Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Woman Holds Stepson Captive for 20 Years, Human Rights Judge Brings Back Slavery | HBR News 494

Transcript

Woman Holds Stepson Captive for 20 Years, Human Rights Judge Brings Back Slavery | HBR News 494 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is h Barren News number four ninety four. Woman
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: holds step two stepson captain for twenty years, human rights
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: judge brings back slavery. We're discussing the news of the
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: I'm here with Hannah and Mike, and we are going
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: to be giving you the news with the badger treatment,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: the Badger seasoning where we give our badgery opinions to
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: the mainstream happenings in the world and try to put
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: a spin on it that makes it a little bit
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: less awful than what it is, or if it's good,
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: we make it tastier. We had more more real sugars,
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: cane sugars, no seed oils, no corn service. Please don't
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: come after us Department of Health and uh yeah. So
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: we have a great show leting for you guys today,
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: so please be sure to continue the conversations both in
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: the chat as well as the comments section. On this
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: week's hbar News. We're gonna be talking about the story
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: of a stepmother who held her steps on hostage. A
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Columbia University human rights fellow. I'm not kidding because convicted
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: of owning a slave and more so, stick around, it's
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: gonna be a good time and be sure to join
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: us afterwards for the patron only show. So if you
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: are a gamer and you have not been living under
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: a rock, you probably are aware of the new slop
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: coming out from Ubi Soft, Assassin's Creed Shadows, and all
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: of the controversy surrounding it. Basically, it is like either
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: the least hyped video game ever for people who really
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: don't want this to flop, or the most hype for
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: people looking forward to the total and absolute collapse of
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: You Be Soft. And they're dealing with a lot of
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: criticism online from gamers and potential customers that don't like
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: the direction and several of the choices and creative decisions
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: made by Ubisoft for this franchise, and of course, instead
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: of listening to the criticisms of fans and potential customers
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: and maybe like having a little bit of an introspective moment,
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: they have only to sign it to double down. And
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: there is word that they're going to be working with
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: the Canadian government to address harassment when Assassin's Creed Shadows launches,
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: so literally getting the government to protect them from harassment.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: This is the bully remember bully Hunters, remember that back
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: in the Gamer game day. This is bully Hunters two
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: point zero with the Canadian government. So we're gonna look
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: at this article from the Gamer, which, by the way,
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: The Gamer is super cringe as a website. They're like
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: the Salon of gaming websites. They are the reason for
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: gamer Gates existence. And we're gonna be reading this article
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: in the after show. So if you want to join
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: us in the after show, you have to become a
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: badgery yourself by going to feed the Badger dot com
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: for us last subscribe to set up a monthly subscription
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: and five bucks a month will get you into the
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: Discord server, where you'll be able to watch all of
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: the bonus content and as well as hang out with
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: us and participate in several of the bonus sort of
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: activities that we have going on. We have writers workstops,
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: we have game nights, we have movie nights, all kinds
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: of stuff, and it is a community that is constantly
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: doing something. So please consider doing that. And if you
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: don't want to wake up one morning to find that
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: we've been yeeded from the Internet, once and for all,
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: then please go to Badger feed dot com or Honeybadger
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Radio dot com. That is where our content lives. Shout
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: out to the Rumble gang that are hanging out on Rumble.
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: I understand the Rumble platform is growing. They've just set
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: up an exclusive lineup with people like Tim Poole, which means,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: I mean, love or hate him. If Temple makes something exclusive,
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: that's a big deal. And I think that Rumble is
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: going places and we would it would be wise of
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: us to pay attention. So shout out to the Rumble gang.
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: If you're watching, I am watching you guys. So anyway,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: with all of that out of the way, let us
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: get into today's stories, all right. This one was given
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: to me by Hannah. James Harrison, often called the Man
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: with the Golden Arm, passed away on February seventeenth, twenty
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: twenty five, at the age of eighty eight in a
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: nursing home in New South Wales, Australia. His death was
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: announced on March first by the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: and it's been making waves since, with tributes pouring in
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: for a man whose lifelong commitment to blood donation staved
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: an estimated two point four million babies. Harrison began donating
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: blood in nineteen fifty four at age eighteen, inspired by
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: a life threatening transfusion that he received at fourteen after
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: major chess surgery to remove a lung. In nineteen fifty four,
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: I don't know that the technology was anywhere near it
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: is now. Over the next sixty four years, he donated
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: plasma every two weeks, totaling one thousand, one hundred and
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: seventy three donations by the time he retired from donating
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen at age eighty one. His plasma contained
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: a rare antid antibody crucial for preventing reciss disease, a
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: condition where a pregnant woman's immune system attacks her fetus's
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: red blood cells if she's RH negative and the baby
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: is OURH positive, potentially causing severe complications like brain damage
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: or stillbirth. Starting in the nineteen sixties, scientists use his
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: plasma to develop antid injections, which have since protected millions
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: of babies, with over three million doses issued in Australia alone,
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: helping around forty five thousand mothers annually. Harrison's contributions earned
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: him national hero status. An Order of Australia medal in
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: nineteen ninety nine and the record for most plasma donations
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: until it was surpassed in twenty twenty two by an American,
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Brett Cooper. No, not that Brett Cooper, his daughter, Tracy
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: Mellowship and her children are among those who directly benefited
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: from his donations. Also patriarchy.
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, part of the reason that I wanted to put
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: this story in is personal. My mom was RH negative
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: and my brother and I are both URGE positive, so
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: my mom got that shot.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Hmmm.
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: And yeah, it's very, very possible that this man saved
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: my life and my brother's life. Although this does affect
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: boys more frequently and it affects girls. This is the
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: the RH factor has been a known issue for many decades.
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: And it's the RH negative factor is very rare blood type.
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: And uh, it's it's much much more common than if
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: you have very particular negatives, like there's much more A
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: B negative and A or B negative for instance, than
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: O negative. But and if if you have type O blood,
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: your universal donor. And there's there's a lot of people
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: I know that that donate specifically because they have a
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: rare blood type but this is kind of an ultra
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: rare situation where somebody builds up antibodies. Somebody has had
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: a mistake made where they got the wrong kind of
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: blood and they didn't die, and because they didn't die,
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: they were able to help other people survive. And that's
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: to be told that and then ask have that asked
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: of you, and say I can do this for other people,
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: and step up and do it regularly and consistently for
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: your whole life, even into old age, even after you're
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: in a nursing home, even after it's dangerous to you
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: to go through the procedure donating blood. That is incredibly heroic,
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: and I think a lot of people may not recognize
• 8:31
  Speaker 2: it because donating blood seems like such a simple thing
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: to do. But it's that the older you get and
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: the more medical care you require and so on, the
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: more dangerous it is to have somebody stick a needle
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: in you for any reason, much less to have your
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: body have to deal with losing the blood and reproduce it.
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: So yeah, I just thought this was a good positive
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: story and I understood the gravity of you know, if
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: this guy had not had that situation and had not
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: been able to do this two point four million babies.
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: He saved two point four million lives. Most people can't
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: even say they saved one.
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Brol get paid for this.
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: Bro should have got paid for this with more than
• 9:32
  Speaker 3: just cookies. I mean, I know, I know he got
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: celebrated and stuff, But at what point do they start
• 9:41
  Speaker 3: paying you for the number of lives you've saved?
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 9:47
  Speaker 3: You know, I have an extremely rare blood type blood type,
• 9:49
  Speaker 3: which is to say, I identify as a non alphabetic
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: blood type. I identify as blood type twelve. I just
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: like the number twelve, So that's how I identify.
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: That's how it work. That's right.
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: Genetics don't really matter, is that we need to find
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: a balance between O and all these things. So yeah,
• 10:10
  Speaker 3: we're going to go and and give you my red
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: blood type and then and then then I should get
• 10:14
  Speaker 3: paid with cookies. I'd be happy with cookies. Sorry, I
• 10:19
  Speaker 3: had nothing for this story. All I could do is sarcasm.
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: And that's.
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: Something. Something kind of funny about getting paid for donating blood.
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: Not funny, haha, and more like George thur a good funny.
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: You know you funny too, that kind of funny. There
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: are there are companies that will pay for blood donation
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: because it's such an important thing here. There's so many accidents,
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: automotive accidents here and so many violent assaults here that
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: result in people losing blood on a level that their
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: body can't make it back fast enough and if they
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: won't get blood, they'll die. And so there are companies
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: that that pay for blood donation. And you know what happened,
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: I bet, I bet Brian knows because you lived in
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: a big.
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: City, knows what what happened with what they called it
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: racist or something.
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: Nope, with with paid blood donation people people paying for
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: blood donation.
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, like uh, well, a lot of I know
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: that a lot of like drug addicts would show up.
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: They were trying to get money to get to feed
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: their habit.
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: Yeah, blood blood donation payments attracted drug addicts, and they
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: will donate more than they're supposed to. They will donate
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: even when they've got it in their system, you know that.
