Latest / Unleashing Intuition Secrets / Mitch Vexler: Could a Texas Court Case Shatter the Property Tax Lie and Set a Precedent for America?

Transcript

Mitch Vexler: Could a Texas Court Case Shatter the Property Tax Lie and Set a Precedent for America? · Unleashing Intuition Secrets

• 0:02
  Hello, everybody.
• 0:02
  It's Michael Jaco with Unleashing Intuition Secrets.
• 0:05
  Joined once again by Mitch Vex- Vexler, and he has really taken
• 0:10
  things to another level with the fraud of, our taxes and so forth.
• 0:15
  Property taxes, how they've been manipulated in Texas where he has a
• 0:20
  a very good case against the all the way up to the Texas Supreme Court.
• 0:25
  And going all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.
• 0:28
  So this is incredible.
• 0:29
  We're gonna be talking about that.
• 0:30
  So Mitch, thanks so much for joining us once again.
• 0:33
  Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to help bring people up to
• 0:37
  speed as to what's happening, and the only word I can think of is egregious
• 0:42
  action- by the Supreme Court of Texas.
• 0:45
  But more than likely, it's gonna get undone for a variety of
• 0:49
  reasons that we'll touch on today.
• 0:51
  But their actions are such that they created deprivation of rights, which
• 0:56
  is a federal crime, against not just Vexler, but against all Texans.
• 1:02
  And they denied a case to be heard, not just under Texas constitutional
• 1:09
  law, but under the constitutional law of the United States of America.
• 1:14
  So in essence, the question that's being presented to the Supreme Court of the
• 1:19
  United States is whether a state, and I'll touch on that in a second, a state m- may
• 1:26
  do an end run around its own constitution- Yeah … and the Constitution
• 1:32
  of the United States of America.
• 1:34
  And why is this so important?
• 1:36
  Because what the S- Supreme Court of Texas has done is they created a replicable
• 1:42
  template for other states to follow.
• 1:46
  So not only have the deprivation of rights been committed against 32 million
• 1:50
  Texans, but in reality if other states follow the Supreme Court of Texas,
• 1:56
  you can kiss the Constitution of the United States of America goodbye.
• 2:01
  Because they would've effectively done an end run around it, and
• 2:05
  that's why this isn't gonna stand.
• 2:07
  Yeah, so it's when you break it down you found the fraud because you're dealing in
• 2:13
  real estate, you're buying and selling and so forth, and you're seeing the property
• 2:17
  taxes are going up way more than the it should be way more because of, the rate
• 2:24
  of inflation is a certain percentage, but the rate of the property taxes going
• 2:30
  up was ridiculously much, much higher.
• 2:33
  And so you started doing the research and that, these property taxes are…
• 2:38
  we give them, we b- we trust them.
• 2:40
  We've given them the trust to do these property taxes and
• 2:43
  app- and appraise property.
• 2:46
  And you found that they were appraising these properties illegally in some
• 2:50
  case all of the cases really to a point where they, they just shut
• 2:54
  everything down and just started putting in numbers on their own
• 2:59
  So if you go back five years and you use the average value of a house of
• 3:04
  $220,000, by virtue of inflation, that $220,000, give or take, legitimately would
• 3:11
  turn somewhere around $272,000 today.
• 3:15
  That's not what happened according to the central appraisal districts.
• 3:19
  What happened was a $220,000 house became worth 440,000.
• 3:24
  And through that process of the overvaluation, which is fraud, then the
• 3:30
  net result to the school districts from which bonds are raised is that they
• 3:36
  stole… This is the fraudulent component, not the total tax, just the fraudulent
• 3:40
  component, $17,700 from the average property owner who had a $220,000 home.
• 3:48
  They did that in the last five years.
• 3:50
  Now multiply that by roughly 149 million homes.
• 3:54
  The damage, 2.6 trillion.
• 3:57
  Hard cash stolen, pure fraud, and it's irrefutable.
• 4:03
  The math is the math.
• 4:05
  No judge on this planet can change the arithmetic, and no judge can explain the
• 4:12
  economic damages done through these bonds because no judge can trace it because the
• 4:17
  courts are prohibiting tracing the CUSIPs.
• 4:21
  How much money was actually raised?
• 4:23
  We've calculated it.
• 4:24
  We did it through a backdoor method of roughly $5.1 trillion.
• 4:29
  Now, I know it's more than that- … because they have 313 agreements,
• 4:32
  they have energy contracts, they have off-balance sheet financing.
• 4:35
  I've seen all that, but I can't quantify it.
• 4:39
  What I could quantify is looking at the median home income, figuring out
• 4:43
  what the values were, and then backing in to the multiples of how much money
• 4:48
  was raised by the school districts with regard to the fraudulent school
• 4:51
  district bonds, roughly 5.1 trillion
• 4:57
  Wow.
• 4:57
  Wow.
• 4:58
  Incredible.
