Latest / Best of LinkedIn: Digital Transformation & Tech / Best of LinkedIn: Defense Tech CW 40/ 41

Transcript

Best of LinkedIn: Defense Tech CW 40/ 41 · Best of LinkedIn: Digital Transformation & Tech

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Provided by Thomas Allgaier and Frenus, based on the most relevant posts on LinkedIn about defense tech in CW-forty and forty-one, Frenus is a B to B market research company that equips product and strategy teams with market and competitive intelligence across the defense industry.
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the deep dive.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: Our mission today really is to distill what's happening in defense tech.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: We're looking just at the key LinkedIn posts from the last couple of weeks.
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: That's CW-forty and forty-one.
• 0:25
  Speaker 0: Yeah, it's definitely a busy time and looking at the source material, you can really see some clear strategic movements emerging, especially in Europe and among allies.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: What are the big ones you're seeing?
• 0:36
  Speaker 0: Well, three things really stand out.
• 0:38
  Speaker 0: A huge push towards autonomy, machine speed.
• 0:41
  Speaker 0: Then a real focus on hardening that counter UAS perimeter.
• 0:45
  Speaker 0: Okay.
• 0:46
  Speaker 0: And finally, a big drive to accelerate industrial capacity, you know, making sure everything worked together better, air, land, sea, space, interoperability.
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: That counter UAS piece, the hardening the perimeter, that seems like a good place to start.
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: The sources definitely confirm uncrewed aerial systems UAS, they're just central now.
• 1:04
  Speaker 0: Absolutely central.
• 1:05
  Speaker 0: ISR drones, tactical UAVs, they're fundamental to land warfare concepts we're seeing discussed.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: And that means, well, a desperate need for constant surveillance and making that kill chain faster.
• 1:16
  Speaker 0: Exactly.
• 1:17
  Speaker 0: And the tactical response counter UAS or CUAS, it's evolving incredibly fast.
• 1:23
  Speaker 0: It's not just one magic bullet anymore.
• 1:25
  Speaker 0: No.
• 1:26
  Speaker 0: No, the consensus is really about layered approaches, you know, blending detection, AI for classification, different kinds of interceptors.
• 1:34
  Speaker 0: But the threat isn't just military now, we've seen that quite clearly.
• 1:38
  Speaker 0: You
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: mean civilian infrastructure?
• 1:39
  Speaker 0: Precisely.
• 1:40
  Speaker 0: National security folks are flagging urgent CUAS gaps right here at home.
• 1:45
  Speaker 0: Benjamin Wolba mentioned that Munich Airport shut down.
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I saw that unauthorized drone right.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Canceled over thirty flights.
• 1:51
  Speaker 0: Yeah, exactly that kind of disruption.
• 1:53
  Speaker 0: It's becoming a real security headache for civilian areas not just battlefields
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: in the markets responding.
• 1:58
  Speaker 0: Oh, definitely lots of tech being thrown at it.
• 2:00
  Speaker 0: We saw Lockheed Martin talking up their sanctum counter UAS system AI driven
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: sanctum, right?
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: What makes that stand out?
• 2:06
  Speaker 0: Well multiple sources pointed to it as embodying what's needed now Smart AI, flexible, open architecture system.
• 2:14
  Speaker 0: Open
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: architecture that keeps coming up.
• 2:16
  Speaker 0: It does.
• 2:17
  Speaker 0: In layered defense, you know, tackling threats at different ranges, different altitudes, it ticks all those boxes.
• 2:23
  Speaker 0: And
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: the investment must be huge.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: Gitarth Rajneesh Vaishnav shared that drone shield news.
• 2:28
  Speaker 0: The new, thirteen million dollar R&D place in Adelaide.
• 2:31
  Speaker 0: Yeah.
• 2:32
  Speaker 0: Shows real strategic growth commitment.
• 2:34
  Speaker 0: But
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: Raven Decker was pushing for urgent capabilities in the Netherlands too.
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: It feels very immediate, this need.
• 2:40
  Speaker 0: It is immediate, but the really interesting part, I think, is the tactical innovation.
• 2:44
  Speaker 0: Ivane Maizaya introduced this concept, the Bait Interceptor Drone.
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: B-Bait.
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: What's that?
• 2:49
  Speaker 0: It's a compact drone launched from a larger carrier UAV.
