Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 4137 The SOROS EMPIRE Is Finally Coming To An END!!!

Transcript

Ep. 4137 The SOROS EMPIRE Is Finally Coming To An END!!! · Turley Talks

• 0:00
  [UNKNOWN]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
• 0:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
• 0:18
  [UNKNOWN]: This is Turley Talks.
• 0:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump's direction, Treasury is expanding its efforts to identify organizations that abuse charitable and non-profit structures as vehicles for elicit finance.
• 0:33
  [UNKNOWN]: We are examining where tax exempt status has been exploited.
• 0:38
  [UNKNOWN]: were charitable entities have become financial conduits for foreign influence activity and how those entrusted with stewardship of these organizations have instead enabled violence.
• 0:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Where the evidence leads, we will not hesitate to follow.
• 0:55
  [UNKNOWN]: And of course, we will hold these organizations, officers, directors,
• 1:01
  [UNKNOWN]: accountable.
• 1:02
  [UNKNOWN]: And just as financial institution must know their clients, they must know their grantees.
• 1:09
  [UNKNOWN]: That work is well underway.
• 1:12
  [UNKNOWN]: For over 50 years, George Soros has operated the single most powerful private political machine on the face of the earth, funding regime changes, funding riots, funding that take down of a sitting American president and doing it all in part with your tax dollars until now.
• 1:32
  [UNKNOWN]: the Trump administration has officially begun the process of permanently dismantling the tentacles of Soros' empire, along with the number of other left-wing NGOs, and you won't believe who Trump has tapped to do it, but it's someone with inside knowledge of how these organizations run, and he's the perfect person to bring the Soros' empire to its final and decisive end.
• 1:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Greetings everyone.
• 2:00
  [UNKNOWN]: It is live stream Friday.
• 2:01
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm your host, Dr. Steve.
• 2:03
  [UNKNOWN]: You're a patriot professor.
• 2:04
  [UNKNOWN]: You're never late.
• 2:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Patre professor.
• 2:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I was reading some of those comments.
• 2:08
  [UNKNOWN]: A wizard is never late.
• 2:10
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm here right when I'm supposed to be, right?
• 2:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Whatever it is, I'm here to help you make sense of the madness with breaking news and analysis.
• 2:18
  [UNKNOWN]: You're not going to get anywhere else.
• 2:19
  [UNKNOWN]: You know what to do?
• 2:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Make sure to smack that bell and subscribe but as always,
• 2:24
  [UNKNOWN]: our super chats are up, so feel free to send in your comments, your questions throughout the broadcast.
• 2:29
  [UNKNOWN]: It will be my privilege and my honor to answer them right here on this live stream.
• 2:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Also, a quick programming note, my Civ calls a master class is filling up fast.
• 2:41
  [UNKNOWN]: We start September 8th and just over a week.
• 2:44
  [UNKNOWN]: And if this is your first time hearing about it, I'm teaching a deep dive master class on my latest book, Siv Cosm, God's algorithms and the rise of a civilizational Cosmocracy, it's been my project for the last three years to give you
• 3:01
  [UNKNOWN]: a comprehensive overall frame for the new world that's rising all around us with the depth of the liberal globalist order and the end of the sorrows empire that's going down with it.
• 3:13
  [UNKNOWN]: What world replaces it?
• 3:15
  [UNKNOWN]: That's precisely the question I answer.
• 3:18
  [UNKNOWN]: in Civ Cosm.
• 3:19
  [UNKNOWN]: The world that's rising is an intersection between three-grand world-wide dynamics, Theo politics, with the return of religion to the public square and the rise of what are called civilization states, techno politics, with the rise of new technologies serving as expressions as civilizational power, and astro-politics, where those expressions
• 3:44
  [UNKNOWN]: in their power competitions over the cosmos itself.
• 3:48
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what the rise of a civilization cosmocracy is all about.
• 3:53
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you want a front or a seat on it, if you want to be as rush limbo you used to say on the cutting edge of societal evolution, right?
• 4:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh gosh, I miss rush.
• 4:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Then you will definitely want to sign up for this amazing six week master class.
• 4:06
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll go over the whole Siv Cosm Framework live virtually for six weeks.
• 4:11
  [UNKNOWN]: You get to ask me your questions,
• 4:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Today only, when you click on that link or scan the QR code, for the next 24 hours only use code SIVCAUSIM30.
• 4:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Civ Cosm30 and at checkout you're gonna at 30 dollars off the essential with a complete bundle.
• 4:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Civ Cosm30 tomorrow the code's gone So you only got 24 hours to scan the QR code click the link and I can't wait to see you for the this live masterclass Could be absolutely awesome.
• 4:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm very very excited.
• 4:42
  [UNKNOWN]: All right.
• 4:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's dive right in here.
• 4:43
  [UNKNOWN]: This is awesome.
• 4:45
  [UNKNOWN]: The New York Post
• 4:47
  [UNKNOWN]: is now reporting from three separate sources familiar with internal treasury deliberations that none other than Scott Basant and the IRS are actively drawing up plans to revoke once and for all the tax exempt status of George Sorcerer's open society foundations.
• 5:09
  [UNKNOWN]: The organization that is function for decades has the financial engine of the entire global left is now staring down the loss of its 501c3 tax status, which means the loss of the single greatest tax shelter, the political left.
• 5:28
  [UNKNOWN]: has ever built and it's not just sorrows the same reporting names the southern poverty law center and care the council on American Islamic relations again another far left activist front as sitting right along side sorrows in the crosshairs of this crackdown now according to the post.
• 5:47
  [UNKNOWN]: That's since inner circle has been drafting a formal blueprint that would strip these organizations that their charitable status all together, it would literally financially destroy them.
• 6:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And here's the number that every single one should make all of us set up.
• 6:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Sorris' network, SPLC and care all lose their exemptions.
• 6:11
  [UNKNOWN]: That would mean
• 6:13
  [UNKNOWN]: that for when it comes to sources organization, roughly $165 million were suddenly be owed to the United States Treasury and back taxes.
• 6:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Actually, it's $165 million total for all of them.
• 6:26
  [UNKNOWN]: 163 comes directly from sources network alone.
• 6:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So this would be catastrophic.
• 6:36
  [UNKNOWN]: This would be dismantling
• 6:39
  [UNKNOWN]: uh... sorrows isn't just one name on this list he is the list if it's a total of a hundred sixty five million back taxes potties hundred sixty five million dollars back taxes and a hundred and sixty three is sorrows this is this is a sorrows obliteration par excellence of what's going on here
• 7:02
  [UNKNOWN]: It's pretty amazing stuff because it all leans on an executive order that President Trump signed back in 2025, targeting non-profits that operate with what the order calls a quote substantial illegal purpose, okay, substantial illegal purpose and what that means.
• 7:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Is that it gives the treasuring the IRS the legal authority to go after tax exempt organizations no matter how sacrosanct like care or like sources organizations the open size foundations.
• 7:39
  [UNKNOWN]: They have all the authority in the world to go after these organizations, they suspect of basically being fronts for nefarious activity.
• 7:47
  [UNKNOWN]: So they depict these organizations, depict themselves in their name and their legal documentation as philanthropic humanitarian organizations.
• 7:57
  [UNKNOWN]: But in point of fact, behind the scenes, they're actually tied to all kinds of political violence, radical ideologies,
• 8:04
  [UNKNOWN]: regime change operations or any other activity that has literally nothing to do whatsoever with their supposed charity work.
• 8:13
  [UNKNOWN]: One source, speaking anonymously to the New York Post, put it perfectly, they compared the Treasury Department right now as a dog with a bone, saying that any organization currently at a compliance is on borrowed time.
• 8:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Scott Besson is lays our focus on crushing these organizations at the direction of President Trump.
• 8:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Other sources did admit
• 8:37
  [UNKNOWN]: that the IRS was moving way too slowly for Trump on this on purpose.
• 8:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Unfortunately, there's still some entrenched forces in there.
• 8:48
  [UNKNOWN]: But the post is reporting that that's about to change very, very soon.
• 8:52
  [UNKNOWN]: They got this.
• 8:53
  [UNKNOWN]: They got all the people they want in charge of this.
• 8:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Everything is converging in such a way so it's to begin speeding up.
• 9:00
  [UNKNOWN]: What promises to be an absolutely devastating crackdown on these organizations.
• 9:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, of course, the usual suspects are already loyering up a left-leaning group called Project Democracy has actually filed a lawsuit against
• 9:18
  [UNKNOWN]: The Treasury Department and the IRS claim in the entire crackdown is just political retribution, retaliation, dressed up as tax enforcement in the likeaha and a spokesperson for the open society foundations gave a statement calling this quote, and a legal attempt to target and stifle the wonderful work that this administration, this evil administration disagrees with, okay, that wasn't quite a quote.
• 9:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I did put in a few extra adjectives in there, but
• 9:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, of course they'd say that right when your entire billion dollar empire is built on tax exempt status tax exempt donations funding partisan warfare and crooked DAs and regime change operations in a while they're what
• 10:00
  [UNKNOWN]: around the world you're going to find anything you possibly you're going to scream political persecution the second someone finally opens up the books I'm surprised they haven't played the race card by this point right now I'm sure a car is about to the the American Islamic relations organization there but here's what's so fascinating and unfortunately so futile for them the Trump administration is already treating this as a done deal
• 10:26
  [UNKNOWN]: There's no way around this.
• 10:28
  [UNKNOWN]: There's guilty of sin, and they're not going to be able to weasel their way out of this with some kind of racial retaliation rhetoric or anything like that.
• 10:38
  [UNKNOWN]: There are now reports that Trump's own team inside the treasury are at this point just merely debating strategy.
• 10:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They're not debating ends.
• 10:50
  [UNKNOWN]: The ends is to destroy the Soros network.
• 10:54
  [UNKNOWN]: The outcome is guaranteed.
• 10:57
  [UNKNOWN]: The outcome is baked into the cake.
• 11:00
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just a matter of what kind of cake do you want to make?
• 11:03
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a matter of strategy.
• 11:04
  [UNKNOWN]: So some officials want a big chunk of this crackdown wrapped up in the next several weeks before the midterms.
• 11:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Others are more cautious because they're worried that going after sorrows and the SPLC too fast before finishing the case of foreign link groups like care that could tie up the whole thing in years of litigation.
• 11:28
  [UNKNOWN]: But what's so key here to understand and what's really happening here inside the administration.
• 11:34
  [UNKNOWN]: There is a genuine tactical debate on how hard and how fast to swing the hammer.
• 11:42
  [UNKNOWN]: But nobody inside the buildings debating whether to swing the hammer.
• 11:48
  [UNKNOWN]: That's already been decided.
• 11:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros is going down.
• 11:51
  [UNKNOWN]: The question is simply now how to do it most effectively.
• 11:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Interesting.
• 11:55
  [UNKNOWN]: We heard JD Vance say something very similar with Ilhan Omar.
• 11:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Do you remember that?
• 11:59
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, Vance basically came out and said, did he say Ilhan, Ilhan Omar?
• 12:04
  [UNKNOWN]: So the guy I forgot, Ilhan Omar has, we have determined has definitely committed immigration fraud.
• 12:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Now the question is just how to handle this.
• 12:12
  [UNKNOWN]: how are we going to go about this, but we are going to bring her to some kind of accountability.
• 12:17
  [UNKNOWN]: It's the same thing.
• 12:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump is all about dropping the hammer.
• 12:19
  [UNKNOWN]: The question is what's the best way to do it?
• 12:22
  [UNKNOWN]: This isn't some isolated tax dispute either.
• 12:25
  [UNKNOWN]: That's another thing to get.
• 12:27
  [UNKNOWN]: This is the post millennials actually reporting that this fits into a much broader pattern, because the treasuries targetless doesn't stop with sorrows or the SPLC or care.
• 12:39
  [UNKNOWN]: We're also hearing that groups like the private equity stakeholder project, the the racial equity group media justice, a whole host of other nonprofits, they're all being scrutinized as part of this same sweet.
• 12:53
  [UNKNOWN]: So this is this is basically a nuclear blast that's going on here.
• 12:57
  [UNKNOWN]: This is a systematic dismantling of the entire nonprofit left-wing industrial complex that the American left-built over decades to fund itself outside the normal democratic process.
• 13:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And Soros' network, since, of course, right at the center of this globalist web.
• 13:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, what you have to understand is how systematic this dismantling is.
• 13:25
  [UNKNOWN]: What best and the Treasury Department are doing comes on the heels, of course, of what Elon Musk and Doge did some months back with USAID and the number of Soros linked organizations.
• 13:37
  [UNKNOWN]: You have to understand, they're already bleeding.
• 13:40
  [UNKNOWN]: They're already bleeding profusely.
• 13:43
  [UNKNOWN]: This will be the coup de grap.
• 13:45
  [UNKNOWN]: This will be as of where the Killsha.
• 13:49
  [UNKNOWN]: We have to remember the bleeding started.
• 13:52
  [UNKNOWN]: with the annihilation of, in effect, of USAID.
• 13:59
  [UNKNOWN]: We have to appreciate just how much of our tax dollars actually funneled to George Sorris' open society foundation.
• 14:05
  [UNKNOWN]: It was staggering the amount of money.
• 14:09
  [UNKNOWN]: It turns out, USAID,
• 14:12
  [UNKNOWN]: had been bankrupt.
• 14:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, if you want, and just you want to take a step back, take a step away from the Panicans, the podcast Panicans, Trump never kept any of this promise.
• 14:25
  [UNKNOWN]: You want to take a step back and just recall how much the world has changed since what you did back in November of 2024.
• 14:34
  [UNKNOWN]: We have to remember that USAID was bankrolling sources organizations
• 14:42
  [UNKNOWN]: to the tune of over a quarter of a billion dollars.
• 14:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Yes, billion with a B, 270 million dollars over the course of 15 years.
• 14:57
  [UNKNOWN]: You and I, our federal talk tax dollars, we're funding George Soros to the tune of over a quarter of a billion dollars.
• 15:10
  [UNKNOWN]: According to report by the Heritage Foundation, it was the Obama administration that designated sorrows as a main recipient of USAID monies in order to fund far-left causes all over the world.
• 15:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, again, using your tax dollars.
• 15:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Here's an example of how those funds again, our money were used to radically impact the geopolitical order, like literally enacting a regime change in Ukraine's going back to 2014, this instigate the Maidan Revolution, this is where the Russia Ukraine war started.
• 15:47
  [UNKNOWN]: In 2014, this is where it all started.
• 15:51
  [UNKNOWN]: We've talked about that endlessly on this channel.
• 15:54
  [UNKNOWN]: We've analyzed the effects of the made-on revolution in influencing what happened in February 2022.
• 16:02
  [UNKNOWN]: So this is Soros himself admitting his role in that 2014 made-on revolution.
• 16:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Take a look.
• 16:13
  [UNKNOWN]: One of the things that many people recognized about you was that you, during the revolutions of 1989, funded a lot of dissident activity, civil society groups in eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic, are you doing similar things in Ukraine?
• 16:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia, and the foundation has been functioning ever since, and the greater an important part in events now.
• 16:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Ukraine.
• 16:48
  [UNKNOWN]: We also were able to have good discussions with the leadership there about how to restart agriculture and improve energy efficiency using this new model of partnering with companies.
