Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Astroturfed Riots, Matt Taibbi Hits Back Against #metoo | HBR News 497

Transcript

Astroturfed Riots, Matt Taibbi Hits Back Against #metoo | HBR News 497 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four ninety seven, AstroTurf Riots
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: Matt Taibi hits back against hashtag me Too, where we
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: discuss the news of the week and give it the
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: Hope because they're doing well this week and that you're
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: laughing at all of this subsurdity so that you are
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: not consumed by it. I am your host, Brian, and
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: I am joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Hannah and Mike, doctor Randa mccam whichever one prefer, rand
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: mccam and Bassion that seems to be what everybody knows
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: him by. But anyway, we have a great shot line
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: up for you guys this week, so please be sure
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: to continue the conversations both in the chat as well
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: as the comment section. On this week's HBr News. We're
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: gonna be discussing the lawfair that is being used against
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk for protecting some semblance of free speech. Congresswoman
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: and Harvard professor are caught planning massive riots and more so,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: stick around, It's gonna be a good time. Ambihito Jonas
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: afterwards for the Patron Only show, So I've been doing
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: this lately. We've been looking at this video about the
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: popular Amazon show called Invincible, and there is a There
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: are lots of thought pieces and essays coming out, and
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: this one is talking about the clever and genius ways
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: that Invincible deconstructs masculinity, which is basically another way of
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: saying how it up ends and subverts our reality. I
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: think that talking about the culture is extremely important, so
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: I do it whenever I can, because I know that
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: is part of what we are fighting against, our essentially assumptions, stereotypes,
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: and perversions of masculinity. That's like how all of the
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: policy gets installed. That's how all of the ways that
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: we treat our men and boys, the way that we
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: see their pain, is all through this lens, which is ubiquitous.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: It is everywhere. So we're gonna continue to look at
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: this video and we might look at some other things.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: So please consider joining us by going to feed the
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com for slave subscribe so you can become
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: a Badger yourself and watch the additional content and participate
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: in these very important discussions. And if you don't want
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: to wake up one morning to find that we have
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: been completely borrowed from the Internet, at least as the
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: mainstream Internet as we know it. Then go find our
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: archived content at badgerfeed dot com. That's badgerfeed dot com.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: That's where our content lives. I got through that shockingly quickly.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: I wanted to before we get into the stories there.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: I wanted to share a tweet or an ex post,
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: I guess is what we're calling it now, an ex
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: post by Karen. And I think that it's important because
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: I didn't make this a story, but I just want
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: you guys to see just how I don't want to
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: say ahead of the curve because it sounds like a post,
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: but like the way that we talk about things and
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: the way that we try to look at things when
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: we look at the news, which is why the news
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: show exists, is to attempt to get people to see
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: the blind spots in most people's discussions around this stuff.
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: And Karen highlighted something so you guys might know if
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: you're paying attention to American politics with regards to the
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: things that Trump is doing, and also with regards to
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: the border and our immigration system, that Trump was trying
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: to use something called the Alien Enemies Act in order
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: to deport MS thirteen gangs like satanic drug dealers, stuff
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: like that, and he wanted to use this Alien Enemies
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: Act to do that, but he was confronted by activist judges,
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: so he made an appeal, went to the Supreme Court
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: and managed to turn to essentially win, but only by
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: one vote. So I'm gonna look at Karen's vote because
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: when people talk about this, and I've seen this everywhere,
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: when people talk about this decision, they think that it's
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: a partisan decision along the lines of Democrats and Republicans.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: And I'm sorry to tell you this, but that's not
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: what it is. And so let's look at Karen's posts here.
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: This is what she said. In a five to four decision,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: Scotis authorized Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: deport gangbangers. All four dissenters were women.
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: Odd.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: It's almost like women don't understand the consequences of their
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: pathological compassion because they can't be drafted or forcibly deputized.
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: He of very few people have this take. Almost everybody
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: sees this as purely a political thing. But the truth
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: of it is that Karen is right here, and I
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: just wanted to share this. I don't know if you guys,
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: Hannah or Mike, if you guys saw this.
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: We see it, but I would have retweeted it because
• 4:46
  Speaker 2: it's something I say all the time.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, because remember, like one of the Supreme Court justices
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: is a woman who is Republican or supposedly republican or
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: conservative whatever, but she voted on the side of the
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: other women. The only people who dissented were the women.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: This is something that we talked about. We've talked about
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: it clear back to the blog talk days, like in
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, when we first started having Honey
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: Badger Radio, and we've talked about the fact that women
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: in government make these decisions, women vote for these decisions,
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: and women push other people to vote for these decisions.
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: Women in journalism promote these decisions. And it's all the
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: same thing. Let leave these guys alone, Let these guys
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: live their lives. They're just as important as other citizens
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: and some of the worst messed up people in the world.
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: And women will they don't want to look like they're prejudiced,
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: so they will ignore behavior that they wouldn't tolerate from
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: somebody of their own ethnic background.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: They wouldn't tolerate it from another woman, but they'll tolerate
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: it from a man who came from another country, or
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: is another skin color, or is an alternative religion, stuff
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: like that, because you just don't want to look bad.
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: Women will do that for the sake of appearances, And
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: then they get upset if men don't protect them from
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: the consequences, and yeah, this is.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they make decisions that impact the perimeter without actually
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: putting anything at risk on the perimeter except the men
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: that are there.
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: And then and they don't even want to be the
• 6:38
  Speaker 2: ones paying the taxes for the social services that are needed.
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: When they that we got to help these people, what
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: they really mean is you have to help these people.
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: You men have to help these people. We sit back
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: and talk about how sad their situation is. And just
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: like I said, we've been talking about this, gosh for
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: twelve years now.
• 7:02
  Speaker 3: It could be a coincidence.
• 7:04
  Speaker 4: Is one of Jackson and and the other one were
• 7:06
  Speaker 4: bound to do this because they're all died in the
• 7:08
  Speaker 4: world communists. In fact, a couple of them were put
• 7:10
  Speaker 4: there because they're women and in the world communists. Jackson
• 7:13
  Speaker 4: in Biden's case explicitly so in Obama's case, less explicitly,
• 7:20
  Speaker 4: ACB could have gone either way. She's not supposed to
• 7:23
  Speaker 4: be there to do whatever Trump wants. She's supposed to
• 7:26
  Speaker 4: be able to go either way. Like Trump once upon
• 7:28
  Speaker 4: a time noticed the right wing judges could go either way,
• 7:32
  Speaker 4: but the left wing judges always go the same way.
• 7:35
  Speaker 4: I guess it's just surprising that the male left wing
• 7:37
  Speaker 4: judges happened to the other the same way as well.
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: It's unlikely to be a coincidence, but it could be
• 7:42
  Speaker 4: just putting out there at these things could be happen.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it could be. It could be. But I think
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: that again, you're right, we are its leave room for
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: that not a problem. But I'm inclined to think that
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: there's something about the way that women perceive the world
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: that's different, and I think that's why they're more likely
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: to have that take. And I think that men are
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: more likely to look at things in terms of what
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: is the right thing to do, what are the consequences
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: for not doing it? And to hell with the compassion
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: and the empathy and all of that, especially because we
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: are again talking about like violent gangs. We're not talking
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: about people who just cross the border. Illegally who also
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: should go back. But he's actually prioritizing the people who
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: are criminals on top of doing the criminal act of
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: crossing the order. Yeah, I don't think I think that
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: you have to say no.
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: It's there's a really solid difference between the way men
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: and women think about this kind of stuff that I
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: don't think. I don't think it's ever in the forefront
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: of people's minds. We'll put it that way. Right. When
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: men think of responsibility, they think of it first as
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: an individual thing that I individually am responsible for this
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: or that, and other people are responsible for their actions
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: and their choices, and they any collective responsibility. There's a
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: disaster and it's time to rescue people from homes that
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: are flooded or on fire or damaged by a storm
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: or something, they'll take collective responsibility for that, but they'll
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: take it in an individual way. Each person has their
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: task and they don't worry about what the other guy
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: is doing. They worry about what they need to get done,
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: and if something isn't done, they do it, and they
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: don't complain about what isn't getting done unless it interferes
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: with the mission. We can't get this done because the
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: government is keeping us from using these vehicles, or this
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: group of guys didn't get their shit done, so now
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: we're delayed. But it's never I'm doing more than Bob
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: is doing and I feel resentful about it. In those
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: types of situations, feminists feminists have exacerbated this, but I
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: think it was always there. Where when you talk about
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: responsibility for women, it's never I it's well right they
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: women take the eye out of everything, and everything has
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: a we in it, even if it doesn't, and so
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: it's we're responsible. And a lot of times women are
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: more focused on whether you're doing your part than whether
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: they are getting theirs done. And what ends up happening
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: is if you have to rely on women in a disaster,
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: or if you have a collective decision that's getting made
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: about a disaster response or a response to any other circumstance,
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: all of a sudden, women are wanting to assign responsibility
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: to other people. They're wanting to take their side or
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: their people, their group, their community, their population, their family
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: or whatever that'sake collective responsibility for another group of people
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: and so on, And it's just the difference creates an
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: inability for women to consider the impact of their decisions
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: on the men that are going to have to carry
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: out what they're advocating for. And it's not just in
• 11:22
  Speaker 2: terms of illegal immigration and the fact that gang members
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: are getting across and that men are having to protect
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: their homes and families from people who back in their
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: home country, like their mo for handling conflict was to
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: behead someone. That's not the only thing, right, it's sending
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: their sons to war, right, it's increasing the taxes that
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: their husband has to pay because they have this weird
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: notion that we should be promoting abortion in Zimbabwe. You
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: know that all of this is the same thing manifesting
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: in different ways, and part of it is because men
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: are accountable. Women are not. So men take individual responsibility
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: and they will take responsibility for all of the consequences
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: of their actions. Women don't take individual responsibility, and they
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: will put collective responsibility on the consequences of their actions.
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: And then any consequences that they can call unintended or
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: that they're embarrassed by or anything like that, that's not
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: our fault. That's the fault of how they reacted to
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: what we did. But if you hadn't done that's not
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: how the reaction would have been. And maybe they don't
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: want America promoting abortion in Zimbabwe. Did you think about that.
