Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Co-Conspirators Who Dodged Justice (5/12/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Co-Conspirators Who Dodged Justice (5/12/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: The hits for Geelan Maxwell and her co conspirators keep
0:04
on coming. It was announced today that the grand jury
0:09
is still convened and they are still investigating the co
0:13
conspirators who were involved in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. Now
0:19
we have known that, especially here on the Jeffrey Epstein Show,
0:23
we have most certainly known that more indictments were on
0:26
the way. I have talked about that fact extensively here,
0:30
and I have been adamant that the charges we see
0:34
Maxwell getting hit with now, the original charges, those were
0:38
just placeholders. Those were a reason to bring her in,
0:41
get her arrested, and get the ball rolling. But there
0:45
is most assuredly more coming down the pipe. And you
0:48
see this, especially in federal indictments all the time. It
0:52
starts out with a couple of charges and then before
0:55
you know it, you have fifteen, twenty thirty charges. In
0:58
some instances that fighting and I expect nothing different here.
1:03
And I also expect that, as I've said numerous times
1:08
in the past, the second other people start getting arrested,
1:11
I expect this to become a RICO case. There's no
1:14
other way that they can prosecute this then, besides using Rico.
1:19
Once other people are arrested, indicted and called co conspirators,
1:24
it is obviously a criminal conspiracy, and then there is
1:28
no way that it is not also a Rico case.
1:33
Now this situation tonight, when we're getting this information from
1:38
the prosecution about the grand jury, it's a pretty big deal, right,
1:42
It's a big nugget to get that confirmation, because what
1:46
it does is it puts pressure on the co conspirators
1:51
just knowing, just them knowing now that this grand jury
1:55
is in session still and that they're still investigating into
1:58
these co conspirators and they're hearing it evidence it is.
2:01
It has to be a nightmare scenario for everybody involved.
2:07
And also I don't think that they would announce this
2:11
or let this be brought to light unless other arrests
2:15
were eminent. Now I would say within the next few
2:20
weeks we should see more arrests here. But who knows,
2:23
with the way the justice system works in this country
2:26
and how screwed up things are, you know, I don't
2:30
know if that's the case. But usually when you see
2:33
signs like this and you hear these rumblings like we
2:36
did before Gelane was arrested, remember, usually more arrests are
2:40
coming and the indictments are about to be unsealed. So
2:45
that's where we're at right now, and that is most
2:48
certainly the biggest news of the day. So let's jump
2:52
into our article from Law and Crime and take a
2:55
look at what they have to say about this situation,
2:59
considering they have been such a good resource throughout this
3:03
whole entire ride when it comes to the ins and
3:06
outs of the legal part of the case, right, because
3:09
that stuff's hard to understand. We're not lawyers. I mean,
3:12
most of us aren't. I'm sure a couple of people
3:14
out there might be who are listening, or a few people,
3:16
but for the vast majority of us, we're just trying
3:20
to figure out, you know, make odds of ends from
3:23
some of this legal stuff. So it's nice to have
3:25
a resource like Long Crime. The author of this article
3:30
is Colin Kombacher, headline prosecutors reveal secret investigation of Gilan
3:35
Maxwell other Epstein co conspirators is ongoing. And again, usually
3:41
they won't reveal stuff like this unless things are already
3:45
in motion because they don't want to tip their hand, right,
3:48
they're playing it close to the vest. They don't want
3:50
these people to lawyer up, clam up, try and run,
3:53
whatever it may be. So usually they play this really
3:56
close to the vest, So I'm wondering what the motivation
3:59
is behind the scenes for them coming out and putting
4:03
this on the record. Federal prosecutors in New York City
4:07
revealed there is an ongoing and separate grand jury investigation
4:12
into Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, co conspirator, fellow child abuser,
4:17
and alleged sex trafficking accomplice, Gilainne Maxwell, in various court
4:22
documents filed Friday afternoon. So already we're seeing that the
4:26
case is blooming, right, We're seeing that it's growing. You
4:30
add a little bit of water to it, in this case,
4:32
more evidence, and then before you know it, your crops
4:37
start to bloom. And that's what's going on here for
4:39
the prosecution. They're adding water, they're adding the evidence, they're
4:43
building their case, and things are growing exponentially. As the
4:49
US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
4:52
SDNY has stated publicly, the investigation into the conduct of
4:56
the defendant and in this case and other possible COCNE
5:00
spirits of Jeffrey Epstein remains active. The government noted in
5:05
a letter motion to the US District Judge Alison Nathan,
5:08
the full scope and details of that investigation, however, have
5:12
not been made public. And that's where we're at, right
5:15
That's what we've been discussing, and that's what we're doing,
5:18
is speculating on who might be involved in this. And
5:23
when you follow all of the evidence and you look
5:25
at all of the players who have been on the
5:27
Epstein stage throughout this whole entire disgusting ordeal, well it's
5:33
obvious who they're talking about here, the core four, most
5:37
certainly maybe Jean Luke Brunel, and I wouldn't be surprised
5:41
if there's a couple of surprise names that we aren't
5:44
even expecting to be in there, because it really looks
5:47
to me like they're going for the neck here. It
5:50
looks like what they're doing is they're really blooming this
5:53
case out. They're going to have several different investigations going,
5:57
a ton of evidence going on, and they're going to
6:00
tie it all up together in a pretty neat bow
6:03
in one big, gigantic Rico case. And once that occurs,
6:08
I know, I know you're probably sick of hearing it.
