Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / Trump Victory on Deporting Students, Harvard Loses Serious Funding plus EPA Chief Zeldin on CA Wildfire Clean Up Week In Review

Transcript

Trump Victory on Deporting Students, Harvard Loses Serious Funding plus EPA Chief Zeldin on CA Wildfire Clean Up Week In Review · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

0:01
Speaker 1: Welcome in his verdict with Center Ted Cruz, the week
0:03
Speaker 1: in Review, Ben Ferguson with you, and here are some
0:06
Speaker 1: of the big stories that you may have missed that
0:07
Speaker 1: we talked about this week. First up, a major victory
0:11
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump by immigration judge that has now said
0:14
Speaker 1: yes he can deport foreign students who come to America
0:18
Speaker 1: and advocate violence against Jews. And up next, Harvard has
0:24
Speaker 1: been receiving billions of dollars from US the taxpayers. Well,
0:28
Speaker 1: the Trump administration is now saying we're cutting off a
0:31
Speaker 1: lot of that money. I'll give you the details why
0:33
Speaker 1: as well. And finally, the EPA administrator Lee Zelden joined
0:37
Speaker 1: us to talk about the California wildfire cleanup that Trump
0:41
Speaker 1: inherited and how the Trump administration was able to get
0:44
Speaker 1: it done quickly. It's the weekend review and it starts
0:48
Speaker 1: right now. I want to move to this other big
0:50
Speaker 1: issue also that we mentioned earlier, and it was a
0:54
Speaker 1: massive victory for the Trump administration when it came to
0:57
Speaker 1: an immigration judge doing a major ruling on deporting students
1:03
Speaker 1: that are advocating for the death and destruction of students
1:06
Speaker 1: on campus that by the way, are Jewish, are advocating
1:09
Speaker 1: their support for terrorists organizations. And this all comes out
1:14
Speaker 1: of Columbia University, where it has become a major point
1:18
Speaker 1: of all, right, who's going to win this? Is the
1:20
Speaker 1: Trump administration going to win this or are the radicals
1:23
Speaker 1: on the left going to win? And it was a
1:24
Speaker 1: big win for Donald Trump this week.
1:26
Speaker 2: Well it was a win. I don't know that it
1:28
Speaker 2: was a massive victory because it's clearly right under the law.
1:32
Speaker 2: So it was a win that was going to happen,
1:34
Speaker 2: but I'm glad it did. And so listen, one of
1:37
Speaker 2: the things that President Trump is doing that is exactly
1:40
Speaker 2: right is the Trump administration is deporting those who engage
1:46
Speaker 2: in anti Israel, anti American protests who are foreign students,
1:50
Speaker 2: who are on student visas, who are non American citizens.
1:53
Speaker 2: You don't have an entitlement to be here. And look,
1:56
Speaker 2: we talked about during the Biden administration when these viciously
2:00
Speaker 2: how Israel anti Semitic protests were going on, that the
2:03
Speaker 2: Biden administration could do something about it, but they didn't
2:06
Speaker 2: want to because Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and Chuck Schumer,
2:09
Speaker 2: they agree with the pro Hamas protesters, they agree with
2:13
Speaker 2: the radicals, and so you didn't see the Department of
2:16
Speaker 2: Justice investigating them. You didn't see them following the money.
2:19
Speaker 2: You didn't see them trying to do anything really to
2:23
Speaker 2: protect the Jewish students on campus who were being targeted
2:26
Speaker 2: for harassment and threats of violence. Well, you and I,
2:30
Speaker 2: in fact, one of the very first pods we did
2:32
Speaker 2: in the new administration, as we interviewed Pam Bondy at
2:35
Speaker 2: SEAPAC and in that podcast with with then Attorney General
2:40
Speaker 2: Bondi right after she got confirmed, she made clear then
2:44
Speaker 2: they're gonna go after these radicals. And I will say
2:48
Speaker 2: immigration law gives considerable, considerable flexibility to the administration to
2:56
Speaker 2: decide who who that is here on a permissive visa
3:01
Speaker 2: can be sent home. And so in this case, you
3:04
Speaker 2: had Mahmoud Khalil, who was a Columbia anti Israel protester,
3:08
Speaker 2: who who the administration is in the process of deporting,
3:11
Speaker 2: and and he is challenging that in court and an
3:15
Speaker 2: immigration judge ruled that he can be deported due to
3:20
Speaker 2: his involvement in last year's pro Haamas protests at Columbia.
