Latest / Yaron Brook Show / MN Fraud; Disability; Russia; Israel; Bannon; Yarvin; Piker; Opera; Birth Rates : Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

MN Fraud; Disability; Russia; Israel; Bannon; Yarvin; Piker; Opera; Birth Rates : Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: A lot of them, fundamental principles of dat cells and
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: an individual loss. M this is the show. Oh right,
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: everybody walk up there on book show on this Wednesday,
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: December third. Everybody's having a great week, and uh, Christmas
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: just inches forward. Yeah. As as I've said many times,
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: this is a great time of year, time of year
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: to plan for the future, think about where we're heading,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: and and uh yeah and kind of, uh relax a
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: little bit, you know, just just relax a little bit,
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: but not a heal on the own book show. We
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: don't relax. We do a show every single day. Uh
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: and uh we're keeping at it all right. Uh Thomas,
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: I see says I saw opera and had to show up.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Probably not what you thought, right, it's the topic. Just
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: I don't want to waste your time. But it's about
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: the disruption of the opera in New York last week
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: or whenever it was where they they stormed onto the
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: stage of Common as Common was being performed. So anyway,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: I was going to talk about that, right, Uh so, no,
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: no deep thoughts about Upper CoA opera politicize politicizing opera.
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: All right, Let's start with you know, yesterday Donald Trump,
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: President Trump I went on this rant, I mean rants
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: about Somali's how horrible they are, horrible the place they
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: come from, how they cannot assimilate to the United States,
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: how we would like to get rid of all of them,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: and they don't belong here, and they need to go.
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: And indeed, today we got new immigration regulations that basically
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: bands Somalis from coming to the country, kind of an
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: expansion of the of what was already in place in
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: terms of Muslims. There's thirteen additional countries that have now
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: been added to the list of people we do not
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: walk come here because they cannot assimilate and they're bad
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: for the country, and they might be terrorists, and they
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: might be bad people and all of that. I still
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: don't see Saudi Arabia on that list, Okata, and I
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: don't ever expect to see that list. Or Syria. Many
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: Syrians are causing significant problems in Europe, but Syria and
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: the Trump administration on best terms right now, they are very,
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: very very friendly. Anyway, the whole Somali thing has come
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: out about because of a story in the City Journal
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: that was published by Chris Ruffo. It's, you know, basically
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: laying out this case that where Somali Americans in large
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: numbers have been have committed massive fraud in the state
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: of Minnesota in Minneapolis. Minneapolis is the city that has
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: attracted Somalis. I mean, because it's so similar to Somalia.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: Weather's almost the same. I'm kidding. I mean, God, they
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: will go for the desert to Minnesota. That has to
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: be traumatic, just that very fact, so cold there. But
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: this case massive fraud in Minnesota, a lot of Somalis
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: part of this part of this case. There are eighty
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: thousand Somalis in Minnesota and they now were and a
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: significant kind of voting block. Of course, we have a
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: Somali Member of Congress from Minnesota representing them. But it's
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: a you know, it's a it's a significant enough portion
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: of the Minneapolis population that they are a significant voting block.
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: And and uh, this plays into the story anyway. Chris
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: Ruffo put out the story long article whose conclusion is basically,
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: it looks so always can't assimilate, uh, and we need
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: to really think about whether they should be here and
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: and kind of the standard kind of right wing argument
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: and you know who'se Poufle compares them to the Norwegians,
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: and the Norwegians assimilated and they brought West. You know,
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: Western values and Somli values are so different, it's really
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: not surprising that they committed all this fraud. So let's
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: go through the fraud case a little bit, because I
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: think it's an illustri of a number of different things. So,
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: you know, for prosecutors, now, I've charged dozens of people
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: with defrauding Minnesota social programs. So these are all various
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: types of welfare programs since twenty twenty, twenty twenty. What
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: happened in twenty twenty, Ah, yes, COVID, So since COVID,
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: since all those new social programs will created around COVID,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: and slush funds were created and huge amounts of money
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: were distributed. Many of the people that have been prosecuted
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: are being prosecuted or have been charged off from the
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Somali American community in Minneapolis. So you know, we're talking
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: about programs like Feeding Up Future Right, which was founded
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen to sponsored daycares and after school programs
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: to enroll in the federal child nutrition program. It received
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: three point four million dollars in federal funding in its
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: first year, However, during the pandemic, this program went suddenly
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: to two hundred million dollars of funding in twenty twenty one.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: Since then, more than seventy seven zero defendants have been charged.
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: We're stealing over two hundred and fifty million dollars in
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: nutrition funds now to the prosecutors, generally, to the government's credit.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: Did I just say that, to the government's credit. I mean,
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: they've caught this pretty quickly, right, So this farud happened
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: twenty one, twenty two to twenty three, and you know
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: this this they saw this jump to two hundred million,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: and they investigated and the they're prosecuting. So again to
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: the government's credit. And this will be the last time
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: we give the government of any credit on this issue.
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: At least they've acted what seems to be fairly quickly
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: on this fraud case. It's not something that's been happening
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: for decades and so on, so they've acted on it.
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: Two hundred and fifty million from one program was stolen.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: That's just unbelievable that anybody could think they could get
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: away with it. They obviously haven't got away with it.
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: Another program, the Minnesota Medicaid Medicaid Housing Stabilization Services Program
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: GOD Medicaid Housing Stabilization Services Program of the State of Minnesota,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: which was launched in twenty twenty to help seniors addicts
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: and disabled and they're mentally ill secure housing, was predicted
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: a customer win six million dollars annually. Instead, payouts reached
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: twenty one million in twenty twenty one rose one hundred
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: and four million in twenty twenty four. There's a red
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: flag for you. Federal prosecutors have been investigating the program
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: and two suspects have pled guilty to fraud as of November.
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: On top of that, the state's Early Intensive Development and
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: Behavior Intervention ARTISM program GOD that's a long, that's a mouthful.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: Early Intervention Development and Behavioral Program ARTISM program for potent
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: is also on the investigation for potential fraud. In September,
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: the US Attorney announced its first charges as part of this, one,
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: accusing a defendant of filing false support therapy services and
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: defrauding the program of about fourteen million dollars. So the
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: big fraud was committed on the nutrition program, then on
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: the on the housing program, and then on the autism program. Yeah,
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: and one of them, uh, one of the claims that
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: Rufo makes in uh. I guess Rufo and he had
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: a co author anyway, I can't find the cuthor name.
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: One of the claims Rufo makes in the City Journal
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: article is that a lot of this money, a lot
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: of this money found its way back to Somalia and
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: was actually used to fund the the slammest terrorist group,
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: Al Schabab, which is affiliated with ISIS and with al
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: Qaeda and so on. But just so clear, as far
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: as anybody can tell, so far, no proof, no will
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: evidence was presented except some speculation by some other people
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: investigating this. We still don't know where all the money
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: actually actually went anyway. As a consequence of this, as
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: we said, Trump yesterday announced the termination of temporary legal
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: protections for Somali immigrants living in Minnesota and denial of
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: new immigrants from Somalia into the country and is generally
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: you know, denigrated immigrants from Somalia and made some pretty
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: awful comments about them. Now you know, the fraud has happened.
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: There's no doubt this has happened, and seventy eight people
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: have been I think seventy eight people have been what
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: do you call it to charge? So far it seems
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: pretty clear. There's little evidence regarding Elsehra Bob and nobody,
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: none of the charges associated with the funding of terrorism,
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: So the government doesn't feel like it can charge anybody
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: on the terrorism on the funding of terrorism, at least
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: charge from what we can tell. But the thought is real.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: It happened. There's no I guess there really is no question.
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: There doesn't seem to be any question about that. The
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: fact that Somali's constitute a vast majority of the people accused,
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: there is no question about that. The will discussion debate
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: that is going on is what can we learn from this?
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: And look, one of the things that's also fairly clear
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: from this is in spite of the fact that the
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: government has been pretty quick to act on this, the
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: government did hesitate and did act slowly, slower than I
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: guess some people would like, and slower than what people
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: were pointing out that something weird was going on and
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: the government acted slowly, and and there's plenty of reasons
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: to believe, plenty of reasons to believe that the act.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: The government acted slowly because they didn't want to alienate
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: the Somali community for political reasons. They acted slowly because
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: they didn't want to be accused of racism. Now, this
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: to me is the most interesting aspect of the whole
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: case and the worst aspect of the whole case. I mean,
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: other than people commaning fraught is awful, But the worst
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: aspect of this, in my view, is this, uh, you know,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: groomer gang phenomena that we know from the UK were like,
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: everybody knew that there were there were grooming gangs. Everybody
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: knew that young British girls were being raped and being
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: groomed and being used by these primari Pakistani groups of men,
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: and the police refuse to act out of fear, refuse
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: to act to protect little girls out of fear of
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: being accused of racism. I mean, this is exactly the
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: opposite of the behavior that is demanded, and it's the
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: opposite of what is needed in order to get these
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: people to have any chance of assimilation. The number one
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: thing you must do with immigrants, particularly immigrants who come
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: from a different culture, a culture where they can get
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: away with stuff, is to make clear to them unequivocally
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: that the rule of law will apply to them. That
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: they are now in a new culture, in a new place,
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: where there are new rules a place where we do
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: not We do not tolerate corruption, We certainly do not
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: tolerate rape. We certainly do not tolerate abusing little goals,
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: we being the British, or we being the government of Minneapol, Minnesota.
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: I mean, this needs to be clamped down. It needs
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: to be clamped down quickly and aggressively. It's the only
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: hope for the better people, the better Somalis. They need
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: to learn as quickly as possible what the standards are
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: in this country, what expectations are in this country. So
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: the idea that people turn the blind eye to this
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: because they don't want to be called racist, because these
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: are black, they don't want to be called you know,
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: they don't want offend a voting group as if you
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: know that is more important than law and order. It's
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: just absurd. And of course there was no one voting group,
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: of one voting block among Somali's they they you know,
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: we saw that in the mayoral race in Minneapolis. One
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: block of Somalis voted for the current mayor, another one
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: voted for the Somali who was running against him. They
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: didn't vote as one block. Of course, even then they
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: were they were ridiculed for being tribal because they split
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: into two blocks. If they'd all voted as one block,
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: they would have been ridiculed for voting as one block.
