Latest / Cariboo Signals / Arts, Culture And Digital Storytelling

Transcript

Arts, Culture And Digital Storytelling · Cariboo Signals

• 0:00
  Casey: Hey, welcome back. Today we've got Williams Lake's Competition Pow Wow, a copy editor's fifty years of instinct versus a chatbot, and the Cowichar title decision that got compressed into pure panic. Plus the big question: when the tools get easier, what happens to the judgment nobody's teaching anymore? That and more, right up top.
• 0:34
  Casey: Welcome to Cariboo Signals, an AI-generated review of the latest tech news and ideas that impact our rural communities — I'm Casey. It's Monday, September 7th, 2026. Coming to you from the Cariboo, on lands that have been cared for by the Secwépemc, Tŝilhqot'in, and Dakelh peoples since time immemorial. Today's theme is Arts, Culture & Digital Storytelling.
• 0:58
  Riley: And I'm Riley. Today we're looking at who tells the stories around here, what tools they're reaching for, and what quietly disappears when a hard job gets an easy button.
• 1:11
  Riley: Quick weather check for the region. Out at Horsefly Lake this morning it's overcast and about 9 degrees, high of 22, low of 7, no rain expected. Around the rest of the Cariboo — 100 Mile House is sitting near 10 with clear skies, Williams Lake around 9 and mainly clear, Quesnel around 8 and overcast, Riske Creek around 9 and clear.
• 1:36
  Casey: Good day to be outside instead of doom-scrolling. Let's get into it.
• 1:42
  Casey: Four stories close to home to start, three more building on today's theme, then a longer tail — a full docket today. Williams Lake First Nation held its Competition Pow Wow over the weekend at the Chief William Pow Wow Arbor.
• 1:56
  Riley: Dancers and drummers came in from across the region for two days of competition dancing, and by most accounts it landed as more than a contest. One organizer told the paper the good weather itself felt like part of the medicine this year, after a summer that's given this region plenty of smoke and not much sun. Families brought kids, brought elders, brought friends from outside the community entirely. The next Competition Pow Wow is already booked at that same arbor for August of 2026.
• 2:28
  Casey: That's the kind of event that runs on the same volunteers year after year — worth remembering next time the paper covers a funding gap.
• 2:36
  Riley: Williams Lake City Council has a budget update for 2027, and it's a mixed one. Council directed staff to hold city services steady while landing on a zero percent increase to the general mill rate.
• 2:50
  Casey: Zero percent sounds good until you read the second half. Staff were also asked to prepare a report on funding options for a water treatment plant that's now more than seventeen million dollars over its original budget. That bill doesn't disappear because the tax rate holds flat this year — it just moves down the road to whoever's on council when the financing decision actually has to get made.
• 3:13
  Riley: Which is its own kind of storytelling problem, honestly. A zero percent headline reads as good news. The seventeen-million-dollar overrun buried in the same report doesn't get nearly the same attention.
• 3:26
  Casey: A public safety note for anyone driving the Cariboo highways this week. My Cariboo Now is reporting that a lot of B.C. drivers don't realize flashing amber lights at the roadside trigger the same Slow Down, Move Over law as full emergency lights.
• 3:41
  Riley: That covers tow trucks, survey crews, utility vehicles — anyone working roadside with amber flashers on. With the last long weekend of summer bringing extra traffic through the region, it's the kind of rule that's easy to not know until you're the one getting the ticket, or worse, the one who didn't slow down for a crew on the shoulder.
• 4:02
  Casey: And in Fort St. James, there's a viral trend making the rounds that's got at least one parent alarmed enough to call it in. Kids are re-enacting scenes tied to "Cat in the Hat" content online, and authorities are looking into it.
• 4:16
  Riley: No injuries reported, and details are thin at this point. But it's a reminder that whatever's circulating on a kid's phone in a big city usually reaches a town the size of Fort St. James within days, not months — and small-town authorities end up figuring out how seriously to take it with almost no context from wherever the trend started.
• 4:38
  Casey: A public library just opened in Poland that's worth a mention on its own terms. ArchDaily covered it — Choszczówka's new branch, built by a firm called Ambient, using low-emission, renewable materials from the ground up, designed to be energy efficient rather than retrofitted for it later.
• 4:55
  Riley: Six hundred twenty-five square meters, according to the write-up. It's a small building doing something a lot of Canadian public buildings still treat as an afterthought — building the sustainability into the design instead of bolting it on after the fact.
