Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Twitter's New CEO is a Friend of the WEF, Did Trump R*pe E Jean Carroll? | HBR News 405

Transcript

Twitter's New CEO is a Friend of the WEF, Did Trump R*pe E Jean Carroll? | HBR News 405 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:02
  This is HBARE News number four four fourteen. Sorry, Twitter's new CEO is
• 0:08
  a friend of the wef Did Trump rape Ejen Carol. We talk about the
• 0:13
  news of the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and
• 0:19
  welcome to Honey Badger Radio. You guys are doing well this weekend that you're
• 0:22
  laughing at all this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it. I am
• 0:26
  the DOJ in charge, Brian Martinez, and I'm joined by my lovely co
• 0:30
  hosts Mike j Doctor, Ryder mccam and Hannah Wallen. On today's HBr News
• 0:37
  show, We're gonna be talking about Elon Musk's pick for CEO of Twitter.
• 0:43
  Trump is made to pay for four I think it's four million dollars or something
• 0:47
  to Ejen Carol for a well, what the media is reporting as a sexual
• 0:52
  assault that took place over twenty years ago. Former Bill's punter Matt Arazia was
• 0:58
  not present for the sexual assault that he is accused of. And more so,
• 1:02
  stick around. It's going to be a good time. Ambi shore to
• 1:04
  join us in the Patron Only show. I have this article that I thought
• 1:08
  we could go through because I just thought it was so, I don't know,
• 1:12
  weird. So there's this woman. This is the Daily Mail, which
• 1:15
  are usually good for, you know, stupid little stories to discuss. Apparently
• 1:21
  she is asking men who want to date her to write a five hundred word
• 1:26
  essay so that she knows that they're not they're not trying to waste her time.
• 1:32
  One even did a power point presentation. Is this just? Is this
• 1:37
  just a middle school teacher? I don't know, that's a good question.
• 1:42
  They Yeah, exactly what she won? The Harvard applicant didn't just write black
• 1:51
  Lives Matter five hundred times? Yeah, and he got in or she?
• 1:55
  I think it was a woman. Um, maybe I know that any any
• 1:59
  person that does that basically gets accepted into any university. Was it not that
• 2:05
  dickhead turned up at Tennessee in the in the Capitol building? Are you talking
• 2:10
  about? Are you talking about the the Tennessee three. Yeah, I've forgotten
• 2:15
  the names already. The guy with the afro who tries to Martin, who
• 2:19
  puts on Martin Luther King junior voice. Yeah. I remember when, um,
• 2:24
  when Black America would actually make fun of those people in the nineties,
• 2:29
  like even in Living Color, did it? It was? It was a
• 2:34
  to these race hustlers. It was a thing we used to make fun of
• 2:37
  because it was so ridiculous, but now we take it seriously because this is
• 2:39
  clown World and the sious. Yeah it must be. It's super serial actually,
• 2:49
  um, but anyway, we're gonna be talking about that in the Patron
• 2:53
  Show. So if you want to join us on the Patron Show, please
• 2:55
  consider becoming a Badge of yourself by going to feed the Badge dot com and
• 2:59
  setting up a monthly subscription. Five bucks a month will get you into our
• 3:01
  discord where you'll be able to watch all the additional content and you can even
• 3:06
  be a part of the content creation in a way, like we have a
• 3:09
  room called Suggestions, and people that find videos or news stories or anything that
• 3:15
  they think would be something that we should talk about on our show. You
• 3:19
  can always drop a link and tag me or Allison or Hannah in those in
• 3:25
  those big part too, you got to make sure you can tag the person,
• 3:30
  yeah, because I might miss it if you don't. Okay, I
• 3:32
  might even miss it if you do. But yeah, you can find me
• 3:36
  in that discord. And there have been several people who have friended me on
• 3:40
  discord. I have to remember how to find how to accept the friendship every
• 3:45
  time. But yeah, getting dms from people about stuff has actually helped me
• 3:50
  find show tops on a number of occasions. So there you go. There
• 3:53
  you go, And if you want to just see what it's like, you
• 3:58
  can always go to Badger and Nation dot online, which is it's access to
• 4:01
  the discord, but it's very like limited. You know, you're only in
• 4:04
  a few of the rooms, but everyone else is on there too, so
• 4:08
  you can see if this community is everything's cracked up to be, and if
• 4:11
  you'd like to become a regular member. And lastly, to just in case
• 4:16
  we get yeeded from YouTube, please follow us on all of our alternate social
• 4:23
  media's at Honey Badger Bite on Twitter, at I believe it's HB Radio on
• 4:29
  rumble If you're not watching on rumble Um, maybe you should and also go
• 4:33
  to Honey Badger Radio dot com or badger Feed dot com where all of our
• 4:39
  content lives. All right, now, with all that out of the way,
• 4:44
  let's get into today's stories. And we're gonna start by talking about Twitter's
• 4:47
  new CEO and what this could mean for the future of Twitter. So,
• 4:53
  Mike j if you could well certainly. Brian so Elon Musk has announced the
• 5:00
  Bird app has taken on a new chief executive officer by the name of Linda
• 5:05
  Yacarino. Hey Yakarino, all right, Yarino. Yakarino made a name for
• 5:13
  herself as an NBC ad exec especially during the COVID nineteen bullshit scare, when
• 5:24
  you had a lot of advertisers which were desperate to escape from spending commitments.
• 5:29
  The way I've understood that it works is these companies will be like, hey,
• 5:33
  we're gonna buy this many ads from you, and it's like okay,
• 5:38
  And the next month we're going to probably do the same. In the month
• 5:41
  after, we're probably going to do the same, and they kind of lock
• 5:43
  you into like one of those things like a like a phone contract, like
• 5:46
  if you pay for twelve months, we'll give you this amount off, but
• 5:49
  you gotta pay for the whole twelve months. And she was really good at,
• 5:55
  I guess, assisting with that, getting the ad buying groups out of
• 5:59
  those commitments, because well, I mean, during the bullshit nobody really wanted
• 6:05
  to buy ads because well, number one, that economy was going down the
• 6:11
  toilet, and number two I'm sure you had a lot of things advertising that
• 6:15
  you just want going to be able to weren't going to be able to really
• 6:18
  do much like advertising for like live sports or for movies that you know you'd
• 6:24
  go and see in theater. And how's that going to work when everyone's scared
• 6:27
  to leave their house. So that's I guess where she made her big claim
• 6:31
  to fame with NBC. Must copes that bringing her on will help reattract advertisers
• 6:38
  that fled after his takeover of Twitter. In the initial announcement last week,
• 6:44
  Elon said that quote Yakarino will focus primarily on business operations and quote as he
• 6:49
  intends to focus more on product design and evolving Twitter into his much talked about
• 6:56
  X the Everything app. However, everything isn't sunshine and rainbows with miss Jacuarino.
• 7:04
  Many of Musk's fans are quick to point out that the former NBC ad
• 7:10
  chief's vision of Twitter may not line up with his early on during the COVID
• 7:15
  nineteen bullshit, Jacquarino championed lockdowns and mandatory masking, and not just like ohs
• 7:23
  she made the Twitter two suggesting they were a good thing. She was heavily
• 7:28
  involved with the likes of the AD Council and she was behind there was pain
• 7:33
  mask up or pack up. Oh yeah, I remember that. Yeah,
• 7:40
  yeah, back when they were really trying to give you the rod, not
• 7:44
  the carrot. And later on, with the same AD Council which she was
• 7:49
  now part of, she partnered up with the Biden administration to further push the
• 7:55
  vaccine and developed campaigns for that as well. Further More, if that wasn't
• 8:00
  enough, it's been discovered that she was also an executive chairwoman of the World
• 8:05
  Economic Forum's Task Force on the Future of Work and their Media and issue as
• 8:11
  a fucking red flash speaker at Davos. Yeah. Despite this, though in
• 8:18
  recent interviews it seems that she's saying she's going to maintain her commitment to Musk
• 8:24
  and his goals stayed unquote A freedom of speech, as he says, is
• 8:28
  the bedrock of this country. I'm not sure there's anyone in this room who
• 8:33
  could disagree with that, but it's such a non statement, I know.
• 8:41
  I yeah too. Before you guys jump on this, I just want to
• 8:43
  say that I got the number of the show wrong. I um it was
• 8:48
  I said four or fourteen. It's four oh five. So sorry about that.
• 8:52
  Um, this is shown number four oh five. That did feel a
• 8:56
  little further along. Okay, go ahead, Yeah, there's there's nothing stopping
• 9:01
  anyone disagreeing with the notion of free speech. Yeah, quite ironically you can.
• 9:07
  You could shake your fist and vehemently oppose the notion of free speech.
• 9:13
  But the louder you do it, the more ironic it is, because you're
• 9:16
  exactly the kind of person, indeed the only kind of person who should probably
• 9:22
  shut the fuck up if you are to be held to the standards you so
• 9:26
  enthusiastically spout. Like I've been saying for you, is the only freedom on
• 9:33
  which we should be free to infringe on? Is the freedom to infringe on
• 9:39
  freedom. Like if you assault someone, you can expect to be assaulted in
• 9:43
  response. If you try to kill someone, you can expect to run the
• 9:48
  severe risk of being killed in the process. If you question the results of
• 9:52
  an election when your opponents win, you can expect them to question the results
• 9:58
  when you win. Oh yeah, I guess not. This is this is
• 10:03
  why it's so important to focus on hypocrisy futile though it very very often is
• 10:11
  because in terms of retributive retributative, retributive justice. It covers almost everything.
• 10:22
  If you're in favor of jeopardizing the freedom of others, you should have that
• 10:26
  freedom summarily jeopardized, all else being equal. It's it's where liberty and authority
• 10:33
  can meet in the middle in some kind of harmony. Authority should only be
• 10:39
  employed for the sake of liberty. If you ask me, and you'll notice,
• 10:43
  I can say this without necessarily being called anything, not even a libertarian,
• 10:50
  And just like, let's have liberty and let's even have some authority if
• 10:54
  it helps for liberty. It's not even about the eye for an eye,
• 10:58
  or for a tooth, or a tongue for a tongue. It's if you
• 11:03
  threaten to remove my tongue, then you forfeit your right to a tongue,
• 11:09
  at least, you know, figuratively speaking. So a month ago, when
• 11:16
  Elon Musk said to Linda Yakarino, quote, if I were to say,
• 11:22
  yes, you can influence me, that would be wrong. That would be
• 11:26
  very wrong, because that would be a diminishment of freedom of speech end quote.
• 11:31
  And she responded, But and then a bunch of corporate gobbledegook that amounted
• 11:39
  to fuck you my speech is more important than everyone else's. Musk's immediate and
• 11:45
  final retort should have been okay, then you don't get to say shit two
• 11:50
  or about this platform. On this platform, you will never be a blue
• 11:56
  check mark, let alone become CEO. A matter of fact, I'm now
• 12:01
  going to cut your mic, pull your tail between your legs, and boot
• 12:03
  you sideways off this stage, never to be heard again. Get thee to
• 12:07
  a nunnery and take that vow of silence that you would have everyone else take.
• 12:13
  I don't know why he didn't do that. I don't know why he's
• 12:16
  going ahead with this scumbag, knowing the rank hypocrisy in which he believes.