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: So they're they the blood can't be used and so on,
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: and they now have to do a blood test on
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: you before they can even take your blood. And they
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: made it actually difficult for people to go in and
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: donate blood. And it's it's easier to just go to
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: the Red Cross to donate blood. Now, it's uh, yeah,
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: anytime you try to do something good, anytime you try
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: to pay people to do something good, there's somebody coming
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: in to try to exploit it. Now that doesn't mean
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: that it's wrong to pay people for service, but yeah,
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: it does make things a pain in the ass when
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: you can't turn people down because you know, the last
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: time they were here they had heroin in their system.
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: It just occurred to me, how much microplastics need to
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: be in your blood before before you come today? Because
• 12:42
  Speaker 3: this is a good example of clearly giving blood it
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: doesn't lead to an early death. Man was eighty eight
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: presurely because it was able to clean his blood.
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: You must have had a very healthy spleen.
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: And yeah, and.
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: Every time you you give blood, you remove some of
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: the microplastics and give them to someone else, and then
• 13:07
  Speaker 3: you create new blood. I guess you can achieve the
• 13:10
  Speaker 3: same result with leeches. Leeches will will will will suck
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: all your blood out, including the microplastics, and then you
• 13:18
  Speaker 3: create new blood without microplastics in it. So yeah, all
• 13:21
  Speaker 3: those sixteenth century doctors were really onto something with all
• 13:24
  Speaker 3: the with all the leeches and stuff. But yeah, it's
• 13:29
  Speaker 3: I have to wonder how true all this stuff is
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: about microplastics or how harmful they really are if everyone's
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: got them in their system anyway, But it's shit. It's
• 13:39
  Speaker 3: it mean, how much how much blood pollution can there
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: be before no one can donate blood because it's fucking
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: fifty plastic or whatever.
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: Well, I guess the the the answer is you kind
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: of got to start looking at things like how much
• 13:57
  Speaker 2: money does corporate America make if it is true? And
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: how much money just corporate America make if it's not true?
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: And are you allowed to question it? Are you allowed
• 14:07
  Speaker 2: to say it, you know, without getting getting canceled by
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: somebody or getting accused of something and so on. It's
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: getting to the truth of a lot of stuff. It's
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: really difficult these days. But if you find something you're
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: not allowed to say and it's not ridiculous to say it,
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: you know, it's just that you can't say it, it's
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: probably true. And if there's something that people have been
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: saying that you're not allowed to criticize, and your criticisms
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: aren't ridiculous, like they don't rely on ignoring information that
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: is real and solid and provable, then yeah, you've stumbled
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: upon basically another sigh up. But in terms of this story, though,
• 15:04
  Speaker 2: I've heard this story about a couple of different types
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: of blood donations and other you know, like somebody donating
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: their kidney, somebody donating bone marrow and stuff like that,
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: and it almost always turns out to be a man.
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: Not always.
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: A lot of times women will donate a kidney or
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: bone marrow or something like that when it's their child
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: or another family member. But in the medical profession, I've
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: heard of nurses and doctors and that find out they
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: have the same type that they're compatible donors for somebody,
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: and you know they'll they'll donate something that donating a
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: kidney is a particularly when you're still alive, is a
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: particularly heroic thing to do too, because you only have
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: two and you can't replace them when they fail unless
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: somebody donates a kidney to you, and we don't we
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: don't know how to make kidneys yet. So but I
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: just wanted to highlight this man because this was a
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: great man, and I knew I understood what he did partly,
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: like I said, because this was something that affected my family.
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: But I'm I'm glad that he existed, and I'm glad
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: that he was He was so kind to do this.
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, thank you for sharing that story, Hannah. Yeah,
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: I think it was a It is a he is
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: a good man, and it's not often that we hear
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: about you know. I mean, I'm sure that he did
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: it for no reason other than it was he felt that,
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: you know, a desire to return the favor.
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: Probably didn't have to do anything else. I mean, his life,
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: his life was saved, right, and so he was like, well,
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: this is what I'm gonna do.
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: So yeah, and anyway, enough of all these white pills.
• 17:06
  Speaker 3: Let's get dark.
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, let's well let me see. Let me
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: see if anybody put any superchowd in real quick, because
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: I gotta look in the superchow section. So remembers set
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: us a super child. If you want to say anything,
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: uh for what is it? Feedabadger dot com force slash
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: just the tip and I will be sure to read it.
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: I don't know if that somebody said anything through last time. No,
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: so yeah, send something through and we'll read it on
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: the show. Okay, sorry, Now on to the next one.
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: Slightly less uplifting Kimberly Sullivan, pictured here, a fifty six
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: year old woman from Waterbury, Connecticut, was arrested on Marsh twelve,
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: twenty five, for allegedly holding her thirty two year old
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: step son captive for over twenty years. The case came
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: to light after the steps on, who weighed just sixty
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: nine pounds at five feet nine inches tall, thirty two
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: years old sixty nine pounds okay step fired to their
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: home on February seventeen, twenty twenty five in a desperate
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: bid for freedom. He claimed he had been locked in
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: a small, unheated room since age eleven and during severe abuse, starvation,
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: and neglect, conditions police described as some of the worst
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: they'd seen, with medical reports noting wasting syndrome, smoke kidnapping
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: or smoke inhalation sorry PTSD, and depression. Sullivan faces charges
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: of first degree assault, sounds awfully tame, second degree kidnapping,
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: first degree unlawful restraint, cruelty to persons, and first degree
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: reckless endangerment. She was released on three hundred thousand dollars
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: bail on March thirteenth, despite prosecutor's push for house arrest
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: and her attorney, Iannis Caldoitus. Caldoitus insists she's innocent, blaming
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: her late husband, Craig, who died in twenty twenty four,
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: for the stepson's treatment. So they're blaming a man who
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: is the father who is dead or the treatment of
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: the stepson. The story is chilling, and Sullivan's denial and
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: her lawyer's claim that Craig controlled the household raised questions
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: about shared responsibility. Could this be a case of folly adieux,
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: as some psychologists suggest, where both parents shared a delusion,
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: Yet the stepson's condition and his principles past concerns about
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: malnourishment suggests Sullivan's involvement was significant. Posts on X show
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: public outrage over her release, with some calling her a
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: monster with a lack of clarity on her motives and
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: Craig's role leaves room for some doubt for others. So
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: that's the story as we know it. The father is dead,
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: has been for at least a year, And yeah, I
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: don't know what this is.
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: I'm I'm sure. The first question a lot of people
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: ask is how surely a woman would never do that?
• 20:19
  Speaker 3: Heaven for fen, But even if she would, how could
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: she surely the average woman could not possibly physically restrain
• 20:26
  Speaker 3: the average man, even if he's emaciated down to sixty
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: nine pounds. Well, fear is a very powerful weapon. If
• 20:36
  Speaker 3: you can instill fear, then you don't need size or strength.
• 20:40
  Speaker 3: If you're a mouse, you can effortlessly bully an elephant,
• 20:45
  Speaker 3: because elephants seem to be hardwired to be afraid of mice,
• 20:49
  Speaker 3: and a great deal of men are soft wired to
• 20:52
  Speaker 3: be afraid of women, or at least a woman, if
• 20:55
  Speaker 3: that woman has abused them for their entire life, and
• 20:59
  Speaker 3: vice verse, Sir. Obviously we all remember Joseph Fritzel, even
• 21:04
  Speaker 3: after seventeen years something like that. The question is, will
• 21:09
  Speaker 3: we remember this woman? How many of you have already
• 21:13
  Speaker 3: forgotten her name? It's Kimberley Sullivan. Will she become as
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: infamous as infamous as Joseph Fritzel. No, No, it's gonna
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: get swept under the rug and memory hold, leaving some
• 21:26
  Speaker 3: of us wondering how many times women commit these atrocities
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: and then get quietly forgotten, if they even get caught
• 21:34
  Speaker 3: in the first place. It makes you wonder how many
• 21:37
  Speaker 3: of them are still out there, still doing this, with
• 21:40
  Speaker 3: or without a man in the picture. Not just to
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: their sons, but to their daughters. Though something tells me
• 21:48
  Speaker 3: they tend to get away with it more when they
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: do it to their sons. Society and indeed the police
• 21:54
  Speaker 3: have a very high threshold of tolerance when it comes
• 21:57
  Speaker 3: to abuse committed in that particular gender direction, and it
• 22:01
  Speaker 3: seems this is the level of abuse required to even
• 22:05
  Speaker 3: make it into the papers for a fraction of a
• 22:07
  Speaker 3: news cycle. Usually the abuse is more subtle. They estrange
• 22:13
  Speaker 3: you from your father and tell you he's a piece
• 22:15
  Speaker 3: of shit. They tell you men are all pieces of
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: shit who should feel perpetually and unforgivably guilty. A truly
• 22:25
  Speaker 3: hideous thing to say to a child, But boys hear
• 22:28
  Speaker 3: it all the time from their mothers, from their teachers,
• 22:31
  Speaker 3: and from the media. They think nothing of it. Well,
• 22:34
  Speaker 3: they have the audacity to tell you that abuse against
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: women is normalized. And then they cut your dick off,
• 22:43
  Speaker 3: one piece at a time. Of course, they start with
• 22:45
  Speaker 3: the foreskin, and then as soon as it's legal, they
• 22:49
  Speaker 3: cut off the rest of it. The tires arad bunches,
• 22:52
  Speaker 3: fucking calling rita. If you want, don't hurt just obay,
• 22:57
  Speaker 3: lie down, do as they say, may as well be heaven,
• 22:59
  Speaker 3: This hell smells the same these sunless afternoons. I can't
• 23:02
  Speaker 3: find myself. Sorry, song lyrics, bleak ones. My head is
• 23:06
  Speaker 3: full of them at all times. Alright, I'm done.
