Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / What’s the difference between inertial and gravitational mass?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, do you ever do physics demonstrations at home
- 0:11Speaker 1: with the kids or on the kids?
- 0:15Speaker 2: We have a strict no experimenting on the kids policy
- 0:18Speaker 2: without both parents' consent.
- 0:20Speaker 1: Oh good, did you have a process?
- 0:22Speaker 2: We had to create a process after one of us
- 0:25Speaker 2: was winging it. But yeah, I love doing physics demonstrations
- 0:27Speaker 2: at home, though usually they don't work.
- 0:30Speaker 1: What do you mean do you break the laws of physics?
- 0:33Speaker 2: Well, I remember, for example, trying to show the kids
- 0:36Speaker 2: that everything falls at the same speed m.
- 0:39Speaker 1: And the laws of physics didn't cooperate.
- 0:42Speaker 2: Well, it was at the dinner table, and I used
- 0:44Speaker 2: little bits of our dinner, and we have a dog,
- 0:46Speaker 2: so only one piece actually made it to the floor.
- 0:49Speaker 1: WHOA. I guess your dog was trying to challenge the
- 0:53Speaker 1: laws of physics or just your physics demonstration.
- 0:57Speaker 2: I think I didn't appreciate the gravity of such an
- 0:59Speaker 2: experiment for my dog, but.
- 1:00Speaker 1: I'm sure your dog heavily appreciated it.
- 1:04Speaker 2: I got his massive thank you.
- 1:21Speaker 3: Hi.
- 1:21Speaker 1: I am Horhemrick, cartoonists and the author of Oliver's Great
- 1:23Speaker 1: Big Universe.
- 1:24Speaker 2: Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor
- 1:27Speaker 2: at UC Irvine, and I think physics can help us
- 1:30Speaker 2: understand the world around us.
- 1:31Speaker 1: Yeah, physics is a powerful tool to help us look
- 1:34Speaker 1: at the world, challenge the laws of it, and try
- 1:36Speaker 1: to figure out how it all works. Because it's a
- 1:38Speaker 1: pretty wonderful universe that's pretty amazing to discover and to appreciate.
- 1:43Speaker 2: That's right, from the tiniest little particles to big baseballs
- 1:47Speaker 2: and enormous black holes. There's lots of mysteries out there,
- 1:50Speaker 2: lots of questions to ask, lots of puzzles to solve
- 1:53Speaker 2: at all different scales. It's not just particle physics that's
- 1:56Speaker 2: revealing the truth about reality.
- 1:58Speaker 1: Yeah, they're big puzzles, like what will dogs eat pretty
- 2:01Speaker 1: much anything? Will they eat dark matter?
- 2:06Speaker 2: Well, I've seen them eat various dark matters for sure. Y.
- 2:10Speaker 1: Yeah, I know it's coming in and out both ends.
- 2:14Speaker 1: That's not good. But yeah, even dogs can be physicists
- 2:18Speaker 1: if they also are trying to figure out how the
- 2:20Speaker 1: universe works, how things fall, and what rate do they fall.
- 2:24Speaker 1: And that's something that even physicists today are looking at
- 2:26Speaker 1: and are puzzling about.
- 2:28Speaker 2: That's right, And we're hoping that our dogs will help
- 2:30Speaker 2: us figure it out and that it won't be too
- 2:31Speaker 2: rough a journey.
- 2:34Speaker 1: So welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,
- 2:37Speaker 1: a production of iHeartRadio.
- 2:39Speaker 2: Where no pun is too corny, no mystery too grand,
- 2:42Speaker 2: and no puzzle too deep for us to explore. We
- 2:46Speaker 2: think that everything out there can be understood, and that
- 2:49Speaker 2: you deserve to understand it. We want to make these
- 2:51Speaker 2: ideas click together in your mind so you have that
- 2:54Speaker 2: aham moment when it all makes sense.
- 2:58Speaker 1: It's right because we are here to dis because the
- 3:00Speaker 1: fundamental loss of the universe and also the fundamental laws
- 3:03Speaker 1: of the universe testing its limits. Are there limits? I
- 3:07Speaker 1: think we just hit that limit.
- 3:09Speaker 2: If you compress too many dad jokes into a podcast,
- 3:11Speaker 2: does it collapse into a black hole?
- 3:13Speaker 1: Does it become a granddad podcast? Now?
- 3:16Speaker 2: And there are physics questions about gravity that we ask
- 3:18Speaker 2: that are not related to punts.
- 3:21Speaker 1: Yeah. Gravity is one of the biggest mysteries in the universe.
- 3:24Speaker 1: It basically holds everything together and makes all the stars
- 3:28Speaker 1: and galaxies out their work. But there are a lot
- 3:30Speaker 1: of big things about it that we still don't understand.
- 3:33Speaker 2: It's one of my favorite things in physics where something
- 3:36Speaker 2: right in front of you is a big mystery. You
- 3:38Speaker 2: don't need a ten billion dollar particle collider to ask, like, well,
- 3:42Speaker 2: why do things move? Or why am I sticking to
- 3:44Speaker 2: the Earth, or why does the Earth go around the Sun?
- 3:47Speaker 2: You just look at the world around you and ask
- 3:49Speaker 2: these basic questions. And our understanding of how this very simple,
- 3:53Speaker 2: everyday experience happens has changed over decades and centuries and millennia.
- 3:58Speaker 1: Yeah, gravity is I kind of a big deal. It's
- 4:01Speaker 1: a heavy topic. It's a massive question that physicists have
- 4:04Speaker 1: about how the universe works. And it's not just in
- 4:06Speaker 1: front of us. It's all around us, under us, low us,
- 4:09Speaker 1: behind us, on top of us, but well, hopefully not
- 4:12Speaker 1: too on top of us.
- 4:13Speaker 2: If you're listening to this podcast, Deep Deep Underground, then yes,
- 4:16Speaker 2: it's on top of you. And an important way to
- 4:19Speaker 2: make progress in these big questions is to look for patterns.
- 4:22Speaker 2: When Newton noticed that the same laws could be applied
- 4:25Speaker 2: to the motions of things in the heavens as on Earth,
- 4:28Speaker 2: he understood that his theory was more general than just
- 4:31Speaker 2: describing planets, that a single idea encompassed all of it.
- 4:34Speaker 2: So looking for clues means looking for patterns, finding apparent
- 4:37Speaker 2: coincidences and digging into them to figure out what the
- 4:40Speaker 2: underlying mechanism really is.
- 4:42Speaker 1: Yeah, and sometimes in looking for patterns, physicists notice certain
- 4:45Speaker 1: things match up in a very suspicious and interesting way,
- 4:49Speaker 1: and so it makes them wonder is this a coincidence
- 4:52Speaker 1: or does this reveal something fundamental about the universe?
- 4:56Speaker 2: Like if you just lost two hundred bucks and then
- 4:58Speaker 2: your friend is like, hey, I have an extra two
- 5:00Speaker 2: hundred bucks to spend, you might think that there's an
- 5:02Speaker 2: explanation that tells the whole story.
- 5:04Speaker 1: Yeah, obviously you need better friends.
- 5:08Speaker 2: Obviously, dinner's on your friend tonight.
- 5:10Speaker 1: Yeah, obviously you're eating scrats with the dog tonight.
- 5:14Speaker 2: Sounds like it.
- 5:15Speaker 1: So today on the podcast, we'll be tackling the question
- 5:22Speaker 1: what's the difference between inertial and gravitational mass.
- 5:26Speaker 2: It turns out there's a massive conceptual difference, but almost
- 5:29Speaker 2: no actual difference.
- 5:31Speaker 1: All right, well, it sounds like it's a detail we're
- 5:32Speaker 1: going to dig into here today. I guess the idea
- 5:35Speaker 1: is that there are different kinds of masses in physics.
- 5:37Speaker 2: There are different kinds of masses in physics, and that
- 5:39Speaker 2: comes from just having different kinds of experience. You know,
- 5:42Speaker 2: we live in the world, we describe what we see,
- 5:45Speaker 2: and the job of physics is to boil down all
- 5:47Speaker 2: of those experiences into as few concepts as possible, to say,
- 5:51Speaker 2: can we explain static electricity and lightning with one idea?
- 5:55Speaker 2: If possible, then that'd be a great success. And so
- 5:58Speaker 2: we have lots of different experiences of masks and the
- 6:01Speaker 2: goals to try to like boil it down into just
- 6:03Speaker 2: one explanation, a holistic view that explains the entire universe.
- 6:08Speaker 1: I wonder, is it kind of like having a separate
- 6:10Speaker 1: space in your stomach for dessert, Like, is some of
- 6:13Speaker 1: my mass due to dessert and some of it is
- 6:15Speaker 1: due to regular food.
- 6:17Speaker 2: Some of my mass is definitely due to dessert, for sure,
- 6:23Speaker 2: and there's always room for dessert. I'm not sure if
- 6:25Speaker 2: that's black hole creation in my stomach or what.
- 6:28Speaker 1: And if you throw white chocolate into a black hole,
- 6:30Speaker 1: what happens? Does it explode?
- 6:32Speaker 2: The black hole does something magical? It turns the white
- 6:34Speaker 2: chocolate dark, not into dark chocolate, unfortunately, but it just turns
- 6:39Speaker 2: it into more black hole.