• 12:24
  Is this just some impotent sinecure that he's giving to some kind of diversity he
• 12:33
  is he just passing responsibility but no real power, to some random, arbitrary
• 12:39
  individual, in which case he would actually be better off if his dog was
• 12:43
  in charge. He's joked about that in the past, but seriously, if
• 12:48
  this is all for show, you'd be safer with a dog. A dog
• 12:52
  may bite you while taking exception to being bitten in return, but they can
• 12:58
  never take away a speech, provided you keep them away from your throat.
• 13:03
  That's what I mean. You are allowing this vicious dog to come uncomfortably close
• 13:09
  to your throat. Elon, I hope you know what you're doing. I
• 13:11
  hope you know something that we don't, something you're not telling us. And
• 13:18
  fair enough, you don't have to. Freedom of speech comes with the right
• 13:22
  to remain silence. So yeah, to be continued there. There there is
• 13:31
  a tweet that I did see from someone who was partning Elon about these things,
• 13:37
  and he did response to it basically saying like, yes, I'm aware
• 13:41
  of these things that she has. What she would, you know, consider
• 13:46
  that detriments to her and I am taking this seriously, but she is basically
• 13:54
  just in here to figure out the ad situation. She's not going to be
• 13:58
  dictating policy. What about what about this? Okay? So um, I'll
• 14:03
  tell you what I think. I think that he's he's picked her specifically to
• 14:09
  try to win back the people who dropped their advertising, to be like,
• 14:15
  oh, look look at this. I'm a centrist, this is this is
• 14:16
  the this is the you know, far left, wef globalist shill that I'm
• 14:22
  putting in charge of this thing. So why don't you guys come back and
• 14:24
  of course, she also happens to be in that department. My my thing
• 14:28
  is, though I think that I've seen people like the Quartering say that,
• 14:33
  you know, he's not our guy, he's betraying us, blah blah blah.
• 14:37
  Right. I don't think it's that, though I know I'm sick of
• 14:41
  this, like so and so is controlled opposition like Trump and you know,
• 14:45
  Musk. I don't see evidence of that. But what I will say is
• 14:48
  it's possible that he's either trying to play both sides, and I think that's
• 14:54
  naive because if we haven't figured it out yet, these people they don't play
• 14:58
  fair, They have no intention of doing that. They will do whatever it
• 15:03
  takes to censor opposition. And every recent stories that have come out have sort
• 15:07
  of demonstrated how far they're willing to go. But we may not be to
• 15:11
  get into those today. So it could be a bit of naivete. It
• 15:15
  could be that he's discovering this, you know, recently, and I know
• 15:20
  that it's it seems weird to say that about someone who's supposed to be really
• 15:24
  smart, but remember, you know, intelligence is not the same as wisdom.
• 15:28
  Um, I don't think that he's our enemy I think that he's trying
• 15:33
  to do you know, the centrist thing. Oh let's let's you know,
• 15:39
  let's be balanced, but he doesn't realize that, like you know, the
• 15:41
  people who were running Twitter before, they didn't want that. They wanted to
• 15:46
  control the conversation. And that's why. So those are my thoughts. I'm
• 15:50
  hoping that you know, he will see like either he's gonna figure this out
• 15:56
  or this woman is maybe she is gonna try and be more control. But
• 16:03
  I have the I have doubts. I have doubts. I think that she,
• 16:06
  you know, has um. I think she has goals. And I
• 16:10
  think that even if she's not in charge of like the actual security on Twitter
• 16:14
  or the content control or whatever, she will be involved in some capacity.
• 16:19
  And I, you know, I think that's I think there's gonna be an
• 16:22
  issue. And if and if the people who left Twitter don't want to come
• 16:25
  back, fuck them, I guess we'll just be seeing my pillow ads.
• 16:29
  And you know, um, I don't know. Black Rifle Coffee seems to
• 16:33
  be loved again. I don't know why that is, but I've seen them
• 16:38
  around, so, you know, patriots supply, I don't know. So
• 16:42
  I mean, you gotta do what you gotta do. So anyway, that's
• 16:45
  just my thought on that. UM, I don't trust feminists period, and
• 16:51
  I certainly don't trust World Economic Forum feminists. So I would say approach with
• 16:56
  caution, and there are a lot of red flags here, But that's it
• 17:00
  for me when it comes to to stuff like this, I don't I don't
• 17:07
  think trust is a factor necessarily in in this UM endeavor. I'll compare it
• 17:15
  outside of like like we're looking at journalism here. This is Twitter has become
• 17:21
  the news site of the Internet anymore. It either through the posting of links
• 17:29
  to sites that otherwise people wouldn't see, or people announcing things on Twitter,
• 17:34
  you know, so on. So it's this is for me. This goes
• 17:40
  back to you know, the newspaper days when you had to sell ads in
• 17:45
  order to keep your newspaper in print and stuff. Um. But let's take
• 17:51
  it to to something else like cars. Right, say you you buy a
• 17:57
  particular UM make of vehicle and your local business that specializes, absolutely specializes in
• 18:07
  transmission repair is run by somebody that hates that company, like they have a
• 18:14
  prejudice against all vehicles of that particular make UM and you yeah, you really
• 18:25
  don't have a lot of other places to go. There's not a broad variety
• 18:30
  of specialists in your area. You're you're dealing with either going to the dealership
• 18:37
  that you know you you bought an old one, so they don't they don't
• 18:40
  service it anymore, or you know, going to a non expert like you
• 18:44
  could go to to to Midas, but they're going to send you to the
• 18:48
  local expert. So you have no choice. You go to the local expert,
• 18:52
  and yeah, they're gonna bitch about you the whole time they're working on
• 18:56
  your vehicle. Why did you have to buy a you know, this particular
• 19:00
  company, why'd you have to buy a Volkswagen? Why don't you buy why
• 19:03
  don't you buy an American car? You know, something along those lines,
• 19:07
  right, But they're still going to fix your transmission. That's basically what I
• 19:12
  think Musk is doing here. He's got a problem with advertising. He might
• 19:18
  find it distasteful to work with somebody who has a political outlook that dominates their
• 19:26
  their communications with the public, who is very unilateral in their outlook, and
• 19:33
  who doesn't look at the bigger picture in terms of speech and other people's rights
• 19:41
  and so on. But he hire her to do that. He hired her
• 19:47
  to fix their advertising problem. Now she may give him advice. Advertisers don't
• 19:52
  want to come back to a free speech platform, and he may have to
• 19:56
  decide one way or another. You know, we're going to place limitations in
• 20:00
  order to bring in more advertisers, or are we going to seek advertisers to
• 20:06
  replace the ones that want us to create limitations. That'll be a decision he'll
• 20:12
  have to make, and every platform has to make that decision. Are we
• 20:19
  going to let other companies tell us how to operate our company in order to
• 20:26
  continue And if it really comes down to it, companies that need to be
• 20:34
  able to advertise, companies whose ads are not just a means of controlling what
• 20:41
  other companies are doing, but are actually a way to increase their customer base
• 20:45
  or maintain their customer base. Like they're going to look at the level of
• 20:51
  engagement they get on Twitter and the level of response they get to their ads.
• 20:59
  That's that's going to determine whether or not they want to advertise on Twitter.
• 21:03
  So it's only going to be the companies that really want to control your
• 21:06
  speech that are going to say, well, we want we want advertise on
• 21:08
  Twitter. If you allow people to say x y Z right and it's it's
• 21:15
  really not going to be up to her. She's not going to have the
• 21:18
  ability to force Musk to change his policy. All she can do is make
• 21:25
  recommendations. She can bitch up one side and down the other about the model
• 21:30
  of the make and model of social media that he is running. But all
• 21:37
  she's there to do is fix the financial transmission. That's what she's supposed to
• 21:45
  do, right. But that's the thing like I'm, I'm, I'm,
• 21:48
  I don't think that's going to be the limit of what she's going to try
• 21:52
  to do. Right. She isn't careful. She's gonna she's gonna take over
• 21:56
  from her position. She will have no power that he does not give her.
• 22:00
  That's that's the thing he has. He has own ownership, right,
• 22:03
  He's not um, He's he's not beholden to her in any way of course.
• 22:10
  So there there's it's just going to be up to him. He's just
• 22:12
  going to have to keep an eye he's obviously, like I said, trust
• 22:17
  doesn't have to be a factor there. If you go to a transmission specialist
• 22:22
  to fix your your transmission in your Volkswagen, and you know they hate Volkswagen.
• 22:26
  You know you're gonna be vigilant. Um if they start telling you a
• 22:30
  bunch of bullshit about your car, you know you're you're going to have to
• 22:34
  judge is this due to their hatred of this particular company or is what they're
• 22:41
  saying legitimate? And he's he's got the same issue with regard to his company.
• 22:47
  If she starts telling him a bunch of bullshit about Twitter and it's its
• 22:52
  capacity for attracting advertisers, he's going to have to sort out what's valid versus
• 23:00
  what she's what she's inserting politically. Is she not seeking out advertisers because she
• 23:07
  wants to use some advertisers reluctance to manipulate the company, or is she doing
• 23:14
  her job? And it's it's going to look really bad for her if he
• 23:18
  discovers that she's not doing her job right. So well, I know it's
• 23:22
  really but it's really gonna gonna say. What it's really going to tell us
• 23:29
  is is a couple of things about Um about Musk, does he have the
• 23:33
  acumen to h judge that is he capable? And I suspect that he is,
• 23:40
  But is he capable of of distinguishing between those two possibilities and those two
• 23:45
  behaviors. Right, that's the first thing. The second thing is is he
• 23:49
  legit? You know? And I think I'm more likely to m view him
• 23:56
  as not legit if he lets this woman take over his company than as naive.
• 24:00
  I don't think he's naive. So this is basically going to tell us
• 24:06
  like I, you know, and you know, the quartering is right about
• 24:10
  one thing. Trump, you know, Trump or Musk or any of these
• 24:15
  big guys that you know, we look at and we're like, oh,
• 24:18
  this is our guys. He's not anybody's guy. They are their own guys.
• 24:22
  That's why they're under attack. That's why they manage to be successful because
• 24:27
  they are their own guys. They're not alpha's of a of a sect,
• 24:34
  right, They're they're completely outside of of the um spectrum. I guess you
• 24:41
  could say they're not alpha's, they're not beta's. Uh gosh, I can't
• 24:45
  think it was. They're zeta. No, Zeta was the term. The
• 24:52
  zeta mail the guy that just like, you know, fuck you guys,
• 24:53
  I'm gonna go do my own things for whatever reason. Yes, Sigma,
• 25:00
  well, whatever whatever you want to call it. These guys, they don't.
• 25:04
  They don't work within the paradigm of um normal politics. They make their
• 25:12
  decisions based on their own set of ethics and morals and interests. So too.
• 25:21
  But yeah, but areth and morals really different from ours. They may
• 25:25
  be, some of them may be, and they may be looking at things
• 25:27
  from a totally different perspective. They're looking at them from a totally different set
• 25:32
  of life experiences, right, So, and it's fine if they are.
