Latest / Honey Badger Radio / ICE Shooting: The Men’s Rights Detail No One Noticed (That Changes Everything)

Transcript

ICE Shooting: The Men’s Rights Detail No One Noticed (That Changes Everything) · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome back to Honeybadger Radio. And here
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: is Brian. I'm here with Alison, and this is a
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: maintaining frame. I guess shooting the men's writes detail nobody
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: noticed that changes everything. Where we are going to be
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: giving our perspective on the recent incident in Minneapolis involving
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: an ice officer and an activist that was trying to
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: impede him, and it ended in up with the activists
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: being killed. And of course this is started a media
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: firestorm and there have been vigils, there have been riots,
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: there have been fighting in the streets, there have been docsing,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: there have been allegations of fascism, and all kinds of
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: other stuff. And we're going to try and break through
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: the noise and look at this in you know, as
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: I guess, as a unique way that we can offer
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: and also giving some clarity because there is such a
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: thing as the truth and we should talk about that.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we should seek it out. Yes, all right, you want.
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: Me to do the things before I get into it.
• 1:11
  Speaker 3: Yes, So if you would like to send us a message,
• 1:14
  Speaker 3: if you have a burning passion to contradict us or
• 1:18
  Speaker 3: say you like us, or whatever else, you can go
• 1:21
  Speaker 3: to feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip
• 1:23
  Speaker 3: and send us a tip and a message with that tip.
• 1:27
  Speaker 3: And it's a better way for you to send it
• 1:29
  Speaker 3: than potentially other ways because you avoid YouTube's comment enhancement
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: and you get a little more space to elaborate on
• 1:36
  Speaker 3: your on your thoughts on your commentary, and we get
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: whatever benefit of the funds you send. So feed the
• 1:44
  Speaker 3: Badger dot com slash just the tip. Still haven't put
• 1:48
  Speaker 3: up the fundraiser, but it will be available when it
• 1:51
  Speaker 3: is up at feed the Badger dot com slash support.
• 1:53
  Speaker 3: And in the meantime, you can always start a subscription
• 1:57
  Speaker 3: at feedbadger dot com slash subscribe, or just join us
• 2:00
  Speaker 3: in our group discord group at Badger nation dot online.
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: That's where I post a lot of my links to
• 2:09
  Speaker 3: resources because YouTube hates links and sometimes I refer to
• 2:12
  Speaker 3: things that aren't in the low bar. So if you're
• 2:15
  Speaker 3: interested in that, and if you're interested in deeper analyses
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: of the things that we talk about, Badger nation dot
• 2:20
  Speaker 3: online is where to go. All right, let's uh, I'll
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: just go ahead, Brian, give us your thoughts in a summary,
• 2:27
  Speaker 3: our summary and your thoughts.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: So yep. So on January seventh in Minneapolis, Minnesota, there
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: was a clash between anti ICE activists and ICE officers
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: that were trying to do their job, and one specific
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: video went viral, and that was of a woman who
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: appeared to have been shot by an ICE officer through
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: the windshield and died. And of course, if I if
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: that's all you heard, then that would be the story
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: and everybody would like be like, oh, you know, case clothes,
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: Ice are terrible people. They've only been telling us this
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: for years on every possible media outlet, everything that had
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: a sound that can come out of it. But it's
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: not as simple as that. So what we originally had
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: some video from people's phones, and those were people who
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: were there, and specifically those were activists that were there
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: that were sort of like on the side of the
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: woman driving the car, and it looked, you know, they
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: were trying to spin it, and people are still doing
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: it now, but we have since gotten buddy and footage
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: after that that sort of shows a different picture now
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: from what I know. And I have a lot of
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: stuff here I can show, but I think it's important
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: to like set the stage. So first of all, we
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: have some information let's just before we even get to
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: this day. Okay. Ever since the ICE deportations have started,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: there have been a tax on ICE officers, and the
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: Department of Home and Security in the States have been
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: hiring and a lot of people have been getting jobs there.
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: This is a decision. This whole deportation operation was something
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: that was put into place because Americans voted for it.
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: And remember on the ticket for twenty twenty four, and
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: this is important context. There were two options. There was
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: the one that was going to close the order then
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: the illegals back cut back on the spending and essentially
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: put keep more money in the pockets of taxpayers. And
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: then there was the party that wanted to kill their babies.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: And it was divided mostly on gender lines when those
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: votes came out. I mean, there was some overlap or whatever,
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: but there was a big divide in that particular thing.
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: And we've been talking about the genera divide on the
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: voting thing and how women have become more and more
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: radical in recent years and how that's been reflected in
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: pulling and in voting patterns, et cetera. But it's also
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: been in the case of activism. And so since ICE
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: has been put on the job. And most of these people,
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: by the way, that are doing this enforcement are men.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: This is important because the men's channel. And yes, men
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: are immigrants, but men are also cops, and they are
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: ICE officers, and they are military, and they are first responders,
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: and they're firemen, and they're rangers and their medics whatever, right,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: so most of the so anyway, according to official statements
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: from the US Department of Homeland Security and ICE, there
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: have been a dramatic reported increase in vehicle related assaults
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: such as ramming, hitting, and using vehicles as weapons against
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: ICE agents. DHS has released statistics highlighting this trend, particularly
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: since early twenty twenty five under the current administration's intensified
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: immigration enforcement operations. Key figures include from January twenty first,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five to early January twenty twenty six. So
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: this is the last not even month, it's just been like, well,
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: it's actually been a year, right about a year. ICE
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: officers reportedly experienced sixty six vehicular attacks compared to just
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: two in the same period in the year of twenty
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: twenty four, you know, when Joe Biden was in office,
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: described as a three thousand percent increase three two hundred
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: percent Earlier reports through November twenty twenty five cided twenty
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: eight vehicular attacks against ICE since January twentieth, versus two
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: in the twenty twenty fourth period, a thirteen hundred percent
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: increase Overall ICE assaults on ICE agents not limited to
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: vehicles were reported as up over thirteen hundred percent or
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: in some statements, and forty seven percent, with death threats
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: rising by eight thousand percent. These numbers come directly from
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: DHS press releases and statements, often attruding the search to
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: radical rhetoric from sanctuary city politicians, activists, and media that
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: they say encourages resistance and violence against federal officers. And
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: we've actually seen this actually coming out from certain governors
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: like Tim Walls and mayors like Brandon Johnson, like the
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: mayor of Minneapolis whose name it slips my mind right now.
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: And yes, so no too. Walls to the governor, some
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: of the mayor, the guy who said get the fuck
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: of our city to ICE, basically threatening them. And of
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: course these are the people, the people who say these things,
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: they never have to like cash the check that they're
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: you know that they're writing. It's always like people on
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: the ground that end up having to deal with that stuff.
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: So this is an important to point out. Okay, so
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: so this this, uh, the individual involved in the in
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: the accident, the actual ice officer himself, whose name I
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: will not reveal, although he has been docks by, you know,
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: left the activists online.
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: Well the thing is that, Okay, just just I think
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: it's okay because even Fox was talking about his name.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: Well they put it out there. Yeah, I guess.
• 8:25
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, I don't think we can necessarily because
• 8:27
  Speaker 3: it be a little bit difficult not to talk about
• 8:29
  Speaker 3: this situation without without actually referencing his name, although I
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: don't I mean, so that let's.
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: Just leave it at that.
• 8:38
  Speaker 3: But yeah, this is uh, continue Brian. So I just
• 8:43
  Speaker 3: wanted to say that I think at this point that
• 8:44
  Speaker 3: the chat is out of the bag.
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so the guy's name is out there. I don't
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: have it in front of me, but I'm sure it's
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: in one of my notes somewhere. Yeah, but he was
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: they were posting him online. That was the Brian Krass
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: that did it. Actually have it on my phone here
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: because I reposted him and I called it monstrous and
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: because he because of the way that they do this
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: and this is exactly, by the way, this is the
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: same shit they did that got Charlie Kirk killed. And
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: I'm not afraid to say that because it's true. Where
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: let me just find it here? Yeah, here we go.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: Brian Crasenstein said, Jonathan Ross is his name? Stay peaceful?
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: So he gives the guy's name, shows a full HG
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: photo of the dude, even though he's bringing a mask,
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: and then says, stay peaceful, ask for it afterwards, which
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: you know that that's what I'm saying, Like this is
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: this kind of like did they do this so they
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: can get plausible deniability and say, well, look, I told
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: him to say people, but if he gets killed by
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: a lunatic, hey, that's just like that's not my problem, right,
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: And it's obvious what they're doing like this they were saying, well,
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: why are these guys wearing masks? Well, I don't know,
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: to protect themselves and their family, because it's not just
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: like you know, activists that are a problem, or even
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: like illegal immigrants might get violent when cornered, that's a problem.
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: It's the cartels that are a problem that are often
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: tied to some of these illegals that are here. It's
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: like there's there's links to terrorist groups, you know, like
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: the Somalians that live in Minnesota that are sending money
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: back to terror cells. So it's not like this is
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: just like in a vacuum. Okay, no, But anyway, going
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: back to that guy, I'm not bringing up who he
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: is or what happened or well, like this specific thing
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: about him being docksed. But it's also important to note
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: that the ICE officer involved in this issue had himself
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: already been attacked. Let me see here, I have the
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: data right here. This is from the Department of Homeland
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: Security and this is from June. So it's not like
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: they put it out there now to like sort of
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: cover him. This is an older report and these are
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: the things that people that know about until something like
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: what happened today happens. Then people start looking into it.
