Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / Fraud, Waste, Skip—It's a Democrat No-Show plus AOC Too Moderate? DSA is Reshaping the Democratic Party

Transcript

Fraud, Waste, Skip—It's a Democrat No-Show plus AOC Too Moderate? DSA is Reshaping the Democratic Party · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What we should do is you should choose the United
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: States of America again. This time we'll leave Mexico and
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Canada out. But then what you do is you which
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: I was very nice to get them in. But what
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: we do is leave you choose us, but you pick
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: somebody else for the next one, and then we'll take
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: some of the anger, hatred and steam out of everyone.
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: But Johnny also had another idea. He said we could
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: do it China and the United States for next time.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: We do them China, United States. So you have a
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: nice short flight in between games.
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: The players would love that you're listening to the forty
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: seven Morning Update with Ben ferguson.
• 0:39
  Speaker 3: Good Saturday morning. It's so nice to have you with
• 0:41
  Speaker 3: us on the forty seven Morning Update. And we've got
• 0:43
  Speaker 3: two big stories for you first up. First up, Democrats
• 0:47
  Speaker 3: refuse to show up for a hearing about massive ways
• 0:50
  Speaker 3: fraud abuse in our federal government. So why did they bail?
• 0:54
  Speaker 3: We'll explain that to you. And also another shocking story
• 0:58
  Speaker 3: for you. The Democratic Party is dying right now and
• 1:01
  Speaker 3: who's taking over the Democratic Socialists of America? And they
• 1:05
  Speaker 3: put out their new manifesto of what they believe in
• 1:09
  Speaker 3: and it should scare every American to your core. It's
• 1:12
  Speaker 3: a forty seven morning update, and it starts right now.
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: Story number one.
• 1:17
  Speaker 3: Typically in Washington, d C. You've got shouting matches on
• 1:21
  Speaker 3: the Senate floor, on the House floor, right. But well,
• 1:24
  Speaker 3: something else happened in Washington yesterday and it involved something
• 1:29
  Speaker 3: much quieter and arguably more telling. The Senate Homeland Security
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: and Governmental Affairs Committee held a major hearing. You did
• 1:39
  Speaker 3: not hear about this at all. I'm guessing it was
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: an important hearing, by the way, examining fraud against you,
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: the American taxpayer. According to committee Republicans, not a single
• 1:52
  Speaker 3: Democratic member attended the hearing that involved taxpayers being defrauded.
• 1:58
  Speaker 3: The hearing focus not on how millions, but how tens
• 2:02
  Speaker 3: of billions of taxpayer dollars have been lost to fraud
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: and what Congress can do to stop it. Translation, Democrats
• 2:11
  Speaker 3: don't want to stop it at all, because many of
• 2:13
  Speaker 3: the fraudsters are the ones paying them to look the
• 2:17
  Speaker 3: other way. Americans are paying taxes at every level. You
• 2:21
  Speaker 3: have your federal taxes, you got your state taxes, you
• 2:24
  Speaker 3: got your local taxes, and families have been dealing with inflation.
• 2:29
  Speaker 3: They've been dealing with higher interest rates and obviously rising costs.
• 2:33
  Speaker 3: So you would think the Democrats would want to expose
• 2:37
  Speaker 3: fraud against taxpayers and also make sure that your dollars
• 2:41
  Speaker 3: are going to be aple that actually need the money
• 2:43
  Speaker 3: unless you're on the take. And Democrats, well, they were
• 2:48
  Speaker 3: completely empty.
• 2:50
  Speaker 4: None of them showed up.
• 2:52
  Speaker 3: Now, one of the reasons they didn't show up is
• 2:54
  Speaker 3: because one of the star witnesses was that independent journalist
• 2:58
  Speaker 3: Nick shirley. Investigation into the Minnesota Childcare Network showed massive fraud,
• 3:05
  Speaker 3: including the Quality Leering Center, which helped draw attention to
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: allegations that the organization received roughly ten million in taxpayer
• 3:14
  Speaker 3: dollars despite having no children in attendance. That is what
• 3:19
  Speaker 3: exploded into a much bigger story of fraud. Senator Jenny
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: Arst used the hearing to argue that this case demonstrates
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: how easily bad actors are exploiting government programs when oversight
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: is virtually nonexistent, especially when Democrats looked the other way,
• 3:37
  Speaker 3: and literally they were looking so far the other way
• 3:40
  Speaker 3: they would even show up to the hearing.
• 3:42
  Speaker 4: About the fraud.