• 17:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And we had George Soros was there too, so we engaged in some of the efforts with him.
• 17:04
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you thought funding regime change in Ukraine that ended up becoming a geopolitical nightmare many years later, if you thought that was as far as the corruption went think again,
• 17:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, I want you to remember how much the world has changed since November of 2024, okay?
• 17:26
  [UNKNOWN]: You and I actually ended up paying in part for the Democrats attempt at regime change here at home.
• 17:35
  [UNKNOWN]: According to the daily signal, sources open society foundations bankrolled a news organization that actually inspired the first impeachment of President Trump.
• 17:46
  [UNKNOWN]: A news article published by the organized crime and corruption reporting project, a news outlet that received funding from both sources open society foundations as well as USAID directly
• 18:02
  [UNKNOWN]: was signed at four times by the original whistleblower came out to claim that President Trump had abused as a powers by threatened with hold military aid to Ukraine in order to dig up dirt on Joe Biden.
• 18:14
  [UNKNOWN]: So both USAID and Soros funds were indeed behind the first impeachment, which means if you think it through,
• 18:33
  [UNKNOWN]: our tax dollars.
• 18:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Through both those sources, USAID and open society foundation, we're used to frame President Trump.
• 18:44
  [UNKNOWN]: It's beyond insane.
• 18:46
  [UNKNOWN]: They don't even use their own money to do it.
• 18:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They use ours.
• 18:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And it gets worse.
• 18:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember the BLM run?
• 18:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It's the summer 2020.
• 18:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Yep.
• 18:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros.
• 18:57
  [UNKNOWN]: USAID gained nearly $25 million to the Tide Center, a source funded group, which in turn funneled millions to BLM in 2020, all as they were burning down our cities.
• 19:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, we were paying for this.
• 19:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We were paying for this.
• 19:13
  [UNKNOWN]: We were paying for this.
• 19:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And it gets even worse.
• 19:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros was given hundreds of millions of dollars of our tax money to not just fund ultra left wing causes around the world, but of course to bankroll radical Democrats here at home.
• 19:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrats made sure.
• 19:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros' foundations were flooded with cash to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars and those foundations in turn funneled money right back into the coffers of the Democrats and not just Democrats.
• 19:42
  [UNKNOWN]: But some of the most radical left wing candidates in the nation, the DSA, the Democrat Socials of America is basically a Soros creation when all sudden done, basically at least tacitly.
• 19:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, of course, thankfully because of what you did in November 2024, Soros' gravy
• 20:14
  [UNKNOWN]: It's all dried up.
• 20:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Our tax dollars are not being used for left-wing causes anymore, to fund left-wing causes.
• 20:22
  [UNKNOWN]: When President Trump through Doge shut down USAID, he didn't just close an obscure federal agency.
• 20:28
  [UNKNOWN]: He severed
• 20:30
  [UNKNOWN]: the single largest taxpayer funded artery feeding sources empire.
• 20:35
  [UNKNOWN]: And sources organizations went into an immediate tailspin.
• 20:38
  [UNKNOWN]: They went to a very public panic.
• 20:41
  [UNKNOWN]: They cut nearly 40% of their global workforce.
• 20:44
  [UNKNOWN]: They abandoned their operations across the European Union entirely.
• 20:48
  [UNKNOWN]: And then in almost comedic desperation, I kid you not even after abandoning their operations
• 20:59
  [UNKNOWN]: They ended up turning around and asking Brussels, the heart of the European Union to bail them out.
• 21:08
  [UNKNOWN]: That's how desperate they got.
• 21:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros went from fleecing US taxpayers to now fleecing European taxpayers.
• 21:17
  [UNKNOWN]: So he's literally shopping for support.
• 21:21
  [UNKNOWN]: So think about the sequence there.
• 21:23
  [UNKNOWN]: First Trump cuts off the USAID pipeline.
• 21:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Sources Empire starts bleeding out.
• 21:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And now months later, Besson is finishing the job along with the IRS, moving in for what could be the final blow.
• 21:36
  [UNKNOWN]: The coup de Grasse, as I call it, stripping away the domestic tax shelter that let Sources operate as political machine virtually tax-free inside our own borders for decades.
• 21:50
  [UNKNOWN]: So those aren't two separate stories.
• 21:52
  [UNKNOWN]: This is one long, coordinated, methodical, comprehensive campaign to permanently cut sorrows off from both foreign aid money and domestic tax privileges at the exact same time.
• 22:09
  [UNKNOWN]: And the idea is,
• 22:11
  [UNKNOWN]: The Open Society Foundation was simply not be able to survive that one-to-punch.
• 22:15
  [UNKNOWN]: It cannot, sir, if it's not getting in the tax dollars, and if it's not allowing whatever donors remain to write off those donations their shop.
• 22:26
  [UNKNOWN]: But it gets even better because there's a reason Scott Bessant in particular was tap by Trump for this job to issue the Kudegross as I say, the decisive blow to end sorrows.
• 22:39
  [UNKNOWN]: If you don't know the particular inside knowledge that Scott Bessant has with sorrows, this is going to absolutely,
• 22:46
  [UNKNOWN]: blow you away.
• 22:47
  [UNKNOWN]: But first gang, if you are just joining us, come on in, love having you here, reminder our super chats are up.
• 22:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So feel free to send in your comments, your questions, to be my absolute honor and answer them honor, honor and my privilege to answer them right here on this livestream.
• 23:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Also, people say all the time, you know, Dr. Steve, I think I'm going to wait to invest in gold.
• 23:08
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, the the price is way up here.
• 23:10
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm going to wait for it to come down a little bit.
• 23:12
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm going to wait for the inflation to settle.
• 23:14
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm going to wait for the
• 23:16
  [UNKNOWN]: to stabilize when until things feel a little bit more normal wait wait wait wait wait but here's my question how is all that waiting before hand how's it done for you right and it's seriously what are you waiting for
• 23:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, you see the likes of the wealthy all around the world, they ain't waiting.
• 23:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Look at the economic reality around a central banks around the world are gumbling up gold.
• 23:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Nations continue looking for alternatives to their dependence on the U.S. dollar.
• 23:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And we're watching an increasingly fragmented global economy take shape right in front of us.
• 23:51
  [UNKNOWN]: These aren't isolated headlines.
• 23:53
  [UNKNOWN]: These are structural changes and we've been talking a lot about these trends in this channel for years.
• 23:58
  [UNKNOWN]: So when someone tells me, I'm going to wait for the right time.
• 24:03
  [UNKNOWN]: to buy up gold, I think you're still focused on the wrong thing.
• 24:07
  [UNKNOWN]: There is no right, it's always the right.
• 24:09
  [UNKNOWN]: The right time was yesterday, the second right time is now.
• 24:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Because of debt, currency concerns, central bank buying, geopolitical uncertainty, if those are all the reasons that you were considering physical gold in the first place, what's changed?
• 24:25
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the question, what's changed?
• 24:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Now whether you perfectly time the price, who cares about that?
• 24:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Now whether gold is higher today than it was a year ago, of course it is.
• 24:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Have the fundamental reasons for owning gold gone away.
• 24:41
  [UNKNOWN]: from where I sit, not even remotely.
• 24:44
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's why people are still looking at purchasing physical gold and silver directly.
• 24:48
  [UNKNOWN]: While others are exploring whether a gold IRA makes sense for a portion of their retirement savings.
• 24:54
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you're looking in either one of those,
• 24:57
  [UNKNOWN]: get educated first and no one is going to educate you better than Augusta precious metals.
• 25:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Their experience education team was sit down with you one-on-one to explain physical gold and silver, the walk you through how a gold IRA works, and answer your questions, and help you understand your options before you make a decision.
• 25:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Go to TurleyBiesGold.com
• 25:18
  [UNKNOWN]: or you text, turlate to URL UI to 35052 that's 35052 to request Augustus free guide, because waiting only makes sense if you're waiting for something fundamental to change, but dead is still climbing, central banks are still gobbling up gold, the global order is still shifting, the reason for owning gold haven't changed, not one bit, click out that link below.
• 25:46
  [UNKNOWN]: right now.
• 25:46
  [UNKNOWN]: All right, many of you, I'm sure no Susan Kokinda of Promethean Updates.
• 25:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I know you've brought up a lot of her work before.
• 25:55
  [UNKNOWN]: She's very insightful for in policy analysts.
• 25:59
  [UNKNOWN]: She was just on with our good friend of this channel, Steven Gardner, and she had a fascinating insight into precisely what Scott Bessant in particular, why he was tapped by President Trump to crush none other than
• 26:16
  [UNKNOWN]: final thing that Scott Bessons said in his press conference yesterday, where he was asked by a reporter, well, why are you giving these other countries the time to disentangle?
• 26:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Why are you just slapping them with these sanctions right off the bat?
• 26:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And Basin said, what do you want me to do?
• 26:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Collapse the entire world financial system?
• 26:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Now that's very interesting.
• 26:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Because what is he saying?
• 26:41
  [UNKNOWN]: He's saying that this whole underground financial black economy.
• 26:47
  [UNKNOWN]: which we all know overlaps with Hong Kong with the city of London, with the Cayman Islands and the other offshore functions.
• 26:56
  [UNKNOWN]: You've got a gray or a black economy, which is really how the global system works fundamentally.
• 27:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Works above governments, above regulation, and some of it is just plain criminal and illegal activity.
• 27:09
  [UNKNOWN]: He's basically saying as we shut off the spigots in terms of what Iran has been able to use.
• 27:17
  [UNKNOWN]: If we did that all at once, that could bring down the entire world financial system.
• 27:21
  [UNKNOWN]: That's telling me that this administration understands just how criminal the existing globalist financial system is and that when you go after it, you don't just bring it down on everybody's head.
• 27:35
  [UNKNOWN]: but you go after it in a very targeted, a very strategic way, it's like defusing a bomb.
• 27:42
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think that's why Scott Basin was chosen by Donald Trump.
• 27:46
  [UNKNOWN]: He knows how the bombs were created when he worked for George Soros, for example, and he knows how to defuse the bombs.
• 27:52
  [UNKNOWN]: I.e.
• 27:52
  [UNKNOWN]: how do you unwind this kind of criminal financial activity which intersects the entire world financial system?
• 28:03
  [UNKNOWN]: There's so much there, she's wonderful, but fundamentally, Scott Bassand was specifically chosen for this role because of, because of not despite his history working directly for George Soros himself.
• 28:18
  [UNKNOWN]: This is where I have always parted company from so many on our side.
• 28:26
  [UNKNOWN]: that always seem to default on the conspiratorial interpretation of what's happening in the world today.
• 28:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Yes, there are leads who are conspiring.
• 28:35
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't want to take anything away from that.
• 28:37
  [UNKNOWN]: But conspiratorial interpretations can often miss
• 28:43
  [UNKNOWN]: very strategic moves that the Trump administration is doing.
• 28:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Scott Basund was probably Trump's least popular cabinet pick.
• 28:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if you remember this.
• 28:55
  [UNKNOWN]: This was going on right after he was elected and then it was announced before he's inaugurate on January 20th.
• 29:02
  [UNKNOWN]: 225, but he had picked the adapt Scott Basant as his Treasury Secretary and all of a sudden and all the conspiracies were saying, hey, do you know what he just did?
• 29:11
  [UNKNOWN]: He just betrayed us because he tapped into a partner at the Soros Fund Management.
• 29:19
  [UNKNOWN]: And he was, Scott Besson was a partner at Source Fund Management for years.
• 29:23
  [UNKNOWN]: And I could still remember so many Dumer-Podcasters accusing Trump of selling out to the globalists.
• 29:30
  [UNKNOWN]: That's absurd, that sounds good.
• 29:33
  [UNKNOWN]: He was selling out to the globalists when he nominated Besson for his cabinet.
• 29:37
  [UNKNOWN]: He was selling out to the WWE, he's selling out to demos.
• 29:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's so utterly preposterous when you think about those accusations, but nevertheless,
• 29:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They repeated verbatim.
• 29:50
  [UNKNOWN]: These accusations Trump selling out did not start with Iran gang.
• 29:54
  [UNKNOWN]: It may have for some in podcast to stand, but for most of the conspiracy crowd, it started with Scott Beasant.
• 30:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Bessant worked for Soros.
• 30:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Bessant had the inside with the Davos crowd.
• 30:12
  [UNKNOWN]: And the only frame that these conspiracy cooks as Trump used to call them could the only frame that they could come up with when Trump appointed Scott Bessant as Treasury Secretary is that Trump sold out to Soros in the WF.
• 30:26
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the only thing they could come up with.
• 30:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank God for people like Susan Kukinda.
• 30:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Because she just nailed precisely why Trump tapped a former Soros employee.
• 30:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's exactly the same rationale that Trump used for himself.
• 30:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Do you remember in 2016 when he was running and he was asked point blanked?
• 30:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Did you write checks?
• 30:50
  [UNKNOWN]: to Democrats?
• 30:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Did you write campaign contribution checks to Democrats like Hillary Clinton?
• 30:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Didn't you, I mean, this is what both the media and his, his Republican primary opponents were both trying to stick them with.
• 31:06
  [UNKNOWN]: You're not a Republican.
• 31:07
  [UNKNOWN]: You actually, we have sign checked.
• 31:09
  [UNKNOWN]: You wrote checks to Hillary Clinton.
• 31:11
  [UNKNOWN]: You wrote checks to Ed Koch.
• 31:13
  [UNKNOWN]: You wrote checks to Democrats.
• 31:18
  [UNKNOWN]: And Trump, rather than go up the, oh, whoa, no, he looked at the straight in the camera and said, you bet your ass I did.
• 31:26
  [UNKNOWN]: I wrote tons it.
• 31:27
  [UNKNOWN]: I wrote millions of dollars of checks for all kinds of Democrats, especially in Manhattan.
• 31:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Because I know how the system works.
• 31:36
  [UNKNOWN]: I know how the system works because I was part of that system.
• 31:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm the most dangerous person to that system imaginable, because now I'm not.
• 31:51
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm going to use my knowledge of how the system works to crush it.
• 31:56
  [UNKNOWN]: That's Scott Basin.
• 31:59
  [UNKNOWN]: That's exactly why Trump Scott Besson.
• 32:02
  [UNKNOWN]: He knows how the bombs were created because he helped build them alongside Soros, which means he now knows how to diffuse the bombs.
• 32:12
  [UNKNOWN]: He understands from the inside exactly how this global network of speculative finance, shell donations and offshore money movement actually works.
• 32:24
  [UNKNOWN]: how it overlaps with the city of London with Hong Kong with the Cayman Islands, how what she calls here, the gray or black economy operates completely above the reach of ordinary regulation.
• 32:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember the Brazilian philosopher, a love at a Carvalieu, would call the Netta Capitalist.
• 32:43
  [UNKNOWN]: They were above the capitalist system.
• 32:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Their power and their wealth literally were hidden from the capitalist system that they claimed to be regulating.
• 32:55
  [UNKNOWN]: In other words, Trump did not put some outside or in charge of taking down Soros who would not have any clue on how to do it.
• 33:05
  [UNKNOWN]: He'd put the one man who used to be inside Soros's machine in charge of dismantling it.
• 33:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Somebody who already has the blueprints, somebody who can't be fooled by the same trick, Soros is used to dodge scrutiny for 50 years.
