Latest / V / Here We Go Again... | Episode 351

Transcript

Here We Go Again... | Episode 351 · V

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hey everybody, welcome to Vince on a Monday. Great to
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: have you with us as always. We've got an epic
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: show ahead for you. The Fang Fang files have been released,
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: despite the fact that Eric Swalwell definitely did not want
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: those out there. I've got the details on that. We've
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: also got some more Fauci files, a lot of Fs today,
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: coming out this weekend, including the warnings that top government
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: officials were sending to Anthony Fauci about how dastardly those
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: vaccines were and so much more. We have a lot
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: to get to today. Great to have you with us
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: on a Monday, as always. Very, very busy, busy show ahead.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: But first, I want to thank the fine sponsors who
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: make the show possible. That today includes the good people
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: at Quince. August is the perfect time. It's August to
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: hit reset before the autumn rush begins. And honestly, I
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: can't think of a better place to start than the
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: old closet. And that's why I love shopping at Quince.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Quince is all about fewer, better pieces. Their clothes are
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: are made with premium materials. They're built to last. They're
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: designed to become the items you reach for day after day.
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: They're great. And I constantly wear the Quince stuff. I'm
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: always looking in the closet going, where did I, Quince, Quince, Quince, Quince, Quince.
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: Love it.
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: Best of all, everything is priced 50 to 80% less
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: than similar brands because they work directly with ethical factories
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: and they cut out the middlemen. Upgrade your every day.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: Download the Quince app for app exclusive offers or go
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: to quince.com slash Vince. Get free shipping on your order
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: and 365-day returns. It's now available in Canada and the UK, too,
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: if that's your thing. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash Vince. Well, well, well,
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: fine to see you fine people today. You know, I
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: saw somebody in the chat go, Vince, you're going to
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: compete with Dan for the weekend updates? You know, I
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: don't actually offer weekend updates that often.
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: I don't know.
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: Do you want weekend updates? Do you want to know
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: what happened on my weekend? I did post a photo
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: to Instagram. I guess here I go. I'm going to
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: give you some. I did post a photo to my
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: Instagram yesterday. We we grew San Marzano tomatoes for the
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: first time this year. We grew a ton of them.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: And then so now they're all starting to ripen. And
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: I went out this weekend and harvested a bunch with
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: my 12-year-old. We harvested a ton of tomatoes. And then
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: we made tomato sauce this weekend. Sunday night, my wife
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: made a homegrown tomato sauce. It was so good. It
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: was wonderful. It actually came out great. I don't know.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: I think the San Marzano was, like, sweet but not
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: too acidic. It was awesome. It really came out wonderfully.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: So that was good. I did some yard work this weekend.
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: Anybody else do yard work?
• 2:33
  Speaker 3: I was.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: I was trimming the trees. I was cutting off all
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: the branches. I was out with a chainsaw. And then
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: of course I get a chainsaw in my hand and
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: I'm like, I'm just now all of a sudden a
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: small job becomes, you know what? That tree needs to
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: be cleaned up too. And I'm working every tree in
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: the whole backyard. The only problem with trimming trees is
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: you got to figure out how to throw everything out afterwards.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: Now I got branches all over the place. And so
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: I was gathering them up and, you know, tethering them
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: to a cart and dragging them out of the yard.
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: So that was fun. That was my weekend. And then
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: I went to church. I always go to church. Anybody
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: else go to church? It was good.
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: It was good.
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: This guy, who's this? EMTNS goes, no weekend updates. I
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: don't care what you do on your time off.
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: Sorry. Let's get to the news. We have Kentucky's so-called
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: moderate Democrat governor, Andy Beshear. This guy, Andy Beshear. They
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: say he's a moderate. He's a moderate. He's a big
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: old moderate.
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: What is that?
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: What makes him moderate? destroying the electoral college? Does that
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: make him moderate? Here he is on one of the
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: Sunday shows this weekend representing the moderate wing of the
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: Democrat Party. Watch Andy Beshear. Got one.
• 3:41
  Speaker 4: The poll also finds rank and file Democrats want leaders
• 3:44
  Speaker 4: to be pushing for making big changes, not smaller ones,
• 3:49
  Speaker 4: even if they're easier to do. Also says they want
• 3:51
  Speaker 4: to feel like the party is, as you said, fighting
• 3:54
  Speaker 4: for them. What is then, well, what I'm curious about
• 3:59
  Speaker 4: is what, given they're looking for big ideas, what would
• 4:02
  Speaker 4: be your biggest, boldest idea that you're promoting these days?
• 4:06
  Speaker 5: Well, I'll give you two because people want you to
• 4:09
  Speaker 5: fix the darn economy and they want you to fix
• 4:11
  Speaker 5: the darn government. On the economy, it is time for
• 4:14
  Speaker 5: an aspirational investment in housing that can bring down the
• 4:18
  Speaker 5: cost of especially first-time home ownership. People can actually see
• 4:22
  Speaker 5: that progress all over the country. We ought to tie
• 4:25
  Speaker 5: the federal dollars to speed. You've got to break ground
• 4:28
  Speaker 5: and you've got to do it quickly. Get through the
• 4:30
  Speaker 5: over-regulation and the nimbyism. But I tell you what, people
• 4:33
  Speaker 5: also think this government is broken. So a fix-the-darn-government constitutional amendment,
• 4:38
  Speaker 5: it is time. It should outlaw partisan redistricting and enshrine.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: Part of the Voting Rights Act right there in the Constitution.
• 4:46
  Speaker 2: It should create term limits for Congress and the Supreme Court.
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: No more gaming those appointments.
• 4:51
  Speaker 5: It should also overturn Citizens United and, I think, call
• 4:55
  Speaker 5: for direct elections of the president and the vice president.
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: That could actually make things work.
• 5:00
  Speaker 5: A big idea that would, yes, change government, but in
• 5:04
  Speaker 5: a way enshrined in the Constitution where people would know
• 5:07
  Speaker 5: it's going to get better.
• 5:08
  Speaker 4: I didn't realize you support abolishing the Electoral College if
• 5:11
  Speaker 4: you're saying direct election of the president and vice president.
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I've said it a number of times.
• 5:16
  Speaker 5: It's because in Kentucky, we will never see a candidate
• 5:19
  Speaker 5: for president or vice president unless they're from here.
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: Why? Because people just expect that it'll go one way
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: or the other.
• 5:26
  Speaker 5: It's the idea that someone would get elected not just
• 5:29
  Speaker 5: knowing about seven states, but having to earn votes all
• 5:32
  Speaker 5: over the United States.
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: I certainly think it's time.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: Okay, there's a lot to unpack there. One, on the
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: housing stuff that he talks about early. Notice, of course,
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: that his solution to the high cost of housing is
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: more government interference in the market. His thought is like, well,
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: we just need to send a lot of federal tax
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: dollars to people so that they can buy houses. Dude,
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: stop it. Knock it off. All of this government spending
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: has only made life more unaffordable. It never results in
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: flourishing and prosperity. knock that crap off. This guy's supposed
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: to be the moderate. What did I tell you last week?
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: Remember this?
