Latest / V / Good Riddance to Canada's Commie Overlord (Ep.113)

Transcript

Good Riddance to Canada's Commie Overlord (Ep.113) · V

0:00
Speaker 1: Good morning and welcome to Bongina Report Early Edition. The
0:04
Speaker 1: FBI is accused of blurring biometric identifying information in the
0:09
Speaker 1: pipe bomber footage. Justin Trudeau resigns as a Liberal Party leader.
0:15
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Jr. is set to visit Greenland today. Andrew
0:19
Speaker 1: Tate announces his bid for UK Prime Minister, which you
0:23
Speaker 1: can't really bid for Prime Minister in the same way
0:26
Speaker 1: you can in the US, but we'll get to that.
0:28
Speaker 1: The Golden Globes awards a film about a transgender Mexican
0:34
Speaker 1: drug lord, and The Golden Globe also awards an anti-Catholic
0:38
Speaker 1: hate film. All this on Bongina Report, early edition. Deep
0:54
Speaker 1: State whistleblower Mike Benz, you guys know he's just the
0:59
Speaker 1: greatest resource on this show. He is dropping, oh my goodness,
1:03
Speaker 1: my sound is on. He is dropping truth bomb after
1:08
Speaker 1: truth bomb and making some allegations that could be wildly
1:13
Speaker 1: impactful on the entire January 6th narrative. He tweeted yesterday,
1:18
Speaker 1: in 2021, I spent literally hundreds of hours on the
1:22
Speaker 1: January 6th pipe bomber. One thing I never published until
1:27
Speaker 1: now still bothers me to this day. I believe the FBI,
1:31
Speaker 1: in addition to nuking the frame rate on the DNC
1:33
Speaker 1: security camera, blurred the eyes so no one could ID
1:39
Speaker 1: based on biometrics, according to Benz, The camera was only
1:43
Speaker 1: 20 feet away with no blur added. You'd have a
1:47
Speaker 1: clear shot of the Pipe Bomber's eyes through his or
1:50
Speaker 1: her transparent glasses, but the eyes are not visible. And
1:54
Speaker 1: this goes for the Pipe Bomber footage released in April
1:57
Speaker 1: of 2021 and the footage released last week. And if
2:02
Speaker 1: Mike Benz is right, I mean, this is huge. The
2:04
Speaker 1: implications would be massive. Why would the federal government deliberately
2:10
Speaker 1: manipulate the security videos to conceal the bomber's identity? Why?
2:16
Speaker 1: Could it be that the bomber was a federal agent
2:19
Speaker 1: or an asset? Whatever it is, it's really odd. Isn't
2:24
Speaker 1: it odd, too, that the Select Committee to Investigate January 6th,
2:29
Speaker 1: the Witch Hunt Committee, barely addressed the pipe bombs? Even
2:35
Speaker 1: though they could have been used to strengthen the claim
2:38
Speaker 1: that the right is full of domestic terrorists and January
2:41
Speaker 1: 6th was an insurrection, the pipe bomber's great for that narrative,
2:46
Speaker 1: so why do they just ignore it? Strange, right? The
2:49
Speaker 1: corporate press, too, shifted focus on the bombs. Would a
2:54
Speaker 1: salacious bomb threat mystery be a major interest to the
2:59
Speaker 1: corporate media whose mission is to demonize the violent political right?
3:03
Speaker 1: Of course. So why didn't they use it? For some reason,
3:08
Speaker 1: it was never of interest. Kamala Harris' security detail somehow
3:12
Speaker 1: missed the bomb during her visit to the DNC, even
3:15
Speaker 1: though the bomb was sitting in plain sight. Why isn't
3:18
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris been interested in the pipe bomb. Just compare
3:22
Speaker 1: January 6th to Pearl Harbor and 9-11. It has been
3:26
Speaker 1: radio silent on the bomb that could have killed her
3:29
Speaker 1: that day. Strange. Meanwhile, text messages from Secret Service agents
3:35
Speaker 1: around the time of January 6th were deleted and requests
3:40
Speaker 1: for the recovered messages have been unsuccessful. Why? It is
3:48
Speaker 1: all entirely bizarre and suspicious. Now, what gives me solace
3:54
Speaker 1: is the fact that the truth is going to come out.
3:57
Speaker 1: This isn't one of those murder mysteries that you watch
4:00
Speaker 1: on television and it leaves you hanging and you'll never
4:02
Speaker 1: find out the answer. It's a decades old cold case. No.
4:08
Speaker 1: With Trump and Kash Patel, we are going to get
4:10
Speaker 1: the facts straight on this. And on JFK and 9-11 too,
4:14
Speaker 1: it's all going to come out. And Cash really gives
4:18
Speaker 1: me hope. Just take a listen to this.
4:20
Speaker 2: You need a 24-7 declassification.