• 33:25
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not a sellout that's strategy, and once again, when it comes to Trump, the conspiracy cooks have egg all over the faces, I don't know why anyone even listens to them anymore.
• 33:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Now here's another piece of the puzzle, just the news, just published, a report showing exactly how sophisticated this money laundering through charity scheme really is.
• 33:46
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, this gang, this is a web that's going to take a long time to entangle.
• 33:53
  [UNKNOWN]: The Capital Research Center found that far left leaning 501C3 charities, organizations whose donations are supposed to be taxed deductible specifically because they stay out of partisan politics, have been acting as pass through pipelines, funneling cash to affiliated 501C4 organizations, which are allowed to engage in direct political and electoral activity at levels we never even
• 34:22
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's the, the pervasiveness is of this is absolutely stunning.
• 34:28
  [UNKNOWN]: One group alone, the America votes education funds sounds so noble.
• 34:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Does it not reported giving over 20.7 million dollars in grants to its political affiliate, while spending a grand total of $532 on office expenses and employing exactly zero people.
• 34:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not a charity, according to this report, it's not a charity, it's a shell.
• 34:59
  [UNKNOWN]: In total, these groups spent $638 million during the 2024 election cycle registering voters.
• 35:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And according to the Center's own analysis, they specifically targeted demographics, statistically most likely to vote, ding ding ding, Democrat.
• 35:16
  [UNKNOWN]: tracing all the way back to a scheme first outlined in leaked emails from Hillary Clinton's own campaign chairman, John Podesta, where donors, foundation literally laid out plans to supposedly nonpartisan charities to reshape the electorate in the Democrats' favor and best in himself confirmed to just the news that
• 35:38
  [UNKNOWN]: The treasure department is now actively reviewing exactly how the money moves back and forth between all of these paired charities and political arms, and they're now preparing to crack down on this and end this Democrat gravy train once and for all.
• 35:56
  [UNKNOWN]: But big picture, if we take some steps back here, there's something truly astonishing that's happening in all of this.
• 36:05
  [UNKNOWN]: What's really happening to Soros as well as all these NGOs and non-profits is that their world, the very world that they built, and that helps sustain them.
• 36:20
  [UNKNOWN]: That world, that liberal, globalist world, is disappearing.
• 36:27
  [UNKNOWN]: It's collapsing, and astonishingly even legacy media outlets are beginning to admit it.
• 36:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Some months back, the New York Times ran a piece admitting that the days of sorrows and the world economic for among Davos are really indeed coming to an end.
• 36:44
  [UNKNOWN]: And this is simply because the world that they built and that sustains them is itself coming to an end.
• 36:53
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the pattern you wanna get.
• 36:56
  [UNKNOWN]: These globalist networks created a world, a global empire,
• 37:01
  [UNKNOWN]: that global empire is dying and therefore these networks are comparably dying.
• 37:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros and his NGOs are slowly but surely dismantling.
• 37:14
  [UNKNOWN]: They're not getting stronger like again, some of these conspiracy cooks have told you.
• 37:20
  [UNKNOWN]: They don't know what time it is.
• 37:21
  [UNKNOWN]: They're still living in the 1990s for heaven six.
• 37:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Soros and his NGOs are slowly but surely dismantling precisely because they've lost influence.
• 37:33
  [UNKNOWN]: They've lost their power to direct and dictate political and economic life around the world.
• 37:39
  [UNKNOWN]: And that is large because more and more populations.
• 37:42
  [UNKNOWN]: are deliberately turning away from globalism and globalist structures and globalist institutions and are instead embracing nationalism and populism and traditionalism and as the world becomes more and more civilizationalist, the globalist projects and purposes that sorrows this pursuit over the last several decades, not only do they run into brick walls, I mean, literal walls that frustrated
• 38:14
  [UNKNOWN]: but they run into increased government scrutiny.
• 38:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Now that the global's governments that he helped impose on populations and that relied on to sustain him are increasingly disappearing.
• 38:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I think about it.
• 38:32
  [UNKNOWN]: There was a time Soros had free reign over El Salvador.
• 38:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, would now you book Kelly?
• 38:38
  [UNKNOWN]: There was a time he had free reign over Argentina.
• 38:43
  [UNKNOWN]: There's a time yet free reign over Columbia now.
• 38:47
  [UNKNOWN]: There's a time yet free reign over the United States now.
• 38:50
  [UNKNOWN]: There's a time yet free reign over Europe now.
• 38:54
  [UNKNOWN]: The rise of the A of D in Germany.
• 38:57
  [UNKNOWN]: And Marine Le Pen, National Raleigh and France and Georgia Maloney, and there's a time he had free reign literally over Yeltsin's Russia now.
• 39:10
  [UNKNOWN]: China?
• 39:13
  [UNKNOWN]: You see, that's the Calcula, India.
• 39:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Some of the most vicious things that have ever been said by George Coras, Soros, come from their foreign minister what is his name, Jay Shankar.
• 39:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Jay Shankar is a brilliant intellectual as part of the BJP, the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Hindu nationalist party, ruling party there, one of the prime minister, Narendra Modi government, and just some of the things he says about Soros are just so spot on, and they're so brutal.
• 39:47
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, where's the, what does it say in the Lord of the Rings?
• 39:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Are list of allies grows thin?
• 39:55
  [UNKNOWN]: He has nowhere, and that's the calculus, the more the liberal, globalist world disappears.
• 40:03
  [UNKNOWN]: the more sources empire proportionally dissipates.
• 40:06
  [UNKNOWN]: The more the globalist world order disappears, the more sources empire proportionally dissipates.
• 40:13
  [UNKNOWN]: It's really that simple.
• 40:15
  [UNKNOWN]: The more the world moves away from sources vision of a globalist empire, the more the institutions perpetuating that vision begin to crack and eventually implode.
• 40:24
  [UNKNOWN]: There's just, not only is there no longer an audience for it, but now there's actual scrutiny.
• 40:30
  [UNKNOWN]: governmental political scrutiny over it.
• 40:34
  [UNKNOWN]: That's why this is just so much bigger than one billionaire.
• 40:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It's so much bigger than one foundation, so much bigger than just one tax audit.
• 40:43
  [UNKNOWN]: What we are watching in real time is the final dismantling of an entire post-war global order.
• 40:52
  [UNKNOWN]: An order where unaccountable, unelected billionaires and their tax-sheltered foundations could quietly reshape elections, topple governments, and manufacture grassroots movements,
• 41:05
  [UNKNOWN]: from thousands of miles away all while hiding behind the label of charity and getting subsidized by the very taxpayers whose governments they were working to undermine.
• 41:21
  [UNKNOWN]: That world, the world sorrows built his empire inside of for 50 straight years, simply does not have a future anymore.
• 41:32
  [UNKNOWN]: nations across the globe have already been slamming their doors on him one by one, India shutters, their doors on China, Russia, Turkey, the whole the Middle East, Hungary, his own home country shut them out.
• 41:47
  [UNKNOWN]: And now the United States itself, the country whose own tax code quietly subsidized his global operation for decades is closing that door for good.
• 41:58
  [UNKNOWN]: This is what genuine civilizational realignment looks like, it's not just tariffs, it's not just border security, it's the systematic identification and removal of every single lever, the old, globalist order used to entrench itself.
• 42:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Whether that's OPEC's grip on oil or Iran's grip on the straight of four moves or right here at home.
• 42:24
  [UNKNOWN]: George Soros is 50-year grip on America's own tax code.
• 42:29
  [UNKNOWN]: One by one, these levers are being found and one by one, they are being pulled.
• 42:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Sores spent half a century building an empire that operated above governments, above borders, above accountability itself.
• 42:49
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's being unwound, piece by piece.
• 42:53
  [UNKNOWN]: by a Treasury Secretary who once worked inside that very same machine armed with an executive order an IRS tax force and a $165 million bill with George Soros' name at the very top of it.
• 43:13
  [UNKNOWN]: This is not a minor tax story buried on page 12.
• 43:17
  [UNKNOWN]: This is the closing chapter of the Soros Empire.
• 43:22
  [UNKNOWN]: An empire built on regime change, riots, impeachment schemes, and hundreds of millions of your own tax dollars.
• 43:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And it is finally, finally, coming to an end.
• 43:38
  [UNKNOWN]: His time is finished.
• 43:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Our is just beginning.
• 43:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Over to you, over to you, our super chats are still up fire away with any questions or comments you have.
• 43:52
  [UNKNOWN]: I'll be more than happy to answer them.
• 43:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Right here on this livestream.
• 43:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Also let me ask you, you know, if something happened tomorrow, all right?
• 43:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Something serious, like the powers out for weeks or the water shuts off, or, you know, the shelves on your local supermarket or empty, and they go bare,
• 44:10
  [UNKNOWN]: what your family know what to do.
• 44:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, not what your family panic, would your family know.
• 44:18
  [UNKNOWN]: You see, that's the difference our grandparents have.
• 44:21
  [UNKNOWN]: As one thing truly worth passing down.
• 44:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Not more stuff.
• 44:25
  [UNKNOWN]: more skills, the kind that can't be taken away, that never run out of batteries, and could be handed to your kids and their kids.
• 44:34
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's why I absolutely love this brand new book.
• 44:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It's called the ancestral secrets, to book from Sierra Madre, and it compiles a hundred of those practical skills taught step by step, and these beautiful, the beautiful hardcover volume, and it's got these lovely,
• 44:54
  [UNKNOWN]: illustrations inside here and photographs.
• 44:58
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a beautiful beautiful book and you'll see it's secret number 72 secret number 45.
• 45:04
  [UNKNOWN]: These all these kind of wonderful skills that you can do yourself, that you can show your grandkids, your kids.
• 45:12
  [UNKNOWN]: It's absolutely wonderful.
• 45:14
  [UNKNOWN]: It's beautifully bound.
• 45:16
  [UNKNOWN]: It's really meant to just last on your fireplace mantle for years and years and years and it even includes a step-by-step video.
• 45:24
  [UNKNOWN]: This is very interesting for every one of the skills beautifully detailed in its pages, skills that carried our ancestors through the great depression and even worse, right?
• 45:34
  [UNKNOWN]: So this isn't a book you read just once.
• 45:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a treasure trove of education that your family keeps
• 45:40
  [UNKNOWN]: for generations that you talk about in the like, there's really never been a better time to get it because there's really never been a time where we were frankly more disconnected from our ancestors secrets.
• 45:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Their way of life without all the technology was a simpler, more resilient time.
• 45:58
  [UNKNOWN]: And there's also just never been a more,
• 46:00
  [UNKNOWN]: frankly unstable time that now, you know, we're teetering on the precipice of complete destruction from a plethora of, you know, I mean previously, if you think about previously unimaginable events geopolitical adversaries, AI pandemics,
• 46:19
  [UNKNOWN]: The one your family turns to can be you.
• 46:22
  [UNKNOWN]: So just click on that link below.
• 46:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Join early as a VIP and reserve your first edition copies signed by hand.
• 46:27
  [UNKNOWN]: They could have christmas early.
• 46:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Your family will love you for click on that link below right now.
• 46:32
  [UNKNOWN]: It's an absolutely wonderful and beautiful book and sestral secrets.
• 46:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Get it now.
• 46:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Alright guys, what have we got?
• 46:39
  [UNKNOWN]: What have we got?
• 46:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Franz, good to hear from you, my friend, I don't see when this war that Carney has launched with the Dems a backfire with that clear, the way for the 51st.
• 46:53
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, I was thinking about that because premier Smith.
• 47:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, of Alberta is really the only one that's making any sense here.
• 47:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Even, uh, even Pierre Poliav.
• 47:08
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know.
• 47:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Pierre Poliav just doesn't seem to be the man for the moment in my opinion at this point.
• 47:14
  [UNKNOWN]: He just doesn't, there was so much hope and he's the head of the conservative party there, the tours in Canada.
• 47:22
  [UNKNOWN]: But I have to say it's Danielle Smith.
• 47:24
  [UNKNOWN]: She's been brilliant.
• 47:25
  [UNKNOWN]: She's just instead of taking on Trump, which is what Pierre Polyad is doing.
• 47:30
  [UNKNOWN]: So he's just making himself carnie light.
• 47:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's how I think in the any lost is election.
• 47:36
  [UNKNOWN]: One of the reasons why is a number of reasons, but instead Danielle Smith is like this is this is a total breakdown of the civilization structure of North America and and Mark Carney does not understand the time we're living in right now.
• 47:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not a matter of Trump right or wrong, it's a matter of trying to understand the time we're living in.
• 47:59
  [UNKNOWN]: We need to live in a civilizational harmony together in the Western Hemisphere.
• 48:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And Karni is still, he still thinks it's 1998.
• 48:10
  [UNKNOWN]: He still thinks, you know, the WF is running the world.
• 48:15
  [UNKNOWN]: And, and he's destroying Canada in the process.
• 48:19
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think she's brilliant.
• 48:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, you know, she's going to hold the referendum in October.
• 48:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Is it enough to pass?
• 48:30
  [UNKNOWN]: It doesn't look like it's so far.
• 48:32
  [UNKNOWN]: It'll be very interesting to see.
• 48:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'm interpreting Franz your question in terms of Alberta and the referendum for cessation.
• 48:45
  [UNKNOWN]: If we start to see dramatic number shifting in that direction, then it is very clear that Carney completely misread even his own country in this process in terms of sentiment of his own country because there's a lot of there's a lot of Canadians rooting for Trump.
• 49:06
  [UNKNOWN]: They're just sick and tired of this regime.
• 49:08
  [UNKNOWN]: They're having to live under
• 49:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, if not, if it or if the number, you know, if the needle just doesn't move, well, then it just seems most Canadians have, uh, have doubled down on sort of the resentment towards the United States.
• 49:22
  [UNKNOWN]: And I've met some.
• 49:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't get me wrong.
• 49:23
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm not, I'm not making this up.
• 49:25
  [UNKNOWN]: I've met, I met some that refused to vacation in the United States as long as Trump is president.
• 49:31
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just a way of sticking it to Trump because he's so, he's so, uh, he's so, um,
• 49:36
  [UNKNOWN]: You know insulting towards towards Canadians.
• 49:40
  [UNKNOWN]: He's not.
• 49:40
  [UNKNOWN]: He's insulting to your regime.
• 49:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Your regime sucks.
• 49:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Your your government sucks.
• 49:45
  [UNKNOWN]: So we'll say we'll have to say, but yeah, I mean, it's an impossible.
• 49:49
  [UNKNOWN]: It's an impossible task for Mark Carney to win.
• 49:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Their exports to the United States, which make up about 75% of their total exports.
• 49:59
  [UNKNOWN]: That makes up 20% of their total GDP.
• 50:05
  [UNKNOWN]: So Americans buying Canadian stuff makes up 20% of their GDP.
• 50:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Canadians buying American stuff makes up 1% of our GDP.
• 50:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Who's going to win this stare down?
• 50:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Who's going to win this game of chicken?
• 50:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Who would you put your money on?
• 50:27
  [UNKNOWN]: To put U.S. dollars or Canadian dollars or other, right?
• 50:31
  [UNKNOWN]: So there's no way he's going to win.
• 50:33
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'm I'm with you.
• 50:33
  [UNKNOWN]: This could backfire a big time in terms of Alberta separatism.
• 50:39
  [UNKNOWN]: With me a tool, predict just for fun.
