Latest / International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better / Bar Bullies, Bureaucrat Bootstraps, and a $368,783 Sunshine Bill That Takes 44 Years to Read—Straight-Face Comedy Mid-Missouri Morning

Transcript

Bar Bullies, Bureaucrat Bootstraps, and a $368,783 Sunshine Bill That Takes 44 Years to Read—Straight-Face Comedy Mid-Missouri Morning · International Flavor: Where the Truth Tastes Better

• 0:00
  Good morning, I am Samuel Trapp.
• 0:03
  This is International Flavor and I'm coming to
• 0:07
  you live from the Lake Ozark Real Estate
• 0:09
  of the Art Studio.
• 0:12
  Please feel free to phone in 573-746
• 0:15
  -8020 should you feel the urge.
• 0:20
  I want to continue on a topic that
• 0:22
  we've been covering the last couple of days.
• 0:24
  It's a long road, very long road.
• 0:28
  And then we'll get to a second road
• 0:30
  because I've told you about the Missouri Bar
• 0:32
  and a complaint I received from them.
• 0:37
  They are attempting to, I don't know what
• 0:40
  they're attempting to do, but I will answer.
• 0:42
  See, so the Missouri Bar, one of their,
• 0:47
  not the Missouri, well the Missouri Bar is
• 0:49
  just a corrupt bunch of a-holes.
• 0:52
  That's what that is.
• 0:53
  I wish it was not, but it is.
• 0:56
  And they target particular people for destruction and
• 1:00
  they take them out.
• 1:01
  And it's, their Board of Governors, they like
• 1:06
  to call it, is really just a high
• 1:09
  school popularity contest.
• 1:12
  And that is how you get places in
• 1:14
  Missouri, because they are one of the most
• 1:17
  powerful organs of government, but they're really not
• 1:20
  government.
• 1:21
  They're completely independent.
• 1:24
  There is no oversight by anyone that will
• 1:29
  correct any of the things they are.
• 1:31
  They were created long ago by a Missouri
• 1:34
  Supreme Court order that created them.
• 1:38
  The OCDC, Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, is
• 1:42
  also, but they are an arm of the
• 1:46
  Supreme Court of Missouri.
• 1:48
  But the Supreme Court doesn't supervise them.
• 1:51
  They don't do anything to OCDC.
• 1:54
  OCDC is completely independent.
• 1:58
  They can choose, pick and choose which lawyers
• 2:01
  to go after and things like that.
• 2:03
  And it's pretty sad because if they choose
• 2:07
  to target somebody, the targeted has no, no
• 2:12
  backup.
• 2:13
  But if you know somebody in the Bar,
• 2:16
  you can go to prison for five years
• 2:18
  for fraud and get, as a lawyer, and
• 2:23
  come out and get your license back.
• 2:25
  But not Samuel Trapp.
• 2:27
  Hell no.
• 2:28
  Not Samuel.
• 2:29
  He has to wait a year and a
• 2:30
  half, a year and a half for his
• 2:34
  one word response.
• 2:35
  One word.
• 2:36
  The Supreme Court of Missouri answers in one
• 2:39
  word.
• 2:40
  Nope.
• 2:41
  So I file three days later.
• 2:44
  And three days later, I file again.
• 2:47
  Same thing.
• 2:48
  The idiot OCDC guy didn't do a thing.
• 2:53
  For two years and six months, I waited
• 2:58
  for a one word response from the Supreme
• 3:02
  Court of Missouri.
• 3:03
  No.
• 3:05
  No explanation.
• 3:06
  No why you can't have a license.
• 3:09
  No nothing.
• 3:10
  And that is the BS that I wish
• 3:13
  to attack daily.
• 3:15
  So fast forward 11 freaking years since someone
• 3:20
  targeted me and took my license.
• 3:22
  11 years.
• 3:23
  Fast forward.
• 3:25
  And here we are.
• 3:27
  Well, truly it's only 10 and a half,
• 3:29
  I suppose.
• 3:30
  I remember the day.
• 3:32
  It was two days before my son's birthday.
• 3:34
  October the 14th of 2014.
• 3:40
  A newspaper calls me.
• 3:43
  A newspaper.
• 3:44
  No, no, no.
• 3:45
  They leaked.
• 3:46
  They leaked the order about me getting done.
• 3:50
  They didn't even tell my attorney.
• 3:53
  They didn't tell me there was no published
• 3:55
  order.
• 3:56
  Allegedly, the other side didn't even know.
• 4:00
  Also, I'm yelling in the microphone.
• 4:02
  Sorry about that.
• 4:04
  I really am.
• 4:05
  I'll try to get back to normal.
• 4:06
  Okay.
• 4:06
  So let's talk like this.
• 4:08
  But when I get pissed off, my voice
• 4:11
  gets raised and I yell.
• 4:14
  And I'm really sorry about that.
• 4:17
  But it's BS.
• 4:18
  It's complete horseshit what these guys did to
• 4:22
  me.
• 4:23
  Okay.
• 4:23
  And over the period that I lost my
• 4:25
  license, they sent letters to all my former
• 4:28
  clients asking them if they wanted money from
• 4:31
  me.
• 4:31
  The girl who, what was her name?
• 4:34
  Angela Sylvie stole my office.
• 4:37
  Every stick of furniture, everything.
• 4:39
  Her husband was a former state rep, state
• 4:43
  senator.
• 4:43
  He's a piece of trash.
• 4:45
  I paid for them to hide their clandestine
• 4:50
  meetings from his ex-wife when he was
• 4:53
  married and they were just screwing around on
• 4:54
  the side.
• 4:56
  And I took her to New York City.
• 4:59
  The whole time she's on the phone with
• 5:01
  him and the cover story was because he
• 5:04
  would take her places.
• 5:05
  And at the lake, I was always their
• 5:07
  cover story.
• 5:08
  And I don't care.
• 5:09
  I don't give a crap what you do.
• 5:10
  Doesn't matter to me.
• 5:12
  But now we're fast forwarded here 11 years,
• 5:16
  right?
• 5:16
  So we're 11 years forward.
• 5:19
  And out of the blue, I get a
• 5:25
  letter several days ago from the office chief
• 5:32
  disciplinary counsel.
• 5:33
  So remember what they do to F you,
• 5:37
  to screw you forever.
• 5:39
  This is the pattern.
• 5:42
  This is how they screw you forever.
• 5:44
  And I'd be happy to just discuss this
• 5:48
  with anyone on the bar.
• 5:50
  Let's have a bar person come on and
• 5:52
  argue and tell me why I'm wrong.
• 5:55
  I'd love to hear it.
• 5:56
  Let's have a Supreme Court person come on.
• 5:58
  I used to be really good friends with
• 5:59
  the Supreme Court clerk who passed away.
• 6:02
  In fact, I had a relationship with his
• 6:04
  wife for a while.
• 6:06
  But we were still halfway decent friends.
• 6:08
  He's a decent guy.
• 6:09
  And his wife was even better.
• 6:11
  But it's these type of things that piss
• 6:17
  me off to no end because they are
• 6:20
  lawless.
• 6:21
  I mean, they don't have to follow any
• 6:22
  real law, real procedure, zero oversight.
• 6:26
  They are bureaucrats, okay?
• 6:29
  And I intend to fully share the Office
• 6:35
  of Chief Disciplinary Counselor's letter to me, which
• 6:39
  I'm responding to even now.
• 6:41
  I wrote most of it yesterday.
• 6:42
  It's due today that I have to give
• 6:44
  to them.
• 6:45
  And I will share it after I send
• 6:47
  it here on the program.
• 6:49
  And I have no problem with that.
• 6:51
  I'm an open book.
• 6:52
  I don't give a crap.
• 6:53
  I don't care anymore.
• 6:55
  We all know what the result is.
• 6:58
  I went all the way to the United
• 6:59
  States Supreme Court.
• 7:01
  They abdicated their responsibility, didn't even look at
• 7:04
  what I've done.
• 7:05
  I'm completely right.
• 7:06
  And I'm okay with that.
• 7:08
  But being right doesn't always mean you win,
• 7:11
  okay?
• 7:11
  And I am not wrong.
• 7:13
  And so I would be completely happy to
• 7:15
  sit down and discuss this with the powers
• 7:17
  that be.
• 7:19
  Maybe they've changed over time.
• 7:21
  Maybe they'll pull their heads out of their
• 7:22
  asses and fix this problem.
• 7:25
  It's a big problem.
• 7:26
  There ain't no reason on earth that I
• 7:28
  should not be an attorney.
• 7:30
  You know how many criminals are attorneys?
• 7:32
  A bunch.
• 7:33
  If you believe I'm a criminal, great.
• 7:35
  Let's assume all of these horrible things about
• 7:38
  me.
• 7:39
  Let's assume it.
• 7:40
  But why would you give me a broker's
• 7:42
  license in Florida and in Missouri?
• 7:45
  I had to have a hearing in Florida.
• 7:46
  I wish I had the transcript of it
• 7:47
  because it was pretty comical.
• 7:49
  At the end, one of the So it's
• 7:51
  like a seven-man hearing committee or board
• 7:57
  of real estate.
• 7:59
  And they have these hearings.
• 8:00
  And in there, there are three attorneys general
• 8:03
  that sit on the side of the table
• 8:05
  and listen to the whole thing.
• 8:06
  And I believe the program is recorded.
• 8:09
  And I went down there.
• 8:10
  Because my license was suspended for the practice
• 8:14
  of law in Missouri, although afterward I was
• 8:17
  perfectly fine getting a broker's license in Missouri,
• 8:20
  which basically has the same ethical requirements and
• 8:25
  duties.
• 8:26
  That is one of the reasons I went
• 8:30
  to go get it.
• 8:31
  Because I want to show the bullshit that
• 8:34
  comes here.
• 8:36
  Or that comes to pass.
• 8:38
  Because it's just not right what they do
• 8:40
  to people.
• 8:41
  If they choose to screw you, they will.
• 8:43
  If you've kissed the ass of power, they
• 8:45
  won't.
• 8:46
  You'll be just fine all the way along.
• 8:49
  And that is the truth.
• 8:52
  People want to talk about the policy of
• 8:56
  truth.
• 8:56
  I did it for a week or so
• 8:58
  as a prelude to my show here.
• 9:03
  But I speak, like I say, all the
• 9:07
  time.
• 9:07
  You want to convince me I'm wrong?
• 9:09
  Come on the program.
• 9:10
  Convince me I'm wrong.
• 9:11
  Send me somebody that says how they could
• 9:13
  do it.
• 9:13
  Because by the time I'm finished, I will
• 9:15
  have them convinced that I am right.
• 9:18
  That's what I believe.
• 9:20
  And this is, and I am right.
• 9:22
  The system is bullshit.
• 9:23
  Pardon my French.
• 9:24
  And they will not fix it.
• 9:26
  Why?
• 9:27
  Because it allows them to target people in
• 9:30
  the shadows and destroy them, which they've done
• 9:33
  to me.
• 9:34
  I was, you know, I don't want to
• 9:37
  say, I suppose wealthy would be the term.
• 9:39
  In Russia there's a term, it's called sidingami.
• 9:42
  With money.
• 9:43
  Sidingami means, dingy is money.
• 9:47
  And sidingami means a person who is, he's
• 9:51
  not rich.
• 9:52
  He's not bagatti.
• 9:53
  That's rich.
• 9:54
  But he has sidingami.
• 9:55
  He's, you know, he does fine.
• 9:57
  And before they targeted me, before Sam Phillips
• 10:00
  targeted me and told me personally to my
• 10:04
  face, I will make sure that you never
• 10:06
  practice law in the state of Missouri again.
• 10:08
  Well, he really made sure that I can't
• 10:10
  practice law anywhere because the Supreme Court does
• 10:13
  the same thing.
• 10:14
  This is bullshit, what they did to me
• 10:15
  completely.
• 10:16
  And I'm giving you a nice prelude because
• 10:18
  I am going to share the letter that
• 10:20
  I received, the efforts that they're making, and
• 10:24
  that's the topic.
• 10:25
  But that will be a topic for tomorrow
• 10:27
  or the next day.
• 10:28
  Well, wait, today's Friday and it'll be a
• 10:30
  topic for next week.
• 10:31
  And I will talk about it next week.
• 10:34
  I am, for those of you listening that
• 10:37
  like my international stuff, I am not abandoning
• 10:40
  that.
• 10:41
  I'm not jumping into personal ethical and legal
• 10:45
  and political issues of my person.
• 10:49
  But I believe it's very important that people
• 10:52
  understand this, especially in mid-Missouri.
• 10:55
  I still have my love and my hobby
• 10:57
  is keeping track of international affairs that the
• 11:01
  Trump administration currently is cocking up pretty badly
• 11:05
  and keep track of what's going on in
• 11:09
  the rest of the world, how the rest
• 11:10
  of the world views us.
• 11:12
  And it's not very well, by the way.
• 11:14
  And I want to make sure that people
• 11:16
  understand that I am still international flavor and
• 11:20
  the flavor is mostly international.
