Latest / The Animal Advocate / Beyond the Shelter Walls: Examining Managed Intake and Community Sheltering

Transcript

Beyond the Shelter Walls: Examining Managed Intake and Community Sheltering · The Animal Advocate

0:00
Welcome back to the animal advocate, your guide for moving
0:04
from compassion into action. We're thrilled you're
0:07
with us. So last time, we touched on two
0:11
approaches that animal shelters are exploring as they face
0:14
their fundamental challenge, more animals than available
0:18
homes. Today, we're taking a deeper
0:22
dive into those two concepts, managed
0:25
intake and community sheltering, because, honestly,
0:29
they're changing the landscape of animal welfare in ways
0:33
worth understanding. If you've noticed shelters requiring
0:36
appointments for surrenders or asking finders
0:40
not to bring in stray cats, you're seeing these changes
0:44
in action. These aren't just administrative tweaks
0:48
to the system. They represent fundamental shifts in
0:51
how we think about animal welfare and what the role of
0:55
animal shelters should be. What makes these approaches
0:58
interesting is that they're addressing the same problem from
1:02
different angles. Both aim to improve outcomes for
1:06
animals, but they take somewhat different paths to get there.
1:10
And many shoulders are implementing some form of both concepts.
1:14
And like any significant change, they each come with promising
1:18
benefits and also legitimate concerns.
1:22
So today, we'll look at both sides, the compelling successes
1:26
and the important questions being raised. We'll talk about
1:29
improvements some shelters are seeing in their statistics and the
1:33
concerns raised not only about animal welfare, but also
1:37
about equity and access. So let's
1:40
explore what happens when shelters rethink their fundamental
1:44
operations. We won't present any perfectly wrapped
1:47
answers, just an honest look at how our
1:51
field is evolving.
1:56
Welcome to The Animal Advocate, where we arm animal
1:59
lovers with the information and inspiration you need to become
2:03
effective advocates. I'm your host, Penny Ellison, and
2:07
I've I've taught animal law and advocacy at the University of Pennsylvania
2:11
since 02/2006. If you've ever thought
2:14
someone should do something about that, I'm here to guide you on
2:18
your journey to being that someone. You can find us
2:22
on the the web at animaladvocacyacademy.com.
2:26
And that's where you'll find show notes and resources, and you can send
2:30
us your comments on episodes and ideas for topics you'd like to
2:34
hear on future shows. So on to today's
2:37
topic.
2:44
Let's start with the truth that's hard to hear, but we need to
2:48
face. The traditional animal shelter model is
2:51
broken in many places. Many shelters are
2:55
still operating on a system designed when Teddy Roosevelt was president,
2:59
and the main goal then was just getting stray animals
3:03
off the streets. But it's not 1910 anymore.
3:06
Right? We expect our shelters not to be old
3:10
fashioned dog pounds, but to provide quality care and
3:13
find new homes for all of the adoptable animals that come through
3:17
their doors. But our shelters are just overwhelmed
3:21
trying to fulfill that expanded mission.
3:25
Staff are burning out, and too many animals are caught in
3:29
this awful limbo, neither going home nor
3:33
finding a new family. So let's take a minute and
3:36
channel our inner math nerds. I know. I know.
3:40
Bear with me, but this actually explains a lot.
3:44
Here's the equation that's keeping shelter directors up at night,
3:48
live release rates. That's the percentage of animals leaving
3:51
shelters alive, and most shelters are desperate to hit at
3:55
least that 90% mark to earn the coveted no kill
3:59
status that supporters seem to demand.
4:02
And the math is pretty straightforward. If a thousand animals
4:06
come through your door, you need 900 happy endings to
4:10
hit that 90% mark. So to improve
4:13
your numbers, you've got two options. Find
4:17
more homes through adoption, return to owner, or
4:21
rescue transfers, that's your numerator,
4:25
or decrease the number of animals coming in to begin
4:29
with, your denominator. For decades,
4:32
shelters have focused primarily on that first one,
4:37
trying to adopt their way out of overcrowding.
4:41
But you know that chocolate factory conveyor belt scene in I
4:44
Love Lucy where everything just speeds up and chaos
4:48
ensues? That's basically what's happening.
4:52
It's just not sustainable. Many communities have realized
4:56
that no matter how many adoption events they hold, no
4:59
matter how much they discount adoption fees, they
5:03
simply can't find enough homes fast enough.
5:08
And that realization, it's changing everything.
5:20
This reality check has led to two innovative
5:24
approaches targeting the intake side of the equation.