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: So in June eighteenth, there was a Today, Department of
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: Homeland Security announced federal law enforcement arrested Roberto Carlos Muno's Guatemala,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: a serial illegal alien, after he dragged in Immigration and
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: Customs Enforcement officer fifty yards with his car in Bloomington, Minnesota,
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: trying to evade arrest. So and then this the ice officer,
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: same guy from today, from this story that we're talking about.
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: He was dragged for fifty yards, just like one hundred
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: and fifty feet. He had to be hospitalized and he
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: got over thirty stitches, and then he went back to work,
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: and now he ran into this problem. And so a
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: woman is threatened to drive into a guy that had
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: already had an experience with a person behind a wheel
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: that didn't want to comply. It's no wonder that he
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: might be a little bit on edge.
• 11:49
  Speaker 3: Well, it's not even like, okay, we need if you're done,
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: I think we should go take a.
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: Look at the footage. And I'm going to I'm.
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: Not showing them that I can come back.
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: I don't know what we need to go through it.
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: Now.
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: It's okay, we can go through the footage.
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: Now, because I want to point out what I think
• 12:05
  Speaker 3: everybody is missed on both the right and the left side.
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: And while I'm not drawing an equivalence between the right
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: and the left narratives, I think it was missed on
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: the right side because it started to spin into.
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: Its own narrative.
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: And this is actually something that reframes everything that happened
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: and lays to rest whether or not it was a
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: justified use of lethal force. So I'd like to I'd
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: like to go through the actual event and take a
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: look at at the circumstances surrounding the discharge of the firearm.
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: Are we allowed to say shooting. I guess it doesn't
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: matter because we're demonetized and de algorithmized. So but anyway,
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: that's what I want to do because I want to
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: point something out that I think has been missed by everyone.
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: And the reason why, you know.
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: When I first when Brian first brought this to me
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: as a topic, I'm like, Oh, gosh, this is this
• 12:56
  Speaker 3: is going to be it's going to be too much political.
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: But and then we talked about it and I realized
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: there's a really strong men's rights at angle to it.
• 13:06
  Speaker 3: And I was looking at researching it and looking into
• 13:09
  Speaker 3: it and looking at the footage. And after he had Brian,
• 13:13
  Speaker 3: Brian had brought that specific situation up in in the
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: past of this officer, I was starting.
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: To I was.
• 13:24
  Speaker 4: I was thinking about that, like the how he was
• 13:26
  Speaker 4: bringing to this situation, the fact that he had himself
• 13:30
  Speaker 4: almost been in like a fatality, like he'd almost been
• 13:34
  Speaker 4: killed by a car, Like when you're dragged by a
• 13:36
  Speaker 4: car of that length.
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: It's almost like a miracle that you weren't killed. Uh
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: fifty yards there. That that that particular scenario has a
• 13:45
  Speaker 3: high light, a high likelihood of injury or death. And
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: he survived that, and he had to go to the
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: hospital get thirty stitches. And I was just in the
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: back of my mind. I was thinking about that while
• 13:56
  Speaker 3: I reviewed the footage. So do you have the footage up, Brian?
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: Are we talking about which clip? The last one I
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: sent you? The one.
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: Actual, the actual.
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: From the of the I of the nice officer, No.
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: From the perspective of the bystanders, the clip of the
• 14:11
  Speaker 3: actual incidents, the original clip that was showed on on Foxes. Yeah,
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: that one right, good, good job, all right? So, yes,
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: expanded as much as you can and let's play it.
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: I can full screen it, Yes, and let's see it.
• 14:32
  Speaker 3: You can see the vehicle there that's law enforcement and
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: it is the Honda Pilot that we should be focused
• 14:39
  Speaker 3: on here. It's about a purpleish reddish.
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: Perpendicular. That's an tactic that's not an accident specifically obstruct.
• 14:51
  Speaker 3: Yes, she's actually blocking their way. She's actually blocking their way.
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: That's verified.
• 14:57
  Speaker 3: But this is what I like. This is the moment
• 14:59
  Speaker 3: where we're going to to see something and I'm gonna
• 15:01
  Speaker 3: point it out. And I don't think anybody's talking about
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: it except in passing. So let's watch what's happening. Okay,
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: we're here agent walking up and then there's another agent.
• 15:13
  Speaker 3: I don't know if you can see that.
• 15:15
  Speaker 2: Did you see it?
• 15:16
  Speaker 3: Did you see it? I'll yes, So.
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: If you slow.
• 15:24
  Speaker 3: It down so way down? Yeah, there we go, so
• 15:28
  Speaker 3: way down. And I want people to watch this.
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: Hey, don't listen to the it's gonna.
• 15:33
  Speaker 3: Be yeah, maybe turn off the commentary.
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: So you see this.
• 15:38
  Speaker 3: Now she backs up, right, she stops. Right, Look and
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: that looks almost like, okay, stop it here. That almost
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: looks like she's complying with what they're telling him to do,
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: which is to get the hell out of the out
• 15:51
  Speaker 3: of the street. Right, she stops, He reaches into the window.
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: Now continue in slow motion. See what happens, right, keep going,
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: keep going.
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: Do you see that.
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: When he reaches into the window, right, just let it
• 16:15
  Speaker 3: let it run, let it run.
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: Do you see the motion that he's making.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: The guy on the guy closer to us.
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: The guy the guy closer to us, who is reaching
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: into the window like he's reaching in, right, Okay, he
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: moves his hand and then after the shots fire, it's
• 16:38
  Speaker 3: almost like there's something that lets go and the momentum
• 16:44
  Speaker 3: of that sends him back a bit.
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: Do you see what I'm saying?
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: All right, let's go let's look at it again and
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: see if you can see what I'm saying. Watch him slowly,
• 16:56
  Speaker 3: don't don't stop it. So his hand goes in, he's
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: trying the lock. He's probably trying to reach to get
• 17:07
  Speaker 3: rid of the lock for some reason, his hand isn't back,
• 17:10
  Speaker 3: and then bam, his hand is released.
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: You see that?
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: Okay, So what did we just see?
• 17:19
  Speaker 3: That guy was almost in the same scenario as the
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: man who shot the protester, his his comrade, or his colleague,
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: was in a scenario where, no matter how long it took,
• 17:35
  Speaker 3: it briefly looked like he was trapped and unable to
• 17:39
  Speaker 3: get his hand out of the car. And the person
• 17:42
  Speaker 3: the man with the gun, had already experienced that, right,
• 17:46
  Speaker 3: so in that split second, he probably thought that that's
• 17:50
  Speaker 3: what it was about to happen.
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: That guy was going to get dragged.
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, he was.
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: The amount of recoil you see on his when he
• 18:00
  Speaker 3: gets his hand back. The amount of recoil suggests that
• 18:03
  Speaker 3: he was actually trapped by something, at least for a moment. Now,
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: I'm not sure, for I'm not. I can't. I'm not
• 18:09
  Speaker 3: a professional analyst. I'm just somebody who is.
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: You know. I've studied motion.
• 18:15
  Speaker 3: Because I'm an artist and briefly an animator, you know.
• 18:18
  Speaker 3: But that looks like there was something pulling him and
• 18:22
  Speaker 3: then he got free, and then there was recoil from
• 18:25
  Speaker 3: that which sent him backwards. Right, So something happened in
• 18:30
  Speaker 3: there to make that guy think and most likely made
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: him think, my colleague is about to get dragged.
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: No, I don't think anybody has noticed that specific at
• 18:42
  Speaker 3: least they haven't brought it out specifically as an important detail.
• 18:47
  Speaker 3: And it is a really critical detail, and I don't
• 18:50
  Speaker 3: think they. I don't think either on the right, certainly,
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: not on the left, the left, whatever, right, nobody has
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: stepped through this from the point of view of vulnerability
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: of these men and what that guy has been through,
• 19:04
  Speaker 3: what the what the officer who shot has been through,
• 19:08
  Speaker 3: because again he experienced nearly dying in that exact scenario
• 19:13
  Speaker 3: that it looks like his colleague was almost in right. Yeah,
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: But here's here is the kicker. And this is why
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: I think that when we step through it, when men's
• 19:23
  Speaker 3: rights active as step through it, we see things like this,
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: We see things that other people don't on either side
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: of the aisle. You know, you see that because you
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: can you can see the vulnerability. And I don't think
• 19:34
  Speaker 3: either side. I don't think the left or the right.
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: For them both the right less than the left. Of course,
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: men are simply heroes or villains, but not people dealing
• 19:47
  Speaker 3: with extremely difficult circumstances. But there is an even more
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: important element to this, and I'm really surprised nobody noticed
• 19:55
  Speaker 3: this interaction means that this was a justified use of
• 20:00
  Speaker 3: lethal force in terms of policy. If if if somebody
• 20:09
  Speaker 3: starts to accelerate while a law enforcement law enforcement officer's
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: arm is in their car, that is considered one hundred
• 20:19
  Speaker 3: use a period, a moment where lethal use is authorized.
• 20:24
  Speaker 3: So this is this is this is a case closed situation.
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: This use of lethal force was acceptable according to policy,
• 20:35
  Speaker 3: and it was acceptable according to US self defense doctrine.
