Latest / Merryn Talks Money / How Amateur Investors Can Maximize Their Returns
Transcript
- 0:03Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.
- 0:15Speaker 2: Welcome to Merrin Talks Your Money, the personal finance edition
- 0:19Speaker 2: of Marin Talks Money. In these bonus podcasts, we talk
- 0:21Speaker 2: about the best strategies for making the most of your money.
- 0:24Speaker 1: I'm Marry Sunset Web and with Me Senior.
- 0:26Speaker 2: Have brought her and Money Distilled author John Depek Hi
- 0:28Speaker 2: John Hi meil.
- 0:30Speaker 1: So this week we are answering a question from Sarah.
- 0:32Speaker 2: Sarah wrote in, So we haven't got the audio for that,
- 0:34Speaker 2: so I'm going to have to read the question.
- 0:36Speaker 1: Sorry about that, she wrote.
- 0:37Speaker 2: In, and she says, I'm a reasonably savvy investor and
- 0:40Speaker 2: I'm monitor my investments closely, although investing is not my
- 0:43Speaker 2: day job, given that I'm smaller, nippy unlike the funds.
- 0:47Speaker 2: How realistic is it set myself a twenty percent per
- 0:49Speaker 2: annum growth target from a mix of thirty percent growth shares,
- 0:53Speaker 2: thirty percent trackers, and thirty percent actively managed funds. Okay,
- 0:59Speaker 2: this is an interesting question, but our answers to this,
- 1:01Speaker 2: I just want to be clear before we get going,
- 1:03Speaker 2: John and I are not going anybody specific advice here,
- 1:06Speaker 2: but we're just trying to do We're going to try
- 1:07Speaker 2: and talk around this subject a little bit and give
- 1:09Speaker 2: a general idea of how to approach this question, this dilemma.
- 1:14Speaker 2: But the first thing to say, and I think we
- 1:16Speaker 2: are going to put a number on it, John one
- 1:18Speaker 2: to ten, ten being realistic, one being not very realistic.
- 1:22Speaker 2: How realistic is for anybody, not just Sarah, but anybody
- 1:26Speaker 2: to make twenty percent a year on their investments year in,
- 1:29Speaker 2: year out.
- 1:30Speaker 3: I'm afraid it's a wine. Okay, So it's highly highly unlikely.
- 1:36Speaker 2: Well, there's almost nobody who has ever done this, right
- 1:39Speaker 2: in our experience. You might get people who, over time
- 1:43Speaker 2: might come out with a really impressive return, but even
- 1:46Speaker 2: with ups and downs, twenty percent a year is fairly spectacular.
- 1:49Speaker 2: But to do that every year for a series of years,
- 1:53Speaker 2: I mean, who's done that?
- 1:55Speaker 1: Who is there?
- 1:56Speaker 3: Well, there are a few people who've mineaged to meet
- 2:00Speaker 3: I mean Stan Druckin Miller, who's like one of the
- 2:02Speaker 3: world's most respected hedge fund managers, consistently mine to make
- 2:06Speaker 3: apparently thirty percent a year between nineteen eighty six and
- 2:10Speaker 3: twenty ten.
- 2:12Speaker 2: Kyle but Lynch, But wait, wait, so without without ever
- 2:16Speaker 2: having a down yet, because that's okay, without ever having
- 2:19Speaker 2: a year when he had a draw down a twenty
- 2:21Speaker 2: thirty forty fifty percent consistently.
- 2:24Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean he was. He's staggeringly good. And there's
- 2:28Speaker 3: also Fidelities Magellan Found, which was run by Peter Lynch
- 2:33Speaker 3: who wrote One Up on Wall Street, which is an
- 2:35Speaker 3: excellent book that you should all read, and he made
- 2:38Speaker 3: twenty nine percent a year between nineteen seventy seven and
- 2:40Speaker 3: nineteen ninety so it's it can be done. But they
- 2:45Speaker 3: are also the world's best investors him and actually it
- 2:50Speaker 3: was their day job as well, so they're not you know,
- 2:54Speaker 3: they're not part time investors.
- 2:56Speaker 2: The other thing that should be said here is there
- 2:58Speaker 2: an argument to be made that if you keep tossing coins,
- 3:01Speaker 2: there's always going to be someone who gets twenty years
- 3:03Speaker 2: worth of heads, right, well.