• 25:37
  Um, they're better and easier to work with than people who are diametrically opposed
• 25:42
  to us. Well, are just people who don't think we should have a
• 25:45
  voice, right So that's basically, they don't have to be in our pocket
• 25:52
  to be worth working with, or worth paying attention to, worth extending a
• 25:59
  little bit of goodwill and so on. But that doesn't mean we should assume
• 26:03
  that we're going to be happy with everything they do. No, I don't
• 26:07
  think that. Well, I mean, I'm not saying that, but but
• 26:08
  I do think that I think I do think that that Musk and Trump,
• 26:12
  as as two examples, are trying to do the right thing, and quartering
• 26:18
  assertion is that they're not. They're pretending to be on our side and they're
• 26:22
  not. And I find that to be you know, I think that's a
• 26:27
  mistake because I do too, because it's like, just wait and see what
• 26:32
  they do and then have an opinion after that. Don't give me this.
• 26:36
  I told you so, you know. No, none of these people are
• 26:38
  our friends. No one's claiming that they're friends. All we care about is
• 26:44
  can we share the same values when it comes to freedom. That's it.
• 26:48
  I don't care what kind of given what you do behind doors. It's a
• 26:52
  false dichotomy issue. Yeah, it's either you're with us or against us.
• 26:56
  It's a false dichotomy. Some people have their own agenda. Yeah, I
• 27:00
  think Elon Musk's agenda is just maintaining a platform that people can communicate on.
• 27:07
  And I don't think that he's looking to shut down speech. I don't think
• 27:11
  that he's hired this woman because he's looking to shut down speech. Yeah,
• 27:15
  the question becomes, you know, like I said, does he have the
• 27:18
  acumen and does he have the interest to maintain speech that hasn't been shut down
• 27:29
  in a in a way that you know, maybe not. All the advertisers
• 27:36
  that are out there are gonna like and agree with is he gonna maintain that
• 27:40
  in the face of a boycott. Yeah, bear in mind, we got
• 27:45
  to the point where we are with this woke takeover, which used to just
• 27:49
  be called a feminist takeover, which used to just be gold Marxist takeover.
• 27:55
  We got to this point through what we call this slow, low march for
• 27:57
  the institutions. Happened incrementally, one small step at a time, pushing the
• 28:03
  Overton window ever so slightly so that everyone forgot what the previous step was.
• 28:08
  Yeah, and it's not like we're gonna we're gonna turn back the other way
• 28:12
  through one giant leap down down to what we what we ideally need. Now,
• 28:18
  it's that that too, is going to be incrementally one small step at
• 28:22
  a time, And a small step is going to look like it's not enough
• 28:26
  because we because we're all desperate to to just rid our society of this cancer.
• 28:33
  But it's not going to work like that any any more than than than
• 28:37
  it worked the other way up. It's going to be one small step at
• 28:40
  a time. And though, like I said that, those small steps are
• 28:41
  going to look like they're not enough, therefore they're not good enough whatsoever.
• 28:47
  Right now, there's it's a small step is good enough. We just need
• 28:49
  to follow it with another small step and then another small step. We'll all
• 28:53
  be dead by the come this. By the time this, this comes back
• 28:57
  down to what we really want, like that, like the Greek proverb,
• 29:03
  we are planting trees under whose shade we shall not say it. We're not
• 29:07
  going to see the ultimate benefits of this until we're all dead, and possibly
• 29:12
  our children are all dead, but we might be able to create a future
• 29:17
  for our grandchildren that was as as good as our grandparents had it. The
• 29:23
  tough thing is going to be that each step is going to have to be
• 29:27
  taken and then held. Yeah, and holding the line is harder actually than
• 29:33
  winning the next step. Mm hmm. Well again that that all starts with.
• 29:41
  We have to be able to speak freely and um, I well,
• 29:45
  I want to say something else about that, but at first I want to
• 29:49
  make sure does anyone else have any final thoughts on this story? And we
• 29:53
  don't know much yet. We don't know what what that's going to look like.
• 29:56
  All we know is what we know about this one and that musk hired.
• 30:03
  So now this is going to be something to watch, yes, and
• 30:07
  it's gonna be something that like, we're always going to pay attention to this.
• 30:12
  You know, this is this is going to require vigilance m pretty much
• 30:17
  forever. Not you know, there's no sitting back and relaxing. Um,
• 30:22
  but I like that's something we've talked about multiple times. You can't you can't
• 30:27
  sit back and relax because the people who want to take away your your freedoms
• 30:33
  in order to have control and to financially exploit you. Every time you sit
• 30:40
  back and relax, they're going to take your ground that you have gained.
• 30:47
  So I got a super chat from XERANX let me just make sure I didn't
• 30:51
  miss anything in the Oh no, not nothing can rumble gives us five bucks
• 30:56
  and says the companies are going to influence Twitter at many of them are following
• 31:00
  ESG. Allegedly Anheuser Busch follows such ideals which might which might sink them.
• 31:06
  Well, so that's that's the thing. Like, Okay, so a lot
• 31:08
  of these corporations that she's going to be, you know, trying to um
• 31:14
  get to advertise they are, well it's not forced on them yet, but
• 31:19
  there but a lot of them are following ESG. And the fact is is
• 31:23
  that I think that that's gotta go, like it's gotta it's gotta fucking go,
• 31:30
  because this is a this is a problem that comes with other problems.
• 31:34
  So the thing is is that if every I don't think every company is going
• 31:38
  to follow esg by the way, because it's not mandated, so the ones
• 31:42
  that don't can get on board. And I think this is part of the
• 31:45
  reason why Must started Twitter Blue because he wanted to. Essentially it's the only
• 31:51
  way he can get some income or like some profits for the company. But
• 31:55
  advertisers would make that even better, which I agree with. But if they're
• 31:59
  going to be using and they're saying to you, we don't want to advertise
• 32:01
  with you unless you make this change, this change or this change, you
• 32:05
  say, fuck you, this is a free speech platform. I'll go with
• 32:08
  fucking you know, like fucking Patriot Mobile or something. You know. I'll
• 32:13
  go with Angel Studios. I'll go with some company that may be small,
• 32:17
  but I think a large reason for that is because they're not like getting a
• 32:21
  lot of exposure instead of you. And if Twitter becomes big enough and if
• 32:25
  enough people believe in freedom of speech are on it, then advertisers will probably
• 32:30
  be willing to compromise because at the end of the day, the ESG thing
• 32:34
  is not helping. It's actually causing a lot of problems for these companies,
• 32:37
  even though the maybe it's helping China. Yeah, it's helping China. Yeah,
• 32:43
  And like you know, maybe some of the people that work in the
• 32:46
  company and the human resources or whatever, the women involved may they may they
• 32:51
  may like it, but it's not it's not good long term. And so
• 32:55
  if those companies fold because of that because they lose so much money, fuck
• 33:00
  them, you know, just advertise craft beer, just just like support the
• 33:05
  people who support your vision. Don't work this the other way around. Either
• 33:08
  they're going to compromise, or they're and just you know, bite the bullet,
• 33:14
  or they're fucked, or they gotta go somewhere else. You can advertise
• 33:16
  on Facebook, Google, YouTube, whatever, you know. That's that's what
• 33:21
  I think. So anyway, thank you for the super chat Zarenkx. Nick
• 33:25
  Dunney gives US seven ninety nine. Australian says could alternate platforms like Rumble be
• 33:30
  the solution spread out social media with more competition, Well, yeah, of
• 33:34
  course, what we're at they're attempting to do that we're on Rumble right now,
• 33:37
  you could watch us. We're live on Rumble and you could watch and
• 33:40
  Saya were also live on Twitter. Um. You know, when I heard
• 33:44
  about Tucker Carlson moving over to Twitter, I thought, you know, Twitter
• 33:46
  streaming might blow up, and I think that that should be, you know,
• 33:51
  pursued, because if this woman doesn't fuck them, and I don't think
• 33:58
  she will before she gets canned, Um, I think that we should we
• 34:02
  you know, Twitter could become like a much bigger thing than it is,
• 34:07
  so it might be a good idea. Thank you, Nick Dunny. Does
• 34:08
  somebody we want to say something about that? I heard a voice no,
• 34:14
  okay, and then ZERANX gives us five bucks and says JP Morgan, Chase,
• 34:17
  and Bank of America have ESG pages on their website. Brian, it'll
• 34:21
  be hard for companies to avoid ESG. Well, dude, I don't what
• 34:24
  do you want me to do? All I can say is we no one
• 34:28
  should be using that. Nobody. I know that the banks are gonna put
• 34:31
  pressure on them, but that so what like, it's bad, it's wrong,
• 34:37
  it's it's immoral. Sooner or later people are going to realize them.
• 34:42
  The incentives they get from following ESG nothing compared with the eleven billion dollars they're
• 34:47
  gonna use from trying. They're gonna lose from charge by, which is what
• 34:52
  happens and has a bush. I guess I hope eventually people will wise up.
• 34:58
  Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I don't. I mean,
• 35:00
  I get what you're saying is are anks. It seems like, you
• 35:02
  know, like, uh, there's no escape, but something has to be
• 35:07
  done, and like all I can do at the level that I operate is
• 35:12
  not banked with those fucking people. You know. So I don't know what
• 35:16
  to tell you. I mean, you know, go to a credit union.