3:24
Speaker 2: And this is a judge, Judge Jamie Corman's comans rather
3:28
Speaker 2: uh and and he said said the government had met
3:32
Speaker 2: its its burden of proof. I think that's that's clearly right.
3:37
Speaker 2: And and the Department of Homeland Security laid out how
3:40
Speaker 2: Khalil misrepresented himself on his green card application, and in particular,
3:45
Speaker 2: he was not upfront about his involvement with organizations he's
3:50
Speaker 2: involved with. He he willfully failed to disclose his employment
3:55
Speaker 2: with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut
3:59
Speaker 2: when he applied for permanent US residency uh And what
4:04
Speaker 2: what what the federal government argued is that made him
4:07
Speaker 2: inadmissible at the time he was given his green card
4:11
Speaker 2: because of quote fraud or wilful misrepresentation of material fact.
4:16
Speaker 2: He also failed to disclose his work for UNRA uh
4:21
Speaker 2: And And you know UNRA we've talked about before, is
4:24
Speaker 2: the UN agency that that has literally been in bed
4:27
Speaker 2: with AMAS. You had multiple A Moss terrorists working at
4:30
Speaker 2: on Rah. UNRA has given significant material aid hamas terrorists.
4:37
Speaker 2: And and the court ruled that that look that that
4:42
Speaker 2: is is ample grounds to deport Uh, to deport him.
4:47
Speaker 2: I think that ruling is is clearly right. And if
4:53
Speaker 2: you looked at at at Khalil. You looked at his writings.
4:55
Speaker 2: This is someone who is viciously anti Israel and anti America.
5:00
Speaker 2: And in fact he's using the deportation to just rail
5:04
Speaker 2: against America and what a hostile environment it is. And
5:09
Speaker 2: in fact Khalil's argument, here's something he wrote. He wrote
5:17
Speaker 2: an op ed in Columbia, you know, attacking how dare
5:19
Speaker 2: you to port me? And he says something. He accuses
5:25
Speaker 2: the Columbia administrators of manufacturing quote public hysteria about anti
5:31
Speaker 2: Semitism without once mentioning the tens of thousands of Palestinians
5:36
Speaker 2: murdered under bombs made of your dollars. So understand, this
5:41
Speaker 2: guy's complaint is that the Columbia administrators stood too strongly
5:47
Speaker 2: against anti Semitism. They let their entire campus get taken over,
5:50
Speaker 2: that they let Jewish students be terrorized, they let campus
5:53
Speaker 2: buildings be taken over. They were weak and and effective,
5:57
Speaker 2: which is why the president of Columbia had to step down.
6:00
Speaker 2: And yet this guy's claim is Nope, no, they were
6:03
Speaker 2: too strong and against anti Semitism. They should have been
6:07
Speaker 2: effectively marching alongside me in favor of Hamas. This ruling
6:11
Speaker 2: is clearly right I'm glad it came down. There are
6:13
Speaker 2: going to be more rulings like this. If you are.
6:16
Speaker 1: Here, this will have precedent, right like this is.
6:19
Speaker 2: Going to be no no. This is a ruling of
6:22
Speaker 2: an immigration judge in this case. So it doesn't resolve
6:26
Speaker 2: the issue across the country, but the immigration law is
6:31
Speaker 2: quite clear that that. Look, Khalil's case was harder because
6:37
Speaker 2: he was a legal permanent resident. He has a green card,
6:39
Speaker 2: and legal permanent residents have greater legal protections than just
6:43
Speaker 2: somebody under student visa. Somebody under a student visa, they
6:46
Speaker 2: can have their visa revoked and sent back. It is
6:50
Speaker 2: not a high threshold to do that. To revoke a
6:53
Speaker 2: green card is a higher threshold. And so the ruling
6:56
Speaker 2: here is well that the Department Homeland Security gave evidence
7:00
Speaker 2: that he had lied when getting his green card and
7:03
Speaker 2: that was basis for deportation. And so that I think
7:06
Speaker 2: that's the right ruling here. It's a good ruling, and
7:09
Speaker 2: I think you're gonna see Listen, let me say to
7:12
Speaker 2: any anti American radicals who've come in on student visas,
7:17
Speaker 2: you are not welcome in America. And if you are
7:21
Speaker 2: going to use our hospitality to attack and threaten and
7:25
Speaker 2: harass fellow students. If you're going to use our hospitality
7:28
Speaker 2: to attack America, get the hell out and and we're
7:32
Speaker 2: going to help you get the hell out. And that
7:34
Speaker 2: is one of the best things that Trump administration is
7:37
Speaker 2: doing right now.
