Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Paying the price for our national lack of vision

Transcript

Paying the price for our national lack of vision · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:31
  My wife and I re-watched the original Star Wars trilogy.
• 0:36
  There's a line in Revenge of the Sith, which I think perfectly describes today's society.
• 0:43
  The price for lack of vision.
• 0:46
  Hello there, everyday Americans, pulling here with a constitution study, where we read instead of the Constitution, teacherizing generation be free.
• 0:53
  Glad you could join me today.
• 0:54
  And yeah, I think in many cases, we are paying the price for our lack of vision.
• 0:59
  I think there are plenty of examples of that.
• 1:01
  And I think there is uh uh probably more and more, more than I could even think of.
• 1:07
  So I'm curious what you think of these.
• 1:09
  When we talk about um again, paying the price for our lack of things we should have seen that um well we didn't see, and now it's gonna cost us, and in some cases it already is.
• 1:22
  Uh take, for example, the the two nine 2009 quote unquote finding by the uh environmental protection agency that um CO2, human exhaust, and other natural byproducts are pollutants, right?
• 1:38
  That that they the that uh you breathing pollutes the environment.
• 1:43
  This was used as a justification for a whole boatload of regulations, many of which coming out of the federal government out of this this EPA, which is an illegal, unconstitutional, and in fact doesn't legally exist agency, because the the act that created it was not made pursuant of the constitution, it violated the constitution.
• 2:03
  That act should be null and void, therefore they didn't create it, but they came up with this thing that carbon dioxide, you breathing is a pollutant.
• 2:12
  Now, again, it's to me, it was obvious then, and it's obvious now that that's just stupid.
• 2:19
  The the idea that that uh a carbon dioxide is a pollutant, it's plant food.
• 2:25
  But again, they put it forward, and that was used by the government and many others as an excuse to regulate your life.
• 2:34
  And now, finally, now in 2026, the uh director, the administrator of the EPA, uh Lee Zeldon announced that no, we are the greenhouse gas emissions are not pollution.
• 2:50
  Carbon dioxide is not pollution.
• 2:53
  As he said, effective immediately, we are repealing the ridiculous endangerment finding and terminating all additional uh green emission standards imposed unnecessarily on vehicle models and engines from 2012 and 2027 and beyond.
• 3:09
  This was actually, I'm sorry, Trump said that was not not Mr.
• 3:12
  Zeldon.
• 3:12
  But again, he pointed out this was a these are unnecessary, they're ridiculous.
• 3:17
  And oh my god, CO2 is dangerous.
• 3:20
  And again, there are other gases.
• 3:22
  Now, again, in large concentrations, anything is dangerous.
• 3:26
  And I remember when LA was smog town, and it was smog town, not because of the number of cars, but because of the number of cars in combination with their localized weather.
• 3:38
  It was the weather patterns around LA that kept the the smog in and around the city rather than letting it disperse like it does almost everywhere else.
• 3:47
  But again, simply to say that that hey, we're just going to declare that this is they call it an endangerment finding, that you breathing endangers others.
• 3:58
  Now, it did include other gases in CO2, but I just love picking on CO2 because it really proves how stupid it is.
• 4:05
  Uh, you know, there were things like uh floor hydrofluorocarbons, nitrous oxide uh and others that um you know they'd simply said, oh, these are dangerous.
• 4:14
  And again, they just made it up.
• 4:17
  This was the Obama administration simply made this up.
• 4:22
  Why?
• 4:23
  Because it promoted their agenda that they don't that I know Mr.
• 4:25
  Trump, Mr.
• 4:26
  I'm sorry, Mr.
• 4:27
  Obama doesn't really believe in because he kept saying that the sea levels are going to rise, but then he bought seafront property on Martha's Vineyard, an island that he claimed would in a few years be underwater.
• 4:38
  Yet doesn't make a lot of sense.
• 4:40
  But again, our lack of our lack of looking at what these people are doing and saying, you know what, that doesn't make a lot of sense.
• 4:46
  And simply going along because of this fictitious belief that, well, the president's he can dictate whatever he wants.
• 4:54
  That it's simply because Congress passes a law, that means it's it's real law and we have to follow it.
• 5:00
  It's not the way that works.
• 5:01
  At least not the way it's supposed to work.
• 5:03
  Article 6, clause 2 says the Constitution is a supreme law of the land.
• 5:07
  Only laws United States made in pursuance of that document are considered supreme.
• 5:13
  So when Congress makes a law that's not pursuant to the Constitution, it is not the Supreme Law of the Land.
• 5:19
  The judges in every state are not bound by it.
• 5:23
  And in fact, as uh uh not only Alexander Hamilton, but at least three times from the Supreme Court, those acts are null and void.
• 5:32
  But we don't we're not taught that.
• 5:35
  We're not taught that the government can't, the federal government can't do what we didn't authorize in the constitution, and that when they go beyond that, those acts are null, they're void, and we need to act that way.
• 5:48
  But again, it's not just the feds.
• 5:50
  See, several states based in, I believe, in no small part on this endangerment finding, created the the well, they call it the climate climate superfund.
• 6:02
  What it really is is a a slush fund funded by blackmail.
• 6:08
  And it basically puts fines and fees on energy producers for the alleged costs of climate change, costs they could never actually define, and are often, you know, claims based on well, ridiculous non-science.
• 6:25
  And now you've got these these climate, these state climate of Vermont uh and New York actually um uh created uh super fund laws in 2024, joining other states like California, New Jersey, Hawaii, Maryland, and others that create these slush funds funded through energy companies, but basically funded uh by your dollars.
• 6:51
  See, when you go to the gas station, when I was uh a teenager, I worked at a at a truck stop, and we used to put on the fuel pumps, gas pumps out front, the cost of the gas, and then the cost of the in of the different classes of tax.
• 7:04
  You had the state tax, the federal tax, right?
• 7:07
  The sales tax, you had all of that was on there so that when you pulled up to the pump, you could look at and say, oh, okay, um, this is costing me uh X amount of dollars, and here's what I'm paying in taxes.
• 7:21
  They don't do that in four.