• 35:19
  I don't know, like you we we we can't just lay lay down
• 35:23
  and be like, well, I guess ESG is our new reality. No,
• 35:27
  I'm not doing that. Fuck that. It's just no, that's no
• 35:30
  way. Fuck that. And it's not because it's China. It's because it's
• 35:35
  authoritarian bullshit. I think we're in a situation where the general population in western
• 35:43
  nations is going to go through a economic version of heroin withdrawal. Yeah,
• 35:53
  we've we've really had a convenience addiction that it has. It's created a situation
• 36:02
  where we've given these corporations a lot of in roads into our private lives,
• 36:09
  into control over our choices. Like there's you know, there's some things that
• 36:16
  you look at and it's like, well, you know, I don't mind
• 36:19
  taking a survey when I buy my groceries, like every time I buy my
• 36:22
  groceries, and it gives the grocery store information that lets them stop the things
• 36:29
  I want in the grocery store. But I've noticed, like I used to
• 36:32
  get all kinds of coupons on on my Kroger card, right, and I've
• 36:37
  noticed now that when I go looking for coupons on Kroger card, the same
• 36:43
  brand names are always the coupons that are available, and they're not things that
• 36:49
  I buy. And if I didn't do the math, I might think,
• 36:54
  well, I'm just going to switch to this brand because I'm getting coupons for
• 36:58
  it and it's cheaper. But actually it's not. It's not cheaper than what
• 37:05
  I'm what I'm buying because that brand has stuff in it that's not good for
• 37:09
  my family. And what I do buy prevents us from having to pay doctor
• 37:15
  bills for the inevitable health problems that we would have from using that other brand,
• 37:22
  right, so it's it's not cheaper. It's cheaper in the next hour
• 37:28
  maybe, but it's not cheaper you know, in the long run. Sure,
• 37:35
  right, But that manipulation. You allow that manipulation and every little thing
• 37:40
  you do. You know, Yes, I have this um this Kroger card,
• 37:44
  and I don't let it manipulate my shopping habits. Most of the time,
• 37:50
  you're wrong about that. You're letting it manipulate your shopping habits. Kroger
• 37:54
  decides where I buy a fuel for my car by giving me a discount on
• 37:59
  my fuel, and that means that another company doesn't get my money. Now
• 38:04
  the oil company delivers the sit you know that the delivers to Kroger delivers to
• 38:07
  other places in the you know, and it's they're still getting But the convenience
• 38:15
  store that I used to work at, for instance, doesn't get a dime
• 38:17
  because I'm getting my fuel at Kroger, because I get ten cents off a
• 38:22
  gallen for you know, having bought groceries there. That kind of manipulation happens
• 38:28
  in every single business that you do business with. Yeah, everything, everything
• 38:35
  from your you know, you when you have insurance through your employer guess who
• 38:39
  decides which doctors you go to, not by telling you, well, you
• 38:44
  can't go to a different doctor, but by telling you, all right,
• 38:49
  your co pay with this doctor is forty dollars, but your co pay with
• 38:53
  this other doctor that's not in our network is eighty dollars. So which doctor
• 39:00
  are you going to go to? You know, you want to spend an
• 39:01
  extra forty dollars to go to a different doctor every single time? You know,
• 39:07
  maybe you do, maybe maybe you have a good reason for it,
• 39:10
  but many people won't. So it's gonna be like, um, it really
• 39:15
  is going to be like Hero and withdrawal every minute of every day. Everything
• 39:19
  that you're doing, every interaction that you have with a business, every interaction
• 39:22
  that you have online, you're going to run into something that you're going to
• 39:29
  deal with an inconvenience in order to get away from this. And the reality
• 39:35
  is it's worth it? Yeah? I think so. Like we've started here
• 39:39
  in in um Our area, there's a few grocery stores that are not big
• 39:45
  chain grocery stores. Like in fact, there's a there's a market that's older
• 39:53
  than Kroger that Kroger sort of tried and failed to copy that we go too
• 40:00
  that A lot of people think of it as a hoity toity place, but
• 40:02
  actually it's just a little um family owned grocery store and they have better products,
• 40:09
  and it's it's sometimes more expensive to go there, and it is not
• 40:15
  in our neighborhood, but it's worth it because when we go in there,
• 40:21
  we're not being manipulated as to what we buy. They have the same products
• 40:25
  that you can get at Kroger. They also have products that you can't,
• 40:30
  right, so we actually have more choices. And that's that. You got
• 40:34
  to do that kind of thing. Yeah, in order to get out of
• 40:37
  this. Yeah, all right, and I'm gonna go someplace else, that's
• 40:42
  right, all right? Uh yeah I could blow. Oh oh you're ready
• 40:46
  to blow. Yeah, I'm ready to blow. Well I'm a mushroom cloud
• 40:50
  land motherfucker. Motherfucker. So we're gonna move on to the next story.
• 40:54
  Thanks for the super chats. Guys, just gonna look here. Nothing in
• 41:00
  rumble rum Rumble squad. Give us a shout out. All right, we're
• 41:06
  gonna move on to the next story. This one. I thought we dealt
• 41:09
  with this already like years ago, but Ejene Carroll is back in the news
• 41:14
  because reasons. So, Mike J, why don't you get us caught up
• 41:19
  on all that? Certainly will Brian so after for more. Former President Donald
• 41:25
  Trump's bombastic CNN town hall, host debate and comedy special for the cat Right,
• 41:37
  former famous person Ejene Carroll is deciding if she wants to sue him for
• 41:43
  comments made against her again so. During the town hall host debate and comedy
• 41:51
  special, Trump made several references to Carol and the former case against him,
• 41:57
  calling it quote made up, fake, and a rigged deal. He also
• 42:02
  referred to Carol as a whack job and stated quote, what kind of a
• 42:07
  woman meets someone brings them up, and within minutes you're playing hanky panky in
• 42:13
  a dressing room. It's called a group. Carol, who did not watch
• 42:19
  the town hall, was presented with the transcript of it by her lawyer.
• 42:24
  Upon reading just the first part, she reacted by saying, quote it's just
• 42:29
  stupid. It's just disgusting, vile, foul, It wounds people. End
• 42:36
  quote. She also added that she had been quote insulted by better people end
• 42:42
  quote. She also stated that she isn't just upset on her own behalf.
• 42:45
  No, no, no, no, no, quote, I am upset
• 42:50
  on the behalf of young men in America. They cannot listen to this boulder
• 42:55
  dash and this old timy view of women, which is a caveman view.
• 43:01
  End quote. You can tell she didn't watch the actual town hall thing,
• 43:05
  or she would have heard the charing by the young men in the audience.
• 43:10
  And also, balderdash is old timey. Yeah, that was That was one
• 43:15
  of my first words. Actually, this woman. Seriously, My dad taught
• 43:21
  me to say balderdash, and I have a recording of me saying balderdash as
• 43:25
  a little little kid somewhere. Yeah, but you guys might never hear.
• 43:30
  Okay, go ahead, Mike, finish it. Carol's lawyer, ROBERTA.
• 43:35
  A. Kaplan, has stated, quote, everything's on the table, obviously,
• 43:39
  and we have to give some consideration to it. We have to weigh
• 43:44
  the various pros and cons and will come to a decision in the next day
• 43:47
  or so probably. Yeah. As we draw closer to twenty twenty four,
• 43:53
  we're seeing a resurgence of every clump of slime that can be lobbed at Trump
• 44:00
  by you know, the deep state, which of course does not exist,
• 44:02
  and if it does, it's a good thing. Please let me enter the
• 44:05
  United States. And yeah, it's yeah, it's just like twenty sixteen.
• 44:08
  It's not just the same levels of vitriol that we saw in twenty sixteen and
• 44:14
  beyond, it's the same stories. These people are scrambling for scandals and smears
• 44:20
  that they can throw at Trump, and you'll notice they can't even find any
• 44:22
  new ones. In terms of sex scandals. All they ever had with Stormy
• 44:27
  Dandles and e Gene. I think most people think of rapers being sexy Carrol,
• 44:34
  and that's still all they can find for all their efforts. If they
• 44:37
  did this much digging on any other politician, especially Democrat politicians, they would
• 44:45
  have pages and pages of juicy dirt that they could dangle like the sort of
• 44:51
  damocles over them forever. And that's what they do. And they're desperate to
• 44:54
  find that kind of dirt on Trump so that they can control him like they
• 44:59
  can roll every other corrupt sex pest in the Senate. And yet all they
• 45:04
  have is a couple of lying, unhinged attention hares who they wheel out as
• 45:09
  and when they inevitably can't find anyone else, they will continue to push every
• 45:15
  smear they've ever device up to, up to and in including or perhaps excluding
• 45:21
  the point where it becomes serious enough for a formal investigation to be conducted,
• 45:27
  because that's the only way you can you can get it off the table.
• 45:30
  You can bet you're asked. They would still be pushing the Russia Russia Russia
• 45:35
  hoax were it not for the Durham report. That was that was their ace
• 45:39
  in the hole, and now they've lost it because if anyone brings it up
• 45:45
  from now on, any given schmuck can raise their hand and go, Actually,
• 45:51
  there was no collusion between Trump and Russia. That was just Democrat leaders
• 45:54
  colluding with intelligence agencies to deliberately lie in an attempt to interfere with an election
• 46:01
  and a sitting president, much like when fifty of them signed off on that
• 46:07
  demonstrable lie about Hunter Biden's laptop. You're not talking about that anymore either,
• 46:12
  No, you could we perhaps get a formal investigation into the FBI's involvement in
• 46:17
  January the sixth, so that we can remove that from your scripted series of
• 46:22
  talking points. Needless to say, none of this is true. The FBI
• 46:25
  doesn't exist, and if it does, it's a good thing. Please let
• 46:29
  me visit the United States. Yeah, well, I promise I will vote
• 46:31
  Democrat even if even if I'm not allowed to, which would of course never
• 46:37
  happened, but if it did, it would be a good thing. Yeah.
• 46:39
  I gotta point out, like, this isn't just about Trump. This
• 46:44
  is actually a pretty big deal. What is being done here is an attempt
• 46:51
  to prevent accused men from declaring your innocence in public. Yep, this is
• 46:59
  not about out who is accused? Who is the accuser? Like, there's
• 47:04
  not even any evidence. The entirety of the evidence that I have been given
• 47:07
  by people crowing about the initial ruling in this case is that Trump made a
• 47:15
  comment to a newscaster off the record, after being sort of goaded into it,
• 47:25
  that acknowledges that some women are gold diggers and some women are cloud chasers,
• 47:31
  and wealthy and powerful men are aware that some women are gold diggers and
• 47:37
  some women are cloud chasers, and of course, being aware of it,
• 47:42
  they take that into consideration when interacting with those women. Right, that's it.
• 47:46
  So that's not actually evidence of any action having been taken toward any particular
• 47:52
  individual. It's just the same as claiming that because Bill Clinton liked big haired
• 48:00
  women and had an affair with Monica Lewinsky. He must have sexually harassed some
• 48:06
  other woman who made an allegation against him, even though there was no smoking
• 48:12
  gun in that case, right, There wasn't even anything close to a smoking
• 48:16
  gun in that case. There are a lot of her feelings and a lot
• 48:20
  of allegations, and you know, a few witness comments, and it's possible
• 48:25
  that he did it, but it wasn't proved. It wasn't proved at all.
• 48:32
  And I really don't like Bill Clinton would love to say that it was
• 48:36
  proved. It wasn't. You know, that's you got to be able to
• 48:39
  admit that. And in the situation with Trump, I've been told that I
• 48:45
  should believe the allegation now because a judge and a jury believed it. But
• 48:51
  there has there's a whole organization out there, the Innocence Project, that has
• 48:59
  pages and pages of cases of men and some women, mostly men, but
• 49:05
  some women as well, and mostly sexual misconduct cases, but also some other
• 49:10
  types of cases, murder, fraud, things like that. Even kidnapping is
• 49:15
  on there. I think where a judge and a jury believed that a person
• 49:21
  was guilty and that person spent years in prison and then it turns out they
• 49:28
  were innocent. Like the longest one I saw in there was thirty eight years.
• 49:31
  Somebody spent long enough in prison that had prison been a career, they'd
• 49:37
  have been eligible for retirement from it because a judge and a jury believed that
• 49:43
  they were guilty and then it was proved after thirty eight years that they were
• 49:49
  innocent. So a man should be able to declare his innocence even if he
• 49:54
  is convicted, which Trump hasn't been convicted of anything. He was sued and
• 49:59
  the lawsuit had a result. Right, that's not a conviction. That's not
• 50:04
  a criminal conviction, right, and them the standard for evidence in a lawsuit
• 50:10
  is not the same as a standard for evidence in a criminal case. Yeah,
• 50:15
  so that's that's basically why a judging and jury were able to make that
• 50:19
  ruling. In a criminal case, that ruling would not have happened because the
• 50:22
  evidence didn't support it. Right, But in any case, Like, I
• 50:27
  don't care if he did it in public and there was video of it,
• 50:35
  and they showed the video and I can see like here you go, here's
• 50:38
  Trump sexually harassing woman, or here's Trump sexually assaulting woman. Okay, he
• 50:44
  still has the right to declare his innocence in public to his dying breath.
