe. So, so yeah, there's so, but so
15:44
there's always other explanations for, you know, and
15:47
general relativity of Einstein. It's, it's more about, you know,
15:50
motion with speeds and then the gravitational field would
15:54
actually affect. There's a whole bunch of things
15:58
about Einstein, you know that I've been misinterpreted,
16:02
basically. Well, also the fact that he has
16:06
been cemented as some some sort of God.
16:09
You cannot question him, and that is obviously an
16:12
unscientific approach anyway. You should be able to question
16:15
him. Yes, and many people have
16:18
questioned him, but you know, not officially perhaps, but you
16:21
know, they still cannot move away from it because it it is so
16:27
everywhere. It it's actually the base of
16:29
every theory there is. So even quantum mechanics,
16:32
cavity theory is actually based on Einstein.
16:35
So it's very difficult to get rid of him.
16:38
You know, there is, you know, there are three people perhaps
16:42
at the moment in the world that have an expansion theory at the
16:45
base of their physics. There is me.
16:48
There is a Mark McCutcheon, which you know, I work with all
16:53
the time. And this is his book, The Final
16:55
Theory, Mark McCutcheon. And there is also Miles
17:00
Matthews. I don't know if you've heard of
17:01
him, but all right, you've got, you've heard of him.
17:05
He's got lots of physics as well.
17:07
Yeah, he doesn't do interviews though.
17:09
None, you know, it's probably a good idea.
17:11
Mark Mark Cutcheon doesn't do any interviews either.
17:15
So I'm the other ones picking on the subject.
17:16
But Mark Miles Matthews, even him has actually kind of moved
17:19
away from expansion theory and but he kept he's got a he's
17:25
found an equivalent kind of idea about the spinning universe that
17:28
can actually create this acceleration towards everything.
17:31
But there's still, I think an expansion, but it's reducing it.
17:36
It's prevented from going any further by something of a charge
17:40
field that he's got. I don't want to speak too much
17:42
about his theory because I'm sure he doesn't like very much,
17:44
but these people should check it out.
17:46
But he, he's got an expression theory as well.
17:49
So, and he kept mathematics, Captain Stein and relativity and
17:54
everything because he, he, he, he went in a different way than
17:57
Mark McCutcheon. Mark McCutcheon doesn't need it.
17:59
And my my my theories are based on Mark McCutcheon where it
18:02
doesn't need Einstein at all and there is other alternate tier
18:05
explanations for everything and for quantum mechanics as well,
18:09
which has been misinterpreted basically.
18:12
What happens if we drop Einstein?
18:16
That's it. The problem is that there's a
18:20
lot of things that goes on. First of all, there is no more
18:22
photons, so there's no more kind of energy.
18:25
Energy is actually particles in motion.
18:28
There is also that the speed of light is no longer constant.
18:32
If the speed of light is no longer constant, then we can go
18:34
faster than the speed of light. We can go anywhere in the world,
18:38
in the universe. I mean much faster than the
18:41
speed of light. And light will still arrive at
18:43
you because although it it moves at a speed of light, there are
18:47
particles that you would eventually see or your camera
18:49
will will register and then you will either see in Fast forward
18:54
or in slow motion or frozen in time or in real time if you are
19:00
at risk compared to the object. So there's no more speed of
19:04
light limit for a start. Second, the speed of light
19:08
itself should be relative instead of being constant
19:12
because it it is something that you see and different observers
19:16
will see differently depending on where they are.
19:18
So the speed of light should be relative instead of constant.
19:20
And time, time for Einstein is actually what is relative.
19:25
So the time rate can change. So not anymore.
19:28
The time is constant everywhere here on Earth, in space.
19:31
And also, you know, the dimensions if you want.
19:36
So if if time is not, is not constant, then there's, there's,
19:41
there's a big difference from, you know, the point of view of
19:44
Einstein. And there are also, since the
19:48
speed of light is not relative, it can accelerate.
19:51
You know when the steroids goes around the sun and they actually
19:56
enter into a partial orbit, they there's a slingshot effect,
20:00
which is relative motion effect due to the expansion of matter.
20:04
And so light has got the same thing, so it will accelerate,
20:07
but on Earth we will not see this that clearly because it's
20:10
also slowed down by a lot of particles that it meets along
20:13
the way, like our atmosphere. So we may always measure the
20:17
speed of light to BC, which is about 300,000 kilometres an
20:20
hour. But I think that you will find
20:23
that in space probably the speed of light is is is accelerating a
20:26
lot, a great deal. But you know the the original
20:29
speed of light which is most of it comes from when they are
20:32
rejected out of the atom. This is most of their speed.
20:35
And at that point then they are subject to cavity.