6:10
By now, But once that occurs, this becomes a whole
6:13
new ballgame. Just look how everybody who gets slapped with
6:17
a Rico case fights tooth and nail to try and
6:19
make it so it is not a Rico case. Take
6:22
a look at Nexium, take a look at r. Kelly.
6:27
Prosecutors declined to share any details about that additional grand
6:30
jury investigation, but offered to provide them to Nathan in
6:34
private under judicial lock and key if she requests such information.
6:39
So what they're saying is is, look, this investigation is
6:42
going on, we are diving deep into these co conspirators.
6:48
We have our net throne wide, and we're going to
6:50
see what the catch is, the catch of the day is.
6:54
And they're telling the judge, Judge Nathan that if she
6:57
wants to see what they're working on in private, they
7:00
would gladly show her what's going on. But as of now,
7:05
this stuff is still secret, right, this is still sealed
7:09
under the grand jury, and they're going to continue to
7:13
investigate in the confines of the jurors room. So it's
7:19
very interesting to see just exactly where this ends up
7:24
and how many people are under indictment right now by
7:28
sealed indictments, right, indictment indictments we don't know about. And
7:32
obviously the most interesting part for us is when are
7:36
those indictments going to be unsealed? To the extent it
7:42
would be useful to this court for the government to
7:44
further elaborate on the nature of the ongoing grand jury investigation,
7:48
the government is prepared to file a supplemental letter specifically
7:52
on that subject, ex partey and under seal, should the
7:56
Court request such an explanation. A footnote in a separate
8:00
letter motion explained so again, that letter that they filed
8:04
is just letting the court know that they'll gladly bring
8:08
to the court's attention what's going on in the grand jury,
8:12
the grand jury hearings right now, and that it is
8:15
still under seal because they have not finished their investigations.
8:21
But obviously Judge Nathan has an incredible power when it
8:26
comes to overseeing what goes on here, and they are
8:30
going to do whatever she wants to do if she
8:32
wants this letter filed. Of course, the government is going
8:34
to do that because the government obviously feels like they
8:37
have a strong case here either way. One of those
8:42
motions was filed in reference to an August seventeenth letter
8:45
filed by Maxwell's criminal defense attorneys. The government asks the
8:50
court to redact certain portions of that already filed letter
8:54
in a motion that is heavily redacted itself. And you
8:57
can come and check out the uh the article obviously
9:01
at Long Crime, and they have all of the documents
9:04
posted with hyperlinks, so you can go and read them yourselves.
9:07
We'll read through this redacted letter real quick. But it's,
9:10
like I just said, heavily redacted. As described above, the
9:15
grand jury investigation is active and ongoing and resulted in
9:18
new charges being brought just last month. In this case
9:23
redacted or redacted redacted two big gigantic black boxes of redactions
9:27
in some The government respectfully submits that the exhibits to
9:31
the defense letter, which consists entirely of filings that have
9:35
been ordered sealed by other judicial officers, should should also
9:39
be filed under seal in this case, while the grand
9:42
jury investigation remains ongoing for the same reasons, the government
9:46
proposes redacting any portions of the defense letter that big
9:50
time redaction. Once again, accordingly, the government respectfully requests the
9:54
court permits the redactions to the defense letter proposed and
9:58
Exhibit A here too, and and that both the unredacted
10:01
defense letter and the exhibits there too remain under seal
10:05
until further order of the court. Additionally, because the instant
10:09
letter discusses the government's ongoing investigation in references about three
10:15
sentences redacted, the government also respectfully requests that it be
10:19
permitted to file a redacted version of this letter on
10:22
the public docket, and that the unredacted version of this letter,
10:26
as well as Exhibit A to this letter, be filed
10:29
under seal. So again, I am not a lawyer, right,
10:33
but I think it's a little bit of a tell
10:36
that they want this on the public docket, but they
10:39
want it redacted. I think they want the public to
10:41
understand that there is more coming down the pipe. I
10:45
think the prosecutors are keenly aware of the scrutiny that
10:49
they're under to do the right thing in this case, because,
10:53
let me tell you what, if they don't, I'm not
10:56
even kidding you, it is pitchforks and torches time. The
11:01
government's second motion requests that the SDNY deny a recent
11:05
request from Maxwell's Council in certain civil cases to file
11:09
discovery materials produced by the government under seal. In other words,
11:13
it appears that Maxwell's criminal case is becoming perhaps perhaps
11:18
unexplainably and twined with the protective order for the discovery
11:22
in the years old and long settled defamation case between
11:26
herself and Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts. The government attempts to
11:31
explain the convoluted situation. So basically, what they're saying here
11:36
is that Maxwell is trying to use the protective order
11:41
for the discovery from the year's old case in this
11:44
new case and trying to intertwine the two. And as
11:48
the authors just stated here, it most certainly has become
11:51
a convoluted situation that is not easy to follow. And
11:55
that is exactly what Gilan Maxwell and her lawyers want.
