Latest / The Death Of Journalism / Episode Two Hundred One: Lock Him Up

Transcript

Episode Two Hundred One: Lock Him Up · The Death Of Journalism

0:00
Speaker 1: Welcome to episode number two hundred and one of the
0:03
Speaker 1: Death of Journalism podcasts. My name is John Zigler. I'm
0:05
Speaker 1: your host on today's show. The President of the United
0:08
Speaker 1: States calls for the GOP presidential nominee to be locked
0:12
Speaker 1: up just before an election, and America Yong's Kamala Harris
0:19
Speaker 1: still can't figure out how to answer the Biden coop question.
0:23
Speaker 1: A Trump hit piece collapses, the Guardian cap controversy heats
0:28
Speaker 1: up in the National Football League, the sports media pretends
0:32
Speaker 1: Brownie James can play pro basketball, and I am forced
0:36
Speaker 1: to address the media's insane revisiting of the Menendez Brothers
0:41
Speaker 1: double murder case. I talk a lot on this podcast
0:46
Speaker 1: about how dangerously desensitized we have become, and there are
0:50
Speaker 1: an awful lot of reasons for why that is the case.
0:53
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has certainly contributed to this phenomenon in the
0:57
Speaker 1: political realm, probably more than anyone else has. But we
1:01
Speaker 1: have long ago left the gravitational pull of the rational
1:06
Speaker 1: Earth when it comes to the issue of desensitization. And
1:11
Speaker 1: I can't think of a more profound example than something
1:15
Speaker 1: that happened yesterday on Tuesday. As I taped this episode
1:20
Speaker 1: on Wednesday morning, when Joe Biden, who is apparently still
1:25
Speaker 1: the President of the United States, no one seems to
1:26
Speaker 1: be one hundred percent sure and no one seems to care, which,
1:29
Speaker 1: by the way, is another example of desensitization. No one
1:34
Speaker 1: really knows who our president is. There's a heck of
1:36
Speaker 1: a lot going on in the world, and no one
1:38
Speaker 1: seems to care that. Right, there is holy cow kind
1:44
Speaker 1: of stuff when it comes to desensitization. But even that,
1:49
Speaker 1: I think pales in comparison to what ended up happening.
1:52
Speaker 1: So Joe Biden was at an event, and you know,
1:56
Speaker 1: he was mumbling and stumbling like he does, and he
2:00
Speaker 1: called for the locking up, locking up in a clear
2:09
Speaker 1: legal context, the locking up of Donald Trump, the GOP
2:15
Speaker 1: presidential nominee, two weeks two weeks before an election. Now,
2:22
Speaker 1: to be clear, Donald Trump, especially during the twenty sixteen election,
2:26
Speaker 1: famously and continuously led his mob, his cult in lock
2:32
Speaker 1: her up. Chance about Hillary Clinton. He was not the
2:36
Speaker 1: president of the United States. Was it appropriate? No, But
2:42
Speaker 1: that was his opponent, and he did what he did.
2:45
Speaker 1: And by the way, when he became president, he did
2:48
Speaker 1: nothing at all to try to lock her up. It's
2:51
Speaker 1: one of the many promises he made to his cult.
2:54
Speaker 1: That it's amazing that the cult doesn't seem to care
2:57
Speaker 1: that that was just a fraud, that there was nothing
3:00
Speaker 1: to that whole locker up chant thing in twenty sixteen.
3:04
Speaker 1: But here we have the president of the United States,
3:08
Speaker 1: at least presumably the president of the United States, in
3:13
Speaker 1: two weeks before an election or election day, in the
3:16
Speaker 1: midst of voting, the president saying that Trump ought to
3:20
Speaker 1: be locked up now to be one hundred percent fair,
3:25
Speaker 1: Biden kind of showing that he is at least somewhat
3:28
Speaker 1: still with it, seemingly immediately realizes that he stepped in it,
3:34
Speaker 1: and he tries to then, as the crowd is politely applauding,
3:40
Speaker 1: he tries to put a caveat on that and say,
3:44
Speaker 1: politically locked up. I'm not even sure I understand what
3:49
Speaker 1: the hell that means. Politically locked up. I guess that
3:53
Speaker 1: might mean if he was trying to save this, that
3:56
Speaker 1: if we beat him, then he's in the wildern and
4:01
Speaker 1: he can never come back because he's too old. I
4:04
Speaker 1: guess if you're being generous to Biden, that would make
4:07
Speaker 1: some sense. But for the record, here is the statement
4:12
Speaker 1: that you know ten years ago would have been all
4:16
Speaker 1: we would have been talking about if the president of
4:20
Speaker 1: the United States, regardless of party, ever said this about
4:24
Speaker 1: the nominee of the opposing party, especially two weeks away
4:29
Speaker 1: from election day. And here's what it sounded like when
4:32
Speaker 1: Joe Biden called for Donald Trump to be locked up.
4:37
Speaker 1: This is not a joke.
4:40
Speaker 2: This is the guy who also wants to replace every
4:42
Speaker 2: civil servant, every single one thinks he has a rated
4:47
Speaker 2: of the Supreme Court ruling on immunity to be able
4:50
Speaker 2: to need be if it was the case to actually eliminate,
4:54
Speaker 2: physically eliminate, shoot killed someone who is a he's a
5:00
Speaker 2: the thread to him. I mean, so, I know this
5:04
Speaker 2: sounds bizarre. It sounds like I said this five years ago.
5:07
Speaker 2: You'd locked me up. We gotta lock him up illically
5:15
Speaker 2: locked him up.
5:17
Speaker 1: Now again, To be fair, as I always am, Biden
5:21
Speaker 1: tried to save it there at the end. I'm not
5:24
Speaker 1: sure I give that effort a lot of credibility. I mean,
5:29
Speaker 1: it's clear that he realized, wait a minute, that didn't
5:32
Speaker 1: sound right that, or I may have made a mistake,
5:35
Speaker 1: or I may have gone too far here, But it
5:38
Speaker 1: felt to me like it was a desperate attempt to
5:42
Speaker 1: salvage the truth coming out by accident, where Biden said
5:48
Speaker 1: the quiet part out loud, so to speak, that this
5:52
Speaker 1: was an attempt to save him from having actually said
5:56
Speaker 1: what he truly thinks, what he truly means. Now, do
6:02
Speaker 1: I think that literally, literally Joe Biden is going to
6:06
Speaker 1: order Donald Trump to be locked up? I don't think so.
6:11
Speaker 2: No.
6:11
Speaker 1: I don't think that that's literally what's happening here. But
6:14
Speaker 1: the level of hypocrisy on this is so off the
6:18
Speaker 1: charts on so many levels, especially when the entire Democratic
6:24
Speaker 1: Party argument in this election is preserving democracy and Trump
6:30
Speaker 1: is going to be some sort of a dictator and
6:32
Speaker 1: a tyrant and a fascist. And here we have the
6:37
Speaker 1: president of the United States again, presumably Joe Biden, calling
6:43
Speaker 1: for the nominee of the opposition party to be locked up,
6:50
Speaker 1: and no one seems the care. No one seems the care.
6:54
Speaker 1: I mean, this made, you know, some waves on social media,
6:58
Speaker 1: but there's zero evidence what I can see, that this
7:01
Speaker 1: is going to be a national conversation moment, which it
7:06
Speaker 1: really ought to be. I mean, this should be, especially
7:10
Speaker 1: if you're taking seriously the Democratic Party's entire theme, the
7:14
Speaker 1: whole saving democracy and being against a dictator, being against fascism.
7:20
Speaker 1: My god, you can't conceive of a more hypocritical statement
7:27
Speaker 1: than that, not to mention the entire issue of the
7:30
Speaker 1: fact that the federal government is currently trying to lock
7:35
Speaker 1: Donald Trump up over multiple charges, which he and his
7:41
Speaker 1: supporters have not without some justification, claimed is politically motivated.
7:47
Speaker 1: And here you have the President of the United States,
7:50
Speaker 1: the man in charge again presumably of the federal government,
7:55
Speaker 1: making statements that are so far beyond the back of
8:00
Speaker 1: anything that is remotely acceptable in the United States of America.
8:06
Speaker 1: And there are a couple of reasons why this is
8:09
Speaker 1: not making waves. One, we've become dangerously desensitized, especially when
8:14
Speaker 1: it comes to Biden. And because Biden is presumed to
8:18
Speaker 1: be senile. That's maybe the most amazing part of this.
8:23
Speaker 1: Biden is so presumed to be senile by the media
8:26
Speaker 1: and by most of the public that we don't even
8:29
Speaker 1: take what he says seriously. Yet no one cares that
8:31
Speaker 1: he's still president. This is all so mind blowing. I
8:39
Speaker 1: can't even believe it's happening. But the fact that most people,
8:43
Speaker 1: including the media, just presume that Biden is senile is why, well,
8:48
Speaker 1: you know, he just made a misstatement, and you know,
8:51
Speaker 1: he kind of cleaned that up there at the end.
8:54
Speaker 1: Not really, but good enough for us to basically ignore this.