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: Maybe your son doesn't want to go to war. Maybe
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: your neighbors don't want to have to have four guns
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: in the house so that they can protect against somebody
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: that might want to come in and take all their
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: stuff and be had their whole family. But but yeah,
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: so it's going to be that way as long as
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: our society allows women to get away with that lack
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: of accountability.
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: Yep. All right, Let's go into the stories because that
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: was just like a little ordure, little appetizer, a little
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: bit of that olive garden breadstick action.
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: So if you read Karen's tweets, go into her profile
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: and read her pronouns.
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I saw that. All right, So let's get into
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: the stories because I don't want this to go super long.
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: So let's start by talking about what has happened with
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: this recent discovery regarding the resistance. All right, So, in
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: a recent expos by PG Media, Victoria Taft reports that
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: Representative Promila Gianopol I'm sorry if I'm mispronouncing that, a
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: former chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and Harvard professor
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: Erica Chetoweth are allegedly orchestrating large scale anti Trump riots.
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: The article Data April third, twenty twenty five claims the
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: duo is conducting resistance training sessions to prepare leftists for
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: street protests aimed at destabilizing Donald Trump's presidency, with the
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: ultimate goal of forcing his resignation. This echoes tactics purportedly
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: used in twenty seventeen, which taff links to the unrest
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: during the quote Summer of Love that was in twenty twenty.
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: The piece suggests that their actions are part of a
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: broader strategy targeting not just Trump, but also figures like
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk, with calls for increased attacks on Tesla, highlighting
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: a coordinated effort from influential figures in Congress and academia.
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: The article frames these revelations as evidence of a deep
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: seated resistance movement in quotes because it's like literally astroturfed
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: from the top down within elite circles. Accusing Jayapal and
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: Chenoweth of leveraging their positions to incite chaos, Taft notes
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: that their plans have drawn screws with some on ex
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: labeling them as potentially insurrectionary, though the evidence presented relies
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: heavily on unarmed, unnamed sources and speculative connections to past events.
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: The piece also ties their activism to broader leftist discontent
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: following Trump's re election in twenty twenty four November twenty
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: twenty four, suggesting a repeat of historical protest cycles, which yes,
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: we are totally going to get. While the article lacks
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: concrete documentation of the training session's content or scale, so
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: we don't know exactly what this involves, it positions this
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: as a critical moment, exposing the links to which Trump's
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: opponents and basically the opponents of half of the country
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: or more will go, urging readers to see it all
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: as a call to action against such schemes. So, yeah, well, Hannah,
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: you actually found out.
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I do have something I was going to say. Yeah, Oh,
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: I want people to understand something about this, all right.
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: It's not just astroturfed. Something that we have learned in
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: the last year about sorrows, money, and a lot of
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: it was. It was stuff that was there as knowledge already,
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: but I think people just weren't paying attention to it.
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: Everybody's Oh yeah, George Soros, he's independently wealthy, and he
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: funds this stuff right out of his independent wealth. That's
• 16:23
  Speaker 2: not correct. He's not independently wealthy. At one point he was,
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: but then when came USAID. And he has a whole
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: bunch of organizations that are funded in various ways, to
• 16:39
  Speaker 2: various degrees by United States federal government programs. And these
• 16:45
  Speaker 2: are all under the humanitarian initiative veil that we have.
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: Can I just jump in real quick? I want to
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: jump in on something, because somebody in the chat, in
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: our chat is saying riots or protests are not the
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: same as though we're stupid enough not to know that
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: there is a difference. Let me read from this from
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: the article. It says here, during a one and a
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: half hour resistance lab trading the Seattle Marxist Jaya Powell
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: and Chennaweth paid lip service to Nonviolence Act. While they
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: paid lip service, non violence activists on call were told
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: to decide what their risk tolerance is for these actions,
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: which is another way of saying, are you willing to
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: get violent, go to jail or hurt someone else? They
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: said the attacks on Tesla were effective at moving people
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: to the streets. They did not disavow any of the
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: attacks on tesla's or the people driving them. And look,
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: we've already experienced the riots, so we know that there happened.
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: This is not this is not somebody who is making
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: a genuine comment, all right, and we aren't falling for
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: it anymore. Okay, it's been since twenty sixteen that we've
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: been hearing from news media and leftists. There were peaceful protests,
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: mostly peaceful protests, fiery, but mostly peace will protest, and
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: the bar just keeps moving to a little bit more
• 18:04
  Speaker 2: and more into the violent end of it, where you're
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: burning down buildings, you're attacking people. In Washington State, the
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: mostly peaceful protesters were dragging people's pets out of their
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: homes and killing them. What's the next step If you're
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: going into people's residents and dragging their pets out and
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: killing them, what's the next step for that? What's the
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: next bar movement that you're going to accept? If they're
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: built burning down whole communities and getting called mostly peaceful,
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: what's the next bar that you're going to accept for
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: that and say it's not a riot, it's a protest.
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: Don't even bother trying. You're useless as a promoter of
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: your side. If you're doing that shit, it is not working.
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: Try a new tactic. Yeah, we're all done. We're all
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: fed up with it. We're not dealing with that anymore.
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: Your narrative is useless. And as a promoter of your narrative,
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: you are useless. If you're getting paid to print to
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: promote the narrative. If you're a paid troll, they're wasting
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: their money on you. If you're not a paid troll,
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: you're a moron for even continuing to try this tactic.
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: But but Yeah, the thing I wanted to point out
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: is the people that are reporting on this that are
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: they're talking about it as mostly peaceful protests and a
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: grassroots movement and resistance and all that want the few
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: people that they are still fooling to actually believe this
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: is organic, grassroots individuals getting together because they're in opposition
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: to what's going on in government and it's normal people
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: thinking normal ways, and this is just people's opinions and
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: it's the tide turning back to what they consider to
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: be right and so on, when in the reality, this
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: is actually a government funded, government orchestrated resistance to an
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: infiltrator of the government who is in there knocking back corruption.
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: This is an immune response to what the corrupt side
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: of the government, which is the biggest side, views as
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: a virus. They're allergic to accountability and they are attacking,
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: and this is part of the attack. None of this
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: is organic. Most of these protesters are paid. The funding
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: to get them there came from us AID, from the
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: us aid's infection. Right. None of this is real, All
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: of it is engineered, all of it is acting. All
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: of it is fake. And the minute that people start
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: recognizing that and start demanding that their local officials do
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: actually something about it, start demanding arrests, start demanding prosecution
• 21:46
  Speaker 2: and conviction and imprisonment. When people burn down buildings and
• 21:51
  Speaker 2: steal from stores and drag people with pets out of
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: their homes and kill them in front of the people
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: that love their pets, right, then this will stop because
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: people won't take those jobs. But until that happens, every
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: community in the country is in danger because this stuff
• 22:16
  Speaker 2: is getting funded, and it's getting funded by your tax dollars.
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: So if you live in a city that has been
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: set on fire by left wing protesters, right, if you
• 22:31
  Speaker 2: live in a city that has had all the stores
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: in your downtown area broken into and stuff stolen, if
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: you've had your homeowner's insurance go up because of these things,
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: just be aware you paid them to come and tear
• 22:48
  Speaker 2: down your city because your government took your money and
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: gave it to mister Soros to fund these terrorists.
• 23:01
  Speaker 4: All right, Yeah, this resistance is being heralded by its
• 23:05
  Speaker 4: architects as resistance against quote unquote authoritarianism.
• 23:11
  Speaker 3: It is horribly ironic.
• 23:14
  Speaker 4: In all sorts of ways, not least the ones Hannah
• 23:17
  Speaker 4: has already outlined. Furthermore, five years ago, the subject of
• 23:23
  Speaker 4: authoritarianism was quite the hot topic because in twenty twenty
• 23:27
  Speaker 4: it went too far, way too far. I'm talking about
• 23:31
  Speaker 4: the kop stuff. No one in their right mind could
• 23:33
  Speaker 4: disagree that it went too far. Unfortunately, a great deal
• 23:37
  Speaker 4: of people were not in their right mind at the time.
• 23:42
  Speaker 4: To this day, they still believe the authoritarianism of twenty
• 23:45
  Speaker 4: twenty didn't go far enough. The impossible nonsensical demands put
• 23:52
  Speaker 4: on the people were not the problem. It was all
• 23:54
  Speaker 4: the people's fault for not sufficiently complying with the impossible
• 23:59
  Speaker 4: nonsense demands, except they didn't call it authoritarianism.
• 24:05
  Speaker 3: It was no. We had to do it.
• 24:06
  Speaker 4: We had to muzzle everyone, We had to confine people
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: to their homes, we had to close their small businesses,
• 24:13
  Speaker 4: and we had to hold their livelihoods hostage over an injection. No,
• 24:17
  Speaker 4: you did not. You chose this. I'm sure you thought
• 24:22
  Speaker 4: you were saving lives because you were lied to on
• 24:25
  Speaker 4: a quite titanic scale. But even if you were indeed
• 24:29
  Speaker 4: saving lives, you chose the path that you thought would
• 24:33
  Speaker 4: save lives, and that path was authoritarian. The least you
• 24:37
  Speaker 4: can do is admit it, which brings us to the
• 24:42
  Speaker 4: present day, where the same people who were perfectly complicit
• 24:47
  Speaker 4: in the forced redundancy and the unlawful house arrest and
• 24:51
  Speaker 4: the chemical warfare against entire nations are turning around and
• 24:56
  Speaker 4: calling the Trump administration authoritarian for text notes preventing theft
• 25:04
  Speaker 4: M M and yes, E it can indeed be called authoritarian.
• 25:08
  Speaker 4: I'm willing to admit that, and I would be willing
• 25:11
  Speaker 4: to choose that, much like in El Salvador, President Bukeley
• 25:16
  Speaker 4: chose to do something about the.
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: Wait, what did President Bukeley use to put all of
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: those ms thirteen satanic gang guys in prison. How did
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: he do that? What did he use? Idea?
• 25:27
  Speaker 4: It was some kind of authoritarian decision. Oh and it
• 25:30
  Speaker 4: was the right thing to do. Now, that seems like
• 25:33
  Speaker 4: an example so extreme that it's uncontroversially obvious. But let's
• 25:37
  Speaker 4: not forget the people attending these rallies, for the large part,
• 25:40
  Speaker 4: cannot even agree with that give a shit that violent
• 25:43
  Speaker 4: criminals are roaming the streets as long as it's not
• 25:45
  Speaker 4: affecting them personally, And even when it does, they let's
• 25:49
  Speaker 4: still find a way to blame old white men for everything,
• 25:52
  Speaker 4: and to punish white Native males of all ages for
• 25:56
  Speaker 4: anything committed by anyone else.
