Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / Trump Indictment Is Garbage - Understand The Facts & Law To Know Why This Is a Brazen Political Persecution

Transcript

Trump Indictment Is Garbage - Understand The Facts & Law To Know Why This Is a Brazen Political Persecution · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

0:02
Speaker 1: Welcome at his verdict to a Senator Ted Cruz ben
0:04
Speaker 1: Ferguson with you. And on March the eighteenth of former
0:07
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump announced via True Social that he quote
0:13
Speaker 1: will be arrested on Tuesday of this coming week. Now
0:16
Speaker 1: protests take our nation back. A spokesman for President Trump
0:21
Speaker 1: stated that the former president has not received a notification
0:25
Speaker 1: from the Manhattan District Attorney's office regarding any potential indictment,
0:29
Speaker 1: and his post was highlighting his innocence. Senator President Trump saying, Hey,
0:35
Speaker 1: this is coming, be ready for it, be ready to protest.
0:39
Speaker 1: Let's talk about what he could be indicted for and
0:43
Speaker 1: how we got to this point with an activist da
0:46
Speaker 1: in New York. Well, let me say several things. Number One, obviously,
0:51
Speaker 1: this is a big damn deal. If the former president
0:54
Speaker 1: of the United States is arrested tomorrow, that is historic.
0:58
Speaker 1: It has never happened in the history of our nation
1:00
Speaker 1: that a former president of the United States has been arrested.
1:04
Speaker 1: Number Two, the case from the Manhattan District Attorney, if
1:08
Speaker 1: they bring an indictment and charge him, is utter and
1:12
Speaker 1: complete crap. Actually, as groundskeeper Willie would put it on
1:16
Speaker 1: The Simpsons, it's crap. I tell you it's crap. It
1:20
Speaker 1: is flimsy, it is weak, It has been rejected by
1:24
Speaker 1: prosecutor after prosecutor after prosecutor, and it is obviously political
1:30
Speaker 1: retribution and a political persecution. Number three, if this case
1:38
Speaker 1: is brought to the jury and the prosecutor loses, the
1:43
Speaker 1: richest irony of everything is it may be left wing
1:48
Speaker 1: Sorrows funded Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg more than anyone else
1:54
Speaker 1: who will have reelected Donald Trump as President of the
1:58
Speaker 1: United States. Because this is if you want to talk
2:02
Speaker 1: about how to unify Republicans behind Donald Trump in the primary,
2:07
Speaker 1: having an unhinged left wing prosecution, complete with perhaps a
2:13
Speaker 1: perp walk for the cameras, that ends up being thrown
2:17
Speaker 1: out and ends in failure could be the single biggest
2:21
Speaker 1: in kind gift to the Donald Trump campaign of this
2:25
Speaker 1: entire cycle. What's before we get into politics of this.
2:28
Speaker 1: I want to get to people so they understand who
2:31
Speaker 1: this district attorney is. This is a George Soros back
2:34
Speaker 1: district attorney. This is an activist DA and as you mentioned,
2:38
Speaker 1: no one else was willing to do this, but I
2:40
Speaker 1: guess this is how he gets campaign contributions. Well, unfortunately,
2:45
Speaker 1: that's right. Alvin Bragg is the District Attorney in Manhattan.
2:50
Speaker 1: He is newly elected. He was supported by more than
2:55
Speaker 1: a million dollars from George Soros. That's how he got elected.
3:00
Speaker 1: And one of the very first things he's done is
3:04
Speaker 1: dramatically reduced the prosecution of violent crime in New York.
3:10
Speaker 1: Accorded to The Daily Mail, in November of twenty twenty two,
3:13
Speaker 1: Manhattan Districttorney Alvin Bragg downgraded fifty two percent of felony
3:19
Speaker 1: cases to misdemeanors, compared to thirty nine percent in all
3:24
Speaker 1: of twenty nineteen. According to new data, by the way,
3:27
Speaker 1: Bragg's convention conviction rate, even after downgrading the cases, its
3:31
Speaker 1: conviction rate is fifty one percent. Barely half the cases
3:36
Speaker 1: his lawyers bring to trial get convicted. That's down from
3:39
Speaker 1: sixty eight percent in twenty nineteen. That is shockingly bad
3:43
Speaker 1: for a DA's office to have a conviction rate of
3:46
Speaker 1: fifty one percent, And if you compare it, his predecessor
3:52
Speaker 1: was Cyrus Vance Junior, another left wing Democrat DA. Between
3:58
Speaker 1: twenty thirteen and twenty twenty, former DA Cyrus Vans Junior
4:04
Speaker 1: never exceeded forty percent in the percentage of cases downgraded
4:09
Speaker 1: from felony to misdemeanor. Alvin Bragg has already gone up
4:12
Speaker 1: to fifty two percent. And he campaigned on the promise
4:17
Speaker 1: of criminal justice reform, which in George Soros world means
4:22
Speaker 1: letting violent criminals go. Now here's the irony. This da
4:26
Speaker 1: comes into office and he sets his hallmark of if
4:29
Speaker 1: you're a violent criminal, if you assault someone, we're going
4:32
Speaker 1: to downgrade your crime from a felony to a misdemeanor.
4:35
Speaker 1: We're going to release you. We're going to let you
4:37
Speaker 1: commit yet more violent crimes in Manhattan. The irony is
4:42
Speaker 1: the legal theory that he is pursuing against Donald Trump,
4:46
Speaker 1: in all likelihood will be an incredibly aggressive legal theory
4:50
Speaker 1: based on going the other way, on taking a misdemeanor
4:53
Speaker 1: and elevating it to a felony. And nobody is confused
4:59
Speaker 1: as to why he is doing this. He is doing
5:00
Speaker 1: this because he's a partisan Democrat and he hates Donald Trump.
5:04
Speaker 1: Now he has a right to hate Donald Trump, but
5:06
Speaker 1: he doesn't have a right to abuse and corrupt the
5:10
Speaker 1: justice system to persecute his political opponents, and that, sadly
5:14
Speaker 1: is exactly what he's doing here. You talk about this
5:18
Speaker 1: persecution of your political opponents, and this goes back to
5:23
Speaker 1: what you warned about and spend a lot of time
5:25
Speaker 1: actually working on in your last book, Justice Corrupted, How
5:31
Speaker 1: the Left weaponized our legal system. Now, you started this
5:35
Speaker 1: book back in January last year. It came out in October.
