Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Assassination?; Tucker/Shapiro; Qatar; Rent; Data Centers; Refunds; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Assassination?; Tucker/Shapiro; Qatar; Rent; Data Centers; Refunds; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

0:05
Speaker 1: Hopefully we do. Should business and individual watch this. This
0:14
Speaker 1: is the show. All right, everybody, welcome to a one
0:21
Speaker 1: book show on this August thirteenth. Everybody is what is
0:29
Speaker 1: a Thursday? It's a Thursday. Everybody's having a u A
0:35
Speaker 1: great uh a great week. Sorry, there was a screenshot
0:40
Speaker 1: of Tucker Colson there for a moment. We will get
0:42
Speaker 1: back to Tucker in a minute, so you're gonna have
0:45
Speaker 1: to you have to watch a little bit of Tucker
0:47
Speaker 1: today for the show. All right, let's see what is happening.
0:52
Speaker 1: As you know, I am in Barcelona, Spain, in this office.
0:56
Speaker 1: I'll be here for the next month or so, although
0:58
Speaker 1: in between I'll be in Israel for a few days.
1:01
Speaker 1: We'll see if I can do shows in Israel. We'll
1:04
Speaker 1: try to do something. But for now we're here in Barcelona.
1:09
Speaker 1: I'll be trying to do shows most days. There'll be
1:12
Speaker 1: days where I take off and it is eight pm
1:17
Speaker 1: over here, so it is late. This is why it's
1:19
Speaker 1: a little early for the regular round book show time frame.
1:25
Speaker 1: All right, let's I guess let's just jump into the news.
1:28
Speaker 1: I mean, I have to say that the first story
1:31
Speaker 1: in the New shar Is is fairly I mean, it's
1:34
Speaker 1: fairly serious and entertaining at the same time. It's really
1:39
Speaker 1: funny actually. So it turns out that when Trump was
1:43
Speaker 1: coming back from the NATO summit in Turkey, was it
1:48
Speaker 1: a month ago, the Secret Service out wind of a
1:51
Speaker 1: plan to kill Trump, indeed by taking Air Force one down.
1:59
Speaker 1: The The plot was supposedly be a plot by Iran
2:06
Speaker 1: that involved that a vote shooting down a FUS one.
2:12
Speaker 1: Now we'll see that this information came from Israeli supposed
2:16
Speaker 1: to be right now, they're saying from Israeli intelligence sources,
2:21
Speaker 1: and we'll get to that in a minute. But yes,
2:24
Speaker 1: Israel is being blamed for this whole fiasco. Anyway, they decided,
2:32
Speaker 1: they decided they would engage in some clever misdirection. So
2:38
Speaker 1: Trump boarded the FUS one as usual, right in the
2:42
Speaker 1: seven forty seven, not the new one that Kata the
2:47
Speaker 1: guitar had given the President. We've already discussed on the
2:50
Speaker 1: show previously that that one is not secure enough, not
2:55
Speaker 1: ready for you know, for showtime yet. So he didn't
3:03
Speaker 1: actually board the the the new for was one. He
3:10
Speaker 1: boarded the original, the normal Air Force one, and he
3:16
Speaker 1: did so in four view of cameras and then everybody
3:19
Speaker 1: shut the windows. And it turns out that Trump climbed
3:25
Speaker 1: into one of the large containers that deliver food to
3:30
Speaker 1: an airplane's gallery, you know, those truck things. And it
3:36
Speaker 1: turns out that it wasn't just him. Two of his aides,
3:40
Speaker 1: three of his aides, three of his age were shuffled
3:43
Speaker 1: into that same you know, cateringe container, and the carting
3:50
Speaker 1: container was was taken off the airplane, off the airplane
3:56
Speaker 1: and trucked over to a smaller C thirty two aircraft
4:01
Speaker 1: where Trump exited the container boarded the plane. Now this story, oh,
4:07
Speaker 1: comes from the Washington Post. It's the story is retold
4:12
Speaker 1: by the Atlantic, which I'm looking at right now. Anyway,
4:16
Speaker 1: that C two A and the seven four seven, which
4:21
Speaker 1: was you know, which was assumed to be the plane
4:24
Speaker 1: that was going to be shot down, then both flew
4:27
Speaker 1: to the United Kingdom, with the seven four seven continuing
4:32
Speaker 1: the rules by identifying itself as Air Force one. Trump
4:37
Speaker 1: got off the smaller plane in Britain, he snuck back
4:40
Speaker 1: on the seven four seven, exited the seven four seven,
4:49
Speaker 1: and got on his new Air Force one two point
4:53
Speaker 1: zero that the Katari government had given him. So just
4:59
Speaker 1: and he You can see that there's actually a photo
5:02
Speaker 1: of Trump in the creating cart peeking out of the
5:06
Speaker 1: catering cart in what is an unbelievably embarrassing photograph, and
5:14
Speaker 1: I'm sure a photograph that has made Trump very very unhappy.
5:22
Speaker 1: I don't think he likes. He likes stuff like that
5:25
Speaker 1: when it happens to him. Now, as I said, he
5:29
Speaker 1: wasn't alone in the food cart. He was also there
5:32
Speaker 1: with Dan Scavino, his former caddy. This is just funny
5:39
Speaker 1: on its own right, his former caddy and wal Nota,
5:44
Speaker 1: his former butler, both of whom are now White House aids.
5:50
Speaker 1: And he chose these dude to save and with Natalie Harps,
5:54
Speaker 1: a executive assistant. Meanwhile, on the seventh four seven, there
5:59
Speaker 1: were being threatened to be shut down. You had military officers,
6:05
Speaker 1: enlisted staff, and several American civilians including the press and
6:12
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio, who was deemed expendable, I guess, and Tersury
6:18
Speaker 1: Secretary Scott Bessett all on the seven four seven, which
6:23
Speaker 1: you know the threat was was going to be maybe
6:26
Speaker 1: shut down with Trump on the c thirty two A
6:31
Speaker 1: was Pete hexseth Uh, Secretary of War War you know
6:37
Speaker 1: of War and several other white out aids. I guess
6:43
Speaker 1: was on the deco, on the on the deco flights
6:47
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller, got Stephen Miller, Stephen Chung and others. Uh yeah,
6:55
Speaker 1: So I get that you don't want the president to
7:01
Speaker 1: be in a plane. If the plane is being threatened,
7:05
Speaker 1: then why is the plane taking off? If the plane's
7:09
Speaker 1: really being threatened, if the threat is significant, why are
7:13
Speaker 1: you placing all those lives under threat, I mean not insignificant,
7:19
Speaker 1: people like Secretary of State and the Secretary of the
7:22
Speaker 1: Treasury and maybe some important generals. What exactly is going
7:30
Speaker 1: on here? Why all these deceptions? Why decoys? I mean,
7:36
Speaker 1: it really makes America look pathetic. It makes the Trump
7:40
Speaker 1: administration look weak and pathetic. How did they decide who
7:49
Speaker 1: goes on the one plane and who goes on the other,
7:51
Speaker 1: Whose life's expendable and who's not. It's you know, it's
8:00
Speaker 1: possible to seecret service acted out of a superabundance of caution,
8:05
Speaker 1: But I still don't understand why there was one had
8:08
Speaker 1: to take off. They could have gotten the president out
8:11
Speaker 1: of there without ever putting him on if it was one,
8:16
Speaker 1: and then dealt with the threat and then it's just absurd.
8:25
Speaker 1: And of course, you know, the way the food truck
8:30
Speaker 1: escapade unfolded, including who Trump chose to take it, who
8:35
Speaker 1: he chose not to take, also reveals a lot about
8:37
Speaker 1: the president's own priorities and why didn't Trump take the
8:43
Speaker 1: press into his confidence even if he couldn't take them
8:46
Speaker 1: all on the safer plane? Now he hates the media,
8:51
Speaker 1: so maybe that's why. Maybe he was hoping that the
8:53
Speaker 1: plane would be shot down. Imagine what would have happened
8:57
Speaker 1: if the seventh or seven actually being shot down. Now,
9:00
Speaker 1: let me let me say something. I assume if it's
9:03
Speaker 1: one has the most advanced anti aircraft electronics and decoys
9:13
Speaker 1: in the world. I know, a lot of all flights
9:18
Speaker 1: have anti uh you know, uh, ground to air missile protections,
9:23
Speaker 1: So I'm assuming if it's one. So even if if
9:26
Speaker 1: somebody shot at it, the LIKELIHO of the do actually
9:29
Speaker 1: be taken down I think is small, right, I mean, uh,
9:34
Speaker 1: Israel and the United States are pretty sophisticated anti ground
9:39
Speaker 1: to air missile tech. So what would have happened though
9:44
Speaker 1: if the planet being shot down? And you know, yeah,
9:54
Speaker 1: the whole thing is just bizarre, right, And of course,
9:59
Speaker 1: all this was kept hidden and broken by the Washington
10:02
Speaker 1: Post investigative reporting. I mean, yeah, the whole thing is
10:10
Speaker 1: bizarre and funny. And guess what, the Iranians I think
10:14
Speaker 1: it's a blast. I mean, the Ranians think this is
10:18
Speaker 1: like the funniest thing ever. This is from This is
10:22
Speaker 1: from Iranian media. Right again, Trump with his new scandal
10:29
Speaker 1: has become the top subject of US media these days,
10:33
Speaker 1: a scandal stemming from fear of Iran's military power power
10:39
Speaker 1: that caused Trump last month, while returning from Turkey, to
10:43
Speaker 1: secretly switch his plane. They obviously added that the whole
10:50
Speaker 1: episode is a source of humiliation for Trump. So yes,
10:57
Speaker 1: I mean, the Ranians are making hey of this. The
11:01
Speaker 1: fish of course not commenting on the allegation that they
11:05
Speaker 1: were threatening Trump. They've tried to fascinate Trump in the past,
11:09
Speaker 1: so it wouldn't be surprising at all. Yeah, I mean
11:21
Speaker 1: extreme lead everyone. The new one. The son has pledged
11:25
Speaker 1: vengeance for the death of his father. Uh, and so
11:30
Speaker 1: the idea that they want to kill Trump is completely valid.
11:36
Speaker 1: But the whole way in which they did this is
11:40
Speaker 1: just bizarre. It's it's it's completely bizarre, but you know
11:47
Speaker 1: it is it is Trump after all. Now here's the thing.
11:55
Speaker 1: It turns out, I mean again, according to Washington Post
11:59
Speaker 1: that the intelligence about the Uranian plot to shoot down
12:03
Speaker 1: the seven forty seven was provided by Israelian intelligence. But
12:11
Speaker 1: it turns out, according to the Post, at least the
12:14
Speaker 1: CIA had very low confidence in this intelligence. Indeed, supposedly
12:20
Speaker 1: the CIA and many people within administration are now saying
12:24
Speaker 1: that this was probably fake intelligence on the part of
12:29
Speaker 1: the Israelis in order for Trump to turn against the Uranians.
12:38
Speaker 1: So the idea was Israel is feeding Trump the idea
12:43
Speaker 1: that Iran is trying to kill him in an attempt
12:47
Speaker 1: to get Trump to get tough on Iran. So, as
12:52
Speaker 1: if you need more fuel for the various anti Semites
12:56
Speaker 1: out there, now we have a conspiracy theory of the
13:00
Speaker 1: Israeli government trying to convince Trump is going to be
13:02
Speaker 1: assassinated in order to get Trump to support Israel in
13:06
Speaker 1: its efforts to attack Iran or something crazy like that.
13:11
Speaker 1: Now I don't know what the intelligence was, I don't
13:13
Speaker 1: know how valid is you know who knows, But I
13:18
Speaker 1: doubt that Israel's exaggerating the threat to Trump in order
13:21
Speaker 1: to try to manipulate him into attacking Iran, partially because
13:25
Speaker 1: by this point they should know they can't count on
13:28
Speaker 1: Trump doing anything of value vis a vis the Ranian threat.
13:36
Speaker 1: Supposely though, just as an aside, because we might hear
13:40
Speaker 1: more about it in the next few days. Israel is
13:42
Speaker 1: on high alert because Trump might attack your on any
13:47
Speaker 1: day now, an massive attack on Iran. So you know, again,
13:51
Speaker 1: who knows if that's Israel trying to manipulate the Trump
13:54
Speaker 1: administration by Oh, yeah, we expect Trump to be tough
13:58
Speaker 1: and we expect an attack any day now. So we're
14:01
Speaker 1: putting ourselves on a lood. Oh whether it's real, you know,
14:06
Speaker 1: is this more you know, trying to psychologically manipulate trumpunoss Now,
14:15
Speaker 1: what is clear is that the seven four seven eight
14:19
Speaker 1: gifted by Kata has insufficient security measures to transport the
14:25
Speaker 1: presidents in a potentially hostile environment. It does not have
14:31
Speaker 1: what it takes, so you know, he that plane was
14:37
Speaker 1: never considered right. So there were three planes involved, the
14:45
Speaker 1: Katari seven for seven that basically transported the president from
14:50
Speaker 1: London to Washington, d C. The original air for S
14:53
Speaker 1: one which transported which was the decoy pretended to transport
14:58
Speaker 1: the president from Key to London and the plane that
15:03
Speaker 1: actually transported him to London, the Air Force C thirty
15:06
Speaker 1: two A.
15:08
Speaker 2: So anyway, there you have it, a funny, weird, strange.