• 7:22
  In fact, I think in New York they passed a law that prohibited people actually telling you who you're paying when you buy gasoline, because part of what you're paying is to put in the super these slush funds so that these um climate activists, again, often without any real science behind them, can you know get paid to do their their research that actually says, oh, I don't know, says that what they're funding is real that says that that you know where they're getting their money is real, a whole bunch of this type of nonsense.
• 7:53
  Now, New Jersey is a perfect example.
• 7:55
  See, the lawmakers in in there are are that they create a they've got a legislation called the Climate Superfund Act of 2025.
• 8:04
  And one of the things they're doing is is really interesting because part of this legislation would literally punish companies for past legal emissions, right?
• 8:15
  That's called an ex post facto law that is prohibited by the Constitution.
• 8:20
  Article 1, Section 9, no bill of attendure or ex post facto law shall be passed.
• 8:26
  So now apparently what they want to do is they want to punish people for doing what was legal when they did it.
• 8:32
  And it's not just New Jersey, right?
• 8:34
  California has two of these bills going forward.
• 8:37
  And again, it's about this this fictitious idea that, you know, and again, like I said, anything, water in sufficient quantities is toxic.
• 8:45
  And I don't mean drowning.
• 8:46
  I mean, if you drink too much water, you can literally kill yourself from it.
• 8:51
  But like anything else, it's like, oh my God, these are these are endangered based simply because a president once said so, and now we're supposed to live our life that way.
• 9:01
  That is not, ladies and gentlemen, a republic.
• 9:03
  That is not a free people.
• 9:05
  That's a dictatorship.
• 9:07
  If a single person can order his, can order through his agencies a rewriting of law of basic fact, that's a dictatorship.
• 9:18
  So now the the EPA says, no, we're not we're gonna stop that finding of an endangerment that has been used to cause so many problems from the cost of your vehicle to uh the cost to heat your home to the cost for the electricity that you're using somehow, probably to listen to this radio program.
• 9:38
  And again, it's not just uh climate change.
• 9:41
  So here's an interesting uh Elizabeth Warren, now and Josh Holly, again, Lizard Warren, not my favorite center, but they've introduced some legislation uh to allegedly to break up the large healthcare conglomerates.
• 9:58
  I find this really
• 10:00
  Interesting because one of the reasons we have such a large healthcare conglomerates is the Affordable Care Act, which was promoted by, among other people, um Elizabeth Warren.
• 10:12
  Further exacerbated by many of the COVID restrictions put in place and supported by Elizabeth Warren.
• 10:20
  So I have to wonder are our Elizabeth Warren just trying to fix the problems created by Congress with both the Affordable Care Act and well, basically allowing the president to pretend he's a dictator and put all sorts of illegal restrictions on people for a disease that well, let's just say it wasn't at all what the federal government was telling me, telling us it was.
• 10:47
  I don't mean that COVID-19 didn't exist.
• 10:50
  It wasn't dangerous to young people.
• 10:52
  It was moderate, very light, low, low level of serious injury to most people.
• 10:57
  And rather than focusing on the people that really needed the help, the elderly, the infirm and those who had gotten sick from it, they not only wasted billions of dollars in research so that uh these drug companies could make money, but so that these large healthcare conglomerates could eat up the smaller uh practices because of the restrictions put in place in large part by the federal government.
• 11:25
  I find it laughable that Ms.
• 11:27
  Warren, who's done everything to centralize and control uh uh everything, doesn't want to centralize control.
• 11:36
  Oh, I know why.
• 11:37
  That's right.
• 11:38
  These healthcare conglomerates are not the federal government.
• 11:43
  She wants to be uh or she wants the federal government to be the large health care conglomerate that controls absolutely everything.
• 11:50
  At least that's the way what she's expressed time and time and time again.
• 11:54
  So I really find no reason to believe that um she would think any different today.
• 12:01
  Uh, in large part, the fact that you can't find a doctor anymore.
• 12:04
  I don't mean you don't can't find somebody with the title doctor, but so many of these doctors are not doctors, they're bureaucrats.
• 12:11
  They come in, they they examine you, they fill out forms, they fill paperwork, and um then okay.
• 12:19
  Now, you know, they don't treat you as a human being.
• 12:22
  You're a file number, you're a set of insurance codes.
• 12:25
  You're a as one person I heard Tesla saying, you're an ATM machine, and you're just a way for them to get money.
• 12:33
  Now, my wife and I thankfully, we've found uh uh uh really a doctor as our primary care physician, someone that actually talks to us and listens to what we have to say and understands our primary issues and concerns.
• 12:49
  What a concept.
• 12:51
  We don't show up as a billing receipt, we show up as a person with issues and concerns, and she knows that, and she recognizes that and she uh allows that.
• 13:03
  I remember one doctor I dealt with um uh the few years ago, who uh I told him flat out there was a certain drug that I would not take.
• 13:12
  Period.
• 13:13
  End of story.
• 13:14
  But he wouldn't stop pushing it.
• 13:16
  Don't see that doctor anymore.
• 13:18
  By the way, I saw another doctor.
• 13:20
  I always I like I like to tell this story.
• 13:21
  Uh, I had injured my shoulder, and I went to see an orthopedist, and and uh it was it was terrible.
• 13:30
  Uh I mean, I showed up, I I would show up before work in the morning.
• 13:34
  So I'd show up early, and I waited and waited and waited for when the wait room.
• 13:38
  I finally got brought back into uh uh a treatment room, and I waited.
• 13:44
  I mean, I was there over over an hour.
• 13:46
  It was like an hour and a half, and I still hadn't seen anybody but the the nurse that brought me back from the the waiting room to the to the treatment room and uh I couldn't wait anymore.
• 13:59
  So I walked out to the uh to the uh uh receptionist and said, listen, um no, sorry, I can't wait anymore.
• 14:06
  This is ridiculous.
• 14:07
  She goes, okay, tell you sorry, we're so sorry.
• 14:09
  Um come back first thing in the morning, and I'll have the doctor see you first thing.
• 14:14
  Come back the next morning.
• 14:15
  I'm sitting there, I says, come see me directly.
• 14:18
  Don't go to the line, go see me directly.
• 14:20
  She wasn't there that day, but apparently she had left a note.
• 14:23
  So I was put into a waiting room in the back.
• 14:26
  And I waited and I waited and I waited.
• 14:28
  And finally, somebody came and put me, brought me to a treatment room, and I waited and I waited.