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: That's their idea of liberty pardon.
• 26:03
  Speaker 4: So it's hardly surprising that they don't want any organized
• 26:07
  Speaker 4: crime syndicate to be held accountable for robbing an entire
• 26:11
  Speaker 4: nation at gunpoint, including their own government. If they want
• 26:17
  Speaker 4: to live under this tyranny, they're desperate for it. It's
• 26:20
  Speaker 4: the most widespread case of Stockholm syndrome ever observed. If
• 26:23
  Speaker 4: the government wasn't stealing our money, what.
• 26:26
  Speaker 3: Would we do? If foreign governments weren't stealing our jobs,
• 26:31
  Speaker 3: what would we do? We'd be flapping in the wind.
• 26:33
  Speaker 4: Would be a capsized vessel bobbing upside down on the
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: open ocean. Why there would be no one to protect
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: us from potentially having all our ship stolen if it
• 26:44
  Speaker 4: wasn't for these international mobsters stealing all our ship.
• 26:49
  Speaker 3: Irony of ironies, they finally have a presidential administration that.
• 26:54
  Speaker 4: Is actually definitively doing everything it can, or at least
• 26:59
  Speaker 4: something it can, to curtail the mass scale theft of
• 27:04
  Speaker 4: the American people's resources by governments domestic and foreign, and they.
• 27:09
  Speaker 3: Can't handle it.
• 27:10
  Speaker 4: That's what they call authoritarian. And to repeat, yes it is.
• 27:15
  Speaker 4: The gangster trying to rob you is authoritarian. The police
• 27:20
  Speaker 4: officer trying to prevent the robber from robbing you is
• 27:23
  Speaker 4: also authoritarian. I, for one, am in favor of the latter.
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: I only wish the police.
• 27:28
  Speaker 4: Loss in my own country would actually do that, rather
• 27:31
  Speaker 4: than imprisoning people for telling jokes. And it is baffling
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: to me that so many people are only in favor
• 27:39
  Speaker 4: of the former of the fucking gangsters. They would rather
• 27:43
  Speaker 4: be robbed, blind and buggered and left for dead by
• 27:47
  Speaker 4: someone with a D next to their name than be
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: so much as convenienced by someone with an R next
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: to their name. I just I don't understand. Sometimes I
• 27:58
  Speaker 4: feel like I understand, but then more stupid shit happens
• 28:01
  Speaker 4: and I realized I never understood. But hey, it's still
• 28:04
  Speaker 4: better than Europe. At least you have an option other
• 28:07
  Speaker 4: than communists runsacking your country forever. At least you could
• 28:13
  Speaker 4: theoretically throw a stone in a five mile radius and
• 28:15
  Speaker 4: reach anyone who isn't captured, brainwashed, bubbleheaded is not along
• 28:21
  Speaker 4: with the communist apocalypse. This is your weekly reminder to
• 28:25
  Speaker 4: be thankful for what you have, America, and to nevertheless
• 28:29
  Speaker 4: stay vigilant. Vigilance is what got you here. So yeah,
• 28:33
  Speaker 4: God bless you, God bless us everyone.
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: All right, let us know what you guys think about
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments. It is always nice to
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: know where all these peaceful fire but mostly peaceful protests
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: are coming from. All right, So we're gonna move on
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: to the next one. This is actually a pretty good story.
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: So the gentleman here pictured as Matt Taibi if you
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: guys don't know, Matt Taibe is a prominent journalist known
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: for his work on the Twitter files, and he recently
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: filed a ten million dollar libel lawsuit against Democratic California
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: Representative Sidney Kamleger Dove on April third, twenty twenty five,
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: following her accusation that he is a quote serial sexual
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: harasser end quote. The claims surface during a House Foreign
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: Affairs Subcommittee hearing on April first, where camp maybe teach
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: it have called April Fools, where Kamleger Dove criticized Republicans
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: for elevating Taiebee as a witness, alleging it distracted from
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: the Trump administration's failings. She later amplified these remarks on
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: social media, prompting Taiebee's legal action. The lawsuit asserts that
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: her statements are quote demonishrably false and were made with
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: actual malice end quote, relying on discredited, decades old satirical
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: content she should have known was unreliable given her public position.
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: Taybe's suit hinges on Kamlager Dove's decision to republish her
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: accusations outside the protections of the Speech and Debate Clause,
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: which shields congressional statements made during legislative duties. In a
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: subsack post, he noted this is taibe that while he
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: couldn't challenge her hearing, romarcs directly. Her social media posts
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: on x and her congressional website opened the door to
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: legal recourse, leading to the filing in a New Jersey
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: federal court. The article highlights the tension between congressional privilege
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: and public accountability, with Tayibe arguing her actions were intended
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: to harm his reputation rather than engage in good faith debate.
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: Of course, because when they when you know, Alla fails
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: accused the guy of being a sexist, which is basically
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: what this is. Neither Tayibee's legal team nor Kamlagger Dove
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: responded to immediate requests for comment, leaving the case's next
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: steps uncertain as of the publication of this article.
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: Allow me to construct a syllogism of sorts.
• 30:53
  Speaker 4: If messages of a sexual nature count as sexual harassment
• 30:58
  Speaker 4: and false accusation of harassment count as harassment, then false
• 31:03
  Speaker 4: accusations of sexual harassment count as sexual harassment.
• 31:08
  Speaker 3: So if this.
• 31:09
  Speaker 4: Woman is found liable for such communications, she should have
• 31:13
  Speaker 4: to register as a sex offender, as should anyone who
• 31:17
  Speaker 4: falsely accuses someone of rape. And this is of course
• 31:22
  Speaker 4: a nice idea. It's an idea that ought to be implemented,
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: but it has not been false accusations of harassment, or
• 31:31
  Speaker 4: too often do not count as harassment. Generally, they are
• 31:35
  Speaker 4: part of the cost as long as they're committed by
• 31:37
  Speaker 4: protected groups such as women against unprotected groups such as men.
• 31:43
  Speaker 4: Same goes for false accusations of rape, which are also
• 31:45
  Speaker 4: almost always committed by women against men. With very few exceptions,
• 31:49
  Speaker 4: women can commit these crimes and they're not even crimes effectively,
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: largely because the vast majority of men don't have the
• 31:57
  Speaker 4: time or resources to file a ten million dollar lawsuit.
• 32:01
  Speaker 4: It's very difficult to conduct a lawsuit of any kind
• 32:04
  Speaker 4: when you've already been arrested on nothing but an accusation,
• 32:08
  Speaker 4: and your reputation has already been irreversibly tacit. The rule
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: of innocent until proven guilty is not nearly as robust
• 32:17
  Speaker 4: as anyone thinks it is, even in the Land of
• 32:19
  Speaker 4: the Free, when it comes to women lying about men,
• 32:23
  Speaker 4: especially not in the Land of the Free. Arguably, so,
• 32:27
  Speaker 4: I hope Matt takes her to the cleanest, assuming she's liable,
• 32:31
  Speaker 4: of course, If not, I hope she takes him to
• 32:34
  Speaker 4: the cleanness if he's the one falsely accusing someone of
• 32:37
  Speaker 4: falsely accusing someone, and at that point I start to
• 32:39
  Speaker 4: get confused. But the point is we are in dire
• 32:42
  Speaker 4: need of a breakthrough case when it comes to lying
• 32:45
  Speaker 4: cunts getting what they deserve. To reid Rate, I'm not
• 32:47
  Speaker 4: saying she's a lying cunt. Maybe matt Aby is, but
• 32:51
  Speaker 4: it wouldn't be the first time a woman destroyed a
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: man through law, fair, justifiably or otherwise. It would be
• 32:58
  Speaker 4: among the first high profile cases of a man doing
• 33:00
  Speaker 4: it to a woman, hopefully in this case justifiably. But
• 33:04
  Speaker 4: we'll see, or maybe we won't see. Maybe you'll all
• 33:07
  Speaker 4: get settled out of courts and will be none the wiser.
• 33:09
  Speaker 4: It's hugely what happens. So yeah, probably a nothing burger.
• 33:13
  Speaker 4: We'll get the nothing lettice from a something burger, and
• 33:16
  Speaker 4: we'll have to begrudgingly chew on that for all its worth.
• 33:19
  Speaker 3: Another day, another dollar.
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: This is one of those things that I've been saying
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: men need to do this every time that a woman
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: makes a false allegation against a man and tries to
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: use that as the way she takes down something that
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: he's doing. Whether it's a woman making a false allegation
• 33:40
  Speaker 2: to get a guy's position at work, or a woman
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: makes a false allegation to win a political campaign against
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: a guy, or a woman makes a false allegation to
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: silence a guy that's criticizing things that she stands for,
• 33:55
  Speaker 2: which is what's going on in this case, then the
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: guy needs to sue for defamation, especially if it's a
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: false allegation of sexual misconduct. But even if it's just
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: a false allegation of harassment or misogyny or any other
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: kind of misconduct, that can ruin a guy's reputation because
• 34:18
  Speaker 2: it's a woman accusing him, you know, when it comes
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: to allegations of criminal misconduct. This one was just made
• 34:27
  Speaker 2: on social media, So his best recourse is a lawsuit, right,
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: But we need to be pushing for something else too,
• 34:35
  Speaker 2: because a lot of women will, in conflict with a man,
• 34:40
  Speaker 2: file false restraining orders, emergency temporary restraining orders. They will
• 34:48
  Speaker 2: retain the services of domestic battery shelters and so on,
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: and they'll falsely accuse men of domestic violence, they'll falsely
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: accuse men of sexual violence, and they'll try to take
• 35:01
  Speaker 2: down their side of the conflict with these false allegations.
