Latest / Reformed Thinking / Apologetics & Evangelism: Strategic Approaches

Transcript

Apologetics & Evangelism: Strategic Approaches · Reformed Thinking

0:00
You're listening to Reformed Thinking, where we delve into
0:03
enduring truths and sound doctrine for today's church.
0:06
Welcome and thank you for joining us for another deep
0:08
dive. Today we're taking a close look
0:11
at how local churches can thoughtfully approach outreach
0:14
and global missions. Yeah, it's a big topic.
0:16
It really is. We've compiled a collection of
0:19
vital sources, from articles to expert discussions, all to give
0:23
you a clear understanding of practical strategies for sharing
0:26
the good news and ministering to others.
0:29
Our goal is to distill the key ideas, reveal potential
0:32
pitfalls, and, you know, lay out a clear framework for building a
0:36
vibrant, gospel centered church. So let's unpack this.
0:39
Indeed, this area of ministry is just well, it's brimming with
0:43
opportunities, yet it's often fraught with unexamined
0:46
assumptions about how best to operate right.
0:48
The sources we have really highlight the call for
0:50
deliberate, focused action, urging us to move beyond just
0:54
sort of reactive measures to truly strategic engagement both
0:57
in the local community and across the globe.
0:59
I can see that. And when we talk about local
1:02
outreach, the starting point for many churches is often quite
1:05
challenging, isn't it? Oh.
1:06
Definitely. Imagine a young pastor, maybe
1:08
fresh out of seminary, stepping into a new congregation.
1:11
He's, you know, brimming with zeal to see the gospel spread
1:15
and to minister. Sure.
1:16
Full of energy. But what he often finds isn't a
1:19
blank canvas, but maybe a dusty, long forgotten easel, perhaps
1:24
with a half finished, stagnant painting of, say, a food pantry
1:28
that hasn't seen any activity for months.
1:30
Yeah, that sounds familiar. This isn't an isolated story.
1:33
Our sources suggest it's a remarkably common starting point
1:37
for churches grappling with local outreach.
1:39
It's a situation where the slate is practically blank, or at
1:43
least covered in a lot of old dust.
1:45
That's a very apartment image. And what's often observed in
1:47
these situations is this prevailing idea that evangelism,
1:51
local outreach, what we sometimes call mercy ministries
1:53
and maybe ethnic ministries, they're solely the pastor's
1:57
burden. OK, so it all lands on the
1:59
pastor's desk. Pretty much pastors frequently
2:01
receive direct requests. You know, calls, emails, pleases
2:06
to personally evangelize specific individuals.
2:09
It might be someone's rebellious son, a struggling relative,
2:12
maybe a Co worker. Even if the pastor doesn't know
2:15
them at all. Exactly.
2:16
Even when the pastor has no personal connection to them
2:18
whatsoever, the expectation is that the pastor is the
2:22
designated evangelism specialist for the entire congregation, and
2:26
sometimes it feels like for the whole town.
2:28
So the pastor becomes almost like a spiritual emergency
2:31
service, expected to drop everything and parachute into
2:34
personal evangelism they know little about.
2:37
That's a good way to put it. And in communities with diverse
2:40
demographics, this expectation can even extend to specific
2:43
language skills. Oh.
2:44
Right, like needing a Spanish speaker.
2:46
Precisely. A church in a predominantly
2:49
Hispanic area, for example, might seek a pastor specifically
2:52
for their Spanish fluency, even if maybe no current church
2:56
members speak that language. The unspoken expectation is that
2:59
the pastor will single handedly handle all ethnic outreach and
3:03
bridge every single linguistic gap.
3:06
This means pastors are often tasked with creating and
3:09
developing the entire outreach strategy from its very
3:12
foundation, pretty much from the ground up.
3:14
That's a huge amount of pressure.
3:16
And it's not just internal pressure, is it?
3:18
What about requests from outside the church?
3:20
Oh yeah, beyond these internal congregational expectations,
3:24
churches also face an almost endless stream of requests from
3:28
external organizations. We're talking about various para
3:31
churches, secular groups like a a sometimes homeless ministries,
3:36
various food banks. All wanting something from the
3:39
church. All seeking to use church
3:40
facilities or maybe present their work to the congregation
3:43
or secure pulpit time during a service.
3:46
The sources highlight that. I mean you could literally fill
3:49
every Sunday with different parishes presentations if you
3:51
weren't careful with discernment.
3:53
Goodness. This constant influx of requests
3:55
can be overwhelming, and if it's not managed well, it can easily
3:59
dilute a church's focus and its resources.
4:02
That makes a lot of sense. It sounds like a church can
4:04
easily become reactive, Just, you know, responding to external
4:08
demands rather than setting its own course.
4:10
That's the danger. But amidst all of these
4:13
challenges and requests, our sources make it clear that the
4:16
core purpose of a church's local outreach vision is singular and
4:21
critical. It's about cultivating a spirit
4:23
of Christ, like love within the congregation.
4:26
Yes. It's not just about doing
4:27
outreach, but becoming a church that is outreach, if that makes
4:31
sense. That's a vital distinction.
4:33
The aim is to foster a culture where sharing the gospel isn't
4:37
seen as some burdensome task. You know, something you
4:40
grudgingly cross off a checklist.
4:41
But not an obligation. But as a natural, spontaneous
4:44
activity flowing from a heart transformed by Christ's work, it
4:48
seeks to instill a clear sense of intention and earnestness
4:51
that encourages holy living and critically positions the Church
4:56
as a light for those who are lost in the community.
4:59
This holistic vision, rather than a piece meal or reactive
5:02
approach, is what truly allows for a lasting impact.
5:05
It's about the church becoming a living demonstration of the
5:08
Gospel. And to achieve this, our sources
5:11
layout some foundational principles that guide genuine
5:13
outreach. The first is a really
5:16
significant one. Evangelism is presented not as
5:19
an event, but as a lifestyle. Yes, that's key.
5:22
This stresses that sharing the good news should be an ongoing
5:25
part of a believer's daily existence, woven into the fabric
5:29
of their conversations, their work, their leisure, rather than
5:33
something confined to specific scheduled occurrences or, say,
5:38
an annual outreach day on the church calendar.
5:40
Indeed, if evangelism gets relegated to a special day, or
5:44
maybe a once a year program, it suggests that it's not genuinely
5:47
integrated into the believer's walk with Christ.