- 6:41Speaker 1: That's how we're going to say that black hole spits
- 6:42Speaker 1: out the white chocolate because it's so terrible.
- 6:46Speaker 2: The only thing that can survive a black hole is
- 6:48Speaker 2: a white chocolate. No, I wish that were true. That
- 6:50Speaker 2: would be fascinating.
- 6:51Speaker 1: And then I thought you were going to say, the
- 6:53Speaker 1: only thing that can survive a white chocolate is a
- 6:55Speaker 1: black hole.
- 6:56Speaker 2: No, it'd be interesting if you threw a white chocolate
- 6:58Speaker 2: into a black hole and somehow it's quantum information was preserved,
- 7:02Speaker 2: so you could come along and tell if a black
- 7:03Speaker 2: hole had had white chocolate thrown into it or not,
- 7:06Speaker 2: if it had been tainted by the disaster that is
- 7:09Speaker 2: white chocolate.
- 7:10Speaker 1: I see, you could shame it later.
- 7:12Speaker 2: Or maybe black holes are like quantum erasers, deleting the
- 7:15Speaker 2: tragedy that is white chocolate from the universe and doing
- 7:18Speaker 2: us all a favor.
- 7:18Speaker 1: Interesting. I think that's what we all need. It's like
- 7:20Speaker 1: an incognito mode for a diet.
- 7:24Speaker 2: I can eat this, but the calories don't count.
- 7:26Speaker 1: Yeah, nobody knows why did.
- 7:28Speaker 2: You turn that off? Ever, I guess you do need
- 7:31Speaker 2: some calories.
- 7:32Speaker 1: To survive, you know, it's a dietary privacy. But anyways,
- 7:36Speaker 1: we're talking about the difference between inertial and gravitational mass.
- 7:39Speaker 1: It seems that these are two separate concepts perhaps in physics,
- 7:42Speaker 1: and the question is are they the same or are
- 7:44Speaker 1: they different things? So, as usually, we were wondering how
- 7:47Speaker 1: many people out there had thought about the difference between
- 7:49Speaker 1: inertial and gravitational mass.
- 7:51Speaker 2: Thanks very much to our army of volunteers who answers
- 7:54Speaker 2: these questions for your education and listening pleasure. If you'd
- 7:57Speaker 2: like to add your voice to the choir, we'd love
- 7:59Speaker 2: to have you. Just right to us two questions at
- 8:02Speaker 2: Daniel Andandhorge dot com.
- 8:03Speaker 1: So think about it for a second. Do you think
- 8:05Speaker 1: inertial and gravitational mass are the same. Here's what people
- 8:09Speaker 1: have to say.
- 8:09Speaker 4: Inertial mass is the mass that the higes gives, and
- 8:13Speaker 4: I think it's the mass involved in like the force
- 8:17Speaker 4: to change, like an object's velocity. And then gravitational mass.
- 8:22Speaker 4: I really never knew how to defer the too.
- 8:24Speaker 5: Inertial mass is how much an object readsists moving through space,
- 8:30Speaker 5: how much force it would take to accelerate it, And
- 8:32Speaker 5: gravitational mass has more to do with in a gravitational field.
- 8:37Speaker 2: But I believe that they are equivalent.
- 8:39Speaker 6: Well, I think that inertial mass represents how hard it
- 8:42Speaker 6: is to change the motion off the given body, and
- 8:45Speaker 6: that the gravitational mass represents how much the formation I
- 8:50Speaker 6: think they is based on fabric that samebody calls us.
- 8:53Speaker 7: I think the difference between inertia and gravitational mass is
- 8:58Speaker 7: on the inertia is on the between the particles or something.
- 9:02Speaker 7: I think that started in here. We have no idea
- 9:03Speaker 7: a book, and like, I think it's like the connecting
- 9:06Speaker 7: of the quarks and stuff, and that's what creates most mass.
- 9:10Speaker 7: So most mass is just a bonding energy, so I
- 9:13Speaker 7: think that's what energies.
- 9:15Speaker 3: Inertial mass is a measure of how hard it is
- 9:17Speaker 3: for an object to change its velocity, whether in magnitude
- 9:21Speaker 3: or direction. As for gravitational mass, it's a measure of
- 9:25Speaker 3: how much an object distorted the space time around it.
- 9:29Speaker 3: I know there is a conundrum in classical mechanics around
- 9:32Speaker 3: the fact that both these values are numerically the same,
- 9:37Speaker 3: and I believe relativity has an answer for that, but
- 9:40Speaker 3: I'm not quite sure what it is. So I'm waiting
- 9:42Speaker 3: for you guys to explain.
- 9:43Speaker 1: All Right, it's some nice, yeah, pretty deep guesses here.
- 9:46Speaker 1: I like the one that says you need a whole
- 9:47Speaker 1: podcast for that done that's the answer.
- 9:50Speaker 2: Not done yet, we're still doing it.
- 9:52Speaker 1: Well, you're listening to this, we already finished.
- 9:54Speaker 2: Oh that's true.
- 9:54Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, we're working in the future.
- 9:57Speaker 2: But yeah, these are great answers. People definitely know about
- 9:59Speaker 2: these concepts, and some people even have ideas about their relationship.
- 10:03Speaker 4: Yeah.
- 10:03Speaker 1: I saw mentions of the Higgs boson here, I saw
- 10:06Speaker 1: mentions of acceleration and energy. Sounds like this is going
- 10:09Speaker 1: to be a pretty dense podcast.
- 10:13Speaker 2: We're going to overcome some massive misunderstandings in people's brains.
- 10:17Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a pretty heavy topic, so let's dig into it. Daniel,
- 10:19Speaker 1: what is mass to a physicist? The non religious physicists, the.
- 10:25Speaker 2: Non denominational idea of mass, I mean, mass to a
- 10:28Speaker 2: physicist is just like a more mathematical and precise description
- 10:32Speaker 2: of our experience, right. Physics is not trying to describe
- 10:35Speaker 2: a universe you don't understand or that isn't familiar to you.
- 10:38Speaker 2: We're trying to describe our universe, our everyday understanding of
- 10:42Speaker 2: what it's like to be in the world, and that
- 10:44Speaker 2: means explaining our intuitive experience, you know, the way that
- 10:47Speaker 2: we live and we have this feeling that like you
- 10:49Speaker 2: can pick something up that is hard, and you pick
- 10:51Speaker 2: something else up and it's easy. Or you push on
- 10:53Speaker 2: something and it's hard to get it moving, you push
- 10:55Speaker 2: on something else and it's easier to get it moving,
- 10:58Speaker 2: and that somehow that that might relate to, like how
- 11:00Speaker 2: much stuff there is to something. You put another watermelon
- 11:03Speaker 2: in the shopping cart and it's a little bit harder
- 11:05Speaker 2: to get it rolling.
- 11:06Speaker 1: So you're saying, the intuitive definition of mass is just
- 11:09Speaker 1: how much stuff there is to something.
- 11:11Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that's the most accessible and intuitive idea
- 11:15Speaker 2: of what mass is. We think of it like the stuffiness,
- 11:18Speaker 2: you know, like this has more scoops of basic universe
- 11:21Speaker 2: stuff than something else.
- 11:23Speaker 1: Like a rock has more stuff stuffed into it. Then
- 11:26Speaker 1: let's say an air balloon.
- 11:28Speaker 2: Yeah, it certainly does. You know, there are more atoms,
- 11:30Speaker 2: it's denser. If you add up the amount of stuff
- 11:33Speaker 2: in all those atoms in a rock, then there's more
- 11:35Speaker 2: in that than in a balloon, for example. Absolutely, the
- 11:37Speaker 2: job of physics isn't to like rely on these fuzzy
- 11:40Speaker 2: concepts and just accept our intuitive understanding. It's to make
- 11:44Speaker 2: a more precise mathematical description of what's actually happening, so
- 11:49Speaker 2: we can extract from that some understanding of like what
- 11:51Speaker 2: the rules of the universe.
- 11:53Speaker 1: Are, right, because I guess there are kind of two
- 11:55Speaker 1: kinds of mass, right, Like there's a measure of how
- 11:57Speaker 1: hard something is to push to get a going, and
- 12:00Speaker 1: then also how hard it is to lift up from
- 12:02Speaker 1: the ground.
- 12:03Speaker 2: Exactly, there's two different things you can do to stuff. Right.
- 12:06Speaker 2: You can push that shopping cart filled with watermelons, and
- 12:10Speaker 2: you know, if you put more watermelons in it, it
- 12:11Speaker 2: takes a bigger push. And then there's also like actually
- 12:14Speaker 2: lifting the shopping card of watermelons over your head, and
- 12:18Speaker 2: the more watermelons that are in there, the more force
- 12:20Speaker 2: it takes. And those are actually two separate concepts, right,
- 12:24Speaker 2: they're related in that more watermelons makes it harder. But
- 12:27Speaker 2: if you're just pushing the watermelons, then you're not lifting
- 12:30Speaker 2: them against gravity, right, You're just like speeding them up.
- 12:34Speaker 2: And that's what we call inertial mass. It's just like
- 12:36Speaker 2: how hard it is to get something going even in
- 12:39Speaker 2: outer space. Right, things take a push to get moving
- 12:42Speaker 2: even when there's no gravity.