7:38
Speaker 1: Now, if you want to hear the rest of this conversation,
7:40
Speaker 1: you can go back and listen to the full podcast
7:43
Speaker 1: from earlier this week. Now onto story number two, which
7:47
Speaker 1: brings us to Harvard, and Trump has said we are
7:51
Speaker 1: freezing the funding going to Harvard. They have slashed over
7:55
Speaker 1: two point two billion in funding to Harvard after the
7:58
Speaker 1: school is defied federal law, and the White House says,
8:02
Speaker 1: we're not playing around. A lot of Americans, by the way,
8:05
Speaker 1: may not realize that two point two in fact, a
8:08
Speaker 1: lot more than that is going to Harvard of your
8:11
Speaker 1: tax dollurs.
8:12
Speaker 2: Yeah, Harvard gets roughly nine billion dollars in federal taxpayer dollars,
8:16
Speaker 2: so it gets an enormous amount. Now, it's a huge
8:19
Speaker 2: research institution, and it does some good research. It does
8:21
Speaker 2: medical research and scientific research, and some of that researches
8:24
Speaker 2: is valuable. But what the Trump administration is announced the
8:28
Speaker 2: Joint Task Force on combating anti semitism. Has announced that
8:32
Speaker 2: it's freezing over two billion dollars in multi year grants
8:36
Speaker 2: and contracts to Harvard. And that was following the school's
8:40
Speaker 2: president putting out a statement saying it would not comply
8:43
Speaker 2: with the Trump administration's demands on anti semitism. And I
8:49
Speaker 2: got to say, this is a battle that that Harvard
8:53
Speaker 2: and a lot of academic institutions are putting out statements
8:56
Speaker 2: in support of Harvard. So brave, so brave. And I
8:58
Speaker 2: will say most other institutions, when the Trump administration has
9:01
Speaker 2: threatened their funding, they've caved, and they've caved very quickly.
9:05
Speaker 2: But but the other institutions are happy to applaud Harvard
9:08
Speaker 2: and say, yes, yes, yes, lose your funds. You're you're
9:10
Speaker 2: so brave.
9:11
Speaker 3: Uh.
9:11
Speaker 2: And And what is striking is that Democrats, Barack Obama,
9:16
Speaker 2: the Democrat governor Massachusetts, are all lining up behind Harvard.
9:19
Speaker 2: And and and there is a reason when you look
9:22
Speaker 2: at the core basis of the Democrat Party.
9:25
Speaker 3: Uh.
9:26
Speaker 2: You know, there was a time in a prior generation
9:28
Speaker 2: when the Democrat Party was considered a blue collar party,
9:31
Speaker 2: and in the age of FDR, it was a party
9:33
Speaker 2: of union members and working class uh and and and
9:37
Speaker 2: In fact, one of the reasons that that FDR was
9:40
Speaker 2: was treated with contempt is because he was a very
9:42
Speaker 2: wealthy person, as many Democrats are. But but he was
9:46
Speaker 2: considered a quote traitor to his class because he was
9:48
Speaker 2: a rich man who became a historic Democrat leader. Well,
9:53
Speaker 2: that Democrat Party doesn't exist anymore. The Democrat Party no
9:57
Speaker 2: longer cares about the blue collar and in fact, they
9:59
Speaker 2: routinely to de stroy blue collar jobs. Today's Democrat Party
10:03
Speaker 2: is a party of coastal elites and and it is
10:05
Speaker 2: a party that is comprised of big universities and and
10:09
Speaker 2: and big business and big Tech and big Hollywood, all
10:15
Speaker 2: of whom have overlapping problems. All of them are are
10:17
Speaker 2: in bed with China and and and all of them
10:21
Speaker 2: have been taken over by by radical leftism, by cultural Marxism.