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: We were talking at some length last week that this
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: idea that there's some sort of meaningful division between the
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: outward socialists and the establishment Democrats in the party is
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: completely belied by the record of the establishment Democrats. When
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden's the one who's kicking open the border and
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: then pretending like he's securing it, And the socialists are
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: the ones who say we shouldn't have borders or immigration enforcement.
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: The only difference between those two parties or those two
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: camps is that the socialists are just being more honest
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: about their intentions. The establishment Democrats share the same policy priorities.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: Andy Beshear is angry that the United States Supreme Court
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: has good justices on it right now. He doesn't want
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas to continue to serve on that court. He
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: doesn't want Justice Alito to continue to serve on that court.
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: And so he's calling for a term limit for them
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: because he wants to get rid of the most compelling
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: and thoughtful justices we have. He's a pack the Supreme
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: Court guy, and he's an abolish the electoral college guy. Now,
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: the founders, in their wisdom, set up the electoral college intentionally,
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: very intentionally, because the founders were trying to safeguard against
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: the tyranny of the majority. We don't have a direct
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: democracy in the United States of America. We don't have
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: a government that is set up by the fleeting whims
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: of the public. It is set up in such a
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: way that it is very deliberatively constructed. There's a role
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: for the states as a whole in our system. And
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: that's where the Electoral College comes in. That's what the
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: Electoral College does. The reality here, the argument that Andy
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: Beshear is making is like, well, because of the Electoral College,
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: the candidates spend all of their time in these states
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: that are going to give them these Electoral College votes. OK,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: that's true. They do spend a lot of time as
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: they campaign in the swing states for big Electoral College
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: votes like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. But there are some states
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: now which have so many Electoral College votes and they're
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: sort of a fait accompli. Like California, do candidates spend
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: a ton of time in California? It's got the most
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: electoral college votes. No, they don't. No, they don't. They
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: might make a stop or two, typically the Democrats, but
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: that's a solidly Democrat state. It's just considered like all
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: of those votes are going to go to Democrats. They
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: don't spend a tremendous amount of time there right now.
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: But in Andy Beshear's world, What would change is he
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: would abolish the Electoral College and then the Democrats would
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: spend all of their time in California. That would be
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: the difference. You see, if we got rid of the
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: Electoral College, if we actually fulfilled what he wanted, that
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: means that Democrat candidates would not spend a single moment
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: in the so-called flyover states. Democrat candidates would concentrate all
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: of their energies on places like California and New York
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: and Illinois. They'd be in Chicago. They'd be in New
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: York City. They'd be in Los Angeles. They wouldn't spend
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: any time getting to know the rest of the country
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: or what the concerns are for any other American anywhere.
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton didn't go to Wisconsin when they're with an
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: electoral college in place. What would happen if you got
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: rid of the electoral college? No shot a Democrat's going
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: to Wisconsin to try and earn a vote there. This
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: is not a for-the-people arrangement. Andy Beshear's acting like everybody's
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: going to show up in Kentucky. You want candidates to
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: straight up ignore Kentucky? Get rid of the electoral college.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: What a stupid idea. And of course, he knows better.
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: Like the thought process here is that they just want
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: to concentrate all of their money and power and efforts
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: on the concentrated metropolitan areas where they have all of
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: these Democrat votes built in. That's what they want to do.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: That's really the scheme here. Just keep an eye on
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: this because that's really what the design of all of
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: this is supposed to be. They don't want to have
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: to exert effort. And one more thing here. Well, there's
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: a lot more things, but here's one. one more on
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: my mind right now. Right now, the way that the
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: electoral process works, these presidential candidates, as they go into
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: swing states, not only do they campaign inside the swing state,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: they also buy advertising in the swing state. They support
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: local media in the swing state. They support local jobs
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: in the swing states. and they have specifically tailored messaging
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: for the swing states as they're campaigning within them. If
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: you get rid of the electoral college, what's gonna happen
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: is it's gonna concentrate all of that much more power, money,
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: infrastructure into the national media. All advertising will be national advertising.
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: It'll all be concentrated in the major metropolitan media markets
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: and on national advertising. That's the way this would work.
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: It's an entirely corrupt scheme. Everything is a rejection of
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: reaching the average American all across the country. That's what
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: the moderate governor, the so-called moderate governor of Kentucky is
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: advocating for. It's pretty radical stuff. And the founders were
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: trying to safeguard against this. Andy Beshear wants to wreck it.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: So next time somebody tells you, well, they're not the socialists,
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: they're not the DSA types. They're not with the Democrat socialists.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: They're totally different. They're much more moderate. They're much more reasonable.
• 11:17
  Speaker 4: Really?
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: Because Andy Beshear is kind of the face of the moderates.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: And he's the guy who says he wants to destroy
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: what the founders have built. Think about that. Kind of
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: amazing stuff. You know, the Democrats themselves are once again
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: in the election rigging process for their own party as well.
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: This weekend, The Democrats declared that South Carolina is officially
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: going to become their first in the nation primary for
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: their party. Now, for our whole lives, we've watched as
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: the Iowa caucuses go first and the New Hampshire primary.
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: The Democrats are trying to change that because they hate
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: Iowa and they hate New Hampshire and they don't want
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: those states selecting their primary nominee. That's just true. It's
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: just quite obviously true. In fact, let me take you
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: back to 2020 for a moment. Remember what happened in 2020?
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: Who here remembers the chaos of the Iowa caucuses in
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: 2020 for the Democrats? If you go back to 2020,
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: they hold the Iowa caucuses. They screwed up everything. You
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: didn't know for a long time who won those caucuses.
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: You're like, what the hell's going on here? And eventually
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: they declared that Pete Bootedge Edge had apparently succeeded and
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: won the Iowa caucuses, although Bernie Sanders had won the
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: popular vote inside of the Iowa caucuses, whatever the hell
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: that means. And then in New Hampshire, Bernie Sanders goes
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: on to get a victory. Nevada, Bernie Sanders gets the victory.
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: So it goes Buttigieg, Bernie, Bernie. So at that point,
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: you're going, well, what the hell is Joe Biden doing
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: in this race? What about the rest of them? Because
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: it kind of seems like a Buttigieg and Bernie situation
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: at that point. That was until South Carolina. That was
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: until Barack Obama and James Clyburn got involved. They got
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: the rest of the field to quit besides Bernie Sanders
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: because they couldn't control him in that case. And they
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: gave the nomination to Joe Biden. You remember all of
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: the election rigging that was going on in the Democrat primary?
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: That's what happened. And then Biden wins in South Carolina.
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: The rest of the field drops out. The rest is history.
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: Now the Democrat Party at the national level is trying
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: to rig that process again, but earlier. They're getting rid
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: of Iowa. They're getting rid of New Hampshire. And now
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: they're going with South Carolina first. Now they say this
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: is because of how important black voters are to their coalition.
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: But clearly, the most important thing to them is not
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: the temperament of black voters or what black voters desire.
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: It's entirely about what state is our best chance to
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: rig this process and make it appear democratic. And that is...
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: to the Democrats is South Carolina. That's what they believe.
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: So now, as of this weekend, they have made a decision.
