Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Woman Savagely Murdered at Hamptons Luxury Spa Before Cops Find 'Psychopath'

Transcript

Woman Savagely Murdered at Hamptons Luxury Spa Before Cops Find 'Psychopath' · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Imagine booking $ 1, 000 a night Hamptons Wellness Retreat.
• 0:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: Just to escape the chaos of your life. Oh, yeah.
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: Just looking for total peace and quiet.
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: Right. You step out of this cedar-scented meditation session and
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: you expect to hear, I don't know, wind chimes or something.
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: Exactly.
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: But instead, you find your serene sanctuary completely swarming with
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: police cruisers.
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: It's just such a jarring image.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: It really is. And that is the jarring reality we're
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: wading into today. We are looking at the deeply complex
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: and tragic death of 33-year-old artist Sabina Rosas.
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah, whose life ended in the intensely private show Soogie
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: Ban House in Watermill, New York.
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: Right, Watermill. And for this deep dive, our source material
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: today is a transcript from the long crime network show Sidebar.
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: Which is hosted by Jesse Weber and features Julie Rundleman.
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: Right, Julie Rundleman, who is a former prosecutor turned defense attorney. So,
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: you know, she brings a really fascinating lens to this.
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: She definitely does.
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: And our mission for this deep dive is to unpack
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: the blurred lines of Sabina's relationship with her suspected killer.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: And we also want to explore the mechanics of how
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: investigators reconstruct a timeline when the primary suspect takes his
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: own life.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Because that completely changes the game.
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: It completely changes everything. Okay, let's unpack this. We should
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: start with just the basic facts to ground everyone.
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: Good idea.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: So Sabina was a Brooklyn-based artist. She was found dead
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: in a guest house at this elite retreat on a Monday.
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: But the man police identified as the suspect, 56-year-old Thomas Gannon,
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: was found dead of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound.
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: 200 miles away.
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: Exactly. 200 miles away in Pennsylvania.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: We are immediately confronted with this massive investigative void. I mean,
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: the traditional mechanism of the justice system. You know, apprehending
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: a suspect, interrogating them, putting them on trial.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: All of that is just gone.
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: It's entirely bypassed. You have a victim of profound violence
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: in a space that is literally engineered for healing.
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: And a suspect who has permanently sealed away the narrative.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: It's incredibly frustrating. And to really understand the magnitude of
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: this loss... We have to establish who Sabina Rosas actually was.
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: We really do.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: Because her background completely shatters the typical profile of someone
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: you might expect to find in a Hamptons true crime headline.
• 2:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, she wasn't born into generational wealth or high society
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: or anything like that.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: Not at all. She's born in Tajikistan in Central Asia.
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: And her family was actually forced to flee a brutal
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: civil war.
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: What's fascinating here is that that background provides a critical
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: psychological baseline for understanding her life trajectory.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Right, because fleeing a war as a kid.
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: It requires a level of psychological endurance and adaptability that, well,
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: most people simply never have to develop. You're dealing with
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: the foundational trauma of displacement, the systemic lengths of safety,
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: and just constantly navigating unfamiliar, hostile environments.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: Exactly. And she lived in Europe for a period, even
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: went back to Tajikistan briefly. Before moving to the U.S.
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: when she was just 17.
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: 17. I mean, think about being 17 and doing that.
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: It's wild. And rather than being consumed by all that displacement,
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: she channeled it into this rising career in the New
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: York art world.
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: Which is notoriously insular.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: Extremely insular. But she co-founded an art publication called Ruo Journal.
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: And in their public tribute to her, they said she
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: moved walls so that gardens could flourish.
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And that she left an impactful legacy. in the
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: arts of Central Asia.
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: The phrase moved walls is just an incredibly potent metaphor
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: when you consider where she came from. Right.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: Breaking down barriers.
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The socioeconomic barriers to entry in the fine arts,
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: especially in places like Brooklyn or Manhattan, they're monumental.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely.
