Latest / Man in America Podcast / ALERT: IRS Using AI To Target Middle Class w/ Dr. Kirk Elliott

Transcript

ALERT: IRS Using AI To Target Middle Class w/ Dr. Kirk Elliott · Man in America Podcast

• 0:00
  Seth Holehouse: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. So there's two things that frighten me. I'll mix a few of the handful of other things. It's artificial intelligence, and that's potential, and the IRS, which I don't trust at all.
• 0:13
  Of course, the CIA, FBI, etcetera. But there's some really important information that came out recently that was came you know, through investigation up from a journalist that was actually recently unveiled on Fox Business that the IRS is actually using AI to monitor your bank account. And this is frightening for a lot of reasons, not to mention that it's unconstitutional. But how does this tie into central bank digital currency? How does it tie into balance?
• 0:38
  How does it tie into the monitoring of all of our financial transactions? So joining us today is my good friend, doctor Kirk Elliott, to help help us make sense of this. So, folks, please enjoy the interview. Kirk, as usual, it's great to have you back on. How's it going?
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: It's going really well, and it's great to see you.
• 0:56
  Seth Holehouse: Thank you. So there's two things that I wake up screaming at night about and have nightmares. And, like, I'm always just frightened that we're walking in the dark, and it's the IRS and artificial intelligence. And so I'm joking a little bit, but there's a recent video that you just showed me. And I'm gonna pull this up.
• 1:17
  This is a a Twitter post from I think it was what yeah. Wall Street Silver. It says alert. IRS using AI to target a middle class. Says what we've learned is that the IRS, in fact, has been using AI to access bank accounts of American citizens without any kind of search warrant.
• 1:34
  These are quotes. This was this was something that was just discovered by an undercover journalist. This is what they found is that the IRS has claimed they have access to every single person's bank account. So there's a short video. It's a minute and a half I wanna play here to just set this discussion into motion for us.
• 1:54
  So let's go ahead and play this video.
• 1:55
  Speaker 3: What we have learned is that the IRS, in fact, has been using AI to access bank accounts of American citizens without any kind of a search warrant or even without any specific, claim that they have committed a crime. So this was something that was, discovered about by an undercover journalist, and what they found is that the IRS has claimed that they have access to every single person's bank account. This person also indicated that they've been working with the Department of Justice and that they have absolutely no problem whatsoever going after the little guy to make sure that they are paying their taxes. This is such a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment that we have, Jim Jordan and I, sent a letter to the IRS demanding that they provide additional information about what they are doing with AI and what they are doing to protect the civil rights of American citizens. So
• 2:45
  Seth Holehouse: so there's a lot to unpack here. But I think one thing which is worth mentioning is that as far as I understand, the IRS is is, in many ways, unconstitutional. And it isn't even a an actual government agency that it's something I mean, I guess you could call it that, but it's something that is almost this kind of extra secretive thing that has you know, like, it's like what a lot of these alpha agencies are turning into that it's like it's a government agency. You might think it is, but it's actually has these these powers and protections. And so walk us through this because I think that a lot of our viewers are middle class, and we're people that the DOJ probably doesn't like because we're calling them out for what they're doing.
• 3:36
  And this is pretty frightening. So how do you make sense of this?
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: So as I watch that, two things come to mind. Number one, and I've been talking about this a little bit with other people that are in the know financially, and one of them said, Well, Kirk, this is actually so they can actually have the technical capability for a bail in. Right? So I'm thinking, Okay, that's one plausible explanation. I don't think that's it.
• 4:07
  So what does that mean? It means when Silicon Valley Bank went under, Janet Yellen basically said too big to fail. No such thing. However, we're not going to bail out financial institutions anymore. The depositors are.
• 4:23
  See, that's the difference between a government bailout and a depositor bail in, where you bail out your own financial institution, so to speak. So if they have your bank account information, where you bank, how much money you have in there, what your account number, routing number is, all of that stuff, It's real easy to institute a bail in, right? Because I already have it. Flip of a switch, it's done. However, I don't think that's the main push behind this.