• 50:52
  In my opinion, you know, you can say, well, no,
• 50:53
  we don't believe you, right, I believe that you're wrong. You know,
• 50:59
  I believe that you were lying. You can say that you have the
• 51:02
  right to answer his declaration of innocence with bullshit. I call bullshit, right,
• 51:09
  just the same as you should have the right to call bullshit on an
• 51:13
  accuser. I just think, go ahead. I'm sorry, I thought you
• 51:20
  were done. Yeah. I don't understand why the entire men's rights movement is
• 51:24
  in up in arms about this. They should be, but you know have
• 51:29
  Yeah, they should be. But I will say because I've spoken into some
• 51:34
  MRAs, and the problem is is that they have bought into the narrative around
• 51:40
  Trump. And I'm talking about the narrative that like that started before once he
• 51:45
  announced his bid to run. So before that he was okay, right,
• 51:51
  like some people just didn't lang because he was rich. Fuck them, who
• 51:53
  cares? Sorry your poor stop complaining, get get off your ass. But
• 51:59
  but then there were people who thought he was all right, and then he
• 52:01
  said I'm gonna run and then the media just went ham and some people started
• 52:07
  to buy into the lies, and it's been lies like they just Trump.
• 52:09
  They look, it's not just Trump. No, I know what I'm saying.
• 52:14
  This is I said this from the beginning. It's not just him,
• 52:17
  but he is an avatar for everything they hate, like about men, about
• 52:23
  capitalism, about merit, all of it. That's the thing. He is
• 52:29
  the avatar of their hatred because he represents all of that. So it's not
• 52:32
  just him. He just happens to be the glowing target. Here's here's the
• 52:37
  thing though, Uh you know, like as a movement, we have to
• 52:40
  be able to separate that. Now, somebody about about being able to find
• 52:46
  common ground with people of different political outlooks, and get it. I've done
• 52:52
  that. Something is I've stood up for I've stood up for Harvey Weinstein.
• 52:55
  I still maintain that because I haven't seen any evidence that that contradicts that I
• 53:00
  stood up for Bill Cosby. I maintain that I stood up for Michael Jackson.
• 53:04
  I maintain that as well. So it's not like I'm just pending.
• 53:07
  I know, I'm not just talking about you though. Yeah, this is
• 53:09
  the thing we have, this is this is probably the fourth or fifth story
• 53:14
  we've talked about, where a man was accused of some form of sexual misconduct
• 53:22
  and then sued for for declaring his innocence. Like the movement, the movement
• 53:27
  has to get ahead of Well, it's too late for the movement to get
• 53:30
  ahead of this, but the movement has to get on this because the pattern
• 53:34
  of filing defamation lawsuits against men for contradicting defamation of their own character. This
• 53:44
  is women basically saying I have the right to defame you with a criminal allegation.
• 53:50
  Do you defend yourself? You are defaming me by calling me a liar,
• 53:54
  yep, and that that has to stop. It's very much the same
• 53:59
  as um women who argue that any self defense a man engages in in in
• 54:07
  a situation where he's being assaulted by a woman is over the top, even
• 54:12
  if he just brushes past her on his way out the door, you know,
• 54:15
  to try to get away from her. So this is something that it
• 54:20
  doesn't matter who the target of the allegation is. It doesn't matter if it's
• 54:24
  Trump, it doesn't matter if it's Bill Clinton. It doesn't matter if it's
• 54:28
  Bill Cosby, it doesn't matter if it's Harvey Weinstein, doesn't matter if it's
• 54:31
  Johnny Depp, doesn't matter if it's Joe Schmo from Columbus, Ohio that nobody
• 54:37
  ever heard of before. Right, You really have to get people to understand
• 54:44
  when you see a defamation lawsuit that is essentially a slap, Right, it's
• 54:50
  a it's a it's a loss suit to silence a person declaring his innocence of
• 54:55
  a criminal allegation. That needs to be something that people are fighting back against.
• 55:02
  Right are we need to and I don't want to say that our politicians
• 55:07
  are going to listen, right, but they do need to get inundated to
• 55:10
  the degree that they can't ignore. Right. They get sick of hearing from
• 55:15
  you, phone calls, emails, letters, snail mails. They need to
• 55:22
  hear over and over again from their local citizenry. And that the ones that
• 55:27
  really need to hear it the most are your city, county, and state
• 55:32
  politicians. Not just your federal politicians, but your city, state, and
• 55:37
  county politicians need to hear. Our area needs to have some sort of of
• 55:45
  legislation that protects a citizen's right to publicly declare their innocence upon facing a criminal
• 55:54
  allegation as part of their free speech right. That is is sacred. It
• 56:01
  is part of your your fourteenth Amendment and Fifth Amendment right to due process to
• 56:09
  not be to night of your due process interfered with. Part of due process,
• 56:14
  part of due process of law is your right to declare your innocence.
• 56:19
  And if they can tell you that you cannot tell the New York Times that
• 56:22
  you're innocent of a crime that you're accused of, they can tell you that
• 56:27
  you cannot tell your Twitter audience, or your Facebook audience, or or any
• 56:31
  other social media audience that you have, your followers, the public that reads
• 56:37
  your social media posts. They can tell you you can't do that. The
• 56:42
  next thing that they will do is tell you that you cannot tell the court
• 56:46
  that you're innocent, because it's an attack on the accuser. If you tell
• 56:50
  a court that you're innocent, and they're working on that, they're trying to
• 56:53
  limit your exculpatory evidence that you can present. There's already some it's on exculpatory
• 57:00
  evidence that you can present in a in a sexual misconduct case, and they're
• 57:06
  trying to increase that. So this is really not about Trump. This is
• 57:10
  really a huge big deal. Oh I know this that it's not political really,
• 57:16
  I mean, yeah, he's a political target and that and that tells
• 57:20
  you how easily this can be done to anyone else. And if it weren't
• 57:24
  for the fact that he seems to keep himself so fucking clean that they have
• 57:29
  to pull shit out of their ass to like try and tag on them and
• 57:31
  it doesn't stick. Um, but yeah, like this is something that MRA
• 57:36
  should be paying attention to and they should be up in arms about because this
• 57:38
  can be done to any man. And right, no, man, men
• 57:43
  are not perfect. Like you might find something in their history, you know,
• 57:45
  and bring it up. But um, well, if you can't declare
• 57:50
  your innocence, they don't have to find something in your history. They just
• 57:52
  have to make it up. And that's the other thing. You know,
• 57:54
  women, Women are not exempt from this. You know. Women may be
• 57:57
  sitting back going well, it's it's you know, it's protecting our right to
• 58:00
  accuse bullshit. If they can tell a man that he cannot declare his innocence
• 58:06
  upon being accused of sexual misconduct against a woman, they can tell a woman
• 58:13
  that she cannot declare her any innocence upon being accused of theft or upon being
• 58:19
  accused of fraud or upon being accused of child abuse. Right. If they
• 58:24
  can do this with one crime, they can do this with every crime.
• 58:30
  Right. You get accused of tax of asion, well and you just gotta
• 58:34
  you just gotta deal with it, pay the taxes. Right. You get
• 58:37
  accused of being at fault for a car accident, you know, don't bother
• 58:42
  bringing in the video from your dash Kim, you were accused, your accuser
• 58:45
  has a right to not be contradicted. Shame on you for defaming your accuser
• 58:52
  by bringing in video that contradicts their story. Right, So every person,
• 58:59
  the women's rights move that should be incredibly aware of this. But every person
• 59:01
  should recognize why this is bad. Yeah, No one should have the right
• 59:06
  to file a defamation lawsuit to stop someone from declaring themselves innocent of a criminal
• 59:15
  allegation even after conviction. Yep, all right, So I gotta move on
• 59:23
  because I got a lot of super chats and stuff, so I want to
• 59:25
  read through them first. Though. We got a super chow, and I
• 59:29
  try to give those priorities if I can. Mereth G gives us five dollars
• 59:34
  through a super chow and says HPR news number four or five honey for the
• 59:37
  badgers. I don't want people to go get blackpilled about ESG. The reality
• 59:42
  is that ESG is antithetical to the fiduciary responsibility that the fund managers who push
• 59:46
  it have to investors. The same goes for the executives, board members,
• 59:51
  and managers at many of the companies that accept this crap to get access to
• 59:54
  funds. As people lose money, Yeah, lose money. Lawsuits are coming,
• 1:00:01
  and there are all politicians that are pushing against ESG retirement funds. When
• 1:00:06
  it becomes relegated to a small group of people rather than leveraging our pensions and
• 1:00:09
  retirement accounts, it will come. It would become too weak to be effective.
• 1:00:15
  Yeah, I don't think it's sustainable, but I think that people really
• 1:00:19
  need to be vocal and not act like, well, I guess that's just
• 1:00:22
  our life now, like because if you if you settle, if you are
• 1:00:27
  complacent, then you basically ensure it. But most of these things that these
• 1:00:30
  people are trying to push on us are not sustainable. And well, I
• 1:00:35
  won't get into it, but there's the yeah, no, the white pill
• 1:00:39
  with a gost to SG is it's not going to last very long. Yeah,
• 1:00:43
  black pill is as long as it does last. It's gonna do damage.
• 1:00:46
  Yes, we have no idea how much damage. So it's just going
• 1:00:51
  to benefit the governments that aren't employing it, like the ccp M and ironically
• 1:00:59
  the Russian government been wrong. Yeah, ergo proxy. So this now I'm
• 1:01:04
  on the super Chats gives us two dollars and twenty cents Canadian. Let me
• 1:01:07
  just make sure that nobody even Rumble sends anything. Nope, what's up Rumble
• 1:01:10
  folks? All right, and says she tried to seduce Anderson Cooper on air.
• 1:01:15
  Yes, I saw that. That's a crazy She's a crazy woman,
• 1:01:19
  dude. She I think that her story about what Trump did, they pulled
• 1:01:22
  that from an episode of SVU. She pulled it from that. Literally,
• 1:01:28
  the same exact thing happened on like you know, Law and Order SVU.
• 1:01:32
  The woman's crazy, and yet we're supposed to take this shit seriously. It's
• 1:01:37
  ridiculous. They couldn't find anything. They had to get a crazy person and
• 1:01:40
  a porn star to come out and make allegations. It's insane, but you
• 1:01:45
  know what it is too. It tells us a little bit about them and
• 1:01:50
  the kind of shit that they got going. I mean we you know,
• 1:01:52
  you guys probably saw the Hunter Biden tape. So anyway, Zarienz gives us
• 1:01:57
  five bucks and says thank you. Ergo Proxy by the way, and Zern
• 1:02:00
  says, if Trump is this clean, people should hope they never find themselves
• 1:02:05
  near Howard Stern. Uh, he seems to me. I mean, the
• 1:02:07
  motherfucker doesn't do any drugs. He doesn't drink. I don't think he even
• 1:02:12
  smokes, you know, like, the guy is squeaky clean. And I
• 1:02:16
  know that some people might say, well, you don't know that for sure.