15:19
Speaker 1: I mean, the photo of Trump, the photo Trump in
15:22
Speaker 1: the in the Katie think, I don't know if this
15:24
Speaker 1: is maybe this is AI. But it is all over
15:27
Speaker 1: the web. It's all over the place, you know, Trump
15:31
Speaker 1: looking you know, from inside the cart between the food packages.
15:35
Speaker 1: It looks like it's AI actually, but it's spreading all
15:40
Speaker 1: over the place. It's it's become a meme. Uh. And
15:43
Speaker 1: again the Runyan's lapping this up. They love it. They
15:49
Speaker 1: love it.
15:51
Speaker 3: All right, let's see, yeah, all right, and everything sound
16:00
Speaker 3: is good and picture is good, and you know it
16:03
Speaker 3: looks it seems like I am I'm actually.
16:09
Speaker 1: I'm actually figured out all these things, all the stuff.
16:14
Speaker 1: Don't forget to like the show, like the show. Press
16:17
Speaker 1: that like button before you leave, I know something you
16:19
Speaker 1: can leave before they end personal like button now, So
16:22
Speaker 1: you don't forget, of course, only if you like the show.
16:25
Speaker 1: Don't forget to use super chat to ask me questions,
16:27
Speaker 1: and that thereby shape the show. You know, I'll talk
16:30
Speaker 1: about what you want me to talk about. Versus what
16:32
Speaker 1: I chosen to talk about. And yeah, don't forget to
16:37
Speaker 1: make a comment in the chat or just act do something,
16:40
Speaker 1: because the more actions you take, the more like shares, contributions, chats,
16:46
Speaker 1: comments and stuff like that, the more the algorithm likes
16:49
Speaker 1: the show and presents it. Oh A quick item that
16:56
Speaker 1: struck me as really bizarre. Right, We've talked about this before,
17:02
Speaker 1: but I just want to keep reminding you of the
17:05
Speaker 1: of this fact. Kata. We talked about Kata, one of
17:09
Speaker 1: Donaldson's favorite countries in the world and one that he
17:13
Speaker 1: seems to have an enormous respect for its leaders. Is
17:18
Speaker 1: Katta is a small authoritarian Islamic dictatorship with three hundred
17:29
Speaker 1: and thirty thousand citizens. It's about the third the sires
17:34
Speaker 1: of New Jersey. It's actually smaller than Israel, which is
17:38
Speaker 1: about the size of New Jersey. It turns out that
17:42
Speaker 1: the Katari people three hundred and thirty thousand citizens, who
17:45
Speaker 1: are quite wealthy because or at least the authoritarian in
17:49
Speaker 1: charge is very wealthy because of natural gas and oil revenue,
17:55
Speaker 1: so they have they have a lot of money to spend.
17:58
Speaker 1: It turns out that you know, they really really really care.
18:02
Speaker 1: I mean they really have a deep concern about higher
18:05
Speaker 1: education in the United States. They because I mean you
18:12
Speaker 1: can see this, they invest heavily, heavily in American liberal
18:17
Speaker 1: arts and stand educations. Indeed, KATA is the largest foreign
18:23
Speaker 1: donor to US colleges and universities. I think it's the
18:25
Speaker 1: largest donor outside of the US government to American colleges
18:30
Speaker 1: and universities. They contributed over six and a half billion billion,
18:35
Speaker 1: not million billion to American higher education. I mean it's
18:45
Speaker 1: they're bigger than any other country that invests in American
18:49
Speaker 1: higher education. Now a bunch of other countries do, which
18:52
Speaker 1: is kind of surprising. I mean, the rest of the
18:55
Speaker 1: world really wants to make sure that the United States
19:00
Speaker 1: it has the best higher education in the world. I mean,
19:03
Speaker 1: China and Hong Kong invests five point six billion dollars
19:07
Speaker 1: in American higher education. Germany, now you know, England four
19:15
Speaker 1: point one, Canada three point seven, Saudi Arabia three point seven,
19:19
Speaker 1: another Islamist country very dedicated to the values of the
19:25
Speaker 1: humanities in the United States, Japan, Switzerland, France, Bermuda, Bermuda
19:30
Speaker 1: one point seven billion. Now Bermuda, that's not really Bermuda,
19:35
Speaker 1: that's the life insurance companies in Bermuda investing, but KATA
19:40
Speaker 1: six point three billion. Now, what do you think they're
19:44
Speaker 1: trying to do? Is it just a love of America
19:48
Speaker 1: that is driving them or is there something else that
19:53
Speaker 1: is that is driving this? Does it buy them influence? Maybe?
19:57
Speaker 1: Does it shape what is being taught in Midi studies
20:02
Speaker 1: programs and maybe some other programs, there is shape at all.
20:06
Speaker 1: You think the anti Israel and anti Semitic attitudes of
20:11
Speaker 1: so many in American higher education, the fact that they're
20:15
Speaker 1: getting six point three billion dollars from the Kataris, and
20:21
Speaker 1: people are worried about APEX, people are worried about the
20:24
Speaker 1: Jews influence on American government higher education, and the rest
20:32
Speaker 1: I start worrying about the Kataris in the Saudis and
20:35
Speaker 1: what exactly they're doing, why they're investing so much. Again,
20:39
Speaker 1: KATA is compared, let's say, to China or to even
20:42
Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia. KATA only has three hundred and thirty thousand people,
20:46
Speaker 1: and those three hundred thirty thousand people are making contributions
20:51
Speaker 1: the size of six pointy six billion dollars to American universities.
20:55
Speaker 1: It doesn't make any sense it really doesn't. All right,
21:07
Speaker 1: let's let's do this. I was actually was supposed to
21:13
Speaker 1: do this before Kata, but let's do it now. Uh,
21:18
Speaker 1: we want to watch a few ups. That's weird, all right.
21:24
Speaker 1: I want to show you a couple of segments. Actually
21:27
Speaker 1: we're gonna start with this other one. A couple of
21:29
Speaker 1: segments of Tucker Cawson. Now, uh, you know, I'm not
21:33
Speaker 1: just doing this to be cool to you. But here's
21:37
Speaker 1: the thing. Tucker Cosson has taken on Ben Shapiro, and
21:42
Speaker 1: we've talked about the fact that Tucker Cosson has political ambitions.
21:45
Speaker 1: Whether he runs for president or backs JD. Vance for president,
21:51
Speaker 1: Tucker cousin is going to have significant influence. Now, his
21:54
Speaker 1: influence seems to be declining based on views on YouTube,
21:57
Speaker 1: but it's still in the millions. Here's one of the
22:00
Speaker 1: most influential pundits out there in America. He is trying
22:07
Speaker 1: to become the spokesman for MAGA and the guy who
22:13
Speaker 1: basically determines the political fate of the Public Republican Party
22:17
Speaker 1: in the future. Again, whether he runs, as we've discussed,
22:21
Speaker 1: or whether JD. Vance runs and he supports him, Tucker's
22:27
Speaker 1: going to have a big role. And you know, I
22:31
Speaker 1: don't have a lot of influence out there in the world,
22:33
Speaker 1: but they literally influence I have. I wanted to least
22:37
Speaker 1: dedicate some of it to doing everything I can to
22:43
Speaker 1: disparage Tucker Couson. I mean, he is the worst of
22:47
Speaker 1: the worst out there. He is the equivalent Hassan Pika
22:51
Speaker 1: of the left. He is anti capitalist, anti American, you know,
22:56
Speaker 1: and he's just a bold face liar. And Tucker's not
23:02
Speaker 1: stupid so these allies. He's pro Russia, he's po Qatar.
23:09
Speaker 1: He probably gets a lot of money from Katcha, and
23:12
Speaker 1: he made twenty million dollars last year off of his
23:16
Speaker 1: YouTube channel and his podcast, which kind of ticks me
23:19
Speaker 1: off because I don't make it any quick close to that.
23:23
Speaker 1: So we're gonna spend time over the next I don't
23:28
Speaker 1: know how often, but next while talking about Tecker Carson, right,
23:37
Speaker 1: because he's a big deal. It's a big deal. This
23:44
Speaker 1: particular video on X has been watched by one hundred
23:46
Speaker 1: and sixteen thousand people, But of course that's just an ax.
23:50
Speaker 1: It's on YouTube, it's a number of different platforms. It's
23:53
Speaker 1: been watched by millions of people. Now Takya Corson has
23:57
Speaker 1: dedicated his last show basically going after Ben Shapiro. This
24:04
Speaker 1: is an hour and twenty minutes of a ruthless attack
24:09
Speaker 1: on Shapiro. Because there are two options in terms of
24:14
Speaker 1: the direction that you know, MAGA or the Republican Party
24:19
Speaker 1: takes the Tucker calls in direction of anti Semitism and
24:23
Speaker 1: anti Israel and anti Ukraine, pro Russia, of anti Americanism
24:30
Speaker 1: and anti capitalism. And of course let's not forget the demons,
24:35
Speaker 1: the demons, the scratch Tucker and might attack you any
24:39
Speaker 1: day now, any moment now, you might be attacked by
24:42
Speaker 1: those demons. Or you know, a vision of Ben Shapiro,
24:47
Speaker 1: which I don't think is I don't think it's a
24:50
Speaker 1: good vision, but significantly better than Tucker's. A vision that
24:55
Speaker 1: at least gives f lip service to being po capitalism,
24:57
Speaker 1: and I think I think Ben really does understand capitalism.
25:01
Speaker 1: A vision that is pro Israel and pro Ukraine inters
25:05
Speaker 1: the phign policy, a vision that I think is ultimately
25:10
Speaker 1: I think Ben Shapea' is pro American. I think Trucker
25:13
Speaker 1: Colson is a hate of America. Tucker's also you know,
25:19
Speaker 1: a conspiracy theorists and up the boy Zoo, and Ben
25:24
Speaker 1: Shapiro is not for the most part. Now, of course,
25:27
Speaker 1: Ben Shabea buys into the biggest conspiracy theory in all
25:30
Speaker 1: of human history, i e. Religion, But so Doukasson. Although
25:37
Speaker 1: Ben Shapiro seems a little sane when it comes to religion,
25:41
Speaker 1: he doesn't at least claim to being attacked by demons,
25:44
Speaker 1: at least not recently. So Ben Shapa's Night and Day
25:49
Speaker 1: much much, much better than Tucker Coulson. If elections between
25:53
Speaker 1: Tucker Coulson and Ben Shapiro, I would vote for Ben Shapiro.
25:57
Speaker 1: And you know, if Benchara was running for it, I
26:00
Speaker 1: might vote for Ben Shapiro. I would never ever ever
26:05
Speaker 1: vote for Taco Causon because Ben Shapa is bad, but
26:10
Speaker 1: bad in kind of normal conservative ways and uh and
26:14
Speaker 1: just again, in completely different ways than Tucker Cosson. Tucker
26:18
Speaker 1: Cosson is just the worst. So let's look at the
26:23
Speaker 1: tack on Ben Shapiro and evaluate it in terms of
26:26
Speaker 1: it's in you know, conhuence and intelligence, but also in
26:30
Speaker 1: terms of the extent to which Techo Cossen is lying.
26:32
Speaker 1: But more importantly, I want you to notice something in
26:35
Speaker 1: Tacho Cosson does throughout this, and of course this is
26:38
Speaker 1: what Teker Cossum does. There is a subtext across the
26:43
Speaker 1: entire thing of a conspiracy. Somebody, you know, Ben Shapiro
26:50
Speaker 1: is not alone in this. He is an agent of
26:54
Speaker 1: somebody else. Somebody might not be mentioned Israel, maybe the Jews,
27:01
Speaker 1: maybe subtainly Israel, but there's an undertone of conspirasey. And
27:09
Speaker 1: this is what so good at and this is what
27:12
Speaker 1: I think attracts so many people to him, and this
27:15
Speaker 1: is what makes him so evil and dangerous. So let's
27:19
Speaker 1: stop by watching this show segment. Then we'll move to
27:22
Speaker 1: slightly long go on.
27:24
Speaker 4: So maybe the last thing they need is to be
27:26
Speaker 4: lectured by people who are clearly the beneficiaries of unearned privilege,
27:31
Speaker 4: like Ben Shapiro some of them.
27:33
Speaker 1: So let's just give you context him. So this is
27:36
Speaker 1: about the twenty dollars burrito. So I don't know, I
27:39
Speaker 1: didn't cover it in my show about the twenty dollars burrito,
27:43
Speaker 1: you know, so kids not kids, I mean gen z
27:47
Speaker 1: Is I guess on the right have been complaining about
27:52
Speaker 1: twenty dollar burritos and the cost of living and they
27:56
Speaker 1: can't afford a house and they can't afford to live.
27:59
Speaker 1: They can't afford to know it's twenty bucks. And Ben
28:03
Speaker 1: Shapiro who went on and said, twenty dollars burrito, Really,
28:06
Speaker 1: Britas don't really cost twenty dollars. And you guys are
28:11
Speaker 1: making more income and have more wealth at your age
28:14
Speaker 1: than any previous generation anyway, I mean, Mitchard were basically said,
28:19
Speaker 1: you guys are overblowing this. Stop it. You know, they're
28:21
Speaker 1: hysteria about the evil of America. America's not doing this bad.
28:26
Speaker 1: America's doing quite well. I mean, I don't think it's
28:30
Speaker 1: doing that well, but it's doing quite well. It's not
28:33
Speaker 1: doing as badly as the left, fall left and fall
28:37
Speaker 1: right would like to suggest. We're all about to starve
28:40
Speaker 1: and we can't afford the twenty dollars burrito. And it's
28:42
Speaker 1: only a few people, the billionaires and trillion is that
28:45
Speaker 1: are making they have a lot of money, and the
28:47
Speaker 1: rest of us just being whited out. By the way,
28:51
Speaker 1: a burrito at I think it's Chipotle who has burritos,
28:54
Speaker 1: with Chipolto has burritos. A burrito at Chipoltar costs less
29:05
Speaker 1: inflation adjusted or amount of work needed to buy it.