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: For a refugee to arrive in the U.S. at 17
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: and successfully integrate into that sphere, I mean, it means
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: she possessed exceptional networking acumen and raw talent and just
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: sheer grit.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: She knew how to build communities and spaces that are
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: historically designed to keep outsiders out.
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah, she really did.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: Which makes the location of her death feel like this
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: cruel paradox. I mean, we're talking about the Shosugi Ban House.
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this isn't some roadside motel.
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: No, this is an environment that wealthy individuals retreat to
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: during the off-season. They go for nutritional resets, sensory deprivation, quiet.
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: The entire business model is basically an architectural placebo designed
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: to insulate you from stress and harm.
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: You're describing what we'd call a zero-risk environment.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: Environmental psychology tells us that humans are constantly, you know,
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: subconsciously scanning their surroundings for threat vectors.
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: Right, like walking down a dark street.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: Exactly. In a subway station at midnight, your threat assessment
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: is highly activated. But in an ultra-luxury gated wellness spa...
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: your threat assessment is intentionally deactivated by the environment itself.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: Because you paid a premium to not have to worry.
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: Precisely. The lighting, the acoustics, the physical distance from public roads,
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: every single variable is controlled. So when an act of
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: supreme violence occurs in a space biologically coded as safe,
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: it creates a profound cognitive dissonance.
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: It really does. I kind of look at it less
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: like a classic locked room mystery and more like an
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: immunization bubble.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: Oh, that's a good way to put it.
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: Right. The extreme price tag acts as a filter, keeping
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: the unpredictability of the general public out. But the vulnerability
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: of that bubble is that you can still invite the
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: virus inside. The violence wasn't a product of the spa.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: It was imported directly into the guest house by the
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: only other person in the room.
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: And that really highlights the inherent vulnerability of interpersonal relationships.
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: I mean, you can physically insulate yourself with wealth and
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: security protocols. You can survive a literal war zone and
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: cross continents.
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: But if the threat is already inside your inner circle.
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: The environmental security is rendered entirely useless.
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: Exactly. And that brings us to the man who imported
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: that violence. To figure out how this happened. were logically
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: forced to follow the only person who walked out of
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: that wellness retreat alive.
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: Right, the suspect, Thomas Gannon.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, a 56-year-old man living in Rain County, Pennsylvania. And
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: when investigators finally tracked him down, they found him dead.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: But here's the piece of evidence that seems to just
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: stop the narrative dead in its tracks. Edward Howell, the coroner,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: Confirmed that Gannon confessed to the homicide in a text message.
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, a text message sent to a family member right
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: before he pulled the trigger.
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: A text message confession.
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: The medium of that confession is a fascinating artifact of
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: modern psychology, honestly.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: How so?
• 6:38
  Speaker 2: Well, historically, a confession preceding suicide was a physical note,
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: you know, left at the scene or on a desk.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Right, like a formalized declaration.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: Exactly, a formalized static declaration. But a text message is impulsive.
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: It's immediate. It's intimate.
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: By sending it to a family member rather than dialing
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: 911 or emailing the police, he's basically weaponizing his confession.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow. Weaponizing it.
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: Yeah. He's ensuring that the last interaction his family has
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: with him is inextricably linked to the trauma of his crime.
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: That is, that's incredibly dark. And we also got to
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: look at his background. And this is where my assumptions
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: just got completely derailed.
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: Damn here.
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: Because the network utilized a truth finder search and Gannon's
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: record was essentially spotless.
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: Completely cleaned.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: We're talking about like a few minor traffic citations.
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: There's no documented history of violent felonies, no restraining orders
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: popping up, no major red flags screaming from his public record.
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: And, you know, the absence of a public record is
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: frequently the most challenging hurdle in predictive threat assessment.
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: Because there's no paper trail.
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: Exactly. When forensic psychologists look at the escalation of violence,
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: they generally expect this staircase effect.
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: OK.
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: You know, minor assaults, domestic disturbances. maybe stalking charges, eventually
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: culminating in a homicide.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: Right, a buildup.
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: But when a 56-year-old man with a clean record allegedly
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: commits a brutal murder, it forces investigators to look for hidden,
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: undocumented histories of coercive control.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: Stuff that just never made it onto a police blotter.