- 12:43Speaker 1: Right, Because the two things don't necessarily have to be
- 12:46Speaker 1: the same, right, Like, you can't imagine a scenario where maybe,
- 12:50Speaker 1: for example, there's a rock on Dolli with wheels in it,
- 12:53Speaker 1: and it takes a certain amount of force to push
- 12:55Speaker 1: it from side to side, but then it maybe takes
- 12:57Speaker 1: no force to lift it up, or maybe take it's
- 13:00Speaker 1: an extra bigger force to lift it up. Right, we
- 13:03Speaker 1: could live in a universe where those two things are
- 13:05Speaker 1: not the same.
- 13:06Speaker 2: Yeah, or even just on a planet. Right, if you
- 13:08Speaker 2: have a rock on Jupiter, then it takes a large
- 13:11Speaker 2: force to counteract Jupiter's gravity, But it takes the same
- 13:13Speaker 2: force to push its side to side on Jupiter as
- 13:15Speaker 2: it does on Earth.
- 13:16Speaker 1: All right, So then the two things are different, and
- 13:19Speaker 1: so let's dig into it a little bit more. Talk
- 13:21Speaker 1: about inertial mass.
- 13:22Speaker 2: So inertial mass is just this sense that it takes
- 13:25Speaker 2: a force to get something going. And this is basic
- 13:27Speaker 2: Newtonian mechanics. Things tend to stay at the same velocity
- 13:30Speaker 2: unless you give them a push. That push is a force,
- 13:33Speaker 2: and so this is just f equals MAA. Right, you
- 13:36Speaker 2: want something to speed up, you got to push on it,
- 13:37Speaker 2: and the amount of speed up you get for that
- 13:39Speaker 2: push depends on the thing's mass. So if it has
- 13:42Speaker 2: a small mass, like if m is very very small,
- 13:45Speaker 2: and you give it a big push, you get a
- 13:47Speaker 2: big acceleration. But if it has a large mass, like
- 13:50Speaker 2: the Earth or something, and you give it a push,
- 13:52Speaker 2: then it gets a very small acceleration. F equals MA
- 13:55Speaker 2: tells you that the larger the mass, the larger the
- 13:58Speaker 2: force you need to accelerate something to speed it.
- 14:00Speaker 1: Up, right, And so in this case, mass is the ratio.
- 14:03Speaker 1: Like what happens You've divide the force you need to
- 14:06Speaker 1: push on something to get it to a certain acceleration, right.
- 14:09Speaker 2: Exactly, And this is a very familiar experience, right. Think
- 14:12Speaker 2: about like firing a rifle. When you fire a rifle,
- 14:15Speaker 2: it's pushing on the bullet to make it go fast,
- 14:17Speaker 2: But the bullet is also pushing on the rifle. Why
- 14:19Speaker 2: doesn't the rifle zoom the other way just as fast
- 14:22Speaker 2: as the bullet. Well, because the rifle has more mass
- 14:25Speaker 2: than the bullet. They have the same force applying on
- 14:27Speaker 2: both of them, but the bullet is less mass, so
- 14:29Speaker 2: it gets more acceleration.
- 14:31Speaker 1: Or maybe think about it as like an asteroid in
- 14:33Speaker 1: space that's not in a planet or anything. The more
- 14:37Speaker 1: massive the asteroid is, the harder it is to get
- 14:40Speaker 1: it moving, that's inertial mass.
- 14:43Speaker 2: That's inertial mass exactly. So things that have this property
- 14:46Speaker 2: we call it inertial mass, are harder to get moving,
- 14:49Speaker 2: They're harder to speed up and harder to slow down.
- 14:51Speaker 2: They have inertia. That's sort of what we mean by inertia,
- 14:54Speaker 2: that we have inertial mass.
- 14:55Speaker 1: All right, Now talk about gravitational mass.
- 14:58Speaker 2: So gravitational mass is what control how much gravitational force
- 15:02Speaker 2: is applied on you. And Newton also has a formula
- 15:05Speaker 2: for this. It's gmm over R squared. We have two
- 15:08Speaker 2: masses there because two things are pulling on each other,
- 15:11Speaker 2: and more mass means more gravity. Like if you added
- 15:14Speaker 2: mass to the Earth without changing its radius, if you
- 15:16Speaker 2: made it more dense so got more massive, then it
- 15:19Speaker 2: would be pulling on you harder. And so that's the
- 15:21Speaker 2: gravitational mass. It's the mass that goes into the gravitational
- 15:24Speaker 2: force formula.
- 15:25Speaker 1: All right. Guess going back to our asteroid in space scenario,
- 15:28Speaker 1: Like if you have an asteroid in space and it's
- 15:30Speaker 1: close to a big planet, the big planet is going
- 15:33Speaker 1: to pull the asteroid towards the planet, and so the
- 15:36Speaker 1: mass of the asteroid is maybe a measure of our
- 15:38Speaker 1: heart would it be to keep the asteroid from being
- 15:40Speaker 1: pulled towards the planet? Like, if you're trying to prevent
- 15:43Speaker 1: the asteroid from falling into the planet, how hard would
- 15:46Speaker 1: it be? Depends that's gravitational mass exactly. More gravitational mass
- 15:50Speaker 1: means more gravity. Imagine you're zooming next to two.
- 15:53Speaker 2: Planets and one of them has more mass than the other,
- 15:55Speaker 2: then you're going to feel it's gravity more strongly. Right,
- 15:58Speaker 2: And this is a Newtonian picture of gravity, or gravity
- 16:01Speaker 2: is a force and you can think about it sort
- 16:03Speaker 2: of like the gravitational mass is like the charge for gravity.
- 16:07Speaker 2: Two electrons will push on each other because they both
- 16:10Speaker 2: have negative charge, and if you increase that charge, then
- 16:13Speaker 2: their force would be stronger. Well, the force law for
- 16:17Speaker 2: gravity is exactly the same structure as a force law
- 16:19Speaker 2: for electromagnetism. Where you replace the charges with the masses.
- 16:23Speaker 2: You increase the mass, you get more gravity.
- 16:25Speaker 1: Right, Like a lightweight asteroid, you wouldn't a small lightweight asteroid,
- 16:29Speaker 1: you wouldn't need to push very hard to keep it
- 16:31Speaker 1: from falling into the planet. With a huge massive asteroid,
- 16:34Speaker 1: you need to be superman basically to keep it from
- 16:36Speaker 1: smashing into the planet. All right, Well, that's the basics
- 16:39Speaker 1: of Newtonian inertial and gravitational mass. Now let's get into
- 16:43Speaker 1: where it gets kind of tricky, and are these things
- 16:45Speaker 1: the same or are they different? According to Einstein, So
- 16:48Speaker 1: let's dig into those details. But first let's take a
- 16:50Speaker 1: quick break. All right, we're asking a massive question here today.
- 17:07Speaker 1: What's the difference between inertial and gravitational mass. Are they
- 17:10Speaker 1: the same? Are they different? Are they just two sides
- 17:12Speaker 1: of the same coin? Are there two coins? How many
- 17:14Speaker 1: coins are there in the universe?
- 17:17Speaker 2: An infinite number of coins, with an infinite number of sides,
- 17:20Speaker 2: with infinite mass. Maybe it's made out of photons. Who knows.
- 17:25Speaker 1: There we go, That would explain why money's so light
- 17:28Speaker 1: in my pockets. All right, so we talked about kind
- 17:30Speaker 1: of the basics of inertial and gravitational mass. I guess
- 17:33Speaker 1: from a Newtonian perspective, so like a couple of hundred
- 17:36Speaker 1: years ago that this is when you'dn figured out, is
- 17:38Speaker 1: that you have something called inertial mass and you have
- 17:41Speaker 1: something called gravitational mass. And he basically measured them to
- 17:44Speaker 1: be the same thing, right, or he thought they were
- 17:46Speaker 1: the same thing.
- 17:47Speaker 2: He actually sort of treated them as different things, right.
- 17:50Speaker 2: He wrote them down as if they were different numbers.
- 17:52Speaker 2: Like he wrote two different formulas, and the masses in
- 17:55Speaker 2: those two formulas didn't have to agree. Like in principle
- 17:58Speaker 2: in Newtonian physics, mass in f egals ma could be
- 18:02Speaker 2: different from mass in the gravitational force formula. So he
- 18:06Speaker 2: allowed for the possibility that these were different.
- 18:08Speaker 1: Wait, what do you mean. He didn't call them mass,
- 18:10Speaker 1: he didn't call them m.
- 18:11Speaker 2: Well, and Newton actually didn't write his equations down in
- 18:14Speaker 2: terms of mathematics. Back then, the style was more pros
- 18:17Speaker 2: so a lot of newton stuff is actually written out
- 18:19Speaker 2: in sentences, so the exact notation can be a little different.
- 18:22Speaker 2: But in our modern translation of Newton's formulas, technically there's
- 18:27Speaker 2: a little I in front of the inertial mass and
- 18:29Speaker 2: a little G subscript in front of the gravitational mass,
- 18:31Speaker 2: and they don't necessarily have to be the same. In
- 18:34Speaker 2: Newtonian physics, you have to go out and measure whether
- 18:37Speaker 2: these things are the same.
- 18:39Speaker 1: But did he do it? Did Newton measure it to
- 18:41Speaker 1: be the same or did he measure it to be different?