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: But they voted in two blocks, so they were really cool.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: You can't win, right, But they need to be they
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: need to be unequivocally to be clear to them that
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: they will not get away with this, and that the
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: United States does not will not treat them differently, will
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: not treat them better because they're immigrants, because they're blacks,
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: or because of any other reason. So I think that's,
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: you know, one of the one of the major you
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: know thing here. And you know, by some instuments, more
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: than a billion dollars of taxpayer money was stolen over
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: the past five years, and note where were stolen from
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: and these programs. To me, one of the other things
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: that jumps out is when you institute crazy, never ending,
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: no limits welfare programs, you're gonna get foed. Why didn't
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: somebody say stop when this one program went from three
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: million to two hundred million, It's like, WHOA, we don't
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: have that kind of money. But this is the thing
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: with government. They just write checks, write checks, there's no consequences.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: Write checks, and then a few years later they discovered
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: some of those checks were fraudulent. Oh big deal. I mean, indeed,
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: much of the money that went out during COVID, you know,
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: by some instruments, well over fifty billion dollars fifty billion
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: with a B dollars were fraudulent. You know, people make
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: claims that they didn't just they weren't there. But they're
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: never going to be caught. Most of them will never
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: be caught. And of course the whole premise of welfare
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: is fraudulent. You deserve stuff because you need it. Other
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: people's money must be taking away from them because you
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: claim to need it. What does need even mean? Go
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: to work, make a living and you'll need is not
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: them all claim? Certainly not an excuse to use violence
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: or force against somebody else. I mean, in my view,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: the real you know, what this really reveals is the
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: absurd proliferation of warfare programs. The fact that these warfare
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: programs are blank checks where they can start a three
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: million and go to two hundred million within one year
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: and nobody seems to care. This is a direct consequence
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: of the welfare state. The existence of the welfare, say,
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: the size of the wealth of state. Indeed, the Welfes
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: state is probably the number one barrier to assimilation. The
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: number one way in which people assimilate in this country
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: into American society is by working, is by getting a job,
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: by speaking the language, by interacting with other people who
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: are not like them. That's what assimilation looks like. Welfare
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: of all that's different shapes and kinds and so on.
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: Prevents them from getting a job, disincentivize them going to
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: get a job, and ifore, disincentivizes them from integrating, from assimilating.
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: So two things. One stop stop being afraid of image
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: or people of color. Do your job, police, or whoever's
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: responsible catching these fraudsters, do your job. Jason Riley, writing
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: in the Wall Street Journal, Rights, the massive fraud was
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: an open secret. Mary Garland, who served as US Attorney
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: General under Joe Biden, called it the largest pandemic relief
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: hustle in the nation. Democratic state officials also suspected wrongdoing,
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: but didn't want to upset an important voting block or
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: to be accused of racism. That's the scandal right there.
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: Here's also a Jason Riley Rights, which I think is
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: very good. It's not so true that Somali's hardly the
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: first migrant group to arrive in America with unwelcome cultural baggage.
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: In the early nineteen hundreds, crime was so prevalent in
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: New York's Jewish and Italian neighborhoods that a specialized detective
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: force was established. These weren't merely negative perceptions or ugly stereotypes. Unfortunately,
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: these groups were willing to face reality. Yeah, once the
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: police comes in and forces them to face reality, cultures
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: can adapt, but they will require confronting the problem rather
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: than ignoring it or pretending that anyone who speaks out
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: in acting is acting in bad faith. Now, of course,
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: big reason why politicians are so afraid of confronting the
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: Somali community is because there are people within the Somali
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: community that will accuse them of racism no matter what
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: they do. A good example of this as Representative elan Omar,
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: who is not acknowledged the evil of this fraud case,
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: is constantly talking about how Somalis being discriminated against and
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: how there's racism and how they're the victim. And she
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: is a huge support of all this proliferation of welfare
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: programs that the Somali community benefits from she arguably is
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: not a proponent of assimilation. And and this is the
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: thing about these groups, They are often the victims of
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: their own leadership, of a leadership that sustain itself as
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: a leadership by making sure that community does not assimilate.
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: Like how you the leader of the Somali community. When
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: the community assimilates and integrates and maybe breaks apart, maybe
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: lives in all kinds of different places, doesn't stick together
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: as a union in one city, that you lose your
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: political power, You lose your political base. People like ilhan
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: Oma ideologically don't want the Somalis to assimilate, and politically
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: from a power perspective, do not want the Somalis to assimilate.
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: So to the extent that there's no assimilation, it's people
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: like her the intellectual political leadership of these communities. And
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: the only way to change that is by persecuting the
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: guilty and by demanding assimilation. And the best way to
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: do that. Best way to do that is cut them
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: off of welfare, not cut them off in wealth, because
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: there's Somalis. Cut everybody off of welfare, you know, make
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: them go get a job, make them ask a charity
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: if they want, they if they need help, and the
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: charities then can can can set conditions on the charity.
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: Governor Waltz is in big trouble over this because he's
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: kind of the guy who turned the blind eye for
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: political reasons and very politically is very vulnerable. Uh. By
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: the way, some of these warfare programs, like they Medicaid,
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: Housing Stabilization Service is actually being scrapped. Now. If it's
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: being scrapped, now, was it ever needed? I mean, my
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: guess is Minnesota probably has I don't know, one hundred
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: different warfare programs. I don't know, I have no idea.
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: So you got to you gotta tackle root causes, and
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: the root causes a lack of assimilation within this community,
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: and and and letting them get away, letting him get
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: away with murder. By the way, part of the problem
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: is that, of course Minneapolis was where the George Floyd
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: episode happened, where he was killed, where the riots began.
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: You know, it's it's it's a it's a city and
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: a state that is super sensitive to the accusations of racism.
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: But that's part of the problem. You need to stop.
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: And it's a state just from a perspective of crime
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: that has seen the number of police go down significantly
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: since George Floyd, instead of doing the opposite, which is
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: increasing police at the same time. Look, in spite of
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: all the efforts of Somali leadership and political leadership and
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: welfare state and everything else not to allow the Somalis
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: to assimilate, they are slowly doing it anyway. Poverty rates
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: are down, workforce participation is up, home ownership rates up
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: over the last twenty years. It's still a long way
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: to go, and it's been too slow because for the
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: reasons I mentioned. But you know, it's not a lost case.
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: There's no reason for it to be a lost case.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: You know, if you if you are born Somali, let's
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: say you're bone Somali in the United States now second generation,
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: there's no gene that prevents you from from from uh
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: embracing Western civilization. There's no gene that forces you to uh,
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: you know, stay a part of Somali culture. So Mali
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: culture is awful. Samaria is a horrible place. Like you know,
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: sometimes I agree with Trump on a sentence here, sentence there.
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: It's rare, but sometimes and he's right. Somalia is a shithole.
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: It's a horrible country. It's a country, you know, in anarchy,
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: in a state of anarchy for years. Again, a good
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: example of what anarchy looks like that you can send
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: all your libertarian friends to they should all move there.
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: But it's not genetic. It's cultural. In other words, it's
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: completely accessible to human free will. In other words, people
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: can adopt a different culture, people can walk away from
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: their culture, people can assimilate, people can change. The Italians
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: and the Jews certainly did. They came from very different
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: cultures when they moved to the US in the early
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: nineteenth century. They were not civilized in the American sense,
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: in the Western European sense, they were not. They were
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: the poor, They were the drag of Europe. The Jews
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: came from Eastern Europe, and they were you know, they
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: were from little statos, from little villages in Eastern Europe.
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: They had no sense of the city, they had no
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: sense of kind of the rules of law that America had.
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: They had to lun and they larned. They did well.
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: That's true of every group of immigrants that comes to
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: this country. They have to run. We don't help them
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: learn by handing them cash. We don't help them learn
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: by looking the other way when they commit offenses. When
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: they commit offenses, it's an opportunity to teach them what
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: our expectations really are. And this is true here, this
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: is too here in you know, in the United States,
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: and it is true in Europe. You know, even Muslims
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: are not beyond assimilation. They can will assimilate if they're
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: expected to and if the police don't look the other
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: way when they commit crimes. So I'm glad you know
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: the the whoever is responsible within the state of Minnesota
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: for going after them is going after them. I just
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: saw the number eighty something people have now been charged.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: My guess is that will be well of one hundred
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: by the time they ended. This is an ongoing investigation.
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: It's only going to get big up. And this is good.
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: And if they're Somalis, there's Somalies. If they're not Somalis,
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: are not some Allis, you don't prosecute them all. Don't
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: take into account race, don't think you can to account
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: country of origin, immigration status. Send him to US as
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: as big of a sentences as they deserve, as they deserve,
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: all right, So yeah, we'll keep an eye on what
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: happens in some in Minnesota. In Minneapolis primarily because the
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: reality is that Donald Trump's going to keep us in
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: the headlines because you know, he went on this, you know,
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: basically racist. Uh diet trapped the other day, well yesterday
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: in the I think it was during the cabinet meeting.
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: And uh, that'll keep it in the news for a while.
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: So we'll update you if there's news coming out about that.
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: Uh let's see, all right, mhmm, what are they what
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: is going on here? Seems to be the fighting, some
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: fighting going on in my on my thing. I'm not
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: sure what it is, all right, I'm gonnagno it. Let's see,
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: all right, came across this story, the story that in
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: the Atlantic magazine. Uh, that is pretty wild. It's really,
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: you know, a a pretty insane uh a story. So
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: you know, American universities have recognized the fact. I guess
• 31:59
  Speaker 1: that's some students have a hard time uh, you know,
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: concentrating or have a different kind of uh you know,
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: mental disabilities that make it difficult for them to do
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: exams and things like that. I think when I was
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: a professor, this is back in the nineties, we had
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: to give them a little extra time, and there was usually,
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: I don't know, one every other class there would be
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: one student who came in and and and and you
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: would have to give them an extra half hour or
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: give them more time for them to complete the exam,
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: and things like that. This is this is you know,
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: the number of students now has just gone through the roof.
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: I'm reading from the story. Professors now struggle to accommodate
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: the many students with an official disability designation, which may
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: entitle them to extra time, an distraction fee, environment, or
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: the use of otherwise prohibited technology. This is intake exam.