• 4:59
  Now I've seen a couple presentations now at the Fraud Fighters summits and
• 5:03
  the last one you did was incredible.
• 5:07
  You exposed that it's not just the bond fraud in the property tax
• 5:12
  area, it's also the elec- it spills right over into election fraud and
• 5:18
  the fraud in so many other areas.
• 5:21
  So they use the same process, is that correct?
• 5:24
  It's not the same process, but what had happened through a
• 5:31
  video that I did, Edward Solomon reached out through Mark Cook.
• 5:35
  So Mark Cook called me and said, "Ed Solomon would like to have a
• 5:39
  conversation with you." And I said okay.
• 5:42
  So what Ed saw in me, which wasn't really articulated at that time, he went into the
• 5:49
  math, but the nexus between the two cases, his case against the manufacturer of the
• 5:58
  voting machines themselves, so Ed was an expert witness or to be an expert witness.
• 6:03
  What he saw was correct, which is there's two parallel cases, two different issues,
• 6:10
  having the exact same problem, which is the inability or the prohibition
• 6:15
  of having a case adjudicated Edward Solomon, as the expert witness, was
• 6:20
  never allowed to walk into a courtroom.
• 6:21
  They knew if he walked in, they lose.
• 6:25
  It's that simple.
• 6:26
  He's got the math.
• 6:27
  I've got their spreadsheets.
• 6:29
  So it's Ed Solomon, Roger Fuller, and as a different mathematician,
• 6:36
  Andrew, Dr. Andrew Paquette.
• 6:38
  They had come to the same conclusion about the election
• 6:42
  fraud software and how it's done.
• 6:45
  What's the nexus to the real estate tax?
• 6:48
  Real estate taxes and the fraudulent component of those taxes, it's
• 6:52
  money spent at the school districts to cover off fraudulent bonds.
• 6:58
  The problem is that money to cover off those fraudulent bonds, A, doesn't
• 7:02
  exist under the median household income.
• 7:04
  B, the bonds themselves, as I proved at the Fraud Fighters Summit, there never
• 7:10
  was, and never, a legitimate reason for any school district to go and raise bonds.
• 7:16
  It is a mechanism of to strip Mom and Pop's equity out of their house.
• 7:22
  That is clearly what I laid out.
• 7:25
  It turns out that an analysis was done on Barrow County,
• 7:29
  Texas, and Harris County, Texas.
• 7:33
  And what did they find in the school districts?
• 7:35
  The exact same flip function inside the voting software that took place.
• 7:41
  In other words, there are people who are sitting on these school
• 7:44
  district boards that were put there by virtue of fraud inside the software.
• 7:50
  So it's a cacophony of fraud everywhere, and that's what we called
• 7:55
  out, and it's a horrible situation.
• 7:58
  But the bottom line is there is no election that could be even deemed
• 8:04
  legitimate but for a punch bowl and paper ballots and voter ID.
• 8:10
  If it touches software, it's automatically suspect.
• 8:14
  Wow.
• 8:14
  And we have the math to back that statement up.
• 8:17
  These voter machines must be destroyed.
• 8:20
  The software must be destroyed and never allowed to be used again in history.
• 8:25
  This stuff is poison, and we've proven it.
• 8:28
  You saw Ed Solomon on stage.
• 8:30
  You saw Roger Fuller on stage.
• 8:32
  What they have come across and the method of the hidden vote distortion
• 8:36
  logic is not up for debate.
• 8:39
  It's real.
• 8:40
  You can say I disagree with it." Go ahead.
• 8:43
  Disprove it.
• 8:44
  And therein lies the problem.
• 8:45
  I laid down that gauntlet.
• 8:47
  Nobody in all these hearings, all these rehearings, have been able to
• 8:54
  prove that we're wrong on anything.
• 8:58
  So I laid down the gauntlet, FBI, DOJ, SEC, IRS.
• 9:01
  If you
• 9:03
  think we're wrong on something, for crying out loud, say it.
• 9:06
  We'll remove it.
• 9:07
  The problem is, there's another 1,100 documents in behind it.
• 9:11
  The point being, if you can't disprove it, then it occurred.
• 9:15
  And if it occurred, those people who are stopping adjudication
• 9:20
  of proven fraud are guilty.
• 9:23
  And therein is the reason why we're having problems of being heard.
• 9:28
  There are people who have been put in office that aren't supposed to be
• 9:31
  there, and we've got the math through the cast vote records to back that up.
• 9:35
  In fact, on the second amendment to the criminal complaint, there's a
• 9:38
  photographic evidence that for those who go to a voting booth and you see a
• 9:44
  touch screen, we have the photographic evidence that the barcodes on the touch
• 9:50
  screen have the flip function built into each one of those little black lines.
• 9:55
  These elections are predetermined, and therein is the huge problem.
• 10:01
  So not only is your money being equity stripped out of your house, your vote
• 10:06
  may not be what you think your vote is.