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: Exactly.
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: But I have a major procedural question here, and I'm
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: sure a lot of you listening are wondering the same thing.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: If the primary suspect is dead and he left a
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: literal confession acknowledging he committed the act, why doesn't the
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: investigation just end right there?
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: It seems like it should, right?
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, the police have the killer. They have
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: the admission of guilt. It seems like the bureaucracy should
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: take over, you know, file the paperwork, close the case
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: and move on.
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: The instinct to view the case as closed is totally understandable.
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: But the legal framework requires a much higher burden of
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: empirical proof. Which is a concept Julie Rendleman details extensively
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: in our source material.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: Right, the former prosecutor.
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: Yeah. In criminal law, a text message confessing to a
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: crime is categorized as consciousness of guilt. It's an indicator,
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: but it is absolutely not a substitution for forensic reality.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Meaning the police can't just take his word for it,
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: even from beyond the grave.
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: Precisely the opposite of taking his word for it, actually.
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: They have to scientifically verify it.
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: Think about it. What if Gannon was suffering from a
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: profound delusion and merely believed he committed a crime?
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: Wow. Okay.
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: Or what if the text message was sent by someone
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: else who had access to his phone? Right. Or what
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: if he arrived at the spa, found Sabina already deceased, panicked, fled,
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: and took his own life out of some misplaced sense
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: of guilt or fear of being blamed?
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: I mean, those scenarios sound crazy, but I guess you
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: have to rule them out.
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: Exactly. While probabilistically low, the justice system simply cannot close
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: a homicide case based on an unverified digital message. The
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: physical evidence at the scene must independently corroborate the narrative
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: of his confession.
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: So they basically have to prove that his confession matches
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: the blood spatter, the timeline of death, the physical injuries.
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: All of it.
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: And beyond the strict legal requirements. Rendleman emphasizes the sociological
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: imperative of the investigation.
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: Right, for the family.
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: A trial is society's mechanism for establishing a public truth.
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: It answers the why and the how for the victim's family. Yeah.
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: When a suspect commits suicide, they are essentially stealing the trial.
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: They're hoarding the truth.
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: Hoarding the truth. That's a powerful way to frame it.
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: So the ongoing investigation is law enforcement's attempt to reconstruct
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: a fragmented narrative just so the family isn't left in
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: this permanent state of ambiguity.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: So they're trying to extract the why because the who
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: evaded accountability. But when we start digging into the why,
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: we're immediately confronted with the nature of their relationship. And
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: looking at the source material, the testimony about who Gannon
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: was to Sabina is completely splinters.
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: It's all over the place.
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: It's a mass of contradictions.
• 10:49
  Speaker 2: It really serves as a masterclass in how human beings
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: compartmentalize their lives and how an observer's own biases shape
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: their interpretation of a relationship.
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: Let's lay out the first perspective we have. We have
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: Ryder Yada.
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: Right, the fashion designer.
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, fashion designer who met Sabina in 2016 at S.C.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: Annaway Purchase. And he went on the record calling her
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: the greatest love of his life. Okay. Now, According to Ryder,
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: he did not believe the relationship between Sabina and Gannon
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: was romantic in any capacity.
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: Interesting.
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he mentioned meeting Gannon once, noted that he got
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: weird vibes from him, and ultimately called Gannon's final act
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: wicked and cowardly. So in Ryder's framing, Gannon is just
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: this peripheral, unsettling presence.
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: Notice how Ryder's assessment minimizes Gannon's significance in Sabina's.
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: Life, though.
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: As a long-term partner, Ryder has a psychological incentive to
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: view Sabina's other male relationships as strictly platonic or professional. Right.
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: You don't want to think of them as a threat.
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The weird vibes indicate he sensed some irregularity, but
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: he categorized it as an annoyance rather than a structural threat.
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: But then you pivot to the second perspective, which comes
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: from Liz Phillips.
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: The art teacher.
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: Right. Sabina's art teacher and mentor. And her read on
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: the situation is drastically different.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: Ain't it?