• 5:10
  Casey: Nice building. Doesn't answer who staffs it, though, or whether Poland's library funding model looks anything like ours.
• 5:18
  Riley: Fair, but it's a reminder that the physical container for stories is still getting reinvented, even while most of the attention these days goes to the digital side of storytelling.
• 5:30
  Casey: Scientific American has a piece up this week on what it's calling "maxxing" — the pressure to optimize every hour of your life, your sleep, your workouts, your reading list — and the psychological toll researchers are finding when that pressure never lets up.
• 5:45
  Riley: Fast Company ran something adjacent to that. Before you take advice from a successful person, the piece argues, ask what specific conditions actually made their path work, because survivorship bias means most of what worked for them might not transfer to your situation at all. The writer even turns it on themselves — asks readers to question how they got a platform to publish that advice in the first place.
• 6:11
  Casey: Good instinct for anyone binge-listening productivity podcasts on the drive between Quesnel and Prince George.
• 6:18
  Riley: Vox published something earlier this week — it's framed as a response to the ongoing trial of Lindsay Clancy in Massachusetts — making the case that postpartum depression is treatable, and that the systems meant to catch it before it turns into a crisis keep failing anyway. It's not really about the trial itself so much as what the coverage of it keeps missing.
• 6:41
  Casey: STAT News ran an opinion piece with a headline that says the whole thing plainly: make infectious disease data boring again. The writers, a group of former CDC officials, are asking why the current CDC director appears to be applying different evidentiary standards to state health data depending on which party runs the state. Lost in that argument, they point out, are the more than four hundred people actually infected in Pennsylvania right now, eighty-three of them hospitalized, some of them children facing real complications.
• 7:11
  Riley: New Atlas has a science story worth a beat of its own — a study out of Columbia University published in Cell challenges where a key Alzheimer's-linked protein actually originates in the brain. It's part of a larger atlas project mapping neurodegenerative disease at the protein level, and it could change how researchers think about the disease's progression rather than just its symptoms.
• 7:37
  Casey: A vote in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt gave the AfD party fresh momentum heading into next year's broader European elections, according to the New York Times — analysts are already reading it as a signal for races across the continent.
• 7:52
  Riley: Adidas is facing calls for a boycott after a campaign featuring a former Israeli soldier who's an amputee — the backlash, per Al Jazeera, is over the political context of using that soldier as the face of an amputee-focused product line, not the product itself.
• 8:08
  Casey: Metro Vancouver has ousted its top executive, Jerry Dobrovolny, just weeks before a municipal election, and hasn't set any deadline for finding a permanent replacement — which leaves a fairly large regional government running without a clear head at an awkward moment.
• 8:23
  Riley: And there's a legal filing worth spending a moment on. Microsoft told a court that its Copilot chatbot almost never reproduces full sentences from New York Times journalism. Out of tens of thousands of chat logs — specifically selected because they were the ones most likely to contain Times content — the company says only about fifty-nine thousand five hundred and forty-five had even sixteen words in common with the source material, and that's before you get to whether that overlap was substantive at all.
• 8:54
  Casey: That's a number produced by the company being sued, in its own defense, so read it that way. But it's a specific claim, not a hand-wave, and it's a real data point in a fight that's mostly been argument up to now. We'll come back to some of that in a minute.
• 9:09
  Riley: Last story for the roundup. Caltech researchers have found that Mars's southern hemisphere runs far hotter underground than the northern half — hot enough, according to the study, that the mantle beneath the south could still be partly molten.
• 9:25
  Casey: Two hundred to four hundred degrees Celsius warmer than the north, by their estimate. Nobody's sure yet why one side of a planet would run that much hotter than the other, and that's the part worth sitting with.
• 9:38
  Riley: A planet keeping its own secrets a few hundred kilometers down. Not a bad note to close the roundup on.
• 9:45
  Casey: Today happens to be International Literacy Day, so the spotlight lines up well. Cariboo Chilcotin Partners for Literacy runs free adult reading, ESL, and digital literacy programs across the region, including right in Williams Lake. Whether someone's working on reading skills for the first time, learning English, or just trying to figure out how to use a smartphone without dreading it, there's no cost and no judgment attached. You can find them at caribooliteracy dot com.
• 10:11
  Riley: That's the kind of infrastructure that never makes a headline and still matters every day of the year. Good group to know exists.