• 10:10
  And the only way to fix it is to destroy, and I mean destroy, the
• 10:15
  voting machines and the voting software- Wow … and put those who are
• 10:18
  responsible for prior elections in jail.
• 10:22
  That's on both sides of our aisle
• 10:25
  That sounds good to me.
• 10:26
  I like the way you're thinking.
• 10:28
  And it's… And a lot of people are like let's just stop paying property
• 10:32
  taxes." But you have made a case that that's not the way this works.
• 10:36
  And in the military I learned very early on, if you have a
• 10:40
  bitch, you better have a solution.
• 10:42
  So you, you've been pointing out fraud, but you also have a solution.
• 10:47
  You could take away the fraud and then start to put out a prop- not a property
• 10:51
  tax, but a a tax, a county tax which would cover within two to three years all of
• 10:57
  the issues that needed to be covered, and then, you could reassess at that point.
• 11:01
  Is that kind of correct?
• 11:03
  So in the case of Texas, now this is not applicable in particular to
• 11:07
  Montana, which could do this at a 9% sales tax rate effective today.
• 11:12
  Wow.
• 11:13
  But in the case of Texas, because of what I had mentioned before with
• 11:16
  regard to the 313 agreements, the off-balance sheet financing, all
• 11:21
  this other kabuki theater having to do where money is put into economic
• 11:25
  development commissions as an example.
• 11:28
  The way to get around this is you say, "Fine, for three years
• 11:31
  the sales tax total in the state of Texas will go to 15%." Wow.
• 11:36
  Upon stabilization after the school districts take bankruptcy,
• 11:40
  it'll drop to about 11%.
• 11:42
  Texas is probably the worst out of the worst.
• 11:45
  Ohio is bad, but in terms of sales tax, Texas is probably at the top of the list.
• 11:51
  So that's about as bad as it's gonna get, but it's a very short-term basis.
• 11:55
  So then the next question would be, why the sales tax?
• 11:59
  Because the infrastructure exists and it's immediate, right?
• 12:04
  If you go to a grocery store and you buy a chocolate bar, you're gonna
• 12:06
  pay 15% and that's the end of it.
• 12:09
  You buy a two-by-four at Home Depot, 15% tax.
• 12:12
  It's immediate, the infrastructure exists, and municipal items- Fire
• 12:19
  departments, police departments, what have you, and even schools have to have
• 12:24
  their true operating expenses covered.
• 12:28
  They have to submit a legitimate budget, not based on raising bonds,
• 12:32
  a legitimate budget, and that is what that tax covers and should cover.
• 12:38
  No problem.
• 12:39
  The issue that we're speaking about is the fraud, because what they've
• 12:42
  done is they took from the school districts and they created bonds.
• 12:47
  So they take the money from mom and pop, but you have to realize that what you
• 12:52
  would normally get in your amortization schedule on your house when you pay off
• 12:56
  your mortgage, that's your amortization.
• 12:58
  When they raise the taxes on an annual basis, de facto, they are
• 13:03
  equity stripping your amortization.
• 13:06
  You will never own that house.
• 13:08
  You would just keep paying in perpetuity.
• 13:11
  So what do we have?
• 13:12
  We have a sales tax that kills off all real estate tax,
• 13:18
  restoring true property ownership.
• 13:22
  No longer will any real estate tax or property tax be in existence.
• 13:27
  You bought it, you own it, never to be taxed again.
• 13:31
  Wow.
• 13:32
  Good.
• 13:33
  That's incredible.
• 13:34
  And now I'm gonna, I'm gonna put on the screen the letter.
• 13:38
  I guess you've got some… Peter Ticktin is involved in this.
• 13:43
  Peter Ticktin for those of you, he- I did a show with Peter Ticktin.
• 13:46
  He was with President Trump when they were going to school together,
• 13:50
  a military academy, so they've known each other for a long time.
• 13:53
  Peter Ticktin was involved with freeing Tina Peters.
• 13:57
  Obviously, that took some time, but he was, directly involved in that.
• 14:00
  And now he saw Mitch's presentation, and he was like, he wanted
• 14:06
  to talk to you right away.
• 14:07
  That- that's great.
• 14:08
  So tell us a little bit about what happened.
• 14:11
  It went through a series of meetings, so I spent probably six, seven hours
• 14:17
  with Mr. Ticktin over those two days.
• 14:20
  And David Kenney was also there.
• 14:22
  So these two gentlemen are both attorneys, both of which happen to
• 14:26
  be licensed to appear in front of the Supreme Court of the United States.
• 14:30
  Wow.
• 14:31
  So the way to get this done is to get the attention of Solicitor General
• 14:36
  Sauer, which is what it is that you're looking at in front of you.
• 14:40
  Because he is the backdoor to the Supreme Court of the United States, and
• 14:44
  he can insist, as can the president, that the Supreme Court of the
• 14:48
  United States should hear this case.
• 14:51
  This is not just a Texas case.
• 14:53
  This is now a national problem.
• 14:56
  Because if other states copy what the Supreme Court of Texas did,
• 15:00
  constitutional rights no longer exist.