4:21
Speaker 1: This is Cash Patel.
4:23
Speaker 2: Whatever you want to call it. Transparency, truth, whatever. I
4:26
Speaker 2: don't care. Sits in the White House, reports directly to you,
4:30
Speaker 2: and you take incoming from the United States of America.
4:33
Speaker 2: I want JFK. I want the 9-11 files. I want this.
4:36
Speaker 1: I want that.
4:37
Speaker 2: All the FBI, and this is a tool, this is
4:39
Speaker 2: something we didn't cover. What the deep state uses the
4:43
Speaker 2: most to cover up their corruption is is an illegal
4:47
Speaker 2: application of the classification system.
4:53
Speaker 3: Yes.
4:53
Speaker 1: 24-7 declassification office. That's exactly what we need. I want
4:59
Speaker 1: to know the truth about everything. JFK, Jeffrey Epstein, 9-11, MKUltra, Iran-Contra,
5:04
Speaker 1: Promise Software, NSA surveillance, Area 51. And then all the
5:09
Speaker 1: abuses that we aren't even aware of. I want to
5:12
Speaker 1: know the truth. It all needs to come to light.
5:14
Speaker 1: And I have a lot of hope that it will.
5:17
Speaker 1: And we're going to find out whether Mike Benz is right.
5:21
Speaker 1: And not only that, but why. Why would they blur
5:26
Speaker 1: the eyes of the pipe bomb? There's another reason to
5:30
Speaker 1: be optimistic right now. Communist Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
5:35
Speaker 1: has announced his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party
5:38
Speaker 1: and will soon step down as Prime Minister. Take a listen.
5:42
Speaker 3: So last night over dinner, I told my kids about
5:46
Speaker 3: the decision that I'm sharing with you today. I intend
5:51
Speaker 3: to resign as party leader, as prime minister, after the
5:57
Speaker 3: party selects its next leader through a robust, nationwide, competitive process.
6:06
Speaker 1: He looks like he's holding back tears. Oh my goodness.
6:10
Speaker 1: Maybe I would feel bad for him. If this guy
6:12
Speaker 1: hadn't run Canada into the ground, if he wasn't an
6:16
Speaker 1: evil man, and I think that about him, I think
6:18
Speaker 1: he's an evil man, especially if you look at the
6:20
Speaker 1: way Canada's health care is run, the way that they
6:23
Speaker 1: euthanize people who are deemed strains on the system, the
6:27
Speaker 1: way that he's destroyed free speech in that country, tanking
6:30
Speaker 1: job approval, housing shortages, inflation. I mean, this guy is
6:34
Speaker 1: the worst. And again, like I said, some of the
6:38
Speaker 1: worst violations of free speech in the entire Western world.
6:42
Speaker 1: This guy, it basically runs it like communist China. So
6:45
Speaker 1: good riddance to Trudeau, who is definitely Fidel Castro's son.
6:52
Speaker 1: And a lot of people online have been saying, congratulating
6:54
Speaker 1: really Donald Trump, saying that Trump got rid of Trudeau.
6:58
Speaker 1: Trump is the reason that Canada is liberated from this man.
7:02
Speaker 1: And There's maybe some truth to that, the pressure that
7:06
Speaker 1: Trump put on Trudeau and all of Canada with his
7:08
Speaker 1: threats of tariffs. But I also think that there is
7:12
Speaker 1: something broader happening right now. Populism is rising in the West.
7:18
Speaker 1: Trump's victory in America, which is the leader of the
7:21
Speaker 1: Western world, is a signal and an inspiration that spreads
7:27
Speaker 1: across the Western world. And I think you're going to
7:30
Speaker 1: see a lot more populist leaders come into power in
7:33
Speaker 1: the wake of this Trump victory, liberalism is in retreat everywhere.
7:38
Speaker 1: We've seen the fruits of it. We've seen a couple
7:42
Speaker 1: decades of liberalism rise in the West, actually really more
7:46
Speaker 1: than a couple. I mean, it's gone into overdrive the
7:48
Speaker 1: last few decades, but it's been since probably 1960s, 1950s,
7:56
Speaker 1: where you've seen this real influence of cultural Marxism in
8:00
Speaker 1: Western society. And people have seen the fruits of it,
8:04
Speaker 1: and they are rejecting it en masse. So these are
8:07
Speaker 1: really hopeful times that we live in. Now, I will
8:11
Speaker 1: say the fight for Canadians is far from over. Trudeau's
8:13
Speaker 1: departure is set to initiate a leadership contest within the
8:17
Speaker 1: Liberal Party of Canada. And of course, all the Liberal
8:20
Speaker 1: members of Parliament and Liberal leadership contenders supported everything that
8:27
Speaker 1: Trudeau did for the last nine years. So a Liberal
8:30
Speaker 1: replacement for Trudeau will be Trudeau 2.0. Now, the Canadians
8:36
Speaker 1: could elect a conservative prime minister. They could get rid
8:40
Speaker 1: of the Liberal Party and general boot him out of power.