• 2:53
  Speaker 0: The idea is it autonomously goes after massed aerial threats.
• 2:57
  Speaker 0: Like
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: those cheap drone swarms, she-head types.
• 2:59
  Speaker 0: Exactly like those.
• 3:00
  Speaker 0: It's designed specifically to counter that kind of threat.
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: Which takes us beyond just the tech, right?
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: There's an economic angle.
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: A
• 3:06
  Speaker 0: huge one.
• 3:06
  Speaker 0: That's the core insight, really.
• 3:08
  Speaker 0: Why is BET potentially so important?
• 3:10
  Speaker 0: Okay, what?
• 3:11
  Speaker 0: Affordability and speed.
• 3:13
  Speaker 0: Right now, you see countries using incredibly expensive fighter jets.
• 3:16
  Speaker 0: Fifty million bucks, maybe?
• 3:18
  Speaker 0: But
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: you've done a twenty thousand dollar drone.
• 3:19
  Speaker 0: Exactly.
• 3:20
  Speaker 0: It's unsustainable.
• 3:21
  Speaker 0: The BAT concept offers an automated economical counter.
• 3:25
  Speaker 0: It replaces that ridiculously costly practice.
• 3:28
  Speaker 0: That economic shift is, I think, going to define the next wave of air defense.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: Makes sense.
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: Speed and economics driving things.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: But Tom Adams brought up a complication.
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: The legal side.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: Ah,
• 3:39
  Speaker 0: yes.
• 3:40
  Speaker 0: The regulatory hurdles.
• 3:42
  Speaker 0: He
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: pointed out the legal risks with unauthorized CUAS tech, like public safety bodies, airports, local police.
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: They need clear authority to actually use detection and mitigation tools.
• 3:52
  Speaker 0: Otherwise you get unintended consequences, legal challenges could actually slow down progress.
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: That tension, the need for machine speed versus human constraints, legal frameworks that actually leads perfectly into our next theme, doesn't it?
• 4:04
  Speaker 0: It really does.
• 4:05
  Speaker 0: AI, autonomy and software, the race for speed.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's get into this.
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: Jonas Singer had that stark quote, latency kills.
• 4:13
  Speaker 0: Yeah, pretty blunt.
• 4:15
  Speaker 0: The argument is simple.
• 4:17
  Speaker 0: You modern combat is too fast for human delay.
• 4:20
  Speaker 0: You can't afford to have a human in the loop for every decision if you expect to survive complex fights.
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: So the human moves.
• 4:27
  Speaker 0: Where?
• 4:27
  Speaker 0: On the loop, that's the goal.
• 4:29
  Speaker 0: Machines operate within rules set by humans encoded, lawful constraints like geofences, confidence levels, and then they execute lethal action at machine speed.
• 4:39
  Speaker 0: The human provides the intent and the boundaries, but the machine acts instantly.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: We saw some real tech examples of this.
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: Daniel Kolfas presented that Airbus Framework, re-legs him, at the NATO CA-IIX-II Forum.
• 4:52
  Speaker 0: Right, using deep reinforcement learning.
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: Explain that a bit.
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: What's it doing for operational planning?
• 4:56
  Speaker 0: Okay, so essentially it lets the AI simulate thousands, millions of options, combat paths, resource allocations, way faster than a human team could.
• 5:05
  Speaker 0: It learns by trial and error and simulation rewarding good outcomes.
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: So instead of weeks planning, it's moments.
• 5:10
  Speaker 0: Pretty much.
• 5:11
  Speaker 0: And Harold Mannheim confirmed this isn't just theory anymore.
• 5:14
  Speaker 0: Airbus is a major partner for the German Bundeswehr's AI transformation.
• 5:19
  Speaker 0: They're focused on scaling this up.
• 5:21
  Speaker 0: moving from prototypes to actual series production, integrating it end to end.
• 5:25
  Speaker 0: And
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: this push for speed isn't just like a nice to have.
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: It's being framed as strategically vital.
• 5:31
  Speaker 0: Absolutely vital.
• 5:33
  Speaker 0: Sandra Losman echoed the German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius saying, the future is unmanned.
• 5:40
  Speaker 0: Why?
• 5:40
  Speaker 0: Cost efficiency?
• 5:41
  Speaker 0: Sure.
• 5:42
  Speaker 0: But also human capital efficiency using people smartly and just decisive effectiveness.