• 15:03
  This is, cannot stand under any circumstance.
• 15:06
  So temporarily, until this- Yeah, tell us
• 15:08
  how they did that.
• 15:09
  They took our constitutional rights and basically built a box around
• 15:13
  them so that if you tried to come in and, protest, "Hey, I n- I
• 15:17
  need judicial clarity on this.
• 15:19
  I need the judicial system to look at this.
• 15:21
  This seems fraudulent to me," you wouldn't even be able to do that.
• 15:25
  Exactly, and that's the problem.
• 15:27
  So there are laws against this.
• 15:29
  18 US Code Section 242, it's a crime.
• 15:33
  Literally, it's a crime, federal crime, for any person acting under
• 15:38
  the color of law to willfully deprive someone of their rights protected
• 15:42
  by the Constitution or the US laws, including states' constitutions.
• 15:47
  It is an undeniable fact that my rights and the rights of every Texan have
• 15:53
  been denied as adjudication of known proven fraud has been prohibited.
• 15:59
  One word, denied.
• 16:01
  Other states can do the same thing, and using the way you just said it,
• 16:04
  yeah, they built a box around it.
• 16:06
  "You can't touch us. We're a court."
• 16:09
  Except for one problem: 18 US Code 242 wouldn't exist- If a
• 16:15
  crime was never being committed.
• 16:19
  And then chapter US code 42 section 1983, individuals can sue.
• 16:27
  Mom and pop can sue these people, including the judges,
• 16:31
  for deprivation of federal rights committed under the color of law.
• 16:36
  They can't hide from this.
• 16:38
  And it goes one step up in that a contract that is designed to break the law isn't
• 16:44
  a contract in the eyes of the law.
• 16:47
  No court has any capacity whatsoever to make a determination that, "Oh,
• 16:53
  no, you don't get to go into court." That's not the job of a judge.
• 16:59
  Adjudication is the job.
• 17:02
  Prohibition of adjudication is not, and that is what the Supreme Court of
• 17:07
  Texas did, and what makes it national now in scope is that other states
• 17:12
  may very well try to follow suit.
• 17:14
  This has to be shut down
• 17:17
  that's incredible.
• 17:18
  So what we're seeing right now in similarly not exactly the same, but
• 17:23
  similarly Nick Shirley in California Senate committee, they're h- holding
• 17:28
  a hearing to stop Nick Shirley Act.
• 17:32
  This bill will criminalize and punish anyone from looking into fraud inside
• 17:37
  immigrant c- communities in California.
• 17:40
  They started this bill because he b- he was starting to expose fraud
• 17:45
  of, in the billions of dollars.
• 17:46
  And so they're creating a bill, kinda like what we're talking about
• 17:49
  right now, which would prohibit anyone from looking at their fraud.
• 17:53
  It's unbelievable, but this is what we're talking about here.
• 17:57
  It's widespread.
• 17:58
  So this would set a precedence potentially, which would collapse
• 18:03
  all of these systems of fraud and control around the country.
• 18:06
  Is that correct?
• 18:07
  They're gonna collapse one way or the other.
• 18:09
  The only question is- Yeah … do you have controlled demolition,
• 18:12
  which is the preference, or-
• 18:14
  Good
• 18:14
  point
• 18:14
  do they keep pushing this can to the point where it just simply blows up?
• 18:17
  And when blows up- … you're gonna walk into the market one day and
• 18:22
  it'll be down 2,000 or 3,000 points because all credibility on behalf
• 18:26
  of the US government will be shot.
• 18:28
  If you have the ability to say, "Okay, fine.
• 18:30
  We recognize the fraud.
• 18:32
  We know where it is.
• 18:33
  We know who did it.
• 18:34
  We know how it was done," the $5.1 trillion in outstanding fraudulent
• 18:37
  school district bond debt, why would you not go after that in
• 18:42
  order to rescue the big kahuna?
• 18:45
  The big kahuna are the US Treasuries, twos, fives, sevens, 10s, and 30s.
• 18:50
  W- without credibility of the US government, they will disintegrate.
• 18:55
  Now are they 30 cents on the dollar, 40 cents on the dollar?
• 18:58
  I don't know.
• 18:59
  Don't care.
• 18:59
  I don't have any of them, but a lot of people do.
• 19:03
  So this is really an issue about credibility, including that what you just
• 19:07
  mentioned at the state of California.
• 19:09
  But to be crystal clear, the federal predicate is deprivation
• 19:14
  of rights under color of law.
• 19:17
  That's exactly what's happening in California, and that's
• 19:19
  exactly what has happened with the Supreme Court here in Texas.
• 19:22
  It's a federal crime.
• 19:25
  But here's the problem on the Texas side, which may grow exponentially
• 19:31
  That deprivation of rights, you must understand that is a guarantee of
• 19:37
  taxation without representation.
• 19:41
  Representation means law.
• 19:43
  Taxation without law.