5:39
Speaker 1: This book, in your mindset more than a year ago,
5:43
Speaker 1: was the worry that the left had gained control of
5:48
Speaker 1: our legal system and then was going to weaponize our
5:52
Speaker 1: legal system to take out political opponents. Now, George Soros
5:56
Speaker 1: has been funding this. He has done a damn good job,
6:00
Speaker 1: given credit of basically turning upside down district attorney's offices
6:05
Speaker 1: all over the country and using them for criminal criminal
6:12
Speaker 1: justice reform, bail reform, jail reform, and defund the police
6:17
Speaker 1: or drive the police in saying the other thing that's
6:19
Speaker 1: done is it's then also allowed for them to weaponize
6:22
Speaker 1: and go after political opponents. Now, your entire book was
6:25
Speaker 1: basically warning America about this. You saw this coming, and
6:30
Speaker 1: you realize that they were putting the pieces of this
6:33
Speaker 1: puzzle together. And here we are now with a president
6:36
Speaker 1: of the United's America that may have a mud shot
6:38
Speaker 1: this week. Well, Unfortunately I did see this coming. You
6:41
Speaker 1: write the book. I spent much of last year writing
6:43
Speaker 1: the book. It came out in October, and it goes
6:46
Speaker 1: into depth on how the left is weaponizing our legal system.
6:50
Speaker 1: There's an entire chapter on George Soros. DA's on the
6:54
Speaker 1: millions of dollars that Soros has spent putting radicals in
6:57
Speaker 1: the position of district attorney. District attorney race has used
7:00
Speaker 1: to be sleepy races, typically between people who are both prosecutors,
7:05
Speaker 1: who are both campaigning on we're gonna lock up the
7:07
Speaker 1: bad guys, We're gonna put violent criminals in jail, and
7:09
Speaker 1: you'd have a back and forth on competence, often without
7:12
Speaker 1: a whole lot of partisanship. Soros has invested tens of
7:16
Speaker 1: millions of dollars in putting radicals people like Alvin Bragg
7:20
Speaker 1: in this position because he understands power. I will give
7:24
Speaker 1: Soros credit. He has found the weak points in our
7:28
Speaker 1: democracy and our rule of law, and he has devoted
7:31
Speaker 1: millions of dollars to attacking those weak points, which have
7:35
Speaker 1: been having tremendous negative effect. And so there's an entire
7:39
Speaker 1: chapter Injustice Corrupted that explains what specifically the Soros DA's
7:44
Speaker 1: are doing. There's also an entire chapter that goes through
7:47
Speaker 1: Crossfire Hurricane, how the Department of Justice and the FBI
7:51
Speaker 1: were weaponized against Donald Trump, were used to attack the
7:56
Speaker 1: person who was then the Republican nominee to be president,
7:59
Speaker 1: and then once he became president, the hardcore partisans that
8:02
Speaker 1: had burrowed into dj and the FBI continued that witch
8:06
Speaker 1: hunt against him. And the book details that at great length.
8:10
Speaker 1: And so I would encourage you if you want to
8:12
Speaker 1: understand what is going on right now with the Biden
8:15
Speaker 1: DOJ and this George Soros prosecutor targeting Trump, go by
8:21
Speaker 1: the book Justice Corrupted. It just came out a couple
8:24
Speaker 1: of months ago, and it walks you through the details
8:27
Speaker 1: of what happened. I want to get into the play
8:31
Speaker 1: by play of if in fact the president is indicted,
8:34
Speaker 1: how does that go through the process, How will he
8:38
Speaker 1: be arraigned, will there be mug shots? How all that
8:40
Speaker 1: happens for people so they understand how this could play
8:43
Speaker 1: out with him saying I'm going to be arrested. That's
8:45
Speaker 1: the president's words, former President Donald Trump's words. Before I
8:48
Speaker 1: get to that, though, I want to talk to you
8:49
Speaker 1: about Augusts of Precious Metals. You've seen what's been happening
8:53
Speaker 1: with banks, You've seen what's been happening on Wall Street
8:55
Speaker 1: just over the last couple of weeks. This is exactly
8:58
Speaker 1: why I've been telling you about August of Press Metals.
9:01
Speaker 1: If you want to protect your hard earned dollars, especially
9:04
Speaker 1: if you're close to retirement or in retirement, you understand
9:08
Speaker 1: protecting your money is what you're focused on. That is
9:12
Speaker 1: what a Gust of Precious Metals can help you do.
9:15
Speaker 1: I'm excited to tell you about a company not only
9:16
Speaker 1: did I trust, but also that I use. A Gust
9:20
Speaker 1: of Precious Metals is different. They will even tell you
9:23
Speaker 1: if a gold IRA isn't your answer. Now, A gust
9:26
Speaker 1: of Precious Meals is all about protecting your iras, your
9:29
Speaker 1: four oh one ks in this crazy economic time that
9:32
Speaker 1: we're in right now. And if you are close to
9:35
Speaker 1: retirement or in retirement, you know there is no time
9:38
Speaker 1: to make up losses. So if you've saved a hundred
9:41
Speaker 1: thousand dollars or more, take a look at their free
9:43
Speaker 1: guide and most importantly, sign up for their live free
9:48
Speaker 1: web conference. Both are filled with economic insights and gold
9:52
Speaker 1: IRA info. For your peace of mind, call a Gusts
9:55
Speaker 1: of Precious Metals eight seven seven the number four gold
9:59
Speaker 1: Ira eight seven seven four gold Ira, or visit August
10:03
Speaker 1: of Precious Metals dot com. Say that I've sent you
10:07
Speaker 1: Ben and they'll pay your fees up to ten years
10:09
Speaker 1: at a gust of Precious Medals dot com or eight
10:12
Speaker 1: seven seven four gold Ira. So I want to go
10:15
Speaker 1: back to the performer President Trump's tweet Senator and he says, look,
10:20
Speaker 1: I'm going to be arrested. This is going to happen.
10:23
Speaker 1: If this does happen, is there a very I mean,
10:27
Speaker 1: is there gonna be a mug shot of Donald Trump?
10:31
Speaker 1: And is that going to be victory for the Democrats?
10:34
Speaker 1: And how does this go? How does this happen? How
10:37
Speaker 1: are his attorney's brought into this to tell people how
10:39
Speaker 1: this will play out legally? So presumably there will be
10:42
Speaker 1: a mug shot if he is in fact arrested. There
10:44
Speaker 1: are a couple of ways they can do it. Typically,
10:47
Speaker 1: when you have an attorney who's represented by counsel and
10:50
Speaker 1: an arrest warrant is issued, you typically will give give
10:54
Speaker 1: that client the opportunity to turn himself in, particularly when
10:57
Speaker 1: the client is not a flight risk. We saw recently.