8:42
Speaker 1: That's an option. But there's another option that Donald Trump
8:46
Speaker 1: has put forward. This is Trump's idea. He wrote on
8:49
Speaker 1: Truth Social yesterday. Many people in Canada love being the
8:54
Speaker 1: 51st state. The United States can no longer suffer the
8:57
Speaker 1: massive trade deficits and subsidies that Canada needs to stay afloat.
9:01
Speaker 1: Justin Trudeau knew this and resigned. If Canada merged with
9:05
Speaker 1: the U.S., there would be no tariffs, taxes would go
9:08
Speaker 1: way down, and they would be totally secure from the
9:11
Speaker 1: threat of the Russian and Chinese ships that are constantly
9:13
Speaker 1: surrounding them. Together, what a great nation it would be.
9:19
Speaker 1: And you guys, it sounds crazy, but first of all,
9:21
Speaker 1: drop a comment, Katie, in the chat. How do you
9:23
Speaker 1: feel about joining America? What do you think of Donald
9:25
Speaker 1: Trump's proposition? But like I said, it sounds crazy, but
9:30
Speaker 1: with Trump, anything is possible. And speaking of anything being possible,
9:37
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Jr. is set to arrive in Greenland, the
9:42
Speaker 1: Danish territory that, of course, Trump has said he would
9:45
Speaker 1: like to acquire today. Now, Donald Trump Jr. is arriving today,
9:51
Speaker 1: and Trump Sr. would like to acquire the territory. Now,
9:55
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Jr. 's trip is reportedly personal. It's focused
10:01
Speaker 1: on creating podcast content, so he says. But that hasn't
10:05
Speaker 1: stopped people from speculating that there's more to it. Perhaps
10:08
Speaker 1: Trump sent his son to scout out the territory, maybe
10:12
Speaker 1: win over the Greenlanders. Who knows what the goal is here?
10:16
Speaker 1: But things are changing in Greenland. At the end of
10:18
Speaker 1: last month, the capital of Greenland experienced power outages lasting
10:23
Speaker 1: for over 10 hours with a windshield of negative 17
10:28
Speaker 1: degrees Fahrenheit. And if, I mean, guys, I lived in
10:31
Speaker 1: northern Wisconsin. I think I've experienced negative 10. Michael, what's
10:36
Speaker 1: the coldest you've experienced? Oh, right. Okay. Michael and I,
10:41
Speaker 1: I was living in Chicago at the time. Michael was
10:46
Speaker 1: in UW Madison, and we did have a polar vortex
10:50
Speaker 1: come in. That was negative 40. That was really cold.
10:52
Speaker 1: But let me just tell you guys, negative 17 is cold.
10:56
Speaker 1: You will die. People will die from those temperatures and
11:00
Speaker 1: not having any power. So really scary stuff. And Nick
11:04
Speaker 1: Sordor wrote on X, President Trump would never allow this
11:09
Speaker 1: to happen to you, Greenland. Time to join us, of course,
11:12
Speaker 1: in reference to the power outages. Yesterday, Trump posted this
11:16
Speaker 1: video of a Greenlander with the caption, make Greenland great again.
11:20
Speaker 3: Buy Greenland?
11:22
Speaker 4: Buy Greenland.
11:23
Speaker 1: Why do you want Trump to buy Greenland?
11:24
Speaker 5: Because we don't want to.
11:25
Speaker 4: Be colonized by Danish government anymore. We get ribbed every
11:29
Speaker 4: year about our minerals from Greenland. We are the richest
11:32
Speaker 4: nation in the world and we don't get to use it.
11:35
Speaker 4: Denmark's using us too much.
11:37
Speaker 1: Do you like America?
11:38
Speaker 4: I love America, but people are too fun over there.
11:42
Speaker 1: Ha ha ha ha ha. He says people are too
11:45
Speaker 1: fat over there. Although I will say he's not the
11:48
Speaker 1: skinniest guy if you see the video. But he says bias,
11:52
Speaker 1: which is wild. Apparently Trump is really winning over some
11:55
Speaker 1: hearts and minds in Greenland. Trump wrote this in his
11:59
Speaker 1: caption with the video, Greenland is an incredible place and
12:03
Speaker 1: the people will benefit tremendously if and when it becomes
12:07
Speaker 1: part of our nation. We will protect it and cherish
12:09
Speaker 1: it from a very vicious outside world. Now Greenland's prime
12:13
Speaker 1: minister is calling for independence from Denmark, indicating that Greenlanders, again,
12:19
Speaker 1: are displeased with Denmark rule. Take a listen.
12:23
Speaker 6: Here in Greenland, we need to have some growth. We
12:25
Speaker 6: need to have some economic growth and diversify our economy.