• 19:46
  250 years ago, the War of Independence and the founding of the United States
• 19:50
  of America was over that issue.
• 19:54
  No taxation without representation.
• 19:58
  It's back.
• 20:00
  And because this is so egregious, and I know that attorneys, while we have to
• 20:05
  talk nice to judges, et cetera, et cetera, under normal circumstances, I get it.
• 20:10
  But the bottom line here, there's nothing nice about this.
• 20:13
  It's basically the Supreme Court of Texas has stripped the
• 20:18
  constitutional rights of all citizens.
• 20:22
  The same grievance that founded the United States of America is back.
• 20:27
  The Supreme Court of Texas is supporting fraud.
• 20:32
  They don't want this case adjudicated.
• 20:34
  Too bad, because in exchange for you not wanting this case adjudicated and
• 20:38
  keeping me out of a courtroom, and keeping all Texans for that matter out
• 20:41
  of a courtroom, what should happen?
• 20:44
  The entirety of the bench, the Supreme Court of Texas, should be impeached.
• 20:51
  That's how bad and how egregious this is.
• 20:53
  This is no joke.
• 20:54
  The United States of America is a republic.
• 20:57
  It has a constitution.
• 20:59
  This is what separates us from everybody else on the planet.
• 21:03
  Under no circumstance should that even be questionable, and yet here we are.
• 21:11
  Yeah.
• 21:11
  It's incredible.
• 21:12
  And you, one of the slides and you shared this with me that you
• 21:17
  put out in your recent briefing.
• 21:20
  So you said, "This is not a theoretical case. 42 million American households
• 21:26
  are one $9,000 emergency away from losing their homes. Roughly 7,000 of
• 21:33
  those dollars are property tax." Wow.
• 21:37
  So this is something everybody needs to really stand up and take notice of.
• 21:43
  The actions of the Supreme Court of Texas and I changed the title on my
• 21:47
  document a couple days before I gave that presentation, and it's foretelling.
• 21:55
  What has happened here is foretelling of an act of war.
• 21:59
  Why?
• 22:00
  Because history says so.
• 22:02
  Our country was founded on this one issue, no taxation without representation.
• 22:07
  We have law.
• 22:09
  We know that.
• 22:10
  We have facts.
• 22:11
  We know that.
• 22:13
  We have the math.
• 22:14
  We most certainly know that.
• 22:18
  What do they have?
• 22:19
  They have the crimes, and the Supreme Court of Texas has chosen, not once
• 22:27
  but twice, to protect the crimes.
• 22:31
  Wow.
• 22:31
  They're protecting the fraud
• 22:35
  Therein lies the problem What happens if our public- If other states move
• 22:38
  to copy, we it's a national issue
• 22:41
  Yeah.
• 22:42
  So it is back on the f- 250th anniversary of the founding of our republic.
• 22:47
  This, taxation without representation and that's what we're seeing in
• 22:52
  Texas, and across the country, probably in every county.
• 22:55
  Do you you've looked at this is going on pretty much in every county.
• 22:59
  What do we have how many counties do we have in America?
• 23:01
  Thousand, 3,000- Three,
• 23:02
  3,147, I believe.
• 23:06
  Yeah.
• 23:06
  Wow.
• 23:07
  Every- Yeah, we have not seen… Let's put it this way.
• 23:10
  If a s- school district is involved, and the school district is raising
• 23:14
  bonds, we have not seen a single county that is being held accountable
• 23:20
  for the fraud that they have created.
• 23:22
  And there's a slide in that deck, I believe it's slide eight, called
• 23:28
  the Infection Rate Spreadsheet.
• 23:31
  And in that Infection Rate Spreadsheet, I have proven irrefutably that
• 23:36
  there's not a single central appraisal district that is part of a c- a school
• 23:41
  district that, in fact, is legitimate.
• 23:45
  They cannot adhere to uniform standards of professional appraisal practice.
• 23:50
  They are in breach.
• 23:51
  Why?
• 23:52
  Because just like COVID, infections will continue to get bigger and bigger.
• 23:57
  So one little bad number, one little bad property comparison, turns into
• 24:02
  tens, turns into hundreds, turns into thousands, and it moves very quickly.
• 24:07
  In fact, the Denton Central Appraisal District, I proved that in a
• 24:10
  60-day cycle, 50% of the database was irretrievably corrupted.
• 24:16
  I took it out three years past that, and 100% of the database
• 24:20
  was irretrievably corrupted.
• 24:22
  The bottom line is, if it touches bonds, it's corrupted.
• 24:26
  The CAD is utter garbage.
• 24:29
  Their databases literally are not worth 10 cents.
• 24:33
  Crimes are being committed.
• 24:34
  The pattern and practice of how this is done is clear.
• 24:38
  The pattern and practice of who did it, right?
• 24:41
  Because you have chief appraisers, and you have school district
• 24:43
  superintendents who are committing bond fraud and accounting fraud.