• 11:23
  But there's certainly some political things that need
• 11:26
  to happen.
• 11:27
  Remember, you can email me at samuelt at
• 11:30
  internationalflavor.com.
• 11:32
  You can check out our websites at civicoutlaws
• 11:38
  .com.
• 11:39
  It's under development right now.
• 11:41
  It only has the lewdness, the ridiculousness of
• 11:43
  lewdness that Templeton and company are in the
• 11:47
  ATC are forcing upon the world as we
• 11:52
  speak.
• 11:52
  They get to decide who's lewd, what's lewd,
• 11:55
  why they think lewd is important, which is
• 11:58
  completely crap.
• 12:01
  It's really quite the story.
• 12:04
  And by the way, remember, I don't have
• 12:06
  any concrete convictions on this one way or
• 12:10
  the other.
• 12:10
  I'm just telling you like it is.
• 12:12
  You know, I'm not, I don't, I don't,
• 12:14
  how do I want to put this?
• 12:16
  I like strip clubs, gentlemen's clubs.
• 12:19
  I like them.
• 12:20
  You know, I have no, I'm not going
• 12:22
  to hide that.
• 12:22
  I don't care.
• 12:23
  I like to go there.
• 12:25
  I don't do anything weird.
• 12:26
  You go in there and you see a
• 12:27
  very attractive girl.
• 12:30
  You know, I rarely go up to the
• 12:32
  stage.
• 12:33
  You know, I've done it before.
• 12:34
  You know, I pay for girls, you know,
• 12:37
  for their, especially if they do something.
• 12:41
  How do I want to put it?
• 12:43
  It's entertaining, but I want to see, you
• 12:45
  know, something sensual.
• 12:48
  I don't want to see gross.
• 12:49
  I don't like that.
• 12:50
  You know, I don't want to watch weird
• 12:51
  things and stuff.
• 12:52
  And I don't even know why I'm talking
• 12:53
  about this, but it's a big issue because
• 12:55
  there are a lot of people out there
• 12:57
  who do, who think something horrible about places
• 13:01
  like that.
• 13:01
  I don't think that way.
• 13:02
  Never have.
• 13:03
  And it's probably because the ones I went
• 13:05
  to in my early life were so fantastic
• 13:09
  and so upper class.
• 13:13
  It's, it's very, I mean, and seriously, if
• 13:17
  they strive to do it, why wouldn't a
• 13:19
  beautiful woman want to come and make a
• 13:22
  fortune, which they do from guys that just
• 13:26
  like it, that appreciate them.
• 13:28
  Now, I, you know, I don't want to
• 13:29
  see anything gross or nasty.
• 13:31
  I'm not, I'm not for that.
• 13:32
  And you don't go to that place and
• 13:34
  find a prostitute.
• 13:35
  Most, 95 or more percent of those women
• 13:39
  are just extremely attractive professional women that wish
• 13:43
  to make a good living.
• 13:46
  And they do, if you don't bother them
• 13:48
  with, with, with things like the ATC.
• 13:51
  So I'm really kind of on a rant
• 13:52
  this morning because my topics are, seem to
• 13:55
  flow.
• 13:55
  And I got to, I have a lot
• 13:57
  of drama in my life right now.
• 13:58
  And that's crap too.
• 14:01
  You know, I even have some family drama.
• 14:03
  You wouldn't believe what the hell is going
• 14:04
  on there.
• 14:05
  I feel like I live in a, you
• 14:14
  know, I hate to make fun of Brumley,
• 14:15
  but it was always like, you know, I'd
• 14:18
  make jokes about it.
• 14:19
  And I, you know, I pick any Ozark
• 14:22
  city.
• 14:23
  This is a joke.
• 14:24
  Okay.
• 14:24
  But you'd say, oh, is this the day
• 14:27
  they share in the false teeth around?
• 14:29
  You know, in the, you get one set
• 14:31
  of false teeth in the city and you
• 14:33
  know, this week they're sharing them around.
• 14:34
  He's got them.
• 14:36
  Anyway, I kind of make up stuff like
• 14:38
  that, but I don't mean anything by it.
• 14:41
  All right.
• 14:42
  Anyway, back to the topic with the, with
• 14:44
  the Missouri bar and what they are doing
• 14:46
  to me, I have to file a response
• 14:49
  yesterday.
• 14:49
  I sat down and I looked at it.
• 14:50
  And one of my chief questions was where
• 14:53
  in the world do you get to power
• 14:55
  after you take my license and destroy my
• 14:58
  life?
• 15:00
  And where do you get the power to
• 15:03
  come back 11 years later and quiz me?
• 15:09
  And the reason is this because I still
• 15:12
  have a license.
• 15:14
  Okay.
• 15:14
  And this is the screw job that they
• 15:17
  play in Missouri.
• 15:18
  And they're very good at it.
• 15:20
  They've been doing it forever.
• 15:21
  That's why Sam Phillips can come up to
• 15:23
  me and say, I'm going to make sure
• 15:25
  you never practice law in the state of
• 15:26
  Missouri again.
• 15:27
  That's how, that's how they do it.
• 15:29
  They know this exists.
• 15:31
  They also know that the lawyer who's being
• 15:34
  attacked doesn't that he does not know because
• 15:37
  it's a committee that they have in the
• 15:40
  Missouri bar that decides to screw people.
• 15:43
  And if they decide to screw you, trust
• 15:45
  me, you're screwed because nobody will pay attention
• 15:48
  to you ever.
• 15:49
  Everything that I wrote in the Western district
• 15:51
  of Missouri, when I sued them, is their
• 15:55
  lawyers told my daughter, I was a criminal.
• 15:59
  The bar lawyers told my daughter, I'm a
• 16:03
  criminal that I stole from my clients.
• 16:05
  That is not what happened.
• 16:08
  I have never, if now, if that's, and
• 16:10
  if that's the case, and it's pretty funny,
• 16:12
  and I only tell you that because now
• 16:14
  the OCDC sent me a request and it's
• 16:19
  really something foolish.
• 16:20
  It's something completely stupid.
• 16:21
  The person who submitted it is a moron
• 16:24
  that suggested a path for me.
• 16:30
  And we were, we've been researching it forever.
• 16:32
  It has resulted in the modern law ecosystem,
• 16:36
  and it has resulted in civic outlaws.
• 16:39
  And one of the guys who was going
• 16:40
  to help develop modern law ecosystem, it was,
• 16:46
  it's pretty funny because it was his idea.
• 16:49
  And he wrote a complaint to the Missouri
• 16:51
  bar.
• 16:52
  And when I tell you who it is,
• 16:53
  eventually you're going to just go, oh my
• 16:55
  God, talk about drama.
• 16:57
  This is drama.
• 16:58
  And so if you, but fast forward because
• 17:02
  Missouri bar idiots are sending the letters going
• 17:04
  to me and they're doing it because, because
• 17:09
  I still have a law license in Missouri.
• 17:15
  They still hold it.
• 17:16
  And the reason they hold it is to
• 17:20
  fuck me completely.
• 17:24
  And they have, and they know what they
• 17:27
  are doing.
• 17:29
  This is wrong.
• 17:31
  No doubt wrong to destroy a man's life
• 17:35
  forever.
• 17:36
  You want to punish him for a bad
• 17:37
  act for bad.
• 17:38
  I have no complaint with the one year
• 17:41
  suspension.
• 17:42
  That is, I'm totally fine with that.
• 17:44
  I get it.
• 17:45
  I fought it all the way to the
• 17:47
  Missouri Supreme court.
• 17:48
  By the time that process was over, I
• 17:50
  was glad that I fought it.
• 17:52
  I was glad that it was done and
• 17:53
  I was depressed that I lost.
• 17:56
  And I decided to move to Qatar for
• 17:59
  a year because I thought, well, you know,
• 18:02
  the best way for me to combat this
• 18:04
  is to go to Qatar and move and
• 18:06
  get a job over there.
• 18:08
  So I did, by the way, Ramadan's coming
• 18:10
  up in February.
• 18:12
  I'm trying to get to Russia between now
• 18:14
  and February 28th when my visa expires.
• 18:18
  And I'm going to go through Doha, Doha,
• 18:20
  Qatar, and I'm going to fly from there
• 18:22
  to Moscow, St. Petersburg, or wherever I wish
• 18:24
  to spend some very cold winter days in
• 18:28
  Russia, mother Russia.
• 18:30
  And then that would be entertaining.
• 18:33
  It'll be very nice.
• 18:34
  And so at any rate, I have to
• 18:39
  answer this complaint that they have given me
• 18:42
  and they have kept jurisdiction over me by
• 18:47
  not disbarring me.
• 18:49
  I am not a disbarred attorney.
• 18:52
  Many people think that I am.
• 18:54
  I am a suspended for one year attorney
• 18:58
  with the right to reapply after one year.
• 19:02
  And I've applied twice after the year was
• 19:06
  gone.
• 19:07
  And the assholes at OCDC or one asshole
• 19:11
  at OCDC, Sam Phillips, held it.
• 19:15
  He didn't do a freaking thing at all
• 19:18
  on my case.
• 19:20
  Nothing until he finally submitted a bullshit document
• 19:26
  that he could have done in several weeks.
• 19:29
  Now, imagine you are trying to get a
• 19:31
  broker's license, right, here in Missouri.
• 19:34
  I file for a broker's license.
• 19:35
  You know when I got it?
• 19:37
  Immediately.
• 19:38
  I got it right there.
• 19:39
  Because they do a criminal record check.
• 19:42
  They check to see if you're a good
• 19:44
  person with a reputation in the community and
• 19:47
  blah, blah, blah.
• 19:48
  And they go search you, right?
• 19:50
  And at the end of that, they give
• 19:52
  you your license.
• 19:53
  It doesn't take long.
• 19:54
  They give you...
• 19:54
  So first they do a little mini investigation.
• 19:57
  Takes them, what, a week or something.
• 19:58
  And then they say, okay, you can take
• 19:59
  your broker's test.
• 20:00
  And you take the broker's test and you're
• 20:02
  done.
• 20:02
  When you get a law license in Missouri
• 20:05
  as a first timer, you submit...
• 20:07
  They have people submit their applications during...
• 20:14
  They have four months.
• 20:15
  The deadline, you know, they need three, four
• 20:17
  months.
• 20:18
  The deadline is...
• 20:19
  So the bar is given twice a year.
• 20:21
  Once in February, once in July.
• 20:24
  And they give you the...
• 20:27
  They do your investigation before that, right?
• 20:31
  And the investigation is done, you know, and
• 20:34
  it's...
• 20:35
  Literally, it's done pretty quickly anyway.
• 20:38
  And they finish it up and they send
• 20:40
  it to you and do the Missouri Supreme
• 20:42
  Court.
• 20:43
  So you submit it to the Supreme Court
• 20:45
  who regulates all the lawyers.
• 20:47
  And they bless you.
• 20:51
  What's it called?
• 20:53
  Conference of Law Examiners or something like that.
• 20:56
  I forget what it's called.
• 20:59
  NCBE, National Conference of Bar Examiners.
• 21:01
  I forget what it is.
• 21:02
  That investigates you, does a test, stuff like
• 21:05
  that.
• 21:06
  And I had one pending because I was
• 21:07
  going to apply in Wyoming.
• 21:09
  And so I just paid for one to
• 21:10
  get done.
• 21:11
  And I opted not to because I'm going
• 21:13
  to fight Missouri.
• 21:14
  And I was planning on doing something again
• 21:16
  to submit to Missouri.
• 21:18
  And these assholes walked right in.
• 21:20
  I'm...
• 21:21
  I was determining how the hell...
• 21:23
  I even spoke to a lawyer about it
• 21:25
  already.
• 21:25
  And I was planning on trying to figure
• 21:28
  out and fight again this bullshit that they
• 21:31
  have done to me.
• 21:34
  But nobody will be convinced they're not wrong.
• 21:37
  These guys, their career...
• 21:40
  Now, if you think my complaints about regular
• 21:43
  bureaucrats like Kristin Templeton is harsh, you wait
• 21:47
  till I talk about the career a-holes
• 21:49
  that took a job in the bar or
• 21:53
  at OCDC.
• 21:54
  They did it specifically to fuck people.
• 21:58
  That's what they do.
• 21:59
  They go out, they pick and choose who
• 22:01
  they want to target, and they target them.
• 22:03
  It is not a standard process where everybody
• 22:07
  has to be reviewed every once in a
• 22:09
  while.
• 22:09
  And if you know somebody, if you are
• 22:12
  connected, trust me, nothing will happen to you.
• 22:15
  But if you're an easy target, like I
• 22:18
  was, then they take a very strong attack
• 22:22
  upon you, and you have no backing, no
• 22:25
  political backing, no money backing from the big
• 22:30
  money donors, stuff like that.
• 22:32
  You know what I mean?
• 22:32
  And they just destroy you.
• 22:34
  And they destroyed me, period.
• 22:37
  Sam Phillips is corrupt.
• 22:40
  Sam Phillips did this intentionally.