• 35:06
  Speaker 2: And the minute a woman goes to the police and
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: register's complaint, and that complaint is a false allegation that
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: needs to be nipped in the bud with legal action,
• 35:21
  Speaker 2: and not just lawsuits. Right, those are actually process crimes,
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: and one of the things that we as a movement
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: should be pushing for is that those process crimes be
• 35:33
  Speaker 2: taken much more seriously when the false allegation is something
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: that can lead to arrest and interrogation, long term trial
• 35:45
  Speaker 2: of great complexity quite frequently, and not just public reputational damage,
• 35:51
  Speaker 2: but potential incarceration sometimes for years. There are men who
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: have been in jail for upwards of five years, and
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: there are some men who have been in jail under
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: false allegations, under a wrongful conviction for long enough that
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: if they had been doing a job, they could retire
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: from it. So their whole working life is taken away
• 36:18
  Speaker 2: by these allegations. That's the same as if you use
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: the false allegation to break into somebody's house, kidnap them,
• 36:28
  Speaker 2: torture them, and then hold them imprisoned for years. So
• 36:36
  Speaker 2: it's equivalent to the crimes of kidnapping, torture, and false imprisonment.
• 36:42
  Speaker 2: And if women are going to do this, and they're
• 36:45
  Speaker 2: going to do it so lightly that they really just
• 36:50
  Speaker 2: consider it their first line of defense in a conflict
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: with a man. We really need to push for the
• 36:56
  Speaker 2: law to change so that if the allegation itself turns
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: out to be false, then the punishment for the processed
• 37:06
  Speaker 2: crimes should be equivalent to what those crimes would be
• 37:13
  Speaker 2: if she had directly acted upon the man herself instead
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: of using the police in the court system to do it.
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: And if that means that a woman might go to
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: jail for twenty years or thirty years because she made
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: a false allegation, then maybe that will act as a deterrent.
• 37:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it is. I hope that he this goes to court.
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: I hope it does set a precedent. I think that
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: one thing that people often underestimate is the power of
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: these accusations and how frequently they get used and people
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: they tend to be a little bit dismissive. He's probably
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: gonna beat it. Oh, but that's not really the point,
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: right beat the allegations not necessarily get like a settlement
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: or win some kind of case or set some kind
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: of legal precedent, because that's the thing. She can make
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: these allegations on social media destroy his reputation. It doesn't
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: matter if some people the evidence proves otherwise, because what
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: happens is most people on social media, they just come
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: to their own conclusions. They don't really look, they don't
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: follow it very closely, they don't concern themselves. They just
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: decide whether or not they believe it, and they tend
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: to side with the woman who makes the allegations and
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: their reasoning. Yeah, oh, they still do it. That's what
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: I'm saying. It never ended, and it's like the thing
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: to do. Like if there is a man that you
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: want to destroy, it doesn't matter if it becomes a criminal,
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: goes to criminal court, it doesn't matter if it results
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: in a cash settlement. The person's life is over. Like
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: even people who beat their cases, like Johnny Depp beat
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: Amber heard legally in every respect, but because he didn't
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: win against the Sun, and because there are people who
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: simply because they bind to the feminist lie that women
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: and almost never see justice and that men are always
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: getting away with it, so it's irrelevant whether or not
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: he wins the case. So women know that they just
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: have it in their pocket like that. I'm not saying
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: they'd all use it, but they know they can and
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: there's not really gonna be any consequences to lying. So
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: even Mike said she might not be lying, but I
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: think that she has way more to gain by lying
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: than Matt Taibi does. Like men don't get that, they
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: don't have that in their back pocket. They don't get
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: to say, she is falsely accusing me, and now I
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: get to ruin her life. That's have you ever heard
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: of that? No, it doesn't happen. In fact, now it's
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: just now coming out. So I think it was like
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: a year ago or maybe two years ago, either twenty
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: twenty three or twenty twenty four that Russell Brand got
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: like accused by three or four women of shit, and
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: we covered it on this show. And now it recently
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: came out that the UK Crown's Prosecution Service is charging
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: him with five account five counts. But these are like
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: the same. It's like it's catching up to the mainstream
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: and a lot of people now are like looking at
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: it and they're trying to decide how feasible it is,
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: even though it's been since two thousand and nineteen ninety
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: ninety two thousand and five since has happened. But it
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter, Like I said, what matters now is in
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: most of these cases like Trump, Matt Tayibe, like Russell Brand,
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: even people that you may not like, like Bill Cosby,
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: like Harvey Weinstein, the judge whose name I can't fails
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: me right now, who's in the Supreme Court, like that
• 40:34
  Speaker 1: they accused him. And a lot of these allegations are complete, yeah, Kavanaugh,
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: and these allegations are completely ludicrous, and none of them
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: are gonna go anywhere except ruining the guy's reputation. And
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: I think that one one thing that about men that
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: I think a lot of people don't understand is that
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: a man's name is more than just like his job
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: or whether or not he broke a law. And I
• 40:56
  Speaker 1: think that a lot of people know that, And so
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: when you destroy a man's name, it doesn't matter if
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: they go to jail, it doesn't matter if they lose money,
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: like they've been tarnished even and they can't possibly completely
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: ever escape the allegation, like you don't ever really escape it.
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: And so Matt Tayibe, I hope and I know that
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: there came after him because of the thing, the work
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: that he's done. That's that I would be okay with
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: staking my reputation on the fact that they did this
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: to him to destroy his reputation and not because he
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: actually did anything wrong. And I know that this is
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: something that can always do unless more people come forward
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: and say, no, you're lying, you're full of shit. I
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: want you to prove it otherwise I stand with this guy.
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: That's what we have to do, because when people cower
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: away from it because they're like, I don't want to
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: be associated with someone that's accused of something without knowing
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: whether or not they've actually been accused of anything. That
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: only serves these people to do it more often, more frequently,
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: and more intensely, because sometimes it's gonna stick, and when
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: it doesn't stick, there's no consequences. So you have nothing
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: to lose by making these allegations. Nothing, so you can
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: just do it. And yeah, so like I saw Russell Brand,
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: now people are coming out and going, oh, yeah, there's allegations.
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: We think this is political. Yeah, we said this two
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: years ago. We here at Honey Badger Radio, like it
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: or not. We're usually ahead of the curve on a
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: lot of this stuff, and now people are catching up,
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: and so they have to be ahead of the curve
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: on this too. Don't when you learn about these allegations
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: you can look into it if you like to, but
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: be prepared to find that this person is lying. And
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: they can do it because they're a woman. They have
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: the ability to make these allegations without people questioning their
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: validity or questioning their integrity. And even if it turns
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: out that she is full of shit, there are no consequences.
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: So there has to start to be consequences, like like,
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: that's the only way this is gonna stop. And that
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: begins with people presuming innocence on the part of men
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: who are accused, just presus doing it. That's what I do.
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: This is the reason. By the way, Paul Elam used
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: to say, what did he used to say? He used
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: to say that he would on a even if all
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: the evidence pointed to a man being guilty of a
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: sexual crime, he would side with him just because of
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: the preponderance of bullshit that stacks up against men before
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: they even go to court.
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: And it's called jury nullification. Yeah, and it's because it's
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: something that you can do because you know that the
• 43:31
  Speaker 2: system is stacked against the one side, for instance, in
• 43:37
  Speaker 2: sexual misconduct crime cases. Yeah, there's a certain because feminists
• 43:43
  Speaker 2: have fought tooth and nail to exempt women from accountability
• 43:48
  Speaker 2: for lying and things like that. They have worked very
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: hard to exclude certain types of exculpatory evidence from court cases,
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: and it's stuff like they would be a to argue
• 44:00
  Speaker 2: in court that whatever it is that they want the
• 44:06
  Speaker 2: judge to exclude isn't relevant, and a jury it could
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: agree with them if they were right. But what they've
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: got put into law is that it's excluded every time
• 44:17
  Speaker 2: it's that type of evidence, and not just when it
• 44:21
  Speaker 2: isn't really relevant to the case. So, yes, it's true
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: that sleeping around with fifteen guys doesn't mean that a
• 44:29
  Speaker 2: woman consented to sex with a particular guy. But at
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: the same time, if there's a specific set of behaviors
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: that she engages in during sex and some of them
• 44:43
  Speaker 2: are rough, her claim that one of those behaviors indicates
• 44:47
  Speaker 2: that she was fighting back and that this particular incident
• 44:50
  Speaker 2: was rape isn't as credible as if she's like virginal
• 44:55
  Speaker 2: and doesn't do those things all the time. Then that
• 44:59
  Speaker 2: was I can't think of the guy name, but that
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: was the case where a woman argued that she had
• 45:05
  Speaker 2: she'd bitten her attacker and that made it proof that
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: she was fighting back. Against a rape, but all of
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: her exes could have testified that she bit during sex
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: all the time. It was what she did when she
• 45:18
  Speaker 2: was feeling passionate, and it didn't necessarily indicate any kind
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: of fighting or defense. And this guy got convicted based
• 45:27
  Speaker 2: on this testimony, and he was not allowed to have
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: the testimony included in the case that actually, it's not
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: an indicator that because she does it all the time,
• 45:38
  Speaker 2: because feminists have gotten it put into law that a
• 45:41
  Speaker 2: woman's sexual history cannot be entered in as evidence unless
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: the judge approves it, so the judge can gate keep
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: that kind of evidence. And that alone, just knowing that
• 45:56
  Speaker 2: exculpatory evidence could have been withheld from the case is
• 46:01
  Speaker 2: reason enough to engage in jury nullification and rape cases.
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, So I got a super chow that I
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: got to read out from the last story. Sorry about that.
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: And I got a super chow yesterday that I guess
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: i'll read just because it's going to get lost if
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: I don't. All right, So a couple things somebody, So
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: I got some super chow, So I'm gonna read those
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: and then we'll move on to the next story. But yeah,
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: I was saying that I hope. I'm glad that Matt
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: Tyvy's making a fuss out of this, because more men
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: need to do that, and they shouldn't take this shit
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: lying down, because if someone's just trying to destroy your
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: reputation or even twist something that did, because sometimes these
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: things they have their kernel of truth, and those are
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: like the worst things to deal with because it's like
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: it gets into a gray area. Did this happen? And
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: of course feminists have already altered the language and altered
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: the meanings of words enough that it becomes very difficult
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: for men to protect themselves, which is why I just say, guys,
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: maybe shouldn't be fucking around with these women, Like maybe
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: you just shouldn't. Like checking out is probably the safest
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: thing to do, to be honest, And if they end
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: up alone and trying to figure out where all the
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: good men are at, then that's on them. That's because
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: it's just not worth it.