• 50:42
  [UNKNOWN]: What do you think the numbers states will be by 2050, oh, my 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50.
• 50:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, there you go, with East Washington, right, or East Oregon, or a greater Idaho, right, California, Puerto Rico, Rhineland, Alberta, to name a few possibilities.
• 50:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you.
• 50:58
  [UNKNOWN]: I didn't even think about that.
• 51:00
  [UNKNOWN]: by 2050.
• 51:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, so, I mean, one way of thinking about that is, where's all the political power going to be by 2050?
• 51:07
  [UNKNOWN]: It's going to be clearly in red states, right?
• 51:09
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll see that by 2032, with the 2030 census.
• 51:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So red states are picking up 14 electoral votes.
• 51:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Blue states are losing
• 51:23
  [UNKNOWN]: the Democrats out with all and particularly with all the redistricting.
• 51:28
  [UNKNOWN]: That's going to lock the Democrats out of power for the foreseeable future, starting around for the midterm and 2032.
• 51:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Is that a, no, that's a presidential election.
• 51:39
  [UNKNOWN]: In 2032, I think JD's got a lot thus far in 2028.
• 51:45
  [UNKNOWN]: We tend to vote for our the same president twice.
• 51:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Sometimes three times.
• 51:52
  [UNKNOWN]: And he, I don't think he'll have a problem in 2032.
• 51:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Provided it gets 2028.
• 51:59
  [UNKNOWN]: So I just, I think the country of completely realigned and when all said and done, then it's going to be if there are any added states
• 52:09
  [UNKNOWN]: It's going to be on the terms of red state America.
• 52:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, if we want to carve out another state with Eastern Oregon or Eastern Washington as you're mentioning, sure, why not?
• 52:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Or Western Maryland, I could see that.
• 52:26
  [UNKNOWN]: They want to kind of hook up with
• 52:27
  [UNKNOWN]: West Virginia since, you know, Garrett County and those areas out there are going to be in orderly Republican as opposed to the insanity in Baltimore.
• 52:39
  [UNKNOWN]: So it'll be whatever it is it's going to be red state.
• 52:42
  [UNKNOWN]: So I doubt Puerto Rico.
• 52:43
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't even think Puerto Rico is Puerto Ricans in general want to be a state.
• 52:48
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't see Greenland necessarily becoming a state
• 52:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Optimus our octagon prime, Dr. Steve, the Democrat plantation hasn't put their best up since JFK.
• 53:05
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a good point.
• 53:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, without USAID, Soros and stealing from the taxpayers, are they even a viable party come 2030.
• 53:13
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm Optimus rockdog.
• 53:15
  [UNKNOWN]: I send this message so we live on.
• 53:17
  [UNKNOWN]: I love it.
• 53:18
  [UNKNOWN]: No, that's what I mean.
• 53:20
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think so.
• 53:21
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't.
• 53:21
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, they live
• 53:26
  [UNKNOWN]: but their funding isn't the same as Republican funding.
• 53:30
  [UNKNOWN]: So Republican funding is, it tends to be genuine funding.
• 53:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not USAID taxpayer funded, and the light that we certainly have been behind the ball in creating these NGOs, and the center for democratic education, all these fronts.
• 53:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Whatever, I don't know, I'm just making up a title there.
• 53:56
  [UNKNOWN]: No, no, we're a good organization.
• 53:58
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm sure you are if you're out there.
• 53:59
  [UNKNOWN]: But yeah, we're just behind the April.
• 54:03
  [UNKNOWN]: We rely on private donors like Elon and it was for a long while.
• 54:09
  [UNKNOWN]: It was the Koch brothers and who went fully anti-Trump.
• 54:16
  [UNKNOWN]: So in the end, we're just behind the April this.
• 54:22
  [UNKNOWN]: These NGOs,
• 54:24
  [UNKNOWN]: these nonprofits, the USAID networks, that was all left-wing, and it's all gone, and they're going to have to make up that money.
• 54:36
  [UNKNOWN]: and the more private donors come in, the more they know they're going to be scrutinized by a Trump treasure department and IRS, and they don't want to do that either.
• 54:45
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think this is very, very important to cutting off the gravy train from them.
• 54:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think ironically, it's our strength that we stayed out of that network, that web,
• 54:58
  [UNKNOWN]: of funding because Republicans have had to rely on just really good ideas and to at least give lip service to their rank and file grass roots.
• 55:08
  [UNKNOWN]: But then with the more Trumpian Republican party, the more populist nationalist party, then you're going to see more and more of an alignment between rank and file sentiments and the people we put in office.
• 55:20
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think it's great.
• 55:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Lennox, it seems that Western media and other Western pillars are under an organized influence.
• 55:32
  [UNKNOWN]: How much negative influence the source's organization really had a Western civilization and why?
• 55:39
  [UNKNOWN]: It's had a lot.
• 55:40
  [UNKNOWN]: It has.
• 55:41
  [UNKNOWN]: So, so big picture.
• 55:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Big picture sorrows.
• 55:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Sores has claimed to sort of geopolitical fame as if I recall, goes back to a papery.
• 55:59
  [UNKNOWN]: So basically, he made his billions, you know, shorting the British pound.
• 56:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And then started to devote his life to academics and to do, he's written a lot of books.
• 56:13
  [UNKNOWN]: But it kind of goes back to an article he wrote, oh gosh, was it 89?
• 56:19
  [UNKNOWN]: 90, I think it was, I'm trying to remember, called the New World Order.
• 56:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Nate, I think it was called NATO in the New World Order.
• 56:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And he had a basic theory for how, I mean, back up.
• 56:32
  [UNKNOWN]: And, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and, and,
• 56:39
  [UNKNOWN]: What it revealed was he was clearly a believer in what's called progressive realism, which is more or less founded by Francis Fukuyama, who made the argument that a meta-historical argument, that the world's economies and governments were inevitably coming
• 57:02
  [UNKNOWN]: to an almost Marxist-like communist like synthesis, a consensus.
• 57:08
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what Marx believed, Marx believed that history was working, called a dialectic materialism.
• 57:12
  [UNKNOWN]: And that all of history was ultimately going to one ultimate form of government and that's communism.
• 57:20
  [UNKNOWN]: What Francis Fuyamadez, he flipped that on its head and said, no, it's actually all going to liberal democracy.
• 57:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Marx was right.
• 57:28
  [UNKNOWN]: It is all
• 57:30
  [UNKNOWN]: The world's economies and politics and even cultures are indeed all consolidating, but it's not communism, it's liberal democracy, and Soros bought that, Soros believed that.
• 57:46
  [UNKNOWN]: So what Soros did is he came up with a concept of world order, where Western wealthy countries
• 58:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Eastern European armies to force Russia into compliance, because he saw Russia as the biggest obstacle to this world order.
• 58:11
  [UNKNOWN]: He thought back in the day, China was 100% with us after data in the 70s.
• 58:20
  [UNKNOWN]: He, he, with Kissinger and decoupling from Russia, he, he thought, you know, they were going to be liberal globalists right along with us.
• 58:28
  [UNKNOWN]: India was, this is before the rise of the B.J.P.
• 58:30
  [UNKNOWN]: in the coming to power and the R.S.
• 58:34
  [UNKNOWN]: and all that in India and so they were liberal secular democracies.
• 58:40
  [UNKNOWN]: So he just, so the world was just going liberal secular.
• 58:49
  [UNKNOWN]: in place.
• 58:51
  [UNKNOWN]: You can allow, I kid you not, this is argument.
• 58:54
  [UNKNOWN]: You can read it yourself.
• 58:55
  [UNKNOWN]: It's online called NATO in the New World Order.
• 58:58
  [UNKNOWN]: You can allow Eastern European armies like Ukraine to basically bully and take over Russia militarily because they can handle casualties.
• 59:15
  [UNKNOWN]: This
• 59:18
  [UNKNOWN]: their populations are, they can stomach this stuff, just because of their history.
• 59:25
  [UNKNOWN]: And so he has deliberately over the last 30, 40 years used his NGOs.
• 59:34
  [UNKNOWN]: to refashion as much of the worlds, particularly the obstacles to this vision of the world, as possible, and he's had no problem.
• 59:51
  [UNKNOWN]: sacrificing Ukrainian troops in the process.
• 59:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, this is what, this is his, this is his empire.
• 1:00:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And so that was in the 1990s.
• 1:00:03
  [UNKNOWN]: But then then in the 2000s, he since he didn't have the enemy of communism anymore, the new enemy became environmental apocalypticism.
• 1:00:15
  [UNKNOWN]: So he always just, he needed a global enemy.
• 1:00:20
  [UNKNOWN]: And the global enemy was at first communism, which he survived in Hungary, and all that sort of stuff.
• 1:00:26
  [UNKNOWN]: And then now it was an enemy we were all facing regardless of what side of the army were on.
• 1:00:33
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's why back then the environmentalists movement, they thought it was going to be their key to power.
• 1:00:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, but all of, when all said and done, Soros really was a progressive realist and the areas, a progressive realist and he honestly believed that the world was moving in a inevitably historically in a liberal globalist direction and now, of course, his entire world collapsed because pretty much all the liberal institutions that he depended on are more or less obsolete.
• 1:01:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Brian, my good friend, I saw you say that several blue states are now soon the Trump administration over the USPS ballot rules.
• 1:01:17
  [UNKNOWN]: What's your expectation?
• 1:01:18
  [UNKNOWN]: How will go?
• 1:01:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Can they run interference?
• 1:01:21
  [UNKNOWN]: For long enough that the rules will not be enforceable for the midter.
• 1:01:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay, so that's yeah.
• 1:01:26
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's where that's what I'm nervous with.
• 1:01:29
  [UNKNOWN]: So when I'm looking at, I'm not even so much looking at the merits, because I thought the Supreme Court more or less telegraphed.
• 1:01:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Maybe not, because maybe they're just so, they're so procedurally sensitive, but the Obama pointed judge, who by the way just put another injunction on a temporary restraining order on it.
• 1:01:53
  [UNKNOWN]: The day after two days after the Supreme Court's decision to lift this judge's previous temporary restraining order.
• 1:02:06
  [UNKNOWN]: They such this judge has, you know, literally no jurisdiction to do it, but it was based on an argument, the argument was that when this
• 1:02:18
  [UNKNOWN]: order goes into force, it's going to, you know, in it, it's going to damage and ornamentally voting rights for these groups of people.
• 1:02:27
  [UNKNOWN]: And the Supreme Court said that's a hypothetical.
• 1:02:29
  [UNKNOWN]: It hasn't happened.
• 1:02:30
  [UNKNOWN]: It, if they could prove it has happened, fine, but you can't, you can't issue, um,
• 1:02:37
  [UNKNOWN]: You can't issue an injunction based on the hypothetical on a subjunctive as a possibility.
• 1:02:44
  [UNKNOWN]: So the judge then turned around and said, all right, we'll find another reason to
• 1:02:51
  [UNKNOWN]: to block it and so we're back to square one again and plus of course because the USPS did announce once the Supreme Court had made its decision that this judge had no grounds for her ruling.
• 1:03:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, they said the rules are in place and so you have all the blue states suing.
• 1:03:12
  [UNKNOWN]: So so I think this is the concern I have.
• 1:03:15
  [UNKNOWN]: So I believe it's September 3rd is when the, the, the, the, the, the day comes in the court with this Obama pointed judge where she will decide whether or not to, to, to lift.
• 1:03:31
  [UNKNOWN]: the TRL, or to impose a permanent injunction as the executive order is considered on constitutional.
• 1:03:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, why a local judge gets to do this?
• 1:03:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I thought the Supreme Court nipped this on the bud.
• 1:03:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They're not allowed to do these unilateral decisions.
• 1:03:52
  [UNKNOWN]: But, alas, here we are.
• 1:03:55
  [UNKNOWN]: And for me, just, you know, well, we'll decide on September 3rd.
• 1:04:00
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just constantly kicking the can to the point of well.
• 1:04:04
  [UNKNOWN]: But now we have to start delivering mail-in ballots, you know, it's August 1st, time to do it.
• 1:04:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Before we know it, we've missed the deadline as it were.
• 1:04:15
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's my concern.
• 1:04:17
  [UNKNOWN]: I think it's not enforceable for the midterms because they're just trying to run interference in the process.
• 1:04:23
  [UNKNOWN]: That's my concern.
• 1:04:24
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'm hoping the Supreme Court's gonna step in.
• 1:04:26
  [UNKNOWN]: I do think they sort of telegraph that they would see that Trump is perfectly within his rights to tell the United States Postal Service that there are standards
• 1:04:39
  [UNKNOWN]: for the, remember, it's, it's really interesting.
• 1:04:43
  [UNKNOWN]: The, um, the state legislatures can say, hey, where are the ones who decide how we do our elections, but it's the U.S.
• 1:04:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Postal Service that has to operate by a chain of custody protocol that is, that is, that is, trans state.
• 1:05:03
  [UNKNOWN]: So the chain of custody protocol is not determined by states, determined by the federal government, the U.S.
• 1:05:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Postal Service.
• 1:05:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So as part of that, Trump has come in and said that you have to abide by this new chain of custody, which is you have to provide a list of your voters and then we're going to cross reference it with our
• 1:05:24
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, citizen registry and if there's any that are not on there, then they're not getting about it.
• 1:05:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, it's very interesting.
• 1:05:34
  [UNKNOWN]: There is a default to this here where they wanted to use that to force the states that cross checking process to force states to clear out.
• 1:05:47
  [UNKNOWN]: their illegals and their dead and, you know, people've moved out, people who probably don't even exist, clear them all out of the, their voting rules before anything gets sent.
• 1:05:59
  [UNKNOWN]: At the very least now what the USPS can do is they can send out ballots only to those who are on the federal list.
• 1:06:07
  [UNKNOWN]: So they don't even have to depend on the states at all.
• 1:06:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So again, to me and the end, they're just
• 1:06:14
  [UNKNOWN]: the blue states are just demonstrating how desperate they are in all of this as you as you well know Democrats are in power.
• 1:06:24
  [UNKNOWN]: I know our our colleagues like to think Democrats are in power because they care for the poor and for the vulnerable Democrats are in power because they're corrupt because they're crooks.
• 1:06:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So what they this is what?
• 1:06:38
  [UNKNOWN]: the modern political left has always been.
• 1:06:42
  [UNKNOWN]: It is a business model that enriches the powerful at the expense of the people they claim to help.
• 1:06:51
  [UNKNOWN]: That was USAID in a nutshell.
• 1:06:54
  [UNKNOWN]: And I just think in the end, they know that if the USPS is now able to enforce Trump's CEO, it's over, they have to clean up their vote, not only if they have to clean up their voter rolls, but if they have to reveal them.
• 1:07:09
  [UNKNOWN]: to the federal government and then the federal government publishes all the illegals and all of the the illegitimate voters and non-citizens and alike on there.
• 1:07:18
  [UNKNOWN]: They know they're shot.
• 1:07:19
  [UNKNOWN]: They know they've just proven Trump's point.
• 1:07:21
  [UNKNOWN]: So, but I'm with you Brian.
• 1:07:23
  [UNKNOWN]: It's that latter point.
• 1:07:24
  [UNKNOWN]: I think they're just trying to run interference long enough to run out the clock at this point.