5:50
Yeah, it feels artificial. It implies it's something to be
5:52
performed rather than a natural outpouring of faith, a natural
5:55
product of a Christian heart. Our sources indicate that when
5:58
it becomes just an event, it often feels forced, unnatural,
6:01
and less authentic to both the one sharing and the one
6:05
receiving the message. It's about recognizing that
6:07
every Christian in their daily rhythms, is a living sermon,
6:11
making outreach less a program to attend and more a life to
6:14
embody. I hear that the second principle
6:17
is a focus on people, not programs, right?
6:20
Outreach should center on individuals, motivating people
6:22
to personally engage in ministries rather than relying
6:25
solely on church organized programs.
6:28
This is a critical distinction because it shifts the locus of
6:31
responsibility from an institution to the individual
6:34
believer. Precisely.
6:36
The sources offer a strong critique of an over reliance on
6:39
programs, pointing out that while they may be
6:41
well-intentioned, they can often be ineffective or even, you
6:45
know, destined for failure. Really.
6:47
How so? Well, consider a church that
6:49
launches maybe 5 different evangelism programs in a year,
6:52
yet individual members rarely share their faith organically in
6:56
their daily lives. An excessive number of
6:59
evangelism programs within a church might actually signal a
7:02
weakness in its evangelistic health.
7:05
It suggests that evangelism has become compartmentalized, like
7:08
at a department, rather than integrated into daily life.
7:11
The true measure of a church's evangelistic vitality should be
7:15
assessed by what individuals in the congregation do for
7:18
outreach, not merely the quantity of organized activities
7:21
or how full the church calendar looks.
7:24
So it's about empowering every member.
7:25
Exactly empowering every member to see themselves as an
7:29
ambassador, not just a participant in some church
7:32
initiative. That distinction between
7:34
programs and a genuine lifestyle of outreach is a truly
7:37
clarifying 1 And Speaking of programs, it inevitably brings
7:41
us to the organizations that often provide those programs and
7:45
frequently come knocking on the church door.
7:48
Para church organization. Yes, the para church question.
7:50
Let's delve into what they are and why churches engage with
7:53
them First, How do we How do we define what a para church is?
7:56
Well, basically, a parachurch is an organization employed by
7:59
Christian churches to collaborate outside the formal
8:02
structure of a single local church or denomination.
8:05
Their aims are broad, ranging from advancing global missions
8:08
to addressing social welfare or promoting evangelism.
8:12
Think of them as specialized entities that can assist
8:15
churches in broader endeavors, often bringing unique resources
8:18
or scale that a single church simply cannot achieve alone.
8:22
So they exist to tackle tasks or needs that a single local church
8:27
might find difficult or even impossible to accomplish on its
8:30
own. That's the idea.
8:31
What are some of the key advantages that come with
8:33
partnering with para church organizations?
8:36
Well, one major advantage is their capacity to achieve what a
8:39
single church often cannot. Consider the immense scale of
8:43
need. Like the sources mentioned, the
8:46
90,000 homeless individuals in Los Angeles.
8:49
Wow, that's a huge number. It is the Union Rescue Mission.
8:52
A well known para church organization assists a
8:54
significant number of these individuals, a task far beyond
8:58
the capacity of even a very large single church, let alone a
9:01
smaller one. Similarly, broad campus
9:04
evangelism like the work Campus Crusade does, or the pooling of
9:08
theological scholarship and seminaries which no single
9:11
church could possibly host all on its own.
9:14
These are all examples of large scale initiatives made possible
9:17
through parachurch collaboration.
9:19
OK, These organizations concentrate resources and
9:22
specialized expertise to address very specific, often large scale
9:28
needs. That makes a lot of sense.
9:30
They allow for a much wider reach and deeper specialization.
9:33
Are there other practical benefits for the local church
9:36
itself? Absolutely.
9:37
Partnerships with parachurch organizations can sometimes free
9:41
up local church staff to concentrate on caring for and
9:44
guiding their existing congregation.
9:46
How does that work? Well, for instance, if a
9:47
parachurch expertly handles a large scale homeless ministry,
9:51
the church staff can then focus more intently on shepherding
9:54
their members, discipling new believers, and providing
9:57
pastoral care rather than managing the daily operations of
10:00
a complex social service. OK.
10:01
That frees up time and energy. It can.
10:04
There's also a significant liability reduction.
10:07
Potentially operating certain ministries may be a homeless
10:11
shelter or a large scale youth camp independently can create
10:14
substantial legal liability for a church.
10:18
I hadn't thought of that. Para church organizations, with
10:20
their specific legal structures and insurance can alleviate much
10:24
of this risk for the local church.
10:26
So they also bring a level of specialized training and
10:29
protection in a way. That's right, they can certainly
10:32
aid congregational training by providing specialized expertise
10:36
for training church members in various ministries, such as
10:39
evangelism. Like specific training programs.
10:41
Exactly. Think of organizations, maybe
10:43
like Way of the Master, which goes around training local
10:45
churches how to evangelize. They offer resources or
10:49
methodologies a pastor might not have the time or specialized
10:52
knowledge to create from scratch.
10:53
And finally, for smaller churches, partnering can foster
10:57
a greater sense of brotherhood and unity within the wider body
11:00
of Christ. It gives them a feeling of being
11:03
connected to a broader fellowship of believers and
11:06
working toward larger Kingdom goals, mitigating feelings of
11:09
isolation that can sometimes arise in smaller, independent
11:13
congregations. That's a compelling list of
11:15
advantages that certainly makes the appeal clear.
11:18
But as we know, not everything is without its drawbacks.
11:21
Sure or no? What are some of the challenges
11:23
or maybe dangers that churches might face when engaging with
11:28
para church organizations? Well, the single most critical
11:31
insight our sources emphasize when considering para churches
11:34
is this While they offer tremendous scale, they demand an
11:38
ironclad commitment to maintaining the local churches
11:40
authority. OK, authority is key.
11:42
Absolutely. Without that, you're not gaining
11:44
a partner, you're potentially creating a competitor for
11:47
loyalty and resources. The core issue, as highlighted
11:50
in the sources, is often a lack of control.
11:52
Lack of control. How so?
11:53
Churches generally cannot direct manage the finances or ensure
11:57
the accountability of the leadership of para church
12:00
groups. This means the ministry operates
12:02
outside the church's immediate control.
