Women, structural harm, and where a digital duty of care needs to begin

The AAWAA Women’s Advocate · Sep 17, 2026 · 10m

Emma and Lucy unpack a gap in the Digital Duty of Care Bill: harms from pornography and misogynist material are fixed directly into law for children, but for adult women, the same harms are left to a minister's discretion, with no requirement they're ever addressed. They discuss what that gap reveals about how Parliament treats women as a class, and why structural harm can't be judged by individual lived experience alone.

__

Donate

If you wish to donate to AAWAA you can do so by making a direct deposit or bank transfer to:

Account name: Affiliation of Australian Women’s Advocacy Alliances…