• 24:47
  So who did it, how it was done, when it was done, 'cause it appears
• 24:51
  in the QSIPS, it's all trackable.
• 24:53
  The problem is we don't have the subpoena power that the SEC does.
• 24:59
  SEC can walk into these school districts and say, "Turn over those
• 25:01
  QSIPS and the amortization schedule. You got five minutes. If you don't,
• 25:05
  we'll arrest you." They have that type of power, and they need to use it.
• 25:09
  But the bottom line is the crimes have been committed.
• 25:13
  Yeah, so they're so they're up against the wall now.
• 25:16
  And when does this case go before the s- I guess the Supreme Court of Texas?
• 25:22
  So the Supreme Court of Texas is done.
• 25:24
  Yeah … that case was finalized on May 7th, I believe.
• 25:29
  May 7th or May 8th.
• 25:31
  So we have till August 6th to get a writ of certiorari into the
• 25:39
  Supreme Court of the United States.
• 25:41
  Wow.
• 25:41
  And that's what I'm working on with Peter Ticktin right now, and
• 25:44
  David Kenney, and ideally Solicitor General Sauer immediately to get
• 25:49
  this into gear to get it submitted.
• 25:52
  And ideally, because it's an emergency basis, it could be
• 25:55
  heard within 60 to 90 days.
• 25:58
  But this case better be heard or the United States of America is in big trouble
• 26:04
  So what kind of timeframe do you see could you about the- would probably, be exposed
• 26:11
  to the point where it would crash the stock market 2 or 3,000 points in one day.
• 26:17
  What kind of timeframe do you see happening for that potential to happen?
• 26:23
  Nobody knows the exact answer.
• 26:25
  The problem is that 42 million households, that's a huge problem.
• 26:32
  The outstanding fraud in school district bond debt, that liability has gotta
• 26:35
  come off these houses very quickly.
• 26:37
  There is no money.
• 26:39
  The median household income existing today cannot pay the interest
• 26:43
  on the outstanding bonds, 5.1 trillion, nevermind paying them off.
• 26:49
  And I wanna point something out.
• 26:51
  In Godley, Texas, right now today, roughly $120,000 is outstanding in
• 26:57
  school district bond debt per house.
• 27:00
  The average house in Godley's 160 grand.
• 27:02
  In 30 years from now, that 120,000 goes up 580%.
• 27:08
  You have the exact same problem on the 5.1 trillion.
• 27:12
  In 30 years from now, it turns into 29 trillion.
• 27:17
  It's mathematically impossible to pay off.
• 27:20
  So the only question, and to your point, when does the market start to
• 27:24
  freak out when they realize the truth?
• 27:27
  What I'm trying to do is push the government to recognize
• 27:30
  the truth and deal with this so we have controlled demolition.
• 27:35
  Why?
• 27:36
  Because, yes, it's true that some people in their portfolios hold municipal
• 27:40
  bonds, and a portion of those municipal bonds are school district bonds.
• 27:44
  But on an individual basis, that's extremely small.
• 27:48
  5.1 trillion is a lot of money, but on an individual basis, it's manageable.
• 27:54
  The problem is if you don't get rid of it, what in essence on a 200 and… It's
• 27:59
  called $120,000 worth of debt, that's roughly $592 a month per household
• 28:04
  to pay for that in Godley, Texas.
• 28:06
  But in 30 years, that turns into over $3,400 a month.
• 28:12
  It's… There is no way that this is going to get paid off.
• 28:18
  Best to deal with it rather than let it blow.
• 28:21
  But the direct answer to your question is, it could be six
• 28:24
  months, it could be eight months.
• 28:26
  When the market wakes up and says, "Yeah, we're not playing this game
• 28:28
  anymore, we're out," you'll know
• 28:33
  Yeah.
• 28:34
  The fraud has been going on for quite some time.
• 28:36
  When exactly did they start doing school bonds?
• 28:39
  That's, there wasn't… It was, like, in the '70s or something?
• 28:42
  Yes.
• 28:43
  So it, it goes back depending on where what community you're looking at.
• 28:46
  However, the bonds then weren't the problem.
• 28:52
  It… Not good, it was a fraud.
• 28:55
  But the math of the bonds- the rule of 72 kicks in.
• 29:01
  And when that occurs, you end up in a problem.
• 29:05
  So around 2000, 2001 is when the interest on the bonds jumped the principal.
• 29:14
  When that happened, it's been downhill ever since.
• 29:18
  So the bonds get bigger, and then you have the compound cumulative effect of
• 29:23
  the interest on top of the bonds from which they have to go out and raise
• 29:27
  more bonds to pay for that interest.
• 29:30
  So you've got a circular argument in reality straight into hell.
• 29:34
  This cannot ever be paid off.
• 29:37
  It's mathematically impossible.
• 29:39
  The income does not exist
• 29:44
  Wow.
• 29:45
  Incredible.
• 29:45
  Because it's been going on for so long they've been stealing for so long
• 29:49
  we've seen a lot of people losing their houses because of the property taxes.