29:10
Speaker 1: Basis than it did twenty years ago. But if you
29:15
Speaker 1: want a super duper incredible burrito with lobster, and I'm
29:22
Speaker 1: sure if you added truffles it would be even more. Yes,
29:25
Speaker 1: it costs twenty dollars at a fancy pants burrito store.
29:31
Speaker 1: But that's the thing. House prices skyrocketing. Yeah, houses double
29:37
Speaker 1: the triple the size of what your parents and grandparents bought.
29:41
Speaker 1: So yes, it's more expensive, But on a pass square
29:44
Speaker 1: foot basis, is it that much more expensive? Not so much.
29:49
Speaker 1: But you see, these are the kind of things nobody
29:51
Speaker 1: wants to hear. They're complaining, they're bitching and complaining, and
29:55
Speaker 1: they really feel the pain they cost up living is high.
29:57
Speaker 1: They can't afford anything. They really really suffering. And you
30:02
Speaker 1: tell them, no, you're the richest generation ever. They're not interested.
30:05
Speaker 1: You tell them, oh, the house price is high because
30:08
Speaker 1: you know, if you wanted a fifteen hundred square foot place,
30:11
Speaker 1: you could afford it. Yeah, if you want the four
30:14
Speaker 1: thousand square foot place, maybe, yeah, that's expensive, But your
30:18
Speaker 1: parents and grandparents didn't have the four thousand square foot place.
30:21
Speaker 1: They started in a fifteen hundred square foot place or smaller.
30:27
Speaker 1: So Bensi wrote I guess pointed stuff like this out,
30:30
Speaker 1: and now tech Cocosta is really really upset. Of course,
30:36
Speaker 1: tech Cocosta wants to be on the side of the
30:38
Speaker 1: far right, of the MAGA crazies, of the people who
30:42
Speaker 1: want to complain, and want to complain, by the way,
30:44
Speaker 1: right now, want to complain about the Trumpet administration. Trumpet
30:48
Speaker 1: adminstration is causing the burritos to be twenty bucks. Not
30:51
Speaker 1: the lobster. It's not the lobster in the burrito. It's
30:54
Speaker 1: not the truffles in the burrito. It's not the fancy
30:57
Speaker 1: fancy you know location you're buying the burrito farm, or
31:00
Speaker 1: the fancy you know staw you're buying it from. No, no, no,
31:05
Speaker 1: it's nothing to do with that. It's Trump. And you know,
31:09
Speaker 1: in his policies, in his co market policies, he's too
31:13
Speaker 1: pro capitalism. That's the problem with Trump. He relies on
31:16
Speaker 1: the markets. What we really need, what we really really
31:20
Speaker 1: really need, are price controls over burritos. All right, let's
31:25
Speaker 1: go back to Tucker Cossa, and notice now he's going
31:28
Speaker 1: to say Ben Shapiro is privileged. Privileged. That's a word
31:33
Speaker 1: instituted and made popular by the left you don't notice
31:40
Speaker 1: how the far awright keeps adopting leftist terminology, leftist ideas
31:46
Speaker 1: and leftist terms privilege. Ben Shapiro is privileged. Why is
31:52
Speaker 1: he privileged? Why is Ben Shapiro privileged?
31:57
Speaker 4: Like Ben Shapiro somehow got into Harvard Law School despite
32:01
Speaker 4: a middling IQ.
32:03
Speaker 1: So Ben Shapiro has a middling IQ. He got into
32:06
Speaker 1: Hubbard Law School in spite of the fact that he
32:09
Speaker 1: has a middling IQ. Now I'm only to bet pretty
32:12
Speaker 1: much anything that Ben Shapah's IQ is higher than Tucker
32:16
Speaker 1: Castles and Tucker custom is no slouch. I think he's
32:19
Speaker 1: pretty smart, but Min Shaville is really smart. I mean,
32:22
Speaker 1: he's probably got a higher IQ than I have. He's smart,
32:27
Speaker 1: as you know. I don't think much of IQ's to
32:29
Speaker 1: beginning with. But why is the care Casson demeaning Ben
32:35
Speaker 1: Shapiro's IQ. It seems stupid, It seems uh low and unfounded.
32:45
Speaker 1: On what basis would you decide that you know Ben
32:49
Speaker 1: Shavilla's a low IQ. Has has he done any tests?
32:54
Speaker 1: I mean, just you know, his ability to play the violin,
32:58
Speaker 1: his ability to talk is fast as he does his
33:02
Speaker 1: ability you have to cuff to talk, you know intelligently.
33:06
Speaker 1: Ben Shapiro is not a low IQ guy. No, I
33:10
Speaker 1: know plenty of people who probably went to Harvard Law
33:12
Speaker 1: School who probably are low IQU, not Ben Shabuin. So
33:19
Speaker 1: where does the privileged comfort who got it into Harvard
33:23
Speaker 1: Law Excuse me? Who the sneeze was there? Maybe it's
33:32
Speaker 1: gone all right, let's let's.
33:36
Speaker 4: The beneficiaries of unearned privile like Ben Shapiro, who somehow
33:39
Speaker 4: got into Harvard Law School despite a middling IQ. How
33:44
Speaker 4: did that happen? Never asked people like that have no
33:49
Speaker 4: standing at all to lecture the rest of America's young people.
33:55
Speaker 1: About whether they have no standing telecture Amaicans? Why don't
33:59
Speaker 1: they have any stand? He telection makers? Because the privileged
34:02
Speaker 1: how did he get into Harvard Law School? There's the
34:04
Speaker 1: implication of somebody. We'll get into the next clip where
34:08
Speaker 1: that application becomes a lot more significant implication.
34:11
Speaker 5: You know that. I don't know.
34:12
Speaker 1: The Mossad got him into Harvard, The Jews got him
34:16
Speaker 1: into Harvard, These ready governments somehow got him into Harvard
34:19
Speaker 1: Law School. The people he works for, does Ben who
34:23
Speaker 1: does bench work for the people who works for got
34:27
Speaker 1: him into Harvard Law School? He never earned it. How
34:31
Speaker 1: do how do how do we know this?
34:33
Speaker 2: Well?
34:33
Speaker 1: Techiccass doesn't have to prove anything, he just tes to
34:36
Speaker 1: claim it. He just tes to insinuate it. Bench bears ally, Q,
34:42
Speaker 1: Why how do you know this is your evidence? It
34:45
Speaker 1: doesn't matter.
34:48
Speaker 5: Asked.
34:50
Speaker 4: People like that have no standing at all to lecture
34:54
Speaker 4: the rest of America's young people.
34:58
Speaker 5: About whether or not they complain.
35:00
Speaker 4: But they're clearly declining standard of living and their future prospects.
35:04
Speaker 5: They have no standing at all, But they do it anyway.
35:08
Speaker 5: Now why do they do it?
35:09
Speaker 1: So? Maybe? So why do they do it? So we'll
35:14
Speaker 1: turn to uh, We'll turn to h to who he
35:18
Speaker 1: thinks Ben Shapiro really is and why he does it.
35:21
Speaker 1: You know, he's trying to trying to undermine America. They're
35:24
Speaker 1: trying to undermine American youth and ultimately trying to get
35:27
Speaker 1: American youth to go die for Israel. That's really why
35:31
Speaker 1: why he's doing it. Here is here is uh. Let's
35:36
Speaker 1: go to the second clip and you can see right
35:40
Speaker 1: off the bat, you've got a little thing here. Ben
35:42
Speaker 1: Shapiro is created by Israel, getting him into law school
35:47
Speaker 1: and making Daily Wire successful. Israel did all that. Who
35:53
Speaker 1: why doesn't Isel do that for me? I you know,
35:56
Speaker 1: I'm a big supporter. I like Israel doing that for me,
36:06
Speaker 1: all right, clearly declining standard living, he says, I mean
36:10
Speaker 1: no prospects of the future. He says. Demagogues have to
36:17
Speaker 1: create a sense of emergency, a sense of catastrophe, a
36:22
Speaker 1: sense of you know, impeding doom in order to justify
36:28
Speaker 1: their authoritarian solutions. I mean Trump did this in twenty sixteen,
36:33
Speaker 1: very very well, and I think he won because of it.
36:39
Speaker 1: And Tucker Cousin and most of the far right are
36:44
Speaker 1: very good at this. That the Lift's gonna take anything over,
36:46
Speaker 1: the Jews are gonna take anything over. Israel is gonna
36:49
Speaker 1: you know, American troops are dying all over the world
36:51
Speaker 1: for Israel, and we have no foul policy. We're just
36:54
Speaker 1: subsiding to Israel. And the whole points, the whole point
37:01
Speaker 1: is to create the sense of doom. So when you
37:04
Speaker 1: come up with crazy solutions, well yeah, I mean, if
37:07
Speaker 1: there was gonna end tom up, we got to be
37:09
Speaker 1: radical in our solutions. We can't be timid. We got
37:11
Speaker 1: to go all out, we gotta we gotta really do it.
37:16
Speaker 1: So tuck us all in on the Doom and Gloom
37:20
Speaker 1: on the doom and glue. All right, let's uh, let's
37:23
Speaker 1: listen to uh uh Tucker.
37:26
Speaker 4: We're not playing this to suggest that Ben Shapiro was
37:29
Speaker 4: like a shaper of history, a mover in American politics.
37:33
Speaker 1: He's not.
37:34
Speaker 5: He's an employee like most everybody else he's.
37:38
Speaker 1: Notice how he snuck that in, right? He is an
37:41
Speaker 1: employee like everybody else. Now, why is he saying that?
37:47
Speaker 1: Like Ben Shapiro owns The Daily Wire, is one of
37:49
Speaker 1: the founders, one of the owners, He runs his own podcast,
37:53
Speaker 1: YouTube channel, whatever, Why is he referring to him as
37:58
Speaker 1: an employee like everybody else who is employing Ben Shapiro.
38:03
Speaker 1: Notice how you know how brilliant this is. I mean,
38:06
Speaker 1: he's a He's a great demagogue. You plant these seeds
38:11
Speaker 1: in people's minds. Ben Shapiro and employees works for somebody?
38:15
Speaker 1: Who does he work for? Oh? And and you don't
38:20
Speaker 1: you don't, You don't explain, you don't articulate reasons. You
38:25
Speaker 1: just say it as if it's absolute, unequivoctly truth. You
38:29
Speaker 1: say it with conviction. Evan Is says, uh Pike is
38:40
Speaker 1: a creep? What a godless mouth? May FBI Severale, This
38:44
Speaker 1: creepy radical Tucker's just as much of a creep as Piking,
38:50
Speaker 1: Just as much of a creepers Assn Piking, Hassan pikm
38:53
Speaker 1: I justified Mao and Stalin and and Tucker cousin is
38:58
Speaker 1: well in his way to justifying Hitler, so just as
39:01
Speaker 1: much of a creep. Discuss anyway. Ben Shapiro is an employee.
39:13
Speaker 5: In politics.
39:13
Speaker 1: He's not.
39:15
Speaker 4: He's an employee like most everybody else. He's doing what
39:18
Speaker 4: he's told. He represents larger interests. Obviously, he's doing what
39:22
Speaker 4: he's told. He represents the larger interests. Obviously, don't question me.
39:27
Speaker 4: There's no point he questioned me. I know the truth.
39:30
Speaker 1: It's obvious. If you can't see it, you're blind. If
39:33
Speaker 1: you don't know IVS loy Q, you're stupid. If you
39:36
Speaker 1: can't see that he's being basically serving other interests, you're hopeless.
39:44
Speaker 4: Sleep So why bother to replay and then rebut something
39:50
Speaker 4: that Ben Shapiro said well in an effort to speak
39:54
Speaker 4: to the people who put him up to it.
39:56
Speaker 1: So he doesn't want to speak to Ben Shapiro. Ben
39:59
Speaker 1: Shaba's nothing, He's a cog. He's an employee. He wants
40:03
Speaker 1: to speak to the people who put him up to it.
40:05
Speaker 1: Those are the people the Taka Cossa is concerned about.
40:08
Speaker 4: So the whole point of Ben Shapiro, and there is
40:11
Speaker 4: a point to Ben Shapiro. This is not like some
40:13
Speaker 4: organic phenomenon like Ben Shapiro was just so charming and
40:15
Speaker 4: brilliant that he somehow got into Harvard Law School and
40:18
Speaker 4: then eyebrows and all emerged as a social media titan.
40:21
Speaker 1: No, you know not how he did that. Somehow got
40:25
Speaker 1: into Harvard, somehow became a social media titan. And he
40:28
Speaker 1: throws the eyebrows in there as kind of a stupid
40:32
Speaker 1: ad hominem personal insult about his face. And he says
40:38
Speaker 1: it with a straight face, he says without any doubt.
40:41
Speaker 1: He says it without giving you any reason to think
40:45
Speaker 1: that he does not have possession of the absolute truth. Here.
40:50
Speaker 1: This guy's really evil, really evil and sophisticated.
40:55
Speaker 5: Well, of course not.
40:57
Speaker 4: Ben Shapiro had a deal with Facebook, a deal no
41:01
Speaker 4: one else got.
41:02
Speaker 5: And so the point of.