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Phillips explicitly stated that Gannon was obsessed with Sabina.
• 12:13
  Speaker 2: Obsessed.
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: Yes. She noted that Gannon had money and he wanted
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: to help her and he wanted to be with her
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: all the time. And kind of echoing Ryder's unease but
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: amplifying it, Phillips said Gannon gave her the creeps.
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: So the mentor is viewing the dynamic through the lens
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: of professional development and vulnerability. She instantly identifies the two
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: core levers of coercive control.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: Which are?
• 12:35
  Speaker 2: Financial resources, and physical proximity. He had money, and he
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: wanted to be with her all the time. That is
• 12:41
  Speaker 2: a classic formula for isolating an individual. The mentor doesn't
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: just see a peripheral annoyance like the partner did. She
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: sees an active, consuming obsession funded by a financial imbalance.
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: And then we get the third perspective, which is the
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: clinical assessment from the authorities. The Suffolk County Police haven't
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: detailed the exact parameters, but they officially labeled the relationship
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: as domestic in nature.
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: And that phrase, domestic in nature, carries very specific weight
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: in a forensic context. Law enforcement uses that terminology to
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: rule out random acts of violence, stranger-on-stranger crime, or purely
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: professional disputes.
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: Taking that a step further, what does domestic imply when
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: they don't actually share a residential address because they didn't
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: live together?
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: It implies a recognized emotional and intimate entanglement that transcends
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: a casual friendship or a standard artist-investor dynamic.
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: Applying Rendleman's logic to the geography of the crime, booking
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: a quiet $ 1, 000 a night spa in the Hamptons during
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: the autumnal off-season, that is an inherently intimate act.
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's not a business meeting.
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: No, it's an itinerary designed for privacy and seclusion. You
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: simply do not engage in that specific type of travel
• 13:53
  Speaker 2: logistics with someone unless there is a significant complex entanglement.
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: Here's where it gets really interesting for me. I see
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: this dynamic as a sort of financial centrifuge.
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: A centrifuge, okay.
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the extreme pressure of Gannon's money, his ability to
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: fund her art, to pay for luxury retreats. It acted
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: as this centrifugal force separating Sabina's life into distinct, isolated layers.
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: I see where you're going with this.
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: Ryder saw the layer where Gannon was just an odd
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: guy hanging around. Liz saw the layer where Gannon's money
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: was creating a suffocating gravity. And the police see the
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: ultimate result of those layers collapsing into a domestic homicide.
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: That is an incredibly apt analogy. You know, the term
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: the source material reluctantly floats is sugar daddy, but that
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: colloquialism actually flattens the complexity of what might have been happening.
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: It oversimplifies it.
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: Way too much. The power dynamics between a 56-year-old man
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: with significant capital and a 33-year-old rising artist are intrinsically skewed.
• 14:51
  Speaker 2: We really have to consider whether Gannon viewed his financial
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: contributions as a purchase of her autonomy. If he is
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: funding her life, Does he believe he has veto power
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: over her relationships, her time, or her career?
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: And it makes you question how much of this separation
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: was Sabina's intentional survival strategy.
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: Absolutely.
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: We all tailor our behavior depending on who we're talking to.
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: It's entirely plausible she downplayed Gannon's intensity to rioter to
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: prevent conflict while leaning into the financial support aspect with
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: her mentor to justify his presence.
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: That's a very common coping mechanism.
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: But when the violence occurs, those isolated layers shatter, and
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: investigators are left holding completely contradictory witness statements.
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: Which is exactly why relying solely on human memory and
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: interpretation in a post-mortem investigation is deeply flawed. Witnesses provide
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: the emotional context, but to establish a factual timeline, investigators
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: must pivot to objective data.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: Right. They have to look at the unalterable digital footprint.
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: And the digital breadcrumbs left behind in this case are
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: not just revealing, they're fundamentally disturbing.
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: They really are.
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: Let's examine Sabina's GoFundMe page. She had set it up
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: to raise funds for an artist residency in Portugal, framing
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: the trip as a gift to herself for her upcoming
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: 33rd birthday.
