Latest / Uncomfortable Conversations with Josh Szeps / UNLOCKED PREMIUM: Racism & Sam Kerr

Transcript

UNLOCKED PREMIUM: Racism & Sam Kerr · Uncomfortable Conversations with Josh Szeps

0:00
Get our humans, welcome to the safe space for dangerous ideas, and what does it mean
0:07
to be racist? Can a person of color ever be racist towards a white person? Can a person
0:13
of color be racist towards another person of color, or is racism just prejudice plus power
0:20
as the new definition insists? This is all coming to a fore in Australia at the moment.
0:25
For the past few weeks, amid a fewer or over one of our greatest athletes, in some respects
0:30
everything that can be said has been said about this incident. And in other respects,
0:37
the deepest questions that it raises about bigotry and tolerance and identity haven't
0:44
really been touched in an authentic way as far as I can tell. So I feel like I ought
0:52
to touch them. My feet have just landed in Australia after a big overseas trip. So I
0:58
was stunned by this news and disappointed at the way that it's been treated in the media
1:03
and the conformism, I suppose, the ease with which people's opinions about it have formed
1:09
along neat ideological lines. If you don't know what happened, if you're not Australian,
1:15
basically the allegation, which has not yet been proven in court, the allegation is that
1:20
14 months ago in January of 2023, Australia's greatest sports star, Samantha Kerr, the captain
1:27
of the Australian women's soccer team and the star of its performance in the women's soccer
1:33
world cup last year, which was hosted in Australia, spent a night in jail in southwest London
1:39
after being charged with the racial harassment of a police officer. Now Sam Kerr is Australian,
1:48
but she has some Indian heritage on her father's side. She would probably pass for white. I
1:54
didn't know. She was not white until I, until she rose to fully national prominence and
1:59
became an icon. Nonetheless, the cop was definitely white. And after an altercation in a taxi
2:06
in the wee hours of the morning, she, the allegation is that she volunteered in a taxi
2:10
and I was arguing about the taxi fare, the police were called. And she called one of the police
2:14
officers, quote, a stupid white bastard according to the police's allegation. Now her legal team
2:21
say she didn't say people were stupid white bastards. She said stupid white cop. Nonetheless,
2:26
the relevant point is that the British authorities charged her not only with harassing a police
2:32
officer, but with the additionally critical charge of being racially aggravated, racial harassment,
2:41
because she said a stupid white bastard or a stupid white cop allegedly. The question has
2:48
arisen in Australia. Is that a bad thing to say? Is it true to say that it's racist if a person
2:57
of color, partly of color? I suppose if you have one drop now, you're considered being of color,
3:04
punches up towards an officer of the law. And the New South Wales Premier, who's like the governor
3:10
of the most populous state in Australia, was asked about this and he gave a simple one word
3:14
answer as to whether or not it's racist. No, he said no. What she did was not racist.
3:19
The Premier of Western Australia, which is where she is from, was also asked about it. He said
3:24
not racist, full support for Sam Kerr. What's interesting, and perhaps the most telling about
3:30
face, came from one of Australia's greatest ever living football players, soccer players,
3:36
Craig Foster, who is now a prominent anti-racism campaigner. He played 29 games for Australia's
3:45
national soccer team, the Socorruz. Of course, they called the Socorruz. Regidage mate, crack out
3:52
the didgeridoo and let's play some Socorru. He was appointed a very prestigious member of the
3:57
order of Australia for his service to multiculturalism and human rights and refugee support
4:02
organizations and to football. So he's involved in the anti-racism space. And yet he was not
4:08
sufficiently aware of the new dogmas about racism. And so when the news broke, he was interviewed
4:18
on television about it and he said this. If I was the chair of football Australia, this is a
4:24
live issue right now. We're talking about racism, which is really serious. Players have
4:29
repeatedly been stood down and you have to answer that question right now. So that set a cat
4:37
among the pigeons, a white man saying that it's racist for a quote unquote woman of color
4:45
to allegedly call a white person a stupid white something or other. In fact, he blended even
4:53
further according to the, I suppose the orthodoxies and the dogmas of modern social justice,
4:59
by urging football's governing bodies, soccer's governing body in Australia, football Australia,
5:04
to potentially strip Sam Kerr of her captaincy. She's the captain of the women's soccer team
5:10
if the charges are proven in order to make a strong stand against racism.