41:03
Speaker 4: Ben Shapiro was, here's a way to send a very
41:07
Speaker 4: specific message, to outline and sell a very specific worldview
41:11
Speaker 4: to young people. Ben Shapiro is an old person's idea
41:15
Speaker 4: of a young person. He is a spokesman for a
41:20
Speaker 4: group of older people.
41:21
Speaker 1: A group of older people people are I wonder if
41:24
Speaker 1: they have a particular ethic or religious affiliation. Who would
41:29
Speaker 1: those be? Who are these older people who are manipulating,
41:33
Speaker 1: who are driving? Who got benchmiat of it and made
41:38
Speaker 1: his media company a success? Who are these older.
41:43
Speaker 4: People aimed at younger people? I have an idea. Let's
41:48
Speaker 4: get Ben Shapiro, This guy Ben Sjambers. He's brilliant, he's
41:51
Speaker 4: a really promising young kid, and we'll get him to
41:54
Speaker 4: sell free market economics and a robust Reaganite foreign policy
41:57
Speaker 4: to the young folks the way I kind of worked
42:00
Speaker 4: for a while thanks to the trans movement, which you
42:02
Speaker 4: suspect they also kind of concocted.
42:08
Speaker 1: Do you get that? That went very quickly? Right? So
42:12
Speaker 1: it worked for a while, right, thanks for the trans movement,
42:18
Speaker 1: because man Shapiro's anti trans, so people listened to him,
42:21
Speaker 1: and they got the free market stuff as a bonus,
42:24
Speaker 1: I guess. And then he says a movement that they
42:30
Speaker 1: also concocted. Probably right, let's hear it again.
42:33
Speaker 4: And we'll get him to sell free market economics in
42:36
Speaker 4: a robust Reaganite foreign policy to the young folks. And
42:40
Speaker 4: by the way, I kind of worked for a while
42:42
Speaker 4: thanks to the Trans Movement, which you suspect they also
42:44
Speaker 4: kind of concocted.
42:46
Speaker 1: So these old people who we don't know who they are,
42:48
Speaker 1: right they I have my suspicions. But these old people,
42:54
Speaker 1: you know, god Ben Shapiro, and then, you know, to
42:56
Speaker 1: make Ben Shapiro success, they created the Trans move movement
43:00
Speaker 1: in Odi so that Ben could criticize the Trans movement,
43:04
Speaker 1: which made him a big shot. Supposedly all this was
43:06
Speaker 1: made up so he could he could, you know, do
43:11
Speaker 1: their bidding in convincing young people of a reagunite foreign
43:16
Speaker 1: policy and free markets. Wow, I mean it's all pretty
43:25
Speaker 1: pretty amazing. You have to have to admit. I mean,
43:29
Speaker 1: these people are these old people are pretty sophisticated. I
43:31
Speaker 1: guess maybe I count as one of the old people.
43:36
Speaker 1: These old people never consulted me, they never asked me,
43:39
Speaker 1: and they certainly have not promoted me like they promoted
43:42
Speaker 1: Min Shapiro.
43:43
Speaker 5: The same group.
43:44
Speaker 4: But whatever wherever that came from. For a while, Ben
43:48
Speaker 4: Shapiro seemed like he was on the side of common
43:49
Speaker 4: sense and he's for free speech, and he's against the
43:51
Speaker 4: trans lunacy, et cetera, etcetera. But always from day one,
43:56
Speaker 4: the point was Ben Shapiro is going to sell this
43:59
Speaker 4: very specific version of economics, not capitalism, bears no resemblance
44:06
Speaker 4: to anything Adam Smith advocated for.
44:10
Speaker 1: Really, I mean, so now you know Tucker Colson is
44:14
Speaker 1: going to claim Adam Smith on his side is gonna,
44:18
Speaker 1: you know, claim somehow he hasn't insights into capitalism. And
44:23
Speaker 1: then Benchhabia was never about capitalism. It was about conyism,
44:27
Speaker 1: the conyism that exists today.
44:29
Speaker 4: But the kind of modern American monopoly arrangement where six
44:34
Speaker 4: countries companies can behave like countries, have sovereignty onlike our
44:39
Speaker 4: own nation, and control every part of your life through debt.
44:44
Speaker 1: Control every part of your life through debt. Remember we
44:48
Speaker 1: talked about Tucker Colson at the end of the day
44:50
Speaker 1: about having this idea that debt is slavery again, something
44:54
Speaker 1: he took directly from the fall left. Debt is slavery.
44:59
Speaker 1: That's a all left argument, dating back Demogs, probably maybe
45:06
Speaker 1: even earlier. I mean, this guy's a far left fall leftists.
45:16
Speaker 1: So what benchbu was really advocating for is not capitalism
45:20
Speaker 1: but monopoly, defense of tech monopolies according to Taka, and
45:26
Speaker 1: controlling your life through debt, which I guess the big
45:30
Speaker 1: tech companies do. I thought that was banks. Maybe the
45:35
Speaker 1: big tech companies control the banks to control your life.
45:39
Speaker 4: Which is kind of broad but fairly accurate definition of
45:43
Speaker 4: our current economic system.
45:44
Speaker 5: So sell that is it.
45:46
Speaker 4: And then sell the even harder to pitch idea that
45:50
Speaker 4: it's unpatriotic to oppose wars for Israel.
45:55
Speaker 1: Now we're getting to the crux of it. It's all
45:57
Speaker 1: about Israel. It's all about wars for Israel. It's I mean,
46:02
Speaker 1: this is the obsession. This is what Tucker has to
46:05
Speaker 1: talk about every single show he has, I mean, his
46:08
Speaker 1: hatred of Israel and by extension, the Jews. And don't
46:14
Speaker 1: forget who the bankers are, who you're enslaved to with
46:17
Speaker 1: the debt. Bankers are I mean, always, always have been
46:23
Speaker 1: just code named for more Jews. So it's all about
46:27
Speaker 1: Israel and the Jews.
46:28
Speaker 4: Like, first of all, it's obviously anti Semitic. I mean,
46:30
Speaker 4: it's just an expression of hate. If you don't want
46:32
Speaker 4: to regime change some country you can't find on a map, Obviously,
46:35
Speaker 4: you're a bigot.
46:36
Speaker 1: You're basically well, maybe if you can't find it in
46:38
Speaker 1: a map, maybe you should think about all the Americans
46:41
Speaker 1: that that country has killed. Maybe it's time to get
46:44
Speaker 1: an education in geography and actually find it on a map.
46:49
Speaker 1: But Tucker's never going to tell you about other people
46:52
Speaker 1: UoN has killed. No, and Tucker's is going to pretend
46:55
Speaker 1: that the only reason in America is in any kind
46:58
Speaker 1: of conflict with Yuon for the last fifty years, is
47:03
Speaker 1: forty something, is forty seven years or whatever is because
47:06
Speaker 1: of Israel. That's news to the hostages who are taking
47:10
Speaker 1: the embassy. It's news to all the Americans who were
47:12
Speaker 1: killed by Iranians over the decades. It's news to all
47:17
Speaker 1: the soldiers who were killed in Iraq because of the Uranians.
47:22
Speaker 1: But Teck, I'll never tell you about anything you Wan
47:25
Speaker 1: has done that is hopeful. He is a friend to
47:28
Speaker 1: Islam after all, into ISLAMI.
47:30
Speaker 4: Countries, those wars for Israel, Like, first of all, it's
47:34
Speaker 4: obviously anti Semitic. I mean, it's just an expression of hate.
47:37
Speaker 4: If you don't want to regime change some country you
47:39
Speaker 4: can't find on a map, obviously you're a bigot. You're
47:41
Speaker 4: basically a Nazi.
47:43
Speaker 1: And note that he says to stuff and again he
47:46
Speaker 1: doesn't have to explain, doesn't have a articulate, just says
47:48
Speaker 1: it is a fact. And then you know, he goes
47:52
Speaker 1: into his own you know, his own record about World
47:56
Speaker 1: War Two. No how he's dismissing it. Now, I was
48:00
Speaker 1: completely you know, oh yeah, people just say that because
48:03
Speaker 1: I oppose Israel, it's all about Israel.
48:05
Speaker 5: In fact, you must be for Hitler.
48:07
Speaker 4: You probably are opposed the second World War two, probably
48:10
Speaker 4: a problems with Churchill, don't you.
48:12
Speaker 1: Didn't you platform a guy who has clearly problems with
48:16
Speaker 1: Churchill who you were nodding along and saying yes, yess
48:19
Speaker 1: and supporting and sanctioning. Did you do that? And you
48:23
Speaker 1: now were you know, changing your mind about that.
48:28
Speaker 4: It's literally immoral to oppose Ben Shapiro's employer's foreign policy.
48:35
Speaker 1: His employee is FIGN policy. Note again employers who employs it.
48:41
Speaker 4: But it's also an American like this country was founded
48:44
Speaker 4: to fight wars for Israel.
48:45
Speaker 5: That's why we're here.
48:46
Speaker 1: Notice this ridiculous.
48:48
Speaker 4: Our founder said explicitly America exists as a juday of
48:52
Speaker 4: Christian country to support Israel.
48:53
Speaker 1: This is arguable.
48:55
Speaker 4: So whatever whatever prime minister of that country wants, we're doing.
48:58
Speaker 4: I mean, that's why we're here. So if you're a
49:00
Speaker 4: against it, you don't believe in America, you're against America,
49:03
Speaker 4: why don't you just leave? People will revoke your green
49:05
Speaker 4: CARDO don't have a green card, will strip your citizenship.
49:08
Speaker 4: And that's what ICE exists to do. Now, in any case,
49:12
Speaker 4: you should know watching this that these are not just
49:13
Speaker 4: Ben Shapiro's opinions.
49:15
Speaker 5: The extend he actually has opinions, who knows, but these are.
49:18
Speaker 4: The opinions of the people who prop up Ben Shapiro,
49:20
Speaker 4: who created Ben Shapiro. And this is what they think.
49:24
Speaker 4: This is the argument they sincerely believe apparently is going
49:28
Speaker 4: to appeal to young people who are worried about the
49:30
Speaker 4: price of burrito.
49:32
Speaker 1: We'll not so here he's gone full circle. It's a
49:35
Speaker 1: price of burritos. But and Ben Shapiro, you know, criticizing
49:41
Speaker 1: or explaining why burritaz is expensive. You know, we don't
49:46
Speaker 1: know what Benchava really thinks. What matters is these are
49:50
Speaker 1: the opinions. What Ben Shavar's expressing are actually the opinions
49:55
Speaker 1: of his employer, The opinions of the people who created
49:59
Speaker 1: by Shippea, the opinions of the people who run Ben Shapiro,
50:04
Speaker 1: who manage Ben Shapil, which was just an employee, and
50:08
Speaker 1: who are these people? We never hear that, but it's
50:11
Speaker 1: obvious from all the windows, from all the subtexts. It's
50:18
Speaker 1: another you know, old people, counsel of elders of Zion,
50:23
Speaker 1: maybe elders, old elders of Zion, old Jews, you know,
50:30
Speaker 1: running the world. I mean, this is so stupid and
50:37
Speaker 1: so you know, so stupid and so ancient. There's nothing
50:44
Speaker 1: original on you here with what Techer costs, and he's
50:48
Speaker 1: just using, you know, the same old accusation against Jews
50:53
Speaker 1: and Tucker costs and Ben Shapurroh is just a fill
50:56
Speaker 1: in for his hatred and and for the fact that
51:00
Speaker 1: he still despises Israel and Jews more broadly. The guy's
51:06
Speaker 1: just become a pathetic joke. I don't know, I don't
51:12
Speaker 1: know what you want to call it, but it's about
51:16
Speaker 1: as bad as it gets. So yes, that is that
51:20
Speaker 1: is Taker Calsa attacking Ben Shapiro in that one. I
51:23
Speaker 1: stand with Ben Shapiro one hundred percent. Ben Shapiro without
51:27
Speaker 1: any doubt is smart. Ben Shapiro is very pro American.
51:31
Speaker 1: I think he understands what America is and what is
51:35
Speaker 1: unique about America better than Tucker Causon. Ever, has Ben
51:39
Speaker 1: Schapper is right about economics vis a VI Tucker Causon.
51:44
Speaker 1: I'm pretty much every topic. Ben Shapiro is better than
51:48
Speaker 1: Taker Colson is, and Ben Shapea succeeded because he's smart,
51:53
Speaker 1: He's entertaining, and people value his opinion. I think smart
51:57
Speaker 1: people value his opinion, so in that conflict. Now I
52:05
Speaker 1: have to say this because after this I watch some
52:08
Speaker 1: clips of Ben Shapiro. I think he was interviewed by
52:12
Speaker 1: Patrick Bindavid and the question Patrick Danndavid asked him was
52:18
Speaker 1: am I gonna see you and Tucker Corsa and have
52:21
Speaker 1: a conversation? And Ben Shapiro's answers, Oh, I've invited him
52:26
Speaker 1: a thousand times. I've tried. I want to have a
52:28
Speaker 1: conversation with Tucker, but Tecka says, no, Tucker won't do it.
52:31
Speaker 1: He won't do it. And in that sense, it's like, Ben,
52:38
Speaker 1: you deserve this, Like why are you granting Tucker anything?
52:45
Speaker 1: Why don't you just say that's scumbag. I will not
52:49
Speaker 1: have anywhere near me. He is a lying, deceiving, horrific
52:56
Speaker 1: human being, and I have no it just to platforminghim.
53:01
Speaker 1: I have no interest in appearing on the same stage
53:03
Speaker 1: as him. I have no interest in dealing with him.