12:05
I see. Which can be problematic,
12:07
particularly if the para church veers off course doctrinally or
12:11
practically. So if a problem arises, maybe
12:15
with finances or conduct, the local church has limited avenues
12:18
for intervention or even basic oversight.
12:21
Precisely, there is typically no means for formal church
12:25
discipline within para church organizations.
12:28
If a Christian affiliated with one mismanages funds or acts
12:31
improperly, the local church has very limited recourse if that
12:35
individual is not under their direct disciplinary oversight.
12:39
The sources cite A striking example of a minister in Albania
12:42
who actually stated he prefers to hire non Christians for
12:44
contract work. Really.
12:46
Why? Because if they cheat him, he
12:48
can involve law enforcement, unlike with Christians who
12:51
aren't under direct church discipline where his options are
12:53
much more limited. Wow, that's a stark illustration
12:56
of the practical implications. What other challenges emerge
12:59
from these partnerships? Well, para churches can
13:01
potentially chip away at church authority in other ways.
13:04
The vision and direction for a ministry might originate
13:07
externally from the para church itself rather than from the
13:11
local churches own leadership. So the church isn't setting the
13:14
agenda. Exactly.
13:15
This can lead to a disconnect between the congregations core
13:18
values or theology and the activities they support
13:21
financially or with volunteers. There's also the risk of
13:25
doctrinal compromise. How does that happen?
13:27
Churches might face pressure, maybe subtle, maybe overt, to
13:31
modify their doctrine or agree only on minimal theological
13:34
principles to participate with a broader parachurch group.
13:38
This can dilute their distinct theological stance and
13:41
potentially confuse their own members about fundamental
13:44
beliefs. It's a subtle but persistent
13:46
pressure that can erode theological clarity over time.
13:49
And it seems like it could also inadvertently reduce the
13:52
congregation's own sense of responsibility for outreach,
13:55
couldn't it? It absolutely can fuel a kind of
13:57
apathy. Heritage involvement can lead to
14:00
the view that certain outreach activities, maybe campus
14:02
evangelism or crisis relief, are somebody else's job.
14:06
Right, the professionals handle. That exactly which reduces the
14:08
congregation's direct engagement and personal involvement in
14:11
outreach. If members feel that the experts
14:15
or the big organizations are handling it, their personal
14:18
drive to share the gospel can wane.
14:22
Moreover, there's a practical resource strain.
14:25
Financial contributions might be directed away from the local
14:28
church to the para church organization, hindering the
14:31
church's own resources and ability to fund its internal
14:34
ministries or its own locally driven outreach initiatives.
14:38
And people might even substitute involvement.
14:41
Yes. In some cases, individuals may
14:43
even associate primarily with a para church organization as a
14:47
substitute for active participation in their local
14:50
church, particularly internationally.
14:52
This draws people away from the very body of believers they are
14:55
called to serve within and be accountable to.
14:58
That certainly presents a significant array of
15:00
considerations. How, then, should pastors
15:03
approach their discernment and interaction with these
15:05
organizations? It sounds like it requires a
15:07
very intentional posture. It really does.
15:10
Pastors need crystal clear discernment regarding para
15:12
church organizations. The objective, the goal has to
15:16
be ensuring that para churches are tools the church uses to
15:19
advance its defined vision for local outreach.
15:22
OK, rather than the church being used by them becoming merely
15:26
say, a fundraising arm or a venue for external groups.
15:30
The church drives the bus. Exactly.
15:32
This requires pastors to articulate a clear local
15:35
outreach vision originating from within the church itself,
15:38
providing direction and purpose to all ministry efforts, whether
15:42
those efforts are internal or carried out through external
15:45
partnerships. The church must be the driver,
15:48
not merely a passenger. So it truly comes down to the
15:51
church setting its own agenda and then seeing how other
15:54
organizations can support it, rather than the other way
15:57
around. That's the key.
15:58
This helps clarify its own mission.
16:00
If the church is to be the user of these tools, not the used,
16:03
how does it define its own distinct outreach agenda?
16:06
Our sources give us a really helpful framework breaking down
16:09
local outreach into four distinct ministry types.
16:12
Let's unpack the first one. OK, the first type is Mercy
16:15
ministry, sometimes also called empathy ministry.
16:18
Mercy Ministry. OK.
16:19
It's central focus is on meeting the immediate, tangible needs of
16:24
individuals, particularly the least of these in society.
16:28
This involves addressing direct physical and social needs,
16:31
things like hunger, homelessness or illness.
16:34
Think of it as providing immediate relief and showing
16:37
practical compassion. And what is this type of
16:39
ministry not primarily about? Because that distinction seems
16:44
pretty critical based on our sources.
16:45
That's right, the distinction is crucial.
16:47
Its aim is not necessarily gospel proclamation or long term
16:51
discipleship as its primary direct goal or measure of
16:54
success. You give an example.
16:56
Sure, ministering to non responsive patients in a
16:58
hospital may be simply singing or praying for them, or caring
17:02
for orphans who may not live long due to severe conditions.
17:05
The focus there is solely on meeting their immediate needs
17:07
and alleviating suffering, not necessarily on conversion or
17:11
just cycling them into the church through that specific
17:13
activity. The sources are clear that the
17:16
goal cannot be broad social change like eradicating
17:19
homelessness, as these names are generally unattainable for a
17:23
single church. Right, the scripture tells us.
17:24
Exactly as one source points out, drawing from Scripture, the
17:27
poor you will always have. Success here is determined by
17:31
whether the ministry is actually meeting a felt need, not just
17:34
being superficial or wearing pious clothing without making a
17:37
true difference in someone's immediate situation.
17:40
It's about genuine care, not simply a platform for something
17:44
else. So it's about genuine compassion
17:47
and meeting immediate specific needs.
17:49
What are some key considerations for churches looking to engage
17:53
in such a ministry effectively? Well, first it must genuinely
17:56
meet needs and critically, it needs to be connected to a local
17:59
church with proper oversight and accountability.
18:02
Right connected to the Church's structure.
18:04
Yes. For instance, partnering with
18:06
organizations like, say, Children's Hunger Fund during
18:10
local emergencies like fires or floods allows churches to
18:14
distribute needed supplies effectively while staying
18:16
connected to the church's broader mission and pastoral
18:19
oversight. Churches should also clearly
18:22
define the ministry's goal at the outset to determine if it is
18:25
a sound use of what can be very time consuming and resource
18:28
heavy efforts. Ask is this specific need the
18:32
best use of our resources right now?
