Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Jordan Williams: Taxpayers' Union Executive Director on the government quietly setting aside the money from next year's budget
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Okay, here's one to raise a few eyebrows. The government's
- 0:02Speaker 1: quietly pre committed more than a billion dollars from next
- 0:05Speaker 1: year's budget, but is refusing to say where this money
- 0:07Speaker 1: is going. So that's a sizable chunk of the two
- 0:10Speaker 1: point four billion spending allowance Nichola Willis has set for
- 0:13Speaker 1: budget twenty twenty seven. Jordan Williams, Taxpayers Union executive director
- 0:18Speaker 1: joins me, Now, good morning, Jordan.
- 0:20Speaker 2: Good morning.
- 0:21Speaker 1: Is this a bit unusual?
- 0:24Speaker 2: It's pretty outrageous, but we have some s of they
- 0:28Speaker 2: with later calling it out. How do you expect us
- 0:30Speaker 2: to review books when you're not saying such a way
- 0:33Speaker 2: at such a significant amount of money it's being spent. However,
- 0:38Speaker 2: the last election year, Labored did something pretty similar and
- 0:42Speaker 2: locking and higher spending in various areas and then claiming
- 0:45Speaker 2: the nets were quote unquote cussing which was only promised
- 0:48Speaker 2: for future projective spending. It's pretty unusual. It's a high
- 0:52Speaker 2: bar not to include it. It looks to be done
- 0:56Speaker 2: here for political rather than the commercially censored of more
- 1:00Speaker 2: security reasons. But what's interesting is that Nichola Willis is saying, look,
- 1:04Speaker 2: I can't include it because it's still under Act of consideration.
- 1:07Speaker 2: But as we've seen with lots of other disclosures, is
- 1:10Speaker 2: that it's a high bar for Treasury to include it
- 1:13Speaker 2: in there. It's specically saying or Treasury is basically saying
- 1:16Speaker 2: the decisions already being made, but we're not going to
- 1:18Speaker 2: tell you where the money's going.
- 1:19Speaker 1: Because budget government's budget for a four year forecast period.
- 1:24Speaker 1: So how is this different to sort of budgeting, you know,
- 1:27Speaker 1: pre committing funding.
- 1:29Speaker 2: Well, what Nikola Willis is doing is a little bit
- 1:33Speaker 2: of a fudge, is that she's saying, look how virtuous
- 1:35Speaker 2: I am. Look how I'm reducing the increased size of spendings.
- 1:40Speaker 2: But what she's doing is because it's an election year,
- 1:44Speaker 2: is she's bringing forward next year's spending or she wants
- 1:47Speaker 2: the political capital for whatever promise or trinket this is
- 1:51Speaker 2: going to be. We're hearing around the traps that the
- 1:54Speaker 2: government likely to announce something very significant in the solar space.
- 1:58Speaker 2: If I was a betting man, I'd say that's what.
- 2:01Speaker 1: This is, okay. So it is most unusual about this
- 2:06Speaker 1: is the fact that there's no transparency. We just don't
- 2:08Speaker 1: know where it's going.
- 2:10Speaker 2: Yeah, and the whole Root's Fiscal Responsibility Act back in
- 2:14Speaker 2: the early nineties was set out to prevent the sort
- 2:18Speaker 2: of surprise for income governments. Nichola Willis rightly complained about
- 2:23Speaker 2: some of the things that were hidden from her, or
- 2:26Speaker 2: she says were hidden from her by the last government.
- 2:29Speaker 2: It's a great shame that she's effectively doing the same
- 2:31Speaker 2: thing all over again.
- 2:32Speaker 1: So why do you think they aren't telling us where
- 2:34Speaker 1: it's going? Do you do you believe the call that
- 2:36Speaker 1: maybe they just haven't got their bits in a row
- 2:38Speaker 1: yet and they're just trying to sort things out.
- 2:40Speaker 2: Well, that's my point. The fact that it's separately disclosed
- 2:42Speaker 2: by Treasury shows that it is a phase complete that
- 2:46Speaker 2: will have managed to convince Treasury Okay, it's going to happen. However,
- 2:51Speaker 2: Nikola Willis wants the political surprise. She wants the ability
- 2:54Speaker 2: to keep its secret, to announce it at the most
- 2:57Speaker 2: political opportune time.
- 2:58Speaker 1: Well, it is a year, isn't it, Jordan. What you
- 3:02Speaker 1: do what you can. This is what politicking is all about,
- 3:05Speaker 1: isn't it.
- 3:06Speaker 2: It's political skull deggery at its very best. But as
- 3:10Speaker 2: a taxpay group, you know, we want the transparency if
- 3:12Speaker 2: the decision has been made unless this sort of commercial
- 3:15Speaker 2: sensitivity or a genuine national security reason, which clearly here
- 3:19Speaker 2: it's not. It's the National Party wanting to keep their
- 3:22Speaker 2: power dry for the election, and that's not how good
- 3:27Speaker 2: transparency should work. Jordan.
- 3:28Speaker 1: Why do governments preallocate money when the next election could
- 3:31Speaker 1: potentially change it all anyway?
- 3:34Speaker 2: Well, here it'll be because they want to go to
- 3:36Speaker 2: the elector and say, look what we've got coming, don't
- 3:39Speaker 2: put it all at risk. For the last Labor government,
- 3:42Speaker 2: I think it was they were trying to lock in
- 3:44Speaker 2: massive increases to various areas of spending so that they
- 3:48Speaker 2: had to stick to whack national with where they increased
- 3:51Speaker 2: it a bit slower and call that cuts. It's classic
- 3:55Speaker 2: just spin doctoring what actually should be. You know that
- 3:59Speaker 2: we don't don't have money at the moment, you know,
- 4:02Speaker 2: the cupboard is bere Now is the time we ought
- 4:05Speaker 2: to be very transparent.
- 4:07Speaker 1: Jordan Williams, thank you so much for your time this morning.
- 4:09Speaker 1: Appreciate it.
- 4:10Speaker 2: For more from Early Edition with Ryan Bridge, listen live
- 4:14Speaker 2: to News Talks at b from five am weekdays, or
- 4:17Speaker 2: follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.