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: So some of the things I'm going to point out
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: here is, you know, the the research done by Sonia
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: Star showed that a lot of times when a man
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: and a woman commit a crime in conjunction with each other,
• 23:25
  Speaker 2: like when they when they both are involved in drug dealing,
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: or they both are involved in a scam or in
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: child abuse, and the woman ends up getting off and
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: the man ends up getting blamed, or the woman ends
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: up getting more lenient treatment and the man ends up
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: getting more harsh treatment, and a lot of times it's
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: because she'll turn on him, and she will turn state's
• 23:52
  Speaker 2: evidence and accuse him of making her commit the crime,
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: and so on, and frequently the evidence turns out that
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: that's not true, but the cops run with it and
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: the prosecutor runs with it because they get a result
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: that the public approves. You found the bad guy, and
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: the bad guy has to be a guy. The bad
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: guy can't be female, because we don't like to acknowledge
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: bad gals. Right now, it's possible that you know the
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: husband was the mastermind of this. But if it was
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: the fact that the husband was the mastermind of this
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: and she didn't want to do it, it should have
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: stopped when he died. Yes, if they.
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: Were not.
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: A team on this, the minute she didn't have to
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: do it anymore, she should have quit. And I see
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: the mice discussion in the grease stream chat. Guys, everybody
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: should be afraid of mice. Hintovirus is deadly. It's as
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: it's as untreatable, if I understand right, it's as untreatable
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: as rabies. It's carried by mice. It's what actually what
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: Gene Hackman's wife died of, and he died because she
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: was gone and couldn't take care of him anymore. Antavirus
• 25:18
  Speaker 2: is no joke. And you shouldn't want mice around if
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: they didn't come from a pet store when you know
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: their disease free, don't touch them, get them out of
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: your house, don't let them near your pets, don't even
• 25:33
  Speaker 2: let your cat catch mice if you can avoid it.
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: And yeah, just just the little side note there. Yeah,
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: but in any case, this situation, even if she comes
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: out and says he made me do it. She's not
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: absolved in my opinion, because she was still around after
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: he was gone. Right, And and this started remember when
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: he was eleven, as as a little kid, when he's
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: too too small to fight back. And if you think
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: about this, all right, when I was a kid, when
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: I was eleven years old, if I just disappeared from
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: from the school system and my neighborhood, my neighbors would
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: have said some things. My school would have said some things,
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: the teachers, the attendance office. There would have been questions
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: my uh, you know, my church family would have said
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: some things, all right. My friends would have said some things.
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: There would there would have been a visit from child
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: Protective Services to my house for sure, because I had
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: connections to other people. And I can't even say I
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: was a normal child. We didn't know I was autistic.
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: But you know, I wasn't separated out from the other students.
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: I wasn't in a separate classroom or anything like that. Right,
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: So I have to wonder what conditions existed in this
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: boy's life that allowed us, an eleven year old child,
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: to vanish from his neighborhood, his school system, his social life,
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: his extended families, lives, any any organizations he was involved
• 27:37
  Speaker 2: with at church, a club, anything like that. What conditions
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: existed in his life. People knew his family was still there,
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: They knew his parents still lived there, but the kid
• 27:46
  Speaker 2: was gone. That he's been locked up and not allowed out.
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: What did they do?
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: Tell everybody? They send him off to boarding school, you know,
• 27:56
  Speaker 2: and and then not have evidence of it? Did they
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: never have people over at their house? So I've had
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: this suspicion, and it the more different someone is, if
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: someone is disabled, if someone has an intellectual disability, a
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: psychological disability, a behavioral disorder, anything like that, where they
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: may have been separated out from people already, the easier
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: it is to do something like this to them. The
• 28:23
  Speaker 2: more out in the country somebody lives, the easier it
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: is to do something like this to them. If the
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: family packed up and moved from one city to another
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: and then did this in the process, that might have
• 28:36
  Speaker 2: been another possibility, right, But it just makes it a
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: more deliberate act. And it also makes it more egregious.
• 28:46
  Speaker 2: If they targeted somebody who was you know, disabled or
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: mentally ill or intellectually disabled, extra vulnerable and so when
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: I saw this story, this is a story I put
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: in too. When I saw the story, I thought, not
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: only is this egregious, not only is she engaging and
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: blame the boyfriend, blame the husband, right, but this may
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: have been a story of a vulnerable boy whose abuse
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: was ignored because he didn't fit. And I think we
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: should watch this story because of that, all of that,
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: because he didn't fit the community. One of the things
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: I've noticed, like when when when I'm working with people
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: with disabilities now and when I go out places with them,
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: the females get more always in that suite attention, and
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: the males get more this guy's in my way attention,
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: And it's it's very upsetting because they're all people with
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: vulnerabilities and special needs and uh, they're they're all people
• 30:00
  Speaker 2: who cannot help the condition they're in. They can't change
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: it themselves. They're not being disabled on purpose, right, And
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: they're not in your way on purpose. They're just trying
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: to live their lives and they are sweet and adorable
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: and you know, yeah, sometimes they have a rough time
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: and they don't deal with it the way you would
• 30:19
  Speaker 2: because they don't have the tools. But there's no reason
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: to get angry at them. It's a reason to have
• 30:26
  Speaker 2: sympathy and compassion and try to be part of the
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: support network that helps them deal with their experiences effectively
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: when they can't use the same tools that you get
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: to use. And this situation, this is a guy, all right.
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: Who is my height.
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: I weigh right now two hundred and six pounds, and
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: people tell me I'm not fat, which is bullshit, because
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: I am. But I don't look like what people think
• 31:01
  Speaker 2: of when they say morbidly obese. Right, this guy weighed
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: sixty nine pounds. A man who was my height, his
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: skeleton would weigh almost half that weigh weigh around thirty pounds,
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: pretty close to thirty pounds, Like we're talking half his
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: weight taken up by that just about. He had no muscle,
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: almost no muscle. Your organs have to take up a
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: percentage of your weight as well. His organs are probably
• 31:36
  Speaker 2: not full size. He probably has breathing difficulty. He's guaranteed
• 31:40
  Speaker 2: he has a heart condition. He will never recover from this.
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: He'll have some improvement, but he stopped growing normally at
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: the age of eleven when he was locked up and
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: the starvation began. Lack of xie, lack of sunlight. He
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: probably has rickets. If you don't get enough vitamin D,
• 32:07
  Speaker 2: if you don't get enough vitamin C, your body doesn't
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: process your vitamin C. It's just this. This is a
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: man who has been profoundly abused, irreversibly harmed, and we'll
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: suffer for the rest of his life because of this.
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: So I don't care if her husband made her do
• 32:32
  Speaker 2: it for any part of that time. She didn't stop
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: when he was gone. Yep, she didn't get this man help.
• 32:43
  Speaker 2: She left the house. It's obvious from the way she
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: looks that she ate, and she slept, and she went outside.
• 32:50
  Speaker 2: She went places and did things as she pleased with freedom,
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: and she told no one. This was happening for twenty
• 33:02
  Speaker 2: years in a country where she could have called any
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: number of domestic violence victim shelters and said, my husband
• 33:11
  Speaker 2: is abusing me and his son. She did nothing. She
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: didn't tell the local school system, she didn't call child
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: protective services, she did nothing. The YMCA and the YWCA
• 33:30
  Speaker 2: run shelters, and she did nothing. So I don't care
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: what her story is nothing.
• 33:43
  Speaker 3: If she was under the thrall of the husband, then
• 33:45
  Speaker 3: I mean she continued a year after the husband died. Like,
• 33:52
  Speaker 3: if it was all the husband's fault, then surely right
• 33:54
  Speaker 3: after he died she would have stopped. She would have
• 34:00
  Speaker 3: not gone to the authorities because there was no husband.
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: Left to.
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: Hold accountable.
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: Whatever.
• 34:07
  Speaker 3: Whatever was happening kept happening after the husband died, and
• 34:13
  Speaker 3: the guy had to burn the fucking house down in
• 34:15
  Speaker 3: order to in order to escape. So clearly he didn't
• 34:20
  Speaker 3: have the wherewithal two to you know, get out from
• 34:24
  Speaker 3: under her throw the women have throll? What the fuck
• 34:27
  Speaker 3: is throll anyway?