20:40
This would also mean that there'd be no singularities.
20:43
No Big Bang, no black holes, no wormholes.
20:46
So this, this idea of a black hole was not generally accepted
20:49
at the time. You know, it was really actually
20:53
there was a lot of opposition and there were lots of
20:54
alternatives. And as if Enstein goes, then
20:57
there is no more singularities. At some point there nothing.
21:00
There was no Big Bang where autumn nothing came, the whole
21:02
universe anyway. They cannot find a central point
21:07
for it in the first place. The further we look into space,
21:10
you know, even if it's 14 million light years or billions
21:14
light years away, we still find all galaxies.
21:17
So and the idea of The Big Bang should go and it's it in
21:23
expansion theory we don't have The Big Bang.
21:25
And so you know, there are three options.
21:29
Either the universe always existed as it is, or there was a
21:33
creation event and the creation event could there be a computer
21:37
simulation or it could be God thinking something.
21:40
Our brain is like a biological computer if you want.
21:43
So if I'm can think something, if I went in prison for 20 years
21:46
and the only thing I had in solitary confinement was my
21:50
mind, I would perhaps try to create the earth and everyone on
21:54
it and identify a few people. There will be non playing
21:56
characters but there will be a few that will follow and things
21:59
I can think of something like that.
22:01
So a God could have actually have created something like
22:03
that. And if we aren't within a
22:04
simulation, if I can do that myself, a God within a
22:07
simulation could also do that. But so.
22:10
So either someone thought this, this reality to the universe
22:14
into existence, or it's a computer simulation, or, you
22:18
know, it was always there. And even if it's a computer
22:21
simulation or even if it's a God creation, there could have been
22:24
an evolution. Because you can actually, when
22:26
you create something, you can say, OK, I want all the signs
22:29
that there was an evolution. I want all the signs that
22:31
billions of years have passed, even if the world has been has
22:34
been created this morning when you woke up, you know, or you
22:37
know, I don't know how long ago, you know, more recently than you
22:40
think you can create the world as it is.
22:43
And there's always a passive in the past doesn't exist When you
22:45
dream something, you there is a past, you know, you, you are in
22:50
a situation probably at work or something, and you interact with
22:53
people and you remember things that happened before that event
22:56
in your dream. So there is a past that exists
22:59
there that you never lived. So reality might be very
23:02
similar, you know, and the past might never have been even
23:06
though it was a creation event. So I don't have a, I don't know
23:11
which option it is in those three, but they are all
23:14
possible. And the possibility of a
23:16
computer simulation is, is certainly very high.
23:18
You know, after Mike bolst home or something from Oxford
23:23
University or something, his paper was very convincing.
23:27
So it's very likely that we live in a computer simulation,
23:29
especially with the event of AI. You know, if God has any kind of
23:33
mind like AI, I'm pretty sure he can think of our universe with
23:36
billions of people on it very easily and control all that
23:40
without any much problem and be everywhere at once.
23:43
So expansion theory is actually compatible with the sort of
23:47
David Icke view that everything's a simulation, and
23:49
it's also compatible with with the Christian or religious
23:53
perspective that there's a creator, but it's not compatible
23:57
with Flat Earth theory. If I haven't read much about
24:01
flatter theory, but if people were to try to explain gravity
24:05
using the expansion of their Flat Earth, I'm sure they can
24:09
find a way. It would be easy.
24:10
So it it could be compatible with that too.
24:12
And it would explain also what anti gravity can be.
24:15
You know, because anti gravity is very interesting in in like
24:19
an expansion theory, because if the Earth is always expanding or
24:22
you can you create anti gravity. It's it's like there's nothing
24:25
you can do because the Earth is always expanding and it's
24:28
expanding the distance reduces. It was an acceleration.
24:31
You couldn't have anti gravity. So how do you explain UFOs?
24:34
You know, they are floating up in space.
24:37
They don't seem to be using any kind of proportion.
24:39
They can float out completely up there and no proportion, no
24:44
noise, anything. So what is anti gravity here is
24:47
actually buoyancy. You know, when you've got a
24:49
balloon of air in water, it goes up to the top because the
24:53
density of the air is much less dense than the water.
24:58
And you've got a balloon of ileum, which ileum is a gas that
25:00
is actually not very dense. It's one of the earlier, I think
25:04
it's the second gas or the first one, I can't remember.
25:08
But it, it goes up in the air as well because it's less dense
25:12
than the atmosphere, the composition of the atmosphere,
25:14
which is nitrogen, oxygen. And so the UFO is the same
25:18
thing. It's buoyancy.
25:19
But what is happening here is it's the the particles, you
25:24
know, when you've got the, the air console expand or that that
25:28
shrink, you know, they, they can, they can if they go, it
25:33
depends on their speed. If they go very fast or orbits
25:36
go faster, then it vibrates faster.