8:59
Speaker 1: And then, of course does the other issue, which is
9:01
Speaker 1: most of the news media is acting as if they
9:04
Speaker 1: are Kamala Harris's campaign manager, and they know that this
9:08
Speaker 1: is not good. This is very very bad, that this
9:12
Speaker 1: is a statement that is not good for Kamala Harris's
9:17
Speaker 1: election hopes. I'm not saying it would decide the election
9:21
Speaker 1: if every American was fully exposed to what Biden said,
9:25
Speaker 1: but I don't think that there's a sound argument to
9:28
Speaker 1: be made that it would be helpful to Harris. I
9:30
Speaker 1: think it would be far more likely to be harmful
9:34
Speaker 1: on a number of levels. One, it goes way too far.
9:37
Speaker 1: It destroys their save democracy theme, But it also goes
9:42
Speaker 1: to this issue of Joe Biden's fitness for office and
9:48
Speaker 1: the cover up that was part of the Democratic Party's
9:53
Speaker 1: strategy up until the post debate era, when all of
9:57
Speaker 1: a sudden, a flip was switched and all the establishment
10:02
Speaker 1: media and all the establishment Democratic leaders suddenly engaged in
10:07
Speaker 1: a coup. And I have talked about this coup a
10:11
Speaker 1: lot of people in the right have talked about this
10:13
Speaker 1: coup ever since it transpired. I have been absolutely stupefied
10:19
Speaker 1: that this has not been a bigger campaign issue, that
10:22
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign has done a lousy job of making
10:25
Speaker 1: it a campaign issue. I was way out in front
10:28
Speaker 1: even before the Republican Convention, before the coup had actually
10:32
Speaker 1: manifested itself or come to fruition, where I was screaming
10:36
Speaker 1: bloody murder that the Trump team was not prepared for
10:40
Speaker 1: what might happen if there is a coup, not closing
10:43
Speaker 1: off the escape hatches for a Biden Harris a circumstance
10:49
Speaker 1: where he could get out and she would be the
10:52
Speaker 1: only other option to be the nominee. I really still
10:55
Speaker 1: to this day I think that was a massive error,
10:57
Speaker 1: and if the Trump team loses this, that will be
11:00
Speaker 1: where they lost it. They had an opportunity to cut
11:03
Speaker 1: off the escape patches. They had several weeks there where
11:06
Speaker 1: it was obvious that this was in the works. Now
11:08
Speaker 1: I did not think Biden would cave, But then the
11:12
Speaker 1: assassination attempt against Trump happened. That changed the dynamic. Biden
11:16
Speaker 1: got COVID, that changed the dynamic. The polls started to
11:18
Speaker 1: shift dramatically or somewhat dramatically against Biden and the pressure
11:23
Speaker 1: that has got to him, and he gave up the
11:25
Speaker 1: car keys. But how we have not gotten to the
11:27
Speaker 1: bottom of how and why that happened, and what Harris's
11:30
Speaker 1: role was in either the cover up or being completely
11:36
Speaker 1: in the dark about what was so obvious to everyone
11:39
Speaker 1: else that Biden was not capable of doing his job
11:43
Speaker 1: is beyond me. I mean, how this, to me should
11:47
Speaker 1: have been the number one issue after the coup and
11:50
Speaker 1: the switcheroo in the campaign. What did Harris know? What
11:55
Speaker 1: did and when did she know it? And how did
11:58
Speaker 1: she deal with it? Did she engage He's going to
12:00
Speaker 1: cover up? Was she part of the coup? She's the
12:02
Speaker 1: one that benefited from the coup at least pick a lane.
12:06
Speaker 1: That's always been my main point here. Forced Harris to
12:11
Speaker 1: pick a lane on all this and she's not been
12:13
Speaker 1: forced to do that. And I'm a big believer that
12:18
Speaker 1: in life and in media, one thing leads to another,
12:23
Speaker 1: that life is often a series of domino effects, that
12:29
Speaker 1: things don't happen in a vacuum, that when one thing happens,
12:32
Speaker 1: it can change the dynamic and cause another thing to happen,
12:37
Speaker 1: and I believe that Brett Behar asking Kamala Harris about
12:42
Speaker 1: the Biden coup more directly than anyone else has and
12:46
Speaker 1: potentially being at least partially inspired by my suggestion, because
12:51
Speaker 1: the wording of his question on that was remarkably similar
12:54
Speaker 1: to the one that I had offered before his interview
12:58
Speaker 1: with Kamala Harris and Jim Gaffigan at the Al Smith
13:02
Speaker 1: dinner going after the Democrats on their hypocrisy regarding democracy
13:09
Speaker 1: and the coup, a clip we played for you in
13:12
Speaker 1: the last episode of the podcast, I think facilitated another event.
13:19
Speaker 1: I think if Brett Behar and Jim Gaffigan do not
13:23
Speaker 1: raise this issue in high profile fashions, I don't think
13:28
Speaker 1: that NBC in the latest interview that was just done
13:31
Speaker 1: with Kamala Harris yesterday, as of this taping done by
13:35
Speaker 1: Haley Jackson, I don't think Haley Jackson asks Kamala Harris
13:42
Speaker 1: essentially about the Biden coup again, and certainly does not
13:46
Speaker 1: do so in as somewhat of an aggressive fashion as
13:51
Speaker 1: she did. The most of the interview that Haley Jackson
13:55
Speaker 1: did with Kamala Harris was incredibly soft. Factly, what you
14:00
Speaker 1: might expect from NBC. It was basically teeing her up
14:04
Speaker 1: on a number of issues. The one exception to that
14:08
Speaker 1: would be the transgender issue, where she gently chided Harris
14:14
Speaker 1: on her position on transgender issues related to the federal government.
14:20
Speaker 1: She even pushed back a little bit when Harris didn't
14:22
Speaker 1: answer the question. It's obvious that Harris is terrified of
14:26
Speaker 1: the transgender issue. It's clear that. I mean, it's very obvious.
14:31
Speaker 1: She's incredibly annoyed by a commercial that the Trump team
14:35
Speaker 1: has spent millions and millions of dollars on playing a
14:37
Speaker 1: clip of her being in favor of prisoners having their
14:43
Speaker 1: transgender surgeries paid for with tax money. It's her own words,
14:49
Speaker 1: but she is clearly very irritated by that. It's obvious
14:53
Speaker 1: from their internal polling that that has left the mark.
14:56
Speaker 1: And so I'll give Jackson a little bit of credit
15:00
Speaker 1: for questioning Harris about that. But I want to play
15:04
Speaker 1: the clip of Jackson questioning Harris on the coup and
15:09
Speaker 1: she takes a slightly different tag than Brett Baar did,
15:14
Speaker 1: but I'll give Jackson credit. She sticks with it. She
15:18
Speaker 1: tries to get Harris to answer. Now, there's two interesting
15:22
Speaker 1: parts about this that I want to talk about to
15:25
Speaker 1: set it up. Number one is that what you're about
15:32
Speaker 1: to hear is not the full question and answer. There's
15:36
Speaker 1: more to it than what NBC released. What you're about
15:41
Speaker 1: to hear is what NBC released on their TikTok page,
15:46
Speaker 1: and I thought that that might must have been the
15:49
Speaker 1: end of that inquiry, but it was not. There's more
15:53
Speaker 1: to it. Jackson actually follows up one more time after
15:58
Speaker 1: this clip you're about to hear ends. And then the
16:02
Speaker 1: other part of this that I think is important is
16:07
Speaker 1: that Harris still can't come up with an answer. She
16:12
Speaker 1: still will not pick a lane. Now, maybe that's by design,
16:17
Speaker 1: Maybe they've just decided we're gonna take the l on
16:21
Speaker 1: this when it comes to not answering the question because
16:24
Speaker 1: there's no good answer for us. That might be the case,
16:29
Speaker 1: but I still am of the position that there's really
16:33
Speaker 1: only two options here, and that the average person can
16:37
Speaker 1: see what these two options are. Either Harris is an
16:42
Speaker 1: idiot who did not realize that Biden was in decline
16:47
Speaker 1: and is in decline. Because that's another important part of this.
16:50
Speaker 1: Harris makes the argument almost simultaneous with Joe Biden calling
16:55
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump to be locked up that he is
16:59
Speaker 1: still well, very much on his game, and still very
17:02
Speaker 1: much the president of the United States. She makes no
17:05
Speaker 1: concession on his mental decline at all. So is she
17:11
Speaker 1: an idiot or is she a liar? Or was she
17:15
Speaker 1: end or you know, I guess under the lying umbrella,
17:18
Speaker 1: was she taking part in a cover up? Well, she
17:23
Speaker 1: is effectively not picking any lane, but she's mostly going
17:27
Speaker 1: into the lane of oh, no, no, Joe Biden's awesome.
17:30
Speaker 1: There's never been any problem with Joe Biden, which then
17:34
Speaker 1: begs the question which unfortunately Jackson does not get an
17:38
Speaker 1: answer to and does not really even go down this path,
17:42
Speaker 1: or that she kind of maybe sort of goes down
17:44
Speaker 1: this path a little bit, she implies it a little bit.