11:02
Speaker 1: In fact, I think last week's pod discussed how the
11:06
Speaker 1: bidendo J sent over twenty FBI agents to the house
11:10
Speaker 1: of Mark Hawk, who was a pro life activist. They
11:13
Speaker 1: showed up with body armor and helmets and machine guns
11:17
Speaker 1: and arrested him at the crack of dawn in front
11:19
Speaker 1: of his wife and seven children who were crying. That
11:22
Speaker 1: was utterly unnecessary in that instance. Mark Howk, his attorney
11:26
Speaker 1: had offered, Okay, if you're going to prosecute him, he'll
11:28
Speaker 1: turn himself in, and the BIDENDOJ said, now, now we
11:33
Speaker 1: want to come raide you. Likewise, we saw the FBI
11:38
Speaker 1: rated Mara Lago searching for documents. There was a sharp contrast,
11:42
Speaker 1: a double standard between how they rated Mara Lago searching
11:45
Speaker 1: for documents, but they were perfectly happy to let Joe
11:48
Speaker 1: Biden's attorneys turn over one set of classified documents after
11:52
Speaker 1: another after another after another, because this is political and
11:56
Speaker 1: partisan justice. In any sane world, if they should arrest warrant,
12:01
Speaker 1: they will allow Trump to turn himself in and they
12:05
Speaker 1: won't actually try to forcibly arrest him. I think that's likely.
12:09
Speaker 1: But if there is an arrest, there presumably will be
12:12
Speaker 1: a mug shot. There is an entire canon of politician
12:20
Speaker 1: mug shots. Unfortunately, we've seen politicized prosecutions before. There is
12:26
Speaker 1: a question about does the politicians smile or not. You know,
12:31
Speaker 1: you may remember Tom Delay when when he was indicted.
12:33
Speaker 1: You may remember Rick Perry when he was indicted, and
12:37
Speaker 1: smiling is one thing. It leads to kind of a
12:39
Speaker 1: strange mug shot. When you have a picture of someone
12:43
Speaker 1: in front of the hash marks for the different height
12:46
Speaker 1: levels and holding a little little placard with their name
12:50
Speaker 1: and number on it, and if they're smiling like a politician,
12:54
Speaker 1: it's it's often quite dissonant. I don't know how Trump
12:58
Speaker 1: will handle that. But will the media and the Democrats
13:00
Speaker 1: go crazy if there's a Trump mugshot? Of course they will.
13:05
Speaker 1: But at the end of the day, I think the
13:08
Speaker 1: image matters less than the facts in reality. And let
13:12
Speaker 1: me explain why this case is crap. So this all
13:16
Speaker 1: stems back to twenty sixteen, which was twenty sixteen was
13:19
Speaker 1: a long time ago. That was seven years ago. And
13:22
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, Trump allegedly paid one hundred and thirty
13:26
Speaker 1: thousand dollars to Stormy Daniels. Remember Stormy Daniels who was
13:30
Speaker 1: a stripper and porn star and allegedly had an affair
13:33
Speaker 1: with Trump. And the allegation is that Trump paid one
13:37
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty thousand dollars of hush money, basically paid
13:40
Speaker 1: her one hundred and thirty thousand dollars to keep quiet
13:43
Speaker 1: because in twenty sixteen he was running for president and
13:45
Speaker 1: he didn't want a bunch of stories about his affair
13:48
Speaker 1: with Stormy Daniels. The person who allegedly delivered the money
13:53
Speaker 1: was Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen was, of course Trump's personal lawyer.
13:58
Speaker 1: He was often involved in and pretty shady conduct. Michael
14:02
Speaker 1: Cohen himself has now served prison time. He has turned
14:06
Speaker 1: hard on Trump. He hates Trump. Michael Cohen is the
14:10
Speaker 1: chief witness for the prosecution in this instance. And look,
14:14
Speaker 1: as an ordinary matter, paying someone hush money is not
14:20
Speaker 1: typically illegal. You know, if you know, Ben, if you
14:24
Speaker 1: if you paid me a thousand bucks not to tweet
14:27
Speaker 1: out that I saw you mowing your lawn and a
14:29
Speaker 1: pink tutu last week, that was true, I would pay
14:34
Speaker 1: you more than a thousand dollars. But keep going, Look,
14:36
Speaker 1: that might be entirely understandable, and it might be two
14:39
Speaker 1: thousand to delete the photo I took on my iPhone
14:41
Speaker 1: of your doing so. But doing that is not illegal,
14:45
Speaker 1: like paying someone to do something, not to do something that,
14:48
Speaker 1: on the face of it is not illegal. So what
14:50
Speaker 1: is it that the DA is trying to say is illegal?
14:54
Speaker 1: And by the way, look, unfortunately people people in both
14:58
Speaker 1: parties ben and women have a they shouldn't affairs, destroy marriages,
15:03
Speaker 1: destroy lives. But this is not the first time that
15:06
Speaker 1: has happened in the history of the world. Paying an
15:11
Speaker 1: adulterous lover to keep quiet is something an awful lot
15:15
Speaker 1: of Democrats, an awful lot of Republicans have done. It's
15:18
Speaker 1: not good or writer moral, it is typically not illegal
15:22
Speaker 1: to do. So what is the Manhattan Day's theory here, Well,
15:25
Speaker 1: it's based on something called New York Penal Law one
15:29
Speaker 1: seventy five dot zero five. That is a statute that
15:32
Speaker 1: makes it a crime when an individual number one makes
15:36
Speaker 1: or causes a false entry in the business records of
15:39
Speaker 1: an enterprise, or two alters a races, obliterates, delete, removes,
15:43
Speaker 1: or destroys a true entry in the business records of
15:45
Speaker 1: an enterprise, or three omits to make a true entry
15:50
Speaker 1: in the business records of an enterprise in violation of
15:52
Speaker 1: a duty to do so which he knows to be
15:54
Speaker 1: imposed on him by law, or the nature of his position,
15:57
Speaker 1: or four prevents the making of a true trier causes
16:00
Speaker 1: the emission thereofs in the business records of an enterprise. Now,
16:03
Speaker 1: what the heck does that mean. It's a bookkeeping requirement.