25:38
So the frequency is higher. And so what's happening is that
25:41
all the, the, the particles enlarge and they're all
25:44
vibrating faster. And then the molecules, the
25:47
atoms, they are expanding, they are larger.
25:50
They are also more spaced out. And it changes the density of
25:53
matter. This is what I call the intense
25:55
dimensional density of matter. And that explains.
25:58
And then this is less dense than our own dimensional, intense
26:02
dimensional density of matter. So that's how they can float.
26:05
So it all makes sense, you know, So this is what density cavity
26:08
is. As as long as you get your
26:10
particles go faster, then everything enlarges, everything
26:13
is more spaced out. And what happens is that you
26:17
change the dimension. The dimension this is what it
26:21
meant by that is the size of the objects is actually the size of
26:24
the particles and so that you move to another dimensions and
26:27
the frequencies how fast all these particles are spinning.
26:30
So this is how unscavity can be explained and other dimensions
26:34
that that's why ghosts can appear and disappear also
26:36
because they just their particles are moving a little
26:38
faster or slower than what our senses can can actually see.
26:42
And that would explain why a child might be vibrating faster
26:46
at a higher frequency would see a ghost while an adult won't.
26:49
And the same for UFOs. You sorry, just to go back to
26:56
your helium balloon, gravity doesn't pull it down.
26:59
That's also quite interesting. Yes, this is this is what
27:03
Beyoncé is and this is how these massive boat on the on the ocean
27:06
can float because the density is much less than the water.
27:12
So the helium balloon, if the gas is this is a a fact of
27:17
physics that anything that is less dense will be pushed up
27:19
above what is denser. And if you've got these kind of,
27:23
you know, the differences in density of matter all the way
27:26
from here to the middle of the Galaxy, then you just have to
27:29
adjust your frequency of matter to, to, to be at the same rate
27:35
at that that it is at that location and even time, you can
27:39
even time travel. So if you adjust your frequency
27:42
or your vibration rate of matter, you can go anywhere in
27:45
the universe instantly. And you can also at any
27:47
particular time because everything anywhere has a unique
27:51
frequency and we all don't use, we don't all live in the same
27:55
dimension. If you want, we all have an
27:56
individual dimensions. But when you've got a certain
27:59
kind of scale of of dimension all together, then you call it
28:02
the 4th dimension. And you know, if you've got
28:05
which we are in apparently, and then no, we aren't moving to the
28:10
fourth. I think because time is no good
28:13
dimension not understand is gone.
28:14
So we it's so time is just constant.
28:17
But if your if your particles are vibrating faster time, your
28:22
time rate will seem to be faster even though it will actually be
28:26
taking at the same speed. You can accomplish more task in
28:30
the in the same amount of time that someone is vibrating
28:33
slower. So in that way, time could all
28:35
still be said to be relative, although it is constant because
28:38
if you look at it, the the planets are not moving faster.
28:42
So time is not very going faster.
28:44
You can just do more in the same amount of time.
28:48
So, so in other dimensions, you know, one of our day can be a
28:54
year for them. So yeah.
28:56
So that that's one thing of expansion theory, or my theory
28:59
anyway. OK, so so Einstein argued that
29:05
light, the speed of light is constant and the expansion
29:10
theory suggests that the speed of light is not constant and
29:13
that time is constant. Is that correct?
29:18
Time is constant and the speed of light is no longer constant.
29:21
It is actually variable and also it is relative so it changes so.
29:27
But on Earth is usually around sea, so we need to keep that in
29:30
mind. And if you look at this as
29:34
equation equal MC square, which is mass energy, kinetic energy
29:38
because this is what it is about kinetic energy equal mass
29:42
multiplied by the speed of light square if if you change you if,
29:46
since the speed of light is constant, if you change the
29:49
kinetic energy of an object, which is the force of impact it
29:52
will have if it hits something, you know the only the mass can
29:56
change because the speed of light is constant.
29:58
So that's a problem. And the mass is relative,
30:02
relative stick mass. The mass doesn't really change,
30:04
but from the point of view of someone, the mass can become
30:07
infinite like in a particle accelerator.
30:09
But it is not basically the it's the it's the speed of light that
30:14
changes. This is and the mass always
30:16
stays the same. So you see there's a massive
30:19
difference with this equation. We might as well perhaps you go
30:23
and use the kinetic energy equation, which is Ek equal half
30:27
MV square, which is almost identical to Einstein.
30:30
So you know, there's only 1/2 there and it's because of
30:35
calculating average of speeds. But V is velocity, so yeah.