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: No sense.
• 5:48
  Speaker 0: And Benjamin Tallis made a strong point too.
• 5:50
  Speaker 0: democracies need AI-driven, autonomous mass capabilities to effectively defend against authoritarian states who might not have the same constraints on human cost.
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: And you need the hardware for that vision.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: Aviv Barzohar and Richard Benton highlighted the Nomadu Avi family from Lockheed Martin and Sikorsky.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: VTL, Hybrid Electric.
• 6:07
  Speaker 0: And critically, Open Architecture.
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: There it is again.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: Why is that so key here?
• 6:12
  Speaker 0: Because open architecture enables that speed and mass we're talking about.
• 6:15
  Speaker 0: It means you can plug in third-party software more easily, upgrade faster, scale configurations for different missions, ISR, strike, logistics, land, sea.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: Gotcha.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: It connects the software potential directly to adaptable hardware.
• 6:29
  Speaker 0: Exactly.
• 6:30
  Speaker 0: Which bridges nicely into our third theme, industrial policy, procurement, and resilience.
• 6:36
  Speaker 0: How do we actually build and pay for all this stuff at scale?
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Where do we start?
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: partnerships.
• 6:42
  Speaker 0: Strategic partnerships are huge.
• 6:44
  Speaker 0: Preston Feinberg flagged that big UK Palantir deal up to one point five billion investment.
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: And Palantir setting up their European HQ in the UK.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 6:53
  Speaker 0: It frames defense deals, not just as buying kit, but as engines for national economic and tech growth.
• 6:58
  Speaker 0: But his
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: growth, the same as resilience.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: Christoph Donique brought up Ryan Middle's massive expansion, sixty three billion backlog, new factories popping up.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: And
• 7:06
  Speaker 0: he asked the crucial question.
• 7:08
  Speaker 0: Does just being efficient make you strategically resilient?
• 7:11
  Speaker 0: Well, if you centralize everything into giant, super efficient factories, you create single points of failure.
• 7:18
  Speaker 0: His argument is Europe needs a balanced, distributed industrial sites, procurement tied to sovereignty metrics, not just sheer volume.
• 7:26
  Speaker 0: Geographical spread matters.
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: You can't talk about European defense industry now without talking about Ukraine.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: Oleksandr Lysikov announced something big.
• 7:35
  Speaker 0: A major turning point, yeah.
• 7:37
  Speaker 0: Ukraine shifting from just defense production for themselves to becoming an exporter, projecting thirty-five billion dollars in production next year.
• 7:45
  Speaker 0: Wow.
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: With plans for export hubs in the EU, US, Middle East.
• 7:50
  Speaker 0: It's forcing a rethink in the West.
• 7:52
  Speaker 0: Martin Joinsar and Mark A. Whitefeld were clear.
• 7:54
  Speaker 0: Supporting Ukraine effectively means localization, speed, constant feedback loops.
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: And Joinser had that really provocative call about procurement.
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: Oh
• 8:02
  Speaker 0: yeah, that was striking.
• 8:03
  Speaker 0: He said Western procurement offices need to change their processes.
• 8:06
  Speaker 0: Start treating things like drones and sensors as consumables or a
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: service.
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: Not like a tank you buy for twenty years.
• 8:12
  Speaker 0: Exactly.
• 8:13
  Speaker 0: Treat them like consumables or a service.
• 8:14
  Speaker 0: Yeah.
• 8:15
  Speaker 0: That's a massive mindset shift for traditional defense bureaucracies.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: What does that practically mean?
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: Treating assets as a service.
• 8:22
  Speaker 0: It means you might buy, say, operational hours or performance outcomes, not just the physical drone.
• 8:28
  Speaker 0: The contractor keeps updating the software.
• 8:30
  Speaker 0: that's the service, and the hardware is maybe seen as more expendable, replaceable quickly with the latest version.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: So it prioritizes ongoing improvement over waiting for the perfect final product.
• 8:41
  Speaker 0: Precisely.
• 8:42
  Speaker 0: Rapid iteration.
• 8:44
  Speaker 0: And to help bridge that gap, Denise Sviatokum mentioned the Nordar Nexus initiative.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: What's that doing?
• 8:50
  Speaker 0: Connecting Ukrainian companies with Danish support programs, helping them get NATO certification, basically speeding up their integration into the wider European defense industry.