• 3:44
  Speaker 3: Now, according to Center Earns, the federal government lost up
• 3:48
  Speaker 3: to five hundred and twenty one billion dollars every year.
• 3:53
  Speaker 3: I'm going to say that again, federal government, meaning your
• 3:56
  Speaker 3: tax dollars, your tax dollars, they're wasting through fraud five
• 4:01
  Speaker 3: hundred and twenty one billion every year to various programs.
• 4:05
  Speaker 3: That's not just waste, it's money that could otherwise go
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: towards legitimate services, or give you a massive tax break,
• 4:14
  Speaker 3: or also pay down our national debt. Now, the hearing
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: also revisited the broader series of fraud scandals in Minnesota.
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: Republicans pointed to investigations alleging that more than nine billion
• 4:26
  Speaker 3: alone in fraud had been uncovered across some multiple state
• 4:31
  Speaker 3: administer programs in recent years.
• 4:34
  Speaker 4: Now. Those figures include the well known.
• 4:36
  Speaker 3: Feeding our Future case, the pandemic related fraud, childcare fraud allegations,
• 4:42
  Speaker 3: and other investigations that have led to numerous criminal charges
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: and arrests. Senator Ernst argued that these cases exposed as
• 4:50
  Speaker 3: systemic failure and it's not just isolated criminal acts. She
• 4:55
  Speaker 3: also discussed legislation she has introduced that would require stronger
• 4:59
  Speaker 3: verification before tax payer money is distributed, require reimbursements only
• 5:05
  Speaker 3: after services are actually provided, and then strengthen the record
• 5:10
  Speaker 3: keeping requirements as well as expand auditing authority. Her argument
• 5:14
  Speaker 3: was straightforward, don't just spend money faster, verify where it's
• 5:19
  Speaker 3: going before writing the check at all. And the broader
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: hearing also looked at how fraud is evolving nationwide. Again,
• 5:27
  Speaker 3: the Democrats weren't in the room for any of this,
• 5:29
  Speaker 3: and the media is not reporting on it either, but
• 5:32
  Speaker 3: witnesses discussed increasingly sophisticated identity theft, digital fraud schemes, and
• 5:39
  Speaker 3: weakness and government verification systems where there have been warnings
• 5:43
  Speaker 3: but no changes. Experts, by the way, also testified that
• 5:47
  Speaker 3: we need much stronger identity verification and also we should
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: be using modern anti fraud technology that the private sector uses.
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: They say just that alone could help stop billions in
• 6:00
  Speaker 3: fraudulent payments before the money leaves the government coffers. Again,
• 6:05
  Speaker 3: all of this was at the hearing that no Democrats
• 6:08
  Speaker 3: showed up four And before I get to that, I
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: want to talk about how important it is right now
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: that we as conservatives and Christians give our mind to
• 6:17
  Speaker 3: companies that actually fight and stand for our values instead
• 6:20
  Speaker 3: of fight against them. And the stakes, as I just mentioned,
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: couldn't be higher. We finally have a president and administration
• 6:27
  Speaker 3: that are fighting hard for America. But if conservatives we
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: lose focus, well, the same people who created this mess
• 6:33
  Speaker 3: will be back in charge, and they're waiting to resume
• 6:36
  Speaker 3: their destructive progressive agenda. Protecting this momentum takes more than votes.
• 6:41
  Speaker 3: It takes you and I staying in the fight for
• 6:43
  Speaker 3: our rights and our freedoms. And that's why more and
• 6:46
  Speaker 3: more people I know I'm one of them switched to
• 6:50
  Speaker 3: Patriot Mobile now. Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative
• 6:54
  Speaker 3: wireless provider. Patriot Mobile offers premium priority nationwide service on
• 7:00
  Speaker 3: all three major networks. They have unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots,
• 7:04
  Speaker 3: international roaming. You can go anywhere and have service, and
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: they have one hundred percent US based customer support. Now,
• 7:10
  Speaker 3: switching has never been easier. You can do it on
• 7:14
  Speaker 3: the phone in minutes, and unlike the other carriers, Patriot
• 7:17
  Speaker 3: Mobile puts your money towards causes defending our faith, our family,
• 7:22
  Speaker 3: our freedom. They contribute millions each year and no cost
• 7:26
  Speaker 3: to you, to organizations on the front lines fighting for
• 7:29
  Speaker 3: our God given rights. So if you have not looked
• 7:33
  Speaker 3: at Patriot Mobile for you or your small business or
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: even a bigger business. Check them out and I'll give
• 7:38
  Speaker 3: you a free month of service. Go to Patriot Mobile
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson.