• 14:33
  And I went out to the after a while, again, another 45 minutes.
• 14:37
  I walked out to the reception and said, Where's the doctor?
• 14:39
  Oh, he's giving a deposition.
• 14:41
  I said, he's not even on site.
• 14:42
  Oh no, he's doing it by phone.
• 14:44
  Fine.
• 14:45
  Give me my records.
• 14:46
  The doctor's fired.
• 14:48
  And in fact, I said, no, this is this is the type of treatment.
• 14:51
  I'm not putting up with it.
• 14:52
  You're fired.
• 14:54
  And uh the funny thing is he called me personally that afternoon to give me the results of the test that I was, I was there to get to look at the my test results.
• 15:03
  And uh, I said, I don't, he called me up and I said, I wanted to give you the results.
• 15:06
  I said, I don't care.
• 15:07
  You're fired.
• 15:09
  You don't, you know, you you treat me as worse than any other place I've ever seen.
• 15:15
  And uh no, I I'm not paying you another dime.
• 15:18
  I'm telling my insurance company not to pay you for the resistance, you're fired.
• 15:22
  And it was such a wonderful thing.
• 15:25
  I did venturey find another doctor, and I got treatment, and my shoulder was fine, but this idea that doctors are just it wasn't the first one, and sadly, I doubt it'll be the last.
• 15:37
  But it's this idea that uh we've turned medicine into um a cash system.
• 15:45
  It's no longer about treating a human being, it's about a billing code.
• 15:51
  And in large part, it was the work of of uh Senator Warren to bring this about.
• 15:57
  I'm not sure about Senator Holly, I'm not sure.
• 15:59
  So when you talk about breaking these up, how about you just get rid of the regulations that make these conglomerates able to devour other places, other practices because there's just so much regulation and paperwork that they've turned the medical industry into.
• 16:18
  Okay, I've had my rant.
• 16:20
  Let me uh I've got a break coming up, so let me do that before I go.
• 16:23
  Again, this year, this is our nation, the 250th anniversary, the semi-quincentennial of the publishing of the Declaration of Independence.
• 16:32
  I'm inviting you, all my listeners to join America Out Loud in Nashville, July 2nd through 4th of this year to celebrate not only 250th anniversary of the publishing of the Declaration of Independence, but 10 years of America Out Loud News.
• 16:46
  I think this would be a great time.
• 16:47
  We're gonna have fun.
• 16:48
  There's gonna be uh uh keynote speakers and and breakout sessions and and panels, and best of all, I hope you'll come up and say hello.
• 16:56
  I'd love to meet you, get your name, shake your hand, hear what you think about the program.
• 17:01
  But it'll happen if you come to Nashville July 2nd through 4th.
• 17:05
  Find out more, go to AmericaOut Loud.news, see what's involved, sign up today.
• 17:10
  And again, if you come, please find me, say hello.
• 17:13
  I'd love to meet you and talk with you.
• 17:15
  We're gonna be at the the Hotel Sheraton, Grand Downtown Marriott, which is kind of a mouthful.
• 17:21
  It's a beautiful hotel.
• 17:22
  We'll have great time.
• 17:24
  And uh now's the time to sign up to not only again attend the event, but if you're gonna stay in the hotel, get a good rate on that as well.
• 17:32
  So go to America Outloud.news and join us in Nashville.
• 17:36
  We'll be celebrating with fireworks July 2nd through 4th this year to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the publishing of the Declaration of Independence and the 10th anniversary of this America Out Loud News Network.
• 17:59
  We're calling all patriots to Nashville, Tennessee, July 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for a powerful celebration of faith, freedom, and the American spirit.
• 18:10
  America Out Loud, the Wellness Company and Clear.
• 18:13
  Invite you to join us for the 25010 Nashville event.
• 18:18
  You'll experience best in class speakers, extraordinary voices from across America, bringing inspiring messages you won't forget.
• 18:26
  And on July 4th, get ready for the most spectacular buy work show in the country.
• 18:32
  Lighten up the Nashville sky.
• 18:34
  250 years of liberty in America and 10 years of America Out Loud News.
• 18:40
  Stand in strong for truth, justice, and the nation we all love.
• 18:45
  You can save now with Early Bird Bryson at America Outloud dot news forward slash Nashville, July 2nd, 3rd, and 4th.
• 18:54
  America Out Loud News.
• 18:56
  25010 Nashville.
• 18:58
  Are you eating like your health depends on it?
• 19:00
  Because it does.
• 19:01
  Most grocery store beef today comes from industrial farms where profit comes before your health.
• 19:07
  Wellness farms eat like your health depends on it.
• 19:09
  A hundred percent grass-fed, grass-finished beef from regenerative American family farms.
• 19:15
  Our cattle are MRNA-free, hormone-free, and vaccine-free.
• 19:18
  Raise the way nature intended, from farm to table, direct to your door.
• 19:23
  Order now at TWC.
• 19:27
  And use code out loud to get your exclusive 20% off for AOL listeners.
• 19:32
  Wellness farms eat like your health depends on it.
• 19:34
  Is your gut a mess?
• 19:36
  Two-thirds of Americans suffer because of gastrointestinal issues, and I was one of them.
• 19:40
  That is why we created a three-step doctor formulated completely natural gut reboot system that you can do at home in just minutes a day.
• 19:50
  Go to Chemicalfree Body.com forward slash out loud today.
• 19:54
  Get the Malcolm Healthy Gut Bundle, reboot your gut and your energy and
• 20:00
  Save 20% on your first order.
• 20:02
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 20:06
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 20:09
  Bear bars or a crunchy savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients.
• 20:16
  Bear bars are plant-based, organic gluten-free contain six grams of protein and are low temperature dried for unique crunch.
• 20:25
  Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with syrups or sweeteners.
• 20:32
  To learn more, just visit barebar.com slash out loud.
• 20:47
  And uh today we're paying the we're showing that we're paying the price for our lack of vision.
• 20:52
  The idea is that there were things that were so obviously wrong and obviously problematic that we just kind of ignored, and now we're paying the price.
• 21:01
  And uh I'm gonna talk actually about a shooting up in Canada.
• 21:05
  Now, again, we don't cover Canada, the Canadian Constitution.
• 21:08
  That's not my point.