- 3:05Speaker 3: Yeah, this is it. I mean yeah, I mean this
- 3:07Speaker 3: all goes into, you know, the whole argument about active
- 3:11Speaker 3: fund managers and somebody's got to win the lottery, even
- 3:14Speaker 3: though the odds are winning the lottery are extremely low
- 3:17Speaker 3: for any one person. So yeah, just because you win
- 3:21Speaker 3: the lottery doesn't mean that your skill. That just means
- 3:23Speaker 3: that you happen to be the one in a million
- 3:26Speaker 3: people that did it, so again, Yeah, it's very difficult
- 3:29Speaker 3: to separate out the low I would say that we
- 3:32Speaker 3: believe in active management having the potential to add alpha,
- 3:37Speaker 3: as it were. There is also a very good argument
- 3:40Speaker 3: to be made about you know, monkey's tossing coins and
- 3:43Speaker 3: one of them getting lots of heads in a row.
- 3:45Speaker 1: Yeah, what about that wonderful Warren Buffett.
- 3:49Speaker 3: Was I was doing in this because I mean, yeah,
- 3:51Speaker 3: if you're looking at things a little bit closer to
- 3:54Speaker 3: the modern day, and also the sorts of funds that
- 3:56Speaker 3: pop into your head instantly if you look back over
- 3:59Speaker 3: the last decade roughly, and I'm taking this in pound terms,
- 4:03Speaker 3: so you've actually also enjoyed a certain amount of currency
- 4:07Speaker 3: benefits here as well, because the pound is largely good
- 4:10Speaker 3: weaker against the dollar. Over the last ten years, Scottish
- 4:13Speaker 3: Mortgage Trust, which is one that I think most of
- 4:15Speaker 3: our readers would imagine, has been an absolute stellar performer
- 4:19Speaker 3: that's done about sixteen percent a year over the last decades.
- 4:24Speaker 3: Perks of Hathaway's managed about sixteen and a half percent,
- 4:28Speaker 3: and to be fair, the IS and P five hundred
- 4:30Speaker 3: has done sixteen percent as well over that period. So
- 4:34Speaker 3: and that those are those are amazing returns by comparison
- 4:38Speaker 3: to you know, the kind of long term return on equities.
- 4:44Speaker 3: So I think the kind of point there is, even
- 4:46Speaker 3: if you'd been invested in what I think most people
- 4:48Speaker 3: would think we're very good investments over the last ten years,
- 4:52Speaker 3: you still wouldn't have managed to hit the twenty percent
- 4:55Speaker 3: of a year.
- 4:55Speaker 2: Yeah, and those are also very good investments in a
- 4:59Speaker 2: period when my marckets have mostly gone up, and particularly
- 5:02Speaker 2: when American markets have mostly gone up, so they've had
- 5:04Speaker 2: a fantastic tail wind at the same time.
- 5:07Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, so it's been a very good time
- 5:09Speaker 3: for those, well I suppose. I mean, one using we
- 5:11Speaker 3: picked them is because they have been among the better
- 5:14Speaker 3: perform investments. So and also obviously if you'd stuck all
- 5:19Speaker 3: your money in any of those that had been highly concentrated,
- 5:23Speaker 3: you know, putting one hundred percent of your money into
- 5:25Speaker 3: even Warren Buffet's fund, you know, is taking a big
- 5:29Speaker 3: sort of non diversification risk. So basically twenty percent is really, really,
- 5:37Speaker 3: really hard, and it's the sort of thing that only
- 5:41Speaker 3: the world's best investors. They're probably taking risks that your
- 5:45Speaker 3: average private investor cannot or should not over you know,
- 5:50Speaker 3: a prolong period of time and using an awful lot
- 5:52Speaker 3: of expertise.
- 5:54Speaker 2: Okay, So John, what is a realistic expect for Sarah?
- 6:01Speaker 3: I mean the long term reton or in equities editatingly,
- 6:06Speaker 3: I don't have it in front of me, but it's there,
- 6:09Speaker 3: about seven and eight percent.
- 6:11Speaker 1: Studying that high.
- 6:12Speaker 2: I thought it was more like six percent. If you
- 6:13Speaker 2: look at all the very long term studies for the US,
- 6:15Speaker 2: you're talking about six percent raere, aren't you sorry?
- 6:18Speaker 3: Six percent real? I think I'm thanking the nominal terms.
- 6:24Speaker 2: Yeah, so once once you've adjusted for inflation about about
- 6:26Speaker 2: six percent.
- 6:27Speaker 1: Although I have to tell you I.