10:26
Speaker 2: As you know. The most recent book I wrote is
10:28
Speaker 2: entitled Unwoke, How to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America, And
10:32
Speaker 2: each chapter breaks down a different major institution that's been
10:36
Speaker 2: captured by the radical left. The first chapter is entitled
10:40
Speaker 2: Universities the wuhan Lab of the Woke virus, and and
10:45
Speaker 2: and what I argue is that it is universities and
10:48
Speaker 2: sadly my alma mater, Harvard, where the woke virus was
10:53
Speaker 2: first created in a lab, and then it mutated and spread,
10:57
Speaker 2: and it spread throughout just about every other major institution
11:01
Speaker 2: in this country. And so Harvard has been the locusts
11:04
Speaker 2: of much of the radical leftism and cultural Marxism that
11:09
Speaker 2: has done enormous damage to our institutions. And Harvard is
11:13
Speaker 2: digging in, and they're claiming that they're digging in in
11:17
Speaker 2: defense of free speech. But what they're really digging in
11:20
Speaker 2: on is they don't want to change their policies Number one,
11:25
Speaker 2: that discriminate on race. They love discriminating on race, they
11:28
Speaker 2: love dei that they love putting race front and center,
11:32
Speaker 2: which by the way, is directly contrary to federal civil
11:34
Speaker 2: rights law. And they also want to continue admitting radical
11:39
Speaker 2: anti Semites. They want to continue looking the other way
11:41
Speaker 2: at Prohamas protesters who threaten Jewish students, who threaten violence,
11:46
Speaker 2: who threaten intimidation, who call for genocide, And they want
11:50
Speaker 2: to continue admitting and promoting anti American radicals. And that
11:54
Speaker 2: includes both students and faculty. And so when the administration
11:58
Speaker 2: put a series of demands in place that Harvard said, No.
12:03
Speaker 2: I got to tell you, Harvard thinks they want this fight.
12:06
Speaker 2: In my opinion, the Trump administration is eager for this
12:11
Speaker 2: fight with Harvard, and you could not ask Harvard has
12:13
Speaker 2: an endowment of over fifty billion dollars. And you know,
12:17
Speaker 2: one of my favorite responses to that, to Harvard's supposed
12:22
Speaker 2: stance on principle where they talked about standing for the
12:25
Speaker 2: First Amendment is Hillsdale College, which is a great college.
12:30
Speaker 2: It is a conservative college, a free market college. But
12:34
Speaker 2: one of the things they do is they don't take
12:36
Speaker 2: federal money. And Hillsdale actually twigted, well, you can say
12:38
Speaker 2: anything you like, just don't take federal money. And oddly enough,
12:42
Speaker 2: Harvard doesn't want to do that. They want the taxpayers
12:44
Speaker 2: to fund them, but they want to continue to be
12:47
Speaker 2: embracing racism and vitriolic anti American sentiment while at the
12:53
Speaker 2: same time being funded by American taxpayers.
12:57
Speaker 1: So when you look at this fight, I do think
13:00
Speaker 1: the very interesting parts of all of this that we're
13:02
Speaker 1: talking about is now Americans are really waking up and
13:05
Speaker 1: realizing like where their money has been going, how much
13:08
Speaker 1: of it is going, And you're right. There's some of
13:10
Speaker 1: this as research, and that's the thing we can be
13:12
Speaker 1: proud of, and that's a good thing. But a lot
13:14
Speaker 1: of this is going to indoctrinating kids with radical leftist ideals.
13:19
Speaker 1: And that's part of the reason why I think they
13:21
Speaker 1: need this money, right, They want the money for that reason.
13:24
Speaker 1: They've been doing a great job of doing that for
13:26
Speaker 1: the last several decades. So if the money does dry
13:29
Speaker 1: up at places like Harvard and then we start to
13:32
Speaker 1: see more questions being asked about other money, not only
13:35
Speaker 1: could this change universities in a positive way, I think
13:38
Speaker 1: for free speech and not having one set of views
13:41
Speaker 1: that are indoctrinated, but it could also say the taxpayers
13:45
Speaker 1: a hell of a lot of money because it's not
13:46
Speaker 1: just Harvard that's getting cash.
13:49
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, but Harvard is the perfect test subject. And
13:52
Speaker 2: our universities right now have become indoctrination labs. They've become
13:57
Speaker 2: places that enforce rigid orthodox and if you say something
14:01
Speaker 2: that is contrary to the radical leftist view, you risk
14:05
Speaker 2: being disciplined, you risk being having your grades, and you
14:09
Speaker 2: also risk just not being admitted. And look, some of
14:12
Speaker 2: the question comes down to a very simple what is
14:16
Speaker 2: it that the administration was requesting. Because if the administration
14:21
Speaker 2: was demanding, Harvard must teach in every class that Donald
14:24
Speaker 2: Trump is the greatest president who have ever lived. I
14:27
Speaker 2: would agree with Harvard that no university could give in
14:30
Speaker 2: to a government demand about a specific position like that,
14:35
Speaker 2: particularly if it's one they disagree with. But that's not
14:37
Speaker 2: what the Trump administration said. And I have in front
14:40
Speaker 2: of me the letter that the Trump administration said. It's
14:44
Speaker 2: five pages. I'm not going to read it all, but
14:45
Speaker 2: I'm going to read some of the portions of it.