• 20:39
  Speaker 3: If this if these two were civilians approaching this car
• 20:43
  Speaker 3: and it wouldn't matter why they put their arm in
• 20:46
  Speaker 3: the car, right, But he had every he had. He
• 20:49
  Speaker 3: was trying to give her instructions to get out of
• 20:51
  Speaker 3: the car, so he had probably shouldn't have, you you
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: might have. You might have a little bit of a
• 20:56
  Speaker 3: place to argue that, Yeah, that wasn't the best strategy
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: for him to have done, but he was within his rights.
• 21:03
  Speaker 3: And let's say these were two civilian men, right, and
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: the same exact scenario, it would be considered a self
• 21:10
  Speaker 3: defense killing because his arm was in her car and
• 21:16
  Speaker 3: she was driving off right, and that is such a
• 21:21
  Speaker 3: dangerous scenario that it is considered acceptable use of let
• 21:25
  Speaker 3: lethal force in that scenario. So there's no like, I mean,
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: we can go with all the narratives she's she's a terrorist,
• 21:34
  Speaker 3: which is plausible as far as I'm concerned, you know,
• 21:37
  Speaker 3: and all of this, and and that the ier being
• 21:40
  Speaker 3: it doesn't matter, right, it doesn't of course the narratives
• 21:44
  Speaker 3: on the left that the the is an unacceptable use
• 21:47
  Speaker 3: of force. No, it all comes down to this. This
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: woman was about to drag his partner colleague in a
• 21:57
  Speaker 3: way that he was just dragged nearly to his death, right,
• 22:02
  Speaker 3: and he made a split decision, and in that circumstance
• 22:06
  Speaker 3: it is considered acceptable to use lethal force. All right,
• 22:11
  Speaker 3: case Clode, Why is nobody talking about this? Right, there's
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: no there's no black there. It is completely black and white,
• 22:20
  Speaker 3: like he was well within his means, well within his
• 22:23
  Speaker 3: rights to do it, just because of that, and nobody
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: seems to be talking about it.
• 22:28
  Speaker 5: Why and why they're talking about from the perspective of
• 22:32
  Speaker 5: the guy shooting to defend himself, because in the other
• 22:36
  Speaker 5: video you see the car actually collide with the guy who.
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: Shoots, and he even doubles over and then fires. So
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: I think that people are looking at that because it's
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: a little bit more like now that we have the
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: I would I guess you could call it the bodycam footage,
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: which I can play as well. The guy who shoots.
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: You can see him get hit and his reaction, but
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: it doesn't sure.
• 23:01
  Speaker 3: That's the problem. The thing with this is the other
• 23:06
  Speaker 3: at the other angle of this, you could argue, oh,
• 23:09
  Speaker 3: he had room to move, which I don't think he
• 23:11
  Speaker 3: really did, and yes it does look terrible right and
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: what she did you can have you make all these
• 23:17
  Speaker 3: stupid arguments, but none of it matters because right there
• 23:22
  Speaker 3: once his arm is in the car and she starts
• 23:24
  Speaker 3: moving forward, He's just his partner is justified in using
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: lethal force to prevent it. The end, like and we
• 23:32
  Speaker 3: don't we can have the discussion about where he was positioned,
• 23:35
  Speaker 3: which is ridiculous, but you know, but it doesn't matter,
• 23:39
  Speaker 3: like this is this is this is the legal this
• 23:41
  Speaker 3: is the legal situation that this entire thing is in.
• 23:44
  Speaker 3: And yeah, I know people focused on him, but maybe
• 23:47
  Speaker 3: they focused on him because it didn't occur to him
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: recur to them. To walk through it through that sequence
• 23:53
  Speaker 3: that I walk through it with, which is look at
• 23:55
  Speaker 3: it from his point of view, from what he has
• 23:57
  Speaker 3: experienced in terms of UH reaction and vulnerability, and see
• 24:01
  Speaker 3: what he's seeing, right, and he's seeing the vulnerability of
• 24:05
  Speaker 3: his colleague to what's about to happen. Right, this guy
• 24:09
  Speaker 3: was not motivated by self defense. He was motivated by
• 24:13
  Speaker 3: defending his colleague almost guaranteed, right, Well maybe not almost guaranteed.
• 24:19
  Speaker 3: I can't infer entirely his mental state, but that's what
• 24:22
  Speaker 3: it looks like. So it doesn't matter where he was situated.
• 24:26
  Speaker 3: What matters is that he was defending his colleague from
• 24:28
  Speaker 3: being dragged from something that he had just experienced. This
• 24:32
  Speaker 3: man is a hero and the woman is a criminal.
• 24:37
  Speaker 3: The woman at the wheel, right, based on what I
• 24:41
  Speaker 3: am seeing, unless I'm seeing something that's completely fabricated, the
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: woman is not a martyr. She is somebody who put
• 24:51
  Speaker 3: lives in danger. She was the one with the greatest
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: amount potential of threat in this whole thing, right, she
• 25:00
  Speaker 3: had access. She was behind the wheel of a three
• 25:04
  Speaker 3: ton pet metal missile. She was the threatening one in
• 25:09
  Speaker 3: this entire scenario. And I think people they lose track
• 25:14
  Speaker 3: of that, and and again they don't walk through this
• 25:18
  Speaker 3: from the point of view of the men who are
• 25:20
  Speaker 3: experiencing it, and then they miss big details and yeah,
• 25:24
  Speaker 3: I know she was aimed for him, right apparently, And
• 25:29
  Speaker 3: then people are arguing, well, he could have gotten out
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: of the way, and there's all these points where you
• 25:34
  Speaker 3: can pick that particular narrative. But this is ironclad in
• 25:38
  Speaker 3: black and white. As soon as his arm was in
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: the cab and she started moving away, lethal force is used.
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: Is acceptable to stop that, to stop dragging, right, That's it.
• 25:51
  Speaker 2: That is the end.
• 25:54
  Speaker 3: We don't even need to have a discussion. I mean,
• 25:56
  Speaker 3: we don't even I mean, we can have a discussion
• 25:57
  Speaker 3: about how the left seems to be inciting this threat
• 26:01
  Speaker 3: narrative around ice that's causing situations like that. But in
• 26:05
  Speaker 3: terms of whether or not lethal force was acceptable in
• 26:08
  Speaker 3: this situation, it was. There's no way to get away
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: from it.
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: There's no argument.
• 26:15
  Speaker 3: You Like, again, they can argue, oh, he wasn't in
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: front of the car, oh whatever else, but and you
• 26:21
  Speaker 3: can maybe misinterpret it from different angles, but this is
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: you can't. There's no misinterpretation. Okay, let's keep going. We
• 26:30
  Speaker 3: can we can look at more.
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: I want to I want to show the video that
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: recently leaked out today of the same thing from the
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: perspective of one of the officers, and I want you
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: to see that interaction with the driver because this is
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: actually like relevant. Is them getting out of the car.
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: You see she's still driving. She's intentionally blocking their path.
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: That's the lady.
• 27:06
  Speaker 3: That's why I'm not what you think. It's okay, we
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: don't change.
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: You're getting the license plate number.
• 27:14
  Speaker 3: Waits every morning. Just show you know there don't be
• 27:17
  Speaker 3: the same plate when you come talk to us later.
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: That's fine. You have citizens.
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: Remember, the media tried to tell us that this woman
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: was terrified for her life. And you can see that
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: she's confidently and smugly just confronting him, you know, defiant, heroic.
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: And again I'm not happy that she was killed or anything.
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: I'm not, but I'm I'm trying to like break this
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: because it was a woman, she must have been a
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: victim narrative.
• 27:49
  Speaker 3: Yes, you think it's okay, We don't change our plates
• 27:53
  Speaker 3: every morning, just show you know there.
• 27:56
  Speaker 2: Don't be the same plate when you come talk to
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: us later.
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: That's fine. You have citizen. You want to come at us,
• 28:03
  Speaker 3: you want to come at us, I say, go.
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: Get yourself some munch big boy.
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: So they're like inciting, asking come after us, come after us, right,
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: And I'm gonna get into that in a second. Because
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: these people they try, especially the women. Though I was
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: trying to get the men riled up. They want the
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: men to attack them because it looks good for the cameras.
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: That's what they're trying to capture. That's why they have
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: their phones out. They're trying to antagonize on purpose. So
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: you see, so this woman was about to get in
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: the car and this chick pulled off. This is when
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: the shooting happens. Hits the guy holding the phone that's
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: the guy who shoots. You see him right there, he
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: doubles over, you can see his face.
• 28:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah, but this is a different incident, right.
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: No, it's the same. This is the this is the incident.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: This is it. This is what happened. There's just another angle.
• 29:05
  Speaker 3: Wow.
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's this. This is the same thing from
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: a different angle. And yeah, I mean I think I
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: think it's fair to say that he also was in
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: danger and this chick was ready to kill him. And
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: I'll say this too, if they did kill these guys,
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: if she killed these men, we would not know about this.
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: It would not go on and it wouldn't be on
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: the news. It wouldn't be talked about full stop. We
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: wouldn't know. And for all I know, people have been
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: killed trying to do their job. Problem, but we're not
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: going to hear about it because it doesn't fit the narrative.
• 29:50
  Speaker 3: No, No, only because these guys are alive, and only
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: because they defended themselves, do we know, Like I didn't
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: know the guy had been dragged for fifty yards and
• 30:03
  Speaker 3: had to get thirty stitches.
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: We only learned that because of this. So it was like, oh, okay,
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: well you see, you see what I'm saying, like, do
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: you understand how the narrative opens right up when it's
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: when it's time for these people to put out a
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: certain kind and then you start you have to do
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: some digging after that, and then you find out, oh, well,
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: this isn't that simple, right, No, it isn't.