• 1:07:29
  [UNKNOWN]: And we'll see, we'll see what they, if they can do it.
• 1:07:31
  [UNKNOWN]: But I'm not, sorry, yeah.
• 1:07:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Vaughan, Dr. Steve, I have heard recently that there should be a moratorium of some kind of unpolitical polls because they're so out of whack.
• 1:07:40
  [UNKNOWN]: For instance, I'm very confident as you are that Tele Rico is no chance in Texas.
• 1:07:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Yet he's pulling ahead of packs.
• 1:07:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And as they always do, I mean, Beto was pulling way past way past,
• 1:07:53
  [UNKNOWN]: crews and ended up losing by two.
• 1:07:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, all these polls, you just know by now these polls will be off by four, five or six.
• 1:08:01
  [UNKNOWN]: They already have been with the primaries, my heavens, and some of these Democrat primaries, like the one in Wisconsin, they were off by over 20.
• 1:08:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We were seeing they were off by 10 to 15, and Michigan.
• 1:08:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And they're always off in Maine with Susan Collins.
• 1:08:17
  [UNKNOWN]: If you just look at the last time in 2020, a year when Democrats, you supposedly won the White House and all that.
• 1:08:26
  [UNKNOWN]: She won by six points, but her opponent was supposed to win by eight.
• 1:08:30
  [UNKNOWN]: And you just look at the RCP average, and that's what you saw.
• 1:08:34
  [UNKNOWN]: So they were off by.
• 1:08:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Nearly, I think 10 points or something like that on average.
• 1:08:39
  [UNKNOWN]: So, no, I mean, Europe does that.
• 1:08:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Europe, there's a number of European countries that don't let you pull a few weeks before the election so it is not 10 influence, but most people, I don't know how, I don't know how influence people are with polls anymore.
• 1:08:56
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, we're kind of a post-emotional society.
• 1:08:58
  [UNKNOWN]: We don't get swayed very much for with that.
• 1:09:04
  [UNKNOWN]: And again, I mean, they were doing this with Trump.
• 1:09:07
  [UNKNOWN]: They were doing it.
• 1:09:07
  [UNKNOWN]: We were told Kamala was supposed to win in a landslide.
• 1:09:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We're told Hillary was supposed to win in a landslide.
• 1:09:12
  [UNKNOWN]: We're told Biden was supposed to win.
• 1:09:15
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, my heavens, what was it?
• 1:09:17
  [UNKNOWN]: One poll had Biden winning by 15.16 points.
• 1:09:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Just a couple of weeks before the election.
• 1:09:24
  [UNKNOWN]: They were only off by.
• 1:09:26
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, I wouldn't pay much attention to it.
• 1:09:30
  [UNKNOWN]: No, Paxon's got this.
• 1:09:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Texas.
• 1:09:37
  [UNKNOWN]: So now we apparently have Lake America.
• 1:09:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Would you ever do an analysis on Trump's trolling?
• 1:09:42
  [UNKNOWN]: How much is strategic and how much is this poking fun?
• 1:09:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, that's a great question.
• 1:09:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
• 1:09:47
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, the trolling is it is a, there is a, what do we want to call it?
• 1:09:56
  [UNKNOWN]: What's the term?
• 1:09:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Not so much mocking.
• 1:09:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, there's a, uh, there's a term for it.
• 1:10:01
  [UNKNOWN]: My, my brain is going blank here.
• 1:10:05
  [UNKNOWN]: I'll be thinking about what I'm not thinking about it, but it is a kind of mocking, it is a kind of self-confident.
• 1:10:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Why am I forgetting the term?
• 1:10:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Anyway, I've read there was actually a study on the biblical, the biblical foundations of it.
• 1:10:26
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's a sign of self-confidence, the thing of the way David, Marx, and Schoffsett, Goliath, for example.
• 1:10:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a sign of self-confidence.
• 1:10:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a sign that you're going to lose and we're going to win.
• 1:10:42
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's part of the momentum of that victory.
• 1:10:47
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think Trump
• 1:10:51
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, I think it's both.
• 1:10:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think it's a, I don't think it's an either or.
• 1:10:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I think it's, I think he honestly believes that mocking and scoffing at and ridiculing your opponent is part of the strategy of defeating them.
• 1:11:09
  [UNKNOWN]: That's, and that's what he's doing with carnie.
• 1:11:12
  [UNKNOWN]: I have a theory, you know, more or less that that's,
• 1:11:15
  [UNKNOWN]: That's why he did not want Pierre Pulleyev to win in their last national election because he news could have to smack the hell out of Canada with all of their, their, you know, rude corrupt taking advantage of American consumers.
• 1:11:33
  [UNKNOWN]: You remember Canada,
• 1:11:36
  [UNKNOWN]: 75% of Canada's buyers export buyers are Americans, 75% but then they turn around and that was generally across the board free market.
• 1:11:48
  [UNKNOWN]: We didn't tariff before Trump.
• 1:11:50
  [UNKNOWN]: We didn't tariff their products.
• 1:11:51
  [UNKNOWN]: But then we have about I think it's about 14% of our products are bought by Canadians and they tariff the hell out of them.
• 1:12:00
  [UNKNOWN]: in order to protect their consumers.
• 1:12:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, they have every right to do that.
• 1:12:04
  [UNKNOWN]: But then we're going to tariff the hell out of there.
• 1:12:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And then the moment we do, they said, well, they work on a reciprocate.
• 1:12:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We're going to fight that.
• 1:12:11
  [UNKNOWN]: What do you mean you're the one to drew the first blood?
• 1:12:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Is it where you threw the first punch?
• 1:12:17
  [UNKNOWN]: You rely on our military, but pay nothing on military and then you lecture us on how our welfare, you know, we don't provide health care for our citizens.
• 1:12:26
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, FU.
• 1:12:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think Trump knew he was going to have to smack Ottawa around a lot.
• 1:12:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And I don't think he wanted necessarily a conservative government in there to smack around.
• 1:12:36
  [UNKNOWN]: That's just a theory.
• 1:12:37
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know that.
• 1:12:38
  [UNKNOWN]: But I think the trolling is part and parcel of Trump's strategy, you know,
• 1:12:50
  [UNKNOWN]: This, it's not just the psychology of the opponent.
• 1:12:52
  [UNKNOWN]: It's also the psychology of his side.
• 1:12:55
  [UNKNOWN]: He wants this side high, you know, high-fiving and, you know, pumping their fists, USA, USA is a way of just kind of, you know, taking out the opponent.
• 1:13:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I've read, you know, just, again, just the typical,
• 1:13:10
  [UNKNOWN]: doomers online.
• 1:13:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, this is such a stupid idea.
• 1:13:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Dude, it's called civilizationism.
• 1:13:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Civilizations name things.
• 1:13:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Adam names the animals.
• 1:13:21
  [UNKNOWN]: You exercise dominion over something by naming it.
• 1:13:26
  [UNKNOWN]: And so Trump renamed the Gulf of America.
• 1:13:31
  [UNKNOWN]: wasn't just a cute idea.
• 1:13:33
  [UNKNOWN]: It was designating that body of water now as a sovereign American energy point, an energy point on the planet.
• 1:13:41
  [UNKNOWN]: That belongs to us now that we know that happened then as well in oil as being sold through American oil and gas brokers.
• 1:13:51
  [UNKNOWN]: So, I mean, to me, it's just all part of the civilizationalism of, you know, we call this Lake Ontario.
• 1:13:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Why?
• 1:13:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Half of it's in the United States.
• 1:13:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, I'm going to call it America.
• 1:14:01
  [UNKNOWN]: And I guess what?
• 1:14:02
  [UNKNOWN]: I can do it.
• 1:14:03
  [UNKNOWN]: I can, with a stroke of a pen, I can do it and I can force all federal, federal maps and documents and so forth to reflect that now.
• 1:14:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So, I think it's all, it's all the same thing.
• 1:14:16
  [UNKNOWN]: It's strategic.
• 1:14:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Bill's Mamedumi family scooping up New York City vacant properties.
• 1:14:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, are they?
• 1:14:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Are they?
• 1:14:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, they have.
• 1:14:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, they have and Mamedani himself owns a vacant property.
• 1:14:36
  [UNKNOWN]: I believe two slices of property in Uganda that are vacant.
• 1:14:40
  [UNKNOWN]: So he'd be subject to his own p-deterritax as well.
• 1:14:43
  [UNKNOWN]: But of course he isn't.
• 1:14:46
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, it's, they're meta-capitalists, they're meta-capitalists.
• 1:14:49
  [UNKNOWN]: So meta-capitalists is one who accumulates the power and wealth and for these idiots socialists generally, they're the ones who have to accumulate the power that are not smart enough to accumulate the wealth by themselves.
• 1:15:02
  [UNKNOWN]: They have to get it from you, but they accumulate enough power and wealth to stand above,
• 1:15:09
  [UNKNOWN]: the so-called evil capitalist system that they regulate.
• 1:15:12
  [UNKNOWN]: So when the communist evolved, the Marxist evolved, like denounced capitalism even for themselves.
• 1:15:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, they were still corrupt and they were still living high in the hog on everyone, but at least they weren't cat.
• 1:15:25
  [UNKNOWN]: They weren't living in palaces per se.
• 1:15:27
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, outside of Chosheski or something like that.
• 1:15:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, these guys are living in palaces.
• 1:15:32
  [UNKNOWN]: They are living as the ultimate capitalist, but they see themselves as above the capitalist system that they claim to regulate.
• 1:15:40
  [UNKNOWN]: So he's in these and idiot.
• 1:15:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Franz, Dr. C, could you please explain to the trolls what the difference is with an EO in a national emergency?
• 1:15:50
  [UNKNOWN]: What happens to the non-compliant?
• 1:15:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, okay, well.
• 1:15:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I don't know about the, well, whatever, whatever the national emergency declares it to be.
• 1:16:00
  [UNKNOWN]: So as I understand it, this is from 1980, there was a decision from the Supreme Court that argued that national emergencies are qualitatively distinct from an EO, an EO, an executive order is subject to judicial scrutiny.
• 1:16:19
  [UNKNOWN]: They are
• 1:16:21
  [UNKNOWN]: they can be struck down by a judge, but a declaration of war, a declaration of emergency, right, a declaration of military action.
• 1:16:34
  [UNKNOWN]: That's nonjudicable.
• 1:16:36
  [UNKNOWN]: That is for the president to decide, whether we should not not a judge, judge doesn't decide that.
• 1:16:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, if people say,
• 1:16:50
  [UNKNOWN]: emergency action, the hats were article one comes in.
• 1:16:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Congress, two thirds vote in Congress, both chambers can stop it.
• 1:16:58
  [UNKNOWN]: It can override it and then the president must rescind that national order.
• 1:17:02
  [UNKNOWN]: But no judge can get in the president's way of a national emergency order.
• 1:17:07
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's the difference fundamentally.
• 1:17:09
  [UNKNOWN]: And Trump has done this before.
• 1:17:12
  [UNKNOWN]: He got funding for his wall by diverting simulatory funding.
• 1:17:18
  [UNKNOWN]: It back in, I think he did in 2019 after the Democrats got to power and blocked all funding for the building of his wall.
• 1:17:29
  [UNKNOWN]: So he declared a national emergency at the border.
• 1:17:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, he has already done that as well this time around and um, and it's part of the same thing.
• 1:17:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It's like, you know, when he declares an organization, a terrorist organization, a judge can't say, well, no, you can't do that because the judge isn't in the position of competence.
• 1:17:47
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not a judicial lane to determine whether a group is terrorists.
• 1:17:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It's, their judicial lane is to determine whether something is constitutional.
• 1:17:59
  [UNKNOWN]: not whether a emergency declaration is valid in terms of who it's launched again.
• 1:18:07
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's the difference, fundamentally.
• 1:18:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Kevin, good afternoon, good afternoon, my friend.
• 1:18:14
  [UNKNOWN]: What we see sort of a rusted seizure of all assets and the same for all of the associates.
• 1:18:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Ooh, Alex as well, all right, allies and followers, who also go down in this action.
• 1:18:23
  [UNKNOWN]: I know no if we're gonna see all that.
• 1:18:24
  [UNKNOWN]: I do not know, I can't go that far, I don't know.
• 1:18:28
  [UNKNOWN]: what we've got so far it seems to me is a concerted effort to completely defund and dismantle the Soros Empire.
• 1:18:37
  [UNKNOWN]: So they defunded it via first and foremost by cutting off the
• 1:18:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And now the dismantling would be taking whatever funds they have left and removing tax exempt status from those funds.
• 1:18:58
  [UNKNOWN]: And so you're in effect turning into a 501C4, which is a political organization, which is not tax exempt.
• 1:19:07
  [UNKNOWN]: 501C3s are supposed to be charitable organizations.
• 1:19:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Those are tax exempts, right?
• 1:19:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Like a church.
• 1:19:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And so he runs 501c3s that are just more or less past-throughs into 501c4s.
• 1:19:19
  [UNKNOWN]: So that'll be treated as 501c4s.
• 1:19:21
  [UNKNOWN]: And yeah, they'll still have, they'll probably still have some checks written to them, but not very much after that.
• 1:19:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Because people writing checks to 501, especially the size of the checks to 501c3s so that they can enjoy reciprocal tax right off with their own taxes.
• 1:19:42
  [UNKNOWN]: That's all they're trying to do right now as I can see it, but that's enough that's all you need to do because if you don't have money, you're shot again keep in mind that was source is that was source is frame it's going to be western money
• 1:19:56
  [UNKNOWN]: combined with East Western, or sorry, Western money combined with Eastern European might.
• 1:20:03
  [UNKNOWN]: And that was going to somehow take over the world.
• 1:20:06
  [UNKNOWN]: It was the immediate enemy was the fledgling Soviet Union and then the non-compliant Russia.
• 1:20:13
  [UNKNOWN]: But he is the money guy.
• 1:20:18
  [UNKNOWN]: He is the one who sets up this entire globalist network and then just funds it with millions of millions of dollars.
• 1:20:24
  [UNKNOWN]: And we have, you know, like here in the United States, we have stats that show that the say House of Representatives candidate.
• 1:20:37
  [UNKNOWN]: who wins their race, Democrat or Republican, 90% of the time, it's the one who's the most funded.
• 1:20:43
  [UNKNOWN]: This does not count for presidential campaigns, but for congressional campaigns, it does.
• 1:20:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Those who are best funded tend to win.
• 1:20:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So right now, I'm in the Delaware Valley area, and this is a very, very Democrat area, all the commercials I'm seeing are Democrat commercials.
• 1:21:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Because there's no Republicans running any commercials because they know they can't win.
• 1:21:02
  [UNKNOWN]: So they're not bothering.
• 1:21:04
  [UNKNOWN]: So if you're in an area where you're starting to see commercial, after commercial, after commercial of like a Republican candidate, that means, ah, that's where the money is going because 90% of the time, they're the ones who are going to win, the ones who are
• 1:21:19
  [UNKNOWN]: most funded, well funded.
• 1:21:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Sorrows knows that.
• 1:21:23
  [UNKNOWN]: So he knows he knows that you just got a set up all the tannacles and then just pour the money in it.
• 1:21:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And so what we're doing is we're getting rid of the money.
• 1:21:31
  [UNKNOWN]: We're drying up the money.