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: The University of Michigan has two centers where students with
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: disabilities can take exams, but they frequently fill to capacity,
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: leaving professors scrambling to find more desks and proctors. Many
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: students now take their exams in the school's load distraction
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: testing outposts that they have become more distracting than the
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: main classrooms because they're most students. They Accommodation and higher
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: education were supposed to help disabled Americans enjoy the same
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: opportunities as everyone else. Equal opportunity. It always starts with
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: that right. No one should be kept from taking a class,
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: for example, because they are physically unable to enter the
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: building where it's taught right. Over the past decade and
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: a half, however, to share of students at selective universities
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: who qualify for accommodations of extra time on tests has
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: grown at a breath taking place. At the University of Chicago,
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: the numbers more than tripled over the past eight years.
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: At UC Berkeley, it has nearly quadrupled over the past
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: fifteen years. Now, if that's going from one to four,
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: that wouldn't be a big deal. But here's some numbers
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: at Brown and Harvard. At Brown and Harvard, more than
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: twenty percent of undergraduates are registered as disabled. Harvard University
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: in Bromp, two of the top universities in the country,
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: twenty percent of disabled. At Amherst, another top university, more
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: than thirty percent of disabled, And at Stanford University in California,
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: nearly forty percent of the students are categorized as disabled.
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: Soon some universities is going to have more disabled students
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: than quote normal students. You know what's happened as students
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: as their parents figured out that claiming disability gives you
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: extended time on exams, housing, accommodations, all kinds of other benefits.
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: The rates of disabilities at colleges, especially at elite colleges, exploded.
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: Now this is not really that surprising people, particularly, you know,
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: particularly people who live a life in which maybe there's
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: some unthinking going on, disintegration going on, people responding sentives.
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: If you give huge advantages to disabilities, people will become this.
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: If you give huge advantages, I don't know, like free
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: homes to homeless people, people become homeless. I mean, we
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: used to stigmatized disability, probably you know, in a in
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: an unfair way. But now it's like wooh, it's like, yeah,
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: let's celebrate it, let's give you goodies. I mean to
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: say that at Stanford half the students are cognitively disabled,
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: you have to then question how they got into Stanford.
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: If cognitive disability means anything, how did they get into
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: standards into Stanford. Here's again a section from this article.
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: The surge itself is undeniable. Soon in some schools may
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: have more students receiving accommodations than not, a scenario that
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: would have seemed absurd just a decade ago. Already, as
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: we said at one law school, forty five percent of
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: students receive academic accommodation. Paul Graham Fisher, Stanford Stanford professor
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: who served as co chair of the university's Disability Task Force,
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: told me I have had conversations with people in Stanford
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: administration that they've talked about at what point can we
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: say no when it hits fifty percent or sixty percent,
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: or maybe all of the students should be disabled. Continuing
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: for the article, at what point do you just say
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: we can't do this? This year, thirty eight percent of
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: Stanford undergraduates are registered as having disability. In the fall quarter,
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: twenty four percent of undergraduates we're receiving academic a housing accommodation.
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: I mean, talk about a snowflake generation. I mean there's
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: even an example here of a mother who is attending
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: class with her son because he has some disability that
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: makes it necessary food to sitting class during lectures. And
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: the problem is she like really participates, she doesn't sit quietly, right, So,
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: I mean this is all the consequence of a law
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: passed in nineteen ninety, the Americans with Disabilities Act, which
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: was meant to make life fairer for people with woral
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: disabilities like worlchairs, And originally it was interpreted that way,
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: and they built ramps and everything. And it's a bad
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: law because it's courserve. It forced businesses to have to
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: invest in all kinds of stuff that for a lot
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: of many of them wasn't necessary. That's why you have
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: so many disability parking slots outside of buildings that don't
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: have enough parking, but there's lots of disability parking spots.
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: The law acquired public and private institutions to provide reasonable
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: accommodation to individuals of physical and mental impairment that that
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: substantially limits one or more major life activities. And in
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: the beginning it was very slow. Supreme Court kind of
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: narrowed the scope of the law. Even in the early
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: two thousands, only a handful of of students had disabilities.
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: This is what I remember in the nineties. Then in
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, Congress amended the Americans with Disabilities Act.
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: Notice how all these things have originate with bad, bad legislation,
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: Bad bad Congress, bad bad Congress. They mented AD eight
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: to restore the law's original intent. The government broadened the
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: definition of disability, effectively expend expanding the number of people
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: the law covered. It also included a list of major
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: life activities that could be disrupted by disability, for example, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, God,
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: I'm constantly constantly disrupted in my thinking. H I should
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: follow with disabilities and they clarified that individuals were protected
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: under the ADA even if their impairment didn't severely restrict
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: their daily life. Well, there you go. Now it's a
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: legal issue if the student applies and is not accepted
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: because their disability, or if he is accepted and his
• 40:41
  Speaker 1: disability is not accommodated for he sues the university under
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: the ADA. In response to two thousand and eight Amendment,
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: the Association are on Higher Education and Disabilities, an organized
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: you know, you know release guidance urging universities to give
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: great await to students own accounts of how they disability
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: affected them, rather than relying on God forbid solely a
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: medical diagnosis. So now you don't even have to show
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: a doctor slip to say, yeah, I can't do an
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: exam unless I have an extra two hours. I need
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: complete quiet. I need a massuits to massage me every
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: thirty minutes so that I can stay loose for the exam,
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: otherwise it triggers my anxiety and I just can't do
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: the exam. Here's what the Association for I Education and Disability.
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: This association said, quote require meing extensive medical and scientifical
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: evidence perpetuates a deviance model of disability. I'm sorry, but
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: this is like, this is where war bs comes from.
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: You know, it's all about the emotions of the person.
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: It's all about your subjective perceptions. Requiring extensive medical and
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: scientific ovenuet perpetuates a deviance model of disability, undervalues the
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: individual's history and experience with disability, and it's inappropriate and
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: burdensome under the revised statute and regulations. So you have
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: to take an account the way they feel, not the
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: objective evidence about their disability, but the way they feel,
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: and it perpetrates a deviance. Well, I mean, the different
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: they're devating from norm disability is different. It's a disability.
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: This I'm surprised they're even willing to use that word, right,
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: it's a very dissing word. I mean, this is the
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: insanity of of of kind of these leftist ide But
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: of course, I'm sure the ADA was passed with the
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: full support of Republicans. This is pure altruism. How can
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: we not take care of people with disabilities and how
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: do we not give them extra credit? And it's not
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: good that to stream code narrow the focus. We need
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: to make it as broad as possible. I mean, this
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: is basically part of the whole campaign over the last
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: twenty years to elevate emotions above all else, above science
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: about medical You know how you feel, that's what's important.
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: If you feel like you need extra time on the test,
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: we'll give you extra time in the test. This is
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: the insanity that the Left is brought on this country.
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: And what's happening now is that close to fifty percent
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: of all students that are universities and now disabled based
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: on this model and believe themselves to be disabled and
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: believe that they should get special treatment because disability. Remember intersectionality.
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: If you have a disability, you get more points, you
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: rise up, you get you know you, you get to
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: demand that people give you stuff. It's it's it gives you.
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: It elevates you morally to be disabled. And all you
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: need is to declare it. You don't even need a
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: slip from the doctor anyway. If you're interested in more
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: of this and a total analysis of this. You can
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: find this article. It's called Accommodation Nation. America's colleges have
• 44:36
  Speaker 1: extra time on tests problem by woes. Horowitz Accommodation Nation
• 44:42
  Speaker 1: at the Atlantic magazine. All right, talk a little bit
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: about Russia. So I got it. God, why did I
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: have so many topics on there? This is going to
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: be a long show, guys. So you know we've we've
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: met our first hour goal. But you know, I don't know,
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: it's going to be a long show. Yesterday, Wickcuff and
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: what's his name, Javid Kushna I met with Putin five hours.
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: They had a five hour meeting with Putin and to
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: try to, you know, figure out negotiate a peace deal.
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: You know, basically coming out of the meeting, there's no
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: deal Russian's and not a compromising I told you this yesterday.
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: But what's interesting is it turns out that during this meeting,
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: five hour meeting. The reason it was five hours is that,
• 45:42
  Speaker 1: you know, Putin gave them a long lecture. I don't
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: think it was a pop up presentation, but he brought
• 45:48
  Speaker 1: a file with him, an entire file on the history
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: of Russia. He gave them a long lecture about the
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: seventeen oh nine Battle of Poltava. You know, basically, I
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: don't know what the Battle of Pultava is. It's one
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: of the key battles of the Great Northern War, where
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: Peter the First defeated the Swedish Army of Charles the twelfth,
• 46:15
  Speaker 1: and there's a Corsak army in it. It was a
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: big deal. But this has all to do with the
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: claim Putin's claim that Ukraine is it's part of Russia's,
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: part of the mother. Russia's heart is torn by the
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: idea that Ukraine would be separated from Russia. I mean,
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: in his interview with Tucker Caruson, Putin spent half an
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: hour recounting Ukrainian history, and he keeps coming back to this.
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: This is I mean, this is what he said repeatedly,
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: was the reason for the invasion of Ukraine, to bring
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: it back to where it belongs, to unite the Russian
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: speaking people's, to heal the wounded spirit of the Russian being,
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: or whatever the hell it was, the mystical whatever. Putin
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: has no intention of giving up on his wish to
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: take over Ukraine, and whatever deal he comes to today
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: is an interim deal to take a breather so that
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: he can then start again and go after the rest
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: of Ukraine. Whatever deal Putin is going to agree to
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: is going to be a deal where he is going
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: to demand the weakening of Ukraine to make it possible
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: for him to take it over. And he's and the
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: only reason he can play this game, the only reason
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: he can get away with it, The only reason he
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: has taken seriously at all is because he has an ally,
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: an out and out unequivocal one hundred percent ally in
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump, where the only reason Trump is not just
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: handing Putin everything he wants is because some people around
• 47:59
  Speaker 1: him object to it, Like there's some people in MEGA
• 48:03
  Speaker 1: who are on the side of Ukraine, Rubio for example,
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: but other in his base and most overwhelming majority of
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: Senate Republicans and House Republicans on the side of Ukraine,
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: so he can't quite get away with it, he feels politically,
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: But from every other respect, Trump is complete one hundred
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: percent pro Russia, pro Russia, and.
• 48:41
  Speaker 2: Is h.
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: You know, Putin is playing with these people, He's playing
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: with them. He lectures to them, he tells them stories.
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: I mean, during the meeting with Trump, in Alaska. Putin
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: brought a massive folder of historical documents that he tried
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: to show Trump. I mean, Trump's not interested in history,
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: doesn't care. He really really doesn't care, but Putin cares anyway.