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: And just to note, utilizing crowdfunding for a residency is
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: a totally standard, pragmatic move for a working artist trying
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: to scale their career internationally.
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: Right, the intent is totally standard. But the text she
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: chose for the description takes on a very, very different
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: weight now.
• 16:27
  Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely.
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: She wrote, As I approach my 33rd birthday, I can't
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: help but chuckle at the fact that 33 is often
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: associated with the age of Cheesan when he made his
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: ultimate sacrifice. While I'm not planning anything dramatic, I see
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: this year as a turning point in my life.
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: The phenomenon we are experiencing when we read that text
• 16:45
  Speaker 2: right now is called retrospective framing.
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: Retrospective framing.
• 16:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Our brains are hardwired to seek narrative cohesion. When
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: we know the tragic outcome, we retroactively scan previous data
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: for prophetic meanings.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: Because it almost forces you to view it as this
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: tragic foreshadowing, even if she just meant it as a
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: lighthearted joke about getting older.
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: It highlights the unsettling permanence of our digital lives. I mean,
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: a casual, slightly dark joke about turning 33 suddenly becomes
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: a permanent public epitaph linking her to the concept of
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: an all-time sacrifice.
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah. But, you know, the more forensically relevant aspect of
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: that GoFundMe page is the donor list.
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: Exactly. Because exactly two months prior to her death, Thomas
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: Gannon made a $ 1, 000 donation. He was the largest contributor.
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: And he didn't do it anonymously.
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: No. He left a public comment that read, You have
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: an amazing gift, and soon all the world will see
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: I love you.
• 17:39
  Speaker 2: Let's really dissect the mechanics of that statement. Soon all
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: the world will see I love you.
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 17:44
  Speaker 2: In the context of a public fundraising page, this is
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: not a private expression of endearment. It's a territorial marker.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: A territorial marker.
• 17:53
  Speaker 2: He is utilizing his financial dominance, being the top donor—
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: As a platform to publicly fuse his identity with her success.
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: He's essentially demanding an audience for his affection. By posting
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: it on a page viewed by her peers, her mentor,
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: her partner, he is asserting his presence into every single
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: silo of her life.
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: It is a textbook example of performative dominance. If an
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: individual feels their control slipping in private, they will often
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: escalate to public declarations to force the victim into acknowledging
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: the dynamic. Right. the financial contribution operates as a leash.
• 18:27
  Speaker 2: If she attempts to establish boundaries, he can point to
• 18:30
  Speaker 2: the public ledger of his support, leveraging guilt and obligation.
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: But the digital trail doesn't just stop at unsettling public comments.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: There's a much darker official artifact that investigators have to
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: contend with.
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: The Miami incident.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: Right. In March of 2023, roughly 18 months before her murder,
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: Sabina was arrested in Miami and charged with battery. And
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: in the mugshot from that arrest, She is sporting a
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: highly visible black eye.
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: Now, the Law and Crime Network's review noted that the
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: Miami-Dade court website showed no active record of the case,
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: which suggests the charges may have been dropped, sealed, or
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: maybe expunged through a diversion program.
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: Okay, so the legal case vanished.
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: Right, but the administrative status of the case is secondary
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: to the physical evidence frozen in that photograph. The black
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: eye is a documented injury.
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: But here's the thing. If the suspect is dead, how
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: do investigators utilize an 18-month-old mugshot? Does it actually help
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: them close the case?
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: This raises an important question about timelines. It is the
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: cornerstone for establishing a timeline of escalation.
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: How so?
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: An isolated homicide in a luxury spa is an anomaly.
• 19:36
  Speaker 2: A homicide preceded by a documented physical altercation 18 months
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: prior reveals a systemic pattern. So the central investigative objective
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: right now is conducting a geospatial analysis of Thomas Gannon
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: in March 2023.
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: They need to prove he was in Miami.
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: Exactly. They need to subpoena flight manifests, hotel credit card authorizations,
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: cell tower pings.
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: If they can definitively place Gannon in Miami during the
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: time of that altercation, and more specifically, if they can
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: link him as the source of that black eye or
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: the catalyst for her arrest, The narrative shifts drastically.
