Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / UNRWA Supports Terrorism, A Secure Ukraine before a Secure America, & Will SCOTUS be Unanimous in Colorado Week In Review

Transcript

UNRWA Supports Terrorism, A Secure Ukraine before a Secure America, & Will SCOTUS be Unanimous in Colorado Week In Review · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Welcome.
• 0:01
  Speaker 2: It's Verdict with Center Ted Cruz. Week in Review, Ben
• 0:05
  Speaker 2: Ferguson with you, and these are the stories that you
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: may have missed that we talked about this week. First up,
• 0:11
  Speaker 2: shocking funding for the United Nations going directly to Terris
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: that we're attacking Israel.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: We'll have all the details on that.
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: Plus, many Americans are very angry over massive funding still
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: being forced down our throats to go to Ukraine. So
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: what's behind this funding and why are they getting so
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: much cash? And finally, could there be a unanimous decision
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: from the Supreme Court over the Colorado case against Donald J.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: Trump.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: It's the Week in Review and it starts right now.
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: So let's follow the money here. If UNDRA is getting
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: funds from the United Nations, and we're the biggest donor
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: to the United Nations, we're giving money and it's being
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: funneled to those that are helping carry out terrorist attacks
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: as well as protecting terraces and the planning and the
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: rockets that are being shot into Israel for for years now,
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: while they've been in the same building.
• 1:12
  Speaker 3: Now, that's exactly right. As The Times of Israel reported,
• 1:16
  Speaker 3: unro's Gaza headquarters is located in Gaza City's upscale Remand neighborhood,
• 1:23
  Speaker 3: an area that the Israeli the IDF had previously operated
• 1:28
  Speaker 3: in and dismantled the local Hamas battalion and withdrawn its
• 1:32
  Speaker 3: troops from And here's a quote from Colonel Benny Aharon
• 1:39
  Speaker 3: from the IDF, who says, quote the IDF was here previously.
• 1:44
  Speaker 3: The first time was to destroy the enemy. But when
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: we were here the last time, we collected a lot
• 1:48
  Speaker 3: of intelligence documents and findings, a lot of prisoners, and
• 1:53
  Speaker 3: thanks to this we reached here. Now we carried carried
• 1:56
  Speaker 3: out a targeted operation to take the capability away. We
• 2:02
  Speaker 3: had a basis of information, but not enough to be
• 2:05
  Speaker 3: able to dig down twenty meters to find it. Twenty
• 2:08
  Speaker 3: meters is about sixty feet. We needed a bit more.
• 2:12
  Speaker 3: There's information we get from prisoners, we capture from computers,
• 2:17
  Speaker 3: we find from documents, maps, and they went down and
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: discovered this terror tunnel. Hazan, who is tasked with coordinating
• 2:29
  Speaker 3: the brigade's underground operation, said the main entrance to the
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: tunnel was located under an Unrau school in the area.
• 2:38
  Speaker 3: Wo and this look the un you want to talk
• 2:43
  Speaker 3: about Number one the UN has always been just a
• 2:46
  Speaker 3: pit of anti Semitism, anti Israel hatred. But they have
• 2:50
  Speaker 3: funneled billions of dollars to UNRA, which in turn is
• 2:57
  Speaker 3: supporting terrorists and supporting him and employing people who participated
• 3:03
  Speaker 3: in the October seventh terror attack.
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: What will America's response be to this, as the Biden
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: administration said anything? And are there anyone in his administration
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: or the UN ambassador asking questions saying what the hell
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: is going on at the United Nations Relief and Work
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: Agency that's been knowingly, as you described it, providing support
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: Tomas terrorists who committed these atrocies against over one thousand
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: Israelies and dozens of Americans as well, which I think
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: has been overlooked as well by this administration.