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: So far, no peace steal. Shockingly, no peace steal, and
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: I don't I don't expect one unless Trump really, you know,
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: gets fed up and just demands Ukraine. Ukraine surrenders and
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: finished with it. All right. A few stories relating to Israel.
• 49:38
  Speaker 1: Will just run through these quickly, mostly about the different
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: types of misinformation that is out there. One is a
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: story coming out today that Israel in Lebanon will have
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: first ever civilian meeting, which which is to try to
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: establish ultra at least some kind of peaceful relations between
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: Israel and Lebanon. I'm not sure how this can literally
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: come to be, because Israel's going to demand that this
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: arming of Grisbela. Lebanon is going to say they'd like to,
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: but they can't. Gasbelae is too powerful, they can't do
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: it themselves, and yet they don't want Israel to actually
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: do it. So nothing is actually going to come of this.
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: But that's this part of the you know, a charade
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: that Trump is playing to pretend that he is the
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: great peacemaker and everything's great in the Middle East. Everything
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: could be great in the Middle East if Trump would
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: just let Israel get on with the job. That is
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: what this meeting is meant. This meeting is under the
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: pressure of Trump. What this meeting has been called is
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: because Israel told Trump that it is going to start
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: a massive bombing campaign of Risbella targets Becausezbela has been
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: re arming, rebuilding its infrastructure. The Israel Israel's already killed
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: the number two in Grisbela, and it wanted us start
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: this massive bobbing complaint. And Trump said, no, I don't
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: accept that. You have to work for peace with Lebanon.
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: And it's just like there's no point they can't Disablebela,
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: just like nobody's gonna disable Ramas and Gaza. We have
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: to do it. And Trump says, no, no, no, you have
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: to go. You have to you have to do this
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: peace thing, this peace thing. And I mean if Israel
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: had been allowed to sustain its offensive against Iran to
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: the point of regime collapse, a lot of these problems
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: in the Middle East would go away. If Israel would
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: have been allowed to thoroughly defeat Ramas and occupy the
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: entire Gaza strip. Haramas problem would go away if Israel
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: were allowed to continue to you know, just cross Grisabela
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: Chrismaela problem would go away, and they'd be peace in them.
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: At least peace will come to the Middle East when
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: Israel wins victory. And the thing preventing Israel from winning
• 52:11
  Speaker 1: is Trump. It's Trump, all right? What else related to this? Yeah,
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: I mean, you constantly hear the claim of genocide. More
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: and more people TikTok videos, you know, lots of just
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: claims of genocide. The absolute reality is in every study
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: that's actually looked at the numbers, looked what happened, looked
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: at Israel's tactics, looks at what happened on the ground,
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: there was no genocide. Indeed, the Israeli warned, Gaza will
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: go down in history as one where the ratio of
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: civilians the combatants killed is the lowest in history, the
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: lowest in all the history of urban warfare. It's indeed
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: a number nobody who knows anything about warfare they can
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: barely believe. But it's a consequence of the fact that
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: the Israeli army is so professional and so good at
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: what it does and has gone out of its way
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: to not kill civilians. When you hear seventy thousand dead, that,
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: by the way, includes all the people who died of
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: natural causes in Gaza since October twenty twenty three, so
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: for over two years, all the people who died just
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: of natural causes. It also includes all the people who
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: are affiliated with Ramas. The actual number of civilians is
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: very killed by Israel is unbelievably low, unbelievable and God
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: Yet you see these accusations repeatedly, and you can debunk
• 54:12
  Speaker 1: them all you want. It doesn't matter. It's it's the
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: same blood libel against Jews as was introduced in the
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: Middle Ages. It's the same story about you know, jewsy
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: drinking baby blood. Facts don't matter. The blood libel repeats
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: itself and comes back and comes back and comes back.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: Over two hundred celebrities have now taken a position about
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: the need that for the Israeli government to release from
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: prison from a multiple life sentences. Mawan Baguri Mawan is
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: one of the one of the masterminds of you know
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: the dozens, dozens and dozens and dozens of terrorist attacks
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: that occurred during the Second Into Fudda in the early
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: two thousands, that where Jewish babies were taking hostage and
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: murdered in cold blood. He was responsible for several attacks
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: in Israel where people were killed butchered. He is a
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: convicted murderer and is serving multiple life sentences, and yet
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: he is a charismatic man who is a potential leader
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: of the Palestinian movement, and they want him released. They
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: want to release from jail with all that blood in
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: his hands. And we're talking about people that I like,
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: I want to throw up, but yeah, I mean Paul simon,
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: Ian McKellen, famous Shakespearean actor, Benedict Cumberbatch, really like his
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: acting till the Swinton. I don't know who that is,
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: Josh O'Connor, any lenox Sting, Margaret Atwood, two hundred celebrities.
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: What do they know, what do they understand? What context
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: do they have to make such a demand? Who the
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: f are they to make such a demand? But by
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: one standard, it's just these a learned experts in the
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: Middle East and they've come to the conclusion that he
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: is innocent, And what the hell is or brings out
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: the worst in people really does brings out the worst.
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: Insum it brings out the best, but in most it
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: brings out the worst, just the worst. Then you get
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: these tweets, right, you know, left and right. It doesn't
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: really matter. Why does Israel get free healthcare and Americans
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: facing medical bankruptcy? Why do Israelis get free education and
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: Americans don't? And we send them billions upon billions of dollars?
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: Why are our taxpayers subsidizing this? So America sends there's
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: all three and a half billion dollars a year. I
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: think Israel spends several hundreds of billions of dollars on healthcare,
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: so you know, you know, in America spends five point
• 57:35
  Speaker 1: six trillion. So the three point eight billion that the
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: US sens to Israel is not going to change the
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: dynamics of healthcare in the United States. Even if it's
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: stayed here. That point eight billion dollars is all spent
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: on medical sorry, on military equipment bought from the United States.
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: All the money comes back to the US. If you
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: took all that money and directed it to I don't know, education,
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: it wouldn't affect anything, It wouldn't make a dent. But
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: it just sounds we give those murderers money and we
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: are suffering. What the hell? And by the way, healthcare
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: and education are not free in Israel. They're not free anyway,
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: as Milton Friedman said, there's no such thing as a
• 58:21
  Speaker 1: free lunch. They're paid for by taxes, by Israeli taxes,
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: and Israeli's paid much higher rates than Americans. So it
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: is education by Israeli taxes, and they pay a much
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: higher rate than Americans. And yes, Americas shouldn't give Israel
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: three and a half billion, threety eight billion dollars. But
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: of all the money that the US government spends, is
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: this the most problematic. It's a tiny speck and you
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: get a pretty good return on the money. It's just
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: America should be giving money to Israel. So yeah, all right,
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: let's jump into watching Steve watching Bannon and Kurtis Yovin.
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: I came across these videos. I thought this would be good.
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: So you'll see both these videos have in a sense
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: of common theme. I mean, they're disgusting in a variety
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: of different ways, but to have a common theme, and
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: that is that the American right, the New Right, it's
• 59:30
  Speaker 1: dedicated itself to rewriting history, rewriting history. And they have
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: two goals in this rewriting of history. It's to make
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: Russia the good guys. And to do that they have
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: to kind of find ways to make the Soviets Union
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: look good, to make Stalin look good. So, because they
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: are traditionalists and because they believe history is deterministic, to
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: say Russia is good today, you have to say Russia
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: has always been good. Russia being on outside, Russia are
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: our friends. We will hear we will hear that in
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: a minute. And of course the big part of that
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: is World War Two. So Russians were the good guys
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: in World War Two, the good guys in World Wars,
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 1: better than England, better than anybody. And the second that
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: then you write is very much dedicated to is too,
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 1: you know, kind of uh normalized Hitler and the Nazis
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: normalize Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany wasn't all bad. There were
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: good things about Nazi Germany. There was some good stuff
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 1: about Nazi Germany. So you know, those are the two
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 1: projects of the of the of the modern right. That's
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: what they're out against. This is why, you know, for
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: Intese keeps is said to Tucker cousin. They need Maya Stalin.
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: It's why he constantly, twice, you know, expresses admiration for Hitler.
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: It's why Tucker Causon keeps having different people on his
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 1: show saying Hitler wasn't as bad as people think. And
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: even this so each union they won't as bad as
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 1: people think. And you know, those are the two and first.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: The third aspect of this that you'll see and I
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: see this in particularly in Tucka, but it's also in
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: for intess and others, is a whitewashing of Islamism. Is
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: this idea that Islamism is not as bad as people think.
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: It's the Jews that are the problem, not the Muslims.
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: Those are the three big projects of the right historical revisionism.
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: See here's the first one. This is Stephen Bannon. This
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: is Stephen Bannon talking about Russia, talking about Russia and
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: Russia's are particularly I mean Russia and the Nazis. You
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: know what really animates them about Russia and Germany? What
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: animates about Russia and Germany they're white, the white and
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: in terms of Russia, clearly the Christian although I don't
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 1: know about Stalin, and you know, really the Nazis were
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 1: too soon, they'll embrace the fact that the Nazis were Christian.
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: So let's listen to let's this is Stephen Bannon about Russia.
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: Thing on the Cia is outrageous, Like, here's the plan.
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 3: The plan is you have a devoutly Christian nation in
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 3: Russia who was our ally.
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 4: Let me remind people.
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: So the devoutie Christian today church attendants in Russia is
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: very low, very low. How Christian are they? Not very
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: at all? Church attendants in Russia is lower than it
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: is in most states in the United States, or maybe
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: in any state in the United States. Most Russians are
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: not that I mean the mystical, the kind of superstitious,
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 1: but not particularly religious in terms of christian But the
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: right has relabeled because of Putin and because of his
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: the way he articulates his case. They relabeled Russia, and
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: you saw that Jordan Peterson did the same thing. They
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: relabeled Russia as this Christian nation, the beast and west
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 1: of the West, because Christianity is the West. It's a
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: Christian nation, and therefore they're the good guys. And we
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 1: know they're the good guys because they used to be allies.
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 1: Of course, people can't change the fact that there are allies.
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: Once doesn't change and it's just mind boggling there were allies.
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: But then he doesn't talk at all about the Cold
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: War where they were enemies in.
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 4: Russia, who was our ally?
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 3: Let me remind people, they were our true ally in
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 3: World War Two.
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 4: They lost twenty five million people.