30:42
OK, so so so light in expansion theory is not made of photons,
30:46
but of clusters of electrons. Yes and but you know for for
30:53
mark and miles, you know speed of light is not accelerating.
30:56
These are these are my ideas. But yeah, so, and it makes
31:04
sense, as I said, that the speed of light, the the light is made
31:07
of crosses of electrons and in it's, it's, it's, it's, there's
31:11
no much difference. You know, you could still call
31:12
them photons, but if they are crosses of electrons and you can
31:16
have different sizes, you know, you could also have different
31:19
sizes. Photon.
31:19
At the moment they don't say that, but if you've got a mass
31:22
that that's the difference and they've got a shape and a
31:25
volume. But you know, in my theory, you
31:28
know, it's, it's the everything is the same when when you've got
31:32
an expansion theory, everything that is extremely small, like
31:34
particle physics quickly become extremely large, like astral
31:37
physics. So it's the same thing.
31:40
So an electron is actually a solar system.
31:42
They are the same. So you've got the nucleus, which
31:45
is the sun, and you've got planets that orbits that sun.
31:48
And so I've called the neutrinos in the electron.
31:52
So you've got a super neutrino as the sun, you've got neutrinos
31:54
as planets, and you've got some neutrinos as moons.
31:58
So you can imagine that an electron is exactly like a solar
32:01
system. And so when electrons are
32:02
interacting together, it's like other solar system interacting
32:05
together. We will find probably other
32:07
planets orbiting very far from our known 8 planets where
32:11
actually connects us to other solar systems.
32:13
And together they form, you know, larger particles such as
32:17
neutrons, protons within, you know, an atom.
32:21
And those are basically just a collection of solar system and
32:23
they're connected together. And the Galaxy itself is
32:26
actually an atom. So an atom is made of electrons
32:29
like, you know, like a Galaxy is made of solar systems.
32:33
And then you've got a molecule after that.
32:35
So the molecules are made of atoms, you know, and they're
32:38
connected together by electrons. So at a larger scale, you've got
32:42
galaxies and they're connected together by orbiting solar
32:45
systems. And so so you've got cosmic
32:48
molecules. So all together, what we're
32:50
looking at at the moment when we're looking at the night sky,
32:54
it could be something, it might be alive, it might not be, might
32:57
be a rock of fish, it might be God, you know, we might be
32:59
inside God. That would explain why he's
33:01
everywhere. And from what, from what I
33:03
calculated, everything that we see in our sky at the moment is
33:06
about half the size of a cell. So if it was to be alive, we
33:10
should be able to see patterns in the night sky of things that
33:13
you would normally find in a cell like DNARNA, organelle,
33:19
things like that. So, yeah, so, so this is this is
33:26
this is quite a big change from normal physics.
33:29
And to make all this work together, I can tell you it's,
33:32
it's quite something, but it's all our base of expansion and
33:35
contraction and growth of matter.
33:38
OK, so if everything in the universe is expanding and
33:42
doubling in size every 19 minutes constant rate including
33:47
the universe, how is it that the earth and moon are not getting
33:51
closer then? Because as I said earlier,
33:54
orbits is a way to counter high gravity and orbits are, you
33:59
know, as I explained, it's, it's all due to the geometry of, of
34:05
expansion. So, you know, Einstein's theory
34:08
was geometric in nature because the space was bent, space time
34:12
was bent. So it it had to obey geometry
34:17
and Newtons, it was like an attraction at a distance.
34:19
You've got vector forces. So at that point it's not
34:23
geometrical. And so, and then expansion
34:26
theory is that if, if things are passing like that in space, as
34:29
they expand, they they actually expand like that.
34:33
But if they are, if they are saying the staying the same size
34:36
from our point of view, the only the distance reduces, but the
34:40
objects remain the same size. So that's what you get, an orbit
34:43
and the orbit, you know, the objects are going totally
34:45
different directions very fast, you know, behind the scenes.
34:48
And that's what we call the gods viewpoint because we can never
34:51
see that viewpoint. But if you could see the
34:53
expansion of matter, this is what you would see.
34:55
And this is how you can actually explain the mechanics of the
34:57
universe is that by seeing what's happening behind the
34:59
scenes. If you could see the expansion
35:01
of matter where there is no gravity, there's just they're
35:03
just expanding and they're just moving away.
35:05
But when from our point of view, there is something in reality,
35:08
when we don't see the expansion, we see a natural orbit effect.
35:11
And so that's why they actually orbit and because if they are
35:14
leaving, if they are going into opposite directions, you know
35:18
they're never going to collide. And, and, and everything is just
35:22
relative motion from our point of view and relative motion
35:24
effects because we cannot see the expansion.
35:26
So any kind of orbits will actually just contracts cavity,
35:31
but it's the cavity is still there all the time.