5:16
Craig has since had a change of heart. He posted an about face on Twitter, which I don't
5:22
want to get stuck into Craig. This is not an attack on him. It is just evidence of where we're at
5:29
in the culture wars that you can come out with what seems like a fairly common sense
5:34
at the point of view and be forced in a short period of time to essentially write a
5:41
screed, a big about face, pledging your allegiance to the orthodoxy that you transgressed.
5:47
I should emphasize also, I think it's ridiculous that Sam Kerr would be charged by a cop.
5:53
I think there are all kinds of conversations we should be having about police officers and their
5:59
power and perhaps arguably their thin skin in not tolerating the rough and tumble of a fairly
6:05
rough and tumble job. So my support is with Sam Kerr either way. I think it's ridiculous that
6:12
she's found herself in this situation, but that's because it's petty, not because it wasn't
6:18
necessarily racist. So let's take a look at Craig Foster's about face, which he posted on Twitter.
6:25
I won't read the whole thing because it's two entire pages long, but he says the need for
6:30
national racism education is critical. The evident gaps in much of our knowledge when approaching
6:37
the same Kerr case alone should be the spur we need to make it happen. I fully support a
6:44
national with a capital N, anti-racism with a capital A, capital R, framework, capital F for this
6:51
reason. I fully support a national anti-racism framework for this reason. Already there's a little
6:59
alarm bell going off in my head. Anytime someone says something and then has to retract it by
7:04
pledging their allegiance to a, quote, capital national anti-racism framework. I mean, sounds a
7:10
sounds a little bit sort of Stalinist doesn't it? Anyway, let's go on. Craig then goes on to muse
7:17
about what racism is and says could a person of color even be guilty of racism? Are there double
7:25
standards? He asks. And he answers himself saying all important questions like many, I'm mistakenly
7:34
thought that comments that referenced any color and were discriminatory, demeaning or hostile,
7:41
were a form of racism. I apologize to Sam for that mistake. He apologizes to Sam for the mistake
7:50
of thinking that comments that reference any color and are discriminatory are a form of racism.
7:57
He goes on to say racism can only be, and by the way, I'm cutting out bits here,
8:01
but I'm not sort of, I'm not changing the meaning of what he's saying, but it's just for time.
8:06
I'm jumping a couple of paragraphs ahead. Racism can only be perpetrated against a marginalized
8:12
person or group. And then he cites the definition of racism from the diversity council of Australia.
8:19
Again, always a little bit fishy to me when someone says something from the heart that it's,
8:26
you know, it's wrong and that they regard those comments as having been racist. And then
8:30
immediately turn around and say, actually, there's an official dogma that's been handed down to me.
8:35
I mean, it's a bit like Russian state television of them, isn't it? Actually, I've just been informed
8:39
that the diversity council of Australia has a different definition from what my common sense
8:44
said. Therefore, allow me to recite the dictionary definition rather not the dictionary definition.
8:50
Actually, the dictionary definition will be closer to what Craig Foster originally said,
8:53
but the diversity council of Australia's definition, which says racism is when an individual
9:00
organization with race-based societal power discriminates, excludes or disadvantages, a
9:06
racially-based person because of their race color, the nationality, ethnicity, religion, or immigrant status.
9:12
Race-based societal power has to be involved.
9:17
So one of Australia's most successful athletes does not have that particular type of power
9:25
because although she grew up in Western Australia, her father has some Indian heritage,
9:32
therefore she lacks race-based societal power. She's a multi-millionaire, she's one of the most
9:37
successful Australians in the world, but she lacks power because it's not race-based.
9:43
Craig Foster goes on to say, definitions of racism were not designed to protect me as a white
9:49
Anglo-Australian male, nor a white police officer who has even greater legal and racial power.
9:58
Setting aside for the moment, whether or not it's true, the police officer has greater racial
10:03
power than a successful white Australian former athlete who has a middle of the order of Australia.