5:28
And let's look at each one examining both the potential
5:32
benefits and the legitimate concerns that they
5:35
raise. First up is managed
5:39
intake, which is essentially appointment
5:42
based sheltering. Instead of taking animals
5:46
whenever someone shows up, shelters require appointments.
5:50
Think about it. This creates actual breathing room
5:54
for staff to prepare and plan
5:58
and maybe even offer alternatives to surrender.
6:02
Let's look at who's behind this approach because there's some serious heavy hitters
6:06
supporting this model. First, there are shelter
6:10
directors and managers, especially those running
6:14
open admission municipal shelters. These are the people
6:17
who spent years, sometimes decades, watching
6:21
animals flow into their facilities faster than they
6:25
can possibly help them. Their perspective,
6:29
controlled intake helps shelters avoid overcrowding,
6:33
which is a primary driver of euthanasia. When
6:37
you're the person making those impossible decisions every day,
6:40
well, you get why they're passionate about finding a
6:44
better way. Then there are the researchers at
6:48
UC Davis shelter medicine program whose
6:51
capacity for care model has transformed how we
6:55
think about shelter management. These
6:59
veterinarians and researchers have the data showing
7:03
that when shelters only take in what they can reasonably care
7:06
for, disease rates, stress levels,
7:10
and euthanasia all dramatically decrease.
7:15
I mean, when you think about it, it's kind of wild that we've accepted the
7:18
idea that shelters should take in unlimited animals
7:22
regardless of their capacity to care for them. Would
7:26
we expect a hospital to admit unlimited numbers of patients without
7:29
enough beds or staff? National organizations like
7:33
the ASPCA, the Humane Society of the United States,
7:37
which is now known as Humane World for Animals, and
7:41
best friends animal society have all supported variations of
7:44
this approach. They talk about moving upstream,
7:48
focusing on helping people keep their
7:52
pets when possible, providing community support,
7:55
and creating diversion programs that prevent
7:59
animals from entering the shelter in the first place. Their vision
8:03
refrains shelters as safety nets, not
8:07
the first stop for every animal issue. It's
8:11
like rethinking how we use emergency rooms versus
8:15
primary care doctors. Even
8:18
public health experts see benefits with managed intake. Have
8:22
you ever walked into a severely overcrowded shelter? The
8:27
stress is palpable, and so are the germs. Crowded
8:31
conditions can become breeding grounds for diseases that affect
8:34
not just animals, but potentially humans too.
8:39
From their perspective, managing intake is a public health
8:43
strategy. The core arguments for managed intake make
8:46
intuitive sense. Preventing the kind of overcrowding
8:50
that leads to emergency euthanasia, improving
8:54
animal welfare through less stress and disease,
8:59
keeping pets with their families when that's an option,
9:02
and focusing limited resources where they're most needed.
9:07
Look at Reno, Nevada. Their humane society
9:10
implemented this approach and documented their results.
9:14
They've reported now only euthanizing animals with
9:18
poor medical prognoses or those considered too
9:22
dangerous to place, achieving what they consider no
9:25
kill status. Importantly, and this is
9:29
really the key, they've built up their community
9:32
programs, affordable spay neuter services,
9:36
vaccination clinics, and surrender assistance because
9:40
that has to work hand in hand with managed intake. Where
9:44
a managed intake has had issues is where it is
9:47
not paired with these types of community resources
9:51
to allow people to keep their pets and keep them
9:55
healthy. So managed intake isn't without
9:58
serious concerns and criticisms. So let's look at the
10:02
other side of this approach. Critics raise legitimate
10:06
concerns that managed intake creates barriers for people in
10:09
crisis. When someone needs to surrender an animal immediately
10:14
because of an emergency. Maybe they're being evicted
10:17
today, or they're facing a health crisis, or they're
10:21
fleeing domestic violence. Waiting lists can
10:24
create frustration and potentially dangerous
10:28
situations. What happens when someone simply
10:32
can't wait? Where do those animals end up?
10:36
Well, in law, we have a concept called prosecutorial
10:40
discretion, and it comes into play a lot in animal
10:43
cruelty cases. A prosecutor might
10:47
exercise their discretion not to charge a person
10:51
with animal cruelty who they judge is doing the
10:54
very best they can to care for their animals.
10:58
So by the same token, a shelter practicing
11:01
managed intake should have discretion and use
11:05
it to waive the appointment requirement in
11:09
true emergency situations. But what about
11:12
the cases where the person can't justify that it's a true emergency
11:17
and the shelter simply tells them they need an appointment? Well,
11:21
another troubling trend emerges, and honestly, it wasn't
11:24
hard to see coming. What do you think happens when
11:28
someone has already made the difficult decision to give up their pet
11:32
and then gets told, sorry. Not today.