11:58
They want the water to be muddy. They want this
12:00
to be dragged out. They want to appeal, and then
12:03
they want to appeal the appeal, and they will do
12:05
everything in their power to make the case. Subpoenas were
12:11
issued to a certain recipient after the government opened a
12:14
grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co conspirators.
12:21
For obvious reasons and in keeping with its standard practice,
12:24
the government did not notify the defendant or council that
12:28
it had issued the subpoenas. In response to receiving the subpoenas,
12:31
the recipient advised the government that it believed that certain
12:35
existing protective orders precluded full compliance. All right, so they
12:39
were asking they subpoened people in the case, right, subpoenaed
12:44
some information, subpoenaed some people. And what's going on is
12:48
the defense is saying that the protective orders preclude full compliance,
12:53
meaning they don't have to comply fully because of the
12:56
protective order from the other case. See what they mean
13:00
here by convoluted, Now, how it's intertwined. Accordingly, In or
13:05
about February twenty nineteen, the government applied X PARTA and
13:09
under sealed to each relevant court to request modification of
13:13
the respective protective orders to permit compliance with the subpoenas. Accordingly,
13:19
in or about February twenty nineteen, the Government applied X
13:23
party and under seal to each relevant court to request
13:27
modifications of the respective protective orders to permit compliance with
13:32
the subpoenas. In or about twenty nineteen, one court Court
13:37
one granted the government's application and permitted that the government
13:42
shared its order and only that order, which itself prohibited
13:46
further dissemination to the recipient. Subsequently, the Second Court Court
13:51
iiO denied the government's application because the relevant grand jury
13:56
investigation remains ongoing. Both Court one and two have ordered
14:01
that the filings regarding the subpoenas remain under seal, except
14:05
that both have expressly permitted the government to produce those
14:09
filings to the defendant as part of its discovery obligations
14:13
in this criminal case. The defense letter now seeks to
14:16
use those discovery materials in the civil case. So what
14:20
they're trying to do is use the materials from the
14:24
discovery here in the criminal case over in the civil case.
14:28
So she's trying to get the old two for one here. Right, Remember,
14:32
PRESCA made Virginia's newer lawyers Cooper and I forget the
14:37
other gentleman's name, destroy the copies of those documents and
14:41
basically maxwell of the excuse me, let me explain a
14:45
little bit better than that of the documents that they
14:47
received from Boys and Schiller after they took over the
14:50
case when Dershowitz filed the defamation against Boys. So they
14:55
got some information and some files from that case and
14:59
brought it over into their case, and remember PRESCA decided
15:03
that that wasn't allowed and she made them destroy those copies.
15:07
So it's kind of the same situation here that Gilann
15:10
Maxwell's looking at, right. She wants to use the information
15:14
from one case to help her in the other case,
15:17
and the government, the prosecution, is saying no way. Essentially,
15:22
Maxwell is complaining that the government provided certain information to
15:26
an unnamed person connected to the Epstein criminal investigation, and
15:30
she wants to use those machinations to her advantage in
15:34
at least one civil case, which again is presumably the
15:38
ongoing release of Epstein materials connected to the Roberts controversy,
15:44
and that the government says is absolutely not the point
15:48
of the criminal discovery process, No, it is not. Discovery
15:52
is to help the defense get themselves prepared for trial.
15:55
Here's what we got. This is what you're looking at
15:57
time to build your defense. It is not for you
16:00
to wrangle and try and use loopholes and use what
16:03
you find in discovery to help you in your civil case.
16:07
There is good reason why both parties proposed and the
16:10
court ordered a protective order that prevents the defendant from
16:14
using materials obtained through the process of criminal discovery in
16:18
any of the many civil cases in which she is
16:21
or could become a party. The motion continues. To allow
16:25
the defendant to do so would permit the dissemination of
16:29
a vast swath of materials, including those that are confidential
16:33
due to witness privacy interests, personnel, personal identifying information of
16:38
third parties, and irrelevance in ongoing grand jury investigations. So
16:45
we know how Maxwell has conducted herself in the past, right,
16:48
She's intimidated people. We know the way she treated Maria,
16:51
we know the way she treated others. So we're going
16:54
to let her have access to the private information of
16:56
people involved in the case. Zero chance of the prosecution
16:59
saying no way in hell. Here. The government was particularly
17:06
concerned about the defendant's interests in blurring these lines because,
17:10
among other reasons, her counsel in the criminal case are
17:13
also her counsel in the civil cases. And that's why
17:17
I refer to the Boys Schiller situation with Dershowitz and
17:21
Virginia having to get other legal counsel in that specific area,
17:27
because it kind of parallels what's going on here. It
17:31
would be grossly inappropriate for defense counsel to be permitted
17:34
to sift through the criminal case discovery and cherry pick
17:37
materials they may believe could provide some advantage in their
17:40
efforts to defend against accusations of abuse by victim plaintiffs.