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: Well, it's not as simple as anybody has made it
• 30:32
  Speaker 3: out to be, right. And like I said, you could
• 30:36
  Speaker 3: maybe make the argument about lethal force when she's driving
• 30:40
  Speaker 3: towards him, that he wasn't really in her sights or something,
• 30:45
  Speaker 3: but ultimately that the arm in the car thing just
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: made it. It's a legitimate use of lethal force the end.
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: And then this is all just adding layers of complicity
• 30:55
  Speaker 3: and malice to it.
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: And honestly, this woman she engaged in an attempted murder, yes, alleged,
• 31:09
  Speaker 3: I don't know, can we say, I mean, look at
• 31:12
  Speaker 3: the video footage, I'll say, an alleged attempted murder. And honestly,
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: if her partner doesn't end up doing time for being
• 31:21
  Speaker 3: an accessory, then justice will not have been served.
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: We'll see, I mean I hope so, but yeah, we'll see.
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: I got what was that?
• 31:36
  Speaker 3: Regardless of the narratives like.
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, regardless, richardly, I gave us five dollars and says,
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: from what I've seen, it seems like many of these
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: activists engage in the magical thinking that if they just
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: make the right mouth sounds and the correct sequence, they
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: will cause law enforcement officers to just go away right
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: up there with so many sovereign citizen roadside traffic stops.
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: No matter how many times the tactic fails, there's always
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: someone else who will try the same thing because obviously
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: the previous one didn't execute it correctly. Skill issue. Okay,
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: thank you Richard for that comment. So uh yeah, So like, okay,
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: so let's talk a little bit about I want to
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: talk a little bit about who this is and what
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: this tactic is. So here's another example of incitement. And
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: they almost always use women for this. So this is
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: a different, different day, different place. This is Whipple Ice
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: facility and a woman screaming at men, asking the men
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: and ice to shoot her. And they do this because
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: they're hoping that you actually try something. Okay, it's a
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: really low volume, but she is saying shoot me, shoot me,
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: And it's like this old like grandma so and why
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: and why am I bringing this up because the purpose
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: of this stuff is to get people to react, and
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: this is a common tactic that these radical groups have
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: been doing for a long time. If they can get
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: you to take the bait, which is what they're doing. Right.
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: Albatross gave us five dollars super child. Thank you, Albatross.
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: If you meant to say something, go ahead and put
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: it in a comment. I'll read it.
• 33:20
  Speaker 3: Why the heck is the is Albatross in particular having
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: problems with this?
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he may have just put like a maybe yeah,
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe maybe he meant.
• 33:30
  Speaker 3: If you put it comment and just put it in
• 33:32
  Speaker 3: the chat and we'll read it out.
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, sorry, just put in the chat.
• 33:37
  Speaker 3: Okay, Okay, keep going har for interrupting.
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: So anyway, Yeah, this is a tactic that it's done
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: because what they try to do is they try to
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: win the hearts of people who are not involved, like
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: the normies that watch the news and TV and they're
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: on the on the internet. So when you have a
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: woman and then the more harmless they're perceived to be,
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: the better it is. Because you know, if it's like
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: some old lady and she's like shoot me, shoot me now,
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: of course, no one's gonna do it if but at
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: some point someone is going to respond or someone is
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: going to take it too far, like why we're talking
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: about this today, and it's they're going to get hurt
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: or or they're you know, or whatever, maybe even get killed.
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: And if that happens, then the media goes into overdrive.
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: The celebrities come out and basically it serves the purposes right,
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: and they're willing to let people get hurt or killed
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: for this. I mean George floyd Is he was not
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: an activist. He was not involved politically with anything. He
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: was just a guy, like a petty criminal that lived
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: in Minneapolis. And he died and it served it served
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: the the sort of activist class perfectly. And we had
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: we had to hear about it for years, and there
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: were riots and there were you know, there was grifting
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: and money was taken and jobs were lost and all
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: kinds of injuries and it went on and on, and
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: now it's the next thing. It's all about creating a
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: chaos constantly, and part of the purpose of that is
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: to demoralize you, guys, to make you think there's no
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: getting out of this. Things are only getting worse. But
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: I think this is a minority. I think most people
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: are still trying to just get on with their life,
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: and I think that this particular incident is not going
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: to have the same impact as the George Floyd thing did.
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: But so like this woman, he was part of an
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: organization called Immigrant Defense Project, which will specifically ICE watch,
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: and ice Watch has a map, like a roadmap of
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: places where ICE facilities are and where they're sort of
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: like hotspots, and what they do is they go to
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: those places and they cause disruption, they block the roads.
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: They you know, think about like any other videos you've
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: seen of a climate activist sitting on highways or going
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: into museums and like defacing art or something like that.
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: I mean that, you know, that's a that's another example.
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: But these are these people do the same thing, but
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: they're specifically tasks with making ICE's life a living hell
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: for as long as they're trying to get their work done.
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: Even though again, this is all something that people voted
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: for and I shouldn't even have to be on here
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: defending that because we voted for it and should just
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: be getting done. But of course they have to make
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: it political because what they do and this woman. And
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: again this isn't necessarily reflecting on anything, but her partner
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: is the other woman that was in the car with her,
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: and the media is making her sound like a victim.
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: You know, they're using everything in their quiver, as it were.
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: She's female, she's a lesbian, she has children, which I
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: think only reflects on her, if anything, for her to
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: go over here and do this stuff when she has
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: kids to raise, and you know, all of this other
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: stuff like, oh, how could you do this? You guys
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: are monsters. She was a poet, didn't you know? And
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: this is all obviously to paint this kind of picture.
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: And here's an article from the New York Post Renee
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: Nicole Good was Minneapolis ice Watch warrior who trained to
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: resist Feds before shooting. So this is like what they do.
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: This is not She's not just a bystander. She's not innocent.
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: She knew what she was doing. She was a grown
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: ass woman. She left her kids somewhere to go do this,
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: and she never came back home and that's a shame.
• 37:23
  Speaker 1: But yeah, she's not an innocent bystander in any of
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: this stuff. And this kind of agitation is not new.
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: But I can come back to that a little bit later.
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: Well, the other thing that when you're putting yourself in
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: scenarios like there's there's appropriate resistance. I think that, for example,
• 37:44
  Speaker 3: what the truck protest in Canada was doing was very
• 37:49
  Speaker 3: peaceful and didn't involve anything like this. And then there's
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: putting yourself in harms and yet they still got forcibly
• 37:58
  Speaker 3: shut down. And then there's putting yourself in harm's way
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: like this, like deliberately putting yourself in a circumstance where
• 38:05
  Speaker 3: you are in a position where lethal force is acceptable
• 38:11
  Speaker 3: to use. Right that that's what she was doing. And again,
• 38:16
  Speaker 3: if this hadn't been an ice officer, if this had
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: just been a man or a woman, two women, two men,
• 38:25
  Speaker 3: what it's two civilians in this situation, they would have
• 38:29
  Speaker 3: had every right to respond to her with le lethal
• 38:33
  Speaker 3: lethaland force in the US for what she did, what
• 38:37
  Speaker 3: was happening. Okay, so this isn't even defending ice. It's
• 38:41
  Speaker 3: basically defending people's right to self defense and no offense.
• 38:46
  Speaker 3: But ice officers also have a right to self defense.
• 38:50
  Speaker 3: They're not just props you can write your narratives on.
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: They're actual people, actual men, you know, who are dealing
• 38:57
  Speaker 3: with a lot of craft, And yeah, I think I
• 39:02
  Speaker 3: assume that there's somebody on the left who came into
• 39:05
  Speaker 3: the normal chat and said the flame fifty nine to nineteen.
• 39:11
  Speaker 3: Ice being the right is pure technicality. You all know what.
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: ICE operating like this in the first place is also
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: wrong to wrongs create even more wrong. It's all demoralizing.
• 39:22
  Speaker 3: Is ICE's operations that significantly different than what they were.
• 39:27
  Speaker 3: I remember somebody was concerned about a deportation that they
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: felt was illegal, and I'm like, and then there was
• 39:36
  Speaker 3: all this narrative from both sides, and I'm like, well, yeah,
• 39:39
  Speaker 3: you want to have oversight, right, you don't want to
• 39:42
  Speaker 3: deport actual US citizens, And if there is, like if
• 39:47
  Speaker 3: they have overreached, you should have channels to redress it.
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: That's good. But it seemed like there was no position
• 39:55
  Speaker 3: where you could take where Enforcing immigration is something a
• 40:01
  Speaker 3: state needs to do in order to survive, especially if
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: it wants to offer any kind of services to the
• 40:10
  Speaker 3: to its citizens. Like if if if we were in
• 40:13
  Speaker 3: I don't know, and Kapistan and there was absolutely no
• 40:18
  Speaker 3: like no no taxes, nobody paid anything, and no services.
• 40:22
  Speaker 3: You know, maybe you could just have people flowing in
• 40:24
  Speaker 3: and out right, because there's not there's not going to
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: be an issue with uh, with someone appropriating resources that
• 40:32
  Speaker 3: the native born citizens have paid for. Nor is there
• 40:36
  Speaker 3: gonna be a situation where the state goes bankrupt doing
• 40:38
  Speaker 3: that right and there, and then there's also no incentive
• 40:41
  Speaker 3: for vote farming really, so yeah, you can do that,
• 40:45
  Speaker 3: but we don't live in that kind of a situation.
