Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Congressional Claims Escalate Scrutiny of Prince Andrew’s Epstein Connections

Transcript

Congressional Claims Escalate Scrutiny of Prince Andrew’s Epstein Connections · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're going to hop across
• 0:06
  the pond once again and get an update on that moron,
• 0:11
  the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family, because now it's
• 0:15
  not only accusations that he sexually assaulted Virginia or that
• 0:20
  he was passing information to Jeffrey Epstein. Now we have
• 0:24
  a picture of Prince Andrew standing over a woman who
• 0:29
  lawmakers say was a trafficking victim. And to say that
• 0:33
  this is a huge blow to Prince Andrew is an understatement.
• 0:37
  Remember he's already facing inquiry in England now for allegedly
• 0:41
  passing Jeffrey Epstein confidential information. And at this point, if
• 0:46
  it was anybody else, they'd be in prison at the
• 0:49
  very least they'd get arrested. But because it's Prince Andrew, well,
• 0:53
  I guess they'll just get a pass. Today's article is
• 0:56
  from the New York Post and the headline women seen
• 0:59
  in photo under disgraced ex Prince Andrew was Jeffrey Epstein,
• 1:03
  sex trafficking victim, lawmaker says during the hearing. This article
• 1:08
  was authored by Emily Crane. The unidentified woman whom Andrew
• 1:13
  mount Batten Windsor was pictured creepily crouching over, was one
• 1:18
  of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking victims. A Democratic lawmaker has said,
• 1:23
  and to tell you the truth, I think there's a
• 1:25
  lot of people out there that are getting confused about
• 1:28
  the females that actually enable Jeffrey Epstein. I see people
• 1:33
  talking like the actual survivors are people that are involved
• 1:38
  in Epstein's bullshit, and that's just crazy, absolutely crazy. You
• 1:44
  want to talk about women that were involved, we can
• 1:46
  do that. The core four, Sarah Kellen Vickers, Adriana Ross,
• 1:51
  Leslie Groff, and Nadia marson Kova. Those are the women
• 1:55
  that enable Jeffrey Epstein. And if there are any other
• 1:58
  adult women that were taking part, they should be outed too.
• 2:03
  But if there were girls who were groomed at fourteen
• 2:05
  fifteen years old to go and get their other fourteen
• 2:07
  and fifteen year old friends, we're gonna call them human traffickers.
• 2:11
  Not on my watch, not here. I mean, people can
• 2:13
  do whatever they want, right, I'm not saying you know
• 2:16
  that what we say here is the be all end ball.
• 2:20
  But I'm talking about me personally. Zero chance. Now, the
• 2:24
  core four or anybody who was above eighteen when they
• 2:28
  decided they were gonna do this shit. Yeah, those people
• 2:31
  strung up by their toes, every last one of them.
• 2:34
  And when I talk about co conspirators, Jeffrey Epstein's main
• 2:38
  co conspirators were women. That much is true. But let's
• 2:41
  be honest about who the women were, and let's just
• 2:44
  call them by name. What are we even doing right now?
• 2:47
  Because Anna Pauline A Luna's rhetoric has set off a firestorm.
• 2:51
  You have people out here now calling the survivors human traffickers,
• 2:55
  which is fucking bananas, because I assure you there's no
• 3:00
  what you getting a pass on this podcast. Every single
• 3:03
  person who's involved, they need to be on the clock.
• 3:06
  But we have to understand the circumstances. We have to
• 3:09
  understand nuance, and we have to understand what grooming is.
• 3:12
  There's a lot of people out there that have no idea,
• 3:15
  so they're running with the whole narrative. Oh, the survivors
• 3:19
  are human traffickers because they think that helps them politically,
• 3:23
  but it doesn't. It makes you look like a fool,
• 3:26
  like a moron, like an idiot who doesn't understand nuance
• 3:29
  and keeping it a buck. If I was one of
• 3:31
  those survivors, I would probably sue Anna, Paulina Luna. She
• 3:36
  can't just get up there and say that about all
• 3:38
  the survivors or a lot of the survivors give us names.
• 3:43
  You know, you talk about the survivors given up names.
• 3:45
  Let's hear some names. It's such a widespread problem. Let's
• 3:48
  hear the names. Let's see it. And I guarantee you
• 3:51
  dollars to donuts. What she's talking about in those emails
• 3:54
  are Sarah Kellen Vickers, Adriana Ross, Leslie Groff, and Nadiam Marsenkole.