35:36
All the distances are reducing in the universe and that's why
35:38
everything is accelerating and that's why all the distances are
35:41
accelerating because distance is always reduced.
35:44
So our solar systems, you know, to see that it's expanding, you
35:48
have to compare with other solar systems that we are not
35:50
connected to. And you would just see that the
35:52
distance is reduces. But if we aren't connected with
35:56
other solar systems through other planets orbiting, then
35:59
what happens is that they always remain at the same distance
36:03
because of because of this. That's a motion effect.
36:08
So and then you know, and at a smaller scale, you know, closer
36:11
to objects, you also have electromagnetism that can
36:16
counteract gravity. So gravity is not a force, it's
36:21
just, it's just everything expanding.
36:25
It's a it's. It's not a force.
36:27
It is a it, it's just the expansion of matter and that the
36:30
geometry of expansion will explain, you know what you will
36:33
see in the universe, all the orbits and and the reduction in
36:37
distance of objects. Like if if saw an object is
36:40
falling down to Earth, it's the Earth is expanding towards it
36:43
and catches up with it as an acceleration at the Earth is
36:47
expanding at 4.9 metres per second and then with the
36:50
acceleration then it, it becomes 9.8, so 9.8 metres per second.
36:55
So that's compounding. It's it, it quickly multiplies.
37:00
So. So gravity is is not a force,
37:03
it's. It's just the geometry of
37:05
expansion because everything expands and.
37:08
How did you get to the 19 minute number?
37:12
So Mark Mccutchen has got equations, a new equation to
37:15
calculate gravity, which is you know the original distance
37:19
multiplied by the the the amount of time squared and multiplied
37:23
by the expansion rate. So it depends on the expansion
37:25
rate of matter and the radius of objects of the both objects and
37:31
then divided by the how to decrease in distance which is 1
37:35
minus expansion of maximum supplied by time again square.
37:38
So it's got new equations. And then his new equation is it
37:42
depends if he can calculate that everything doubles in size every
37:45
90 minutes. And he can calculate the the the
37:47
9.8 metres per second square acceleration downwards towards
37:52
Earth as cavity because because of the equation that he come up
37:56
with. And it's all based on the
37:58
expansion, the radius of the objects and as I say, the time
38:03
and the distance between them and all depending on the
38:07
expansion rate of matter. So this is how he was able to
38:10
come up with the 90. You can calculate how much time
38:14
it would take before an object actually takes to double in
38:19
size. And it's our universal because
38:21
expansion rate is universal everywhere, so every 19 minutes
38:25
everything doubles in size. What about Redshift?
38:31
Now redshifts. There's a redshift is based on
38:35
the the sound, the Doppler effect in sound.
38:41
They thought that light was the same, but the problem is that
38:43
it's not. And so when you see a red shift
38:46
in space, they think that it gives them the idea of what the
38:50
distances are, of how the object is, you know, the direction of
38:54
motion. And, and so, but it's not it,
38:58
you know, you can get a red shift just by having dust
39:01
between what you're observing in an object.
39:03
So it's, it's no indication of anything.
39:06
It's not really reliable. So we think that things they
39:09
that universe is expanding at an extraordinary rate and even
39:12
more. And we came up with the idea of
39:14
dark energy and and dark matter to explain all this.
39:17
All this is all gone. This was just fudge factors to
39:20
make Einstein still works to explain the cosmology of the
39:22
universe and it's pretty clear to everyone and you read the
39:25
headlines everywhere in the magazines.
39:26
We need a new theory because Einstein cannot explain any of
39:28
this. I'm sure they'll find a way to
39:30
fudge this or to come up with new equations on top of new
39:33
equations to be able to to, to still keep these these ideas.
39:38
But it's, it's clear that something is truly wrong here.
39:41
So to measure distances in space, the universe is not
39:45
expanding. It is expanding in the sense
39:48
that it will double in size around 10 minutes, but we cannot
39:50
see that because everything expending expends at the same
39:54
distances and we cannot see this expansion.
39:57
But from our point of view, it's not expanding.
40:01
Everything is mostly static in the universe and galaxies are
40:05
clustering together and that's just what you see when you're
40:08
looking at telescopes. So all this idea that.
40:11
This was Big Bang and everything is expanding even faster.
40:15
This is this is probably all wrong and it's all based on the
40:18
stretch of idea that is like the Doppler effect.
40:20
It is no indication of distance. It's not the no indication of
40:23
direction of motion and it's no indication of speed.
40:26
Basically, it may give you a good idea, but you know it.
40:31
There's nothing reliable about it and they are aware of that.
40:33
You know when they can do any calculations.