• 40:48
  Speaker 3: Either the US or Canada live in a situation where
• 40:51
  Speaker 3: there are comprehensive services for citizens. So if you bring
• 40:55
  Speaker 3: people in who aren't services, aren't citizens, you know they're
• 40:59
  Speaker 3: going to appropriate those services unless you have really strict control.
• 41:03
  Speaker 3: So it's a situation where you have to have, like
• 41:05
  Speaker 3: a state has to control immigration into itself. And that's
• 41:08
  Speaker 3: not even getting into all of the issues in terms
• 41:12
  Speaker 3: of different cultural expectations and moral frameworks because you know,
• 41:19
  Speaker 3: I know this is really difficult for people who were
• 41:21
  Speaker 3: born and raised in weird cultures, right, Not everybody has
• 41:26
  Speaker 3: the same general ethical schema as worth Western and Northern
• 41:32
  Speaker 3: Europeans and those in their descendants. Just saying we're not
• 41:36
  Speaker 3: our baseline not something that everybody buys into, which is
• 41:42
  Speaker 3: funny because you know, the people who are pro immigrat
• 41:45
  Speaker 3: or not pro pro illegal immigration, basically would argue that
• 41:50
  Speaker 3: they are different, but only in good ways, not necessarily
• 41:53
  Speaker 3: in the bad ways that might be incompatible with a
• 41:56
  Speaker 3: weird culture. So there's, you know, not even getting into that.
• 41:59
  Speaker 3: There's all kinds of issues that uncontrolled immigration causes, you know,
• 42:06
  Speaker 3: and we're also seeing increases, decreases in wages, increases in
• 42:10
  Speaker 3: standards of living, all of that stuff. So a state
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: that wants to remain in existence has to be able
• 42:17
  Speaker 3: to control immigration into itself. Right, That's a non negotiable.
• 42:22
  Speaker 3: It's basically like sewers and other forms of infrastructure. It's
• 42:26
  Speaker 3: a non negotiable. And we can discuss how that should
• 42:28
  Speaker 3: be taken, how we should conduct ourselves while that's being done,
• 42:34
  Speaker 3: but it's a non negotiable that it has to happen.
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: And if you are somebody who does not understand that,
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: you realistically can't be part of the discussion. Right. If
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: you can't come into the discussion understanding that immigration as
• 42:49
  Speaker 3: an essential function of a controlling immigration is an essential
• 42:54
  Speaker 3: function of a society unless you're willing to embrace pure
• 42:58
  Speaker 3: end capistani, and I don't think most of you are
• 43:01
  Speaker 3: who are this pro illegal immigration unless you can understand that,
• 43:05
  Speaker 3: you're always going to bring a framework into the discussion
• 43:09
  Speaker 3: that anything ICE does is illegitimate, right, anything a Homeland
• 43:14
  Speaker 3: Security does is illegitimate. I mean not just getting rid
• 43:18
  Speaker 3: of a completely harmless female men's rights activist who's just
• 43:21
  Speaker 3: trying to put on a goddamn convention. You know that
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: that we can have a discussion about that. That that's
• 43:27
  Speaker 3: you know, but anything Homeland Security it does is wrong, right,
• 43:33
  Speaker 3: is wrong? And yeah, I bring that up because it's
• 43:36
  Speaker 3: funny because I can understand that right. I can understand
• 43:39
  Speaker 3: that the US has every right to patrol its borders
• 43:42
  Speaker 3: and determine who who decides who is allowed to be
• 43:46
  Speaker 3: in their borders. While being individually upset that I feel
• 43:51
  Speaker 3: like that wasn't applied justly in my case, but yet
• 43:54
  Speaker 3: the US does have a right right. Okay, they have
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: the right to me out. I think it was wrong,
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: but you know, they have the right to do that.
• 44:03
  Speaker 3: They have the right to maintain their borders. They have
• 44:06
  Speaker 3: the right to export people who come in illegally for
• 44:09
  Speaker 3: no whatever reason, like it does. They don't have to
• 44:12
  Speaker 3: be rapists and child molesters and criminals and part of cartels.
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: If you're there illegally, you're there illegally, you're the country
• 44:22
  Speaker 3: where you're occupying illegally has a right to remove you
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: the end. So anybody who can't understand that can't have
• 44:31
  Speaker 3: a reasonable discussion about this. And for those of you
• 44:35
  Speaker 3: who are you know, men's rights adjacent or interested in
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: the issues that we talk about, I think you need
• 44:41
  Speaker 3: to have a real good funk, a good long thunk
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: about why you have a problem with things like immigrant
• 44:48
  Speaker 3: of immigration policy or anti illegal immigration policy, right, Why
• 44:54
  Speaker 3: you have a problem with that? And also generally if
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: you have a problem with that, you usually also have
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: a problem with the police. Right, So why do you
• 45:03
  Speaker 3: have a problem with that particular manifestation of what is
• 45:09
  Speaker 3: essentially a male drive. And this is where I'm going
• 45:12
  Speaker 3: to get into the men's issues thing. Men police other men, right,
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: They police them for their illegal behavior. They're unleftical behavior,
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: they're moral behavior, their behavior that's antisocial, even their behavior
• 45:26
  Speaker 3: that isn't pro socially providing and protecting for others. Men
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: police men. Ice is policing men also women, as we
• 45:34
  Speaker 3: see here, which is probably why this is blown up, right,
• 45:38
  Speaker 3: because it's ice policing women and engaging in lethal force
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: when a woman is being very very dangerous, let's say, and.
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: Teazing on an opportunity. There have probably been lots of
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: videos of you know, like ice arrests that have maybe
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: gotten spicy or whatever. But this because they're involved a
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: woman that you could paint as a you know, simple
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: normy passerby. That's why it got legs and went as
• 46:08
  Speaker 1: far as it did.
• 46:11
  Speaker 3: I'm seeing a lot of pain in the in the
• 46:13
  Speaker 3: the other lesbian woman's face there.
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: I don't know where that was at least, that's just
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: like the female version of the soy face. But I
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: got a Albatross got back to us with his comment
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: let me just read it, and then he sent a
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: super chat with the same thing. So you didn't have
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: to do that thing, But thank you, Albatross. He says,
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: this incident reminds me of previous episodes where y'all said
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: that women don't really take violence, their violence unto men
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: very seriously because they're mostly sheltered from it, so they
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: never FAFO. Yes, that's what I'm That's what I'm saying.
• 46:44
  Speaker 1: Like the like the when Antifa protests are going on
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: and look just for the for the record, I'm not
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: My goal is not to make this political, but I'm
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: just looking at observable reality. When there are riots and
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: there are violent protests, they are usually leftist ones. Sorry,
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: like the truckers weren't burning down buildings. They were just right.
• 47:08
  Speaker 3: They weren't left or right, honestly, no, but they were
• 47:11
  Speaker 3: just tired.
• 47:12
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: Well maybe not Allison. But again, those guys don't get
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: to decide where they get framed. Justin Trudeau framed them.
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: He called them Nazis and white supremacists. Guess what that means.
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: They're on the right. They get debated. It doesn't matter
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: what they call themselves, it's what they get labeled. That's
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: what I'm sorry. Well, number one, you don't get to
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: decide what you are the people who are trying to
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: destroy your life to and they just do that and
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: they act on that. You can't convince them. Hey, guys,
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: I'm one of you. I just don't agree with this
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: thing with I Guess what, you're not one of us
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: because you do agree with this thing right. So anyway,
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: I'm getting off track. It's usually women at the front,
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: and they do this as part of their tactic. Because
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: they operate under the presumption and I don't think it's
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: an inaccurate one that as women not going to get
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: the shit kicked out of them because it doesn't look good.
• 48:03
  Speaker 1: And if somebody does try to kick the shit out
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: of them or or man handle them or throw them aside,
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: it's kind of like those fights that women start in public,
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: so that if the man reacts and everyone else sees it,
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: they immediately activate. Right, that's exactly what they're counting on.
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: So yes, albatross, you're right, that's that. That's and sometimes
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: it does. There are consequences, you know, there is sort
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: of thing as FAFO or equal rights, equal lefts or whatever.
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: But unfortunately, we still live in a time in history
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: where if a man does, even to protect himself hurt
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: a woman, then everyone is going to descend on the
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: man and they're going to immediately ignore whatever the woman
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: was doing.
• 48:45
  Speaker 3: Yep. So yeah, yes, indeed, Ultimately, what I'm trying to
• 48:51
  Speaker 3: bring up is the if this was an acceptable use
• 48:54
  Speaker 3: of force, it was according to policy, and I mean
• 48:59
  Speaker 3: I could so, and we don't even have to look
• 49:03
  Speaker 3: at we don't even have to argue about where he
• 49:05
  Speaker 3: was positioned, where his feet were, it was an acceptable
• 49:09
  Speaker 3: use of force when he his partner or colleague reached in.
• 49:17
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 49:18
  Speaker 3: So the key overlooked fact is that at the critical moment,
• 49:21
  Speaker 3: one ice officer's arm is inside the suv while the
• 49:25
  Speaker 3: driver begins to move the vehicle forward. Under standard US
• 49:29
  Speaker 3: use of force doctrine, a moving vehicle with an officer's
• 49:31
  Speaker 3: limb in side is a textbook lethal threat scenario because
• 49:35
  Speaker 3: of the risk of dragging or crushing, which makes deadly
• 49:38
  Speaker 3: force generally considered objectively reasonable at that point. Why this
• 49:44
  Speaker 3: makes the shooting legally justified. Once she moves the car
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: with his arm in the cab, the legal question is
• 49:50
  Speaker 3: not whether she actually hits or drags him or the
• 49:53
  Speaker 3: other officer, but whether a reasonable person in Ross's position
• 49:57
  Speaker 3: would fear imminent death or serious injury to himself or
• 50:00
  Speaker 3: his colleague, which he obviously did.