• 21:10
  My point really is how that story is playing out and um how at least American media is reporting on it.
• 21:20
  Again, there was a mass shooting in uh in northern British Columbia.
• 21:23
  I think it was most mass shooting in in Canadian history.
• 21:27
  Uh, but again, that's not the point.
• 21:30
  Um, what's got my attention, again, it's it's tragic.
• 21:34
  And and I hate the fact that this this happened, but I'm interested in how this is being reported.
• 21:42
  You have the uh uh the Canadian police referring to this as a as a gun person, um citing, you know, well, privacy.
• 21:53
  So they're gonna call me a gun person who committed this attack.
• 21:59
  Well, all right, could that be just uh uh, you know, well, just being a little bit political correct and and we don't want to use man or woman because heaven forbid we actually identify men and women?
• 22:10
  Uh no, no, it appears to be much worse than that, because mainstream media is referring to this evil dude as a woman.
• 22:23
  I've even seen pictures, and and you know, you got the guy, he's got eye makeup and he's got lipstick, but it's uh it's it's quite obviously a dude because he's got a five o'clock shadow.
• 22:35
  Now, uh uh again, a report from uh associated press referred to this dude as a her.
• 22:43
  And and uh they also reported a woman who police believe was the shooter.
• 22:48
  Except this wasn't the one.
• 22:50
  This is not a woman.
• 22:52
  Uh they all the police described her as a female in a dress with brown hair.
• 22:57
  Now, again, this is should not be a surprise.
• 23:01
  After years now of people who simply cannot understand basic biology, who have ignored the truth to make up a lie, and now it's being reported this way, that this is being reported as a as a female shooter.
• 23:14
  This problem is this is not a female shooter, this is a dude.
• 23:18
  This is a by the way, a dude with an obvious mental disorder, right?
• 23:22
  Because, well, let's say if you're a dude and you think you're a chick, that's obvious that that's evidence of a of a mental disorder.
• 23:31
  But what about the mental disorder of police?
• 23:36
  You have police saying this is imagine I want to put an APB out on a woman in a dress, and um I wonder how they're gonna pick up this dude if he's supposed to be the a woman in a dress.
• 23:52
  It's irrational.
• 23:54
  A female, I'm sorry, but a female in a dress with brown hair.
• 23:59
  How many women would be picked up because of such a stupid and inaccurate description?
• 24:08
  How easy would it be for the alleged shooter to simply get away with it?
• 24:14
  All he's got to do is take a dress off.
• 24:16
  Voila.
• 24:17
  Well, I'm not female, so you've obviously got the wrong person.
• 24:21
  This is the consequence.
• 24:22
  This is how we're paying for our lack of vision that people with a mental disorder don't get to establish reality.
• 24:30
  But yet we we act as if they do.
• 24:33
  So now you're a you're a gun person.
• 24:36
  I wonder how well it would work in a doctor's office.
• 24:40
  But then again, even in medical schools are playing games with this.
• 24:44
  What happens when, you know, uh uh, you know, again, this is a again, uh, you have a tragedy in in Canada, and I wonder how much of the media is actually being in looked at, not because of the shooter, but because they can't tell the difference between a man and a woman.
• 25:02
  By the way, associate press, not one of my trusted sources for news and information.
• 25:07
  Why?
• 25:08
  Because once again, they lie to us.
• 25:11
  Same with uh CNN.
• 25:13
  They reported that the police identified the alleged shooter in the the bridge in the shooter as uh uh uh I'm not gonna do the person's name, an 18-year-old female resident of the town who had dropped out of school.
• 25:26
  Wait a second, it's not a female resident.
• 25:28
  Now, I don't know if this is CNN simply repeating what the police said or not, but I never trusted CNN to begin with, so really not a surprise.
• 25:37
  I mean, if they wanted to be a trusted source of news, they would have said, well, police refer to as a female resident.
• 25:42
  This is actually a man pretending to be a female resident.
• 25:45
  But then again, I I know I think in logic and reason and evidence, and how dare I uh do this.
• 25:54
  But again, this is the this is the price we are paying for the years of letting this lie not only uh percolate, but be promoted and not pushing back and saying, no, that's not true.
• 26:09
  This is not a female, this is not a woman, this is not a girl.
• 26:13
  This was a dude.
• 26:14
  This is a mentally deranged dude that committed a mass shooting in Canada.
• 26:19
  And um, blaming a woman for this is the height of not only not only stupidity, but again, you talk about shaming.
• 26:28
  This is not a woman who did this.
• 26:31
  Now there is a glimmer, a glimmer of hope that maybe this insanity might be might have run its course.
• 26:41
  Uh a woman referred to as a detransitioner when a two million dollar malpractice case, referred to as the first major medical association's uh uh case against their quote-unquote gender-affirming care, their gender-affirming surgery for minors.
• 27:01
  Now, the a New York jury awarded this young woman a two, again, two million dollars in malpractice because doctors who who promoted that she get a double mastectomy at age 16.
• 27:16
  Um, and uh basically scared her parents into uh agreeing with it by claiming that if they didn't do this to their daughter, they didn't allow this to happen, then she'd kill herself.
• 27:30
  He completely ignored the obvious evidence of gender dysphoria, a mental disorder, right?
• 27:37
  When you hear gender disorder, that's a mental disorder.
• 27:39
  You see your transgender.
• 27:41
  That's a meant your problem isn't your body, the problem is your mind.
• 27:44
  Your mind is confused.
• 27:46
  And rather than dealing with that, he suggested mutilating her body.
• 27:51
  Now, this is to my knowledge, the first D they call them detransitioners.
• 27:56
  Um, you know, someone who who getting was mutilated, mutilated themselves, and then said, oops, my mistake.
• 28:02
  Uh, she's the first one to actually win at trial.
• 28:06
  And I think partially because of this, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons released a position statement shortly thereafter, recommending delaying such surgeries until after the patient is at least 19 years of age.
• 28:21
  Not just 18, 19.
• 28:24
  So there are some examples of, like I said, maybe a sense of sanity coming back.
• 28:31
  At least sanity in this idea that, you know, again, gender dysphoria is a mental disorder.
• 28:36
  It had been recorded as a mental disorder for decorate for decades in the you know diagnostic manuals, but now all of a sudden he has people who claim to be doctors and claim to be scientists who cannot recognize that if a person thinks something that is not true, that's a problem with their mind, not the fact that reality doesn't match their mind.