• 4:56
  So I think that the main push behind this has more to do with what the World Economic Forum has said, that central bank digital currency is coming. It's programmable money, right? The ability to cut you off from buying or selling if your ideology doesn't match up. How if central bank digital currency is coming? And last week, Seth, the World Economic Forum came out with their numbers of 98% of every country in the world is now ready for central bank digital currency, and they're going to deploy it.
• 5:31
  98%. To me, that's everybody because who are the 2% that might not be? Well, maybe like some South Pacific island that doesn't even have computers to begin with. I mean, who even knows? But 98 is pretty much everybody.
• 5:46
  So when you're going to deploy that and you start to add up some other things that we know based on their memorandums, their agendas, their dates that they've already put out to the public. September of this year, the United Nations has the Pact for the Future Symposium in Shenzhen, China. I think that's how you pronounce it. Well, what are they going to do? They are going to actually expose to the world everything they've been working on since 2019, which is basically recruiting all of these countries to have a central bank digital currency, building out the the framework for the central bank digital currency.
• 6:29
  Now, SWIFT, the SWIFT system has interoperability. They've finished their third beta test. So all these different CBDCs around the world that have different currencies, different exchange rates, They can now talk to each other through the SWIFT system and international bank wires. So all these pieces are actually in place. And by September of this year, the United Nations wants biometric identification to attach to your bank account.
• 6:59
  That's all part of the pact for the future. And so Amazon actually went is ahead of the game and they want to basically take over merchant processing from like Visa, Mastercard. When you swipe your card at any cash register anywhere, they want to do that with a palm scanning device that they've already unveiled that they're releasing. So that's biometric identification. Or couple that with Sam Altman's World Coin, which has a stupid orb that actually scans your retinas.
• 7:34
  So all of this biometric identification to you so you can protect yourself against hackers and data thieves, because if it's not you, you can't get it. So they're promoting all of this as very positive. I'm looking at this as very negative. And the fact that the IRS has been using already without warrant, basically accessing people's bank accounts, what can they already do? They can see your profile in the sense of who are you, Seth?
• 8:06
  And who are you, Kirk? Well, we are a reflection of what we spend money on. That's who we are. It'll show our preferences. It'll show what kind of a church we give to it.
• 8:15
  We tithe to it. It'll show what political party we may or may not give to. It'll show what kind of food we eat, where we travel, what TVs we watch, by what subscriptions we have, just streaming services, all of that stuff. They're building this dossier on each person so they can easily, with the flip of a switch, be able to tell what is their ideology, what is the basis of their spending, and are they for us or against us? Are they globalist?
• 8:44
  Are they not? Are they for a clean climate or not? All this stuff. So I think this is what the IRS is actually doing, not necessarily doing it just so they can attach things for a bail in. No, I think they're building the digital social profile on everybody, which the World Economic Forum has already said is going to be the basis of programmable money is your digital social profile, your social credit score, your ESG if you're a company.
• 9:12
  I think that's what this is all about.
• 9:14
  Seth Holehouse: It really makes me want to go off grid and get rid of all my technology, pull everything out of the bank, bury it in the backyard somehow, and and just kinda wait for the whole system to fall apart. Of course, not gonna do that because I I can't be doing this with you here right now if that was
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: I know.
• 9:34
  Seth Holehouse: My life, but it's like, like, this is it's it's dystopian. That's really what it is. I mean, it's dystopian. Even look, even if it was just tax related, even still, like, that's our private property. Right?
• 9:50
  So, you know, to have the ability to come in and just seize and just take what they want, and, you know, what you mentioned to your friend who's in the financial circles talking about bail ins. It's like even even worse. If they're if they if they know that, say, there's more bank collapses coming, which I'll pull up one article here that we're gonna talk about. He would say, bank failures begin again. How Philadelphia's First Republic Bank is seized by the FDIC.