• 22:43
  He told me he was gonna do it.
• 22:46
  He held my investigation the first time for
• 22:49
  18 months, told me that any other license
• 22:53
  would wait 18 months to investigate somebody.
• 22:57
  Hell, they do terrorists in two or three.
• 23:00
  You know, you tell me you can't investigate
• 23:02
  me and find out the bullshit in my
• 23:04
  life, which there's plenty of, and quiz me
• 23:06
  upon it.
• 23:07
  You can't quiz me about that or justify
• 23:10
  it or not justify it or give me,
• 23:13
  Supreme Court, give me a fucking reason.
• 23:16
  Sorry for the swearing today, but this really
• 23:19
  pisses me off.
• 23:21
  And I am right.
• 23:22
  They are wrong.
• 23:23
  And so there you have it.
• 23:25
  I mean, I will shout the truth from
• 23:27
  the rooftops.
• 23:28
  This is bullshit, what you've done to me
• 23:32
  and what you've done to others.
• 23:33
  I'm not alone.
• 23:34
  This is how they destroy lives of people
• 23:37
  who might do what I'm doing, might talk.
• 23:40
  And I did talk.
• 23:41
  I fought the government in Missouri for years
• 23:44
  until, well, we're gonna target that guy.
• 23:47
  We're going to take his license.
• 23:48
  And trust me, they did.
• 23:50
  And it was one guy, one guy can
• 23:54
  destroy your life.
• 23:55
  And I laughed at him when he told
• 23:57
  me that I just left.
• 23:58
  Yeah, right.
• 23:59
  You know, first of all, and nothing I
• 24:03
  have done is a disbarable offense.
• 24:05
  Nothing.
• 24:06
  If they disbarred me for what I did,
• 24:08
  I mean, it's complete bullshit.
• 24:10
  I was I've been disciplined.
• 24:11
  Here's my discipline, which has lasted 11 fucking
• 24:14
  years so far.
• 24:16
  My my suspension, 11 years for what failure
• 24:20
  to communicate with a client.
• 24:21
  Every lawyer does that every fucking day.
• 24:24
  Pardon my French.
• 24:25
  They do it every day, every day.
• 24:28
  And you could target anybody for that, you
• 24:31
  know, and say, Hey, geez, give me a
• 24:32
  list of all your clients and phone up
• 24:34
  all the clients say, When's the last time
• 24:35
  you talked to your lawyer?
• 24:37
  Well, it was a hard getting ahold of
• 24:38
  him.
• 24:38
  It's been whatever being let's punish them.
• 24:41
  Tell you what, you could find that on
• 24:43
  any lawyer.
• 24:45
  The second two, there were two counts of
• 24:47
  Samuel trapped failed to communicate with the investigator.
• 24:51
  Who's the investigator?
• 24:52
  Sam Phillips.
• 24:52
  What did he want documents that didn't exist?
• 24:55
  He wanted me to create them.
• 24:57
  Tell me this.
• 24:58
  Tell me what happened on this day.
• 24:59
  Three, four years ago.
• 25:00
  I said, I don't have those.
• 25:02
  He said, You know, you have to have
• 25:03
  them.
• 25:03
  Well, I don't.
• 25:05
  He said, Well, you have to have them.
• 25:06
  Please provide them.
• 25:08
  You need to go back and create them
• 25:10
  and tell us what this is about.
• 25:11
  I wouldn't do it.
• 25:12
  I was like, Screw you.
• 25:13
  As soon as I do that, you're going
• 25:14
  to come back and say that now I'm
• 25:16
  creating stuff that didn't exist and quiz me
• 25:18
  on a transaction that I'm telling you.
• 25:21
  I don't know what it is.
• 25:23
  And and I don't want to make it
• 25:25
  up.
• 25:25
  You can punish me for not knowing what
• 25:27
  it is that I should know what it
• 25:29
  is.
• 25:29
  And I don't.
• 25:30
  But I'm not going to go create something
• 25:32
  so you can hang me on it.
• 25:33
  Not a question was asked about it in
• 25:34
  the hearing in the Supreme Court.
• 25:36
  Not a question was asked about it ever,
• 25:40
  except for Sam during the process, asking me
• 25:43
  for some documents that didn't exist.
• 25:45
  And he didn't bring it up in the
• 25:46
  hearing.
• 25:47
  He didn't discuss it at all.
• 25:49
  We didn't defend it at all.
• 25:51
  We thought it was one that was just
• 25:52
  going to be, you know, when there were
• 25:54
  16 counts against me, they punished me for
• 25:57
  four.
• 25:58
  They couldn't prove the other 12 and or
• 26:01
  maybe it's 15.
• 26:02
  I don't remember, but it was a big
• 26:03
  amount.
• 26:03
  And and one and the biggest one was
• 26:06
  a property issue, which I didn't do.
• 26:08
  But Greg Williams did.
• 26:10
  And they punished him for that.
• 26:12
  But they didn't take his license.
• 26:14
  They gave him probation.
• 26:17
  He got probation.
• 26:18
  And he did the big deed.
• 26:20
  You know, he did the bit, but he's
• 26:22
  connected.
• 26:22
  He knows people.
• 26:23
  You know, I don't.
• 26:24
  Never did.
• 26:25
  Never cared about the political bullshit.
• 26:29
  Never.
• 26:29
  And but I should have.
• 26:31
  And so at any rate, the reason I'm
• 26:34
  telling this entire debacle is because of this
• 26:37
  new letter that came in.
• 26:39
  I have been fighting this horse shit for
• 26:42
  11 years and really only 10 because the
• 26:46
  year of 2015, I lived in Qatar and
• 26:48
  I loved it.
• 26:48
  It was great.
• 26:49
  I'm hoping to go back.
• 26:50
  There's a possibility that I might be doing
• 26:55
  something over there, something extremely interesting and at
• 27:00
  least communications.
• 27:02
  Therefore, I believe it's time that Donald Trump
• 27:05
  did something about Russia, Mother Russia.
• 27:09
  And I don't mean about Russia.
• 27:11
  I mean about the war in Ukraine, the
• 27:13
  corrupt hell hole that is Ukraine.
• 27:16
  And, you know, if that happens, I wish
• 27:19
  to have some.
• 27:21
  Financial interest in a couple of things going
• 27:24
  on in Russia and or in Qatar with
• 27:27
  Russians.
• 27:27
  They have a there's a lot of people
• 27:29
  with a shitload, veritable shitload of money.
• 27:33
  Well, in Ukraine, too, because we keep giving
• 27:35
  it to them.
• 27:36
  You know, hey, here's another 90 billion.
• 27:38
  Just kill another 100000 men of yours.
• 27:41
  This is bullshit.
• 27:42
  We're paying for them to die.
• 27:45
  That's what we're doing.
• 27:46
  That's and now Europe is doing most of
• 27:47
  it, but we're paying for them to die.
• 27:49
  So like I said, fast forward to now
• 27:52
  when the Missouri Bar has sent me some
• 27:54
  complaint saying that I am practicing law without
• 27:57
  a license.
• 27:58
  Anybody who knows me remotely that has asked
• 28:01
  me a question, I have people ask me
• 28:03
  legal questions all the time.
• 28:05
  And guess what I tell them every single
• 28:08
  time.
• 28:09
  Some people get tired of it because they've
• 28:10
  asked me several questions.
• 28:12
  Every time I say this, I'm not a
• 28:17
  lawyer.
• 28:17
  I don't play a lawyer on TV.
• 28:19
  I don't give legal advice.
• 28:21
  If you want legal advice, find a lawyer.
• 28:25
  I can recommend one or two should you
• 28:27
  like every single time I say that.
• 28:32
  If someone wants a lawyer, I have not.
• 28:35
  I don't have a lawyer.
• 28:38
  We have an organization and we may have
• 28:40
  lawyers that are connected.
• 28:42
  That's what we're trying to do.
• 28:43
  We're trying to build an ecosystem of law,
• 28:47
  an ecosystem, including research, development, AI structure.
• 28:54
  We are exploring AI and the structure of
• 28:57
  that in the legal sphere.
• 28:59
  If you're a lawyer and you want to
• 29:00
  know more about it, help give us a
• 29:02
  call.
• 29:03
  573-347-7000 is the number.
• 29:07
  And we aren't quite up and running.
• 29:13
  We're developing the websites and all that, ModernLawEcosystem
• 29:17
  .com.
• 29:18
  You can also type in just ModernLawEco.
• 29:20
  I bought both sites and .com, so maybe
• 29:23
  a short one, maybe a long one.
• 29:25
  They're both going to the same place.
• 29:26
  It's a long name, but I like it
• 29:27
  and I'm going to keep it.
• 29:29
  And the other one is Civic Outlaws, and
• 29:31
  that is our 501c3 charity.
• 29:34
  And we are in this charity.
• 29:36
  We're going to do things like attack the
• 29:37
  government.
• 29:38
  We're going to do things like I talked
• 29:39
  about yesterday, which I will continue with today.
• 29:42
  But now I've given you the prep of
• 29:44
  the bar asinine, idiotic attack upon me.
• 29:51
  And the reason they hold your license in
• 29:55
  a suspended state, that's the preferred state for
• 29:59
  them now.
• 30:00
  And anything I've done, would never be disbarred
• 30:03
  for.
• 30:04
  Well, if I did, it was clearly for
• 30:06
  targeting.
• 30:07
  But it's worse.
• 30:08
  I didn't know it, but what they've done
• 30:10
  to me is actually worse because it allows
• 30:13
  bureaucrats like Sam who are completely unregulated.
• 30:17
  They are nothing, not regulated.
• 30:20
  So talk about the chief disciplinary council, the
• 30:24
  top dog there.
• 30:25
  So chief disciplinary council has, I don't know,
• 30:27
  seven, eight, I don't know, 10 maybe.
• 30:29
  I don't know the number, the number of
• 30:33
  attorneys that work there, okay?
• 30:35
  Because they can't make it on their own
• 30:37
  in the real world.
• 30:38
  They will go work there.
• 30:39
  And they like targeting people.
• 30:42
  They love being bureaucrats.
• 30:44
  And maybe I'm generalizing from only the Sam
• 30:46
  Phillips types, but why in the world would
• 30:48
  you work there anyway, except to destroy people?
• 30:51
  That's what you do.
• 30:52
  It'd be different if you were doing it
• 30:54
  to have a pure system, make sure that
• 30:57
  everybody was ethical.
• 30:58
  But no, no, no.
• 30:59
  Tell you what, this is a high school
• 31:03
  popularity club, nothing but.
• 31:06
  And they want to be there.
• 31:08
  It's an easy job.
• 31:09
  They don't have to do anything.
• 31:10
  They just have to target lawyers.
• 31:14
  And so they solicit complaints.
• 31:17
  But only from lawyers they don't like.
• 31:20
  So they'll hear something and they don't like
• 31:22
  it.
• 31:22
  And that's Sam Phillips did to me.
• 31:25
  But Sam Phillips' reason was because he asked
• 31:27
  me to help him get Greg Williams provided
• 31:30
  evidence to me when I sued Greg Williams
• 31:33
  provided evidence to me against Greg Williams, okay?
• 31:38
  So that's how far these a-holes will
• 31:40
  go to destroy people.
• 31:42
  But they didn't destroy Greg Williams and they
• 31:44
  could have.
• 31:44
  They destroyed me.
• 31:46
  And I believe they shouldn't have, because all
• 31:48
  I had were four counts that they got
• 31:51
  me on.
• 31:51
  One, failure to communicate with a client.
• 31:54
  Two, and three, both are failure to cooperate
• 31:57
  with Sam Phillips' asinine stupid questions.
• 32:01
  And four, this is the biggest one, potential,
• 32:04
  potential, potential intermingling of my funds with the
• 32:10
  lawyer's funds.
• 32:11
  And that's a joke and a half.
• 32:13
  Because every single lawyer could, and I'm not,
• 32:18
  well, let's, you know what?
• 32:20
  I have to qualify that.
• 32:21
  Any single non-governmental or big firm lawyer
• 32:29
  has done this.
• 32:30
  Because if you're in a big firm, you
• 32:31
  have 50 accountants doing all your stuff and
• 32:33
  you just pass off the money.
• 32:34
  So if you're a small attorney, usually, sometimes
• 32:37
  you don't even have an attorney.
• 32:38
  I was at the point where, an accountant.
• 32:42
  I was at the point where I probably
• 32:44
  should have had one and not done it
• 32:47
  on my own.
• 32:48
  And I didn't.
• 32:50
  And I should have.
• 32:51
  So that is probably the biggest f-up
• 32:53
  that I did, okay?
• 32:55
  That's me.
• 32:55
  But those are the four things I was
• 32:57
  punished for.
• 32:58
  All of them, something another lawyer would have
• 33:01
  done and just got a tiny pat on
• 33:02
  the head, slap on the wrist.
• 33:04
  Oh, gee, we're real sorry about that.
• 33:06
  Let's have some brotherly love and let's help
• 33:08
  you do some training and fix you.