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: Yes, so sadly, the Biden administration from day one has
• 3:37
  Speaker 3: been funneling money into Gaza. Look early on in the
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: Biden administration, I led a group of seventeen senators saying
• 3:45
  Speaker 3: do not give money to Gaza, because if you give
• 3:48
  Speaker 3: money to Gaza, that will flow directly to Hamas and
• 3:51
  Speaker 3: be used for terrorist activities. At the time I sent
• 3:55
  Speaker 3: that letter, there were one hundred and fifty House Democrats
• 3:59
  Speaker 3: who sent a letter to the administration saying, please do
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: give money to Gaza even though it will likely be
• 4:06
  Speaker 3: used by Hamas for terrorism. We now know because it's
• 4:09
  Speaker 3: been publicly reported how the Biden administration resolved that issue.
• 4:14
  Speaker 3: The Biden administration concluded that it was quote highly likely
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: those are their terms, highly likely that money given to
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: Gaza would be used by Hamas for terrorism. Now ordinarily
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: been under US anti terrorism law. If it's highly likely
• 4:30
  Speaker 3: the money will be used for terrorism, you can't send
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: the money. That would be common sense. Well, what the
• 4:35
  Speaker 3: Biden administration did instead is they formally waived US anti
• 4:41
  Speaker 3: terrorism law because their political ideology, they so wanted to
• 4:45
  Speaker 3: send the money they didn't care if it would be
• 4:48
  Speaker 3: used by Hamas for terrorism. So, in a very real sense,
• 4:52
  Speaker 3: Joe Biden the Democrats funded Hamas and the October seventh terror.
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: Attack, which goes back back to the bigger question in
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: the aid it looks like American aid. We say, hey,
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: we're going to send some to Israel, but we're also
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: wanting to send aid to Gaza. How do we not
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: how do we assure that that money is not going
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: to go directly in the hands of the terrorists.
• 5:16
  Speaker 3: We can't and it is truly asinine. And in the
• 5:20
  Speaker 3: wake of this horrific terror attack, what did Joe Biden
• 5:23
  Speaker 3: the Democrats want to do. Let's send more money to Gaza.
• 5:25
  Speaker 3: Let's send more money to Gaza. And my view is
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: stop sending money to people who want to kill us.
• 5:31
  Speaker 3: If you cannot assure that the money doesn't go to
• 5:35
  Speaker 3: terrorists who want to murder Americans, don't send the money.
• 5:39
  Speaker 3: And by the way, this past week, I let a
• 5:42
  Speaker 3: group of senators urging the Justice Department to open a
• 5:46
  Speaker 3: criminal investigation into a US based nonprofit that raises money
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: for UNRA. And it's a group called UNRA USA, which
• 5:58
  Speaker 3: is a nonprofit with the self described mission to support
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: the quote work of UNRA through fundraising, education, and advocacy
• 6:07
  Speaker 3: in the United States. And as I pointed out, here's
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: what I wrote in the letter with several other senators. Quote,
• 6:15
  Speaker 3: we write to call on you to open a criminal
• 6:16
  Speaker 3: investigation into NRA USA, its principles, and its leadership for
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: knowingly providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations including hamas.
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: This support facilitated and continues to facilitate terrorism, including the
• 6:34
  Speaker 3: October seventh terrorist attack in which Palestinian terrorists killed or
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: kidnapped dozens of Americans and over one thousand, two hundred Israelis.
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: According to its twenty twenty one annual report, NRA USA
• 6:50
  Speaker 3: dispersed nearly five million dollars in donations to ANRA that year,
• 6:56
  Speaker 3: making the organization onnra's largest institutional donor.
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: I mean you hear that, and is an American taxpayer.
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: It makes me angry to know that basically I'm funding
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: the terrorists that took out these attacks, not just on
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: the people in Israel. But we still have not, I think,
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: gotten a full accounting from this administration on Americans that
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: were killed and also taken hostage.
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: Now, sadly that's right. And the Biden administration we've talked
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: about before when it comes to foreign policy, it is
• 7:33
  Speaker 3: all politics all the time, and they set aside US
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: national security that they set aside the interest of protecting
• 7:40
  Speaker 3: our allies, and they especially set aside the interest of
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: protecting American citizens, and it's made the world much more dangerous.