• 50:03
  Speaker 2: And again.
• 50:05
  Speaker 3: Right here you can also put some emotional motive. This
• 50:08
  Speaker 3: is exactly the scenario that nearly killed me. Right, Okay,
• 50:15
  Speaker 3: By that standard, and even setting inside perfect imperfect tactics
• 50:18
  Speaker 3: before that moment, you conclude that this was a legitimate
• 50:21
  Speaker 3: use You can conclude that this was a legitimate use
• 50:24
  Speaker 3: of force lethal force. If two civilians were in the
• 50:27
  Speaker 3: same configuration, the same self defense logic would apply. Narratives
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: versus male vulnerability. You see the dominant framings. Ice executed
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: an inostant observer on the left and terrorists tried to
• 50:42
  Speaker 3: run over agents on the right. Both of these I
• 50:46
  Speaker 3: think missed the core. Two men in a lethal bind,
• 50:49
  Speaker 3: one trying to protect the other, right, and all of it.
• 50:53
  Speaker 3: There is no argument now, and there shouldn't be, right,
• 50:56
  Speaker 3: There's no argument now this was an acceptable use of
• 50:59
  Speaker 3: lethal force. Now we can talk about who is putting
• 51:03
  Speaker 3: people in this situation. Who is constructing this mess, right,
• 51:08
  Speaker 3: who is constructing this chaos that can turn lethal at
• 51:13
  Speaker 3: a moment's notice. Okay, m hm, left wing i's fascist
• 51:22
  Speaker 3: threat narratives are creating the mental environment in which she
• 51:26
  Speaker 3: was present, non compliant and prime to see agents as
• 51:30
  Speaker 3: existentially dangerous, raising the probability of a panicked, lethal looking move,
• 51:35
  Speaker 3: or even a calculated lethal move, which is starting to
• 51:40
  Speaker 3: that that's starting to emerge. Isn't it that this wasn't
• 51:44
  Speaker 3: just panicked, This was calculated. This was a calculated move
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: potentially at the same time, okay, you know, at the
• 51:56
  Speaker 3: same time, I feel like we lose something when we
• 51:59
  Speaker 3: take this incident and use it as fuel for more
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: political narratives on either side while admitting like this, this
• 52:09
  Speaker 3: this the reason why this is happening, the reason why
• 52:13
  Speaker 3: this is getting so high, like that the energy is
• 52:17
  Speaker 3: so what is the way to frame that?
• 52:20
  Speaker 2: Brian?
• 52:20
  Speaker 3: You know, it's just like something's in the air, like
• 52:23
  Speaker 3: things are just getting really dangerous, and do you know
• 52:29
  Speaker 3: how to frame that pitch? Yeah, reaching a fever pitch.
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: The reason why this is happening is because of this
• 52:38
  Speaker 3: rhetoric around ice and immigration. And again, what I was
• 52:42
  Speaker 3: trying to get at before the Albatross super chowd was
• 52:47
  Speaker 3: this is like, this is this is a reaction to
• 52:53
  Speaker 3: what men do. Like let's let's bring it down and
• 52:56
  Speaker 3: look at it from the point of view of things
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: things that are like evolution. Men are evolutionarily wired, behaviorally
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: wired to.
• 53:04
  Speaker 2: Do and this is one of them.
• 53:07
  Speaker 3: Police borders, police the people inside borders, and this is
• 53:12
  Speaker 3: this is something that men do that is absolutely critical
• 53:15
  Speaker 3: for the maintenance of society and every capacity. We wouldn't
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: have societies if we didn't have men making sure that
• 53:22
  Speaker 3: you know, they weren't they weren't being invaded, and they
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: weren't full of criminals taking advantage of people who are
• 53:32
  Speaker 3: just trying to get by, right, And this is particularly
• 53:35
  Speaker 3: a male thing, and you know it's a male thing
• 53:38
  Speaker 3: because feminists and other women who believe that the world
• 53:42
  Speaker 3: would be better if it was run by women think
• 53:46
  Speaker 3: that this behavior by men, well, they explicitly recognize it
• 53:50
  Speaker 3: as masculine, and they think if they stop it, somehow
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: a utopia will fall out, that somehow men's policing is
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: what's causing criminals, men's leasing is what's carousing illegal immigrants.
• 54:02
  Speaker 3: Men's policing is what's causing.
• 54:04
  Speaker 2: The huns to be at your gate.
• 54:07
  Speaker 3: It's like, no, and not just that that ability and
• 54:12
  Speaker 3: desire to police goes beyond other human beings into the world,
• 54:17
  Speaker 3: like going into the world and making infrastructure, even at
• 54:21
  Speaker 3: the risk of self. You know, it's all sort of
• 54:24
  Speaker 3: the same thing. And what's interesting to me is that,
• 54:28
  Speaker 3: in particular, the left's narrative here is calling out and
• 54:36
  Speaker 3: framing is terroristic something that men do.
• 54:40
  Speaker 2: Do you get what I'm saying, Brian?
• 54:43
  Speaker 3: And it seems very consistent with this idea that the
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: future's female and we're going to construct a utopia out
• 54:51
  Speaker 3: of feminine impulses, which I don't think that's happening. But anyway,
• 54:55
  Speaker 3: what we have here is this entire complex of of
• 55:01
  Speaker 3: condemnation and threat narrativing, and it has constructed a situation
• 55:07
  Speaker 3: where people like this think it's sensible to go and
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: put ICE agents at physical risk, right, and and.
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: That's even sufficiently dehumanized too. So it's a really short trip.
• 55:26
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a very short trip. And there are men
• 55:28
  Speaker 3: doing something that men do. That's what I'm getting at.
• 55:31
  Speaker 3: So ICE agents are men. They're doing something that men
• 55:36
  Speaker 3: do that is explicitly masculine, which is policing norms, policing borders, okay, policing,
• 55:47
  Speaker 3: and they're also being framed as doing it against the vulnerable.
• 55:51
  Speaker 3: So yeah, it's a very short trip. Yeah, it's a
• 55:55
  Speaker 3: very short trip for men in this situation, and it's
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: appalling that there's a group of people that is doing it.
• 56:05
  Speaker 3: There's one thing to make sure, like I said before,
• 56:09
  Speaker 3: it's one.
• 56:09
  Speaker 2: Thing to have oversight.
• 56:11
  Speaker 3: There's one thing to make sure that you know, procedures
• 56:13
  Speaker 3: are followed, you know, and that this isn't an excess
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: use of force. But honestly, while I'm very sympathetic to oversight.
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: I don't.
• 56:25
  Speaker 3: I can't often can't figure out what's going on here.
• 56:28
  Speaker 3: All I see is a group of people building up
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: this giant threat narrative against men who are trying to
• 56:36
  Speaker 3: do a job. Okay, And I see that the group
• 56:40
  Speaker 3: of people that are building up this threat narrative generally
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: seem to dislike men a lot. You know what I mean, Brian,
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: It's like they just really don't like men. They don't
• 56:50
  Speaker 3: like what men do, they don't like women being in
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: relationships with men. They just don't like it. They really
• 56:56
  Speaker 3: don't like it. So is this the one moment where
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: right about men and a group of men who are
• 57:02
  Speaker 3: doing something that men do? This? Is this like the
• 57:06
  Speaker 3: clock is right two times or twice a day kind
• 57:09
  Speaker 3: of situation or are they once again just condemning something
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: because it's a bunch of men doing it and it's
• 57:15
  Speaker 3: something that men do. Huh like? And yeah, I'm pretty sure.
• 57:23
  Speaker 3: And then the other thing is that what's happening on
• 57:25
  Speaker 3: the side of the left, Like why is there all
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: of these people who are so open to doing stuff
• 57:32
  Speaker 3: like this? And it's not just lesbian couples, it's a
• 57:36
  Speaker 3: lot of young men too, who are no doubt going
• 57:39
  Speaker 3: to battle against the evil orcy icy horse forces, you know,
• 57:43
  Speaker 3: the evil ice orcs. And so where's that coming from?
• 57:48
  Speaker 3: And I think, if I could make an overall prognostication again,
• 57:53
  Speaker 3: I think it's coming from the same place that the
• 57:55
  Speaker 3: threat narrative is coming from, this condemnation of men. Right,
• 57:59
  Speaker 3: you have this whole narrative that the society has been
• 58:02
  Speaker 3: laboring under that men oppress women for their own benefit, which, well,
• 58:08
  Speaker 3: what happens to people's relationships with each other? When? When
• 58:11
  Speaker 3: when that is the predominant narrative, when men oppress women,
• 58:16
  Speaker 3: You can't you can't be a woman and be in
• 58:18
  Speaker 3: a relationship with a man. He's going to oppress you. Right,
• 58:22
  Speaker 3: you can't be a man wanting to be in a
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: relationship with a woman. What's that? That's oppression. That's the
• 58:26
  Speaker 3: worst thing ever. So it's like destroys people's relationships with
• 58:30
  Speaker 3: each other, destroys their relationships with themselves, destroys their identities,
• 58:35
  Speaker 3: and it also destroys the process what drives people to
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: participate in the collective project that is civilization, which is
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: you know, a man, a young man meets a young woman,
• 58:47
  Speaker 3: they get together, they want to have a family, they
• 58:49
  Speaker 3: want to produce or create some kind of life together,
• 58:52
  Speaker 3: you know, and then they start building. Well that's where
• 58:55
  Speaker 3: where where does that impulse go to define yourself through
• 58:59
  Speaker 3: your productivity?
