Latest / The Occult Rejects / The Life of Giordano Bruno

Transcript

The Life of Giordano Bruno · The Occult Rejects

0:02
Speaker 1: You see something's going to happen. What's going to happen? Help? What?
0:24
Speaker 1: The year is sixteen hundred and the Roman square of
0:27
Speaker 1: Campo di Fiori. A hooded figure stands bound to a
0:31
Speaker 1: wooden steak. His tongue is clamped to silence him. Around him,
0:36
Speaker 1: bundles of kindling crackled to life. A monk presents a crucifix,
0:41
Speaker 1: which the condemned demand turns away from, not in fear,
0:45
Speaker 1: but in contempt. He has spent seven years in prison
0:49
Speaker 1: by the Inquisition, and now the sentence is carried out
0:53
Speaker 1: to be burned alive for heresy. His name is Geodano Bruno,
0:59
Speaker 1: and the fire that consumes his body did not consume
1:02
Speaker 1: the vision he gave this world, who defied every authority, religious, scientific,
1:08
Speaker 1: and academic, not out of rebellion alone, but in pursuit
1:13
Speaker 1: of what he called the infidite whole. Jada R. Bruno
1:17
Speaker 1: was merely a martyr, magician, or mystic. He was a
1:20
Speaker 1: man who claimed the stars were not lights nailed to
1:23
Speaker 1: a crystal dome, but suns like our own, each with
1:27
Speaker 1: their own earths, perhaps filled with their own lives and souls.
1:31
Speaker 1: He envisioned a universe without center or edge, a cosmo
1:35
Speaker 1: so vast that to contain it, God himself must be infinite.
1:41
Speaker 1: But this is no simple tale of science verse religion.
1:44
Speaker 1: Bruno's story is richer, stranger, and more dangerous than that.
1:49
Speaker 1: He spoke of metapsychosis, souls moving between bodies, maybe even planets.
1:55
Speaker 1: He revived Egyptian theorgy and hermetic rights. He taught memory
1:59
Speaker 1: not to just as his skill, but as a mystical technology.
2:03
Speaker 1: He spoke of binding souls through desire and elevated the
2:06
Speaker 1: magus as the true philosopher. King Bruno didn't just predict
2:10
Speaker 1: the future. He dared to live as if he had
2:14
Speaker 1: already arrived, and for that he was excommunicated by Catholics, Calvinists,
2:19
Speaker 1: and Lutherans alike, branded a heretic, a sorcerer, a corruptor
2:24
Speaker 1: of souls. Yet centuries later, poets, scientists, occultists, and revolutionaries
2:31
Speaker 1: would call him prophet, martyr and even saint. So who
2:37
Speaker 1: was Geodano Bruno really a heretic, burned for denying the Trinity,
2:42
Speaker 1: a proto scientist's silence for imagining alien life? Or was
2:46
Speaker 1: he something more? The last true magician of the West,
2:50
Speaker 1: Wandering through the courts of Europe, carrying the spark of
2:53
Speaker 1: a cosmos were only beginning to understand. Filippo Bruno was
2:59
Speaker 1: born in January or February in fifteen forty eight in
3:02
Speaker 1: the town of Nola, near Naples, in the Kingdom of Naples,
3:05
Speaker 1: then under Spanish rule. He was the only son of
3:09
Speaker 1: Giovanni Bruno, a professional soldier in Prolisi Savellino. From an
3:15
Speaker 1: early age, Bruno showed exceptional intellectual ability. At age fourteen,
3:20
Speaker 1: he was sent to Naples to be educated, studying Latin
3:23
Speaker 1: logic and dialectics. He lodged with the Dominican Friars and
3:27
Speaker 1: also attended public lectures at the Stadium General University in Naples.
3:33
Speaker 1: One of his teachers introduced him to philosophy of Avros,
3:37
Speaker 1: the medieval Islamic commentator on Aristotle. This everest influence, which
3:42
Speaker 1: held that reason in philosophy stand above blind faith, resonated
3:46
Speaker 1: with Bruno's own bold, questioning temperament. Enamored of the life
3:51
Speaker 1: of the mind, at age seventeen, Bruno joined the Dominican Order.
3:55
Speaker 1: In fifteen sixty five, he entered the Dominican Covenant of
3:59
Speaker 1: San Domme Nico Maggiore in Naples, taking the religious name
4:03
Speaker 1: Giordano after his mentor, Friar Giordano Crispo, Bruno immersed himself
4:09
Speaker 1: in the rigorous study of theology, philosophy, and the arts.
4:13
Speaker 1: By fifteen seventy two, at age twenty four, he was
4:16
Speaker 1: ordained a priest, and later that year obtained a license
4:19
Speaker 1: in theology. Despite his brilliance, the young Friar's independent spirit
4:24
Speaker 1: and unorthodox reading habits soon aroused suspicion. He later recalled
4:30
Speaker 1: that the training he received attempted to draw from me
4:34
Speaker 1: worthier and higher occupations, to lay my spirit in chains,
4:39
Speaker 1: and from a free man in the service of virtue,
4:42
Speaker 1: to make me the slave of a miserable and foolish
4:45
Speaker 1: system of deceit. This scathing reflection, written years afterwards, reveals
4:52
Speaker 1: bruno disillusionment with dogmatic teaching. Within the monastery, Bruno did
4:59
Speaker 1: the unthinkable. He read forbidden books and voiced forbidden ideas.
5:04
Speaker 1: He admiringly read Erasmus, a Humanist on the index of
5:08
Speaker 1: banned books, and reportedly even questioned the doctrine of the Trinity.
5:13
Speaker 1: On one occasion, he removed the faced images of the saints,
5:18
Speaker 1: keeping only a Crucifix, an act of iconoclasm that alarmed
5:22
Speaker 1: his superiors. In fifteen seventy five, Bruno was formerly accused
5:26
Speaker 1: of heresy for sympathizing with the ancient arian view that
5:29
Speaker 1: Christ was divine but not equal to God. When a
5:33
Speaker 1: fellow friar discovered Bruno's hidden copy of Erasmus annotated in
5:36
Speaker 1: the margins, the Neapolitan Inquisition prepared to indict him rather
5:42
Speaker 1: than await trial, and early fifteen seventy six, Geo Dano
5:45
Speaker 1: Bruno fled Naples and became a fugitive from Catholic authorities.
5:49
Speaker 1: He was twenty eight years old and his life as
5:52
Speaker 1: a wanderer had begun. Bruno's first stop as a fugitive
5:57
Speaker 1: was the remote Italian town of Noli on the Ligurian coast,
6:01
Speaker 1: where he made a living tutoring young students. Over the
6:05
Speaker 1: next few years, he moved frequently from Noli to Savona,
6:10
Speaker 1: to turn in Venice, and then north across the Alps.
6:14
Speaker 1: In Venice, he reputedly published a small work on the
6:17
Speaker 1: Sign of the Times with the help of a friendly Dominican,
6:20
Speaker 1: but he could not stay long. By fifteen seventy nine,
6:23
Speaker 1: Bruno arrived in Geneva, a refuge from many Italian Protestants
6:28
Speaker 1: who had fled the Inquisition. Although Geneva was Calvinist, Bruno
6:32
Speaker 1: was not particularly devout in that faith either. He later
6:36
Speaker 1: told the Venetian Inquisition that in Geneva he did not
6:39
Speaker 1: intend to adopt the religion of the city. I desired
6:43
Speaker 1: to stay there only that I might live at liberty
6:45
Speaker 1: and insecurity, protected by friends like the Marchis di Vico.
6:51
Speaker 1: Bruno don civilian clothes and lived as a lay scholar
6:55
Speaker 1: in Calvinist society. For a short time, Bruno found the
6:59
Speaker 1: freedom he craved in Geneva's Republic of Letters. He even
7:03
Speaker 1: registered at the University of Geneva in May fifteen seventy nine. However,
7:08
Speaker 1: he soon classed with authorities. In August fifteen seventy nine,
7:11
Speaker 1: Bruno published an unprompted pamphlet attacking a respected Calvinist professor,
7:16
Speaker 1: Antoine de la Fey as incompetent. The response was swift.
7:22
Speaker 1: Bruno and his printer were arrested for slander. Bruno refused
7:27
Speaker 1: to recant his words. The Calvinist Consistatory excommunicated him, briefly
7:32
Speaker 1: denied him communion, and essentially drove him out of Geneva,
7:37
Speaker 1: in a pattern that would repeat throughout his life. Bruno's
7:40
Speaker 1: sharp tongue and impatience with fools alienated those in power.
7:45
Speaker 1: He left Geneva in late fifteen seventy nine, persona non
7:49
Speaker 1: grata and yet another Christian denomination. Remarkably, Bruno would eventually
7:54
Speaker 1: be excommunicated by all three major branches of Western Christianity,
7:59
Speaker 1: Roman Catholics, Calvinism, and Lutheranism. Bruno next traveled through France,
8:05
Speaker 1: arriving in Line and then Toulouse in fifteen eighty to Louse,
8:09
Speaker 1: a university city welcomed him. He earned a doctorate in
8:12
Speaker 1: theology and was appointed to lecture on philosophy at the university.
8:17
Speaker 1: For almost two years, Bruno taught in Toulouse, producing writings
8:20
Speaker 1: and attempting unsuccessfully to reconcile with the Catholic Church. He
8:25
Speaker 1: approached a Jesuit for confession, but was refused absolution. His
8:30
Speaker 1: stay ended when fresh turmoil erupted. Renewed fighting in the
8:34
Speaker 1: French Wars of Religion between Catholics and Hugonots made Toulouse unsafe.