17:47
Speaker 1: But why in the world did Joe Biden drop out
17:50
Speaker 1: of the race? That's the number one question? Now, why
17:54
Speaker 1: did Joe Biden drop out of the race? So here,
17:57
Speaker 1: with all that context, maybe a little too much kind
18:00
Speaker 1: text is NBC's Haley Jackson and part most of her
18:06
Speaker 1: exchange with Kamala Harris over the issue of Biden's fitness
18:12
Speaker 1: and dropping out of the race. And while she doesn't
18:14
Speaker 1: use the term coup, I don't think effectively Harris's participation
18:20
Speaker 1: or reaction to the coup that resulted in her being
18:23
Speaker 1: handed the Democratic presidential nomination.
18:26
Speaker 3: I know that Joe Biden is not on the ballot.
18:28
Speaker 3: I understand that. But the reason that you are at
18:30
Speaker 3: the top of the ticket is because he dropped out
18:31
Speaker 3: of this race, and it was largely because of that
18:33
Speaker 3: debate performance back in June. You defended him in the
18:36
Speaker 3: days before and in the days after as you were
18:38
Speaker 3: campaigning for another four years for President Biden. Can you
18:41
Speaker 3: say that you were honest with the American people about
18:43
Speaker 3: what you saw in those moments with President Biden as
18:45
Speaker 3: you were with him again and again repeatedly in that time.
18:49
Speaker 4: Of course, Joe Biden is an extremely accomplished, experienced and
19:01
Speaker 4: capable in every way that anyone would want if they're president.
19:05
Speaker 1: It was a bad debate.
19:07
Speaker 4: People have bad debates.
19:09
Speaker 3: He is absolutely That's the reason why you're here and
19:12
Speaker 3: he's not running for the top of the ticket.
19:15
Speaker 4: Well, you'd have to ask him if that's the only reason.
19:18
Speaker 4: Why what do you think I am running for president
19:22
Speaker 4: the United States? Joe Biden is not. And my presidency
19:27
Speaker 4: will be about bringing a new generation of leadership to
19:32
Speaker 4: America that is focused on the work that we need
19:35
Speaker 4: to do to invest in the ambitions and aspirations of
19:38
Speaker 4: the American people.
19:39
Speaker 1: I cannot emphasize enough that when you listen to that exchange,
19:45
Speaker 1: the average person has to be asking themselves at some level, so,
19:51
Speaker 1: then why the hell did Biden drop out of the race?
19:54
Speaker 1: If he's perfectly fine? And by the way, Harris even
20:00
Speaker 1: kind of opens the door that there's a lot more
20:03
Speaker 1: to the story than meets the eye. I say, well,
20:05
Speaker 1: you have to ask Joe Biden. Well, why don't we
20:09
Speaker 1: ask Joe Biden? To me? This is a very unsatisfactory answer,
20:16
Speaker 1: not just for someone like myself who is passionate about
20:19
Speaker 1: the issue and has followed it very very closely, but
20:22
Speaker 1: I think the average voter when they watch that, it
20:28
Speaker 1: just is incredibly unsatisfying. And it's obviously not honest. I mean,
20:34
Speaker 1: because the average voter understands that Joe Biden is clearly
20:40
Speaker 1: and has been in mental decline. She's not acknowledging that
20:44
Speaker 1: at all. And then, of course, going to my pic
20:47
Speaker 1: a lane theory, Okay, well, if he's perfectly fine, then
20:52
Speaker 1: why did he get out of the race? Why are
20:54
Speaker 1: you the nominee and there may not be a good
20:58
Speaker 1: answer here. I'm incredibly open minded to that. I've already
21:03
Speaker 1: stated it, and I think that strategically, maybe this is
21:08
Speaker 1: part of what the Harris team has decided beforehand. We
21:12
Speaker 1: just don't have a good answer here, so they'll just
21:15
Speaker 1: off of skate, don't say anything bad about Biden, and
21:18
Speaker 1: you know, whatever damage is done is done, and let's
21:21
Speaker 1: just hope we can get through it. That could be
21:24
Speaker 1: the strategy. But there's also the scenario where Harris has
21:28
Speaker 1: had multiple opportunities now to answer a very basic and
21:33
Speaker 1: obvious question and has whiffed every time. I mean, you
21:40
Speaker 1: got to know that this has has to be a
21:44
Speaker 1: subject that they have talked about in the Harris campaign.
21:48
Speaker 1: I realize that they're relying on the media being on
21:51
Speaker 1: their side, but they had to know Brett bher was
21:54
Speaker 1: likely to ask a question about this, even if they
21:57
Speaker 1: don't follow my Twitter feed, And once Brett bhar did so,
22:02
Speaker 1: and once Jim Gaffickan made a very I thought tremendous
22:07
Speaker 1: and profound and damaging joke at the Al Smith dinner,
22:12
Speaker 1: now the pressure is on the rest of the media,
22:16
Speaker 1: and I truly do believe that if Brett Bahar and
22:19
Speaker 1: Jim Gaffigan had not done what they had done on
22:22
Speaker 1: this topic last week, Haley Jackson does not feel any
22:26
Speaker 1: pressure to ask this question. And it's interesting because it
22:30
Speaker 1: was the last subject of the interview. And that gets
22:35
Speaker 1: me to the part that NBC, at least as far
22:38
Speaker 1: as I can tell, has not released publicly. They did,
22:42
Speaker 1: unlike CBS in the sixty minutes interview that Bill Whittaker
22:45
Speaker 1: did with Kamala Harris, they did release a transcript, which
22:50
Speaker 1: I thought was a little bit of a passive aggressive
22:53
Speaker 1: shot at CBS. I don't know, maybe it was, maybe
22:56
Speaker 1: it wasn't, but they released a full transcript. If you
23:01
Speaker 1: read the transcript, here's what happened after the clip that
23:07
Speaker 1: I just played for you, and I'm amazed. This is
23:10
Speaker 1: remarkable that this was not part of what aired or
23:13
Speaker 1: what has been made public as far as I can tell.
23:16
Speaker 1: Jackson follows up after what you just turned and says,
23:22
Speaker 1: it's a judgment question. That's why I ask, can the
23:29
Speaker 1: American people trust you in these moments even when it's
23:35
Speaker 1: maybe uncomfortable for Americans to have to level with Americans
23:40
Speaker 1: in that way. So that's why I ask we are
23:46
Speaker 1: that Jackson has to justify twice why she's asking this.
23:49
Speaker 1: That tells you an awful lot. But back to what
23:51
Speaker 1: Jackson says, and it sounds like what you're saying is
23:57
Speaker 1: you feel like you feel like you never saw anything
24:02
Speaker 1: like that from President Biden. Now that is it's a
24:07
Speaker 1: remarkable follow up, partially because having to justify twice why
24:12
Speaker 1: she's asking an incredibly significant question that we should get
24:17
Speaker 1: an answer to, We should have had an answer to
24:20
Speaker 1: months ago on this. But she's essentially saying, look, your
24:25
Speaker 1: judgment is in question here. If you don't see that,
24:29
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is greatly diminished. And then she sets Harris
24:35
Speaker 1: up by saying, it sounds like you're saying you feel
24:38
Speaker 1: like you never saw anything like that from President Biden,
24:42
Speaker 1: meaning the mental decline. And here is part of Harris's response,
24:49
Speaker 1: I have worked with Joe Biden, whether hours and hours
24:53
Speaker 1: and hours over these years, these over these four years,
24:58
Speaker 1: whether it be in the situation room or the Oval office,
25:02
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the one who was able to bring
25:05
Speaker 1: NATO together during a crisis. Blah blah blah blah blah.
25:08
Speaker 1: She starts talking about all the wonderful things that Joe
25:11
Speaker 1: Biden has done, and then Harris finishes by saying, I
25:15
Speaker 1: speak with not only sincerity, but with a real first
25:21
Speaker 1: hand account of watching him do this work. I have
25:26
Speaker 1: no reluctance in saying that, no, of course I don't.
25:32
Speaker 1: And then Jackson thanks her for the interview and ends it.
25:40
Speaker 1: I would love to see that clip. I think this
25:44
Speaker 1: is not to the level of the sixty minutes situation,
25:47
Speaker 1: where they completely changed Harris's answer to a question and
25:52
Speaker 1: part of what they released to the public, and they
25:54
Speaker 1: never put out a transcript. But again, to my knowledge,
26:00
Speaker 1: this part of the interview has not been made public.
26:03
Speaker 1: I've looked for it. I can't find it. If it's
26:05
Speaker 1: out there, and I'm wrong, I apologize, But my sense
26:09
Speaker 1: is it would have been in that original clip that
26:13
Speaker 1: I played for you that was put out by NBC News.