18:34
Good question. Also consider if a need would be
18:36
better addressed through broader, maybe global missions
18:39
or perhaps by another better equipped local church closer to
18:43
the need. An example given is, you know,
18:46
sending a chaplain 300 miles away versus a closer church
18:49
handling it more effectively and efficiently.
18:51
That makes sense. And perhaps most critically, it
18:53
requires A sustained approach. Avoid those flash in the pan
18:56
motivations that flare up after a crisis but then quickly fade,
18:59
leaving needs unmet down the road.
19:02
And what are some practical examples of mercy ministries
19:04
that churches might engage in? Well, things like providing food
19:07
through soup kitchens or maybe food drives, offering clothing
19:11
to the displaced after a disaster, ministering to orphans
19:14
or those with terminal illnesses like AIDS.
19:17
Visiting non responsive wards and hospitals.
19:20
May be singing, praying or reading scripture without
19:23
expectation of a verbal response.
19:24
Outreach at children's hospitals, where patients might
19:27
be too young or too I'll for direct evangelism and ministry
19:31
in psychiatric wards or rescue missions, focusing on immediate
19:34
comfort and care. The guiding principle is
19:37
tangible, compassionate action. OK, that gives a clear picture
19:41
of Mercy Ministry. The second type of local
19:43
outreach identified is Excursion ministry.
19:46
How does this differ and what's its focus?
19:48
Right excursion ministry is fundamentally distinct from
19:50
mercy ministry. Its focus is direct gospel
19:53
proclamation with the clear aim of seeing people brought to
19:56
salvation and ideally added to the local church.
19:59
So the goal here is conversion and church membership.
20:02
Explicitly, this is where the verbal sharing of the Good news
20:05
of Christ is paramount and the desired outcome is spiritual
20:08
conversion and assimilation into the local body of believers.
20:11
What are some practical examples of this type of outreach in
20:15
action? How does this look on the
20:17
ground? Well, it includes methods like
20:19
door to door evangelism, where the specific goal is to share
20:22
the gospel directly with households.
20:24
It also covers ministry at, say, drug and alcohol rehab centers
20:28
or correctional facilities OK, where churches might conduct
20:32
regular services or Bible studies with the intent of
20:34
leading inmates or residents to Christ.
20:37
Community Christmas concerts that specifically include a
20:40
clear gospel presentation are another example.
20:43
I've seen those. Sports outreaches, too, like
20:46
opening a gym for basketball followed by a gospel
20:48
presentation. Hospital ministry can also be an
20:51
excursion ministry if it involves inviting patients to
20:54
church services or engaging in bedside evangelism, asking
20:58
permission to pray or read the Bible with the clear intent of
21:02
sharing Christ. And other visitor outreaches,
21:05
like inviting people who visit the church on the Sunday today
21:07
morning to hear more about the gospel.
21:10
Grace Community Church, for example, hosts Bible studies for
21:13
individuals struggling with what they call life dominating sins
21:16
like addictions, with the explicit goal of presenting
21:20
Christ as the solution. So it's about direct
21:23
proclamation and a clear invitation to salvation.
21:27
What are the essential components for an excursion
21:29
ministry to be well effective? Good question.
21:33
First, it must be received by people, meaning individuals in
21:37
that context are generally open and receptive to hearing the
21:40
Gospel through the chosen method.
21:42
So context matters. Huge difference.
21:44
For instance, the effectiveness of door to door evangelism
21:47
varies significantly by community.
21:49
It may not work well in an area like Santa Clarita where doors
21:52
are often slammed shut, but might be very effective in other
21:55
more receptive areas where people are genuinely looking for
21:58
spiritual answers. 2nd, it must provide a clear opportunity to
22:03
clearly proclaim the gospel. That is, the message of
22:06
salvation through Christ's death and resurrection must be
22:09
articulated unambiguously. And ultimately, it simply needs
22:12
to be effective in achieving its stated goal of gospel
22:16
proclamation and conversions. And how do you evaluate that
22:19
effectiveness? Is it just about counting heads?
22:22
Not necessarily just numbers, but the key question for
22:24
evaluation is pretty straightforward.
22:26
Is it working? Is the gospel being clearly
22:29
proclaimed? And are people experiencing
22:31
salvation showing genuine change in their lives?
22:35
This requires objective evaluation rather than simply
22:38
continuing a ministry because we've always done this, or
22:41
because it feels good to do it. It's not about perceived
22:44
religiosity or activity levels, but verifiable spiritual fruit,
22:48
actual conversions, and new members joining the church body.
22:51
And what considerations or potential pitfalls come with
22:54
excursion ministry for the church or its members?
22:56
Well, this type of ministry requires consistent training and
22:59
teaching for participants. Pastors need to diligently equip
23:03
people with what to say, how to share the gospel effectively,
23:07
and maybe how to answer common questions or objections.
23:10
So training is essential. Absolutely.
23:13
A potential pitfall is that it can at times inadvertently
23:16
foster. And if you're not doing this
23:18
specific thing, you're not evangelizing mentality among
23:21
church members. Creating tears of evangelists.
23:24
Right, which should be carefully avoided.
23:26
Evangelism is a lifestyle for all believers, expressed in many
23:30
ways, not just a special activity for some who
23:32
participate in a specific program.
23:34
So we have mercy ministry focused on immediate physical
23:38
needs, OK, and excursion ministry focus on direct gospel
23:41
proclamation. How critical is it for a church
23:44
to distinguish between these two?
23:46
Is it OK to mix them? Well, our sources truly under
23:49
score that the most significant distinction between these two
23:51
types of ministries is their fundamental objective.
23:54
Mercy ministry targets meeting physical and immediate needs
23:57
without gospel proclamation as its direct goal or measure of
24:00
success. In contrast, excursion ministry
24:03
explicitly focuses on proclaiming the gospel and
24:06
seeing people saved as its direct goal and measure of
24:09
success. The desired outcome really
24:12
drives the design and evaluation.
24:14
Why is that distinction so valuable for a church to
24:16
maintain? Maintaining this distinction
24:19
helps in evaluating the success of each ministry appropriately.
24:22
I mean, if you don't know the goal, how can you know if you've
24:25
hit the target right? Makes sense.
24:27
Defining the goal clearly at the outset helps determine if
24:30
efforts are hitting their mark and where resources should be
24:32
allocated. Now, trying to combine these two
24:35
types of ministries in the same event isn't inherently wrong,
24:39
but it can often be ineffective or create what the sources call
24:43
a sense of duplicity in the eyes of recipients.