10:12
You know, the working-class Bobby keeps head up against him. Don't know why that person
10:16
has greater racial power, nonetheless. It's true to say. I mean, the weird thing is,
10:23
definitions of racism absolutely were designed to protect white people against people of color
10:31
right up until the 1960s. You know, it's not a new thing that we have had unfair racial structures
10:39
and an anti-egalitarian attitude towards race and minority groups. Up until the civil rights
10:46
movement, you know, the finger of the state was very forcefully on the scales of injustice,
10:53
rigging everything in favor of white people and using definitions of race and identity and
10:59
immigration. So I mean, they haven't said, Australia had an official white Australia policy
11:04
for decades up until the middle of the 20th century. Well, you know, middle is generous. I think it
11:10
was the late, I think it was 1969 that we've gotten rid of. So of course, there has been racial
11:17
definitions that have suited white people. What happened was that between the 1960s and the 2000s,
11:24
the sort of first decade of the 2000s, we decided that the way to get rid of racism was to get rid
11:29
of racism and effectively to stop considering race. We had a Martin Luther King, Jr. Barack Obama
11:36
attitude towards race. Let's let's try to turn down all of the dials on considerations of race
11:42
and treat everybody equally. It's only in the past 10 years that this new diversity council of
11:48
Australia definition of racism has insisted that it's only racism if you have prejudice plus power,
11:54
it's only racism if the person who is committing the offense has race-based societal power.
12:02
So God bless Craig Foster and everybody who has been sort of forced to step in line and lock
12:07
step with this new orthodoxy in the wake of the Sam Kerchage and allegations. But it's not true
12:14
to say that definitions of racism were not designed to protect white Anglo-Australian males.
12:21
They were right up until three seconds ago in cultural time at which point we did away with that
12:25
and now it's the social justice left that's trying to bring them back in the opposite direction.
12:30
Nonetheless, Craig goes on to say, that is because, in other words, that racism was not designed
12:37
to protect him. That is because I cannot experience racism in Australia. I cannot experience racism
12:46
in Australia. I mean, is this some kind of 1984 big brother or well-earned word play? We're
12:55
basically just redefining the word, right? We're just taking the word racism, animus towards race,
13:01
and we're saying it no longer means what the common sense meaning is, therefore,
13:07
Craig Foster or white male cannot experience this new thing that we're now giving the same name
13:12
as a thing that we all understood in the past. I cannot experience racism in Australia. Why?
13:18
Because we just change the definition of racism. All right, well, that's convenient, isn't it?
13:22
Let's just change it to something that a white man can't experience.
13:26
I'm not at all surprised, writes Craig finally, at having made a mistake. And I'm very pleased
13:32
to be able to learn. After all, he writes, I often tell people, these conversations are challenging.
13:38
Just approach it in good faith. Learn correct mistakes and grow.
13:45
A beautiful sentiment. Learn correct mistakes and grow. I agree. Can we also add another word
13:55
like think? Can we also add another word like reason? Could we say learn correct mistakes,
14:03
grow, think, reason, debate? Are you? Hashtag out perhaps? Have uncomfortable conversations.
14:14
You have to learn correct mistakes and grow. According to the dogma,
14:20
according to the orthodoxy, according to the diversity council of Australia's definition.
14:24
If you don't, the mobs are going to bloody come for you. Again, I'm not having a go at Craig Foster,
14:30
who wants to be the target of the social justice mob coming for you because you said what you
14:36
thought was the right thing in calling out racism. Then they said, no, no, no, that's not racism.
14:42
It's not racism when we do it. And he goes, oh, shit, I don't know why, I want to get cancelled.
14:48
And look, maybe he has really learned, maybe this is a genuine change of heart. Maybe all of the
14:52
people who thought that they had a definition of racism that no longer applies and that feel like
14:58
they're being threatened by exclusion from polite society and from, I suppose, the social justice
15:06
club of well-meaning university educated mostly white elites. Maybe they really have had a change
15:12
of heart and they thought this through carefully and it makes sense to them. Maybe also some of them
15:19
are just afraid, some of them are just cowardly and some of them are not, I suppose, keen enough,
15:25
or maybe as keen as I am, and actually wrestling with big ideas to add to their learning and
15:30
their correcting of mistakes and their growth, the possibility of thinking, arguing, debating,
15:37
and reasoning. So that about face I just thought was instructive because it reads like someone
15:44
has just come out of a malice reeducation camp, repenting for thought crimes of the past.
15:50
But it's not just crate foster, it's so many people around Australia.