• 10:20
  Casey: Which is a decent hinge into today's Deep Dive, because it turns out literacy and who gets to shape a story are more tangled up than they look on the surface.
• 10:30
  Riley: Here's a question worth sitting with before we get into the specifics: when the tools that produce a story get easier to use, what actually disappears along with the difficulty?
• 10:40
  Casey: Loaded question for a show that runs partly on AI-generated scripts.
• 10:44
  Riley: Noted. Let's use it anyway.
• 10:46
  Casey: There's a piece in Columbia Journalism Review about a sixty-nine-year-old copy editor who joined the Salt Lake Tribune as a junior hire after fifty years in the business, teaching journalism on the side. Even with that resume, he made a rookie mistake on the job. Not a spelling error, not a name misspelled in a headline — something subtler, a judgment call about how a story should read that he'd have caught on reflex twenty years earlier.
• 11:11
  Riley: Which cuts against the idea that experience alone is the safeguard. If a fifty-year veteran can still slip, what's the tool supposed to catch that he can't?
• 11:21
  Casey: It argues the opposite, actually. He caught his own mistake fast, named precisely what kind of mistake it was, and could explain in detail why it mattered to the reader. That's fifty years of pattern recognition talking. A tool executes a rule. It doesn't develop a nose for when the rule doesn't quite fit the situation in front of it.
• 11:40
  Riley: There's a companion piece in the same publication asking whether newsrooms should "run toward" AI — there's a new book making exactly that argument. And there's something to it. The Tow Center keeps a running tracker of AI deals and disputes, and it's long. Standing outside the tool entirely hasn't protected anybody from the legal and financial fights already underway around it.
• 12:04
  Casey: Running toward it hasn't gone especially well so far, though. The BBC tested its own AI tools against its own journalism and got what one internal report called a confused cocktail of errors — wrong facts stitched into otherwise plausible-sounding copy. A separate study from this fall found AI assistants misrepresenting news content in a substantial share of the cases researchers tested: wrong sourcing, invented details, information presented as current when it was stale.
• 12:31
  Riley: The BBC also built an editorial review step before anything generated gets published — a human reads it before it goes anywhere near an audience. That's not blind adoption. That's adoption with a filter built in from the start.
• 12:45
  Casey: A filter run by people who still have the judgment of that sixty-nine-year-old editor. Take the filter away in ten years, once nobody's been trained the long way anymore, and what's left holding the line?
• 12:55
  Riley: That's the real question underneath all of this. Not whether the tool works today. Whether the skill it's replacing gets taught to anyone once the people who learned it the hard way retire.
• 13:06
  Casey: Right. And it's not hypothetical for a paper the size of the Tribune or the Observer. One editor, thin staffing, no bench of juniors coming up behind them learning the trade by doing the boring parts of it.
• 13:18
  Riley: There's a version of this that isn't about factual errors at all — it's about compression, about how much gets cut before a complicated story reaches most people. Look at how the Cowichan Aboriginal title decision got covered outside BC's legal press. The Tyee's podcast walks through it with an author who spent a year following the case closely. The actual ruling applies to a defined stretch of land on Lulu Island near the Fraser, where the court found specific fee-simple grants made by the federal Crown and the City of Richmond were defective and invalid.
• 13:52
  Casey: And what most people in Richmond actually absorbed from a year of coverage was closer to "your house might not be yours anymore." That's not what the ruling said.
• 14:01
  Riley: It never was. That's a story that needed the friction — someone actually reading the judgment, calling the property lawyers, explaining the narrow legal scope before the scarier headline got to run unchallenged. Skip that friction and you get a year of property panic built on a distorted version of a real decision.
• 14:19
  Casey: CBC's own reporting backs that up. A lot of Richmond residents said nobody explained the actual claim to them clearly before the anxiety set in and the political statements started flying. That's not really an AI failure. It's an old failure — speed beating explanation. What AI does is make the fast, wrong version cheaper to produce and easier to spread further and faster than the correction ever travels.
• 14:43
  Riley: Which means the fix was never going to be "slow the tools down" as a stand-alone answer. It's "who still has the authority, and the time, to do the slow explaining before the fast version wins the day."
• 14:54
  Casey: Nobody local has answered that. Regional papers don't have a Cowichan-decision specialist on staff. They've got two reporters covering council, wildfire season, and the school board, and that's before anything provincial or national lands on their desk.