24:45
Also like a bait and switch. Sort of.
24:48
For example, offering a coat with an immediate requirement to
24:51
sit through a gospel presentation can be perceived as
24:54
having an ulterior motive, making the recipient feel
24:57
manipulated rather than genuinely cared for.
24:59
However, if the goal, say using a meal to attract people
25:03
specifically for gospel sharing, is clearly defined beforehand
25:06
and communicated transparently, it can manage demand and clarify
25:10
intentions. So clarity upfront is key if
25:14
combining. Exactly.
25:16
This might lead to fewer recipients than if it were
25:18
purely a mercy ministry event, but potentially deeper gospel
25:22
engagement for those who do attend because they know the
25:24
terms upfront and choose to participate.
25:27
That's a vital point for churches to consider for
25:29
integrity and effectiveness. Now let's move to the third
25:32
type, equipping ministry. What's its focus?
25:35
Equipping Ministry centers on training and guiding people from
25:38
conversion through to church membership, diligently preparing
25:42
them for ministry and spiritual growth within the body of
25:44
Christ. So, discipleship in preparation
25:47
for service. Pretty much it's about
25:48
discipling believers and readying them to serve God and
25:51
others effectively within the church and in the world.
25:54
What are some practical examples of this type of ministry in
25:57
action? Examples include things like new
25:59
believers classes. Grace Community Church has a
26:02
well known 20 week Fundamentals of the Faith class which has
26:06
been noted as very effective not just for discipling new
26:09
Christians, but also interestingly, for seeing people
26:12
come to salvation as they learn foundational truths.
26:16
Interesting baptism ministries are also a part of this,
26:18
especially when conducted in an evangelistic way where new
26:22
believers share their testimonies publicly.
26:24
Yeah, testimonies can be powerful.
26:26
Very powerful. It's a compelling tool for those
26:28
in the congregation who may have built up defenses against
26:31
sermons. Personal stories often bypass
26:33
those defenses and speak directly to the heart.
26:36
Evangelism training classes like Grace Evangelism or another
26:40
clear example, Providing believers with practical tools
26:43
to share their faith. OK.
26:45
Additionally, providing gospel resources like website messages
26:48
or C DS in various languages equips members to share their
26:51
faith confidently and effectively.
26:53
It's all about building up the believer.
26:55
What are the key components and considerations for effective
26:59
equipping ministry? Well, this ministry absolutely
27:02
requires qualified and knowledgeable teachers,
27:05
individuals who are biblically sound and capable of clearly
27:09
communicating Christian truth. That's non negotiable.
27:12
Right, solid teaching. A critical consideration is to
27:15
ensure this type of ministry doesn't replace normal
27:17
fellowship and organic growth within the church.
27:20
It should enhance, not substitute, the natural
27:23
spiritual development and relationships that occur within
27:26
a healthy congregation. So it's not just about classes,
27:28
but integration into church life.
27:30
Exactly. The goal isn't just knowledge
27:32
transfer, but spiritual formation that happens best in
27:35
the context of genuine Christian community.
27:38
I understand the 4th category is ethnic ministry, also known as
27:42
Foreign Language ministry. What does this involve?
27:44
This focuses on outreach to communities within the local
27:47
area that do not spake the primary language of the church.
27:50
Think of Spanish, Korean, Italian, Arabic or Armenian
27:54
ministries operating within an English speaking church, as is
27:58
common in diverse metropolitan areas.
28:00
Reaching specific language groups locally.
28:03
The aim is to bridge linguistic and cultural gaps to reach
28:07
specific language groups with the Gospel right there in the
28:09
church's neighborhood. What are the core principles for
28:12
a good ethnic ministry? What should it look like?
28:14
Well, it must genuinely reach the community at targets,
28:17
speaking to their specific cultural and linguistic context.
28:21
And critically, it must be evangelistic.
28:24
Its purpose has to be bringing people to Christ and into the
28:28
Church from those language groups, ensuring they are not
28:31
just served tangentially but actually discipled.
28:34
This sounds like an area ripe for challenges and potential
28:37
pitfalls if not handled carefully.
28:39
What are some of the significant ones our sources highlight?
28:42
Oh, absolutely. A major pitfall occurs when an
28:45
ethnic ministry operates as an almost entirely separate entity
28:48
within the main church's building.
28:50
How does that happen? It might possess his own
28:52
pastoral leadership, maybe even its own finances, but lacks a
28:56
real accountable connection to the doctrinally sound local
29:00
church leadership like the elders.
29:02
This often leads to a gradual loss of control by the main
29:04
church, potential tension over doctrine or practice, and even
29:09
painful church splits because the main church lacks genuine
29:12
oversight of its direction, financial practices, and
29:15
leadership accountability. So it essentially becomes a
29:18
church within a church. Exactly, but without the
29:21
safeguards of full integration and accountability.
29:24
So it can create a splintering effect rather than a unifying 1.
29:27
Precisely Another challenge is the often undefined relationship
29:31
and the substantial resource demands.
29:34
Churches often desire to start an ethnic ministry without fully
29:37
grasping the enormous demands at places in terms of time,
29:41
financial resources, and personal sacrifices from the
29:44
main church leadership. If the relationship between the
29:47
ethnic group and the main church is not clearly defined at the
29:50
outset, problems inevitably arise concerning critical issues
29:53
like membership. Are they members of the main
29:55
church, the ethnic group, or both?
29:58
Right. Who's accountable to whom?
29:59
Exactly. And leadership oversight,
30:01
especially when significant language barriers exist and
30:04
financial arrangements such as how funds are raised and
30:07
allocated. This ambiguity can braid
30:10
misunderstanding and conflict down the line.
30:12
And I imagine there could be issues of perceived inequality
30:15
which would create division. That's a very common and
30:18
sensitive point. Yes.
30:20
Tensions can certainly arise if joint worship services, shared
30:23
facilities, or even teaching consistently favor the main
30:26
church's language or culture. Like always translating from
30:29
English. Right.
30:30
For instance, if all the songs are in English with only one
30:32
translated song, or if the English pastor always preaches
30:35
with translation but never vice versa, it can foster animosity
30:39
and a sense of being a second class ministry within the larger
30:42
church structure. This can lead to resentment and
30:45
undermine true unity. Given these significant
30:48
pitfalls, how can churches success successfully manage and
30:51
harmonize ethnic ministries to ensure they are truly integrated
30:55
and effective, not divisive? Well, a well managed ethnic
30:59
ministry must maintain a strong, tangible connection to a
31:03
doctrinally sound local church. This means actual oversight and
31:07
accountability from the main church's leadership, like its
31:10
elders. OK, real oversight.