8:38
Speaker 1: In fifteen eighty one, Bruno made his way to Paris,
8:43
Speaker 1: by then under the rule of the tolerant King Henry
8:46
Speaker 1: the Third. In Paris, Bruno's fortune sword, he obtained permission
8:53
Speaker 1: to hold the cycle of public lectures on theology, an
8:56
Speaker 1: extraordinary opportunity for an ex Dominican. His memory may skills
9:00
Speaker 1: soon became the talk of the town. Bruno could recite
9:04
Speaker 1: and memorize vast amounts of material talents he attributed not
9:08
Speaker 1: to magic, but to his secret art of memory. More
9:10
Speaker 1: on this Later, word of this magician with an infallible
9:14
Speaker 1: memory reached King Henry the Third himself curious, the king
9:19
Speaker 1: summoned Bruno to court to demonstrate hisnmonic ability. Bruno later
9:23
Speaker 1: recounted the meeting. I got me such a name that
9:27
Speaker 1: King Henry the Third summoned me one day to discover
9:30
Speaker 1: from me if the memory which I possessed was natural
9:33
Speaker 1: or acquired by magic art. I satisfied him that it
9:38
Speaker 1: did not come from sorcery, but from organized knowledge. And
9:42
Speaker 1: following this a guid a book on memory printed entitled
9:46
Speaker 1: The Shadow of Ideas, which I dedicated to his magistry. Forthwith,
9:52
Speaker 1: he gave me an extraordinary lectureship with a salary. This
9:57
Speaker 1: extraordinary royal favor a paid lectureship in Paris gave Bruno
10:01
Speaker 1: the platform he had long desired. By fifteen eighty two,
10:05
Speaker 1: under the king's patronage, Bruno published several works that showcased
10:09
Speaker 1: his expertise in the art of memory and his emerging
10:12
Speaker 1: philosophical ideas. These included The umbrus Idereum on the Shadow
10:18
Speaker 1: of Ideas from fifteen eighty two and Ours Memory the
10:22
Speaker 1: Art of Memory from fifteen eighty two, both of which
10:25
Speaker 1: explained his complex mnemonic systems. He also published Kantus Circaeus,
10:31
Speaker 1: a treatise blending memory arts with a hermetic allegory, and
10:35
Speaker 1: even a satirical comedy, The Candlemaker from fifteen eighty two.
10:40
Speaker 1: In these Paris years, Bruno rose in status from penniless
10:43
Speaker 1: exile to celebrated intellectual. He rubbed shoulders with powerful patrons
10:47
Speaker 1: and was known as an audacious thinker at the royal court.
10:52
Speaker 1: And here is a perfect time to cover some of
10:54
Speaker 1: his works. De umbras Idereum on the Shadow of Ideas
10:58
Speaker 1: and the Art of Memory. The umbrius Idereum on the
11:05
Speaker 1: Shadows of Ideas. The umbrius Idereum, written in Latin in
11:10
Speaker 1: fifteen eighty two, is Bruno's first major work dedicated to
11:14
Speaker 1: King Henry the third of France. The title translates to
11:18
Speaker 1: on the Shadows of Ideas, and it inaugurates Bruno's lifelong
11:22
Speaker 1: focus on the art of memory and the nature of knowledge.
11:26
Speaker 1: On the surface, it is a treatise of mnemonic technique
11:29
Speaker 1: methods to improve memory, but at its core it presents
11:32
Speaker 1: a theory of the mind and reality. Bruno introduces the
11:36
Speaker 1: work with a dialogue between a philosopher and Hermes Trismegistus,
11:41
Speaker 1: the legendary stage of Hermeticism. This sets a mystical tone.
11:47
Speaker 1: Hermi symbolizes ancient wisdom in the union of human intellect
11:50
Speaker 1: with divine knowledge, signaling that Bruno's memory art is more
11:54
Speaker 1: than a trivial trick. It's a path to higher understanding.
11:59
Speaker 1: Bruno proposes that our mental impressions, the things we remember
12:03
Speaker 1: or imagine, are like shadows cast by the true ideas.
12:08
Speaker 1: Drawing on Platonic and neo Platonic thought, he argues that
12:11
Speaker 1: ideas in our mind are not the ultimate reality, but
12:14
Speaker 1: are shadows of absolute divine ideas, similar to the shadows
12:18
Speaker 1: on the wall in Plato's Cave Allegory. Importantly, these shadows
12:23
Speaker 1: are not mere darkness or falsehood. Bruno describes a shadow
12:27
Speaker 1: as the vestige of light, a trace of reality that
12:31
Speaker 1: is accessible to our understanding. In other words, human understanding
12:36
Speaker 1: operates through shadows. Our mind works with images and representations
12:41
Speaker 1: shadows that reflect higher truths. By studying and manipulating these
12:46
Speaker 1: shadows through a nomadic system, we can organize knowledge and
12:50
Speaker 1: approach the light of true ideas. Bruno explicitly writes that
12:55
Speaker 1: shadows are the forms that reason takes during the learning
12:58
Speaker 1: process and can be used as symbols to organize the
13:02
Speaker 1: knowledge of things. Crucially, Bruno's system integrates mnemonics, psychology, and magic.
13:11
Speaker 1: He was influenced by the Hermetic tradition and by Marsilio
13:14
Speaker 1: Ficino's ideas about the imagination and soul. Thus, De Numbrius
13:18
Speaker 1: Idearum doesn't simply list memory tips. It lays out a
13:22
Speaker 1: philosophy in which memory training becomes a path to enlightenment.
13:27
Speaker 1: This text presents an elaborate memory scheme, involving a complex
13:31
Speaker 1: arrangement of letters, images, and even magical concepts. Bruno describes
13:37
Speaker 1: engraving letters A through Z, and even Hebrew characters on
13:41
Speaker 1: rotating disks or wheels. These memory wheels can be turned
13:45
Speaker 1: to generate countless combinations of letters and images, a kind
13:49
Speaker 1: of mechanical aid for thought. In effect, Bruno created a
13:54
Speaker 1: proto computer device for the mind. The practitioner to replace
13:59
Speaker 1: vivid images standing for concepts or data into Loki places
14:04
Speaker 1: on the wheel or in the memory palace, using the
14:06
Speaker 1: letters and images to recall complex information. Bruno's contemporaries would
14:12
Speaker 1: have recognized that he was adapting and extending the classical
14:15
Speaker 1: art of memory that date backs to Cicero and medieval scholars,
14:20
Speaker 1: but Bruno's contribution was unique in its scope and metaphysical depth.
14:24
Speaker 1: He believed training the memory could ignite the intellect in
14:27
Speaker 1: even the soul, bringing one closer to divine truth. In summary,
14:33
Speaker 1: the Umber's ideoum provides both a practical mnemonic system and
14:36
Speaker 1: a philosophical justification for it. The shadows of ideas are
14:41
Speaker 1: the mental impressions we can cultivate and arrange. By skillfully
14:45
Speaker 1: imprinting these shadows and memory using Bruno's techniques, the mind
14:49
Speaker 1: can ascend from scattered data to organized knowledge and ultimately
14:52
Speaker 1: towards insight into the underlying realities the ideas themselves. By
14:59
Speaker 1: skillfully imprinting these shadows in memory. Using Bruno's techniques, the
15:03
Speaker 1: mind can ascend from scattered data to organized knowledge and
15:07
Speaker 1: ultimately towards insight into the underlying realities the ideas themselves.
15:14
Speaker 1: This work laid the foundation for Bruno's subsequent writings on
15:17
Speaker 1: memory and knowledge, marking him as one of the Renaissance's
15:21
Speaker 1: most creative memory practitioners. Is no coincidence that Bruno's very
15:26
Speaker 1: next work, The Art of Memory, directly continues the project
15:30
Speaker 1: begun in Deumbres, and now we will move on to
15:37
Speaker 1: the Art of Memory. Bruno's Art of Memory is essentially
15:41
Speaker 1: a companion to Deumbrous Idereum, often published together or as
15:46
Speaker 1: an annex. In fact, Bruno includes The Art of Memory
15:51
Speaker 1: in the same volume as Deumbres when presenting his ideas
15:53
Speaker 1: to the French Court. While Deumbrous Idereum lays out the
15:57
Speaker 1: philosophical underpinnings, the Art of Memory is more of a
16:01
Speaker 1: practical manual for the mnemonic system itself. It drills into
16:05
Speaker 1: the how to of Bruno's method, showing readers how to
16:08
Speaker 1: construct their own memory structure step by step. In the
16:14
Speaker 1: Art of Memory, Bruno builds on classical principles but with innovative twists.
16:20
Speaker 1: He introduces the terminology of subjects and adjects for the
16:23
Speaker 1: standard memory concepts of loci and images. A subject locus
16:28
Speaker 1: is a mental place or scene, for example, a room
16:31
Speaker 1: in a familiar building, and an adject or image is
16:35
Speaker 1: a memorable figure or symbol placed in that scene to
16:37
Speaker 1: represent information one wishes to recall. A subject locus is
16:43
Speaker 1: a mental place or scene, for example, a room in
16:46
Speaker 1: a familiar building, and an adject image is a memorable
16:50
Speaker 1: figure or symbol placed in that scene to represent information
16:53
Speaker 1: one wishes to recall. Bruno emphasizes that each memory subject
16:58
Speaker 1: should be vivid and unique, and each adject image should
17:02
Speaker 1: be emotionally striking or unusual so that they stick in
17:05
Speaker 1: the mind. He even notes the importance of contrast. The
17:10
Speaker 1: background subject should not overshadow the details of the image
17:14
Speaker 1: adject placed on it. These recommendations echo earlier memory treaties,
17:20
Speaker 1: but Bruno pushes them further. He advises the student to experiment,
17:25
Speaker 1: personalize the images, and organize them accordingly to your own
17:29
Speaker 1: best methods. One hallmark of Bruno's nomadic art is the
17:36
Speaker 1: use of combination and movement. He provides complex sets of
17:40
Speaker 1: images sometimes drawn from mythology, such as figures from Greek
17:44
Speaker 1: and Roman pantheons, that can be systematically combined to encode information.