14:48
Speaker 2: So it is addressed both to Alan Garber, who is
14:52
Speaker 2: the president of Harvard University, and Penny Prisker, who is
14:55
Speaker 2: the lead member of the Harvard Corporation. Penny Pritzker, by
14:58
Speaker 2: the way, was a cabinet member under Barack Obama. And
15:00
Speaker 2: the Harvard Corporation runs all of Harvard. And it's this
15:04
Speaker 2: privately held corporation of all Democrats that run Harvard as
15:08
Speaker 2: this left wing bastion. Here's how the letter begins, Dear
15:12
Speaker 2: doctor Garber, the United States has invested in Harvard University's
15:16
Speaker 2: operation because of the value to the country of scholarly
15:18
Speaker 2: discovery and academic excellence. But an investment is not an entitlement.
15:24
Speaker 2: It depends on Harvard upholding federal civil rights law, and
15:27
Speaker 2: it only makes sense if Harvard fosters the kind of
15:29
Speaker 2: environment that produces intellectual creativity and scholarly rigor, both of
15:34
Speaker 2: which are antithetical to ideological capture. Harvard has in recent
15:39
Speaker 2: years failed to live up to both the intellectual and
15:42
Speaker 2: civil rights conditions that justify federal investment, but we appreciate
15:46
Speaker 2: your expression of commitment to repairing those failures and welcome
15:49
Speaker 2: your collaboration in restoring the university to its promise. We
15:53
Speaker 2: therefore present the below provisions as the basis for an
15:56
Speaker 2: agreement in principle that will maintain Harvard's financial relationship with
15:59
Speaker 2: the government. Here's the first governance and leadership reforms. By
16:06
Speaker 2: August twenty twenty five, Harvard must make meaningful governance reform
16:10
Speaker 2: and restructuring to make possible major change consistent with this letter,
16:15
Speaker 2: including fostering clear lines of authority and accountability. Apparently that
16:19
Speaker 2: was objectionable, empowering tenured professors and senior leadership, and from
16:24
Speaker 2: among the tenured professorate and senior leadership, exclusively those most
16:29
Speaker 2: devoted to the scholarly mission of the university and committed
16:32
Speaker 2: to the changes indicated in this letter. Reducing the power
16:36
Speaker 2: held by students and untenured faculty, reducing the power held
16:40
Speaker 2: by faculty, whether tenured or untenured, at administrators more committed
16:45
Speaker 2: to activism than scholarship. Now, again, this is something Harvard
16:49
Speaker 2: found unacceptable. We're not willing to focus on scholarship instead
16:53
Speaker 2: of activism. Note that's a violation of what we want
16:56
Speaker 2: to do. And reducing forms of governance bloat, duplication, or
17:00
Speaker 2: decentralization that interfere with the possibility the reforms indicating this letter.
17:05
Speaker 2: So that's the first one. Apparently something was objectionable about that.
17:09
Speaker 2: What's the next one? Merit based hiring reform. By August
17:14
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five, the university must adopt and implement merit
17:17
Speaker 2: based hiring policies and ceased all preferences based on race, color, religion, sex,
17:22
Speaker 2: or national origin throughout its hiring, promotion, compensation, and related
17:26
Speaker 2: practices among faculty, staff, and leadership. Now, mind you, that
17:30
Speaker 2: is existing federal civil rights law. You cannot discriminate against
17:34
Speaker 2: based on race, and yet for Harvard that is is outrageous.
17:40
Speaker 2: Of course, they want to discriminate based on race. It's
17:43
Speaker 2: an ideological commitment. What's the next one? Merit based admissions reform?
17:47
Speaker 2: By August twenty twenty five, the university must adopt and
17:50
Speaker 2: implement merit based admission policies and ceased all preferences based
17:54
Speaker 2: on race, color, national origin, or proxies thereof, throughout its
17:58
Speaker 2: undergraduate program, each graduate program, individual, each of its professional schools,
18:02
Speaker 2: and other programs. Again, the idea of actually admitting students
18:06
Speaker 2: based on merit rather than discriminating based on race, which
18:09
Speaker 2: minds you? Discriminating based on race as illegal under federal
18:12
Speaker 2: civil rights law. To Harvard is anathema. What's the next one?