31:12
Over the ministry's direction, its finances and the
31:15
accountability of its leaders, this foundational connection is
31:18
non negotiable for health. So clear definitions and
31:22
established lines of accountability are key from the
31:25
very beginning, before it even starts.
31:27
Absolutely upfront clarity is essential before starting any
31:31
such ministry. The church needs to clearly
31:33
define the vision and the relationship between the main
31:35
congregation and the ethnic group.
31:37
What kind of things need defining?
31:39
Things like clarifying membership status, joint
31:41
membership with the main churches, often recommended as
31:44
it is at Grace Community churches, Spanish ministry,
31:47
establishing how elders will provide oversight across
31:50
language barriers, setting up clear financial management,
31:53
perhaps with a designated fund that also draws from the general
31:56
church budget for accountability and transparency.
31:58
So full integration financially too.
32:00
Yes, and most critically, integration into the broader
32:04
church vision in life is vital. For instance, at Grace Community
32:08
Church, the Spanish ministry's pastor and associate pastor are
32:12
elders of the main church. They participate in all pastoral
32:16
meetings, and their membership is part of the main church's
32:18
overall membership. Ah.
32:20
So they're fully part of the leadership team.
32:22
Exactly. It fosters a genuine sense of a
32:25
single team. Furthermore, their children and
32:28
youth, who typically speak English, are integrated into the
32:31
main churches, Sunday school and college ministries, ensuring
32:34
future generations remain connected to the broader church
32:37
family. And a final critical
32:39
consideration for ethnic ministries, particularly for the
32:41
long haul. What about identity?
32:43
Right. It is advisable, based on the
32:46
sources, to define these ministries by language rather
32:49
than broad ethnicity. Language, not ethnicity.
32:52
Why is that? To avoid inadvertently creating
32:55
culturally or ethnically segregated churches, as second
32:59
generations often become English speaking and naturally
33:01
assimilate into the dominant language of the wider church.
33:05
Focusing on language allows for a smoother transition and helps
33:08
maintain unity. It keeps the focus on the Gospel
33:11
and reaching people across linguistic barriers rather than
33:14
creating permanent, separate cultural enclaves within the
33:18
larger body. We've covered local outreach
33:20
comprehensively, from initial challenges to specific ministry
33:23
times. Now let's pivot to global
33:26
missions, which also requires thoughtful strategy and,
33:30
according to our sources, is often done well inefficiently.
33:34
Yes, the global side has its own set of common issues.
33:37
Our sources point out significant problems with what's
33:39
often called the shotgun approach to missions.
33:42
What exactly is that and why is it problematic?
33:45
The shotgun approach is regrettably common, especially
33:48
it seems, in smaller churches. It basically involves supporting
33:51
numerous missionaries with small, scattered amounts of
33:53
money. You know the classic example is
33:55
sending $100 per month to 20 different missionaries.
33:57
Spreading the support very thin. Exactly, and this often stems
34:01
from what the sources call weird connections like supporting A
34:05
missionary who happens to be a nephews neighbor rather than
34:08
strategic planning based on the churches clearly articulated
34:11
missions philosophy. So relational ties over
34:14
strategy. Often, yes, and this
34:17
uncoordinated giving can also create what is essentially a
34:20
political minefield inside the church if leadership ever tries
34:24
to discontinue funding for one of these individuals.
34:26
Wow. So because these missionaries
34:28
supported through these weird connections are often entrenched
34:32
within one or two influential families in the church, trying
34:35
to stop support can lead to, while the sources say, civil war
34:39
inside of your church. Wow, that certainly sounds like
34:42
a recipe for internal discord and external inefficiency.
34:46
How does this approach stretch missionaries sin both
34:49
financially and personally? Oh, in multiple, debilitating
34:52
ways. First, financially, it's
34:54
obvious, right? Missionaries often receive
34:56
minimal support from many different churches, forcing them
34:59
to secure funding from a very large number of organizations or
35:03
individual donors just to meet their significant annual
35:06
financial needs. Which can be quite high.
35:08
Oh yeah, easily 60,000 to $70,000 or more in some regions.
35:12
This constant fundraising burden is immense.
35:15
It distracts them from their primary ministry on the field
35:17
and creates chronic financial insecurity.
35:20
It really is like trying to fill a bucket with 100 tiny drips
35:23
rather than a steady stream. And I imagine that impacts their
35:27
personal well-being too, beyond just the financial strain.
35:30
Furloughs must be tough. Absolutely.
35:33
Instead of periods of rest and spiritual refreshment,
35:36
furloughs, their time back in their home country become these
35:39
exhaustive jet tours. Missionaries have to travel
35:42
extensively to visit all their numerous supporting churches,
35:45
giving updates, saying thank you and basically re soliciting
35:49
funds for the next term. That sounds exhausting.
35:51
It is one example cited in our sources involved a missionary
35:54
family who literally rented an RV to drive cross country,
35:58
visiting dozens of churches. They found themselves needing a
36:01
vacation after their furlough just to recover from the
36:03
relentless travel and presentations.
36:06
And what about short term teams visiting them?
36:08
That's another major stressor. They're often overwhelmed by
36:11
short term missions or STM's. Missionaries on the field can be
36:15
stretched incredibly thin by the constant influx of short term
36:19
mission teams arriving from their various supporting
36:22
churches. Hosting becomes a job in itself.
36:24
It can become a full time occupation.
36:27
Hosting these teams, arranging logistics, housing,
36:30
transportation, activity, supervising can redirect the
36:33
missionary completely from their primary work.
36:36
Think about it. If maybe 25 out of 100
36:39
supporting churches send teams each for a week or two, the
36:43
missionary schedule becomes completely consumed with hosting
36:45
duties. It takes away valuable time that
36:48
should be dedicated to their primary callings.
36:50
So their primary ministry almost becomes secondary to managing
36:53
all these supporting relationships and visits.
36:55
Indeed, and it creates significant difficulty meeting
36:58
major unexpected needs when a substantial financial need
37:02
arises, like needing to replace a critical vehicle for say,
37:05
$15,000. Which happens, right?