17:50
Speaker 1: In the art of memory, Bruno outlines a kind of
17:53
Speaker 1: visual alphabet or adject wheel, layers of symbols which, when combined,
17:58
Speaker 1: can represent entire words or concepts. This idea is similar
18:03
Speaker 1: to a modern person action object memory system, but far
18:07
Speaker 1: more elaborate and grounded. In Bruno's a cult and philosophical symbolism,
18:11
Speaker 1: he literally had wheels of images that one could rotate
18:14
Speaker 1: to generate different nomonic codes. This method could, in theory,
18:19
Speaker 1: allow a trained practitioner to memorize encyclopedic amounts of knowledge
18:25
Speaker 1: by recombining a limited set of images. Bruno also departs
18:29
Speaker 1: from tradition by insisting that memory images should be animated
18:33
Speaker 1: whenever possible. He writes that movement brings objects to life,
18:37
Speaker 1: and under a hermetic philosophical view, anything endowed with movement
18:42
Speaker 1: as a soul. Thus, by imagining one's demonic images and motion, dancing, fighting, speaking,
18:48
Speaker 1: or transforming, one links them to the living soul of
18:52
Speaker 1: the cosmos, making them more powerful and easier to recall.
18:57
Speaker 1: This mystical rationale shows Bruno blending memory to technique with
19:00
Speaker 1: his belief in an unsold universe. Practically, it also makes
19:05
Speaker 1: the images far more memorable than static pictures. Finally, the
19:10
Speaker 1: art of memory emphasizes discipline and practice. Bruno cautions that
19:15
Speaker 1: mastering this art is not instant. One must practice daily,
19:19
Speaker 1: walk one's memory palace regularly, and refresh the images to
19:23
Speaker 1: avoid them growing stale. He even gives a timeline within
19:28
Speaker 1: three or four revolutions of the moon, you'll get results.
19:31
Speaker 1: Within six you should have mastery, basically three to six
19:35
Speaker 1: months of work. This underscores that Bruno saw his memory
19:39
Speaker 1: system as a serious endeavor, almost monastic in its dedication.
19:44
Speaker 1: The reward, in Bruno's vision, was not just a better memory,
19:48
Speaker 1: but a transformed intellect. The student's imagination is like a
19:53
Speaker 1: painter working on the canvas of the mine, and with
19:56
Speaker 1: proper ordination, order, and determination kimrror the harmonic order of nature.
20:03
Speaker 1: It systematizes the creation of memory loci and images, introduces
20:08
Speaker 1: innovative combinatorial wheels, and infuses the whole art with vitality
20:12
Speaker 1: and cosmic significance. Bruno is not merely training memory, He's
20:18
Speaker 1: training the mind's eye to see patterns and connections, effectively
20:22
Speaker 1: turning memory into a tool for innovation and discovery. This
20:26
Speaker 1: work cement to Bruno's reputation as one of the great
20:29
Speaker 1: Renaissance memory masters, and modern scholars note that his mnemonic
20:33
Speaker 1: writings were an attempt to create a universal tool for knowledge.
20:38
Speaker 1: The influence of these ideas can be traced in the
20:41
Speaker 1: Hermetic tradition and in the thinkers fascinated by the capacity
20:45
Speaker 1: of the human imagination. Emboldened by success in France, Bruno
20:51
Speaker 1: set his sights on England, the land of Elizabeth, then
20:54
Speaker 1: in a golden age of Renaissance culture, in April fifteen
20:58
Speaker 1: eighty three to London with letters of recommendation from King
21:02
Speaker 1: Henry the Third. In London, Bruno stayed as a guest
21:06
Speaker 1: at the French embassy. There he befriended John Florio, a
21:10
Speaker 1: noted Italian English linguist. Through Florio and Castlemow, Bruno gained
21:16
Speaker 1: entry to the vibrant circle of intellectuals and Elizabeth. In England,
21:20
Speaker 1: he befriended the famed poet Sir Philip Sidney, to whom
21:24
Speaker 1: he would dedicate two of his books. There was evidence
21:27
Speaker 1: Bruno interacted with hermeticists at court men fascinated by a
21:31
Speaker 1: cult philosophy and science, and he was aware of England's
21:35
Speaker 1: magus John Dee, though a later report claims Bruno never
21:38
Speaker 1: met Dee in person. Bruno's time in England was one
21:42
Speaker 1: of the most productive and controversial periods. He visited Oxford
21:47
Speaker 1: University in the summer of fifteen eighty three, hoping to
21:50
Speaker 1: secure a teaching position or at least engage the scholars there.
21:54
Speaker 1: In a series of guest lectures, Bruno proclaimed his support
21:57
Speaker 1: for Copernicus's heliocentric theory and expect founded his own expansive philosophy.
22:03
Speaker 1: The Oxford Dons, steeped in conservative Aristolianism, were not amused.
22:10
Speaker 1: George Abbott, then a young Oxford scholar later Archbishop of Canterbury,
22:15
Speaker 1: ridiculed Bruno as an arrogant Italian di dapper, a small
22:19
Speaker 1: diving bird, implying Bruno as a frivolous transient. And Bruno
22:24
Speaker 1: upheld the opinion of Copernicus that the earth did go
22:29
Speaker 1: round and the heavens did stand still, whereas in truth
22:33
Speaker 1: it was his own head which rather did run round
22:36
Speaker 1: and his brains did not stand still. Another Oxford scholar,
22:42
Speaker 1: John Underhill attacked Bruno for plagiarizing and distorting the work
22:46
Speaker 1: of Marsilio Ficino. Bruno never went to back down, engaged
22:51
Speaker 1: in heated debates and responded with scathing criticism of Oxford's academics.
22:56
Speaker 1: He later described one Oxford doctor as a pendant with
22:59
Speaker 1: the manners of a discourtious pig, and he went on
23:03
Speaker 1: about narrow mindedness of English intellectuals. Such remarks, published to
23:08
Speaker 1: a wider audience, caused a furor. Bruno failed to secure
23:12
Speaker 1: a position at Oxford and returned to London in frustration.
23:17
Speaker 1: Despite these clashes, Bruno's London stay was very fruitful. During
23:22
Speaker 1: fifteen eighty three and fifteen eighty five, he wrote and
23:25
Speaker 1: published The Seal of Seals, an Explanation of Thirty Seals,
23:30
Speaker 1: and six ambitious philosophical works, his famous Italian Dialogues, which
23:36
Speaker 1: contained the core of his thought. These were printed in
23:39
Speaker 1: London in Italian The Language of Bruno's Heart by John
23:44
Speaker 1: Trlwood and others. But first, let's talk about Explanation of
23:51
Speaker 1: Thirty Seals. As Bruno continued developing his memory art, he
23:57
Speaker 1: produced Explanation of Thirty Seals in fifteen eighty three, shortly
24:02
Speaker 1: after moving to England. This treatise is a direct continuation
24:06
Speaker 1: of Bruno's nomadic project, and its full title indicates its
24:10
Speaker 1: ambitious scope explanation of the thirty Seals for the invention,
24:15
Speaker 1: arrangement and memory of all sciences and arts. In essence,
24:20
Speaker 1: Bruno was offering a method to not only memorize knowledge,
24:24
Speaker 1: but also to invent and organize it across every discipline.
24:28
Speaker 1: The number thirty is key. Bruno presents thirty seals, which
24:33
Speaker 1: we can think of as thirty fundamental configurations or images
24:37
Speaker 1: that underpin his system. This work likely included or was
24:42
Speaker 1: accompanied by diagrams. Indeed, a surviving copy shows intricate figures
24:47
Speaker 1: likely representing Bruno's seals. These seals or mystical logic diagrams
24:53
Speaker 1: that encode relationships among concepts. They might be compared to
24:59
Speaker 1: remendous La Willis, combinatory wheels, or two Kabbalistic sizzles, both
25:04
Speaker 1: of which Bruno admired. According to a Cambridge exhibition commentary,
25:09
Speaker 1: Bruno's diagrams in this book relate to mnemonics and logic,
25:13
Speaker 1: an attempt to fuse the art of memory with logical
25:16
Speaker 1: structure by rotating and permuting the thirty Seals, a practitioner
25:22
Speaker 1: would generate patterns that correspond to ideas or even entire propositions.
25:29
Speaker 1: Bruno intended this as a master key to all knowledge.
25:35
Speaker 1: In modern terms, it's as if he tried to create
25:37
Speaker 1: a universal encoding system for knowledge, using images and symbols
25:41
Speaker 1: instead of binary code. It's important to note that the
25:45
Speaker 1: Explanation of Thirty Seals was published in London, and Bruno
25:49
Speaker 1: was very aware of the intellectual daring of his ideas.
25:53
Speaker 1: A contemporary report notes that Bruno's nomonic works, including this one,
25:58
Speaker 1: were mystical works about logic, mnemonics, and the art of remembering,
26:03
Speaker 1: all part of Bruno's philosophical world. The word mystical is telling.