12:30
Speaker 6: And of course, we welcome our strong partners, like-minded nations
12:35
Speaker 6: as first. But if they don't invest, there's a lot
12:38
Speaker 6: of companies who also want to invest in this country.
12:43
Speaker 1: Now, interestingly, Trump Jr. 's surprise trip to Greenland coincides
12:48
Speaker 1: with Greenland's prime minister postponing a planned meeting with Denmark's
12:55
Speaker 1: king on Wednesday in Copenhagen. But the prime minister, of course,
13:00
Speaker 1: insisted this is just pure coincidence.
13:02
Speaker 3: I don't know.
13:03
Speaker 1: It's looking like things are changing on the Greenland front.
13:06
Speaker 1: Maybe it's not a pipe dream after all for Donald Trump.
13:09
Speaker 1: Drop a comment. Would you go and visit Greenland if
13:13
Speaker 1: Trump acquired it for America? I think I would, honestly,
13:17
Speaker 1: I would be, I would be interested in going there.
13:20
Speaker 1: One of the happiest places that I've ever, um, been
13:24
Speaker 1: and lived was when Michael and I were up living
13:27
Speaker 1: on a lake in the North woods of Wisconsin. So
13:30
Speaker 1: I have to imagine that I'd appreciate Greenland's natural beauty,
13:35
Speaker 1: even though it's a very cold climate. Um, and especially
13:38
Speaker 1: if I visited in the summer, right, it'd be much
13:40
Speaker 1: more temperate. Here's what Greenland looks like. I mean, just beautiful.
13:49
Speaker 1: It's a different kind of beauty than if you are
13:52
Speaker 1: like a beach vacation lover. But you see these beautiful
13:59
Speaker 1: ice caps and I hear that the sunsets, I guess,
14:02
Speaker 1: can last hours in Greenland because of its positioning on
14:05
Speaker 1: the globe. Michael, would you visit Greenland? Greenland? Not an
14:11
Speaker 1: interest for Michael, it looks like. I don't know. I
14:13
Speaker 1: think I would be excited if Trump acquired it for America,
14:16
Speaker 1: so I might be excited and want to go. That
14:20
Speaker 1: actually happened when the United States acquired Hawaii. There was
14:22
Speaker 1: this big boom and everybody wanted to go to Hawaii
14:25
Speaker 1: and you had all these movies take place in Hawaii.
14:29
Speaker 1: I think there was an Elvis Presley movie that was
14:31
Speaker 1: really famous. Oh, Blue Hawaii. It's a great film that
14:34
Speaker 1: came out in response to the U.S. acquiring the Hawaii,
14:38
Speaker 1: the island state. Now, I also hear that fishing is
14:43
Speaker 1: really good in Greenland. So maybe that would interest you, Mikey.
14:46
Speaker 1: Maybe the fishing. Yeah, okay. So Greenland also happens to
14:50
Speaker 1: be 96% Christian, which is a very positive thing. Mostly Lutheran.
14:55
Speaker 1: It's 95.5% Lutheran. So any Lutherans in the chat, looks
15:00
Speaker 1: like Greenland is the place to be for Lutherans. Now,
15:02
Speaker 1: I do have a warning. I have a warning about
15:04
Speaker 1: Canada and I have a warning about Greenland. I'm not
15:07
Speaker 1: interested in them becoming states, frankly. Territories are fine, but
15:12
Speaker 1: both appear to vote pretty left-wing, and I would rather
15:17
Speaker 1: them not become states. We don't need them ruining our
15:19
Speaker 1: electoral college. It's already in the balance as it is.
15:23
Speaker 1: Who knows what conservatives will be looking at once Trump
15:26
Speaker 1: is out of office. So territories are fine, not interested
15:30
Speaker 1: in them becoming states. Now, in more outside news from
15:34
Speaker 1: the U.S., Andrew Tate.
15:38
Speaker 1: The famous Manosphere influencer, has declared that he is now
15:43
Speaker 1: running for UK prime minister. And like I said, Andrew
15:47
Speaker 1: Tate is a male influencer online. He's pretty controversial. He
15:52
Speaker 1: says a lot of outlandish things. He's also pretty funny.
15:55
Speaker 1: And this declaration has been somewhat made fun of because
15:59
Speaker 1: the UK's parliamentary system doesn't let anyone just run for
16:03
Speaker 1: prime minister directly. like you can run for president in America.
16:07
Speaker 1: The prime minister is the leader of the majority party,
16:10
Speaker 1: and Andrew Tate is currently the leader of no party,
16:13
Speaker 1: let alone is he even in UK parliament. Nevertheless, here
16:17
Speaker 1: is why Andrew Tate says that he wants to become
16:21
Speaker 1: prime minister.