• 10:20
  Okay? So we now have another bank, right, that was seized by the FDIC. Okay. That doesn't sound very good. It says that Republic Bank had about 6,000,000,000 of assets and 4,000,000,000 in deposits.
• 10:34
  It's not a small bank. I mean, you know, smaller banks are, you know, as as I've seen, you know, researching on waste waste reading ratings is, you know, a couple hundred billion dollars is your typical small local bank. Right? So it says the Republic Bank had about 6,000,000,000 in assets, 4,000,000,000 in deposits at the January. The FDIC estimated the failure will cost the deposit insurance fund $667,000,000, which is interesting.
• 11:01
  But, I mean, this like, this we we've talked a lot about bail ins. We've talked a lot about bank runs. We've talked a lot about bank failures. So, I mean, I though I'm I share your absolutely share your concerns about the bigger picture of, you know, financial privacy, CBDC, etcetera. It also does concern me that they know that you and I are doing shows warning people that this is what happens in a bank run.
• 11:29
  Like, go watch It's a Wonderful Life. So if their strategy is the bail in, which, you know, I recently interviewed David Webb, right, behind the great taking, which that takes it to, like, the the tenth degree of how corrupt they are and how intricate the plan is to seize assets. This is concerning because to me, it's like, okay. Say this, you know, bank run, which we're looking at the the the Philly bank, if that kicks off the next series of bank runs, all of sudden, they, a, shut the bank accounts down and say, okay. You can no longer withdraw.
• 12:03
  This is our safeguard to prevent the bank, you know, run and bank failure contagions from spreading. But then b, if they say, okay. Now that we've shut your bank account down, you can't access your funds as a safeguard, we're now going to take 10% from everyone's account. We're gonna take, you know, up to the first ten thousand dollars from everyone's account because we're gonna have to bail in these banks. I mean, it's like you look at the Great Depression and how that, I I believe, was a setup.
• 12:29
  Really, it was done by the banks as a way to to basically seize the assets and shut down the thousands of small local banks across the nation to centralize the banking system in America. It's almost like this could be the same thing, but on a household level.
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: So, okay, the great taking, that's a very interesting thing to bring up with this because, in essence, it makes a bail in already done, right? Because after 02/2009, when Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns went under, they changed the financial rules. This is what this amazing bookdocumentary was all about. I mean, one of the most well researched things I've ever seen. Right?
• 13:10
  So they changed the rules to where you are no longer the owner of your deposits, you're a beneficial owner, which and they needed that because if they've got Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, for example, had tons of derivatives debt exposure, like massive amounts, they didn't have any assets to pay off their derivatives debt. So this is why they went under. So what they decided was they devised this scheme where it's like, Okay, if we make Seth and Kirk and everybody watching the show who has checking accounts, savings accounts, brokerage accounts, beneficial owners rather than the real owner, We all already gave up our ownership of our deposit accounts to the financial institution we're working with. Right. So so therefore, they don't have to ask for permission to take our money.
• 13:59
  They can just do it, and they already have the legal basis to do so. So here's where the whole concept of bail in is a pretty Of course, they can do that because they own the assets already. It's like, well, Kirk, how I didn't sign up for that. Yeah, you did. You probably didn't read the TOCs that came out.
• 14:20
  Or when you opened up your bank account and you get the folder with 20 or 30 pages in it, nobody reads a small print because they see beneficial owner and they might not know what that means. But that means that you're just the beneficiary. They own it. So all of this stuff is is kind of creepy in the sense of you said dystopian future. It's like the government on Hunger Games, which we thought was so evil and so foul.
• 14:45
  But it's it's almost the same thing that we have today.