26:08
Speaker 1: Bruno's memory system was suffused with hermetic mysticism, astrological symbols,
26:13
Speaker 1: and references to both classical and occult knowledge. Bruno's integration
26:18
Speaker 1: of memory art with concepts like the Copernican heliocentric model,
26:22
Speaker 1: new physics, mechanics, and the plurality of worlds is noted
26:26
Speaker 1: by historians. While Explanation of Thirty Seals itself focuses on
26:31
Speaker 1: memory and logic, Bruno's preoccupation with an infinite cosmos in
26:35
Speaker 1: an animated nature was never far away. All these ideas
26:39
Speaker 1: chimed well with Martyred thinking of his day, yet also
26:43
Speaker 1: alarmed conservative theologians. Structurally, Explanation of Thirty Seals likely provides
26:51
Speaker 1: the practical exposition of the seals. Bruno unfolds or explains
26:55
Speaker 1: each of the thirty, perhaps detailing how each seal could
26:58
Speaker 1: be drawn to or imagined and what facet of knowledge
27:01
Speaker 1: it pertains to. Because this work was published together with
27:05
Speaker 1: Sigillus Sigilorum, it seems Bruno split his presentation into two parts,
27:11
Speaker 1: the theoretical introduction seal of seals and a practical compendium
27:15
Speaker 1: the specific seals. One French commentator confirms that Sigillus Sigilorum
27:21
Speaker 1: is the theoretical part of a nomonic treatise, of which Explanation
27:25
Speaker 1: of thirty Seals is the practical part. Thus, we can
27:30
Speaker 1: view the Explanation of thirty Seals as containing the actual
27:34
Speaker 1: nomonic engine the thirty seals, diagrams and instructions on their
27:38
Speaker 1: use for memory and invention. Why Sigillus Sigilorum provides philosophical
27:44
Speaker 1: rationale In summary, Explanation of thirty Seals is a bold
27:49
Speaker 1: attempt at a universal memory system. It extends Bruno's art
27:54
Speaker 1: of memory into a comprehensive tool laden with symbolic images.
27:59
Speaker 1: This seals that could encode the vast breadth of human knowledgy.
28:04
Speaker 1: Few in Bruno's time attempted such an all encompassing schema.
28:09
Speaker 1: This treatise illustrates Bruno's confidence in the power of the
28:12
Speaker 1: human imagination. With the right system, he believed one could
28:16
Speaker 1: penetrate all sciences and arts, finding connections and storing insights
28:21
Speaker 1: systematically in the mind. It's a vision of a total
28:25
Speaker 1: knowledge at one's mental fingertips, a dream that, while never
28:30
Speaker 1: truly realize, anticipated later ideas of universal languages and encyclopedia systems.
28:37
Speaker 1: And next we have sagillious sigilorum, or the Seal of Seals.
28:43
Speaker 1: Bruno's Seal of Seals is a theoretical counterpart to the
28:46
Speaker 1: Thirty Seals explication, where explanation of thirty Seals presumably lays
28:52
Speaker 1: out the mechanics of Bruno's mnemonic seals. The Seal of
28:55
Speaker 1: Seals provides a philosophical foundation, a deep reflection on how
28:59
Speaker 1: memory and thought work and why such a system is
29:02
Speaker 1: even possible. Bruno is not here teaching how to memorize. Rather,
29:07
Speaker 1: he's explaining why the art of memory is central to
29:10
Speaker 1: human cognition. In the Seal of Seals, Bruno aligns himself
29:15
Speaker 1: with two major authorities of Western thought, Plato and Aristotle.
29:20
Speaker 1: He invokes Plato's theory of reminiscence and Aristotle's maxim He
29:25
Speaker 1: invokes Plato's theory of reminiscence and Aristotle's maxim that to
29:29
Speaker 1: think is to consider images. According to one analysis, Bruno
29:34
Speaker 1: doesn't treat these as abstract aphorisms, but as clues to
29:38
Speaker 1: codified mnemonic practices throughout history. In other words, whenever philosophers
29:44
Speaker 1: spoke of recalling in eight ideas Plato or needing images
29:48
Speaker 1: for thought Aristotle, Bruno reads it as evidence that memory
29:52
Speaker 1: and imagination underlie all thinking. He thus proposes the theory
29:57
Speaker 1: of mental activity centered on memory. Memory is not just
30:02
Speaker 1: about retaining the past. It becomes an active, creative force
30:07
Speaker 1: that organizes one's inner world. Bruno writes that memory is
30:11
Speaker 1: a principle of organizing the internal sense and indeed the
30:15
Speaker 1: entire soul. By actively structuring our memories, for example, by
30:20
Speaker 1: using pnemonic seals, we actively shape our intellect in even
30:24
Speaker 1: our spiritual being. Bruno's approach in Sigilla's sigil orm also
30:30
Speaker 1: involves a distinctive theory of signs and images. He breaks
30:34
Speaker 1: from Augustinian tradition that often saw images and material impressions
30:38
Speaker 1: as lesser or potentially deceptive. Instead, Bruno sees images the
30:43
Speaker 1: products of imagination, as vital bridges between the senses and
30:47
Speaker 1: the intellect. He connects this to the concept of intellectual conjunction,
30:53
Speaker 1: the hot topic and Renaissance Aristolian circles, especially via Avros,
30:58
Speaker 1: the idea of how the individual man connects to the
31:00
Speaker 1: universal intellect. Bruno stance is that by using images and
31:04
Speaker 1: themonic devices, the mind can more tightly join itself to
31:08
Speaker 1: higher intellective truths, effectively tuning the individual memory to the
31:13
Speaker 1: patterns of the universal mind. This ties memory to a
31:17
Speaker 1: quasi mystical goal, the union of the thinker with the
31:21
Speaker 1: intelligible order of the cosmos. It's a very neoplatonic idea
31:27
Speaker 1: where the human soul can ascend and reunite with the
31:29
Speaker 1: one dressed in the terminology of memory science. Cagillous Sigolorum
31:36
Speaker 1: also provides a brief look at Raymond Loll's art and
31:39
Speaker 1: Bruno's take on it. Lolls R's Magna is a medieval
31:43
Speaker 1: combinatorial system aimed at logical and theological discovery. Bruno is
31:48
Speaker 1: inspired by Loll's ideas of rotating figures to generate concepts,
31:53
Speaker 1: and in Cagillous Sigilorum, he offers a quick presentation of
31:57
Speaker 1: the deduction of Lull's art. Interpreted it as an instrument
32:01
Speaker 1: of invention, Bruno essentially repurposes Lull's combinatorial logic with his
32:07
Speaker 1: own memory system. Lull's wheels become tools for creativity as
32:12
Speaker 1: much as for memory. By calling his work this seal
32:16
Speaker 1: of seals, Bruno implies that his theory is the seal
32:20
Speaker 1: that validates all other's seals, his thirty seals. In any
32:24
Speaker 1: other system of knowledge, it's the meta seal, the guaranter
32:30
Speaker 1: that the method works grounded in the nature of thought itself.
32:36
Speaker 1: To illustrate Bruno's thinking, he argues that whenever we recall
32:40
Speaker 1: one thing and it makes us think of another, say,
32:42
Speaker 1: seeing a photograph reminds you of the event it depicts,
32:46
Speaker 1: we are exercising the fundamental power of memory that underlies thought.
32:52
Speaker 1: His art of memory is a deliberate amplification of this
32:55
Speaker 1: natural power. Furthermore by populating the mind with powerful images,
33:00
Speaker 1: which he often drew from mystical or divine names. As
33:04
Speaker 1: Bruno was known to incorporate estrological and cabalistic symbols into
33:08
Speaker 1: his seals, we align our mind with the living forces
33:11
Speaker 1: of nature. Bruno was indeed influenced by the hermetic notion
33:17
Speaker 1: that nature is God in things, and that by impressing
33:20
Speaker 1: natural and celestial symbols into memory, we partake in the
33:25
Speaker 1: divine order. In summary, Sigillous Sigilorum can be seen as
33:33
Speaker 1: Bruno's manifesto on the power of memory and imagination. It
33:37
Speaker 1: inserts that memory is not a passive storage, but an active,
33:41
Speaker 1: generative faculty that, when harnessed, elevates to intellect and even
33:47
Speaker 1: the soul. This work links Bruno's demonic art to his
33:52
Speaker 1: broader philosophical and magical ideas, showing a unity between knowing
33:57
Speaker 1: and being. Little wonder that latest goys like Francis Yates
34:01
Speaker 1: found Bruno's memory theories pivotal. He was bridging the gap
34:05
Speaker 1: between the inner cosmos of the mind and the outer
34:08
Speaker 1: cosmos of nature with memory as the connecting seal, and
34:14
Speaker 1: now onto his Italian dialogues. First, we have The ash
34:19
Speaker 1: Wednesday Supper, published in fifteen eighty four, a cosmological and
34:24
Speaker 1: comic dialogue set at an Ash Wednesday dinner in London. Here,
34:30
Speaker 1: Bruno and the character of Nolan, the Man from Nola,
34:34
Speaker 1: explains and defends Copernican heliocentrism to two skeptical Oxford mathematicians.