- 18:43Speaker 2: So Newton measured it using a pendulum, and lots of
- 18:45Speaker 2: other people have done these measurements and we find that
- 18:48Speaker 2: they are the same. And it's sort of a famous
- 18:50Speaker 2: result that people learn about, you know, in elementary school,
- 18:53Speaker 2: that two things, even if they have different mass, fall
- 18:56Speaker 2: at the same speed. That's basically testing whether inertial and
- 18:59Speaker 2: gravitational mass are the same thing. Something that has more
- 19:02Speaker 2: mass takes a bigger force to get going, but if
- 19:05Speaker 2: it has more gravitational mass also, then it gets a
- 19:08Speaker 2: bigger force from the Earth. And so something that's low
- 19:11Speaker 2: mass and something that's high mass will get accelerated the
- 19:14Speaker 2: same way by the Earth. The Earth is pulling harder
- 19:16Speaker 2: on the one with more mass, which takes more effort
- 19:19Speaker 2: to get it going. So the two things perfectly balance out.
- 19:22Speaker 1: I guess we're just lucky. Newton didn't have a dog
- 19:25Speaker 1: when he ran his experiments, so it even ran this
- 19:28Speaker 1: experiment and he measured it to be the same Did
- 19:30Speaker 1: he then conclude that it was the same thing? Did
- 19:32Speaker 1: he then start calling it the same thing?
- 19:33Speaker 2: Newton's experiment was not super precise, so this is one
- 19:36Speaker 2: hundreds of years ago, and the technology for timing things
- 19:39Speaker 2: and measuring things precisely was much fuzzier. So he concluded
- 19:42Speaker 2: these things were likely the same, but he had no
- 19:44Speaker 2: proof theoretically that showed that they had to be the same,
- 19:48Speaker 2: and he only had an experimental measurement which was kind
- 19:50Speaker 2: of fuzzy. And so people continued on measuring these things,
- 19:53Speaker 2: and they've been measuring it basically ever since. People are
- 19:56Speaker 2: basically still measuring this to see if they can find
- 19:58Speaker 2: any discrepancies.
- 20:00Speaker 1: At some point, I guess in our scientific history, scientists
- 20:02Speaker 1: sort of kind of concluded they were the same, didn't they.
- 20:05Speaker 1: I mean, at least when you're in high school, you know,
- 20:07Speaker 1: they just teach you M. They don't teach you M
- 20:09Speaker 1: I and MG. They just teach you M.
- 20:11Speaker 2: There is a sort of simplified version of it in
- 20:13Speaker 2: high school. But in Newtonian physics, these are potentially different,
- 20:16Speaker 2: which is why you know, astronauts on the Moon in
- 20:18Speaker 2: the sixties did this experiment, you know, dropping a feather
- 20:22Speaker 2: and hammer at the same time, and why in the
- 20:25Speaker 2: last couple of decades people have made this even more
- 20:27Speaker 2: precise with high tech torsion balances. The narrow this down
- 20:30Speaker 2: to the one part in ten to the thirteen. But
- 20:33Speaker 2: you know, from an experimental point of view that's not
- 20:35Speaker 2: the same. That just says it's either the same or
- 20:38Speaker 2: it's very very close together.
- 20:40Speaker 1: But I guess I mean like sort of in I
- 20:41Speaker 1: guess in our society and our culture, at least how
- 20:44Speaker 1: they teach physics in high school, right in college at
- 20:47Speaker 1: least in my time, people are just sort of assume
- 20:49Speaker 1: they're the same thing.
- 20:50Speaker 2: Well, I think there's a simplification there. It's sort of
- 20:52Speaker 2: like when people tell you of the photon has no mass. Well,
- 20:55Speaker 2: we're pretty sure the photon has either no mass or
- 20:59Speaker 2: almost nos some very very small number, but we haven't
- 21:02Speaker 2: exactly measured it to be zero. We've measured it to
- 21:05Speaker 2: be close to zero within some tolerance. So it just
- 21:07Speaker 2: depends on how precise you want to be with your language.
- 21:10Speaker 2: According to these measurements, they seem like basically the same thing.
- 21:13Speaker 2: But that's not the same as saying we understand why
- 21:15Speaker 2: they have to be the same. Theoretically they're linked. It
- 21:19Speaker 2: might just be a coincidence, all right.
- 21:21Speaker 1: So then scientists have been sticking to it. They've been
- 21:24Speaker 1: trying to do this experiment to see if these two
- 21:27Speaker 1: things are the same. Would have the experiments found.
- 21:29Speaker 2: The experiments have never found any discrepancy between gravitational mass
- 21:34Speaker 2: and inertial mass. Galleo did this experiment with like things
- 21:37Speaker 2: rolling down inclined planes. There's this apocryphal story of him
- 21:40Speaker 2: dropping things off the leaning tower at Pisa, which I
- 21:42Speaker 2: don't think ever happened. There really was this test on
- 21:45Speaker 2: the Moon where they drop a hammer and a feather,
- 21:48Speaker 2: because you know, this is only truth. There's no air resistance.
- 21:50Speaker 2: Air resistance makes everything much more complicated. If the only
- 21:52Speaker 2: force involved is a force of gravity and it just
- 21:55Speaker 2: has to overcome the inertia, then those things should perfectly
- 21:58Speaker 2: balance out if the inertial mass and the pavitational mass
- 22:00Speaker 2: are the same. So nobody's ever found any violation of
- 22:04Speaker 2: these two things being the same.
- 22:06Speaker 1: Okay, So then I guess the question is are they
- 22:09Speaker 1: actually the same or are they just being measured to
- 22:12Speaker 1: be the same.
- 22:12Speaker 2: Yeah, Like, is it a coincidence or is it really
- 22:16Speaker 2: just two ways of looking at the same thing. And
- 22:19Speaker 2: those are two very different ideas about how the world
- 22:21Speaker 2: could work. It's sort of like the way the electron
- 22:24Speaker 2: charge and the proton charge balance each other out. We think, exactly,
- 22:28Speaker 2: does that mean that there's a fundamental relationship between the two,
- 22:31Speaker 2: or do we live in a world where these two
- 22:33Speaker 2: things just happen to balance, and that's why we live
- 22:35Speaker 2: in this world. Right, Even if your experience of the
- 22:37Speaker 2: world is the same and doesn't change any experiments, it's
- 22:40Speaker 2: a very different story about how the world works, about
- 22:43Speaker 2: which universe we live in.
- 22:45Speaker 1: Okay, So what do we know about this question?
- 22:47Speaker 4: So?
- 22:47Speaker 2: Newton's answer is it's a coincidence. These are two different concepts,
- 22:50Speaker 2: they appear in two different formulas, we measure them, they
- 22:53Speaker 2: happen to be equal. End of the story. Newton says,
- 22:56Speaker 2: there's no reason for these two things to be the same.
- 22:58Speaker 2: They just happen to be. So. So Newton has two
- 23:01Speaker 2: parameters and they just happen to be exactly the same value.
- 23:04Speaker 2: But that seems like too delicious a clue. When we
- 23:06Speaker 2: find coincidences like that in nature, we're like, hmm, maybe
- 23:09Speaker 2: there's a simpler version of the story. Maybe we can
- 23:11Speaker 2: explain these two sides of the coin in terms of
- 23:14Speaker 2: one coin. And that's where Einstein comes in. Einstein has
- 23:17Speaker 2: a very different explanation for why things always fall the
- 23:20Speaker 2: same way, no matter how massive they are.
- 23:23Speaker 1: Right to Einstein, gravity is not even a force, right that's.
- 23:26Speaker 2: Right, and that's the basic answer. Einstein says, there is
- 23:29Speaker 2: no gravitational force. You can never measure gravity. You can't
- 23:32Speaker 2: feel gravity. The reason things fall is because they're actually
- 23:36Speaker 2: just moving together to follow the shape of space. Einstein says,
- 23:39Speaker 2: you're kind of asking the wrong question by saying why
- 23:41Speaker 2: these two things equal. He says, there's only one thing.
- 23:44Speaker 2: There is only inertial mass. There's no such thing as
- 23:47Speaker 2: gravitational mass, because there is no such thing as a
- 23:50Speaker 2: gravitational force.
- 23:51Speaker 1: Right. According to Einstein, gravity is like the bending of
- 23:54Speaker 1: space right, space time. That's what makes something fall to
- 23:57Speaker 1: the ground or orbit around the planet or the sun.
- 24:01Speaker 2: That's right. To Einstein, gravity is sort of like an illusion.
- 24:04Speaker 2: You can never even feel it or sense it directly.
- 24:07Speaker 2: Let's make sure we unpack that a little bit, because
- 24:10Speaker 2: there are important ideas in there that we have to
- 24:12Speaker 2: mentally import to understand what's going to happen next. I mean,
- 24:16Speaker 2: what does it mean that there's no gravitational force. You
- 24:19Speaker 2: can't measure gravity. Gravity kind of looks like a force.