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: They say South Carolina is going to hold the first
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: Democrat presidential primary. Here's the piece from CBS. And Democrats
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: on Saturday approved this new arrangement, nominating calendar for 2028,
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: cementing South Carolina's place as the first official Democrat primary state.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: As the party looks to elevate states that better reflect
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: its diverse coalition of voters, there's CBS buying the nonsense.
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: The vote came during the DNC's summer meeting. This was
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: in Austin this weekend. Members signing off on the schedule
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: begins with South Carolina on January 22nd, followed by Nevada,
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan, and Florida. Virginia rounding out
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: the early state lineup throughout February, all voting before Super Tuesday. Now,
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: they go on to say that not everybody in this
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: is on board. Democrat leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire,
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: previously the first and second states to hold primary contests,
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: excoriated the new map as soon as the Rules and
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: Bylaws Committee recommended it, arguing it diminishes the role of
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: states that have long taken on the responsibility of shaping
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: the presidential nomination system.
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: Battlefield.
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: Momentum for South Carolina's ascension in the calendar traces back
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: to 2020. That's when a victory there shifted momentum in
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: the primary to Joe Biden after he performed poorly in Iowa,
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: New Hampshire, and Nevada. Under pressure from Biden and his allies,
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: the DNC moved South Carolina to first in the 2024 calendar.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: That's true. That cycle, New Hampshire defied the DNC's revised schedule.
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: This is great. New Hampshire, please keep causing trouble, and
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: held its primary before South Carolina. They cited a state
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: law that mandate that they hold the first primary. In response,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: the party stripped the contest in New Hampshire of its
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: sanctioned status. DNC Chairman Ken Martin has signaled that if
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: New Hampshire jumps ahead again in 2028, punishment will be
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: more severe. That's right. The punishment will be more severe.
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: They're going to deploy Ilhan Omar to tour the state.
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: It's going to be a very severe punishment in New Hampshire.
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: I love this. New Hampshire, please keep defying the Democrats.
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: Go ahead. Hold your primary early. So they can't even
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: organize a primary schedule without chaos, these Democrats. They're really
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: something else. So they screwed it all up, and they're
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: trying to rig the primary process to have their establishment picks,
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: and you're witnessing it just in case you're wondering what's
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: going on. Also, on the point about the Democrats, you know,
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: the establishment versus the socialists, what do Americans believe about Democrats?
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: You ready for this? Check this data out. Breitbart has
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: a great report up this weekend. Look at this. Poll.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: Quarter of Americans say most Democrats are socialists. A quarter
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: of America, that's a ton of Americans. You know, we
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: live in a country of over 300 million people. You know,
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: that's a huge, huge number of Americans say that most
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: Democrats are socialists. A quarter of Americans believe most Democrats
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: are socialists. A recent survey from Economist and YouGov revealed.
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: The survey very simply asked respondents, do you think most
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: Democrats are socialists? That's a good question. That's a great
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: way to ask it. It's a relevant question, Breitbart reports.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: given the rise of Democrat Socialists of America candidates all
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: across the country and the left's promotion of socialist policies. Overall,
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: over a quarter of all Americans, 26%, say they believe
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: that most Democrats are in fact socialists. However, 42% said
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: they don't believe that, but nearly one-third, 32%, remain unsure.
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure. They might be socialists. That's a terrible situation.
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: Can you imagine having a political party And a third
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: of the country isn't sure whether or not your ideology
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: is a totalitarian, homicidal, psychopathic ideology like socialism. 26% say
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: they believe they're socialists. That's bad news for the Democrats, man.
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: Imagine being a Democrat campaign strategist. 26% Democrats are socialists. 32%,
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: they might be. 42% said they don't believe it. Now
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: that 42%, remember, this is all Americans. This would be Democrats, Republicans, independents,
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: everything in between. 42% said they don't believe it. Okay.
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: Some of this has to be cope. Some of this
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: just has to be Democrats who are like, we're not socialists.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: We're not socialists. We can't be socialists. You got a
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: lot of socialism going on. Opinions vary along party lines.
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: For instance, most Democrats, 61% said that most Democrats are
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: not socialists. This is cope. Although 12% of Democrats say
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: they are. Yeah, and they're proud of it. Most Republicans,
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: 54% now believe that most Democrats are socialists, followed by
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: 25% who are not sure, and just 21% who said
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: they are not. A plurality of independents, 44% said that
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: most Democrats are not socialists, although 41% said they're not sure,
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: while 15% said they are. Look, I'm telling you right now,
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: you don't want to go into the midterms with the
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: American public thinking that your party is dominated by socialism.
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: Not a winning message. Not going to sell. Not going
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: to be a great message to go into the midterms with.
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: So the Republicans, insofar as they have their opponents absolutely
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: in flames, that's good news. But what will Republicans have
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: to offer? What can Republicans run on? I'm glad you asked,
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: because in a moment, we're going to go over what
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: President Trump's poll is advising the Republican Party to run on.
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: I'll see what you think about all of this. Get
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: your reaction to it. We'll get America's reaction to it
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: coming up on this edition of Vince. But hold on tight.
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: I want to thank one of the fine sponsors who
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: make today's show possible. That's Brickhouse Nutrition. We love Brickhouse.
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: Everybody's talking about weight loss injections. The results are very dramatic.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: They work by lowering your blood sugar, reduce appetite. But
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: what if you want to lose the weight and you
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: don't want the painful weekly injections, especially when you hear
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: about some of those side effects? Well, that's why the
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: doctors at Brickhouse Nutrition created a great weight loss supplement
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: called Lean, and the results are remarkable. The studied ingredients
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: in Lean have been shown to help lower your blood sugar,
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: help you burn fat by converting it into energy, and
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: help you curb your appetite and your cravings, so you're
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: less hungry. But listen, Lean by Brickhouse Nutrition is not
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: for the casual dieters, for frustrated dieters, serious people with
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: 10 or more pounds to lose. Now, if that's you,
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: let's get you started. 20% off, free rush shipping. Visit TakeLean.com
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: and or Vince for your discount. That's promo code VINCE. TakeLean.com.
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: any disease, and it's not a substitute or alternative for
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: care from a healthcare provider. Thank you, Brickhouse. Thank you, Lean.
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: Great operation. Appreciate their ongoing support of our program. They've
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: been so wonderful through the years. All right. Let's see here.
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: I'm going to bounce this off of you, Chad, and
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: you tell me whether or not the Trump pollster here,
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: Tony Fabrizio, is on the right track of what the
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: Republican Party should run on. And the summary here comes
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: to us from Sean Spicer. I'll just, I'll use the
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: Sean Spicer tweet. We'll bounce off of that. Ready? Here's
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: what Sean says. He says, interesting polling details from Axios.
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: Top Trump World campaign officials, including James Blair... Pollster Tony
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: Fabrizio and Senate Leadership Fund Executive Director Alex Latcham briefed
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: senators and aides August 5th on the midterms just a
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: few days ago. They presented polling on the party's strongest
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: potential campaign messages, according to slides that Axios viewed. One
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: of the strongest, going after health insurance companies. Going after
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: health insurance companies. Republicans had a 46-point advantage. when calling
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: for greater transparency around insurers' profits, claim denials, and wait
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: times for patient care, while hitting Democrats for lining insurers' pockets.