26:17
Speaker 1: Why didn't they put that part in there, because that's
26:21
Speaker 1: the money shot for all intensive purposes, Because now there's
26:27
Speaker 1: no possible way for Harris to claim that she was
26:33
Speaker 1: aware that Biden was in decline or is in decline,
26:38
Speaker 1: And you have an NBC newsperson saying, well, this is
26:43
Speaker 1: a judgment question because and by the way, that's real
26:48
Speaker 1: if you can't discern that the guy that you're with,
26:51
Speaker 1: and you talk all the time about how much you're
26:54
Speaker 1: with him, is in significant mental decline, so much so
26:58
Speaker 1: that he's forced to give up up the presidential nomination
27:02
Speaker 1: as an incumbent president. If you don't have the judgment
27:05
Speaker 1: to see that, how can you possibly have the judgment
27:09
Speaker 1: to be president the United States? Now? To be clear,
27:13
Speaker 1: I don't really believe that. I believe that Harris knew
27:18
Speaker 1: like everybody else did, that Biden is in mental decline.
27:23
Speaker 1: But she went along with it. She was effectively part
27:26
Speaker 1: of the cover up because she was going to be
27:29
Speaker 1: his vice president and then she got manna from heaven
27:33
Speaker 1: because he had a terrible debate performance and the Democratic
27:36
Speaker 1: elites took him out on her behalf. Now, how much
27:39
Speaker 1: she was involved in the coup, I don't know. I
27:43
Speaker 1: would like to know that. That's one of those questions
27:46
Speaker 1: that it will never be asked to her properly, but
27:49
Speaker 1: ought to be Biden is kind of implied on a
27:53
Speaker 1: couple of occasions if you interpret his words in a
27:56
Speaker 1: certain way. Now, that's always dangerous because of his mental decline.
27:59
Speaker 1: But we've out on multiple occasions where if the media
28:03
Speaker 1: wanted to create a chasm between Biden and Harris, there's
28:07
Speaker 1: more than enough ammunition to do that. So I'm not
28:12
Speaker 1: convinced that Biden doesn't think that Harris at least played
28:17
Speaker 1: somewhat of a role here or was not one hundred
28:19
Speaker 1: percent loyal during the coup. I point you directly to
28:23
Speaker 1: his interview on the View where he made a couple
28:26
Speaker 1: of statements that were certainly consistent with that, and his
28:31
Speaker 1: aggravated treatment of her at a cabinet meeting I think
28:34
Speaker 1: was consistent with that view on Biden's behalf. Of course,
28:38
Speaker 1: again with Biden, you never know for sure because of
28:41
Speaker 1: his mental decline. But that, to me, it's amazing that
28:45
Speaker 1: NBC did not make that, to my knowledge public because
28:50
Speaker 1: Harris didn't answer the question. She's not being honest. In
28:54
Speaker 1: my opinion. She's decided she cannot rip Biden because politically
29:00
Speaker 1: that would be too damaging, so she'd rather play the
29:04
Speaker 1: role of an idiot and hope that the news media
29:07
Speaker 1: is never going to make this clear. Jackson went further
29:12
Speaker 1: down that path of making this clear that hey, are
29:14
Speaker 1: you really saying that you don't have the judgment to
29:18
Speaker 1: see that Joe Biden was in mental decline, and NBC,
29:22
Speaker 1: to my knowledge, didn't even air that part at least
29:27
Speaker 1: not that I can find. So that is that is
29:30
Speaker 1: remarkable and I think very very telling. Now, are we
29:34
Speaker 1: ever going to get to the bottom of this? I'm
29:35
Speaker 1: sure we're not. That's probably the last time that this
29:39
Speaker 1: will be asked, because you know, any future interviewer is
29:43
Speaker 1: going to be very friendly to Harris. And it's been
29:47
Speaker 1: now asked twice by you know, major news personalities Brett
29:52
Speaker 1: Baer and Hallie Jackson, and so it's not like there's
29:56
Speaker 1: going to be blood in the water now all of
29:57
Speaker 1: a sudden. Every media personality is going to want to
30:00
Speaker 1: talk about this. This is the way they view this.
30:02
Speaker 1: As the campaign manager for Kamala Harris is okay, all right,
30:07
Speaker 1: let's be done with this, Let's move along, asked and answered.
30:10
Speaker 1: There's other things that are far less dangerous to talk
30:14
Speaker 1: about now. One of those things that the media has
30:18
Speaker 1: not talked about properly is the aftermath of the McDonald's
30:23
Speaker 1: episode over the weekend where Donald Trump went to a
30:26
Speaker 1: McDonald's in my old home area of Bucks County, Pennsylvania
30:31
Speaker 1: to work quote unquote Adam McDonald's to expose and to
30:37
Speaker 1: shine a light on the fact that Kamala Harris, in
30:40
Speaker 1: his view and in mind now, has lied about having
30:44
Speaker 1: previously worked at McDonald's as a young person. And when
30:49
Speaker 1: I talked about this in the last episode of the podcast,
30:51
Speaker 1: I acknowledged that this was a fantastic photo op. It
30:56
Speaker 1: was obvious that it was effective because liberals lost their
30:59
Speaker 1: goddamn mind The media lost their minds trying to clay
31:03
Speaker 1: oh my god, it was staged. Well, no shit, you
31:06
Speaker 1: really think that Donald Trump works at McDonald's. No, really,
31:11
Speaker 1: you thought this was real. I mean, it's just that's
31:15
Speaker 1: how you knew that. This was very troubling to the
31:19
Speaker 1: left and to the media because they lost their minds.
31:23
Speaker 1: But I said in the last episode, and I am
31:26
Speaker 1: standing by this, that I don't think that this was
31:30
Speaker 1: a grand slam or a touchdown the way that a
31:34
Speaker 1: lot of Trumpsters think that it was, or that it
31:36
Speaker 1: could have or should have been. And my main argument
31:41
Speaker 1: is that I don't think that the average person, the
31:46
Speaker 1: average swing voter, anyone who might still be undecided at
31:49
Speaker 1: this point, even understands why Trump went to McDonald's. Because
31:57
Speaker 1: I don't think the news media has made that. I
32:00
Speaker 1: think they purposely made that unclear. I don't think that
32:04
Speaker 1: the Trump team went out of their way to make
32:07
Speaker 1: that clear. I think that when the Harris team put
32:11
Speaker 1: out a statement, a written statement in response to the
32:16
Speaker 1: McDonald's stunt criticizing his stance on the minimum wage, that
32:22
Speaker 1: it was a weird but actually maybe brilliant political maneuver
32:28
Speaker 1: to try to give the media enough ammunition to pretend
32:35
Speaker 1: that the reason why he was at McDonald's was not
32:39
Speaker 1: to expose Kamala Harris as a liar, because that was
32:45
Speaker 1: to me, that statement, and this trives me crazy. I've
32:49
Speaker 1: spent I don't know how many probably hours on social
32:53
Speaker 1: media over the last several days arguing with liberals about
32:58
Speaker 1: how in the world can you still believe you know,
33:02
Speaker 1: I'm not pretending this is the most important thing in
33:04
Speaker 1: the world, by the way, but if we're having this
33:06
Speaker 1: debate of whether she lied or not, how can you
33:09
Speaker 1: not understand that in the real world, putting out a
33:14
Speaker 1: written statement in response to the McDonald's stunt focusing on
33:20
Speaker 1: the minimum wage and not even claiming that you really
33:25
Speaker 1: did work at McDonald's, and that Trump is full of
33:29
Speaker 1: crap How can you live in a real world and
33:34
Speaker 1: not understand that that's in admission for all intensive purposes,
33:38
Speaker 1: that she lied about working at McDonald's. I just this
33:42
Speaker 1: is beyond my comprehension, and I saw this dozens and
33:48
Speaker 1: dozens of times on social media. Now part of that's
33:51
Speaker 1: our deep political divide, and no one wants to ever
33:54
Speaker 1: admit that their side is wrong. But I'm sorry. You
33:57
Speaker 1: could easily still be a Harris supporter and hate Donald Trump,
34:00
Speaker 1: but acknowledge, Yeah, she clearly lied. And the statement really
34:05
Speaker 1: does put the final nail in her coffin, because if
34:09
Speaker 1: we use our brains for a second, if she really
34:12
Speaker 1: did work at McDonald's, the response, as I said in
34:17
Speaker 1: the last episode of the podcast, but it bears repeating,
34:19
Speaker 1: the response to what Trump did, would have been to
34:22
Speaker 1: get out in front of a camera immediately and drop
34:26
Speaker 1: the hammer on him with a full throated, detailed description
34:31
Speaker 1: of where, when, and how she worked at McDonald's. And
34:36
Speaker 1: she would. If she did that in a remotely convincing fashion,
34:40
Speaker 1: she would have won that day. She would have humiliated Trump,
34:44
Speaker 1: especially with the specter, which I think is at least
34:49
Speaker 1: subconsciously in a lot of people's minds is obvious similarity.
34:52
Speaker 1: Here we have Donald Trump previously having falsely accused Barack
34:58
Speaker 1: Obama of not being born in Hawaii and faking his
35:02
Speaker 1: birth certificate. Remember that that's literally how Trump's political career
35:07
Speaker 1: as the future Republican presidential nominee began. I mean, without
35:12
Speaker 1: birther Riism, Trump's not ever the nominee in my opinion.