- 24:22Speaker 2: It certainly feels like we can measure it. Right. Gravity
- 24:26Speaker 2: looks like a force because we can't see the curvature
- 24:29Speaker 2: of space. We think things should move in straight lines
- 24:32Speaker 2: because we don't see that space is curved. So when
- 24:35Speaker 2: we see things move differently than we expect, Newton tells us, oh,
- 24:39Speaker 2: there's a force there, But if you could see the
- 24:41Speaker 2: curvature of space, you'd understand that it's just stuff moving
- 24:44Speaker 2: along those curves. There's no force there. It's actually just
- 24:48Speaker 2: free fall motion. So when you jump off a building,
- 24:50Speaker 2: for example, and you fall towards the Earth, you're in
- 24:53Speaker 2: free fall. There are no forces acting on you. From
- 24:57Speaker 2: your point of view, the surface of the Earth is
- 24:59Speaker 2: accelerating to towards you. And if you pulled out a
- 25:02Speaker 2: gravitometer or an accelerometer like a scale, you would measure
- 25:06Speaker 2: no acceleration. You're not accelerating. There is no force on
- 25:09Speaker 2: you at all. F equals ma equals zero. Now standing
- 25:13Speaker 2: on the surface of the Earth, you do measure acceleration.
- 25:16Speaker 2: A gravitometer like a scale measures non zero acceleration. But
- 25:20Speaker 2: that's not the force of gravity on you. That's the
- 25:23Speaker 2: surface of the Earth accelerating up against the natural free
- 25:27Speaker 2: fall motion of gravity. All acceleration is against the natural
- 25:31Speaker 2: motion of gravity. So Newton says that the person on
- 25:34Speaker 2: the surface is not accelerating and the falling person is
- 25:37Speaker 2: being accelerated by the force of gravity. But Einstein says
- 25:41Speaker 2: that the surface of the Earth is accelerating and the
- 25:44Speaker 2: person falling has no acceleration. You will not sense any
- 25:48Speaker 2: gravity there because there is no force there for you
- 25:51Speaker 2: to measure with your accelerometer.
- 25:54Speaker 1: Right, But I guess you still sort of have the
- 25:56Speaker 1: concept of mass, right, because some things bend space time
- 26:00Speaker 1: more than others. Like a feather, doesn't it bend space
- 26:03Speaker 1: and time a little bit more or less than a
- 26:05Speaker 1: bowling ball?
- 26:06Speaker 2: Yes? Absolutely, But that's just the single concept of mass, right.
- 26:09Speaker 2: That's like the inertial mass of the object. It controls
- 26:12Speaker 2: how it bends space. But everything moves through bend space
- 26:15Speaker 2: the same way, regardless of its mass. But that's just
- 26:18Speaker 2: one concept in general relativity.
- 26:20Speaker 1: What do you mean it's the same concept. So now
- 26:22Speaker 1: Einstein said that the idea that they're identical doesn't matter.
- 26:25Speaker 1: Beca is they're the same thing.
- 26:27Speaker 2: He says, there essentially is only one idea here, the
- 26:29Speaker 2: mass of the object, and that controls how it bends space.
- 26:33Speaker 2: And it's the bending of space that controls essentially how
- 26:36Speaker 2: these objects move.
- 26:37Speaker 1: Right, But isn't there like a degree to which something
- 26:39Speaker 1: bends space more than other things.
- 26:41Speaker 2: Well, the bending of space actually doesn't come from mass,
- 26:43Speaker 2: it comes from energy density. Mass doesn't have a unique
- 26:46Speaker 2: property to bend space. It's really just the energy content
- 26:49Speaker 2: of something which bends space. And you can bend space
- 26:52Speaker 2: even if you don't have mass, like a box of photons,
- 26:55Speaker 2: for example, can bend space.
- 26:56Speaker 1: Right, right, I mean we've talked about this before in
- 26:58Speaker 1: the podcast, that there really is no such thing as mass.
- 27:02Speaker 1: There's really only energy. Right.
- 27:03Speaker 2: That's a strong philosophical statement. I would say mass makes
- 27:06Speaker 2: some sense, but in the end, when you look at it,
- 27:08Speaker 2: it's basically another kind of energy. Yeah.
- 27:10Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I'm just going by what we wrote
- 27:12Speaker 1: in our book.
- 27:14Speaker 2: I don't think we said that mass doesn't exist. We've
- 27:17Speaker 2: said that mass is internal stored energy.
- 27:19Speaker 1: Yeah, so like all mass is energy, is what we said.
- 27:23Speaker 1: But there is this weird property about energy that if
- 27:26Speaker 1: you have concentrated energy bound to like a particle or something,
- 27:29Speaker 1: then that particle is hard to move. Right. That's still
- 27:32Speaker 1: what you would call inertial mass.
- 27:34Speaker 2: But now when you say something is easier or harder
- 27:38Speaker 2: to accelerate, you're adding in other forces to make that
- 27:41Speaker 2: acceleration happen. If we're just talking about gravity, like the
- 27:44Speaker 2: experiment of dropping a bowling ball or a feather, there
- 27:47Speaker 2: is no way to accelerate it because gravity isn't the
- 27:50Speaker 2: force and doesn't accelerate things. Things just move according to
- 27:54Speaker 2: the curve of space. Other forces can provide acceleration. In fact,
- 27:58Speaker 2: they are the only way to accelerate things. So they
- 28:02Speaker 2: still have this concept of inertial mass that's separate from
- 28:05Speaker 2: gravity for the other forces. But within gravity, there's just
- 28:09Speaker 2: one concept of mass, the energy that helps bend space.
- 28:13Speaker 2: That mass doesn't play a role in how things move
- 28:16Speaker 2: through that space. So there's not a separate concept of
- 28:19Speaker 2: inertial and gravitational mass in Einstein's relativity like there is
- 28:23Speaker 2: in Newtonian gravity.
- 28:25Speaker 1: Right, But then like more energy then also then bend
- 28:29Speaker 1: space more around it.
- 28:30Speaker 2: Yes, that's right, more energy density, bend space more around it.
- 28:33Speaker 1: So what do you mean by Einstein said that it's
- 28:36Speaker 1: all the same thing? Like it can all be explained
- 28:38Speaker 1: by just the concentration of energy.
- 28:40Speaker 2: In general relativity, these all flow from the same fundamental equations.
- 28:43Speaker 2: Newton has two equations that are totally separate totally distinct,
- 28:47Speaker 2: completely different descriptions. F equals ma a is one equation.
- 28:50Speaker 2: F equals gmm over r squares the other. He has
- 28:53Speaker 2: his law of inertia, and he has his law of gravity.
- 28:55Speaker 2: For Einstein, these things all just flow from the concentration
- 28:58Speaker 2: of energy density energy city bend space, and objects move
- 29:02Speaker 2: through that bend space. But these things just all flow
- 29:04Speaker 2: from the same set of equations. There's just one equation there.
- 29:07Speaker 2: There's no room to like put in another equation with
- 29:10Speaker 2: a separate value from mass. The separate equations are the
- 29:13Speaker 2: other forces. Electromagnetism can accelerate objects, and that's a concept
- 29:18Speaker 2: totally separate from gravity. It requires a concept of inertial mass.
- 29:22Speaker 2: So if you involve the other forces, there are still
- 29:25Speaker 2: two parameters there, but now there's only one for gravity
- 29:28Speaker 2: thanks to Einstein.
- 29:29Speaker 1: But I wonder if there's like a knob there, you know,
- 29:32Speaker 1: like let's say I have I don't know, ten kilo
- 29:35Speaker 1: jewels concentrated in a the size of a lemon. Now
- 29:39Speaker 1: that amount of energy concentrated in one spot, it's going
- 29:41Speaker 1: to be a little bit hard to move. That's inertial
- 29:43Speaker 1: mass of the lemon. But then also that lemon is
- 29:46Speaker 1: bending space time around it to a certain degree, wouldn't
- 29:49Speaker 1: I call that gravitational mass, Like you can imagine ten
- 29:52Speaker 1: kilo jewels of energy bending space a lot in one
- 29:55Speaker 1: universe and bending space not much at all in another universe.
- 29:59Speaker 2: So the lemon nd space and causes curvature. But from
- 30:02Speaker 2: a gravitational point of view, it has no meaning to
- 30:04Speaker 2: say it's hard to accelerate the lemon, because gravity doesn't
- 30:08Speaker 2: accelerate things. The lemon and a pebble and a bowling
- 30:11Speaker 2: ball all moved through that curved space the same way gravitationally.
- 30:15Speaker 2: If you bring in other forces like rockets, then you've
- 30:18Speaker 2: reintroduced inertial mass, but not gravitationally. There is another nub there.
- 30:23Speaker 2: That's the gravitational constant, right, which appears in Newton's formula
- 30:26Speaker 2: but also appears in general relativity. But that affects everything, right,
- 30:31Speaker 2: That affects how much mass is going to bend space.
- 30:34Speaker 2: So you crank G up and then the same amount
- 30:36Speaker 2: of mass is going to bend space more right, But
- 30:39Speaker 2: that's simultaneously automatically also going to change how things move,
- 30:43Speaker 2: because things move just following the curvature of space. So
- 30:47Speaker 2: That's the beautiful thing about GRS that it tells you
- 30:50Speaker 2: that the way things move through space doesn't depend on
- 30:52Speaker 2: their mass. It only depends on the geometry of space.
- 30:55Speaker 2: It's purely geometric. So the reason, for example, that the
- 30:59Speaker 2: feather and the hammer fall at the same rate is
- 31:02Speaker 2: because they are both just following the curvature of space,
- 31:04Speaker 2: regardless of what their mass is. So if you crank
- 31:07Speaker 2: up g you get more curvature and that changes how
- 31:10Speaker 2: everything moves.