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: Health insurance, going after the health insurance companies. Ladies and gentlemen,
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: do you agree with this? There's a 46-point advantage here. Now,
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: there's no question that Democrats have worked overtime to line
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: the pockets of the insurance companies. No question whatsoever. Obamacare
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: was nothing more than a gigantic giveaway to the health
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: insurance industry. Obamacare and the so-called Affordable Care Act, which
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: has made health care anything but affordable. And when it
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: came to COVID-19, Nobody worked harder to enrich the big
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: pharmaceutical companies than the Democrats, despite the fact that Republicans,
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: excuse me, Americans were being subjected to the COVID jab
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: under duress, under the threat of the loss of their jobs.
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: People's lives were upended and destroyed by all of this.
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: The Democrats are the ones who are protecting all of
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: the cruel so-called medical operations that have been mutilating children
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: all across the country, trying to prevent your scrutiny or
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: concern from taking hold, which is like getting the health
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: care system back on track. Do you agree here that
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: this is a massive, massive issue worth campaigning on for Republicans?
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: The president's been fighting to bring the cost of prescription
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: drugs down. He's been fighting to make it so that
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: these big drug companies aren't selling these drugs at cut
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: rates overseas while sticking Americans with the bill to develop
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: the drugs. These are the types of things that the
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: president's been fighting for. Do you think this is a
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: big issue? Now, somebody said in our chat, no, it's
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: the economy, stupid. Who said that? Subvet said that. But
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: I would argue that this is an economic concern, clearly.
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: If you are paying out the nose for health insurance
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: and then your health insurance company is like, yeah, we're
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: not going to cover that. We're not covering that procedure.
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: We're not covering that drug. We're not covering that health
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: care needs you have. This is maddening to American citizens.
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: Maddening.
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: So that's what Trump's pollster, Tony Fabrizio, is saying is
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: a huge, huge detail, according to the American people. It
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: is one of them. This is on the list, says
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: Jen Fisher. I agree.
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: I totally agree.
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: All right, number two, let's see here. What else do
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: they have? Banning congressional stock trading and cracking down on fraud.
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: Thank you, J.D. Vance, for doing that. Also emerged as
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: potentially powerful issues. 44-point and 38-point advantages for Republicans, respectively.
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: So the American people think that when it comes to
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: congressional stock trading— and the people who are the most corrupt,
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: they look at Nancy Pelosi. That's what this means to me.
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: They're looking at Nancy Pelosi going, you're disgusting. You've been
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: fully enriched by your access to power. And they see
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: Republicans as the answer to this. So when it comes
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: to Republicans, banning congressional stock trading and cracking down on fraud,
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: huge GOP advantage. You know, cracking down on fraud, it's
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: not a shock that Republicans have a huge advantage here
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: because Democrats... are the fraudsters. Republicans are the guys who
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: are cracking down on the fraud, led by people like J.D.
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: Vance and Colin McDonald over at the Justice Department. You've
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: got Scott Besson.
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: All over this.
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: You've got Dr. Mehmet Oz, all of these people within
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: the administration cracking down on fraud every day. Every day,
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: I've got a new press conference on the fraudsters who
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: are being arrested and the money that we're getting back
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: as we go after them. It's a huge deal. Now,
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: this makes it no wonder why the administration keeps having J.D.
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: Vance and company do these press conferences. It's a huge
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: statement for the American people that they're going after the fraudsters,
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: but also it redounds to the electoral benefit of the
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: Republican Party. Smart. Very smart. The intrigue. Now, let's get
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: into this because this is interesting. Messaging on the SAVE Act.
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: Messaging on the SAVE Act had far less upside. Interesting.
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: Giving Republicans just a 14-point advantage over Democrat messaging on
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: the issue, according to the results shared.
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: In the meeting.
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: Now, what is Democrat? Okay, what's the Democrat message on
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: the SAVE America Act? Is anybody in chat now? Now,
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: Kickley Bates says SAVE America Act is number one. Nothing
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: else matters if we don't have fair elections. Totally agree.
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: But you are assessing... the importance of the issue in
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: terms of the stability, the existence of America. You're making
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: the right assessment. But this question is fundamentally about what
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: messaging resonates the most with American voters. That's what these
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: questions are about. So what is the Democrat messaging on
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: the Save America Act? Yeah, that women would lose the vote,
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: that it's racist, that it causes climate change. That's pretty funny. Yeah,
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: they're lying about it. They're pretending like President Trump is
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: trying to rig an election. Meanwhile, what President Trump is
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: attempting to do is stop Democrats from rigging elections. In fact,
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: it would stop any politician from any party from rigging
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: elections to have secure elections. But what this tells us
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: is that the Democrats in their messaging have had some
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: success in in misleading people about what the Save America
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: Act does. Now, have they had overwhelming success?
• 28:08
  Speaker 5: No.
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: Republicans still have a 14-point advantage on this issue. It's
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: not a slim majority. They've got a huge majority advantage
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: on this issue. That's a big deal. Voters prefer a
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: Republican who supports the Save America Act by double digits
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: over a Democrat who opposes it. We have a litany
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: of policies that deliver for Americans who won't put us
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: over the top in November, a source familiar with the
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: presentation said. So I'm just telling you in advance, I
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: want you to know what's coming. If you're interested, if
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: you're like, why is the political advertising like this going
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: into the midterms? Why are Republicans spending money on these ads?
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: It looks like the three big issues are going to
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: be going after the health insurance companies, which by the way,
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: the Democrats have pretended to do for years. If Republicans
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: do this, they are going to destroy the Democrat advantage
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: on that issue, which they don't deserve an advantage on, right?
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: So you'll get Republican messaging on that, banning the corruption
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: of congressional stock trading. Watch, Nancy Pelosi's face is going
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: to be all over all sorts of advertising on a
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: television near you. And then the Save America Act, which
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: is not a small issue. It's a massive issue. But
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: it just doesn't have the same sort of voter appeal
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: as the first two issues did. Does that make sense?
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: Just want to give you a sense of what's coming next. Oh,
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: it's KickLibAss? I'm sorry. I've been saying KicklyBass, I think,
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: for as long as I've seen your name. It's KickLibAss.
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: That makes way more sense. KicklyBass sounds fun, though.
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: I don't know.
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: KickLibAss. Okay, fun. Anyway, that's the advertising that's coming. Now,
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: having said all that, why hasn't it arrived yet? Well,
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: it's about to. The president is about to unleash the
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: midterm war chest. The Republicans have a huge money advantage
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: right now. Huge. President Trump and J.D. Vance have raised
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: so much more money than the Democrats who are, this
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: will not come as a shock to you, in debt.
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: They're in debt. They're in massive amounts of debt right
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: now on the Democrat side. But the Republican side, there's
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: a huge war chest that President Trump has put together,
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: despite the fact that you've got, you know, some, what
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: do you call them? Dunderheads in the United States Senate.
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: Some idiots who've decided to go on vacation rather than
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: do things like pass the Safe America Act. Still, President
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: Trump has had a lot of success raising funds for
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: the party. He is about to unleash the war chest.
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: According to Axios, let me fast forward to the spending
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: component of this. Blair said the following.