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: Sata, I want to ask you another question about just
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: the response from this administration when this type of news
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: comes out. There seems to be a no re response.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Are a very timid response. And I worry that's because
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: they've known that there's been this level of corruption for
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: quite some time. They're just now being faced with it
• 8:09
  Speaker 2: in the government. What do we When did they know
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: about the corruption with with Andra and and when did
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: the warning STEGN start hitting them?
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: Was it before this attack or can they play done?
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: No, We've known about it a long time, and I
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: will say it's bad ding. When I questioned the Biden administration,
• 8:28
  Speaker 3: when I questioned the State Department, and I press them,
• 8:30
  Speaker 3: why do you keep giving hundreds of millions of dollars
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: to Gaza. Gaza is run by Hamas. Hamas is the
• 8:37
  Speaker 3: government of Gaza, And people.
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: Don't believe you when you say that.
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: Just the tunnel system that we've seen since they the
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: Israelis have gone in is more than enough proof they.
• 8:52
  Speaker 3: Can understand the Palestinians. So part of the leftist rhetoric
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: they say Gaza is the largest open air prison on earth.
• 9:00
  Speaker 3: That's a lie. You know, Gaza is not run by Israel.
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: Gaza is run by the Palestinians. Israel left the Gaza Strip,
• 9:08
  Speaker 3: So the Gaza Strip is a portion of what used
• 9:11
  Speaker 3: to be Israel, and it is on the south west
• 9:16
  Speaker 3: portion of Israel, and they just left Israel left and said,
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: all right, there's a massive population Palestinians. You guys are
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: in charge. You run it. And they had elections in Gaza,
• 9:26
  Speaker 3: and the people of the Gaza Strip elected Hamas, which
• 9:30
  Speaker 3: is which is a terrorist organization. It pledges the destruction
• 9:36
  Speaker 3: of Israel and the death of Jews. That that is
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: in its core mission. That's who the people of the
• 9:42
  Speaker 3: Gaza Strip elected. Now understand, over the past decades, billions
• 9:48
  Speaker 3: of dollars have flowed into the Gaza Strip in terms
• 9:51
  Speaker 3: of relief, both from the United States, from Europe, from
• 9:55
  Speaker 3: international agencies, from UNRA, and that money instead of actually
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: helping the Gaza Strip, helping the Palestinians, instead of building
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: schools and hospitals, instead of building roads, they take massive
• 10:09
  Speaker 3: amounts of that money and they turn it directly to terrorism.
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: So for example, and I've been to Israel many times
• 10:16
  Speaker 3: and when you talk with it, with the Israeli forces,
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: they explain money that goes into Gaza, say to build
• 10:22
  Speaker 3: water pipes to bring fresh water to people who need it.
• 10:25
  Speaker 3: They take the water pipes, they cut it into six
• 10:28
  Speaker 3: feet segments and they use those water pipes, they turn
• 10:31
  Speaker 3: them into rockets and they fill them with propellant and
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: explosive and shrapnel ball bearings and metal that they can
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: then fire into Israel. And so the result is the
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: people of Gaza, the Palestinians, get denied relief they desperately need.
• 10:50
  Speaker 3: Why because Hamas, who controls it, would rather kill Jews
• 10:56
  Speaker 3: than help Palestinians. And every time I am asked the
• 11:00
  Speaker 3: Biden administration, okay, how do you make sure the money
• 11:03
  Speaker 3: going into Gaza doesn't go to terrorism? Their response, you
• 11:06
  Speaker 3: know what, they say, what's that? Oh, we trust UNRA.
• 11:10
  Speaker 3: Unra's great. Give it to UNRELL. Be fantastic. And it
• 11:13
  Speaker 3: has been evident for a long time that UNRA and
• 11:17
  Speaker 3: Hamas are utterly intertwined. A dozen UNRAU employees were actual
• 11:23
  Speaker 3: terrorists on October seventh, and yet the Biden administration's position
• 11:28
  Speaker 3: is we love UNRA.
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: Final question on this, is there a way to actually
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: stop the funds going into Gaza going into UNRA.