16:06
Speaker 1: It's basically, don't keep bogus books. Don't keep fake books
16:11
Speaker 1: in a business. Now, the allegation here is that the
16:17
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty thousand dollars was recorded as legal
16:21
Speaker 1: expenses because Trump paid Michael Cohen one hundred and thirty
16:24
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, when in fact it was not legal expenses
16:28
Speaker 1: in the sense of paying the hourly rate of your lawyer,
16:31
Speaker 1: but it was money that was given to Stormy Daniels
16:33
Speaker 1: to keep quiet. So that's the allegation. Now, it actually
16:37
Speaker 1: gets more complicated than that because New York penal law
16:44
Speaker 1: WON seventy five dot O five is a second degree
16:48
Speaker 1: Class A misdemeanor which has a maximum jail sentence of
16:51
Speaker 1: one year and has a two year statute of limitations,
16:55
Speaker 1: which means the DA can't charge Trump for something that
16:58
Speaker 1: happened seven years ago as a misdemeanor, because the statute
17:01
Speaker 1: of limitations has run. So what would the DA do. Well,
17:08
Speaker 1: there's a second provision, which is New York Penal Law
17:11
Speaker 1: one seventy five dot one zero. That is a felony,
17:16
Speaker 1: And for it to be a felony, which has a
17:18
Speaker 1: longer statute of limitations, the prosecutor must prove that Trump
17:24
Speaker 1: committed the misdemeanor business record falsifications, and that his intent
17:30
Speaker 1: to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or
17:36
Speaker 1: to aid in concealing the commission of another crime. So
17:40
Speaker 1: he's got a piggyback. Not just was this a bogus
17:45
Speaker 1: business record, but it was done to hide the commission
17:48
Speaker 1: of another crime. And presumably the theory for the other
17:51
Speaker 1: crime would be some sort of election federal election violation,
17:56
Speaker 1: that this money was somehow a campaign expenditure that you
17:59
Speaker 1: were hiding. It would be something like that. Now, Number one,
18:07
Speaker 1: the Muller Report already examined this exact issue. Did Donald
18:11
Speaker 1: Trump commit a federal campaign violation through the alleged one
18:15
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty thousand dollar hush payment to Stormy Daniels?
18:18
Speaker 1: And Mueller decided not to prosecute, decided there was not
18:21
Speaker 1: enough here to prosecute. The Southern District to New York
18:24
Speaker 1: the US prosecutor in New York, and I think it's
18:27
Speaker 1: fair to say there is no love lost between the
18:30
Speaker 1: Southern District of New York and Donald Trump. They decided
18:33
Speaker 1: not to prosecute because the evidence. A because Michael Cohen
18:36
Speaker 1: is an exceptionally unreliable witness, someone would have I think,
18:42
Speaker 1: serious credibility problems. But B because this is really really attenuated. Look,
18:48
Speaker 1: they actually tried to prosecute John Edwards. Remember John Edwards,
18:52
Speaker 1: the former Democrat senator who did the same thing, paid
18:55
Speaker 1: off his mistress to keep her quiet, and they went
18:57
Speaker 1: after him, alleging that that was really a campaign expenditure,
19:01
Speaker 1: and they lost. The jury said get the hell out
19:03
Speaker 1: of here or they lost. So in this instance, the
19:09
Speaker 1: Manhattan DA has to piggybank one alleged state violation on
19:14
Speaker 1: another alleged federal violation, both of which are exceptionally weak legally.
19:20
Speaker 1: This is about as flimsy a case as you can imagine.
19:24
Speaker 1: If this case is tried, how does that play out?
19:28
Speaker 1: He's indicted, you get a mug shot, Is there a
19:31
Speaker 1: trial date that would then be set, because the question
19:34
Speaker 1: is going to be how does that affect the president's
19:37
Speaker 1: run for the presidency. He's already announced he's gonna run
19:40
Speaker 1: again senator, So how does that play out? And can
19:44
Speaker 1: do you go to trial quickly so it's not in
19:47
Speaker 1: the middle of an election or does this just could
19:49
Speaker 1: it be held up in court for a year or two?
19:52
Speaker 1: And how does that play out politically? So usually you
19:56
Speaker 1: would go to court relatively quickly on this sort of thing. Now,
20:00
Speaker 1: I will readily admit I have not practiced law in
20:04
Speaker 1: New York state courts. I've certainly not practiced criminal law
20:07
Speaker 1: in New York state courts, so I don't have personal
20:09
Speaker 1: familiarity with trying a case like this in New York
20:12
Speaker 1: state courts. That being said, typically for a criminal provision,
20:18
Speaker 1: there's a speedy trial obligation, and this would ordinarily proceed
20:24
Speaker 1: relatively quickly. The first step would be the district attorney
20:27
Speaker 1: going and getting an indictment from a grand jury. Now,
20:30
Speaker 1: given given the politics in New York, I suspect it
20:35
Speaker 1: would be very easy to get an indictment. When you
20:37
Speaker 1: get an indictment from a grand jury, the criminal defendant
20:40
Speaker 1: isn't in there. Your lawyer doesn't get to make an
20:42
Speaker 1: argument to the grand jury as to why you shouldn't
20:45
Speaker 1: be indicted. And so that leads to the old aphorism
20:48
Speaker 1: that a prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich. And so
20:52
Speaker 1: I think if the DA decides to go seek an indictment,
20:56
Speaker 1: he'll get an indictment in all likelihood. But bringing this
20:59
Speaker 1: case to the jury is going to be exceptionally difficult,
21:04
Speaker 1: even a biased jury of partisan Democrats. The evidence here
21:11
Speaker 1: is really flimsy. Look number one, listen. I think cases
21:15
Speaker 1: where people are engaged in sexual infidelities and trying to
21:19
Speaker 1: cover it up, There's been a long history of politicians
21:22
Speaker 1: doing that. Donald Trump is not the first politician alleged
21:26
Speaker 1: to have done that. Obviously, Bill Clinton famously had a
21:29
Speaker 1: career involved in doing this. John Edwards had these issues.
21:36
Speaker 1: I think juries are often skeptical of holding people accountable
21:41
Speaker 1: for what they view as essentially private and personal failings
21:46
Speaker 1: rather than official corruption. I think a lot of juries
21:51
Speaker 1: are not going to be eager to convict, particularly the
21:55
Speaker 1: first criminal conviction of a former president of the United
21:57
Speaker 1: States and the history of our nation. I think there
22:00
Speaker 1: is an understanding that if that is going to happen,
22:03
Speaker 1: the threshold needs to be significant. It shouldn't be some
22:07
Speaker 1: little ticky tack book keeping claim that if Trump's name
22:15
Speaker 1: were Donald Smith, the chances that Alvin Bragg would be
22:18
Speaker 1: bringing this case are zero. It is one hundred percent
22:22
Speaker 1: because he hates Donald Trump why this case will be brought.
22:25
Speaker 1: All point out. Also, look, we've talked a lot in
22:28
Speaker 1: the podcast about how I believe the Biden Department of
22:32
Speaker 1: Justice wants to indict Trump, and I think Merrick Garland
22:36
Speaker 1: personally wants to indict Trump on federal charges, federal charges that,
22:40
Speaker 1: if brought, I think would be more serious than these
22:43
Speaker 1: charges that apparently are going to be brought this week.