35:18
Speaker 1: And Trump lied about that. And what happened when Trump
35:22
Speaker 1: lied about Obama's literal birth, Well, it took a long time.
35:27
Speaker 1: It took a lot longer than it needed to, and
35:29
Speaker 1: I believe it was done purposely by the Obama people
35:32
Speaker 1: because they realized this was a great issue for them,
35:34
Speaker 1: or at least they thought it was a great issue
35:36
Speaker 1: for them. Didn't turn out great in the end, but
35:39
Speaker 1: in the short run, they thought this was fantastic to
35:41
Speaker 1: have Trump leading these right wing whack jobs that seemed
35:46
Speaker 1: awfully racist going after his birth when they knew full
35:50
Speaker 1: well that he was born in Hawaii and they had
35:53
Speaker 1: the proof to do so, and they enjoyed having that
35:56
Speaker 1: issue linger out there. But when it got big enough,
36:01
Speaker 1: Obama went out in front of cameras and produced his
36:06
Speaker 1: birth certificate, his long form birth certificate, he dropped the
36:11
Speaker 1: hammer on Trump. Now, unfortunately, we live in a world
36:14
Speaker 1: where that probably ended up helping Trump when it came
36:17
Speaker 1: to eventually winning the Republican presidential nomination and replacing Barack Obama.
36:24
Speaker 1: But the reality is that's what Obama did. Well. If
36:28
Speaker 1: Harris was not lying about having worked at McDonald's, she
36:32
Speaker 1: would have acted very similarly to what Obama did with
36:37
Speaker 1: the birth certificate. And yet, based upon my anecdotal experience
36:43
Speaker 1: on social media, people who are not Trump fans are
36:48
Speaker 1: not getting this, and that's even when they understand why
36:51
Speaker 1: Trump went there. And so I'm not sure how many
36:56
Speaker 1: people are even aware, you know, low information voters are
36:59
Speaker 1: even a where why Trump made the trip because the
37:03
Speaker 1: media has offiscated the issue. They've not focused on it.
37:08
Speaker 1: The Harris campaign gave them the whole minimum wage thing
37:12
Speaker 1: to distract people with, and I'm just not convinced that
37:17
Speaker 1: while it was a great photo op, that it's gonna
37:21
Speaker 1: convince people or persuade people that hey, wait a minute,
37:26
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris has got a truth problem just like Trump does.
37:30
Speaker 1: And that, by the way, is you know why it's significant.
37:34
Speaker 1: Obviously Trump is a liar too, I just proved it
37:38
Speaker 1: with the whole Barack Obama birth certificate thing. But Harris
37:42
Speaker 1: is not perceived widely as a liar because she hasn't
37:46
Speaker 1: been really vetted, She hasn't been in the public eye
37:50
Speaker 1: nearly as much as Donald Trump has been. She is
37:54
Speaker 1: still very vulnerable to these types of political viruses. Trumprump
38:00
Speaker 1: is not, and so from a purely political perspective, this
38:04
Speaker 1: would have some I'm not pretending it would have ultimate,
38:09
Speaker 1: but it would have some political power and punch, especially
38:13
Speaker 1: in the waning days of an election. So I am
38:18
Speaker 1: skeptical that the McDonald's stunt has had as much impact
38:23
Speaker 1: or anywhere near the impact that Trump fans would like
38:26
Speaker 1: to believe that it would have. I will also say
38:31
Speaker 1: that it seems as if Tim Waltz did not get
38:33
Speaker 1: the memo, if there was a Harris team strategy on. Hey,
38:39
Speaker 1: let's just pretend that we don't even understand why Trump
38:43
Speaker 1: went to McDonald's because he went on the view and
38:47
Speaker 1: hilariously is still trying to claim that Kamalaris did work
38:53
Speaker 1: at McDonald's, and that, in comparison to Harris actually working
38:58
Speaker 1: supposedly allegedly with no evidence at McDonald's. Trump simply did
39:03
Speaker 1: a photo wop. This is Tim Waltz on the view.
39:08
Speaker 1: She actually worked in a McDonald's.
39:09
Speaker 3: She didn't go and pander and disrespect McDonald's workers by
39:14
Speaker 3: standing there in your red time take a picture.
39:16
Speaker 1: I would honestly love to though whether or not Tim
39:18
Speaker 1: Waltz didn't get the memo or spoke out a turn,
39:23
Speaker 1: was you know, going on his own or made a mistake,
39:28
Speaker 1: because that doesn't make any sense to me. You know,
39:31
Speaker 1: I don't know why he would even reference the idea
39:35
Speaker 1: that Harris worked at McDonald's. That feels to me like
39:39
Speaker 1: he was off on his own. But again, see if
39:44
Speaker 1: the mainstream news media was not acting as Kamala Harris's
39:48
Speaker 1: campaign manager, the wall statement on the view would further
39:54
Speaker 1: ignite this fire, this conversation would keep going. Okay, well,
40:00
Speaker 1: let's get to the bottom of this. And by the way,
40:04
Speaker 1: Harris wasn't asked in the Haley Jackson interview whether she
40:07
Speaker 1: ever worked at McDonald's. Gee. I wonder why it didn't happen.
40:11
Speaker 1: I mean, this interview took place a day after or
40:16
Speaker 1: two days after this massive stunt that everyone was talking about,
40:22
Speaker 1: and Jackson didn't even bother to ask Harris about it,
40:26
Speaker 1: because she knows it's too dangerous. She knows it's not
40:29
Speaker 1: good for her either, because she's either gonna have to
40:32
Speaker 1: look like a stooge and let Harris lie, or she's
40:35
Speaker 1: gonna have to bring it and maybe cause great damage
40:40
Speaker 1: to Harris's campaign. She's not gonna do that, and so
40:44
Speaker 1: no one's gonna ask Harris directly that has any credibility
40:49
Speaker 1: about this whole situation. But I can't emphasize enough if
40:55
Speaker 1: she had worked there, the response would not have been
40:59
Speaker 1: a written state about the minimum wage. That's not what
41:02
Speaker 1: would have happened, And there would be so much evidence.
41:08
Speaker 1: That's the other thing I've seen on social media that's hilarious.
41:11
Speaker 1: People are saying, well, I can't prove where I worked
41:15
Speaker 1: in a part time job in nineteen eighty three. Well, okay,
41:21
Speaker 1: let me just grant you your argument. Just for the
41:25
Speaker 1: sake of it. I'll pretend that you can't because apparently
41:29
Speaker 1: you never took a photograph as a woman. You never
41:32
Speaker 1: had a journal or a diary, which was very popular
41:36
Speaker 1: in the nineteen eighties where you would talk about your
41:38
Speaker 1: first job at McDonald's. You don't have any witnesses that
41:43
Speaker 1: remember you from working at McDonald's. Okay, I'm just gonna
41:46
Speaker 1: grant that all that's plausible, that's possible. There's no paperwork,
41:50
Speaker 1: no photos, all that. But can we please think about
41:56
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris's life. Did you you run for district attorney
42:03
Speaker 1: and attorney general and you as Senate and never mentioned
42:07
Speaker 1: that you worked at McDonald's previously until you started running
42:12
Speaker 1: for president in twenty twenty. Did you write a book
42:16
Speaker 1: that had an entire chapter on the service industry and
42:20
Speaker 1: never referenced that you worked at McDonald's. Did you do
42:23
Speaker 1: any of that? No, of course not. So you have
42:28
Speaker 1: to understand this, look at this through the prism and
42:31
Speaker 1: the context of Kamala Harris's life, and there would be
42:36
Speaker 1: evidence that this happened if it did. And for me,
42:41
Speaker 1: the final name on the coffin was the response to
42:44
Speaker 1: Trump's stunt, because it was it was obvious that they
42:48
Speaker 1: did not want to engage on the substance of why
42:52
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was there. They'd rather talk about the minimum wage,
42:56
Speaker 1: a topic that they also happened to be wrong about.
42:58
Speaker 1: But at least that's not going into the topic of
43:01
Speaker 1: whether or not she lied about having worked at McDonald's.
43:05
Speaker 1: Now the next clip I'm going to play for you.
43:09
Speaker 1: I'm playing it mostly because it shows a remarkable level
43:12
Speaker 1: of bias by the mainstream news media. But I also
43:16
Speaker 1: think that exposes and kind of backs up my theory
43:21
Speaker 1: that most people And I'm not suggesting that this is
43:25
Speaker 1: from CBS Evening News. I'm not suggesting that CBS Evening
43:28
Speaker 1: News controls the narrative for the entire country, but it's
43:32
Speaker 1: symbolic of the way the news media has reacted to
43:35
Speaker 1: all this. Because I'm going to play this clip from
43:37
Speaker 1: Nora O'Donnell CBS Evening News, which has gone viral because
43:43
Speaker 1: it's just so incredibly biased towards the Harris campaign and
43:47
Speaker 1: against the Trump campaign. But this is basically Nora O'Donnell,
43:51
Speaker 1: fellow Georgetown crab with whom I've had some very high
43:56
Speaker 1: profile run ins in the past. She's a clear left
43:59
Speaker 1: wing partisan. That's what she was on MSNBC, but now
44:03
Speaker 1: she's soon to be the X news anchor for the
44:07
Speaker 1: CBS Evening News. And I want you to listen to
44:11
Speaker 1: how she describes in her list her litany of negative
44:17
Speaker 1: things about Donald Trump, how she describes the McDonald's stunt.