17:45
The Lake Court ordered disclosure of previously sealed materials or
17:49
any other legal effort the defendant may be undertaking at
17:53
any particular time. And yet that is what the defendant proposes. Again,
17:59
it's all about slowing it down. That's what she's trying
18:01
to do here, Folks, all the other little minutia that's
18:04
going on here, the legalese, it's fine and well, but
18:08
Glaine Maxwell is trying to slow things down here. That's
18:11
what her lawyers want. They want more time to formulate
18:14
their case. They're hoping that perhaps some kind of miraculous
18:18
evidence shows up, or that Glayne is able to work
18:23
out a deal where she rats on other people, or
18:25
whatever it may be. But I'll tell you what. They
18:29
understand that they're in a very dangerous situation legally speaking,
18:34
and they understand that the ground that they're holding is untenable.
18:39
Maxwell is currently in prison an awaiting trial on various
18:42
charges related to her alleged role in Epstein's decades long
18:46
sex trafficking operation that preyed on young girls. Read both
18:50
letter motions in full below, and both of the emotions
18:54
are here for you to check out. Just click the
18:56
link hyperlink and you can go read them yourself. Try
18:59
and die dies them, navigate your way through the word
19:03
soup of legal ease, and you know, we keep it
19:06
going right. This is a huge, a huge deal. It
19:11
just validates what we already knew obviously that there is
19:14
still things going on behind the scenes. There's going to
19:17
be more indictments and folks, this is far far from over.
19:23
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
19:25
at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo Bby
19:29
c ap u Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can
19:34
also find me on Twitter at bo bby underscore c
19:37
ap u c CI. What's up everyone, and welcome back
19:41
to the Epstein Chronicles. One of the most absurd things
19:46
you hear when talking about co conspirators in the Jeffrey
19:50
Epstein criminal enterprise is that this non prosecution agreement in
19:54
Florida protects them everywhere. That is just absurd, and the
19:59
s and the prosecutors in New York. Well they prove
20:04
that by prosecuting Glaine Maxwell. Now the question becomes, how
20:09
come they're not going with the same vigor or the
20:12
same gusto after the other co conspirators. Considering there is
20:18
precedent here with Maxwell, who was certainly protected under the
20:22
non prosecution agreement getting prosecuted here, you would think that
20:27
the prosecutors would continue to dismantle this criminal enterprise and
20:33
bring these people to yield. But that has not happened.
20:37
We've had a lot of lip service, We've had plenty
20:40
of platitudes, and we've had a lot of promises from
20:43
the Department of Justice and the SDNY, Yet none of
20:47
it has materialized. Have any of the other co conspirators
20:51
been brought up on charges? What about the people using
20:54
the services of Glaine Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein. Still nothing,
21:00
No subpoenas, no huge commissions, no huge hearings, nothing like that.
21:06
It's as if all of these people in power just
21:09
want this to go away. Well, unfortunately for them, that's
21:13
not going to happen. All of the authorities that were
21:16
involved in this, they have some answers to give us.
21:20
Let's remember here, we don't live in some country where
21:23
the secret police run the whole world. These people have
21:27
to be accountable to the taxpayers. And when there's no accountability,
21:31
well what's left. They're able to do whatever they want,
21:36
whenever they want. And we've seen it time and time again.
21:40
You know, it's not because they don't have the evidence, folks,
21:43
it's they don't have the willpower or the spine to
21:46
go after the rest of these co conspirators because they
21:49
understand just what sort of Pandora's box that would be opening,
21:54
and they can't have that right. They can't have their
21:56
faves get in trouble, they can't have their bag men
21:59
get in trouble. Who's going to fund their campaigns? Today
22:03
we have an article from Lawn Crime headlined SDNY rejects
22:08
absurd notion that Jeffrey Epstein's non prosecution agreement still protects
22:13
Gallaine Maxwell. This article was authored by Colin combat Combacker
22:19
and it was published on July thirteenth, twenty twenty. So,
22:24
right out of the gate, if the sdn Y is
22:27
rejecting the absurd notion that Jeffrey Epstein's non prosecution agreement
22:31
protects Maxwell, then why aren't they going after the rest
22:35
of the co conspirators using this as precedent. If it's
22:38
absurd for Maxwell, it's absurd for the rest of them.
22:45
The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York
22:48
argued against Glaine Maxwell's bail request in an aggressive motion
22:52
filed with the Manhattan based federal court on Monday. The
22:57
prosecution's argument against pre trial release for Jeffrey Epstein's sex
23:01
trafficking accomplice notably focused on one of the most visible, criticized,
23:06
and controversial aspects of the case, the non prosecution agreement
23:12
that infamously purported to shield any of Epstein's potential co
23:16
conspirators from federal charges. And now nobody gets a deal
23:21
like that where it shields potential co conspirators, people that
23:26
aren't even named. How in the world do you get
23:30
yourself a deal like that unless you have friends on high.
23:33
That doesn't just materialize for anybody, but Jeffrey Epstein's gross ass, Well,
23:38
he gets that kind of deal. In two thousand and seven,
23:44
as part of Epstein's sweetheart deal inked with the Southern
23:46
District of Florida, an office that was then led by
23:49
President Donald Trump's one time labor secretary Alex Acosta, but
23:53
administered by Mukesy and the rest of them. Let's not
23:56
forget that they conveniently leave that kind of stuff out.