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: But anyway, it's so bad that you could have proof
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: of consent.
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and it wouldn't matter. You could have never met
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: the person and they could say some shit.
• 47:22
  Speaker 2: It's not just that I can't think of the guy's
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: name in Canada either, the case where he had a
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: bunch of women accuse him of sexual misconduct where they
• 47:32
  Speaker 2: said they hadn't consented, and then it turns out he
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: had physical evidence, like messages they'd written and stuff like
• 47:40
  Speaker 2: that to him that proved that actually, yes, they had consented.
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: And then there were also messages back and forth between
• 47:48
  Speaker 2: them proving that they orchestrated this campaign of false allegations
• 47:53
  Speaker 2: against him as an attack on him for completely different
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: reasons that had nothing to do with whether how they
• 48:00
  Speaker 2: felt about their sex acts with him and everything. Yeah,
• 48:06
  Speaker 2: and what did Canada do in response to that case?
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: Do you know what the feminists did in Canada? And
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: response to that case, they tried to outlaw the submission
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: of communications around a sex act that this evidence that
• 48:21
  Speaker 2: proved that these women were lying. Feminists, are you.
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: Should They could argue that it's revenge.
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: They could, they could try to do it, but that
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: wasn't what they were going But they did argue that,
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: but it wasn't the main argument they were making on it.
• 48:37
  Speaker 2: But they tried to get it excluded that if you
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: have any communications, uh around a sex act or anything
• 48:46
  Speaker 2: like that demonstrates consent and demonstrates that after the sex act,
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: like immediately after the sex act, that the woman was
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: happy was what had happened, and was saying, oh, I
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: can't wait to do this again, and things like that.
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: That those can't be admitted because they might prove the
• 49:03
  Speaker 2: guy innocence, prove the guy innocent, and if she said
• 49:07
  Speaker 2: she was raped, that she was raped, and therefore anything
• 49:11
  Speaker 2: that might constitute proof of innocence is an attack on
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: a rape victim. That was their logic.
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, but anyway, I got some super child's let
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: me read them really quick. Backing up rant, somebody gave
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: us a few days ago. Rancircer two thirty seven Manifestela
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: Influencers gave us five dollars and said we was pharaohs
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: and philosophers and shit. Thank you Rancircer, two thirty seven
• 49:38
  Speaker 1: manifestel On Influencers for that five dollars. And then anonymous
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: gave us ten dollars and then ten dollars, So I
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: think it's part of this went to the fundraiser, So
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: thank you to that person. Thank you come again, and said,
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: can Brian or Allison watch and comment on the video?
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: Young men are beginning to revolt by Nick freetasks They
• 49:58
  Speaker 1: discussed men becoming monsters as a result of feminism and
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: feminism feminine led society, that women are responsible to fix
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: what is happening to young men, and how we should
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: present men with women who are worthy of their time
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: and sacrifice, present women men with women. I was surprised
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: to hear people outside of the MRA and anti feminism
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: community talking about this so casually, and not just the Badgers,
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: Tom Golden, Janis Fiamenngo, and Rachel Wilson. The video gets
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: good at thirty eight minutes when the woman mentions male
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: criminals are maybe a result of abusive mothers. Someone with
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: a large following actually telling women that their actions have
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: an impact. Yes, I heard about that. I haven't watched
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: the video yet, but I understand that Matt free Tasks
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: or Nick free Tasks name, he has started to come
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: around a little bit on this stuff. Like in the past,
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: he was the kind of yeah, just man up kind
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: of guy, but he's starting to see that. He says, Oh,
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: the landscape has changed from when I was a kid,
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: but I don't I think that it's huge. Didn't pay attention.
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: You just put up with it when you were younger.
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: That's what I think, But.
• 51:04
  Speaker 2: A lot of people weren't impacted by it when they
• 51:07
  Speaker 2: were younger, and so they didn't see it. And the
• 51:09
  Speaker 2: longer you live, the more likely a thing that happens
• 51:13
  Speaker 2: to a lot of people is that you're going to
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: be included in the a lot of people group and
• 51:19
  Speaker 2: not the group of people that it hasn't happened to yet.
• 51:22
  Speaker 2: Just some people have never experienced the flu until the
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: first time they get it, and then they know what
• 51:26
  Speaker 2: it's like to have the flu. And this is just
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: about as common as the flu, and it is a
• 51:32
  Speaker 2: social contagion. Once women start learning that they can behave
• 51:37
  Speaker 2: this way and get away with mistreating men, using false allegations,
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: taking advantage of men for their money, living as single
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: moms at the expense of the baby daddy, and all
• 51:50
  Speaker 2: of the men paying taxes to the government, and then
• 51:53
  Speaker 2: they don't raise their kids and they don't take the
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: blame for it when their kids have problems in adulthood
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: and problems for other people in adulthood. As long as
• 52:02
  Speaker 2: women feel like they can get away with that, it
• 52:05
  Speaker 2: increases among women. They'll reinforce it to each other. Girl,
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: you shouldn't take that from a guy, he can't tell
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: you that, he can't criticize you for that. How dare
• 52:15
  Speaker 2: you what's wrong with him? That's misogynistic. And of course
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: now we've got ormies talking about it, they're starting to
• 52:22
  Speaker 2: notice because the contagion has spread far enough that it
• 52:27
  Speaker 2: has reached their women and they are experiencing the consequences.
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you for that. And then Meredith June gives
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: us five dollars and says HBr News four ninety seven.
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: I'm a little late on the comment because I finally
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: got home. So here's a problem with all these people
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: defending the organized protest. Not only is a BS because
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: it is organization of violence and property destruction, which is criminal. Yes,
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: it's not a protest if you're destroying Tesla's thank you.
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: Even vandalism is property destruction. If you care about private
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: proper rites, then yeah, this is illegal. That's it. It's
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: just criminal. It is a means of trying to overturn
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: the results of an election. We are already dealing with
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: the judiciary exceeding its authority to subvert the will of
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: the people. If you didn't vote for Trump and don't
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: like the consequence, tough shit elections have consequences, but don't
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: use my taxpayer dollars to subvert my vote and the
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: votes of millions of other Americans. Rant over, keep in
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: mind all of the protesters are captured by the system
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: and view those dollars that are being cut as theirs. Yeah,
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: like commies usually do dollars or the person who actually
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: earned them and paid the taxes. All right, thank you, Meredith.
• 53:37
  Speaker 2: Guys, I want to point something out too, all Right,
• 53:40
  Speaker 2: just because something the riot gets deemed a protest doesn't
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: make it not a riot.
• 53:46
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 53:46
  Speaker 2: People don't riot out as a blue for no reason.
• 53:49
  Speaker 2: They're just standing around one day and they're like, I'm
• 53:51
  Speaker 2: gonna go rob a bunch of stores downtown and the
• 53:54
  Speaker 2: whole community does it all at once without some predicating
• 53:58
  Speaker 2: factor and without some goal in mind or at least
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: some objection in mind, Some protests become riots. There's still protests.
• 54:09
  Speaker 2: It's not that either or there is a huge overlap.
• 54:13
  Speaker 2: Every riot is a protest that got out of hand
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: in one way or another. Whether that was deliberate and
• 54:21
  Speaker 2: orchestrated or not. Being a protest doesn't necessarily make it
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: not a riot either.
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: Yep, yep, all right, yep. That's the thing gets framed
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: all of one thing or all of another thing. And
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: the truth is that it becomes a riot when people riot,
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: and that doesn't mean that everyone engage in violence or
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: destruction are rioters because a lot of times the protests
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: are used by rioters as cover for them to do
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: what they're doing.
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: It's important that people respond to this in an effective manner,
• 54:55
  Speaker 2: and it is effective. When someone says, oh, that wasn't
• 54:58
  Speaker 2: a riot, it was a pro test, you can say
• 55:01
  Speaker 2: being a protest does not preclude being a riot. If
• 55:04
  Speaker 2: there's violence involved. If you're setting things on fire, that's
• 55:08
  Speaker 2: a riot. Even if it was a protest. Yeah, you
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: rioted in protest, but it's still a riot. It's not
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: protected speech.
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, let's move on to next story. Let
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about this one in
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: the comments. Speaking of all this stuff dealing with Musk,
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: the European Union is considering the possibility of finding elon
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: Musk's x one billion, one billion dollars. The EU cites
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: their new Digital Services Act and accuses Musk's platform. I
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: could see like doctor Evil at the head. He's like
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: the chairman of the European Union.
• 55:47
  Speaker 2: Yeah, just because I wanted to hear you.
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: We have them in Belgium. In Belgium, it's called a
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: Belgium dip Okay anyway, The EU cites their new Digital
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: Services Act and accuses Musk's platform of having violated the act.
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: Quote in area is linked to dark patterns, advertising transparency
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: and data access for researchers. End quote, further alleging that
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: the blue check mark system quote negatively affects user's ability
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: the way the blue checks are bad. Now about the
• 56:19
  Speaker 1: about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they
• 56:22
  Speaker 1: interact with. End quote. CEO of X Linda Yakarino stated
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: on X that such an action quote would be an
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: egregious example of regulatory overreach at all.
• 56:33
  Speaker 4: First time, First time, bro, you think this is egregious?
• 56:38
  Speaker 4: The EU eats the ship for breakfast. Yes, the EU
• 56:42
  Speaker 4: does indeed eat shit on.
• 56:44
  Speaker 3: A gluten free portal.
• 56:48
  Speaker 4: The day the EU Gracio village was the most egregious
• 56:51
  Speaker 4: regulatory overreach of your life.
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: For the EU, it was Tuesday. X is an American company.
• 56:58
  Speaker 3: Maybe y'all should just leave the European Union.
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: Oh wait, you.