34:41
Speaker 1: Bruno portrays his English scholarly opponents as absurd pendants, and
34:46
Speaker 1: he mingles philosophical arguments with personal satire. This earned him
34:52
Speaker 1: notoriety for insulting English pride. The ash Wednesday Supper is
34:56
Speaker 1: notable for presenting Bruno's early ascertation that the universe is
35:01
Speaker 1: infinite and that the stars are other suns with their
35:04
Speaker 1: own planets. And then we have On Cause, Principle and
35:10
Speaker 1: Unity from fifteen eighty four, a deeper metaphysical dialogue examining
35:16
Speaker 1: the nature of the universe's first causes and fundamental unity,
35:20
Speaker 1: published shortly after the uproar over the Ash Wednesday Supper.
35:23
Speaker 1: It opens with an apologia in which Bruno, addressing the
35:28
Speaker 1: mathematicians of Oxford, have heartedly retracts the tone of his
35:32
Speaker 1: previous statements while justifying his critique. In the dialogue itself,
35:38
Speaker 1: Bruno argues for an imminent God and a unity of substance.
35:42
Speaker 1: All reality is one, an expression of the infinite divine principle.
35:48
Speaker 1: He revives aspects of Neoplatonism and Renaissance Hermetic thought, proposing
35:52
Speaker 1: that the universe and God are inseparable, a view that
35:56
Speaker 1: borders on pantheism. This next one we're going to cover
36:01
Speaker 1: a little more extensively, and that one is on the
36:05
Speaker 1: infinite universe. In Worlds from fifteen eighty four. This is
36:11
Speaker 1: one of Bruno's most famous and visionary writings. It consists
36:15
Speaker 1: of five dialogues and represents Bruno's cosmological masterpiece in the
36:19
Speaker 1: Italian language. In these dialogues, Bruno passionately argues for a
36:25
Speaker 1: view of the cosmos that was radically new. The universe
36:29
Speaker 1: is infinite, it has no center, and it contains innumerable
36:33
Speaker 1: worlds like our own. At this time, the dominant cosmology
36:39
Speaker 1: was still the Aristolian ptolemic model, a finite universe with
36:42
Speaker 1: the Earth at the center, surrounded by nested crystalline spheres
36:47
Speaker 1: carrying the planets and the fixed stars, often likened to
36:50
Speaker 1: an onion of concentric shells. Copernicus had published his heliocentric
36:56
Speaker 1: theory in fifteen forty three, placing the Sun at the
36:59
Speaker 1: center of the universe, with Earth as just another planet.
37:02
Speaker 1: But Copernicism was still controversial and mostly treated as a
37:06
Speaker 1: computational convenience by astronomers, not a physical reality. Bruno seized
37:13
Speaker 1: upon Copernicus's idea and went much further on the infinite
37:18
Speaker 1: of the universe and worlds. He declares, not only does
37:21
Speaker 1: the Earth move around the Sun, but the copernicuant model
37:24
Speaker 1: implies a limitless universe. If the old idea of a
37:27
Speaker 1: fixed fear of stars is an illusion due to Earth's rotation,
37:30
Speaker 1: as Copernicus said, then there is no edge to the
37:33
Speaker 1: cosmos at all. In quotes, the universe was not a
37:39
Speaker 1: finite globe composed of concentric spheres. Instead, it was an infinite,
37:44
Speaker 1: homogenous expanse populated by an infinite number of solar systems
37:49
Speaker 1: like our own. Bruno triumphantly compares this conceptual revolution to
37:55
Speaker 1: great voyages. Just as Columbus discovered new continents on Earth,
38:00
Speaker 1: Bruno claims to have discovered countless worlds in this universe.
38:04
Speaker 1: One of Bruno's key contentions in these dialogues is that
38:07
Speaker 1: the stars we see at night are themselves suns, each
38:11
Speaker 1: potentially surrounded by their own planets or earths. Therefore, our
38:17
Speaker 1: sun is just one star among an infinity, and our
38:22
Speaker 1: Earth one world among an infinite plurality of worlds. This
38:28
Speaker 1: destroyed the unique status of Earth, and by extension, challenged
38:33
Speaker 1: the unique status of man in the cosmos, a deeply
38:37
Speaker 1: unsettling idea for the orthodox mindset. Bruno bolsters his cosmology
38:43
Speaker 1: with multiple lines of reasoning philosophical, empirical, and even theological. Philosophically,
38:49
Speaker 1: he argues there's no reason nature would limit itself to
38:52
Speaker 1: a single closed system. If it's possible for there to
38:56
Speaker 1: be many worlds, then in an infinite universe, all possible
39:00
Speaker 1: must be realized. He often insisted that in an infinite creation,
39:05
Speaker 1: what is possible and reasonable must also be actual. Empirically,
39:12
Speaker 1: he points to the new telescopic observations just emerging and
39:16
Speaker 1: the inadequacy of the naked eye astronomy to discern any boundary.
39:21
Speaker 1: The stars could be at vast varying distance and a
39:25
Speaker 1: huge void. Theologically, he makes the claim God's omnipotence an
39:32
Speaker 1: infinite fecundity would be limited if creation had an end
39:37
Speaker 1: a finite universe would not do justice to an infinite God,
39:41
Speaker 1: whereas an infinite universe with endless worlds is a truer
39:44
Speaker 1: manifestation of divine greatness. Bruno even cites biblical hints, like
39:50
Speaker 1: the verse in Daniel about God's throne attended by thousands
39:53
Speaker 1: upon thousands of angels, which he interprets as meaning countless
39:58
Speaker 1: celestial bodies. The dialogues are written with dramatic flare. Bruno
40:04
Speaker 1: often uses a character name Philothius of Philothius Lover of Truth,
40:09
Speaker 1: who essentially speaks for Bruno's own views and pits him
40:13
Speaker 1: against pendants who defend old cosmology. Though witty and fiery exchanges,
40:19
Speaker 1: Bruno addresses and demolishes common objections of the time. For instance,
40:25
Speaker 1: Aristolians argue that an infinite cosmos is impossible because then
40:29
Speaker 1: an outer sphere would have to move infinitely fast, or
40:33
Speaker 1: a stone moved far from Earth wouldn't know where to
40:36
Speaker 1: fall if multiple centers existed. Bruno replies that these objections
40:41
Speaker 1: lose force once you remove the Earth from the cosmic center.
40:47
Speaker 1: In an infinite universe, there is no absolute up or down,
40:51
Speaker 1: no absolute center. Every observer can consider themselves at the
40:56
Speaker 1: center of their own horizon, and motion is relative. Bruno
41:01
Speaker 1: into it's a form of principle of relativity. Since the
41:05
Speaker 1: Earth is moving, what we call up or down is
41:09
Speaker 1: just relative to our position, and likewise for any world,
41:15
Speaker 1: each world has its own center of gravity, and objects
41:17
Speaker 1: are attracted to their local worlds by any kind of
41:21
Speaker 1: universal natural attraction. Bruno discussed a form of gravitational theory,
41:27
Speaker 1: noting that parts are drawn to holes, anticipating ideas Galileo
41:32
Speaker 1: and Newton would explore. He even compares the endless distribution
41:36
Speaker 1: of stars to specks of dust in a sunbeam, appearing
41:40
Speaker 1: dense near the source, in sparser further away, but truly
41:43
Speaker 1: filling an undefined expanse. Another daring aspect of Bruno's cosmology
41:48
Speaker 1: in these dialogues is his idea that the universe is
41:50
Speaker 1: one eternal, living organism. He famously asserted that the Earth
41:56
Speaker 1: and everything else is animated, with the soul as the
41:59
Speaker 1: center of every part. Bruno's view, each star in each
42:05
Speaker 1: planet is a living entity with an internal principle causing
42:08
Speaker 1: its motion. He extends the concept of soul, which are
42:13
Speaker 1: stolians reserved for living beings. Hence the stars move, not
42:17
Speaker 1: because they are pushed by crystal spheres or angels, but
42:20
Speaker 1: because they are self moving, living things. This is the
42:24
Speaker 1: world's soul hypothesis, a form of pantheism where God is
42:29
Speaker 1: imminent in nature and every part of the universe is
42:31
Speaker 1: infused with life and divinity. Bruno's character Philothius declares that
42:37
Speaker 1: Nature is God in things, collapsing the distance between Creator
42:42
Speaker 1: and creation. Such statements edged towards heresy. The imply God
42:47
Speaker 1: is not a distant creator outside the world, but essentially
42:51
Speaker 1: the world itself and its infinite extension. All the infinite
42:56
Speaker 1: universe and worlds presents an entire new cosmic paradigm. It
43:00
Speaker 1: was a philosophical manifesto as much as a cosmological one.
43:05
Speaker 1: The work did not go unnoticed or uncriticized. While in England,
43:09
Speaker 1: Bruno's cosmology intrigued some. He had admirers among this Sydney
43:14
Speaker 1: circle and others, but it also shocked conservative scholars. Years later,
43:19
Speaker 1: during Bruno's trial by the Inquisition, his assertion of innumerable
43:24
Speaker 1: worlds and an infinite universe was listed among the charges
43:27
Speaker 1: of heresy, not because the Church had formerly condemned Compernicus
43:31
Speaker 1: yet and had it in Bruno's time, but because of
43:34
Speaker 1: the theological implications of Bruno's infinity multiple worlds raised questions
43:41
Speaker 1: like the Christ's redeem of the world's too orther, multiple incarnations, etc. Bruno, however,
43:49
Speaker 1: was unrepentant in his vision. He believed that he had
43:53
Speaker 1: glimpsed a truth far greater than the closed vault imagined
43:56
Speaker 1: by antiquity. On the infinite Universe and Worlds stands today
44:01
Speaker 1: as a remarkably piece of work. It anticipated the modern
44:05
Speaker 1: view that space is boundless and filled with countless galaxies,
44:09
Speaker 1: worlds upon worlds, though of course Bruno arrived at this
44:14
Speaker 1: by philosophical insight rather than scientific telescopes. In literature and philosophy,
44:20
Speaker 1: Bruno's infinite universe would inspire in trouble thinkers for centuries
44:24
Speaker 1: to come. And then we have the Expulsion of the
44:28
Speaker 1: Triumphant Beast from fifteen eighty four, and that's an allegorical satire.