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: They were a true ally as compared to our false
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: allies like the.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 4: British soldiers fighting the Wehrmacht.
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: It would have taken us ten fifteen years, and who
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 3: knows if we'd even do it.
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 1: That is complete bs, she shaid. Have Victor Davis Hanson
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: asked Victor Davis Hanson about what would have happened if
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: the Russians had not lost twenty five million people. I mean,
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: and we'll talk about why Russia entered the war and
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: under what circumstances Russia entered the war as our quote
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: ally really ally. I mean, these people are They're not ignorant,
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: they're not delusional. They are lias their bold face, unequivocal lias.
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 4: With just the United Kingdom, in the United States, everybody
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 4: else surrendered.
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: The French surrendered, The Spanish were on their side, claimed neutrality.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 3: The Italians were on their side. Half of Eastern Europe
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 3: was on their side. All of the Norwegians, the Swedes,
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 3: all of those guys were on their side.
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 4: All of them on the side of the Nazis.
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 3: Okay, NATO today, all the leadership didn't lift a finger
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 3: except for the Poles.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: Notice how history determines the present, So NATO didn't lift
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: a finger. There was no NATO back then. The people
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: who made decisions back then went alive. Many of those
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: countries try to fight, but faced the overwhelming force from
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: the Nazis. The French fought, they just folded very quickly.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: The Belgiums fought, They just folded very quickly because of
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: overwhelming for it by the Nazis. But because they folded
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 1: in World War Two, they are not our allies today.
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: I mean that historical determinism, that it's in their genes
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 1: to not fight the Nazis, to not be our allies.
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: It's just the collectivism, the tribalism, the determinism that these
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: people hold is truly medievalist. These people are medievilists. They
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: do not belong in the twenty first century. They certainly
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: do not belong in America. These people are anti American.
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: They stand for everything that is against America, collectivism and
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: tribalism and determinism and statism. There is other than the
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: extreme left. There is no more anti American force today
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: than this alt right new right, led to a large
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: extent by people like Steve Benner.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: That helped us out when and where they could. So remember,
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: we're going against our traditional ally.
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: A traditional and I remember from nineteen forty something, forty eight,
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: let's say, until nineteen ninety one, they were like our foe.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: They were the enemy. There's a cold war. He skips
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: over that. That doesn't count. They were ally traditional ally?
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: What other ward were they ally? Were they ally in
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: World War One? No, they backed out of World War One?
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: You know before the US entered the war. Were they
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: our ally in the I don't know the Crimean War?
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: Where were they ally exactly? In WHATLD war? Was Russia
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: ally other than World War two? But they are traditional
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: ally forever, we mean friends with Russia forever. There's no
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: cold war that just disappears, it just evaporates.
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 3: Oh, by the way, the guys that stopped the Ottoman Turk,
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 3: stopped Napoleon, stopped Hitler, just to name just couple three
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 3: off the top of my head.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 1: The Ottoman Tooks are attacking the US. Oh no, he
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: means white people, white people. They stop the Automan Tooks
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: to attacking white people.
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 4: I think I want to take with those guys, not these.
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: Did they or was it really you know, the Poles
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: and Lithuanians and the Austrians who actually stopped the Ottomans
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: in Vienna in sixteen eighty three.
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 3: I think it was beckless, hapless atheistic who are being
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 3: overrun by Islam.
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so it's the atheists who are bad. It's the
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: atheist Europeans who are bad. It's Western European that are bad.
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: The good guys are the Russians. They're the good guys.
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: They can't sell a thirty year bond right now. You
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: know why they can't sell a thirty year bond.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 4: They can't sell a.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: Thirty year bond because nobody knows who's going to be
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 3: in charge in thirty years.
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: It's just not true. Not only are they selling thirty
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: year bonds right now, Denmark is setting thirty year bonds
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: at a lower interest rates than the United States. Is
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: they're having an easier time selling thirty year bonds in
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: the US is now again. He's not an idiot. He
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: worked for Goldman Sachs. He knows what he's talking about
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: in bonds. He knows it's not to what he just said.
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: He lies. It's just bold faced lying, you know, to
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: achieve a political end, to make Russia appear like the
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: good guys. Cold War out. Europe is bad up. Can't
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: sell a bond when they can every date. It's the
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: United States. It's in trouble of selling bonds.
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 3: And maybe the Muslims don't want to, you know, and
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 3: I don't want to be charged interest, so they're gonna
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 3: stiffy on the payment.
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 3: Those countries are collapsing in front of us.
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: They have nothing as competit to Russia, which is thriving.
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: I mean, god standard living, quality of life in Russia
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 1: through the roof, there's so much richer than Europeans. Yeah right.
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 1: I mean some of the poorest countries in Eastern Europe
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: maybe are similar to Russia, but Russia is dramatically and
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: significantly significantly poorer than than Western Europe. I mean, Russia
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: is poor and right now the body bags the two
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand people that have died or more
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: the million people that have been injured. Russia is the
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: basket case, I complete and utter basket case, ruled by
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: a megalomaniac nutcase putin. And you're complaining about Western Europe
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: in comparison, Oh, a lot poorer than Poland, particularly given
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: the growth. I mean Poland is growing significantly, many times
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: faster than than Russia. This guy is lying through his teeth.
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: Somebody says they didn't know Bannon was a was a
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: was a finance guy. Yeah, he was. He to Golden
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: Sex and where.
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 4: Supposed caltal to them. No, it's ridiculous.
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 3: It's time now to look see what we see and
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: start taking action.
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 4: Action action. Recall Kelly today. He's a tough guy.
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 3: He's going on with a Jimmy Kimmel or Colbert one
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 3: of the shows list night talking more smack Pete, your.
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 4: Secretary of freaking war.
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 3: Recall this guy today, and let's convene a court martial
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 3: Friday morning, zero eight hundred and then have them in
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 3: Levenworth zero eight hundred.
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: So Kelly is the senator who who did that video
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: together with a bunch of other senators about soldiers shouldn't
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: obey illegal orders and he wants him in living living
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: with anyway. You can see this campaign just a few
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: of the other historical facts. Right, this is a Nikos
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: posted a post do you know what? Do you know
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: what happened when when Jiminy invaded Poland? Do you know
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: what Russia did? What did Russia do when Germany invaded Poland?
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: I mean our ally, what did our traditional ally do
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: when Russia invaded Poland in nineteen thirty nine. I'm curious
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: how many of you know history? Russia also invaded Poland. Basically,
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: world War two started. The beginning of the World War
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: two is a treaty between Hitler and Stalin to divide
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: up Poland. To divide up Poland. So World War two
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: is was started by Russia and Germany. They won Germany side. Indeed,
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: late as November nineteen forty, Molotov, the Russian was in
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: Berlin making an official proposition huge Germany to join for
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: the usssart to join the Axis Power. So Russia is
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: a traditional ally. Russia was in Germany's side until what happened,
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: until Hitler made the arguably mistake of opening the Eastern
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: Front and attacking Russia. Russia didn't come to our aid.
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: Russia didn't do it to help us. Russia was attacked,
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: and when there was attacked, who helped them? Who helped him?
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: Who helped the Russians with stand the German attack? The
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: US with an amazing land leased deal that they never
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: had to pay back, a massive quantities of weapons they
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: were sent to them defend off the Germans. It was,
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: you know, the mechanized forces that the Red Army used
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: that allowed them to occupy all of Eastern Europe were
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: American given to them. I mean, while Americans were not
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: getting healthcare for free and not getting education for free,
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: we were giving weapons to the Russians. Who cares how
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: many people they lost? And then how do they reward us?
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: How do they reward us for FDR's generosity of granting
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: them the entire Eastern Europe. Pattern could have taken Eastern Europe,
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: at least big chunks of it the Czech Republic Czechoslovakia.
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: That whole area didn't need to fall under Russian occupation
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 1: and become part of the Communist bloc. It could have
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: been liberated by the Americans. It's a deal that if
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: the our cut was Stalin to give him all of that.
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: Were they are allies when they occupied all of eastern Europe?
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: Were they are allies when they stole the secrets of
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: how to build an atomic bomb and built their own
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: nuclear bombs targeted at the United States? I mean Stalin
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: played Churchill, he played Truman, he played FDR. He wasn't
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: the good guy, he wasn't a friend, he wasn't an
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: ally really disgusting. All right, one more, God, I take
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: on too many. I need to cut these shows and
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: make them shorter. This is ridiculous. How long these shows are? All? Right?
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 1: This is Curtis Yovin. Curtis Jovin is one of the
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: most influential intellectuals on the right today. He has been
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: embraced by the Clamont Institute in California, conservative think tank.
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: He's been embraced by is I, the Intercollegious Studied Institute,
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: an old, seventy plus old conservative institution on the East
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: Coast that snubbed me once I was supposed to meet.
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: It's the head of that and he didn't show up.
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: He is incredibly influential Silicon Valley, incredibly influential with people
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: like Marc Andreesen, Peter Tiel, and others, Jed E. Vans,
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: jeredy Vans, you know, getting friendly with Curtis Yovin and
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: influenced by him. Here is his come to Jesus moment.
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: This is when he realized something was very wrong, you know,
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: something something about what we had told about history and
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: about reality today very long. You know, listen to this,
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: Listen to this guy.
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 2: You know, it's like, actually, if I, you know, to
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 2: describe the first moment in which I realized that like
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 2: things were going to happen in history had not ended.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 5: Was it was like two thousand and five or something.
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 2: YouTube was a new thing, and and I.
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 5: Saw this video.
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 2: I'm sure it's long since disappeared, but it was really
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: just like kind of.
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 5: Burnt a hole in me. And it wasn't even a video.
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: It was actually just a sequence of photos sort of
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: presented with us kind of slow animated zoom in, dissolve,
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: zoom in, dissolve.
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 5: Sad piano music sort of over it.
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 2: And the photos were in two sequences, so that you know,
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 2: the even photos in the odd photo is all matched,
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 2: and the even photos were sort of brightly colored pictures
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 2: of just like general Western you know, decadence, decay, rot, filth.
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 5: You know, we've all.
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 2: Seen these things, and then interspersed between them formal dress
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 2: portraits of Nazi officers. Just like you watch this thing,
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 2: you're just like filth degeneration, bright optimistic young man in
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 2: Nazi uniform. Filth degeneration, bright optimistic young man in Nazi uniform,
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 2: and you're just like.