• 7:47
  Speaker 3: You can also call them nine to seven to two
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: Patriot and if you use the promo code ferguson, you'll
• 7:53
  Speaker 3: get a free month of service. That's Patriot Mobile dot
• 7:55
  Speaker 3: com slash ferguson or nine seven to two Patriot. And
• 7:59
  Speaker 3: make that switch and make a difference with every call
• 8:01
  Speaker 3: you make today. Now you may say they just don't care, Well,
• 8:06
  Speaker 3: Democrats may have had reasons for not attending beyond that.
• 8:09
  Speaker 3: They of course claimed it was scheduling conflicts or disagreement
• 8:14
  Speaker 3: about the committee's focus. That was some of their big lines.
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: But what you really have to look at is the
• 8:20
  Speaker 3: Democratic Party. Many of the members receive money connected to
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: many of the fraud abusers. So this isn't just about politics.
• 8:30
  Speaker 3: This is about optics, and they didn't want to have
• 8:32
  Speaker 3: to answer questions about the money that's come into their
• 8:35
  Speaker 3: own campaigns. Now, Republicans, they are furious, and this is
• 8:40
  Speaker 3: exactly what Donald Trump had been talking about for months
• 8:43
  Speaker 3: on end. He believes that every dollar's town through fraud
• 8:48
  Speaker 3: is a dollar that hard working Americans have earned and
• 8:51
  Speaker 3: then sent to Washington, expecting it to be used responsibly.
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: But when criminals exploit the government programs, the taxpayers don't
• 8:59
  Speaker 3: just pay once, they now pay twice.
• 9:02
  Speaker 4: Not only they lose the money.
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: But they're often asked to pay even more taxes to
• 9:07
  Speaker 3: keep those same programs funded. And that is why the
• 9:10
  Speaker 3: President said he's had enough now. This hearing also comes
• 9:13
  Speaker 3: as Washington continues debating deficits government spending in the national.
• 9:19
  Speaker 4: Debt, which is clearly out of control.
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: So if lawmakers are actually serious about fiscal responsibility, many
• 9:26
  Speaker 3: would argue that preventing fraud should be one of the
• 9:29
  Speaker 3: easiest places to start. You don't have to cut benefits
• 9:33
  Speaker 3: to stop fraud. You don't have to raise taxes to
• 9:36
  Speaker 3: stop fraud. You simply have to make sure taxpayer dollars
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: actually reach the people and purposes they're intended for. Now,
• 9:45
  Speaker 3: whether today's hearing ultimately leads to biparson reforms, I can
• 9:49
  Speaker 3: promise you that ain't gonna happen. But Republicans clearly intend
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: to make government fraud, and the absence of the democratic
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: participation in today's hearing a political issu thank you ahead
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: of the midterms, as they should. It's also estimated that
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: now we're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars that
• 10:09
  Speaker 3: could have been saved through stronger oversight. Democrats knew this,
• 10:13
  Speaker 3: and they chose to push fraud and make it bigger.
• 10:17
  Speaker 3: They also knew we needed better verification, and they were warned.
• 10:21
  Speaker 4: But what do they do.
• 10:22
  Speaker 3: They made sure there wasn't verification why so the fraudsters
• 10:26
  Speaker 3: could continue to do their schemes. And they also knew,
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: of course I'm talking about the Democrats, that we needed
• 10:33
  Speaker 3: more effective enforcement when people broke the rules. But instead
• 10:36
  Speaker 3: what they do they made sure there was virtually no enforcement. So,
• 10:42
  Speaker 3: for all of you taxpayers listening right now, the question
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: that we all should be asking is this, If Congress
• 10:49
  Speaker 3: can't agree on almost nothing else, why can't they even
• 10:52
  Speaker 3: agree on protecting the money that American families have worked
• 10:56
  Speaker 3: so hard to earn. The answer, unfortunately, is clear. Democrats
• 11:01
  Speaker 3: would rather steal your money have it come back from
• 11:05
  Speaker 3: the fraudsters into their campaigns. That's what they're really all
• 11:09
  Speaker 3: about now.
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: Story number two.