• 34:32
  Speaker 2: Yeah, obviously, and we we need proper throll control in
• 34:36
  Speaker 2: this country from now on. All. Yeah, you can't go
• 34:42
  Speaker 2: anywhere with the man without being chaperoned by a family member.
• 34:48
  Speaker 2: Proper throll control.
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: There you go, we need proper thraw control. Well, yeah,
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: this is sick. I'm glad that where it's coming to
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: light and hopefully there will be just this. But I
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: don't know, man, I don't think that man is going
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: to recover from that easily, so he certainly needs a
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: network of support. But we'll see. Well, if anything new
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: comes out of this, and like she is on, I
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: guess she's like made bail or whatever. We'll see where
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: this goes. We will follow up when we know more.
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: So let us know what you guys think about this.
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: One of the comments, I did get a super child
• 35:24
  Speaker 1: from Meredith gu for five dollars and she says, HBr
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: four ninety four, honey for the Badger's thanks for the
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: upbeat story to start off the show. It's been a
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: long day and I needed some good news from my
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: mental health. Yeah, yeah, well you're welcome, and thank you
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: to Hannah for doing that. So, okay, there's this movie on.
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: There's a bit of a discussion about whether you know
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: it's not her child, you know in the in the chat.
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I was thinking that because she's a stepmom that
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: could be.
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: You know what it too, That is absolutely no excuse,
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: all right. I would walk through fire for my stepdaughters.
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: And if you can look at a child in pain
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: and not have your heart ripped out, there is something
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: wrong with you. If it doesn't bother you that somebody
• 36:18
  Speaker 2: is abusing a child at all, If you don't get
• 36:23
  Speaker 2: at least inspired to say, hey, that's wrong. And you know,
• 36:28
  Speaker 2: if I can tell an authority and make it stop,
• 36:32
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna do that. If you can't at least do
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: that there is something wrong with you. I don't care
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: whose kid that is. I don't care if that's a
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: complete stranger's kid you never saw before. If you see
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: a terrible thing happening to a child, especially on this level,
• 36:48
  Speaker 2: it's a different story. If you've got you know, people
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: at the store when a kid has been told no,
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: and a kid throws a temper tantrum, you know, and
• 36:57
  Speaker 2: it's like, oh, we are all familiar with that. Isn't
• 36:59
  Speaker 2: that cute?
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 37:00
  Speaker 2: That's one thing, right, But if you see somebody beating
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: a child, or if you're aware that a child is
• 37:07
  Speaker 2: being starved and you do nothing, you're a monster too.
• 37:15
  Speaker 2: That's that's just the way I feel about it, Like,
• 37:19
  Speaker 2: how can you not care about someone who is vulnerable
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: and helpless and children are you know, it's not you
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: don't have to try to be their parent. You don't
• 37:29
  Speaker 2: have to try to go into the burning building and
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: rescue every kid and all that. You don't have to
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: be a superhero to pick up a phone and say, hey,
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: there's a kid in that house and he hasn't left
• 37:40
  Speaker 2: any year.
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: You know.
• 37:43
  Speaker 2: That's that's or my partner is forcing our child to
• 37:51
  Speaker 2: stay in the basement. I'm allowed to leave. So I
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: came here to tell you because I can't get him out.
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: How can you not?
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: There is no excuse none.
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: All right, well, let us know what you guys think
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. I'm gonna move on
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: to the next story in the meantime, and thank you
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: to Meredith g for the super child. Okay. So I
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: had to change stories last minute because I saw this one.
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: I saw this one, but I kind of forgot about it,
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: and then I saw it again this morning. I was like, ooh,
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna put this one in here. So on March thirteenth,
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, a British jury at Oxford Crown Court
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: convicted Mugabe. Crap the I don't know if I okay,
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: I'll try to say the name here. Hold on Lydia Mugabe.
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: Basically she is a United Nations. This is important detail.
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: A United Nations judge Lydia Mugabe okay on four charges
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: forced labor, an immigration offense, conspiracy to intimidate a witness
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: and arranging travel with a view to exploitation. She owned
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: a slave. Mugabi a High Court judge in Uganda and
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: a United Nations judge with the International Residual Mechanism for
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: Criminal Tribunals since May of twenty twenty three. Had been
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: a fellow at Columbia University's Institute for the Study of
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: Human Rights in twenty seventeen, where she was celebrated for
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: her work on gender based justice in Africa, even winning
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: awards like the Vera Chirwa Human Rights Award and the
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: People's Choice Gavel Award. Mugabe lured a young Ugandan woman
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: to the UK under false pretenses, promising her a job
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: in a diplomatic household. Instead, she forced the woman to
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: work as an unpaid maid and nanny at her private
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: residence in Kildington, England, confiscating her passport, visa and phone
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: to trap her. At least she got to work in
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: the house. Mugabe exploited the victim's lack of knowledge about
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: her rights, using her position and connections with the Ugandan
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: High Commission in London to secure a visa through a
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: quid pro quo deal with diplomat John Leonard Mugerwa, who
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: had diplomatic immunity. The victim eventually contacted a friend who
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: alerted authorities, leading to mcgave's arrests. She appeared distress after
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: the verdict, and sentencing is set for May second, twenty
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: twenty five. The case has drawn shock, with gasps in
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: the courtroom and criticism for the hypocrisy of a human
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: rights advocate engaging in slavery, though some argue it highlights
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: broader systemic issues in elite institutions like the UN and Columbia,
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: where such contradictions often go unchecked.
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: Okay, history in a nutshell. Now, I wonder who they're
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: going to blame for this, because they can can't blame her.
• 41:00
  Speaker 2: She's a black woman.
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: She's also on the UN, and she fights for equality
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: and social justice and feminism.
• 41:08
  Speaker 2: And stuff, so gender based justice, and she's got them.
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: She's got the right opinions.
• 41:13
  Speaker 2: So some some things that we aren't allowed to talk
• 41:16
  Speaker 2: about in public. A large number of people involved in
• 41:21
  Speaker 2: human trafficking as perpetrators are women. We are frequently told
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: that this is because men made them do it. What
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: man made her do this? None? She is in a
• 41:31
  Speaker 2: position of power and authority, major power and authority.
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: We are frequently told that human traffickers are white and
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: they target minorities. There's actually a large majority among human
• 41:47
  Speaker 2: traffic traffickers who are of the same race, the same
• 41:52
  Speaker 2: ethnic background, and in many cases the same nationality as
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: they're victims there. This doesn't mean that why people are
• 42:00
  Speaker 2: never involved, But this is a situation where none of
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: the stereotypes that are used to blame white people, and
• 42:11
  Speaker 2: in particular white men, for enslavement and exploitation of other people,
• 42:18
  Speaker 2: are present. Not any And that's why you haven't heard
• 42:25
  Speaker 2: this all over the news. You haven't heard this emphasized
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: by any outlet. You haven't seen outrage among all of
• 42:34
  Speaker 2: the people who usually come out of the woodwork to
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: talk about how horrible white men are. You haven't seen
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: any outrage by any women's organizations, the you know you
• 42:49
  Speaker 2: and women organizations that come out and condemn men all
• 42:54
  Speaker 2: the time for gender based this and gender based that.
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: Not a word, not a single word. Nothing from the
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: National Organization for Women in the United States, nothing from
• 43:08
  Speaker 2: not even the right wing organization I can't think of
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: her name, Concerned Women for America. I haven't seen them
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: say anything about this either, Right, None of the women's
• 43:20
  Speaker 2: organizations in the UK are speaking up about this. None
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: of the women's organizations in the continent of Africa. Right,
• 43:30
  Speaker 2: none of them, none of the organizations for people of
• 43:34
  Speaker 2: color are speaking about this. Where's the NAACP, Where are
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: the organizations in Europe? Where are they? Why aren't they
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: talking about this woman? Why aren't they talking about how
• 43:48
  Speaker 2: easy it was for her to do what she did? This,
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: this rich, powerful, wealthy woman who lured another woman to
• 43:56
  Speaker 2: her house and trapped her in in slave labor. Why
• 44:02
  Speaker 2: aren't they talking about this?
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: M I really wonder, and why is diplomatic immunity a thing?
• 44:13
  Speaker 3: What the fuck do these people do that's so important
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: that they're allowed to commit crimes? They basically any kind
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: of crime. I know it's a cliche, but you know
• 44:22
  Speaker 3: what it used to be for.
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: It used to be for where when when person A
• 44:27
  Speaker 2: goes to a country b with a dramatically different culture,
• 44:31
  Speaker 2: where like maybe you're not allowed to walk on the grass,
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: and they set one foot on the grass and oh,
• 44:35
  Speaker 2: we're gonna hang you. Uh, that's what it used to
• 44:37
  Speaker 2: be for. It was never intended for shit like this,
• 44:40
  Speaker 2: and it gets used for shit like this all the time.
• 44:43
  Speaker 3: It's absolute power. And yeah, it's a cliche for a reason.
• 44:48
  Speaker 3: Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts. Absolutely. These people aren't saving lives.