• 11:36
  Speaker 3: And and what Donald Trump did it? Absolutely, you can
• 11:40
  Speaker 3: stop it. The reason this money has gone is because
• 11:44
  Speaker 3: Joe Biden places a higher priority on his political ideology
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: than he does on keeping Americans safe, or keeping Israeli safe,
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: in our allies safe, and the result is the world's
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: a lot more dangerous.
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: Now, if you want to hear the rest of this
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: kind conversation, you can go back and listen to the
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: full podcast from earlier this week. Now onto story number two. Senator,
• 12:08
  Speaker 2: there are a lot of Americans that are very angry
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: that so many Republicans defected and did this deal with
• 12:17
  Speaker 2: Democrats to send more funding to Ukraine than we'll be
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: spent to secure our southern border, putting Americans last and
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: putting others first around the world. And this money we
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: don't have, We're gonna have to borrow this money. We're
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: gonna have to pay interest on this money. And it
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: seems like there's no in insight for the obsession with
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: sending money to Ukraine. We're sending more money to them
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: than to Israel as well. Why did so many Democrats
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: get along so well with so many Republicans on this one?
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: How is it that so many Republicans can't just stand
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: their ground.
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: Well, it's incredibly frustrating. Look, you and I are recording this.
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: It is ten oh seven pm Texas time on Tuesday night.
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: I started this day this morning at a little after
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: five am, voting on the Senate floor. And the reason
• 13:05
  Speaker 3: we were voting at five am is because Chuck Schumer
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: had kept the Senate in all night in order to
• 13:11
  Speaker 3: try to force this vote through, and he succeeded. The
• 13:15
  Speaker 3: vote was seventy to twenty nine. In other words, seventy
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: Senators voted yes, twenty nine voted no. All the Democrats
• 13:25
  Speaker 3: except three voted for the funding bill, and yet there
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: were just twenty nine of us.
• 13:34
  Speaker 4: I was a no.
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: There were twenty nine of us, and that was twenty
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: six Republicans and three Democrats who voted no. And listen,
• 13:43
  Speaker 3: my reasons for voting no. We've talked about at length,
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: but it's worth revisiting. There are elements of this bill
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: that I support. There are even elements of this bill
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: that I strongly support. So for example, this bill includes
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: emergency military funding for Israel. I think that is incredible important.
• 14:00
  Speaker 3: I think we should have passed that months ago. This
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: bill includes funding to help Taiwan defend itself against communist China.
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: I think that is very important for US national security.
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: And then, most notably, this bill contains tens of billions
• 14:17
  Speaker 3: of dollars of funding for Ukraine. Now, my views on
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: that are mixed. I think it is very important that
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: Russia lose and Putin loses, and there are certainly circumstances
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: in which I would be willing to support military funding
• 14:32
  Speaker 3: for Ukraine to stop Russia, because I think that's in
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: the United States's interest. However, just a couple of months ago,
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: every single Republican in the Senate we stood united, and
• 14:45
  Speaker 3: we made a united stand. We said we will not
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: fund additional money for Ukraine unless and until we secure
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: our own border. That we're not going to spend billions
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: to secure the border of another name until America secures
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: our border. And we're not going to spend billions to
• 15:06
  Speaker 3: stop the invasion of another country until we stopped the
• 15:10
  Speaker 3: invasion of our own country. Now, when I said that,
• 15:14
  Speaker 3: I meant it. Unfortunately, I think for a lot of
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: my colleagues they did not, because, as you know, what
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: happened was Chuck Schumer and the Democrats refused to negotiate
• 15:27
  Speaker 3: and agree to meaningful border security. Instead, they demanded a
• 15:31
  Speaker 3: bill that in many ways would have made the border
• 15:33
  Speaker 3: crisis worse, would have codified Joe Biden's open borders, and
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: when as soon as the bill TECHS was released, they
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: negotiated in secret. Within twenty four hours, the bill had
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: collapse because everyone reading it realized it was a terrible bill.
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: What Republican leadership did next, I think was indefensible. They said, Okay,
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: well a few people don't like Chuck Chuck Schumer's open
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: border proposal, then never mind, will'll just pass all the
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: funding with nothing on the border at all. I think
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: that is an absurd position. But unfortunately seventy senators just
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: cast a vote that way.