• 14:50
  Seth Holehouse: Remember as a kid your parents and grandparents making you try all the vegetables on your plate or when they coaxed you to eat fruit instead of sweets? That's because they knew what was good for you, and it's truer today than ever before. You need to eat your fruits and veggies. There's no substitute for a healthy diet, but there is balance in nature. Their products are gluten free and non GMO, and they contain no added sugars or synthetics.
• 15:14
  So if you're looking for something to make you feel better naturally, you should definitely try Balance of Nature today. Eat your fruits and veggies every single day with Balance of Nature. I started taking Balance of Nature the day I decided I was ready to start feeling better. You ready to start? Follow the link and use the promo code Seth to get the special offer of 35%.
• 15:34
  So order online and use the link and use the discount code Seth to get 35% off today.
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: Right. It's where people are meaningless. Their own power and expansion is the only thing that matters. So you look at these So anyways, we go back to Silicon Valley Bank and all of these things, remember that we just talked about beneficial ownership coming into play. What happened with Silicon Valley is FDIC had a little over 1.7% of assets to cover all the deposits in America.
• 16:08
  After Silicon Valley, Credit Suisse, First Republic, Silvergate and Signature Bank went under, it came down to 0.74%. So after that, I'm just giving you a little lesson in history here. After that, the Fed came up with the bank temp funding program, which was stimulus money for banks. And everybody applauded the Fed and said, Good job. You stopped the bank runs.
• 16:35
  We don't know what you did, but you stopped it. That's amazing. All it was was stimulus money to actually stop a bank from failing before it went into FDIC receivership. So therefore, there was no more FDIC. But that program sunset on March 11.
• 16:51
  And for about seven months, Seth, you and I have been talking about there's going to be another bank run coming, bank run two point zero. But it's it's probably going to be much worse because there's more debt. People have been taking money out of the system for that whole time under Biden's economic plan for America. There's more withdrawals than there are deposits going into banks now. This this Republic Bank in Philly goes into FDIC receivership, but they went directly into FDIC receivership.
• 17:21
  There was no bank temp funding program. There was no emergency stimulus or else they might not have. So those numbers that you said, dollars 6,000,000,000 in assets, 4,000,000,000 in deposits. Okay, dollars $667,000,000 is what it costs FDIC, but they have $4,000,000,000 in deposits. So, if FDIC is going to cover people with $250,000 or less, that means that there's $3,350,000,000 in assets that weren't covered by FDIC.
• 18:00
  What happens to that? It just kind of disappears. It vaporizes. So the reason we know that is because in October or November of last year, Silicon Valley Bank went to the FDIC and said, hey, you know, you bailed out our depositors $2.50 or less, but there's $2,000,000,000 that you seized of assets that we had. We want it back because that's actually us.
• 18:26
  I mean, we pay into this FDIC insurance program. You covered everybody. But what about this other stuff that's actually ours? FDIC denied them. It's like, no, we're not giving it back.
• 18:37
  So to me, this is just like, okay. And I don't feel too bad if a bank has such bad mismanagement that they waste it. They shouldn't get their money back. But yet, FDIC just said, We're keeping it. We're not giving it back.
• 18:51
  Well, isn't this kind of the rule of law of the day when when Biden decides, hey, we're going to freeze Russia's assets because they're at war with them, with Ukraine, and Putin says, what? We have hundreds of millions of dollars worth of gold in that. And then Janet Yellen says, hey, Putin, we're going to actually give it to Ukraine. It's like, what? And now The United Kingdom Two Days ago basically said they've got all these gold artifacts that they have to give back to Ghana from the nineteenth century.
• 19:22
  And the European Union tells Russia, it's like, hey, you owe Romania Ninety One Point Five tons of gold. Medvedev says, no, we don't. We're not listening to you. And and it just keeps going on. And now Russia is fighting back.
• 19:41
  And in court, they said, Hey, JPMorgan Chase, when our assets are frozen, we're actually now under court order in Russia, taking $440,000,000 of assets that you're holding of ours hostage. We get it back due to court order. See, but what do all these stories have in common? Government just seizing people's stuff. All of them.