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: Here it is.
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: One of the president's top advisors, Blair, says to expect MAGA, Inc.
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: and Republican National Committee money to start flowing into midterm
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: races soon, though he did not specify when or where.
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: According to two sources familiar with what was said, National
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Tim Scott echoed the message, quote,
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: good news coming our way is what they basically indicated.
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: He told Axios in a brief interview after their meeting.
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: Anxiety has grown in Republican campaign circles over when, where,
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: and whether Trump will unleash the more than $ 400 million
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: sitting in MAGA Inc. to boost Republicans in the midterms.
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: President Trump telling Punchbowl News recently, quote, I control it.
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: I can spend it on pretty much anything I want. But,
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: he added, I'm going to help Republicans. Yeah, no kidding.
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: Of course he will. That's it. So hundreds of millions
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: of dollars about to be unleashed. And those are the
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: messages you can probably expect. Just here to tell you
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: what's about to happen.
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: All right.
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: More ahead on the program, including another left wing fake
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: scandal of the week. We've got that and so much
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: more to get to all ahead. Oh, and Fang Fang,
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: the Fang Fang files. Holy crap. All ahead on this
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: edition of Vince. Before we get there, though, I want
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: to thank the fine people at Bull and Branch for
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: supporting the program. You ever climb into a bed on
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: a summer night and instantly regret it? Your sheets are
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: sticking to your legs, not breathing at all, and you're
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: debating how much you need to turn the air conditioning
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: down and whether or not you can afford the AC
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: bill as a result of it. It's all so crazy.
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: Sleeping hot is the worst. This is why I love
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: Bowling Branch. Their summer bedding is breathable, lightweight, designed to
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: help you stay cool all night long. Their sheets are
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: made from 100% organic cotton. They're woven specifically for airflow,
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: not just softness. The Colonized household, we love our Bowling
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: Branch sheets. We've had them for years. I sleep so
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: well in them. And I love my wife even more
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: because she purchased them. Sleep cooler this summer with Bowling Branch.
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: Get 15% off your first order plus free shipping at bowlingbranch.com
• 32:55
  Speaker 1: slash Vince with the code Vince. That's bowlingbranch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D, branch.com
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: slash Vince, code Vince. Unlock 15% off. bowlingbranch.com slash Vince,
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: code Vince. Exclusions apply. See bowlingbranch.com For details. Thank you,
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: Bowling Branch. And thank you also to Bone Charge. We've
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: been using the Bone Charge products in our household. We
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: love them. I use the infrared sauna blanket. It's amazing.
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: Allison uses the red light face mask. It's amazing. Ever
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: since they sent them to us, we can't recommend them enough.
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: You know, that sauna blanket is great because I can
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: just literally wrap myself up and I've got a sauna.
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: I've got an infrared heat sauna wrapped around me.
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: It's great.
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: I've noticed a real difference in how relaxed and rejuvenated
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: I feel afterward. Allison uses the red light face mask
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: because red light therapy works. It is very impressive. She
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: uses it because it improves her skin's texture. It reduces inflammation.
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: She has seen fantastic results. It's like having a mini
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: spa treatment right at home. If you're thinking about trying
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: these products out, you are in luck. All you have
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: to do is head to bonecharge.com. That's B-O-N charge.com. Use
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: the code Vince at checkout. Get 15% off. Both of
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: these products have made a huge impact on us and
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: our wellness. I think you're going to love them, too.
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: Use the code VINCEBONDCHARGE.COM. Save 15%. These statements and products
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: have not been evaluated by the FDA. These products are
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: or condition. Our thanks, as always, to Bond Charge. Appreciate them.
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: All right, all right, all right. Is it time? Should
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: we do the Left Fake Scandal of the Week? It
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: is time. and now it's time for the left's fake
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: scandal of the week extra extra Yes, indeed, the last
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: fake scandal of the week. This week is that, well,
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: it's the same as every week. They claim that the
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: United States Justice Department is supposed to be independent of
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: the President of the United States, that the President should
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: have no control over the Justice Department, that the Justice
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: Department should do whatever it damn well pleases. Now, where
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: is that in the Constitution? It ain't there, but it
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: doesn't stop the media. When you've got a Republican in office,
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: suddenly the Justice Department needs to be a complete completely
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: different branch of government. How does that work? It doesn't.
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: Here is Todd Blanch smacking down this nonsense on Meet
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: the Press this weekend. Cut to watch.
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: Just heard in your address to the Justice Department staff
• 35:25
  Speaker 3: this week, you said you and DOJ will, quote, uphold
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: the law without fear or favor. You, of course, used
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: to be President Trump's former personal defense attorney. Can you
• 35:37
  Speaker 3: pledge that the Justice Department will always act independently of
• 35:41
  Speaker 3: the White House?
• 35:42
  Speaker 6: Well, there's a big difference between saying we will always
• 35:45
  Speaker 6: do our job and investigate any case and act independently
• 35:49
  Speaker 6: of the White House. No, I'm not going to pledge that.
• 35:52
  Speaker 6: And no attorney general should ever pledge that. The president,
• 35:55
  Speaker 6: I mean, if I were to pledge I will be
• 35:56
  Speaker 6: independent of the White House, what that means is that
• 35:59
  Speaker 6: if President Trump says I want the Department of Justice
• 36:02
  Speaker 6: to go after every violent criminal in this country, which
• 36:05
  Speaker 6: is what he has said, What you're saying to me
• 36:08
  Speaker 6: is I should say, no, sir, not going to do it.
• 36:10
  Speaker 6: So I will act with integrity. Our prosecutors will act
• 36:14
  Speaker 6: with integrity. We will prosecute without fear or any sort
• 36:18
  Speaker 6: of favor. And that's exactly what we've been doing. And
• 36:20
  Speaker 6: that's what every Department of Justice should do.
• 36:23
  Speaker 3: Well, I guess big picture, if the president asks you
• 36:25
  Speaker 3: to do something that you feel crosses an ethical or
• 36:27
  Speaker 3: legal line, would you do it?
• 36:29
  Speaker 6: The president will never ask me to do something unethical
• 36:32
  Speaker 6: or illegal. He never has. He never will. And no,
• 36:36
  Speaker 6: I swore to the Constitution of the United States like
• 36:39
  Speaker 6: every cabinet secretary has done and like every attorney general
• 36:42
  Speaker 6: before me has done. And so this narrative that's mostly
• 36:46
  Speaker 6: pushed by the left and pushed by the media that
• 36:49
  Speaker 6: the president's going to pull me aside and ask me
• 36:51
  Speaker 6: to do something illegal is completely a false narrative, not true,
• 36:56
  Speaker 6: will not happen, and hasn't happened.
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they're scandal mongering. They're just making shit up. That's
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: the whole game plan. They're just going to make it up.