• 33:10
  Because hell, if you're a drug addict, if
• 33:13
  you're a drug addict, steal all your money
• 33:14
  out of your trust fund or trust account
• 33:17
  and run away to Zimbabwe and they catch
• 33:20
  you two or three years later, you just
• 33:22
  blame it on drugs.
• 33:23
  If I had gone to the OCDC and
• 33:27
  started blubbering like a baby, I'm on drugs.
• 33:30
  I got a drug problem.
• 33:32
  Suddenly, suddenly you are a pet.
• 33:37
  You're a pet that that pet can, oh,
• 33:40
  we help people.
• 33:42
  We've helped lawyers get past this drug addiction
• 33:45
  and they'll give you your license right back.
• 33:47
  He didn't do anything.
• 33:48
  He had a drug problem.
• 33:50
  But if you don't have a drug problem,
• 33:51
  you don't have that excuse to get you
• 33:53
  off the hook.
• 33:54
  Well, that's Sam Trapp.
• 33:57
  He's different.
• 33:57
  He hates government.
• 33:59
  He hates bureaucracy.
• 34:00
  Therefore, he cannot, if you hate, I don't
• 34:03
  want to say hate.
• 34:04
  I don't hate the bar.
• 34:05
  I'm very truthful about the bar.
• 34:07
  I'm very truthful about the high school musical
• 34:10
  sort of how you, how they get people
• 34:13
  to join their little committees.
• 34:16
  They join the committees because they want to
• 34:18
  be connected.
• 34:19
  That's why they do it.
• 34:20
  Or they like power.
• 34:21
  They want to go, that's where the power
• 34:24
  is.
• 34:25
  And if you can get put there, and
• 34:27
  what happens is all the big time lawyers
• 34:29
  around, they'll put one of their associates from
• 34:32
  their firm.
• 34:33
  They will call the bar and get them
• 34:34
  on a particular committee.
• 34:36
  Because if you get on one of their
• 34:37
  committees, you can be connected.
• 34:39
  I didn't want to do any of that.
• 34:41
  I didn't give a rip.
• 34:42
  The only time I tried to stay with
• 34:44
  the Missouri Bar was during training courses because
• 34:48
  they had a nice annual training session for
• 34:52
  three, four days here at the lake at
• 34:54
  a nice resort.
• 34:55
  And you could go get your CLE done,
• 34:58
  you know, rather all at one time.
• 35:00
  And you don't have to do it.
• 35:02
  But even then, I only did that every
• 35:03
  once in a while because the Missouri Bar
• 35:05
  is a bunch of, you know, they usually,
• 35:07
  there's some good teachers, but usually it's some
• 35:09
  blowhard sitting up there giving war stories about
• 35:12
  what he's done.
• 35:13
  And that's great.
• 35:15
  Let's talk about war stories.
• 35:16
  You want to come on my radio program,
• 35:18
  I'll be happy to talk about your war
• 35:20
  story.
• 35:20
  But the war story of we're going to
• 35:23
  take your license forever, Samuel Trapp, because you
• 35:25
  pissed off Sam Phillips or Sam Phillips doesn't
• 35:29
  like you.
• 35:30
  Well, 11 years later, you can get a,
• 35:33
  it's interesting to me that I got the
• 35:35
  letter from another attorney in there.
• 35:38
  It's not, it's not Sam.
• 35:39
  I wonder if he retired.
• 35:41
  Hopefully so.
• 35:42
  Hopefully he's gone, but I doubt it.
• 35:44
  He's got to be up there finger puppeting
• 35:46
  because he was pretty high up.
• 35:47
  He's like number two in the organization or
• 35:49
  something when he was dicking around with me,
• 35:51
  which was strange also.
• 35:55
  Tiny coffee break there.
• 35:56
  Sorry about that.
• 35:57
  And at any rate, I'm sorry to rant
• 36:00
  on this so much this morning, but I'm
• 36:02
  an open book.
• 36:03
  I have nothing to hide, nothing.
• 36:07
  And it's, so the letter comes, the letter's
• 36:12
  bullshit.
• 36:12
  I look at the letter.
• 36:14
  The big point that I'm trying to make
• 36:16
  here and the end is jurisdiction.
• 36:20
  Okay.
• 36:20
  Let us talk about jurisdiction.
• 36:23
  The way they keep Samuel Trapp from having
• 36:27
  any power anywhere in the country, in the
• 36:32
  country is by suspending him.
• 36:35
  I cannot be a paralegal in many States,
• 36:39
  not Missouri.
• 36:41
  I can be a paralegal in Missouri, but
• 36:42
  I've done the research in many States.
• 36:45
  So I'm working for some lawyers in Florida,
• 36:48
  doing some consulting for lawyers in Florida.
• 36:50
  Right.
• 36:51
  And I do research for them.
• 36:53
  Sometimes a little bit of case management, sometimes
• 36:55
  a little bit of a, of whatever.
• 36:57
  Right.
• 36:57
  And so last year um, I'd been working
• 37:00
  with a client down there for a little
• 37:02
  while.
• 37:03
  And, uh, I forget his name.
• 37:06
  He's from Uzbekistan or something like that.
• 37:08
  And, uh, uh, spoke Russian.
• 37:10
  It was pretty, pretty good, pretty good deal.
• 37:12
  And so I'm consulting with these guys and
• 37:14
  all I'm doing is sometimes calling insurance companies,
• 37:17
  sometimes putting the paperwork together.
• 37:19
  I never meet the client.
• 37:21
  I don't know who the client is.
• 37:22
  I'm working out of my room.
• 37:23
  You know, I have a, uh, it's just
• 37:26
  a small, I've worked for several firms.
• 37:28
  Right.
• 37:28
  And all I would do was do their
• 37:30
  research and do their stuff.
• 37:31
  Cause I'm good at it.
• 37:32
  And, uh, and I understand it.
• 37:33
  I'm a master researcher.
• 37:35
  I am good at it.
• 37:38
  And so I, I, and I'm an excellent
• 37:41
  case manager and I have to work, you
• 37:43
  know, what am I going to do?
• 37:44
  You know, it's like, you've destroyed my life,
• 37:48
  assholes.
• 37:48
  You've destroyed it.
• 37:50
  You won, I lost.
• 37:51
  And now I can never, never, never come
• 37:55
  back unless I admit that I stole and
• 37:58
  I didn't.
• 37:59
  And so screw you.
• 38:00
  I'm not admitting it.
• 38:01
  Your process is bullshit.
• 38:03
  The way you've done it is also bullshit.
• 38:05
  I've talked about that plenty of times, and
• 38:07
  I'm going to talk about it here on
• 38:09
  this show.
• 38:09
  It's wrong what they're doing to me.
• 38:12
  It is absolutely wrong.
• 38:13
  And they've done it to others too.
• 38:15
  It's a bullshit system.
• 38:17
  And, uh, it is, it is just wrong.
• 38:19
  And why is it a bullshit system?
• 38:21
  The real reason why is because the Supreme
• 38:23
  court has a job to do, right?
• 38:25
  They have a job.
• 38:27
  They are taking care of big cases that
• 38:29
  come through.
• 38:30
  They have shunted shunt what's shuffled off, I
• 38:34
  suppose, but they have shunted the whole thing.
• 38:36
  I think that's the right word.
• 38:37
  I'm my, obviously I'm illiterate in both English
• 38:40
  and Russian.
• 38:41
  So, uh, therefore I can't come up with
• 38:43
  a word right now, but they have abdicated
• 38:45
  their responsibility to manage the OCDC process.
• 38:48
  They have abdicated.
• 38:50
  Now, uh, they appointed somebody to run that
• 38:52
  place.
• 38:53
  Okay.
• 38:53
  I believe he's appointed by the Supreme court.
• 38:56
  Uh, the, the, the OCDC is an arm
• 38:59
  of the Supreme court, but they're an independent
• 39:01
  arm.
• 39:02
  Why?
• 39:02
  Because they have to be, they have to
• 39:04
  be somewhat independent because otherwise you have a
• 39:08
  conflict of interest.
• 39:10
  You have the Supreme court who regulates attorneys
• 39:13
  that's bullshit too, by the way, the Supreme
• 39:15
  court regulates the attorneys and the Supreme court
• 39:19
  is also the supervisor of office of chief
• 39:22
  disciplinary counsel.
• 39:24
  Right?
• 39:24
  But they don't supervise them.
• 39:25
  They just appoint some blowhard to go there
• 39:27
  and attack attorneys.
• 39:28
  Right?
• 39:29
  So that's, that's their job.
• 39:31
  And so they submit the papers to the
• 39:33
  Supreme court, but they're appointed by the Supreme
• 39:36
  court.
• 39:36
  They're blessed, bless you.
• 39:38
  You may be a member of OCDC.
• 39:39
  That is a conflict.
• 39:41
  Okay.
• 39:42
  Should everything else, every other license in the
• 39:45
  state is there's 42 of them.
• 39:48
  They, well, there was 10 years ago.
• 39:50
  Um, cause I remember that number.
• 39:52
  There's 42 different professions that require a license
• 39:54
  in Missouri and those are administrative in nature.
• 39:59
  They are administrative, administrative law rules apply.
• 40:03
  Then the governor appoints the heads or points
• 40:07
  people on these boards and they have their
• 40:08
  own rules, but their executive branch duties because
• 40:12
  who, who fulfills the legislature, the law who
• 40:16
  fulfills the statutes and regulations.
• 40:19
  That is the legislature.
• 40:20
  The legislature sends over a law.
• 40:23
  It is signed by the governor.
• 40:25
  And now the governor executes what is in
• 40:27
  the law except for the practice of law.
• 40:30
  So the, the legislature creates all the rules,
• 40:33
  creates all the statutes and regulations that every
• 40:35
  license has to follow.
• 40:37
  And so a broker gets a license from
• 40:40
  the governor stamps.
• 40:41
  It says you, you get, you know, it's
• 40:42
  actually the, but it truthfully, that's an executive
• 40:45
  branch items.
• 40:46
  You get a license from there.
• 40:49
  If there's a dispute between the person receiving
• 40:53
  the license and the board of whatever accountancy
• 40:58
  doctors, you know, whatever that the board, whatever
• 41:01
  that board is, has decided to do something
• 41:04
  to that license, that person has the right
• 41:07
  to go to court, a real court.
• 41:10
  Okay.
• 41:11
  You can file suit in Cole County and
• 41:14
  can fight the law, can fight the law.
• 41:18
  And if somebody in that group got a
• 41:21
  one word response, I go and apply for
• 41:23
  my broker's license and I get a piece
• 41:25
  of paper that says, no, you don't get
• 41:28
  a license.
• 41:28
  And all it says is, no, we've decided
• 41:30
  you can't be a broker in Missouri.
• 41:32
  I can sue them in Cole County circuit
• 41:35
  court.
• 41:36
  And then I will get a ruling and,
• 41:39
  and most importantly, a judgment, a written judgment.
• 41:43
  He can't have a license because he's an
• 41:46
  evil perverter of innocent little boys, or he's
• 41:49
  a, I don't know, robbed a bank while
• 41:51
  this was going on.
• 41:52
  And whatever they actually discuss what is and
• 41:56
  is not ethical.
• 41:57
  And they make a judgment and the judge
• 41:59
  who hears that case is going to be
• 42:01
  very careful in the writing of his judgment.
• 42:06
  So he will write a long judgment and
• 42:08
  make sure that if he's going against the
• 42:11
  board of whatever board of accountancy, let's say,
• 42:14
  and he writes this judgment, he's going to
• 42:16
  be very careful because he knows that the
• 42:18
  board of accountancy is 90% certain to
• 42:22
  appeal whatever he says to the next level.
• 42:26
  And the western division, if it's Cole County,
• 42:30
  which I believe is near Kansas City, might
• 42:31
  be St. Joseph or something like that.
• 42:33
  And they will go to the appellate court,
• 42:37
  right?
• 42:37
  And the appellate court will review that judgment
• 42:39
  and be very careful to make sure that
• 42:42
  it's a, you know, that it's a consistent,
• 42:45
  that we have some consistency over the years.
• 42:48
  And looking at this, if it's a new
• 42:49
  issue, they'll be even more careful.
• 42:51
  And they'll have a look at it and
• 42:53
  create law regarding.
• 42:56
  So an accountant can be certain, he can
• 43:01
  be aware of what is going on in
• 43:04
  the entire process, right?
• 43:05
  He can be aware of that because the
• 43:08
  judgment is very specific.
• 43:10
  We're not giving you a license because you're
• 43:12
  an evil perverter of innocent little boys.
• 43:15
  And evil perverters of innocent little boys cannot
• 43:17
  be accountants.
• 43:20
  We have decided that.
• 43:21
  And that is a particular judgment.
• 43:23
  And so let's say that Cole County circuit
• 43:26
  court judge said that in his judgment.
• 43:29
  And he, in the applicant to be an
• 43:34
  accountant, appealed that and said, wait a minute,
• 43:37
  I'm not an evil perverter of innocent little
• 43:39
  boys.