• 1:21:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And then the tentacles we think will be brittle enough to break apart after that.
• 1:21:39
  [UNKNOWN]: And then there's so many, I mean, you've got Karen that's going down with him.
• 1:21:43
  [UNKNOWN]: You got SPLC that's going down with them.
• 1:21:45
  [UNKNOWN]: There's a nut, and I think they're looking at all the bit.
• 1:21:48
  [UNKNOWN]: What's the who's the billionaire that's in living in Beijing right now?
• 1:21:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Why am I forgetting his name?
• 1:21:52
  [UNKNOWN]: But I think I think it would be keeping an eye.
• 1:21:55
  [UNKNOWN]: No, I don't know if they can get them.
• 1:21:57
  [UNKNOWN]: But I think he could possibly freeze assets in the like.
• 1:22:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Rubber guy with the Lindsey clansy stuff being demonic, especially with their supporters.
• 1:22:08
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm seeing people say we should repeal 19th Amendment, so don't give me into that now, I'd go in there dude, I'd go in there.
• 1:22:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, I have no thoughts, again, I'm a descriptive guy, not a prescriptive guy.
• 1:22:22
  [UNKNOWN]: You come to my channel to get analysis of what's happening.
• 1:22:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Not analysis of what ought to happen, you know, I just, I keep my analysis very sense.
• 1:22:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So I have no opinions on that.
• 1:22:37
  [UNKNOWN]: If there were a mass movement to get rid of the 19th amendment, I would be,
• 1:22:43
  [UNKNOWN]: I would be, I would be covering it, but right now it's a completely fringe, fringe movement.
• 1:22:50
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, I'm not, again, not saying it's, I'm descriptive, I'm not saying one way or the other.
• 1:22:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, we all said it done, you know, even if we got rid of 19th Amendment, women would still vote, but generally speaking, it would be, there would be heads of households.
• 1:23:04
  [UNKNOWN]: So prior to 19th Amendment, we tended to be very covenantal and our understanding.
• 1:23:09
  [UNKNOWN]: So here, I mean, I could help you.
• 1:23:12
  [UNKNOWN]: or talk about it historically, we didn't be very covenantal and are understanding of human society.
• 1:23:18
  [UNKNOWN]: And so, so, they're what, when it came down to voting for things whether at church or at the board or in government, it usually there was a representative, a federal head for the family unit.
• 1:23:41
  [UNKNOWN]: And that federal head, classically speaking, is the man.
• 1:23:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, in a family where there's no man, if the father is absent or is passed away or what have you, then the mother would vote.
• 1:23:56
  [UNKNOWN]: The woman would vote on behalf of the family.
• 1:23:59
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's not that women didn't vote part two the 19th Amendment.
• 1:24:08
  [UNKNOWN]: conception of human society.
• 1:24:11
  [UNKNOWN]: The family was considered the basic unit, not necessarily the individual, and so there was a designated person to vote on behalf of the family, and it was universally recognized at the time as the man, the Adam, the representative of Adam for the family.
• 1:24:34
  [UNKNOWN]: So even if we got rid of 19, the men, women would still be voting and especially with all the single women out there, they would technically as I understand it'd be voting, it would just be probably cut in half or what heavier, I don't know, I don't know how it would flesh out, but I get it's just pure, hypervolite or pure speculation hypothetical stuff.
• 1:24:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Ah, get 10th.
• 1:25:00
  [UNKNOWN]: If federal judge in Boston is blocked, the USPS.
• 1:25:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, same one.
• 1:25:03
  [UNKNOWN]: It's the same one, yeah, who did the original one.
• 1:25:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And this Supreme Court already said that President Trump could go through with it, it's frustrating.
• 1:25:11
  [UNKNOWN]: It is, it is.
• 1:25:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, it's the same one too.
• 1:25:14
  [UNKNOWN]: So, so technically, all right, so this is how law works.
• 1:25:19
  [UNKNOWN]: And, you know, this is, I mean, again, this is why I, this is why I limit my legal coverage
• 1:25:27
  [UNKNOWN]: As I understand it, it was a hypothetical that was put forward to this judge, a bomb appointed judge, that if the USPS standards go through, you know, these voting demographics and they're always left-wing Democrats.
• 1:25:46
  [UNKNOWN]: are going to be an organically harmed and disenfranchised.
• 1:25:50
  [UNKNOWN]: She said you're right and she issued a Indian Junction.
• 1:25:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Supreme Court came in and said you have no authority, you have no jurisdiction to incident in Junction based on a hypothetical.
• 1:26:03
  [UNKNOWN]: If this goes in effect, then you don't know that.
• 1:26:07
  [UNKNOWN]: There's no, so they struck it down.
• 1:26:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So new plaintiffs came in.
• 1:26:14
  [UNKNOWN]: They argued it differently, and I forget their arguments obviously doesn't matter.
• 1:26:18
  [UNKNOWN]: I tend to look at the arguments after the Supreme Court decides on them.
• 1:26:23
  [UNKNOWN]: New plaintiffs come in.
• 1:26:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Same thing, they judge shop.
• 1:26:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Find, you know, Biden or Obama point A.
• 1:26:31
  [UNKNOWN]: They make a different argument, she goes, you're right and she throws slaps on another in junctions.
• 1:26:36
  [UNKNOWN]: So you're right.
• 1:26:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's kind of like whack a mole.
• 1:26:38
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's what I think is making us very frustrated.
• 1:26:42
  [UNKNOWN]: I would love for the Supreme Court just to come in and knock this down one way or the other.
• 1:26:47
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's what I'm hoping they'll do.
• 1:26:49
  [UNKNOWN]: We thought they did.
• 1:26:50
  [UNKNOWN]: We certainly thought they did.
• 1:26:52
  [UNKNOWN]: But the Democrats are desperate here.
• 1:26:54
  [UNKNOWN]: This is existential.
• 1:26:56
  [UNKNOWN]: If this, if this USPS
• 1:26:59
  [UNKNOWN]: If these measures go into effect, they're shot and that's why in the end, I just think Trump needs to give them all a middle finger and declare a national emergency and then dare Congress to, so, and then you'll get, I'm sure you get some activist judge.
• 1:27:14
  [UNKNOWN]: So you can't do that.
• 1:27:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Yet, it's nonjudicial.
• 1:27:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Go back to 1983 Supreme Court ruling and dare Congress to overturn them with a two thirds vote, which of course they can't.
• 1:27:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Kevin, do you agree that communist China was Xi Jinping is undergoing a catastrophic unrecoverable demographic fiscal and economic collapse?
• 1:27:34
  [UNKNOWN]: So we need to end reliance on it before it explodes and it's a good question.
• 1:27:38
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think that's what Trump is doing.
• 1:27:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I think he's, I actually think he's concerned about China.
• 1:27:45
  [UNKNOWN]: He's very concerned about the future of China in terms of their accumulation of power.
• 1:27:55
  [UNKNOWN]: The demographic thesis on China certainly has merit.
• 1:28:00
  [UNKNOWN]: They are losing a lot of pot, and I mean, it's almost stunning because they're so big.
• 1:28:05
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, when we say they're 1.4 billion, that point four is bigger than the total population in the United States.
• 1:28:13
  [UNKNOWN]: China is massive, India is even bigger.
• 1:28:16
  [UNKNOWN]: I think aren't they at 1.5 now?
• 1:28:19
  [UNKNOWN]: But it's just it's a massive country.
• 1:28:22
  [UNKNOWN]: So a governor over a province oversees a population the size of the United States or the size of Brazil or something.
• 1:28:28
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just they're just huge.
• 1:28:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So the population implosion in real numbers is is gigantic.
• 1:28:37
  [UNKNOWN]: We're talking, you know, like 50 million in a matter of 20 years, whatever, or for go whatever stats.
• 1:28:44
  [UNKNOWN]: And then you have people like Peter Zion who believes actually their population could be cutting half in the very near future.
• 1:28:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I forgot what his projection is, 10, 20 years or so.
• 1:28:59
  [UNKNOWN]: And that they simply can't, they won't have the economic output.
• 1:29:02
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it would be a devastated, I mean, if they went from like 1.4 to 700 million, that's just a different country.
• 1:29:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, I don't know if those numbers are going to bear out number one, those are the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the most extreme number two, they're not the only country losing population in the region.
• 1:29:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Japan is losing it even around the same level if not faster South Korea is losing it even faster Singapore is losing it even faster so they're, they're not outliers.
• 1:29:35
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the problem here.
• 1:29:37
  [UNKNOWN]: They're not out same with with
• 1:29:38
  [UNKNOWN]: the West for that matter, particularly Europe.
• 1:29:41
  [UNKNOWN]: They're not outliers.
• 1:29:42
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a global south of like in Sub-Saharan Africa.
• 1:29:46
  [UNKNOWN]: They're having, that are having kids three, four, five per woman.
• 1:29:53
  [UNKNOWN]: They're the one, and, and, and, and parts of
• 1:29:58
  [UNKNOWN]: South East Asia's well rural areas, or having lots of kids with the 1040 window is where having a lot of children, Middle East, not all Jordan's going through a, and obviously Iran, Syria are all going through a population.
• 1:30:15
  [UNKNOWN]: decline.
• 1:30:17
  [UNKNOWN]: The Pakistan, you know, they're they're grown by leaps and bounds.
• 1:30:22
  [UNKNOWN]: So all of that's to say all that's to say that I don't I don't think the effects of the demographic decline are going to be as catastrophic simply because they're not alone.
• 1:30:34
  [UNKNOWN]: other nations particularly surrounding them and that Sinosphere are declining relatively at comparable rates and their economies are going to be comparably affected.
• 1:30:49
  [UNKNOWN]: And just in the world of AI and robotics, you're not going to need people the way you need it before just no way around that.
• 1:30:58
  [UNKNOWN]: We're already seeing that with autonomous cars, you know, you're just not
• 1:31:03
  [UNKNOWN]: So the world's changing in a way that might be able to absorb and accommodate population decline.
• 1:31:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Having said that, I just think President Trump is concerned that China, he is, and I think this is right, he is assuming the worst case scenario for China in terms of the accumulating power, maintaining their power.
• 1:31:28
  [UNKNOWN]: and he's trying to box them out in the process, then if they demographically implode all the better, you know, we get to for one as a way of thinking about it and that we decoupled our dependence upon them and got other countries to decouple their dependence upon them in the process.
• 1:31:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Great question, Kim.
• 1:31:48
  [UNKNOWN]: For all of us, as we've dissonantly and amnesty have compatibility,
• 1:31:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I have to think about that one.
• 1:31:58
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, in terms of my PrimaFacean, no, PrimaFacean seems to me that they're two opposite.
• 1:32:13
  [UNKNOWN]: They're two opposite dynamics, you know.
• 1:32:16
  [UNKNOWN]: But I guess, I guess you could say if the people want to give Amnesty was like when Reagan in 86 granted Amnesty was that an act of a sovereign nation.
• 1:32:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, in one sense, but not in a globalist context, where you have people like Soros looking for borderless countries.
• 1:32:38
  [UNKNOWN]: So I guess so.
• 1:32:39
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it just it seems to me it's the macro context in the end.
• 1:32:43
  [UNKNOWN]: So if the macro context is that the powers that be the elites, you know, the ones that can spire, right, again, sovereign nations, if they're the ones who are doing everything they can to try to erase borders, then whether you know it or not, even if it's.
• 1:33:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Even if it's popular, granting honesty is destroying your sovereignty.
• 1:33:11
  [UNKNOWN]: But if we are in a national's pockets, civilizationalist world, as we are now, where borders are being enforced like never before, and then a nation decides it wants to grant an honesty.
• 1:33:22
  [UNKNOWN]: I see that as perfectly within their sovereign right.
• 1:33:25
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's consistent within a world where borders are mutually reinforced.
• 1:33:32
  [UNKNOWN]: The only way we know our borders can be enforced is if
• 1:33:43
  [UNKNOWN]: in human condition.
• 1:33:44
  [UNKNOWN]: My only benefit and thank you for the gift.
• 1:33:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you all for your gifts, the very, very appreciate.
• 1:33:48
  [UNKNOWN]: My only fear of magas that it might get so comfortable.
• 1:33:51
  [UNKNOWN]: They can no longer envision its own defeat.
• 1:33:54
  [UNKNOWN]: We must remain vigilant and never underestimate commis in the people vote for them.
• 1:33:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Absolutely.
• 1:34:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Absent presumptuousness is the root of your fall.
• 1:34:05
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think that's what happened to liberals in many respects.
• 1:34:08
  [UNKNOWN]: They honestly believe they built an undefeatable system.
• 1:34:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's why I think they're going berserk right now.
• 1:34:18
  [UNKNOWN]: That's partly what's behind TDS, so you just cannot believe he's actually doing it.
• 1:34:23
  [UNKNOWN]: He's ripping apart
• 1:34:25
  [UNKNOWN]: But what that which was supposed to be unassailable.
• 1:34:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So you're absolutely right.
• 1:34:28
  [UNKNOWN]: We can never, ever be presumptuous.
• 1:34:32
  [UNKNOWN]: And we can never be complacent.
• 1:34:35
  [UNKNOWN]: No, you're absolutely right.
• 1:34:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's, you know, and I tend to always, you know, if I give some good news in the midterms, if I tend to always say, okay, gang, look, we still have a far way to go.
• 1:34:45
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not here yet in anything, can you know, I want to do that.
• 1:34:48
  [UNKNOWN]: I want to give those little little, you know,
• 1:34:54
  [UNKNOWN]: the flashes of action, the need to take action.
• 1:35:01
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't want compliance by any stretch, the imagination.
• 1:35:06
  [UNKNOWN]: No question on that.
• 1:35:08
  [UNKNOWN]: And so you're absolutely right, and the way to do that when all of a sudden done is is self-reflection.
• 1:35:17
  [UNKNOWN]: It's like spiritual disciplines.
• 1:35:20
  [UNKNOWN]: focusing on, before you point the finger at someone else, you have to point the finger to yourself.
• 1:35:26
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, where am I, where am I, spiritually weak?
• 1:35:30
  [UNKNOWN]: What, what, what sins am I wrestling with, you know, if I'm honest with myself, that kind of self evaluation, I think is very good for a nation, for a movement.
• 1:35:40
  [UNKNOWN]: All right, where are we, where are we, where are we, where do we risk getting getting hit and hit hard by an enemy that is hell been on destroying us?
• 1:35:50
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what third world in the world is fundamentally about.
• 1:35:54
  [UNKNOWN]: The idea that the West is the ultimate evil upon the earth.
• 1:35:58
  [UNKNOWN]: We are mortal and they see themselves as arrogant and they're going to take us down.
• 1:36:03
  [UNKNOWN]: And, and of course, you know, what are they going to do?
• 1:36:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Texas on the shock.
• 1:36:14
  [UNKNOWN]: On the podcast, Panicans, do you think their influence is rising or falling?
• 1:36:19
  [UNKNOWN]: I keep having ones that are black-pilled, pedaling or trying to house JD, showing up on my feed.
• 1:36:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, unfortunately, those are the, those are going to be the pro Israel crowd.
• 1:36:31
  [UNKNOWN]: So this is, this is, I mean, I'm just
• 1:36:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I'm just calling them as a CM here.
• 1:36:38
  [UNKNOWN]: If you're talking about with JD, oh JD is having a really hard time.