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: All right, there's a new warning and a new article
• 11:14
  Speaker 3: from the Free Press that is reigniting the long running
• 11:17
  Speaker 3: debate about the direction of the Democratic Party and specifically
• 11:22
  Speaker 3: now the massive influence and the massive number of candidates
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: that the Democratic Socialists of America known as DSA are
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: actually having and when it comes to influence in its
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: leadership on American politics. Now, this article now has come
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: out saying that quote, the majority of the National Political
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: Committee for the Democratic Socialists of America, that is, the
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: organization's elected governing body all right publicly identifies with or
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: belongs to quote caucauses that embrace Communists, Marxists, or Marxist
• 11:59
  Speaker 3: Leninist trade additions. Now, the article argues this represents a
• 12:04
  Speaker 3: significant ideological shift within the organization's leadership compared with previous years. Now,
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: for decades, many Americans assume that the term Democratic Socialists
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: was like a fringe idea, that it was like a
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: very small number of people in the Democratic Party, nothing
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: to really worry about. Well, that assumption is now wrong,
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: because Democratic Socialists now refers primarily to what is a
• 12:31
  Speaker 3: European style welfare state. Right. It expanded government programs massively.
• 12:37
  Speaker 3: That's why Democrats like it. Now, the Free Press is
• 12:41
  Speaker 3: now saying that within the DSA itself, the organized communist
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: factions have gained increasing influence over the entire Democratic Party
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: and also over the internal elections and policy directions of
• 12:55
  Speaker 3: the Democratic Party.
• 12:56
  Speaker 4: Now.
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: The article also notes that several caucuses represented in the
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: leadership now openly describe themselves as not just like communists. Okay,
• 13:06
  Speaker 3: straight up Marxists, are Marxist Leninists. Others are reporting that
• 13:11
  Speaker 3: this is a growing role of these factions within the
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: entire Democratic leadership in general. That's now why you're seeing
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: so many extremist candidates that are actually running and winning. Now,
• 13:24
  Speaker 3: this also raises another important question. If the leadership in
• 13:29
  Speaker 3: this organization has become this powerful, what does that mean
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: for the Democratic Party in general, Well, it means that
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: there is chaos within the Democratic Party. They don't know
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: how to stop the Marxist Leninists from taking over, and
• 13:44
  Speaker 3: that is what they're doing. Okay, you can identify as
• 13:48
  Speaker 3: a Democrat, as a as a Marxist, they don't have
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: a problem with you as a socialist, and I have
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: a problem with you. If you're a communist, they don't
• 13:55
  Speaker 3: have a problem with you. But that is the problem.
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: The fact that the Democrats did not fight this within
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: their own family, and now it is festered into a
• 14:06
  Speaker 3: massive cancer. They don't know how to stop it because
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: now these crazies are actually in charge and they're picking
• 14:14
  Speaker 3: the candidates that are running.
• 14:16
  Speaker 4: Now.
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: Marxism has developed, by the way, by Karl Marx called
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: for quote, replacing capitalism with collective ownership of the means
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: of production. They also envisioned what they described as a
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: classless society.
• 14:31
  Speaker 4: Everyone's the same.
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: So governments would then say, all right, we're going to
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: have policies that say everyone must be equal. Think about
• 14:40
  Speaker 3: how that changes America. You look at the Soviet Union
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: under Lenin and Stalin, all right. You look at Malan, China.
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: You look at Cuba under Castro, you look at Cambodia
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: all right, under rogue. They all became authoritarian states, right,
• 14:54
  Speaker 3: and they committed widespread human rights abuses to gain the
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: power that now the Communis in America are begging for. Historians,
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: by the way, also say this, find us a country
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: that has actually flourished under communism, socialism, or Marxism.
• 15:13
  Speaker 4: It doesn't exist. Now.
• 15:15
  Speaker 3: You look at Russia, for example, Right now you have
• 15:18
  Speaker 3: political repression, You've got restrictions on civil liberties, and you
• 15:22
  Speaker 3: even have mass deaths of their own people. You can
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: apply that to any other country. By the way, that
• 15:27
  Speaker 3: socialist communists are Marxists. So why is the Democratic Socialist
• 15:31
  Speaker 3: Party of America having the success right now? Because they
• 15:35
  Speaker 3: were not policed or stopped by the Democratic Party. And
• 15:39
  Speaker 3: that is the heart of why this matters today. Now,
• 15:42
  Speaker 3: the Free Press also argued this isn't simply a matter
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: of labels. It contends that communist align causes now run
• 15:51
  Speaker 3: or play a significant role in shaping the leadership and
• 15:54
  Speaker 3: the agenda of the left. That is a threat to
• 15:58
  Speaker 3: American democracy, the American freedom, our constitution. And because several,
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: by the way, elected officials around the country have now
• 16:07
  Speaker 3: been affiliated and endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America,
• 16:12
  Speaker 3: you have to look at them and say, hold on,
• 16:14
  Speaker 3: how did the Democratic PARTI as a whole and not
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: get a hold of this?