• 44:54
  Speaker 3: They're not even trying to save life. They're just fucking talking.
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: It's like un representatives just go around the world telling
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: everyone to be giant fagots, and somehow they're allowed to
• 45:03
  Speaker 3: commit any crime they like because they are tasked with
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: going around the world telling people to be complete fagots.
• 45:11
  Speaker 3: Diplomatic immunity should not be a thing. No one should
• 45:14
  Speaker 3: have a position where they're allowed to commit crimes. We're
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: going to get onto this in the fourth story as well,
• 45:23
  Speaker 3: people getting rhetoratically pardoned for crimes that they haven't even
• 45:29
  Speaker 3: been charged with. But this is the precedent has been
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: set when it comes to this bullshit that you get
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: to commit any crime you like because dot doc, question
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: mark do profit. Wow, I love me the fucking profit. God,
• 45:49
  Speaker 3: this is awful.
• 45:54
  Speaker 2: Diplomatic immunity is like daylight savings time. There were circumstances
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: under which it made since historically, when it was harder
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: for people to communicate quickly and end mass over large
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: different distances and so on, it's outdated. Now we don't
• 46:11
  Speaker 2: we don't need diplomatic immunity because you can find out
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: every little thing in the moment that you should or
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: should not do in a in a foreign country and
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: avoid creating errors that could get you arrested. There's no
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: reason for it anymore.
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and uh, you know obviously it the the the
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: The headline of the story just says everything. Columbia University
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: human rights fellow convicted for having a slave. It's like,
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: I don't even need to add anything to this. On
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: the board at the un A fellow at a university
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: owns a slave. The well end.
• 47:00
  Speaker 2: And yeah, she was celebrated for her work on gender
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: based jeff justice in Africa.
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: Yes, and she.
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: Targeted a woman, right, mm hmmm. They don't. These people
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: don't believe any of the narratives that they promote. When
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: they tell you that women are the primary victims and
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: it's bad to do it to women and blah blah,
• 47:23
  Speaker 2: they don't believe any of that. They do not care.
• 47:26
  Speaker 2: They care about making money on it. And I wonder
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: how much money she's made in her lifetime on this.
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: The people that haven't stepped up and said anything, they're
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: exactly the same as she is, whether they have or
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: have not exploited somebody. They said nothing when she did it.
• 47:46
  Speaker 2: None of them came out and said this is not acceptable.
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: None of them came out and said, uh, you know this,
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: this this should not be happening within our ranks. Nothing,
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: they don't care.
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: Nope, there's nothing legitimate about these people so or at
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: least very little. So I thought that was worth speaking
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: of illegitimate women that run things. There's another thing that happened. Well,
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: it's not like for sure yet, but it looks like
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: it's going this way. But anyway, let us want you
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: guys think about that story in the comments. Did you
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: guys know so now in the United States? So this
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: is just a United States thing? Okay, the last two stories.
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: In the US, the Democratic Party is experiencing a bit
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: of a crisis of leadership, and you know, they put
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: forward their best what they consider are their best players,
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: and it doesn't look good for them. They're scrambling now
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: to figure out what direction the party is going to
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: go in. Can you guys guess who's at the top
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: of the list according to.
• 48:57
  Speaker 3: It, don't say it's AOC.
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: Is AOC. AOC tops less of Democrats who best reflect
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna see more of her. She is like
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: the new blood.
• 49:12
  Speaker 2: And I thought occasional cortex, yep.
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: And she is gonna be the face of the Democratic
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: Party going forward. A lot of people on the left
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: are really angry at the establishment Democrats like Chuck Schumer
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: and Nancy Pelosi and Tim Walls and Kamala Harris and
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden. So we look, I know, she's not even
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: a real politician. She was like a waitress that was
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: like put She was literally placed here by people that
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: work for the young Turks. And that's that's the reason
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: why I think this is relevant. So AOC is the
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: modern progressive feminist that we're gonna be looking at. She
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: is the future of the party. Where that goes, who knows,
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: But I'm just letting you know. This is the absolute state.
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: This is where it landed. So I don't know what
• 50:03
  Speaker 1: you guys thoughts.
• 50:04
  Speaker 3: Are on that Chenk was leading the charge against Joe
• 50:07
  Speaker 3: Biden on account of he's demented. This witch is like
• 50:11
  Speaker 3: thirty something and she's already demented.
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: You have to clarify who you were talking about when
• 50:18
  Speaker 2: you said he, because that could be either one of them.
• 50:24
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I mean, check knows where he is. He
• 50:28
  Speaker 3: can remember his name at least. Yeah, he's a very
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: different kind of mental illness, schizophrenia. I think it's closed,
• 50:40
  Speaker 3: so some kind of skitzide things. He's just gonna keep
• 50:45
  Speaker 3: yelling until AOC is in power, and then he's gonna go,
• 50:48
  Speaker 3: oh yeah that's fine. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
• 50:51
  Speaker 3: that's that's exactly who I wanted, is it. Yeah, yeah,
• 50:54
  Speaker 3: we know it is.
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah yeah. And look, my my thing is like
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: they can't they can't not go this route because she
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: checks a number of boxes. She's a feminist, she's a woman,
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: she's she's brown, and that that's it. Like that's doesn't
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: matter whether or not she's qualified. That's all they have.
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: Like that, that's like she's obviously not. And it's the thing,
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: like a lot of people don't seem to get about
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: this whole Let's not let's for a moment not look
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: at it in the framework of like left and right
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: and Democrats and Republicans or whatever tories in labor. Let's
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: look at it in terms of because the thing is
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: is that the problem is is that people operate within
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: that paradigm as though that's the only choice we have,
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: and that the literal like results of the twenty twenty
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: four election did not throw all of that out the window,
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: which it should have, which I've been saying for the past,
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: like ever since twenty sixteen's election, which is that you know,
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: Trump isn't a Republican, he's not right wing. He's he's
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: a Democrat from like fifteen years ago, from twenty years ago.
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: He still holds those values. He's still pretty liberal. So
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: that doesn't even apply. And yet people like the bread
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: tubers and the and Reddit and the loonies on x
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: who you know, like have TDS or eeds elon OF's
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: arrangement syndrome. They still think that they're fighting this like
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: left and right thing and that all they need is
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: somebody who has the best rhetoric and then they win.
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: And they still talk about it that way. We need
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: our own Joe Rogan. What about Hassan Piker. He's like,
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: he's like our Joe Rogan. You can't win based on that.
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: The problem is not Je Obama. Yeah, yeah, let's give
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: Michelle Obama partcasts. The problem is not that you don't
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: have the right rhetoric. The problem is you have terrible
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: ideas and nobody likes them, so you don't have good
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: policies because you don't give a fuck about the people
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: who are voting. You have bad ideas. It's not because
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: oh we're just not selling it right. No, no, no,
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: you're not doing what we what people want. You are
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: opposing us. You have you have attacked this country and
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: its citizens for so long, especially the men in particular
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: the men. Okay, you literally couldn't rhetoric your way out
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: of it because you have done this to yourselves. And
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: this is what people don't get. It's not about who
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: has the best rhetoric. That was what Like we had
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: all these for a little while on this channel. We
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: had like debate me bros coming on right, and they're like, well,
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: we're gonna we're gonna argue against you. And then all
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: they would do is they bring out their their tools
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: of language, like I'm gonna fuck with this word and
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: make it mean something else. Haha, gotcha. Looks like I
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: win another debate. And it's like, yeah, but you haven't
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: actually done anything of substance. There's nothing real there. And
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: that's why I don't debate these people anymore, because they
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: don't say anything real. They just use words to make
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: it sound like they've won they're just trying to score points.
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: It's it's empty, okay. Into twenty sixteen. When Trump won
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: that first election, he destroyed the Republicans. They were never
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: the same. The Republican Party is that in name only.
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: All that's left are the old neo con rhinos that
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: are trying to like get their hands in and nobody
• 54:15
  Speaker 1: likes them. So that's done now, and that was the
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: right it was or what we would you know whatever.
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: The Republican Party was gone in twenty fifteen, destroyed. Like now,
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: there's either people who are on the side of the people,
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: the people who like voted a mandate to like get
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: some things changed and put the focus back on this country,
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: or they did not agree with that, and that puts
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: them in the outcamp. Those are the camps. You're for
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: America or you're against America. You're America first or your
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: America last. And that's it. And these people, like AOC's people,
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: they're still trying to do this based on well and
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: you know the reason why it upsets me is why
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: I get a little bit heated about this. Ultimately, it's
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: an insult to you because they think you're stupid enough
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: to think that if they can get you on the rhetoric. Oh,
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: I just said the right words, and now you're going
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: to vote for me forever. That's how dumb they think
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: you are. That was how they treated minorities like blacks
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: and Latinos. They would say, well, you have to vote
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: for us, because if you don't vote for us, you're
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: not going to get any more Gibbs and the other
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: people are going to take your gibs away. And so
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: people are voting against basically in favor of Gibbs. And
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: to some degree those minority groups still do that, but
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: at least this time they're like, you know what, actually,
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: we don't want that anymore. And now we're realizing that
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: the worst welfare queens aren't even American citizens. They're like
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: foreign fucking you know, leaders right of foreign countries. So
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: the rhetoric is dead, guys. So the Republican Party is
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: never going to be the same because of what Trump did.