• 4:00
  And if it's not them, let us have the names
• 4:03
  so they can be on the clock too. The disturbing
• 4:06
  images of the former royal and the mystery woman were
• 4:09
  shown to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, as Attorney
• 4:12
  General Pam Bondi was grilled over the release of the
• 4:15
  Epstein files. Facing questions from Representative Ted lu, the AG
• 4:20
  confirmed the woman's face had been redacted under congressional law
• 4:24
  designed to protect sex trafficking victims. And you know what,
• 4:28
  I have a feeling that the DOJ and the FBI
• 4:33
  are considering the core for his victims. Here and let
• 4:36
  me be very clear. Okay, if you're one of the
• 4:39
  co conspirators that was named in the NPA and you
• 4:44
  have immunity, yeah, you're not a victim. Okay, point blank period.
• 4:48
  And if the DOJ is really playing this game, like
• 4:50
  I'm starting to suspect they are, this is some devious,
• 4:54
  next level shit. I'm talking Stasi level of propaganda, because
• 4:58
  what they're effectively trying to do is the story by
• 5:01
  turning the people who were wronged into the villains. And
• 5:05
  you know, there's a bunch of mouth breathing morons with
• 5:08
  an appetite for that shit. So Anna Paulina Luna needs
• 5:11
  to clarify what she meant and if she has new
• 5:14
  names to share with us, she should do that, just
• 5:17
  like they keep demanding that the survivor's pony up names. Cool,
• 5:21
  you do the same thing. Why don't you walk the
• 5:23
  walk instead of just talk the talk. I'm going to
• 5:30
  show you two photos of former Prince Andrew. Prince Andrew
• 5:33
  attended various parties with Jeffrey Epstein, lou told the hearing.
• 5:37
  Under the law Congress past, you were allowed to redact
• 5:40
  photos to protect the victims of Epstein's sex trafficking operation.
• 5:44
  You redacted the photos of this victim's face because you
• 5:48
  were following the congressional law. Is that correct? After Bondie
• 5:52
  confirmed the reasoning behind their redaction, Lou declared that the
• 5:56
  photos proved we are looking at a sex trafficking victim.
• 6:00
  And one of the other letters that came out or
• 6:02
  emails was somebody talking about scuba diving near Epstein's island,
• 6:07
  and everybody was trying to figure out who it was,
• 6:09
  why the name was redacted, Why was somebody that was
• 6:12
  running for Congress having their name or adacted in the emails? Well,
• 6:17
  it turns out the person was gwendolen Beck. And then
• 6:20
  Todd Blanche has the audacity to call her a victim.
• 6:23
  Are you fucking kidding me? Right now? This lady was
• 6:25
  a political operative. She's not a victim. Oh and by
• 6:29
  the way, Epstein wasn't the only person that she was
• 6:32
  palain around with. In fact, Epstein and gold Bar Bob
• 6:35
  Menendez are Eskimo brothers. When it comes to gwendolen Beck,
• 6:40
  she is not a victim. That is some crazy, crazy shit.
• 6:44
  And if we're going with that narrative from the DOJ,
• 6:48
  that's why I think that they're saying that these names
• 6:51
  that are adacted are victims. I'm not buying it. I
• 6:55
  think that they're talking about the core of four. And
• 6:57
  I also think they know exactly what they're doing, and
• 6:59
  they're trying to cause more confusion. Under the Federal Victims
• 7:03
  Trafficking Protection Act, not only is Jeffrey Epstein guilty, but
• 7:07
  anyone who patronizes Epstein's sex operation is also guilty of
• 7:11
  a crime. The lawmaker said, that's true too. If you're
• 7:15
  out here getting girls with Jeffrey Epstein, going to his house,
• 7:19
  enjoying his parties, if you will getting a massage, chances
• 7:24
  are you're guilty. And I think that with this picture
• 7:27
  out there and all we know about Prince Andrew previously,
• 7:30
  is there any doubt that he should be under investigation
• 7:33
  here in the United States. There's no statute of limitations
• 7:36
  for what he allegedly did. That's why I find it
• 7:40
  absolutely despicable that you sought to protect Epstein's clients like
• 7:44
  former Prince Andrew lou Tolbondi. The lawmaker went on to
• 7:49
  question why the Department of Justice ultimately determined the Epstein
• 7:53
  files had uncovered any evidence that would warrant charges against others,
• 7:58
  alleging that the photos of the disgraced prince we're incriminating.
• 8:02
  I agree with that they most certainly are, maybe not
• 8:04
  on their own. But when you take it with everything
• 8:07
  we know and you look at the whole product, not good.
• 8:12
  So you can pick and choose evidence if you want.
• 8:14
  I'm talking about the full body of evidence, circumstantial and otherwise,
• 8:18
  that's been collected over the years. You need to tell
• 8:21
  me there's a prosecutor out there who looked at that
• 8:23
  and said, oh, we don't have enough here, give me
• 8:26
  a break. There's been plenty of evidence for a very
• 8:29
  long time. You know what, There hasn't been willpower. That's
• 8:32
  the big problem. No courage, no willpower. These two photos
• 8:37
  staring at you in the face are evidence of a crime,
• 8:40
  more than enough evidence to predicate an investigation against former
• 8:44
  Prince Andrew lou alleged, and I agree. I'm not calling
• 8:48
  for Andrew to be brought to the gallows right away.