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: So what happens now, because what we're hearing is that
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: this could move the House side Speaker Johnson has indicated
• 16:18
  Speaker 2: no or probably not, this isn't going to happen. And
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: then now Democrats apparently, oh Kim Jeffreys is saying, all right,
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: well they're going to get together and they're going to
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: get a game planned or basically ram this down everyone's throat.
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: What would that look like and what does that mean
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: moving forward? On top of the fact that the House
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: majority for Republicans just got slimmer as well tonight because
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: we've lost a special election.
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: Well that's exactly right. Look, if it is up to
• 16:44
  Speaker 3: House leadership, if it's up to the Speaker of the House.
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: This bill will not pass. The Speaker has said so
• 16:51
  Speaker 3: unequivocally that the House is not going to take up
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: and pass any military funding for Ukraine unlessen until it
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: contains serious and meaningful border security. And by the way,
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: the House has already passed strong border security legislation, that
• 17:06
  Speaker 3: is HR two. The House passed that months ago. Chuck
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: Schumer refused to take it up. I introduced HR two
• 17:13
  Speaker 3: in the Senate. I'm the author of HR two in
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: the United States Senate. I had it as an amendment
• 17:18
  Speaker 3: to this bill. And by the way, I was clear,
• 17:20
  Speaker 3: I said, you know what, if we pass HR two,
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: I'll vote for this bill. If we pass strong legislation
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: that forces Joe Biden to secure the border, I'm on board.
• 17:32
  Speaker 3: And Schumer said, not just no, but hell no. Refused
• 17:36
  Speaker 3: to allow a vote on HR two. When we were
• 17:39
  Speaker 3: voting this morning, I was trying very hard to get
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: a vote. Schumer locked down and blocked every single amendment vote.
• 17:47
  Speaker 3: What I expect Republican leadership in the House to do
• 17:51
  Speaker 3: is to take up this bill and to attach strong
• 17:54
  Speaker 3: border security to it and then send it back to
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: the Senate. That's what I think is likely to happen.
• 18:01
  Speaker 3: There is a chance, and you referenced it. There's some
• 18:03
  Speaker 3: Democrats talking about trying to do what's called a discharge petition,
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: which is all the House Democrats teaming up with a
• 18:10
  Speaker 3: handful of hawkish Republicans to basically overrule the Speaker of
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: the House and force the bill onto the floor. I
• 18:20
  Speaker 3: don't think that will happen, and it is the sort
• 18:23
  Speaker 3: of move that would be just absolute rebellion by the
• 18:27
  Speaker 3: rank and file Republican members. And but that is really
• 18:33
  Speaker 3: what Mitch mcconnlin Chuck Schumer's plan is, is to try
• 18:37
  Speaker 3: to use this bill to directly attack the Republican Speaker
• 18:41
  Speaker 3: of the House. And I got to say, Ben, I
• 18:42
  Speaker 3: don't understand why Senate Republican leadership is trying to lead
• 18:48
  Speaker 3: the attack on House Republican leadership.
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: Well, one final question this what was in it for
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: Republicans that just caved on this? I mean, I know,
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: and I'm cynical because I've been around it probably too long,
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: and you're probably you see it every day, so you're
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: cynical too. I'm like, all right, so what did you
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: get like to make you not listen to the American
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: people and just go along with this. What was the
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: incentive there to side with the Democrats.
• 19:16
  Speaker 3: So so let me be a little more forgiving in
• 19:19
  Speaker 3: this sense. You know, there are folks that said, what
• 19:22
  Speaker 3: did they get? They're compromised. Look, in my experience, that's
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: not how Washington works. I don't think there's anybody with
• 19:29
  Speaker 3: a folder of people having, you know, sexual relations with
• 19:33
  Speaker 3: barnyard animals. And I don't think this is compromant. I
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: don't think it's And I also don't think for the
• 19:40
  Speaker 3: people who voted for this that what did they get?