• 28:57
  We don't we don't create reality in our mind.
• 29:00
  We create reality by looking at what's there.
• 29:03
  And you know, again, this is a small change, but it could be a significant, it could be an inflection point, a turning point in this transgender insanity.
• 29:12
  The same way that the EPA and the the you know the greenhouse gases may be an inflection point, a turning, a change that may lead to a little more sanity, but that doesn't mean we're not paying the price.
• 29:26
  How many young people have been permanently scarred by these plastic surgeries, these unnecessary surgeries in order to promote their mental disorder?
• 29:38
  I mean I I I find it amazing.
• 29:42
  You know, you have it the was it the Hippocratic Oath starts with first do no harm.
• 29:47
  And when you see a person with a mental disorder and you you try to change their body to meet their mental disaster, how's that not doing harm?
• 29:56
  How many young people have been harmed?
• 29:58
  How many young people.
• 30:00
  People have been permanently sterilized by the taking of hormones and drugs, being told, oh, it's completely reversible.
• 30:06
  You change your mind, everything goes back to normal when that just is not true.
• 30:11
  How are the consequences?
• 30:12
  How many consequences are we living with from this insanity, this nightmare of being unwilling?
• 30:22
  I was talking uh on a I have a Zoom call Saturday mornings I joined and we were talking.
• 30:28
  And you know, your point is do I love my neighbor?
• 30:31
  Well, loving my neighbor doesn't mean not lying to them.
• 30:34
  Not telling them it's okay to do something dangerous because well, that's what they think.
• 30:40
  That's not loving.
• 30:41
  That's hateful.
• 30:43
  If I watch somebody walking into a bear trap and I don't say anything, that's not loving.
• 30:49
  If I watch somebody driving their car towards a cliff, and I don't say anything, that's not loving.
• 30:55
  That's hateful.
• 30:56
  That means I don't care.
• 30:57
  I literally don't care what happens to you.
• 31:00
  That's hateful.
• 31:02
  And now we're seeing, again, possibilities.
• 31:05
  There may be changes, there may be a future on the residence.
• 31:08
  The question is, have we learned from our lack of vision?
• 31:13
  See, we're paying the price for it.
• 31:15
  The real question is, have we learned from it?
• 31:18
  Because we learn by our mistakes.
• 31:21
  That's how we learn some of our most important lessons.
• 31:24
  The question is, have we learned?
• 31:26
  Have we learned of the harms that uh of this these unbridled federal regulations have come?
• 31:32
  Have uh of the remember it under the Biden administration, this idea of of um gender dysphoria being a physical, not a mental problem flourished.
• 31:42
  It was promoted by the by the administration.
• 31:47
  Um we learned our lesson.
• 31:51
  Are we willing to walk away from such politicized medical professionals?
• 31:56
  People who place the politics above the science, above their oath to do no harm.
• 32:04
  Uh have we learned to uh uh you know, place the truth above the propaganda of media?
• 32:12
  You know, when I point out just how ridiculous mainstream media has been with this Canadian shooter, um, this Canadian murderer.
• 32:22
  Really, how can you trust anything they say at this point?
• 32:25
  How do you know that they're not manipulating for political reasons?
• 32:30
  I'm not saying that that politics is part, but at least be honest and say, listen, this is our political agenda to say uh this dude is actually a chick, and um, you know, kind of and again, not just the media, the police, the Canadian police.
• 32:45
  Is that really where you want to be?
• 32:48
  Imagine, you know, someone commits a crime again.
• 32:50
  They break into your home, maybe they assault some one of your family members, but the police can't decide.
• 32:56
  Well, is it a boy or a girl?
• 32:57
  Is a male or a female?
• 32:58
  I don't know.
• 32:59
  We'll put something out that doesn't actually match their description because we don't want to offend anybody by saying it's a you know, it's a it's a gun person, because you don't want to offend anybody by saying they're they're uh a gun man or a gun woman.
• 33:12
  No, no, no.
• 33:12
  We don't we don't want to do that.
• 33:15
  We don't want to put out an accurate description because, well, you know, what you might offend somebody.
• 33:20
  We're not worried about the victims.
• 33:22
  We're worried about offending the criminal or the alleged criminal, be fair about it.
• 33:28
  We have to learn the lesson that yes, the truth sometimes hurts, but it's important to get better.
• 33:36
  I I remember as a child.
• 33:38
  I I had um I fallen down or hurt myself.
• 33:41
  I don't remember.
• 33:42
  I was at my I remember I was at my aunt's and uncle's place.
• 33:44
  I was playing with my cousin, and uh I had a cut, and my uh my aunt came out with this uh I thought it was Mercurichrome, and she put it on that cut, and it stung like the dickens.
• 33:58
  It was horrible, but it kept me from getting an infection and getting sick.
• 34:03
  Yes, sometimes the truth hurts, but it hurts for a good reason to learn a lesson.
• 34:11
  And the question I still am asking, have we learned the lesson, or are we going to continue to pay the price for our lack of vision, our inability to see the plain truth in front of us?
• 34:25
  Because that's really up to us, isn't it?
• 34:27
  And again, these organizations that's promoting these fraud, these lies, this this things we should see and just don't.
• 34:35
  Well, they get a lot of their money from corporations that you probably support.
• 34:39
  There are a lot of companies I don't do business with a lot of products I refuse to buy because of the support they give to organizations that are going after our rights.
• 34:50
  That said, there's a at least one organization I do uh support, I do business with.
• 34:56
  That's Patriot Mobile.
• 34:57
  America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
• 35:00
  I joined them years ago, not because of their Christian conservative uh company.
• 35:05
  No, no, no.
• 35:06
  Not because of their 4G and 5G coverage nationwide, nope.
• 35:10
  Not even because their customer support is 100% US-based.
• 35:14
  No.
• 35:14
  I joined them because Patriot Mobile donates a portion of every dollar to organizations fighting for your rights.
• 35:22
  First Liberty, turning point USA, NRA, folds of honor, students for life in America, these and many, many more, now including the Constitution study.
• 35:32
  They donate millions of dollars every year to organizations that are helping to defend your rights.
• 35:37
  So the time is now.