- 31:11Speaker 1: Right, But the bowling bustle has more inertial mass, right,
- 31:14Speaker 1: So why does it move at the same rate as
- 31:16Speaker 1: a feather.
- 31:17Speaker 2: Because motion through space doesn't depend on your mass.
- 31:21Speaker 3: Right.
- 31:21Speaker 2: You have to get rid of this idea of inertial
- 31:22Speaker 2: mass affecting how you're going to move. What affects how
- 31:25Speaker 2: you move is just the curvature of space, just the
- 31:28Speaker 2: geometry of space time. The way to look at it
- 31:30Speaker 2: is not that both the bowling ball and the feather
- 31:33Speaker 2: are being accelerated the same amount. That's Newtonian and requires
- 31:37Speaker 2: gravitational forces balanced by inertia. The way to look at
- 31:41Speaker 2: it is that the bowling ball and feather move the
- 31:43Speaker 2: same way through space time. Neither of them is accelerating.
- 31:47Speaker 2: They're both in free fall. What's accelerating is the surface
- 31:51Speaker 2: of the Earth rushing up to them, so of course
- 31:53Speaker 2: it reaches them at the same time.
- 31:55Speaker 1: Well, maybe it would help to understand a little bit
- 31:57Speaker 1: more how gravity causes things to move and this idea
- 32:01Speaker 1: of pseudo forces. So what do you mean, Like gravity
- 32:03Speaker 1: is a pseudo force.
- 32:04Speaker 2: So electromagnetism is a real force. It like accelerates stuff, right,
- 32:07Speaker 2: It pushes and it pulls. That's what we mean by
- 32:10Speaker 2: a force. But a pseudo force is when something appears
- 32:13Speaker 2: to move without a force being applied to it, right,
- 32:16Speaker 2: And this is not unfamiliar to you. Like if you're
- 32:18Speaker 2: in the back of a truck and there's a bowling
- 32:20Speaker 2: ball there and somebody hits the gas, Then to you
- 32:23Speaker 2: in your frame of the back of the truck, the
- 32:25Speaker 2: bowling ball is going to move. They hit the gas,
- 32:27Speaker 2: the bowling ball is going to move to the back
- 32:28Speaker 2: of the truck. They hit the brakes, the bowling ball
- 32:30Speaker 2: is going to move to the front of the truck.
- 32:31Speaker 2: So you're seeing, like this ball move even though nobody's
- 32:34Speaker 2: pushing on it, right, nobody's pulling on it, nobody's applying
- 32:37Speaker 2: any force to it, but you're seeing the ball accelerate,
- 32:40Speaker 2: so there's a pseudo force there. Something is happening to
- 32:43Speaker 2: accelerate this thing even though there's no forces on it.
- 32:46Speaker 2: And in the same way, for example, if you're out
- 32:48Speaker 2: in space and you're in a rocket ship and your
- 32:50Speaker 2: rocket ship is accelerating and you drop a ball, then
- 32:54Speaker 2: that ball is going to fall to the floor. How
- 32:56Speaker 2: you can get the appearance of gravity on a spaceship
- 32:58Speaker 2: if you're accelerating, So that's a pseudo force, right. Basically, acceleration,
- 33:02Speaker 2: any accelerating frame gives you a pseudo force. There's no
- 33:05Speaker 2: gravity on the spaceship. It's just the floor is accelerating
- 33:08Speaker 2: up to meet the ball that you've dropped it. All right,
- 33:11Speaker 2: So that's the concept of a pseudo.
- 33:13Speaker 1: Force, like in those space movies where they have like
- 33:16Speaker 1: a rotating spaceship or something, and this interpretive force makes
- 33:19Speaker 1: it feel like there's gravity around you.
- 33:21Speaker 2: Exactly, that's right, yeah, but there's.
- 33:23Speaker 1: No actual gravity happening.
- 33:24Speaker 2: There's no actual gravity there. It's just acceleration that's creating
- 33:28Speaker 2: this pseudo force. And so now Einstein says, well, curvature
- 33:32Speaker 2: of space time, which is invisible to us, we can't see.
- 33:35Speaker 2: It also causes pseudo forces. Like if you're out in
- 33:39Speaker 2: space and you drop a ball and somewhere near the Earth,
- 33:43Speaker 2: it's going to drift towards the Earth, and somebody watching
- 33:46Speaker 2: you do this experiments from sort of far away is
- 33:49Speaker 2: going to notice, hmm, there seems to be a force
- 33:51Speaker 2: on this ball, and that's what Newton would call the
- 33:54Speaker 2: gravitational force. But Einstein would say, no, there's no actual
- 33:57Speaker 2: force there. It's moving because of a pseudoforce. It's moving
- 34:01Speaker 2: because actually just following the curvature of space time. You
- 34:04Speaker 2: can't see that curvature. It's not obvious to you, but
- 34:07Speaker 2: the ball is following the curvature of space time, and
- 34:10Speaker 2: to us it looks like there's a force on it,
- 34:12Speaker 2: even though there's not. The ball is not actually accelerating.
- 34:15Speaker 1: So you're saying, like what we think of it as
- 34:17Speaker 1: gravity is really just pseudo gravity, right, kind of like
- 34:22Speaker 1: when you have like a black hole and it's bending
- 34:23Speaker 1: space time around it, it's sort of like causing acceleration
- 34:27Speaker 1: around it or something. It's bending space time so that
- 34:29Speaker 1: there's acceleration so that it feels like something is pulling
- 34:33Speaker 1: us down.
- 34:33Speaker 2: So yeah, masses definitely bend space time. But the issue
- 34:36Speaker 2: of acceleration is a little bit subtle. Like if you
- 34:39Speaker 2: are that ball that's falling towards the Earth, you don't
- 34:41Speaker 2: feel any acceleration, just like if you jump off of
- 34:44Speaker 2: a building. Before you hit the ground, you feel like
- 34:46Speaker 2: you're in free fall. You feel weightless. Right, so you
- 34:49Speaker 2: never actually experience gravity. You never feel gravity accelerating you.
- 34:54Speaker 1: Okay, but to somebody standing far away, it does look
- 34:57Speaker 1: like you're accelerating, right.
- 34:58Speaker 2: That's right, that's where the pseudo force comes. Then somebody
- 35:00Speaker 2: else in an inertial frame would say, oh, there's a
- 35:02Speaker 2: force on you. You're falling down towards the center of the Earth,
- 35:05Speaker 2: or you're falling in towards that black hole, and you're
- 35:07Speaker 2: accelerating relative to them. They're seeing that pseudo force. But
- 35:11Speaker 2: Einstein says, there's no force there. It's just things moving
- 35:14Speaker 2: according to the curvature of space time. Right.
- 35:18Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's dig a little bit more into
- 35:20Speaker 1: this detail and how it compares to inertial force, how
- 35:24Speaker 1: Einstein may be grappled with the idea of inertial mass,
- 35:27Speaker 1: and maybe where mass even comes from. So let's dig
- 35:30Speaker 1: into those details. But first, let's take another quick break.
- 35:46Speaker 1: All right, we're talking about the difference between inertial and
- 35:48Speaker 1: gravitational mass, and it's getting a bit hairy, Daniel, I
- 35:51Speaker 1: feel like, because I feel like we're once again trying
- 35:54Speaker 1: to explain really difficult general relativity special relativity topics on
- 36:00Speaker 1: an audio podcast, and so it can be a little
- 36:02Speaker 1: bit confusing. But it sounds like what you're saying is
- 36:05Speaker 1: that Einstein sort of puts the whole question kind of
- 36:09Speaker 1: in the nonsense category, like it doesn't make sense to
- 36:12Speaker 1: even compare gravitational and inertial mass because to Einstein, there
- 36:16Speaker 1: is no such thing as gravitational mass.
- 36:18Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. And it's sort of beautiful because he still
- 36:21Speaker 2: does manage to sort of like explain what we see,
- 36:25Speaker 2: Like we see these interesting things like a big ball
- 36:27Speaker 2: and a little ball fall at the same rate, and
- 36:29Speaker 2: he can still explain that and explain it in this
- 36:31Speaker 2: gorgeous geometrical explanation, and he does so by saying that
- 36:35Speaker 2: there is no ambiguity between the inertial and gravitational masses.
- 36:38Speaker 2: There's just one mass.
- 36:40Speaker 1: Well, Nick, if I can ask a question and maybe
- 36:42Speaker 1: take us deeper into the black hole, rabbit hole here.
- 36:47Speaker 1: So we're imagining this scenario where we have a bawling
- 36:49Speaker 1: ball and a feather, and let's say they're near a
- 36:52Speaker 1: black hole. Now you're saying that to somebody standing far
- 36:55Speaker 1: away from this scenario, they're both going to accelerate and
- 36:58Speaker 1: move towards the black hole at the rate. Because that's
- 37:01Speaker 1: so gravity works.
- 37:01Speaker 2: Right, because things move through space time regardless of their mass. Right,
- 37:05Speaker 2: Your mass does not affect in general relativity how you
- 37:08Speaker 2: move through space.