16:21
Speaker 5: If England was the England I remember, If England was 2001, Oasis,
16:27
Speaker 5: Pub Garden, you could walk around safely at night.
16:30
Speaker 1: But it's not.
16:31
Speaker 5: England's nothing like I remember. England's nothing like it used
16:33
Speaker 5: to be. England's a shadow of its former self. The
16:36
Speaker 5: politicians ignore us. They're sending our money to Ukraine we
16:38
Speaker 5: don't even want them to. They're allowing boats of thousands
16:41
Speaker 5: of people in to destroy our country. Our little children
16:43
Speaker 5: are getting stabbed to death. Nobody's even allowed to talk
16:45
Speaker 5: about it.
16:46
Speaker 7: If I mention it on.
16:46
Speaker 5: Facebook, I go to jail.
16:47
Speaker 8: And the media, the BBC, all of them are complicit
16:51
Speaker 8: in this by trying to paint the people who are
16:52
Speaker 8: concerned that their country no longer looks like the country
16:55
Speaker 8: they remember. Those are the bad ones, not the ones
16:57
Speaker 8: who are committing the crime. They're the bad ones because
16:59
Speaker 8: they're far-right thugs. The same media which is run by
17:02
Speaker 8: a bunch of f * * * ing pedophiles.
17:04
Speaker 1: I mean.
17:09
Speaker 1: I don't disagree with any of that. And Tate knows
17:13
Speaker 1: a thing or two about tyranny. The man has essentially
17:15
Speaker 1: been blacklisted by every single company, including Airbnb and Uber,
17:20
Speaker 1: because of his political opinions. Now, Tate has introduced a
17:24
Speaker 1: new political party named the BRUV Party, which stands for
17:28
Speaker 1: the Britain Restoring Underlying Values Party. By the way, on Greenland,
17:34
Speaker 1: Andrew Tate writes on X, As unofficial prime minister of
17:39
Speaker 1: the United Kingdom, I wholeheartedly support Greenland's annexation into the
17:43
Speaker 1: American empire. I have sent a diplomatic cable to the
17:47
Speaker 1: Danish stating, fighting America is insanity. You're cooked, bruv. Give
17:51
Speaker 1: it up. Finally, perhaps the island can be used for
17:55
Speaker 1: something cool. Nobody even goes there, writes Andrew Tate. Frankly,
17:59
Speaker 1: you guys, I'll take the bruv party and Andrew Tate
18:03
Speaker 1: over Keir Starmer and the Labour Party. any day of
18:06
Speaker 1: the week. Andrew Tate's bid, again, you can't really bid
18:09
Speaker 1: for prime minister, comes as Keir Starmer is in serious
18:13
Speaker 1: hot water. People have begun talking about how over a
18:15
Speaker 1: thousand white British young girls as young as 11 years
18:20
Speaker 1: old were sexually abused and raped by networks of Pakistani
18:26
Speaker 1: men across England for at least a decade. And multiple
18:31
Speaker 1: UK government agencies and police departments knew about the abuse
18:34
Speaker 1: and they did nothing. It appears the UK authorities didn't
18:38
Speaker 1: want to seem racist by investigating the Pakistani men, which is,
18:44
Speaker 1: I mean, it's like multiculturalism to its final form of
18:48
Speaker 1: just complete and utter evil and decay. It's awful. And
18:52
Speaker 1: the details here are so appalling. I mean, they're really
18:55
Speaker 1: hard to even think about. One of the grooming gangs,
19:00
Speaker 1: raped a young girl with a broken bottle, and she
19:04
Speaker 1: was so injured that she now can't have children. I mean,
19:07
Speaker 1: you guys have no idea. It actually gets worse. In
19:10
Speaker 1: some cases, authorities actually punished the child victims. Take a listen.
19:18
Speaker 9: And at 2.30 in the morning, the next morning, a
19:21
Speaker 9: woman on the other side of Rotherham picked up the
19:23
Speaker 9: phone and dialed 999 because she'd heard a young girl
19:25
Speaker 9: screaming in the house next door. Police had gone round
19:30
Speaker 9: to the house. They found this 13-year-old girl with another
19:34
Speaker 9: young girl. She was almost completely naked. She was blind
19:38
Speaker 9: drunk and she was with seven adult Pakistani men. She
19:43
Speaker 9: was drunk and leery. And South York police arrested the
19:49
Speaker 9: 13 year old girl for being drunk and disorderly they
19:52
Speaker 9: took her back to the station put her in the
19:54
Speaker 9: cells eventually charged her and she was convicted they didn't
19:58
Speaker 9: even question the men as to why they were in
20:02
Speaker 9: a house with a 13 year old girl who was
20:05
Speaker 9: nearly naked in the early hours of the morning.