• 35:38
  Don't just vote for these or vote with your dollars.
• 35:42
  Put a stand for to support companies that believe what you believe.
• 35:46
  Use your cell phone to stand against those that are trying to take away and destroy and infringe on your rights.
• 35:53
  Go to Patriot Mobile.comslash constitution and find a plan that works for you.
• 35:58
  By the way, see if you're eligible for a discount.
• 36:00
  Everyone from NRA members and first responders to families with multiple lines are eligible for a discount.
• 36:07
  When you check out, use the code constitution, you'll even get your new line activated absolutely free.
• 36:14
  Pretty good deal.
• 36:15
  But only if you go to Patriot Mobile.comslash constitution, find a plan that works for you, support the work that we're doing here with your cell phone, get a discount, and you know, make the world make the America a better place, simply using your cell phone.
• 36:30
  While you're at it, I head over to AmericaOutloud.news each and every day.
• 36:34
  Why?
• 36:35
  Because it's a new source that I can trust, yet still verify.
• 36:39
  So I go there every day, and again, not just for the radio program or the website, but because I'm looking for a good source of news, and I recommend you do so too.
• 36:47
  Just go to AmericaOut Loud.news and look at the stories, the articles, the podcast, the videos, there's great content there.
• 36:54
  But I want you to do a bit more.
• 36:55
  I want you to take it up a notch.
• 36:58
  I want you to share that information.
• 37:00
  Because when you share that information, you're gonna find that people say, gee, I never knew that.
• 37:04
  I never heard of that.
• 37:05
  I never knew that happened.
• 37:07
  That's because corporate media is lying to us, as I just showed.
• 37:10
  The AP's been lying to us and others.
• 37:13
  So we need a source we can trust.
• 37:15
  And when you share them, you're not only enlightening them, you're not only giving them an opportunity, but you're helping to secure the blessings of liberty for all of us.
• 37:28
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the Sprout Book, and I've devoted my life to helping people reconnect with food at its most alive stage, the sprout.
• 37:39
  When you germinate a seed, you're not just growing food, you're activating potential.
• 37:44
  Sprouts grow without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer right on your kitchen countertop.
• 37:50
  They're organic, fresh, and cost less than a dollar a serving.
• 37:54
  It's nature's fastest form of farming, accessible to anyone anywhere.
• 38:00
  Discover the joy of growing your own food and the power of living nutrition.
• 38:04
  Visit the sprouting company.com and use the code out loud for an exclusive offer.
• 38:10
  Oral hygiene hasn't changed in 50 years.
• 38:14
  Brush, floss, repeat.
• 38:16
  We're told to use fluoride, which doesn't really address the acid creating bacteria.
• 38:22
  That is where the dentist recommended spray dental defense system shines.
• 38:27
  Sprite products contain xylitol, a natural sugar, which helps get rid of those nasty, smelly acid-creating bacteria in our mouth.
• 38:36
  The best way to care for your teeth and gums is by using spray.
• 38:40
  The spry dental defense system has a wide variety of products, toothpaste, mouthwash, mints, and chewing gums that are designed to work together to keep your teeth clean and mouth healthy and smelling sweet all day long to get your oral care back on track in an easy, effective, and very tasty way.
• 38:59
  Switch to spray today.
• 39:01
  Ask your dentist about xylitol and the spray products.
• 39:05
  Sprite can be found online and at all fine natural product retailers.
• 39:11
  A man's country is not a certain area of land of mountains, rivers, and woods, but it is a principle.
• 39:18
  And patriotism is loyal to that principle.
• 39:22
  I'm happy to report that American patriotism flows freely once again.
• 39:30
  America out loud news is that place to awaken your heart, soul, and mind to the outloud truth.
• 39:47
  Welcome back, everyday Americans to rejoin the Constitution Study.
• 39:50
  Today, I'm pointing out how we're paying the price for our lack of vision.
• 39:55
  The idea that we saw these things, we saw them coming, and our should
• 40:00
  We should have seen them coming.
• 40:01
  Several people did see them coming.
• 40:03
  I've talked about them, and well, in many cases, now we're paying the price.
• 40:07
  The question is, are we going to learn from it?
• 40:09
  For example, during the 2020 elections, there were several irregularities in many of the state elections.
• 40:15
  Um, of course, I I actually consulted, I actually love consultant.
• 40:20
  I offered advice to uh a legislator in one state on how to deal with that, and I'm not going to mention it because I don't have their permission.
• 40:27
  But one of the areas that was a problem was Georgia, specifically Fulton County, Georgia.
• 40:32
  Uh, of course, remember, so we saw several.
• 40:35
  We saw, you know, people counting ballots behind closed doors, covering up the windows so people couldn't see uh in in Fulton County, you know, uh ballots magically appeared after the uh the the election inspectors were sent home saying counting and stopping, and all of a sudden, boo, ballots appear and counting goes on.
• 40:54
  There's a lot.
• 40:55
  And again, this was now over five years ago, and we were saying back then there were problems with the election.
• 41:03
  Well, back in January, the FBI sought and received a warrant to get court to get election uh records from Fulton County, Georgia.
• 41:16
  Now, the affidavit, because you know, to get a warrant, it has to be, you know, based on probable cause supported by Oath or affidavit, the affidavit requesting the warrant uh uh says that uh a special agent requested the seizure of election records to include paper ballots, ballot images, and absentee ballot envelopes currently retained by the Fulton County Board of Registration and election.
• 41:39
  Now, again, there's got to be there's got to be probable cause, right?
• 41:43
  What's this thing?
• 41:44
  Well, the affidavit said also lists a series of allegations of uh irregularities, including uh missing images of ballots from the Fulton County's uh records, a duplicated ballots, tabulator tapes, and pristine ballots.
• 42:01
  Now, the the FBI agent that requested this uh was looking at a violation of Title 52, Section 2511 of the United States Code, which said a person, including an election official who, in any election for federal office, among other things, knowingly and willfully deprived defrauds or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of the state of a fair and impartial, partially conducted election process shall be fined in accordance with Title 18 or imprisoned, not more than five years, or both.
• 42:35
  Meaning these are criminal allegations.
• 42:37
  We're not talking a lawsuit.
• 42:39
  We're talking a criminal allegation.