• 43:40
  I was 30 years ago, and I got
• 43:42
  arrested and convicted for that.
• 43:44
  But geez, it's been 30 years.
• 43:46
  I'm a church pastor now.
• 43:48
  I've done this.
• 43:48
  I've done that.
• 43:49
  And, you know, here it is.
• 43:51
  And by the way, when I was in
• 43:52
  Florida at the board of brokers, because they
• 43:56
  made me have a hearing to get my
• 43:57
  license, I heard stories exactly like this.
• 44:00
  There was a guy who was charged with
• 44:02
  and convicted when he was in his early
• 44:06
  20s.
• 44:06
  He was convicted of sex with a minor.
• 44:11
  It's one of those situations where he was
• 44:14
  over 18 and the girl was still in
• 44:16
  high school and they had a sexual relationship.
• 44:19
  He got charged.
• 44:20
  Dad wasn't happy.
• 44:21
  He got a crime.
• 44:23
  He pleaded guilty.
• 44:24
  He didn't fight it.
• 44:25
  You know, he just pleaded guilty and moved
• 44:27
  on.
• 44:28
  So fast forward 20, 30 years later, he's
• 44:31
  an evil perverter of innocent little girls and
• 44:34
  he still got a license.
• 44:37
  They said to him, they said, well, we
• 44:39
  understand you had these things.
• 44:40
  And there was four or five of these
• 44:41
  four or five people.
• 44:42
  Now this is Florida.
• 44:43
  I'm not talking about Missouri on this one,
• 44:46
  but it's the same concept because they do
• 44:48
  the same thing.
• 44:50
  And a law, a status, what you have
• 44:53
  is created forever and ever.
• 44:56
  And so if they say this person, well,
• 45:00
  if the judgment says, well, this guy's an
• 45:03
  evil perverter of innocent little boys, but it
• 45:05
  happened in the last, uh, this, this happened
• 45:10
  within the last five years.
• 45:12
  And we believe that it should be, um,
• 45:18
  uh, 10 years, you know, you need to
• 45:20
  have at least 10 years from the time
• 45:22
  you were an evil perverter of innocent little
• 45:24
  girls or boys.
• 45:25
  And so that is, they'll make a ruling
• 45:29
  and that ruling, that specific ruling gives an
• 45:34
  idea to a later applicant that they have
• 45:38
  to, after another, another perverter of innocent little
• 45:41
  boys or girls that they have to wait
• 45:43
  10 years.
• 45:44
  It's called case law.
• 45:46
  They have to wait 10 years.
• 45:49
  It may be that's established.
• 45:50
  Uh, let's say the, the guy said, even
• 45:53
  though it's five, I think the judge said,
• 45:55
  even though it's only been five years, I'm
• 45:57
  going to approve him a license anyway.
• 45:59
  And the attorney general or the board of
• 46:01
  accountancy through the attorney general appeals that to
• 46:04
  the appellate court, the appellate court says, well,
• 46:06
  you know, the judge heard the case and
• 46:08
  the judge looked at this guy and he
• 46:09
  believes the guy is okay.
• 46:11
  So he gave an exception, but wait a
• 46:13
  minute.
• 46:14
  There's no such thing as exceptions in the
• 46:15
  prior case law.
• 46:16
  It said 10 years and here's this Jack
• 46:18
  off getting his in like six.
• 46:20
  That's nonsense because everybody has to wait 10,
• 46:22
  the floodgates are going to open.
• 46:24
  And now we're going to get all the
• 46:25
  evil pervertism, innocent little boys applying after five
• 46:28
  years and not after 10.
• 46:29
  So this, the court in, uh, you know,
• 46:32
  the, uh, uh, intermediate court, the appellate court,
• 46:34
  they, uh, rule that no five years is
• 46:39
  okay.
• 46:39
  We support the judge down below the judge
• 46:42
  down below can make it five years, uh,
• 46:44
  but it's still 10.
• 46:45
  But if the judge particularly likes the person
• 46:47
  in the hearing, he can do it.
• 46:49
  That's a rule that is something you can
• 46:51
  work with going forward.
• 46:52
  So now the Supreme court of Missouri, somebody
• 46:54
  else peels it.
• 46:55
  Supreme court of Missouri gets that.
• 46:57
  Okay.
• 46:57
  And the Supreme court of Missouri has done
• 46:59
  this millions of times.
• 47:01
  I'm going to switch what the guilt is.
• 47:04
  Well, I'll give you the quick one real,
• 47:05
  real fast in the Missouri Supreme court.
• 47:07
  They would either bless the appellate court or
• 47:11
  they'd bless the, well, since they were the
• 47:13
  same, they could bless it and say, no
• 47:15
  five years is okay.
• 47:16
  Or they could be dicks about it and
• 47:18
  say, well, even though now he's, uh, I
• 47:21
  don't know, donated a million dollars to charity.
• 47:24
  He's, um, you know, saved, uh, 50 children
• 47:27
  from destruction and poverty in Zimbabwe.
• 47:30
  And he's done a lot of positive things
• 47:33
  in his life.
• 47:33
  We still think the rule is 10 years,
• 47:36
  come back in three, four years and apply
• 47:38
  again.
• 47:38
  Boom.
• 47:39
  You have law that you can look at.
• 47:42
  The only reason I told that incredibly long
• 47:44
  story is because in the Missouri bar and
• 47:48
  in the Supreme court's documentation, they process is
• 47:53
  bullshit.
• 47:54
  You do not get a judgment.
• 47:57
  You do not get the Supreme court analyzing
• 47:59
  Sam traps case and saying, well, it's been
• 48:04
  two and a half years since, uh, Sam
• 48:06
  Phillips started investigating Samuel trap.
• 48:09
  It took him two and a half years
• 48:11
  to come up with the exact same document
• 48:14
  that he filed after one and a half
• 48:16
  years.
• 48:18
  It's the same document, but both times the
• 48:21
  Supreme court abdicating responsibility says just one word.
• 48:26
  No, no, no.
• 48:28
  That's it.
• 48:29
  Nope.
• 48:29
  You can't have a license.
• 48:31
  They don't.
• 48:32
  There is no analysis of anything that they
• 48:35
  would require in every other profession in the
• 48:40
  state of Missouri.
• 48:42
  That is the bullshit I am fighting.
• 48:45
  If they had written a lengthy judgment and
• 48:47
  they do it, they, they, they, they write
• 48:50
  apologetic judgments.
• 48:51
  The Apollo apologetic judgment.
• 48:53
  So it was a guy down in Springfield
• 48:55
  who never, ever even had a trust account.
• 48:57
  He would take 50, 65, $70,000.
• 49:01
  I took one of his clients from him
• 49:02
  years ago.
• 49:04
  And she came in and said that, uh,
• 49:05
  he, uh, he was going to charge her
• 49:07
  50,000.
• 49:08
  And I said, well, I'll charge you 30.
• 49:10
  And she goes, well, I can't pay that
• 49:12
  as well.
• 49:12
  Then I can't work for you.
• 49:13
  You know, go, go hire this guy.
• 49:15
  And he would demand, she goes, well, the
• 49:17
  problem wasn't the 50.
• 49:19
  The problem was that he wanted it all
• 49:20
  immediately.
• 49:21
  I can give you six or 10 or
• 49:23
  something like that.
• 49:24
  And then I can pay you a thousand
• 49:25
  dollars a month.
• 49:26
  And if you know this case as well,
• 49:27
  by the time the trial comes up, you
• 49:29
  got to have me paid all of that,
• 49:31
  everything.
• 49:32
  And, uh, the other lawyer, uh, that never
• 49:34
  got punished ever.
• 49:36
  The Supreme court wrote an apologetic, an apologetic
• 49:40
  reason why they were giving him a license.
• 49:43
  So they'll write apologies and say, this guy
• 49:46
  can have a license because geez, he's been
• 49:48
  around for 40 years.
• 49:50
  He's been doing good work and he's never
• 49:52
  had a trust account, but perhaps the law
• 49:55
  has changed since that time.
• 49:57
  And they write this apologetic bullshit thing to
• 50:01
  justify giving this guy a license.
• 50:04
  Why?
• 50:05
  Because he was connected.
• 50:07
  Okay.
• 50:07
  I'm not.
• 50:08
  And so therefore you can just shunt Sam
• 50:10
  away and say, well, this guy's not connected.
• 50:13
  Uh, we can do with him what we
• 50:15
  want.
• 50:15
  We can give one word judgments.
• 50:16
  We can, we can let Sam Phillips destroy
• 50:19
  this man by soliciting complaints from every client
• 50:23
  and coaching them on what to do to
• 50:26
  screw Sam trap.
• 50:27
  And they've done it to other lawyers too.
• 50:29
  It's, it's a, every year they have to
• 50:30
  have a poster child, you know, that they,
• 50:33
  from the state that they can claim that
• 50:35
  they're doing their job for the rest of
• 50:36
  the bar.
• 50:37
  Okay.
• 50:37
  Because that's, that's necessary.
• 50:39
  They need it.
• 50:40
  And, uh, they have to be able to,
• 50:42
  to keep us in line and to shut
• 50:44
  us up.
• 50:46
  Those of us who they dislike at, well,
• 50:48
  they won't shut me up, um, ever.
• 50:50
  And whether they give me a license or
• 50:52
  not, I think the way to shut me
• 50:54
  up is give me a license because what
• 50:56
  you've done is incredibly wrong.
• 51:00
  What you've done is not correct.
• 51:03
  It is not.
• 51:05
  How do I want to put this?
• 51:07
  I live in America.
• 51:09
  I had an American dream and bureaucracy has
• 51:12
  turned it into the American nightmare.
• 51:15
  I have known since I was 10 years
• 51:17
  old that I was going to be a
• 51:19
  lawyer.
• 51:19
  I busted my ass to get there.
• 51:22
  I was doing a pretty good job of,
• 51:24
  uh, with my clients and one asshole, one
• 51:27
  bureaucrat can destroy you.
• 51:29
  I've always been against government overreach.
• 51:33
  I did it in the army.
• 51:34
  I questioned everything.
• 51:36
  I did it in my, in my life.
• 51:38
  When I was an HR director, I have
• 51:40
  always questioned things that I don't find to
• 51:44
  be correct.
• 51:45
  Things that I think need to be, I
• 51:50
  don't know, uh, tailored, fixed, uh, tweaked, however
• 51:54
  you want to put it in general.
• 51:56
  And I, and, and you know what?
• 51:57
  I probably should not label as a blanket.
• 52:01
  Everyone is just a, a part of this
• 52:03
  corrupt arm, but they sure turn their heads
• 52:06
  the other way.
• 52:07
  In certain cases, you don't turn your head
• 52:11
  away from wrongdoing.
• 52:13
  You just don't.
• 52:15
  And, uh, uh, you know what they have
• 52:17
  done to me is wrong and, uh, it's
• 52:21
  bureaucracy and it's wrong.
• 52:23
  And so that, that is, we're going to
• 52:27
  continue on this topic because I do intend
• 52:29
  to share that letter.
• 52:31
  Uh, but right now I'm going to switch
• 52:33
  gears.
• 52:34
  We've done a little more than half of
• 52:36
  the program and I'm going to switch gears.
• 52:38
  Yesterday, I promised to share with you the,
• 52:41
  uh, ATCs nonsensical, nonsensical letter that was received
• 52:49
  last week.
• 52:50
  And, uh, it's pretty funny because, uh, I
• 52:53
  told you yesterday, I walked you through the
• 52:54
  Chevron doctrine.
• 52:56
  I walked you through the overturning of the
• 52:58
  Chevron doctor doctrine by the Loper Bright decision,
• 53:01
  a Supreme court of the United States.
• 53:03
  I walked you through the statute in the
• 53:06
  state of Missouri that codifies the overturning of
• 53:11
  the Chevron doctrine.
• 53:12
  The Chevron doctrine said that a court should
• 53:15
  defer or should, you know, to the professional
• 53:20
  bureaucrat.
• 53:21
  So a bureaucrat has been in office and
• 53:23
  screwed people and told them you can't have
• 53:25
  a license ever.
• 53:26
  And I'll make sure you never practice law
• 53:27
  in the state of Missouri.
• 53:28
  Again, those guys don't get to make that
• 53:32
  what they do in the bar because the
• 53:33
  bar doesn't have any supervision anyway.
• 53:35
  But, uh, if it was in the, uh,
• 53:37
  um, executive branch, you know, these people, this
• 53:40
  administrative agency, you can't control the Missouri bar.
• 53:44
  They don't even have to answer a sunshine
• 53:46
  requests.
• 53:46
  I sent one.
• 53:47
  They've never even answered ever.
• 53:49
  And I do plan to follow up on
• 53:51
  that because against the law, I, I should
• 53:53
  sue them, but they don't answer.
• 53:55
  But since it was about four or five
• 53:57
  months ago, I'll, I'll probably resend that and
• 53:59
  see if we can't do it again.
• 54:01
  You know what I mean?