53:09
Speaker 1: This is the problem with Ben Shapiro. He won't actually
53:12
Speaker 1: stand up for himself. He's a cello to himself. He
53:18
Speaker 1: won't stand up for his own values. He sells them out.
53:23
Speaker 1: The values them would suggest that you don't deal with
53:27
Speaker 1: your enemy, you don't promote your enemy, you don't negotiate
53:31
Speaker 1: with the enemy, and you don't debate people who lie
53:36
Speaker 1: about you the way Tucker Causon, for example, just blind
53:41
Speaker 1: about men. Why would he even contemplate going on Tucker
53:46
Speaker 1: Causis show, or having tech on his show, or having
53:48
Speaker 1: a debate somewhere. It's insane. He has no self esteem,
53:56
Speaker 1: no self for God. Also asked about would he debate
54:03
Speaker 1: Nick Frantis, and again he said, I wouldn't do it
54:07
Speaker 1: if he's gonna kid around. He's a comedian like the
54:11
Speaker 1: guy denies the Holocaust, supports Hitler is an explicit anti Semite.
54:19
Speaker 1: Why would you engage with him at any level in
54:23
Speaker 1: any format anyway? It truly is insane, it's self destructive,
54:36
Speaker 1: it's suicidal. I mean, it's why to some extent, I blame,
54:43
Speaker 1: you know, Ben Shapiro for Trump, because while he might
54:51
Speaker 1: criticize Trump on teriffts, he might criticize Trump on Iran,
54:57
Speaker 1: but him criticized seeing him so weakly and only a
55:03
Speaker 1: certain things rather than broadly about the phenomena of Trump.
55:10
Speaker 1: Ben Shapiro has helped make that phenomena possible. He is
55:13
Speaker 1: sanctioned evil. When you sanction evil, you make evil more powerful.
55:17
Speaker 1: By saincy Trump, he made Trump more powerful, and he's
55:20
Speaker 1: got a big enough audience that it matters. By sanctioning
55:24
Speaker 1: Tecker Cossa and Iniqfluantis, Ben Shapiro makes them more powerful.
55:28
Speaker 1: How can you treat Techer Cosson is legitimate on anything,
55:34
Speaker 1: on anything, after what he just said about you, I e.
55:40
Speaker 1: Ben Shapin, So Ben, wake up, wake up, Stop defending
55:47
Speaker 1: your enemies. You're better than this. Stop trying to appease
55:54
Speaker 1: everybody to the right the rights in some sense of you.
56:00
Speaker 1: You don't need Nick Foyantis, you don't need Tucker Calson.
56:07
Speaker 1: You need to take whatever principles you have more seriously
56:14
Speaker 1: and sneak by them and tell these bastards to go
56:18
Speaker 1: to hell, to go to hell. They don't deserve a
56:21
Speaker 1: minute of your time. I mean criticize that, but they
56:26
Speaker 1: don't deserve a sanction, which is what a meeting, a
56:29
Speaker 1: friendly chats, a conversation, or even a debate. All right,
56:38
Speaker 1: let's move on from Ben Shapiro and Tucker Calson. Let's
56:49
Speaker 1: go to Mamdani says, you know, mam, Donnie's big thing
56:53
Speaker 1: is cost of living. Rents are going up. He wants
56:56
Speaker 1: to solve the rent problem in New York and for
56:59
Speaker 1: that he had the original never tried before idea, never
57:03
Speaker 1: tried before idea of rent control in New York City
57:10
Speaker 1: and expanding it and maybe even public ownership, which really exists,
57:15
Speaker 1: but expanding public ownership of rent of properties in New
57:18
Speaker 1: York City. And he's put all this into place, and
57:24
Speaker 1: the consequence are pretty fast. I mean, people adjust to
57:28
Speaker 1: these new circumstances pretty quickly, and as you expect, rents
57:34
Speaker 1: are plummeted in New York City. No, not the average
57:44
Speaker 1: price tag for place to live in New York City,
57:47
Speaker 1: in Manhattan. I think it's in Manhattan. Yeah, Manhattan has
57:52
Speaker 1: just hit a Joe dropping six thousand, six hundred and
57:55
Speaker 1: fifty five dollars a month, which is an all time high.
58:00
Speaker 1: Now I should know, yeah, people who are worried about
58:07
Speaker 1: cost of living should probably are worried about paying that
58:10
Speaker 1: kind of rent.
58:11
Speaker 2: You know.
58:11
Speaker 1: One way to deal with that is to leave New
58:13
Speaker 1: York City. You can get a pretty amazing place in
58:18
Speaker 1: other parts of the country for six six hundred and
58:20
Speaker 1: fifty five dollars a month. Anyway, this is a ten
58:27
Speaker 1: percent jump from a year ago, and the culprit is
58:33
Speaker 1: clearly the incoming rent freezers. People are raising rents now
58:38
Speaker 1: because they're going to be frozen soon. And then there's
58:42
Speaker 1: also the tax. The tax is going to squeeze the
58:46
Speaker 1: market even higher. This tax on apartments that are not
58:51
Speaker 1: occupied a significant part of the year, right, and then
58:56
Speaker 1: there's a record low number of vacant apartments because, in
59:00
Speaker 1: spite of my pleading, most people want to live in
59:02
Speaker 1: New York. A lot of people want to live in
59:04
Speaker 1: New York. They like living New York. They indeed willing
59:07
Speaker 1: to pay six six hundred and fifty five dollars a
59:09
Speaker 1: month for an average apartment in New York. The median
59:16
Speaker 1: rent that was that was the that was the average
59:20
Speaker 1: the median rent, so fifty percent of higher, fifty percent
59:23
Speaker 1: of lower. It's and ninety five dollars, which is up
59:27
Speaker 1: six percent from last July. So it's been going up.
59:35
Speaker 1: It's been going up. Every size apartment is getting hit.
59:41
Speaker 1: Average prices up double digits for two and three bedrooms.
59:45
Speaker 1: Studios now average four thousand and eighty eight dollars. Imagine
59:50
Speaker 1: you know, paying four thousand dollars a month for studio,
59:54
Speaker 1: which is up eight percent. One bedroom apartments at eighty six,
1:00:00
Speaker 1: up seven percent, two bedrooms up thirteen percent to eight
1:00:04
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, and three bedrooms are averaging a staggering twelve
1:00:09
Speaker 1: two hundred and twenty eight thousand dollars. How do you
1:00:13
Speaker 1: raise a family in New York when you're paying twelve thousand,
1:00:16
Speaker 1: two hundred and twenty eight dollars a month for rent.
1:00:23
Speaker 1: I mean, that's that's a huge amount of money. And
1:00:26
Speaker 1: that's for a three bedroom apartment now probably not a
1:00:28
Speaker 1: very big one. Vacancy rate is one point four to nine,
1:00:39
Speaker 1: the tightest that's been since nineteen sixty eight, down for
1:00:42
Speaker 1: one point five seven previously, anything hundred five percent is
1:00:48
Speaker 1: a landowner landloaders market, so rents go up. Now, of course,
1:00:51
Speaker 1: the solution of this we all know. We all know
1:00:55
Speaker 1: what the solution is, more apartments, more rental properties. State
1:01:02
Speaker 1: registration data are self supported by landlords, show about fifty
1:01:06
Speaker 1: seven thousand rents stabilized apartments set empty. Why are they
1:01:10
Speaker 1: sitting empty because it's not worth the while of the
1:01:16
Speaker 1: landlord to rent them out at the rates the rent
1:01:22
Speaker 1: stabilization has set. That's about five point six percent of
1:01:29
Speaker 1: the regulated stock. So more and more apartments that are
1:01:34
Speaker 1: rent stabilized, rent control rates stabilized. It's such a a
1:01:40
Speaker 1: misleading term when controlled by the government, city governed. In
1:01:44
Speaker 1: this case, five six percent of those apartments are empty
1:01:50
Speaker 1: because to clean them up and to renovate them and
1:01:53
Speaker 1: to get them out to spec would cost so much
1:01:56
Speaker 1: money you couldn't make it back given the rents that
1:01:59
Speaker 1: the controllers allow. You allow you. It's your property, you know,
1:02:05
Speaker 1: to charge. So yeah, I mean, if you look at
1:02:11
Speaker 1: New York state and city regulations, things like good cause
1:02:16
Speaker 1: evictions making it very difficult to evict attendance who's not
1:02:19
Speaker 1: paying you, The Fair Act and the twenty nineteen rent
1:02:25
Speaker 1: laws have all basically created a perfect storm for high
1:02:30
Speaker 1: rent and have taken a bunch of apartments off the market. Right.
1:02:39
Speaker 1: So yeah, and what is the single most important thing
1:02:41
Speaker 1: to New York voters cost of living. So let's elect
1:02:46
Speaker 1: a mayor who's going to raise the cost of living
1:02:50
Speaker 1: by restricting even further the number of apartments available for rent.
1:02:54
Speaker 1: That is shrinking supply. And we know what happens when
1:02:58
Speaker 1: you shrink supply. When you shrink supply, places go up.
1:03:03
Speaker 1: When you artificially shrink supply, prices have to go up.
1:03:08
Speaker 1: The incoming rent freeze is just gonna make things worse.
1:03:12
Speaker 1: It's gonna it's gonna apply to more more landlords, more
1:03:17
Speaker 1: apartments will go off market, and ultimately prices of the
1:03:21
Speaker 1: unfrozen rent are going to go up more significantly. Right.
1:03:27
Speaker 1: I mean, the tenants in the apartments that are going
1:03:30
Speaker 1: to be frozen, they benefit. But anybody out there in
1:03:35
Speaker 1: the marketplace, those prices are going to continue to go up,
1:03:40
Speaker 1: continue to go up. The rent freeze, by the way,
1:03:42
Speaker 1: officially kicks in October first, So I will update you
1:03:47
Speaker 1: after that, and and we will we will see. But
1:03:50
Speaker 1: this is this is not a mystery. What's happening in
1:03:52
Speaker 1: New York is completely expected and it's a seek economics
1:04:00
Speaker 1: one on one. Nothing about this should surprise anybody.
1:04:09
Speaker 6: All right, let me just see where we are. All right, there, oops,
1:04:21
Speaker 6: one second, there we go.
1:04:24
Speaker 1: We did cut out, we did rents. Okay, data centers.
1:04:27
Speaker 1: So data centers are becoming the issue that is uniting
1:04:33
Speaker 1: left and right. And here we're not talking about fall
1:04:35
Speaker 1: left and far right. We're talking about just plain left
1:04:38
Speaker 1: and right. A majority of Americans today pose to data centers.
1:04:43
Speaker 1: Aaron Brokeleiche famous environmentalist activists. There's a movie about a
1:04:52
Speaker 1: pretty good movie actually about whose environmental activism. The movie
1:05:00
Speaker 1: was good even if we disagreed with what was being depicted.
1:05:07
Speaker 1: Edinburgh Rich was on Real Time with Billmont on Friday,
1:05:10
Speaker 1: and she has spent the year mapping American towns that
1:05:16
Speaker 1: found out a data center was coming only after the
1:05:18
Speaker 1: bulldozers arrived. So she's got like the thousands of reports
1:05:24
Speaker 1: from all fifty states and where this big facility shows up,
1:05:30
Speaker 1: A big facility that can consume millions of gallons of
1:05:33
Speaker 1: water a day. And yeah, artificial intelligence is just destroying
1:05:40
Speaker 1: this country. It's just going to destroy water. So take land.
1:05:45
Speaker 1: Let's start with land, just to give you a sense
1:05:48
Speaker 1: of how big this is? Whoops, Christmin and Wakefield a
1:05:54
Speaker 1: commercial real estate from the tracks these tracks Data sent
1:06:00
Speaker 1: Deals reposts that the average parcel bought for data center
1:06:05
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four ran a couple of one hundred acres.
1:06:10
Speaker 1: Scaled up by the computing capacity in the industry expects
1:06:13
Speaker 1: to have running by twenty thirty, and you get something
1:06:20
Speaker 1: around the size of Rhode Island. So the total amount
1:06:24
Speaker 1: of data centers in the United States, total land occupied
1:06:28
Speaker 1: by those data centers will be about the size of
1:06:30
Speaker 1: Rhode Islands. I mean, I don't know if that makes
1:06:34
Speaker 1: you feel like it's a huge amount over Rhode Island's
1:06:37
Speaker 1: a pretty small state. Nah, that's not big of a deal.
1:06:41
Speaker 1: Now compare that with ways we already use land. And
1:06:46
Speaker 1: this is, by the way, from a report written by
1:06:50
Speaker 1: Marion Twope maryon twopee. He was really really good guy
1:06:56
Speaker 1: on the Human Progress website human progress dot org. I
1:07:00
Speaker 1: highly recommend visiting Human part was talking oh periodically because
1:07:04
Speaker 1: they have some really interesting stuff. Anyway, he says, looks
1:07:09
Speaker 1: look at some other ways in which the federal government,
1:07:11
Speaker 1: for example, uses land. Federal government requires refiners to blend
1:07:16
Speaker 1: corn ethanol into gasoline do you know how much space
1:07:22
Speaker 1: growing corn for use as ethanol? How much space that
1:07:27
Speaker 1: takes up in the United States? About the size of
1:07:32
Speaker 1: New York State. So take New York state envision that
1:07:37
Speaker 1: is one big corn field. That's how much corn is
1:07:41
Speaker 1: being grown in the US because of the federal government
1:07:45
Speaker 1: mandate to blend corn ethanol into gasoline. Talk about a
1:07:53
Speaker 1: misallocation of resources. And that's big New York State, a
1:07:58
Speaker 1: lot bigger, a lot bigger than Rhode Island. Oh you know,
1:08:09
Speaker 1: take the agriculture department that pays farmers to leave a
1:08:13
Speaker 1: Kentucky sized area Kentucky size unplanted. So agriculture of our
1:08:21
Speaker 1: department pays farmers not to plant. Since two thousand, American
1:08:31
Speaker 1: farmland is shrunk by an area larger than Colorado. And
1:08:36
Speaker 1: we still make more food than ever, more stuff than
1:08:39
Speaker 1: ever because some of it's not food. Nobody seems to
1:08:43
Speaker 1: care about how land is being used in these cases.