37:08
Missionaries cannot realistically approach any
37:11
single church that's only providing minimal support for
37:14
such a large unexpected request. They simply don't have a
37:17
reliable, deeply invested source for larger emergency type needs,
37:22
leaving them in very precarious situations sometimes.
37:25
Beyond the practical and financial strain on
37:28
missionaries, what about the relationship with the supporting
37:31
church itself? What's lost there in this
37:33
scattered approach? A.
37:34
Huge amount is lost. There's often a severe lack of
37:38
genuine connection and accountability.
37:40
Churches and their congregations often have no true personal
37:44
relationship with the missionaries they support.
37:46
They don't even know their names sometimes.
37:47
Frequently, they don't know their names, their families, or
37:50
what they're actually doing on the field beyond maybe a brief,
37:53
generic update in the newsletter.
37:55
This absence of personal knowledge leads to a critical
37:58
lack of genuine passion, specific prayer, and practical,
38:01
informed support for the missionaries.
38:04
The giving becomes an impersonal transaction rather than an
38:07
extension of the Church's active involvement and care.
38:10
So the missionary is out there perhaps facing really difficult
38:12
situations, cultural stress, spiritual warfare, practical
38:16
problems, and they don't have a strong invested support network
38:19
from their churches back home providing wisdom or real help.
38:23
You've hit on a crucial point. They often lack meaningful
38:26
accountability or a strong support structure when facing
38:29
challenges like, say, denominational tension on the
38:32
field, unexpected houses issues, or complex counseling
38:35
situations. Like the example from Uganda?
38:38
Exactly. A missionary in Uganda dealing
38:41
with land disputes or intricate church political issues.
38:44
They lack a clear source for wisdom, financial help in a
38:47
crisis, and moral support from partners who are truly
38:50
financially invested and feel morally responsible for them.
38:54
This can leave them feeling incredibly isolated, burnt out
38:57
and without proper guidance in times of real need.
39:00
And for the church itself, what is this shotgun approach
39:03
revealed about their own philosophy of missions?
39:06
It seems like it implies A broader lack of strategy,
39:09
doesn't it? Yeah.
39:10
It absolutely points to a lack of focus, a lack of strategic
39:13
thinking. Churches adopting this approach
39:17
often lack a clear philosophy or objective for their missions
39:20
work. It results in what the sources
39:22
call a very disjointed approach. Just.
39:25
Try and do a little bit everywhere.
39:27
Pretty much. The underlying aim may simply be
39:29
to support as many people as possible, perhaps cynically just
39:34
to make the mission map look more full on the wall in the
39:36
church voye, rather than achieving specific strategic
39:40
outcomes in a particular region or through a particular method.
39:44
Without a clear focus, such as on a particular method like
39:47
church planting or specific geographic location, churches
39:50
find it challenging to thoughtfully decline various
39:52
requests. This leads to fragmented
39:55
resource allocation. Where they're giving is spread
39:57
so thin it really loses its impact.
39:59
So it's not just inefficient for the missionary, it's also not
40:01
truly strategic in advancing the Kingdom for the church.
40:05
How can a church led by its pastor?
40:07
Craft a more focused philosophy of missions to move beyond these
40:10
problems. Well, the pastor has to
40:13
formulate and lead the churches philosophy of missions.
40:16
This is not a task that can just be delegated or left to chance
40:19
or a committee alone. The pastor needs to own it.
40:22
Yes, this involves the pastor being actively engaged, ideally
40:26
by serving on the missions committee, which interestingly
40:29
is often less politically charged in smaller churches,
40:32
making it an ideal place for the pastor to guide the vision and
40:36
its implementation without necessarily facing huge
40:39
obstructions. OK, so how does this process
40:42
work? The process really begins with
40:44
three key steps, each building logically on the last.
40:47
What's the first step in this strategic shift?
40:49
Step one is to choose a method of missions.
40:53
The Church needs to strategically select a specific
40:55
type of missions work that it will concentrate its efforts and
40:58
resources on. Like focusing on one kind of
41:00
ministry. Exactly.
41:01
This could include church planting, which focuses on
41:03
establishing new congregations, or maybe seminary training,
41:06
equipping future pastors and leaders indigenous to a region.
41:10
It might be mercy ministry on a global scale, addressing
41:12
widespread physical needs, or street evangelism in specific
41:16
unreached cities. Other examples?
41:18
Sure, things like literature production, maybe printing
41:21
bibles in underserved languages, or even school teaching at
41:24
institutions specifically for missionaries children, which is
41:27
a vital support. Role OK, so pick one main
41:30
method. What's the benefit?
41:31
The benefit here is huge. Choosing a specific method
41:35
immediately clarifies the Church's vision for missions.
41:38
It helps to focus efforts and resources, and it enables the
41:42
church to discern which requests to support thoughtfully and
41:46
which to politely decline because they simply don't align
41:49
with the chosen method. It provides a clear filter.
41:52
So it provides that filter, making decisions clearer and
41:55
less political perhaps. And after choosing a method,
41:58
what's the next logical step? Step 2 is to choose a geographic
42:02
location. After selecting a method, the
42:04
church should target a specific continent, country, or maybe
42:07
even a particular region within a country for its primary
42:11
missionary efforts. Focus a location too.
42:13
Why? This concentration allows the
42:15
congregation to become genuinely more engaged and passionate how?
42:21
Through focused prayer, more informed giving, and developing
42:25
real affection for the specific mission and missionary in that
42:28
particular area. It becomes more personal.
42:30
Much more personal, regular updates and personal testimonies
42:34
from a specific area foster a far deeper connection than a
42:37
broad, unfocused approach ever could.
42:40
It also makes it much easier for the church to decline requests
42:43
that do not align with its chosen focus without feeling
42:46
obligated or causing a fence. Can you give an example?
42:49
Sure, if a church focuses specifically on church planting
42:53
in Uganda, a request for a new van for the missionaries doing
42:56
that work there is likely to be met with far greater enthusiasm
43:00
and sacrificial giving than if it were just one of 20 random
43:03
requests from all over the globe.
43:05
People feel invested. That makes perfect sense.
43:08
A focused target makes it more tangible and relatable for the
43:11
congregation, creating true investment, not just writing a
43:14
check. What's the third crucial step?
43:16
Step 3 is to choose your missionary carefully.
43:19
Okay, the person matters. Critically, the ideal approach,
43:23
and the one that fosters the deepest connection and
43:25
accountability, is to select a missionary from within the
43:29
church itself, someone known and trusted by the congregation,
43:33
perhaps a young person who has grown up in the church and shown
43:36
godly character and gifting. Sending your own.