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 5: Yeah, that's the thing. And like basically it's a form because.
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 2: It's it's breaking in a way. It's just it's a
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 2: totally forbidden thing, and that you watch it and you're
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 2: just like, wait a second, something's wrong here.
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: Wow, I mean something's wrong here. What do he means
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: is something's wrong with the West? Look at these amazing
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: looking Nazis. And this goes back to Nick Foyntis yesterday,
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: order order, cleanliness, good uniforms, well dressed. Now, what happened
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: to all those good looking Nazi guys in those uniforms?
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: A few years later? They would have blown up, they
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: were defeated, They ran away, maybe hiding in a Brazilian
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: jungle or they you know, who knows. Their families were killed.
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: Millions of Germans died because of them, millions of Germans,
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: never mind everybody else. What is appealing about that? What
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: is positive about that? We are decadent? They were what
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: this guy, this cutish of it? He is like they go,
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: the real big shot. This is the guy they all admire.
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: I'm going to show you another. This is only twenty
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: eight seconds long, so I think you can tolerate it.
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: I hope you can tolerate it. Also could as you
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: have been talking about talking about what happened at the
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 1: end of World War Two.
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 5: You know, the West wind in.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: You know, the Allies went into Germany and used these
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 2: very very harsh, you know, really criminal measures to suppress
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 2: national socialism.
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 5: And they expected, like you.
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 2: Know, werewolf terrorists to be everywhere, and they were nowhere.
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 5: And they expected the same thing.
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: In Japan they had Comickazis, right, you know, they had
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: these incredibly radicalized people nothing crickets, right, because this is
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 2: the you know, the.
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 1: The West went in with hush you know, hush measures
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: against who against the Nazis. Yeah they were Nazis. And
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: why were they no terrorism in Japan or in Germany?
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: Because Dresden had just been flattened. He was she and
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 1: Nagasaki had just been flattened as every other major Japanese
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: city had been You don't get terrorism when you demonstrate
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: that kind of ruthless you know, uh, complete domination. But
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 1: the point about the West was, you know, very very
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 1: harsh measures, criminal measures to suppress national socialism. Really after
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: five years of war. This is a leading lights for
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 1: the new right, for the for the for the for
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 1: the new right, for the ultra right. This is the
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: intellectual leader. This is who people were quoting me when
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: I was doing that debate in San Francisco. He believes
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: that the United States should embrace monarchy. After all, our
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: corporations are run by ceo. The country should be run
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 1: by a king, which is like a CEO. We're in
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 1: bad shape, guys, Intellectually, this country is bad shap because
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: the alternative on the left is no better. You know,
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: I think the Nick Fuenttis of the left is Hassan Pika.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 1: He's a man who platforms terrorists, promotes political violence, you know,
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 1: shingless propaganda for murderous authoritarian regimes. He's just a sick
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: human being. He's a hater of America, despises this country.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: He said America deserves nine to eleven. And yet this
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: is a guy who is regularly mentioned by Democrats as
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: the answer to Joe Rogan, to the Joe Rogan problem.
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: He's the guy who is as popular. He's hosted AOC,
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Omau, and Zoon Mamdani on his podcast uh.
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: He's been on podcasts for The New Yoka, for Vox.
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 1: You know, is a favorite of a number of other
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: kind of left wing podcasts out there. You know, he
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: is part of the Democrats beak tent, and yet he
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 1: is a completely He's as bad, if not worse then
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 1: then fors. And these are the people with influence, These
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: are the people with audiences. These are the people who
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: are setting the terms of the debate. These are the
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: people that are getting out there and getting attention. And
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: it really is despicable. And again I will say this,
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: I've said it in the past. What makes them possible,
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 1: what makes the pipe as possible, what makes Fuentas and
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 1: Tucker possible, are the more moderate people who are willing
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: to tolerate them. Are the more moderate people who are
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: willing to platform them, The more moderate people who are
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: not willing to stand up for any positive principle, because
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: if they were shunned, ridiculed, canceled by normal culture. Then
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: they would disappear, they would go all the way. It's
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: the fact that they're just you know, accepted and listen
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: to and platformed and debated as if they are legitimate.
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 1: These people are illegitimate. They have no legitimacy. Chris Yavin
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 1: is a zero, He's a nothing. These ideas about the
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 1: nazis despicable, hateful, horrific. The more we the more they're entertained,
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: the stronger these people become. So it's the moderates that,
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: you know, don't want to be too judgmental, are the
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 1: ones who really make this, this horror really possible. All right,
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: let's do these last to quickly. I'll just mentioned this
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 1: is uh uh So last week, I guess a group
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: of climate activists burst onto uh the stage of the
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: Metropolitan Opera in New York City in the middle of
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 1: the performance of Common and they you know, they created
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: orcus and they some of them went on stage and
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: and just just you know, created a real mayhemmon. Today,
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: the guy who led this, uh this attack on the
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: Oppera wrote a letter of apology, not exactly an apology.
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: He says, this open letter is first an apology to
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 1: the cast and explanation of our actions and a retaliate
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: reiituation of our plea right. First, of the cast of Common,
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. You have every right to be furious
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 1: with us or whatever else you feel. I know many
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: of you were scared. We intentionally stayed downstairs and know that,
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: you know, it is best irrelevant for most of you.
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: And then some of some people went on stage, and yeah,
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: that was bad. They shouldn't have gone on stage. You know.
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: One of my dearest friends in New York works at
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: the met you know. Isn't that a standard line if
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 1: you're you know? And and I accept the outcomes of
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: my action, including anyone's scorn. And then he says, and
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: then he explains why the group did it right. The
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: group did it because of the fact that the Lincoln
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: Center is named after Coke Industries.
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 5: Uh.
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 1: It's named after David Coke, and it has links to
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 1: Coke Industry, Chevron, and Texico, you know. He argues that
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 1: the presence of these names conflicts with the themes depict
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: it in Common. I'm not exactly how uh, and with
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 1: the institution's artistic commission. He says, David Coke is a liar.
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 1: Climate change is mass murder. Climate change is mass murder. No,
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: fossil fuels a savior have saved more lives than maybe
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 1: any other innovation in human history. I'll say that again,
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: fossil fuels have saved more lives than maybe any other
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 1: product innovation in human history. I mean, we can deal
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: with climate change, and we are dealing with climate change
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 1: mass murder. How many people have died from climate change?
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: He go goes on. I know that the person who
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: secured the deal with David Coke for Lincoln Center did
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: it with an ease. David spent millions of dollars on
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 1: misinformation political nullification. Obama almost got both parties to pass
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 1: the most ambitious climate legislation in history, and might have relegated,
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: negated my need to become a climate activist, but David
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: Coke killed it. Yay, Good for David Coke. His legacy continues.
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: The Greenland ice sheets alone will bury Lincoln Center in water.
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: Have you heard that one before? And it is said
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 1: to be past the point of an overturn. So it's
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 1: going to happen any day. New York will be flooded.
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: Coke Industries and Chevron are working tirelessly to ensure that
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: this happens. They want to see New York flooded and
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: we will never change and they will never change. Course,
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: I have heard them say it outlied on camera to
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: their investors before being dragged out of the room. And
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: for what for their profits? Profits? That they that then
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 1: they gave you to put the name of the building,
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: so remove the names. That's the demand. I mean, that
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 1: is such a load of garbage and absolute nonsense. That yeah,
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: read Alex Epstein's books. Remember he's the sponsor of the show.
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 1: Read alex Epstein dot subseat dot com if you're interested
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: in that old debate and why. Factually that is just
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: a load of garbage. The whole thing, just an absolute,
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 1: unequivocal load of garbage. The reality is right now that
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: the climate change nuts are losing, and they know they're losing.
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 1: In the United States, there is zero appetite for any
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 1: regulation as part of why Trump want any regulation that
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 1: limits energy, limits fossil fuels. There's just no passion around it.
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 1: Nobody cares. And indeed that is a growing sentiment in
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 1: Europe as energy costs go through the roof in Great Britain,
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 1: through the roof in Germany, nobody has the patience, nobody
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 1: wants to hear about climate change. So the tide is turned,
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: I think dramatically against him, against the climate change activists.
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 1: And as the world turns against them, as their voice
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: gets drowned, they will become more desperate and they will
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: put on more of these nihilistic which is what they
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: are ultimately than nihilists. They want New York to be flooded,
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: they want it to burn, because that's what will happen
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: if you don't have fossil fuels. New York City will
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: be depopulated. Millions of people will die. That's what they
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 1: really want. And if they if they let their mind
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: actually function and they thought about it. So they're going
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: to become more desperate, which is going to mean put
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: on bigger and bigger extravagant shows. They don't have gret
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: Her anymore. She's too busy with the Palestinian cause they
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: need attention. Their attention grab their nihilism demands it all right.
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: I know I had the topic birth rates. We'll talk
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: about that tomorrow or another time. We're already gone an
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: hour and a half and we've got quite a few
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: questions and we've raised you know, we haven't raised enough
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: for the second hour, so we're probably going to go
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: into that third hour. So again, best way to support
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 1: the show super chat. Ask me questions, I answer them.
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 1: That way, you get to set the terms of the show.
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: If you want to just trade and value for value,
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: you're listening, you're gaining value from the show. If you
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: would like to reciprocate, then do a sticker, ask a question.
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: That's a good way, a great way to reciprocate, to
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 1: express the trade of principle that we all, I think
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 1: most of us believe it. So please think about asking
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: a question or doing a sticker, even ninety nine cents,
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: even a couple of dollars, five dollars, ten dollars, five
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 1: hundred dollars. You can go up to five hundred dollars
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: with the stickers to do any of those. Okay, I
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: want to a few things. I want to remind you
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: that Dan Rand Institute is a sponsor of this show.
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 1: They are holding a conference in Porto, Portugal in April.
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: The conference. I'll be there, tals Fani will be there,
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: Nicos will be there, Ben Bear and I'm missing somebody
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 1: on car Well. I'll be there and we'd like you
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: to be there as well. We'd love for you to come.
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 1: Those of you are under thirty four can get a scholarship,
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: so apply. Those of you over the age of thirty four,
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 1: you get a discount because your listeners to a run
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: book show. That discount code is twenty six ybs ten.
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 1: I already told you about Alex Epstein, so check out
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: his substack. Alex Epstein does substack dot com and and
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 1: let me just mention the Hendershot Wealth hender Shot well
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: dot com slash ybs, which has products that can reduce
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 1: dramatically reduce your capital gains, tax liability. You can find
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: information about that in a video I did with a
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 1: Robert Handershot and an interview we did. We describes all this.