1:08:45
Speaker 1: Why we suddenly care about how land is being used
1:08:48
Speaker 1: in data centers now? One of the arguments is we
1:08:52
Speaker 1: care because it uses up so much water. What are
1:08:56
Speaker 1: then that is not available for the local community. The
1:09:01
Speaker 1: water is ev operates. Yeah, the rainfall somewhere, but if
1:09:05
Speaker 1: falls somewhere else, and that could create problems with local
1:09:09
Speaker 1: community terms of access to water, price of water. But
1:09:15
Speaker 1: here again the issue the number of issues. One is well, yeah,
1:09:20
Speaker 1: I mean, if we privatize water and we priced it right,
1:09:24
Speaker 1: then there'd be a huge investment right now in discovering
1:09:29
Speaker 1: new sources of water. Maybe we'd be building desalination plants,
1:09:33
Speaker 1: which we should anyway in some parts of the United
1:09:35
Speaker 1: States because water would become so valuable. It's the exact
1:09:39
Speaker 1: issue about power. Residents are not going to pay higher
1:09:43
Speaker 1: power bills because it's going to come so profitable to
1:09:47
Speaker 1: build new pop plants to deal with the data centers.
1:09:50
Speaker 1: They we're going to get a huge, a huge build
1:09:54
Speaker 1: of power plants. They're going to actually drive prices lower,
1:09:57
Speaker 1: not higher. So okay, so there's an issue of water.
1:10:06
Speaker 1: But here's the thing. There are now multiple ways in
1:10:12
Speaker 1: which this can be dealt with. One, there is now
1:10:16
Speaker 1: a technology that Nvidia is presenting which is actually going
1:10:23
Speaker 1: to use fans right. Two cool the you know, the servers.
1:10:36
Speaker 1: The water is being used to cool the servers because
1:10:39
Speaker 1: you got these big buildings with thousands of servers running
1:10:43
Speaker 1: and they produce heat like a Nvidia chip can run
1:10:46
Speaker 1: at one hundred and thirteen degrees fahrenheit, So you could
1:10:54
Speaker 1: use something like a radiator and fans and have a
1:11:00
Speaker 1: close system with water not being lost. Now you need
1:11:07
Speaker 1: a lot of electricity because you need the fans. But okay,
1:11:10
Speaker 1: we know how to build pop lanes that can be
1:11:12
Speaker 1: dealt with. Microsoft does announced a design that circles the
1:11:18
Speaker 1: same fluid through a sealed loop past the chip and back.
1:11:22
Speaker 1: Google and Amazon and Microsoft already run sites untreated city
1:11:28
Speaker 1: wastewater those dirty chips rather than anything anyone would drink,
1:11:36
Speaker 1: So you know they are solution stalls. And we've already
1:11:41
Speaker 1: seen and I've talked about this on the show. If
1:11:43
Speaker 1: you think about consumption of water by these by these plants,
1:11:48
Speaker 1: and you compare the consumption of water by almond growers
1:11:50
Speaker 1: in California and things like that, I mean, it's it's ludicrous.
1:11:53
Speaker 1: We because of our crazy schemes of pricing water that
1:11:59
Speaker 1: are all run by the government, we favor the worst uses,
1:12:04
Speaker 1: not the best. Worst, not in the sense of there's
1:12:10
Speaker 1: any bad with almonds, but it's unbelievably wasteful to go
1:12:16
Speaker 1: almonds in California, and it wouldn't happen if water was
1:12:20
Speaker 1: priced by a market, not subsidized by government. So yeah,
1:12:31
Speaker 1: the technology to bring on site water use near zero
1:12:37
Speaker 1: already exists. And again, if you priced water appropriately, the
1:12:43
Speaker 1: incentive to employ these technologies would only increase. So you know,
1:12:52
Speaker 1: they this anti tech, this alarmists, this hysteria. The word's
1:12:57
Speaker 1: gonna end. We're gonna run out of water. I mean,
1:13:01
Speaker 1: the one of problems in the US, just to ask
1:13:04
Speaker 1: people in Arizona and in Nevada and in places like that,
1:13:09
Speaker 1: there were problems because of changing weather patterns. But you know,
1:13:18
Speaker 1: Brocker Rich and sadly also Bill Maher have this, you know,
1:13:24
Speaker 1: inherent suspicion of anything man made. Anything man made is
1:13:30
Speaker 1: a disaster for quote nature is a problem for nature.
1:13:39
Speaker 1: So I just wanted to update you on that. Let's see, Yeah,
1:13:45
Speaker 1: one more, this is a good story. So refunds on
1:13:48
Speaker 1: tariffs are being paid out to companies. We've talked about
1:13:51
Speaker 1: this that were billions of dollars. So far, over forty
1:13:55
Speaker 1: s and p five hundred companies have reported some nine
1:13:58
Speaker 1: point six billion in refunds in the past quarter or so,
1:14:02
Speaker 1: including at least two point one billion in cash already
1:14:05
Speaker 1: received among the biggest refunds of tariffs. The biggest is
1:14:12
Speaker 1: by Paul Apple two point two billion, nine hundred and
1:14:16
Speaker 1: eighty six million, FedEx at about eight hundred million, Amazon
1:14:20
Speaker 1: at six forty million, and General Motors at five hundred million.
1:14:24
Speaker 1: So this is literally the US Customs and Border Protection
1:14:27
Speaker 1: Agency sending checks. They received two hundred and fifty two
1:14:34
Speaker 1: thousand refund applications as of July thirty first for tariffs
1:14:39
Speaker 1: they were collected based unlawfully used law as determined by
1:14:46
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. So the customer Agency is accepted one hundred
1:14:52
Speaker 1: and twenty eight point seven billion in refunds for processing.
1:14:57
Speaker 1: And you know, the money is slowly lowing out. Now.
1:15:03
Speaker 1: The interesting thing about it, as their wallsee journal reports,
1:15:08
Speaker 1: is that the companies are now starting to refund this
1:15:11
Speaker 1: money to customers. I said then the other day on
1:15:15
Speaker 1: the show, the customers will never see it. Well, it
1:15:17
Speaker 1: turns out I was wrong. It turns out that a
1:15:22
Speaker 1: number of companies now actually sending checks to the people
1:15:32
Speaker 1: who they sold goods to where they passed on the
1:15:36
Speaker 1: cost of the tariff. Let's see, so, for example, fed
1:15:45
Speaker 1: Ex and UPS are both refunding the money they got
1:15:49
Speaker 1: from the government and then they're passing it on to customers. Idex,
1:15:57
Speaker 1: which sells pumps and valve to range of industries, said
1:16:03
Speaker 1: it expected to rebate fourteen point seven million dollars to customers.
1:16:07
Speaker 1: That is about two thirds of the more than twenty
1:16:09
Speaker 1: million in received. Now here's the big point, right, The
1:16:14
Speaker 1: big point is don't let anybody ever, god ever claim
1:16:20
Speaker 1: the foreigners pay the tariff. Should I say that again?
1:16:26
Speaker 1: Don't let anybody ever claim the foreigners pay the tariff.
1:16:31
Speaker 1: US companies and US consumers pay the tariff. As it
1:16:35
Speaker 1: suggests that by the fact that it's US customers, US
1:16:39
Speaker 1: companies and even customers who are getting the refunds. Yeah,
1:16:50
Speaker 1: it's uh so it's good to see these companies sending
1:16:55
Speaker 1: it to customers. I think it's the right thing to do.
1:16:57
Speaker 1: It's the competitive thing to do. And yeah, particular UPS
1:17:04
Speaker 1: and FedEx in particular because basically FedEx and UPS acted
1:17:08
Speaker 1: as customers brokers for imported packages. They received tariff refunds
1:17:13
Speaker 1: from the US government and they started to pass those
1:17:16
Speaker 1: refunds to the customers that originally paid the tariff. So
1:17:20
Speaker 1: you paid the tariff when you bought something, but FedEx
1:17:24
Speaker 1: and ups in a sense of applied for refunding your name.
1:17:29
Speaker 1: So these companies work, they worked for us. It's pretty amazing.
1:17:37
Speaker 1: All right, let's see where. Yeah, I didn't list this
1:17:49
Speaker 1: as a show topic, but what the hell? So you remember
1:17:52
Speaker 1: that story about President Trump media company that were selling
1:17:58
Speaker 1: for one hundred thousand dollars a month the Trump's tweets
1:18:04
Speaker 1: in advance of making them public so that people could
1:18:09
Speaker 1: trade on them anyway. Two media organizations have now sued
1:18:14
Speaker 1: Trump over the social media platform truth Social's news service
1:18:19
Speaker 1: offering faster access to his offer market moving posts. They
1:18:25
Speaker 1: called it extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional. The Intercept and the
1:18:31
Speaker 1: nonprofit and the nonprofit Freedom of the Press Foundation alleged
1:18:35
Speaker 1: that the truth Social offering runs afoul of the First
1:18:39
Speaker 1: Amendment guarantee of equal public access to the president's statements.
1:18:44
Speaker 1: I don't know if there's a guarantee in the First
1:18:45
Speaker 1: Amendment for that. Maybe it's some interpretation by the Supreme Court.
1:18:49
Speaker 1: And also that it violates a Fifth Amendment by granting
1:18:53
Speaker 1: preferessional preferential access for unreasonable sums. The suit asks the
1:19:00
Speaker 1: According New York to block the president for posting official
1:19:02
Speaker 1: government information exclusively on truth Social Now, this is going
1:19:06
Speaker 1: to be a really interesting one because I think it's
1:19:10
Speaker 1: reaching on the constitutionality. Yet it's clearly wrong, clearly and
1:19:15
Speaker 1: equivocally wrong. So it'll be interesting to see how a
1:19:19
Speaker 1: quote rules, if this ever makes it anywhere. This is
1:19:25
Speaker 1: one of the lawyers. This is what they wrote. The
1:19:28
Speaker 1: president here is using the power of the office to
1:19:30
Speaker 1: vastly enrich himself, and I think it's unprecedented in American history.
1:19:35
Speaker 1: In some ways, Trump is the Picasso of corruption. He
1:19:40
Speaker 1: comes up with schemes that just won't occur to UOI
1:19:44
Speaker 1: and the Truth Social one is an example of that. Now,
1:19:50
Speaker 1: the lawsuit also names as defendants the President's executive assistant
1:19:55
Speaker 1: Natalie Harp and the White House Deputy Chief of Staff
1:19:59
Speaker 1: Dan Scavine, you know, both who were in the in
1:20:02
Speaker 1: the food court escaping the seven seven. These are two
1:20:09
Speaker 1: ages that have access to President Trump's to social accounts,
1:20:13
Speaker 1: and that's why they're being sued. Anyway, I'm looking forward
1:20:19
Speaker 1: to seeing how this gets ruled on by the courts.
1:20:23
Speaker 1: It's it's going to be I mean, again, it's so
1:20:26
Speaker 1: explicitly corrupt, But what is the basis of outlawing it.
1:20:32
Speaker 1: It'll be interesting, all right. A few good news stories,
1:20:37
Speaker 1: a few human achievements stories. A county in North Carolina.
1:20:42
Speaker 1: High County in North Carolina actually is the first in
1:20:46
Speaker 1: the nation to deploy an e v T O L
1:20:50
Speaker 1: E and electric aircraft on a nine to eleven call.
1:20:57
Speaker 1: Height Counties EMS deployed a light train paramedic aboard an
1:21:02
Speaker 1: e How do you pronounce these e veto. They're going
1:21:06
Speaker 1: to have to figure out some better acronym, e veto,
1:21:12
Speaker 1: you know. So these at little one man planes that
1:21:16
Speaker 1: can take off and land with no space. And so
1:21:21
Speaker 1: this one arrived about twenty minutes ahead of an ambulance.
1:21:27
Speaker 1: And so there was during two recent emergency calls, a
1:21:31
Speaker 1: flight trained paramedic piloted the e Vetol aircraft directly to
1:21:36
Speaker 1: the patient. One on one call, The paramedic arrived about
1:21:42
Speaker 1: twenty minutes before a ground ambulance and began providing advanced
1:21:46
Speaker 1: life support while other crews were still in route. Official
1:21:52
Speaker 1: said the mission marked the first years of the e
1:21:54
Speaker 1: Vetol aircraft and routine emergency medical response in the United States.
1:21:59
Speaker 1: The program is designed to shorten the time between a
1:22:01
Speaker 1: nine to one to one dispatch and the arrival of
1:22:04
Speaker 1: advanced medical care, particularly in rural areas where long distance
1:22:08
Speaker 1: can delay ground ambulances. Now I'm waiting for it to
1:22:12
Speaker 1: be in cities where ambulances could get stuck in traffic. Uh.