• 57:02
  Speaker 4: Guys were two hundred years ahead of the curve on
• 57:05
  Speaker 4: that one spotted. It's handy to be able to project
• 57:09
  Speaker 4: economic models more than two seconds into the future. I'm
• 57:13
  Speaker 4: sure the price of tea did indeed go up on
• 57:16
  Speaker 4: that fateful Thursday in Boston, but it worked out pretty
• 57:20
  Speaker 4: sweetly eventually. That was until income tax was introduced, and
• 57:25
  Speaker 4: it created one hundred years of darkness. That made a
• 57:29
  Speaker 4: two cent tax on tea or whatever it was seem
• 57:32
  Speaker 4: rather trifling in comparison. Imagine if you will, a president
• 57:37
  Speaker 4: who is prepared to take the perhaps drastic measures necessary
• 57:42
  Speaker 4: to end that century of darkness. And what I mean
• 57:46
  Speaker 4: by darkness, by the way, is stealing people's wages, punishing
• 57:53
  Speaker 4: people for working hard, disincentivizing people from being productive members
• 57:59
  Speaker 4: of society. That's certainly not going to do any favors
• 58:02
  Speaker 4: for anyone, except, of course, the organized crime syndica doing
• 58:06
  Speaker 4: all the stealing. That is guaranteed to cast a poll
• 58:09
  Speaker 4: of despair over a populace as the poor get poorer
• 58:14
  Speaker 4: and the rich get poorer, and everyone in between gets poorer,
• 58:18
  Speaker 4: and the government spends everyone's money on wars and bureaucracy
• 58:22
  Speaker 4: and a whole bunch of gay bullshit that no one needs.
• 58:25
  Speaker 3: That's what I mean by darkness.
• 58:28
  Speaker 4: The EU, on the other hand, doesn't seem to be
• 58:30
  Speaker 4: making any effort to clarify what it means by quote
• 58:34
  Speaker 4: areas linked to dark patterns end quote that they're just
• 58:39
  Speaker 4: leaving it hanging there like we're supposed to understand. Look,
• 58:42
  Speaker 4: I don't like how Twitter defaults to dark mode either.
• 58:46
  Speaker 4: Dark mode sucks up my eyes, but it's very easy
• 58:48
  Speaker 4: to change it to light mode. It's right there in
• 58:51
  Speaker 4: the settings tab. Is that what they mean by dark
• 58:54
  Speaker 4: I presume they're not being racist. The EU would never
• 58:58
  Speaker 4: do that in that direction anyway. If anyone else on
• 59:03
  Speaker 4: Twitter spoke ill of areas linked to dark patterns, they
• 59:07
  Speaker 4: would probably be arrested for hate speech in the EU
• 59:11
  Speaker 4: for dangerous insinuations about the Great Replacement. But the EU
• 59:15
  Speaker 4: can go ahead and say and refuse to elaborate and
• 59:18
  Speaker 4: then leave, and it's fine. I suspect it might just
• 59:22
  Speaker 4: be empty emotional rhetoric, folks. They might as well be
• 59:26
  Speaker 4: saying areas linked to evil skullduggery, to villainous nefariousness and
• 59:33
  Speaker 4: so on.
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: Yes, people are voicing unwonted facts.
• 59:41
  Speaker 4: They're blaspheming against our precious global gay race communism. Whoa
• 59:47
  Speaker 4: somebody think of the trans children. So let's see if
• 59:50
  Speaker 4: we can translate some of these other passages that they've
• 59:52
  Speaker 4: cited as worthy of a billion dollar.
• 59:56
  Speaker 3: Tiste advertising transparency.
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 4: Look, I'm annoyed by ads as much as anyone else,
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 4: but they're fairly easy to spot because they say AD
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 4: at the top right, and if you're that bothered, you
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 4: can just block them or mute them. Yes, a lot
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 4: of videos on Twitter have had a certain watermark at
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 4: the bottom right advertising a certain gambling site. But the
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 4: community notes have done their best to point this out.
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 4: If we're talking transparency, no other site has community notes
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 4: or anything resembling them. How many dollars are you going
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 4: to steal from Google given that they curate their search
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 4: results in favor of essentially advertising global gay race communism,
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 4: and they neglect to inform anyone that they're doing this. No,
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 4: that's fine, nothing to say.
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 3: That's weird. That is weird. What else do we have?
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: They remember the EU? You tried to bad Pepe the Frog?
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: Oh god, they've fanned.
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 1: Everything Article thirteen EU Article thirteen banded Pepe the Frog.
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 1: I'm not kidding, but go ahead, I'm sorry, revolt.
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 4: Data access for researchers they've been accused of not allowing.
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 3: Yeah, imagine that.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 4: Imagine Twitter having the audacity to not hand over its
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 4: database to the EU, who will then sell it on
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 4: to the highest bidder, namely China.
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 3: Oh the nerve.
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 4: Now, if we want to steal a billion people's private data.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: We will.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 4: We have to perform drag counting the international Denos attack
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 4: and steal it during the blackout.
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 3: It's just so inconvenient. We shouldn't have to do that.
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: You should just give us what we want. That does it.
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 3: We're gonna steal your data and your money.
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 4: We're definitely the good guys. By the way, we're definitely
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 4: not the forces of darkness in this equation.
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 3: How very dare you already? Yeah?
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 4: The blue checkus system negatively affects the user's ability to
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 4: make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 4: accounts and the content they interrup No, it does not.
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 3: The blue check mark.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 4: Indicates that someone is paying for a premium account, and
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 4: that's all. The gold check mark indicates the account is
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 4: a verified organization, and that means they're very probably biased
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 4: and you should approach them with caution. The gray check
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 4: mark indicates the account is a government official, and that
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 4: means they're definitely biased and you should have seen by
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 4: default that everything they're saying is a lie. It's a
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 4: very simple system and a very effective one, and it's
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 4: outlined concisely in Twitter's help center.
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: If you're a.
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 4: Moron and you're unable to figure this shit out, that
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 4: is entirely your problem, and you probably shouldn't be in
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 4: charge of a fucking continent.
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: Well that's just my opinion, feels now.
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: What's interesting about this is how people are looking at it,
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: because I've seen some discussion on this well where people
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: are like, look, this is just their rules. If he
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 2: wants to do business in their country, he's got to
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 2: obey their rules. Does a man standing up for what
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: he thinks is right, whether you agree with what he
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 2: thinks is right or not. He's taking a huge risk
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 2: with everything that he's doing. He's taking a huge financial
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: risk he's taken. He probably can't go to Europe now
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: because they'll probably they would arrest him for something. They
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: would find some sort of charge to make up, and
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: they don't need they don't need a reason that they
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: wanted to do it is obvious, and like he's going
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: through the budget of the United States government and finding
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 2: areas of corruption where money laundering has been taking place
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 2: and ending those Like he's his organization has been putting
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: the kebash to quite a bit of stealing that has
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 2: been taking place, and every nation in the world has
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 2: been involved in that theft, and including America stealing from
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 2: a America. And we've essentially been the harvest that everybody's
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 2: taking from for so long, So no wonder they hate him.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: And this is a man who's stepped up and decided
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 2: to pay the consequences that's needed in order to keep
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: this going and keep the reform happening. Like you've seen
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 2: the meme of the night where the hero standing over
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: a kid and the kids sleeping peacefully and the hero
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 2: has a bunch of knives in his back. That's what
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: we're looking at right now. And it's always a man.
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 2: You don't see women very often wearing that cape and
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: getting those knives in their back. When they do, they
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 2: back down, they don't take it. Then he hasn't backed down.
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 2: And I think the EU is missing something here too,
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: because when ukrained needed Internet connections available needed service in
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 2: order to be able to maintain their communications. He put
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 2: up satellites and gave them communications capability. And if the
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 2: EU decides we're going to find him a billion dollars
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 2: and he decides he's not going to pay it, if
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 2: he's going to spend that kind of money in order
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 2: to be able to continue to do business there, like
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 2: you can just put up satellites and if people can't
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 2: access it through their regular Internet service, they can access
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 2: it that way. He could get around anything that they
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: try to do to him. Just depends on how much
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 2: money he wants to spend, how much investment he wants
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 2: to make, and how much returning he can get on
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 2: his investment. Even though it seems like they're a big
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 2: dog going after a mouse, they're actually a mouse yapping
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 2: at a big dog. And it's going to be interesting
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: to see how this plays out. Maybe he'll pay the
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: fine and say all right, I pay the fine and
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: keep doing business. Maybe he'll make some changes to how
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: Twitter works, how x works in Europe, so that if
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: you're using it in Europe, Europe is allowed to harvest
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: your data, all right. Maybe he'll do some different things
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: like that, but there isn't really anything they can make
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: him do, no, and I don't know, I kind.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: Of that's why they're considering.
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, looking forward to seeing how this plays out, because
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 2: it is fun to watch a guy deal with this
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 2: kind of stuff, and a guy who is I wouldn't
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 2: say that Musk is fearless. I don't think anybody is fearless,
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 2: but he's definitely very targeted in his actions and he
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 2: you know, he makes his decisions like very pointedly, and
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 2: it's always fun to watch those kind of guys respond
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 2: to changes like this in their business environment. So it's
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: one of the things that actually made Trump fun to
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 2: watch doing business when he was younger. Yeah, that's part
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 2: of why I wanted to see this talked about, is
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 2: just the fact that, like I said, this is something
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 2: that men deal with. This isn't really something that women
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 2: deal with. The behavior the EU is engaging and is
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 2: very feminine, so it'll be quite interesting to see how
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 2: the masculine handles more feminine bullshit.
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: Yep, Well that is the way you guys think about
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments. Yeah, Yeah, what could happen
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: is maybe he'll pay them the billion and then they'll
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: give it back to us because they got to pay
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: the tariffs. Yeah, okay, here's a billion. I'll give us
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: two hundred billion, all right, So anyway, let us know
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this. One of the comments
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: I did get a rumble rant from nova fan. Thank you,
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: nova Fan. I really got to put rumble chan back
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: on on the streams. Want to figure out a better
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: way to do it, implement it. But he gives us
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: a dollar and says I saw a few content creators
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: call out Megan Kelly for being a feminist infiltrator, whining
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: about girls being told they can't find a man if
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: she has a job. In other news, water is wet.
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: Thank you for that. I would not call Megan Kelly
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 1: an infiltrator because it suggests that she is covert. I
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 1: think that the truth is. I know a lot of
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: people call the supposed right wing women covert feminists. But
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: what people have to understand, and I've been saying this
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 1: for I don't know, I feel like I've been saying
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: this for absolutely the entire time that I've been doing this,
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: almost most of us are feminists. Supposedly conservative women are
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: just feminists doing the speed limit that that that means
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: they're not conservative like Dave. If you put an AR
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: next to your name, it doesn't change your fundamental core
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: belief system or your principles. It comes down to how
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: do you act in the world. This is what I'm
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 1: when I say people, I don't care what you call yourself.