20:10
Speaker 1: It's just unreal. They charged the 13-year-old. And Keir Starmer
20:17
Speaker 1: is also accused of ignoring the rape network when he
20:22
Speaker 1: was in opposition. And here's what's really disgusting. Because all
20:27
Speaker 1: this is coming back. Yesterday, Keir Starmer suggested that anyone
20:31
Speaker 1: demanding a new inquiry into the rape gang issue and
20:36
Speaker 1: how it was handled is part of the far right. Yeah,
20:39
Speaker 1: he's accusing them of being part of the far right
20:42
Speaker 1: for caring about rape victims. Take a listen.
20:46
Speaker 7: When politicians, and I mean politicians, who sat in government
20:52
Speaker 7: for many years, are casual about honesty, decency, truth, and
20:57
Speaker 7: the rule of law, calling for inquiries because they want
21:02
Speaker 7: to jump on a bandwagon of the far right, then
21:06
Speaker 7: that affects politics.
21:10
Speaker 1: It's far right to stand up against the mass rape
21:12
Speaker 1: of children. Is this guy serious? I mean, are there
21:17
Speaker 1: any UKers in the chat? Because I can't believe that
21:20
Speaker 1: there is not a revolution starting right now. Maybe that's
21:23
Speaker 1: just an American thing, but I would never tolerate. I mean,
21:26
Speaker 1: this is a level of evil coming from the UK's
21:31
Speaker 1: overlords that's almost incomprehensible. That you're not going to investigate
21:35
Speaker 1: the rape of children because you don't want to seem
21:37
Speaker 1: racist because those people happen to be Pakistanis imported into
21:41
Speaker 1: the UK, frankly, against the will of the British people.
21:45
Speaker 1: The whole thing is such a scandal. And here's what
21:52
Speaker 1: I have to say about Andrew Tate. I like the guy.
21:55
Speaker 1: With everything I've seen, I like the bruv party and
21:58
Speaker 1: what it stands for. I think Keir Starmer is a
22:02
Speaker 1: genuinely evil man. And only someone possessed by a demon
22:07
Speaker 1: would cover up a scandal like that. But I'm not
22:12
Speaker 1: sure that Andrew Tate is the answer. In fact, I
22:15
Speaker 1: think the only answer for the UK is Christian leadership.
22:20
Speaker 1: The UK is drowning in cultural Marxism and diversity to
22:27
Speaker 1: the point where they no longer have an identity. But
22:31
Speaker 1: what is British identity? I think there's an impulse in
22:35
Speaker 1: the UK and even here in America to put a
22:38
Speaker 1: major emphasis on whiteness. And this is an understandable reaction
22:43
Speaker 1: to the obvious discrimination of white people in the West.
22:48
Speaker 1: But I don't think that's enough. What gave the UK
22:51
Speaker 1: a real concrete identity was not skin color, although that's
22:56
Speaker 1: arguably a part of it. It was culture rooted in
23:00
Speaker 1: their Christian faith. Today, approximately 5% of the UK population
23:06
Speaker 1: attends church services on a weekly basis. The UK doesn't
23:11
Speaker 1: stand a chance if that's not fixed. And the same
23:16
Speaker 1: goes for the United States. The UK and, frankly, here
23:20
Speaker 1: in the States, we need Christian leadership if we want
23:24
Speaker 1: to fight demonic leftism and reclaim our cultural heritage. It
23:29
Speaker 1: is the only answer. All right, I promise you guys
23:34
Speaker 1: that this next story is not a joke. A French-Mexican
23:39
Speaker 1: film called Emilia Perez won the Golden Globe Best Picture
23:44
Speaker 1: for a Musical or Comedy of 2024, beating out wildly
23:49
Speaker 1: box office successful Wicked. And Emilia Perez is, I kid
23:54
Speaker 1: you not, about a Mexican drug lord who decides to
23:59
Speaker 1: transition into a woman. Here's a snippet of the film.
24:04
Speaker 7: China, is it for you? For me?
24:09
Speaker 1: No.
24:11
Speaker 7: What would you like to know about it, madam? I
24:17
Speaker 7: want to know it all.
24:18
Speaker 1: What is the protocol, the techniques and the risks?
24:21
Speaker 2: How many operations?
24:23
Speaker 6: How much time do you need?
24:26
Speaker 3: Yes.
24:26
Speaker 1: What is that?
24:27
Speaker 7: Adam's apple reduction. Yes, yes, yes, yes.
24:30
Speaker 1: Yes.
24:59
Speaker 4: I guess the.