11:36
Many of them don't exactly unmake that decision.
11:40
Some tie the dog to a fence outside the shelter.
11:44
Others just let them go somewhere.
11:48
As Cara Achterberg pointed out in our interview last episode,
11:52
some areas are seeing an alarming increase in strays where they've
11:56
implemented managed intake. And she also pointed out
11:59
that about 80% of surrendered animals in the South are unaltered.
12:04
So now these pets aren't just homeless. They're out there making
12:08
more homeless animals. And there's the safety issue
12:11
too. A pet wandering the streets isn't safe, and,
12:15
honestly, neither is the public in some cases.
12:19
In the Northeast, we see some of that as well as a
12:22
related phenomenon. When people learn that the
12:25
shelter will make them wait or charge a surrender fee,
12:30
suddenly, everyone's, quote, finding dogs. Oh,
12:33
this dog? No. No. Not mine. I found him wandering.
12:37
Total stranger to me. Meanwhile, the dog is looking at them
12:41
with those eyes that clearly say, why are you pretending you don't
12:45
know me? We had breakfast together this morning.
12:49
Beyond the heartbreak of watching that charade play out,
12:53
it means the shelter gets zero information that could help that
12:56
dog find a new family. Can he live with kids,
13:00
other pets? Is he house trained? They're all mysteries
13:04
now because the owner can't admit they know anything about the
13:07
dog they've never seen before, not exactly setting that
13:11
animal up for success. There are also
13:15
significant equity concerns that can't be brushed aside with this
13:18
approach. Research shows that appointment systems
13:22
may inadvertently create more obstacles for people in
13:26
underserved communities. And here's a troubling
13:29
pattern that researchers have documented. Animals
13:33
are frequently surrendered from lower income neighborhoods,
13:37
but then adopted into more affluent areas,
13:41
creating this one way flow that reflects
13:45
broader social inequities. People in
13:48
disadvantaged communities often face more barriers,
13:51
transportation challenges, inflexible work
13:55
schedules, language differences, the list goes
13:59
on. When shelters implement managed intake
14:03
without addressing these systemic issues, they
14:06
risk further disadvantaging already marginalized
14:10
communities. A system that works well for people with
14:14
resources, flexibility, and options
14:18
might completely fail those without these advantages.
14:22
So while managed intake shows promising results in some
14:25
communities, these concerns remind us that no single
14:29
approach works perfectly for everyone.
14:43
Now let's turn to our second approach, community sheltering.
14:48
This takes an entirely different philosophical approach,
14:52
and I want to be clear about what this actually means because it's not just
14:55
a slight tweak to the system. It's a fundamental
14:59
rethinking of what an animal shelter is. Community
15:03
sheltering operates on this principle. Animal
15:07
shelters are just one part of a broader safety
15:11
net for animals, not the sole problem solvers.
15:14
It's like the difference between saying, hospitals
15:18
are responsible for public health versus public
15:22
health is everyone's responsibility. Community
15:26
sheltering is about building a network of community support to
15:30
prevent animals from entering the shelter and share
15:34
responsibility for animal welfare. Instead
15:38
of being isolated facilities waiting for animals to arrive,
15:42
animal shelters actively engage with the public.
15:45
Not just animal people, but everyone, pet
15:49
owners, rescues, foster homes, volunteers,
15:54
field officers, even organizations
15:57
that have nothing to do with animals, like domestic violence
16:01
shelters or senior services. The
16:04
supporters of this approach make compelling arguments.
16:08
Shelter reform advocates say community sheltering is the only
16:11
way to end the cycle of overcrowding and euthanasia.
16:16
They believe that no shelter, no matter how well
16:20
funded or beautiful, can solve animal homelessness
16:24
alone. They need to activate
16:28
the entire community. The large animal
16:31
welfare organizations point to resilience.
16:36
More foster homes, better public trust,
16:40
stronger political support. They've seen that
16:44
animal welfare works better when it's distributed across
16:48
many hands, not concentrated in just one
16:51
building. They're also the grassroots rescue
16:55
groups, the people working in neighborhoods with specific
16:58
populations like pit bulls or community cats.