• 42:42
  And uh apparently there was sufficient probable cause supported by this affidavit for the judge to sign the warrant because the FBI um they quote unquote raided the Fulton County, Georgia election office.
• 43:00
  Now, apparently this isn't just the 2020 election that they're concerned with, because this FBI agent cited uh uh an unnamed witness who analyzed the results of the 2024 election and alleged almost 18,000 missing ballot images from the Secretary of State, the Georgia Secretary of State's website.
• 43:21
  They it also notes that the state Board of Elections um uh was issued a letter of reprimand to the Fulton County election office, but didn't refer the matter for criminal prosecution.
• 43:34
  Another witness uh said that um while analyzing ballot images, she noticed many cases the absence of a digital marker to prevent manipulation of the images.
• 43:48
  Fairly serious concerns from my standpoint.
• 43:51
  Another witness who worked as a as a data analyst claimed that there were duplicate ballots included in both the original and the recount of the state's 2020 uh presidential elections or presidential elector elections, technically, but specifically in Fulton County as well as other counties across the state of Georgia.
• 44:11
  Now, based on some review, the FBI has concluded that there was intentional ballot duplication, but it was not strictly partisan.
• 44:19
  Now, there's plenty that we're paying for this.
• 44:22
  I mean, obviously, we still have we're paying for the FBI to do the investigation.
• 44:26
  The state of Georgia and Fulton County is still paying to produce this information.
• 44:31
  But I have to ask you, after five years, how much did this nation pay based on the question of the validity of the 2020 presidential election results?
• 44:41
  Specifically the state uh electors uh race, right?
• 44:46
  Because remember, the people don't vote for president, they vote in a state election to tell their legislators which slate of electors they want uh appointed to vote for president.
• 44:55
  It's it sounds a little convoluted.
• 44:58
  That's mostly because most Americans were not taught how in the constitution the people don't vote for president, the states do.
• 45:04
  Now, according to the FBI, they have substantiated some of these major irregularities in how uh votes were conducted in again, Georgia, the largest urban area, the Fulton County.
• 45:15
  And now what they're looking at is was this intentional or was this uh accidental?
• 45:22
  Now, according to the FBI, not all of the allegations have been proven, many have been disproven, but there were still plenty, many that were substantiated.
• 45:31
  There's there's evidence that this is this is going on, which again led to uh uh the the collection of data for further investigation.
• 45:40
  So not only do we have the the election problem, but think how many times have we even told there was one person keeps telling me, don't talk about fraud in the elections?
• 45:49
  Why?
• 45:50
  What is the cost of ignoring this, of not seeing the vision of what this would lead to?
• 45:56
  It's more fraud in elections.
• 45:58
  What is the cost of ignoring these problems?
• 46:01
  Did we have an did we have an illegitimate and unelected president for four years?
• 46:07
  Will we ever really know the truth?
• 46:09
  Will we ever trust elections again?
• 46:12
  See, the cost of this is not an inconvenience.
• 46:16
  It's not even the money we spend.
• 46:19
  It's literally the dismantling of the republic.
• 46:22
  Because if we don't trust our elections that we use to hire our representatives, then we are not a republic anymore.
• 46:30
  How do you trust them?
• 46:32
  See, trust is one thing it takes forever to earn in a nanosecond to destroy.
• 46:38
  And well, let's face it, Fulton County, Georgia destroyed any trust in their elections for the foreseeable future.
• 46:47
  Where else has this happened?
• 46:49
  What other states?
• 46:51
  And what lack of what does our lack of vision lead to in the future?
• 46:57
  As I mentioned, I I offered some advice to us to a legislator in a state that had election problems.
• 47:05
  And well, let's just say the majority of the electors, the margin of the legislators, I should say, they couldn't foresee the issue.
• 47:13
  See, there was a simple constitutional solution to their problem.
• 47:18
  They couldn't see it.
• 47:20
  They couldn't see it.
• 47:21
  They couldn't, they didn't recognize that.
• 47:23
  Guess what?
• 47:24
  Um, it's the legislators that appoint the state legislature appoints electors, not the people.
• 47:32
  Now they do it based on the people, but the laws, the constitution still says it's the state legislature.
• 47:38
  And they could have come up with a with that not only a constitutionally sound solution that I offered, but one that I think would properly represent the people of the state, but they couldn't see it.
• 47:51
  Which means that lack of vision means the elections in their state is now in question.
• 47:58
  Because the legislators apparently are less interested in doing their job than in look well than in looking good on the media.
• 48:05
  That was one of the big reasons they said we couldn't do that.
• 48:08
  The media would be all over us.
• 48:10
  You didn't take an oath to support the media.
• 48:11
  You didn't take an oath to be simple to be liked by the media.
• 48:14
  You took an oath to support the constitution of your state and of the United States.
• 48:19
  These failures, our lack of vision for the future has caused us a lot of pain.
• 48:26
  Pain from, you know, everything from, you know, not only what you pay for your cars, but but the the craziness in the cars and you know, the the washing machines and dishwashers and toilets and all these things with all these rules that were made up based on, well, simply the a president making something up, declaring it to be true, and the whole world is going along.
• 48:50
  How many billions, how many trillions of dollars has been slushed into these super these climate superfund slush funds and used to infringe on your rights?
• 49:00
  How many?
• 49:02
  How much money has been sent?
• 49:04
  How much pain have people gone through because of these these health care conglomerates that were created in response to federal actions, the Affordable Care Act, the reaction to COVID-19?
• 49:17
  How many, how many people could not be with their dying parent because of these rules and regulations?
• 49:25
  How many people went to a hospital trying to get treated only to find out that they were more interested in the politics of their solutions than the actual health of their of their patients?
• 49:37
  What was that cost?
• 49:40
  What's the cost of pretending that men are women?
• 49:44
  You know, in the case of this uh Canadian murderer, the cost was merely, you know what?
• 49:52
  Media look stupid.
• 49:53
  The police look stupid.
• 49:56
  But what was the cost in the future?
• 49:58
  If you have a
• 50:00
  Man that shoots things up and they put a a uh a uh be on the lookout for a woman in a dress.
• 50:07
  How many people could be hurt because guess what?
• 50:09
  You ask for the wrong information.
• 50:13
  All of these have costs.