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: Trump's biggest power. You know, it's amazing. It's just amazing
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: the extent to which this is nothing more than a
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: gigantic cope and a ton of projection onto President Trump
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: for the sins that the left actually commits when it's
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: in charge of the United States Justice Department. They routinely
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: abuse their power. If attorneys general quitting their jobs over
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: being told to do something unlawful was a thing that
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: had to happen. It would have happened under Biden with
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: Merrick freaking Garland. If Garland had any decency whatsoever, he
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: would have resigned in protest to the way his Justice
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: Department was being used by the Biden administration to go
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: after Donald Trump and everybody around him. They were leading
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: investigations on hundreds of conservative organizations. They were going after
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: people like Mark Houck and people singing church hymns outside
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: of abortion mills. They were writing down the license plate
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: numbers of parents who were speaking at school board meetings
• 38:06
  Speaker 1: in protest of their kids being abused inside of the
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: school systems. President Trump was putting mugshot after mugshot after
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: mugshot in Democrat jurisdictions across this country in an effort
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: to rig our elections. Spare us your lectures about how
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: to run the Justice Department. Todd Blanche is the right
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: guy at the right time for this job. And the
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: media are furious that he's in it. Why? Because he
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: is an agent of accountability. He's in a position to
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: actually do something about the injustices that have played out
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: in our country. And the media had a role in
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: those injustices. They were water carriers for that tyranny. And now,
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: because they're concerned that that story is going to come
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: out in its totality, They're doing everything they can to
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: try and suppress Todd Blanche's efforts to actually get justice.
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: I'm glad to see he's not falling for it. And
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: I'm glad he's standing up for the Constitution. How hard
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: is that to do? Why does this feel unusual? You
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: should stand up for the Constitution. We have an executive
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: branch for whom the Attorney General works. The Attorney General
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: of the United States works for the President of the
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: United States. In other words, I'M NOT GOING TO TALK
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: ABOUT THAT. I'M NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT THAT. THE
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: STATES IS RESPONSIVE TO THE UNITED STATES IS RESPONSIVE TO
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY VIRTUE OF THE fact that he
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: works for the president. If he was working outside of
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: that structure, you'd be like, wait a second, this is
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: completely unconstitutional. That doesn't work. It's amazing. And so Todd
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: Blanch points out, he goes, look, I wish every attorney
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: general in history would answer this question the same exact way,
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: because I'm right. Cut three, watch.
• 39:47
  Speaker 3: Would you take his opinions into consideration when he says,
• 39:50
  Speaker 3: I think this case should be revived? Will you take
• 39:52
  Speaker 3: that into consideration?
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: So, hold on.
• 39:55
  Speaker 6: Will I take the president of the United States' view
• 39:59
  Speaker 6: on something into consideration?
• 40:01
  Speaker 2: Yes, of course.
• 40:03
  Speaker 6: And I hope every attorney general in history would not
• 40:06
  Speaker 6: answer that question differently. Just let's play that out. The
• 40:11
  Speaker 6: president of the United States, the elected president of the
• 40:13
  Speaker 6: United States, says something to me, and I'm supposed to
• 40:16
  Speaker 6: say to you, I would say, nope.
• 40:19
  Speaker 2: I mean, that's not the way it works.
• 40:20
  Speaker 6: Now, the president is extraordinarily, every day he wakes up
• 40:26
  Speaker 6: with one mission, which is making this country better. And
• 40:29
  Speaker 6: as it relates to me, making this country safer. So
• 40:32
  Speaker 6: if he has a view on that, he talks about
• 40:34
  Speaker 6: it on social media. He talks about it when he
• 40:36
  Speaker 6: speaks to the American people. That's certainly something that I
• 40:39
  Speaker 6: listen to.
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: It's the Constitution, Capisce. Do you understand this? Do you
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: understand this? What's so difficult about this concept, Kristen Welk?
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: Are you familiar with this? It's like, why does Todd
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: Blanch even have to explain it? It's that brain dead.
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: It's that stupid. Why would that even come up in
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: an interview like this? It's like a basic civics lesson.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: The Justice Department works for the President of the United States.
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: If the President had told you to do something, would
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: you do it?
• 41:05
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: I work for the President.
• 41:09
  Speaker 3: Yes.
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: If the president says, I want you to concentrate on
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: going after the cartels, I want you to concentrate on
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: going after drug dealers, I want you to concentrate on
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: going after violent crime, I want you to use your
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: precious limited resources for these priorities, all you say is, aye, aye, sir,
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: and you freaking do it. This is not complicated. But
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: you see what she's doing. She's trying to suggest like, well,
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: if the president tells you to go after his political opponents,
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: are you going to do it? If there's a criminal predicate, yes.
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: If there's evidence of a crime, yes. And is there
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: evidence that President Trump's political opponents have committed crimes in
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: pursuit of rigging our elections?
• 41:53
  Speaker 4: Yes.
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: Yes, indeed.
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: So, good.
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: I love this. Todd Blanch, please make– look, I think
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: we can measure the success of Todd Blanch's tenure based
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: on how much screeching Kristen Welker does going forward. If
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: she screeches a lot more, that's a sign of success. Please,
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: come on.
• 42:14
  Speaker 2: Mr.
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: Attorney General, crush them. Crush them. All right. Let me
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: talk about a guy who deserves justice, Anthony Fauci. We've
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: got the Fauci files. I'll get to the Fang Fang files.
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: I've been promising that. I've got that. That's breaking news today.
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: But first, we've got the Fauci files. This is from
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: Senator Ron Johnson this weekend. Ron Johnson, who just joined
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: me on the radio show last week. He's furious about
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: Anthony Fauci. He wants to see this guy in handcuffs.
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: Here is Ron Johnson sharing a new email. This is
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: from Dr. Janet Woodcock, real name, from May of 2021. Dr.
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: Woodcock was the head of the Food and Drug Administration
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: at the time. And she emailed Anthony Fauci about personally
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: receiving reports of patients who were experiencing hard to classify
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: adverse events from the COVID jab. She said that they're
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: having trouble getting any sort of response from government officials, quote,
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: no one takes them seriously. No one knows how to
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: treat them. And there is no effort to study this. Oddly, Dr.
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: Fauci seemed reluctant to respond to her, says Senator Johnson.
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: So what do we have in the email? Let's take
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: a look. Here's the actual email. Here's Janet Woodcock, real name,
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: From the FDA, and here's what she says. Quote, I've
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: been contacted by a number of people who have experienced
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: adverse events. She's writing in May of 2021, very early
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: in the Biden administration. I've been contacted by a number
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: of people who have experienced adverse events post-COVID-19 vaccination from
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: all three of the current vaccines. That would be Pfizer, Moderna,
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: and Johnson & Johnson. Many are healthcare professionals. Many are
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: healthcare professionals, some of whom I know, says Janet Woodcock,
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: real name. The symptoms do not fit together into a
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: distinctive syndrome, and most are not easily quantifiable or evaluated
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: with standard laboratory testing. She said early during mass vaccination,
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: you will get a lot of psychological reactions, and it's
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: hard to sort these things out. But the people's main
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: complaint is that no one takes them seriously. No one
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: knows how to treat them. And there is no effort
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: to study this. This is the head of the FDA. Now,
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: none of this was public, by the way. This was
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: all behind the scenes. These problems are not the sort
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: that a system like VAERS, VAERS, that's the adverse event
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: reporting system, vaccine adverse event reporting system. The one that, remember, VAERS,
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: this was, everyone, all these reports were coming in of
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: these side effects from the COVID jabs. And Dr. Fauci
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: and everybody else said, just ignore VAERS. Don't even pay
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: any attention to VAERS. It doesn't matter at all. That
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: was Fauci's position. He just thought it was noise. It
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter. Like, what does it mean? What do you
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: mean it doesn't matter? We got all these reports coming in.