17:02
They bring this crucial perspective that local knowledge
17:06
matters. The people embedded in communities
17:09
often understand local needs better than centralized
17:13
facilities can. You know what they say about
17:17
top down versus bottom up approaches? So
17:20
what does community sheltering actually do? Well,
17:24
it tries to prevent animals from entering the shelter unless
17:28
absolutely necessary. Recruit community
17:32
members to house and care for animals
17:35
outside shelter walls, offer support services
17:39
to keep pets with their families, and empower everyone
17:43
to share responsibility for animal welfare. Give you an
17:46
example. In Dallas, Dallas Animal Services
17:49
pioneered this approach with impressive data backing them
17:53
up. Research shows these community support
17:57
programs really work. Here's a number that stopped
18:00
me in my tracks when I first read it. A study from
18:04
Portsmouth, Humane in Virginia found that fifty eight percent of
18:07
people who initially intended to surrender their pets
18:11
were able to keep them after receiving guidance and
18:15
support. Fifty eight percent. That's not a tiny
18:19
improvement. That's transformational. The
18:22
benefits go beyond just keeping animals out of shelters.
18:27
Public engagement increases with community sheltering.
18:31
People feel more connected to animal welfare in their
18:34
community. Foster homes and partnerships
18:38
multiply what a shelter can accomplish. And the animals
18:42
themselves, they're usually happier and healthier in
18:46
homes, even temporary ones, than in kennels.
18:50
Plus, and this matters, communities that feel involved
18:54
are more likely to donate, volunteer,
18:58
and advocate for better animal policies. It
19:02
creates this virtuous cycle of engagement.
19:05
But, of course, community sheltering faces its own set of
19:09
significant challenges and criticisms. There
19:13
are real concerns from experienced shelter professionals
19:17
about, for one thing, consistency and oversight.
19:21
How do you maintain standards of care across dozens or
19:24
hundreds of foster homes? What about record keeping,
19:28
liability issues, or ensuring medical protocols
19:32
are followed? When animals are distributed throughout the
19:36
community, quality control becomes infinitely
19:39
more complicated. Another issue, will
19:43
owners looking for their pets be able to find them in this
19:47
kind of a distributed system? It's a challenge.
19:50
Central record keeping is so important. There's also the
19:54
question of unaltered animals that remain in the community. If we're
19:58
telling people not to bring animals to the shelter and to leave them where
20:02
they are or to take them into their home, if those animals
20:06
are unaltered and continue to reproduce, we could
20:09
end up with larger populations of unwanted animals down the
20:13
road. It's like bailing water from a boat
20:16
without patching the hole. There are also serious
20:20
equity considerations. Community sheltering requires
20:24
trust, education, and infrastructure,
20:28
resources that aren't equally distributed. Without
20:31
deliberate investment in inclusive outreach, disadvantaged
20:35
communities might feel left behind, widening the
20:39
very inequalities we should be working to close.
20:43
The reliance on volunteers creates sustainability questions
20:47
also. What happens when people burn out or interest
20:50
wanes? A system built on volunteer energy
20:55
needs constant recruitment and support, which requires
20:58
its own resources and infrastructure. Some government
21:02
officials and policymakers have reservations as well. They're
21:06
concerned that community sheltering might mask fundamental
21:09
resource needs. If hundreds of animals are in
21:13
foster homes instead of a shelter facility, it might look
21:17
like the system is working fine, and this is a big concern of mine,
21:21
when in reality, proper infrastructure and staffing
21:25
are still desperately needed. In the worst
21:29
case, community sheltering could become an excuse for underfunding
21:33
core shelter services. And perhaps hardest
21:37
of all, community sheltering requires this profound
21:40
cultural shift, changing how people think
21:44
about responsibility for animal welfare.
21:48
That kind of deep change doesn't happen overnight or even
21:52
over years. It requires sustained,
21:55
intentional effort. So where does this all leave
21:59
us? The fundamental tension here is fascinating when you
22:02
really think about it. With managed intake,
22:06
critics worry it might abandon animals and communities when
22:10
they most need help. Supporters believe
22:14
it creates a more sustainable system that ultimately saves more
22:17
lives. With community sheltering,
22:21
advocates see it as a more humane, empowering future.
22:26
Critics worry about consistency, equity, and
22:29
whether it masks the need for proper shelter funding.
22:34
And here's what I find most interesting. Everyone
22:37
involved genuinely wants to reduce animal suffering
22:41
and euthanasia. They just have different visions of how to get
22:45
there. The communities showing the most promising
22:48
results seem to be implementing thoughtful combinations of these
22:52
approaches. They maintain shelters as essential safety
22:56
nets while simultaneously developing community
22:59
based alternatives. What matters most
23:03
is the philosophy behind these systems. Are we
23:07
treating animal welfare as everyone's responsibility
23:11
or placing the burden primarily on shelters?