- 6:28Speaker 2: Was speaking of build inning at Waverturn and he was
- 6:31Speaker 2: pointing out to me that the beginning of two thousand
- 6:33Speaker 2: and nine, the UK stock market, adjusted for inflation, that's
- 6:36Speaker 2: the key bit, stood no higher than it was in
- 6:39Speaker 2: sixteen ninety three. It was also lower the marit finished
- 6:42Speaker 2: every year between seventeen sixteen and seventeen fifty nine, and
- 6:46Speaker 2: below its level every year from eighteen ninety three to
- 6:49Speaker 2: nineteen thirteen. So that's not really ideal, is it. That's
- 6:51Speaker 2: not the kind of returns were after.
- 6:53Speaker 3: That's bad. But the same thing the UK Kana is
- 6:56Speaker 3: known as an income market, and I do think that.
- 7:00Speaker 3: I mean, like the DAKS the gym and DAX is
- 7:02Speaker 3: a good example here. You know, it's recently made new records.
- 7:05Speaker 3: But what most people don't fully appreciate is that the
- 7:07Speaker 3: DAKS is a total return index, so it includes the
- 7:11Speaker 3: income from dividends in it. And if the foots one
- 7:15Speaker 3: hundred is of total return index, it would look very different.
- 7:19Speaker 3: I do feel excluding your I get why people do it,
- 7:23Speaker 3: but I also don't see that it's of that much
- 7:26Speaker 3: use if you're looking at long term returns to calculator.
- 7:30Speaker 2: Like that mega John steppeck Oh is available to defend
- 7:34Speaker 2: the UK. Thanks John, that's it, are you right?
- 7:38Speaker 1: Of course?
- 7:39Speaker 3: I think that there's a slightly there's another issue here
- 7:44Speaker 3: the way that say that's thinking about this. So she's
- 7:47Speaker 3: looking at wanting to make twenty percent growth a year,
- 7:49Speaker 3: and then another part of her questions, she sort of
- 7:52Speaker 3: com makes a comment that implies that she wants to
- 7:56Speaker 3: make twenty percent every year in each kind of discrete year,
- 8:00Speaker 3: and I think that that shows that she's thinking to
- 8:02Speaker 3: short term, like why why does it need to be
- 8:05Speaker 3: twenty percent a year?
- 8:07Speaker 1: So she can double that money in three years, John, Well.
- 8:09Speaker 3: Yeah, no, and that would be great. I'd love to
- 8:10Speaker 3: do that too. But it's more I think you need
- 8:13Speaker 3: to start from the perspective like, well, what is my
- 8:17Speaker 3: end goal? What is a realistic return that an average
- 8:21Speaker 3: person would make? And then if I mine to beat that,
- 8:24Speaker 3: that's great, But what's the average return? And then how
- 8:27Speaker 3: much do I need to be saving it this end
- 8:29Speaker 3: to make sure that I have the best chance of
- 8:32Speaker 3: meeting my goal. I think in the way she sort
- 8:35Speaker 3: it feels as if she's looking at this backwards, it's
- 8:38Speaker 3: like she's kind of started with, well, twenty percent would
- 8:41Speaker 3: be a nice number, and perhaps hasn't truly thought through, well, actually,
- 8:45Speaker 3: what is my end goal and what am I doing
- 8:47Speaker 3: this for?
- 8:49Speaker 1: Yeah?
- 8:49Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, And we know that she's most likely to
- 8:52Speaker 2: fail to hit this goal, which means that she might
- 8:56Speaker 2: start making the wrong decisions. I'm not getting it with
- 8:59Speaker 2: this mix of both earlier, So I'm going to change
- 9:00Speaker 2: this portfolio quickly because I might get up with this
- 9:02Speaker 2: other kind of portfolio. I'm not getting in with that
- 9:04Speaker 2: kind of portfolio, So maybe I'll change and try this
- 9:06Speaker 2: kind of portfolio, which, as we know, is the is
- 9:09Speaker 2: the root to ruin really, because you end up racking
- 9:11Speaker 2: up transaction fees and taking far too much risk along
- 9:14Speaker 2: the way.
- 9:15Speaker 3: It's easy to panic if you have the wrong target.
- 9:18Speaker 2: Yeah, And the other thing that we should talk about,
- 9:21Speaker 2: I think, and you said this is that if we're
- 9:24Speaker 2: talking about growth shares, trackers and actively manage funds, what
- 9:28Speaker 2: are we actually talking about. That's not really an accid allocation,
- 9:31Speaker 2: that is a style allocation.
- 9:34Speaker 3: Well yeah, and it's not even a style allocation because
- 9:36Speaker 3: you're like, well, the trackers at this point in time
- 9:40Speaker 3: almost certainly all are basically growth funds because you know,
- 9:45Speaker 3: the S and P five hundred is run by or
- 9:48Speaker 3: setting up until very very very recently has been run
- 9:50Speaker 3: by growth stocks all the rest of them, so basically,
- 9:55Speaker 3: and then the active funds will what type of active
- 9:57Speaker 3: funds are you looking at? And that's before you get
- 9:59Speaker 3: to things like your country allocation and your more more importantly,
- 10:03Speaker 3: your asset allocation. So have you get any money in bonds,
- 10:07Speaker 3: you get any money in gold, that sort of thing.