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 59:01
  Speaker 3: Where does that go in this system? It's completely delegitimized.
• 59:05
  Speaker 3: So where do these people find a positive identity? What
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: will they find it in these narratives that they can
• 59:12
  Speaker 3: go be heroes, they can both go be modern day
• 59:16
  Speaker 3: era Gorn swinging their sword against the icy orcs like,
• 59:20
  Speaker 3: that's where they find it. And so the left has
• 59:24
  Speaker 3: constructed the narrative that manufactures its own troops. Mm hmm.
• 59:33
  Speaker 3: I don't know, it's just so yeah, okay, I'm just
• 59:35
  Speaker 3: putting that out there. If you can push back, if
• 59:37
  Speaker 3: you want, Brian on anything, I've said.
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: No, it's fine. I mean I think the men everywhere
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: are just looking for a place where they can be
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: like essentially see a heroic narrative, and leftism looks appealing
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: to some, so they go with that, even though they're
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: not aware that those people hate them. Richard bie I
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: gave us a super chow.
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: What well, they.
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 3: They're more interested like they hating men for a lot
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 3: of men is very abstract compared to being the one
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 3: good man, which is very concrete like and in fact,
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 3: how can you be the one good man? No?
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: You you can be the man that isn't like the
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: other men?
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 3: Yes, how can you be the one good man swinging
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: your sword against the ice orcs if you don't recognize
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 3: that all other men are lesser and immoral, and it's
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 3: like it's a precondition. The The only guys who get
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 3: away from that are guys who actually don't regard other men.
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 3: They don't, they don't, they don't believe it when they're
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 3: when the people say, hey, other men are terrible people,
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 3: and they're like, no, well I'm not. And the men
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: I know aren't you know, And but you know, those
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 3: guys are apparently very very few and far between. But
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 3: go ahead, go do the super super child.
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: For Richard Berre, he gave us five and he says
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: a thing about the truckers in Canada is that when
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 1: the skull crackers were deployed, they all went in with
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: no identifying markings on their uniforms. Yes, and then tell them.
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: Nar gave us twenty dollars and five hundred, so thank you.
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: Tell Nar, really appreciate that.
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 3: What I'm just trying to figure out where the heck
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 3: he put the t I didn't think that went.
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: And he said, I'm surprised, astonished, nay, gobsmacked that a
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: pair of far left women operating on an ideological basis
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 1: made a foolish decision. Yes, my gobs have also been smacked,
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: My foundeds have been dumbed, my drops have been thundered,
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 1: my uh my gas died, my flabbers are gasted. All right, anyway,
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: thank you for that. I think that's all of the
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: super chats and super child to support.
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: Eight managed to support a fundraiser that isn't open. This
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 3: is like an existential How did you do that?
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: Sir?
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 2: Wow, that's thank you for.
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 3: That generous support to a fundraiser that isn't open. I
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 3: would like to know how you did that.
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: That's interesting? Is there? Somebody said, is fu but exhausting.
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 1: Look I'm not trying. Look, I was never trying to
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: make this about politics. I was trying to talk about
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: the female female dynamic. Yeah, that the political part of
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: this is inavoidable, because feminism is inherently political, even if
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: it's facing emotion and all that. But and it's like
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: a giant financial drift and it's a power grab, but
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 1: it does operate in that sphere as well, so you
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: end up having to like address it on some level,
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: but I'd rather not do that.
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: You know, Well, let me put it this way.
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 3: Okay, this entire ideal idea industrial complex that is feminism.
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 3: It constructs the preconditions for these kind of radical foot
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 3: soldiers and also the single people who end up.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: Overwhelmingly voting Democrat.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 3: So it's sort of it's sort of terriforming the social
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 3: sphere to its liking. And it's I know that it
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 3: is very political in a way, and I know that
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 3: this is sometimes really I know that I'm trying to
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 3: convey something that can be very difficult to understand, but
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 3: it is. It is just it is what it is
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 3: it all. And the thing is that this is why
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 3: I say that it's it is political, but it doesn't
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 3: really have ethics, if that makes sense. It doesn't really
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 3: have principles. I still see that there are principles related.
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: To what I don't think politics have to have principle.
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: A lot of time they're just means of exerting power,
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 1: and they could be yeah, that well, most politics in
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: the world are just tribes. Like that's what most of
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: it is. We're the ones that are fortunate enough to
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: have a kind of post enlightenment set up. But like,
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: there are people who have lost elections in Minnesota who
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 1: are Somali and they lost even in a majority Somali
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: community because he was in the wrong Somali ark tribe
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: and there was an opposing tribe even though they're from
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: the same country and they look the same. And you know,
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: normally people vote like that along racial lines. They're like, no,
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: he's in a bad tribe, we're not voting for him,
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: and he didn't win. So, like, I think, just as
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: an aside, like most people are tribal, Like we're lucky,
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: but even then there's a lot of tribalism here as well.
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 3: Well we're getting ideological tribalism.
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: And yeah, it's well, same thing. It doesn't matter, Like it's.
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 3: Almost this this this sort of complex, this idea industrial complex. Basically,
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 3: the feminist one is its own kind of self supporting tribe, right,
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 3: and its approach to politics is incredibly tribal. It's it's
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 3: a destruction of the things that make a society productive.
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 3: But at the same time as it manufactures its own
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 3: voting base, it manufactures its own foot sholdiers. And I
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 3: don't think it really reflects the kind of politics that
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 3: are healthy in a society. So it's came from the left,
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 3: it came from liberals, but I don't think it is
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 3: those kinds of ethics because I still think there is
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 3: a space for you know, openness, self doubt, and all
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 3: of the liberal principles that are good that they don't have.
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 3: They've just been they've just metastasized into this political tribe
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: that perpetuates itself and seeks power and clout and money.
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 3: And that's what it is at this point. And it
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 3: has an enemy, and it has its threat narratives, and
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: it doesn't really have principles because principles you might have
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 3: to extend to the enemy, See what I mean?
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, all right, So.
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: I wanted to talk a little bit about back to this. So,
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: first of all, her children apparently she has kids, or
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: at least a kid. Maybe it's just a kid, let
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 1: me see here. Yeah, So she has a child, and
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: her child attends a charter school, and I wanted to
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: show you guys to charter school a little bit so
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: this is like our mission. The south Side Family sent
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: Charter School is a small K through five school that
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: meets the needs of culturally and ethnically diverse population by
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: engaging children in critical thinking and problem solving, involving children
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: in political and social activism, encouraging creative expression, offering a
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: wide range of activities, and advocating for children and families.
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: So it goes on. But it's basically a social justice
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: education charter school for children. And I think her she
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: might be a teacher there, but don't quote me on that.
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: I just know that her child attends it. And I'm
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 1: doing this to paint a picture of like what where
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: this woman's brain is at or where a head is
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: at on stuff. And so she's part of this group
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: called Ice Watch. I guess her brother in law in
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: like an in like another interview, was like against her
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: going up there and doing this. Her she's from Missouri,
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: so like her vehicle has Missouri plates her SUV and
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: she drove all the way up to Minneapolis. You guys
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: don't know Missouri is like on the south. I believe
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: it's a southern state and Minneapolis is like bordering the
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: bordering Canada. I believe. So, yeah, she drove up there
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: to do this, and she's very she was very committed
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: to the That's what I'm saying. So this is not
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: a not an innocent by Sandra. I'm just reinforcing that
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: important note because this is the narrative they're gonna put
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: out there, right, it's not gonna she still has the
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: woman card, So I'm not acting like that's not a thing.
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: The other thing is that there is a lot of
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: like black pilling going on, like, oh my god, things
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: are getting so bad. It's gotten so much worse. Things
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: are really ramping up, civil war, blah blah blah. That's
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: want to point out that this is something that's always happened.
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: We've always had these kinds of things all throughout history.
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: There's always gonna be movements that are going to try
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: and disrupt the social order so they can seize power
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: or cause chaos or something. And I want to give
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: you guys a few examples, and you'll notice a pattern
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: because a lot of them are feminists, actually most of them,
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: and they go all the way back. So first, this
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: is the Weather Underground. So the Weather Underground was a
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: radical leftist group splinted from students for Democratic Society. Notice
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: they always give themselves really nice sounding names, like, you know,
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: we believe in freedom. We're the Freedom, Liberation, Good Things Party.
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: But they're communists, right. Inspired by communists and anti imperialist ideologies,
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: they conducted over twenty five bombings targeting US government buildings,
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 1: police stations, the Pentagon, and the Capital to protest the
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 1: Vietnam War because it was racist and imperialists or something.
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: In nineteen seventy they bombed the New York City Police headquarters,
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: and in nineteen seventy five they targeted the State Department.