23:16
Are we seeing pet owners as part of the solution or
23:20
the problem? These aren't just abstract questions
23:23
for animal welfare nerds like me. They shape
23:27
policy decisions, funding priorities, and
23:30
ultimately determine whether animals live or die
23:34
in our communities.
23:44
Now for our listener q and a segment. Today's
23:48
question comes from Jamie. Jamie asks,
23:52
I have a friend who's posting on social media about needing to surrender her
23:56
dog due to a housing change. What resources can I
23:59
suggest before she takes her pet to a shelter?
24:03
Jamie, first of all, thank you for being that friend who sees
24:07
a problem and immediately thinks, how can I help, instead
24:11
of just scrolling past? When someone's considering pet
24:15
surrender, the first step is exploring retention
24:18
options. Many shelters offer support specifically
24:22
designed to keep pets and people together.
24:26
Free or reduced cost veterinary care, temporary fostering
24:29
during housing transitions, help with pet deposits,
24:33
and even pet food banks. For housing issues
24:37
specifically, suggest your friend check out websites with
24:40
databases of pet friendly rentals. Many animal
24:44
welfare organizations maintain resources like these.
24:47
Some even keep lists of rental properties that accept
24:51
specific breeds that are often restricted by housing policies.
24:55
If rehoming truly becomes necessary, and sometimes it does,
24:59
services like Rehome by Adopt a Pet provide a
25:03
platform where pets can go directly from one home to
25:07
another without entering a shelter. These services
25:10
help create profiles with photos and behavioral
25:14
information, and some even help you screen potential adopters.
25:18
Just remind your friend to use reputable rehoming services
25:22
rather than general classified sites where animals may end up
25:26
in, let's just say, less than ideal situations.
25:30
Lastly, encourage her to contact her local
25:33
shelter even before surrendering because many have
25:37
waiting lists of people looking for a specific breeds or types of
25:40
pets, and shelter staffs can provide guidance on how
25:44
to screen potential adopters if your friend chooses to
25:48
rehome directly. The key is approaching pet
25:51
rehoming as a thoughtful process rather than an
25:54
emergency decision whenever that's possible.
26:06
For today's be the change segment, I wanna suggest something
26:10
practical that can make an immediate difference in your community.
26:14
Find out which shelter or organization in your area operates
26:18
a pet food bank and organize a donation drive.
26:22
Here's the heartbreaking reality. Many pet owners
26:26
surrender their animals simply because they can't afford to feed
26:30
them. A temporary hardship becomes a
26:33
permanent separation. Pet food banks help
26:37
bridge that gap, keeping families together
26:40
during challenging times. So contact your local
26:44
animal shelter, humane society, or community action
26:48
agency to find out who's providing this service because
26:52
somebody probably is. Then organize a collection at
26:55
your workplace, your religious organization, or your child's
26:59
school. Most organizations need dry and wet
27:03
food for both dogs and cats, with kitten and puppy
27:06
food often in the highest demand. Create visible
27:10
collection bins once you pick an organization to do it with, set
27:14
a time frame for your drive, and provide regular updates
27:18
to maintain momentum. Even a modest collection
27:22
can help multiple families keep their pets during
27:25
times of hardship. And remember, preventing animals from
27:29
entering shelters in the first place is one of the most effective
27:33
ways to reduce euthanasia rates in our communities.
27:37
The systems we create reflect our values.
27:41
If we truly value animals' lives, we need to
27:45
build systems that protect them, not just
27:48
in theory, but in practical, everyday
27:53
reality.
27:58
That's it for today. The Animal Advocate podcast is
28:02
brought to you by the Animal Advocacy Academy. You can
28:06
find episodes and show notes at
28:08
animaladvocacyacademy.com, along with a
28:11
link to our Facebook and LinkedIn in pages where we discuss our
28:15
podcasts, and we'd love to discuss your thoughts and experiences
28:18
there. If you're interested in learning more about protecting
28:22
animals, subscribe to the show so you get every episode when it
28:26
comes out. If you have any questions on this or any other
28:30
topic related to animal law, email them to
28:33
podcast@animaladvocacyacademy.com, and
28:37
we'll make sure to get them answered. We'll either email you back
28:40
or feature them in a future episode or both.
28:44
And remember, compassion is great, but
28:47
compassionate action is infinitely better. Until next
28:51
week, live with compassion.