25:00
Speaker 1: Woman in this is the assistant to the drug lord
25:03
Speaker 1: who's doing the research into the supposed gender transition surgeries
25:09
Speaker 1: that her boss could get. I mean... You sometimes just wonder, like,
25:20
Speaker 1: what have we become? That crap is being awarded? And
25:25
Speaker 1: a lot of Mexicans are actually pretty ticked off by
25:27
Speaker 1: this whole film. French director, of course it's French, forcing
25:32
Speaker 1: left-wing gender-bending values on highly Catholic, socially conservative Mexico. Some
25:38
Speaker 1: have compared it to the word latinx, the gender-neutral word
25:43
Speaker 1: for Latino or Latina. But no one wants this film,
25:47
Speaker 1: and it's frankly disrespectful. And when will Hollywood stop feeding
25:53
Speaker 1: the masses slop? That's what this is. It's disgusting. There's
25:58
Speaker 1: no care for for any kind of art form anymore.
26:01
Speaker 1: Everything is about subverting, eroding social norms, lying about history,
26:08
Speaker 1: all to serve left-wing politics. In other words, it's propaganda.
26:13
Speaker 1: Which brings me to Conclave. Conclave is a movie that
26:17
Speaker 1: came out a few months ago and won Best Screenplay
26:21
Speaker 1: at the Golden Globes. So I watched it for the
26:24
Speaker 1: first time over the weekend. I watched Conclave and boy
26:28
Speaker 1: was that a mistake. Now, Conclave is a fictional story
26:33
Speaker 1: that follows a papal election after the Pope's sudden death.
26:38
Speaker 1: And you have all these rivalries and hidden secrets among
26:41
Speaker 1: the cardinals involved in the election that totally disrupts the process.
26:45
Speaker 1: And we get a bunch of woke speeches. A ton
26:47
Speaker 1: of cardinals are ambitious and really sinful, slandering of church leadership, really.
26:54
Speaker 1: And the bad guys, the really bad guys, they're the traditionalists.
26:59
Speaker 1: The ones who want Latin mass, the ones who love
27:02
Speaker 1: chapel veils and big Catholic families, those guys are the
27:05
Speaker 1: bad guys, the really bad guys. And by the way,
27:08
Speaker 1: I'm a traditionalist. I love Latin mass in the Catholic church.
27:11
Speaker 1: I found it super offensive that they smear traditional Catholics. Now, spoiler,
27:18
Speaker 1: everybody warning, spoiler. At the end of the film, we
27:21
Speaker 1: learn that the man who was ultimately elected Pope, who
27:25
Speaker 1: happens to be the only character that is not seriously flawed,
27:31
Speaker 1: is not a man at all. Yeah, the new Pope
27:34
Speaker 1: is a secret genetic woman, an intersex individual.
27:38
Speaker 5: Big listen.
27:40
Speaker 3: I had a surgery to remove my appendix. And that
27:45
Speaker 3: was when the doctors discovered that I had a uterus.
27:50
Speaker 5: And ovaries.
27:53
Speaker 3: Some would say my chromosomes would define me as being
27:57
Speaker 3: a woman, and yet I'm also as you see me.
28:03
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, so that's a new pope in the movie.
28:07
Speaker 1: It's so disrespectful, and frankly, it's predictable. This is what
28:12
Speaker 1: they do. They defame and subvert through media. The left
28:18
Speaker 1: hates Christianity, and specifically hates the Catholic Church, so they
28:24
Speaker 1: weaponize their cultural power against it, to the point where
28:27
Speaker 1: so many of us are desensitized. We expect nothing less
28:31
Speaker 1: from the Western world, from Western media. But decades ago,
28:36
Speaker 1: the book that this movie was based off of wouldn't
28:39
Speaker 1: even be able to find a publisher. Never mind would
28:42
Speaker 1: this movie have been produced by an actual studio. Now,
28:48
Speaker 1: I will admit, The cinematography in Conclave is pretty good,
28:53
Speaker 1: but it's also dark and ominous. Clearly, the filmmakers wanted
28:58
Speaker 1: to paint the Catholic Church as negative and actually scary.
29:04
Speaker 1: And Hollywood does this with movies about the past as well.
29:08
Speaker 1: Progressive films that take place in modern times, like the
29:12
Speaker 1: film Unpregnant, where a young girl goes on a road
29:15
Speaker 1: trip to get an abortion, it's all bright and glittery.
29:19
Speaker 1: It's joyful. I mean, you can see in the footage
29:24
Speaker 1: that Michael's showing right now. It's yellow. It's pastel. It's warm.
29:29
Speaker 1: It's almost inviting. Again, this is a movie about a
29:33
Speaker 1: young girl who goes on a road trip to get
29:35
Speaker 1: an abortion. But then movies that feature value. of the
29:40
Speaker 1: past are different. They're always dark and muted in color.
29:46
Speaker 1: Think Kingdom of Heaven, Jane Eyre, Dunkirk, Lincoln. There's no vibrancy.
29:52
Speaker 1: The film is dead and depressing. It's as if they
29:59
Speaker 1: want to subliminally signal that the past and its values
30:03
Speaker 1: are to be feared. Meanwhile, the progressive present is sunny
30:07
Speaker 1: and wonderful. But is it? Objectively, there is less beauty
30:12
Speaker 1: and less color in modern life. Here's a comparison of
30:17
Speaker 1: everyday objects, past and present, like just benches and lampposts.