15:56
This is the sentiment of experts. Racism can only be perpetrated against a marginalized person
16:02
or group. So is the powerlessness of the recipient relevant or the power of the perpetrator
16:13
more relevant. According to the Diversity Council, the relevant thing is that a person with
16:20
race-based societal power is saying the harassing thing, the demeaning thing, the prejudiced thing.
16:30
And yet there's another case going on in Australia at the moment in which you have two rugby league
16:38
players, one of them some on Australian, Spencer Laneu. He has received an eight-week ban for calling
16:45
a rival player who's an indigenous bloke, a monkey. This was at the season opener they were
16:52
playing in Las Vegas and apparently there's a long history of racially coded abuse on the field
16:57
in rugby league, especially towards First Nations Australians. It's appalling. The some on Australian
17:04
rugby league player says he didn't realise that calling him a monkey was racial in nature and he has
17:11
apologised, nonetheless he's been given this eight-week ban. But hang on a second, I thought that
17:17
the Diversity Council of Australia, whose mandates everybody now seems terrified to parrot,
17:26
says that you need to have race-based societal power in order for it to be racism.
17:32
How does the some on bloke? How does the some on footy player have greater societal power
17:38
than an indigenous bloke? Like what if the indigenous player had found out just before they
17:43
went on the field that actually wasn't indigenous he was of Indian descent like Sam Curries? Well
17:50
Indians do a lot better. They're a lot better off in Australia than indigenous Australians do.
17:56
In fact they earn more than white Australians do. Would that then mean that it's not racist because
18:02
he's in a better position like I don't understand. You've got two people of colour who are
18:10
slinging each other, harassing each other in you know probably a good-natured way from at least
18:15
the harassers perspective doesn't excuse it but nonetheless it's part of the rough and tumble.
18:21
And it abays a different logic, different laws of gravity so to speak culturally than the alleged
18:29
Sam Curr incident does. So imagine for example like I'm just trying to wrestle with what power means
18:39
in all this right. Imagine you've got a white homeless woman crossing the road and being cut off
18:47
by a BMW that's driven by a wealthy Pakistani Australian cardiac surgeon on his way to a round
18:54
of golf and the homeless white woman calls him you know I have some racial slur. Or imagine
19:04
a Chinese Australian corporate lawyer who grew up in the Hong Kong private school system being
19:10
ripped off by a Greek Australian mechanic about whether it was overcharged for repairs to his
19:16
Mercedes. Are we sure that we're talking about only race-based power like is that the only salient
19:24
variable here? The white homeless woman is capable of racism towards the rich Pakistani Australian
19:32
cardiac surgeon on his way to a round of golf in his BMW because she's white and he's a person
19:39
of colour. I mean that's what the Diversity Council of Australia's definition says. racism is when
19:42
an individual organisation with race-based societal power. It doesn't matter in the Sam Curr incident
19:50
that she's a multi-millionaire successful athlete and the cop is essentially a working class like
19:55
take cop out of the equation because I think it muddies things here as I said I'm really uncomfortable
19:59
with the police using the power of the state and their power has privileged officers of the state
20:04
to pursue petty vendettas but imagine that the cop was instead any other lower middle class government
20:11
employee who's a white man and is faced with abuse, racial abuse from a wealthy woman of colour.