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: And that integration focus shows up in national plans too.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Pascal M noted Denmark buying more F-thirty-fives and collaborative combat aircraft.
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: The
• 9:08
  Speaker 0: drone wingmania.
• 9:09
  Speaker 0: Specifically
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: to boost NATO interoperability and support local industry like Turma and Multicut.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: It all ties together.
• 9:15
  Speaker 0: It does.
• 9:16
  Speaker 0: Which brings us maybe to the last theme, specialization within domains, sea, air, PNT.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: Okay, let's start underwater.
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: Seems like a lot happening there.
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: Amelia Gould announced Helsing acquiring blue ocean marine tech systems.
• 9:29
  Speaker 0: Right.
• 9:29
  Speaker 0: Bringing Helsing's AI focus together with expertise in autonomous underwater platforms to counter nefarious subsea activity.
• 9:38
  Speaker 0: That
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: sounds serious.
• 9:39
  Speaker 0: It is.
• 9:40
  Speaker 0: And we're seeing coordinated European efforts too.
• 9:43
  Speaker 0: Jürgen Skrabak detailed the European Defense Agency's twenty twenty six goals.
• 9:48
  Speaker 0: Underwater domain awareness, uncrewed maritime systems, seabed protection.
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: And they're using a modular approach.
• 9:54
  Speaker 0: Yeah, a pragmatic, minimum viable unit concept.
• 9:58
  Speaker 0: Built around a standard, twenty-foot shipping container.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: Why the container standard?
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: What makes that so useful?
• 10:03
  Speaker 0: Logistics?
• 10:03
  Speaker 0: Pure and simple.
• 10:05
  Speaker 0: If your complex sensor system or drone launcher fits in a standard container, you can deploy it rapidly using existing global infrastructure, cargo ships, military transports, whatever, cuts deployment time dramatically.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: Speed and standardization again.
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: Same in the air domain.
• 10:18
  Speaker 0: Seems like it.
• 10:19
  Speaker 0: Paul Lemo highlighted Lockheed Martin firing up their SPY-Seven radar for the Aegis Vessels, another step in modular radar tech.
• 10:26
  Speaker 0: And Dr.
• 10:27
  Speaker 0: Dennis G mentioned Vectis focusing on air power integration, making sure different fleets, especially fifth gen like the F- Thirty-Five, can work together seamlessly.
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: Okay, and finally, that critical bit of infrastructure, PNT.
• 10:40
  Speaker 0: Positioning, navigation, and timing.
• 10:42
  Speaker 0: Absolutely crucial.
• 10:43
  Speaker 0: Eliza Drasny's confirmed it's a major focus in the Baltics, strengthening PNT resilience.
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: Because GPS can be denied or spoofed.
• 10:51
  Speaker 0: Exactly.
• 10:52
  Speaker 0: In a conflict, you have to be able to operate without relying solely on GPS.
• 10:56
  Speaker 0: So you see civil tech, like from saffron electronics and defense, being transferred into military P&T solutions.
• 11:02
  Speaker 0: It's driving that civil military tech transfer.
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: OK, so let's try and pull this all together.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: What we've seen across LinkedIn these past two weeks suggests defense tech is really shifting around three core ideas.
• 11:11
  Speaker 0: I think so.
• 11:12
  Speaker 0: First, speed, driven hard by AI and autonomy.
• 11:15
  Speaker 0: Second, mass, fueled by affordable drones and the urgent need for counter drone tech.
• 11:20
  Speaker 0: And third, industrial resistance.
• 11:22
  Speaker 0: with Ukraine acting as a catalyst and a broader push for smarter EU industrial policy.
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: And thinking about that resilience and the procurement changes needed.
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: Brenda Jacobs point about modular, software-defined systems.
• 11:34
  Speaker 0: Yeah, that they're, per se, never fully developed.
• 11:38
  Speaker 0: That thinking completely rejects the old way of doing things, waiting for that perfect, finished, gold standard system.
• 11:45
  Speaker 0: Right.
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: Which leaves a really interesting question for you, the listener, to think about.
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: What big established defense systems out there right now are maybe being held back by that old demand for a gold standard solution?
• 11:56
  Speaker 0: Yeah, and how different could they be, how much faster, how much more effective, if we truly embraced a software-first service-based approach where improvement is constant.
• 12:05
  Speaker 0: That's the transformation happening right
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: now.