• 54:02
  And, uh, uh, and I hope to do
• 54:04
  so that that'll be, uh, entertaining for us.
• 54:07
  We can talk some more about that.
• 54:09
  And, uh, so since I've switched gears and
• 54:11
  gone back to the ATC yesterday, we talked
• 54:14
  about her, uh, outlining the, what do we
• 54:20
  want to call this?
• 54:21
  I call it conspiracy.
• 54:25
  That's what I call it.
• 54:26
  And I believe it is.
• 54:28
  And I believe they conspired a guy named
• 54:31
  Clayton Weems and a girl named a lady
• 54:34
  named Kristin Templeton.
• 54:37
  And now it could be that they're just
• 54:38
  dumb, that the bureaucrats are, you know, the
• 54:41
  bureaucracy has, has gotten them so used to
• 54:44
  taking power that doesn't belong to them that,
• 54:47
  you know, they just, they have been allowed
• 54:50
  to do it forever.
• 54:51
  It could be because the Chevron doctrine and
• 54:55
  the non and the effect of similar laws
• 54:58
  in the state of Missouri, because Missouri didn't
• 55:00
  change it either kind of blessed the bureaucrat,
• 55:03
  uh, screwing people because the bureaucrat is the,
• 55:08
  is it'd be like hiring an engineer.
• 55:12
  You don't want an engineer out of high
• 55:14
  school.
• 55:14
  You, if you're building a bridge that's crossing
• 55:17
  a five mile structure or lake, I mean,
• 55:20
  and, uh, you want somebody who really knows
• 55:23
  what the hell they're doing and you'd never
• 55:24
  hire somebody who's only done it for a
• 55:26
  month, right?
• 55:27
  He would wait.
• 55:27
  You'd want somebody who's built one before has
• 55:30
  gone 30 years.
• 55:30
  And so understanding the Chevron doctrine, which basically
• 55:34
  said, well, we'd defer to the experts in
• 55:39
  bureaucracy who do stuff with that's overturned.
• 55:42
  And I believe that's direct result of the
• 55:44
  Trump, uh, issues overturning, uh, the Chevron doctrine
• 55:50
  because now it's the Loper bright doctrine.
• 55:52
  It's that says you as a court must
• 55:56
  review DeNovo new, uh, brand new case, any
• 56:02
  interpretation of a statute that is questioned by
• 56:06
  someone attacking an administrative agency.
• 56:09
  Now skip the bar because none of this
• 56:11
  applies to the bar.
• 56:12
  Nothing applies to the bar.
• 56:13
  Nothing applies to OCDC.
• 56:15
  One word decisions by the Supreme court are
• 56:17
  the way to keep lawyers in check.
• 56:19
  So low lawyers aside, at least in Missouri,
• 56:22
  the, the, the, the, the cocked up system
• 56:24
  in Missouri, this is, this is how it
• 56:27
  works.
• 56:27
  But if you have a real administrative agency,
• 56:30
  not the Missouri bar who, you know, they
• 56:31
  claim they're apparently claim they don't have to
• 56:34
  answer sunshine requests because they're not a public,
• 56:36
  uh, uh, entity, I presume, but they've never
• 56:39
  answered and I've never filed suit against them.
• 56:41
  I might because I need to.
• 56:43
  Um, anyway, I need some more coffee.
• 56:47
  Maybe I shouldn't drink coffee in the morning
• 56:49
  because I've been on a rant like three
• 56:52
  days in a row and I'm still ranting.
• 56:54
  Um, at any rate, um, the conspiracy between
• 57:00
  Kristen Templeton and Clayton Weems is documented in
• 57:04
  her letter.
• 57:05
  And I told you yesterday, she, she wrote
• 57:08
  out, um, that Clayton discovered a statute that
• 57:14
  has actually been in place since 2010 but
• 57:17
  current leadership team was completely unaware of.
• 57:20
  And in parentheses, we later learned that the
• 57:23
  then leadership was notified of the law taking
• 57:26
  effect, but believe that perhaps due to timing
• 57:29
  in conjunction with mass layoffs where they was,
• 57:32
  was never able to be incorporated into enforcement
• 57:36
  action.
• 57:37
  Well, it could be Ms. Templeton that the
• 57:40
  prior, uh, administration, the prior leadership or the
• 57:46
  then leadership, as you call it, it could
• 57:48
  be that they were correct.
• 57:50
  Now I, this conspiracy of what they are
• 57:54
  doing is they are the, I use the
• 57:57
  term bootstrapping.
• 57:59
  I use the term sucking it into their
• 58:02
  zone of authority.
• 58:04
  So Clayton, that's Clayton Weems discovered this law
• 58:08
  and the law says something about sexually oriented
• 58:11
  businesses and that, but the sexually oriented business
• 58:13
  definition changed over time.
• 58:15
  And most importantly, the ATC has zero authority
• 58:20
  to enforce the 573 statutes.
• 58:24
  They can only enforce 311 and 407.
• 58:27
  So this is the path that we're watching
• 58:31
  her and Clayton, uh, take power.
• 58:35
  This is a bureaucrat taking power that doesn't
• 58:37
  belong to them.
• 58:38
  And so the, this, the legislature never gave
• 58:42
  it to them.
• 58:43
  There's no enabling statute, none.
• 58:47
  It doesn't say, gee, you can have, you
• 58:50
  can have power over 311, uh, violations and
• 58:54
  407 violations.
• 58:56
  And then you can suck in violations from
• 58:59
  other places, other criminal statutes.
• 59:03
  You can suck those in as your requirement
• 59:06
  with no hearing, no due process, no right
• 59:10
  to a jury, no proof necessary, none.
• 59:14
  The only proof is some, some investigator, some,
• 59:17
  some guy goes in and you should read
• 59:18
  some of these cause they're frigging hilarious.
• 59:20
  So here's what the ATC does.
• 59:22
  They send in their investigators men and these
• 59:26
  men get lap dances.
• 59:28
  These men sit at the stage and then
• 59:31
  watch the girls and have them dance, give
• 59:34
  them dollars, you know, drink a beer.
• 59:36
  You know, they hang out there.
• 59:37
  They're having a, they're having an evening party,
• 59:39
  right?
• 59:40
  They go in, they go back to a
• 59:41
  booth and some girl dances with them.
• 59:43
  And then at the end, what do they
• 59:45
  do?
• 59:47
  So let's say the girl takes him back
• 59:49
  into a booth.
• 59:49
  You should read some of these.
• 59:50
  They're hilarious.
• 59:51
  And this is what I call entrapment.
• 59:53
  Okay?
• 59:54
  So you go in, you get some guy
• 59:56
  to come into a strip club and they
• 59:58
  do this.
• 59:59
  This is what they do.
• 1:00:00
  They bring them into a strip club or
• 1:00:02
  a gentlemen's club or a cabaret, whatever you
• 1:00:05
  wish to call them or whatever they eventually
• 1:00:07
  might unilaterally decide is right.
• 1:00:11
  They have someone come in and this girl,
• 1:00:13
  let's say the girl takes him back into
• 1:00:15
  the little private booth room and dances with
• 1:00:19
  him.
• 1:00:19
  And while dancing, she takes her top completely
• 1:00:22
  off, shows some nipples, no pasties, right?
• 1:00:26
  She takes it off because usually the girls
• 1:00:28
  are just wearing, uh, you know, panties and
• 1:00:30
  they're put pasties over their nips and, uh,
• 1:00:33
  and on they go.
• 1:00:34
  So, so the ATC sends in these clowns
• 1:00:37
  to go in and sit around and get,
• 1:00:40
  uh, sit at the, uh, the, the, what
• 1:00:43
  do you call it?
• 1:00:43
  Center stage and watch the girls dance.
• 1:00:46
  And if they show a nipple hell, they
• 1:00:47
  even give them money to throw that, throw
• 1:00:49
  them at and buy them some beer.
• 1:00:51
  You know, this free, this is a free
• 1:00:52
  night out for these jackoffs.
• 1:00:54
  And they get to go and, and take
• 1:00:57
  the girl in the back room and trap
• 1:00:59
  her.
• 1:01:00
  You know, they, we don't know the conversation
• 1:01:02
  that goes on back there.
• 1:01:04
  We don't, I mean, why wouldn't they, or
• 1:01:06
  why couldn't they at that time proposition her?
• 1:01:10
  Would it be okay if they propositioned her
• 1:01:12
  and said, you know, Hey, uh, you, you
• 1:01:15
  know, if you meet me later, we can
• 1:01:16
  go back to my, you know, have an
• 1:01:21
  evening of it.
• 1:01:22
  And, um, you know, in return, I'll give
• 1:01:23
  you two, $300.
• 1:01:24
  What do you say?
• 1:01:26
  What's to stop them from that?
• 1:01:28
  And if the accepts what can they arrest
• 1:01:30
  her?
• 1:01:31
  No, they can't arrest her for that.
• 1:01:35
  You know what they can do?
• 1:01:36
  They can go back to the, they can
• 1:01:38
  call somebody to arrest her, but they don't
• 1:01:40
  have the power to arrest.
• 1:01:42
  Okay.
• 1:01:42
  Because they're, they're administrative.
• 1:01:45
  They may have a post certification.
• 1:01:47
  They're all law enforcement officers, but they're not
• 1:01:50
  a policeman.
• 1:01:51
  They're not a police department.
• 1:01:52
  So they can take this girl back and
• 1:01:55
  have her, uh, do the deed, uh, you
• 1:01:58
  know, dance for them.
• 1:02:00
  Um, then they walk out, they create a
• 1:02:05
  report, which they send back to the powerhouse
• 1:02:09
  of the ATC and say, well, look, while
• 1:02:12
  I was in there, I was able to
• 1:02:14
  walk out with a beer hidden in my
• 1:02:16
  jacket.
• 1:02:16
  Never should have been allowed to do that.
• 1:02:18
  I was able to see a girl dancing.
• 1:02:21
  They don't have to identify the girl.
• 1:02:22
  They don't have to do anything.
• 1:02:23
  There's no video.
• 1:02:24
  There's nothing.
• 1:02:26
  They there's no evidence.
• 1:02:27
  And, and by the way, these are crimes
• 1:02:29
  I'm speaking of.
• 1:02:30
  They don't occur at, at, at most, uh,
• 1:02:33
  you know, does a nipple occasionally get shown?
• 1:02:35
  Sure.
• 1:02:36
  I'm sure it does in every place, but
• 1:02:38
  are the girls instructed to wear pasties?
• 1:02:40
  They are.
• 1:02:41
  Is it against the law to show a
• 1:02:43
  nipple in there?
• 1:02:44
  Yes.
• 1:02:44
  And if a cop saw it that was
• 1:02:46
  on duty and saw the girl do that,
• 1:02:48
  he could arrest her, take her in and
• 1:02:50
  charge her with a crime because it's a,
• 1:02:53
  it's a crime that is listed in the
• 1:02:55
  five 73 statute.
• 1:02:57
  Right?
• 1:02:58
  So the stealing of the power by the
• 1:03:03
  ATC is the sending of these agents in
• 1:03:06
  to entrap the girls into showing something that
• 1:03:08
  they shouldn't.
• 1:03:08
  And then they show it.
• 1:03:09
  And what do they do?
• 1:03:10
  They come back and blame the owner of
• 1:03:13
  the bar for the girl showing her nipple,
• 1:03:17
  which is a criminal offense.
• 1:03:18
  And they say, you are engaged in showing,
• 1:03:22
  uh, you know, in criminal activity on your
• 1:03:25
  location, we're going to steal your license.
• 1:03:29
  But as the owner of the, of the
• 1:03:31
  facility, you don't get to have a trial.
• 1:03:37
  A jury trial is not available.
• 1:03:40
  This is an administrative action.
• 1:03:43
  There's not even any evidence that needs to
• 1:03:45
  be put out except the statement of the
• 1:03:48
  person going to solicit these sorts of violations.
• 1:03:52
  I'm not saying that there shouldn't be a
• 1:03:55
  requirement.
• 1:03:56
  I'm saying that there is not any do
• 1:03:59
  any program that gives the authority to ATC
• 1:04:04
  to, to do this.
• 1:04:05
  Okay.
• 1:04:06
  To go and investigate could, could a highway
• 1:04:09
  patrolman come in and charge a girl with
• 1:04:12
  something.
• 1:04:12
  And, and perhaps there are those that actually
• 1:04:15
  do affect the, that is a crime that
• 1:04:19
  affects the club owner.
• 1:04:21
  That is, that is part probably true.
• 1:04:25
  I've looked at some of the, some of
• 1:04:27
  the stuff in there could be a criminal
• 1:04:29
  violation for, for the failure perhaps to supervise
• 1:04:33
  or something like that.
• 1:04:34
  I don't think so because it's all administrative.
• 1:04:37
  It's more, they have a pretty big stick
• 1:04:40
  as the ATC.
• 1:04:41
  And if they can collude and make this
• 1:04:44
  573 statute their own, which was never done
• 1:04:48
  by the legislature, the power was never given
• 1:04:51
  by the legislature to AC, ATC to even
• 1:04:56
  investigate anything like this.