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: Show me who you are by what you do and
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 1: what you believe. And that's how I know. So Megan
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: Kelly is not infiltrating. She just is. She's just Megan Kelly.
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: She's a girl boss, second wave feminist like most of
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: these supposed right wing commentators are. That's just and I'm
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: not even mad because it's not like I see it
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 1: as a deception. That's what infiltration infers. She's not deceptive,
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: she just is. She's She's not a crazy progressive, pro
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: trans intersectional feminist, but that doesn't mean she's not a
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 1: feminist like most people, regardless of what they tell you,
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: they believe are feminists like most of us, because you
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: know that they are because when they say here are
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: the things I disagree with when it comes to feminism,
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: they're saying that there is stuff that they do agree with.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: That's how like they're not rejecting it whole, and why
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: would they Most of us don't know another way to
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: see this. They have no other way to look at
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: this dynamic. And that's that goes for men and women, right,
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 1: So I understand, well, here's the thing, But here's the thing.
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: It is starting to come to a head. It's starting
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: to with some people who are realizing that this scenario,
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: this feminist framework that everybody operates under, everybody all over
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: the world, it will eventually have to come to a
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: head at some point. Either the birth rates are going
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: to fall enough that people in like the Korea or
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: Japan or parts of like other parts of Asia, are like,
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: we got to do something about this, or it's going
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: to come out in other ways. But it's going to
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: happen eventually, and there's nothing that can be done about it.
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: So at the end of the day, yeah, Megan Kelly's
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: a feminist news at eleven water is wet. There's she's no,
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 1: she's basically no different from the average modern woman. There
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: they are, and men too, they're all on board. Like
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: to shake them out of it. It's a monumental task.
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: It's just not gonna happen overnight. People are way too
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: embedded in this right now, and that's the reason why.
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: But it's gonna come to a head because enough again,
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 1: not enough suffering has happened for people to realize that
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: this is an unsustainable project that has done nothing but
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: crazy amounts of damage to every level of our society,
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: and not enough people are speaking out. But I think
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 1: that one way or another, it's gonna have to be confronted.
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: All right. What people have to understand is women can
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 2: do harm without being feminist. Women can be wrong without
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: being feminist, right, women can be entitled without being feminist.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 2: And just because a woman's sense, a woman's wrongful sense
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 2: of entitlement does harm doesn't make it feminist. And just
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: because a woman's wrongful sense of entire that does harm
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: is not feminist doesn't make it okay. So even if
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 2: she doesn't think that women have been oppressed throughout history
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 2: by all of male civilization, the entire male population, and
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: she doesn't think that there's a fight for equality between
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 2: men and women that needs to happen, and she doesn't
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 2: think that abuse is only abuse when a man does
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: it and not when a woman does it, and all
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 2: that kind of thing, even if she doesn't think those
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 2: things if she does think that men owe women provision
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 2: and protection and a sense of divinity. Basically, women should
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 2: be revered because they're female, that women deserve to be
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: treated like ladies, whether they act that way or not.
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 2: Even if she's not feminist, even if she doesn't have
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: that victim narratives that feminists have, just those things are
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 2: still wrong and should still be called out. And we
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: don't have to use the word feminist wrongly or falsely
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: in order to call those things out. It's shitty behavior
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 2: right right wing women. There's a lot of shitty behavior
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 2: that still needs to be called out. The assumption that
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 2: you're going to be a housewife and he's going to
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 2: work two jobs, and if you don't like the fact
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 2: that he didn't vacuum the living room floor, you get
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 2: to nag him about it, but he's not allowed to
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 2: say anything to you about wearing a shirt that shows
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 2: half your tits. That's got to be called out. Right.
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 2: If they're going to use equality, if they're going to
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 2: use legal equality, if they're going to use equal pay,
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: if they're going to use the fact that the court
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 2: systems will side with them if they get a divorce,
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: then they need to be called out on it, even
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 2: if they don't identify as feminists, and even if they
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: don't identify with the most well known feminist narratives.
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: Yes, but Magan Kelly does believe those things. Like I said,
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: feminism is the default setting period, like very few people
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: do not believe. Yes, that's what I'm saying. It's the
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: normal fault even if Yeah, it's like I said, it is,
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: but it is what is trained into the average person,
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: like it's ubiquitous. It is the ubiquitous belief system, even
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: if it isn't true. Yeah, sure women can be shitty,
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: but Megan Kelly, people is she but she is feminist
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: though that's the important thing. He does agree with those No,
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: it does in this case important thing.
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 2: The important thing is that we have to be able
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: to call women out regardless.
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: Of absolutely absolutely. But the Yeah, for sure, I don't
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: disagree with that, But I'm just saying, in this case,
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: Megan Kelly and other conservatives supposedly.
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 2: I do agree that that's a lot of women believe it.
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 2: I do agree.
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that's the that's not the end all
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: be all of wrongness, but I'm saying when people say
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: it's a right feminist, and it's yeah, they're a feminists that.
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: Claim there are lots of right wing feminists. There's a
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 2: whole right wing feminist organized voter group. They're called Concerned
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 2: Women for America. It's a pro life group and everything,
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 2: but they are feminist. They still have that narrative of
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 2: women were oppressed, and that that makes the difference. If
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 2: they believe the women were oppressed and they believe in
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 2: patriarchy theory, they're feminists, and they don't believe in that bullshit,
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 2: they're not feminists. But if they're still promoting ideas that
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 2: enslaved men, they're still wrong. They're still guyinocentric, and that's
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: a larger group and a bigger target. It's important to
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 2: not lose sight of that because there's been multiple times
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 2: where I've been arguing with somebody about a particular issue
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 2: or a particular lifestyle, and the argument isn't necessarily I
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 2: think this other person shouldn't be able to have that
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 2: lifestyle consensually with another person. It's I'm saying this lifestyle
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 2: isn't something that should be imposed on men, and she's
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 2: saying this lifestyle is something women have a right to
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 2: and a man is not a real man if he
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 2: doesn't give it to her. And I get back, why
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 2: are you arguing with this woman? She's not a feminist,
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 2: she's right wing, And the two things that are wrong
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: with that statement is that one being right wing doesn't
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: preclude feminism, and two, not being a feminist doesn't preclude
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: being harmfully wrong.
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 4: I'll sometimes use feminism as a descriptor, and some people
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 4: they use it as an identity, and that's where the
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 4: wi is get crossed. This is why we have the
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 4: way gunccentric. It covers all these things. Megan Kelly's clearly
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 4: a ghan of centrist. All feminists are clearly ganiscentric. That's
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 4: just an easy way.
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, feminism is basically economic exploitation of gyanocentrism.
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but anyway, let us don't you guys think about
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments? I got two. I got
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: one more story, but it's two stories because they're very similar,
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: so I'm gonna read through both of them. And this
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: is just women being women. So I have a this
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: is like the women are Wonderful segment that I sometimes do,
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: where we just hear about all of the ways that
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: women can do everything that we claim men can do
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: times are changing? Ladies can douche stump? Now?
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 3: All right?
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: So here we go number one and these are two stories.
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: But notice it's very similar. In Columbus, Ohio, Sephanie Demetrius,
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: pictured here, a forty four year old literacy enrichment instructor
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: at the Academy for Urban Scholars High School, was arrested
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: and charged with felony conspiracy for alleged lead attempting to
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: hire a student to kill her estranged husband. The plot
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: unraveled when the student's mother discovered incriminating text messages on
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: her son's phone and alerted authorities. Court documents revealed that
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: on March twenty six, twenty twenty five, Demetrius offered the
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: student two thousand dollars, providing an initial two hundred and
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: fifty dollars cash down payment, and discussed logistics such as
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: her husband's work from home schedule and dismissing concerns about
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 1: neighbors hearing gunfire. The Columbus Division of Police emphasized the
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: grooming aspect so she groomed a student to kill her husband,
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: with Sergeant James Fuqua noting the teacher's intent to manipulate
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: the young person into committing murder. Demetrius was apprehended on
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: April second at her Powell home, as captured in police
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: body camera footage, and arraigned in Franklin County Municipal Court
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: with a one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bond set.
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: Her public defender denied the allegations, calling them fabricated, while
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: prosecutors highlighted her history of possess behavior, including prior violations
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: of a protective order issued by her husband amid their
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: ongoing divorce. The Academy for Urban Scholars swiftly terminated her employment,
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: underscoring her their priority on student safety. The case, which
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: has drawn attention for its disturbing abuse of authority, a
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: way to preliminary hearing on April eleventh, leaving the community
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: grappling with the implications of such a betrayal by an educator.
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: And then we have this other story number two. Both
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, bardon pictured here this is a teacher, Elena Barden.
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 2: I don't know.
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: Let's see Barden, a twenty seven year old teacher at
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: a juvenile detention center. Were wait, I think I have
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I got to find the correct write up.
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: I think I have the wrong thing here, give me
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: a second. I am sorry, Demetrius. Oh yeah. Kentucky, a
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: twenty seven year old teacher named Elena Barden, employed by
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: Adair County Schools at a juvenile detention center, faces serious
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 1: charges following a disturbing discovery. On March twenty seventh, during
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: a routine surge at the Adair County Juvenile Detention Center,
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: Kentucky State Police uncovered letters and sexually explicit materials in
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: a boy's bunk allegedly sent by Bardin investigator's claim, she
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: subjected the juvenile inmate to illegal sexual contact. That's what
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: they're calling it, illegal sexual contact. I feel like there's
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: another word for that, and provided him with explicit images
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: of herself, exploiting her position of authority. The situation escalated
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 1: further when evidence revealed Barden had asked the boy to
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: kill her husband, intertwining sexual misconduct with a solicitation of murder.
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: Barden was arrested on April third, twenty twenty five, and
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: charged with first agree sexual abuse, use of a minor
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: in a sexual performance, and tampering with physical evidence, with
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: additional charges pending as the investigation continues. The Kentucky State
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: Police acted swiftly after the detention Center's findings, highlighting the
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: gravity of the allegations against the trusted educator. The Adair
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 1: County School District issued a statement distancing itself from Barden's actions,
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: emphasizing that her alleged behavior occurred outside school premises and
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: reinforcing their commitment to student safety. This case has shocked
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: the local community, raising questions about oversighting juvenile facilities and
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: the vetting of staff in such sensitive roles.