• 19:43
  Speaker 3: I don't think that they're like the Biden family in
• 19:47
  Speaker 3: terms of making millions of dollars off of this. I
• 19:49
  Speaker 3: don't think that's why it happened. At least among the Republicans.
• 19:53
  Speaker 3: I think a great many of them passionately believe that
• 19:58
  Speaker 3: it is in America's interest for you Ukraine to beat Russia.
• 20:02
  Speaker 3: And I understand that sentiment. I think Russia's winning this
• 20:05
  Speaker 3: war would be very, very bad for America and over
• 20:09
  Speaker 3: the long term, would be much more expensive for American
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: taxpayers than it would be to defeat Russia and Ukraine.
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: So want I want Russia to lose and I think
• 20:19
  Speaker 3: it's combined with there are a lot of Republican senators
• 20:23
  Speaker 3: that basically they don't like a fight, and in any
• 20:28
  Speaker 3: given fight, when you ask them, all right, let's hold
• 20:31
  Speaker 3: the line and say we won't do this unless we
• 20:34
  Speaker 3: get real border security, they look at you and say, well,
• 20:37
  Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer would never do that. And I don't understand
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: why they expect Chuck Schumer to stand strong and never blink,
• 20:45
  Speaker 3: and yet their solution is always, well, therefore, we got
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: to give Schumer what he wants. But that's temperamentally the
• 20:52
  Speaker 3: view of far too many Republicans in Congress.
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: As before, If you want to hear the rest of
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: this conversation on this topic, you can go go back
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: and now the podcast from earlier this week to hear
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: the entire thing. I want to get back to the
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: big story number three of the week.
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: You may have missed.
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: It's amazing that Colorado took it this far because to me,
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: this seems like there's a decent chance this could be
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: exactly what you thought. It could be a unanimous decision
• 21:19
  Speaker 2: or even an eight to one.
• 21:21
  Speaker 3: Well, and to underscore that, so we played obviously Justice
• 21:25
  Speaker 3: Thomas and Justice Gorsich are conservatives. But let's listen now
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: to Justice Elena Kagan, and remember what I said at
• 21:32
  Speaker 3: the outset, which is that I believe this had a
• 21:35
  Speaker 3: very good chance of being unanimous. I think the Chief
• 21:38
  Speaker 3: Justice desperately wants it to be unanimous, and I think
• 21:41
  Speaker 3: the way it gets to be unanimous, in particular, is
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: the Chief Justice goes to Elena Kagan, who I think
• 21:46
  Speaker 3: is the smartest of the liberal justices. She was the
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: former dean of the Harvard Law School, she was former
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: Solicitor General of the United States. She's very, very smart.
• 21:56
  Speaker 3: Listen to Justice Kagan asking the Colorado lawyer Jason Murray question.
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: Before I play that for you, I want to tell
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: you about our friends over at Patriot Mobile. For ten years,
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: Patriot Mobile has been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: When I say only trust me, they're the only one.
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: Patriot Mobile is a great support of the show. That's
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: one of the reasons why I love them. I'm proud
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: to partner with great commies at sport conservative Christian values.
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: And when you switch to Patriot Mobile, not only do
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: they give you dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: to access all of the major networks, meaning you get
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: the same exact coverage that you have right now. You
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: get that same coverage you've been accustomed to, but without
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: funding the woke left, you may not realize that Big
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: Mobile supports Democrats and democratic causes and candidates and Planned
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: parenthood with millions and millions of dollars in donations. That's
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: why when you look at my cell phone the top left,
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: it says the word Patriot, I know every month when
• 22:54
  Speaker 2: I get my bill, I am supporting conservative causes that
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: I stand behind. They actually at Patriot Mobile take about
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: five percent of your bill every month and they give
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: it back to free speech organizations, religious freedom organizations, organizations
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: that support and protect the sancty of life, the Second Amendment,
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: as well as our military, our veterans, our first responder heroes,
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: and our wounded warriors.
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: They have one hundred percent.