• 1:02:19
  If there was something, they would have gotten it, if there was
• 1:02:22
  anything that could have used against them, that would have been the first thing
• 1:02:24
  they did. They don't have anything, except he says things that people don't
• 1:02:29
  like. Sometimes, well you could say the same thing about it, all
• 1:02:36
  right, Oh, Joe Rogan smokes weed like he's going out of fashion,
• 1:02:42
  even since he moved to Texas. Sure, and he's still apparently squeaky clean
• 1:02:46
  in the eyes of the very federal government that would bring him down in a
• 1:02:51
  heartbeat if they could. How does that work? Um, you know,
• 1:02:54
  I get I get that he's that he smoked weed like it was to kill
• 1:03:00
  if accounts. So when he was in California, especially after it was made
• 1:03:04
  legal. But he's he's moved to Texas and he's still like, look how
• 1:03:07
  much we do I don't know? Is it is it like super illegal in
• 1:03:13
  Texas because here in Virginia, um, you know it's not. It's not
• 1:03:16
  for recreational use yet, but you can you can get weed if you have
• 1:03:21
  like a doctor's know, from like a dispensary. So what people are out,
• 1:03:29
  Yeah, what people are starting to figure out in regard to this is
• 1:03:32
  the vice laws in general, whether we're talking about weed, whether we're talking
• 1:03:37
  about sex, whether we're talking about any other substance or activity that is regulated,
• 1:03:43
  gambling, you know, alcohol and all that. They don't exist to
• 1:03:47
  protect the public, right yeah. They exist to give the authorities a bludgeon
• 1:03:54
  with which to beat people into submission and when they don't have some other criminal
• 1:04:00
  activity that they can get them on. Right and right now, if you
• 1:04:06
  look at enforcement of drug laws in the United States, they're not preventing drug
• 1:04:14
  use. Will start with that. They're not like those of us that do
• 1:04:17
  not partake. Our reason for not partaking isn't because it's illegal, Like,
• 1:04:25
  I don't partake because I have a shitload of allergies and I don't want to
• 1:04:29
  end up at the hospital trying to explain what's going on with me symptom wise
• 1:04:33
  while I'm high, right, well, I ingested something I'm allergic to.
• 1:04:39
  What was it? I can't tell you. You know that's not gonna work,
• 1:04:42
  Okay, So it's it's ineffective. That's the first thing, right.
• 1:04:48
  The second thing is it is very lucrative, incredibly lucrative for departments like police
• 1:04:58
  departments, medical department and so on. Right, it's very lucrative, and
• 1:05:02
  it is a major in road for the government to take away your due process
• 1:05:09
  rights. Again, So you have this law in the United States, HIPPA
• 1:05:14
  that's supposed to protect your medical privacy. You don't. If I have a
• 1:05:19
  patient and that patient is on some medication, and that medication comes in a
• 1:05:26
  package with a label that has the name of the medication and the name of
• 1:05:30
  the patient on it, and I give them the medication, and now the
• 1:05:33
  package is left and I have to dispose of it. Of procedures and protocols
• 1:05:36
  I have to follow to make sure that their next door neighbor can't find that
• 1:05:41
  package and find out they were taken at medication right, And it doesn't matter
• 1:05:45
  what medication it is. If it's aspirint over the counter aspirint and it's dispensed
• 1:05:50
  from a pharmacy so their name is on it, I have to I have
• 1:05:54
  to follow those procedures and protocols to protect the patient's privacy. One medication over
• 1:05:59
  the counter that lots of people take that doesn't have anything associated with it.
• 1:06:03
  You could be like, oh so one so takes asbourne ha ha, No,
• 1:06:06
  still got to protect it right. When I worked at a pharmacy,
• 1:06:11
  we were trained that if a patient a client dropped their bag in the parking
• 1:06:17
  lot after they took their medication out of it and it had their label on
• 1:06:20
  it, it was our responsibility to find that and put it in the trash.
• 1:06:27
  And the company I worked for as as support for that lesson, they
• 1:06:32
  cited a lawsuit somebody won against the company because someone at one of their stores
• 1:06:41
  didn't know that a customer had dropped their bag in the parking lot after they
• 1:06:45
  paid for it and walked out of the store. The company was responsible for
• 1:06:49
  a breach of medical privacy because the patient breached their own medical privacy, and
• 1:06:56
  the company didn't stop them from doing it, didn't clean up after them fast
• 1:07:00
  enough. Right, That's how strict that is. Unless you're suspected of using
• 1:07:10
  prescription painkillers too much, and then your local prosecuting attorney has very few barriers
• 1:07:18
  to stop them from getting into your medical information. And they don't even have
• 1:07:25
  to prove that you committed a crime. Right, they could go after you
• 1:07:28
  for a made up crime called doctor shopping because in addition to your pain care,
• 1:07:34
  you also receive heartcare or kidney care or some other type of care,
• 1:07:41
  and you have specialists for the different types of care you're getting. You don't
• 1:07:45
  even have to take an unusual amount of medication for them to go after your
• 1:07:51
  medical records, your freedom, and your doctors. And they have systematically used
• 1:07:59
  that to shut down providers of pain care all over the country. Right,
• 1:08:05
  you have no medical privacy, none at all if the government wants your medical
• 1:08:14
  information, none. Yep. Right, So are the point that I'm making
• 1:08:21
  in regard to this is again with the due process thing. We've we've looked
• 1:08:28
  at um, we've looked at the allegation part of it, right with with
• 1:08:34
  the Donald Trump's story, but with this super chat. If you think that
• 1:08:41
  you have um a right to the presumption of innocence and a right to present
• 1:08:46
  act exculpatory evidence in your defense, and a right to not be accused of
• 1:08:51
  a crime that doesn't exist in things like that, take a look at the
• 1:08:57
  drug situation. Men all over the country or being jailed on a regular basis
• 1:09:03
  for nothing. They don't even have to be using drugs illegally. They just
• 1:09:09
  have to have more than one doctor treating their medical medical issues and be on
• 1:09:13
  pain medicine. And I had a family member that that happened to. So
• 1:09:17
  yeah, like I'm I know, I'm a little off topic on this,
• 1:09:24
  but it does go back to your due process rights. And in terms of
• 1:09:28
  the drug laws in the United States, there's literally no reason why we should
• 1:09:33
  continue to have them. They're nothing but a government abuse and they're only used
• 1:09:39
  to extort the public for money, extort the public for free labor, because
• 1:09:45
  if you look at our prison system, it is a slave market, straight
• 1:09:50
  up slave market, and they're only used to slap people down who get a
• 1:10:00
  little out of hand politically. Yeah, consider the drugs they're giving to Joe
• 1:10:05
  Biden to keep him lucid enough to talk in public. Maybe they should,
• 1:10:11
  Maybe they should be illegal. Maybe they already are illegal. There is the
• 1:10:15
  problem. Oh, I'm sure a lot of them are on paper. Yeah,
• 1:10:19
  to quote Bill Hicks, it's not a war on drugs, it's a
• 1:10:23
  war on personal freedoms. Yeah, if that matter all times, Hulks,
• 1:10:27
  you don't have those personal freedoms, Joe public, Joe Biden and his handlers
• 1:10:31
  do. Let's push it to let's push it to equality. Show he has
• 1:10:36
  you'll call it one way or another. Yeah, hash jack, abolish the
• 1:10:42
  FDA, hashtag abolish the d E A right, come on, man,
• 1:10:46
  all right, so I got some let me get through the rest of these
• 1:10:49
  super chats. Um. Nick Dunney gives US seven ninety nine Australian and says
• 1:10:56
  perhaps now is a good time for a third party candidate to step forward.
• 1:11:00
  While they may not win this round, it could offer a different path for
• 1:11:02
  people. Well, there's usually somebody that does that, So I guess we'll
• 1:11:06
  see. But um, you know, I don't know. They'd have to
• 1:11:11
  be pretty fucking amazing, and I don't think a third party person is necessarily
• 1:11:15
  not part of the swamp. Just so you know, So what we're gonna
• 1:11:19
  say what Ross Peru, I don't know if he's still alive, but he
• 1:11:24
  kind of ruined it for third party candidates for a long time. Like and
• 1:11:29
  I will always hold this against him. If he had stayed in the race,
• 1:11:33
  he would have won. Yeah, and he dropped out. And there's
• 1:11:39
  a lot of us that suspect he dropped out because he was winning and then
• 1:11:44
  he entered. No. I I kind of suspect Ross Peru was like fake,
• 1:11:58
  Oh okay, I feel like he opped out because he was winning,
• 1:12:00
  and then he got back in because the wrong person was winning when he wasn't
• 1:12:04
  in the race, right, and that was that was just manipulation. The
• 1:12:11
  whole thing was fake. Yeah, all right, Well, thanks for the
• 1:12:15
  super chats and the super chow. Nothing from Rumble, but I am watching.
• 1:12:20
  Let's move on to the next story. So we're gonna be talking about
• 1:12:25
  think tanks. Apparently, the Progressive Policy Institute Progressive that should be a bit
• 1:12:32
  of a red flag or gigantic alarm, a center left leaning nonprofit organization,
• 1:12:39
  released a policy paper that recommends prioritizing vocational career training. The brief says that
• 1:12:44
  quote, it is time, it is time for our education system to undergo
• 1:12:48
  much needed reform and finally reinvent high schools and quote the institute calls for funding
• 1:12:55
  for students who want to focus on career learning. President Jen Robinson of the
• 1:13:00
  James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal said that quote for too long,
• 1:13:04
  our policies and culture have promoted university education at the expense of career and technical
• 1:13:10
  education. And quote wait, wait, correct me if I'm wrong, But
• 1:13:13
  this is this is good news so far? Right? Yes, I'm not.
• 1:13:16
  I'm not used to reading something that translates is good news, especially context
• 1:13:23
  or a non academic context as it were. It's just it's just hard to
• 1:13:29
  compute one paph. The paper points out that there is funding for vocational education
• 1:13:36
  in high schools, however, that vocational education tends to receive less funding than
• 1:13:41
  college prep education. The paper highlights that Modern Apprenticeships in Indiana is a quote
• 1:13:46
  two to three year program designed to prepare Central Indiana high school students for the
• 1:13:51
  workforce with paid, hands on experience that complements their traditional coursework. Apprentices start
• 1:13:58
  in their junior year and pursue jobs in growing fields such as business, advanced
• 1:14:01
  manufacturing, and information technology. They can continue on to a college degree or
• 1:14:06
  jump right into the workforce. And quote, I have to wonder if the
• 1:14:13
  zoomer generation even knows what an apprenticeship is, because it an apprenticeship is specifically
• 1:14:23
  designed for someone who knows or at least has a good idea what they want
• 1:14:27
  to do in life. They know what kind of trade on which they wish
• 1:14:31
  to embark. It's relatively inexpensive, it only takes a couple of years,
• 1:14:36
  and it sets you up for life in an essential career like like electrician electrician,
• 1:14:43
  or plumber, mechanic or it guy whatever. If only more young people
• 1:14:48
  could find and be satisfied with such a niche that early in life, they
• 1:14:55
  would greatly benefit from it, as would everyone else, except, of course,
• 1:15:00
  the government and the universities. They oversee the problem. The problem with
• 1:15:08
  the university courses, I mean, among many other problems, it's not just
• 1:15:13
  that they're that they're extortionately expensive. Is that it's that they don't actually prepare
• 1:15:17
  you for a real job. In the majority of cases, especially the faculty
• 1:15:24
  of Arts as they call it. That old adage that goes, it's not
• 1:15:30
  it's not what you know, it's who you know. Mostly applies to the
• 1:15:35
  arts. If you if you want to be an actor or a musician,
• 1:15:40
  or a visual artist or a basket weaver or whatever, the best, the
• 1:15:45
  best qualification you can ask for is a four leaf clover and a rabbit's foot,
• 1:15:51
  because every success story in those fields comes down to either a chance encounter
• 1:16:00
  where you're in the right place at the right time, or you happen to
• 1:16:03
  already have contacts through friends and family who will give you a contract through the
• 1:16:11
  inevitable nepotism, and from there you can try and keep the ball rolling.