• 1:04:58
  And what they've done, they, they created a
• 1:05:01
  document.
• 1:05:01
  These guys, the ATC created a document and
• 1:05:05
  we got plenty of copies of it.
• 1:05:07
  And the document says they have relabeled themselves
• 1:05:10
  as a police department.
• 1:05:13
  They've laid, they have investigative things.
• 1:05:16
  So these investigators, these, these clowns that are
• 1:05:18
  going in and sucking these girls into doing
• 1:05:21
  dances and checking to see if they can
• 1:05:23
  get them to show a nipple, or maybe
• 1:05:24
  they can show them the, the vagina or
• 1:05:27
  something like that.
• 1:05:28
  And you know that I'm not saying that
• 1:05:30
  hasn't happened on the planet, but these guys
• 1:05:32
  go in and encourage the girls to do
• 1:05:35
  it.
• 1:05:35
  And then they turn this stuff in and
• 1:05:39
  charge people to, to not get a license.
• 1:05:41
  It's entrapment.
• 1:05:42
  That's all there is to it.
• 1:05:43
  And so they, well, I hate to laugh
• 1:05:46
  about this cause it's not funny.
• 1:05:47
  This is bullshit, right?
• 1:05:49
  It's crap all the way around.
• 1:05:51
  But if you don't understand it, you don't
• 1:05:53
  understand why the bureaucracy is so crap around
• 1:05:56
  here and they just steal power.
• 1:05:59
  That's what they do.
• 1:06:00
  It doesn't belong to them, but they steal
• 1:06:02
  it anyway.
• 1:06:04
  And this, and now they've done it with
• 1:06:07
  the support of the attorney general's office, helps
• 1:06:09
  them steal it.
• 1:06:10
  Says, Oh gee, here's a new law.
• 1:06:12
  We were completely unaware of 2010 and no,
• 1:06:16
  and we haven't checked to see who can
• 1:06:17
  enforce it and it's outside of yours.
• 1:06:19
  So, but I say, Hey, let's create a
• 1:06:22
  new circular.
• 1:06:23
  Let's create a circular.
• 1:06:24
  We send it out.
• 1:06:25
  It tells everybody what's going on, right?
• 1:06:27
  Let's do that.
• 1:06:28
  And so they send that out, they create
• 1:06:31
  the service, they continue with the collusion, you
• 1:06:33
  know, and this is how they regulate or
• 1:06:37
  destroy businesses.
• 1:06:39
  Okay.
• 1:06:39
  Just like Sam Phillips destroyed me on as
• 1:06:43
  a personal vendetta, personal attack and personally held
• 1:06:47
  it for 18 months when he could have
• 1:06:49
  done an investigation in a couple of weeks
• 1:06:52
  and then held it for 26 months and
• 1:06:54
  submitted an identical thing to the one he
• 1:06:58
  did in the year and a half.
• 1:06:59
  It was the same.
• 1:07:00
  And the Supreme court says no and no
• 1:07:03
  again, with no explanation, no development of the
• 1:07:06
  law, no warning to another lawyer.
• 1:07:08
  So what's the warning to other lawyers?
• 1:07:10
  Seriously, if there's no case law, no, no
• 1:07:13
  interpretation of the rule by the Supreme court,
• 1:07:17
  just a one word judgment for lawyers, one
• 1:07:20
  word.
• 1:07:21
  Nope.
• 1:07:21
  And the Supreme court of the United States
• 1:07:23
  upheld upholds that and says, well, it's okay
• 1:07:26
  to not have a reason for a lawyer,
• 1:07:28
  but you'd never get away with it with
• 1:07:29
  an accountant.
• 1:07:30
  You'd never get away with a real estate
• 1:07:32
  broker, but if it's a lawyer, that's fine.
• 1:07:34
  Because why the state needs a way to
• 1:07:37
  screw lawyers because lawyers know stuff, lawyers know
• 1:07:42
  things and lawyers might, uh, you know, do
• 1:07:45
  things that we don't like, like sue the
• 1:07:46
  state, like do other things.
• 1:07:48
  And if they're not connected, screw them.
• 1:07:50
  If they're connected, they'll prove they're connected and
• 1:07:53
  nothing will happen to them anyway, because that's
• 1:07:55
  how it works.
• 1:07:56
  Well, destroying a person personally is almost the
• 1:08:00
  same as drawing a business, destroying a business,
• 1:08:02
  um, or a corporation.
• 1:08:05
  And they're, and it's not just strip clubs,
• 1:08:07
  by the way, I know I'm talking about
• 1:08:09
  this one particular case, but it's everywhere because
• 1:08:12
  they have changed a documents.
• 1:08:15
  They, they've created a definition.
• 1:08:17
  They don't have the power to create.
• 1:08:19
  And remember after Loper bright overturning the Chevron
• 1:08:22
  doctrine, after the codification of this in five,
• 1:08:25
  three, six, uh, I'm sorry.
• 1:08:26
  Yeah.
• 1:08:27
  Five 36 dot one 40 in Missouri that
• 1:08:29
  says you have to do a de novo
• 1:08:31
  and the court does the interpretation, not the
• 1:08:33
  agency.
• 1:08:34
  After all that, it's pretty clear to me
• 1:08:36
  that they're, that they are going well, they
• 1:08:38
  should, uh, the, the court should, and either
• 1:08:40
  way it'll be appealed anyway.
• 1:08:42
  This is, this is a decision that hasn't
• 1:08:44
  come out yet.
• 1:08:44
  You know, I plan to look on a
• 1:08:46
  case net to see if anything happened yesterday
• 1:08:49
  and I haven't done that yet.
• 1:08:51
  And, uh, um, I'm gonna, I'm typing it
• 1:08:54
  in even now, but I'm the slowest and
• 1:08:56
  worst typist on the planet.
• 1:08:59
  And, uh, so I like to speak into
• 1:09:02
  my, uh, into my phone or microphone apparatus
• 1:09:08
  so that, um, I can, um, cause I
• 1:09:14
  don't type very well, you know, it's a
• 1:09:16
  nonsense.
• 1:09:16
  And, uh, so let's see here.
• 1:09:19
  We are checking even now to see if
• 1:09:22
  anything has happened, uh, parties and attorneys docket
• 1:09:27
  entries.
• 1:09:29
  Nope.
• 1:09:30
  Still waiting.
• 1:09:31
  So we're, we're waiting on a judgment in
• 1:09:33
  that case, what the judge will do.
• 1:09:35
  And, and, uh, I will share that with
• 1:09:37
  you here when we see it.
• 1:09:39
  And I will keep you posted on where
• 1:09:41
  we're going because we are the very first,
• 1:09:44
  we, it's not me, but I'm, I'm involved
• 1:09:46
  as kind of a researcher in this.
• 1:09:48
  And, uh, uh, we are waiting for this
• 1:09:52
  judgment.
• 1:09:53
  I believe we are the first to engage
• 1:09:57
  in this, uh, statutory question for 536.140
• 1:10:05
  in Missouri.
• 1:10:06
  And I'm extremely interested to see what the
• 1:10:08
  judge will do.
• 1:10:09
  And I think, I think, I think he
• 1:10:13
  should, I think it's pretty clear that, uh,
• 1:10:15
  this is bureaucratic overreach and that, uh, this
• 1:10:19
  is exactly the type of case that, uh,
• 1:10:22
  the U S Supreme Court was attacking in
• 1:10:25
  Loper bright and that the legislature in the
• 1:10:28
  state of Missouri was attacking in Missouri.
• 1:10:31
  And they put it also in Missouri DeNovo
• 1:10:33
  review by the court of anything.
• 1:10:36
  So we have asked the court to interpret
• 1:10:38
  what I've just told you all about DeNovo
• 1:10:41
  review and, uh, interpretation doesn't go to the
• 1:10:47
  bureaucrat.
• 1:10:49
  It goes to the court and the court
• 1:10:53
  is instructed to make a decision by the
• 1:10:57
  legislature that protects individual liberties and has kind
• 1:11:04
  of a leaning against overreach by, uh, uh,
• 1:11:08
  what do you call it?
• 1:11:09
  Bureaucrats.
• 1:11:10
  And so I believe, well, either way, they're
• 1:11:13
  going to appeal it because they liked the
• 1:11:15
  control that they have right now.
• 1:11:16
  So if they lose, if the ATC doesn't
• 1:11:19
  win, then they'll appeal it.
• 1:11:21
  Well, the same is going to happen if
• 1:11:23
  the other guy, you know, if the, if
• 1:11:24
  Jack's loses or, um, um, you know, club
• 1:11:27
  GQ loses, it'll be appealed because this is
• 1:11:31
  an important issue.
• 1:11:31
  And so the judge is going to be
• 1:11:33
  careful with what he, uh, with what he,
• 1:11:35
  uh, does and how he rules.
• 1:11:38
  And, uh, but I believe it's pretty self
• 1:11:41
  -explanatory.
• 1:11:41
  I've gone through it for you and hopefully
• 1:11:44
  everybody understands what happened.
• 1:11:46
  But after Loper Bright and after 536.140,
• 1:11:49
  I don't think the court's got a choice.
• 1:11:51
  I think they have to get rid of
• 1:11:53
  the, um, what do you call it?
• 1:11:57
  Administrative, the bureaucratic decision, the lifetime, uh, administrator
• 1:12:03
  should be questioned.
• 1:12:06
  These are the people that we question.
• 1:12:09
  These are the people that should be questioned.
• 1:12:12
  These are the people that need to, like,
• 1:12:17
  like the legislature said, need to err on
• 1:12:20
  the side of individual liberty and you know,
• 1:12:25
  not government overreach and, and to the bureaucrats
• 1:12:29
  out there, I know you exist.
• 1:12:30
  It's a, I don't, I don't hate you.
• 1:12:32
  You know, I, I just think that you
• 1:12:34
  have a tendency to take things that don't
• 1:12:37
  belong to you.
• 1:12:38
  And namely power, the power that you get
• 1:12:42
  is derived from the legislature.
• 1:12:46
  That's where you get your power.
• 1:12:49
  Now, if you narrow that down to a
• 1:12:51
  city, the power is given to the water
• 1:12:54
  guy by either the, the water board or
• 1:12:58
  a board of aldermen or something like that.
• 1:13:01
  But the law comes from those people.
• 1:13:04
  It is, it's a similar thing locally.
• 1:13:07
  So the board or whoever's there will create
• 1:13:09
  the rule.
• 1:13:10
  There's a senior person, maybe a mayor, maybe
• 1:13:13
  a senior commissioner, presiding commissioner, maybe somebody like
• 1:13:16
  that who stamps it, signs it.
• 1:13:19
  Now it's law.
• 1:13:20
  That law is carried out.
• 1:13:24
  The provisions of that law are carried out
• 1:13:26
  by the water dude.
• 1:13:28
  Okay.
• 1:13:28
  So that's where the water dude derives his
• 1:13:31
  authority.
• 1:13:32
  Now he's ignored mostly after that.
• 1:13:35
  And I hate to pick on the water
• 1:13:36
  dude because, but it's the easiest example.
• 1:13:38
  And if the water dude chooses to not
• 1:13:41
  give you a license, Jesus, you're in the
• 1:13:43
  same boat, right?
• 1:13:44
  You're in the same boat, but administrative, administrative
• 1:13:48
  overreach is, is rampant all over the place,
• 1:13:52
  you know, and you take more power.
• 1:13:55
  Why?
• 1:13:56
  Because people love it.
• 1:13:57
  Power is a good thing.
• 1:13:58
  People like having power.
• 1:14:00
  People like, and if they have power, Jesus,
• 1:14:03
  what they want is more power.
• 1:14:05
  That's it.
• 1:14:05
  And more power to you.
• 1:14:06
  Just follow the fricking law.
• 1:14:08
  And you won't have assholes like me coming
• 1:14:10
  after you for not following the law.
• 1:14:14
  If for example, the statute of the state
• 1:14:17
  of Missouri, let's say the legislature in the
• 1:14:19
  state of Missouri said in 573, the 573
• 1:14:25
  statutes related to sexually oriented businesses, cabarets, whatever,
• 1:14:31
  list them.
• 1:14:32
  We, we now allow ATC to enforce, or
• 1:14:36
  if they, if ATC was turned into a
• 1:14:40
  police department, they think they have been because
• 1:14:42
  they have investigative documents that on the top
• 1:14:45
  of it, it says alcohol, tobacco control police
• 1:14:48
  department.
• 1:14:49
  Now they deny they exist, but we have
• 1:14:51
  six of them at least.
• 1:14:53
  And we've asked for more.
• 1:14:54
  We've asked for every, every more.
• 1:14:55
  And I'm going to leave you with that
• 1:14:57
  today because this letter that they sent us.
• 1:14:59
  So, you know, we were asking about that
• 1:15:01
  stuff.
• 1:15:02
  Why do you identify yourself as a police
• 1:15:04
  department?