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: And I'm not saying he did it single handly. I'm
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: saying it was a movement of people that had the
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: ability to communicate ideas and and and actual like like
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: uh theories and and political philosophies on the internet, un
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: guarded unfiltered by the media, so we can actually talk
• 56:10
  Speaker 1: to each other like adults about what we really want
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: and get that done. And and the the establishment people
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: in the White House or whatever your relative, you know,
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: governments of your own countries no longer had complete control
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: over the narrative. And that and by the way, that's
• 56:27
  Speaker 1: a testament to the First Amendment. That's why America is
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: unique because we don't put up like Canada is only
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: doubling down on their censorship. It's only getting worse over
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: there because they have they they are still trying to
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: control the narrative. And there are enough Canadians that think
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: that their identity is all about not being us the US,
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: that they will just swallow that shit. Okay, but over time,
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: if they're if they're willing to do the work, and
• 56:53
  Speaker 1: there will learn the same things that we have learned
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: as Americans. And so the Republicans are gone like that,
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: whatever that was, the days of George H. W. Bush
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: and all that, that's over. That's gone. And now the
• 57:07
  Speaker 1: same is happening to the Democrats. They've been they're completely
• 57:10
  Speaker 1: leaderless and all they have left is AOC. And the
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: reason why I think it's really funny is because the
• 57:16
  Speaker 1: only thing that she has is identity politics. That's all
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: they have. They have nothing because they have never actually
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: took a moment to ask themselves, what do the American
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: people want and how can we get it for them?
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: As people who are servant to the constituents who voted
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: for us, they still can't do it. All they can
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: do is pretend. And it's because they think so little
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: of you. That's what I'm trying to get. They're elitist
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: at their core. They have forgotten that we're the ones,
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: actually the whole power that they're supposed to fear us,
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: and they're learning that now, but I fear it's too little,
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: too late. And I'll say one other thing too, is
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: a lot of people worry that what will come of
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: this the Democrat Party is destroyed, that we'll be living
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: under a one party state. I say, no, that's not
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: gonna happen, because ultimately there will always be fractures of
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: some kind along certain lines. Nothing is absolute. But it's
• 58:12
  Speaker 1: actually for the best that we get rid of the
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: people who are literally a cancer on our on our systems,
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: that don't do anything but essentially pes You know, they're parasites.
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: They just extract shit from us, like our money, and
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: they don't serve us in any way. So what will
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: ultimately happen is there whatever's left of you know, in
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: the wake of all this, will either get with the
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: program and understand what Americans want and start responding to it,
• 58:39
  Speaker 1: and then split along different party lines on that vector.
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: You know, if you look at it like a pie
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: that's being cut up into smaller pieces, there's parts of
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: the pie that can just go. Like these people, they
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: can just go. Identity politics that's yesterday. Sorry, that's gone.
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: I don't want that anymore. Nobody wants that anymore. It's
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: not useful. Okay, welfare forever, that's got to go too,
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: that's got to go. All the spending, all the four
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: and AID, giving money to Israel, giving money to Ukraine.
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: That's over. We're not doing that anymore, or at least
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: that's our goal. It may not happen now, but it
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: will over time, because that's the sentiment. That's what it's
• 59:11
  Speaker 1: coming from, because we want to come first. So that
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: being said, I think it's hilarious that AOC is going
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: to be the face because it just shows you the
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: state they're in. This is the desperation. Why is she
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: the big booty latina because she's young. They doesn't what
• 59:28
  Speaker 1: they think. They think young people are stupid. They'll vote
• 59:30
  Speaker 1: for the young person. Young people believe in diversity, they're feminists.
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: They'll vote for the woman, they'll vote for the brown lady.
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: They'll vote for the young person. She talks to them.
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: You saw those videos of that purple hair Democrat lady.
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: That's like, really she looks like an old witch with
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: purple hair, and she puts out these like shit, these
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: things on TikTok where she's talking zoomer speak like that's
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: cap and like this is like, we're, you know, very demure,
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: very mindful. Like that's the that's how desperate they are.
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: That's how add that this whole thing is. Okay, So
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: I'm just I just saw this one. I learned about
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: this late last night, and I was like, oh, I
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: gotta I gotta mention this at least just so I
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: can point this out.
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 2: But yeah, the play ups that are going to come
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 2: out of this are gonna be great. They're gonna be hilarious,
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 2: They're gonna be cringe. They're gonna be fun to make
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 2: fun of. And and here's why I say this, all right,
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: what they've been doing for the last eight years, nine
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 2: years is pretending. Well, first of all, they came out with,
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: you know, let's let's get all women all on board
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 2: with feeling I don't know, victimized or or represented. I
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: guess bye bye uh at Woods. I can't think of
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 2: the name of the stupid story with the with the
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: stupid red outfits that they all. I had to read
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 2: it in college too.
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: It was Her Handmaid's Tale.
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: Handmaid's Tale, Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, the dunnest book ever written,
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 2: all right, because there is no civilization that has ever
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: existed in the world which would have actually done that. Uh,
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: and there never will be. But in any case, they're
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 2: gonna they've they've spent the last light I guess, ten
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: years really trying to convince women that they are represented
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: by the Handmaid's Tale. No woman is represented by the
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 2: Handmaid's Tale, not even in the cultures that everybody likes
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: to look at and say.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 1: That patriarchy over there.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 2: No, even that patriarchy over there, supposed patriarchy over there
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: is not the Handmaid's Tale. Okay, there is no Handmaid's Tale.
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 2: It is bullshit. It has always been bullshit, and it
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 2: will always be bullshit, and it's never going to be
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 2: worth paying attention to other than your daughters have been
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: targeted with it, and it's been a frenzied targeting, Like
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 2: they've been pushing this so hard that they've put big
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 2: holes in it, big handprints sticking through the back right,
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 2: and they're gonna continue, and it's gonna get more frenzied,
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 2: and it's gonna get worse. It's gonna get dumber. It's
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 2: gonna get even dumber than the the whole trend of
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 2: uh girls and women going on TikTok and playing really
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 2: bad campy adventure theme music or woman anthems, I guess
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 2: in the background while they put on lipstick to to
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 2: to show the patriarchy. Look, I am wearing a color
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 2: of lipstick. Take that patriarchy. It's gonna be one hundred
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 2: times dumber and one hundred times worse, and every stupid
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: girl out there is gonna fall for it, all right.
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: What happened during the last election was that men told
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: women know m And what happened after the election the
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 2: election was that when men had massive tantrums in response,
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 2: and you are going to see four years of screaming
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 2: and tantrums and promises and threats, and they're not going
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 2: to make good on any of them. So stand your ground.
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: Watch what the candidates do. Look at who is actually
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 2: telling women no, Look at who is actually spending less
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: of your money. Nobody is going to be free of kinocentrism.
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 2: There is not going to be a candidate running for
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: anything in the next probably the next ten years yet
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 2: that will turn around and say, Nope, fuck ginocentrism. You
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 2: ask free equality, you got it. Yeah, but there will
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: be candidates that will say, no, you can't have everything
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: you're asking for ladies. No, you can't make men pay
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 2: for your abortions. No, you can't make men pay for
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 2: your stupid life choices. No you can't get out of
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: military service. No, we're not going to tax men in
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: America to pay for you to go tell women in
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: Zimbabwe that their husbands are keeping them captive. Right, those
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 2: are the people that are going to be our best bet.
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: If we want to go talk to a politician that
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: that might actually say, you know what, maybe the family
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 2: courts shouldn't favor women over men. It's going to be
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 2: those guys that can say, no, we're not going to
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 2: to to pay you to go distribute condoms to children
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: in Africa just in case they get raped. Right, that's
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: that's going to be the people that will say, you know, hey,
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 2: maybe we should try to stop children from being raped
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 2: in African And by the way, let's let's see what
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: we can do about American family courts. You're not going
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 2: to get it from AOC. So now, so that's where
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: we should be. We should be looking at this as
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: every time some stupid cringe sigh op gets introduced, and
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: you'll recognize them because you won't be allowed to criticize them.
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 2: You'll be racist, sexist, homophobic, whatever for saying anything against it.
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: Make fun of it, ridicule it, meme the shit out
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 2: of it, mock it, make it embarrassing to be associated
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 2: with it. Right, every single time they come out with
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: a new thing, just do that over and over again.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: You will not see AOC in the presidency. It's not
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: like she can run anyway. I mean, she got killed
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 2: during the Ja six riots, remember.
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: Twice twice.
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's very tragic, and.
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I realize it's just rhetoric when people say nobody
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 3: cares about identity politics. Nobody is interested in these democratic candidates.
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 3: It's obviously not nobody, but it's not just not nobody.