24:00
And remember, folks, lies of omission are still lies. The
24:05
mysteriously wealthy financier, pedophile and alleged serial sexual abuser no
24:10
more alleged of young girls was able to secure a
24:13
criminal justice bargain in exchange for pleading guilty to state
24:18
prostitution charges and a thirteen month sentence with work from
24:21
home privileges. Acosta and the whole US government DOJ immunized
24:27
Epstein for any further associated crimes along with his named
24:32
and unnamed alleged co conspirators. So that should never happen
24:36
in any situation. There should never be a deal that
24:40
is such an umbrella that it covers even non named
24:44
co conspirators. That should never be okay. And there should
24:49
never be a federal prosecutor or a director of the
24:53
DOJ Attorney General that signs off on anything like that.
24:59
And I can't slam the whine home enough that Acosta
25:02
was just a middle manager. How many of you work
25:05
at a job and have a middle manager who's basically
25:07
his only job is to set the schedule and make
25:10
sure you show up at work. It's basically what a
25:12
costa is, right, just another middle manager. How many of
25:17
these field attorney generals are there around the country, A
25:21
whole bunch of them. So Acosta is in some special
25:25
guy who had all these special powers. It was his
25:29
bosses from on high who were okay with this deal.
25:32
All the Kirkland Ellis lawyers that have all of these relationships.
25:37
And remember, with these lawyers, you're not buying what they're
25:39
going to do in the courtroom. You're buying their connections
25:42
outside of the courtroom. You're buying the fact that they
25:45
can walk into the judge's chamber, sit down with a
25:47
judge and know he's an old buddy from Harvard. That's
25:51
what you're paying for. Under the ages of what mostly
25:57
as a self evidently corrupt non prosecution agreement, Maxwell sought
26:01
shelter from the federal charges filed against her in late June,
26:05
charges that were unsealed after she was arrested in early July.
26:10
So she had tried to use the fact that she
26:12
has this non prosecution agreement down in Florida to protect
26:16
herself in New York. And we all know that doesn't fly,
26:20
and the fact that the federal government has basically let
26:23
them get off because of this non prosecution agreement is
26:27
just unacceptable. Arguing the government's case is subject to significant challenges,
26:34
Maxwell defense attorney Marc S. Cohen and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
26:39
said the client's prosecution is barred by Epstein's September twenty fourth,
26:43
two thousand and seven, non prosecution agreement with the Department
26:47
of Justice, which covers any potential co conspirators of Epstein.
26:52
I mean, wow, there's really not even much to say
26:57
about it. How can anyone look at that deal he got,
27:00
and especially Monday morning quarterbacking it with hindsight as our guide,
27:05
and not see how screwed up it all was, and
27:07
not see how corrupt it all was. And the fact
27:10
that nobody who was involved in administering that deal ever
27:14
had any sanctions hit against them is just beyond beyond absurd.
27:22
The SDNY attempted to rubbish that line of argument in full.
27:26
So this is important right here. Right If they're arguing
27:29
that this is rubbish here, how come it's not rubbish
27:32
for say, Sarah Kelln Vickers. The defendant's motion alludes to
27:36
defenses in this case, all of which are legal or
27:39
procedural in nature, and none of which pass. Muster Let alone,
27:43
counsel in favor of Bell. Monday's detention support memo notes
27:47
to begin with the notion that the defendant is protected
27:50
from prosecution by the non prosecution Agreement and PA between
27:54
Jeffrey Epstein and the US Attorney's Office in the Southern
27:57
District of Florida is absurd. That agreement affords her no
28:02
protection in this district for at least three reasons. So again,
28:08
the reason we're going back and talking about this is
28:11
SDNY themselves are saying that there's precedent here to go
28:15
after the co conspirators non named or named as Epstein associates,
28:21
Yet they have not done so. And the question is why,
28:24
If they have precedent, if they have the evidence, what
28:27
are they waiting for. First, the defendant was not party
28:32
to that agreement nor named in it as a third
28:35
party beneficiary, and the defendant offers no basis to think
28:39
she would she would have standing to claim any rights
28:42
under the NPA. Tellingly, the defendant cites no authority for
28:47
the proposition that an agreement she was not party to
28:50
and that does not even identify her by name could
28:53
possibly be invoked to bar her prosecution. I think that
28:57
applies for all of the cops. Right. Once again, all
29:02
of the co conspirators are using this non prosecution agreement
29:05
as their basis for not being charged. Second, and equally important,
29:11
the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York,
29:14
which was not party to the agreement. See the United
29:17
States versus Annaby, seven to seven to one F Dot
29:21
two D six seven zero six seven to two, Second
29:24
District Circuit, nineteen eighty five. A plea agreement binds only
29:29
the office of the United States Attorney for the district
29:32
in which the plea is entered, unless it affirmatively appears
29:35
that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction. And this is