1:22:17
Speaker 1: The follow the program followed months of planning and flight training,
1:22:21
Speaker 1: including more than three hundred training flights before the light
1:22:24
Speaker 1: mission began. Yeah, I mean it's it's really cool. So
1:22:28
Speaker 1: you're gonna start seeing these little aircraft flying around, landing
1:22:32
Speaker 1: on the spot, taking off one spot. These are and
1:22:36
Speaker 1: these of course need a pilot. Uh. But we're also
1:22:40
Speaker 1: seeing drones used for similar emergency like situations. So here's
1:22:48
Speaker 1: a case. Also, it happened, you know, recently an automated
1:22:53
Speaker 1: extended defibrillator was delivered by an ever drone Ever drones
1:23:00
Speaker 1: droned system that it was used in response to a
1:23:05
Speaker 1: confirmed out of hospital cardiac arrest involving a man in
1:23:09
Speaker 1: his sixties in Boras, Sweden. So this is a Sweden
1:23:14
Speaker 1: of the United States. On nineteen July twenty twenty six,
1:23:18
Speaker 1: the droners dispatched as part of a new standard emergency
1:23:24
Speaker 1: response and delivered and delivered the AED. This is the
1:23:29
Speaker 1: you know, the what do you call automated external deflator
1:23:32
Speaker 1: lator to the scene of the incident pry it to
1:23:36
Speaker 1: an ambulance arriving. Demand regained a pulse at the scene
1:23:40
Speaker 1: and was subsequently treated in a hospital. According to the
1:23:45
Speaker 1: CEO of ever Drone, the company that provided the drone,
1:23:49
Speaker 1: in cases of out of hospital cardiac arrest, the first
1:23:51
Speaker 1: few minutes a crucial. Ever Dron's drone system helps healthcare
1:23:56
Speaker 1: providers get an AED to the scene as early as possible,
1:24:00
Speaker 1: giving the patient the best possibility the best chance of survival.
1:24:06
Speaker 1: The drone flies autonomously to the emergency location and delivers
1:24:09
Speaker 1: the AED by lowering it on a winch from an
1:24:15
Speaker 1: altitude of approximately thirty meters. It's in suspected cardioc arrest cases,
1:24:21
Speaker 1: the drone is dispatched automatically in parallel with the ambulance. Now.
1:24:28
Speaker 1: In this case, the drone was dispatched from its local
1:24:30
Speaker 1: base and delivered the AED directly to the scene prior
1:24:34
Speaker 1: to the ambulance arrival. Bystanders immediately started CPR and attached
1:24:40
Speaker 1: the AED with guidance and support from the emergency dispatcher.
1:24:45
Speaker 1: So they told them exactly how to do it, and
1:24:48
Speaker 1: the AED analyzed the patient's heart rhythm and the defibrillation
1:24:52
Speaker 1: shock was delivered. The subsequent medical response was provided by
1:24:56
Speaker 1: the ambulance servers and the other emergency responses. So really
1:25:00
Speaker 1: cool stuff where you're getting where you're deploying stuff by
1:25:04
Speaker 1: drone right and you know, a defibrillator or in the
1:25:13
Speaker 1: other case of person, an actual medic to a location
1:25:18
Speaker 1: which we're getting an ambulance that is going to take
1:25:22
Speaker 1: a lot longer. These are really cool ways in which
1:25:24
Speaker 1: to deploy this technology. Here's another one. Tampa General Hospital, Tampa,
1:25:29
Speaker 1: Florida prepares to deploy first in the nation whole blood
1:25:34
Speaker 1: drone delivery program in partnership with Hillsboro County Fire Rescue
1:25:40
Speaker 1: and Archer First Responders Systems. So the hospital announced the
1:25:45
Speaker 1: launch of the system. The program, you know, basically will
1:25:50
Speaker 1: deliver when patients are hemorrhaging. It will deliver whole blood
1:25:56
Speaker 1: to the location by drone. When patients are hamaging, every
1:26:01
Speaker 1: minute without blood drastically decreases the chances of survival. This
1:26:07
Speaker 1: is a quote I guess from the CEO of the hospital.
1:26:09
Speaker 1: As far out as premier academic health system and a
1:26:13
Speaker 1: world class Level one trauma center, Tampa General offers patients
1:26:17
Speaker 1: in crisis the best chances at best possible outcomes. But
1:26:21
Speaker 1: we refuse to set up for the status quote, which
1:26:24
Speaker 1: is why we invest in the latest tech and pursue
1:26:27
Speaker 1: innovation solutions to reach patients faster with equipment and care
1:26:31
Speaker 1: they need. So anyway, drones and on delivering blood very cool.
1:26:39
Speaker 1: By what else did I have in this segment? Yeah,
1:26:43
Speaker 1: Grock Grok just announced its latest and greatest AI Grock
1:26:48
Speaker 1: four point six. Grock proprin sixes is the equivalent of
1:26:52
Speaker 1: ch GPT's latest and by the benchmarks, both of those
1:26:56
Speaker 1: rank just a little behind Fable Fable five max, which
1:27:01
Speaker 1: is andthropics and toropics. Uh, you know, uh main products.
1:27:10
Speaker 1: On some things, Grock is better than a topic and
1:27:14
Speaker 1: other things that falls further behind. But yes, this is
1:27:17
Speaker 1: one of the this is one of the main So
1:27:20
Speaker 1: competition among AI companies continues. Competition among uh the frontier
1:27:26
Speaker 1: companies continues. They keep matching each other and improving. This
1:27:31
Speaker 1: will also ultimately drive costs down for all of us.
1:27:35
Speaker 1: And of course they are all facing the competition from
1:27:37
Speaker 1: open source open source products that are coming from China,
1:27:42
Speaker 1: but also ultimately open source products that come from from
1:27:47
Speaker 1: the US, like like matters open source that you know
1:27:53
Speaker 1: will be released I think and I'm sure will be
1:27:55
Speaker 1: up there in terms of its capabilities. All right, so
1:28:00
Speaker 1: growuck full point six. All right, there's all of this
1:28:04
Speaker 1: other news that I'm gonna skip. All right, We'll do
1:28:09
Speaker 1: this other news another time. So that is the news,
1:28:14
Speaker 1: my friends for Thursday, August thirteenth. Thank you all for watching,
1:28:18
Speaker 1: Thank you all for being here, and we will turn
1:28:21
Speaker 1: to a super chat. We'll turn to a super chat
1:28:25
Speaker 1: just as soon as I think some of some of
1:28:31
Speaker 1: the promotions some of the people who supporting the Iron
1:28:40
Speaker 1: Book show. We'll start with Alex Epstein. Alex Epstein has
1:28:45
Speaker 1: is the number one expert in the world on all
1:28:47
Speaker 1: things energy and environmental regulation and the effect that has
1:28:52
Speaker 1: an ability to produce energy. Is also becoming a world
1:28:56
Speaker 1: class experts on data centers, So expect to see a
1:28:59
Speaker 1: lot of material out Alex on data centers if you
1:29:04
Speaker 1: want to, if you want Alex's talking points on all
1:29:06
Speaker 1: of these issues, if you're getting into conversations with friends, family,
1:29:10
Speaker 1: co workers, and you want the ammunition to be able
1:29:13
Speaker 1: to defend your position on things like data centers, check
1:29:16
Speaker 1: out Alex Epstein dot substack dot com. Alex Epstein dot
1:29:19
Speaker 1: substack dot com. The Iman Institute Iman Institute is UH
1:29:26
Speaker 1: has a conference in Austin, Texas in September eleventh through thirteenth.
1:29:30
Speaker 1: I believe if you're thirty five years or young guy,
1:29:34
Speaker 1: I think you can still apply for scholarship. Now, the
1:29:37
Speaker 1: link through the Iran dot oak slusybs doesn't seem to
1:29:41
Speaker 1: be working, but you can just search Google Irand Institute
1:29:46
Speaker 1: Conference Austin, Texas, twenty twenty six and you'll get the
1:29:50
Speaker 1: conference and on the conference page there's the application for scholarships.
1:29:54
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean it's up to seven hundred dollars,
1:29:57
Speaker 1: pay your tuition and some of your transportation costs. It's
1:30:01
Speaker 1: a it's an incredible deal. I know Lincoln, who's usually
1:30:04
Speaker 1: on here, has already got a scholarship. Moved the Defenders
1:30:14
Speaker 1: of Capitalism Defenders of Capitalism dot com Michael Williams's project,
1:30:17
Speaker 1: which I've been working with Michael on for many years.
1:30:24
Speaker 1: Defenders of Capitalism, you know, deploys its materials at the
1:30:32
Speaker 1: Leadership Program of the Rockies. Leadership Program of the Rockies
1:30:38
Speaker 1: is is a program that basically teaches people how to
1:30:43
Speaker 1: be good activists, how to how to go out there
1:30:50
Speaker 1: and try to change the world. And the education they
1:30:54
Speaker 1: get on capitalism is work class. It's it's the best.
1:31:00
Speaker 1: You know. It's stuff that Michael and I have built
1:31:04
Speaker 1: based on objectivism, and it covers politics, and it covers
1:31:10
Speaker 1: economics and importantly and what makes it unique is it
1:31:13
Speaker 1: covers it covers a philosophy, It covers morality, the morality
1:31:18
Speaker 1: of capitalism. What is my computer doing right now? Not
1:31:23
Speaker 1: behaving the way I wanted to? All Right? Anyway, you
1:31:28
Speaker 1: can sign up and attend the Leadership Program of the Rockies.
1:31:33
Speaker 1: And you don't have to be found the Rockies to
1:31:36
Speaker 1: actually attend this. You can. People fly in from all
1:31:39
Speaker 1: over the country. It's once a week, once a month
1:31:42
Speaker 1: on a Friday. It's a second Friday of every month
1:31:46
Speaker 1: for nine months. I mean, this is really intense. It's
1:31:49
Speaker 1: a really intense program. It's a whole date of talks
1:31:52
Speaker 1: and lectures and exercises where you get to practice communicating
1:31:58
Speaker 1: right and uh, you know, as I I speak there
1:32:04
Speaker 1: two three, three times a year. It's an excellent program.
1:32:09
Speaker 1: And I covered you to play uh you know, let
1:32:13
Speaker 1: me just find you the link. Sorry for some reason
1:32:21
Speaker 1: this is fighting me on on getting you that link.
1:32:29
Speaker 6: Huh.
1:32:34
Speaker 1: Let me just one second, all right, so you can
1:32:49
Speaker 1: go to Leadership program dot org. Leadership Program dot org,
1:32:56
Speaker 1: all right and hand a shot. Wealth finders shop Wealth
1:32:59
Speaker 1: dot com is uh. They have a they have a
1:33:03
Speaker 1: number of UH products that make it possible for you
1:33:06
Speaker 1: to save a lot of money and capital gains taxes. Uh.
1:33:10
Speaker 1: So check them out. Hand a shot wealth dot com,
1:33:13
Speaker 1: slash whybs, check out us of the interview I did
1:33:17
Speaker 1: with Robert hand a shot on on YouTube and on
1:33:20
Speaker 1: my channel on YouTube and playlists sponsors. There's the video
1:33:25
Speaker 1: and check it out. All right. Let's uh remind you
1:33:32
Speaker 1: that this program cannot exist without your support, right. It's
1:33:36
Speaker 1: your support that makes that pays for my time to
1:33:40
Speaker 1: research and uh and put together these new shows and
1:33:44
Speaker 1: then deliver these new shows. It's incredibly time consuming. And
1:33:51
Speaker 1: the way you pay for this to happen is through
1:33:55
Speaker 1: super chats, stickers. I haven't seen a lot of stickers today.
1:33:59
Speaker 1: We can definitely use some stickers because we're below the
1:34:01
Speaker 1: one hour goal, which is not a good place to be.
1:34:03
Speaker 1: We shouldn't be below the one hour goal, and our
1:34:07
Speaker 1: goal is to in a fifty an hour on here
1:34:09
Speaker 1: Live and then of course through Patreon, you too can
1:34:13
Speaker 1: help support this show by becoming a monthly support on Patreon.
1:34:16
Speaker 1: The monthly support is amazing, right because it's predictable, So
1:34:22
Speaker 1: please consider becoming a supporter on Patreon. You can also
1:34:25
Speaker 1: do it on PayPal dot com. So PayPal Patreon and
1:34:29
Speaker 1: just put you on book show in and sign up.
1:34:32
Speaker 1: Those of you are on live right now. If you're
1:34:34
Speaker 1: on some other platform other than the YouTube, come on
1:34:38
Speaker 1: over to YouTube see you can help support the show.
1:34:40
Speaker 1: And those of you on YouTube consider doing a stick
1:34:43
Speaker 1: on one dollar, two dollars, five dollars, fifty dollars, five
1:34:47
Speaker 1: hundred dollars, anything in that range is great. It all
1:34:51
Speaker 1: adds up. We're still about seventy five dollars short about
1:34:54
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty dollars goal, so please consider supporting
1:34:58
Speaker 1: us and getting us to that goal. But yeah, jump
1:35:03
Speaker 1: in and help us out. I'd very much appreciate it.
1:35:07
Speaker 1: All right, let's start with Liam says thought us a
1:35:10
Speaker 1: Nick Foyant is being placed on the no fly list.
1:35:12
Speaker 1: I haven't heard of that. Is this a rights violation
1:35:15
Speaker 1: or is it an objective national security threat? The federal
1:35:18
Speaker 1: government doesn't need to go before a judge to place
1:35:20
Speaker 1: someone on the no fly list. It's ridiculous. It's absolutely
1:35:25
Speaker 1: a violation of his of his rights. He is not
1:35:29
Speaker 1: a national security threat as far as I know, unless
1:35:32
Speaker 1: they have some real information that justifies this. As you know,
1:35:37
Speaker 1: he's scheming, he's involved in I don't know, white suprematist
1:35:41
Speaker 1: terrorist attacks or something like that. This is absolutely ridiculous.