44:22
Speaker 1: She makes absolutely no reference. She references it negatively, even
44:27
Speaker 1: though you know, it's clear from the public perception that
44:31
Speaker 1: it was a very effective and positive photo op for
44:35
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign. But she does not even reference why
44:40
Speaker 1: he was there, or you know, make any implication that
44:44
Speaker 1: Harris is on the defensive, or charges against Harris's veracity
44:49
Speaker 1: in her biography. Nothing like this. So what you're about
44:52
Speaker 1: to hear is noro' donald in the CBS Evening News
44:55
Speaker 1: basically taking a series of events surrounding the campaign two
45:03
Speaker 1: weeks ahead of the election and spinning every single one
45:07
Speaker 1: as positively for Harris as she possibly can and negatively
45:11
Speaker 1: for Trump as she possibly can. And here's what that
45:15
Speaker 1: sounded like.
45:16
Speaker 5: A Selection day is just over two weeks away, and
45:18
Speaker 5: the fight for every single last undecided vote in battleground
45:22
Speaker 5: states is intensifying. Vice President Kamala Harris's targeting disaffected Republican
45:27
Speaker 5: voters by hitting the trail with Liz Cheney in the
45:29
Speaker 5: crucial blue wall states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Cheney
45:34
Speaker 5: was a powerful Republican congresswoman and today she called Harris
45:37
Speaker 5: a responsible adult. As for former President Donald Trump, he
45:41
Speaker 5: was back in North Carolina, again pushing false claims about
45:44
Speaker 5: FEMA and immigrants. A's after he spent the weekends slinging
45:48
Speaker 5: a crude insult at Harris, engaging in lewd locker room
45:51
Speaker 5: talk about the late golfing legend Arnold Palmer, and staging
45:55
Speaker 5: a campaign stunt at a Pennsylvania McDonald's.
45:58
Speaker 1: Now I fully acknowledge that that is bias one oh one. However,
46:05
Speaker 1: to be you know, fair, as I always am, I
46:09
Speaker 1: only have a couple of objections to what was wrong
46:14
Speaker 1: with what was said there. First of all, the entire
46:18
Speaker 1: idea that, oh, this is very close election and the
46:21
Speaker 1: blue Wall States. You know, just by the way, just
46:25
Speaker 1: the reference of the blue Wall States in that context
46:28
Speaker 1: is inherently pro Harris, because it's presumed that that's Harris territory.
46:33
Speaker 1: I get it. Historically, other than twenty sixteen, it has
46:36
Speaker 1: been Democratic territory. But to be fair, if this was
46:40
Speaker 1: a journalistic organization, you would put something in there along
46:45
Speaker 1: the lines of the blue Wall might be cracking, or
46:48
Speaker 1: the Trump has momentum in the in the blue Wall States.
46:52
Speaker 1: Not to mention, you would also, you know, not spin
46:56
Speaker 1: the stuff about Trump. I get putting in oral Palmer Penis.
47:01
Speaker 1: I think that deserves to be in there, although there's
47:03
Speaker 1: no evidence that that has been a negative for Trump.
47:07
Speaker 1: It might be, we don't know that there's no evidence
47:09
Speaker 1: of that. And then I end with the whole McDonald's
47:13
Speaker 1: stunt being portrayed negatively without even any acknowledgement that Harris
47:20
Speaker 1: is on the defense or Trump is attacking her on
47:24
Speaker 1: the veracity of her biography, nothing like that. And so
47:28
Speaker 1: the importance of that clip is one it is really
47:31
Speaker 1: a really good example of the extreme and obvious bias
47:36
Speaker 1: that we now see in the mainstream news media, where
47:38
Speaker 1: they don't evenly even pretend anymore. I mean, they used
47:41
Speaker 1: to at least pretend because they had to protect their backside,
47:45
Speaker 1: but now you know, the CBS Evening News has no
47:48
Speaker 1: conservative audience, and so they don't care. They're just gonna,
47:52
Speaker 1: you know, give their liberal audience what's left of it
47:55
Speaker 1: what they want. And I do think that the way
47:58
Speaker 1: o'donald handled the McDonald situation is emblematic of how most
48:03
Speaker 1: of the media is doing so, which is again acting
48:07
Speaker 1: like the campaign manager for Kamala Harris because they know
48:11
Speaker 1: this is damaging and so we're just gonna you know,
48:15
Speaker 1: we're gonna pretend that we don't know why Trump was
48:18
Speaker 1: at the McDonald So we're gonna pretend it was out
48:21
Speaker 1: about the minimum wage or about you know him, you know,
48:24
Speaker 1: staging an event he's he didn't really work there. By
48:30
Speaker 1: the way, Newsweek got absolutely crushed, and understandably so on Monday.
48:37
Speaker 1: There must have been a contest at Newsweek on Monday
48:40
Speaker 1: for the most insanely absurd, biased anti Trump articles, but
48:49
Speaker 1: this one got ridiculed quite a bit. This is from
48:53
Speaker 1: Newsweek on Monday after I taped. I think I might
48:57
Speaker 1: have referenced this in the last episode of the podcast,
48:59
Speaker 1: but he didn't. I didn't quote it, So Newsweek put
49:03
Speaker 1: out a story with the headline this is on Twitter.
49:07
Speaker 1: Rumors have been circulated on social media that former President
49:11
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's visit to the popular fast food chain was staged.
49:19
Speaker 1: Rumors that it might have been staged. Get out of
49:24
Speaker 1: fucking town. You're kidding me, right, and that you know
49:28
Speaker 1: that went viral because people are like, this is crazy.
49:30
Speaker 1: I mean, does Newsweek really think or are they do?
49:33
Speaker 1: They think their audience things that Trump actually works at
49:37
Speaker 1: McDonald's and it's just running for president. On the side
49:41
Speaker 1: is that really what they think I mean. And by
49:42
Speaker 1: the way, the use of the word rumors is also hilarious.
49:45
Speaker 1: It was very, very obvious it had to be staged,
49:48
Speaker 1: if only from a security perspective. But if that wasn't enough.
49:53
Speaker 1: On the same day, not that long afterwards, a couple
49:58
Speaker 1: hours later, Newsweek Puts had another story with the following
50:02
Speaker 1: headline on Twitter, Donald Trump has shared what is likely
50:07
Speaker 1: an AI generated image on his true social account showing
50:12
Speaker 1: him as a player for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Trump had
50:19
Speaker 1: gone to the Steelers Sunday night football game, and he
50:24
Speaker 1: put out a true Social what was obviously an AI
50:29
Speaker 1: generated image of him, you know, looking like the incredible
50:33
Speaker 1: Hulp and looking much younger and a thousand times fitter
50:38
Speaker 1: in a Pittsburgh Steelers jersey. So, thank goodness we have
50:42
Speaker 1: Newsweek to expose this scandal that, you know what, it
50:48
Speaker 1: might have been AI generated, because we want to make
50:51
Speaker 1: sure people realize Trump does not actually play for the
50:57
Speaker 1: Pittsburgh Steelers. So this is weird news Week is now
51:01
Speaker 1: they spend much of Monday making sure people realize Trump
51:04
Speaker 1: doesn't really work for McDonald's and Trump doesn't actually play
51:09
Speaker 1: for the Pittsburgh Steelers. This is unbelievable what has happened
51:16
Speaker 1: the destruction of the mainstream news media. I mean Newsweek
51:19
Speaker 1: used to be a reputable news outlet and now literally
51:23
Speaker 1: online they're being used as a joke. Now because we're
51:28
Speaker 1: late in October, it's expected that we're gonna see October
51:31
Speaker 1: surprises or quote unquote surprises or hit pieces in the
51:35
Speaker 1: news media. I referenced in the last episode that Bill
51:39
Speaker 1: Maher on HBO kind of already prepared his audience for
51:43
Speaker 1: the fact that there we're gonna be October surprises against Trump,
51:47
Speaker 1: that we're not going to be impactful against him, because,
51:50
Speaker 1: in my words, he's immune to all viruses. And I
51:53
Speaker 1: think we saw a classic example of that in a
51:57
Speaker 1: story in The Atlantic, another outlet which with whom I
52:01
Speaker 1: have quite a storied history. I've referenced it many times before.
52:05
Speaker 1: Many years ago, they did a twenty three page cover
52:07
Speaker 1: story on me written by David Foster Wallace that was
52:09
Speaker 1: a complete hack job, with lots and lots of inaccuracies.