18:18
Speaker 2: International admissions reform? By August twenty twenty five, the university
18:22
Speaker 2: must reform its recruitment, screening, and admission of international students
18:27
Speaker 2: to prevent admitting students hostile to the American values and
18:33
Speaker 2: institutions inscribed in the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence,
18:38
Speaker 2: including students supportive of terrorism or anti Semitism. Again, apparently,
18:45
Speaker 2: that is outrageous and unacceptable. The next one viewpoint, diversity
18:50
Speaker 2: and admission and hiring. By August twenty twenty five, the
18:53
Speaker 2: university shall commission an external party which will satisfy the
18:58
Speaker 2: federal government as to its competence and good faith to
19:00
Speaker 2: audit the student body, faculty, staff, and leadership for viewpoint diversity,
19:06
Speaker 2: such that each department, field, or teaching unit must be
19:09
Speaker 2: individually viewpoint diverse. Now, notably, they're not saying higher conservatives.
19:13
Speaker 2: They're not saying higher Trump supporters. They're saying, you cannot
19:17
Speaker 2: have a faculty that is universally orthodox and indoctrinating that
19:23
Speaker 2: all have the same view that.
19:25
Speaker 3: You know, the.
19:26
Speaker 2: Left loves to prattle on about diversity as our strength,
19:29
Speaker 2: and by diversity they mean we must all be leftist
19:32
Speaker 2: to believe the same thing, but saith though with different
19:35
Speaker 2: skin colors. Now, I actually think diversity means having different ideas,
19:40
Speaker 2: confronting ideas you disagree with. Look I go through these
19:45
Speaker 2: to give an example. I think each of those demands
19:47
Speaker 2: are very reasonable. They're saying, comply with federal law. Be
19:51
Speaker 2: an institution that actually does what you say, what you
19:54
Speaker 2: claim to be doing. And yet Harvard is outraged. How
19:59
Speaker 2: dare you hold us to the terms of federal law.
20:03
Speaker 2: We cannot comply with.
20:05
Speaker 1: That as before, If you want to hear the rest
20:07
Speaker 1: of this conversation on this topic. You can go back
20:10
Speaker 1: and now the podcast from earlier this week to hear
20:13
Speaker 1: the entire thing. I want to get back to the
20:16
Speaker 1: big story number three of the week. You may have missed.
20:19
Speaker 2: You told a story earlier today about the EPA's involvement
20:23
Speaker 2: in cleaning up the California wildfires, and it's a good
20:26
Speaker 2: example of how it impacts people's lives. Like you wouldn't
20:29
Speaker 2: necessarily think the EPA is involved in dealing with wildfires,
20:32
Speaker 2: but you guys are deeply involved.
20:34
Speaker 4: As soon as the wildfires hit Los Angeles, over thirteen
20:37
Speaker 4: thousand properties destroyed, President Trump comes into office. He inherits
20:41
Speaker 4: it happened a few days before he got there. He
20:43
Speaker 4: signs an executive order. He says, EPA, you have thirty
20:47
Speaker 4: days to do your entire Phase one hazardous material removal
20:52
Speaker 4: before Phase two starts, which is the Army Corps of
20:54
Speaker 4: Engineers doing their debris removal.
20:56
Speaker 2: And like with the wildfires, you have people's homes that
20:58
Speaker 2: burn to the ground. There's a lot of toxic sludge.
21:01
Speaker 2: I mean, it's a mess. It's dangerous. Like fires produce
21:04
Speaker 2: bad stuff, and you guys had to figure out how
21:06
Speaker 2: to clean it up, but do it in thirty days?
21:09
Speaker 3: Yeah.
21:09
Speaker 4: First the response was that's impossible. This is going to
21:12
Speaker 4: take you until the summer at best. It's going to
21:15
Speaker 4: take a few months for sure. The lithium ion batteries
21:18
Speaker 4: were all over this particular area. We got it done
21:21
Speaker 4: in less than thirty days after ramping up to fifteen
21:24
Speaker 4: hundred workers. Proud of the effort from EPA. We do
21:27
Speaker 4: a lot like this that the American public might not
21:29
Speaker 4: know about. And that's why in just a couple of days,
21:31
Speaker 4: we're heading to the Tijuana area in southern California, where
21:34
Speaker 4: a lot of Mexican raw sewage is entering for decades.
21:37
Speaker 3: We need to end it.
21:38
Speaker 1: Number one about you guys dealing with water issues and
21:42
Speaker 1: Tijuana and I also and there's another one that a
21:45
Speaker 1: lot of Americans will remember, and that was the trained derailment,
21:49
Speaker 1: and it seemed like the government was picking winners and
21:51
Speaker 1: losers with that cleanup or lack thereof. You guys have
21:55
Speaker 1: also gotten involved with that because what you did in
21:57
Speaker 1: the wildfires in California is incredible. That's what every American
22:01
Speaker 1: should get, no matter where they live, and politics shouldn't
22:03
Speaker 1: come into it.