• 1:36:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Those 10s to be the pro Israel crowd.
• 1:36:45
  [UNKNOWN]: The pro Israel crowd, the Israel first crowd is they're often called.
• 1:36:52
  [UNKNOWN]: They are,
• 1:36:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I just think they're their own worst enemy to be honest with you.
• 1:36:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Because wherever they find a home or seemingly find a home politically, they very quickly make themselves unwelcome.
• 1:37:07
  [UNKNOWN]: They wear out the welcome very, very quickly.
• 1:37:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So after February 28th,
• 1:37:15
  [UNKNOWN]: the pro is real crowd rush to maga 100%.
• 1:37:19
  [UNKNOWN]: They were a thousand percent behind maga because Trump was doing the brave thing.
• 1:37:23
  [UNKNOWN]: He was finally taking on Iran and he's going to see it all the way through and you know Ben Shapiro is calling, you know, Trump the most brave man on the planet.
• 1:37:32
  [UNKNOWN]: This is the most amazing political move I've ever seen, blah, blah, blah, whatever it is, right?
• 1:37:37
  [UNKNOWN]: The accolades come.
• 1:37:38
  [UNKNOWN]: And then Trump says, okay, we're done.
• 1:37:40
  [UNKNOWN]: And what does that crowd turn around and do?
• 1:37:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay, we're done.
• 1:37:44
  [UNKNOWN]: We've got to cease fire.
• 1:37:45
  [UNKNOWN]: We're good.
• 1:37:46
  [UNKNOWN]: We're getting the flow of oil moving and we're going to bring the pump down.
• 1:37:50
  [UNKNOWN]: We're going to bring the prices of the pump down that relieve the pain at the pump.
• 1:37:54
  [UNKNOWN]: What do they say to, but you did do what we wanted you to do?
• 1:37:59
  [UNKNOWN]: You didn't say what you said you were going to do.
• 1:38:04
  [UNKNOWN]: And all of a sudden you realize, too,
• 1:38:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Do you understand how this game is play?
• 1:38:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 1:38:13
  [UNKNOWN]: We're a team and the captain just said we're done.
• 1:38:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 1:38:18
  [UNKNOWN]: He's got his reasons and we're going to defend him.
• 1:38:21
  [UNKNOWN]: We're going to point the fingers at the other side and make sure they never come to power now.
• 1:38:26
  [UNKNOWN]: No, they end up, they act like, oh, no, no, no, no, I'm above politics now.
• 1:38:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And I can criticize this, so this side hates JD.
• 1:38:36
  [UNKNOWN]: They see JD is more or less of best friends with Tucker or, you know, whatever, and they just see him as very anti-Israel.
• 1:38:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, for right or for wrong, I actually don't know where it comes from, uh, maybe because they seem as a Catholic antagonist or what, and they see it Catholic antagonist is inherently anti.
• 1:38:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know.
• 1:38:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know where it comes from, but, uh, shut them all, I mean, that they're just pushing propaganda.
• 1:38:59
  [UNKNOWN]: That's all they're doing.
• 1:39:01
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just pure propaganda.
• 1:39:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Does it have a lot of influence?
• 1:39:03
  [UNKNOWN]: No.
• 1:39:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Outside of their circles?
• 1:39:05
  [UNKNOWN]: No.
• 1:39:05
  [UNKNOWN]: None of it all.
• 1:39:06
  [UNKNOWN]: The poll showed JD would crush anybody in, in a, in a Republican primary, including Marco.
• 1:39:13
  [UNKNOWN]: No, he, and then if Trump gives him the nod, he wins, I mean, it's just literally that simple.
• 1:39:22
  [UNKNOWN]: They have no power beyond that, whatever little influence.
• 1:39:26
  [UNKNOWN]: But they have no power beyond just the the cheering that they can give your side for the little time they will do it, but their loyalties are not with maga.
• 1:39:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, no more than a libertarians' loyalties are with Magga, you know, Dave Smith was the first to leave the Magga train.
• 1:39:41
  [UNKNOWN]: It was all Magga, Trump gets in and Trump opens by the, no, that you don't say that I'm all, I'm out, you know, and that's exactly what we're seeing with Massey and M.T.G.
• 1:39:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Their loyalties are not with Magga, they're not Magga at all despite all their lip service.
• 1:39:57
  [UNKNOWN]: So, no, I don't see their influence rising at all.
• 1:40:01
  [UNKNOWN]: The podcast, podcast, the stand.
• 1:40:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I think they're, they're virtuous.
• 1:40:11
  [UNKNOWN]: And as virtualists, they are, they are mired in virtual reality.
• 1:40:18
  [UNKNOWN]: They are not mired in empirical reality.
• 1:40:20
  [UNKNOWN]: I saw one of them the other day saying,
• 1:40:24
  [UNKNOWN]: There is, well, there's obviously a hundred million illegal migrants in the United States right now.
• 1:40:32
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, that was on the, on the X, X pose, a hundred million migrants in the United States right now.
• 1:40:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Where are they getting that number?
• 1:40:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Where are they getting that number?
• 1:40:48
  [UNKNOWN]: I've seen numbers as high as 30 million.
• 1:40:51
  [UNKNOWN]: I've seen that with possibly.
• 1:40:53
  [UNKNOWN]: What we're finding actually is we're getting some stats that show actually the numbers probably more around 12 to 15.
• 1:41:01
  [UNKNOWN]: With Trump already, I'm getting numbers now I've already getting rid of at least three possibly as many as 4.5 million.
• 1:41:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, it's tough when you're dealing with,
• 1:41:12
  [UNKNOWN]: accurate numbers here.
• 1:41:13
  [UNKNOWN]: But one of the ways you can do it is you can actually find a very accurate number of how many illegal aliens are in a particular state and then extrapolate from that based on models of states, other states, proportionally how many would be in those states.
• 1:41:31
  [UNKNOWN]: and so many of these models around 15 million.
• 1:41:33
  [UNKNOWN]: But again, there's models or study and so for these, these conspiracy podcasts, these, these panic and podcasts, there's just pulling numbers out of their butts at this point.
• 1:41:44
  [UNKNOWN]: They're just, it's just,
• 1:41:46
  [UNKNOWN]: It's sad and it's virtualism.
• 1:41:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They're just living in virtual reality.
• 1:41:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And empirical reality has nothing to do with their analysis.
• 1:41:53
  [UNKNOWN]: So at this point it just it just seems to be it's just this kind of weird sort of almost sort of like a WWE entertainment in a circle, though I like WWE.
• 1:42:01
  [UNKNOWN]: I prefer WWE, but it's just its own surreal.
• 1:42:06
  [UNKNOWN]: virtualist reality that has very literally nothing to do with empirical reality.
• 1:42:12
  [UNKNOWN]: The problem, though, is, and so they're one goal is to suck you in.
• 1:42:15
  [UNKNOWN]: That's it because once you're in, then they have their own plausibility structures placed into it.
• 1:42:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Since it's virtual reality, right?
• 1:42:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Candace zones, I think, would be a perfect example of this.
• 1:42:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So, since it's virtual reality, since everything is virtual,
• 1:42:35
  [UNKNOWN]: what is truth ends up becoming comparably virtual.
• 1:42:40
  [UNKNOWN]: It's all virtual and so it's you're just kind of sucked into this quasi-nostic digital pseudo-reality that takes its place of real reality.
• 1:42:57
  [UNKNOWN]: And thank God, I think the vast majority of MAGA is in real reality right now.
• 1:43:03
  [UNKNOWN]: All the polls seem to show it voter registration trends, show it,
• 1:43:09
  [UNKNOWN]: It shows it, so I wouldn't worry about it.
• 1:43:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Richard Dr. Steven conservative podcast predicts a Republican bloodbath in the midterms, you're a thought.
• 1:43:21
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, again, what's your data?
• 1:43:24
  [UNKNOWN]: I just have to look at what your data is.
• 1:43:28
  [UNKNOWN]: There are some.
• 1:43:29
  [UNKNOWN]: There are some.
• 1:43:31
  [UNKNOWN]: holsters who are seeing certainly danger for the Republican party.
• 1:43:38
  [UNKNOWN]: But they tend to be outliers.
• 1:43:43
  [UNKNOWN]: The vast majority of the polling right now shows that in terms of the generic ballot, Democrats and Republicans are relatively close.
• 1:43:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrats look like I think on the real clear politics average.
• 1:43:58
  [UNKNOWN]: They have about a five or six point lead.
• 1:44:01
  [UNKNOWN]: That's not enough.
• 1:44:02
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not going to that's not going to do it.
• 1:44:04
  [UNKNOWN]: In other words, the electorate will be five or six percent more Democrat than Republican.
• 1:44:10
  [UNKNOWN]: That's not going to do it.
• 1:44:14
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, that'll be about a seven point swing from 2024.
• 1:44:19
  [UNKNOWN]: It's pretty significant, but that's typical for midterm, but in an era of redistricting where seats have been redrawn to now represent disproportionate partisan makeup, it's increasingly hard to see a true
• 1:44:41
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, toss up C, most seats are within districts that we're say, in this case Trump plus seven plus eight, Trump plus nine.
• 1:44:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 1:44:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's swing seven.
• 1:44:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 1:44:55
  [UNKNOWN]: But you're in the Trump plus eight district.
• 1:44:57
  [UNKNOWN]: You lose.
• 1:44:58
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not going to happen.
• 1:44:59
  [UNKNOWN]: So you know, you have 7% more Democrat.
• 1:45:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but it was a Trump plus eight down.
• 1:45:04
  [UNKNOWN]: All right.
• 1:45:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, near shot.
• 1:45:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And oh, yeah, that Trump plus three district, they importantly come out and they vote.
• 1:45:12
  [UNKNOWN]: So it may be Republican plus two there.
• 1:45:15
  [UNKNOWN]: But the plus seven average around the country doesn't affect this particular district.
• 1:45:23
  [UNKNOWN]: So again, I'd have to see the data they're drawing from.
• 1:45:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Because Cook Political Report, Crystal Ball
• 1:45:35
  [UNKNOWN]: They're seeing right now only about 20 or so toss-up seats.
• 1:45:40
  [UNKNOWN]: And I'm sorry, that's not a blood bath.
• 1:45:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Even if Democrats want, and they didn't win all toss-up seats in 2018, the last time they won 40 seats.
• 1:45:49
  [UNKNOWN]: So even though they want all toss-up seats, 20 seats, that's not a blood bath.
• 1:45:54
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just not, they're done.
• 1:45:56
  [UNKNOWN]: They end with like, you know, 229 seats.
• 1:46:01
  [UNKNOWN]: to the Republicans, whatever it is, 277 or whatever, that's not a blood bath.
• 1:46:08
  [UNKNOWN]: The ceilings are very low for both parties right now.
• 1:46:11
  [UNKNOWN]: So maybe in blood bath they're looking at the Senate.
• 1:46:15
  [UNKNOWN]: And they're like, oh man, I mean, Democrats are just going to steam roll them to the Senate.
• 1:46:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but it's summer, polling bias always works in favor of Democrats.
• 1:46:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And some of them are just polling idiocy.
• 1:46:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, with Talaureka Beating, Paxton, who's one three statewide election elections before by double digit margins as a
• 1:46:43
  [UNKNOWN]: beating and by four points or so forth.
• 1:46:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, those are probably a good 10 points off that'm easily You know Romuswami losing to his Democrat opponent is a governor in an Ohio that's like Trump plus 13 or plus 14 No, not gonna happen not even in a plus seven Democrat That's just not gonna happen electric so I just I'd have to look at the data
• 1:47:09
  [UNKNOWN]: And I have to, well, I've heard the arguments that the Republicans are going to get wiped out, but I just don't, how do you, you know, how do you, what are you relying on?
• 1:47:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Generally, they're relying on polling.
• 1:47:21
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't want to rely on polling.
• 1:47:23
  [UNKNOWN]: You can use polling, but you don't want to rely on because it's so off.
• 1:47:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So bad, polling is demonstraly gotten really bad this year.
• 1:47:31
  [UNKNOWN]: So you don't go there.
• 1:47:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So then what, what do you have?
• 1:47:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, you have voter registration trends.
• 1:47:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrats are getting crushed in those.
• 1:47:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 1:47:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, you've got fundraising trends, Democrats are getting crushed in all that.
• 1:47:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, you got issues, issues, Democrats are getting crushed.
• 1:47:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They're always on the 20% side of 80, 20 issues.
• 1:47:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, affordability.
• 1:47:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, yeah, affordability is a really big thing in Manhattan.
• 1:47:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
• 1:47:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Is it that big of a thing in Mississippi?
• 1:48:02
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't
• 1:48:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, I have to say, but I'm not, again, I'm just not seeing it in the data.
• 1:48:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Deborah, the midterms depend on turnout.
• 1:48:13
  [UNKNOWN]: What message should GOP candidates focus on?
• 1:48:16
  [UNKNOWN]: To get out low turnout voters, especially Christians.
• 1:48:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I'll be honest with you, Deborah.
• 1:48:23
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think it's a message.
• 1:48:25
  [UNKNOWN]: I think it's a machine.
• 1:48:26
  [UNKNOWN]: You have to have a turnout machine.
• 1:48:29
  [UNKNOWN]: So this is where Cliff Bologna will have on as a guest here on the on the show in the next week and he'll he'll give you the strategy of how they're trying to get out the vote, particularly in Pennsylvania.
• 1:48:42
  [UNKNOWN]: No, you're going to have to you have to go to them.
• 1:48:45
  [UNKNOWN]: You have to go to them and you have to basically provide the mechanism for them to both fill out a ballot and send it in.
• 1:48:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Most will not go.
• 1:48:59
  [UNKNOWN]: They'll order a ballot and you can as I understand that you can.
• 1:49:04
  [UNKNOWN]: get the ballot ordered for them.
• 1:49:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And then filled out and sent in.
• 1:49:09
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's a, it's a door knocking initiative.
• 1:49:12
  [UNKNOWN]: What door knocking is not trying to convince somebody to vote for somebody.
• 1:49:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Door knocking is going to load a no prop Republican voters and getting them to vote and getting them to vote or like because you know the vote, you know the voters that vote on election day, they're coming out no matter what.
• 1:49:28
  [UNKNOWN]: So you got that and we tend to dominate election day Republicans always have it's the early voters that we need to work on and that that requires a what we call a get out the vote campaign.
• 1:49:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Joan, how can a district judge defy scoge?
• 1:49:46
  [UNKNOWN]: All right, so I know, I know Joan, it's so frustrating.
• 1:49:50
  [UNKNOWN]: She didn't, it's a different case.
• 1:49:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a different case, it's a different plaintiff and it's a different argument, bottom line.
• 1:49:59
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's what the Democrats do, the Democrats, just whack them all at.
• 1:50:03
  [UNKNOWN]: They, they don't send up one complaint complaint and they send up a dozen so that if the Supreme Court strikes down a ruling by this judge with one complainant one plaintiff.
• 1:50:18
  [UNKNOWN]: They'll just put in another plan of, and that same activist judge can continue to fulfill her job description.
• 1:50:25
  [UNKNOWN]: She was appointed in order to ensure left-wing power remains in place.
• 1:50:30
  [UNKNOWN]: That's her job, her job is into interpret the law, her jobs to, and this is why it despises about the fact that the Supreme Court plays along with this BS.