29:39
something I've talked about from the beginning. Look, I'm certainly
29:41
not a legal mind, right, I don't know the law
29:46
inside and out. But I do know for a fact
29:49
that if you have a plea agreement with one district
29:52
that doesn't get rid of all your crimes in a
29:54
different district, you haven't sat down with the attorneys in
29:58
insert district here and done. Year three OZ two signed
30:01
your proffer agreement and became king for a day that
30:03
only happened in Florida. This rule applies even when the
30:10
text of agreement refers to the signing party as the government. Third,
30:14
and perhaps most important, even assuming the NPA could be
30:18
read to protect this defendant and buying this office, which
30:21
are both legally unsound propositions. The indictment charges conduct not
30:26
covered by the NPA, which was limited by its terms
30:29
to conduct spanning from two thousand and one to two
30:32
thousand and seven, a time period that post dates the
30:35
conduct charged in the indictment, and to violations of statutes
30:39
not charged in this indictment. So what they're saying is
30:43
the original charges the original non prosecution agreement doesn't even
30:47
cover the charges that SDNY was talking about here and again,
30:52
just to slam it home, the same could be said
30:55
of the other co conspirators. The prosecution me memo continues
31:03
in this respect. The government further notes that the indictment
31:06
brought in this district is entirely independent of the prior
31:10
SDFL investigation, and two of the survivors referenced in the
31:14
indictment were never approached or interviewed by the SDFL and
31:19
never spoke to law enforcement until they met with our
31:21
office in twenty nineteen. Bingo, done and done, But still
31:27
the rest of the co conspirators are somehow hiding using
31:30
this as a defense. The SDNY is spot on here,
31:35
and Maxwell's argument stands essentially no real chance. Former SDNY
31:40
Assistant US attorney and current CNN legal analyst Ilehannig told
31:45
Law Crime in an email. At least Epstein had the
31:48
shred of an argument that he was party to the
31:50
NPA and could enforce it against the government. Maxwell is
31:54
neither a party to the agreement nor even one of
31:57
the names of beneficiaries, and, as the SDNY notes the
32:02
charge document, a charge conduct falls entirely outside the timeframe
32:06
stated in the NPA. So the NPA isn't carte blanche. Right.
32:11
When you sign an NPA, a non prosecution agreement and
32:14
a three to zero two, you tell the government of
32:16
all of the crimes that you have committed up to
32:18
that point, and up to that point, you get relief
32:21
for all of those crimes that you have committed if
32:23
you have been honest with the government. Anything that happens
32:27
after that, however, well that's still on you. Julie Randleman,
32:33
a former homicide prosecutor and currently a defense attorney working
32:37
in New York City. She serves as a legal analyst
32:40
on the Law and Crime Network. Randallman agreed with the
32:43
sdnwyse reasoning to why Epstein's NPA is inapplicable to Maxwell's
32:47
Bell request, but noted that Maxwell's defense attorneys are more
32:51
or less bound to exhaust any plausible excuses to get
32:55
their client out of jail. Well, that's for sure, they're
32:58
going to utilize whatever they can to try and get
33:00
their client out of jail, and if there's a non
33:02
prosecution prosecution agreement on the table, they're certainly going to
33:06
try and use that. The attorneys for Maxwell are for
33:10
the moment, focused on getting her out on Bell pending trial,
33:14
Rendelman told Law on Crime. To that end, they are
33:16
including every potential argument that either supports the position that
33:20
she is not a flight risk or undermines the federal
33:24
government's case. In general, the raising of Jeffrey Epstein's NPA
33:28
is just one example of their effort to present potential
33:31
cracks in the government's case. She added, The problem for
33:35
Maxwell is that the NPA, even if valid, seems to
33:39
only bind the southern district of Florida, not New York. Further,
33:43
as Maxwell was not a party to the NPA nor
33:46
named in it, it would seem a stretch to think
33:49
this would save her from facing charges in New York,
33:53
or in New Mexico, or in the Virgin Islands or
33:56
an insert place here. That's why, when they only had
33:59
one federal investigation going on and not parallel investigations in
34:02
these states, I had something to say about it. So
34:06
what we're gonna rely just on the federal government. As
34:09
an attorney general of a state like Balderas in New Mexico,
34:14
your duty is to protect the citizens of your state.
34:17
You can't pump that to the federal government. So you
34:20
need to step up and have a parallel investigation and
34:24
maybe bring state charges because those state charges. She's not
34:27
protected from those state charges under the NPA right, and
34:32
neither of the other co conspirators. So again I ask you,
34:35
why is it that the government has not brought a
34:38
Rico case here? Why is it that the government has
34:40
not used this precedent to go after Jeffrey Epstein's other
34:44
co conspirators. All right, folks, that's gonna do it for
34:48
this episode. If you'd like to contact me, you can
34:51
do that at Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com. That's
34:55
bo bb Y c apu Cci at ProtonMail dot com.