• 50:15
  Uh uh, what is the the line from uh is a line from the the mini-series Chernobyl?
• 50:23
  Every lie imposes a debt to the truth.
• 50:26
  How much debt to the truth do we do we have?
• 50:29
  And what are the consequences of that truth?
• 50:31
  And how long are we going to be suffering the consequences of that debt?
• 50:38
  These are not minor issues.
• 50:41
  You may do, oh, that's no big deal, just brush it off.
• 50:44
  In the long run, they incur not only a debt, but they incur a cost, a cost not just in paid in money, but in trust in our future in the exercise of our rights.
• 51:01
  We've been paying the price for our lack of vision for decades.
• 51:05
  When will we open our eyes?
• 51:07
  When will we get the corrective lenses that we need?
• 51:10
  When will we simply maybe take off the blinding glasses?
• 51:14
  The corrective lenses that are distorting reality and simply look at the truth and the logical consequences, the logical, secondary and third and try ternary um order issues that come from that.
• 51:31
  When if we don't, then Franklin's warning that he gave us a republic if we can keep it, shows that it had a termination date.
• 51:45
  Because we cannot keep the republic if we not only refuse to learn from our history, but refuse to use it to see the the our to see what the future holds and prepare and defend ourselves from it.
• 52:01
  Now, listen, none of us have a crystal ball.
• 52:03
  It's not like we know what the future is going to be.
• 52:08
  But there are certain things where you can make some obvious, I'll call them assumptions, at least to educated guesses, things that you know probably you should prepare for, but we don't.
• 52:21
  And we often suffer the consequences.
• 52:24
  Now, of course, in the Star Wars movie, it's you know, well, you know, it's the it's the evil guy, the emperor, and it turns out that Luke's father saves him, and everyone, you know, it ends happily ever after, sort of.
• 52:37
  But I have to look at our lives and say, when we look at these decisions, too often we don't consider the consequences.
• 52:44
  We don't take the time to even consider what are the second and third order consequences of these decisions.
• 52:52
  Because we're talking about, in many cases, government action.
• 52:55
  What about the people we put in government?
• 52:58
  Remember, the laws that we've been talking about, the EPA, um, um, you know, and and these the uh Lenny the slush funds and and whatnot, these were created by people we hire to represent us.
• 53:10
  I mean the consequences don't go stop with them.
• 53:14
  They go all the way back to us as we the people.
• 53:17
  See, we the people not only ordain and establish the constitution, we are the sovereign of this country.
• 53:24
  These decisions are made in our name.
• 53:27
  And if we're not willing to look at the future and determine, or they take an assumption of the future and take the consequences for our actions, well then what future is there?
• 53:40
  We talk about being free, but how free are we when we keep handing over our freedom and our rights and our liberties to a bunch of representatives that have been doing a really terrible job.
• 53:51
  You know, I'd love to tell uh um these senators, you know, uh uh Holly and Warren, you know what?
• 53:59
  I have a better idea.
• 54:00
  How about you get rid of the rather than then mandating that these healthcare conglomerates break up, how about you get rid of the laws that made them effective?
• 54:08
  You know, perhaps if we spent less time worrying about donkeys and elephants and more time worrying about the consequences of their actions, maybe we'd live in a better country.
• 54:19
  Now you may wonder, hey Paul, where'd you get all of this?
• 54:21
  Well, like I said, I've been studying the Constitution uh for years now, and I I enjoyed it so much.
• 54:28
  I wrote a book, The Constitution Study, returning the Constitution to We the People.
• 54:32
  Because I'm product of public schools.
• 54:34
  I wasn't taught the Constitution.
• 54:36
  In fact, the first time I actually sat down and read the Constitution, I was shocked by two things.
• 54:41
  How much I had not been taught in school, and how much of what I have been taught was absolutely false.
• 54:47
  So I started studying and reading and learning, and then, well, I created this book because I wanted other people to understand as well.
• 54:56
  This the book, the Constitution Study, is a clause-by-clause study of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, written in plain conversational English.
• 55:05
  It's not legalese, it's not academic doublespeak, it's plain English so that everybody can read it and understand it and use it as John Jay said to learn to defend and assert our rights.
• 55:26
  And of course, when you purchase it there, all the proceeds go to keeping the constitution study up and running.
• 55:32
  Nobody gets a salary from all of this.
• 55:35
  All the work we do is voluntary and we spend money to put this, keep putting these products out.
• 55:41
  So you can help.
• 55:42
  Buy a book, buy a mug, buy a shirt, just donate to the cause.
• 55:46
  But I really hope you take a look at the book and read it.
• 55:49
  It's designed for individuals and small groups to study the constitution so you get a better understanding of it, so that you can protect your own rights and those of your friends and family and neighbors.
• 56:00
  Once again, that website is Constitution Study.com slash shop.
• 56:04
  You'll find that book under the book sections and the other things that we do under the other sections of the Constitution Study store.
• 56:10
  Now, most of all, I hope you'll come back and join us here for the Constitution Study every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 56:16
  Eastern time on America Out Loud Talk Radio, heard on the iHeartRadio Network.
• 56:20
  Now you can listen on our media player.
• 56:22
  We've also got app for Apple, Android, and Alexa, whichever works best for you.
• 56:27
  Now, I know not everybody can listen then.
• 56:30
  So all of my shows go to podcasts generally a day or two after talk, they're heard on Talk Radio.
• 56:36
  You don't get them at the same time, but you get to listen whatever you like to on your favorite podcast app.
• 56:42
  But I'm gonna ask you to do me a favor.
• 56:44
  Subscribe to the show.
• 56:46
  Leave us ratings, especially on Apple Podcasts.
• 56:49
  Why?
• 56:50
  Because the algorithms that play that these sites use base it on number of subscribers and the number of four-star and five-star reviews.
• 56:57
  The more subscribers we have, the more positive reviews we have, the more likely it's to be shown to other people.
• 57:03
  They can learn about us.
• 57:04
  Hopefully, click the link and join us here for the constitution study.
• 57:08
  Speaking of links, you can find all the links you need at the homepage at AmericaOut Loud.news.
• 57:14
  But as with everything else, please share those links.
• 57:17
  Share this program, share the work that we're doing.
• 57:20
  By doing so, you're helping to share the blessings of liberty to everyone who calls this great nation home.