• 15:09
  Riley: So bring it back home. The pow wow story we covered earlier this hour ran a couple hundred words in the Tribune — warm, accurate, clearly written by someone who understood what the protocol at that arbor required and what tone the event called for.
• 15:25
  Casey: That's not a skill an AI model has sitting in its training data. That's a reporter who's covered that event before, or who took the time to talk to someone who has, and knows the difference between describing a pow wow and understanding one.
• 15:38
  Riley: And when that specific reporter moves on to another job, the next hire has to relearn all of that from scratch, because none of it is written down anywhere formal. It lived in one person's head and their contact list.
• 15:52
  Casey: Which is a real gap. It's also a different gap than "AI is coming for the job." It's "nobody's documented the institutional knowledge, regardless of who or what ends up doing the writing five years from now."
• 16:04
  Riley: Fine, two separate gaps then. Doesn't make either one smaller to admit there are two.
• 16:08
  Casey: No, it doesn't.
• 16:10
  Riley: Here's where I'd push back a little on the doom framing, though. The Verge's reporting on that Microsoft court filing found Copilot barely reproduces full sentences from Times journalism — a small fraction of tens of thousands of logs that were specifically selected to try to catch it doing exactly that. If the leading commercial tool is that bad at substituting for original reporting, that's some evidence the underlying skill isn't disappearing as fast as the fear suggests.
• 16:39
  Casey: It's a legal filing produced by the company defending itself in the lawsuit. That's a convenient number for Microsoft to have found.
• 16:47
  Riley: Sure, and I'd weight it accordingly. But it's a specific figure, not a vibe, and it's paired with something else — audience research out of the University of Minnesota's journalism school found American readers stay skeptical of AI in news no matter how it's deployed, and they want it clearly labeled even when a human's reviewing every word before publication. Readers aren't fooled by a smooth sentence. That's its own kind of guardrail, even if it's an unofficial one.
• 17:16
  Casey: Distrust isn't a maintenance plan, though. It just means people notice after the quality's already dropped. Noticing doesn't reverse the drop.
• 17:24
  Riley: No, it doesn't reverse it. But it does mean a small paper that keeps a real, visible editor in the loop has a trust advantage that a fully-automated feed will never build, in a town where everybody already knows the byline personally.
• 17:38
  Casey: Maybe. The part that stays unresolved is training the next one. Where does a nineteen-year-old in Quesnel learn the judgment that sixty-nine-year-old editor built over five decades, if every entry-level task that used to teach it — the fact-check, the small correction, the tedious copy edit nobody wants to do — gets handed off to a tool instead of a junior hire?
• 17:59
  Riley: That's the honest open question, and it doesn't have a clean answer today. Cariboo Chilcotin Partners for Literacy exists precisely because reading and writing skills don't transmit automatically even in a world full of easy tools — somebody still has to teach them, person to person, one learner at a time. Newsroom judgment might need the same kind of deliberate apprenticeship, built on purpose, instead of hoped for by accident.
• 18:26
  Casey: An actual junior position, doing the boring editorial tasks a machine could technically already handle, kept on purpose so the judgment actually gets built in a human being over years. That's a much stranger pitch to make to a publisher than "cancel the intern line, buy the AI subscription, it's cheaper this quarter."
• 18:44
  Riley: Stranger, and probably the only version of this that survives past whoever's currently holding the institutional memory at these papers.
• 18:53
  Casey: We don't have an answer for who funds an apprenticeship like that. But that's not actually the most useful question to end on today — the more useful one is whether any Cariboo outlet is even asking it right now, versus just adopting whatever tool shows up cheapest and hoping the judgment problem quietly sorts itself out on its own.
• 19:12
  Riley: Worth putting to listeners directly. If you work at a paper, a station, anywhere words get read over before they go out into the world, we'd like to know how you're training the next person to catch what you catch.
• 19:26
  Casey: Email us. Feedback at cariboo signals dot c-a. Story tips too, corrections, whatever you've got sitting in your inbox.
• 19:33
  Riley: We use AI tools ourselves to put this show together — Google's Gemini voices this very episode — so this isn't a question either of us gets to stand outside of.
• 19:43
  Casey: No. None of us do anymore.
• 19:44
  Riley: On that note — have a great rest of your day.
• 19:47
  Casey: Go read something with an editor behind it.