22:47
Speaker 1: But Merrick Garland's effort has gotten much much more complicated
22:51
Speaker 1: because I think DJ was on the verge of indicting
22:54
Speaker 1: Trump for the classified documents at Marlago, when suddenly Joe
23:00
Speaker 1: Biden appeared to have classified documents just about everywhere, almost
23:04
Speaker 1: stuck in the glove compartment of his corvette. I mean it,
23:08
Speaker 1: And as we talked about in this podcast, look, legally
23:11
Speaker 1: that's not technically a problem, but it creates an obvious
23:17
Speaker 1: political problem because the double standard is evident if the
23:21
Speaker 1: bidendj says, if Trump has classified documents, we want to
23:25
Speaker 1: put him in jail. But if Biden has classified documents
23:28
Speaker 1: at his home, no biggie, all good with us. Even
23:32
Speaker 1: people not paying attention say, wait a second, that's a
23:35
Speaker 1: double standard. Well, here's a huge double standard with the
23:39
Speaker 1: Alvin Bragg potential prosecution of Trump, which is the theory
23:44
Speaker 1: that he's basing it on that Trump gave one hundred
23:49
Speaker 1: and thirty thousand dollars recorded it as legal fees, when
23:54
Speaker 1: in fact it was hush money to Stormy Daniels. Well,
23:58
Speaker 1: that is precise sleep the charge that was raised against
24:03
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton funded the so called Steele dossier.
24:09
Speaker 1: This is something again that I discuss at great length
24:11
Speaker 1: in the book Justice Corrupted the Steele Dossier. The Hillary
24:14
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign paid over a million dollars to make the
24:19
Speaker 1: Steele dossier, which is it's a work of fiction, it
24:22
Speaker 1: is a political hit job. But she covered up the
24:26
Speaker 1: payments for making the Steele dossier by calling those payments
24:31
Speaker 1: legal fees. So she did the exact same thing Donald
24:36
Speaker 1: Trump is accused of doing. Well, and to be clear,
24:38
Speaker 1: she was not indicted. I want to make that very clear.
24:41
Speaker 1: Remind people of the double standard here. She was not indicted.
24:44
Speaker 1: By the way, She's a resident of New York, so
24:47
Speaker 1: she could have been indicted under this statute by this
24:50
Speaker 1: DA and by the way, she did it at the
24:54
Speaker 1: same time Trump was doing. This is the twenty sixteen election,
24:57
Speaker 1: so she literally did exactly the same thing at exactly
25:02
Speaker 1: the same place, at exactly the same time. But Alvin
25:06
Speaker 1: Bragg is a Democrat, so he doesn't want to indict
25:08
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton even though their conduct was identical. Although let
25:12
Speaker 1: me put in a caveat, I have no evidence to
25:14
Speaker 1: suggest that Hillary Clinton had a sexual relationship with Stormy Daniels,
25:18
Speaker 1: so that conduct I'm not suggesting was identical. But the
25:23
Speaker 1: payments that are called legal fees, they both did the
25:25
Speaker 1: exact same thing. How the hell do you just go
25:29
Speaker 1: after the opposing party and not your own party's nominee.
25:33
Speaker 1: I got to ask you also about the timing of this.
25:36
Speaker 1: There was big breaking news that the Biden crime family
25:40
Speaker 1: had expanded this past week with payments coming from the
25:44
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist governments. You know, these sectors and jobs that
25:48
Speaker 1: were sending cash back to the Biden crime family now
25:51
Speaker 1: has expanded to more family members, and exactly the same
25:55
Speaker 1: week that happens this story breaks. Now, before I get
25:59
Speaker 1: your reaction, I don't want to tell you about Patriot Mobile.
26:01
Speaker 1: If you're a conservative and you care about working and
26:06
Speaker 1: standing with companies that actually protect and defend your values,
26:11
Speaker 1: one way you can stand up for what you believe
26:13
Speaker 1: in is by switching your cell phone to Patriot Mobile.
26:16
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile is growing and they are the largest and
26:20
Speaker 1: only conservative Christian cell phone provider in the country. Now
26:24
Speaker 1: here's the part that you're gonna love. They take a
26:27
Speaker 1: portion of your bill every month that no extra cost
26:29
Speaker 1: to you, and give it back to conservative causes and
26:34
Speaker 1: organizations that you stand for. We're talking about protecting, defending
26:38
Speaker 1: our First and our Second Amendment rights, standing up for
26:41
Speaker 1: unborn children, and even helping with adoptions. With Patriot Mobile,
26:46
Speaker 1: you get great cell phone service, the same coverage you
26:49
Speaker 1: have right now. You have to keep your same cell
26:51
Speaker 1: phone number, and many times you can keep your same
26:54
Speaker 1: cell phone if you want to, or upgrade to a
26:56
Speaker 1: new one while paying that bill every month. You stand
26:59
Speaker 1: up for what you believe in. So call them. Eight
27:01
Speaker 1: seven eight Patriot is the number. Eight seven eight Patriot.
27:06
Speaker 1: Use the promo code Verdict and you'll get the best
27:09
Speaker 1: deals of the day eight seven eight Patriot or online
27:13
Speaker 1: at Patriotmobile dot com. That's Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict. Senator,
27:18
Speaker 1: I want to go back to the point I was
27:20
Speaker 1: making a moment ago, and that is this week was
27:22
Speaker 1: a really big week in the news area, to the
27:26
Speaker 1: point where even Biden's team had to respond Hunter. Biden's
27:29
Speaker 1: team had to respond about these new allegations that there
27:32
Speaker 1: was millions coming in from shady Chinese companies are directly
27:36
Speaker 1: tied to the Communist government, and expanded the list of
27:40
Speaker 1: people with the last same Biden who were receiving these
27:43
Speaker 1: funds from these shady business deals that we're all being
27:47
Speaker 1: run through Hunter and James Biden. Then in the middle
27:50
Speaker 1: of the same week when this happens and they're forced
27:53
Speaker 1: to respond, Bam, we're hearing about an indictment of Donald Trump.
27:56
Speaker 1: Is there any connection in your mind between these timing
27:59
Speaker 1: of these stories. Look, I don't know that that was
28:03
Speaker 1: the driving factor for Alvin Bragg my suspicion as Bragg
28:06
Speaker 1: is not a big fan of Biden either, so I
28:09
Speaker 1: doubt that that was his driving motivation to cover up
28:13
Speaker 1: for the growing evidence of Biden family corruption. Now I
28:16
Speaker 1: will say, you know you pointed out you said last
28:19
Speaker 1: week was a big week. My reaction listening to that
28:22
Speaker 1: was to chuckle. I'm like, well, wait a second, how
28:25
Speaker 1: could that possibly be. I didn't see it on CNN.