30:21
Speaker 1: Look at the difference. There is and ornateness and interesting,
30:31
Speaker 1: beautiful design to everyday objects that are just devoid of, frankly,
30:39
Speaker 1: humanity today. No color, no creativity. The difference is striking.
30:49
Speaker 1: No warmth, no creativity. And objectively, people are more depressed
30:55
Speaker 1: and unhealthy than ever before in human history. So what
30:58
Speaker 1: has progress really gotten us? They can keep sending us
31:03
Speaker 1: subliminal messages that the ancient and beautiful Catholic Church is
31:05
Speaker 1: corrupt and negative, but the Catholic Church is responsible for
31:10
Speaker 1: the universities, hospitals, all the best art and architecture, Western ethics.
31:16
Speaker 1: The fruits of Christianity are beautiful. The fruits of modernity
31:20
Speaker 1: are ugly and frankly dystopian and terrifying. The technological advancements
31:26
Speaker 1: in societal change Changes that we celebrate today have come
31:30
Speaker 1: with a price. Though we may have unlocked powerful tools
31:33
Speaker 1: for communication, entertainment, and efficiency, we've also created systems that
31:38
Speaker 1: prioritize progress over well-being, convenience over authenticity, and superficiality over depth.
31:46
Speaker 1: Fast food, mass consumerism, and the dominance of digital screens
31:50
Speaker 1: over face-to-face connection has led to a dehumanizing culture. where
31:55
Speaker 1: individual worth is measured in terms of productivity rather than
31:59
Speaker 1: inherent human dignity. Why do you think Canada is content
32:04
Speaker 1: to euthanize the elderly and the ill if they deem
32:07
Speaker 1: to be strains on the healthcare system? That's modern ethics.
32:11
Speaker 1: Relativism and secularism create rootless people, unsure of their purpose
32:17
Speaker 1: in life. The future we're heading toward is one of
32:20
Speaker 1: increasing surveillance, automation, technological control, a world where the government
32:27
Speaker 1: can lie to our faces and use its power to
32:30
Speaker 1: distort the truth, like with the DNC pipe bomber, and
32:33
Speaker 1: often they get away with it. It's a world completely
32:38
Speaker 1: devoid of spiritual and moral richness that once guided Western civilization.
32:44
Speaker 1: The contrast between the fruits of Christianity and the fruits
32:47
Speaker 1: of modernity offer a stark reflection on the values that
32:51
Speaker 1: guide us today. where Christianity brought beauty, charity, and a
32:55
Speaker 1: sense of duty to others. Modernity focuses on individualism, progress
33:00
Speaker 1: at all costs, technological utopia that's spiritually bankrupt. But the
33:04
Speaker 1: good news is that the propaganda is losing its effectiveness.
33:08
Speaker 1: People are awake to the game. This is why so
33:10
Speaker 1: many have been drawn to the Make America Great Again slogan.
33:16
Speaker 1: And that's why I think the slogan is deeper and
33:18
Speaker 1: richer than just Donald Trump the man. There's a brightness
33:22
Speaker 1: and an optimism to the global populism that is rising
33:25
Speaker 1: in the West. But we can't just rely on identifying
33:29
Speaker 1: the problems as Andrew Tate does in the UK. We
33:33
Speaker 1: need to replace progressivism with a future that draws on
33:36
Speaker 1: the beauty and the richness of the West's cultural and
33:40
Speaker 1: religious heritage. I think that's the only way to reverse course.
33:44
Speaker 1: And that's all I have for you guys today. If
33:46
Speaker 1: you're listening on Apple or Spotify, rate and review this podcast.
33:49
Speaker 1: If you want to listen to this show in its
33:51
Speaker 1: video form, go to rumble.com slash Aveda. Also, be sure
33:56
Speaker 1: to follow me on Locals. I just started a Locals
33:59
Speaker 1: channel where I'll be posting more personal, less political content.
34:03
Speaker 1: My user is at Aveda Duffy. And with that, I
34:07
Speaker 1: will see you all tomorrow. The Dan Bongino Show.
34:10
Speaker 10: I think a lot of people are underestimating the Trump
34:13
Speaker 10: effect in this midterm. You've heard it yourself. Act like
34:16
Speaker 10: I'm on the ballot. Why is he saying that? You
34:19
Speaker 10: think he doesn't know what he's doing? That is the
34:22
Speaker 10: X factor. Folks, elections are a math issue. That is it.
34:26
Speaker 10: This is not a football game.
34:29
Speaker 6: If you vote, we will win.
34:31
Speaker 10: It is not complicated.
34:32
Speaker 1: The Dan Bongino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.