44:35
Speaker 1: It imagines the Olympian gods, with Jupiter presiding, deciding to
44:39
Speaker 1: reform the heavens by expelling the constellations, conceived as animals
44:44
Speaker 1: representing vices and replacing them with new symbols of virtue.
44:49
Speaker 1: Through this symbolic cleansing of the sky. Bruno critiques the
44:53
Speaker 1: moral corruption of this time, and especially Poke's fun at
44:57
Speaker 1: the hypocrisies of organized religion. The triumphant beast in the
45:03
Speaker 1: title is often interpreted as ignorance and superstition, or sometimes
45:07
Speaker 1: the Roman Church itself that must be cast out. The
45:12
Speaker 1: dialogue draws on Bruno's extensive knowledge of classical mythology, astrology,
45:16
Speaker 1: and hermetic symbolism. In one notable passage, Bruno, through the
45:22
Speaker 1: figure of Wisdom, argues that the gods do not require
45:26
Speaker 1: worship for their own sake. It is an unworthy, foolish, profane,
45:32
Speaker 1: and reprehensible thing to think that the gods demand reverence, fear, love, worship,
45:38
Speaker 1: and respect for any other good end or utility than
45:42
Speaker 1: those of men themselves, inasmuch as being perfectly glorious in themselves.
45:48
Speaker 1: Such statements reveal Bruno's belief that religion should serve moral
45:53
Speaker 1: and philosophical elevation. And then we have the Cabal of
45:59
Speaker 1: Pegasus from fifteen eighty five. This is a satire in
46:03
Speaker 1: which Bruno uses the form of a mock dialogue to
46:06
Speaker 1: ridicule the pedantry of philosophers and theologians The title literally
46:12
Speaker 1: means cabal of the horse Pegasus, and in this work
46:16
Speaker 1: Bruno imagines a discourse involving a donkey and Pegasus, the
46:20
Speaker 1: winged horse of lore. It is a parody of foolish learning,
46:24
Speaker 1: Bruno's jabs at those who cling to asinine doctrines. Beneath
46:30
Speaker 1: the humor, the Kabbala also contains serious discussions on the
46:34
Speaker 1: nature of the soul and the autobiographical eventing of Bruno's
46:38
Speaker 1: frustrations with academia. And then we have The Heroic Frenzies
46:45
Speaker 1: from fifteen eighty five, Bruno's Final London Dialogue, a poetic
46:51
Speaker 1: and philosophical meditation on enthusiasm and the estatic pursuit of truth.
46:57
Speaker 1: Written as a series of love poems with the companying
47:00
Speaker 1: commentary in dialogue form. The Heroic Frenzies uses the metaphor
47:04
Speaker 1: of love's madness as an analog for the soul's quest
47:07
Speaker 1: for the divine. Bruno describes the heroic lover, the philosopher
47:13
Speaker 1: a poet, as one driven to seeming madness by an
47:16
Speaker 1: insatiable desire for the infinite. He writes, heroic love is
47:22
Speaker 1: proper to higher natures, calling insane, not because they do
47:27
Speaker 1: not know, but because they know beyond the ordinary. Bruno's
47:33
Speaker 1: heroic Frenzies is filled with hermetic, platonic, and mystical imagery,
47:38
Speaker 1: celebrating intellectual passion as a form of divine fury or fury.
47:44
Speaker 1: It stands as a unique Renaissance work fusing literature and philosophy,
47:47
Speaker 1: and its style alternating verse and learned explication, underscores Bruno's
47:53
Speaker 1: belief that poetry and myth are as vital as logic
47:56
Speaker 1: for grasping truth. Bruno's Italian Dialogues in England secured his
48:03
Speaker 1: reputation for better and worse. They circulated his bold cosmological
48:08
Speaker 1: and philosophical ideas to a broader European audience, but they
48:12
Speaker 1: also offended many. In these works, Bruno openly insulted the
48:17
Speaker 1: pendants of Oxford and more generally railed against the arrogance
48:20
Speaker 1: of those who clung to Aristotle and scorned new ideas.
48:26
Speaker 1: As a result, by fifteen eighty five, Bruno had strained
48:30
Speaker 1: the hospitality of his London patrons. The French ambassador who
48:34
Speaker 1: had sheltered him was recalled to France in October fifteen
48:37
Speaker 1: eighty five, and Bruno left England in his company. According
48:42
Speaker 1: to one theory proposed by historian John Bossi, during Bruno's
48:46
Speaker 1: time in London, he may have also been acting as
48:49
Speaker 1: a spy for Queen Elizabeth's spymaster, Sir Francis Walsingham. Bossi
48:55
Speaker 1: speculates that Bruno's stay at the French Embassy allowed him
48:59
Speaker 1: to gather information on Catholic conspirators using the code name
49:03
Speaker 1: Henry Faggott. Whether or not Bruno was a secret informer,
49:09
Speaker 1: by the time he departed England, his bridges there were burned.
49:13
Speaker 1: He had, however, achieved something lasting. Bruno left England having
49:17
Speaker 1: published an unprecedented vision of an infinite cosmos and a
49:21
Speaker 1: sweeping critique of accepted wisdom, works that would inspire thinkers
49:25
Speaker 1: for generations to come. It is notable that in an
49:28
Speaker 1: attendee at Bruno's Oxford Talks, the student Francis Godwin went
49:34
Speaker 1: on to write one of the first science fiction stories
49:36
Speaker 1: in English, The Man in the Moon, in sixteen thirty eight,
49:41
Speaker 1: about a journey to an inhabited moon, a tale arguably
49:45
Speaker 1: influenced by Bruno's cosmic imagination. When Bruno returned to Paris
49:51
Speaker 1: in late fifteen eighty five, he walked into a tense
49:54
Speaker 1: political and religious atmosphere. France was in the throes of
49:59
Speaker 1: the Catholic Hugot conflict, the War of the Three Henrys.
50:03
Speaker 1: The tolerant King Henry the Third was under pressure from
50:06
Speaker 1: the ultra Catholic League. Bruno found that the intellectual freedom
50:10
Speaker 1: he had enjoyed a few years earlier had evaporated characteristically.
50:16
Speaker 1: He soon provoked the French scholars. Bruno composed a set
50:20
Speaker 1: of one hundred and twenty thesis attacking Aristotle's natural philosophy
50:25
Speaker 1: and challenged old comers to a public debate. In fifteen
50:30
Speaker 1: eighty five, during a disputation at the College of Cambray
50:34
Speaker 1: and Paris, a violent quall broke out between Bruno and
50:38
Speaker 1: a champion of Aristolian orthodoxy. The dispute degenerated, and Bruno,
50:44
Speaker 1: who had once again made powerful enemies, decided it was
50:47
Speaker 1: prudent to leave France. During this time, he did write
50:52
Speaker 1: The Interpretation of the Dream in fifteen eighty six, which
50:56
Speaker 1: I do think is worth mentioning for a bit. The
51:00
Speaker 1: Interpretation of the Dream is a less known but fascinating
51:04
Speaker 1: dialogue written in fifteen eighty six after Bruno had returned
51:07
Speaker 1: to France. From England. It forms a part of a
51:11
Speaker 1: group of Latin dialogues Bruno composed in Paris, which also
51:15
Speaker 1: included Idiota Triumphants, The Triumphant Idiot or Literate, and also
51:22
Speaker 1: Mordentius nd Mordenti Secchino, all published around the same time.
51:29
Speaker 1: These dialogues are born from Bruno's intellectual conflicts in France,
51:32
Speaker 1: particularly a dispute with the Italian mathematician Fabrizio Mordente over
51:38
Speaker 1: a new mathematical instrument, Mordente's proportional compass. What makes this
51:44
Speaker 1: book unique is its allegorical framework. Bruno uses a scenario
51:49
Speaker 1: of interpreting a dream as a creative vehicle to convey
51:52
Speaker 1: his philosophical message. In this dialogue, Bruno essentially stages a
51:58
Speaker 1: dream and then has the characters interpreted its meaning, using
52:01
Speaker 1: that it is an opportunity to expound his own ideas.
52:06
Speaker 1: In this dialogue, Bruno essentially stages a dream and then
52:10
Speaker 1: he has the characters interpret its meaning, using that as
52:14
Speaker 1: an opportunity to expound his own ideas. The dream imagery
52:19
Speaker 1: likely allowed Bruno to satirize and criticize his targets with
52:22
Speaker 1: some veil of fiction. According to historical letters, By this time,
52:27
Speaker 1: Bruno was furiously at odds with Mordente and also taking
52:31
Speaker 1: bold shots at Aristolian scholastics in Paris. A contemporary account
52:37
Speaker 1: by the scholar Giambattista Corbinelli, writing in June fifteen eighty six,
52:42
Speaker 1: notes that Bruno had published dialogues, including one on the Dream,
52:46
Speaker 1: and is engaged in destroying the whole of the Aristolian philosophy,
52:50
Speaker 1: delivering his arguments vigorously. The same letter calls Bruno the
52:55
Speaker 1: Nolan after his birthplace Nola, and describes him as an
53:00
Speaker 1: epicurean in his way of life who had caused schisms
53:04
Speaker 1: in academic circles, painting a picture of Bruno as a provocative,
53:08
Speaker 1: combative figure shaking up orthodox academia. So what is this
53:13
Speaker 1: book about. Why the detailed content is obscure. The dialogue
53:17
Speaker 1: itself is not a widely available as Bruno's cosmological works.