20:21
Are we certain that the power cleaves only according to race? I thought the point of intersectionality,
20:28
original intersectionality was that there were lots and lots of different ways in which power,
20:33
prejudice and privilege all coincide so that if you're a homeless person and you're a lesbian and
20:39
you're a trans person then all of those things kind of coalesce into a mosaic a network of
20:47
of disadvantage that is greater than the sum of the parts. Isn't the real point here the sort of
20:53
elephant in the room class and status? Everything is being reduced down to this one single variable
21:01
of race without consideration of other variables that are surely relevant. I mean the reason
21:08
why it's being reduced in this case is because England has laws on the books which actually make
21:12
an additional crime if harassment was racially motivated but what if the harassment was class
21:19
motivated or was about denigrating a poor person and kicking down over and over and over again and
21:25
making their lives more miserable is that kosher? Do you get off scot free for that? It strikes me
21:31
that there are only a few ways of coming down here either you say race is the salient factor
21:40
and calling a cop a white bastard is as bad as calling as a cop calling a young aboriginal
21:47
kid a black bastard and that seems just silly right? I mean if you were to take a purely racially
21:52
purest point of view and do away with the diversity council definition do away with all these
21:57
definitions and come back to look any racially tinged comment is equally bad that can't be right
22:03
you know you have to have a power imbalance or privilege of some kind it's obvious that a cop
22:08
calling a poor indigenous kid a black bastard is worse than a cop being called a white bastard
22:15
but the alternative would be to say that power is actually the salient factor and people who have
22:22
lots of ways of achieving their goals they might have a powerful job title like cop or they might
22:26
have lots of know how like a lawyer or they might have lots of connections like a politician or
22:31
they might just have lots of money like a neurosurgeon or a cardiac surgeon you might say that
22:36
their fair game and they ought to shut up a bit when it comes to denigrating other people but
22:42
cop a bit of denigration themselves that doesn't seem crazy to me as a social norm it doesn't
22:48
seem crazy to me that say to say that morally people who have all the chips should have to tolerate
22:53
a little bit more shit than people who have no chips who have no one in their corner who have no
22:59
cards to play but as a criminal matter surely it's impossible to legislate that which is why
23:05
the state should probably just keep out of such things and the UK probably shouldn't have laws on
23:09
the books like the one that Sam Ker has been charged with because how can the law be nuanced
23:15
enough to possibly capture all of the multifarious ways in which bigotry can express itself and
23:20
prejudice and power can express itself instead what we've got is this weird hybrid that
23:27
you know the new social justice elite have come up with and Craig Foster has been forced to
23:30
parrot and the diversity council of Australia is insisting that everyone go along with otherwise
23:36
they're dinosaurs this prejudice plus power model it seems like like it makes a certain amount
23:46
of intuitive sense but the problem is that it defines power exclusively along racial lines
23:52
it defines power as whiteness I mean that definition is right there racism is when an individual
23:57
or organization with race based societal power now I'm not denying that white privilege has existed
24:04
if your white then you may have had lots of problems but one of those many problems was not that
24:09
you were persistently judged by your race although you can argue that Greeks and Jews were whites
24:16
who were always a bit suspect to traditional Anglo society and even you know communities like
24:20
the Polish in the UK or Italians in America were as well um so historically yes there's been
24:28
white privilege today it's a slightly harder case to make I mean I'm on very sensitive territory
24:36
here aren't I treading on all the egg shells and you know potentially triggering all the
24:40
tripwires a white man saying that racism is not the most fundamental motivating injustice in society
24:47
right now call me old-fashioned I would say the class and status and economic injustice are more
24:52
salient right now um but let's I mean let's just think about this clearly right what what are the
24:57
racial differences in modern society in 2024 there are more you know look Indian Australians earn
25:07
more than whites in Australia in the UK South Asians hold more wealth than whites do Asians earn
25:15
more than whites do in America you know non whites do brilliantly in lucrative fields like medicine
25:23
and the diversity targets that most corporations have to hire more minorities are so intense that
25:32
it is inconceivable these days that a woman of color with identical skills and experience to a
25:38
white man does not have a slight advantage I mean come on of course they do a friend of mine was
25:46
speaking with a very very experienced and talented high flying Australian woman of South Asian
25:54
extraction of Pakistani Australian and she was talking about leaving her job and she said you
25:59
know well if I left I have to find another job and then she said I mean of course I'd get hired
26:03
look at me and my friend said well I mean you'd also get hired because you're really good at what
26:10
you do and she laughed and said yeah yeah of course that as well and she was a bit embarrassed
26:15
but that's where we're at right a highly qualified highly experienced good worker who's a woman
26:24
a Pakistani Australian woman knows we all know that she has a slight edge at the moment given