28:27
Speaker 1: I didn't see it on ABC or CBS or NBC. Like,
28:31
Speaker 1: the corporate media just ignores the evidence. So if you
28:34
Speaker 1: listen to this podcast, you know the facts. If you
28:39
Speaker 1: listen to a handful of conservative media outlets, you can
28:42
Speaker 1: find at least some of the facts. But the corporate
28:46
Speaker 1: media utterly ignores it. So my suspicion about the timing
28:50
Speaker 1: is it was less that Bragg is driven by wanting
28:54
Speaker 1: to change the media story, but the instant this began happening,
29:00
Speaker 1: I think the media was more than eager to jump
29:03
Speaker 1: all over it and change the topic because they certainly
29:05
Speaker 1: didn't want to be forced to discuss the evidence that
29:09
Speaker 1: came out last week that up to four Biden family
29:13
Speaker 1: members now collectively received over one million dollars from the
29:18
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist That's a big, big deal. The media doesn't
29:22
Speaker 1: want anyone to know about it, and so the best
29:24
Speaker 1: way to do that is to talk instead about who
29:27
Speaker 1: Trump was sleeping with a decade ago. And if we
29:30
Speaker 1: can talk about porn stars and distract people from the
29:34
Speaker 1: sitting president and his family receiving over a million bucks
29:37
Speaker 1: from the Chinese communist well that's that's convenient for the
29:41
Speaker 1: political narrative from the corporate media. One of the things
29:44
Speaker 1: that the media is covering is Donald Trump in there
29:47
Speaker 1: now saying that he is threatening violence again. He put
29:51
Speaker 1: out a message about the possible is possible arrests. And
29:55
Speaker 1: I want people to be able to hear what Trump
29:57
Speaker 1: had to say quickly, and then I want you to
29:59
Speaker 1: hear CNN clearly take him out of context, treating him Mike,
30:02
Speaker 1: he's a domestic terrorist. Here's Trump in his own words.
30:06
Speaker 1: These four horrible radical left Democrat investigations of your all
30:12
Speaker 1: time favorite president me is just a continuation of the
30:16
Speaker 1: most disgusting witch hunt in the history of our country.
30:20
Speaker 1: It's gone on forever with the Russia, Russia, Russia and Ukraine, Ukraine,
30:24
Speaker 1: Ukraine and the Mueller hooks. It's an absolute disgrace. What's
30:29
Speaker 1: going on. They even spied on my campaign, and remember this,
30:34
Speaker 1: with all of the work that they did on Mueller.
30:37
Speaker 1: No collusion, that's what the answer was was all no collusion.
30:42
Speaker 1: Whether it's the Marlago raid or the Unselect Committee hoax,
30:48
Speaker 1: the perfect Georgia phone call, it was absolutely perfect, or
30:52
Speaker 1: the stormy horse faced Daniels extortion plot, they're all sick
30:58
Speaker 1: and it's fake news. Are of means, are desperate to
31:01
Speaker 1: stop us because they know that we are the only
31:04
Speaker 1: ones who can stop them, and they know it very strongly.
31:08
Speaker 1: And they're looking at the polls where not me, but
31:11
Speaker 1: we are up by so much they can't even believe it. Now.
31:15
Speaker 1: You hear him say that, And how does CNN spin it?
31:18
Speaker 1: They say that the President of the United States of
31:20
Speaker 1: America is threatening violence again and he should be treated
31:24
Speaker 1: basically like a domestic terrorist. Your CNN and their own words,
31:27
Speaker 1: your reaction to Trump's claim that he will be arrested Tuesday,
31:30
Speaker 1: his calls for protests, and by the way, the Manhattan
31:33
Speaker 1: Day's Office still not confirming that there is any imminent
31:37
Speaker 1: arrest or indictment that is scheduled for Tuesday, right, that's
31:42
Speaker 1: part of the story that he's putting us a specific
31:44
Speaker 1: date on it that the DA's office is not. But
31:48
Speaker 1: obviously the larger point is the one Fred that you mentioned.
31:51
Speaker 1: You know, if you are the most sympathetic observer possible
31:54
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump and you do double backflips, you can
31:57
Speaker 1: find some credence in his argument that I'm January sixth,
32:00
Speaker 1: he did not know that his language would lead to violence,
32:05
Speaker 1: But January sixth has now happened. He knows the effect
32:08
Speaker 1: of the language that he used that day and how
32:10
Speaker 1: it led to violence, and here he is coming very
32:13
Speaker 1: close to that language again. It makes it very hard
32:16
Speaker 1: to avoid the conclusion that he is willing to use
32:20
Speaker 1: the threat of violence as part of his political strategy.
32:24
Speaker 1: And that is just a reminder of the very different
32:27
Speaker 1: era we are in that we have been at any
32:30
Speaker 1: point in American history where you have Trump, the leader
32:33
Speaker 1: of a political movement who is routinely willing to raise
32:37
Speaker 1: the specter of violence as a way of advancing his goals.
32:41
Speaker 1: And so many conservative commentators and members of Congress who
32:46
Speaker 1: have condemned preemptively the possibility of indictment remained silent on
32:52
Speaker 1: his raising this threat of violence. So that I think
32:57
Speaker 1: is just enormously significant and a mark of the very
33:00
Speaker 1: different era that we are in politically that we have
33:03
Speaker 1: ever been in before. I mean, they're pretty much calling
33:06
Speaker 1: out what I do. They're calling out you, Senator, saying
33:08
Speaker 1: as a member of Congress and basically saying that you're
33:11
Speaker 1: aiding and abetting a domestic terrorist who's now calling for
33:14
Speaker 1: a massive uprising in the country. That's not what I
33:16
Speaker 1: heard from Donald Trump. I heard a former president saying,
33:19
Speaker 1: this is an activist day who's gone rogue yet again
33:22
Speaker 1: with four different times. They're batting over three on the
33:25
Speaker 1: first ones, and now they're going at me again. CNN
33:29
Speaker 1: is not a news organization. They are a left wing
33:32
Speaker 1: propaganda outlet, and they lie for a living. Every word
33:39
Speaker 1: of that diatribe, including and butt and the we're lies.
33:44
Speaker 1: Nothing Trump said was a call for violence. If you
33:49
Speaker 1: look at his truth social post, he said quote he
33:53
Speaker 1: will be arrested on Tuesday of next week. Protest, take
33:58
Speaker 1: our nation back. Now. The last I checked, the word
34:01
Speaker 1: protest is not the same thing as riot. It is
34:05
Speaker 1: not commit violence. The last I checked. The First Amendment
34:09
Speaker 1: to the Constitution, the very first protection in the Bill
34:12
Speaker 1: of Rights, protects our right to protest, our right to
34:17
Speaker 1: stand up and speak out. And what the left does,
34:22
Speaker 1: and in fact, what the left has done since January sixth,
34:26
Speaker 1: is they've tried to smear the thousands of people who
34:29
Speaker 1: engaged in peaceful protests. They tried to smear those protesters
34:35
Speaker 1: with the violent action of a much smaller cohort. My
34:39
Speaker 1: view is simple in its consistence, if you commit violence,
34:43
Speaker 1: you should go to jail. The irony is that whole
34:46
Speaker 1: screed from CNN. The right does not excuse violence. If
34:50
Speaker 1: you commit violence, if you assault a police officer, you
34:53
Speaker 1: ought to be in a jail cell a long damn time.