40:35
They tried out maybe 3 different ways by which they can measure
40:38
these things, but I think they've got it probably
40:41
completely wrong because and you know, once an idea is out there,
40:44
everybody's trying to explain it by any means.
40:47
And so, and then if you give them enough time and enough
40:51
millions of people working on this, they will come up with
40:53
something, you know. And so it's, it's like the moon,
40:57
the cavity on the moon. That's you had an interview
41:00
recently with someone said that probably the Apollo missions
41:03
were fake. So when we were on the moon,
41:06
they say that we calculated that, that the the cavity on the
41:10
moon was 1.6 metres per second square 1.62.
41:14
But I don't think, and this is 1/6 the cavity of the Earth.
41:17
But if you look at the moon, it's four times the, it's four
41:19
times smaller than the Earth. And if you look at its radius,
41:23
cavity on the moon should actually be two point 62.6
41:27
metres per second square, not 1/6.
41:29
It should be 1/4, a bit more than 1/4.
41:32
And so from orbit, from a perfect orbit around the the
41:37
moon, this is definitely what you will get.
41:39
But as soon as you're no longer in that perfect orbit, you know,
41:41
and you're falling down kind of a knock way or, you know,
41:45
straight down, you know, then it could be 1/6.
41:49
This despite the fact that it's it's one that it should be 1/4,
41:54
but I don't think it's likely. I think that's and that would
41:57
explain why half the unmanned missions of cash on the moon,
42:01
they were expecting 1/6 before they went.
42:03
And this is what they confirm. And if these missions were fake,
42:06
then obviously it was never verified.
42:08
And so I think it's probably 1/4.
42:10
And when you look at mathematics and Mark McCutcheon, when they
42:13
tried to their theories and their equations to try to
42:16
justify this, this what it would be on the moon, they they
42:21
assumed that 1.6 was correct, that it was 1/6.
42:24
And then they tried to explain it.
42:27
I think Miles explains it with his charged field, but Mark
42:29
Mccutchen explains it by the fact that it's 1/6 on the near
42:33
side, but it's actually 1/3 on the hidden side because the
42:36
density of the moon is totally different.
42:38
It's much more dense to close to the Earth because of the
42:41
original formation of the Earth moon system.
42:44
So it's so to all together added together 1/3 and 1/6 and then
42:49
1/4 at the edges, it gives you exactly that, a fourth of the
42:53
cavity of the earth. And the earth, the centre of of
42:58
cavity is more towards the centre because the earth was
43:01
spinning at a time but the moon was not spinning.
43:03
We always see the same face of the the moon.
43:05
So definitely there's a graduation degradation of of
43:09
density of matter gravity also once you're on the ground,
43:14
gravity is also when you're all you are being pushed up by the
43:17
object itself. So the density of matter is is
43:21
important then, but I don't think there will be that much
43:23
difference. I think that it's probably a
43:25
quarter all around, maybe a bit less on on near side and a bit
43:31
more on the other side because gravity goes from the centre of
43:35
mass. And if it's nearer our side then
43:38
it there will be more expansion towards of the matter towards
43:41
where the other side of the moon is.
43:44
But I think for miles it's probably 1/6 all around at 1.6
43:49
metres per second square all around.
43:51
I'm not sure. I'll have to double check that
43:52
people can check this on his website, but I think it's
43:56
probably a quarter. But you know, I can't be sure.
43:59
Maybe the appurmissions did happen, you know, I can't be
44:02
sure. What do you think?
44:03
What do you think? Do you think they did happen?
44:06
To be honest, I don't know, you know, if if I had made a massive
44:11
research on it. It's, it's very difficult these
44:13
days to say anything because you need to research everything and,
44:16
you know, writing a book or to maybe.
44:19
Yeah, yeah. So I, I can't be sure.
44:21
But, you know, very, people are very convincing.
44:24
Many people are, they are, you know, expressing their fields
44:26
and they've, they've written all these things.
44:27
And he will explain a lot because it doesn't make any
44:29
sense that gravity would be 1/6. You know, originally they
44:32
thought it would be 1/6 because, you know, they, they, they,
44:35
they, they had the wrong mass. And this is all because we use
44:38
Newtons and in these equations which are based on mass.
44:41
But if everything is based on on expansion only there's a size
44:46
counts. Gravity is like from surface to
44:48
surface of expanding objects. It's no longer mass.
44:52
And that's why they had the wrong mass and they had the
44:54
wrong density as a result. So what happens is that they
44:58
thought that the moon was much less dense than it is, but it
45:01
doesn't make any sense. I think that probably the moon
45:04
is for the same kind of density than the Earth on not that much,
45:08
that much more. So even on the moon, I would
45:11
have thought that it would be one 1/4 so.