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 1: It's available on my play in the playlist for uh,
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: you know, for sponsors. Under the sponsorship playlist you'll find
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: that interview. So again, Hindershot Wealth one would dot com
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 1: slash ybs. All right, let's see no thirty four year
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: olds and above thirty four year olds don't get If
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: you are thirty four year olds, I don't know. I
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 1: don't know which group you fall into. You'll have to
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 1: check iinman dot oak slash dot here where you can
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 1: find all the information you need about this all right. Finally,
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 1: I want to remind you that supporting the show on
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 1: a monthly basis, like with a regular payment, is the
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: preferred method and amazingly valuable. This is a show that
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 1: could not exist without your support, So please consider going
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: to patreon dot com patreon dot com and making a
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: monthly contribution to the one book show. I'm looking for
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: six more people to do that so we can meet
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 1: our annual goal. A goal for the year would be great. Again, reminder,
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: we're like one hundred dollars short, ninety five dollars short
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: of our second hour goal, and we're definitely gonna crush
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 1: the second hour and spill into the third hour, so
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 1: please consider supporting the show again. Small a small stickers
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: are great. Sting a Bell, thank you for the sticker.
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: Benjamin Nunez, thank you for the sticker. Katherine, thank you
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 1: for the sticker. Let's see dot Dom Paul, thank you,
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: and I think I saw all right. That's great. Thank
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 1: you guys. I appreciate it. Uh So, feel free to
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 1: jump in with we'll stickers any amount, any amount.
• 1:36:20
  Speaker 6: Let's see what I want to do. I don't remember
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 6: how we do that. Let's start this time. No, I
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 6: don't want to do that.
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: All right, let's jump in. I'm gonna gift some memberships
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: here because we're gonna have a members only show soon.
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 1: You can also gift memberships. By the way, it's another
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: way you can support the show is by gifting memberships,
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: which would be great because we've got a members only
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: show coming up and many of you will be able
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 1: to participate. So that's great. All right, let's go through questions,
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 1: John and Uh. John says that the way to pronounce
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: his family name is Gloy. Sir John Gloy. Thank you.
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: Sorry you didn't enjoy the songs I requested. You're on,
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 1: but thanks for the honest reviews. If you're up to
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: one more, could you do a view of Incabbus's Drive
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 1: Incabus's Drive. Yes, I will do that. Let me copy
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: paste it. It mentions the importance of independence and how
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: fear pushes people into secondhandedness. Maybe you'll like this one.
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 1: As I said, I think when I reviewed the songs,
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: it wasn't so much the lyrics. I thought the lyrics
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: were in some cases quite good. It was more the
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: it was more the the music and the integration between
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: the music and the lyrics that I didn't like and
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 1: I didn't think was done well. Thank you, John, I
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: really appreciate the support. That was one hundred dollars for
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: the music for the song with you. You too can have
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 1: a song reviewed for one hundred bucks, all right, David,
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: fifty dollars. You once told me that if you were
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: to debate You've al Haraai, it would be on the
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 1: subject the theory of knowledge. Please explain. Oh, I can't
• 1:38:21
  Speaker 1: remember saying that, so I don't remember the context of
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: why I said that. You know, I'd love to debate
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: you all Haarrai pretty much anything. I disagree with him
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: on pretty much everything. But yeah, I mean, I mean,
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: he's basically a complete empiricist. His theory of knowledge is
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: completely corrupt by his inability to recognize abstractions, even though
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: he uses them all the time.
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 1: So, for example, there's a video of him saying there's
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 1: no such thing as individual rights. Individual rights are nonsense
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 1: on stilts, you know, quoting Bentham. If you dissect the
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 1: human being, you will not find individual rights inside of him.
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: But of course you won't find love or reason, or
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 1: history or any abstractions as physical manifestations in the real world.
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: So it's just silly. And so his theory of knowledge
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: is based on what. But he's wrong on so many things.
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: He's wrong on what makes the human human being successful
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 1: as a species. He believes it's corporation, but you know,
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: way before corporation has to be ability to reason and
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: to think for ourselves, which allows us to communicate and
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: it allows us to cooperate. Corporation is just an outcome
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: of reasoning. But reasoning is the fundamental. So I could
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: debate him on on is basically is basic. Epistemology is
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 1: basic way of discovering knowledge and what knowledge is. Ultimately,
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: he's a collectivist and an altruist, and his perception of
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 1: the nature of man is wrong, and in politics he's awful,
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: and on technology is awful. He's a pessimist. And yeah,
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: so I'm pretty much everything. You know, we would disagree
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: and it would be debatable. Yeah, maybe we can make
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: that happen one day. All right, these are all twenty
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: dollars questions, Thank you guys. Let's start with Mike. Mike says,
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: how likely is it that the millions of fans that
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: Carson influentas allegedly have actually like live in other countries.
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 1: I hate to think so many Americans are that an American.
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 1: I'm not an ex you know, it's hard to tell.
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: I'm sure a lot of them are. But at the
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: end of the day, I think a lot of them
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: are Americans. I think it is an American phenomena. The
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: alt right, the new Right is primarily an American phenomena.
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: And I think they really are this. Many Americans are this,
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: and they're young, and many of them sit in their
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: mother's basements, and many of them are what are called
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 1: in cells, alienated from the female, from females, and you
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: know they are they are, you know, losers. It's a
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 1: it's a Now. Tucker has a broader audience that he's
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 1: brought with him over his many years in Fox and
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 1: other places to the podcast, and he slowly brainwashed him
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: into this complete and utter nonsense. But I think I
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: think most of them Americans, not all, but most of
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: them are. And look, not everybody who listens to them
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: agrees with them, But why would you listen if you
• 1:41:52
  Speaker 1: hated everything they say? Which is what? Which is the
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 1: healthy response? Ointvent from no Timothy Chalomay is at it again,
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 1: starting in a movie, Marty Supreme, coming out this Christmas.
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: The movie is about individualism, just a movie is about
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 1: individualism and ambition. Hope they depict it as virtues. The
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: trailer contains banger quotes such as, I live with the
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: confidence that I believe in myself and the money will follow.
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna step up in ways you can't even imagine.
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 1: This is another quote from the movie. You want to
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: get physical like an ape. Very much looking forward to it. Yeah,
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 1: I mean I like him as an actor. I like
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: it very much as an actor, so it definitely should
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 1: be interesting. What was it was the movie that he
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: started recently that was really good? That yeah, I can't remember,
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: but the name of the movie, but that he was
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 1: there was really good in anyway. Yeah, I like him
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 1: as an actor, and that sounds promising, So I hope
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 1: it's good. We'll wait and see. What's it called again?
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 1: You said it was called Marty Supreme. Marty Supreme. He
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 1: start in Dune. He was really good in Dune. But no,
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: something else that I'm thinking of, and I can't, I can't.
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 1: I saw a movie of it's called The King, which
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: was a movie about Henry Henry the Fifth kind of
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: loosely based on the Shakespearean play, but not exactly with
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 1: a twist at the end. Anyway, We'll have to We'll
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 1: have to see Marty Supreme soon, all right, Thomas. Given
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 1: that the government owns roads and controls driver's license, would
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 1: they come a point with the growth of Wei MO,
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 1: with the safety record you detailed yesterday, that human human
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 1: driven cause could become illegal? Ooh, I doubt it, but
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 1: certainly not in my lifetime. Maybe in the distant future
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 1: in an authoritarian state. Yeah, but I think that would
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 1: be quite authoritarian, and I would it would be, Yeah,
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 1: it would be. Yeah, I'm not sure so, but I
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 1: don't think in my lifetime. I don't think we're going
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 1: to get to that point. I don't think Americans would tolerate.
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 1: Was still still too much of our people who love
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 1: our cause and love driving. Chabot I want to putin
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 1: is a risk board game fan. Gaining new territory is
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 1: super easy in the game, and his subordinates let him win.
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 1: Of course, he might have expected actual mi lative action
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: to be no different. Yeah, I don't know far as
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 1: I've gotten in terms of games as Monopoly. That's that's
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 1: about it for me. But maybe he does play risk.
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 1: Chaza says, I just finished watching Chernovo. Have you seen it.
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: It's astonishing what happened there before, during, and after the disaster,
• 1:45:22
  Speaker 1: assuming that is an accurate representation. Yeah, I've watched it.
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 1: It's excellent. It's very well made. It brings out the
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 1: irrationality of communism. It clearly shows the responsibility the communist
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 1: mentality had for the Chernobyl accident and in dealing with
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 1: it and the failure over and over again. It shows
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: how the communist system, you know, incentivizes Reward's secondhandedness, unthinking.
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 1: It's really well concretized, really well done, so highly we
• 1:45:59
  Speaker 1: can watching Chernobyl. Whether it's accurate to the fact of
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 1: what happened or not, it's really good. It's really well done.
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 1: Hop A Campbell Part one. That's the fact that Nick
• 1:46:14
  Speaker 1: Foyintis has millions of subscribers and you only have forty
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 1: thousand suggest the collapse of civilization is drastically gaining momentum,
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: or perhaps only a momentary nihilistic bubble that will burst,
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 1: and how slow and steady objectives train will ultimately win
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 1: and race before things collapse. I mean, I don't know,
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 1: but the fact that he has millions of adherents he's entertaining.
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 1: There is clearly a nihilistic streak in young people right now.
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 1: They are looking, they are searching, and I don't think,
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 1: you know, I hope I'm not overly optimistic, But I
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 1: don't think that his popularity is sustainable. I think he's
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: probably reaching peak influence and you know, peak followers. We'll
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 1: see I think we keep chugging along. I just don't
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 1: see him. I think he still represents a marginal, marginal
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: group within society. It might be millions, but the millions
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: of losers. My forty thousand people a good good people
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 1: and successful people, you know, competent people. People are striving
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 1: to make something of their lives. I don't think you
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 1: have a bunch of losers like his audience. If I
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 1: thought you were, I wouldn't do the show. So I
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 1: think very different type of people. Lincoln. Do you think
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 1: objectivism will be applied in Europe or America? First, the
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: US is more free market postal liberties, but Europe is
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 1: more secular and have a slow growth, which could make
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: them open to the philosophy of objectivism, so I can
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 1: see the argument for it happening in either place. I
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 1: don't know. I don't know, and it's still so far
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 1: into the future I don't know that we can tell.