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: It totally does.
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: It transforms the relationship from a vaguely obsessive dynamic into
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: a verifiable history of intimate partner violence.
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: It provides that vital context that the violence in the
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: Hamptons wasn't just some sudden out-of-the-blue psychological snap. It was
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: the terminal stage of a cycle that had been escalating
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: for over a year.
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: Conversely, though, investigators must maintain objective rigor.
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: What do you mean?
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: Well, what if the Miami incident was a completely unrelated altercation,
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: a dispute with a stranger, an accident, an incident involving
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: a different individual entirely?
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: Oh, right.
• 20:45
  Speaker 2: Until the data firmly places Gannon at the center of
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: that 2023 event, it remains a critical, unresolved variable.
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: It's a stark reminder of how digital archives freeze moments
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: in time out of context. You know, a birthday fundraiser
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: and a sealed arrest record meant entirely different things when
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: they were created.
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: Absolutely.
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: But when recontextualized by a murder, they become the scaffolding
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: investigators used to build a motive. And all of this
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: underlying tension, this financial leverage and potential history of violence,
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: it eventually reached a boiling point in the physical world.
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: It culminated at the Shusugi Ban House. Right.
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: Which brings us to the logistics of the immediate aftermath,
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: specifically how Gannon fled the scene.
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: And, you know, the escape phase of a crime often
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: provides the clearest window into the perpetrator's psychological state.
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: When you consume true crime media, you know, you're conditioned
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: to expect a high stakes getaway. Burner phones, swap license plates,
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: cash transactions, fleeing across the border.
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the Hollywood getaway. Right.
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: But Thomas Gannon's escape defies every cinematic trope. He leaves
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: the watermill retreat alone. He has no vehicle. So he
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: opens his smartphone and he summons an Uber.
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: The juxtaposition is almost absurd when you think about it.
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: Utilizing a mundane, heavily tracked consumer rideshare application as the
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: getaway vehicle for a capital offense.
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: It's crazy.
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: He is actively generating a GPS-stamped, time-coded digital receipt of
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: his flight from a murder scene.
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: And he requests a ride for a 200-mile, four-hour journey
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: from the Hamptons all the way to Wayne County, Pennsylvania.
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: Four hours in an Uber.
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and the total cost was $ 370. And because he
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: used an app, Long-coursemen easily identified and interviewed the driver.
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: The driver's observations give us a real-time snapshot of Gannon
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: in the hours immediately following Sabina's death.
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: And how did the driver categorize his passenger's behavior?
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: Well, the driver noted that Gannon did not leave a tip, which,
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: I mean, is a minor detail but paints a picture.
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: More importantly, he described Gannon as looking miserable, exhausted, and agitated.
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: Gannon barely spoke a word for the entire four-hour drive. Wow.
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: But the most crucial detail the driver provided was a
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: visual one. There was absolutely no visible blood on Gannon's clothing.
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: Let's analyze the neurobiology of that four-hour ride first because
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: the driver's description of miserable, exhausted, and agitated is a
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: perfect clinical description of an endocrine system crash.
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: You're talking about the adrenaline dump.
• 23:14
  Speaker 2: Specifically, the extreme activation of the sympathetic nervous system followed
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: by the parasympathetic rebound. Committing an act of lethal violence
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: requires a massive surge of cortisol and epinephrine. The heart
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: rate spikes. The pupils dilate. The body is fully primed
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: for extreme physical exertion. But the human body cannot sustain
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: that state.
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: It just gives out.
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: Once the act is completed, the system crashes violently. The
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: exhaustion the driver witnessed wasn't just tiredness. It was the
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: physiological toll of his body attempting to process massive amounts
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: of stress hormones.
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: The agitation makes sense, too. I mean, he's trapped in
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: a moving box for four hours. He has just committed murder.
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: He's leaving the body in a spa where it will
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: inevitably be found. And he's heading home to orchestrate his
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: own death. The claustrophobia of sitting in the back of
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: a stranger's car, listening to the hum of the tires,
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: entirely unable to control the environment around him. that has
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: to induce severe psychological panic.