45:13
But you know, maybe the Chinese will verify it and tell us the
45:17
truth. So OK, So what you're suggesting
45:23
is that expansion theory is far more elegant in its explanation
45:29
of everything. Elegant.
45:33
That's a nice word to use. And for theories in physics,
45:36
which is definitely meaningless. You know, it's like string
45:38
theory has always been declared elegant.
45:40
I don't know what's elegant about it.
45:41
It's a nightmare. And it's not getting them any
45:44
kind of solutions anytime soon. It's doomed.
45:48
Sorry. Might just.
45:50
More. Pragmatic.
45:53
It's more mechanical in nature. So that's very important.
45:56
If you got a theory in physics, you know, you've got to have
45:59
these particles you have, you've got to be able to explain the
46:01
interactions and you've got to explain why things happen.
46:05
You know, it's like this natural orbit effect, for example, or
46:08
gravity distance is reducing. And you can visualise this
46:11
because you know, you can see the God's viewpoint behind the
46:14
scenes where you can see the expansion, you know, and you
46:18
know, that's one perspective because of your point.
46:20
The second is what we see now resulting in reality.
46:22
But there's a third perspective, which is once, once you've seen
46:26
the the Nevada motion effects, what is really happening then at
46:29
that point, because, you know, for the moon to orbit the Earth,
46:33
if they are expanding, we don't see this and it looks like the
46:38
the orbit is very stable. But you know, if the Earth is
46:41
expanding, technically the moon is also expanding and it's
46:44
moving into a non lodging spirals and all the orbits in
46:47
the solar systems as well. And This is why they are
46:49
expanding. And this is that's why they
46:51
doubled in size, you know, these objects and all these orbits and
46:54
all these systems. So there are different
46:58
perspectives to help you to actually visualise exactly what
47:00
is going on. So I don't know if it's, if we
47:04
could say that it's elegant and I'm not sure any theory in
47:06
physics is elegant. But does it make sense?
47:09
And then is it easy to understand?
47:10
Can a child understand it if he's 10 years old?
47:13
Yeah, probably. If I take the time to explain,
47:15
I'm pretty sure that they they would, and much easier as well
47:18
than an adult who actually knows about physics.
47:20
And U turn and Einstein, because then he gets very confused.
47:23
You know, when I was a kid, for me, when I look at particle
47:27
physics and when I look at the still physics, they were the
47:29
same. It was obviously the same.
47:30
I just had to figure out how. And it took me, you know, a
47:33
lifetime so to figure it out. But I have, you know, it is the
47:38
same thing. And once you've got these
47:40
theories and to explain things and the the contradict the fact
47:43
that, Oh no, particle physics is totally different from astral
47:45
physics. What you see in the night sky
47:47
has got nothing to do with what you see in a microscope or a
47:49
very powerful microscope if you want, but they are the same
47:52
thing. So electrons are, you know,
47:55
solar systems, galaxies are atoms and then cosmic molecules
47:59
are, you know, galaxies linked together.
48:02
And all of this must be there are lots of rogue planets and
48:05
rogue solar systems in the universe are outside the the
48:08
solar systems outside the galaxies.
48:10
And we have never paid attention to them because they are very
48:12
difficult to see and only solar systems can be seen.
48:15
And even then very difficult with the great difficulties.
48:17
So now it's a prediction, I'm telling you that there are those
48:20
things. So we should look at the at
48:22
these all they are linked together because all these
48:24
particles are linked together. And we can see that now there
48:28
are some discoveries of patterns in the universe with galaxies
48:31
that, you know, are in in strange shapes.
48:34
They obviously kind of link together.
48:35
How do you explain that? And what do they represent?
48:38
It's very difficult to see because we don't know because of
48:41
the distortion, because the path of light changes all the time.
48:44
Sometimes you can see an object twice because it has taken
48:47
different paths to get to you. And then you see it in different
48:51
locations. But there are patterns out
48:53
there. And so.
48:55
So yeah, this is this is interesting.
49:01
It sounds extremely theoretical, and at the risk of it becoming
49:05
sort of academic masturbation, what is the real world
49:08
application of of theories like this?
49:13
It's the entire physics, it's chemistry, it's every, it would
49:17
affect everything you know, from every point of view, you know.
49:22
So it is extremely important. It's how you explain physics and
49:26
the right equation to explain everything.
49:28
And you know how you build plane, for example, or do they
49:31
fly? You know, if the Earth is
49:33
expanding, they're constantly going higher.
49:35
How do you explain orbits for satellites, for example, you
49:38
know, in lower orbit they go faster.
49:41
And if you want them to go higher into a higher orbit, then
49:45
you know, you've got to accelerate.