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 1: Europe is also heading towards authoritarianism. How it comes out
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: of that authoritarianism. Who knows, it might also becoming more religious.
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 1: It's hard for me to tell. So I really don't
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 1: know who's gonna get it first. Maybe it'll be Argentina,
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 1: maybe it'll be somewhere else. Maybe to be somewhere in Asia. Unlikely,
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 1: but I just don't know. It's good, it's it's decades
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 1: in the future, and how these everything evolves in the
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 1: next few decades is really really hard to tell. Maybe
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: everybody in America will read my book with don and
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 1: reject their Christianity the book that's still coming. Unlikely, but
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 1: maybe Lincoln. I remember Melton Friedman saying in Free to Choose,
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 1: how wonderful the clothing sweat ups were by forcing his
• 1:49:24
  Speaker 1: mother to assimilate and taking personal responsibility in the days
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 1: before welfare. Absolutely absolutely, work is the number one way
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 1: in which people assimilate, and I think it's necessary and
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 1: countries that don't emphasize work. Are the countries that are
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 1: going to have the biggest problem with immigrants. It's why
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 1: people assimilate more in America than elsewhere because our office
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 1: state is less effective, less efficient, less robust, and people
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 1: up are required to work, and they assimilate whether they
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 1: want to or not. Yes, so Americans can. They have
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 1: free will, so they can definitely reject Christianity. America is
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 1: not a Christian country. Indeed, we argue in the book
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 1: that America is the anti Christian country. The America is
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 1: the is a country that stands as proof that you
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 1: can succeed in spite of Christianity, and that you can,
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: that you can. You know that to be successful you
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 1: have to in a sense reject the essence of Christianity.
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: And this is why, by the way, the New Rights
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 1: which is big on Christianity, has to reject the Founders
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 1: and reject the Declaration of Independence, because that the Founders
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 1: and the Declaration of Dependence are anti Christian in the
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 1: way that Christians understand it today, and the anti collectivism
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: and tribalism, so they're anti Then you write, that's why
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 1: the Right has to reject the Founders if they want
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 1: to keep their Christianity. Lincoln, I remember using my Asperger's
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 1: syndrome diagnosis to get extra time on AP and SATs.
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 1: I was not traditionally disabled, but I took advantage of
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 1: the loophole. And I was far from the only one
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 1: who did this. There was a kid who had an
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: IQ above one sixty and was mentally disabled. My AQU
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 1: was also very high. It played a big role in
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: the two of us getting into prestigious colleges since being
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: upper middle class white males, we weren't going to get
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: in on AA. I got into Santa CLA's Business school
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 1: and he got into produced engineering program, all thanks to
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 1: the disability classification helping us. Yeah, I get it, but
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: there's something just weird about that and about you know,
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 1: now everybody has it. You've created a huge incentive for
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: people to embrace the disability category. I mean, you guys
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: are smart. Being smart is not a disability. How much
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 1: longer should the war in Ukraine? Go? Well, I'd say
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 1: two things. As long as Ukraine is willing to fight
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 1: it and as long as Russia doesn't surrender, that's it.
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 1: I mean, there's no timeline. Ukraine is the one suffering.
• 1:52:39
  Speaker 1: Ukraine is the one fighting for their liberty, fighting for
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 1: their land, fighting for their sovereignty, fighting for their future,
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 1: fighting for their children, fighting for their families. Ukraine therefore
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 1: gets to say when they want to stop fighting and
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 1: we should support them because Russia is the bad guy,
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 1: and because Russia is a threat to the West, which
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: includes US. Ukraine is led by Zelensky. He is very popular,
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 1: still popular within Ukraine. If there were elections tomorrow, he
• 1:53:17
  Speaker 1: would probably win, and even if he didn't, the opposition
• 1:53:21
  Speaker 1: party which would run against him is for the war.
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 1: So there's no significant political force in Ukraine that is
• 1:53:33
  Speaker 1: against the war. So to claim that this is Zelensky's
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 1: war is again completely detached from reality, from the facts
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 1: on the ground. It is buying into Russian propaganda. Russian
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: bots feeding your propaganda online. I mean, I get it,
• 1:53:55
  Speaker 1: the Trump buys into that propaganda. You the listeners to
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 1: the one book show, shouldn't buy into that. Pup again, Lincoln,
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 1: the activists are trying to get people to not watch
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 1: Netflix show Stranger Things. The reason one of the main
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 1: characters is design is jew. Wow. That is pretty nuts.
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: I didn't realize that there was asignist jew on Stranger
• 1:54:17
  Speaker 1: things I watched the most, I think the whole first season.
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 1: I couldn't get into it. It just wasn't that interesting
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 1: to me. Jason estimate, estimate what we spend a military
• 1:54:32
  Speaker 1: basis overseas, and if and if how we could conceptualize
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 1: money for Israel or good allies as a formal valuable ASCID. Yeah,
• 1:54:43
  Speaker 1: I think that's right. Being the troops home, shut down
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 1: the bases, and to help those allies that they need
• 1:54:52
  Speaker 1: our help and be provide us with real value as allies.
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 1: That would be much cheaper. Seventeen seventy six says thank
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 1: you for membership, gift my pleasure. Thank you and join
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 1: us for the membership shows. Jamie from Canada, how you
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: on what would be the cost to get to review
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 1: a YouTube video that is criticizing econ one oh one
• 1:55:22
  Speaker 1: that's approximately forty five minutes long? Oh god, it's long?
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: And do I how do I set that up? Just
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: send link an amount here. You can do a linking
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 1: amount here or you can do it through PayPal. Either way,
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 1: forty five minutes long. God, I mean, my holy eight
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 1: is five hundred bucks. So let's say you know, three
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 1: hundred dollars for the forty five minute video. Yeah, I
• 1:55:55
  Speaker 1: think that's right because TV. Yeah, actually, yeah, two fifty
• 1:55:59
  Speaker 1: I do two fifty four episodes of shows which are
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 1: about forty five minutes long. So two fifty, two hundred
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 1: fifty dollars and send me the link. Forty five minutes
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 1: video is going to be hard a critique though, because
• 1:56:14
  Speaker 1: I can't. I mean, I'll watch it and then give
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 1: you I'll give you a summary critique of it. Thomas
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: schubout him. Are you familiar with the writings of Hoover
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: Scalar Stephen Koken, Yes, an historian gigantic three volume biography
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 1: of Stalin. Yes, I haven't read it, but I've seen it.
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: He lectures and geopolitics, very anti communist, don't always agree,
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 1: but a real intellectual. Yeah, he's kind of left of Senna.
• 1:56:38
  Speaker 1: I've seen him speak a number of times. He's smart, thoughtful,
• 1:56:43
  Speaker 1: a good guy, and very good on Stalin and very
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 1: anti communist. All right, we just shot fifty bucks for
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 1: the well. Actually, now we're only short thirty dollars for
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 1: the second hour goal, and we're we're three minutes away
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: from the second hour, so it'd be great if somebody
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 1: came in with thirty bucks, thirty buck question, thirty bucks sticker,
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 1: and we're done. Novel recommendations. The Second Sleep by Robert
• 1:57:09
  Speaker 1: Harris lights spoil up. The book makes you think it
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 1: takes place in the dark Ages, but you discover that
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: it's the future. Civilization has regressed because of Christian forces
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 1: gain control. Again. Well, that sounds like a good book
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 1: for me to read, I mean, or maybe listen to.
• 1:57:31
  Speaker 1: All right, thank you jjjigbees for the recommendation thirty bucks. Guys,
• 1:57:36
  Speaker 1: somebody coming in with thirty bucks and get us to
• 1:57:40
  Speaker 1: the target. Can you discuss the tpsukay student who had
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 1: her professor placed on leave after she was failed for
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 1: making faith based arguments in a science class. I'm not
• 1:57:53
  Speaker 1: sure if you've seen this, but the suspension is manifestly unjust. Absolutely,
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 1: I mean, I think it's absolutely right for the professor
• 1:58:05
  Speaker 1: to fail the student for making faith based arguments in
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 1: a science class. Science class is about science, not about faith. Indeed,
• 1:58:12
  Speaker 1: it is about making science based argument, and by making
• 1:58:16
  Speaker 1: a faith based argument, you should fail a science class.
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 1: So good for the professor, and it's tragic that he
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 1: is that he's that the professor's being suspended, I mean,
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 1: this is the Christianization of our culture. And Christianization is
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 1: not a good thing. Not a good thing. Bad things happen.
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 1: Christianity is a force for ill, not a force for good.
• 1:58:49
  Speaker 1: It's a force that leads us towards destruction, not towards
• 1:58:52
  Speaker 1: growth and progress. Thought criminal. Thank you for the sticker.
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 1: Now we're only twenty dollars away, or actually less than
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 1: twenty dollars, seventeen dollars away, because that was ten dollars,
• 1:59:04
  Speaker 1: ten pounds, seventeen dollars away from the five hundred dollars goal.
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 1: So please consider jumping in. We're seventeen dollars and getting
• 1:59:14
  Speaker 1: us over the threshold. America is not going to reject
• 1:59:20
  Speaker 1: Christianity anytime soon, but certainly can. There's a difference between
• 1:59:24
  Speaker 1: can and will? Will it? No? Can it? Yes? All right, guys,
• 1:59:31
  Speaker 1: I didn't see that story. I'll have to look it up.
• 1:59:33
  Speaker 1: Thank you Eric for pointing it out to me. Thank
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 1: you Eddie for the five dollars sticker. We're chipping away
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 1: at this goal. Should it just stay up here and
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 1: till you guys do enough stickers to get us through this? So, oh,
• 1:59:51
  Speaker 1: there it is. Richard just got us over the threshold.
• 1:59:53
  Speaker 1: Thank you Richard twenty dollars sticker. I appreciate it. Thank
• 1:59:57
  Speaker 1: you guys. Thanks all the superchatters. Don't forget Patreon dot com.
• 2:00:01
  Speaker 1: You on books show. I will see you tomorrow, probably
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 1: at the regular time. Uh, today was a doctor thing. No, yeah,
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 1: it was a doctor thing. I'll see you tomorrow and
• 2:00:12
  Speaker 1: Friday and Saturday. Have a great rest of your week.
• 2:00:16
  Speaker 1: See you guys. Bye.