• 20:04
  That's what it's about. So to me, when the IRS is basically monitoring without warrant people's bank accounts, that means I don't trust the system that we're going to be able to access our funds if our ideology doesn't match up with theirs because of historical precedent. I'm not just making stuff up and saying, I don't like them for whatever reason. They have shown time after time after time after time that if they wanna take your stuff, they can easily get it. Right?
• 20:34
  And that's the that's the part that bothers me about all
• 20:36
  Robert Kiyosaki: of this.
• 20:36
  Seth Holehouse: And look at what happened with the gold seizure. I think it was it was under Roosevelt. Was that 1935? I I forget which year it was specifically.
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: It's in the thirties.
• 20:45
  Seth Holehouse: In the thirties, when they seized all the gold. And and actually, and David Webb talked about this in his documentary where they they seized all the gold to say they were gonna go, basically, I think, it to bail out the Fed, and they just seized it all. Like, they they didn't use it to help. They was like, okay. We're just taking it.
• 21:02
  And they they gave people $20 an ounce in exchange for it. But what's interesting is that when I asked David, I said, would you see that happening again? And he was kind of like, well, now the asset isn't the gold. The asset is all of these, like, these assets. Like, it's it's the mortgages.
• 21:18
  It's, like, basically, it's the it's the stock portfolio. It's, like, there's no need to go try to, you know, fumble with stealing the physic the precious metal. Not to mention that the percentage of households that had physical gold in the thirties, I would imagine, was way higher than it is right now. I think right now, it's between 12% of households in America that actually hold precious metals, physical precious metals. They're gonna bother with that.
• 21:44
  Right? So why would they bother with that when they can go to say, okay. We're gonna take your four zero one k. We're gonna take your IRA. So it's it's it's like it's it's changing.
• 21:55
  Like, the the landscape is changing. But what's interesting, though, is that, like, it seems like the theme of discussions I've been having lately both with my wife and also some of my recent interviews is that as they they push for this agenda, people are going back to the old way of doing things. Like, I was talking to my wife this morning, and we're, like, thinking about our grocery shopping. Okay. We go to a local farm for our meats.
• 22:20
  We have there's a local butcher we go to that raises organic, you know, pasture raised, grass fed, grass finished beef. We go there to buy that. We go to this Christian milk farm to get our milk. We get raw milk from this beautiful Christian milk farm. We get our milk and our eggs.
• 22:35
  We haven't got chickens again yet. We go to all these other local places. So we're doing things that it will pay cash a lot of times. So it's it's not even something that goes through the system, but there's this resurgence of people that are going back to the traditional way of doing things. And I see the same thing happening with precious metals versus modern finance.
• 22:55
  I think a lot of people are saying, I don't I don't trust this my this modern financial system. Not to mention, now you've got AI, right, which is, to me, is like the pinnacle of the threat of modernism is AI working together with the IRS to monitor all of our digital things. I think that you're gonna see even more people saying, you know what? Like, I'm going analog. Like, I'm I'm not gonna I'm not gonna partake in this system.
• 23:19
  And I'm curious if, obviously, you your your career is dealing in precious metals. Your career is is actually, like, you're not that different from the guy who milks his cow and sells milk and says, hey. Here's a way to have your own milk locally. Right? It's like getting out of the system of going to the grocery store and buying from some big factory farm.
• 23:39
  It's been ultra pasteurized and everything. But are you seeing because I know you interact with a lot of clients. Are you seeing more and more people that basically just want to go back to the real tangible way of living and doing things and their financial decisions are reflecting that?
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: I am. And it's kind of a self preservation thing. People are waking up to the fact that the government overreach is too much. They're hearing story after story after story. I mean, that was not some rogue Internet blogger that was saying, oh, the IRS is nasty and it's going to access people's bank accounts.