• 1:15:04
  Blah, blah, blah.
• 1:15:06
  And asking for some, some further information, by
• 1:15:10
  the way, Trump has labeled Ukraine envoy, an
• 1:15:14
  idiot for backing Zelensky, Keith Kellogg.
• 1:15:19
  I tell you what, I, you know, you,
• 1:15:21
  how do you not love Trump?
• 1:15:23
  The U.S. has frozen child care funding
• 1:15:25
  to all States.
• 1:15:26
  Denmark is standing firm against Trump's plan for
• 1:15:28
  Greenland.
• 1:15:30
  Elon Musk says America's toast if the radical
• 1:15:32
  left wins.
• 1:15:34
  Fyodor Lukanov says the West has gambled on
• 1:15:36
  Russia's defeat and has trapped itself instead.
• 1:15:38
  I wanted to share some of those with
• 1:15:40
  you because they're very interesting articles, but we're
• 1:15:42
  not going to get today that today.
• 1:15:44
  Cause we're still staying local.
• 1:15:45
  Okay.
• 1:15:46
  And Oh, by the, by the way, the
• 1:15:48
  New York city mayor swore in on the
• 1:15:50
  Koran to bring a new era.
• 1:15:53
  He asked for the Koran instead.
• 1:15:55
  I'm trying to decide how I feel about
• 1:15:56
  that.
• 1:15:57
  I don't know yet.
• 1:15:58
  And I, I have mixed feelings even right
• 1:16:01
  off the bat, but perhaps I'll come up
• 1:16:03
  with something entertaining on that.
• 1:16:06
  Zelensky has made the top spy chief from
• 1:16:09
  the investigative committee, his chief of staff.
• 1:16:13
  And so that is, that is what the
• 1:16:17
  news has been.
• 1:16:19
  But I wanted to share with you where
• 1:16:21
  in the hell is it?
• 1:16:23
  Let us have a look.
• 1:16:24
  Shall we?
• 1:16:25
  We shall.
• 1:16:27
  But it'll take me a minute to find
• 1:16:28
  it.
• 1:16:28
  I think I have it somewhere in here.
• 1:16:31
  The latest letter from these people.
• 1:16:34
  You won't believe this is unbelievable.
• 1:16:38
  Well, it's par for the course.
• 1:16:40
  Let's put it at that.
• 1:16:41
  Oops.
• 1:16:42
  I've gone too far.
• 1:16:45
  Where are we?
• 1:16:47
  Sorry to take so long to find this.
• 1:16:49
  I should have had it pulled up already,
• 1:16:51
  but this is a comical letter that I
• 1:16:54
  promised to share yesterday.
• 1:16:57
  And let's see where it is.
• 1:17:02
  Okay.
• 1:17:03
  That's the one we received on 1223.
• 1:17:09
  Let's see.
• 1:17:12
  Oh, there were two we received on 1223.
• 1:17:15
  Where's the other one?
• 1:17:16
  We have to find it because this is
• 1:17:18
  so damn comical.
• 1:17:21
  Let's see here.
• 1:17:24
  Come on.
• 1:17:24
  Where are you?
• 1:17:25
  I'm having troubles here.
• 1:17:27
  And I'm getting depressed over it because this
• 1:17:33
  letter was such a joke.
• 1:17:36
  I'm going to look for it.
• 1:17:38
  Maybe I'll find it better in my email.
• 1:17:41
  I don't know.
• 1:17:42
  Anyway, I really apologize for not having it
• 1:17:45
  readily pulled up, but I've ranted quite a
• 1:17:48
  bit today.
• 1:17:49
  And perhaps it's something that...
• 1:17:55
  Let's see.
• 1:17:56
  Is it this one?
• 1:17:57
  Nope.
• 1:17:58
  We have gotten so many responses from them.
• 1:18:01
  It's freaking unbelievable what they have said.
• 1:18:04
  And I think this is it.
• 1:18:11
  Yeah.
• 1:18:12
  This is comical.
• 1:18:15
  What they are telling us.
• 1:18:23
  $156 paid.
• 1:18:25
  We need the other one.
• 1:18:29
  And how much this is going to pay.
• 1:18:31
  And I want to share this with you
• 1:18:33
  in almost in its entirety.
• 1:18:36
  Okay.
• 1:18:37
  This is a sunshine response.
• 1:18:40
  So the request was to get some documents
• 1:18:42
  and the meat of it is, so this
• 1:18:44
  is dated December the 23rd to Jax, which
• 1:18:50
  owns Club GQ.
• 1:18:52
  And we received your letters, lists all these
• 1:18:57
  licensing letters.
• 1:18:58
  Since August, the division has provided a bunch
• 1:19:01
  of documents to date.
• 1:19:03
  Here's the meat of it.
• 1:19:05
  To date, more than 3,600 pages of
• 1:19:08
  records have been provided to you in fulfillment
• 1:19:11
  of your August 5th, September 4th, September 6th,
• 1:19:14
  October 3rd requests.
• 1:19:15
  By the way, paid nearly $6,000 to
• 1:19:19
  get these 3,600 pages and paid fees
• 1:19:22
  that they are not allowed to charge.
• 1:19:25
  By the way, they're charging legal fees to
• 1:19:28
  research this.
• 1:19:29
  That is not allowed.
• 1:19:31
  It's very clear in the latest ruling that
• 1:19:34
  they're not allowed to do this and they
• 1:19:36
  are not following the law.
• 1:19:38
  So our communication with you regarding those requests
• 1:19:42
  consistently include clear estimates of dates that things
• 1:19:46
  would be made available to you.
• 1:19:48
  I move forward.
• 1:19:50
  I'm going to parse this and read just
• 1:19:51
  the important sentences.
• 1:19:53
  We wholeheartedly believe our team's extraordinary efforts to
• 1:19:57
  refill your request demonstrates the agency's respect for
• 1:20:01
  Missouri's policy favoring open conduct of public business
• 1:20:05
  and your ability to access the same.
• 1:20:09
  Despite our good faith, it is plain from
• 1:20:12
  increasingly hostile argumentative tone of your communications and
• 1:20:17
  broad burdensome nature of your demands, particularly those
• 1:20:20
  made and list a bunch of dates, that
• 1:20:22
  your invocation of Missouri sunshine law is intended
• 1:20:25
  not as a tool to examine meetings but
• 1:20:27
  as a weapon to harass the division.
• 1:20:30
  Right?
• 1:20:30
  And then they go forward.
• 1:20:31
  Nevertheless, we are committed to providing your request.
• 1:20:37
  Ready?
• 1:20:38
  And we are providing an estimate below calculated
• 1:20:42
  assuming as we must at this time that
• 1:20:44
  the requests are completed using currently available agency
• 1:20:48
  resources.
• 1:20:49
  Okay?
• 1:20:50
  And here it is.
• 1:20:51
  Remaining records encompassed by requests that were made
• 1:20:56
  in September 6 and October 3.
• 1:20:59
  For the dates of January 1, 2015, to
• 1:21:04
  October 3, 2025, they requested communications policy or
• 1:21:08
  regulatory decisions regarding swimming bars at the lake.
• 1:21:12
  It says with respect to these records as
• 1:21:14
  indicated to you in November 27 response, there
• 1:21:17
  were several topics, several words that we wanted
• 1:21:21
  to investigate.
• 1:21:23
  Lewd, sexually oriented business, chapter 311, chapter 573,
• 1:21:27
  industry circular, policy memo, gentlemen's quarters, jacks, strip,
• 1:21:32
  adult, nude, and a bunch of other terms.
• 1:21:34
  Right?
• 1:21:36
  So this list resulted in this is comical
• 1:21:39
  right here.
• 1:21:39
  Right?
• 1:21:40
  This list resulted in the retrieval of 691
• 1:21:43
  ,463 email files.
• 1:21:47
  We conservatively estimate this is funny.
• 1:21:50
  The cost associated with fulfillment of this portion
• 1:21:54
  of these records is $368,783.77.
• 1:22:04
  And this is they calculated this saying it's
• 1:22:09
  $32 an hour for a secretary to look
• 1:22:12
  at it.
• 1:22:13
  And it's 11,528 hours of review plus
• 1:22:19
  a flash drive of $3.61 for a
• 1:22:21
  total sum of $368,783.77.
• 1:22:32
  The earliest we estimate these records are available
• 1:22:36
  for you to review is 44 years, three
• 1:22:39
  months, and 26 days from our receipt of
• 1:22:42
  your payment.
• 1:22:43
  So give us $368,000, basically $369,000.
• 1:22:53
  We're going to round up a little bit
• 1:22:54
  with difference to make $369,000 and give
• 1:22:58
  us 44 years and we will comply.
• 1:23:01
  So obviously they have no ability to search
• 1:23:05
  any of this, anything out there.
• 1:23:08
  But apparently they do because they immediately came
• 1:23:10
  up with 300, with how many pages did
• 1:23:13
  they say?
• 1:23:14
  600,000 pages or something like that that
• 1:23:17
  they came up with that said that is
• 1:23:19
  there.
• 1:23:21
  Now I bring that up because it's just
• 1:23:24
  completely stupid and asinine.
• 1:23:26
  Okay.
• 1:23:27
  How it should be would be that somebody
• 1:23:30
  would call and be collegial, be, I don't
• 1:23:34
  know what, cooperative and say, you know, if
• 1:23:39
  you say this isn't a bullshit letter, you're
• 1:23:41
  a bureaucrat.
• 1:23:42
  You're somebody who loves this type of thing
• 1:23:45
  and loves to antagonize people and come after
• 1:23:48
  them and entrap them by sending officers in.
• 1:23:52
  You're one of those.
• 1:23:53
  Okay.
• 1:23:53
  Or you're extremely religious and can't leave other
• 1:23:56
  people live and let live.
• 1:23:57
  You can't leave other people alone.
• 1:23:59
  You got to enforce your beliefs upon others.
• 1:24:03
  That's what you got to do.
• 1:24:04
  And frankly, I believe that's what's happening here.
• 1:24:07
  I I'm a middle of the rotor.
• 1:24:08
  I'm neither for it nor against strip clubs
• 1:24:11
  or whatever they do.
• 1:24:11
  I don't give a crap, you know, but
• 1:24:13
  if people are there and I'm not saying
• 1:24:14
  I haven't gone to them, I have, but
• 1:24:17
  it's a, if you, if you want to
• 1:24:19
  tear them down, why, what harm is it
• 1:24:21
  doing to you?
• 1:24:23
  Well, I mean, seriously, what, what for a
• 1:24:25
  place it's been around for 40 something years
• 1:24:28
  and you're trying to destroy it?
• 1:24:29
  Why, why, why that's the main answer.
• 1:24:34
  And it's because you want to steal power.
• 1:24:36
  That's not yours.
• 1:24:37
  So every letter that's been received from these
• 1:24:40
  people has been condescending sort of a rant
• 1:24:44
  by them that, Oh, geez, it's going to
• 1:24:46
  take us.
• 1:24:46
  We have to work.
• 1:24:48
  They don't want to work.
• 1:24:49
  This letter that they sent is not a
• 1:24:53
  realistic discussion of anything.
• 1:24:56
  What it is, is announcing their power and
• 1:24:59
  announcing their deterrence.
• 1:25:02
  That is what they were doing.
• 1:25:04
  So I forgot that today is Friday and
• 1:25:06
  I have to end early.
• 1:25:08
  I have, I appreciate y'all listening to
• 1:25:11
  me.
• 1:25:12
  I am Samuel trap.
• 1:25:14
  This is international flavor.
• 1:25:16
  We are going to continue with this letter
• 1:25:18
  because freaking comical.
• 1:25:20
  And I, I ranted way too long today
• 1:25:22
  on one of my rants took too long.
• 1:25:24
  So I hope you enjoyed it.
• 1:25:27
  And, uh, I'm going to put on a
• 1:25:29
  couple of Christmas songs just because that's what
• 1:25:31
  I like.
• 1:25:32
  And, uh, we shall have some Christmas.
• 1:25:37
  I'm going to put two or three in
• 1:25:38
  there just because I like them.
• 1:25:39
  And, uh, our oncoming host who has a
• 1:25:43
  great show can, uh, go from there.
• 1:25:46
  Sorry to overrun today.
• 1:25:48
  I meant to be done by, uh, by,
• 1:25:50
  uh, eight 45, but anyway, this is international
• 1:25:54
  flavor.
• 1:25:54
  I am Samuel trap.
• 1:25:55
  I'm coming to you live from the Lake
• 1:25:57
  Ozark real estate of the art studio.
• 1:25:58
  I do so every day from seven 39
• 1:26:00
  o'clock, except on Fridays when I'm supposed
• 1:26:02
  to be gone by, uh, eight 45.
• 1:26:04
  And I, uh, totally cocked that up today.
• 1:26:07
  So join us every morning, uh, live at
• 1:26:10
  damn radio.com and, uh, listen to me
• 1:26:14
  later at international flavor.com.
• 1:26:18
  Hope to see you Monday morning.
• 1:26:20
  Have a nice day.