• 1:16:17
  Only at that point does hard work actually come into it. No One,
• 1:16:21
  absolutely no one gives the first shit whether whether you have a degree or not.
• 1:16:29
  If if you're going to university to study the arts, you are being
• 1:16:34
  conned. Sorry, but it's true. The best, the best you can
• 1:16:40
  hope for, is that the university itself and in the institution of the people
• 1:16:45
  around you, will be the place in which you make those necessary contacts.
• 1:16:49
  If you're the kind of introvert who just puts their head down against the work
• 1:16:54
  done and never actually networks with anyone, you will have exactly nothing to show
• 1:17:00
  from a university degree. It's just a highly expensive way of transitioning from your
• 1:17:06
  parents' house to the real world. And even that's not going to necessarily going
• 1:17:13
  to work out the way you wanted it to. Be honest, it might
• 1:17:16
  even be a similar grift with regard to the faculty of science. How how
• 1:17:23
  likely is it that a degree in chemistry will land you a high paying job
• 1:17:28
  in a laboratory in Wuhan, for example. I'm not I'm not I'm not.
• 1:17:33
  I'm not saying it doesn't happen. It's probably, It's probably close to
• 1:17:39
  the only way it can happen. But what would what would we see if
• 1:17:43
  we weighed the success stories against the failure stories, not just those who dropped
• 1:17:47
  out because they couldn't hack it, but those who passed with flying colors and
• 1:17:53
  still didn't get a good job out of it. Let's face it, there
• 1:17:58
  aren't many professional chemists. I mean, relatively speaking, there aren't many professional
• 1:18:03
  marine biologists, or astronomers or theoretical physicists. There are probably more qualified scientists
• 1:18:13
  working in McDonald's than there are in scientific facilities. But I can speak to
• 1:18:19
  this. I dated a PhD chemist, and they they wait in between jobs
• 1:18:25
  for a head hunter to come find them and you know, put their put
• 1:18:29
  their card out, and that's it. Like you do a job for a
• 1:18:33
  while and then you're you finished that job. And when you finish that job,
• 1:18:38
  you don't have a job. Yeah, Like that's so yeah, But
• 1:18:43
  like they're contractors. In every town, in every village, in every small
• 1:18:48
  borough of a large city, there are tradesmen. Yeah, electricians, plumbers,
• 1:18:56
  mechanics, the people you call out whenever something in your house explodes or
• 1:19:02
  randomly stops working. And to bring it back to subjects relevant to our interests
• 1:19:10
  here at Honeybedger Radio, those people are almost always men. As as men,
• 1:19:15
  you will be valued as a tradesman. On quite the other hand,
• 1:19:21
  you will not be valued. At university. You will be called You will
• 1:19:26
  be called an oppressor and a rapist and a patriarchal enemy whose human rights may
• 1:19:32
  not are not allowed to be discussed anywhere on campus except in the context of
• 1:19:39
  reducing those human rights. You will be lucky if you make it out of
• 1:19:42
  there with your human rights intact, let alone, with your mental health intact,
• 1:19:46
  Let alone with a good job to show for it. Don't do it,
• 1:19:51
  lads, leave the eighteen year old woman child degenerate owes to populate the
• 1:19:59
  university's by themselves. I will see how long they lost. In short,
• 1:20:03
  if you want to abolish student debt, it's like playing a game of tech
• 1:20:10
  tecte or thermonuclear war. The only way to win is not to play.
• 1:20:17
  That's true. I just wanted to say that I think this is good news
• 1:20:20
  everyone that they're doing that. I think apprenticeships are a super good idea.
• 1:20:27
  I was. I was advocating for them when I was in college. That
• 1:20:30
  I mean, at least in Chicago where I was going to school, nothing
• 1:20:34
  like that existed. And as an artist, especially if you're like in the
• 1:20:39
  arts, apprenticeships are the best way to learn. Like a lot of the
• 1:20:42
  great artists they learned under you know, other people that they worked with.
• 1:20:46
  I think that is amazing, Like this should definitely be be pursued, and
• 1:20:54
  I will. I will also couple that with the need for more people in
• 1:20:58
  the trades because these office jobs that women are mostly women. Because that's what's
• 1:21:02
  happening. Women are going into university, they're graduating with their bachelors or their
• 1:21:06
  masters or even their doctorate, and they're getting a job one hundred thousand dollars
• 1:21:12
  in debt in an office, in a cubicle, you know, entering data,
• 1:21:16
  and those jobs are gonna go away because AI is going to replace all
• 1:21:20
  of those women's jobs. But AI is not going to replace plumbing and the
• 1:21:27
  trades, carpentry, you know, mechanics, mechanical repair, or even like
• 1:21:31
  engineering or whatever. But if it's just like putting numbers in or letters in
• 1:21:35
  or whatever, I think that a lot of women, a lot of women
• 1:21:39
  are going to lose their jobs and it's going to be an issue of misogyny,
• 1:21:43
  of course, but we'll wait and see. But that I think that
• 1:21:45
  this is a good thing. That's all I would say. Like, I
• 1:21:49
  hope that this becomes a trend. I hope more people men or women get
• 1:21:56
  involved with this because I think it's good for women too, but I think
• 1:21:59
  mostly men are going to do it. And yeah, I mean I think
• 1:22:02
  that this could be a good thing. So that's all I wanted to say
• 1:22:05
  about that. Yeah, one of the reasons that I actually put this in
• 1:22:11
  our chat is because it was specifically a left leaning think tank, and you
• 1:22:15
  know, the right has been talking about this for like eight years, nine
• 1:22:19
  years out there, but like we've talked about this on HBr talk a couple
• 1:22:26
  of times because the right was talking about it already, and you know,
• 1:22:30
  we've we've had we've had quite a bit of discussion about the fact that there's
• 1:22:36
  been a shortage in these in the trades for quite a long time. There's
• 1:22:43
  been an issue of you can't find like HVAC for instance, you cannot find
• 1:22:49
  workers in that area. And it's such an emergency that there's already been initiatives
• 1:22:56
  to try to get people involved. And similarly, it's hard to find carpenters
• 1:23:00
  and electricians. Um, nobody's going into those and especially you know, the
• 1:23:06
  younger generation. They they seem to not view those as modern job prospects,
• 1:23:14
  like, oh, people used to be carpenters, but now we build everything
• 1:23:16
  out of metal and plastic, so who needs carpenters. Well, actually,
• 1:23:21
  we build a lot of things out of wood. We we use carpentry quite
• 1:23:26
  a bit. There's quite a bit of work for carpenters and it's it's fairly
• 1:23:30
  lucrative. Um, so it's something that's worth doing. But the left hasn't
• 1:23:34
  been talking about that. They've been encouraging people to get into coding. They've
• 1:23:39
  been encouraging people to a variety of other things they've been and and that that
• 1:23:45
  has uh sort of sort of led to an influx of highly spoon fed,
• 1:23:53
  very uneducated, honestly um young people that they think they know all kinds of
• 1:24:01
  stuff, but in reality they're really just brainwashed and they end up making decisions
• 1:24:09
  based on that brainwashing that have been very bad for society. Right, So
• 1:24:13
  that's one thing. Yeah. The other the other thing that I wanted to
• 1:24:15
  talk about with regard to this is the money. All right, So as
• 1:24:18
  soon as there's money in something like this, this is where we MRA's that
• 1:24:27
  feel like, well, you know, we're spending our wheels because we're not
• 1:24:29
  doing anything. All right, watch this be vigilant in regard to this.
• 1:24:33
  Pay attention because now that there's money, now that there's there's funding being advocated
• 1:24:42
  for the women's organizations are going to come in and try to hang up the
• 1:24:45
  real curtains place over and kick the men out. Right. Oh well,
• 1:24:48
  yes, we do need support for vocational education for women. We need we
• 1:24:56
  need to direct all of these programs to to girls in getting more girls into
• 1:25:02
  carpentery, getting more girls into electrician school, getting more girls into apprenticeships,
• 1:25:09
  no, we don't. We just need to get more people involved. There
• 1:25:15
  doesn't have to be anything gender specific. Being a girl shouldn't keep you from
• 1:25:19
  going into this. Being a girl shouldn't keep your program from being funded,
• 1:25:26
  But it shouldn't be the reason it gets funded, and it shouldn't be the
• 1:25:30
  reason that you're encouraged either, right. It just should be no factor at
• 1:25:34
  all, none in this. And that that is what mrs need to watch
• 1:25:42
  for and advocate for. Is this needs to be genderless, all right,
• 1:25:45
  And if it happens to be dominated by boys, it's because boys have more
• 1:25:49
  interest in it. And if the funding happens to go to programs that end
• 1:25:55
  up dominated by boys, as long as they are not excluding women and girls
• 1:26:00
  in their in their rules for how they're they're they're being administrated like, then
• 1:26:11
  there there's no discrimination taking place none. Right. So that's that's going to
• 1:26:16
  be our job. That's that's UM and that's something that you should be aware
• 1:26:21
  of in every area. But this is this is a new one. So
• 1:26:27
  I do think this is good news. It's great news, and I think
• 1:26:30
  it should happen in more places. It's great that it's you know, you're
• 1:26:33
  seeing UM apprenticeships in Indiana, you know, going up. I'd love to
• 1:26:40
  see the same thing happen here in Ohio. I'd love to see the same
• 1:26:43
  thing happen all over uh, the United States. Probably the same problem is
• 1:26:46
  happening in Canada, and the same types of programs need to happen in Canada.
• 1:26:51
  Just don't let feminists take them over. Very important. Don't let them
• 1:26:56
  do it. Remain vigilant um. Okay, So we're gonna move on unless
• 1:27:01
  somebody else wants to say anything about this. I think it's good news.
• 1:27:06
  So if you guys want, let us know what you guys think about this
• 1:27:10
  in the comments, and we're gonna move on to the final story. Okay.
• 1:27:15
  So I don't get any any football fans in the audience. So the
• 1:27:20
  Buffalo Bills, we've heard of them. There's a there's a punter named Mattia.
• 1:27:29
  He was released from the NFL and the Buffalo Bills team last year after
• 1:27:33
  a lawsuit was filed accusing him of raping a then seventeen year old girl.