• 1:50:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Just, you know, censor, you know, you're going to have to hold this judge into contempt.
• 1:50:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Now.
• 1:50:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Brian, follow up.
• 1:50:53
  [UNKNOWN]: The judge lifted her.
• 1:50:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, no, I know she let I know.
• 1:50:57
  [UNKNOWN]: She lifted her temper or straining order yesterday.
• 1:51:00
  [UNKNOWN]: That was the original one as I understand that though, it's a new one today.
• 1:51:04
  [UNKNOWN]: That's that's the whack-a-mole insanity.
• 1:51:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think that the and that's that's the court shopping and why does she have all of these cases in her courtroom?
• 1:51:14
  [UNKNOWN]: That's where I think the Supreme Court's really get to have to crack down.
• 1:51:17
  [UNKNOWN]: And they're not at
• 1:51:24
  [UNKNOWN]: So, Doc, do you think that when the Democrats and DSA lose a historic midterm, they'll go back to protests and riding, you know how much we miss that so much?
• 1:51:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but with what money, USAID got cut off, right?
• 1:51:37
  [UNKNOWN]: So, very little money, notice we don't see a lot of protesting anymore.
• 1:51:40
  [UNKNOWN]: because so many of these organizations lost so many hundreds of millions of dollars.
• 1:51:44
  [UNKNOWN]: But yeah, so I would, yeah, the end I'd prefer them yelling and screaming in the streets to actually governing for sure, or I just being in a hole.
• 1:51:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So they never governed, but just being in position to power.
• 1:51:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Love us, love our dogs.
• 1:51:59
  [UNKNOWN]: What a beautiful name there.
• 1:52:01
  [UNKNOWN]: People keep talking about Trump needed to declare national emergency, but he signed it yesterday.
• 1:52:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know.
• 1:52:09
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm not sure, he signed it a yo to change the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America, but I did not catch that.
• 1:52:16
  [UNKNOWN]: I did not catch him signing the National Emergency Sway for election status.
• 1:52:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Kevin, at what point should President Trump treat the federal courts the same way.
• 1:52:27
  [UNKNOWN]: President Andrew Jackson did and just started ignoring them thought, well, yeah.
• 1:52:32
  [UNKNOWN]: But it's not, yeah, it's not the 19th century anymore.
• 1:52:35
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the problem.
• 1:52:38
  [UNKNOWN]: The the Republicans and and I'm just Congress is a whole be under enormous public that is media pressure.
• 1:52:48
  [UNKNOWN]: to hold him accountable.
• 1:52:50
  [UNKNOWN]: So he's got, he's got to be careful there.
• 1:52:52
  [UNKNOWN]: He does have some limitations.
• 1:52:54
  [UNKNOWN]: So he can't just ignore the, I think he can ignore these, these stupid little appellate courts decisions.
• 1:53:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I think he can, and in many ways they have, because they know either these Supreme courts get it.
• 1:53:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, they know they're going to overrule it eventually, so they just treat it, but they but they have to treat the court with as much respect as possible because you have institutionalists like Roberts and Barrett, who could push back on Trump if he, if he, two, flagrantly ignores lower courts.
• 1:53:27
  [UNKNOWN]: In terms of ignoring the Supreme Court, I just, the political fallout can be pretty rough there.
• 1:53:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, it's not the 19th century anymore.
• 1:53:36
  [UNKNOWN]: John got it.
• 1:53:38
  [UNKNOWN]: He can't insert themselves in the pictures.
• 1:53:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I doubt it.
• 1:53:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think there's going to be a lot that they can do.
• 1:53:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Cynthia, thanks for announcing a rest of demon crats other video just all you liked that video yesterday.
• 1:53:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, yeah, there's a lot.
• 1:53:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, there's a lot.
• 1:53:55
  [UNKNOWN]: The story writes itself, it's incredible.
• 1:53:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, if you guys haven't seen that, I think it was my first video yesterday morning.
• 1:54:02
  [UNKNOWN]: On just all of these Democrats all across the country they're getting arrested and died and convicted, it's pretty impressive.
• 1:54:08
  [UNKNOWN]: It's very, very impressive list.
• 1:54:13
  [UNKNOWN]: MDE, we meet culture, I've been thinking of the dilemma that left has to address, we culture.
• 1:54:20
  [UNKNOWN]: They are horribly, they are horrible at building societies.
• 1:54:23
  [UNKNOWN]: They're too narcissists, yeah, it's a good point.
• 1:54:25
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a very, very good point.
• 1:54:28
  [UNKNOWN]: They're too narcissistic, yeah.
• 1:54:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, it's a very odd thing because they're champions of collective identity.
• 1:54:41
  [UNKNOWN]: But in many respects, it seems to me, it's a war against national identity, and for whatever reason, the full collective, and it's funny.
• 1:54:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I've heard it put this way that at one point,
• 1:55:01
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, the narcissistic liberal rebels at everything, even against their own individualism.
• 1:55:06
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a very interesting thing.
• 1:55:08
  [UNKNOWN]: They rebel against everything, even against their own individualism.
• 1:55:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Hence why they embrace collectivism.
• 1:55:14
  [UNKNOWN]: So the collectivism can be itself an expression of their own narcissistic rebellion against the world.
• 1:55:21
  [UNKNOWN]: So, but no, I mean, the left hasn't built.
• 1:55:24
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, that's not true.
• 1:55:25
  [UNKNOWN]: The left did build the post-war consensus in a sense.
• 1:55:31
  [UNKNOWN]: You could call it the left.
• 1:55:33
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if you could say they built it as much as they took it over, and of course as a result it fell.
• 1:55:40
  [UNKNOWN]: But no, everything woke collapses precisely because the left has just embraced absurdity and when you embrace absurdity, reality will always win.
• 1:55:49
  [UNKNOWN]: There's no way around it.
• 1:55:54
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, I hear the Supreme Court accepted a case that could end property tax based around fraud.
• 1:56:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Interesting.
• 1:56:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I haven't heard anything about it.
• 1:56:07
  [UNKNOWN]: So that would be very, very interesting.
• 1:56:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, I, I don't know if they would.
• 1:56:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I don't know.
• 1:56:15
  [UNKNOWN]: I could have comment one way or the other.
• 1:56:16
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's very, it's very interesting.
• 1:56:23
  [UNKNOWN]: It may be understood under the federalist structure of our nation.
• 1:56:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So in other words, it's property taxes in issue of states.
• 1:56:37
  [UNKNOWN]: If you don't like it, move to Florida.
• 1:56:38
  [UNKNOWN]: If you love it, move to where I grew up in Connecticut or Massachusetts or New Jersey.
• 1:56:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I'll pack his offering collectivism.
• 1:56:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I come in a lot.
• 1:56:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, great alert.
• 1:57:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Professor, I didn't see Jesse Waters interview a comrade.
• 1:57:03
  [UNKNOWN]: El Said, but did Jesse tell him to get ready to be accused of sexual deviancy.
• 1:57:09
  [UNKNOWN]: You'll probably tell Mike Rogers to be on the lookout too.
• 1:57:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I know.
• 1:57:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I didn't watch, so I just watched clips of it.
• 1:57:18
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, anyone who tells you that castration and circumcision of the same is, and then claims to be an M.D.
• 1:57:27
  [UNKNOWN]: should be in a padded room.
• 1:57:29
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, that's like a haircut and decapitation.
• 1:57:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I think that's what the Babylon Bay talked about.
• 1:57:35
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, that guy's a nut.
• 1:57:37
  [UNKNOWN]: And he's an absolute nut.
• 1:57:39
  [UNKNOWN]: And, you know, it's funny, because he knows the woke support.
• 1:57:44
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if he's woke, this is the interesting thing.
• 1:57:47
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if the Islamic Socialists are woke, but they know they need the woke to win.
• 1:57:53
  [UNKNOWN]: But it's interesting because the,
• 1:57:57
  [UNKNOWN]: the city council in Hamtramic, Michigan, all Muslim city councils right outside of Deerborn.
• 1:58:06
  [UNKNOWN]: One of the first orders of business was to ban the pride flag.
• 1:58:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's very interesting to see if he's just using wokeness to gain power.
• 1:58:16
  [UNKNOWN]: But I mean, again, the guy is just the guy made
• 1:58:25
  [UNKNOWN]: He phobed up.
• 1:58:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Hey Doc, long time late to the meeting.
• 1:58:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Why have I missed on what have I missed us or us?
• 1:58:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Dude, by the way, China, the lose population of France.
• 1:58:36
  [UNKNOWN]: I know over the eight, that's right.
• 1:58:38
  [UNKNOWN]: So eight to 10 years.
• 1:58:39
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's, I heard, 50 million something I can do that.
• 1:58:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, piece of favada, you've got to go and, um,
• 1:58:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, watch it again, but bottom line, treasury department and the IRS are teaming up to remove his 501c3 tax status and that means more or less getting whatever remaining money he had after USAID got it.
• 1:59:02
  [UNKNOWN]: movieurotic supporters, not anti-JD, they skeptical because Tucker supporters, not anti-JD, our skeptical because of, people who are skeptical of JD are skeptical because of his relation to Tucker.
• 1:59:24
  [UNKNOWN]: for sure, but they tend to be, people care about his relationship to Tucker, generally speaking, any more than they care about, Trump's relationship to Tucker.
• 1:59:34
  [UNKNOWN]: You only care about it if Tucker is saying something that is radically offending you, and this it tends to be his clearly anti-Israel, very, very, very intently anti-Israel.
• 1:59:46
  [UNKNOWN]: stance.
• 1:59:49
  [UNKNOWN]: So the anti Israel crowd, I'm sorry, the pro Israel crowd is trying to throw JD in with that and get Marco and instead, they just see him as safer.
• 1:59:59
  [UNKNOWN]: But they're not going to have any influence whatsoever on anything.
• 2:00:02
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the thing, I just I kind of shake my head at it.
• 2:00:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Just again, I think it's a kind of virtualism.
• 2:00:09
  [UNKNOWN]: uh... some russia uh... samrash a question the reason that and even not causing problems right now is because of uh... is it don't i think you meant doge yeah no i think you're right absolutely they got you think that that they're also uh... i believe they're officially terrorist organization we've had our first uh... antifa thugs convicted in taxes as terrorists so they're being prison for a long-long time
• 2:00:36
  [UNKNOWN]: So, yeah.
• 2:00:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Now that's what you do.
• 2:00:38
  [UNKNOWN]: You play hardball, you use the power, the political power that you've been given to destroy your political enemies.
• 2:00:44
  [UNKNOWN]: It's what you got to do.
• 2:00:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And then and stay in power as long as you can by rewarding your friends.
• 2:00:52
  [UNKNOWN]: To Boe, born and raised in Massachusetts, Iran still had capability.
• 2:00:57
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what Israel was talking about.
• 2:00:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Not that you didn't do what we wanted you to do.
• 2:01:02
  [UNKNOWN]: He just wasn't finished period and it turns out they were right.
• 2:01:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Now it doesn't turn out any no, no.
• 2:01:07
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't see this as two, but this is where I get, I get a little frustrated with you.
• 2:01:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Ocent folk, Ocent, or open source international folk, you think you have better intelligence than the president.
• 2:01:24
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't, this isn't, let me give you sort of a virtual slap here.
• 2:01:29
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't have better intelligence than the president.
• 2:01:33
  [UNKNOWN]: you don't.
• 2:01:34
  [UNKNOWN]: He knows what's going on.
• 2:01:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And then he, oh, but he said he's telling you what he thinks he is saying what he wants Iran to hear.
• 2:01:48
  [UNKNOWN]: He's not telling you the truth.
• 2:01:50
  [UNKNOWN]: He's telling, this is politics, man.
• 2:01:53
  [UNKNOWN]: This is politics.
• 2:01:54
  [UNKNOWN]: He's telling you what you, you don't actually think he was sitting there.
• 2:01:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Do you actually, do you actually think he's like, okay, they want to be my best friend now.
• 2:02:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh yeah, we, you know,
• 2:02:07
  [UNKNOWN]: You should do my was it runs throughout the capability that's what yeah.
• 2:02:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, no, they don't have the capability I'm at they told me Iran told me they don't have the capabilities anymore now we can be friends Do you on it?
• 2:02:20
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, I'm not trying to be a jerk, but dude dude
• 2:02:26
  [UNKNOWN]: There is a crowd out there that believes they have better intelligence and better decision-making skills than the president of the United States.
• 2:02:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Even with Biden, I had to watch out with this.
• 2:02:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Even with Biden, with the disastrous pullout in Afghanistan, it was like, okay, what the hell just happened there?
• 2:02:48
  [UNKNOWN]: And then I had to look and I looked at international news and so I had to try to piece together a pattern.
• 2:02:53
  [UNKNOWN]: That's all right.
• 2:02:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Here's what I think actually happened.
• 2:02:56
  [UNKNOWN]: But what the crowd you're trying to defend does is they actually pretend they pretend they have better.
• 2:03:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Intel than the president does and then they pretend that the president is saying things like he's a junior higher like oh yeah, no, but Timmy told me were were good, but then Timmy turned around and betrayed me.
• 2:03:18
  [UNKNOWN]: So now I have to smack Timmy around again.
• 2:03:21
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the that's the
• 2:03:24
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the web of rhetoric that surrounds what's actually going on right now.
• 2:03:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think we were very clear in our analysis of what Trump was doing.
• 2:03:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you go back to my videos, what was Trump doing?
• 2:03:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Two things, he was rearming and he was giving the oil markets a little pause and a little relief.
• 2:03:47
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what he was doing.
• 2:03:54
  [UNKNOWN]: energy markets, and possibly open up a little opportunity for Iran and the more amicable if there is such a thing, negotiators within Iran to come on in and play ball to finally get a Venezuela like situation.
• 2:04:15
  [UNKNOWN]: It didn't work and no problem.
• 2:04:16
  [UNKNOWN]: We go home.
• 2:04:19
  [UNKNOWN]: But seriously, did we pack up our military and say, oh, we're done now, and did we go a no, of course not.
• 2:04:25
  [UNKNOWN]: We're still there stronger than ever.
• 2:04:28
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's it.
• 2:04:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't, don't, yeah, stop, stop, stop, stop pretending you just know more because you don't.
• 2:04:35
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's just, it's very frustrating.
• 2:04:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Xerovon, thank you, Doc.
• 2:04:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I've learned a lot from you.
• 2:04:43
  [UNKNOWN]: What's the word for political evil?
• 2:04:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Ponyarology.
• 2:04:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Ponyarology.
• 2:04:47
  [UNKNOWN]: What's the study of evil?
• 2:04:49
  [UNKNOWN]: So Ponyarology is the Greek word for evil.
• 2:04:56
  [UNKNOWN]: And then Ponyarology is the study of political evil, from Andre Lovicowski.
• 2:05:05
  [UNKNOWN]: And with that gang, love you.
• 2:05:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Have a wonderful weekend.
• 2:05:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember I am your back porch professor of any breaking news happens.
• 2:05:11
  [UNKNOWN]: I will see you over the weekend.
• 2:05:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Stay on this channel all weekend.
• 2:05:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Love you guys.
• 2:05:16
  [UNKNOWN]: God bless.
• 2:05:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of The Turley Talks Podcast.
• 2:05:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
• 2:05:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
• 2:05:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.