22:06
Speaker 4: This is something that really showed then Junior Senator JD
22:10
Speaker 4: Vance as someone who understands leadership in a time of crisis,
22:14
Speaker 4: when disaster strikes, your instinct as a leader should be
22:18
Speaker 4: to show up at that site and to be the
22:20
Speaker 4: voice of the people. And what was wild was JD
22:23
Speaker 4: was like the only one there. I think that might
22:26
Speaker 4: be Congressman Bill Johnson's district.
22:28
Speaker 2: Well, to be fair, Donald Trump came to.
22:30
Speaker 3: Yeah, well and it was j and JD.
22:33
Speaker 2: Not Joe Biden, not Pete boudhage Edge, but Donald Trump came.
22:37
Speaker 3: That's right.
22:37
Speaker 4: And I remember the conversations where JD was engaging with
22:42
Speaker 4: President Trump to make sure that President Trump was there.
22:45
Speaker 4: And this was all in the initial days and weeks
22:49
Speaker 4: after disaster struck. Yes, and a lot of people were wondering, well,
22:53
Speaker 4: where is this person, where is that person, Where is
22:56
Speaker 4: this agency, where's that agency? It should be This is
22:59
Speaker 4: the ultimate gut check and an instinct check of just
23:03
Speaker 4: when it's amazing.
23:04
Speaker 2: Because Biden and the Democrats they really like Palestinians, you
23:07
Speaker 2: would think they would have gone, oh my.
23:09
Speaker 3: Gosh, you know, all right.
23:12
Speaker 2: For the record, Lezelden is officially speechless. He doesn't know
23:15
Speaker 2: what to do with that smart ass comment.
23:18
Speaker 4: I'll tell you it was a it was such a
23:20
Speaker 4: missed opportunity to lead and that EPA. Over the course
23:25
Speaker 4: of time, they ended up being two hundred and twenty thousand.
23:29
Speaker 2: Uh.
23:30
Speaker 4: We saw a two hundred and twenty thousand tons of
23:32
Speaker 4: contaminated soil removed, We saw tens of millions of gallons
23:35
Speaker 4: of water removed. They ended up becoming a massive EPA
23:39
Speaker 4: effort that actually is still ongoing and in a way
23:43
Speaker 4: for the environmental and human impacts. There's gonna be testing
23:46
Speaker 4: going on for a long time to come. And I
23:49
Speaker 4: would encourage anyone who's out there listening, who is in
23:53
Speaker 4: that community, in the in the area, that that maybe
23:56
Speaker 4: you used to go to East Palestine, but now you
23:58
Speaker 4: take a detour, you go somewhere else. We all need
24:00
Speaker 4: to do our part to help bring East Palastine, Ohio back,
24:03
Speaker 4: and very important to the Vice President, but unfortunately too
24:07
Speaker 4: many of these cases have shown that lack of leadership.
24:11
Speaker 2: Well and tell us what you're doing in Tijuana, because
24:13
Speaker 2: it's an amazing here.
24:14
Speaker 4: You have an issue where for decades Mexican ros sew
24:17
Speaker 4: which has been coming across the border. It's been poured
24:20
Speaker 4: into the Tijuana River. It ends up contaminating water and air.
24:25
Speaker 4: We have Navy seals getting sick. They have to do
24:28
Speaker 4: training somewhere else. So we have decided enough is enough.
24:31
Speaker 4: We're going to Tijuana in the coming days. I can't
24:34
Speaker 4: wait to get there. We're gonna be on the US
24:36
Speaker 4: side of that border. We have a whole plan of action.
24:39
Speaker 2: I'm just warning you when you're in the cabinet, what
24:42
Speaker 2: happens in Tijuana does not stay in Tijuana.
24:46
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, sir, great advice.
24:49
Speaker 4: And especially if you drink the water, you'll be bringing
24:52
Speaker 4: that back to you, back with you to DC. So listen,
24:55
Speaker 4: it's something that we're going to step up on and
24:58
Speaker 4: tackle and we're proud of that. EPA wants to assist.
25:02
Speaker 4: And these are Americans that we see over there California.
25:06
Speaker 3: Do they vote red or blue? All your listeners know
25:08
Speaker 3: the answer to that one doesn't matter.
25:10
Speaker 2: But look, you're you're you're cleaning that crap up literally.