35:00
You can also find me on Twitter at Bobby underscore
35:05
cap Ucci. The link that I discussed can be found
35:09
in the description box. What's up everyone, and welcome back
35:14
to the Epstein Chronicles. One of the most confounding things
35:19
about the whole entire Jeffrey Epstein shit show is the
35:22
fact that nobody, and I mean nobody really dug into
35:26
the financials. You would think that a man who is
35:29
spreading the cheese all over the bread the way he
35:32
is would be looked at from a financial point of view,
35:36
but he was not. And the only reason that I
35:39
can come up with for that not to occur is
35:42
that the ties that would have led to other people.
35:47
They didn't want this to become a reco case. They
35:49
didn't want you to know all of the people that
35:52
were involved. You want to talk about an embarrassment for
35:56
the federal government, hell for the governments of the world.
36:00
Let this turn into a Rico case and let's start
36:02
following the money. I mean, just take a look at
36:05
all of the people Jeffrey Epstein has donated to throughout history.
36:09
We're talking just about every politician that you could think
36:13
of in New York from the early nineties up until
36:16
his first arrest. I mean, he gave Chuck Schumer a
36:19
whole ton of money. So anyone who received money from
36:23
Jeffrey Epstein should be on the radar. But that never occurred, right,
36:27
And that's because there's a two tier justice system, folks,
36:31
one set up for them and one setup for me
36:33
and you. And in this article today that we're going
36:37
to take a look at from July of twenty nineteen,
36:40
it's just another example of that. Jeffrey Epstein wired three
36:44
hundred and fifty thousand dollars to two people after a
36:48
twenty eighteen report, and we all know what that money was.
36:52
More hush money. And is it any surprise that these
36:57
co conspirators haven't come out and went on the red.
37:02
It's because they were being paid off not to go
37:04
out on the record. And also, Epstein wasn't stupid when
37:08
it comes to his criminal enterprise. It's just like the mafia.
37:11
Right to get your to get made, you have to
37:14
clip somebody so that you share in their crimes. And
37:17
that's what Epstein did with his assistants, the Core Four.
37:21
They all partook in the crimes, so that they all
37:24
had the legal jeopardy that they were facing if things
37:28
went south. But the little add on on the top
37:31
of it was, I'll give you some dough too, And
37:35
that's how Jeffrey Epstein was able to buy silence. And
37:38
still to this day, none of the Core four have
37:40
come out and spoken to authorities. None of the Corps
37:44
four have talked to the police. And you would think
37:48
that some of them would want to get on the
37:50
record at the very least and have their stories told. Now.
37:53
I know that there is some legal jeopardy for some
37:57
of them. I know Nadia Martian specially has some you know,
38:03
issues she would have to deal with if she wants
38:05
to speak out. But where's Sarah kellen Vickers, Where's Leslie Groff,
38:09
Where's Adriana Ross. We haven't heard anything from any of them.
38:14
And then the icing on the cake is how Epstein
38:17
was spreading this dough around. The prosecutors knew and still
38:21
didn't wrap any of these people up with a bow.
38:25
Today's article is from Business Insider headline Jeffrey Epstein reportedly
38:30
wired three hundred and fifty thousand dollars to two people
38:33
after a bombshell twenty and eighteen report. Prosecutors say this
38:39
article was authored by David Choi. Federal prosecutors accused Jeffrey Epstein,
38:46
the sixty six year old hedge fund manager, charged this
38:49
week with sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit traffic, to
38:53
commit sex trafficking of witness, tampering, and alleged wire and
38:58
alleged he wired hundreds of thousands of dollars to two
39:02
potential witnesses, according to court documents reviewed by The New
39:05
York Times on Friday. So, if this was a mafia
39:10
trial and Jeffrey Epstein's last name was let's say, Ruggero,
39:17
all of the people that he wired this money to
39:19
would now be part of the case. Anybody, if you
39:23
received a dollar from him, could now be part of
39:26
this case and be part of the criminal conspiracy, even
39:29
if you have done nothing wrong. That gives the Feds
39:31
the ability to, you know, bug your phone, follow you,
39:34
look at your financials, get warrants on you, and all
39:37
the rest of it. And that's why the RICO laws
39:39
are so powerful and That's why they go after the
39:42
mafia with them, because when you can start targeting people's families,
39:45
it changes the whole entire landscape of the prosecution. Prosecutors
39:52
claim Epstein wired three hundred and fifteen three hundred and
39:55
fifty thousand dollars between November and December in twenty eighteen,
40:00
after The Miami Herald published its extensive investigation about his
40:04
previous plea deal with the US Attorney's Office in Miami.
40:07
According to The Times, unbelievable and nothing happened. You know,
40:12
we look at this in hindsight now and when it
40:14
was all happening in real time, I'm saying to myself,
40:17
Oh yeah, someone's definitely getting nailed here. Look at all
40:20
this money flying every which way but loose. Look at
40:22
all of these wire transfers. Look at all of these
40:25
ill gotten gains being moved around in the financial sector.
40:28
Somebody has to catch this, right Surprise, three years later,
40:32
four years later, not a nothing ungats. The two individuals
40:38
who were alleged to have received the money were a
40:40
possible co conspirators, prosecutors said, according to NBC News and
40:45
The Times, So you have people you're involved with, right
40:49
and you're moving dough to them while you're under criminal prosecution,
40:52
while you're under investigation, and that doesn't lead the investigators
40:57
to go after the co conspirators as well. They had
41:03
everything they needed, folks to go after these co conspirators.