34:56
Speaker 1: But you know who does excuse violence? The left, The
34:59
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, the media, CNN happily sat there cooing about
35:06
Speaker 1: the Antifa and Black Lives Matter riots across the country,
35:11
Speaker 1: listening while Democrats called it a summer of love as
35:14
Speaker 1: great American cities burned, as police cars were firebombed, as
35:19
Speaker 1: stores were looted, as police officers were murdered. Now, let's
35:22
Speaker 1: be clear the Black Lives Matter riots, there were some
35:26
Speaker 1: people engaged in peaceful protests. They had a right to
35:30
Speaker 1: do that. But there were hundreds, if not thousands, of
35:33
Speaker 1: people engaged in organized acts of violence, and the Democrats
35:39
Speaker 1: turned a blind eye to it. The media not only
35:42
Speaker 1: ignored it, they celebrated it and Kamala Harris went so
35:46
Speaker 1: far as to raise bail money to bail out of
35:49
Speaker 1: jail the violent criminals committing acts of violence. And you
35:53
Speaker 1: don't have to go back three years ago, you can
35:57
Speaker 1: go to right now. Right now. You have aggressive, threatening
36:02
Speaker 1: rioters outside of the homes of Supreme Court justices, threatening
36:07
Speaker 1: the justices and their families, threatening their children. Their conduct
36:11
Speaker 1: is a federal crime. And we have an Attorney General
36:13
Speaker 1: under Joe Biden who just ignores the law, refuses to
36:16
Speaker 1: enforce that law. Why because he and the Biden White
36:21
Speaker 1: House agree with the people who are committing criminal offenses.
36:25
Speaker 1: They are quite content to use threats of violence to
36:29
Speaker 1: advance their political ends. By the way, they're also not
36:32
Speaker 1: investing resources in prosecuting the people who are firebombing crisis
36:38
Speaker 1: pregnancy centers across the country. Why because they are perfectly
36:42
Speaker 1: happy to use violence for their ends. So, look, Marxists,
36:47
Speaker 1: what they accuse you of doing, typically they are doing.
36:53
Speaker 1: And CNN illustrated that right there and then that was
36:57
Speaker 1: not a call for violence. And let's be clear my home,
37:00
Speaker 1: my prayer by urging to everyone is no one should
37:04
Speaker 1: engage in violence this week or any other week. But
37:07
Speaker 1: peaceful protesting, speaking out that is protected by the Constitution,
37:13
Speaker 1: and that is good for America. I want to ask
37:15
Speaker 1: you one final question about an eligibility issue. There's so
37:19
Speaker 1: much misinformation out there center about if the president is
37:23
Speaker 1: a indicted does he is ineligible to be president? And
37:26
Speaker 1: b if he is convicted before election day in e one,
37:30
Speaker 1: would he be ineligible. Before I get you to answer that,
37:33
Speaker 1: I want to tell everybody about our friends over at Chalk.
37:36
Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you're getting a little bit
37:37
Speaker 1: older and you feel like you've lost some of that
37:39
Speaker 1: strength and vitality, you're feeling a bit weak and just
37:43
Speaker 1: that complacency, then you need to hear what Chalk can
37:47
Speaker 1: do for you. The problem is pretty simple. Men's assass
37:50
Speaker 1: from levels are off a cliff historically, at an all
37:53
Speaker 1: time low. The patriots at Chalk are here to help
37:57
Speaker 1: real American men take back their right to proudly maximize
38:01
Speaker 1: your masculinity by boosting testostrum levels up to twenty percent
38:06
Speaker 1: over ninety days. Now you're gonna ask the question, does
38:09
Speaker 1: it work. I've been doing this now for about sixty days.
38:12
Speaker 1: I can tell you it does. I've been taking Chalk
38:15
Speaker 1: Cchoq and the Male Vitality Stack is what I've been using.
38:19
Speaker 1: It works. It's manufactured right here in the US of A.
38:22
Speaker 1: Chalks and natural herbal supplements are clinically proven to have
38:27
Speaker 1: game changing effects on your energy your focus. Checkout chalkhoq
38:33
Speaker 1: dot com. Use the promo code ben for thirty five
38:37
Speaker 1: percent off any Chalk subscription for life. You can cancel
38:41
Speaker 1: anytime as Wellhoq dot com use the promo code been
38:46
Speaker 1: that Choq dot com. Finally, Senator, there's so much misinformation
38:52
Speaker 1: out there, and I've seen a lot of fodder about this,
38:55
Speaker 1: people saying, well, the Democrats win if they indict Donald Trump,
38:59
Speaker 1: that means he's an eligible to be president. I've seen
39:01
Speaker 1: others that have said, well, if he's indicted, the rush
39:04
Speaker 1: to a jury trial because if he is convicted then
39:07
Speaker 1: they'll be ineligible to be president. What does the law
39:10
Speaker 1: actually say, Well, it doesn't say any of that. So,
39:15
Speaker 1: first of all, there is no prohibition on someone who
39:20
Speaker 1: is indicted running for president. There's no prohibition on someone
39:23
Speaker 1: who is indicted being elected president. Sadly, we have seen
39:28
Speaker 1: far too many political officials, both candidates and and officeholders
39:33
Speaker 1: indicted for political and partisan reasons. In my book Justice Corrupted,
39:38
Speaker 1: and look, this podcast wasn't supposed to entirely focus on
39:41
Speaker 1: the book, but the entire book is written on what's
39:43
Speaker 1: happening right now. I talked about DJ's prosecution of Ted Stevens.
39:48
Speaker 1: Ted Stevens was a senator from Alaska. He was a Republican.
39:53
Speaker 1: He was an incredibly long serving senator. The Department of
39:56
Speaker 1: Justice brought a corruption case against him, tried him, and
40:02
Speaker 1: he ended up being defeated in the on election day,
40:05
Speaker 1: a Democrat won the Alaska Senate seat. Subsequently, it turned
40:09
Speaker 1: out the prosecution and engaged in massive misconduct and the
40:13
Speaker 1: entire thing was a political persecution. It was designed to
40:16
Speaker 1: do what it did, which is weakened him politically and
40:19
Speaker 1: let the Democrat win. Likewise, I talk about in the
40:22
Speaker 1: book the prosecution of Bob Menendez. Bob Benendez was a
40:27
Speaker 1: Democrat senator and DOJ announced that they leaked an indictment
40:34
Speaker 1: against Bob Menendez for misuse of campaign funds. But they
40:39
Speaker 1: did it literally the day that Bob Benendez announced his
40:43
Speaker 1: opposition to the Biden Iran nuclear deal. The Biden White
40:48
Speaker 1: House was mad at him because he was a Democrat.