43:38
Exactly. This might involve a significant
43:41
long term investment from the Church, such as sending them to
43:44
seminary, providing language training, or supporting them
43:47
through other preparatory stages, even if it means they
43:50
won't actually go to the field for several years, maybe four or
43:53
five that. Requires patience.
43:54
It does, but it fosters a true sense of adoption by the church.
43:59
They treat the missionary as an extension of the church staff
44:01
and family. Now, if an internal candidate is
44:04
not available, what then? The alternative is to partner
44:08
with a missions organization that the church trusts
44:10
doctrinally and philosophically, maybe like Grace Ministries
44:14
International for Grace Community Church, to help find
44:17
suitable missionaries who align with the church's chosen method
44:20
and geographic focus. And what's the ultimate goal of
44:23
this careful selection and focused support compared to the
44:27
shotgun approach we talked about?
44:29
The overarching goal is simple. Support fewer missionaries, but
44:33
with greater financial and moral responsibility.
44:36
Deeper, not wider. Precisely, it is generally far
44:39
more effective to support 1 missionary with substantial
44:42
adequate funding, for example, $15,000 annually, than to try
44:46
and spread tiny ineffective amounts among many missionaries,
44:50
like $1000 each. This focus support ensures that
44:54
the missionaries are adequately resourced.
44:56
So they can actually do the work.
44:57
Right. Allowing them to concentrate on
44:59
their ministry rather than constant fundraising.
45:02
And it provides them with a strong, accountable support
45:05
structure back home. Now, while a single church can
45:08
certainly send missionaries directly, trusted missions
45:11
organizations can provide crucial support for safety,
45:14
logistical and even political issues in difficult or remote
45:17
areas. So partnership can still be
45:18
valuable. It can be A church can partner
45:21
with such organizations while still maintaining financial
45:24
control and direct oversight of their chosen missionary.
45:27
It's about quality and depth of support, not just quantity
45:30
spread thinly. This sounds like a strategic
45:33
realignment that can truly make a difference for both the church
45:36
and the missionary. How does a church actually
45:39
implement this new missions philosophy, especially if it's
45:42
currently using the shotgun approach and has many existing
45:46
maybe long standing commitments? That sounds tricky.
45:50
It is tricky and needs wisdom for churches transitioning from
45:54
a shotgun approach. There will inevitably be a
45:57
delicate process of discontinuing support for
46:00
missionaries who do not align with the new focus philosophy.
46:03
How do you do that without causing that civil war?
46:06
Open and honest communication is absolutely key.
46:09
Provide ample notice, for instance a full year if
46:11
possible. Clearly explain the new vision
46:14
and why support is being adjusted, framing it in terms of
46:17
Kingdom effectiveness, not personal preference.
46:19
And hope they understand most missionaries, being godly
46:23
individuals focused on the Kingdom, will grasp the benefit
46:26
of a focused approach and understand the Church's desire
46:30
for greater effectiveness, even if it affects them personally.
46:34
Practical steps include coordinating the end of support
46:37
with their furlough returns if possible, to allow them time to
46:41
find new support while they are stateside.
46:43
That's considerate. And even offer assistance in
46:45
doing so, perhaps by connecting them with other churches or
46:48
organizations that might be a better fit for their specific
46:51
ministry. But critically, this sensitive
46:54
decision must be led by the Missions committee and the
46:57
elders together, not solely by the pastor.
47:00
Why is that shared leadership so important here?
47:02
To ensure broader church ownership of the decision and
47:05
minimize the internal political issues that could arise from
47:08
changing long standing, often personal relationships, it needs
47:12
to be seen as a church decision, not just the pastor's idea.
47:15
And what about short term missions or STMS under this new
47:19
focus philosophy? How should they be integrated?
47:21
Do they still have a? They definitely can have a
47:24
place, but their focus needs to shift rather than primarily
47:27
focusing on providing A heightened religious experience
47:30
for the participants coming from the sending church.
47:33
Which is often the implicit goal, right?
47:35
Often, yes. Instead, short term missions
47:37
should genuinely aid the missionaries already on the
47:39
field. STM should meet the specific
47:42
expressed needs of the missionaries themselves,
47:45
aligning directly with their long term objectives and
47:48
strategy. So the missionary directs the
47:50
STM purpose. Exactly.
47:52
This could mean helping build a needed facility, assisting with
47:56
St. evangelism alongside them under their direction,
48:00
conducting vacation Bible schools that fit their outreach
48:03
plan, leading ESL classes if that's a strategic need.
48:06
Or even playing basketball. Or even, as in the example,
48:09
participating in unique outreaches like basketball
48:12
tournaments in Muslim slums, as was specifically requested by a
48:15
missionary in France, ministering in those areas
48:18
simply because his local church did not have people who played
48:21
basketball and it was an end to the community.
48:23
That's fascinating. The benefit of this approach is
48:25
immense. It ensures that people's
48:28
generosity, their time, effort and money directly aligns with
48:32
the missionaries actual needs and it deepens the congregations
48:35
connection and passion for missions by allowing them to
48:38
directly support and participate in the long term work of their
48:41
own chosen missionaries. It's fundamentally about serving
48:44
the mission, not just having an experience.
48:46
We've seen how churches can move beyond simply reacting to needs,
48:50
establishing A thoughtful vision for both local and global
48:53
outreach. By distinguishing between types
48:56
of ministries, carefully discerning partnerships, and
48:59
focusing global efforts, churches can truly make a
49:02
faithful impact for the Kingdom. It really comes down to
49:04
stewarding resources, time, and gospel truth with wisdom,
49:07
doesn't it? This raises an interesting
49:09
question for each of us listening when we consider the
49:12
breadth of these outreach opportunities we've discussed.
49:14
What is 1 area within your own local community, or perhaps a
49:18
specific global need that resonates that you could bring
49:21
before the Lord in focused prayer this week, asking for His
49:24
grace to move in a tangible way? What a critical question for
49:28
each of us to consider personally.
49:30
We hope this Deep Dive has equipped you with some new ways
49:33
to think about your church's vital role in reaching the lost,
49:36
both near and far. Thank you for joining us on The
49:39
Deep Dive, a program dedicated to looking closely at the truths
49:43
that shape our lives in the world.
49:45
We look forward to our next conversation.