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: Almost seventy seventy million people voted for Kamal Harris because
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 3: they fell for this bullshit. It's it is a mistake
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 3: to assume that we have the majority.
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: I mean, I barely.
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 3: You'll did have the majority, and that's why got elected,
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: assuming there was no fortification, which we kind assume because
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 3: the fortification only appears to happen in that direction.
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 1: But you.
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 3: You do yourself a disservice by underestimating just how many
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 3: people have fallen for this, just how many people will
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 3: in fact vote for AOC. I mean, people will vote
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 3: Democrat no matter who. There's a huge, huge faction of
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: vote blue no matter who. And over here in Europe
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 3: it's even worse. We have like six different left wing parties,
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 3: including refer Now by the way, we have nothing resembling
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: a right wing party. It's just the the window has
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 3: been shifted so that people people think extreme leftism is
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 3: the sensible center. Like, it's very possible that what you're
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 3: fighting against is the majority because the majority are listening
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 3: to the likes of the BBC or or NBC or
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 3: CNN and and and ship like that, and they and
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 3: they've and they've fallen for it, hook line and sinker.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: You're you're you're dealing with a massive amount of people
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 3: who have just been hoodwinked and and the and they
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 3: can't they can't roll it back. They'll never roll it back.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 3: They are they are deep into the sunken cost and
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 3: and and so and so and so they'll never come back.
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 3: So yeah, I know we like to rhetorically act like
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: we're the majority, but it's very possible that we're not.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 3: It's it's especially because it's the majority of young people
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 3: have been have been hoodwinked and we and they don't
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 3: show up in the polls because they're too young to
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: do it. Because the first thing they took over in
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 3: their long, slow march through the institutions was the educational institution. Yeah, so,
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 3: so these young people are already brainwashed, and they're going
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 3: to grow up to become voting age, and they're going
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 3: to vote for AOC, They're going to vote for whoever
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 3: the fuck is blue. So yeah, this is never going
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 3: to change until we've not just broken through the voting
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: registry but broken through the education system. And that's going
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 3: to take a long time because it's been a long
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 3: time since these feminist communists took over the education system.
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 3: It's and and you know, it's it's still an emergency
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 3: and it's going to be an emergency until we could
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 3: undo everything that that these communist fucks have done to
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 3: the education system. It's hard to even imagine an education
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 3: system that isn't saturated with with communist liars. And you
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 3: know that we need to sort that out first. And
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: we're not out of the woods until we've even begun
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 3: two to undo what these communists folks have done to
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 3: the education system. It started with the education system and
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 3: and and then that bled out into the media, and
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 3: then that bled out into the government. And that's that's
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 3: why we are where we are now. And yeah, it's
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 3: I'm I'm glad that we that the people have confidence
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 3: now in this in this pushback against the left. But
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 3: as I've often said, don't don't don't rest on your laurels,
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 3: don't assume you have the majority on your side. There
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 3: are many majorities, like I say, especially among the young
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah who who who? Who are still just fucked and
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 3: they will always be fucked. So it's going to take
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 3: several generations before we can before we can actually fix this.
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 3: So so yeah, don't don't assume you have the majority
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 3: on your side. You don't necessarily just work on the principles.
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: Work on the.
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 3: On the rule, on the rule of law, because because
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 3: it's more important than democracy. Democracy is fake and gay
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 3: and failed when compared with ray publica, which which means
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 3: the rule of law.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: It's it's.
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 3: It's it's the last vestige of principles. And if price
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 3: suppose they're gonna win over the the brainwashed minds of
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 3: the masses, then you have to realize you're you're you're
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 3: up against a monster. You're up against an enormous monster.
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, yeah, And and you're not gonna win if
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 3: if you if you assume that this monster is just
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 3: a kitten, it's not, it's a fucking monster. Right, keep fighting,
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 3: keep don't never underestimate your enemy. That's that's how you lose.
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 3: Overestimate your enemy if anything, All right, yeah, I agree.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: Uh, And don't be afraid to use your enemy's weapons
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: against them, which means, even if you don't believe in democracy,
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 2: vote anyway. Yeah, just don't let them tell you how
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 2: to vote.
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: All right, well, let us know you guys think about this.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: One of the comments, what do you think the future holds?
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: How woke do you think things are gonna get? Will
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: they get before they get better? I don't know, but
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: I'm interested to see what the future holds. I think
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: that we're seeing something significant. And by the way, I
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: think it's very very important to point out that a
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: lot of the tools that these people use, people who
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: just want to control your worldview, comes from our media,
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: and the media landscape is changing very fast. So I
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: think that like what we do here on this show,
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: and even though it's a small thing, we don't have
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: a lot of followers, but I think the conversation has
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: a way of spreading, and these ideas and these concepts
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: have a way of spreading. You don't know where they're
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: going to come up. So I think that there has
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: probably never been a better time to try and change
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: minds than now, because of our access to the ability
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: for individuals anyone to just get on their computer, get
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: on their phone and make a statement about something, tell
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: the truth. And I think that that is something that
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: should not be underestimated because once upon a time, not
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 1: that long ago, only a small number of people had
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: control over all these narratives, and those narratives are falling
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: apart pretty fast if now that we have access to
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: all this other media. So think of it that way, Like,
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: what was the purpose of Hollywood? Was it really just entertainment?
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: I have my I have my uh you know, serious
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: suspicions about that. I think in part, yes, but I
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: think there's something else too. There's a reason why maybe
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: at once upon a time, in ancient times, uh, you know,
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: actors were sort of like a step above prostitutes, that
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: that's how they were seen anyway, So maybe there's something
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: to it. Maybe not. I'm not I'm not shitting on actors.
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: I know that there's plenty of great ones. I used
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: to work in theater. But I'm just saying that it
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: was a method of communication that once upon a time,
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: not that long ago, almost all of it was coming
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 1: from one place with one in one specific direction, with
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: one specific worldview. And now we're finally able to like
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: make our own thing. And that's what I'm I'm excited for,
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: and that's what I promote on my channel, Honey Badger Arcade,
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: which you guys can follow on YouTube anyway. But let's
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 1: move on to the last story of today's show on
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: Pretty Good Time. So this one Mike J did for me.
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Mike J. Kind of a small one, but
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: maybe worth talking about. I'm sure that there's rants like
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: loaded up in the in the old clip. So as
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: Trump begins to hit his stride on the second term
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: of his presidency, he has come to question one of
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: the more controversial actions his predecessor made. One of the
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: last moves that former President Biden made as commander in
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 1: chief was to issue a large number of pardons, some
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 1: to people who had not even been convicted or charged
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: of any crime. Trump takes the most issue with the
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: frequent use of autopen technology, stating on truth social quote,
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: the pardons that sleepy Joe Biden gave to the unselected
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: committee of political thugs and many others lots of others
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: are hereby declared void, vacant, and of no further force
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: or effect because of the fact that they were done
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: by autopen end quote. An autopen is a machine that
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: is capable of replicating signatures automatically without the signee being present.
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: The conclusion that President Trump seems to be drawing is
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: that it is possible that Biden was not aware of
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: these pardons and could possibly have not okayed their signing.
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: And just to add on to that, I think Speaker
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: of the House Mike Johnson again he just said this
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: on an interview, said that there were certain orders that
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: Biden put out that when he confronted him, Biden said
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: he had no memory of actually signing, and there were
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: a lot done, and it is a bit suspicious some people.
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: I know that there's like a couple of debate me
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: bros On exitter saying that auto pens are completely legal
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: and that there's like that you can't possibly think there's
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: anything untoward happening. I don't know that. I mean, if
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: you can't know what you're signing and just take a
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: minute to sign something, I mean when Trump signed his
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: executive orders, he did in front of cameras and everything.
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: So just saying, but anyway, what do you guys think.
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, the auto pen was something that came out
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 2: during the Obama administration, and at the time that it
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: came out there there was a lot of speculation. Wasn't
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 2: something that was discussed by the mainstream right, but there
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: was a lot of speculation that this would create a
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 2: situation where a puppet may be put into office and
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 2: run by people who are not elected officials. Essentially, you
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 2: know in theory that this could lead to us not
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 2: being governed by people that we elected to office. And
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: it was it was a fair consideration, right, And if
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 2: I remember, it was created because of an emergency. They
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 2: couldn't do something without the president's signature, and the president
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 2: was traveling a lot because of some other thing, and
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 2: they needed to have the president be able to sign
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 2: something from a distance. They didn't have another way to
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 2: do it. Well, they do now, all right, And I've
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 2: done this numerous times. I have signed paperwork for things
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 2: on my phone with a stylist where I put my
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: signature in my handwriting on a piece of paperwork and
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: then and it's considered my signature, it's legally binding and
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 2: and so on. So there's no need for something that
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 2: that that the president doesn't operate himself by his own
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 2: hand on live video feed, that you know, can sign
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 2: anything that anybody puts in front of him and him
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 2: not know about. There's no need for that, right, There's
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 2: no need for him to be you know, be unpresent
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 2: and not present when he's signing something. So there's no
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 2: need for this device anymore. It is moot. And so
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 2: the only reason for somebody to have used something like this,
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: especially with Biden, wasn't traveling all over the world, right,
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 2: he was in locations where he could at any moment
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 2: have been contacted, brought forward, put at a desk, and
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: allowed to sign whatever he wanted. Right, there's no reason,
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 2: there's no valid reason, there's no trustworthy reason, there's no
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 2: reason we should be believing why Joe Biden should sign
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 2: anything with an auto pin. Therefore, anything he signed with
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 2: NOTT open is suspect, and in the future, the autopen
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 2: should not be getting used by anyone in any executive
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 2: position in any part of the country, not the president,
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 2: not a governor, not a mayor, nothing like that, because
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 2: it's outdated. There is no cause, no reason, no circumstance
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 2: under which any kind of paperwork cannot be signed in
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 2: person by the individual who is responsible for deciding whether
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 2: or not it gets a signature. So I think Trump
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 2: was right to do this, and it's gonna be interesting
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: what comes out of it. I'm sure there's a lot
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 2: of people that are shooting themselves that thought they were safe.