• 29:53
  In your estimation, that's it's a real stretch to figure out what those
• 29:58
  numbers are, but what would you say percentage-wise across the United States,
• 30:02
  and some areas are gonna be more than others of course, of people that are
• 30:05
  losing their homes through this fraud?
• 30:08
  In… It's everywhere, but the answer is tens of thousands so far this year alone.
• 30:14
  Wow.
• 30:14
  So in Texas, you've got over 4.2 million.
• 30:17
  It's coincidental on the number.
• 30:19
  It's over 4.2 million households cannot afford the roof over their head.
• 30:23
  That money just doesn't exist to pay the taxes.
• 30:26
  And it's even tied to hunger.
• 30:29
  So back in December, I did a story about hunger, and I tied that
• 30:34
  back to the real estate taxes.
• 30:36
  You get rid of these taxes, you can feed people who are hungry, no problem.
• 30:40
  Yeah.
• 30:42
  Yeah.
• 30:42
  A lot of people in the chat are saying, their property taxes, we have taxes
• 30:46
  in here too are super, super suspect.
• 30:49
  They've been exploding upwards like you've been talking about.
• 30:51
  So people are aware of this before we even had this discussion.
• 30:55
  And there's like we're talking about, there's no recourse.
• 30:59
  They protected themselves legally from, exposing the fraud and saying,
• 31:04
  "How is this, how is our property tax going up so much?" Now we're
• 31:07
  seeing properties are losing value.
• 31:11
  I've seen like in just this one Reventure Consulting, this gentleman that comes up,
• 31:15
  he was in Atlanta, Georgia, and there's 40, 50% decrease in property values.
• 31:22
  So how is that going to start to impact on this?
• 31:25
  So you would think that they're having to like, constantly inflate these numbers,
• 31:29
  and now we're gonna start to have real property values go down significantly.
• 31:35
  How… That could accelerate the collapse, couldn't it?
• 31:39
  Technically speaking, you should end up in a 50 to 60%
• 31:44
  devaluation from the high- Yeah
• 31:46
  of what the CAD was saying with regard to value.
• 31:50
  In other words, the reversion to the mean- … but for the fraud is the bogey.
• 31:56
  If the fraud didn't exist, this money that I mentioned from the $220,000 home
• 32:01
  at 17,000 being stolen the last five years, that never would've happened.
• 32:06
  But I'm gonna give you the cheat code.
• 32:09
  So they're gonna lie, and they're gonna say, "Well-
• 32:13
  We need to change the mill rate.
• 32:15
  We have to up our tax rate because the values are going down, so
• 32:19
  we'll change the mill rate.
• 32:21
  This is a crime.
• 32:22
  This is utter nonsense, and why is it a crime?
• 32:25
  Because that's not how uniform standards of professional appraisal practice works,
• 32:29
  which is the law, which is required in all states, a- which also is being
• 32:36
  ignored, and therein is the problem.
• 32:40
  There's no doubt, zero, that these people, these chief appraisers, the school
• 32:45
  district superintendents, are colluding.
• 32:48
  It's called conspiracy.
• 32:50
  Conspiracy to defraud.
• 32:52
  They're caught, there is no way out, and what the judges are doing by backstopping
• 32:57
  them temporarily is just that.
• 32:59
  It's a temporary fix.
• 33:02
  Best the government get involved, or you're likely to end up
• 33:05
  in a kinetic war, civil war.
• 33:09
  You can't steal from people and think you're not gonna be held accountable
• 33:14
  Yeah civil war against the institutions that are doing the fraud, which
• 33:18
  was, like we talked about, judicial and these appraisers and so forth,
• 33:22
  so it's not a big civil war.
• 33:24
  It's like there's a f- just a few individuals that are
• 33:27
  gonna be held accountable.
• 33:28
  And civil war because, we're not getting any representation, so people
• 33:32
  turn into vigilante almost and start, and go into this civil war type of
• 33:37
  environment where they strike back.
• 33:39
  We don't want that obviously, so you are bringing justice so that we don't
• 33:44
  have to, go to that extreme, and I think that's gonna be extremely valuable.
• 33:48
  And that's why it goes to Supreme Court.
• 33:52
  Now, we've seen the Supreme Court has not, done some good things lately.
• 33:56
  What are your thoughts on will, will they rule rightly in this case?
• 34:01
  I think so, but what are your thoughts?
• 34:04
  I don't think they have any choice in the matter, and it's not even
• 34:06
  a question of I don't think.
• 34:07
  I know, factually speaking, they do not have any choice in the matter.
• 34:12
  Wow.
• 34:13
  This is so crazy to deny the rights of a citizen the existence
• 34:19
  of the Constitution of the United States of America is beyond insane.
• 34:25
  But nonetheless, this is what they have done, the fear being
• 34:29
  that other states will follow.
• 34:31
  If other states follow, those states, and in truth the Supreme Court,
• 34:39
  would make everything illegal.
