
The reason AI is impacting only 20% of tasks
Anthropic just dropped a labor market report with a chart you need to see. It maps what AI could theoretically do across every major occupation against what it's actually doing. The gap is enormous. In computing and math, AI could theoretically handle 94% of tasks. Observed usage? 33%. Legal hits nearly 90% theoretical — real-world usage barely clears 20%.
This week on In The Loop, I break down why. Some of it is a people problem: adoption looks more like a cliff than a curve, with a tiny fraction of users actually pushing AI to its limits. Some of it is structural — enterprise contracts…
The skinny
The skinny isn't ready yet — notes appear once the transcript is processed.