Latest / The Science of Leading / Beyond Trust Falls: Building High-Performance Teams with Data
Transcript
- 0:00Welcome to the show everybody!
- 0:01I'm Claire Monroe, here with Edwin Carrington.
- 0:04And Edwin, I want to start today with a picture that I think will trigger some mild
- 0:07PTSD for a lot of our listeners.
- 0:10You are standing in a drafty conference room on a Tuesday morning.
- 0:13You've just been handed a blindfold, and a colleague you barely talk to is
- 0:17whispering, "just fall backward, I've got you."
- 0:20Yes, we are talking about the classic corporate trust fall.
- 0:24Oh, spare me.
- 0:25The trust fall.
- 0:26Or my personal favorite, paying thousands of dollars to lock your accounting
- 0:30department in an escape room for two hours so they can solve fake riddles while
- 0:34their actual, real-world inbox overflows.
- 0:37It is a classic illusion, Claire.
- 0:39We mistake a momentary spike in adrenaline and forced camaraderie for sustainable
- 0:44behavior change.
- 0:45Right!
- 0:46It feels like you did something because you all went out for margaritas afterward,
- 0:49but then Wednesday morning rolls around, the same communication bottlenecks happen,
- 0:53and everyone goes right back to their silos.
- 0:56In fact, Team Coaching International put out a stat that absolutely blew me away:
- 1:00less than ten percent of teams rate themselves as high-performing before they
- 1:04undergo actual, systemic team coaching.
- 1:06Less than ten percent!
- 1:08That ten percent figure is entirely consistent with what I've seen over forty years.
- 1:12And the reason is simple: organizations treat the team as just a collection of
- 1:16individuals.
- 1:18They send the manager to leadership training, they give the star player executive
- 1:22coaching, and they hope it trickles down.
- 1:24But it doesn't.
- 1:25The team itself is the unit of change.
- 1:28You have to coach the system, not just the parts.
- 1:31"The team as the unit of change."
- 1:33I love that phrasing because the business case for getting this right is massive.
- 1:37I was looking at the Gallup 2020 meta-analysis, and they found that highly engaged,
- 1:42cohesive teams drive twenty-three percent higher profitability and eighteen percent
- 1:48higher productivity.
- 1:49That is not a marginal gain; that is a massive competitive moat.
- 1:53Twenty-three percent higher profitability.
- 1:56Think about that.
- 1:58If you told a CEO you had a software tool that could boost profitability by a
- 2:02quarter, they would write a blank check.
- 2:05But when you tell them it requires changing how their executive team actually
- 2:09communicates and makes decisions, suddenly they want to go do another escape room.
- 2:14It's because addressing systemic misalignment is hard, uncomfortable work.
- 2:19It's easy to fix a single person's behavior in a silo; it's much harder to untangle
- 2:24the invisible web of expectations, defensive routines, and coordination bottlenecks
- 2:29that build up between people.
- 2:31So let's talk about how we actually untangle that web, because you can't just
- 2:35lecture a team into high performance.
- 2:37It has to happen in the flow of work.
- 2:39What does real, systemic team coaching look like in practice?
- 2:43It looks like running concrete, low-stakes behavioral experiments during your actual
- 2:47meetings, not at an offsite.
- 2:49For example, I often have teams implement a "decision log."
- 2:53It sounds incredibly simple, but you document every major decision,
- 2:57who owned it, what the assumptions were, and then you review it three months later.
- 3:02It completely strips away the hindsight bias and forces a feedback loop on how the
- 3:07team actually processes information.
- 3:10Or you set up peer coaching circles where team members solve real operational
- 3:14bottlenecks together, without the leader in the room to rescue them.
- 3:18That is such a key distinction.
- 3:20You are changing the actual rituals of how the work gets done,
- 3:23not just talking about "trust" in the abstract.
- 3:26But to do that effectively, you can't just guess at what's wrong.
- 3:30You need data.
- 3:31And this is where OAD, or Organizational Analysis and Design,
- 3:35comes in as the diagnostic backbone.
- 3:37Exactly.
- 3:39Without validated behavioral data, you're just throwing spaghetti at the wall.
- 3:43OAD allows you to baseline the actual, hard-wired behavioral traits of your team
- 3:48members.
- 3:49You get to see the real data on role fit, cognitive styles,
- 3:53and communication traits.
- 3:55For instance, is your team struggling because they lack cohesion,
- 3:59or is it because you have six highly dominant, fast-paced visionaries and not a
- 4:03single person naturally wired to build structure and process?
- 4:08OAD takes the guesswork out of those dynamics completely.
- 4:11It maps the invisible currents in the room.
- 4:14Instead of pointing fingers and saying, "Why is Susan always slowing us down with
- 4:19questions?", the team looks at the OAD data and realizes, "Oh,
- 4:24Susan's behavioral profile shows she has a high need for precision and risk
- 4:28mitigation.
- 4:29That is actually our safety valve, not a bottleneck."
- 4:33That shift in perspective is massive.
- 4:36It turns personal conflict into objective chemistry.
- 4:39You stop blaming people's character and start engineering their interactions.
- 4:44Well, if you want to stop guessing and start measuring, you can actually test this
- 4:47framework yourself.
- 4:49Go to O-A-D dot AI to test OAD for free, baseline your team's unique behavioral
- 4:54profile, and start building a high-performing team based on real data,
- 4:58not trust falls.
- 5:00That is O-A-D dot AI.
- 5:02Edwin, thank you as always for the wisdom.
- 5:05Always a pleasure, Claire.
- 5:06Let's leave the blindfolds in the closet.