• 16:17
  Speaker 4: How do they not stop it? Maybe they didn't want to.
• 16:19
  Speaker 3: By the way, if you think about the most democratic
• 16:22
  Speaker 3: elected officials right now in this country, the newest ones,
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: they are radical socialists and Marxists. The Democratic Party has
• 16:29
  Speaker 3: not figured out a way to stop them from growing,
• 16:31
  Speaker 3: including the leadership like Chuck Schumer, you have the rise
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: of AOC and Mandannie and others like that. And so
• 16:38
  Speaker 3: even some former DSA members have expressed concerns about the
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: organization's trajectory.
• 16:44
  Speaker 4: Let me give you an example.
• 16:45
  Speaker 3: There was a recent opinion piece by the former DFA
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: member Jake Altman, and he argued that the organization has
• 16:52
  Speaker 3: shifted from a broader Democratic Socialist coalition towards one increasingly
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: influenced by more ideologically rigid Marxists.
• 17:01
  Speaker 4: And Lennen tendencies.
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: If they're warning you, and I'm talking about former members
• 17:07
  Speaker 3: of the board about how radical they become, you know
• 17:10
  Speaker 3: we've got a real problem now for voters. The larger
• 17:14
  Speaker 3: question and the lesson may be this, you need to
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: look at your candidates, right, because this is much bigger
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: of a problem than basic campaign slogans or even party labels.
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: All right, you look at the organizations that candidates belong to.
• 17:29
  Speaker 3: That tells you who they really are. You need to
• 17:32
  Speaker 3: look at the platforms that they support. By the way,
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: if you want to see how radical the Democratic Socialism
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: America are, go to their website, read what they believe in,
• 17:40
  Speaker 3: and you're going to say, oh my gosh, Ben this
• 17:43
  Speaker 3: isn't real, and I'm going to say I wish it wasn't,
• 17:45
  Speaker 3: but guess what it actually is. You can see who
• 17:49
  Speaker 3: they endorse, and then you know who is a threat
• 17:52
  Speaker 3: to our freedoms in this country. And these people they're
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: shaping not only the candidates we get, but they're also
• 18:00
  Speaker 3: so now reshaping the Democratic Party as a whole. Now,
• 18:05
  Speaker 3: let me just explain to you how radical I'm saying
• 18:08
  Speaker 3: they become. You know, AOC the darling of the left,
• 18:11
  Speaker 3: she's a radical. Well, the Democratic Socialists of America have
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: now officially pulled their support for AOC, not because she's
• 18:22
  Speaker 3: too radical, but because they say she's actually too moderate.
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: The loss of a socialist endorsement by AOC, like, that's
• 18:30
  Speaker 3: the point where you're like, all right, did hell freeze over?
• 18:32
  Speaker 4: Let me read their own statement.
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: The national leadership of the Democratic Socialists of America have
• 18:38
  Speaker 3: pulled their endorsement of AOC. They cite her pragmatic approach
• 18:42
  Speaker 3: to party unity, her fundraising for establishment Democrats, and her
• 18:48
  Speaker 3: careful positioning regarding the war in Gaza as proof that
• 18:51
  Speaker 3: she had quote moderated, therefore losing their support. Now, this
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: is who is running the Democratic Party right now. These
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: are the people that are picking the candidates. And I
• 19:04
  Speaker 3: tell you this because you need to understand. This is
• 19:09
  Speaker 3: now where the Democratic Party is. They are radical, they
• 19:13
  Speaker 3: are extreme, and the majority of them in the Democratic
• 19:17
  Speaker 3: leadership say they're either a socialist, a Marxist, a Stalinist.
• 19:22
  Speaker 3: In their approach, all of those things equal one main theme.
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: They want to destroy America from within. They believe America
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: is evil. They believe America is a threat to their
• 19:35
  Speaker 3: belief system, and they want to destroy this country and
• 19:38
  Speaker 3: rebuild it where they have all the power. And every
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: one of us is poor and incompetent, and our children
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: have bad educations, and none of us have any money
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: to stand up to them. That is their plan. When
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: they tell you it's their plan, and they put it
• 19:54
  Speaker 3: on their website, I will say it again.
• 19:56
  Speaker 4: Believe them.
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: Thank you for listening to the forty seven Morning Up
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: Date with Ben Ferguson. Please make sure you hit subscribe
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: wherever you're listening to this podcast right now and for
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: more in depth news, also subscribe to the Ben Ferguson
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: podcast and we will see you back here on Monday morning.