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 1: Members evaded federal agents through underground networks and clashed with
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: law enforcement during arrests. All these groups that I'm also
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 1: going to mention also engaged in this kind of like
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: organized antagonism where they would try to get police or
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: get law enforcement or first responders or whatever ice in
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 1: which because the current thing is immigration this year, and
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 1: it's all about getting them antagonized and to react so
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: that they can get it on tape and frame themselves
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 1: as victims. Whether underground was also a radical feminist organization
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: as well, and there are a bunch of women involved
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: with that. So that's one group the other one on
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: the next one I have here is the Black Liberation Army,
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: an underground Marxist Leninist offshoot of the Black Panther Party.
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 1: So not the Black Panthers, it's different, okay. Focused in
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: Black liberation through armed struggle. They have assassinated police officers,
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: including ambushism law enforcement in New York and San Francisco,
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: and conducted bank robberies to fund operations. In nineteen seventy one,
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: they killed two New York police officers in a targeted attack,
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: viewing police as enforcers of systemic oppression. Sound familiar. The
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: group also aided prison breaks and resisted federal investigations. Okay.
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 1: Next we have what the political is describing as the
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: first female terrorist group. Okay. These are called the May
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: nineteenth Communist Organization. I believe they were also associated with
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: Weather Underground and Black Liberation. Is why I'm bringing this
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: up because it's all together. So they are a communist
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: revolutionary group formed by former Weather Underground and Black Liberation
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: Army members. They bombed federal sites, including the US Capital
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: in nineteen in a three which caused a million dollars
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: in damage, an FBI office and the Navy Yard in Washington, DC.
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: Their actions aim to overthrow capitalism and support anti imperialist causes.
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: They also facilitated prison escapes, like that of Assada Shakur
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: in nineteen seventy nine. I believe that's Tupac's mom obstructing
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: federal custody. I think it is. I have to look
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: that up. I'm curious now Asata Shakur. Okay, So that's them,
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 1: and again radical feminist organization. They have a history of violence,
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 1: and I'm only going through like the sixties and seventies,
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: so there's like stuff going back to like the turn
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: of the century as well. Right, all right, So next
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: we have the Simbionese Liberation Army, a leftist revolutionary group
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: with communist influences known for the nineteen seventy four kidnapping
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: of Paddy Hurst and bank robberies. To fund a people's army,
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: they assassinated a school super intended and engaged in shootouts
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: with police, including a nineteen seventy four LA confrontation where
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 1: six members died resisting arrest. Their manifesto called for violent
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: overthrow of the government. Okay, next, I have two more
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: and then I'll be done. So I don't want to say,
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: I know that this is going a little bit long,
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: but we have the United Freedom Front, the UFF, a
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: Marxist Leninist group that bombed corporate and military targets, including
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: mobile oil headquarters and IBM offices to protest US imperialism
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: and apartheid. In the nineteen eighties, they targeted federal buildings
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: and clash with law enforcement during robberies. Members were arrested
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty four after evading FBI pursuits. They claimed
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: responsibility for over twenty bombings. And then lastly, we have
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: this one's a little on the nose, but the Red
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: Army Faction influence in US nineteen seventies. While primarily West German,
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: this communist terrorist group inspired US radicals and had loose
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: ties through international leftist networks. US based sympathizers engage in
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: bombings and obstructions, for example in nineteen seventy to the
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: influence attacks on US military facilities in Germany, but domestic
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: echoes included solidarity actions disrupting federal operations. And this is
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: just from nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies. And I'm saying
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: that because I wanted you guys to just get a
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: little bit of perspective that this is actually not what's
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: happening now is not as bad as what we have
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: had in the past, and I think that we are
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: able to keep keep it under control and put it
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: in perspective. So we're talking about bombings, assassinations. I mean,
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 1: there have been assassinations like we've had that happen, and
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: it does seem like things are ramping up, but I
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: think that things have been a lot worse in the past.
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: So but I want.
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 3: There, I will, I will push back on I think
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 3: there's a lot more general problems in terms of birth rate,
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 3: family formation, relationship.
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, yeah, yeah.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 3: And uh you know that's that That's what I would say.
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 3: So there there may be more foot soldiers for these
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 3: people to to start recruiting because of that. So did
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 3: you sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt. You finish off
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 3: what you're thought.
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: No, it's okay. Yeah. Oh by the way, this uh
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: Asada Chakorus Tupac's crod mother. So she's related to Tupac. Yes, yeah,
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: and she lived in Cuba. I think she was like
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: an escape that that fled to Cuba to escape prosecution
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: after she was broken out. So but yeah, no, that
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: was it. I just wanted to like put it again,
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: put things in perspective. Yes, we have problems, but I'm
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: asking you guys, please don't be blackpilled, because that's what
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: they want. They want you to think it's all hopeless
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: and it's just not so keep the faith.
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 2: Well it's not.
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 3: It's if if at some point the pain gets sufficient
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 3: that they start to correct the font the source of
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 3: all of this, which is the messaging around relationships between
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 3: men and women, then we will have a chance like uh,
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 3: but until then things are going to probably get worse.
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 3: But you know, eventually and not just like the at
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 3: the tip of the spear that that's the sort of
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 3: the minimal thing. It's the it's the relation lack of
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 3: relationship formation. It's the lowering lowering birth rate, it's the
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 3: the lack of economic productivity and all of that other
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 3: stuff like that's that's sort of where the big part is.
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 3: In my opinion, this stuff is is on the edges.
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 3: But anyway, do you want to Uh, we did have
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: a second topic, but I'm not sure if we have
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 3: time for it.
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: What do you think.
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: It's kind of a I watched the video. It's pretty
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: like shocking, it's shocking, it could be. It's yeah, it's
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: kind of a I think it's kind of a big
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: topic potentially, but it is a good one.
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I know it's the issue you.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 3: I'm probably not. I'm not gonna be able to do
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 3: a show on Monday, so that's yeah. So it would
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 3: be Wednesday before we could do it again, that's the thing.
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: So I don't know. I mean, I think it's still good,
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: but it's up to you. It's up to you, all.
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 3: Right, So if we should do it now or just
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 3: do it another date, or you could do it yeah,
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 3: or you could do it on a.
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 2: Tuesday, right, I could.
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: Well, I could cover it as a news story for sure.
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: But for video, the video is is where a lot
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: of the juice is at. So I think you're out
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: for a video response.
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, Well, because what we're talking about is recently
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 3: there was a woman arrested in relation.
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: To the education teacher mm hmm.
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 3: And she's arrested because she groomed and sexually assaulted or
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 3: you know, graped, statutorily raped a underage boy and how
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 3: a special education boy and how this was framed and
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 3: what her family said about it is just it's astounding.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, what the family said was astounding. Absolutely it deserves.
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 3: The men's rights drubbing, shall we say, is it drubbing
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 3: the men's.
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: Rights caning pummeling.
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 3: Just just to get get down into the depths of
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: absolute depravity of this entire nest of people. But yeah, yeah,
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 3: it is getting pretty late in the evening, so big
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 3: thanks to Telenar for.
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: Somehow donating to a non exist in fundraiser.
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 3: That is that is some that is some level of
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 3: commitment there. And uh, if you also want to try
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 3: your hand at donating or supporting a fundraiser that doesn't exist,
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 3: feed the badger dot com slash support.
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 2: Thank you.
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 3: And if you want to send a message, uh and
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 3: uh gasped my flabbers a little less. That sounds awful.
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 3: It's sounded better when you did it, flabbers.
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 2: Okay, if you want to smack still not.
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 3: Found my dumbs, Yeah, that's that's a little bit less. Yeah,
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 3: then send us some message it feed the badger dot
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 3: com slash just the tip and uh, yeah, whatever you
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 3: want to send, very best way to send your message,
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 3: very best way to give us a tip, because you
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 3: know you don't send your message through YouTube's comment squirrels,
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 3: and you send it to our squirrels, which are superior squirrels.
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 3: They're they're they're the best squirrels, the best, and feed
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 3: thebadger dot com slash just the tip to do that
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 3: and uh our badgination dot online if you want to
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 3: find out about our resources and have more in depth
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 3: conversations about these things.
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 2: All right, I'm gonna hand it back to Brian.
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: All Right, I gotta read a couple of rumble rants
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: that I got and then I'll wrap it up. So
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: hold on just a moment here. I'm going to turn
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: off the auto scene switcher thing. Okay, so tell him now,
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: are in a Nova fan? Sorry? Nova Fan twenty one
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: gave us a dollar and said, way, I'm an activists
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: get offended at something and provoke a white Knight to
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: save her stead. Men rescues her by policing. Woman blames
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: policing for them not having utopia. Men need to stop simping. Yes,
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: Nova fan then says for another dollar. Also cue the
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: meme of the guy that can't believe he did something
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: that he already knows frustrates him, but did it any
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: wayn is also confused, Yeah, all.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 3: Right, can I just the reason why men simp is
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 3: because the reason why they do these things is often women.
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 2: Mm hmm, like the reason.
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 3: Why they're patrolling the boundary, why women, the reason why
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 3: they're going after criminals. Why so it's safe for women.
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 3: So it really becomes a double bind when you see
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 3: a woman encouraging invasion and being a criminal.
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 2: What do you do?
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: All right?
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 2: Yep, okay, all right.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so yeah, thanks Snope fan. Yeah, it's tough, man,
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: It's tough out there, but uh okay. So, if you
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: guys like this video, please hit like subscribe you don't
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: already subscribe to the bellfl notifications, leave us a comment,
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about what we
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: discussed on the show today, and please share this video
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: because Sharon's caring. Thank you guys so much for coming
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: on today's episode of Maintaining Frame, and we will talk
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: to you all in the next one.