- 37:09Speaker 1: Time, right, right, And even though the feather has less
- 37:13Speaker 1: inertial mass than the bowling ball, the balling ball will
- 37:16Speaker 1: we definitely for sure, right, I think it has more
- 37:18Speaker 1: inertial mass.
- 37:18Speaker 2: But even just saying the phrase inertial mass implies F
- 37:22Speaker 2: equals MA. That's the formula that apears in so puts
- 37:25Speaker 2: you in a Newtonian point of view, right, So, like
- 37:28Speaker 2: the phrase inertial mass doesn't really belong in a conversation
- 37:31Speaker 2: about general relativity. There's just mass.
- 37:33Speaker 1: Well, like if I were to strap a rocket to
- 37:36Speaker 1: my bowling ball and a strap a little rocket to
- 37:38Speaker 1: my feather, I would need to expend more energy in
- 37:41Speaker 1: that rocket to move the bowling ball than the feather.
- 37:44Speaker 2: If you want to add in other forces electricity or
- 37:47Speaker 2: rockets or whatever, then you bring back inertial mass. But
- 37:50Speaker 2: for Einstein's gravity, there's just one mass, the one that
- 37:53Speaker 2: bends space time. Think about your big ball and your
- 37:56Speaker 2: little ball on the surface of the Earth, right, what's
- 37:58Speaker 2: happening there, Well, both of them want to be sort
- 38:01Speaker 2: of falling towards the center of the Earth to follow
- 38:03Speaker 2: the natural motion of the Earth. Both of them are
- 38:06Speaker 2: not because the Earth is pushing back up on them, right,
- 38:10Speaker 2: And so really what's happening there is like their Earth
- 38:12Speaker 2: is accelerating them up at the same rate so that
- 38:15Speaker 2: they don't fall towards the center of the Earth.
- 38:18Speaker 1: I guess maybe if we can go back to the
- 38:20Speaker 1: feather and the bowling ball, Like, if I have the
- 38:22Speaker 1: feather in the bowling ball in space, nothing around it,
- 38:24Speaker 1: no black hole, no planet Earth, and I wanted to
- 38:27Speaker 1: move them one meter, I would need more energy to
- 38:30Speaker 1: move the bowling ball than the feather, right, I don't
- 38:32Speaker 1: need a bigger force.
- 38:33Speaker 2: Yeah, if you're out in deep space and there's no
- 38:36Speaker 2: gravity in your by so space is totally flat, then
- 38:39Speaker 2: these things just sit there if you don't apply force
- 38:40Speaker 2: to them, And if you do apply force to them,
- 38:43Speaker 2: then they will accelerate. That You can sort of use
- 38:45Speaker 2: Newtonian mechanics in this context because there is no curvature
- 38:48Speaker 2: to space. And if you want to apply other forces,
- 38:50Speaker 2: ones that generate real acceleration, then you bring in inertial mass. Again,
- 38:54Speaker 2: but that concept doesn't exist in gravity anymore.
- 38:57Speaker 1: Right, and so in this case there is something calling
- 38:59Speaker 1: our like it takes a bigger force to move the
- 39:02Speaker 1: bowling ball on space.
- 39:03Speaker 2: Takes a bigger force to move the bulling ball. Yes,
- 39:05Speaker 2: Newton would say, that's inertial mass.
- 39:07Speaker 1: That's inertial mass. Okay, Now let's put the feather and
- 39:10Speaker 1: the bowling ball near a black hole and I let
- 39:12Speaker 1: go of them. You're saying, because of Einstein and the
- 39:16Speaker 1: way the black hole is bending space time around it,
- 39:19Speaker 1: the feather and the bowling ball are going to fall
- 39:21Speaker 1: towards a black hole at the same rate, because that's
- 39:23Speaker 1: how space time is bent around.
- 39:25Speaker 2: That's right, they both follow space time regardless of their mass.
- 39:28Speaker 1: Right. But now let's say I put little rocket. It's
- 39:32Speaker 1: in the feather and in the bowling ball, and I'm
- 39:35Speaker 1: trying to prevent these things from falling into the black hole.
- 39:38Speaker 1: To an outside observer far away from this catastrophic scenario.
- 39:42Speaker 1: Don't I need to push the bowling ball harder or
- 39:46Speaker 1: expand more energy in my rocket to keep the boiling
- 39:48Speaker 1: ball from falling into the black hole than the feather?
- 39:50Speaker 2: Yes, in general relativity, if you don't want to follow
- 39:52Speaker 2: the curvature of space time, then you need a force, right,
- 39:55Speaker 2: That's what forces are. Essentially, anytime you're accelerating, is accelerating
- 39:59Speaker 2: to avoid just following the curvature of space time. And so, yeah,
- 40:03Speaker 2: you need a force to push on these things. And yeah,
- 40:06Speaker 2: I think you need a bigger force to push on
- 40:07Speaker 2: the bowling ball than the feather.
- 40:09Speaker 1: Okay, so you're saying that my rocket on my bowling
- 40:12Speaker 1: ball needs to push harder than the rocket on the
- 40:14Speaker 1: feather to keep it from falling into the black hole. Right,
- 40:17Speaker 1: so's just more of something there that needs to happen
- 40:20Speaker 1: in order to keep them from falling into the black hole. Now,
- 40:22Speaker 1: is that more of that something or is that something
- 40:25Speaker 1: that there's more for the bowling ball? Is that still
- 40:27Speaker 1: inertial mass or is that a different amount related to
- 40:31Speaker 1: how much the black hole is bending space time?
- 40:34Speaker 2: Yeah, here we're talking about real acceleration opposing the natural
- 40:38Speaker 2: motion according to the curvature of space, and that has
- 40:41Speaker 2: to come from something other than gravity, which means a
- 40:44Speaker 2: real force, and that brings in inertial mass. Again, yes,
- 40:47Speaker 2: but again, there's no inertial mass in gravitational motion. The
- 40:51Speaker 2: reason the bowling ball and the feather fall towards the
- 40:53Speaker 2: black hole at the same rate without rockets.
- 40:56Speaker 1: So it's the same as inertial mass.
- 40:58Speaker 2: Then yeah, when you bring in the other forces, there
- 41:00Speaker 2: will be inertial mass again, but within gravity itself there
- 41:03Speaker 2: isn't one anymore. Like the reason that you do not
- 41:05Speaker 2: fall towards the center of the Earth is because the
- 41:07Speaker 2: surface of the Earth is pushing you up exactly the
- 41:10Speaker 2: same way that rocket is accelerating the bowling ball away
- 41:12Speaker 2: from the black hole. The surface of the Earth is
- 41:15Speaker 2: pushing you up away from gravity. And if you drop
- 41:17Speaker 2: a ball. Newton says, oh, that ball is accelerating towards
- 41:21Speaker 2: the center of the Earth. Einstein says, no, when you
- 41:23Speaker 2: drop the ball is when it stops accelerating. You are
- 41:26Speaker 2: accelerating up away from the center of the Earth, like
- 41:29Speaker 2: the bowling ball and the rocket, to avoid falling in
- 41:32Speaker 2: and the ball is now in free falls now flowing
- 41:34Speaker 2: naturally with gravity, it's stopped accelerating. That's why everything falls
- 41:38Speaker 2: at the same rate, because it's really the Earth that's
- 41:40Speaker 2: rushing up to meet it, rather than like the bowling
- 41:42Speaker 2: ball or the feather that are falling. They're just like
- 41:45Speaker 2: hanging out, not accelerating with respect to space.
- 41:47Speaker 1: Right, And so in that sense, it's the same thing,
- 41:50Speaker 1: like inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. But
- 41:54Speaker 1: I guess my question now leading up to this is,
- 41:57Speaker 1: let's say we lived in a universe in which gravity
- 41:59Speaker 1: were differently, Like the amount of space time bending that
- 42:04Speaker 1: a black hole does is different in my universe and
- 42:06Speaker 1: in your universe. Like in my universe, the black hole,
- 42:10Speaker 1: if you constantly constant dam much energy into a spot,
- 42:12Speaker 1: doesn't bend space time very much, like almost not at all.
- 42:15Speaker 2: You're changing the value of G.
- 42:17Speaker 1: Yeah, changing the value of G.
- 42:18Speaker 2: Okay, you're making it the value of J, the whorege value.
- 42:21Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, it's the J constant that's right, for which
- 42:24Speaker 1: I'll get I'm sure i'll get an oval price. But
- 42:26Speaker 1: in your universe G is huge. So like the black
- 42:29Speaker 1: hole bends spacelime a lot, and so space in your universe,
- 42:32Speaker 1: space is rushing towards the black hole a lot, super fast,
- 42:35Speaker 1: a lot, And whereas in my universe, let's say it,
- 42:37Speaker 1: it means even zero. So now wouldn't in my universe
- 42:41Speaker 1: I would need less to spend less energy in my
- 42:43Speaker 1: rockets to keep the balling well from falling into the
- 42:46Speaker 1: black hole, whereas in your universe I would need a
- 42:48Speaker 1: lot of energy to keep the bowling ball from falling
- 42:50Speaker 1: into the black hole.
- 42:50Speaker 2: Yes, the force you need does depend on the gravitational constant,
- 42:54Speaker 2: because you're pitting gravity against non gravitational forces, which do
- 42:58Speaker 2: have a concept of inertial map. And when you fight
- 43:01Speaker 2: against the curvature with other forces than the relative strength
- 43:04Speaker 2: of curvature and those forces matters.