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: US based customer service team that makes switching easy and
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: you can keep your same cell phone number you have
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: right now, keep your same phone if you have that
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: you have right now, or upgrade to a new one.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: Plus the team will help you find the best plan
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: for your needs and many times it can save you
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: big money every month. So go to Patriot Mobile dot
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: com slash verdict. That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict.
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: Or call them and make the switch nine seven to
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: two Patriot. That's nine seven to two Patriot. Get free
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: activation when you use the promo code Verdict that's Patriot
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: Mobile dot com slash verdict. Or call them nine seven
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: to two Patriot. That's nine seven to two Patriot. Take
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: a listen to this very interesting back and forth between
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: Justice Kagan and the Colorado lawyer Jason Murray.
• 24:06
  Speaker 4: Justice Kavanaugh, there has to be some process for determining
• 24:08
  Speaker 4: those questions, and then the question becomes does anything in
• 24:12
  Speaker 4: the fourteenth Amendment say that only Congress can create that process?
• 24:15
  Speaker 4: And Section five very clearly is not an exclusive provision.
• 24:19
  Speaker 4: It says Congress shall have power.
• 24:21
  Speaker 5: It maybe put most boldly, I think that the question
• 24:25
  Speaker 5: that you have to confront is why a single state
• 24:27
  Speaker 5: should decide who gets to be president of the United States.
• 24:31
  Speaker 5: In other words, you know, this question of whether a
• 24:33
  Speaker 5: former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again
• 24:39
  Speaker 5: is just say it. It sounds awfully national to me.
• 24:44
  Speaker 5: So whatever means there are to enforce it would suggest
• 24:46
  Speaker 5: that they have to be federal national means, why does
• 24:51
  Speaker 5: you know if you weren't from Colorado when you were
• 24:53
  Speaker 5: from Wisconsin or you were from Michigan, And it really,
• 24:57
  Speaker 5: you know, what the Michigan Secretary of State did is
• 25:00
  Speaker 5: going to make the difference between whether Candidate A is
• 25:05
  Speaker 5: elected or Candidate BE is elected. Matt seems quite extraordinary,
• 25:09
  Speaker 5: doesn't it.
• 25:10
  Speaker 4: No, your honor, Because ultimately it's this court that's going
• 25:12
  Speaker 4: to decide that question of federal constitutional eligibility and settle
• 25:16
  Speaker 4: the issue for the nation. And certainly it's not unusual
• 25:19
  Speaker 4: that questions of national importance come up.
• 25:22
  Speaker 5: Well, I suppose this Court would be saying something along
• 25:25
  Speaker 5: the lines of the state has the power to do it.
• 25:28
  Speaker 5: But I guess I was asking you to go a
• 25:30
  Speaker 5: little bit further and saying, why should that be the
• 25:32
  Speaker 5: right rule? Why should a single state have the ability
• 25:36
  Speaker 5: to make this determination not only for their own citizens,
• 25:40
  Speaker 5: but for the rest of the nation.
• 25:42
  Speaker 4: Because Article two gives them the power to appoint their
• 25:46
  Speaker 4: own electors as they see fit. But if they're going
• 25:48
  Speaker 4: to use a federal constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant,
• 25:54
  Speaker 4: then it's creating a federal constitutional question that then this
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: Court decides and other courts other states. If this Court
• 26:01
  Speaker 4: affirms the decision below determining that President Trump is ineligible
• 26:05
  Speaker 4: to be president, other states would still have to determine
• 26:08
  Speaker 4: what effect that would have on their own states law
• 26:10
  Speaker 4: and state procedures.
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean we if we affirmed, I mean center,
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: even she someone you would expect would be on the
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: side of Colorado not really having it either.
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 26:20
  Speaker 3: Look, and as I said, I don't think any justices
• 26:24
  Speaker 3: are going to vote with Colorado. I think we're going
• 26:26
  Speaker 3: to see in all likelihood of unanimous decision. And she's
• 26:29
  Speaker 3: focusing on you know, earlier we played Katanji Brown Jackson,
• 26:33
  Speaker 3: and she was focusing on the fact that that president
• 26:35
  Speaker 3: is not an officer that has specified in the fourteenth Amendment,
• 26:38
  Speaker 3: Section three. Justice Kaiget's po pointing out, well, why does
• 26:42
  Speaker 3: one state get to do this? And if one state
• 26:43
  Speaker 3: gets to do it, couldn't another state do something different?