- 10:09Speaker 3: So there's a lot of questions about diversification and exactly
- 10:15Speaker 3: have you properly thought through where your money is because
- 10:19Speaker 3: it sounds to me, like with that mex it would
- 10:23Speaker 3: be extremely top heavy growth at the moment and bottom
- 10:26Speaker 3: heavy everything else.
- 10:28Speaker 2: Well, I mean it would be because I mean, let's
- 10:30Speaker 2: say that growth shares means what the Mega seven track means,
- 10:34Speaker 2: A very large percentage is in the Mega seven or
- 10:37Speaker 2: at least in US tech stocks and in particular in
- 10:39Speaker 2: the US and thirty percent actively managed funds. Now, that
- 10:43Speaker 2: could mean anything at all. But it's also true that
- 10:46Speaker 2: most actively managed funds these days will have a relatively
- 10:49Speaker 2: high allocation to those same momentum driven technology stocks, because
- 10:54Speaker 2: without it you will almost definitely underform, perhaps not going forward,
- 10:58Speaker 2: but historically you would definitely have one performed. If you
- 11:00Speaker 2: didn't tell this doc said, if you hold those two
- 11:03Speaker 2: things and you don't think about it.
- 11:05Speaker 1: Very carefully, you are effectively in momental investor. Yeah, which
- 11:09Speaker 1: is probably not what you want to be over the
- 11:11Speaker 1: long term.
- 11:12Speaker 3: Yeah No, because you again, you need to diversify by
- 11:16Speaker 3: style as well. And I think this is the other issue,
- 11:18Speaker 3: isn't it. I mean, obviously depending on how active you
- 11:21Speaker 3: want to be, But you can't predict the future, so
- 11:26Speaker 3: you probably want to have exposure to more than one strategy.
- 11:32Speaker 3: You don't want all your eggs in one basket. And
- 11:35Speaker 3: the only other thing that we can usually say with
- 11:39Speaker 3: a moderate degree of confidence is that if you buy
- 11:43Speaker 3: stuff when it's cheaper, then you've got a better chance
- 11:45Speaker 3: of getting a better return than if you buy it
- 11:48Speaker 3: when it's expensive. I recognize that that has not entirely
- 11:54Speaker 3: been the you know, like betting on the expensive stuff
- 11:57Speaker 3: has been a good bet for quite a while and
- 11:59Speaker 3: play for longer than I'm normal, But that doesn't mean
- 12:03Speaker 3: that you know, they can rules of investing, if you like,
- 12:06Speaker 3: have been can retracted all our time. If you buy
- 12:12Speaker 3: stuff that is cheap, then you should do better than
- 12:14Speaker 3: buying stuff that's expensive.
- 12:16Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that's always our message, isn't it. So
- 12:18Speaker 1: there you go.
- 12:19Speaker 2: Lots of things to think about, Sarah, But the key
- 12:22Speaker 2: point there is that I'm afraid twenty percent is unrealistic.
- 12:25Speaker 2: In fact, it's very unrealistic, and maybe we need to
- 12:27Speaker 2: go back to the drawing board with this one.
- 12:29Speaker 1: Think about what it is.
- 12:30Speaker 4: That you really want, how long you have to reach
- 12:32Speaker 4: the goal, and start thinking about it from the grand up,
- 12:36Speaker 4: and also, in particular, think about asset allocation a little
- 12:39Speaker 4: bit more carefully.
- 12:41Speaker 2: And I think that's X for this week on that question.
- 12:43Speaker 1: But just to be clear again, we are not giving advice.
- 12:46Speaker 1: We are giving things to think about, which is different.
- 12:49Speaker 1: Thank you for listening to this week's Mary Talks Money.
- 12:51Speaker 2: If you like us, share, rate, review, and subscribe wherever
- 12:53Speaker 2: you listen to podcasts, and be sure to follow me
- 12:55Speaker 2: and John on X or Twitter at marins w and
- 12:58Speaker 2: at John Underscore. This episode was produced by some Asadi
- 13:02Speaker 2: Production Importance. Sound designed by Blake Naples. Questioning comments on
- 13:05Speaker 2: this show and all our shows are always welcome. Our
- 13:08Speaker 2: show email is merin Money at Bloomberg dot ne