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 4: Who else came into this thinking it was going to
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 4: be just another nons story.
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 3: We've done so many of these.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 4: Now I got half a sentence into the right up,
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 4: and I went all right, talking of e seven o'clock.
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 3: Fire up the wood chipper.
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 4: Dang, this wood chip is getting knacked now, Old Betsy
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 4: needs a sharpening. It's like trying to push a nod
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 4: through a paper shedder. At this point, bit of a
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 4: straighten on my shoulders. All the wear and tear on
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 4: the old shoven stick. So imagine my surprise to discover
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 4: that it's even worse than nonsery. You might wonder if
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 4: anything could be worse than that, But yes, actually I
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 4: think this is considerably worse there are many among us
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 4: who can only laugh and rejoice the last trauma that
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 4: a young man goes through when he gets raped by
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 4: a woman, especially a teacher. But even those sociopaths would
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 4: have to think twice about the notion of using an
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 4: adolescent boy as a murder weapon, using him as a dildo. Fine, nice,
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 4: Even I wish my teacher use me as a dildo.
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 3: Where were these teachers but a murder weapon?
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 4: No, even I the sociopath, I am finding myself feeling
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 4: this eerie sense that adolescent males might actually be humans.
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: Like vulnerable, impressionable, maybe even innocent humans.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 4: It's such a strange feeling. And maybe that's because the
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 4: thought had never occurred to you that women do this
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 4: all the time. It's usually not underage boys, and it's
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 4: usually not murder. But yes, women commit violent crimes all
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 4: the time and get away with it because their weapon
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 4: of choice is a man, usually against another man.
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 3: And unlike when they use a dog as.
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 4: A weapon, you don't get all manner of bossie boneheads going.
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 4: It's the owner's fault, it's the owner's fault. It's just
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 4: bad training. Dogs don't even have genetics. I'm not listening. No,
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 4: when the weapon is a.
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 3: Man, it's the opposite.
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 4: It's always the weapon's fault. When the weapon is a gun,
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 4: it's split right down the middle. Half the people say
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 4: it's the gun owner's fault and we should lock them up.
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 4: The other half say, is the gun's fault and we
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 4: should lock up the guns. But when the weapon is
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 4: a man, all other political persuasions disappear. The liberals and
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 4: the conservatives, and the dog people and the car people
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 4: will all stand shoulders to shoulder, pat each other on
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 4: the back and blame everything on the weapon because the
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 4: weapon is a man, because he should know better, after all.
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 3: And what do you mean she there was no woman involved?
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: What are you a massagnist? Right up?
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 4: Yeah, Well, you're seeing in this story is just the
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 4: tip of the ice work, the first nodule of ice
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 4: that you've ever seen, poking out of the water, blissfully
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 4: unaware as you are, about the three mile chunk of
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 4: blue death under the surface. The long and storied history
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 4: of women sending men and boys to kill and be killed.
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: It happens here, It.
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 4: Happens all the way over there, in that backwards land
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 4: of savages that you could have sworn was a real patriarchy,
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 4: and it happened in the long long ago when you
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 4: could have sworn it was a real patriarchy. Ask yourself
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 4: why this is what it took for you to finally
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 4: notice a teacher doing it to a student. A teacher
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 4: can't do that to a student. Teachers can't just treat
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 4: students like property, as though they have the.
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 3: Power of life and death over them. Guess what.
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 4: Women can't just do that to men either, because women
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 4: do not own men.
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 3: Y'all are already struggling on. You'll hear you go.
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 4: Mothers don't own their sons either. Yeah, no, not as property.
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 4: Property is something that you get to destroy if you
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 4: want to, and you can use it to destroy something
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 4: else if you need to.
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 3: You do not get to do that to human beings
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 3: of any age or sex. You do.
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 4: It's the sad state of affairs we're living. And you
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 4: can absolutely do that to a male human and you
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 4: will probably get away with it. But I don't approve
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 4: It's what I'm saying. I can't get behind that, and
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 4: one day I hope to live in a society where
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 4: you don't get to do that.
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 3: But I'm not holding my breath.
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 4: If it ever does happen, very probably won't happen in
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 4: my lifetime or the next. And so I keep my
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 4: head down and I plant trees in whose shades I
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 4: will never sit. My gravestone will tell everyone that I
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 4: was a crazy person. And maybe that's true, but at
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 4: least I never killed or died for a woman. I
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 4: had nine eye problems, for sure. You can fill in
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 4: the rest.
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 3: I was here and no I wasn't. Whatever.
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a few elements of this that I want
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 2: people to notice, all right. I want you to remember
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 2: what Donald Trump was sued for that has led to
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: people wrongly calling him a convicted rapist, right because he
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 2: was never convicted of rape. But a judge did award
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 2: one of his false accusers a large sum of money
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 2: on the idea that it was defamation against her for
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 2: him to deny that he committed a crime that he
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 2: has not been found guilty of committing. And that's it.
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 2: That's all he did was say, I did not do
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 2: what she said, and she's making it up and she's crazy,
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 2: like those were here. Those were his takes on the subject.
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: These women said that about these boys that they groomed
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 2: and raped and were grooming into committing murder. They specifically
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: targeted boys because it's unlikely that you're going to be
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 2: able to get a girl to murder somebody for you,
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 2: especially if you're another if you're a female, So they
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: specifically targeted boys. And you have to think about people
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 2: talk about these stories in terms of the nefariousness of
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: the sexual violence, and the nefariousness of the gas lighting
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: and the grooming and so on. What happens this state
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: doesn't catch the grooming happening before the murder is committed.
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 2: What happens if the kid actually pulls the trigger? Does
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: he get treated as a crime victim then, because there
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: have been some cases in the past where suddenly it
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 2: was an adult woman and an underage boy conspiring to
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 2: kill her husband, and the boy pulled the trigger, and
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 2: of course he gets tried as an adult. So it's
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 2: recognized that he's vulnerable and endangered by this process right
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 2: up until it's successful. And then if he actually gets
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: conned and he actually commits the crime and he has
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 2: to remember for the rest of his life that he
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: shot somebody and that person died right in front of him,
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 2: suddenly he's an adult who's accountable for equal participation, and
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 2: he's the mastermind who pulled the trigger and he goes
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 2: to jail, and there's this disconnect with people. But is
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 2: the crime was heinous? Right? He must be accountable as
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 2: an adult because what he did was so bad. Nothing
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 2: about that indicates that he understood that at the time
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 2: that it happened, right, Nothing about that indicates that he
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: had adult comprehension and an adult capacity to appraise his
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 2: actions and their potential consequences. It's that we're as mad
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 2: at him as we would be at an adult, and
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 2: therefore we want to treat him like an adult. And
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 2: that's wrong. Yeah, what happened here is wrong. The reporting
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: on it is wrong. They're not taking seriously the sex
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: crimes that were committed. The insidiousness is much bigger than
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 2: is being reported. And the fact that nobody in media
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 2: has spoken up and said, we recognize these boys as
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: victims when the process of brainwashing them into committing a
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 2: heinous crime is stopped before its completion. We should be
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 2: able to recognize them as victims if it's not stopped
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 2: before it's completion. Thinking about what those boys' lives would
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: have been like, Oh yeah, if these women had succeeded,
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 2: and two men would have been dead, just gone.
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: But those boys are probably going to be somewhat transformed
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: by this. Even though they did, it didn't end up happening,
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 1: so like it's they, these women probably still left quite
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 1: the mark on them, regardless, especially the grooming. I thought
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: one of these boys was like in a special education program,
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: but I couldn't be. Yeah, one of them was in
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: juvenile but I thought the other one, yes.
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 2: The other one was in special education.
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: The other one was in special education. Yes, these are
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 1: not normal guys.
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 2: They didn't act on it. They acted on One of
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 2: them acted on a guy that was a captive that
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 2: could not run away from her, that if she didn't
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: like the way he behaved, she could affect his life
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 2: in profound ways, take away privileges, cause punishments to happen,
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 2: bad mouths him to the people that were in charge
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 2: of the facility he was in, and so on. Right,
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 2: And the other one, because he was he did have
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 2: a learning disability, he was in a vulnerable position as well,
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 2: not just vulnerable because of his mentality. But when you're
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 2: in a special program in school, you have les leeway
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: where you can go and what you can do. And
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 2: if you are in a conflict or it looks like
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 2: there's trouble, you're at risk of being deemed the cause
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 2: of the trouble without an investigation because you must have
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 2: done something wrong because you have an intellectual disability, even
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 2: when it's like severe dyslexia.
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 3: Yep.
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 1: Anyway, So anyway, let us know what you guys think
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: about this one and these two stories in the comments?
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: Did you see any apparently remember those? You ever had
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: a highlights book? And there's the matching game. We have
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: two pictures and they look very similar, but there's little
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: differences yet to find the differences. See if you guys
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 1: can do that with these two stories. So anyway, we're
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 1: gonna go now into the Patron Show and we're gonna
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 1: look at the rest or at least some more of
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 1: this video how Invincible deconstructs masculinity and try to address
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 1: this person's comments on it. I had another video that
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: I was going to show at the end, which was
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: this funny little video about the ways that women lie
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: to other women so that they could like compete. It
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: was pretty funny, but for whatever reason, the file's too
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: big for me to play in the browser, so I'll
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: have to show it off another way, but I can't
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: do it now, so anyway, I'm gonna end it there.
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 1: Maybe I'll play it in the Patron show, so maybe
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: you should come check it out there, But for now,
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to that show itself, so I'm
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 1: gonna let you guys go. I want to thank you
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 1: guys for showing up to the show. I want to
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: thank Mike and Hannah as always for providing their commentary
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 1: which is invaluable. And I'm wanna thank you guys for
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: watching because like without you, we'd be forgiving to the voids.
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: So with all that said, if you guys like this video,
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 1: please hit subscribe if you're not already subscribe to the
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: bellf notifications. Leave as a comment, let us know what
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 1: you guys think about what we discussed on the show today,
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: and please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 1: you guys so much for coming on today's episode of
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: HPR News and we will talk to you guys in
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: the next one.
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 5: Seel Men's Right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 5: literal machines. They are talking point machines. They are impossible
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 5: to deal with, especially if you have especially if you
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 5: have a couple of dudes who have good memory on
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 5: top of that too, Holy shit, you're fucked