26:31
diversity dogmas in corporations then a white man now I'm not crying foul about this you know
26:38
that is a legitimate way to redress cultural and racial injustice if we want to go down
26:45
that route but the idea that the main thing that creates inequality and justice and discrimination
26:52
in society at the moment is racism as conceived exclusively of white people targeting people of color
27:01
is just out of date it is just bonkers why is race the sole arbiter of a person's supposed power
27:10
in the prejudice plus power matrix I mean coming back to those two footy players those two rugby
27:17
league players right one of whom was suspended for calling the up for you know racial slurs
27:22
against the indigenous one there was no racial imbalance there there was no prejudice plus power
27:29
but we rightly understand that there should be a consequence there should be I mean if instead of
27:36
both being football players what if the target of the slur the indigenous bloke
27:42
was the CEO of a mining company or a corporate tax accountant would the slur be equally wrong
27:49
I'm not sure I don't think so I think if it was you know Elon Musk or I don't know the
27:56
prime minister of the UK or something who was receiving a racial slur then that is less bad
28:02
than if you're punching down to someone who has less power even if the racial outlook is exactly
28:07
the same I mean the so what's the what's the plausible or most generous response that you might get
28:14
from an identitarian social justice activist here it might be something like it would still be
28:20
just as wrong because the CEO or the accountant who of color still belongs to a community that has been
28:26
historically disadvantaged they don't enjoy white privilege they might enjoy other privileges
28:30
but they don't enjoy white privilege which opens up a lot of other questions like why do they get
28:38
to be the beneficiaries of wrongs that were done to people in the past who they didn't even know
28:44
or why is white privilege the privilege to trump all other privileges or isn't it a bit
28:53
condescending to say to a successful non-white person that they're still fundamentally
28:58
downtrodden because of the color of their skin and most controversially perhaps it raises the
29:05
question if racism by whites is the supreme explanation for the power imbalances that we see
29:14
in society whether you're defining that as personal animus towards people of another race or
29:19
just structural racism that hold back people of color if it is the salient factor the explanation
29:26
for differences in outcomes between racial groups then why do some non-white races thrive
29:34
and others can't get ahead like why do Koreans do well everywhere why are Nigerian Americans
29:42
doing so well if anti-black racism is the sole explanation for black dysfunction in America I mean
29:49
take race out of it all together and you get a clearer picture you know it may just be muddying
29:53
the waters so to speak why do Dutch and Armenian migrants make good money but Irish and Brazilian
30:02
migrants don't make much money surely we're not just talking about race here we're talking about
30:07
some combination of self-selection in terms of who comes to countries and how their communities
30:13
are structured well you know there are kind of cultural rhythms like the norms that exist in
30:19
those cultures norms around education around financial restraint around sobriety and work ethic
30:26
and family or whatever it might be for social justice dogmatists this all just doesn't compute
30:33
every unequal outcome is evidence of prejudice you know this is now a massive industry in the
30:38
United States Ibrahim X candy is a best seller he even has a book called anti-racist baby
30:45
that social justice socially justice minded you know Americans are buying to teach their babies
30:51
about how important it is to understand that we're all divided inexorably into racial groups and
30:57
that the history of the world is a history of those racial groups squabbling and fighting over
31:02
and ever shrinking pie um you've got these you know these sort of dinners where white women pay
31:10
thousands of dollars to learn how they're racist so that people can come and talk to them
31:16
over dinner about racial injustice you've got robin d'Angelo running corporate seminars about
31:24
how racism underpins you know white racism against people of color underpins essentially all
31:31
communal and cultural interactions in a workplace there's big money in this and big vested interests
31:37
in this they don't want to be told that racism is not prejudice plus power yet the crazy thing is
31:45
they fundamentally make that term effectively total logical because the social justice advocates
31:53
who are pushing racism is prejudice plus power define both prejudice and power as being
32:01
determined by your race prejudice is all about race power is all about race so when you say racism
32:08
is prejudice plus power you're really just saying racism is racism plus racism i thank you for that
32:12
enlightening point i mean they rigged the deck they sort of redefine everything they redefine racism
32:18
to mean only something that someone with race-based societal power can do they redefine privilege
32:24
to mean that you're in a race that is privileged they redefine power to mean that you have racial
32:30
power therefore it's racism racism racism racism racism is racism is racism is racism is racism is racism
32:36
now you can apply this same model to any other identity group sexuality gender uh but here it's
32:42
most salient because we're all talking about race because of the ridiculous UK charge against
32:47
San Kurt what is missing here the piece of the jigsaw that actually makes sense of our intuitions
32:57
the thing which the modern identitarian left has erased from the conversation about what is bad