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely. But the detail regarding the lack of visible
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: blood is the most forensically significant observation the driver made.
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: That is exactly where my mind went. I mean, if
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: you commit a brutal murder, how do you walk out
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: of the room and climb into an Uber without looking
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: like a butcher? Does the absence of blood indicate a
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: specific mechanism of death?
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: It heavily directs the investigation away from sharp force trauma,
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: such as a stabbing or severe blunt force trauma that
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: would cause arterial spray or or significant cast-off blood patterns
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: on the perpetrator's clothing.
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: So it points towards something like asphyxiation or strangulation?
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: Statistically, yes. In cases of intimate partner violence, where the
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: perpetrator leaves relatively clean, manual strangulation or asphyxiation is highly prevalent.
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: It's an intensely personal, quiet, and externally bloodless method of
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: inflicting lethal harm. The violence is contained internally within the
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: victim's anatomy.
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: But we also have to factor in the unreliability of
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: the observer here, right?
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: Sure.
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: Because the Uber driver wasn't an investigator processing a suspect.
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: He was just a guy trying to complete a long-haul fare.
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: That is a vital caveat. The driver was merely glancing
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: in the rearview mirror. He wouldn't have noticed a subtle
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: smear of biological material on a dark cuff or defensive
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: scratches hidden under a collar.
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: He only noted the absence of obvious catastrophic gore. The
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: physical journey for Gannon ends in Pennsylvania. He exits the rideshare.
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: sends the text message confession to his family, and pulls
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: the trigger.
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: But for the medical examiners and for Sabina's family, the
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: forensic journey is just initiating.
• 25:47
  Speaker 2: When the suspect eliminates the possibility of a courtroom trial,
• 25:51
  Speaker 2: the autopsy suite becomes the sole remaining venue for truth discovery.
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: The family released a statement expressing their devastation over the
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: senseless loss, and they revealed their plan to return Sabina's
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: body to Tajikistan once the autopsy is concluded.
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: And as Rendleman details in the source material, the autopsy
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: is now the absolute center of gravity for this case.
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: It will determine the precise mechanism of death, which helps
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: define the legal nature of the crime.
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: If we connect this to the bigger picture, the medical
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: examiner really operates as the final historian for the victim.
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: The final historian. Yeah.
• 26:25
  Speaker 2: If the autopsy reveals petechial hemorrhaging in the eyes and
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: a fractured hyoid bone, they can definitively rule the cause
• 26:32
  Speaker 2: as strangulation. If they find specific bruising patterns, they can
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: outline a timeline of the assault.
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: But they are just examining Sabina. The autopsy of Gannon
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: is equally critical for piecing together the interaction.
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: Very much so. They will subject Gannon's body to a
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: rigorous examination for defensive wounds. They'll search his forearms, his face,
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: and his hands for scratches, bite marks, or bruising that
• 26:54
  Speaker 2: would indicate Sabina fought back.
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: They'll swab under his fingernails for her DNA and vice versa.
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: They are attempting to choreograph the final moments of the
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: struggle through the trauma left on both bodies.
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: It really highlights the incredible burden we place on medical
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: examiners in murder-suicide scenarios. In a standard homicide, the medical
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: examiner's report is just one piece of a massive prosecutorial
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: puzzle presented to a jury.
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: But here, the medical examiner is the only entity left
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: who can speak for Sabina. Their scientific findings become the
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: definitive historical record. Because all the human voices capable of
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: explaining what happened in that room have been silenced.
• 27:34
  Speaker 2: They are forced to read the story written in tissue
• 27:36
  Speaker 2: and bone, you know. Translating pathology into a narrative of
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: justice for a family that will never get to see
• 27:42
  Speaker 2: a perpetrator held accountable.
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: So what does this all mean? I really want you,
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: the listener, to consider what closure actually looks like in
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: a paradigm like this.
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: Our cultural script for justice is deeply ingrained.
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: Very much so.
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: We expect a courtroom drama. We expect a verdict read aloud.
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: And we expect the perpetrator to be led away in handcuffs.