52:14
Speaker 1: It's still very famous to this day. The Atlantic has
52:17
Speaker 1: gotten worse since then. They are owned by a top
52:22
Speaker 1: financial backer to Kamala Harris, and they did a hit
52:27
Speaker 1: piece that was so absurd, so ridiculous, and so completely
52:33
Speaker 1: collapsed almost immediately upon publication that it seems like a parody.
52:41
Speaker 1: It seems like a parody. But the essence of this
52:43
Speaker 1: piece and what was clearly the target or the reason,
52:48
Speaker 1: the motivation, what the political motivation of this piece clearly
52:52
Speaker 1: was dealt with a situation where Trump as president had
52:58
Speaker 1: offered to pay for the funeral of a Mexican American
53:04
Speaker 1: Mexican soldier who died. And you know, it's a long story,
53:09
Speaker 1: but basically allegedly in this telling of it by a
53:13
Speaker 1: god but nam of Jeffrey Goldberg, who's a terrible reporter
53:17
Speaker 1: for The Atlantic, that Trump, when he found out how
53:21
Speaker 1: much the funeral was gonna be, supposedly sixty thousand dollars,
53:27
Speaker 1: he told Mark Meadows, his chief of staff at the time,
53:31
Speaker 1: it doesn't cost sixty thousand dollars to bury a fucking Mexican.
53:37
Speaker 1: Don't pay it. Now, Before anybody responded to this piece,
53:44
Speaker 1: that just seems ridiculous. I mean, come on, that doesn't
53:48
Speaker 1: even pass the lap test, especially two weeks before an election,
53:54
Speaker 1: especially when it's really the caricature of what liberals would
53:58
Speaker 1: like to bel leave Donald Trump is really all about.
54:02
Speaker 1: I mean, they so badly want him to be a racist.
54:05
Speaker 1: And of course I'm sure it's just a coincidence that
54:09
Speaker 1: polls are showing that Trump is doing very well with
54:11
Speaker 1: Hispanic voters, especially in the key states of Arizona and Nevada.
54:17
Speaker 1: So it's just a coincidence that the Atlantic concox or
54:22
Speaker 1: comes up with this story all of a sudden, many
54:26
Speaker 1: years later, many years. I mean, that's one of the
54:29
Speaker 1: many reasons I don't believe the story. One, it's too
54:31
Speaker 1: good to be true from the left wing perspective. But two,
54:34
Speaker 1: if this had happened, it would have been known instant, fuckingtaneously.
54:40
Speaker 1: I mean, that is an outrageous statement for anybody to make,
54:43
Speaker 1: but especially a president of the United States. So it
54:47
Speaker 1: doesn't pass the lap test. It's suspicious because of the
54:52
Speaker 1: targeting of Hispanic voters two weeks before an election. It
54:57
Speaker 1: doesn't even sound to me like Trump at all. But
55:01
Speaker 1: putting all that aside, just looking at this from a
55:04
Speaker 1: journalistic perspective, So what happened after publication, Well, here's a
55:10
Speaker 1: list of the people who immediately immediately put out public statements,
55:16
Speaker 1: not just disagreeing with the story, but overtly clearly condemning
55:24
Speaker 1: the story, contradicting the story. These are people directly involved
55:30
Speaker 1: in the story who are saying it's not true. Let
55:38
Speaker 1: me go through the list. The soldier's sister made an
55:43
Speaker 1: impassion post on Twitter saying this is not true and
55:47
Speaker 1: that they had just voted for Donald Trump because he
55:50
Speaker 1: had been so wonderful to their family during the ordeal.
55:56
Speaker 1: That alone would bring the story into grave question, especially
56:01
Speaker 1: given the context of two weeks before an election. But
56:04
Speaker 1: it didn't stop there. The family's lawyer put out a
56:08
Speaker 1: similar statement, Mark Meadows, put out a statement condemning the story.
56:14
Speaker 1: Former Trump's staffers who were there put out statements saying
56:20
Speaker 1: that the story is not true. Now, as of this taping,
56:23
Speaker 1: The Atlantic has not, you know, taken back the story.
56:29
Speaker 1: If you would think in a rational world that they
56:31
Speaker 1: would be forced to address this, I have not seen
56:34
Speaker 1: that they have as of yet. But this is just
56:37
Speaker 1: utter crap, utter crap. And again this is you know,
56:41
Speaker 1: I'm somebody who loads Donald Trump. I've made that very clear.
56:45
Speaker 1: I am more than willing to contemplate Trump doing all
56:51
Speaker 1: sorts of crazy and terrible things. I don't think there's
56:54
Speaker 1: any evidence this happened. The journalism behind it is obviously horrendous,
56:59
Speaker 1: and the story doesn't even ring true. It doesn't even
57:03
Speaker 1: pass the laugh test, especially given the context of two
57:07
Speaker 1: weeks before an election when this allegedly happened many years ago. Similarly,
57:14
Speaker 1: we have the story of John Kelly, top Trump aid,
57:18
Speaker 1: who is now going around doing an interview saying that
57:24
Speaker 1: Trump loves Hitler and loves the loyalty that Hitler's generals
57:30
Speaker 1: showed to him. Now again, you know, I would consider
57:36
Speaker 1: Kelly to be a credible person, and you know, he
57:41
Speaker 1: certainly has a great history of serving his country, so
57:45
Speaker 1: I am open to what he has to say. But
57:50
Speaker 1: again I go back to you're telling me that Donald
57:56
Speaker 1: Trump said all these great things about Hitler and you know,
58:01
Speaker 1: wanting generals that were loyal to him, like they're loyal
58:05
Speaker 1: to Hitler, and you're just now talking about this just now.
58:12
Speaker 1: How is that possible? I mean, Kelly has been a
58:15
Speaker 1: critic of a very severe critic of Donald Trump for
58:20
Speaker 1: a very long time, many many years now, and just
58:25
Speaker 1: now he suddenly comes forward with the Trump loves Hitler thing.
58:32
Speaker 1: Much like the fucking Mexican quotation from Trump from an
58:38
Speaker 1: unnamed source. You know, that is denied by Mark Meadows,
58:43
Speaker 1: the person that he allegedly said that to. This is
58:47
Speaker 1: too convenient, I mean, it dovetails too much with what
58:51
Speaker 1: the left wants to believe about Donald Trump. I mean
58:55
Speaker 1: the Atlantic was calling him Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini just
58:59
Speaker 1: a couple of days ago. So I'm a little less
59:04
Speaker 1: skeptical because the source is John Kelly and not a
59:08
Speaker 1: writer for The Atlantic using unnamed sources. But it's still
59:13
Speaker 1: it doesn't ring true. There's a problem there. Why is
59:17
Speaker 1: this the first time you're saying this? And I don't
59:22
Speaker 1: have an explanation for that. But I also know that,
59:25
Speaker 1: as Bill Maher has said that, I have said, this
59:28
Speaker 1: is not going to have any impact on Trump. It
59:31
Speaker 1: really isn't. I mean, he is immune to this virus.
59:36
Speaker 1: Even among you know, independent still undecided voters, all four
59:42
Speaker 1: of them out there. I don't think this is going
59:45
Speaker 1: to be the deciding factor if anything. And this is
59:49
Speaker 1: a mistake that liberals made in twenty sixteen. They're making
59:54
Speaker 1: Trump into too strong a figure. I have always believed
59:58
Speaker 1: you don't go after Trump as Hitler, you go after
1:00:04
Speaker 1: Trump as a buffoon, as a person who is weak,
1:00:10
Speaker 1: a person who is a fraud, a coward, a you know.
1:00:17
Speaker 1: I mean, there's all sorts of ways you could do that.
1:00:21
Speaker 1: But he is a joke. He's not Hitler. Hitler makes
1:00:25
Speaker 1: him seem stronger than he really is. Not that people
1:00:29
Speaker 1: have a positive view of Hitler, but I'm talking about
1:00:34
Speaker 1: the portrayal of Trump. And let's be clear, you know,
1:00:40
Speaker 1: alpha versus beta, masculine versus feminine is a key, at
1:00:46
Speaker 1: least subconscious issue in this campaign. I mean, frankly, it
1:00:49
Speaker 1: might be the number one issue, as pathetic as that is,
1:00:53
Speaker 1: the number one issue in this campaign might be are
1:00:56
Speaker 1: you more of a masculine person or a fact in person?
1:01:00
Speaker 1: Are you more of an alpha or a beta? Well,
1:01:04
Speaker 1: turning Trump back into Hitler's stalin and Muzzolini gives him
1:01:09
Speaker 1: the alpha mantle. Again, this is subconscious. I just don't
1:01:14
Speaker 1: think it's particularly effective, and I don't know that it's
1:01:17
Speaker 1: really accurate either. But that's what they're doing with Trump
1:01:21
Speaker 1: in the closing weeks of the election, and I don't
1:01:24
Speaker 1: think it's going to be particularly effective. I don't know
1:01:27
Speaker 1: that that means he's gonna win. I'm just saying this
1:01:29
Speaker 1: is not going to be what ends up giving the
1:01:31
Speaker 1: election to Harris. One other specific media related note that
1:01:38
Speaker 1: does have at least a connection to Donald Trump, and
1:01:42
Speaker 1: we've talked about this in the past. New York Magazine
1:01:45
Speaker 1: has officially let go of Olivia Nuzzy, the writer reporter
1:01:52
Speaker 1: who was put on leave when it was revealed that
1:01:55
Speaker 1: she had been engaged in a romantic relationship, extra marital,
1:02:01
Speaker 1: extra relationship. She was at a fiance at the time
1:02:05
Speaker 1: who's also a mainstream news media reporter, but she was
1:02:09
Speaker 1: engaged in some sort of a romantic relationship with rf
1:02:12
Speaker 1: K Junior, of course, is married to a Hollywood star.