25:13
Speaker 2: I mean that that is valuable. That's what we want
25:17
Speaker 2: the EPA to be doing. That's important. Let me let
25:21
Speaker 2: me ask you so, so you and I are in
25:22
Speaker 2: in Midland, Texas. We spent the day We started by
25:25
Speaker 2: going to a rig that was drilling an oil well.
25:28
Speaker 2: We then had a roundtable. And actually, when you were
25:30
Speaker 2: being confirmed and you came by my office, you and
25:33
Speaker 2: I have been good friends for over a decade, but
25:35
Speaker 2: when you were being confirmed, I said, I want to
25:37
Speaker 2: ask you to commit to come the Midland Texas and
25:41
Speaker 2: sit down with with oil and gas leaders, with entrepreneurs,
25:45
Speaker 2: with people that are producing energy and hear from them.
25:49
Speaker 2: And it's amazing. You're the first EPA administrator in history
25:54
Speaker 2: to come the middle of Odessa, which is astonishing. It's
25:57
Speaker 2: like saying an ag secretary never been to Iowa. It's
26:01
Speaker 2: like saying a secretary of State had never been to
26:03
Speaker 2: the United Kingdom or never been to Israel. Like like
26:06
Speaker 2: your job, every EPA administrator should be in the Permian base.
26:10
Speaker 2: And given the importance of it, and and and the involvement.
26:13
Speaker 3: Of the e p A.
26:14
Speaker 2: So so tell us about you met with wildcatters and
26:18
Speaker 2: business leaders, a lot of people that are good friends
26:20
Speaker 2: of mine. Give us your impression of of of the
26:23
Speaker 2: folks you met, and and and what you learned on
26:25
Speaker 2: this trip?
26:25
Speaker 3: Was it valuable salt of the earth? Job creators?
26:29
Speaker 4: You could just imagine how much sweat equity was around
26:33
Speaker 4: that table of people who have poured their lives, their heart, blood, tears,
26:41
Speaker 4: creating jobs, providing energy to Texans and beyond.
26:45
Speaker 3: And these people need us to.
26:48
Speaker 4: Be thanking them, to be to be praising them for
26:50
Speaker 4: their good work, to be supporting them as opposed to
26:53
Speaker 4: using our power to try to make it more difficult
26:56
Speaker 4: for them.
26:56
Speaker 3: We shouldn't be trying to so by them.
26:57
Speaker 2: By the way, these guys are all close friends and
27:00
Speaker 2: buddies of mine. I have had great joy in recent
27:04
Speaker 2: weeks and months asking them how much they're like Billy
27:07
Speaker 2: Bob Thornton. Have they ever been tied up and had
27:09
Speaker 2: a mask over their head? Have they been covered in
27:11
Speaker 2: gasoline by cartels? Our host Bill Holmes, great great, great friend, Landman,
27:19
Speaker 2: very successful businessman. I asked him so. By the way,
27:23
Speaker 2: if you haven't watched Landman, you should. It's the best
27:24
Speaker 2: show on television. I did play for President Trump in
27:29
Speaker 2: the Oval Office last week. The segment from Landman where
27:33
Speaker 2: Billy Bob Thornton talks to the left wing environmental lawyer
27:38
Speaker 2: about windmills. It's the best three minutes on television of
27:41
Speaker 2: our lifetime. And I will say at least the landman
27:44
Speaker 2: I know in Midland tell me that that they murder
27:46
Speaker 2: fewer people than they do in the show. It's still
27:48
Speaker 2: a great show.
27:49
Speaker 4: And for Billy Bob, if you're out there listening, that
27:52
Speaker 4: was some that was a free sponsorship from Senator Ted Cruz.
27:54
Speaker 4: So you're lucky that you have that fan playing it
27:57
Speaker 4: for President Trump in the Oval, bringing a great a
28:01
Speaker 4: great show to the people, and listen, we need to
28:04
Speaker 4: get smart with energy policy. There are people promoting win
28:07
Speaker 4: as an intermittent sources if that's a substitute for base
28:09
Speaker 4: load power.
28:10
Speaker 3: For all of you out there listening.
28:12
Speaker 4: Let's let's get smart, educate, advocate the people who are
28:16
Speaker 4: around all the policy.
28:18
Speaker 1: As always, thank you for listening to Verdict with Center
28:22
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with you don't forget to down
28:24
Speaker 1: with my podcast and you can listen to my podcasts
28:26
Speaker 1: every other day you're not listening to Verdict or each
28:28
Speaker 1: day when you listen to Verdict. Afterwards, I'd love to
28:31
Speaker 1: have you as a listener to again the Ben Ferguson
28:33
Speaker 1: podcasts and we will see you back here on Monday morning.