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 2: But you know like like Fauci, Yeah Hunter, like the
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 2: man who has killed more people than every dictator in
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 2: the history the world. Yeah, so that guy. But you know,
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 2: like all the JA six people that that Biden pardoned,
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 2: like this is this is this had to happen, but
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 2: uh yeah, vacationing in the Virgin Islands. Zeranks gave us
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 2: five dollars and said Biden was vacationing in on Virgin
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 2: Islands when some pardons were signed and he's supposed to
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: supposed to personally sign those. Auto sign goes back as
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 2: far back far before JFK. I don't think so. I
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 2: don't think auto sign goes that far back. But in
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 2: any case, I remember the the debating about it when
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 2: Obama was president because they're like, oh, this is this
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 2: is really uh not good, this is dangerous and the
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 2: future of this is bad. But there's internet service in
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: the Biden or in the Virgin Islands. You can you
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 2: can send documents to the Virgin Islands, they can be signed,
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 2: and they can be sent back exactly the way that
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: I described. And so there's no there's no cause for
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 2: an auto sign to be used. Ever, again, they have
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: ways to securely send things, they have ways to make
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: it provable that it was the same document. They have
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: ways to make it provable that it was him using
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 2: his hand to sign that exact document. There is no
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: reason to ever ever use something that signs the document
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 2: for the president when the president is not there ever. Again,
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 2: So there you go.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: I'm still concerned that this might ultimately be a nothing,
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 3: but legally speaking, like you said, it was allowed under Obama.
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: Whatever you can say about Obama, he's not too demented
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 3: to understand what he's doing. And even if there is
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 3: a small gray area, or indeed a bloody great red area,
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 3: I'm skeptical that anyone is going to get arrested in
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 3: the end, certainly not politicians for politicking. It's like it's
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: like trying to arrest royalty. It's not it's not going
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: to happen. Prince Andrew is not going to get arrested,
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 3: no matter what happens. Gis Layne Maxwell went to prison,
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 3: and Jeffrey Epstein got self deleted because he got Epstein.
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 3: Because that's what it takes to get everyone else off
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 3: the hook. They always do whatever it takes to get
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 3: them off the hook where there's a bill. There's a
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 3: way that that joke works on several level levels. I
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: am clever, but yeah, No, you can slash USAID funding.
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 3: You can suck a bunch of people for being useless,
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 3: and that's great, and you're absolutely should. But the government
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 3: is the ruling class I mean, in America is the
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 3: equivalent of royalty. They don't face consequences unless the ruling
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 3: class is health comes together en mass to throw you
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 3: under the bus. That's how you can tell that Trump
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 3: is not in their club, because he did get prosecuted
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 3: on the very definition of trumped up churches, while the
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 3: rest of them are embezzling and laundering billions of dollars
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 3: and in many cases bombing and drone striking countless inness
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: and people and getting away with it. And I don't
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 3: I don't mean to blackpill everything. There are things that
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 3: can be done, but it really only goes as far
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 3: as firing people. It could emerge that the entire Gen
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 3: sixth Committee is caught bang to rights having committed treason,
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 3: and the worst consequences they will ever face is getting fired.
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 3: If even that. Fortunately, that's one of Trump's specialties. I
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: have it on good authority that he's just a reality
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: TV star and that was the only thing he was
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 3: he was ever famous for before he became president. Apparently
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 3: he was a total nobody until he was in a
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 3: TV show where he fired people. Okay, whatever, well, let
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 3: him cook, let him cook. He's even gonna fire Elon
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 3: at some point. The doge is only supposed to exist
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 3: for like two years and then it's.
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's supposed to make itself obsolete. He said that
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: when he started it.
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 3: Yeah, if if only every government department.
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 1: Only there were movements that tried to advocate for things
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 1: that would make it making themselves obsolete the goal.
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah, achieve what you need to achieve, then fuck off forever.
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 3: What a world that would be would be joining hands
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 3: and singing kumbaya for real. So, yeah, it would be
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 3: nice if we could send these criminals to prison where
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 3: they belong. They would be nice if such a deterrent
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 3: were put in place. But at the same time, it's
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 3: a mechanism that could easily be corrupted and used against
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: the good guys. I mean it already is, so realistically,
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 3: let's work on getting them sacked. That'll have the same effects.
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 3: As far as the general public is concerned. Get them
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: out of our lives, stop them stealing our money, and
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 3: don't let it happen again. If you give them a
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 3: short sharp shock, they don't do it again. I mean,
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 3: he got off like I could have given him.
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 2: A All right, this is going to become obsolete, but
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 2: it's not going to become absolute. What's gonna happen is
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 2: it's gonna be be It's gonna have to go from
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 2: being Musk's responsibility to everyone's responsibility.
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: I cannot you got to remain an ever vigilant apparatus.
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, it's basically gonna stop being an agency or
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 2: a department and it's gonna have to start being people
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 2: paying attention. And there have been those type revelations my
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 2: whole life. At least. I remember there being something when
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 2: I was a little kid called the Pork Report that
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: my parents got outraged about. They spent money on. That
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 2: they spent money on that, What the hell is wrong
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 2: with these people?
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: You know?
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 2: And you would you would hear stupid things like I
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 2: always like to highlight the Catchup study where they actually
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: put different brands of ketchup on a slanted table and
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 2: rated how fast they ran down the table, and the
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 2: government helped pay for that study because it was just
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 2: so important to the American people to know which ketchup
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 2: is runniest and which ketchup is the least runny that
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 2: they took your tax dollars and paid for that at
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 2: one point, right. And there was another one where they
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 2: gave cocaine to pigeons to see what happened. The outcome
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 2: was heart attacks. Yeah, pretty pretty predictable stuff, right, And
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: these kind of things like this stuff. People should have
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 2: been so outraged over this stuff fifty years ago that
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 2: they started voting people out of office. There should have
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 2: been a complete lack of incumbents for the last fifty years,
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 2: and instead, most of our governing body, most of our
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 2: federal governing body has been incumbents for the last fifty years. So,
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 2: you know, we can't we can't just rely on we
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: can't just put it on the back of one guy
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 2: and his team, right, And I'm sure anybody with his
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 2: success level, Musk success level wouldn't want to do this
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 2: for his whole life because he has other things he
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: would rather be focusing on. But that means the rest
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 2: of us have to pay attention to those pork reports
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 2: and those outrage news articles where they oh, they funded
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 2: this stupid, idiot thing that isn't of any value to
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: the overwhelming majority of American people. Why is your money
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 2: being taken to do this? And you know, if we
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 2: don't pay attention, within a couple of years, we're going
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: to be right back where we were.
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: Mm hmmmm. All right, well, let us know what you
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments. We have
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: come to the end, my friend, we're now going to
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: look at this article from the Gamer. We're gonna talk
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: about something a little bit lighter but also kind of fun,
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 1: and maybe talk a little bit about snow White and
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 1: the absolute death of potentially death of Disney So I
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: don't know. Join us in the Patron show. Go to
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: Feed Thebadge dot com Force last subscribe and set up
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: a monthly subscription five bucks a months. We'll get you
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: into the discord where you'll be able to watch all
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: of the additional content, or you can give a higher
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: levels and be a part of the conversation itself. I
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: hope to see you guys there. With all that said,
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 1: thank you guys so much for coming on the show.
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: Thank you to Mike and Hannah as always for helping
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: me get through the stories and giving your takes, and
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: thank you guys for watching most of all, because without you,
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 1: we'd just be shouting into the void. To be like
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: throwing a message in a bottle in an ocean full
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: of messages in bottles, Who the hell knows which one
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 1: is ours? All right? So with all that said, if
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 1: you guys liked this video, please hit like, subscribe. If
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: you're not already subscribe, hit the bellf notifications, leave it's
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 1: a comment, let us you gues think about what we
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: discussed on the show today, and please please please share
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 1: this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: much for coming on today's episode of HBr News and
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 1: we will see you next Tuesday.