- 43:07Speaker 1: I guess maybe where I'm going with this is that
- 43:09Speaker 1: you're sort of making it sound like there is no
- 43:11Speaker 1: coincidence anymore with Einstein's relativity. But I wonder, and again
- 43:14Speaker 1: I'm not an expert. I'm just kind of intuitively following
- 43:16Speaker 1: my sense of intuition here. I wonder if it's still
- 43:19Speaker 1: sort of a coincidence. You just move the coincidence somewhere else, I.
- 43:23Speaker 2: Think, to me, the way to answer that question is
- 43:25Speaker 2: just to think about the bowling ball and the feather
- 43:27Speaker 2: without the other forces, because it's the fact that the
- 43:30Speaker 2: bowling ball and the feather fall at the same rate that,
- 43:34Speaker 2: in Newton's view, means these two things have to be equal, right,
- 43:37Speaker 2: That's where the coincidence comes from. And Einstein says that
- 43:41Speaker 2: the bowling ball and the feather have to follow the
- 43:43Speaker 2: same rate because they're just following me the curvature of
- 43:45Speaker 2: space time. Even if you crank up G. If you
- 43:48Speaker 2: crank up G to the new Joorge value, so now
- 43:50Speaker 2: everything is crazy curved, then the bowling ball and the
- 43:53Speaker 2: feather are going to fall into the black hole at
- 43:54Speaker 2: the same rate. They'll fall faster than in a universe
- 43:57Speaker 2: without crazy G, but they will both fall into the
- 43:59Speaker 2: black hole the same rate. If you relax G downs
- 44:02Speaker 2: so that space is curved less by mass, it's harder
- 44:04Speaker 2: to make black holes or whatever, then the bowling ball
- 44:07Speaker 2: and the feather are going to fall in more slowly,
- 44:09Speaker 2: but they're still going to fall at the same rate.
- 44:10Speaker 2: Doesn't that answer the question?
- 44:12Speaker 1: Okay, so you're saying that in your universe with the
- 44:14Speaker 1: big G, the feather and the bowling bell would fall
- 44:17Speaker 1: really fast towards a black hole, whereas in my universe
- 44:20Speaker 1: with the little G they would fall slowly.
- 44:22Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
- 44:23Speaker 1: Okay, But in both universes, if there is no black hole,
- 44:27Speaker 1: they would Both the feather and the bowling ball would
- 44:30Speaker 1: have different inertial masses to each other, but they would
- 44:32Speaker 1: The bowling ball in my universe would have the same
- 44:34Speaker 1: inertial mass as the bowling ball in your universe.
- 44:37Speaker 2: Yes, for the real forces, you still have inertial mass.
- 44:39Speaker 2: But the coincidence within gravity is explained by Einstein since
- 44:43Speaker 2: gravity now only has one mass instead of two.
- 44:47Speaker 1: You see what I mean, Like there's inertial mas. I'm
- 44:49Speaker 1: wondering if that inertial mass, which is the same in
- 44:51Speaker 1: my universe in your universe, is different than the gravitational mass,
- 44:56Speaker 1: which is different in my universe and your universe because
- 44:59Speaker 1: we have different gs, or I wonder if maybe the
- 45:01Speaker 1: answer Maybe what's confusing me is that in both universes,
- 45:05Speaker 1: the one with big G and litogy, we would in
- 45:08Speaker 1: both cases we would still be wondering about the same thing.
- 45:12Speaker 1: Like I wonder if both universes it would they would
- 45:15Speaker 1: seem like coincidences that inertial gravity and gravitational gravity in
- 45:19Speaker 1: a Newtonian sense, are the same.
- 45:20Speaker 2: I think in both the big G universe and the
- 45:22Speaker 2: little G universe, you'd have a big Newton and a
- 45:24Speaker 2: little Newton, which would have developed their own laws of
- 45:28Speaker 2: Newtonian physics, which would seem like there was a coincidence
- 45:31Speaker 2: between them because they have these two different concepts, one
- 45:34Speaker 2: of gravitational force from some gravitational mass that explains the
- 45:38Speaker 2: apparent force of gravity. But then Big Einstein and Little
- 45:42Speaker 2: Einstein would have come along and explain that there is
- 45:45Speaker 2: no force operating there, that there really is just the
- 45:48Speaker 2: one mass. And if Big Einstein and Little Einstein could
- 45:52Speaker 2: talk to each other and compare notes, if both the
- 45:55Speaker 2: universes are relativistic, then they would see that both universes
- 45:58Speaker 2: are following their laws of physics. I think it's interesting
- 46:00Speaker 2: that in one universe you have like a stronger reaction
- 46:03Speaker 2: to energy density in terms of the curvature space than
- 46:07Speaker 2: in the other, which will definitely change how things move.
- 46:09Speaker 2: But in that universe things always agree, right, Like the
- 46:12Speaker 2: two objects moving through the same space time move the
- 46:15Speaker 2: same way regardless of their mass is the key.
- 46:17Speaker 1: Okay, it sounds sort of like the main idea is
- 46:20Speaker 1: that sometimes so we think it is a coincidence, it's
- 46:22Speaker 1: really just a different way of looking at how the
- 46:25Speaker 1: universe works.
- 46:25Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, that you can bring two different ideas together
- 46:28Speaker 2: and click them into one larger idea. Where you thought
- 46:31Speaker 2: you had the freedom to twiddle two knobs to whatever
- 46:34Speaker 2: values you want, but turns out they're connected in some way.
- 46:37Speaker 2: There's a relationship between the knobs twidt the one you
- 46:40Speaker 2: have to twiddle the other. So really there's just one knob.
- 46:43Speaker 1: Or at least it's one knob, and maybe I don't know,
- 46:46Speaker 1: there could still be other knobs in the universe, but
- 46:48Speaker 1: like the ones that affect how things move and how
- 46:50Speaker 1: things get attracted to larger objects through gravity. You're saying,
- 46:55Speaker 1: in this universe they're sort of connected. It's like one knob,
- 46:58Speaker 1: mm hmm.
- 46:59Speaker 2: Exactly in our unit. First, at least you're right that
- 47:01Speaker 2: there are other knobs for the other forces, and those
- 47:04Speaker 2: still have the concept of inertial mass. But within gravity,
- 47:07Speaker 2: the apparent coincidence between those two knobs gravitational and inertial
- 47:11Speaker 2: mass is explained because there is no inertial mass in gravity,
- 47:14Speaker 2: because it doesn't accelerate anything because it's not a force.
- 47:17Speaker 1: So then to answer the question of the podcast, there
- 47:20Speaker 1: is no difference between inertial or gravitational mass, or is
- 47:23Speaker 1: the answer that this question doesn't make sense?
- 47:25Speaker 2: The answer is that there is still inertial mass for
- 47:27Speaker 2: other forces, but within gravity, there's just one concept of mass.
- 47:31Speaker 2: There's no separation between gravitational and inertial mass. There is
- 47:34Speaker 2: just mass, and we can still understand why things fall
- 47:39Speaker 2: at the same rate even in that context. Right, we
- 47:41Speaker 2: don't have to worry about this miraculous balance between inertia
- 47:44Speaker 2: and gravity because they are just two sides of the
- 47:47Speaker 2: same coin. Inertia and gravity are wrapped up by Einstein
- 47:49Speaker 2: into one idea that controls how things move through space.
- 47:53Speaker 1: All right, Well, it was a heavy topic, but I
- 47:55Speaker 1: think we made it through to the other side, or
- 47:58Speaker 1: at least we did not fall to a black hole
- 48:01Speaker 1: well discussing it, although maybe we should just add more
- 48:04Speaker 1: dad jokes and puns so that we, you know, reach
- 48:08Speaker 1: the event horizon.
- 48:09Speaker 2: Yeah, and to me, thinking about these examples really helps
- 48:11Speaker 2: you get more intuition for thinking about gravity as just
- 48:14Speaker 2: a geometric thing. Doesn't matter what your mass is, you
- 48:17Speaker 2: move through space the same way mends on your velocity, certainly, right,
- 48:21Speaker 2: And like a photon flying near a black hole is
- 48:23Speaker 2: going to have a different trajectory than a grapefruit traveling
- 48:26Speaker 2: at five meters per second. Your velocity definitely matters, but
- 48:29Speaker 2: not your mass, which is just a very different way
- 48:31Speaker 2: of thinking about the universe. And I love how the
- 48:33Speaker 2: story of physics is explaining everything we see in all
- 48:36Speaker 2: of our experiences with different stories, stories that update through
- 48:40Speaker 2: time to give us a different picture of how the
- 48:42Speaker 2: universe works.
- 48:43Speaker 1: Yeah, although your dog had been there, may it would
- 48:45Speaker 1: have eaten the grip and we'd still be back at uh,
- 48:49Speaker 1: not understanding any of this.
- 48:50Speaker 2: My dog will eat almost anything.
- 48:52Speaker 1: All right. Well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for
- 48:54Speaker 1: joining us, See you next time.
- 49:01Speaker 2: For more science and curiosity, come find us on social
- 49:04Speaker 2: media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discborg, Insta,
- 49:09Speaker 2: and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel
- 49:12Speaker 2: and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production iHeartRadio. For
- 49:16Speaker 2: more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
- 49:21Speaker 2: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.