• 24:14
  That was on Fox Business and a congresswoman talking about it. I mean, how much more legit can you get than that, that this is actually a really big deal? Now, another story that came out that tells you that there's really a problem and people are starting to wake up is The Wall Street Journal posted an article, I think the end of last week, maybe on Friday, about Trump wanting to revamp the Fed. His top advisors want to revamp the Fed. It's like, sweet, we've been hearing about this for quite some time.
• 24:51
  So what do they want to do? Evidently, in a 10 page kind of secret report, two of the provisions of that came out. Number one is that Trump is going to sit on the board of the Federal Reserve. And number two, he's going to have the final say on interest rate policy.
• 25:09
  Seth Holehouse: Really?
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: So that's new to that was just on Friday. Yeah. So I'm so we don't know what else is in that 10 page memo, but those are the two provisions that actually came out somehow. So I'm thinking about this.
• 25:24
  Seth Holehouse: That's crazy.
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: Isn't that crazy? But think of this. So Trump, a businessman who understands business, understands interest rate policy and can give good directions to that. I love that idea. I love it.
• 25:40
  Right. The flip side of that coin is if they're going to give him, the sitting president, a seat on that, what if Biden had that? Or what if what if Obama had that? Or what if any future president has that? It's kind of a dangerous thing to actually want to want.
• 26:00
  Right now, I want that desperately with Trump being the president because I think and I trust him that he would do the right thing for America and for business. But other I can't say that I would trust that with other people. And so sometimes here's the point of this is this is an amazing thing if, as on the board, Okay, let's just abolish the fat. We don't need them anymore. And as the chairman of the board, it's like, Okay, that would be great.
• 26:31
  Then you don't have to worry about having to sit on the board and have interest rate policy discussions where you're the final say. It's like you have to take it one step further because going piecemeal like this could have a bad circumstance moving forward. Just like the presidential immunity case that's in front of the Supreme Court right now. And it's like, okay, they so want to not have Trump be in office, probably because he knows where the skeletons are right in the closet of everybody. But it's like, okay, no more presidential immunity.
• 27:05
  We've got to get him. We're to make this trial really difficult. But the implications in two of the justices, Barrett and Kavanaugh, already are saying, yeah, but this is going to change the presidency forever, Forever. If nobody has presidential immunity, what kind of decisions are you gonna make?
• 27:25
  Seth Holehouse: They're also saying that that it means that that, I guess, that Trump could be going after, say, Bush and Obama. Right? Like, if if if they get rid of that, it's like Trump could then weaponize that and go against these other presidents. Right? It's like Well which upset that president, which is dangerous.
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: See, they so want Trump to not be in office that they're not looking at the future ramifications of that or the ramifications on themselves already. So here's where when we look at what people are saying that they want now, we want to stop human trafficking and sex trafficking and arms dealing and money laundering. That's what central bank digital currency is going to provide, those transparency of transactions. The flip side of that coin is ideologically based, which is what they have already said this is all about. So if somebody on your side, I'm a conservative, I would say, I'm great with Trump basically deciding that.
• 28:30
  But where people on the left said, there is no way I'm going to have him be the test of my ideological stuff, we're the same way. It's like, I don't want somebody on the left being the test of my ideological spending. So depends on who's in power and if you're going to like it or not, which is why I think that that lack of immunity is going to make the president basically impotent because I'm not saying that I agree or disagree, but let's follow this little example. If you have presidential immunity, would you go in and Osama bin Laden was killing millions of people all over the world? Would you basically vote for the vote to do them in?
• 29:12
  Put them six feet under. I mean, that's what happens. This is the kind of decisions presidents make. What if you knew if you did that and you had no presidential immunity and you could be charged with war crimes? Would you still do it?