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: That is how society processes trauma. But when the perpetrator
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: bypasses the system, when they act as their own judge, jury,
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: and executioner, that script is completely shredded.
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: It creates a vacuum of accountability. The victim's family is
• 28:17
  Speaker 2: handed forensic reports, toxicology screens, and police summaries. And they're
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: basically expected to synthesize their own closure from clinical data.
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: It's a profoundly sterile substitute for actual justice.
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: It is. And think about the geographic tragedy of Sabina's life.
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: As the eldest of three daughters, she fled a civil
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: war in Central Asia as a child. She navigated the globe,
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: seeking safety, seeking a platform for her voice. And she
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: successfully built that in America.
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: She built an incredible life.
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: And now, her life is violently ended in an exclusive...
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: fortified luxury spa, and her body is being flown back
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: to the very country she escaped. It's a devastating globe-spanning loop,
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: closed in the most violent manner imaginable.
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: Her journey underscores a chilling reality. The environmental safety we seek,
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: whether it's immigrating to a new continent or booking a
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: gated retreat, is often an illusion. True vulnerability is usually
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: dictated not by where we are, but by who we
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: allow into our proximity.
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: That is heavy. Right.
• 29:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: Transforming from a refugee of a civil war into a
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: cornerstone of the New York art community.
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: We dissected the heavily contradictory testimonies surrounding her relationship with
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: Thomas Gannon, analyzing how a mentor saw an obsession fueled
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: by money, while a partner saw an unsettling but non-threatening presence.
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: The layers of perception.
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: Exactly. We examined the concept of retrospective framing through her
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: digital footprint, the tactical use of a rideshare app for
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: a getaway, and the heavy burden placed on medical examiners
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: to write the final history of a crime when the
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: killer takes his own life.
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: It's a true case study in the fragmentation of truth
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: and how investigators must rely on forensic and digital architecture
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: when human testimony fails.
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: And bringing this directly back to you, listening right now,
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: it forces us to confront how deeply flawed our understanding
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: of other people's lives truly is. So true. We observe
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: our friends, our colleagues, our family members, And we confidently
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: assume we understand their relationships. But the reality is we
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: only ever see the specific layer of the centrifuge they
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: allow us to see.
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: Just that one slice.
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: Sabina's partner saw one version of Gannon. Her mentor saw another.
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: It is so easy to rationalize warning signs, to brush
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: off weird vibes as just a quirky personality, or to
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: view overwhelming financial involvement as just intense patronage.
• 30:47
  Speaker 2: You make excuses.
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: We excuse these red flags because it is socially convenient.
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: until tragedy strikes and violently recontextualizes everything we thought we knew.
• 30:57
  Speaker 2: It reinforces the absolute necessity of trusting our visceral instincts.
• 31:02
  Speaker 2: When a dynamic feels coercive or obsessive to an outside observer,
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: that intuition is rarely wrong, even if the victim themselves
• 31:10
  Speaker 2: is downplaying the severity of the threat.
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: Before we sign off, we want to leave you with
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: a final thought to chew on, something that builds on
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: the digital permanence we discussed today. We live our lives
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: leaving an endless, continuous trail of digital data.
• 31:22
  Speaker 2: Every single day.
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: I comment on a friend's fundraiser, an offhand joke on
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: a social feed, a location tag, a saved photo. We
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: operate under the assumption that we will always be alive
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: to provide the necessary context for those artifacts. Right. But
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: if you are suddenly removed from the equation today and
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: an outside observer had to piece together the narrative of
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: your life solely using your digital footprint... Without you there
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: to explain the inside jokes, the fleeting frustrations, or the
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: sarcastic comments, what completely different, potentially unrecognizable story might they
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: invent about who you were?
• 31:55
  Speaker 2: We constantly author our digital legacy, but the moment we're gone,
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: we completely forfeit the right to interpret it.
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: Something to seriously consider the next time you leave a
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: comment or hit post. Thank you for joining us on
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: this deep dive into the shadows of the Shosugi Ban House.
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: Take care of yourselves, and we will catch you on
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: the next one.