33:03
and what is worse about different ways of being held back or denigrated is class economic power
33:13
cultural status pasha do you get invited to long lunches at high end restaurants and do you have
33:21
the phone number of a fancy high hat lawyer who owes you a favor class do you have a position
33:30
where you can send an email or lodge a complaint and institutions will get a move on the wheels will
33:38
actually start turning in your favor or to get anything done do you have to go to a government
33:44
service center and take a ticket and wait in line and be told that computer says no that's class
33:51
did you go to school with people who now work for corporations and governments or with people
33:56
who work as checkout cashiers and Uber drivers that is class that is the real injustice that is
34:04
where discrimination and difficulty in getting ahead genuinely stems from in 2024 it didn't always
34:12
it didn't always we rightly did away with overt racial discrimination and for the half century
34:18
between the 1960s and the first decade of the 2000s it was heading in the right direction now we've
34:23
all drunk the cool aid and decided that what we really should be doing is what white people
34:27
had been doing prior to the 1960s but just in the opposite direction this is why the same curve
34:33
incident allegation has been so confusing a cop is lower class than a world champion multimillionaire
34:43
athlete and coach but the social justice hierarchy down grades the world champion multimillionaire
34:52
athlete tells her that actually she's she hasn't oppressed status because her father is of
35:00
Indian descent therefore she gets to play this card and the working class lower middle class
35:09
cop is the oppressor as I say the fact that he's a cop does complicate things because
35:16
cops really do have additional power to being an ordinary white man but the idea that a multimillionaire
35:23
athlete and coach world champion is the oppressed person in this scenario is a little bit weird
35:32
I mean if the cop was any other flavor of lower middle class government employee it would be
35:36
ridiculous to say that he's the powerful one because he's a white man and that is what's being said
35:42
the allegation is not that that sam cures alleged slur was not racist because he's a cop
35:48
the allegation is it's not racist because he's a white man and in order to be racist you have to
35:53
enjoy and I quote from the diversity council of Australia race based societal power yet when there
35:59
are actual real world examples of racism such as the between people of color that is such as the
36:06
racism that we saw on the field from a some Australian player towards an indigenous player
36:11
we all sort of quietly throw that rule book out the window because deep down inside we know
36:17
that we're just talking bullshit and that racism is more complicated than that so I would have
36:22
three takeaways from this firstly don't make these kinds of laws England don't police being mean
36:29
and being an asshole it's too difficult it's too complicated if you're going to enforce them
36:34
uniformly then you end up with ridiculous situations like sam ker finds herself in it's absurd
36:40
she shouldn't spend a night in jail and she you know she shouldn't be charged look at if the that
36:44
is if the allegations even that the police say are true are true I mean charger with being unruly
36:50
or whatever but don't add the additional wrinkle of racism it shouldn't matter why you're being
36:54
mean to somebody why you're harassing somebody harassment should just be harassment now there can be
36:59
incitement to violence laws so if you go out and you say oh let's all go and you know
37:05
beat up people who look like such and such that should be a crime because they're going to lead
37:09
to actual real-world harms but simply expressing some slur a slur is a slur regardless of the content
37:15
of it don't start getting inside people's brains trying to figure out what they meant
37:19
the second point I would make is that cops just need to cop it a bit more like you've taken that
37:24
job on you're gonna cop it a little bit we don't mean to be mean to you but suck it up to some
37:29
extent and the third point I would make the most important one after saying that there shouldn't be
37:33
laws that govern speech and that cops should have thicker skin is that class and power and resources
37:42
the ability to achieve your goals are what matters your ethnicity doesn't matter as much as that
37:48
the color of his skin does not matter in 2024 as much as the way you walk the way you talk who
37:54
you know how much you earn what your education is like these things sometimes overlap of course
38:01
because you know equality is not spread equally so you'll have race mapping onto economic injustice
38:09
but the way to resolve those racial disadvantages is to address the economic injustice and then
38:14
anyone's happy everyone's happy rather like if you want to fix inequality go straight for
38:22
inequality you'll have more buy-in the middle class you know the whites will be more supportive of
38:29
policies that try to lift people up on the basis of their disadvantage rather than policies that
38:34
try to lift people up because they belong to a historically marginalized community and they look
38:38
a bit like people who were wronged in the past don't use divisive racial signifiers as proxies
38:44
for injustice just go at the injustice target the injustice directly with what the left used to be
38:50
about providing opportunity for everybody regardless of who you are so I wish Sam Kerr all the best
38:57
I wish Craig Foster all the best and I wish anyone who actually wants to wrestle with these issues
39:03
thoughtfully using reason instead of simply reciting dogmas that they've been handed
39:08
at the threat of a mob coming for them definitely all the best see you soon