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: What do you do with that?
• 26:46
  Speaker 3: And let's let's do one other clip which emphasizes that point.
• 26:51
  Speaker 3: And you remember we did an entire podcast talking about
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: the amicus brief that I filed, and this was an
• 26:57
  Speaker 3: argument that I made on behalf of one hundred and
• 26:59
  Speaker 3: seventy members of Congress, and I think it's a really
• 27:01
  Speaker 3: powerful argument. Let's listen to Justice Alito asking about that argument,
• 27:06
  Speaker 3: in particular, Thank you, Thank.
• 27:09
  Speaker 4: You, Counsel Justice Thomas.
• 27:12
  Speaker 6: Justice Alito, Suppose there's a country that proclaims again and
• 27:17
  Speaker 6: again and again that the United States is its biggest enemy.
• 27:22
  Speaker 6: And suppose that the President of the United States, for
• 27:26
  Speaker 6: diplomatic reasons, think that it's in the best interests of
• 27:29
  Speaker 6: the United States to provide funds or release funds so
• 27:35
  Speaker 6: that they can be used by that country. Could a
• 27:39
  Speaker 6: state determine that that person has given aid and comfort
• 27:43
  Speaker 6: to the enemy and therefore keep that person off the ballot.
• 27:47
  Speaker 4: No, your honor, this Court has never interpreted the aid
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: and comfort language, which also is present.
• 27:52
  Speaker 3: So that's another enormous problem with Colorado's argument, which is
• 27:57
  Speaker 3: that if Colorado is able to throw Donald Trump off
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: the ballot, you're going to see other states act. You're
• 28:03
  Speaker 3: going to see red states throw Joe Biden off the ballot.
• 28:06
  Speaker 3: And the hypothetical that Sam Alito asked, it's a very
• 28:09
  Speaker 3: good hypothetical. He's obviously talking about Iran, and Iran is
• 28:13
  Speaker 3: led by an Iatola who chanced death to America, who
• 28:17
  Speaker 3: has murdered hundreds upon hundreds of servicemen and women, American
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: servicemen and women, who's the biggest funder of state funder
• 28:25
  Speaker 3: of terrorism in the world, And Joe Biden has flowed
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: one hundred billion dollars to the IYATOLA. Now, as Justice
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: Alito pointed out, Biden argues, it's for diplomatic reasons. But
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: under the argument of Colorado, you could some other state
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: could say, well, no, we conclude you're giving aid and
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: comfort to our enemy. So Joe Biden is off the ballot.
• 28:47
  Speaker 3: And the lawyer's answer was just well no, no, no, no,
• 28:50
  Speaker 3: that's a different provision. So no, no, we like Joe Biden,
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: so you can't do that. I think that demonstrates that
• 28:58
  Speaker 3: the theory behind this decision is insupportable, and it leads
• 29:02
  Speaker 3: to chaos, and it fundamentally leads to judges battling each
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: other to decide elections rather than the voters deciding elections.
• 29:11
  Speaker 3: And so I'm going to reiterate, I think the chances
• 29:14
  Speaker 3: that the US Supreme Court reverses this decision are one
• 29:19
  Speaker 3: hundred percent, and I think the chances are significant more
• 29:24
  Speaker 3: likely than not that the decision will be unanimous and
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: I think we will get it this month, the month
• 29:29
  Speaker 3: of February.
• 29:30
  Speaker 2: As always, thank you for listening to Verdict with Center
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you don't forget to deal
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: with my podcast and you can listen to my podcast
• 29:39
  Speaker 2: every other day you're not listening to Verdict or each
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: day when you listen to Verdict afterwards, I'd love to
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: have you as a listener to again Ben Ferguson Podcasts,
• 29:46
  Speaker 2: and we will see you back here on Monday morning.