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: What's the point of the system? If we're supposed to
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: ignore it, why do we have a vaccine adverse reporting
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: system if we're not supposed to assess what's in it
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: at all? Dr. Woodcock, real name, said that these problems
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: are not the sort that a system like VAERS would
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: be able to detect or even a more sophisticated population-based
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: active follow-up such as CDC has or a medical record-based
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: system such as BEST best. I think it would be
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: worthwhile to do a study and evaluate a cohort of
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: these individuals. But of course, money needs to be made
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: available and you would need an investigator who is interested
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: in medical mysteries. I doubt the industry would support it
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: for obvious reasons, she says. But my experience is that
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: if you let a problem fester, then it will come
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: back to bite you later and you're not prepared. What
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: do you think of this? Says Dr. Woodcock, real name. Okay,
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: so this, you see at the end, she admits, you
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: know what, the reason we're never going to get clear
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: answers on this is because the industry doesn't want us
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: to give the truth out, and we have to do
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: whatever the industry wants. You know, the pharmaceutical industry. Well,
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: they made all these drugs, so they don't want to
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: talk about the side effects. So there's not going to
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: be any funding available. Well, that kind of seems like
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: a massive problem. If you're reliant on the very same
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: industry that is generating record profits, as the funding source
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: to conduct a study on whether or not those very
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: products are hurting people, that system is jacked. That's completely jacked.
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: And the fact that this debate was not being held
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: in public, that these disclosures were not being made, that
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: American citizens were being harmed, that the head of the
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: freaking FDA knew it and alerted Anthony Fauci to it,
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: and they did nothing about it, that's jacked. And this
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: is why people are demanding criminal accountability. This is why
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: when you get a criminal referral that was just sent
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: over by the United States Senate to the United States
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: Justice Department, that people are asking, okay, can we put
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: Fauci in handcuffs yet? What does it take? How many
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: of these emails need to pop out where he's covering
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: up the fact that Americans are being harmed by the
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: jab that he forced on them? Oh, the Fauci ouchie.
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: It was way worse than that. It was way worse
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: than that. And the head of the FDA knew it early,
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: very early. That's the latest there. More disclosures from Ron
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: Johnson as he stays on that story. Now, we also
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: got another disclosure this morning. I've got breaking news this morning.
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: The Fang Fang files have been released. That's right. Just
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: the news led by Stephen Richards and John Solomon here
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: with the report. The FBI had evidence that Eric Swalwell
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: got illegal donations from Fang Fang. bombshell memos show, the
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: Chinese spy. The FBI developed evidence that a Chinese woman
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: with direct ties to that country's intelligence service had potentially
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: compromised Eric Swalwell. She had potentially compromised a Democrat congressman
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: from California with sex, foreign interns, and illicit donations while
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: she was being recruited to become a bureau informant. a
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: decade ago, according to bombshell memos that expose another threat
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: to America's political system from Beijing. The files chronicling the
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: relationship between Representative Eric Swalwell and the Chinese national Fang Fang,
• 48:52
  Speaker 1: also known by an English name, Christine Fang, were declassified
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: by President Trump and released Monday by the White House
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: Government Transparency Task Force as a part of a broader
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: effort to unmask foreign threats to U.S. political and election systems.
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: They show the FBI had opened a predicated investigation, which
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: is a formal law enforcement inquiry backed by a factual
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: basis or an allegation that indicates a crime or national
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: security threat already exists. Unlike un-predicated assessments. a predicated investigation
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: allows agents to use advanced and intrusive methods like electronic
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: surveillance or informants. The files provide significant new details about
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: the long-rumored relationship between Fang and Swalwell. Now, I want
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: to remind you of an important detail here. We have
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: known for some time, it was kind of obvious, that
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: Swalwell was banging Fang Fang. We knew that. But Swalwell
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: has never explicitly acknowledged that detail in public. He's always
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: sort of just tucked tail and run away from questions
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: about it. Now we have, for the first time, an
• 49:58
  Speaker 1: on-the-record confirmation from Swalwell to the FBI that he did
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: the Fang Fang with Fang Fang. We now know that
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: for certain. because he admitted it to the FBI. Now,
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: these files, which are just being released now, Swalwell's been
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: trying to prevent their release. He and his lawyers had
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: sued the FBI earlier this year to prevent the release
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: of today's Fang Fang files. Well, they're out, and here's
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: what they say. The FBI, these are some of the details.
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: These are as summarized by John Solomon, and I'll show
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: you some of the actual records. The FBI initially wanted
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: to investigate the congressman for a bribery scheme in which
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: he exchanged donations from Fang Fang for her planting interns
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: in his office, but eventually decided to narrow the case
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: to see criminal charges only against her for making illegal
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: donations to the California Democrat through conduits. You see? So
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: she was driving all sorts of money into his office,
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: and in exchange, he was letting her put her interns
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: in his office. Now, what do you think the Chi-coms
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: are doing with a bunch of Chinese spy-selected interns in
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: Swalwell's office? You know the answer. They're spying on him
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: and the affairs of the United States government. Remember, Eric
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: Swalwell ends up on the freaking Intel Committee. Fang Fang
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: doing that. Swalwell admitted to having sex with Fang. He
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: also admitted that his staff was placing Fang's interns in
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: Congress and not having a strong enough campaign finance system
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: to detect the straw donations she allegedly passed to the U.S.
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: citizen conduits. This is bull. This is utter bull. Oh,
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: we just didn't have a strong enough system to realize
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: that she was doing. Oh, come on. You were turning
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: a blind eye to it because you were sleeping with her.
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: You didn't care. You were perfectly comfortable with this arrangement.
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: The Justice Department declined to prosecute Fang despite strong evidence
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: of the illicit donations after she fled the U.S. as
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: the FBI began interviewing her associates and raided her home.
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: The early steps in the investigation were overseen in part
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: by controversial prosecutor Jack Smith. Jack Smith was overseeing the
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: early parts of the cases. How'd that go? Who would
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: later pursue Donald Trump on criminal charges. The FBI was
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: recruiting Fang. This is an interesting detail. The FBI was
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: trying to recruit Fang to become a confidential informant through
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: an undercover agent. They wanted a double agent, in other words.
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: They were like, okay, we got this chick spying on America.
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: Why don't we turn her and see if she'll spy
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: for us? They gave her a code name, Rusty Thumbs.