• 29:25
  Exactly. It's like, But if it was right the first time, it's got to still be right the second time. And if you say, no, I wouldn't do that, then, well, then it wasn't right the first time. These are these are the kind of questions that every president is now going to come up with, and they're going to say, Oh, let's just do nothing. I mean, it's human nature, right?
• 29:43
  So I think this is what's going to make the president impotent, it's going to make economic decisions harder to do. Look, these consequences, the whole gist of this conversation is people just can't look at the short term benefit of something when the long term consequence could be absolutely detrimental. Just like in our finances. Yeah, we want simplicity of transactions, three sixty five days a year, 20 fourseven money transfer, make things really fast and really easy. But that comes with the price of they're going to know everything about you.
• 30:19
  The IRS already is in your bank accounts. And to what end? I believe it has to do with CBDCs and testing your ideology, your spending patterns. And now that 98% of all the countries in the world are going to be adopting central bank digital currency, the mechanism is already there. Evidently, the IRS is already in people's bank accounts without CBDC.
• 30:44
  It's like, good grief, Seth. This this world is spinning out of control so quickly that we just have to be ahead of that curve and do something that's private, where this is where I think, you know, you started the show with you. You know, people are going to have this kind of outcry and want to go into something that's more private. Yes, they are. They're going to get going to want to get off the grid.
• 31:07
  How do you do that financially with a private, tangible asset like gold and silver, where you're not a digital slave in their digital world? You're not don't have some kind of people pay piece of paper that can be put into a unified ledger and they can flip off the ownership from you to somebody else at the flip of a switch. Nobody wants that. Nobody wants that. I don't care what side of the political spectrum you're on because you're not going to like that when somebody from the opposite party is in control.
• 31:38
  And power shifts all the time. Right? So this is where we just go with tried and true basic economic freedom, basic economic privacy. That's where tangible assets come in. And just as a plus, that's an important philosophical piece of it.
• 31:58
  It's growing a lot. Silver's up over 30% in the last sixty days. I mean, that's not too shabby. You get the best of both worlds. You get growth and safety and privacy all wrapped into one, that should start putting be putting a smile on people's face.
• 32:14
  Seth Holehouse: Exactly. To me, the big thing is the privacy. Yeah. It's a little bit less convenient. That's absolutely true.
• 32:20
  But so is going to milk farm versus going on to Amazon Fresh. Right? Like, I'm willing to to to to bear that. So we've got a website. If folks wanna go and work with you, we've got gold with seth.com.
• 32:34
  And what's the phone number? The best phone number to reach your team if they do wanna talk to you about potentially saying, hey. Instead of having the money sitting in an IRA or four zero one k, what's probably being monitored, let's move it over into precious metals. What's the best phone number to reach out?
• 32:48
  Speaker 2: (720) 605-3900.
• 32:53
  Seth Holehouse: Perfect. Well, Kirk, it's always great speaking to you. Thank you so much. Take care, man, and God bless.
• 32:58
  Speaker 2: You bet. We'll see you.
• 32:59
  Seth Holehouse: Alright. Folks, perhaps you'd agree with me when I say that over the past five years, the mainstream health care systems credibility has plummeted. Alternative health care systems that aren't beholden to medical consensus or big pharma are on the rise. Sweetamine is time tested and proven to boost your life with better health. It's one of the leading products that helps with inflammation and daily aches and pains.
• 33:22
  Just because you get older, it doesn't mean you have to feel old. And folks, did you know that most of the diseases that make people sick and die these days are rooted in chronic inflammation, oftentimes due to glycine deficiency. So sweetamine is composed mainly of the amino acid glycine, the nutrient that the immune system uses to regulate inflammation. So with once daily sweetamine, most people feel the reduction in pain after just a few days. So I challenge you to the twelve day sweetamine challenge to fight inflammation and take control of your health today.
• 33:52
  So folks, buy Sweetamine online at sweetamine.com, or call 855 That's (855) 438-7933, and make sure you use promo code Seth, s e t h, to get a nice discount on your purchase.