40:51
Speaker 1: Opposing the catastrophic Iran nuclear agreement, and so their DOJ
40:57
Speaker 1: in a naked act of politics, they leaked, and they
41:02
Speaker 1: leaked then in order to punish Menendez for daring opposed
41:09
Speaker 1: the White House. By the way, we see the Biden
41:11
Speaker 1: DOJ doing political leaks constantly. At the end of the day,
41:17
Speaker 1: the Menendez case went to trial and they lost at trial.
41:21
Speaker 1: So there are no consequences other than political for being indicted.
41:26
Speaker 1: And the question is, well, what if you're convicted, Well,
41:29
Speaker 1: if you're convicted, that doesn't mean you're ineligible to run
41:34
Speaker 1: for president or be president either. It's happened in the past.
41:38
Speaker 1: For example, the socialist Eugene Debs ran for president four
41:43
Speaker 1: times in the early nineteen hundreds, and he was a
41:45
Speaker 1: candidate while he was in jail, so he was literally
41:48
Speaker 1: as a socialist in jail running for president. And the
41:52
Speaker 1: Constitution Article two, section one of the Constitution provides the
41:57
Speaker 1: qualifications for president, and nothing in that clause precludes felons
42:03
Speaker 1: precludes people who are incarcerated from running for president or
42:08
Speaker 1: serving as president. There is just one mechanism that could
42:12
Speaker 1: theoretically happen, which is if Trump were prosecuted, if he
42:17
Speaker 1: were convicted, and if the House of Representatives were subsequently
42:20
Speaker 1: to impeach him yet again, and if the Senate were
42:24
Speaker 1: to convict him in what would now be his third
42:27
Speaker 1: impeachment trial. One of the penalties that the Senate can
42:33
Speaker 1: impose and the impeachment of a president is to prohibit
42:36
Speaker 1: him from running for office in the future. So that
42:40
Speaker 1: is a penalty that is theoretically possible. But it would
42:43
Speaker 1: take the House of Representatives, which is controlled by a
42:46
Speaker 1: Republican majority, and it would take two thirds of the
42:48
Speaker 1: Senate to impeach and then convict Trump and make him
42:54
Speaker 1: ineligible for office. The chances of that happening I can
42:58
Speaker 1: quantify precisely or zero point zero zero percent. This is
43:02
Speaker 1: a Democrat fever dream. This is a corporate media fever dream.
43:08
Speaker 1: The consequences of this are purely political. And I want
43:11
Speaker 1: to underscore Alvin Bragg. You know, you know sometimes Donald Trump,
43:17
Speaker 1: in many respects, has enjoyed a great deal of luck
43:21
Speaker 1: in his life. And one of the areas where he's
43:24
Speaker 1: enjoyed a lot of luck is in having the right enemies.
43:27
Speaker 1: There were times where the Trump presidency was in difficult straits,
43:32
Speaker 1: and yet the Democrats and media hated him so much
43:35
Speaker 1: that they were so over the top attacking him that
43:39
Speaker 1: it had the reverse effect and it rallied voters behind him,
43:43
Speaker 1: and they said, you know, if those sobs hate him
43:46
Speaker 1: that much, he's got to be the right guy. That
43:49
Speaker 1: dynamic is very much alive here. I'll tell you if
43:53
Speaker 1: I were a partisan Democrat, if I wanted a Democrat
43:56
Speaker 1: to win in twenty twenty four as president, I would
44:00
Speaker 1: be beside myself right now that this clown from Manhattan
44:05
Speaker 1: is going to bring a case that is ridiculous, that
44:08
Speaker 1: is legally weak, and in fact, here I'll read you
44:12
Speaker 1: what Jonathan Turley. Jonathan Turley is a law professor, very smart,
44:16
Speaker 1: well respected law professor, left of center, but willing to
44:21
Speaker 1: speak the truth even when it doesn't further Democrats interest.
44:24
Speaker 1: Here's what Turley wrote last week in The Hill quote.
44:28
Speaker 1: Trump faces serious legal threats in the ongoing Marlago investigation,
44:32
Speaker 1: but the New York case would be easily dismissed outside
44:38
Speaker 1: of a jurisdiction like New York, where Bragg can count
44:41
Speaker 1: on highly motivated judges and jurors. Although it may be
44:45
Speaker 1: politically popular, the case is legally pathetic. Bragg is struggling
44:52
Speaker 1: to twist state laws to effectively prosecute a federal case
44:56
Speaker 1: long ago rejected by the Justice Department against Trump over
44:59
Speaker 1: his payment of hush money to former stripper Stormy Daniels.
45:04
Speaker 1: If Bragg brings this case and he tries it to
45:08
Speaker 1: a jury and he loses, which is what should happen,
45:12
Speaker 1: if Trump wins at trial, that single action could be
45:18
Speaker 1: the single most decisive action that elects Trump as president,
45:22
Speaker 1: that helps him win the Republican nomination number one, but
45:25
Speaker 1: that helps him win the general number two. If I
45:29
Speaker 1: were a partisan Democrat, I would be crying in my
45:32
Speaker 1: beer right now that they are so extreme, so partisan,
45:36
Speaker 1: so abusive, that they are driving the American people the
45:41
Speaker 1: other direction. Elon Musk, because he put it in a tweet.
45:44
Speaker 1: He said, if they do this, he believes that Donald
45:47
Speaker 1: Trump will get reelected in the landslide, just for the
45:50
Speaker 1: reason that you just mentioned there. If you're listening to
45:53
Speaker 1: Verdict and you have never hit that subscriber auto down
45:57
Speaker 1: with a button, this is the time to do it,
45:58
Speaker 1: because this week, I promise you, is going to be
46:01
Speaker 1: a week you don't want to miss any of our episodes.
46:03
Speaker 1: And if this does happen. I can promise you we're
46:06
Speaker 1: going to get you a response right away, so make
46:08
Speaker 1: sure you subscribe to Verdict, download it wherever you get
46:13
Speaker 1: your podcasts, Share this podcast with your family and friends,
46:17
Speaker 1: and most importantly, please write us a five ser review.
46:20
Speaker 1: It helps us reach a bigger audience, and we'll see
46:22
Speaker 1: you back here in a couple of days