• 8:51
  I'm calling for a robust investigation. You know, something that
• 8:55
  should have happened twenty years ago, but here we are.
• 9:00
  So since they didn't do it, then they're gonna do
• 9:02
  it now. And I promise you there's no moving on
• 9:06
  until it occurs. So I ask you, Attorney General Pambondy,
• 9:11
  why did you shut down this investigation last July? And
• 9:14
  why have you not prosecuted former Prince Andrew look combat
• 9:18
  of Bondi fired back, asking why lawmakers hadn't asked the
• 9:21
  same questions of her predecessor, Merrick Garland, who was an attorney
• 9:25
  general under former President Joe Biden. Yo, this is some
• 9:30
  wild stuff here, Pambondy, breaking news. You were hired to
• 9:34
  fix this. Donald Trump was elected because he was allegedly
• 9:39
  going to fix this. So what are you even talking
• 9:42
  about right now? Why do I care about what Merrick
• 9:44
  Garland was doing? And frankly, this whole line of bullshit
• 9:49
  doesn't even work on us. I don't give a fly
• 9:51
  and fuck who the president is. I want full transparency,
• 9:55
  I want an investigation, and I want people who are
• 9:57
  responsible to be held accountable. Is that clear enough for everybody?
• 10:01
  I mean, Jesus Christ, why didn't you call Meeric Garland
• 10:05
  to the carpet? Why didn't you do this or that? Yeah,
• 10:07
  mutually assured destruction. That's why people need to understand. The
• 10:12
  Democrats wanted nothing to do with this. The old Guard
• 10:16
  they all knew that they were caught up. It's the
• 10:18
  newer Democrats that are pushing for this because they know
• 10:21
  they don't have any ties to Abstein. What do they care.
• 10:24
  They're willing to burn it all to the ground, whereas
• 10:27
  previously they knew that it would take out people like
• 10:30
  the Clintons, so they decided not to pursue it. And
• 10:33
  that's just the truth. And I know that's a hard
• 10:36
  pill to swallow for some people, but here we are.
• 10:40
  Let me be very clear, for the last seven years
• 10:44
  I haven't had much help from people on the left,
• 10:48
  and the whole entire media structure has been against us.
• 10:53
  So I certainly welcome it now. But let's not act like,
• 10:57
  you know, this was this gigantic thing and everybody was
• 11:00
  clamoring for justice, because that's not the truth. But be
• 11:05
  that as it may. That doesn't give Pam Bondy armor
• 11:09
  here to say, oh, well, the other administrations other people
• 11:12
  didn't handle it. Yo, you're in charge now. The buck
• 11:15
  stops with you. I don't want to hear about anybody else.
• 11:18
  And if you're resorting to what about is them, you've
• 11:21
  already lost the debate. I agree with you. During the
• 11:25
  Biden administration, I call for people looking at Epstein files.
• 11:29
  Merrick Garland dropped the ball, as did Attorney General Bill Barr,
• 11:32
  as did Alex Acosta. A whole string of failures, But
• 11:36
  you were in charge, lou said, going all the way
• 11:38
  back to the first Clinton administration. So every single administration
• 11:44
  since then shares the blame. And if you'll wonder why,
• 11:48
  I tell you all the time that all this politic
• 11:50
  bullshit is just a bunch of garbage. This is why
• 11:54
  you have the power to change things, to hold these
• 11:56
  men accountable, and you're doing the opposite, you're protecting them.
• 12:00
  And he's right about that. Like I said, the buck
• 12:02
  stops of pan Bondi. Two things can be right at once.
• 12:05
  We can talk about the failures of the prior administrations,
• 12:09
  but that doesn't give you any kind of armor, any
• 12:12
  kind of breathing room for your own failures. It just
• 12:15
  adds to the problem. Do they not see this? With
• 12:19
  some of Epstein's victims seated behind her in the hearing room,
• 12:22
  Bondi defended the DOJ's handling of the investigative files related
• 12:27
  to the well connected financier and accused Democrats of using
• 12:31
  the documents to distract from Trump's success. Yeah, you know,
• 12:35
  because the Dow Jones is really important when we're talking
• 12:38
  about a worldwide ring of money laundering pedophiles. No big
• 12:43
  deal here, Let's just, you know, move on, let's talk
• 12:45
  about the Dow Jones. This lady, for real, does she
• 12:48
  understand that the vast majority of Americans don't give a
• 12:51
  fuck at this point? I truly don't think they understand
• 12:54
  the sort of genie that has left the bottle, And
• 12:57
  at this point, there's no putting it back in. And listen,
• 13:01
  there's no going back now, and we're certainly not moving on.
• 13:05
  All of the information that goes with this episode can
• 13:08
  be found in the description box.