1:35:46
Speaker 1: It's a violation of his First Amendment because clearly this
1:35:49
Speaker 1: is penalizing him on what he says. I hate Nick Foyantis.
1:35:53
Speaker 1: I despise Nickfoyantis. This is not how you deal with
1:35:56
Speaker 1: people you disagree with. This is clearly outside of what
1:36:01
Speaker 1: the US government should be doing, has the right to do.
1:36:09
Speaker 1: And let's hope that if it goes in front of
1:36:12
Speaker 1: a court, the courts can you know, figure this out
1:36:16
Speaker 1: and you know and get him off the no fly lists.
1:36:23
Speaker 1: I mean, if they can do that the Nick frantis
1:36:24
Speaker 1: without going in front of a judge, they can't do
1:36:26
Speaker 1: it to anybody and that can't be right. So again,
1:36:29
Speaker 1: the government has way too much power, and this the
1:36:32
Speaker 1: no fly list, which is again a product of the
1:36:35
Speaker 1: post nine eleven trauma and the post nine eleven hysteria
1:36:39
Speaker 1: and the post nine eleven you know, paranoia that cannot exist.
1:36:46
Speaker 1: You cannot be able to put people in no flights
1:36:48
Speaker 1: lists without a judge if they're Americans. If they're Americans,
1:36:55
Speaker 1: a judge has to prove that you're restricting the freedom
1:36:58
Speaker 1: movement of an American citizen in America. It's just unacceptable.
1:37:07
Speaker 1: Andrews says, can you critique a former Republican senator's claim
1:37:14
Speaker 1: the capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than
1:37:17
Speaker 1: anything other than Christianity. That's pretty funny, unclear how to
1:37:22
Speaker 1: unpack it. Had you heard before the Christianity souls poverty.
1:37:26
Speaker 1: No Christianity, cowarges is poverty the meek soil inhabit the earth,
1:37:30
Speaker 1: and military said knew this. That's why she never helped
1:37:33
Speaker 1: people really out of poverty. She just helped them stay
1:37:36
Speaker 1: poor and not die. I don't even know where to start.
1:37:40
Speaker 1: I mean, the only way I can conceive of him
1:37:43
Speaker 1: thinking about this, and it would be great if you
1:37:45
Speaker 1: could send me the clip where he talks about this,
1:37:49
Speaker 1: is that he would argue that Christianity caused capitalism. Christianity
1:37:52
Speaker 1: is the source of capitalism and therefore Christianity's the source
1:37:55
Speaker 1: of capitalism's poverty eliminating. But other than that, this is
1:38:03
Speaker 1: just fantasy and absurdity. And it's not like christian charity
1:38:06
Speaker 1: has brought people out of poverty and any significant numbers,
1:38:10
Speaker 1: if at all. It's not like anybody came out of
1:38:13
Speaker 1: poverty for thousands of years, for two thousand years, out
1:38:16
Speaker 1: of Christianity. It's only literally only capitalism that brought people
1:38:20
Speaker 1: out of Coverty. So the only thing I can think
1:38:22
Speaker 1: of is he's taking credit. He's given Christianity credit for
1:38:26
Speaker 1: the achievements of capitalism because he claims the Christianity's cause capitalism.
1:38:30
Speaker 1: Now that'll be debunked in my book with Don Watkins,
1:38:33
Speaker 1: so stay tuned, all right, fronts will should one practice
1:38:43
Speaker 1: a skill that they don't enjoy and aren't particularly good at,
1:38:48
Speaker 1: but believe is useful for their projects? Or should one
1:38:52
Speaker 1: only specialize in what they are good at and enjoy
1:38:55
Speaker 1: from the beginning? Oh? No, absolutely, you should practice and
1:38:59
Speaker 1: be I'm good at skills than an assay for your career.
1:39:03
Speaker 1: I assume that's what you mean by projects. Not everything
1:39:07
Speaker 1: in life is enjoyable. Life is not about enjoyment of
1:39:13
Speaker 1: every actual everything that one does. And if you understand
1:39:18
Speaker 1: that the skill is necessary or your career full projects,
1:39:23
Speaker 1: then it will become more enjoyable with time, as you
1:39:26
Speaker 1: get better at it, and as you understand it's relevance
1:39:30
Speaker 1: for your future, it will become more enjoyable. Now, look,
1:39:34
Speaker 1: is exercise enjoyable? Not? Really? Is it necessary for prolonging
1:39:40
Speaker 1: my life? Yes? So I do it. They are more
1:39:44
Speaker 1: enjoyable things I could do with that time. So objectivism, egoism,
1:39:49
Speaker 1: selfishness is not arguing pursue only that which is enjoyable. No,
1:39:53
Speaker 1: pursue only that which is good for you. And developing
1:39:59
Speaker 1: a learn a skill, even if unenjoyable, then is gonna
1:40:04
Speaker 1: enhance your career is definitely good for you, is definitely
1:40:11
Speaker 1: life enhancing. So do it. So my answers absolutely shouldn't
1:40:16
Speaker 1: do it, and and and again. If you expect everything
1:40:20
Speaker 1: to be enjoyable from the beginning, God, you know, what
1:40:24
Speaker 1: are you gonna do when you have a baby. It's
1:40:26
Speaker 1: not enjoyable from the beginning. I mean, you can find
1:40:29
Speaker 1: joy in it, but it's a lot of damn work
1:40:33
Speaker 1: and scary and your first child and a lot of
1:40:37
Speaker 1: book but everything, everything requires doing things sometimes that you're
1:40:45
Speaker 1: not gonna enjoy changing diapers. You can become really good
1:40:48
Speaker 1: at it, but it never becomes enjoyable. Oh fun, I'm
1:40:53
Speaker 1: gonna clean this babies anyway. You get my point? Uh,
1:40:58
Speaker 1: Sebastian says. The explosions in Italian weapons factory. Yes, I
1:41:03
Speaker 1: saw that huge explosion in KNDS ammunition factory in Italy.
1:41:10
Speaker 1: Hard to tell because it's making news. It only happened
1:41:12
Speaker 1: a few hours ago. We don't know what caused explosion.
1:41:16
Speaker 1: It could be an accident, but it also could be
1:41:18
Speaker 1: Russian sabotage. It could very well be Russian sabotage. Russia
1:41:23
Speaker 1: is getting more and more aggressive, going after Europeans and
1:41:28
Speaker 1: challenging them and poking them, and so in Europe is
1:41:33
Speaker 1: doing nothing so far about it. So it definitely could
1:41:36
Speaker 1: be Russian sabotage. It could also be an accident, so
1:41:38
Speaker 1: I don't want to assume. When we find out more,
1:41:41
Speaker 1: if it is Russian sabotage, we can talk about it
1:41:44
Speaker 1: more than all right, Michael, will this make Trump more
1:41:57
Speaker 1: likely to finish off you?
1:41:58
Speaker 5: On?
1:41:59
Speaker 1: No? I think that's the that's the conspiracy theory idea
1:42:04
Speaker 1: about why Israel promoted this uh, this, this assassination attempt
1:42:09
Speaker 1: because they thought that it would make Trump more likely.
1:42:12
Speaker 1: But no, I don't think anything. It is going to
1:42:15
Speaker 1: be more likely. And remember he faces a real challenge
1:42:18
Speaker 1: which is a consequence of his bad strategy and when
1:42:23
Speaker 1: he launched the work, and the challenge is a real
1:42:26
Speaker 1: reduction in munitions, a real shortage of ammunition uh to
1:42:32
Speaker 1: attack you on worth and to defend American allies when
1:42:36
Speaker 1: he won response, And that's real, and you can tell
1:42:39
Speaker 1: it's real by that, by the by all the contracts,
1:42:43
Speaker 1: the Pentagon is frantically, you know, signing with defense contractors
1:42:48
Speaker 1: to build more munitions. They wouldn't be doing that if
1:42:50
Speaker 1: they were no problems with munitions here. So they get
1:42:55
Speaker 1: denied all they want. There is a problem with munitions.
1:42:57
Speaker 1: So he faces that as well. And again the only
1:43:00
Speaker 1: reason for that is is that they ran the First war,
1:43:03
Speaker 1: the war badly, and they didn't end it quicker, and
1:43:06
Speaker 1: they didn't open the street, and they didn't do it
1:43:10
Speaker 1: was necessary to win it and win a fast Hopper Campbell.
1:43:15
Speaker 1: Are Europeans too sophisticated to ever elect a clown like Trump?
1:43:20
Speaker 1: Because America had a John Dewey, and Europe never had
1:43:23
Speaker 1: a philosophic philosopher of education anywhere near as bad. No,
1:43:27
Speaker 1: but you know, Europeans elected Hitler and they elected Mussolini.
1:43:33
Speaker 1: They tolerated Mussolini and Hitler, they tolerated Franco, and they
1:43:38
Speaker 1: elected socialist governments all over the place. So no, I
1:43:42
Speaker 1: don't think Europeans are too sophisticated. I think you could
1:43:47
Speaker 1: easily get a clown. I mean, what was Barbis Johnson
1:43:53
Speaker 1: in England? I mean, not quite as bad as Trump,
1:43:56
Speaker 1: but he was bad. So no, I don't I think
1:43:59
Speaker 1: Europe is quite susceptible to this. Rowland says, come to
1:44:04
Speaker 1: Switzerland and you'll learn to appreciate your twenty dollars burrito.
1:44:07
Speaker 1: Switzerland is an expensive place to live. I mean, wages
1:44:10
Speaker 1: are very high as well, but Switzerland is an expensive
1:44:13
Speaker 1: place to live. And you know, so Roland, are you
1:44:18
Speaker 1: inviting me to a expensive burrito when I come to
1:44:23
Speaker 1: Switzerland next? So you're gonna buy me a thirty dollar
1:44:25
Speaker 1: burrito in Switzerland? Forty dollars burrito with lobster and truffles.
1:44:32
Speaker 1: Thomas says, value for value off work and cam can
1:44:39
Speaker 1: catch you live. Thank you Thomas, I appreciate that I
1:44:45
Speaker 1: like numbers says. When Tucker says he hates Christian Zionists
1:44:49
Speaker 1: more than anyone else, isn't he trying to turn Christians
1:44:53
Speaker 1: against Jews. Yes, he's trying to turn Christians against Jews.
1:45:00
Speaker 1: He's trying to claim that the Christians who support Israel
1:45:05
Speaker 1: are the worst of the worst. It's supporting Israel is
1:45:09
Speaker 1: on Christian it's un American, and he's trying to turn
1:45:13
Speaker 1: Americans against Israel, but also trying to turn Christians against Jews. JJGBS.
1:45:20
Speaker 1: Isn't worth committing social suicide to opine on an issue
1:45:24
Speaker 1: one has no control over them being pro data centers,
1:45:28
Speaker 1: for example, essentially all of my peers consider DC's data
1:45:33
Speaker 1: centers a plague and support them for them and support
1:45:38
Speaker 1: for them as evil. I don't know what social suicide is.
1:45:46
Speaker 1: I don't know why these people are value, why you
1:45:51
Speaker 1: know you need them. I think it's important at every
1:45:57
Speaker 1: opportunity to have this is how you change the culture,
1:46:01
Speaker 1: to stand up for what you believe. And this is
1:46:04
Speaker 1: an important belief about the ability of our economy and
1:46:10
Speaker 1: therefore our well being to grow. And I think it's
1:46:14
Speaker 1: important to stand up for that belief. So yes, I
1:46:16
Speaker 1: think you should stand up against them. I'm for speaking out.
1:46:23
Speaker 1: Solano says, yesterday you were wondering how Clivacula got popular.
1:46:29
Speaker 1: He used clipping, paying editors to cut his streams into
1:46:33
Speaker 1: short videos and flood TikTok with them. Most big streamers
1:46:37
Speaker 1: and podcasters do this. Well, I do that not. I mean,
1:46:42
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't flood, but I do a
1:46:44
Speaker 1: lot of YouTube shorts. There are a lot of YouTube
1:46:47
Speaker 1: shorts of me out there. It hasn't got me the numbers.
1:46:51
Speaker 1: Maybe I need to be on klik clock TikTok. Clinicular
1:46:55
Speaker 1: spent about five hundred thousand on at least thirty k
1:46:59
Speaker 1: videos in one month. Thirty thousand videos in my month.
1:47:03
Speaker 1: YouTube would freak out if I did that. YouTube is
1:47:06
Speaker 1: so anti flooding with shorts, it really is. It hates it.
1:47:13
Speaker 1: Andrew Taite became popular the same way. All right, Yeah,
1:47:19
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to figure this out. Andrew Tuckum may
1:47:23
Speaker 1: own twenty million annual income, but aside from selling his soul,
1:47:27
Speaker 1: he's corrupted his mind. The rambling monologues full of non
1:47:33
Speaker 1: sequitors indicates mental disintegration. Yeah, I agree, absolutely all right guys,
1:47:38
Speaker 1: thanks to all the super chatters. We will meet again
1:47:42
Speaker 1: tomorrow and with a new episode of the Iran Book Show,
1:47:48
Speaker 1: News shows and yeah, if you have topics, if you
1:47:52
Speaker 1: have videos you'd like me to comment on, send me links.
1:47:56
Speaker 1: You at your on bookshow dot com. You on at
1:47:58
Speaker 1: your on bookshow dot com. See tomorrow, Bye everybody,