41:06
They did not. And again I ask you why not?
41:09
That's a question you need to ask yourself. In two
41:14
thousand and eight, Epstein cut a plea deal with US
41:16
Attorney Attorney Office in Miami to avoid federal charges on
41:21
suspicion of sexually abusing underage girls at his mansion in
41:25
Palm Beach, Florida. Instead, he pleaded guilty to two state
41:28
counts of soliciting prostitution and avoided serving federal or state prison.
41:35
So this guy has been getting the king's end of
41:39
the deal for how long? And it's just so amazing
41:42
to me that we had institution after institution, law enforcement
41:46
group after law enforcement group not do a damn thing,
41:49
even though they knew who the guy was. Instead, he
41:54
registered as a sex offender and served thirteen months in
41:56
a private wing of a county jail for six days
41:59
the week. He was allowed to work in an office
42:01
setting for twelve hours a day and according to reports
42:04
he was still abusing girls while he was out on
42:07
this work release. So who's responsible for that? Oh, that's right.
42:11
The Palm Beach officers who were supposed to be with them.
42:13
They destroyed a bunch of documentation and records about their
42:17
time minding Jeffrey Epstein. So you tell me, every time
42:20
we turn around when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, videos
42:23
are being erased, documentations being erased. This is being erased.
42:27
That's being erased. So it's all a coincidence. I guess
42:32
if you want to believe that all of this is
42:34
a coincidence, then that's fine. But for me, there is
42:39
obviously something bubbling under the surface here, and the idea
42:43
is to dig deep enough till we get to the source.
42:49
Epstein's attorneys reportedly asked the court that his client be
42:53
under house arrests with an ankle monitor. NBC News said
42:57
prosecutors are asking for Epstein's bell to be denied in
43:00
light of the new accusations of witness tampering. And this
43:04
was just old hat for Epstein. For people who might
43:07
not be aware, this is how he got off the
43:09
first time. It wasn't just a costa you think a
43:11
Costa has that kind of power. It was the whole,
43:14
entire broken system and Jeffrey Epstein's manipulation of it. This
43:21
course of action, and in particular it's timing, suggests the
43:24
defendant was attempting to further influence co conspirators who might
43:28
provide information against him in light of recently re emerging allegations,
43:32
prosecutors said in court filings. According to NBC News, now look,
43:37
if these co conspirators had signed three h two proffers
43:40
and they were working as government informants and they were
43:42
helping the government take down Maxwell and Epstein, I could understand.
43:46
But that's not the case. And the only way anyone
43:49
should be given any sort of leniency that doesn't mean
43:53
get off completely, by the way, is if you help out,
43:56
if you give information that helps the authorities make arrests.
44:00
So why are the co conspirators still walking around and
44:03
living it up. None of this money that they received
44:06
from Epstein was tainted. Epstein is currently being held at
44:12
the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan. He is pleading not
44:15
guilty to the charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy to
44:19
commit sex trafficking. He faces a maximum sentence of forty
44:23
five years in prison. Even that sentence is ridiculous. How
44:26
is it again, ask yourself that Keith Rainier he gets
44:29
a buck twenty, but Epstein was only looking at forty five.
44:34
Why how is it that the system is so tilted
44:38
for people like Epstein? When you and I not that
44:41
you would ever commit anything like this, I would hope,
44:43
but we would be thrown underneath a jail, forget about it.
44:50
The charging document alleged Epstein sexually exploited and abused dozens
44:55
of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New York,
44:58
and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations. But what this
45:02
article shows you, once again, folks, is that there were
45:05
a lot of people in on this, and a lot
45:06
of people were you know, went in their beak on
45:09
Jeffrey Epstein's dime. And this guy was making his money
45:14
in a criminalistic way. So that means everybody who was
45:17
involved with him, well, they're involved in the conspiracy. So
45:21
how is it that he's able to send money to
45:23
co conspirators. He's able to send money to this one
45:25
and that one, and there's no forensic investigation. The SEC
45:30
and the irs aren't over here with their bibs on
45:34
and you know, a fork and knife and a plate
45:36
because they're so hungry to eat the rich. Isn't that
45:40
the whole going mantra? That's what the irs is going
45:43
to be doing moving forward. I have a hard time
45:46
believing it because guess what the track record says something different.
45:51
Do you think you'd be afforded all of these different
45:54
rights and different uh, you know breaks in the system
45:59
that Jeffrey Epstein. Of course you wouldn't be, but he was.
46:03
And guess what, that whole time that he was catching
46:06
those breaks, that whole time that he was being enabled,
46:11
he was raping and abusing children and women, and all
46:16
of the people who were involved in that need to
46:18
be held responsible. All right, folks, it's gonna do it
46:23
for this one. If you'd like to contact me, you
46:24
can do that at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com.
46:28
That's b O B B y c A p U
46:31
c c I at ProtonMail dot com. You can also
46:34
find me on Twitter at bo B B y underscore
46:38
c A p U C c I. The link that
46:41
I discussed can be found in the description box