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: Rusty Thumbs. I thought Fang Fang is a perfectly good
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: code name. You just go with that. Planned to hire
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: her through a cutout company, and they were still evaluating
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: her suitability as a confidential human source when they discovered
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: her alleged criminal behavior. The FBI knew early on during
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: the recruitment that Fang was tied to Chinese Ministry of
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: State Security. Beijing's Notorious Intelligence Service. The Bureau also identified
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: her parents as Ministry of State Security agents. They knew
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: she was raising money for California Democrats and that she
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: was willing to use sex as a means of getting
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: ahead in the world of U.S. politics. All right, so
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: they had her number. They knew all about this. And
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: they knew what Swalwell was up to. They knew exactly
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: what Swalwell was up to. Look at some of the
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: documents here. Here's one. Found some of these. this morning,
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: going through the documents that were just declassified by the
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: White House. Redacted, ready? I'm quoting here. This is from
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: an interview that was dated May 1st of 2015. Redacted
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: had no firsthand knowledge of any romantic or physical relationship
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: between Fang and Swalwell. However, Redacted had heard secondhand that
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: Swalwell had physical relations with with Fang prior to Swalwell's
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: election to Congress. Redacted heard from Redacted, Swalwell's chief of staff,
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: that Fang has shown up on Swalwell's door unannounced on
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: at least one occasion. Redacted heard from Redacted, the Redacted,
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: that Fang showed up on Swalwell's door on occasion and
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: made it clear to Swalwell that she was not wearing
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: any underwear. Redacted did not know if Redacted and Redacted
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: were referring to the same occasion. Hmm. So they don't
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: know if he had a physical relationship, but she was
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: volunteering information like, hey, I'm not wearing any underwear. Okay.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: That's odd. There's also this document where apparently Swalwell admitted
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: that they, quote, hooked up. This is the euphemism. It's
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: what the kids are saying these days. Is this a
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: new phrase, hooking up? No, Vince, it's been around forever.
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: I know. All right, look. Fang came to Swalwell's apartment twice.
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: Both occasions were probably before he was elected into Congress.
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: This is according to Swalwell, by the way. This is
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: his conversation with the FBI. He does not remember having
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: candles lit while she was there. One night, Fang came
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: over late in the evening and started banging on Swalwell's door.
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: Swalwell's redacted let her in, and she and Swalwell hooked up. Yeah, baby,
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: they hooked up. Okay, Fang left after a couple of hours.
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: Swalwell barely remembers the event. Okay, this is nonsense. He
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: says because he took an Ambien prior to Fang arriving.
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: Swalwell takes Ambien to help him sleep.
• 55:39
  Speaker 5: Uh-huh.
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: Okay, this is lying to the FBI. I don't really
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: remember it, though. I guess we hooked up, maybe, but
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: I don't really remember. I took an Ambien beforehand. Oh,
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: shut up. Please. Will you stop? It's just a constant
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: series of lies from this guy. It's like, oh, anyway,
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: the Fang Fang files are being released. And so finally,
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: confirmation of what you already knew, but now in disgusting
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: detail from the FBI. Thank you to the Trump administration
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: for the never ending and sometimes, you know, vomit inducing transparency.
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: Just it's just amazing what a wild world we live in.
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: It's just the craziest thing.
• 56:22
  Speaker 2: It really is.
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: Yes, indeed. All right. I've got a lot more to
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: get to. We've got a big national radio show coming
• 56:27
  Speaker 1: up today. A couple of programming notes for you today, though.
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: I want to share with you just to get everybody
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: the lay of the land. First and foremost, big national
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: radio show. It's always available. Every radio affiliate we've got
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: across the country, we've got hundreds of them. They're all
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: around the place. You know, you probably have one that's
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: right near you. If you haven't tuned in yet, you
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: should go to the Vin show dot com. You can
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: get your local radio listings. We broadcast the show live
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: on Rumble in the final hour. Starting today, the final
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: hour of our radio program each day, it's a 12
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: to 3 Eastern radio program. From 2 to 3 Eastern,
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: you'll be able to watch this show on Rumble, rumble.com
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: slash Vince. You can see the video version of the
• 57:07
  Speaker 1: show live. Now, having said that, I know for those
• 57:10
  Speaker 1: of you who've been with me for a while, you
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: know that we were at one point, we had three hours,
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: we're down, we're at one hour now on Rumble. Having
• 57:16
  Speaker 1: said all of that, I should tell you, I'll just
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: be forthcoming with you. We have a plan to get
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: all three hours up on video in the near term.
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: That's the plan. But right now it's the final hour.
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: So I'll just give that as a tease to you.
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: Right now it's the final hour from 2 to 3 p.m.
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: Eastern time, rumble.com slash Vince. You can join me on
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: the big national radio show. Now, here's the other great
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: news today. You ready for the great news? Dan Bongino
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: at 10, rumble.com slash Bongino. Haley Caranilla at noon, rumble.com
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: slash Haley. She's great. Haley with two Ys.
• 57:48
  Speaker 2: Why?
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: Because she's great. And then starting today at 1 p.m.
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: Eastern on Rumble, the mighty Sean Farish joins the team here.
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: We're calling it, what do we call it? Josh, is
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: this Silver Lock or Bongino? Have we ever sorted this out?
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: You know the answer to this question? It doesn't even matter, really. Fundamentally,
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: we just have a great team. We've got a great
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: operation going on here producing world-class content. Sean Farish, this
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: is so long overdue, is launching today, 1 p.m. Eastern today. Rumble.com
• 58:21
  Speaker 1: slash Sean. That's S-H-A-W-N, that version of the spelling. Rumble.com
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: slash Sean, 1 p.m. Eastern each day on Rumble. He's phenomenal.
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: I can't wait to see what he does with his
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: first show.
• 58:32
  Speaker 2: Look at him.
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: Look at him. He's right there. He's, do I have,
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: oh my gosh, I can't even point in the right direction.
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: He's right there. I told you, I'd be a terrible weatherman.
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: You know how they do those green screens? I can
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: never point in the right direction. There's Sean. He just
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: appeared right on my screen. There he is. Looking marvelous.
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: He's got the great Don't Tread on Me shirt in
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: the photo. That's great. That was a good idea. I
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: should have done that for the headshots. Don't move him around. Dude,
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: you move him around, I'm going to have no chance
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: of finding him on the screen. There's not a chance
• 59:02
  Speaker 1: in the world. Again, 1 p.m. You can find him
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: on Rumble. Rumble.com slash Sean. I can't wait to see
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: what he does with it. And as always... I hope
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: you have a fantastic day. I'll be back with you tomorrow,
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: I promise, with another mighty, mighty show. You guys are
• 59:18
  Speaker 1: the best. And don't you worry, I'll keep doing the
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: weekend updates, despite the fact that some of you don't
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: like it. What can I say? You can't please all
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: the people all the time. I'll be back tomorrow.
• 59:34
  Speaker 4: The U.S. Soccer Podcast.
• 59:36
  Speaker 5: I'm your host, Megan Klingenberg, and I am super stoked
• 59:39
  Speaker 5: to be joined by Daryl Dike.
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: Arguably, your most impressive quality cannot be measured. You're a
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: guy who is the definition of grit. Injuries have ended
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: plenty of careers, but instead you decided yours would only
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: be a chapter instead of the ending.
• 59:52
  Speaker 5: Welcome to the show, Daryl.
• 59:53
  Speaker 2: Thank you so much.
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: That's a good intro right there.
• 59:56
  Speaker 5: That's good.
• 59:56
  Speaker 4: The U.S.
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: Soccer Podcast.
• 59:58
  Speaker 4: Follow and listen on your favorite platforms.