53:22
Speaker 1: We can infer some themes. It is the fourth dialogue
53:26
Speaker 1: in the Mordente cycle, meaning it was likely the culmination
53:29
Speaker 1: of Bruno's response to Mordente. Mordente had invented a compass
53:33
Speaker 1: able to divide intervals into fractions. Bruno initially praised Mordente's device,
53:39
Speaker 1: but then claim Mordente didn't grasp its deeper philosophical implications.
53:45
Speaker 1: In this book, Bruno probably uses a dream narrative to
53:48
Speaker 1: illustrate his philosophical point of view about the infinite divisibility
53:52
Speaker 1: of space or the concept of the minimum. One academic
53:56
Speaker 1: source suggests Bruno was exploring the possibility of law of
53:59
Speaker 1: motion that could account for both circular and linear motion
54:03
Speaker 1: in these dialogues. It's plausible the dream in question featured
54:07
Speaker 1: some symbolic scenario, perhaps an encounter with celestial figures or
54:12
Speaker 1: a journey through the heavens, that, when interpreted, reveals the
54:16
Speaker 1: shortcomings of Aristolian physics and the truth of Bruno's infinite
54:20
Speaker 1: animistic cosmos. Furthermore, this book and its companion, Idiota Triumphants,
54:27
Speaker 1: served as Bruno's self defense and literary form. Rdente was
54:32
Speaker 1: angered by Bruno's earlier writings and tried to suppress them.
54:36
Speaker 1: Bruno counterattacked by writing these two new dialogues, casting himself
54:41
Speaker 1: in a positive light. The title Idiota Triumphants already suggests
54:47
Speaker 1: a satirical reversal. The idiot unlearned triumphs over the supposedly
54:52
Speaker 1: learned perhaps poking fun at penance. The interpretation of the
54:58
Speaker 1: dream might portray Bruno as the a wise interpreter, unlocking
55:01
Speaker 1: profound truths from a dream while his adversaries fall to
55:05
Speaker 1: grasp them. Given Bruno's sharp tongue, we can imagine the
55:09
Speaker 1: dialogue contained biting critiques of academic aristolians. Which particularly intriguing
55:15
Speaker 1: is that Bruno chose dream interpretation as a device. Dream
55:20
Speaker 1: interpretation has a long legacy, but Bruno's usage likely has
55:24
Speaker 1: a philosophical spin. The dream could symbolize the outdated worldview,
55:30
Speaker 1: something fantastical that people took as real, and its interpretation
55:34
Speaker 1: would mean waking up to the new reality if we
55:38
Speaker 1: consider that only one year later Bruno wrote Cabbala of
55:42
Speaker 1: the Horse Pegasus, which is similarly aragorical satirical attack on pedantry.
55:47
Speaker 1: It fits a pattern Bruno in these works mixes a
55:52
Speaker 1: erudition with humor, myth with argument. In summary, this book
55:58
Speaker 1: showcases Bruno's literary flair and boldness. It is philosophy in disguise,
56:05
Speaker 1: using the interpretation of a dream as an allegory for
56:08
Speaker 1: discovering truth. Through this dialogue, Bruno continues to champion his
56:13
Speaker 1: revolutionary ideas, but in a playful, imaginative form. It also
56:18
Speaker 1: reflects Bruno's embattled life. We see him at the height
56:22
Speaker 1: of controversy in Paris, fearless in destroying the whole parapatetic
56:26
Speaker 1: philosophy if need be. Not long after these events Bruno
56:31
Speaker 1: left France for Germany, as even the relatively tolerant Paris
56:34
Speaker 1: was becoming dangerous fan This book therefore can be read
56:39
Speaker 1: as one of Bruno's last shots fired in the intellectual
56:42
Speaker 1: battles of the fifteen eighties, a dream form which he
56:46
Speaker 1: hoped European thought would finally awaken. And now back to
56:53
Speaker 1: his wanderings. In mid fifteen eighty six, he traveled to Germany,
56:59
Speaker 1: the patchwork of Indie dependent states and universities offering new prospects.
57:04
Speaker 1: He first tried Marburg, but the Lutheran authorities there refused
57:08
Speaker 1: to let him teach due to his controversial reputation. Bruno
57:12
Speaker 1: then went to the more liberal German city of Wittenberg,
57:15
Speaker 1: the heart of the Protestant Reformation, where Martin Luther had
57:19
Speaker 1: taught decades earlier. Amazingly, Wittenberg University welcomed him. From fifteen
57:25
Speaker 1: eighty six to fifteen eighty eight, Bruno taught there as
57:27
Speaker 1: a professor, giving lectures on Aristotle, the very philosopher he
57:32
Speaker 1: so often attacked. Bruno's time in Wittenberg was relatively calm
57:36
Speaker 1: and productive. He tempered his open criticism of Lutheran's doctrines
57:40
Speaker 1: and found protection under the humanist Duke of Saxony. However,
57:45
Speaker 1: after two years the religious climate shifted. A more conservative
57:50
Speaker 1: faction gained influence in Wittenberg, and Bruno's position became untenable.
57:55
Speaker 1: In mid fifteen eighty eight, he left Wittenberg on uneasy terms.
58:00
Speaker 1: Bruno next traveled to Prague with the Holy Roman Emperor
58:03
Speaker 1: Rudolph the second, maintained a court fascinated by alchemy, astrology,
58:07
Speaker 1: and the arts. In fifteen eighty eight, Bruno presented the
58:11
Speaker 1: emperor with a manuscript, apparently his work Articuli Centrum one
58:16
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty thesis against the mathematicians and philosophers of
58:20
Speaker 1: this time, and he received a small stipend of three
58:23
Speaker 1: hundred dollars for his effort. However, Rudolph the Second did
58:28
Speaker 1: not offer him a permanent position. After less than a year,
58:32
Speaker 1: Bruno moved on again. By fifteen eighty nine, he was
58:35
Speaker 1: in the Lutheran German state of Brunswick and settled in
58:38
Speaker 1: the town of Helmstead. There he briefly attained a position
58:43
Speaker 1: from the local duke and taught the Calvinists founded University
58:46
Speaker 1: of Helmstead. But bruno stay in Helmstead went awry as well.
58:51
Speaker 1: He could not resist speaking his mind on religious matters.
58:56
Speaker 1: He argued for broad religious tolerance, that different Christians sex
59:00
Speaker 1: should coexist peacefully, an idea far too crazy for that time.
59:06
Speaker 1: In January fifteen eighty nine, the Lutheran superintendent in Helmstead
59:11
Speaker 1: excommunicated Bruno from the Lutheran Church. Though an excommunication in
59:17
Speaker 1: a Protestant land did not carry the threat of execution,
59:20
Speaker 1: it did mean Bruno lost the Duke's protection. By fifteen ninety,
59:25
Speaker 1: he had to flee yet again. During these restless years
59:30
Speaker 1: in Germany from fifteen eighty six to fifteen ninety, Bruno
59:33
Speaker 1: continued to write prolifically and mostly in Latin. He composed
59:38
Speaker 1: several scholarly treaties that expanded on his magical, mnemonic and
59:41
Speaker 1: cosmological ideas, often dictating them to his friend and secretary
59:46
Speaker 1: Girolamo Bessler. Among the works Bruno produced or begun in
59:50
Speaker 1: this period were d Magia on Magic. It is a
59:55
Speaker 1: systematic exploration of magic in which Bruno defines magic as
59:59
Speaker 1: the practical app location of natural philosophy. He distinguished natural
1:00:04
Speaker 1: magic using hidden properties of nature akin to science, from
1:00:07
Speaker 1: divine magic, spiritual elevation, and from negative demonic sorcery. Bruno
1:00:14
Speaker 1: saw the true age as a wise man who understands
1:00:16
Speaker 1: the bonds of sympathy connecting all things. And then we
1:00:21
Speaker 1: have on the Bonds in General from fifteen ninety one
1:00:25
Speaker 1: and original treatise on the Forces that bind and influence
1:00:28
Speaker 1: minds and Soul. Here Bruno applies his understanding of love, desire,
1:00:33
Speaker 1: and imagination to explain how magicians and charismatic figures can
1:00:36
Speaker 1: bind others to their will. It's a pioneering work in
1:00:41
Speaker 1: what we call psychology of persuasion, analyzing everything from erotic
1:00:46
Speaker 1: attraction to the manipulation of belief. And then we have
1:00:52
Speaker 1: On the Composition of Images, Signs and Ideas from fifteen
1:00:56
Speaker 1: ninety one, a work on mnemonic images and the art
1:00:59
Speaker 1: of memory. Continuing Bruno's earlier efforts in Paris, he provides
1:01:04
Speaker 1: detailed methods for constructing memory schemes using symbolic images, often
1:01:09
Speaker 1: astrological or hermetic symbols to organize knowledge. This text merges
1:01:14
Speaker 1: bruno nhomonic technology with his magical philosophy, asserting that arranging
1:01:19
Speaker 1: ideas and potent images can unlock deeper powers of the mind,
1:01:25
Speaker 1: and then we have the soul. Called Frankfurt Trilogy of
1:01:28
Speaker 1: fifteen ninety one, a series of sophisticated metaphysical works printed
1:01:33
Speaker 1: at Frankfort on the threefold, minimum and measure, on the monad,
1:01:39
Speaker 1: number and figure, and on the innumerable, the immense and
1:01:45
Speaker 1: the unfigurable. In these, Bruno elaborated in an entire system
1:01:51
Speaker 1: of thought. He posited that the universe is constructed from
1:01:55
Speaker 1: fundamental units atoms of matter, atoms of spirit, monads, and
1:02:01
Speaker 1: atoms of space and time minimal geometric points. Centuries before
1:02:07
Speaker 1: modern atomic theory. Bruno describes an atomic cosmology where matter
1:02:11
Speaker 1: and soul are both composed of indivisible units, and change
1:02:16
Speaker 1: is seen as their recombination. In d Monad, he explores
1:02:22
Speaker 1: unity in the mystical significance of numbers and shapes, showing
1:02:26
Speaker 1: his deep affinity for Pythagorean ideas. Diamenso returns to the
1:02:31
Speaker 1: theme of an infinite cosmos, aiding mathematical and speculative arguments
1:02:36
Speaker 1: to bolster the ideas of an endless universe with infinite worlds.