49:46
But once they have accelerated, they suddenly go slower into
49:51
orbit around the Earth. How do you explain all this?
49:53
And you can explain that you know easily with the the the
49:56
geometry of expansion behind the scenes and so but.
49:59
Planes do fly. Sorry, but but hang on.
50:01
Hang on, but planes? Do fly.
50:03
They fly, yeah. But I mean to say is that if the
50:06
Earth isn't expanding, it's actually always at the same
50:09
altitude. But if the Earth is expanding,
50:12
it must be always going up upwards.
50:14
And so, you know, their, their wings are making sure that
50:19
they're always going up higher because they must go into
50:22
aspiring upward way to, to counteract the gravity of the
50:27
Earth. And so there's, there's a lot
50:29
and you know, what wire satellite can remain in the same
50:32
space as geostationary orbits, you know, above your house
50:36
without moving at all. And this is also the expansion
50:39
matter. It is actually in orbit and it
50:40
is moving, but it, it's in with the rotation of the Earth.
50:43
And then so as the Earth expands and rotate, the, the the
50:48
satellite is probably moving in a completely straight line, the
50:53
distance reduces, but they will always remain at the same place.
50:56
And then you will have to not sure of the effect again.
50:59
And then you can explain why actually it's at the same place.
51:01
Otherwise it's a total mystery. And so once you've got a better
51:04
understanding of everything, like the speed of light might be
51:07
accelerated, it changes everything from any kind of
51:12
invention about energy, you know, or because it's not just
51:15
light, it's also, you know, energy, it's magnetic fields and
51:18
electrical fields. And this is whole what
51:22
technology is about. And there could be a massive big
51:25
evolution, you know, like quantum entanglement is is not
51:29
exactly something that the it's completely misunderstood.
51:33
And you know, mathematics says there's they are not even they
51:36
aren't even interconnected. They are just sync on eyes like
51:38
clocks and these spin. And I think this is a very good
51:41
explanation, but quantum autonomy can also be explained
51:46
by the fact that if two particles are entangled, they're
51:51
actually they're connected together by a, you know, a big
51:54
field of particles between them over long distances.
51:58
And when one particles change, the other one as well.
52:01
So, you know, there's, there's a lot of different explanation.
52:04
They're built, they're trying to build computers on this and lots
52:06
of technology. So they better understand
52:08
exactly what they're dealing with.
52:09
You see. So it's, it's crucial and
52:12
chemistry as well, you know, it changes a lot of things.
52:14
So and all science, I would have thought.
52:17
What about vectors like wind? Vectors like.
52:23
Does wind Does wind expand also every 19 minutes?
52:28
Wind for so if you look at wind, it's made of air molecules.
52:33
So it all the molecules are definitely expanding
52:36
individually. All the particles when you got a
52:39
gas, you know, it's, it's very kind of chaotic.
52:42
Everything is kind of spaced out and it's going, it's it's
52:47
vibrating faster. And so, but what is interesting
52:50
about wind is that, well, the money they are molecules are
52:53
definitely expanding, but the Earth is expanding and in all
52:57
directions around the Earth. And so that's what creates the
52:59
pressure of the weather. So all the winds and all the
53:03
atmosphere is being pushed out and see if you got mountains and
53:06
if you got, you know, oceans or a different kind of geography
53:10
down below, it will push the wind in certain directions, you
53:13
see. So yes, that the wind itself
53:16
very interesting questions. Does the molecules of the gases
53:19
composing the wind are expanding and doubling in size around 10
53:22
minutes? But as I was saying that the
53:25
earth is expanding in every directions everywhere.
53:28
This is why the atmosphere is not lost into space.
53:31
And this is what creates the the weather under the pressure and
53:35
and the problems because you know of the different geography
53:38
of the earth like mountains and oceans or you know just normal
53:44
hills. So it it pushes the the wind in
53:46
different directions. How can I follow your work?
53:51
So if people do a search on on sub stack or new medium, I've
53:56
got a lot of articles there. A lot of my chapters are free to
54:00
to be read, to be read, all the most important ones.
54:03
Also I've got a website whichisthemarginal.com the
54:08
marginal so THEMAR ginal.com. So from there there are links
54:15
everywhere else. I'm not that.
54:18
I'm not that much on social media.
54:20
I do have all the accounts, but I'm I'm not using it.
54:22
Otherwise I wouldn't be doing any work.
54:24
I don't know, Elon Musk. Elon Musk does it.
54:26
He's always and Trump, you know, are they always tweeting?
54:29
Do they do anything with their days?
54:31
I don't know. I can't pronounce your name in
54:36
your native language. I'm going to say, Roland
54:38
Tremblay, thank you for joining me in the trenches.
54:41
No, thank you very much. It was a pleasure.