• 1:27:40
  Prosecutor said the former Buffalo Bills punter was not present when the alleged gang rape
• 1:27:45
  occurred at in October twenty twenty one party according to witness testimony. The San
• 1:27:49
  Diego District Attorney has decided to not press charges against Araiza. The lawsuit accused
• 1:27:57
  Ariza, who was twenty one at the time, of leading the seventeen year
• 1:28:00
  old girl to the side of the house and getting her to perform oral sex
• 1:28:03
  on him before they had sexual intercourse. As cited by ESPN, The lawsuit
• 1:28:09
  claims Ariza then took her inside the home where at least three other men,
• 1:28:13
  including the other two defendants named in the suit, former AZTECS teammates Xavier Leonard
• 1:28:18
  and Nolan Iwallaco, were located, and that she was repeatedly raped for about
• 1:28:25
  one and a half hours. This is the claim. Wait wait, wait,
• 1:28:28
  wait, wait an hour and a half yeah, even even between three
• 1:28:32
  guys. Did you have got to have some kind of technique. Surely the
• 1:28:39
  whole idea of raping someone is to come and these guys went for an hour
• 1:28:44
  and a half even between three of them were players. Presumably if you're a
• 1:28:48
  rapist, they are football players. Well, even for a rapists, then
• 1:28:56
  rapist your fetish. These guys were indulging in the fet and they still manage
• 1:29:00
  to keep, you know, keep the horses at bay for an hour and
• 1:29:04
  a half. A lot of goes would kill for the opportunity to experience that
• 1:29:08
  kind of ton trick. How do they do it? Do they use that
• 1:29:11
  trick of think on sexy thoughts so they could go for longer, like think
• 1:29:15
  of Grandma or something. I'm gonna stop talking now. I never gonna know
• 1:29:18
  because it didn't happen. Yeah, that's that's the point. It like when
• 1:29:24
  you make stuff up like that, when you make up the story, you
• 1:29:28
  can add details are totally not realistic and believable. Um, and it I
• 1:29:36
  I there's a lot of things I could say. I'm not done with the
• 1:29:40
  right I'm not done with the right up yet. But there is something,
• 1:29:43
  there is some important data here. So videos recorded from the party were taken
• 1:29:47
  from those engaging in the acts. So there was sex, and she did
• 1:29:51
  have sex with like three dudes or more or more could have been the whole
• 1:29:56
  defensive line. Um, because they had it on they had video. Now
• 1:30:01
  we didn't get to see it, but but the judge did. He unsealed
• 1:30:05
  them for the trial. Apparently the video clips did not show her pass out.
• 1:30:10
  I doubted, and that she instead was actively participating in the encounters and
• 1:30:15
  appeared to know at some point she was being videotaped. The clips did not
• 1:30:18
  show evidence of her being forced. In an interview with USA Today's Sports,
• 1:30:24
  the woman emphasized that she was intoxicated to the point of not being able to
• 1:30:28
  consent sex, but a witness said she was approaching man at the party asking
• 1:30:31
  to have sex with them. At least two witnesses at the party allegedly heard
• 1:30:34
  the girls say she was eighteen, while others said that they did not recall
• 1:30:39
  her age coming up, so she According to witnesses, she claimed to be
• 1:30:44
  legal and she was proposing to have sex with whoever right while sex with a
• 1:30:53
  woman that night, he never went inside the house arises story and video evidence
• 1:30:58
  contradicts the woman's claim. In the lawsuit, all three accused men deny the
• 1:31:01
  allegations and say that any contact with the team was consensual and she lied.
• 1:31:08
  You think your consent is your own property? Oh oh, you Paul naive
• 1:31:14
  fool, No, your consent belongs to the state. The state will decide
• 1:31:18
  whether you consent it or not. As for the men's consent, fuck,
• 1:31:24
  it doesn't matter how drunk they were, um that they were interesting to her
• 1:31:28
  tight end. Yeah, their freedom belongs to the state. We will decide
• 1:31:33
  on all of your behalf what happened here? Fuck all of y'all that she
• 1:31:42
  You know, apparently teenagers in California are much much slower at progressing toward adulthood
• 1:31:54
  than teenagers in the Yeah, they mature less quickly. You can tell because
• 1:32:01
  their age of consent is eighteen, whereas here in Ohio, I could consent
• 1:32:08
  at sixteen to the same things that they would call rape in California just because
• 1:32:15
  of my age if I was sixteen, very very interesting difference in cultures there.
• 1:32:20
  Apparently California takes longer for it's parenting, you know, of the people
• 1:32:30
  that live in California, Like apparently the parents in California just aren't good enough
• 1:32:34
  to get their kids through the process of emotional, intellectual, and psychological metiration
• 1:32:45
  to to keep up with the kids from Ohio. We are, we are
• 1:32:48
  smarter than Californians, obviously. But she was seventeen years, three hundred and
• 1:32:55
  sixty four days, twenty three hours, fifty nine minutes and fifty nine seconds
• 1:32:59
  old. Six Fuck yeah, well that's just that's just it. Like this,
• 1:33:04
  this blows my mind, something that we do in the United States that
• 1:33:09
  just is it makes no sense. I mean, I can understand there being
• 1:33:13
  a difference in age of consent between say a Western nation with a culture that
• 1:33:19
  m has sort of establishes through the education system that at a certain age you're
• 1:33:27
  old enough to drive, and at a certain age you're old enough to to
• 1:33:30
  sign up for the military. Because you can sign up for the military before
• 1:33:34
  your eighteenth birthday, you just can't go to boot camp until you're eighteen,
• 1:33:39
  uh, you know, and that's been that way for a long time.
• 1:33:42
  Um, but you you know, you can't in some states, you can
• 1:33:46
  sign up for the military, make a decision that would possibly send you to
• 1:33:53
  war, and make it that decision knowing it could possibly put you in a
• 1:33:58
  position to go into combat. Um. But but you can't have sex.
• 1:34:02
  And somebody else that is your age that has sex with you could be considered
• 1:34:06
  a rapist even if they can't have sex. Like That's that's how our system
• 1:34:13
  is. And and of course also like in Ohio, you know, when
• 1:34:19
  I was sixteen, I could consent to any kind of sexual activity an adult
• 1:34:25
  could consent to. But if I allowed photographs to be taken of it or
• 1:34:30
  video to be taken of it, that could be considered child porn. And
• 1:34:34
  if I participated in the creation of it, I would be guilty of creating
• 1:34:40
  child porn. That's that's the law in a while. So I could couldn't
• 1:34:45
  document my activities, but I could engage in them because I'm old enough to
• 1:34:49
  consent to engage in them. But yeah, it's still child porn. Like
• 1:34:54
  it's our laws are so fucked up on this. If you can present proof
• 1:34:58
  that you were raped, then you would be legible for another crime. And
• 1:35:04
  it's actually woman, she was seventeen, right, right, And legally that
• 1:35:10
  brings up questions. Yeah, a prosecutor could if they chose to, the
• 1:35:15
  prosecutor could go after the people who got that video. And the other thing
• 1:35:19
  about this is as seventeen year old can approach people for sex and get consent
• 1:35:27
  from those people from adults from an eighteen year old. Actually they can be
• 1:35:32
  three weeks apart in age and one is still seventeen and the other is eighteen,
• 1:35:39
  and she can approach him for sex, or he can approach her for
• 1:35:41
  sex if he's the seventeen year old, and the eighteen year old will be
• 1:35:45
  considered a rapist, and any documentation, video or photo documentation of the act
• 1:35:50
  will be considered child porn, and they can both be prosecuted for child porn.
• 1:35:57
  Even if the seventeen year old says I can scented, it still can
• 1:36:01
  be considered rape. The parents can press charges and the eighteen year old is
• 1:36:05
  sol's like, that's that's our laws in the United States. It's really fucked
• 1:36:10
  up, and it's it's treated the same as the reprehensible act of a fifty
• 1:36:15
  year old taking advantage of a thirteen year old who has not matured enough to
• 1:36:21
  understand all of the implications and injuries that can take place with regard like mental
• 1:36:29
  injuries that can take place with regard to engaging in a sex act and then
• 1:36:33
  experiencing abandonment, right, which is what happens with pedophiles. They always abandoned
• 1:36:41
  their victim when their victim passes their age of attraction, like that's it,
• 1:36:45
  You're done, You're not a person to them anymore. And it doesn't matter
• 1:36:54
  that the act shouldn't have happened. I could tell you, it still hurts
• 1:36:59
  to be abandoned, and when by your abuser. When a twenty nine year
• 1:37:03
  old female teacher has sex with a thirty old male student. Yeah, and
• 1:37:13
  in certain states, and indeed in certain nations, it does count as rape.
• 1:37:17
  So you would hope the media would report on it as such rather than
• 1:37:23
  saying, twenty nine year old teacher seduces a thirteen year old male student.
• 1:37:30
  Nice and so on and so forth. Yeah, like it, like it's
• 1:37:35
  The first step is to be able to charge them with rape. The second
• 1:37:40
  step is for the media to actually call it what it is, rather than
• 1:37:45
  present it as some kind of sex scandal. Well, well, and they
• 1:37:50
  see that's the other thing. You know. You have this situation where the
• 1:37:57
  convoluted differences in our laws make it make the situation confusing for everyone involved.
• 1:38:04
  You have the situation where a young person can want something that is bad for
• 1:38:11
  them, and then an older person is responsible for making sure that they don't
• 1:38:18
  they don't get um injured by the thing they want that is bad for them,
• 1:38:25
  and the young person is not responsible for seeking it. And then you
• 1:38:29
  have this situation where exploitation can take place and nobody does anything about it or
• 1:38:33
  cares because the person doing the exploiting was female. Like, when are we
• 1:38:39
  gonna straighten all this shit out h So we gotta move, we gotta end
• 1:38:45
  the show. But I just want to say that, unfortunately, even though
• 1:38:51
  this guy was cleared because he wasn't actually there, so apparently one of the
• 1:38:55
  dudes that was running a train on her, she either mistaken for this guy
• 1:39:00
  or she just wanted to like get this guy in trouble. But um so
• 1:39:04
  the false allegation was proven to be false. But this guy still lost his
• 1:39:10
  He lost his job as an athlete because of the press. So I think
• 1:39:14
  for me, that's the most important takeaway. I mean, we could certainly
• 1:39:17
  tell jokes about what happened and like, and I did, and when I
• 1:39:23
  learned about it, I talked with Lindsay, my wife, and I was
• 1:39:26
  like, I don't see how any man would want to be around other men
• 1:39:30
  banging the same chick. But there's that that just does not appeal to me.
• 1:39:34
  I just don't get it. I don't get it. So anyway,
• 1:39:40
  let us know. We guess say about the story in the comments. Whatever
• 1:39:42
  it is, your thoughts are put it in the comment section, and references
• 1:39:46
  to all of the stories we cover today are in the description under the link
• 1:39:51
  to our patreon, which is a link you can all access even if you're
• 1:39:55
  not patrons, but please consider becoming a patron by joining on Patreon or at
• 1:40:01
  fee The badge of dot com. So I want to thank you guys for
• 1:40:05
  coming on today's episode of HBr News. If you guys liked this video,
• 1:40:10
  please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the bell for
• 1:40:13
  notifications, leave us a comment, let us alway you guys think about what
• 1:40:15
  we discussed on the show today, and please please please share this video because
• 1:40:19
  sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode of
• 1:40:23
  HBr News, and we will talk to you all in the next video.