1:02:41
Speaker 1: These Latin works are dense and not widely read today,
1:02:44
Speaker 1: but they demonstrate Bruno's effort to create a coherent philosophical system,
1:02:49
Speaker 1: one that combines in an atomic theory of nature, an
1:02:52
Speaker 1: infinite cosmology, and a kind of mathematical mysticism. There is
1:02:58
Speaker 1: one of these books from the trilogy that I would
1:03:00
Speaker 1: like to talk about a little more in depth. On
1:03:04
Speaker 1: the Innumerable, the Immense, and the Unfigurable. This book represents
1:03:10
Speaker 1: the culmination of Bruno's cosmological and metaphysical thought. While On
1:03:15
Speaker 1: the Infinite Universe and Worlds was a lively Italian dialogue
1:03:18
Speaker 1: aimed at a broad audience, this book is a dense,
1:03:21
Speaker 1: systematic treatise written in a mix of verse and prose,
1:03:25
Speaker 1: aimed at learned readers. It dives even deeper into the
1:03:29
Speaker 1: idea of infinite cosmos and addresses the mathematical and philosophical
1:03:33
Speaker 1: underpinnings of infinity to put into context. Bruno's Frankfurt trilogy
1:03:39
Speaker 1: comprised of On the Very Small and Minimum, On the monad,
1:03:43
Speaker 1: Number and Shape, and On the Innumerable, the Immense, and
1:03:47
Speaker 1: the unfigurable. Together, these works form a grand synthesis. On
1:03:54
Speaker 1: the very small and the minimum deals with the infinity small,
1:03:57
Speaker 1: proposing a kind of atomic theory or my minimum principle
1:04:00
Speaker 1: for matter of space and time. On the monad, number
1:04:05
Speaker 1: and shape deals with the unity of things, introducing metaphysical
1:04:08
Speaker 1: units monads that combine to form reality, bridging arithmetic and ontology.
1:04:15
Speaker 1: On the innumerable, the immense, and the unfigurable, or focus
1:04:18
Speaker 1: deals with the infinitely large the structure of the universe
1:04:22
Speaker 1: at the cosmic scale. In this book, Bruno shows the
1:04:28
Speaker 1: order of the worlds with proofs that nature is an
1:04:32
Speaker 1: infinite whole. He methodically argues that the universe has no
1:04:36
Speaker 1: fixed boundaries, no center, and no end. The term unfigurable
1:04:42
Speaker 1: or shapeless suggests that you cannot encompass the universe in
1:04:46
Speaker 1: any definitive geometric shape or figure. It is boundless, so
1:04:51
Speaker 1: you cannot draw it on a map or model it
1:04:53
Speaker 1: as a closed sphere. He takes pains to refute any
1:04:58
Speaker 1: last vestiges of the Aristolian f Fite's sphere. By fifteen
1:05:02
Speaker 1: ninety one, Bruno had gathered more intellectual ammunition. He references
1:05:07
Speaker 1: ancient and Renaissance sources that hinted at infinity. He was
1:05:10
Speaker 1: aware of Nicholas of Cusa's idea of the infinite universe,
1:05:14
Speaker 1: Lucretius's infinite void, and other such currents. He even engages
1:05:19
Speaker 1: with contemporaries like Francesco Patrizi and others who were exploring
1:05:23
Speaker 1: non Aristolian cosmologies. One seventeenth century Amira Abraham Vaughan Frekenberg
1:05:30
Speaker 1: later wrote that Bruno's concept of space in d I
1:05:34
Speaker 1: Menso was akin to the Cabalist notion of einsoff the infinite,
1:05:38
Speaker 1: divine no end, essentially God as space. This captures Bruno's
1:05:45
Speaker 1: idea of God with an infinite universe. This work is
1:05:49
Speaker 1: structured into eight books written in hexameta poetry with extensive
1:05:53
Speaker 1: prose commentary. Bruno uses his format to both enchant and reason.
1:06:00
Speaker 1: Poetry praises the infinite creation, while the prose unpacks the
1:06:03
Speaker 1: dense arguments. He reiterates many points from the fifteen eighty
1:06:07
Speaker 1: four dialogue, but now with more rigorous argumentation on the
1:06:13
Speaker 1: infinity of the worlds. There is an infinite multitude of worlds, stars,
1:06:17
Speaker 1: of planets, truly without number, Bruno insists, no matter how
1:06:22
Speaker 1: many are discovered, there are always more beyond ad infinitum.
1:06:27
Speaker 1: The infinity of spaces space, the universe is immeasurably vast,
1:06:32
Speaker 1: having no outer edge. Thus motion, place, and orientation are
1:06:37
Speaker 1: all relative, an early grasp of the relativity of spatial
1:06:42
Speaker 1: reference frames. Absence of cosmic center, with no boundary, that
1:06:48
Speaker 1: can be no single center, every world can be considered
1:06:52
Speaker 1: a center from its own perspective. Bruno even says the
1:06:56
Speaker 1: center is everywhere to circumference nowhere, echoing a medieval formula
1:07:02
Speaker 1: for God. Worlds are similar. All celestial bodies are made
1:07:07
Speaker 1: of the same elements and obey the same natural principles.
1:07:10
Speaker 1: Earth is not unique. It's one of the planets and
1:07:14
Speaker 1: the stars of suns animated universe. Consistent with his earliest stance,
1:07:20
Speaker 1: Bruno affirms that the universe is one, infinite immobile, the
1:07:25
Speaker 1: form or soul is one, the matter or body is one,
1:07:31
Speaker 1: a quote in which he unifies all existence under one principle.
1:07:36
Speaker 1: Everything has life. It was a universal spirit that manifests
1:07:40
Speaker 1: in individual souls. This means not only is the universe
1:07:44
Speaker 1: infinite in extent, it is also internally unified and divine.
1:07:50
Speaker 1: Bruno's metaphysics in this book is strikingly modistic. He often
1:07:54
Speaker 1: refers to the one following neoplatonic tradition. He claims God, Nature,
1:08:00
Speaker 1: the universe, substance, form and matter, or all aspects of
1:08:05
Speaker 1: one same reality, just understood differently. To avoid outright accusations
1:08:12
Speaker 1: of atheism, Bruno sometimes phrase it as everything emanating from God,
1:08:17
Speaker 1: rather than being identical with God, but readers like the
1:08:22
Speaker 1: later German philosopher Jacobi would indeed label Bruno a pantheist
1:08:27
Speaker 1: and connect him to Spinoza's idea that God is the
1:08:30
Speaker 1: infinite substance of the world. Bruno's own nuance was that
1:08:35
Speaker 1: while God is fully imminent in nature, one could still
1:08:39
Speaker 1: speak of God as the unity that is above particular things.
1:08:43
Speaker 1: But this was subtle, and many thought Bruno erased the
1:08:46
Speaker 1: creator creation distinction altogether. An interesting aspect in this book
1:08:53
Speaker 1: is Bruno's fusion of mathematics with metaphysics. He doesn't shy
1:08:57
Speaker 1: away from the mathematical infinity. He discusses geometrical figures, the
1:09:03
Speaker 1: idea of the minimum and maximum, and paradoxes of the infinite.
1:09:07
Speaker 1: In his dedication of the trilogy to the Duke of Braunchwi,
1:09:12
Speaker 1: Bruno outlines how each part connects understanding mathematics and reality.
1:09:18
Speaker 1: For instance, d Minimo explores the idea that even as
1:09:22
Speaker 1: the universe is infinitely large, it is also composed of
1:09:26
Speaker 1: individual minima, a sort of atomic theory that ensures the
1:09:30
Speaker 1: infinite doesn't become a formless mush. Dimenso then deals with
1:09:35
Speaker 1: how those innumerable parts form an infinitely vaz structured whole.
1:09:41
Speaker 1: Bruno is effectively trying to reconcile the continuum infinite divisibility
1:09:45
Speaker 1: of matter and space, with atomism, discrete units, and with
1:09:49
Speaker 1: the continuity of the cosmos. It's an impressive intellectual spiderweb,
1:09:55
Speaker 1: one that prefigured later debates on calculus and physics. Before
1:10:00
Speaker 1: we continue, we will wrap this up now for part one.
1:10:04
Speaker 1: We will continue with his wanderings in fifteen ninety one
1:10:08
Speaker 1: in part two. Hope you all enjoyed and thank you
1:10:11
Speaker 1: for listening.