1:02:17
Speaker 1: It's amazing that at this point we don't know that
1:02:19
Speaker 1: rf K Junior has experienced any ramifications for this. He's
1:02:24
Speaker 1: received very little criticism in the news media. He has
1:02:28
Speaker 1: not been, you know, let go of his role in
1:02:30
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign. Frankly, I think Trump probably tests more
1:02:34
Speaker 1: respect for RFK Junior now because he clearly had a
1:02:37
Speaker 1: thing for Nuzzy. Nuzzy used her feminine attributes, in my opinion,
1:02:45
Speaker 1: to cozy up to Trump. Trump liked her because she's
1:02:48
Speaker 1: an attractive, young blonde woman. That's the way Trump does things.
1:02:52
Speaker 1: But Nuzzy apparently engaged in what appears to have been
1:02:57
Speaker 1: a FaceTime romantic relations Now we don't know that for sure,
1:03:01
Speaker 1: but you know, there's been a denial of a physical relationship.
1:03:06
Speaker 1: But obviously there was proof of it enough to where
1:03:10
Speaker 1: New York Magazine suspended and then essentially fired her and
1:03:14
Speaker 1: her fiance, former fiance Ryan Lizza, who I think was
1:03:19
Speaker 1: the source. I mean, if you use Akham's raiser. In fact,
1:03:23
Speaker 1: you know there have been legal documents that have backed
1:03:26
Speaker 1: up my theory on this that it has to be
1:03:29
Speaker 1: Liza that was the source. I mean, how else you
1:03:32
Speaker 1: would have to have electronic proof of this for New
1:03:35
Speaker 1: York Magazine to do what they did without a confession.
1:03:39
Speaker 1: And you would think that the person with the motive
1:03:42
Speaker 1: and the opportunity to get that electronic information, not to
1:03:45
Speaker 1: mention as a journalist to wherewithal to understand how this
1:03:50
Speaker 1: whole thing works. All signs point to her former fiance Liza,
1:03:55
Speaker 1: being the source of the information here. So Nuzzy has
1:04:00
Speaker 1: gone from the New York Magazine. RFK Junior, as of
1:04:05
Speaker 1: our public knowledge, has not suffered any negative ramifications for this,
1:04:12
Speaker 1: and so you know, I don't know where we go
1:04:14
Speaker 1: from there. To my knowledge, rf K Junior has never
1:04:16
Speaker 1: been properly asked about this situation. But it is another
1:04:22
Speaker 1: indication of the death of journalism, not because Nuzzy has
1:04:25
Speaker 1: been let go, but because Nussy somehow and this is
1:04:29
Speaker 1: a major mainstream reporter who had a significant role in
1:04:34
Speaker 1: the Biden coup. It should be pointed out that she
1:04:37
Speaker 1: wrote a very key article at a key time that
1:04:42
Speaker 1: really pushed the momentum of the Biden coup. And here
1:04:46
Speaker 1: she is being so stupid as to engage in a
1:04:51
Speaker 1: romantic relationship with a person who at the time was
1:04:56
Speaker 1: still a major force in this campaign. I mean, she
1:04:59
Speaker 1: had done US story on him when he was still
1:05:02
Speaker 1: a candidate RFK Junior. So just by virtue of the
1:05:05
Speaker 1: fact that this could even happen is an indication of
1:05:09
Speaker 1: the death of journalism. Now I'm not naive. I'm sure
1:05:13
Speaker 1: this is not the first time this has happened. I'm
1:05:16
Speaker 1: quite certain that this has happened in the past. But
1:05:18
Speaker 1: we now live in a world where electronic proof is
1:05:22
Speaker 1: much more easily obtained and so we find out about
1:05:26
Speaker 1: these kinds of things. But living in a world where
1:05:29
Speaker 1: a reporter would find this to be remotely acceptable or
1:05:33
Speaker 1: a good idea forget about the even if she wasn't
1:05:37
Speaker 1: reporting on RFK Junior, but the fact that she already
1:05:39
Speaker 1: had and that she was still doing significant reporting on
1:05:43
Speaker 1: the presidential campaign, including that article I referenced that helped
1:05:48
Speaker 1: facilitate the Biden coup, is really extraordinary. And while this
1:05:52
Speaker 1: story has gotten a lot of play in media circles,
1:05:55
Speaker 1: I don't think it's gotten enough attention in the public sphere.
1:05:58
Speaker 1: But it certainly does go to the issue of the
1:06:01
Speaker 1: lack of trust in media. There's a new survey out
1:06:04
Speaker 1: once again showing how catastrophic the drop in public trust
1:06:09
Speaker 1: in the news media is, especially among Republicans and independents,
1:06:14
Speaker 1: but even among Democrats. Interestingly, after twenty twenty, even democratic
1:06:20
Speaker 1: trust in the mainstream news media has gone down rather significantly. Gee,
1:06:25
Speaker 1: I wonder what happened in twenty twenty. I'm not usually
1:06:29
Speaker 1: an optimist, but there seems to be some evidence, based
1:06:31
Speaker 1: upon this new survey, that even Democrats lost trust in
1:06:36
Speaker 1: the news media, either directly or indirectly because of the
1:06:40
Speaker 1: COVID panic. So there's, in a weird way, there's good
1:06:43
Speaker 1: news there and there's bad news. The good news is
1:06:46
Speaker 1: some people are getting it bad news is not everyone's
1:06:50
Speaker 1: getting it. But also, especially going into this election, I
1:06:54
Speaker 1: think it is very dangerous, very dangerous to have a
1:06:58
Speaker 1: society a country that has no trust in the news media,
1:07:01
Speaker 1: especially on the Republican side, when we may have an
1:07:04
Speaker 1: incredibly close election, an incredibly close election that no one
1:07:11
Speaker 1: has anyone to turn to that they trust, that can
1:07:13
Speaker 1: tell them their side lost. That is a very dangerous
1:07:19
Speaker 1: situation on both sides. So, you know, we may be
1:07:23
Speaker 1: heading towards our closest election maybe ever in some ways
1:07:28
Speaker 1: it could be closer than twenty twenty. You know, I'm
1:07:31
Speaker 1: not suggesting we're gonna have Florida down to six hundred votes,
1:07:35
Speaker 1: but there's so many swing state votes that may take
1:07:38
Speaker 1: days or maybe even weeks theoretically to decide who won.
1:07:42
Speaker 1: In a very combustible situation involving a candidate who claims
1:07:46
Speaker 1: the last election was rigged against him, where nobody believes
1:07:50
Speaker 1: the news media, no one believes any of our institutions,
1:07:55
Speaker 1: So who's going to trust the results, especially if they're
1:07:58
Speaker 1: super close, and we have this is a very dangerous
1:08:03
Speaker 1: set of circumstances. It is a perfect storm that is
1:08:07
Speaker 1: theoretically coming together, that could cause a whole lot of
1:08:11
Speaker 1: problems that would make Florida in two thousand seem like
1:08:15
Speaker 1: a picnic. I'm serious. If you took the circumstances of
1:08:20
Speaker 1: Florida in two thousand and placed them in twenty twenty four,
1:08:25
Speaker 1: there's no way we handle the situation as well as
1:08:28
Speaker 1: we did in two thousand, and there were a lot
1:08:31
Speaker 1: of problems in two thousand. I was living a lot
1:08:33
Speaker 1: of the time in Florida at that During that year,
1:08:36
Speaker 1: I was literally there for the protests for on multiple days,
1:08:42
Speaker 1: So you know, I lived that and that was very
1:08:45
Speaker 1: weird and it almost went the wrong direction. But I
1:08:50
Speaker 1: think if that happens today, it is way way worse,
1:08:54
Speaker 1: in large part because of the catastrophic loss and trust
1:08:58
Speaker 1: in the news media among everybody, but especially among Republicans.
1:09:04
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to today's free drop of the abbreviated show.
1:09:08
Speaker 1: If you're interested in listening to the entire show, you
1:09:11
Speaker 1: must become a patron. Please go to Patreon. That's p
1:09:16
Speaker 1: A t R E O N dot com Patreon dot com.
1:09:21
Speaker 1: Slash the Death of Journalism with John Ziggler. My name
1:09:27
Speaker 1: is j H N z I E g l e R.
1:09:30
Speaker 1: That's Patreon dot com slash the Death of Journalism with
1:09:36
Speaker 1: John Zigler. Good luck to you on that, But that's
1:09:40
Speaker 1: how you can subscribe