• 34:42
  There would be no law
• 34:47
  Wow.
• 34:48
  So the overvaluation, overtaxation I'm reading from this one letter.
• 34:53
  Overvaluation, overtaxation in order to carry the interest on debts that are
• 34:57
  not properly tracked so that they've done these, like you say in one of your
• 35:04
  slides, these workarounds, which is not…
• 35:07
  There's no legal word for workaround, but they've actually said that.
• 35:11
  So there's so many different things that they're being exposed for.
• 35:16
  Like you say, the Supreme Court is they're gonna look at this there's no
• 35:19
  other… They're gonna rule against this.
• 35:22
  Let me try to bring this down real quick just to help everybody
• 35:27
  understand how egregious this is.
• 35:30
  What is the Supreme Court of Texas hiding?
• 35:33
  One of the documents is something called unlimited tax.
• 35:39
  I defy anybody that's watching this video to define what an unlimited tax is.
• 35:43
  There's no such thing.
• 35:46
  There's no such thing as unlimited tax.
• 35:49
  You don't have unlimited money.
• 35:51
  Nobody does.
• 35:53
  Not even Elon Musk.
• 35:55
  Therefore, if there's no such thing as an unlimited tax, or if there's no
• 36:01
  such thing, then the question becomes why is that being sold to the public?
• 36:08
  That's the tax that is used to raise the bonds.
• 36:13
  All nonsense
• 36:18
  He
• 36:18
  can bring the whole house of cards down with two words.
• 36:21
  Yeah.
• 36:21
  Wow.
• 36:23
  Yeah it's unbelievable.
• 36:25
  And so I know you, you've had, after our fraud event you, you had
• 36:30
  some throat issues and you're still recovering from that, so I don't
• 36:33
  wanna keep you too much longer.
• 36:35
  Thank you so much for coming on 'cause I know you- you're fighting through that,
• 36:38
  and you wanted to get on and share this information, so we really appreciate that.
• 36:41
  What are the final things we would like to end with?
• 36:45
  So we can focus on something going forward.
• 36:48
  Some kind of recourse maybe that we're gonna see.
• 36:50
  What are your thoughts?
• 36:53
  Getting the attention of Solicitor General Sauer right now, top priority.
• 36:59
  This has to happen because he is the backdoor to the Supreme
• 37:02
  Court of the United States.
• 37:04
  Get me in front of the judges, I'll take care of the rest of it.
• 37:07
  That's what it comes down to.
• 37:08
  This case needs to be remanded and tried on its merits.
• 37:12
  That's all we're asking for.
• 37:14
  But continuing to hide the fraud is not gonna fly.
• 37:22
  Very good.
• 37:23
  Very good.
• 37:24
  And it is not gonna, it's not gonna fly much longer 'cause
• 37:27
  everybody's piling in now.
• 37:29
  So you got the top guys that are, Peter Ticktin, he's gonna
• 37:33
  be… He's like a pit bull.
• 37:34
  You get him involved and it's pretty much game over.
• 37:37
  At some point they have to give up, and that's where we are right-
• 37:40
  that's where we're at right now.
• 37:41
  Mitch, thanks so much.
• 37:42
  Now, how can people reach you if they want to?
• 37:46
  So my website is mockingerproperties.com/dcad.
• 37:54
  And the current information is all up top with regard to the couple
• 37:59
  of presentations that I'm giving, including these, some of these slides.
• 38:04
  So it's all there, and probably within three days the document that I just
• 38:10
  sent to Michael will actually be posted, and that is the letter that
• 38:14
  went to Solicitor General Sauer and Peter Ticktin and David Kenney- Wow
• 38:19
  discussing it.
• 38:20
  And I've shared everything with the public since day one.
• 38:23
  As fast as we draft it, it's out there.
• 38:26
  We're doing that on purpose, especially now, because we need Solicitor General
• 38:31
  Sauer to step up and do his job.
• 38:36
  So he's he's up against the wall, so he's got nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.
• 38:40
  The information's there, so we're gonna see some s- some
• 38:43
  resolution here pretty soon.
• 38:45
  And I definitely look forward to having you back on and we- we talk about that.
• 38:49
  So fantastic as always, Mitch.
• 38:53
  Again thanks for coming on.
• 38:54
  You've had, issues with your throat prayers for you to get well soon.
• 38:58
  And we'll look forward to this resolution coming.
• 39:01
  So keep us informed and we'll we'll have you back on, and we'll talk about it.
• 39:04
  Thanks a lot.
• 39:05
  Absolutely, and thank you very much for giving me the
• 39:07
  opportunity to help update people.
• 39:10
  Absolutely.
• 39:11
  Yeah.
• 39:12
  Lots… I- I'm sure everybody, we say lots of love, and we're sending
• 39:15
  you lots of love and success in this.
• 39:17
  So appreciate all your efforts and what you've done to expose all this.
• 39:20
  Thank you.
• 39:21
  Thank you.